The metabolic impact of rapamycin (sirolimus) in chronic canine islet graft recipients

Pancreatic Islet Transplantation in Humans: Recent Progress and Future Directions

Pancreatic islet transplantation has become an established approach to β-cell replacement therapy for the treatment of insulin-deficient diabetes. Recent progress in techniques for islet isolation, islet culture, and peritransplant management of the islet transplant recipient has resulted in substantial improvements in metabolic and safety outcomes for patients. For patients requiring total or subtotal pancreatectomy for benign disease of the pancreas, isolation of islets from the diseased pancreas with intrahepatic transplantation of autologous islets can prevent or ameliorate postsurgical diabetes, and for patients previously experiencing painful recurrent acute or chronic pancreatitis, quality of life is substantially improved. For patients with type 1 diabetes or insulin-deficient forms of pancreatogenic (type 3c) diabetes, isolation of islets from a deceased donor pancreas with intrahepatic transplantation of allogeneic islets can ameliorate problematic hypoglycemia, stabilize glycemic lability, and maintain on-target glycemic control, consequently with improved quality of life, and often without the requirement for insulin therapy. Because the metabolic benefits are dependent on the numbers of islets transplanted that survive engraftment, recipients of autoislets are limited to receive the number of islets isolated from their own pancreas, whereas recipients of alloislets may receive islets isolated from more than one donor pancreas. The development of alternative sources of islet cells for transplantation, whether from autologous, allogeneic, or xenogeneic tissues, is an active area of investigation that promises to expand access and indications for islet transplantation in the future treatment of diabetes.

Evaluation of a Purified Enzyme Blend for the Recovery and Function of Canine Pancreatic Islets

Recently developed technologies enabling the production of a reproducible, purified enzyme blend for optimal human pancreatic islet isolation has renewed interest in clinical islet transplantation. The canine model has been an ideal preclinical model for the development of islet transplantation protocols. As seen in other species, the application of crude collagenase for isolating canine islets resulted in highly variable islet yields, extensive islet fragmentation, and variable islet functionality. We compared the function of commercially available crude collagenases with that of Liberase™-CI purified enzyme blend for canine islet isolation. We also compared two manufacturing runs of Liberase-CI enzyme (lots 1 and 2) to demonstrate reproducibility of islet recovery and function. We report on the improved recovery and function of islets isolated using Liberase-CI enzyme. No difference in dog age, mean body weight, or pancreas weight were observed between the experimental groups. We observed a significantly higher postpurification recovery of islet equivalent number (IE) from pancreases processed using two lots of Liberase-CI enzyme (189 ± 20 × 103 IE, n = 4) and lot 2 (234 ± 39 × 103 IE, n = 7) than that obtained from pancreases processed with Sigma Type V (116.8 ± 27 × 103 IE, n = 5), Serva collagenase (49 ± 11.6 × 103 IE, n = 5, p < 0.05) or Boehringer–Mannheim (BM) Type P collagenase (85.4 ± 25 × 103 IE, n = 5, p < 0.05, ANOVA). No significant differences were observed in islet yield recovery from pancreases processed using the two production lots of Liberase-CI enzyme. Islet survival after 48 h in culture at 37°C was significantly higher from islets isolated using Liberase-CI enzyme (88 ± 3.7% survival) when compared to Sigma Type V (81.8 ± 3.3%), Serva (71.7 ± 2.8%), and BM Type P (77 ± 7.2%) (p < 0.05). Islet functional testing in vitro demonstrated islets isolated using crude collagenase had an increased insulin basal release and a reduced insulin stimulated response when compared with islets isolated using the two lots of Liberase-CI enzyme. The calculated stimulation index was 7.8 ± 1.7, 3.1 ± 0.6, and 4.8 ± 1.1 for Sigma Type V, Serva, and BM Type P isolated islets, respectively, compared to 15.7 ± 1.6 and 16.2 ± 1.9 for islets isolated with Liberase-CI enzyme production lots 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.05). This evaluation demonstrates that a purified enzyme blend can significantly improve islet recovery and function. It also demonstrates the manufacturing reproducibility of Liberase-CI enzyme lots resulting in the isolation of canine islets with the same degree of efficacy. A blend of purified enzymes, specifically formulated for canine islet isolation, can consistently yield large numbers of islets that survive longer in culture and demonstrate an improved insulin response in vitro.

Rapamycin: An InhibiTOR of Aging Emerges From the Soil of Easter Island

Rapamycin (sirolimus) is a macrolide immunosuppressant that inhibits the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) protein kinase and extends lifespan in model organisms including mice. Although rapamycin is an FDA-approved drug for select indications, a diverse set of negative side effects may preclude its wide-scale deployment as an antiaging therapy. mTOR forms two different protein complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2; the former is acutely sensitive to rapamycin whereas the latter is only chronically sensitive to rapamycin in vivo. Over the past decade, it has become clear that although genetic and pharmacological inhibition of mTORC1 extends lifespan and delays aging, inhibition of mTORC2 has negative effects on mammalian health and longevity and is responsible for many of the negative side effects of rapamycin. In this review, we discuss recent advances in understanding the molecular and physiological effects of rapamycin treatment, and we discuss how the use of alternative rapamycin treatment regimens or rapamycin analogs has the potential to mitigate the deleterious side effects of rapamycin treatment by more specifically targeting mTORC1. Although the side effects of rapamycin are still of significant concern, rapid progress is being made in realizing the revolutionary potential of rapamycin-based therapies for the treatment of diseases of aging.

Progress in islet transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

More than 500 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus have now received islet transplants at over 50 institutions worldwide in the past 5 years. Rates of insulin independence at 1 year with current protocols are impressive. However, inexorable decay of islet function over time indicates that there are many opportunities for improvement. Improved control of glycosylated hemoglobin and reduced risk of recurrent hypoglycemia are seen as important benefits of islet transplantation, irrespective of the status regarding insulin independence. For the use of islet transplantation to expand it is essential that the donor-to-recipient ratio be reliably reduced to 1 : 1. Enormous opportunities lie ahead for the development of successful living donor islet transplantation, single donor protocols, improved engraftment, islet proliferation in vitro and in the recipient, alternative islet sources, and novel tolerizing drugs. With these emerging opportunities, islet transplantation may expand to include more patients with type 1 diabetes, including children, and will not be restricted to the most unstable forms of the disease, as it is today.

Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus: Causes, Treatment, and Impact on Outcomes

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a frequent consequence of solid organ transplantation. PTDM has been associated with greater mortality and increased infections in different transplant groups using different diagnostic criteria. An international consensus panel recommended a consistent set of guidelines in 2003 based on American Diabetes Association glucose criteria but did not exclude the immediate post-transplant hospitalization when many patients receive large doses of corticosteroids. Greater glucose monitoring during all hospitalizations has revealed significant glucose intolerance in the majority of recipients immediately after transplant. As a result, the international consensus panel reviewed its earlier guidelines and recommended delaying screening and diagnosis of PTDM until the recipient is on stable doses of immunosuppression after discharge from initial transplant hospitalization. The group cautioned that whereas hemoglobin A1C has been adopted as a diagnostic criterion by many, it is not reliable as the sole diabetes screening method during the first year after transplant. Risk factors for PTDM include many of the immunosuppressant medications themselves as well as those for type 2 diabetes. The provider managing diabetes and associated dyslipidemia and hypertension after transplant must be careful of the greater risk for drug-drug interactions and infections with immunosuppressant medications. Treatment goals and therapies must consider the greater risk for fluctuating and reduced kidney function, which can cause hypoglycemia. Research is actively focused on strategies to prevent PTDM, but until strategies are found, it is imperative that immunosuppression regimens are chosen based on their evidence to prolong graft survival, not to avoid PTDM.

Improvement in insulin sensitivity after human islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes

CONTEXT

Islet transplantation can improve metabolic control for type 1 diabetes (T1D), an effect anticipated to improve insulin sensitivity. However, current immunosuppression regimens containing tacrolimus and sirolimus have been shown to induce insulin resistance in rodents.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of islet transplantation on insulin sensitivity in T1D using euglycemic clamps with the isotopic dilution method to distinguish between effects at the liver and skeletal muscle.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Twelve T1D subjects underwent evaluation in the Clinical and Translational Research Center before and between 6 and 7 months after the transplant and were compared with normal control subjects.

INTERVENTION

The intervention included intrahepatic islet transplantation according to a Clinical Islet Transplantation Consortium protocol under low-dose tacrolimus and sirolimus immunosuppression.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Total body (M/Δinsulin), hepatic (1/endogenous glucose production ·basal insulin) and peripheral [(Rd - endogenous glucose production)/Δinsulin] insulin sensitivity assessed by hyperinsulinemic (1 mU·kg(-1)·min(-1)) euglycemic (∼90 mg/dL) clamps with 6,6-(2)H2-glucose tracer infusion were measured.

RESULTS

Glycosylated hemoglobin was reduced in the transplant recipients from 7.0% ± 0.3% to 5.6% ± 0.1% (P < .01). There were increases in total (0.11 ± 0.01 to 0.15 ± 0.02 dL/min·kg per microunit per milliliter), hepatic [2.3 ± 0.1 to 3.7 ± 0.4 × 10(2) ([milligrams per kilogram per minute](-1)·(microunits per milliliter)(-1))], and peripheral (0.08 ± 0.01 to 0.12 ± 0.02 dL/min·kg per microunit per milliliter) insulin sensitivity from before to after transplantation (P < .05 for all). All insulin sensitivity measures were less than normal in T1D before (P ≤ .05) and not different from normal after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Islet transplantation results in improved insulin sensitivity mediated by effects at both the liver and skeletal muscle. Modern dosing of glucocorticoid-free immunosuppression with low-dose tacrolimus and sirolimus does not induce insulin resistance in this population.

Improvement in β-cell secretory capacity after human islet transplantation according to the CIT07 protocol

The Clinical Islet Transplantation 07 (CIT07) protocol uses antithymocyte globulin and etanercept induction, islet culture, heparinization, and intensive insulin therapy with the same low-dose tacrolimus and sirolimus maintenance immunosuppression as in the Edmonton protocol. To determine whether CIT07 improves engrafted islet β-cell mass, our center measured β-cell secretory capacity from glucose-potentiated arginine tests at days 75 and 365 after transplantation and compared those results with the results previously achieved by our group using the Edmonton protocol and normal subjects. All subjects were insulin free, with CIT07 subjects receiving fewer islet equivalents from a median of one donor compared with two donors for Edmonton protocol subjects. The acute insulin response to glucose-potentiated arginine (AIRpot) was greater in the CIT07 protocol than in the Edmonton protocol and was less in both cohorts than in normal subjects, with similar findings for C-peptide. The CIT07 subjects who completed reassessment at day 365 exhibited increasing AIRpot by trend relative to that of day 75. These data indicate that engrafted islet β-cell mass is markedly improved with the CIT07 protocol, especially given more frequent use of single islet donors. Although several peritransplant differences may have each contributed to this improvement, the lack of deterioration in β-cell secretory capacity over time in the CIT07 protocol suggests that low-dose tacrolimus and sirolimus are not toxic to islets.

Evidence for rapamycin toxicity in pancreatic β-cells and a review of the underlying molecular mechanisms

Rapamycin is used frequently in both transplantation and oncology. Although historically thought to have little diabetogenic effect, there is growing evidence of β-cell toxicity. This Review draws evidence for rapamycin toxicity from clinical studies of islet and renal transplantation, and of rapamycin as an anticancer agent, as well as from experimental studies. Together, these studies provide evidence that rapamycin has significant detrimental effects on β-cell function and survival and peripheral insulin resistance. The mechanism of action of rapamycin is via inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). This Review describes the complex mTOR signaling pathways, which control vital cellular functions including mRNA translation, cell proliferation, cell growth, differentiation, angiogenesis, and apoptosis, and examines molecular mechanisms for rapamycin toxicity in β-cells. These mechanisms include reductions in β-cell size, mass, proliferation and insulin secretion alongside increases in apoptosis, autophagy, and peripheral insulin resistance. These data bring into question the use of rapamycin as an immunosuppressant in islet transplantation and as a second-line agent in other transplant recipients developing new-onset diabetes after transplantation with calcineurin inhibitors. It also highlights the importance of close monitoring of blood glucose levels in patients taking rapamycin as an anticancer treatment, particularly those with preexisting glucose intolerance.

Chronic mTOR inhibition by rapamycin induces muscle insulin resistance despite weight loss in rats

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

mTOR inhibitors are currently used as immunosuppressants in transplanted patients and as promising anti-cancer agents. However, new-onset diabetes is a frequent complication occurring in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors such as rapamycin (Sirolimus). Here, we investigated the mechanisms associated with the diabetogenic effects of chronic Sirolimus administration in rats and in in vitro cell cultures.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Sirolimus was administered to rats fed either a standard or high-fat diet for 21 days. Metabolic parameters were measured in vivo and in ex vivo tissues. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by glucose tolerance tests and euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamps. Rapamycin effects on glucose metabolism and insulin signalling were further evaluated in cultured myotubes.

KEY RESULTS

Sirolimus induced a decrease in food intake and concomitant weight loss. It also induced specific fat mass loss that was independent of changes in food intake. Despite these beneficial effects, Sirolimus-treated rats were glucose intolerant, hyperinsulinaemic and hyperglycaemic, but not hyperlipidaemic. The euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp measurements showed skeletal muscle is a major site of Sirolimus-induced insulin resistance. At the molecular level, long-term Sirolimus administration attenuated glucose uptake and metabolism in skeletal muscle by preventing full insulin-induced Akt activation and altering the expression and translocation of glucose transporters to the plasma membrane. In rats fed a high-fat diet, these metabolic defects were exacerbated, although Sirolimus-treated animals were protected from diet-induced obesity.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Taken together, our data demonstrate that the diabetogenic effect of chronic rapamycin administration is due to an impaired insulin action on glucose metabolism in skeletal muscles.

AEB071 (sotrastaurin) does not exhibit toxic effects on human islets in vitro, nor after transplantation into immunodeficient mice

AEB071 (AEB, sotrastaurin), a specific inhibitor of protein kinase C, reduces T-lymphocyte activation and cytokine release. AEB delays islet allograft rejection in rats and prevents rejection when combined with cyclosporine. Since many immunosuppressive agents have toxic effects on the function of transplanted islets, we investigated whether this was also the case with AEB. Human islets were transplanted into Rag-knockout mice randomly assigned to vehicle control, AEB or sirolimus treatment groups. Non-fasting blood glucose levels, body weight and glucose tolerance was measured in recipients. In a separate experiment, human islets were cultured in the presence of AEB and assayed for glucose dependent insulin secretion and level of β-cell apoptosis. Eighty-six percent of the AEB-treated recipients achieved normoglycemia following transplant (compared with none in sirolimus-treated group, p < 0.05). AEB-treated recipients exhibited similar glucose homeostasis as vehicle-treated controls, which was better than in sirolimus-treated recipients. Human islets cultured with AEB showed similar rates of β-cell apoptosis (p = 0.98 by one-way ANOVA) and glucose stimulated insulin secretion (p = 0.15) as those cultured with vehicle. These results suggest that AEB is not associated with toxic effects on islet engraftment or function. AEB appears to be an appropriate immunosuppressive candidate for clinical trials in islet transplantation.

Mammalian target of rapamycin and diabetes: what does the current evidence tell us?

New-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious complication in organ transplantation; not only does it enhance the risk of graft dysfunction, it also increases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is regulated independently by insulin, amino acids, and energy sufficiency. It integrates signal from growth factors, hormones, nutrients, and cellular energy levels to regulate protein translation and cell growth, proliferation, and survival. In addition, mTOR generates an inhibitory feedback loop on insulin receptor substrate (IRS) proteins. Therefore, it was suggested that mTOR might link nutrient excess with both obesity and insulin resistance. In this review, we summarize the role of mTOR and its inhibitor sirolimus (SRL) on chronic hyperglycemia and insulin resistance in beta cells, adipose tissue, liver, and muscle. We further hypothesize, based on data from the literature and generated in our laboratory, that SRL could counteract the development of NODAT in stable glucose homeostasis due to its positive effects on insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, whereas in conditions that require an adaptive beta cell proliferation (such as pregnancy and weight increase), the administration of SRL might have effects that would promote the development of NODAT. Therefore, it seems crucial for patient outcome to consider these potentially contrasting effects of SRL.

Current status of islet cell transplantation

Despite substantial advances in islet isolation methods and immunosuppressive protocol, pancreatic islet cell transplantation remains an experimental procedure currently limited to the most severe cases of type 1 diabetes mellitus. The objectives of this treatment are to prevent severe hypoglycemic episodes in patients with hypoglycemia unawareness and to achieve a more physiological metabolic control. Insulin independence and long term-graft function with improvement of quality of life have been obtained in several international islet transplant centers. However, experimental trials of islet transplantation clearly highlighted several obstacles that remain to be overcome before the procedure could be proposed to a much larger patient population. This review provides a brief historical perspective of islet transplantation, islet isolation techniques, the transplant procedure, immunosuppressive therapy, and outlines current challenges and future directions in clinical islet transplantation.

Anti-proinflammatory effects of sirolimus on human islet preparations

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus plays a critical role in facilitating steroid-free immunosuppression, in conjunction with low dose tacrolimus, in current islet transplantation. Although several studies have investigated the effects of sirolimus on islet cells, conflicting results have been reported. In this study, we assessed the effects of sirolimus supplementation in culture media on human islet preparations, focusing on the anti-proinflammatory aspects.

METHODS

Human islet preparations were divided into four groups: pure (purity >90%) sirolimus (30 ng/mL); pure control (0 ng/mL); impure (purity 40%-60%) sirolimus; and impure control. All groups were cultured for 3 days and assessed regarding glucose stimulated insulin release, fractional beta-cell viability, beta-cell, and macrophage content. Cytokine and chemokine production from islet preparations and sorted pancreatic ductal cells were also examined.

RESULTS

Stimulated insulin release in the impure sirolimus group was significantly increased (P=0.024), as previously reported. Although fractional beta-cell viability showed no significant differences, beta-cell survival during culture significantly increased in impure sirolimus group when compared with the impure control group (P=0.015). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1beta, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta production from the impure sirolimus group significantly decreased (P<0.05). Furthermore, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta production from sorted ductal cells significantly decreased in the sirolimus group (P<0.05). The number of macrophages contained in islet preparations significantly decreased in the impure sirolimus group when compared with the impure control group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Sirolimus improved not only stimulated insulin release, but also beta-cell survival during culture. The antiinflammatory effects of sirolimus also appear beneficial to islet cells in culture and may be a useful strategy in improving islet transplantation outcomes.

Rapamycin in islet transplantation: friend or foe?

The Edmonton protocol was undoubtedly a major step forward in the history of islet transplantation. Its immunosuppression regimen was largely based on the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin (sirolimus), which remains the most frequently used immunosuppressive drug in clinical islet transplant protocols. As time reveals the somewhat disappointing long-term results achieved with the Edmonton protocol, a number of publications have appeared addressing the potential beneficial or deleterious role of rapamycin on islet cell engraftment, function survival and regeneration, as well as on its side-effects in human subjects. This paper reviews the sometimes contradictory evidence on the impact of rapamycin in islet transplantation.

In vivo and in vitro effect of sirolimus on insulin secretion

BACKGROUND

The effects of sirolimus on insulin secretion are still debated. Our aim was to investigate the effects of sirolimus, both (1) in vivo in healthy minipigs; and (2) in vitro on human islets.

METHODS

(1) Ten minipigs were evaluated during three successive stages: (a) basal; (b) at the end of a 4-week period of treatment with sirolimus; and (c) after a 4-week period of wash-out. We evaluated insulin secretion with the acute insulin response (AIR), and glucose tolerance with the glucose disposal rate (GDR). (2) Insulin content, stimulation index, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and apoptosis were measured in human islets treated in vitro with sirolimus at therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentrations.

RESULTS

(1) Basal and stimulated insulin levels and GDR increased during sirolimus administration and returned to baseline after a wash-out period; (2) regardless of culture duration, sirolimus dose-dependently decreased apoptosis and increased insulin content. Stimulation indexes and ATP were also significantly enhanced but only at therapeutic concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that sirolimus, at plasma-drug concentrations usually targeted in clinical practice, (1) increases basal and stimulated insulin levels in vivo and insulin content in vitro regardless of culture duration; (2) is able to reduce apoptosis. These findings may partly underlie the improved results of islet transplantation.

Effects of immunosuppressive drugs on in vitro neogenesis of human islets: mycophenolate mofetil inhibits the proliferation of ductal cells

Assuming that neogenesis contributes to long-term function of islet grafts, it is important to study the effects of immunosuppressive drugs on precursor cell proliferation and differentiation. We examined the effects of low-dose immunosuppressive drugs on these processes in vitro. Immunosuppressive drugs, including sirolimus, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), daclizumab and their combinations were tested in parallel culture wells through either the expansion phase (5-7 days) or the entire culture period (4-5 weeks). MMF, alone or in combination with sirolimus or tacrolimus, severely hampered duct-cell proliferation by 8-fold during the expansion period, and significantly reduced the total DNA content by about 40% after 5-week culture. After 4-5 week exposure to different drugs, only sirolimus and daclizumab showed no adverse effects on insulin content, whereas significant reductions of 30-60% in insulin content were seen in all other experimental groups. Only tacrolimus decreased the insulin content per DNA, as well as the proportion of insulin-positive cells. In conclusion, MMF has a potent inhibitory effect on neogenesis primarily through an antiproliferative effect on the precursors, whereas tacrolimus mainly affects beta-cell differentiation. Sirolimus and daclizumab have no adverse effects on these parameters. The immunosuppressive protocol may be an important determinant of long-term clinical islet graft function.

Effects of non-steroid immunosuppressive drugs on insulin secretion in transplantation

Post-transplantation diabetes (PTD) is a serious complication in organ transplantation: not only does it increase the risk of graft dysfunction; it also increases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. PTD incidence is correlated with age, non-Caucasian ethnic background, a family history of diabetes, excess weight, hepatitis C infection and steroid boluses for potential rejection. Different mechanisms might explain post-transplantation glucose metabolism disorders: ischemia-reperfusion disorders, whether renal, hepatic or cardiac, are responsible for insulin-resistance, which is increased by post-transplantation steroids; the detrimental effect of non-steroid immunosuppressive drugs on insulin-secretion could also be involved, especially with calcineurin inhibitors. In vivo and in vitro studies have shown that tacrolimus has inhibitory effects on insulin-secretion, while these effects are less obvious for cyclosporin, and were mainly demonstrated in vitro. Mycophenolate has no overt effect on insulin-secretion. Sirolimus and everolimus, two mTOR inhibitors, have shown controversial results in this realm. The effects of sirolimus (most often studied mTOR inhibitor) appear to depend on serum levels, cell type (ss cell or cell line), species (human or animal) and also environmental nutrients. At therapeutic concentrations, a stimulatory effect on insulin secretion was observed on human beta cells. This might explain the success of islet cell transplantation with the Edmonton protocol. Finally, steroids are mainly detrimental because they accentuate insulin resistance whereas anticalcineurins, in particular tacrolimus, lower insulin synthesis.

Immunosuppressive drug-induced diabetes

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) has emerged as a major adverse effect of immunosuppressive drugs (ISD). As recipients of organ transplants survive longer, the complications of diabetes mellitus have assumed greater importance. The predominant factor for causing PTDM by corticosteroids seems to be the aggravation of insulin resistance, however several studies have displayed deleterious effects on insulin secretion and beta-cells. Calcineurin inhibitors induce PTDM by a number of mechanisms, including decreased insulin secretion and a direct toxic effect on the pancreatic beta-cells. Recent in vitro studies stress on the increased apoptosis of beta-cells when exposed to these drugs. Studies involving other immunosuppressive agents (mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], sirolimus) are scarcer and lead to conflicting results, while daclizumab seems to have a neutral effect. Clinical studies have consistently shown a greater potential of tacrolimus to induce PTDM compared with cyclosporine. Reducing PTDM incidence is a feasible goal while using corticosteroid-sparing regimens and/or lower tacrolimus trough levels. In patients developing PTDM, conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine could improve or reverse glucose tolerance abnormalities. In the absence of well-designed studies in this specific indication, treatment of PTDM is based on the same principles as type 2 diabetes mellitus. Thiazolidinediones do not display any pharmacological interaction with calcineurin inhibitors, but their safety and efficacy in PTDM need to be confirmed in large-scale randomized trials. Use of sulfonylureas has to be cautious regarding the suspected interaction of some of them with calcineurin inhibitors. If needed, insulin regimens have to be adapted in patients who display the particular glycaemic profile of corticosteroid-induced diabetes. Incretin-based therapies, due to their specific action on beta-cell apoptosis and proliferation, raise promises that have to be confirmed in clinical studies. Until methods for inducing specific graft tolerance become available, immunosuppressive regimens should be tailored to the individual patient on the basis of predictive criteria for the development of PTDM.

alpha-lipoic acid regulates AMP-activated protein kinase and inhibits insulin secretion from beta cells

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The antioxidant compound alpha-lipoic acid (alpha-LA) possesses antidiabetic and anti-obesity properties. In the hypothalamus, alpha-LA suppresses appetite and prevents obesity by inhibiting AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Given the therapeutic potential of alpha-LA for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity, and the importance of AMPK in beta cells, we examined the effect of alpha-LA on pancreatic beta cell function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolated rat islets and MIN6 beta cells were treated acutely (15-90 min) or chronically (18-24 h) with alpha-LA or the known AMPK-activating compounds 5'-amino-imidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside (AICAR) and metformin. Insulin secretion, the AMPK-signalling pathway, mitochondrial function and cell growth were assessed.

RESULTS

Acute or chronic treatment of islets and MIN6 cells with alpha-LA led to dose-dependent rises in phosphorylation of the AMPK alpha-subunit and acetyl CoA carboxylase. Chronic exposure to alpha-LA, AICAR or metformin caused a reduction in insulin secretion. alpha-LA inhibited the p70 s6 kinase translational control pathway, and inhibited MIN6 growth in a manner similar to rapamycin. Unlike AICAR and metformin, alpha-LA also acutely inhibited insulin secretion. Examination of the effect of alpha-LA on mitochondrial function showed that acute treatment with this compound elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and enhanced mitochondrial depolarisation induced by Ca(2+).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

This study is the first to demonstrate that alpha-LA directly affects beta cell function. The chronic effects of alpha-LA include AMPK activation and reductions in insulin secretion and content, and cell growth. Acutely, alpha-LA also inhibits insulin secretion, an effect probably involving the ROS-induced impairment of mitochondrial function.

Effect of the immunosuppressive regime of Edmonton protocol on the long-term in vitro insulin secretion from islets of two different species and age categories

The success of the new immunosuppressive regime known as the Edmonton protocol in islet allotransplantation may suggest that it is also possible that this regime may prevent the rejection of xenografts. This protocol applies a combination of Tacrolimus, Sirolimus and Daclizumab at low doses. This combination may have some toxicity that affects the function and viability of the pancreatic islets. The choice of species or age category, whose islets can tolerate the toxicity of this immunosuppressive combination, may become important for the graft survival. It was the aim of this study to investigate the long-term effect of this regime on insulin secretion from pancreatic islets isolated from two species (rats and pigs) and from two age categories (day 7 postnatal [P7] and adult rat). Islets were cultured for three weeks in medium containing Tacrolimus in a concentration of 5 ng/ml, while the concentration of Sirolimus was 15 ng/ml. Daclizumab was added at the beginning of culture and once weekly in a final concentration of 10 ng/ml. In immunosuppressive-treated groups, Glucose was able to stimulate increases of insulin secretion over the basal value after 1 and 3 weeks in adult rat islets, and could not stimulate this secretion in P7 islets, while it stimulated the secretion only after 1 week, but not 3 weeks, in porcine islets. The immunosuppressive regimen caused significant reductions of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion magnitude in adult rat and porcine islets after 3 weeks, while it reduced both basal and stimulated secretions after 1 and 3 weeks in P7 rat islets. There was no difference in DNA contents between control and immunosuppressive-treated groups after 1 or 3 weeks in any of the islet preparations. DNA decreased considerably with the time in culture. The change in DNA content over 3 weeks was higher in the Edmonton group of adult porcine and P7 rat than in adult rat islets. Comparison of the responses of islets from different age categories and species leads to conclude that in vitro cultures of adult rat islets are more tolerant to this immunosuppressive combination toxicity than P7 islets, and there is variable responses of islets from different adult species to this toxicity.

Cross-sectional and prospective association between proinsulin secretion and graft function after clinical islet transplantation

Proinsulin levels as a marker of beta-cell dysfunction have not been described after clinical islet transplantation. Proinsulin secretion was studied in 23 type 1 diabetic patients after islet allotransplantation and in 20 age-matched nondiabetic controls. Fasting serum insulin, total proinsulin (TP), intact proinsulin, proinsulin fragments (PFs) and their ratios to insulin were determined 1 and 12 months after patients became insulin independent. TP, PF, and proinsulin/insulin ratios were lower in transplant recipients compared with controls, in patients who retained long-term insulin independence. Insulin, C-peptide, and intact proinsulin values were similar in transplant recipients and controls. Hormone levels remained stable over time in the group of patients who retained long-term insulin independence, but the TP and PF levels were higher at 12 months compared with 1 month in the group of patients who resumed insulin therapy. TP and PF levels were reduced in transplant recipients compared with controls but increased over time if insulin independence was lost.

Pancreas transplantation: indications and consequences

Pancreas transplantation continues to evolve as a strategy in the management of diabetes mellitus. The first combined pancreas-kidney transplant was reported in 1967, but pancreas transplant now represents a number of procedures, each with different indications, risks, benefits, and outcomes. This review will summarize these procedures, including their risks and outcomes in comparison to kidney transplantation alone, and how or if they affect the consequences of diabetes: hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and microvascular and macrovascular complications. In addition, the new risks introduced by immunosuppression will be reviewed, including infections, cancer, osteoporosis, reproductive function, and the impact of immunosuppression medications on blood pressure, lipids, and glucose tolerance. It is imperative that an endocrinologist remain involved in the care of the pancreas transplant recipient, even when glucose is normal, because of the myriad of issues encountered post transplant, including ongoing management of diabetic complications, prevention of bone loss, and screening for failure of the pancreas graft with reinstitution of treatment when indicated. Although long-term patient and graft survival have improved greatly after pancreas transplant, a multidisciplinary team is needed to maximize long-term quality, as well as quantity, of life for the pancreas transplant recipient.

Rapamycin has a deleterious effect on MIN-6 cells and rat and human islets

Rapamycin (sirolimus) is a macrolide fungicide with immunosuppressant properties that is used in human islet transplantation. Little is known about the effects of rapamycin on MIN-6 cells and islets. Rapamycin had a dose-dependent, time-dependent, and glucose-independent deleterious effect on MIN-6 cell viability. At day 1, using the MTT method, 0.01 nmol/l rapamycin reduced cell viability to 83 +/- 6% of control (P < 0.05). Using the calcein AM method, at day 2, 10 nmol/l rapamycin caused a reduction in cell viability to 73 +/- 5% of control (P < 0.001). Furthermore, 10 and 100 nmol/l rapamycin caused apoptosis in MIN-6 cells as assessed by the transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling assay. Compared with control, there was a 3.1 +/- 0.6-fold increase (P < 0.01) in apoptosis in MIN-6 cells treated with 10 nmol/l rapamycin. A supra-therapeutic rapamycin concentration of 100 nmol/l significantly impaired glucose- and carbachol-stimulated insulin secretion in rat islets and had a deleterious effect on the viability of rat and human islets, causing apoptosis of both alpha- and beta-cells.

Clinical islet transplantation

Type 1 diabetes affects over 1 million persons in the United States, with over 30,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Transplantation of new insulin-producing b cells, in the form of the whole pancreas or isolated islets, has been shown to ameliorate the disease by eliminating the need for exogenous insulin and normalizing glycosylated hemoglobin levels. Islet transplants are a particularly attractive form of therapy because they are a minimally invasive procedure and are more likely to be scaled-up to treat the large numbers of people affected by diabetes. Currently, only a handful of programs have been successful in the endeavor. Nevertheless, the early clinical experience strongly demonstrates that islet transplantation is an effective treatment strategy in select patients with type 1 diabetes. To scale up this therapy and use it earlier in the disease and for more people, the shortage of suitable donor tissue must be solved and the requirement of lifelong immunosuppression must be minimized.

Pancreatic Islet Cell Transplantation

Pancreatic islet cell transplantation as a treatment for diabetes has hitherto been confined to small patient cohorts with limited success. This article summarizes the results of islet cell transplantation before and after the advent of the new 'Edmonton protocol' of immunosuppression and management of the donor pancreas. Adopting this regimen has achieved unprecedented success and renewed interest in this potential cure for diabetes. Central to recent improvements in the technique has been the transplantation of an adequate islet mass. Improved methods to procure, isolate, and purify islets for clinical use are now being adopted as a new 'gold standard'. The use of new immunosuppressive drugs has further improved clinical results. Corticosteroid sparing-based regimens, and agents such as humanized monoclonal antibodies, are likely to form the mainstay of immunosuppressive protocols with the aim of achieving donor-specific tolerance. Alternative sources of islet cells are also required to expand the technique in an era of reduced numbers of donor pancreata. Manipulation of stem cells and xenotransplantation may yet yield sufficient islets to overcome the problem of donor shortage. Islet cell transplantation now forms the basis of a prospective multicenter trial under the aegis of the Immune Tolerance Network. The results of this are awaited, but it appears that islet cell transplantation may yet emerge as an effective treatment option for some members of the diabetic population.

Defining optimal immunosuppression for islet transplantation based on reduced diabetogenicity in canine islet autografts

BACKGROUND

The recent results of clinical islet transplantation have improved substantially with the introduction of a more potent but less diabetogenic immunosuppressant protocol. The successful development of this protocol was based in part on the outcomes of studies reported herein, addressing the diabetogenic potential of a series of immunosuppressant agents used alone or in combination in a canine islet autograft model. Although it is recognized that failure to achieve long-term insulin independence in human islet allotransplantation has been multifactorial, with low engraftment mass, acute or chronic rejection, autoimmune recurrence, loss of islet-acinar integrity, heterotopic site, denervation, and insulin resistance all being implicated to varying degrees, avoidance of diabetogenic immunosuppression has been pivotal to the enhanced outcomes of clinical islet transplantation. We here explore the effects of clinically relevant doses of cyclosporine or tacrolimus when given alone or in combination with glucocorticoids on long-term canine islet autograft function.

METHOD

Dogs (n=8) underwent total pancreatectomy, islet isolation, and intrasplenic autotransplantation and were normoglycemic with stable long-term graft function 3 months to 8 years posttransplant. The frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) was performed predrug (baseline), at 1 month of therapy (on drug), and again 1 month after withdrawal of therapy (postdrug).

RESULTS

Monotherapy treatments with low- or high-dose prednisone, Neoral, or tacrolimus had minimal impact on islet autograft function. The combination of Neoral and prednisone led to a marked impairment in glucose decay (25% decline from 1.77+/-0.2 to 1.24+/-0.2, P<0.05), without significant change in insulin responsiveness or glucose effectiveness. However, insulin sensitivity was markedly impaired while on therapy (7.10+/-1.2 to 3.10+/-0.5, P<0.01). Importantly, glucose decay and insulin sensitivity failed to return to baseline after withdrawal of therapy. The combination of tacrolimus and glucocorticoids led to permanent and irreversible diabetes in all recipients (n=6, P<0.001). Similar treatment of healthy control dogs led to a 44% decrease in glucose decay (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppression must be specifically tailored for islet transplantation and be glucocorticoid free if insulin independence is to be sustained clinically.

Intrahepatic islet transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients does not restore hypoglycemic hormonal counterregulation or symptom recognition after insulin independence

Islet allotransplantation can provide prolonged insulin independence in selected individuals with type 1 diabetes. Whether islet transplantation also restores hypoglycemic counterregulation is unclear. To determine if hypoglycemic counterregulation is restored by islet transplantation, we studied hormone responses and hypoglycemic symptom recognition in seven insulin-independent islet transplant recipients using a 3-h stepped hypoglycemic clamp, and compared their responses to those of nontransplanted type 1 diabetic subjects and nondiabetic control subjects. Glucagon responses of islet transplant recipients to hypoglycemia were significantly less than that observed in control subjects (incremental glucagon [mean +/- SE]: -12 +/- 12 vs. 64 +/- 22 pg/ml, respectively; P < 0.05), and not significantly different from that of nontransplanted type 1 diabetic subjects (-17 +/- 10 pg/ml). Epinephrine responses and symptom recognition were also not restored by islet transplantation (incremental epinephrine [mean +/- SE]: 195 +/- 128 [islet transplant recipients] vs. 238 +/- 73 [type 1 diabetic subjects] vs. 633 +/- 139 pg/ml [nondiabetic control subjects], P < 0.05 vs. control; peak symptom scores: 3.3 +/- 0.9 [islet transplant recipients] vs. 3.1 +/- 1.1 [type 1 diabetic subjects] vs. 6.7 +/- 0.8 [nondiabetic control subjects]). Thus the results indicate that despite providing prolonged insulin independence and near-normal glycemic control in these patients with long-standing type 1 diabetes, hypoglycemic hormonal counterregulation and symptom recognition were not restored by intrahepatic islet transplantation.

Inhibitory effects of immunosuppressive drugs on insulin secretion from HIT-T15 cells and Wistar rat islets

Until recently, islet allotransplantation for type 1 diabetic patients has been largely unsuccessful. Previous pharmacologic studies of single drugs have suggested that one factor contributing to this poor success is toxicity of immunosuppressive drugs on transplanted islets. However, no comprehensive study of agents currently used for islet transplantation has been previously reported. Consequently, we exposed HIT-T15 cells and Wistar rat islets to various concentrations of five immunosuppressive agents for 48 and 24 hr, respectively, and measured glucose-stimulated insulin secretion during subsequent static incubations. Results are expressed as percent reduction of insulin secretion at the lower and upper limits, respectively, of plasma drug concentrations used in clinical transplantation compared with control (no drug exposure). Insulin secretion from HIT-T15 cells was significantly inhibited by 74% and 90% after exposure to methylprednisolone (P<0.05), 11% and 24% after exposure to cyclosporine (P<0.01), 60% and 83% after exposure to mycophenolate (P<0.05), 56% and 63% after exposure to sirolimus (P<0.001), and 10% and 20% after exposure to tacrolimus (P<0.001). Insulin secretion from Wistar rat islets was reduced by 0% and 48% after exposure to mycophenolate (P<0.001) and 20% and 31% after exposure to tacrolimus (P<0.05). No reduction in insulin secretion was observed from either HIT-T15 cells or rat islets after exposure to daclizumab. The results support the hypothesis that toxicity of certain immunosuppressive drugs on beta-cell function plays a role in the poor success of islet allotransplantation. This is especially true of intrahepatically transplanted islets, which are exposed to higher portal concentrations of immunosuppressive agents. These findings support the use of low-dose immunosuppressive drug protocols in clinical islet transplantation.

Risk factors for and management of post-transplantation cardiovascular disease

The mortality rates due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) in transplant recipients are greater than in the general population. CVD is a major cause of both graft loss and patient death in renal transplant recipients, and improving cardiovascular health in transplant recipients will presumably help to extend both patient and graft survival. Further studies are needed to better evaluate the effectiveness of risk modification on subsequent CVD morbidity and mortality. There is no reason to consider risk factors for CVD such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and diabetes mellitus in transplant recipients differently from in the general population. In addition, there are specific transplantation risk factors such as acute rejection episodes and the use of immunosuppressive drugs. It is obvious that several of the immunosuppressive agents used today have disadvantageous influences on risk factors for CVD such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM), but the relative importance of immunosuppressant-induced increases in these risk factors is basically unknown. This may be a strong argument for the selective use and individual tailoring of immunosuppressive agents based upon the risk factor profile of the patient, without jeopardising the function of the graft. Hyperlipidaemia is common after transplantation, and immunosuppression with corticosteroids, cyclosporin, or sirolimus (rapamycin) causes different types of post-transplantation hyperlipidaemia. However, to date, no studies have demonstrated that lipid lowering strategies significantly reduce CVD morbidity or mortality and improve allograft survival in transplant recipients. Several studies using preventive or interventional approaches are ongoing and will be reported in the near future. Post-transplantation hypertension appears to be a major risk factor determining graft and patient survival, and immunosuppressive agents have different effects on hypertension. Controlled studies support the opinion that post-transplantation hypertension must be treated as strictly as in a population with essential hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or chronic renal failure. As increasing numbers of immunosuppressive agents become available for use, we may be in a better position to tailor immunosuppressive therapy to the individual patient, avoiding the use of diabetogenic drugs, drug combinations, or inappropriate doses in patients susceptible to PTDM. Multiple acute rejection episodes have also been demonstrated to be a risk factor for CVD - a strong argument for the use of immunosuppressive drugs to reduce acute rejection. Until we have a better understanding from ongoing landmark studies on the management of CVD, presently available therapy to reduce risk factors needs to be used together with individual tailoring of immunosuppressive therapy with the aim of reducing CVD in these patients.

Pancreatic islet transplantation in the treatment of diabetes mellitus

This chapter reviews current developments and future directions in clinical islet transplantation. With the recent introduction of glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive therapies and improved methods for islet isolation, the success of the procedure has increased substantially. Challenges ahead include progress with international multicentre trials, development of single donor protocols, progress in clinical tolerance based therapies to lower overall risk of immunosuppression, and ultimately finding an alternative source to provide effective therapy for more patients with diabetes. Recent advances in stem cell biology and xenotransplantation may soon provide this opportunity.

Human islet cell transplantation--future prospects

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation has the potential to cure diabetes mellitus. Nevertheless despite successful reversal of diabetes in many small animal models, the clinical situation has been far more challenging. The aim of this review is to discuss why insulin-independence after islet allotransplantation has been so difficult to achieve.

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken using Medline from 1975 to July 2000. Results reported to the International Islet Transplant Registry (ITR) up to December 1998 were also analysed.

RESULTS

Up to December 1998, 405 islet allotransplants have been reported the ITR. Of those accurately documented between 1990 and 1998 (n = 267) only 12% have achieved insulin-independence (greater than 7 days). However with refined peri-transplant protocols insulin independence at 1 year can reach 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many factors which can explain the failure of achieving insulin-independence after islet allotransplantation. These include the use of diabetogenic immunosuppressive agents to abrogate both islet allo-immunity and auto-immunity, the critical islet mass to achieve insulin-independence and the detrimental effects of transplanting islets in an ectopic site. However recent evidence most notably from the Edmonton group demonstrates that islet allotransplantation still has great potential to become an established treatment option for diabetic patients.

Islet transplantation in seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen

BACKGROUND

Registry data on patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who undergo pancreatic islet transplantation indicate that only 8 percent are free of the need for insulin therapy at one year.

METHODS

Seven consecutive patients with type 1 diabetes and a history of severe hypoglycemia and metabolic instability underwent islet transplantation in conjunction with a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen consisting of sirolimus, tacrolimus, and daclizumab. Islets were isolated by ductal perfusion with cold, purified collagenase, digested and purified in xenoprotein-free medium, and transplanted immediately by means of a percutaneous transhepatic portal embolization.

RESULTS

All seven patients quickly attained sustained insulin independence after transplantation of a mean (+/-SD) islet mass of 11,547+/-1604 islet equivalents per kilogram of body weight (median follow-up, 11.9 months; range, 4.4 to 14.9). All recipients required islets from two donor pancreases, and one required a third transplant from two donors to achieve sustained insulin independence. The mean glycosylated hemoglobin values were normal after transplantation in all recipients. The mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (a measure of fluctuations in blood glucose concentrations) was significantly decreased after the attainment of insulin independence (from 198+/-32 mg per deciliter [11.1+/-1.8 mmol per liter] before transplantation to 119+/-37 mg per deciliter [6.7+/-2.1 mmol per liter] after the first transplantation and 51+/-30 mg per deciliter [2.8+/-1.7 mmol per liter] after the attainment of insulin independence; P<0.001). There were no further episodes of hypoglycemic coma. Complications were minor, and there were no significant increases in lipid concentrations during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations in patients with type 1 diabetes indicate that islet transplantation can result in insulin independence with excellent metabolic control when glucocorticoid-free immunosuppression is combined with the infusion of an adequate islet mass.

Determination of an improved sirolimus (rapamycin)-based regimen for induction of allograft tolerance in mice treated with antilymphocyte serum and donor-specific bone marrow

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant donor-specific bone marrow (BM) infusion in mice treated with antilymphocyte serum (ALS) induces specific unresponsiveness (tolerance) to skin allografts, which can be augmented by the adjuvant administration of chemotherapeutic immunosuppressive agents. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal dose and timing of administration of sirolimus (rapamycin) to induce maximal skin allograft survival in ALS-treated, BM-infused recipients.

METHODS

DBA/2 donor skin grafts were placed on B6AF1 recipients (class I- and II-disparate). Groups of recipient mice (n=10 each) received combinations of the following treatment protocols: ALS, 0.5 ml on days -1 and 2; BM, 25x10(6) donor-specific cells on day 7; sirolimus, 6, 12, 18, or 24 mg/kg at times indicated; and cyclosporine, 50 mg/kg at times indicated. The immune status of putatively tolerant animals was examined with mixed lymphocyte cultures, cell-mediated lympholysis assays (CML), and limiting dilution analyses.

RESULTS

When administered in conjunction with ALS/BM, a single dose of sirolimus (6 mg/kg) on days 21, 18, 14, 10, or 7 resulted in median skin graft survival times of 35, 26, 40, 46, and 103 days, respectively, versus a median survival of 27 days in mice given ALS and BM alone. The addition of cyclosporine to sirolimus (6 mg/kg) given on day 7 or days 7 and 10 did not significantly increase graft survival over that achieved with sirolimus alone. A single dose (18 or 24 mg/kg) of sirolimus administered on day 7 to ALS/BM-treated recipients resulted in 100% 200-day skin graft acceptance. Tolerant mice demonstrated nonspecific suppression of the mixed lymphocyte culture assays at 90 and 200 days and a nonspecific reduction of the CML assay at 50 days. By 200 days, the third-party CML response was restored, whereas donor-specific cell-mediated cytotoxicity remained suppressed. There was a donor-specific reduction in the number of alloreactive cytotoxic T lymphocyte clones by limiting dilution assay at 120 days. In vivo specificity of immunosuppression induced with this protocol was demonstrated by indefinite survival of second donor-specific skin grafts placed on putatively tolerant mice at day 90, whereas third-party skin grafts were rejected in 14 days.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of sirolimus (18-24 mg/kg) administered on day 7, within the context of an ALS/BM immunosuppressive regimen, reliably induces permanent skin allograft acceptance in this model. In vitro measures of immunocompetence demonstrated an early nonspecific suppression of the recipients immune status and later recovery of third-party immunoreactivity. In vivo testing indicates an operationally tolerant state that is donor-specific 90 days after treatment.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus. The role of immunosuppression

Immunosuppressive agents increase the risk of death due to coronary disease or stroke by their ability to cause 3 different adverse effects: dyslipidaemia, hypertension and hyperglycaemia. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus has emerged as a major adverse effect of immunosuppressants. As recipients of organ transplants survive longer, the secondary complications of diabetes mellitus have assumed greater importance. There is a need for a precise definition of post-transplant diabetes mellitus to facilitate inter-centre comparison and to study the natural history of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. We recommend broad criteria to define hyperglycaemia, as a fasting blood glucose level of > 400 mg/dl at any point or > 200 mg/dl for 2 weeks, or a need for insulin treatment for at least 2 weeks. We also recommend serial measurements of HbA1c. Cyclosporin and tacrolimus cause post-transplant diabetes mellitus by a number of mechanisms, including decreased insulin secretion, increased insulin resistance or a direct toxic effect on the beta cell. For corticosteroids, the induction of insulin resistance seems to be the predominant factor. However, few studies have examined the mechanism of diabetogenicity at the molecular level. This may hold the key for pharmacological manipulation of current immunosuppressive regimens which may result in decreased metabolic complications. Corticosteroid sparing regimens have been shown to reduce the metabolic complications of immunosuppressants including post-transplant diabetes mellitus. However, their use should be balanced against the increased incidence of transplant rejections. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus may be organ-specific irrespective of the immunosuppressant used. Tacrolimus causes a high incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus in recipients of kidney transplants (upto 20% in some reports); the diabetogenicity of cyclosporin-based regimens is comparable with that of tacrolimus-based regimens in recipients of liver transplants. A few clinical studies in which attempts were made to discontinue cyclosporin resulted in an unacceptable loss of the transplant. In the case of tacrolimus, complete withdrawal of immunosuppression may be possible in selected patients with liver transplants. However, post-transplant recipients who may benefit from this approach are difficult to identify. In some early series, patients received doses of tacrolimus that were approximately 2 to 3 times higher than those currently used, which may have resulted in a higher incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. More recently, it has been shown that tacrolimus was successful in salvaging whole pancreatic grafts which were maintained on cyclosporin. Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression as primary therapy was also used with remarkable success in solitary whole pancreas transplants. Strategies to reduce the metabolic complications of immunosuppressants should be pursued aggressively as this will directly lead to a decrease in long term cardiovascular adverse effects.