Caring for Critically Ill Patients with the ABCDEF Bundle: Results of the ICU Liberation Collaborative in Over 15,000 Adults

Prehabilitation to mitigate postintensive care syndrome in surgical patients: The rationale for a peri-critical illness pathway involving anaesthesiologists and intensive care physicians

The post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) refers to the long-term physical, psychological and cognitive impairments experienced by intensive care unit (ICU) survivors, while PICS-Family (PICS-F) affects their family members. Despite preventive strategies during the ICU stay, PICS remains a significant concern impacting survivors' quality of life, increasing the healthcare costs, and complicating recovery. Prehabilitation offers a promising approach to mitigating PICS and PICS-F, especially when the ICU stay can be anticipated, such as in the case of major surgery. Recent literature indicates that prehabilitation - interventions designed to enhance patients' functional capacity before critical illness - may mitigate the risk and severity of PICS. Studies have demonstrated that prehabilitation programs can improve muscle strength, reduce anxiety levels and enhance overall quality of life in ICU survivors. Family prehabilitation (prehabilitation-F) is also introduced as a potential intervention to help families to cope with the stress of critical illness. This article aims to explore the role of multimodal prehabilitation and post-ICU follow-up in preventing and managing PICS and PICS-F, focusing on improving patient outcomes, supporting families and optimising healthcare resources. Combining prehabilitation with post-ICU follow-up in peri-critical care clinics could streamline resources and improve outcomes, creating a holistic care pathway. These clinics, focused on both pre-ICU and post-ICU care, would thus address PICS from multiple angles. However, the heterogeneity of patient populations and prehabilitation protocols present challenges in standardising the interventions. Further research is necessary to establish optimal prehabilitation strategies tailored to individual patient needs and to demonstrate their utility in terms of patient outcome.

Impact of patient safety on outcomes. From prevention to the treatment of post-intensive care syndrome

Survivors of critical illness may present physical, psychological, or cognitive symptoms after hospital discharge, encompassed within what is known as post-intensive care syndrome. These alterations result from both the critical illness itself and the medical interventions surrounding it. For its prevention, the implementation of the ABCDEF bundle (Assess/treat pain, Breathing/awakening trials, Choice of sedatives, Delirium reduction, Early mobility and exercise, Family) has been proposed, along with additional strategies grouped under the acronym GHIRN (Good communication, Handout materials, Redefined ICU architectural design, Respirator, Nutrition). In addition to these preventive measures during the ICU stay, high-risk patients should be identified for subsequent follow-up through multidisciplinary teams coordinated by Intensive Care Medicine Departments.

Delirium in the Acute Care Setting From the Families Perspective: A Scoping Review

AIM

To explore the existing literature on delirium within the acute care setting from the family members' perspective and summarise key findings.

DESIGN

A scoping review guided by Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and refined by the Joanna Briggs Institute.

REVIEW METHODS

The Population, Concept, and Context framework recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute's scoping review protocol identified the main concepts in the primary review question. The inclusion criteria focused on primary research studies from any chronological date that explored the family members' experience of delirium within the acute care setting. Following screening by two independent reviewers, data extraction was conducted and presented in tabular form, detailing the study aim, sample, setting, methods, key findings and recommendations for future research and clinical practice.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search was conducted in January 2025 using CINAHL+, MEDLINE, JBI, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. Citation searching and reference lists supplemented this review to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Families' experiences of delirium were categorised into (1) lack of awareness and understanding of delirium; (2) communication and informational needs of family members regarding delirium; (3) the emotional impact delirium has on family members, and (4) family desire to participate in their loved one's care.

CONCLUSION

This review highlighted a paucity of literature addressing the experiences of family members who witness delirium in the acute care setting. The existing research underscored the need for clear communication and information regarding delirium to mitigate the negative emotional impact that delirium places on families.

IMPACT

This scoping review provides insights into the challenges facing families witnessing delirium in the acute care setting. A better understanding of family members' experiences can guide the development of a supported family-centred approach to delirium care.

PATIENT CONTRIBUTION

No patient/public contribution.

Management of severe acute encephalopathy in the ICU: an expert consensus statement from the french society of intensive care medicine

INTRODUCTION

Acute encephalopathy in the ICU poses significant diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic challenges. Standardized expert guidelines on acute encephalopathy are needed to improve diagnostic methods, therapeutic decisions, and prognostication.

METHODS

The experts conducted a review of the literature, analysed it according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology and made proposals for guidelines, which were rated by other experts. Only expert opinions with strong agreement were selected.

RESULTS

The synthesis of expert work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 39 recommendations. Among the 39 formalized recommendations, 1 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1 +) and 10 had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2 + or 2-). These recommendations describe indication for ICU admission, use of clinical scores and EEG for diagnosis, detection of complications, and prognostication. The remaining 28 recommendations were based on expert consensus. These recomandations describe common indications for blood and CSF studies, neuroimaging, use of neuromonitoring, and provide guidelines for management in the acute phase.

CONCLUSION

This expert consensus statement aims to provide a structured framework to enhance the consistency and quality of care for ICU patients presenting with acute encephalopathy. By integrating high-quality evidence with expert opinion, it offers a pragmatic approach to addressing the complex nature of acute encephalopathy in the ICU, promoting best practices in patient care and facilitating future research in the field.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024

The 2024 revised edition of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock (J-SSCG 2024) is published by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. This is the fourth revision since the first edition was published in 2012. The purpose of the guidelines is to assist healthcare providers in making appropriate decisions in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock, leading to improved patient outcomes. We aimed to create guidelines that are easy to understand and use for physicians who recognize sepsis and provide initial management, specialized physicians who take over the treatment, and multidisciplinary healthcare providers, including nurses, physical therapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists. The J-SSCG 2024 covers the following nine areas: diagnosis of sepsis and source control, antimicrobial therapy, initial resuscitation, blood purification, disseminated intravascular coagulation, adjunctive therapy, post-intensive care syndrome, patient and family care, and pediatrics. In these areas, we extracted 78 important clinical issues. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 42 GRADE-based recommendations, 7 good practice statements, and 22 information-to-background questions were created as responses to clinical questions. We also described 12 future research questions.

Delirium prevention in hospices: Opportunities and limitations - A focused ethnography

BACKGROUND

Delirium is common and distressing for hospice in-patients. Hospital-based research shows delirium may be prevented by targeting its risk factors. Many preventative strategies address patients' fundamental care needs. However, there is little research regarding how interventions need to be tailored to the in-patient hospice setting.

AIM

To explore the behaviours of hospice in-patient staff in relation to delirium prevention, and the influences that shape these behaviours.

DESIGN

Focused ethnography supported by behaviour change theory. Observation, semi-structured interviews and document review were conducted.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

A total of 89 participants (multidisciplinary staff, volunteers, patients and relatives) at two UK in-patient hospice units.

RESULTS

Hospice clinicians engaged in many behaviours associated with prevention of delirium as part of person-centred fundamental care, without delirium prevention as an explicit aim. Carrying out essential care tasks was highly valued and supported by adequate staffing levels, multidisciplinary team engagement and role clarity. Patients' reduced physical capability limited some delirium prevention behaviours, as did clinicians' behavioural norms related to prioritising patient comfort. Delirium prevention was not embedded into routine assessment and care decision-making, despite its potential to reduce patient distress.

CONCLUSIONS

The value placed on fundamental care in hospices supports delirium prevention behaviours but these require adaptation as patients become closer to death. There is a need to increase clinicians' understanding of the potential for delirium prevention to reduce patient distress during illness progression; to support inclusion of delirium prevention in making decisions about care; and to embed routine review of delirium risk factors in practice.

Fostering tEAmwork for ResiLiEnt Staff and Safe care in ICU (FEARLESS ICU): study protocol

In intensive care units (ICUs), various healthcare professions work together in interprofessional teams to deliver high-quality, effective care. These teams and their teamwork practices have implications for staff retention, burnout, and wellbeing, as well as patient safety and care outcomes. However, the United Kingdom's (UK) annual National Health Service (NHS) Staff Survey indicates that reported rates of high-quality teamwork are waning. Interventions to enhance teamwork are therefore crucial, yet in the NHS there is still no consistent approach to training teams. This protocol reports on the qualitative methodology we will employ to understand the factors that influence interprofessional teamwork practices in UK ICUs with a view to developing an evidence-based intervention. Methods consist of a rapid ethnography carried out across a minimum of five different hospitals with ICUs in England, coupled with interviews of health professionals. This in-depth approach will provide the opportunity to observe how different professionals interact with one another, their perceptions of these interactions, and the factors that influence collaborative work. In doing so, we aim to gain a comprehensive and contemporary understanding of ICU team working dynamics in the post-pandemic space. With this knowledge, we will collaborate with healthcare professionals to co-develop an interprofessional toolkit to improve teamwork to ultimately enhance staff wellbeing and improve patient outcomes.

Solid Metal Chemical and Thermal Injury Management

INTRODUCTION

Solid metals may create a variety of injuries. White phosphorous (WP) is a metal that causes both caustic and thermal injuries. Because of its broad use in munitions and smoke screens during conflicts and wars, all military clinicians should be competent at WP injury identification and acute therapy, as well as long-term consequence recognition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

English-language manuscripts addressing WP injuries were curated from PubMed and Medline from inception to January 31, 2024. Data regarding WP injury identification, management, and sequelae were abstracted to construct a Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles guideline-consistent narrative review.

RESULTS

White phosphorous appears to be ubiquitous in military conflicts. White phosphorous creates a characteristic wound appearance accompanied by smoke, a garlic aroma, and spontaneous combustion on contact with air. Decontamination and burning prevention or cessation are key and may rely on aqueous irrigation and submersion or immersion in substances that prevent air contact. Topical cooling is a key aspect of preventing spontaneous ignition as well. Disposal of all contaminated clothing and gear is essential to prevent additional injury, especially to rescuers. Long-term sequelae relate to phosphorous absorption and may lead to death. Chronic or repeated exposure may induce jaw osteonecrosis. Tactical Combat Casualty Care recommendations do not currently address WP injury management.

CONCLUSIONS

Education and management regarding WP acute injury and late sequelae is essential for acute battlefield and definitive facility care. Resource-replete and resource-limited settings may use related approaches for acute management and ignition prevention. Current burn wound management recommendations should incorporate specific WP management principles and actions for military clinicians at every level of skill and environment.

Safety of Early Mobilization in Adult Neurocritical Patients: An Exploratory Review

Introduction: Early mobilization has shown significant benefits in the rehabilitation of critically ill patients, including improved muscle strength, prevention of physical deconditioning, and reduced hospital length of stay. However, its safety in neurocritical patients, such as those with strokes, traumatic brain injuries, and postsurgical brain surgeries, remains uncertain. This study aims to map and examine the available evidence on the safety of early mobilization in adult neurocritical patients. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-SCR guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. The research question focused on the safety of early mobilization in neurocritical patients, considering adverse events, neurological changes, hemodynamic changes, and respiratory changes. A comprehensive search was performed in databases such as PubMed, BVS-LILACS, Ovid MEDLINE, and ScienceDirect, using specific search strategies. The selected studies were assessed for methodological quality using JBI tools. Results: Of 1310 identified articles, 25 were included in the review. These studies comprised randomized controlled trials, prospective observational studies, retrospective studies, and pre- and postimplementation intervention studies. The review found that early mobilization in neurocritical patients is generally safe, with a low incidence of severe adverse events, and does not increase the risk of vasospasm, and most complications were manageable with protocol adjustments and continuous monitoring. Conclusion: Early mobilization in neurocritical patients has been shown to be potentially safe under specific conditions, without a significant increase in severe complications when properly monitored. However, the available evidence is limited by the heterogeneity of protocols and study designs, emphasizing the need for further research. The importance of tailoring mobilization protocols to each patient and ensuring continuous monitoring is highlighted. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to fully understand the associated risks and optimize mobilization strategies.

Effect of educational program on nurses' performance regarding application of liberation bundle in pediatric intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines in paediatric critical care emphasize the implementation of the evidence-based liberation bundle to improve patient outcomes in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). However, there is limited information on the application of this bundle in Egyptian hospitals, and the effectiveness of educational programs on nurse performance in this context remains unclear.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an educational program on nurses' performance regarding the application of the liberation bundle in paediatric intensive care unit.

METHODS

A one-group pre/post quasi-experimental design was employed. The study was conducted in the PICUs of Al-Azhar University Hospital and Menoufia University Hospital, involving a convenient sample of 52 paediatric nurses. Data were collected using two tools: a predesigned questionnaire to assess knowledge about the liberation bundle and an observational checklist to evaluate nurse practices before and after the educational program.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated significant improvements in nurses' knowledge and practices post-intervention. The studied nurses' total level of knowledge regarding the liberation bundle increased from 13.7 to 92.3% post-educational program X2 (P. value) = 89.143(0.000). The studied nurses' total level of practices regarding the liberation bundle increased from 9.6 to 80.8% post-educational program X2 (P. value) = 89.143(0.000).

CONCLUSION

The educational program significantly enhanced the nurses' knowledge and practices in applying the liberation bundle in PICUs. This improvement in knowledge and practices is expected to lead to better outcomes for paediatric patients, including reduced mortality, shorter PICU stays, and fewer post-intensive care complications. By equipping nurses with the skills to implement the bundle, the program can improve recovery and long-term health outcomes in critically ill children.

A bibliometric analysis on delirium in intensive care unit from 2013-2023

Background

Delirium is a common manifestation of acute brain dysfunction among patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), afflicting an estimated 30-35% of this vulnerable population. The prevalence of delirium in ICU settings has catalyzed a surge in academic interest, as evidenced by a growing body of literature on the subject. This study seeks to synthesize the progress in understanding ICU delirium through a bibliometric analysis.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of the Web of Science Core (WOS) Collection database for literature on ICU delirium, focusing on studies published between 2013 and 2023. Our analysis utilized two bibliometric software tools, Citespace and VOSviewer, to scrutinize the data across various dimensions, including country contributions, authorship patterns, publishing journals, key thematic terms, and other pertinent metrics, with the aim of identifying emerging trends in the field.

Results

Our search yielded a total of 1,178 publications on ICU delirium within the WOS database from January 2013 to June 2023. The United States emerged as the leading contributor in terms of published articles, with Ely, E. Wesley being the most prolific author, having published 85 articles, and "Critical Care Medicine" as the journal with the highest number of publications, totaling 105. The application of literature clustering and keyword analysis revealed that future research is poised to delve deeper into areas such as pediatric delirium, risk factors, and the development of preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Conclusion

This study employs bibliometric analysis to provide a multifaceted overview of the ICU delirium research landscape over the past decade. By examining the topic from various perspectives, we have not only mapped the current state of ICU delirium research but also illuminated potential avenues for future inquiry and areas of emphasis.

Two-year trajectory of functional recovery and quality of life in post-intensive care syndrome: a multicenter prospective observational study on mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease-19

BACKGROUND

Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) affects the quality of life (QOL) of survivors of critical illness. Although PICS persists for a long time, the longitudinal changes in each component and their interrelationships over time both remain unclear. This multicenter prospective study investigated the 2-year trajectory of PICS and its components as well as factors contributing to deterioration or recovery in mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and also attempted to identify possible countermeasures.

METHODS

Patients who survived COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation completed questionnaires on the Barthel index, Short-Memory Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and EuroQol 5 dimensions 5-level every six months over a two-year period. Scores were weighted to account for dropouts, and the trajectory of each functional impairment was evaluated with alluvial diagrams. The prevalence of PICS and factors impairing or restoring function were examined using generalized estimating equations considering trajectories.

RESULTS

Among 334 patients, PICS prevalence rates in the four completed questionnaires were 72.1, 78.5, 77.6, and 82.0%, with cognitive impairment being the most common and lower QOL being noted when multiple impairments coexisted. Physical function and QOL indicated that many patients exhibited consistent trends of either recovery or deterioration. In contrast, cognitive function and mental health revealed considerable variability, with many patients showing fluctuating ratings in the later surveys. Delirium was associated with worse physical and mental health and poor QOL, while prolonged ventilation was associated with poor QOL. Living with family was associated with the recovery of all functions and QOL, while extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was associated with the recovery of cognitive function and mental health.

CONCLUSIONS

Critically ill patients had PICS for a long period and followed different trajectories for each impairment component. Based on trajectories, known PICS risk factors such as prolonged ventilation and delirium were associated with impaired recovery, while ECMO and the presence of family were associated with recovery from PICS. In critically ill COVID-19 patients, delirium management and family interventions may play an important role in promoting recovery from PICS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000041276, August 01, 2020.

Impact of healthcare system strain on the implementation of ICU sedation practices and encephalopathy burden during the early COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic posed unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, particularly in managing critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation early in the pandemic. Surging patient volumes strained hospital resources and complicated the implementation of standard-of-care intensive care unit (ICU) practices, including sedation management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of an evidence-based ICU sedation bundle during the early COVID-19 pandemic. The bundle was designed by a multi-disciplinary collaborative to reinforce best clinical practices related to ICU sedation. The bundle was implemented prospectively with retrospective analysis of electronic medical record data. The setting was the ICUs of a single-center tertiary hospital. The patients were the ICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation for confirmed COVID-19 between March and June 2020. A learning health collaborative developed a sedation bundle encouraging goal-directed sedation and use of adjunctive strategies to avoid excessive sedative administration. Implementation strategies included structured in-service training, audit and feedback, and continuous improvement. Sedative utilization and clinical outcomes were compared between patients admitted before and after the sedation bundle implementation. Quasi-experimental interrupted time-series analyses of pre and post intervention sedative utilization, hospital length of stay, and number of days free of delirium, coma, or death in 21 days (as a quantitative measure of encephalopathy burden). The analysis used the time duration between start of the COVID-19 wave and ICU admission to identify a "breakpoint" indicating a change in observed trends. A total of 183 patients (age 59.0 ± 15.9 years) were included, with 83 (45%) admitted before the intervention began. Benzodiazepine utilization increased for patients admitted after the bundle implementation, while agents intended to reduce benzodiazepine use showed no greater utilization. No "breakpoint" was identified to suggest the bundle impacted any endpoint measure. However, increasing time between COVID-19 wave start and ICU admission was associated with fewer delirium, coma, and death-free days (β =  - 0.044 [95% CI - 0.085, - 0.003] days/wave day); more days of benzodiazepine infusion (β = 0.056 [95% CI 0.025, 0.088] days/wave day); and a higher maximum benzodiazepine infusion rate (β = 0.079 [95% CI 0.037, 0.120] mg/h/wave day). The evidence-based practice bundle did not significantly alter sedation utilization patterns during the first COVID-19 wave. Sedation practices deteriorated and encephalopathy burden increased over time, highlighting that strategies to reinforce clinical practices may be hindered under conditions of extreme healthcare system strain.

ICU Delirium

Delirium is not a harmless transient event during ICU hospitalization; rather, it is a severe complication of critical illness associated with increased mortality, morbidity, and persistent disability. Despite being recognized for decades, it remains underdiagnosed. Employing validated tools for detection helps reduce missed cases. Early detection facilitates prompt management. Sedatives, opioids, and antipsychotics should be avoided whenever possible. Optimizing environmental triggers, minimizing iatrogenicity, and treating underlying critical illness constitute the basis of the currently recommended approach to diminish the burden of delirium in ICU patients.

A Rapid-Cycle Intervention to Enhance Patient and Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Patient and family satisfaction with care in intensive care units is not reflected in Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys. Gaps may be unknown.

LOCAL PROBLEM

In a cardiothoracic intensive care unit, patient satisfaction scores were not assessed and gaps could not be addressed. The primary aim was to obtain baseline data on patient and family satisfaction. The secondary aim was to improve identified gaps in satisfaction.

METHODS

A preintervention-postintervention, 2-cycle quality improvement project and a 12-month sustainability assessment were conducted to evaluate patient and family satisfaction in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit in a large academic health system from August 2022 to August 2023. The Nursing Intensive Care Satisfaction Scale was used to measure patients' satisfaction and the European Quality Questionnaire was used to measure family members' satisfaction with intensive care unit nursing care. Standardized scripting, processes for patient and family engagement during rounds, and structured communication were used to enhance patient and family engagement.

RESULTS

At baseline (47 patients, 35 family members), overall patient and family satisfaction was high (mean [SD] satisfaction scores: patients, 87.6 [19.3]; family members, 94.6 [9.7]; P = .06). After intervention cycle 2, family members (n = 50) had high mean satisfaction scores on the Information Needs sub-scale of the European Quality Questionnaire. Family participation in rounds improved from 18.5% of rounds at baseline to 76.5% after intervention cycle 2 and was 61.5% at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Strategies that engage family members in rounds improve communication and satisfaction.

Recognizing the Need for Goals of Care Conversations Among Critically Ill Surgical Patients

INTRODUCTION

Recognizing the need for end-of-life care is a critical aspect of health care. Delayed recognition leads to undue patient suffering and nonvaluable health-care expenditures. Care of patients with surgical diseases is often focused on curative intent despite the presence of significant comorbidities and discrepant patient and family wishes. We hypothesized that surgical patients with clear end-of-life needs may not receive goals of care (GoC) conversations, with variations in frequency by provider level and specialty.

METHODS

Providers caring for critically ill patients at an urban, academic, quaternary care center reviewed five case vignettes of critically ill surgical patients. The blinded providers were asked to list at least three care priorities for the patients. Responses were analyzed using Stata/BE 17.0 for inclusion of GoC.

RESULTS

A total of 123 participants responded to at least one scenario (24.1% response rate). In total, 95 participants (77.2%) prioritized GoC at least once for any scenario, and GoC prioritization ranged from 9.7% (scenario 1) to 73.7% (scenario 5) for individual scenarios. Surgical providers prioritized GoC more often than nonsurgical providers (83.1% versus 67.4%, P = 0.044). Critical care specialty training was not found to increase prioritization of GoC (83.3% versus 71.4%, P = 0.12). Increasing post-graduate year (PGY) levels were correlated with increased likelihood of prioritizing GoC; 60.9% of PGY1-4's prioritized GoC as compared to 90.9% of PGY5-9's (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Providers demonstrated ranging abilities to identify GoC as a priority. For housestaff, increasing PGY level correlates with prioritizing GoC. Surgical providers more often prioritized GoC as compared to nonsurgical providers, suggesting familiarity with surgical pathologies may result in increased prioritization.

Perspectives of Clinicians on the Value of the Get to Know Me Board in the ICU

BACKGROUND

Critical illness can render patients at heightened risk of anonymity, loss of dignity, and dehumanization. Because dehumanization results in significant patient distress, it is imperative to find ways to humanize care in the ICU. A Get to Know Me board (GTKMB) is a personal patient profile designed to bring the patient from anonymity; however, its widespread adoption has been challenging.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Identify perspectives of ICU clinicians on the value of the GTKMB in caring for patients in the ICU.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This qualitative study used focus groups conducted via videoconference. We recruited stakeholders from multiprofessional teams across different ICU settings at a large US quaternary care center. Thematic content analysis approach was performed to identify key themes and concepts.

RESULTS

We interviewed 38 participants in six focus groups including 10 nurses, seven physicians, six advanced practice providers, five rehabilitation therapists, a respiratory therapist, and a social worker. Themes highlighted the role of the GTKMB in multiple domains including humanizing care of the critically ill, fostering communication, connecting with families, and guiding and facilitating care processes. Several subthemes were identified for each category.

INTERPRETATION

The GTKMB was considered important in fostering humanized caring in the ICU by diverse members of an interprofessional ICU team, helping to facilitate communication, establish family connection, and guide care.

Scandinavian healthcare professionals' perceptions of rehabilitation practices in the intensive care unit. A cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVE

To describe healthcare professionals' perception of current early rehabilitation practices and their preconditions, focusing on functional and cognitive stimulation facilitated by nurses and other healthcare professionals in Scandinavian intensive care units (ICUs).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional electronic survey administered to healthcare professionals. The survey was developed in Danish, translated into Norwegian and Swedish, and delivered using Google Forms. The qualitative data were analysed using the framework method.

SETTING

Scandinavian ICUs.

RESULTS

Practices facilitated by nurses and other healthcare professionals in the ICU often began with weaning from the ventilator and reducing sedation. This was followed by increased mobilisation and building physical strength. There was attention to optimising nutrition, swallowing function, and oral intake. Enabling communication and employing cognitively stimulating activities and bodily stimulation to engage the patient's mind were also framed as rehabilitation. To avoid delirium and overexertion, it was important to balance rest and activity and to shield the patient from unnecessary stimulation. Furthermore, it was important to support the patient's will to live and to involve the family in rehabilitation. Post-discharge rehabilitation activities included reaching out to patients discharged to wards and homes.

CONCLUSION

Rehabilitation was described as progressing from passive to active as patients gained consciousness and strength. Weaning, balancing rest and activity, supporting the patient's life courage and will to recover, open visitation policies, and multi-professional collaboration were important prerequisites for rehabilitation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

All aspects of patient care can function as important opportunities for physical and cognitive rehabilitation. Balancing rest and activity is important for conserving the patient's energy for rehabilitation.

Update on Perioperative Delirium

A strong association between frailty and in-hospital delirium in nonsurgical patients has been shown. Physical and cognitive frailties have been associated with decline and dysfunction in the frontal cognitive domains. Risk factors for frailty are similar to risk factors for postoperative delirium (POD). Frailty can be screened and diagnosed by various tools and instruments. Different anesthetic techniques have been studied to decrease the incidence of POD. However, no anesthetic technique has been conclusively proven to decrease the risk of POD. Patients with dementia develop delirium more often, and delirium is associated with accelerated cognitive decline.

Analgosedation and delirium practices in critically ill patients in the Pan-American and Iberian setting, and factors associated with oversedation after the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the PANDEMIC study

Oversedation has adverse effects on critically ill patients. The Analgosedation and Delirium Committee of the FEPIMCTI (Pan-American and Iberian Federation of Critical Care Medicine and Intensive Care) conducted a cross-sectional study through a survey addressed to ICU physicians: PANDEMIC (Pan-American and Iberian Study on the Management of Analgosedation and Delirium in Critical Care [fepImCti]). HYPOTHESIS: Worsening of these practices in the course of the pandemic and that continued afterwards, with further oversedation. OBJECTIVES: Perception of analgosedation and delirium practices in Pan-American and Iberian ICUs before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, and factors associated with persistent oversedation after the pandemic. Of the 1008 respondents, 25% perceived oversedation after the pandemic (95%CI 22.4-27.8). This perception was higher in South America (35.8%, P < .001). Main risk factor: habit acquired during the pandemic (adjusted OR [aOR] 3.16, 95%CI 2.24-4.45, P < .001). Main protective factor: delirium monitoring before the pandemic (aOR 0.70, 95%CI 0.50-0.98, P = .038). The factors identified in this study provide a basis for targeting future interventions.

A pharmacist's guide to mitigating sleep dysfunction and promoting good sleep in the intensive care unit

PURPOSE

To review causes, risk factors, and consequences of sleep disruption in critically ill patients; evaluate the role of nonpharmacological and pharmacological therapies for management of sleep in the intensive care unit (ICU); and discuss the role of pharmacists in implementation of sleep bundles.

SUMMARY

Critically ill patients often have disrupted sleep and circadian rhythm alterations that cause anxiety, stress, and traumatic memories. This can be caused by factors such as critical illness, environmental factors, mechanical ventilation, and medications. Methods to evaluate sleep, including polysomnography and questionnaires, have limitations that should be considered. Multicomponent sleep bundles with a focus on nonpharmacological therapy aiming to reduce nocturnal noise, light, and unnecessary patient care may improve sleep disorders in critically ill patients. While pharmacological agents are often used to facilitate sleep in critically ill patients, evidence supporting their use is often of low quality, which limits use to patients who have sleep disruption refractory to nonpharmacological therapy. Dedicated interprofessional teams are needed for implementation of sleep bundles in the ICU. Extensive pharmacotherapeutic training and participation in daily patient care rounds make pharmacists vital members of the team who can help with all components of the bundle. This narrative review discusses evidence for elements of the multicomponent sleep bundle and provides guidance on how pharmacists can help with implementation of nonpharmacological therapies and management of neuroactive medications to facilitate sleep.

CONCLUSION

Sleep bundles are necessary for patients in the ICU, and dedicated interprofessional teams that include pharmacists are vital for successful creation and implementation.

Survivorship After Cardiogenic Shock

Advances in critical care therapies for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), including temporary mechanical circulatory support and multidisciplinary shock teams, have led to improved survival to hospital discharge, ranging from 60% to 70%. After their index hospitalization, however, survivors of CS may continue to face cardiac as well as extracardiac sequelae of these therapies and complications for years to come. Most studies in CS have focused primarily on survival, with limited data on long-term recovery measures among survivors. In other forms of critical illness, research indicates that many intensive care unit survivors experience impairments in multiple domains, such as cognitive function, physical ability, and mental health. These impairments, collectively referred to as Post-Intensive Care Syndrome, in turn impact survivors' quality of life and future prognosis. This review identifies unique aspects of CS-related survivorship, highlights lessons learned from other forms of critical illness, and outlines future research directions to determine specific strategies to enhance recovery and survivorship after CS.

Patient safety in the intensive care department

Patient safety is a priority for all healthcare systems. Despite this, too many patients still suffer harm as a consequence of healthcare. Furthermore, it has a significant impact on family members, professionals and healthcare institutions, resulting in considerable economic costs. The critically ill patient is particularly vulnerable to adverse events. Numerous safe practices have been implemented, acknowledging the influence of human factors on safety and the significance of the well-being of professionals, as well as the impact of critical episodes at hospital discharge on patients and their families. Training and engagement of professionals, patients and families are of paramount importance. Recently, artificial intelligence has demonstrated its ability to enhance clinical safety. This update on "Patient Safety" reviews all these aspects related to one of the most pivotal dimensions of healthcare quality.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024

The 2024 revised edition of the Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock (J-SSCG 2024) is published by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. This is the fourth revision since the first edition was published in 2012. The purpose of the guidelines is to assist healthcare providers in making appropriate decisions in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock, leading to improved patient outcomes. We aimed to create guidelines that are easy to understand and use for physicians who recognize sepsis and provide initial management, specialized physicians who take over the treatment, and multidisciplinary healthcare providers, including nurses, physical therapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists. The J-SSCG 2024 covers the following nine areas: diagnosis of sepsis and source control, antimicrobial therapy, initial resuscitation, blood purification, disseminated intravascular coagulation, adjunctive therapy, post-intensive care syndrome, patient and family care, and pediatrics. In these areas, we extracted 78 important clinical issues. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 42 GRADE-based recommendations, 7 good practice statements, and 22 information-to-background questions were created as responses to clinical questions. We also described 12 future research questions.

Comparison of SAT and SBT Conduct During the ABC Trial and PILOT Trial

BACKGROUND

Implementation of the "B" element-both spontaneous awakening trials (SATs) and spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs)-of the ABCDEF bundle improves the outcomes for mechanically ventilated patients. In 2021, the Pragmatic Investigation of optimal Oxygen Targets (PILOT) trial investigating optimal oxygenation targets in patients on mechanical ventilation was completed.

OBJECTIVES

To compare SAT and SBT conduct between a randomized controlled trial and current clinical care.

METHODS

The 2008 Awakening and Breathing Controlled (ABC) Trial (2003-2006) randomized mechanically ventilated patients to paired SATs and SBTs versus sedation per usual care plus SBTs. The PILOT trial (2018-2021) enrolled patients years later where SAT + SBT conduct was observed. We compared SAT and SBT conduct in ABC's interventional group (SAT + SBT; n = 167, 1140 patient days) to that in PILOT (n = 2083, 8355 patient days).

RESULTS

Spontaneous awakening trial safety screens were done in all 1140 ABC patient-days on sedation and/or analgesia and in 3889 of 4228 (92%) in PILOT. Spontaneous awakening trial safety screens were passed in 939 of 1140 (82%) instances in ABC versus only 1897 of 3889 (49%) in PILOT. Interestingly, SAT was performed in ≥95% of passed SAT safety screens in both trials and was passed in 837 of 895 (94%) in ABC versus 1145 of 1867 (61%) in PILOT. SBT safety screens were performed in all 983 ABC instances and 8031 of 8370 (96%) in PILOT. SBT safety screens were passed in 647 of 983 (66%) in ABC versus 4475 of 8031 (56%) in PILOT. Spontaneous breathing trial was performed in ≥93% of passed SBT safety screens in both trials and was passed in 319 of 603 (53%) in ABC versus 3337 of 4454 (75%) in PILOT.

CONCLUSION

This study compared SAT/SBT conduction in an ideal setting to real-world practice, 13 years later. Performance of SAT/SBT safety screens, SATs, and SBTs between a definitive clinical trial (ABC) as compared to current clinical care (PILOT) remained high.

Long-Term Cognitive Function Among Critical Illness Survivors

Cognitive impairment is common after critical illness and persists beyond the period of acute illness. Clinicians caring for this patient population are encouraged to screen for cognitive impairment and provide supportive measures to mitigate its distressing effects. Further research is needed to evaluate the laboratory and neuroimaging correlates of post-intensive care unit (ICU) cognitive impairment, which may in turn lead to personalized interventions to address this debilitating complication of critical illness. Further research is needed to evaluate the laboratory and neuroimaging correlates of post-ICU cognitive impairment, which may, in turn, lead to personalized interventions to address this debilitating complication of critical illness.

Advancing Delirium Treatment Trials in Older Adults: Recommendations for Future Trials From the Network for Investigation of Delirium: Unifying Scientists (NIDUS)

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the delirium treatment trial literature, identify the unique challenges in delirium treatment trials, and formulate recommendations to address each in older adults.

DESIGN

A 39-member interprofessional and international expert working group of clinicians (physicians, nurses, and pharmacists) and nonclinicians (biostatisticians, epidemiologists, and trial methodologists) was convened. Four expert panels were assembled to explore key subtopics (pharmacological/nonpharmacologic treatment, methodological challenges, and novel research designs).

METHODS

To provide background and context, a review of delirium treatment randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2003 and 2023 was conducted and evidence gaps were identified. The four panels addressed the identified subtopics. For each subtopic, research challenges were identified and recommendations to address each were proposed through virtual discussion before a live, full-day, and in-person conference. General agreement was reached for each proposed recommendation across the entire working group via moderated conference discussion. Recommendations were synthesized across panels and iteratively discussed through rounds of virtual meetings and draft reviews.

RESULTS

We identified key evidence gaps through a systematic literature review, yielding 43 RCTs of delirium treatments. From this review, eight unique challenges for delirium treatment trials were identified, and recommendations to address each were made based on panel input. The recommendations start with design of interventions that consider the multifactorial nature of delirium, include both pharmacological and nonpharmacologic approaches, and target pathophysiologic pathways where possible. Selecting appropriate at-risk patients with moderate vulnerability to delirium may maximize effectiveness. Targeting patients with at least moderate delirium severity and duration will include those most likely to experience adverse outcomes. Delirium severity should be the primary outcome of choice; measurement of short- and long-term clinical outcomes will maximize clinical relevance. Finally, plans for handling informative censoring and missing data are key.

CONCLUSIONS

By addressing key delirium treatment challenges and research gaps, our recommendations may serve as a roadmap for advancing delirium treatment research in older adults.

Creating a Culture of an Awake and Walking Intensive Care Unit: In-Hospital Strategies to Mitigate Post-Intensive Care Syndrome

The ABCDEF bundle and Awake and Walking intensive care unit (ICU) approach aim to prevent the long-term consequences of critical illness (ie, post-intensive care syndrome) by promoting patient wakefulness, cognition, and mobility. Humanizing the ICU experience is the key, preserving patients' function and autonomy. Successful implementation requires cultivating an ICU culture focused on avoiding sedatives and initiating prompt mobilization, addressing organizational barriers through tailored strategies. Overall, these patient-centered, mobility-focused models offer a holistic solution to the complex challenge of preventing post-intensive care syndrome and supporting critical illness survivors.

Pediatric Post-Intensive Care Syndrome and Current Therapeutic Options

Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) impacts most pediatric critical care survivors. PICS spans physical, cognitive, emotional, and social health domains and is increasingly recognized in survivorship literature. Children pose unique challenges in identifying and treating PICS given the inherent population heterogeneity in pediatric samples with biological differences across ages and neurodevelopmental stages, unique disease pathophysiology, strong environmental influences on disease and recovery, and lack of standardized measurements to identify morbidities or track response to intervention. Emerging literature and the recent development of specialized multidisciplinary clinics highlight opportunities for intervention across PICS domains in inpatient and outpatient settings.

Physicians' decision making when weaning patients from mechanical ventilation: A qualitative content analysis

BACKGROUND

Weaning from mechanical ventilation is a complex and central intensive care process. This complexity indicates that the challenges of weaning must be explored from different perspectives. Furthermore, physicians' experiences and the factors influencing their decision-making regarding weaning are unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore and describe the factors influencing physicians' decision-making when weaning patients from invasive mechanical ventilation in Swedish intensive care units (ICUs).

METHODS

This qualitative study used an exploratory and descriptive design with qualitative content analysis. Sixteen physicians from five ICUs across Sweden were purposively included and interviewed regarding their weaning experiences.

FINDINGS

The physicians expressed that prioritising the patient's well-being was evident, and there was agreement that both the physical and mental condition of the patient had a substantial impact on decision-making. Furthermore, there was a lack of agreement on whether patients should be involved in the weaning process and how their resources, needs, and wishes should be included in decision-making. In addition, there were factors not directly linked to the patient but which still influenced decision-making, such as the available resources and teamwork. Sometimes, it was difficult to point out the basis for decisions; in that decisions were made by gut feeling, intuition, or clinical experience.

CONCLUSION

Physicians' decision-making regarding weaning was a dynamic process influenced by several factors. These factors were related to the patient's condition and the structure for weaning. Increased understanding of weaning from the physicians' and ICU teams' perspectives may improve the weaning process by broadening the knowledge about the aspects influencing the decision-making.

The Impact of Listening to Quran Recitation during Pain-Inducing Procedure among Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation Support: An Interventional Study

Background

Pain experienced by intubated patients is caused by several extrinsic sources, including nursing care procedures such as endotracheal suctioning. Several nonpharmacological therapies, including listening to Quran recitation, have never been tested for their pain relief effects among intubated patients, despite these therapies being cost-effective, easy to implement, and free of adverse effects. This study aimed to examine the pain-relieving effect of listening to Quran recitation during pain-inducing procedures in patients receiving mechanical ventilation support.

Materials and Methods

This pilot study used an experimental design with 32 intubated patients at King Abdullah University Hospital in Irbid, Jordan. The Behavioral Pain Scale and Ramsay Sedation Scale were used to assess pain levels and sedation, and physiologic parameters were monitored before and during endotracheal suctioning.

Results

The findings showed significant differences in Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) scores and heart rate measures between the intervention and control groups after controlling for the level of sedation. The patients in the intervention group scored lower pain and HR measures than those in the control group (F5,26 = 11.47, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The findings showed significant improvement in the levels of pain and heart rate measures among intubated patients who are exposed to Quran recitation. Complementary medicine is essential to the healthcare plans of critically ill patients and their families. Holy Quran recitation has been reported to be a useful nonpharmacological intervention for critically ill Muslim patients.

[Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: functional impairments of critical illness survivors]

With a decrease in mortality of critically ill patients in recent years, intensive care medicine research has shifted its focus on functional impairments of intensive care units (ICU) survivors. ICU survivorship is characterized by long-term impairments of cognition, mental health, and physical health. Since 2012, these impairments have been summarized with the umbrella term Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS). Mental health impairments frequently entail new are aggravated symptoms of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Beyond impairments in the three PICS domains, critical illness survivors frequently suffer from chronic pain, dysphagia, and nutritional deficiencies. Furthermore, they have a higher risk for osteoporosis, bone fractures, and diabetes mellitus. Taken together, these sequelae reduce their health-related quality of life. Additionally, ICU survivors are challenged by social problems such as isolation, economic problems such as treatment costs and lost earnings, and return to previous employment. Yet, patients and caregivers have described post-ICU care as inadequate and fragmented. ICU follow-up clinics could improve post-ICU care, but there is insufficient evidence for their effectiveness. Thus far, large high-quality trials with multicomponent and interdisciplinary post-ICU interventions have mostly failed to improve patient outcomes. Hence, preventing PICS and minimizing risk factors by optimizing ICU care is crucial, e.g. by implementing the ABCDE bundle. Future studies need to identify effective components of post-ICU recovery interventions and determine which patient populations may benefit most from ICU recovery services.

C-L Case Conference: The Interaction Between Emotional Dysregulation and Chronic Critical Illness in a Patient With a Terminal Personality Disorder

We present a case of a patient who presented for endocarditis and subsequently had a prolonged and challenging hospital course, with much of it spent in the intensive care unit (ICU). Throughout their hospitalization, personality factors, combined with impaired communication and pain in severe medical illness, led to challenging behaviors of disengagement, impulsivity, splitting, agitation, and suicidal statements. Experts in critical care psychiatry review the case and its key elements, including principles of critical care psychiatry and pharmacologic management of ICU patients; communication problems in ICU patients and associated psychiatric distress; the benefits of proactive consultation for challenging patients; and the construct of post-intensive care syndrome. Patients with personality disorders often struggle to cope with severe medical illness, leading to challenging, self-defeating behaviors. Such acts are even more difficult to manage in intensive care, where a patient's tenuous medical status depends on smooth interactions between them and the medical team. We address how these challenges may be mitigated in collaboration with a psychiatric consult team.

The interactivity and independence of Recovery challenges and coping strategies for ICU survivors and their caregivers: a systematic review and Meta-synthesis

BACKGROUND

The post-ICU home recovery period requires patients and caregivers to confront recovery challenges and adopt coping strategies as a family dyad, necessitating effective dyadic interaction patterns. Existing qualitative research shows that the dyads face interactive or independent challenges and employs varying coping strategies, which may include strong communication or, conversely, avoidance. However, a single qualitative study alone might offer limited generalizability, and there is a lack of broader, more nuanced understanding about the recovery challenge and copings among ICU survivors and caregivers. This meta-synthesis aims to figure out the interactivity and independence of challenges and coping strategies during the recovery process for ICU survivors and caregivers.

METHODS

This is a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies, which was guided by the Stress and Coping Framework. We systematically reviewed six electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycArticles, and PsycInfo, for relevant qualitative studies published from inception to January, 2024. We utilized a content analysis approach for data analysis. Presentation of this synthesis adhered to the PRISMA guideline and the ENTREQ guideline.

RESULTS

After full-text screening, 49 studies were included. Four themes with 16 sub-themes emerged from this synthesis including, interactivity of recovery challenges for ICU survivors and caregivers (subthemes: Life was turned upside down, Situational overstrain, Isolation without compassion, Empowerment conflicts, Marginalized support), independence of recovery challenges for ICU survivors and caregivers (subthemes: Recovery means silent suffering, Gap in memory, Sacrificing to caregiving), interactivity of recovery coping strategies for ICU survivors and caregivers (subthemes: Reorientation of mindset, Cultivating inner power, Sharing burden with an open-ear, Going through thick and thin together, Negotiating care level), and independence of recovery coping strategies for ICU survivors and caregivers (subthemes: Wearing a faked smile, Developing daily routine, Seeking respite).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that ICU survivors and caregivers experience overlapping yet distinct challenges during recovery, often involving shared coping strategies, alongside a need for individual space. These results support the presence of both interactivity and independence in recovery challenges and coping strategies for ICU survivors and their caregivers. Therefore, we call for future dyadic or family interventions to target both ICU survivors and caregivers, taking advantage of their interactivity and desire for gradual independence, so that fostered individualized coping strategies adapted to flexible contexts.

Efficacy and safety of a non-immersive virtual reality-based neuropsychological intervention for cognitive stimulation and relaxation in patients with critical illness: study protocol of a randomized clinical trial (RGS-ICU)

BACKGROUND

Experiencing a critical illness may be a stressful life event that is also associated with cognitive dysfunction during and after the intensive care unit (ICU) stay. A deep-tech solution based on non-immersive virtual reality, gamification and motion capture called Rehabilitation Gaming System for Intensive Care Units (RGS-ICU) has been developed that includes both cognitive stimulation and relaxation protocols specifically designed for patients with critical illness. This study aims to evaluate whether the cognitive and relaxation protocols of the RGS-ICU platform are 1) effective in improving neuropsychological outcomes during and after ICU stay and 2) safe for patients with critical illness.

METHODS

This is a study protocol for a multicenter longitudinal randomized clinical trial. At least 80 patients with critical illness will be included: 40 experimental subjects and 40 control subjects. Patients in the experimental group will receive daily 20-min sessions of cognitive stimulation and relaxation with the RGS-ICU platform adjuvant to standard ICU care in their own rooms during the ICU stay and until discharge from the ICU or up to a maximum of 28 days after randomization, provided they are alert and calm. Patients in the experimental group will be constantly monitored as part of standard ICU care to ensure the safety of the intervention and that no avoidable adverse events occur. Patients in the control group will receive standard ICU care. The primary outcome is objective cognition 12 months after ICU discharge, assessed with a composite index including measures of attention, working memory, learning/memory, executive function and processing speed. The secondary outcome is the safety of the intervention, assessed by considering the number of sessions terminated early due to unsafe events in physiological parameters. Other outcomes are comfort experienced during the ICU stay, and subjective cognition, mental health (anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder), functionality and health-related quality of life 12 months after ICU discharge.

DISCUSSION

The expected results are 1) better neuropsychological outcomes during and after the ICU stay in patients in the experimental group compared to patients in the control group and 2) that the cognitive and relaxation protocols of the RGS-ICU platform are safe for patients with critical illness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06267911. Registered on February 20, 2024.

Management of pain and sedation in the intensive care unit

Advances in our approach to treating pain and sedation when caring for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been propelled by decades of robust trial data, knowledge gained from patient experiences, and our evolving understanding of how pain and sedation strategies affect patient survival and long term outcomes. These data contribute to current practice guidelines prioritizing analgesia-first sedation strategies (analgosedation) that target light sedation when possible, use of short acting sedatives, and avoidance of benzodiazepines. Together, these strategies allow the patient to be more awake and able to participate in early mobilization and family interactions. The covid-19 pandemic introduced unique challenges in the ICU that affected delivery of best practices and patient outcomes. Compliance with best practices has not returned to pre-covid levels. After emerging from the pandemic and refocusing our attention on optimal pain and sedation management in the ICU, it is imperative to revisit the data that contributed to our current recommendations, review the importance of best practices on patient outcomes, and consider new strategies when advancing patient care.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome who were admitted to the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate characteristics and outcomes in critically ill patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).

METHODS

Consecutive adults with GBS who required intensive care unit (ICU) admission at a tertiary-care hospital between 1999 and 2020 were enrolled into this retrospective cohort study. Demographics, clinical data and patient outcomes were compared between patients who did or did not receive mechanical ventilation (MV).

RESULTS

During the study period, the number of ICU admissions gradually rose from approximately 900 to 3000 annually. Forty-three patients had GBS and were included, of whom, 27 (62.8%) received MV for a median of 13 days. The MV group stayed longer in the ICU (median, 26 versus 6 days) and in the hospital (median, 120 versus 39 days) than the non-MV group. Most patients in the MV group (22 [81.5%]) required tracheostomy. At maximum follow-up, Hughes Functional Grading scores were 0 (full recovery) in 11 patients (25.5%), 1-3 in 18 (41.8%), 4-5 in 12 (27.9%), and 6 (death) in two (4.6%, both in the MV group), with higher median Hughes score in the MV group (3 versus 0.5). Complications during ICU and hospital stay included: veinous thromboembolism in five (11.6%), gastrointestinal bleeding in three (7.0%), bacteremia in five (11.6%), bedsore in one (2.3%), and GBS-treatment side effects in four (9.4%) patients; all of these complications occurred within the MV group.

CONCLUSIONS

GBS was an uncommon reason for ICU admission. The findings highlight significant morbidity with GBS, particularly among patients who need MV.

Nurse perspectives on supporting children and youth who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in the pediatric intensive care unit

Many children who require hospitalization in the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) are unable to or have difficulty communicating through speech, whether because of preexisting or acute conditions. Children who are unable to be heard and understood using only speech benefit from aided augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), including in hospital settings. This qualitative interview study sought to understand the perspectives of nurses on care and support for children who use or would benefit from aided AAC in the pediatric ICU. Participants were six nurses who worked in pediatric intensive care at a tertiary care unit of a children's hospital in the United States. Three main themes were identified related to nurses' views about supporting children's communication: (a) Caring for the Whole Child, (b) Needing Support from Others and Moving between Roles, and (c) Working with Available Resources and Demands. Nurses emphasized the importance of a holistic approach to care, the impact of others' support and knowledge, and a desire for building greater capacity for promoting children's access to effective communication. Findings offer insight that could improve patient-centered care for children with complex communication needs and support for nurses themselves, particularly within the broader context of ICU liberation.

Post-ICU Syndrome and the "3 Ds" in Geriatric Psychiatry: A Complicated Case Report of Major Depression With Psychosis in a 96-Year-Old Woman

In the growing field of geriatric psychiatry, the "3 Ds"-depression, dementia, and delirium-are a complex clinical challenge, especially in patients with medical comorbidities. This is a case report of a 96-year-old Saudi woman with chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and recurrent hyponatremia presented with worsening sleep, depression, persecutory delusions, and hallucinations following an intensive care unit (ICU) stay for urinary tract infection. Examination revealed cognitive decline and depressive symptoms, with sodium at 123 mmol/L. After a psychiatric evaluation, she was diagnosed with major depressive disorder with psychosis, likely exacerbated by hyponatremia and ICU-related stress. She was treated with sertraline, olanzapine, and sodium correction. One-month follow-up showed significant improvement in mood, sleep, and resolution of psychotic symptoms, restoring her quality of life. In conclusion, this case highlights the challenges between these conditions and the importance of comprehensive assessment in geriatric care.

Patient Characteristics and Practice Variation Associated With New Community Prescription of Benzodiazepine and z-Drug Hypnotics After Critical Illness: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink

PURPOSE

Survivors of critical illness are often affected by new or worsened mental health conditions and sleep disorders. We examined the incidence, practice variation and factors associated with new benzodiazepine and z-drug community prescriptions among critical illness survivors.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink data included 52 846 adult critical care survivors hospitalised in 2010 and 2018 who were not prescribed benzodiazepines or z-drugs before hospitalisation. We performed multilevel multivariable logistic regression to assess patient factors associated with new (any prescription within 90 days) and with new-and-persistent (2+ prescriptions within 180 days) benzodiazepine or z-drug prescribing, and to evaluate variation by primary care practice.

RESULTS

5.2% (2769/52846) of treatment-naïve survivors (95% CI 5.1-5.4) were prescribed a benzodiazepine or z-drug, and 2.5% (1311/52846) had new-and-persistent prescribing. A history of insomnia (adjusted OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.74-2.21), anxiety or depression (adjusted OR 1.40; 95% CI 1.28-1.53) and recent prescription opioid use (adjusted OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.34-1.61) were associated with new community prescription. Sex was not associated with new prescriptions and older patients were less likely to receive a prescription. 2.6% of the variation in new prescribing and 4.1% of the variation in new-and-persistent prescribing were attributable to the prescribing practice.

CONCLUSIONS

One in twenty critical illness survivors receive a new community benzodiazepine or z-drug prescription. Further research is needed to understand where in the patient care pathway initiation occurs and the risk of adverse events in survivors of recent critical illness.

Updates on Post-Intensive Care Syndrome After Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Epidemiology, Core Outcomes, Interventions, and Long-Term Follow-Up

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) survivors often experience post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), is defined as new or worsened impairments in physical, cognitive and/or mental health status persisting beyond hospital discharge. These impairments negatively impact survivors' quality of life and their return to work or usual activities. Moreover, family members are also impacted as recognized by the term, PICS-Family (PICS-F). PICS poses an increased burden on the health care system and has a negative societal impact. There are ongoing efforts to understand risk factors for PICS-related impairments; design and evaluate interventions for specific impairments (including the use of an ARDS survivorship core outcome set); and refine and evaluate ICU recovery clinics to support and treat survivors and their families.

Evaluation of the effects of a team-based systematic prevention and management program for postoperative orthopedic older patients: A retrospective cohort study

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate a team-based systematic prevention and management program for delirium (a multicomponent intervention addressing potentially modifiable risk factors based on the DELirium Team Approach [DELTA]) in older patients undergoing orthopedic surgery within a real-world clinical setting. The DELTA program was initiated at our hospital in January 2019.

Methods

A retrospective before-after study was conducted during a preintervention period (January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2018) and a postintervention period (January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021) at orthopedic wards of an advanced acute care hospital in Japan. A total of 787 inpatients were evaluated before the preintervention period, and 833 inpatients were evaluated after the postintervention period.

Results

After the DELTA program's implementation, a significant decrease in benzodiazepine receptor agonist prescriptions (odds ratio [OR], 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.53) and an increase in prescriptions of either melatonin receptor agonists or dual orexin receptor antagonists (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 2.49-5.88) were observed. However, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of falls, self-extubation, or required level of medical and nursing care, including risky behavior and inability to follow medical or care instructions following the intervention, despite a reduction in the length of hospital stay and institutionalization.

Conclusion

Implementing the DELTA program for older patients undergoing orthopedic surgery contributed to optimizing the prescription of hypnotics; however, the impact on other patient outcomes, such as falls, self-extubation, and required level of medical and nursing care was limited.

Nonpharmacological Prevention and Management of Delirium: Past, Present, and Future

Delirium has been recognized, documented, and examined for centuries. In 500 BC Hippocrates described hyper- and hypoactive forms of delirium. As medicine, surgery, and critical care have accelerated over the last century, so too has our understanding of delirium and its profound risks to patients, families, and health care teams. It has also been increasingly understood that it is the accumulation of risk factors that ultimately precipitates delirium and nonpharmacological interventions to reduce these risks remain the cornerstone of delirium prevention and management. However, over the last three decades, these nonpharmacological strategies have moved from a single-component approach to a multicomponent approach, targeting multiple risk factors. Additionally, our understanding of what constitutes a risk factor for delirium has evolved, and in particular, it has been recognized that delirium can sometimes be a byproduct of our interventions and health care systems. In the surgical setting, for example, optimization of risk factors prior to surgery, when possible, is now seen as a key way to prevent postoperative delirium. Similarly, critical care medicine now operates with the appreciation of the profound risk to patients of prolonged mechanical ventilation, sedation, and immobilization and seeks to minimize each to reduce the risk of delirium, among other negative effects. The future of delirium prevention and management lies in both better implementation of best practices that have been defined over the last three decades as well as taking more of a whole patient view. This includes harnessing the electronic medical record, artificial intelligence, and so on to risk assess and individualize care for each patient; restructuring care to reduce deliriogenic practices and care environments; redefining what usual care looks like (e.g., utilizing music and involving loved ones, etc.); policy changes to change systematic priorities. In this paper, we will explore the past, present, and future of nonpharmacological prevention and management of delirium across care settings.

Pharmacologic Treatment Strategies for Delirium in Hospitalized Adults: Past, Present, and Future

Despite the use of multidomain prevention strategies, delirium still frequently occurs in hospitalized adults. With delirium often associated with undesirable symptoms and deleterious outcomes, including cognitive decline, treatment is important. Risk-factor reduction and the protocolized use of multidomain, nonpharmacologic bundles remain the mainstay of delirium treatment. There is a current lack of strong evidence to suggest any pharmacologic intervention to treat delirium will help resolve it faster, reduce its symptoms (other than agitation), facilitate hospital throughput, or improve post-hospital outcomes including long-term cognitive function. With the exception of dexmedetomidine as a treatment of severe delirium-associated agitation in the ICU, current practice guidelines do not recommend the routine use of any pharmacologic intervention to treat delirium in any hospital population. Future research should focus on identifying and evaluating new pharmacologic delirium treatment interventions and addressing key challenges and gaps surrounding delirium treatment research.

Improving Pain Management in the Intensive Care Unit by Assessment

PURPOSE

Patients in the intensive care unit suffer from pain caused by life-threatening illness or injury but also treatments such as surgery and nursing procedures such as venipuncture. Unconsciousness following head trauma or sedation stage complicates self-report, and both under- and over-management of pain can occur. Inadequate assessment and treatment might follow from unsuitable pain assessment practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the implementation of a pain assessment tool on nurses` documentation of pain and the administration of analgesia and sedation.

DESIGN

Quantitative pre-post design.

METHODS

The study was conducted at one intensive care unit at a university hospital and involved 60 patient records and 30 pre-implementations and 30 post-implementations of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT).

RESULTS

After implementation, a 38% adherence rate was found. The frequency of nurses' pain evaluations increased significantly from 1.3 to 2.3 per nursing shift. The implementation of CPOT also improved how often nurses identified pain by use of facial expressions, muscle tension, and cooperation with the mechanical ventilator, whereas focus on vital signs dropped (p = .014). A larger proportion of patients (17%) received paracetamol after the CPOT implementation compared with before (8%). Findings were statistically significant at p < .01.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of CPOT increased the frequency of pain evaluations, and the observable patient behavior was more often interpreted as pain-related. Nurses' adherence rate to sustained patient behavior focus being modest highlights the essential need for ongoing improvements in practice. Implementation of a new tool must be followed by non-pharmacological and pharmacological pain management steps.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Implementing the CPOT as a pain assessment tool has the potential to enhance assessment practices. However, it is important to note that simply increasing assessment frequency does not guarantee nursing interventions to alleviate pain. This indicates the need for additional steps to be taken in order for nurses to complete the pain assessment cycle and effectively address interventions and reassessments.

Early Rehabilitation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Providing early rehabilitation during critical illness is considered best practice; however, the respiratory compromise suffered by patients with ARDS often limits their capacity to participate in active exercise. This article outlines the current evidence regarding early rehabilitation in the ICU with a specific focus on the considerations for this cohort. It provides some practical recommendations to assist clinicians in the identification of appropriate early rehabilitation techniques, taking into account disease severity and medical management strategies. It outlines methods to ensure the safe implementation of early rehabilitation with the aim of improving the outcomes of ARDS survivors.