Opioid Use After Discharge in Postoperative Patients: A Systematic Review

Information and Access for Safe Narcotic Disposal: A Cluster-Randomized Trial Among Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgical Patients in Los Angeles County

INTRODUCTION

Greater than two-thirds of individuals report unused opioids following surgical procedures. The need for improved prescribing practices notwithstanding, efforts to improve safe narcotic disposal are requisite to decreasing aberrant narcotic availability and opioid-related hospitalizations. This study aimed to evaluate the additive efficacy of education and access to DEA-compliant narcotic return receptacles on narcotic disposal rates among pediatric orthopaedic surgical patients.

METHODS

From July 2021 to July 2023, patients aged 5 to 17 years at two disparate sites were recruited for enrollment. Cluster randomization was done weekly to determine whether education was given on safe narcotic disposal versus standard discharge instructions. Halfway through the study, narcotic disposal receptacles were introduced as an additive intervention. Postoperatively, participants were asked to self-report opioid disposal rates and complete the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short Form to gauge pain control. Two sample z test of proportions and Fisher exact tests were used to compare disposal rates from both the isolated and combined interventions.

RESULTS

Analysis was restricted to 131 of 576 total patients: 44 (33.6%) disposed of unused narcotic medications and 87 (66.4%) did not. No notable difference was observed in disposal rates between those who received education or not (28/70 [40.0%] vs. 16/61 [26.2%], P > 0.05) and those who had bin access or not (18/59 [30.5%] vs. 26/72 [36.1%], P > 0.05). Furthermore, no notable difference was found between the control group and combination intervention group receptacles (6/25 [24.0%] vs. 8/23 [34.8%], P > 0.05) or the education only and combination intervention group (20/47 [42.5%] vs. 8/23 [34.8%], P > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Neither preoperative education alone nor the addition of convenient disposal bins improved narcotic disposal rates following surgery.

CONCLUSION

Retention rates remained high despite either intervention. Therefore, efforts to decrease narcotic availability must be nuanced and multimodal. Further studies may investigate the role of longitudinal patient education to better influence risk perception and subsequent behavioral changes.

Exploring take-home opioid stewardship (ETHOS) in UK postoperative patients

Background

Surgery is one of the most common indications for a patient's first opioid prescription, with some patients progressing to unintended long-term use. There is no current data from the United Kingdom on how much patients use of the opioid medication dispensed at discharge from hospital. This study investigates discharge opioid prescribing and usage following common surgical procedures.

Methods

This cohort study was conducted at the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and involved 20 of the most commonly performed adult surgical procedures. At least 20 patients per procedure were surveyed using a standardised telephone questionnaire 6-8 days after discharge to establish the amount of used and unused opioids. Opioid doses were converted to oral morphine equivalent (OME) for analysis.

Results

The amount of opioid given to patients after all types of surgery far exceeded requirement, with often large variations in prescribing practices for the same procedures, most notably in trauma and orthopaedics.For the cohort of 426 patients, a total of 55 080 mg OME was dispensed on discharge, with only 34.4% actually used by patients, leaving a total of 36 108.5 mg OME unused in the community, risking inappropriate opioid use, overdose, or diversion.

Conclusions

Opioid overprescribing is common after surgery and represents waste, expense, and risk to patients. There is a clear need to develop a procedure-specific evidence-base for discharge opioid prescribing, adopting an "enough but not too much" approach to ensure that patients have adequate analgesia to facilitate functional surgical recovery, but not more than is needed.

Pharmacist-led DE-eSCALation of opioids post-surgical dischargE (DESCALE) - A multi-centre, non-randomised, feasibility study protocol

Background

Opioids are frequently prescribed for short-term acute pain following surgery. Used appropriately, opioids deliver extremely favourable pain relief. Used longer than 90-days, however, can result in health complications, including unintentional overdose and addiction. Globally, >40 million people are dependent on opioids and annually >100,000 die from opioid misuse. With >4.7 million surgical procedures occurring annually in the United Kingdom it is imperative that opioid-use is managed upon discharge. A declining General Practitioner (GP) workforce and increased patient numbers, however, means gaps in healthcare during transfer of care. Here we report a mixed-methods protocol to understand the feasibility, and acceptability of a clinical pharmacist (CP)-led early opioid deprescribing intervention for discharged surgical patients.

Methods

DESCALE is a multicentre, non-randomised, pragmatic feasibility study. Participants aged ≥18 years who have undergone a surgical procedure at a single NHS trust in Southeast England and discharged with opioids and without a history of long-term opioid use, cancer diagnosis or study contraindications will be offered a Medicines Use Review (MUR) within 7-10 days of discharge. The MUR will be delivered by CPs at participating GP practices. Feasibility outcomes will focus on recruitment, fidelity of CPs to deliver the MUR, and barriers within primary care that affect delivery of the intervention, with a maximum sample size of 100. Clinical outcomes will focus on the number of participants that reduce or stop opioid use within 91 days. Prescribing, medical, surgical, and demographic data for individual participants will be collected and analysed to inform future trial design. Qualitative interviews with participants and associated healthcare professionals will explore acceptability and implementation of the intervention.

Conclusion

Data collected with respect to opioid use post-surgery, feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, patient experience and outcome data will inform the design of future research and larger clinical trials.

Comparative Effectiveness of Different Opioid Regimens, in Daily Dose or Treatment Duration, Prescribed at Surgical Discharge: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Opioids are prescribed for postsurgical pain management, but a balance between achieving adequate pain control and minimising opioid-related harm is required. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of different opioid regimens, in daily dose or treatment duration, prescribed at surgical discharge.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and ICTRP was performed from inception to 12 January 2025. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs comparing different daily doses or treatment durations of opioid analgesics were included. All surgeries were included, except those related to cancer treatment or palliative care. Eligible populations were adults (≥ 18 years) or individuals classified as adults according to the criteria of the respective studies. Data were extracted at immediate-term (≤ 3 days), short-term (> 3 to ≤ 7 days), medium-term (> 7 to ≤ 30 days), and long-term (> 30 days). Data from RCTs were pooled using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed. Certainty of evidence from RCTs was evaluated with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). The primary outcome was pain intensity. Adverse events were also measured.

RESULTS

A total of 8432 records were identified. In total, 12 RCTs with 7128 patients and 24 non-RCTs with 118,849 patients were included. Studies included orthopaedic, gynaecology and obstetric surgeries, ranging from minor to major procedures. Higher-doses of opioids were more effective than lower-doses in reducing immediate pain intensity (mean difference (MD) 4.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-8.23, n = 364, three studies, I2 = 0%, high certainty). No difference in pain was found between higher-doses and lower-doses at other time points (moderate to high certainty). Longer-durations of opioid treatment showed no difference in pain at any time point (low to moderate certainty). More adverse events were reported with higher doses of opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher-dose opioids provide a slight reduction in immediate post-discharge pain intensity but may lead to more adverse events. Longer durations of opioid treatment are probably not more effective in reducing pain than shorter treatment durations. Our findings suggest that clinicians may choose to prescribe lower doses of opioids or shorter durations of opioids without compromising pain control, even for major surgery.

Opioid use patterns following discharge from elective colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Opioid overprescription after colorectal surgery can lead to adverse events, persistent opioid use, and diversion of unused pills. This study aims to assess the extent to which opioids prescribed at discharge after elective colorectal surgery are consumed by patients.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included adult patients (≥ 18 yo) undergoing elective colorectal surgery at two academic hospitals in Montreal, Canada. Patients completed preoperative questionnaires and data concerning demographics, surgical details, and perioperative care characteristics (including discharge prescriptions) were extracted from electronic medical records. Self-reported opioid consumption was assessed weekly up to 1-month post-discharge. The total number of opioid pills prescribed and consumed after discharge were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Negative binomial regression was used to identify predictors of opioid consumption.

RESULTS

We analyzed 344 patients (58 ± 15 years, 47% female, 65% laparoscopic, 31% rectal resection, median hospital stay 3 days [IQR 1-5], 18% same-day discharge). Most patients received a TAP block (67%). Analgesia prescription at discharge included acetaminophen (92%), NSAIDs (38%), and opioids (92%). The quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge (median 13 pills [IQR 7-20]) was significantly higher than patient-reported consumption at one month (median 0 pills [IQR 0-7]) (p < 0.001). Overall, 51% of patients did not consume any opioids post-discharge, and 63% of the prescribed pills were not used. Increased opioid consumption was associated with younger age (IRR 0.99 [95%CI 0.98-0.99]), higher preoperative anxiety (1.02 [95%CI 1.00-1.04]), rectal resections (IRR 1.45 [95%CI 1.09-1.94]), and number of pills prescribed (1.02 [95%CI 1.01-1.03]).

CONCLUSION

A considerable number of opioid pills prescribed at discharge after elective colorectal surgery are left unused by patients. Certain patient and care characteristics were associated with increased opioid consumption. Our findings indicate that post-discharge analgesia with minimal or no opioids may be feasible and warrants further investigation.

Analgesia After Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery in Europe-Potential for Reduction of Postoperative Opioid Usage

OBJECTIVE

Excessively prescribed opioids promote chronic drug abuse and worsen a highly prevalent public health problem in the era of the opioid epidemic. This study aimed to (a) determine general analgesic prescription patterns after surgery for vestibular schwannoma (VS) with a focus on opioid prescription rates, (b) identify risk factors for receiving narcotics for postoperative pain management, and (c) highlight the feasibility of opioid-free analgesic treatment strategies.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 105 adult inpatients who underwent VS surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Analgesic prescription patterns were evaluated, and factors associated with opioid prescriptions were identified.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Number of prescribed analgesics.

RESULTS

Metamizole (=dipyrone) and acetaminophen (=paracetamol) were the most frequently prescribed non-opioid drugs. Sixty-three (60%) patients received an opioid with a median intake of 23.2 ± 24 mg of oral morphine equivalents. Only 10 (9.5%) individuals received opioids for longer than postoperative day 1. Subjects with small tumors undergoing middle cranial fossa tumor removal (p = 0.007) were more likely to receive opioid drugs. In contrast, patients undergoing retrosigmoid craniotomy required fewer opioids for pain control (p = 0.004). Furthermore, individuals receiving opioids were prone to obtain higher dosages of acetaminophen (odds ratio 1.054, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.10, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioids for acute postoperative analgesia after VS surgery may be necessary in many patients. However, middle- and long-term pain control can be accomplished using non-opioid treatment regimens, resulting in a reduction in opioid prescriptions and the accompanying negative effects on individual and public health.

Impact of automated alerts on discharge opioid overprescribing after general surgery

PURPOSE

The objectives of this study were to identify the most performed surgical procedures associated with the highest rates of discharge opioid overprescribing and to implement an electronic health record (EHR) alert to reduce discharge opioid overprescribing.

METHODS

This quality improvement, before-and-after study included patients undergoing one of the identified target procedures-laparoscopic cholecystectomy, unilateral open inguinal hernia repair, and laparoscopic appendectomy-at an academic medical center. The alert notified providers when the prescribed opioid quantity exceeded guideline recommendations. The preimplementation cohort included surgical encounters from January 2020 to December 2021. The EHR alert was implemented in May 2022 following provider education via email and in-person presentations. The postimplementation cohort included surgical encounters from May to August 2022. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a discharge opioid supply exceeding guideline recommendations (overprescribing).

RESULTS

A total of 1,478 patients were included in the preimplementation cohort, and 141 patients were included in the postimplementation cohort. The proportion of patients with discharge opioid overprescribing decreased from 48% in the preimplementation cohort to 3% in the postimplementation cohort, with an unadjusted absolute reduction of 45% (95% confidence interval, 41% to 49%; P < 0.001) and an adjusted odds ratio of 0.03 (95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.08; P < 0.001). Among patients who received opioids, the mean (SD) opioid supply at discharge decreased from 92 (43) oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (before implementation) to 57 (20) MME (after implementation) (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients who received additional opioid prescriptions within 1 to 14 days following hospital discharge did not change (P = 0.76).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of an EHR alert along with provider education can reduce discharge opioid overprescribing following general surgery.

Chronic Opioid Prescribing After Common Otolaryngology Procedures in Adults

OBJECTIVE

(1) Describe short and long-term opioid prescribing patterns and variation after common otolaryngologic procedures and (2) assess risk factors for chronic opioid use in this cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Optum's deidentified Integrated Claims-Clinical data set.

METHODS

An adult cohort of patients undergoing common otolaryngology procedures from 2010 to 2017 was identified. Associations between procedure and other covariates with any initial opioid prescription and continuous opioid prescriptions were assessed with multivariable modeling. Opioid use was defined as continuous if a new prescription was filled within 30 days of the previous prescription. A time-to-event analysis assessed continuous prescriptions from the index procedure to end of the last continuous opioid prescription.

RESULTS

Among a cohort of 19,819 patients undergoing predominately laryngoscopy procedures (12,721, 64.2%), 2585 (13.0%) received an opioid prescription with variation in receiving a prescription, daily dose, and total initially prescribed dose varying by procedure, patient demographics, provider characteristics, and facility type. Opioids were prescribed most frequently after tonsillectomy (45.4%) and least frequently after laryngoscopy with interventions (3.9%), which persisted in the multivariable models. Overall rates of continuous use at 180 and 360 days were 0.48% and 0.27%, respectively. Among patients receiving an initial opioid prescription, maintaining continuous prescriptions was associated with tonsillectomy procedures, age (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.997 per year, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.993-0.999), opioid prescriptions 6 months preprocedure (aHR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.37-0.47), and nonotolaryngology initial prescribers (aHRs: <1, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

There is substantial variation in initial prescribing practices and continuous opioid prescriptions after common Otolaryngology procedures, but the overall rate of maintaining a continuous prescription starting after these procedures is very low.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Opioid Prescribing for Acute Pain Management in Children and Adolescents in Outpatient Settings: Clinical Practice Guideline

This is the first clinical practice guideline (CPG) from the American Academy of Pediatrics outlining evidence-based approaches to safely prescribing opioids for acute pain in outpatient settings. The central goal is to aid clinicians in understanding when opioids may be indicated to treat acute pain in children and adolescents and how to minimize risks (including opioid use disorder, poisoning, and overdose). The document also seeks to alleviate disparate pain treatment of Black, Hispanic, and American Indian/Alaska Native children and adolescents, who receive pain management that is less adequate and less timely than that provided to white individuals. There may also be disparities in pain treatment based on language, socioeconomic status, geographic location, and other factors, which are discussed. The document recommends that clinicians treat acute pain using a multimodal approach that includes the appropriate use of nonpharmacologic therapies, nonopioid medications, and, when needed, opioid medications. Opioids should not be prescribed as monotherapy for children or adolescents who have acute pain. When using opioids for acute pain management, clinicians should prescribe immediate-release opioid formulations, start with the lowest age- and weight-appropriate doses, and provide an initial supply of 5 or fewer days, unless the pain is related to trauma or surgery with expected duration of pain longer than 5 days. Clinicians should not prescribe codeine or tramadol for patients younger than 12 years; adolescents 12 to 18 years of age who have obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, or severe lung disease; to treat postsurgical pain after tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy in patients younger than 18 years; or for any breastfeeding patient. The CPG recommends providing opioids when appropriate for treating acutely worsened pain in children and adolescents who have a history of chronic pain; clinicians should partner with other opioid-prescribing clinicians involved in the patient's care and/or a specialist in chronic pain or palliative care to determine an appropriate treatment plan. Caution should be used when treating acute pain in those who are taking sedating medications. The CPG describes potential harms of discontinuing or rapidly tapering opioids in individuals who have been on stable, long-term opioids to treat chronic pain. The guideline also recommends providing naloxone and information on naloxone, safe storage and disposal of opioids, and direct observation of medication administration. Clinicians are encouraged to help caregivers develop a plan for safe disposal. The CPG contains 12 key action statements based on evidence from randomized controlled trials, high-quality observational studies, and, when studies are lacking or could not feasibly or ethically be conducted, from expert opinion. Each key action statement includes a level of evidence, the benefit-harm relationship, and the strength of recommendation.

Opioid Consumption After Upper Extremity Surgery: A Systematic Review

There is currently an overprescription of opioids, which may result in abuse and diversion of narcotics. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate opioid prescription practices and consumption by patients after upper extremity surgery. This review was registered a priori on Open Science Framework (osf.io/6u5ny) and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A search strategy was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases (from their inception to October 17, 2021). Prospective studies investigating opioid consumption of patients aged 18 years or older undergoing upper extremity surgeries were included. The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions and Risk of Bias 2.0 tools were used for quality assessment. In total, 21 articles met the inclusion criteria, including 7 randomized controlled trials and 14 prospective cohort studies. This represented 4195 patients who underwent upper extremity surgery. Most patients took less than half of the prescribed opioids. The percentage of opioids consumed ranged from 11% to 77%. There was moderate to severe risk of bias among the included studies. This review demonstrated that there is routinely excessive opioid prescription relative to consumption after upper limb surgery. Additional randomized trials are warranted, particularly with standardized reporting of opioid consumption and assessment of patient-reported outcomes.

Association of Opioid Disposal Practices with Parental Education and a Home Opioid Disposal Kit Following Pediatric Ambulatory Surgery

BACKGROUND

The majority of opioid analgesics prescribed for pain after ambulatory pediatric surgery remain unused. Most parents do not dispose of these leftover opioids or dispose of them in an unsafe manner. We aimed to evaluate the association of optimal opioid disposal with a multidisciplinary quality improvement (QI) initiative that proactively educated parents about the importance of optimal opioid disposal practices and provided a home opioid disposal kit before discharge after pediatric ambulatory surgery.

METHODS

Opioid disposal behaviors were assessed during a brief telephone interview pre- (Phase I) and post-implementation (Phase II) after surgery. For each phase, we aimed to contact the parents of 300 pediatric patients ages 0 to 17 years who were prescribed an opioid after an ambulatory surgery. The QI initiative included enhanced education and a home opioid disposal kit including DisposeRX®, a medication disposal packet that renders medications inert within a polymeric gel when mixed with water. Weighted segmented regression models evaluated the association between the QI initiative and outcomes. We considered the association between the QI initiative and outcome significant if the beta coefficient for the change in intercept between the end of Phase I and the beginning of Phase II was significant. Safe opioid disposal and any opioid disposal were evaluated as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The analyzed sample contained 161 pediatric patients in Phase I and 190 pediatric patients in Phase II. Phase II (post-QI initiative) cohort compared to Phase I cohort reported higher rates of optimal (58%, n = 111/190 vs 11%, n = 18/161) and safe (66%, n = 125/190 vs 34%, n = 55/161) opioid disposal. Weighted segmented regression analyses demonstrated significant increases in the odds of optimal (odds ratio [OR], 26.5, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-177.0) and safe (OR, 4.4, 95% CI, 1.1-18.4) opioid disposal at the beginning of Phase II compared to the end of Phase I. The trends over time (slopes) within phases were nonsignificant and close to 0. The numbers needed to be exposed to achieve one new disposal event were 2.2 (95% CI, 1.4-3.7]), 3.1 (95% CI, 1.6-7.4), and 4.3 (95% CI, 1.7-13.6) for optimal, safe, and any disposal, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach to educating parents on the importance of safe disposal of leftover opioids paired with dispensing a convenient opioid disposal kit was associated with increased odds of optimal opioid disposal.

Virtual Reality as a Pain Control Adjunct in Orthopedics: A Narrative Review

Orthopedic surgeons typically prescribe opioids for postoperative pain management as they are effective in managing pain. However, opioid use can lead to issues such as overdose, prescription excess, inadequate pain management, and addiction. Virtual reality (VR) therapy is an alternative route for postoperative pain management that has grown in popularity over the years. VR therapy involves immersing patients in a virtual 3D experience that is anticipated to alleviate pain. In this review article, we summarized the findings of numerous PubMed studies on the effectiveness of VR therapy for postoperative pain control. VR therapy is beneficial for reducing anxiety, pain, and opioid use after surgical procedures across various specialties. Further studies should explore VR therapy in orthopedic procedures.

Effectiveness of a discharge analgesia guideline on discharge opioid prescribing after a surgical procedure from a tertiary metropolitan hospital

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a discharge analgesia guideline on the number of days' supply of opioid analgesics provided among surgical patients upon hospital discharge. The secondary objective was to analyze the effect of this guideline on the provision of an analgesic discharge plan.

DESIGN

A retrospective historical control cohort study.

SETTING

A tertiary metropolitan hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

A discharge analgesia guideline recommending the supply of opioid analgesics on discharge based on patient use in the 24 hours prior to discharge and the supply of an analgesic discharge plan.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome measure was the number of days' supply of opioids. The secondary outcome measure was the proportion of patients receiving an analgesic discharge plan.

RESULTS

There was no change in the number of days' supply of opioids provided on discharge (median, interquartile range: 5, 3-9.75 vs 6, 4-10; p = 0.107) and in the proportion of patients receiving an analgesic discharge plan (26 percent vs 22.2 percent; p = 0.604). The results of two multivariable regression models showed no change in the number of days' supply of opioids (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 1.1, 0.9-1.2) and the provision of an analgesic discharge plan (adjusted odds ratio, 95 percent CI: 0.6, 0.2-1.4) after adjusting for confounding variables.

CONCLUSION

Overall, our study found no change in the number of days' supply of opioids provided on discharge and the provision of an analgesic discharge plan after implementation of a discharge analgesia guideline, but we also found that prescribing practices already aligned with the guideline before its implementation.

Experiences and perspectives of adults on using opioids for pain management in the postoperative period: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Opioids play an important role in peri-operative pain management. However, opioid use is challenging for healthcare practitioners and patients because of concerns related to opioid crises, addiction and side effects.

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to identify and synthesise the existing evidence related to adults' experiences of opioid use in postoperative pain management.

DESIGN

Systematic scoping review of qualitative studies. Inductive content analysis and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) were applied to analyse and report the findings and to identify unexplored gaps in the literature.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Library and Google Scholar.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All qualitative and mixed-method studies, in English, that not only used a qualitative approach that explored adults' opinions or concerns about opioids and/or opioid reduction, and adults' experience related to opioid use for postoperative pain control, including satisfaction, but also aspects of overall quality of a person's life (physical, mental and social well being).

RESULTS

Ten studies were included; nine were qualitative ( n  = 9) and one used mixed methods. The studies were primarily conducted in Europe and North America. Concerns about opioid dependence, adverse effects, stigmatisation, gender roles, trust and shared decision-making between clinicians and patients appeared repeatedly throughout the studies. The TDF analysis showed that many peri-operative factors formed people's perceptions and experiences of opioids, driven by the following eight domains: Knowledge, Emotion, Beliefs about consequences, Beliefs about capabilities, Self-confidence, Environmental Context and Resources, Social influences and Decision Processes/Goals. Adults have diverse pain management goals, which can be categorised as proactive and positive goals, such as individualised pain management care, as well as avoidance goals, aimed at sidestepping issues such as addiction and opioid-related side effects.

CONCLUSION

It is desirable to understand the complexity of adults' experiences of pain management especially with opioid use and to support adults in achieving their pain management goals by implementing an individualised approach, effective communication and patient-clinician relationships. However, there is a dearth of studies that examine patients' experiences of postoperative opioid use and their involvement in opioid usage decision-making. A summary is provided regarding adults' experiences of peri-operative opioid use, which may inform future researchers, healthcare providers and guideline development by considering these factors when improving patient care and experiences.

Postoperative opioids administered to inpatients with major or orthopaedic surgery: A retrospective cohort study using data from hospital electronic prescribing systems

BACKGROUND

Opioids administered in hospital during the immediate postoperative period are likely to influence post-surgical outcomes, but inpatient prescribing during the admission is challenging to access. Modified-release(MR) preparations have been especially associated with harm, whilst certain populations such as the elderly or those with renal impairment may be vulnerable to complications. This study aimed to assess postoperative opioid utilisation patterns during hospital stay for people admitted for major/orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

Patients admitted to a teaching hospital in the North-West of England between 2010-2021 for major/orthopaedic surgery with an admission for ≥1 day were included. We examined opioid administrations in the first seven days post-surgery in hospital, and "first 48 hours" were defined as the initial period. Proportions of MR opioids, initial immediate-release(IR) oxycodone and initial morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day were calculated and summarised by calendar year. We also assessed the proportion of patients prescribed an opioid at discharge.

RESULTS

Among patients admitted for major/orthopaedic surgery, 71.1% of patients administered opioids during their hospitalisation. In total 50,496 patients with 60,167 hospital admissions were evaluated. Between 2010-2017 MR opioids increased from 8.7% to 16.1% and dropped to 11.6% in 2021. Initial use of oxycodone IR among younger patients (≤70 years) rose from 8.3% to 25.5% (2010-2017) and dropped to 17.2% in 2021. The proportion of patients on ≥50MME/day ranged from 13% (2021) to 22.9% (2010). Of the patients administered an opioid in hospital, 26,920 (53.3%) patients were discharged on an opioid.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients hospitalised with major/orthopaedic surgery, 4 in 6 patients were administered an opioid. We observed a high frequency of administered MR opioids in adult patients and initial oxycodone IR in the ≤70 age group. Patients prescribed with ≥50MME/day ranged between 13-22.9%. This is the first published study evaluating UK inpatient opioid use, which highlights opportunities for improving safer prescribing in line with latest recommendations.

How low can we go? A randomized controlled trial of low-quantity initial opioid prescriptions for shoulder surgery

BACKGROUND

Orthopedic surgeons are the third most frequent prescribers of opioid medications. Given the current opioid addiction crisis, it is critical to limit opioid prescriptions to the lowest effective dose. In this study, we investigated how the initial opioid prescription after shoulder surgery affects maximum possible opioid consumption. We hypothesized that fewer pills in the initial opioid prescription would lead to less opioid consumption, a lower refill request rate, and fewer post-surgery office contacts for pain.

METHODS

In this single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial, 74 adults who underwent shoulder arthroplasty, rotator cuff repair, or other arthroscopic shoulder procedures were enrolled from December 2020 to July 2022. Follow-up was completed by February 2023. Participants were randomly assigned to receive postoperative prescriptions of seven 5-mg oxycodone pills (n = 20), 15 pills (n = 29), or 23 pills (n = 25). The primary outcome was maximum possible opioid consumption within 2 weeks after surgery, calculated by assuming consumption of all pills in the initial prescription, as well as any refills. Secondary outcomes were the opioid prescription refill request rates, post-surgery pain-related telephone calls or messages to the provider's office ("office contacts") within 2 weeks after surgery, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons pain scores 2 weeks after surgery. Baseline characteristics did not differ among groups except for mean age, which was younger in the 7-pill group (P = .047).

RESULTS

Maximum possible opioid consumption increased with the number of pills initially prescribed, with means of 78 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for the 7-pill group, 118 MME for the 15-pill group, and 199 MME for the 23-pill group (P < .001). None of the secondary outcome measures differed among groups. Refill request rates were 20% for the 7-pill group, 3.4% for the 15-pill group, and 12% for the 23-pill group (P = .20). The proportions of patients with at least 1 office contact were 35% in the 7-pill group, 45% in the 15-pill group, and 28% in the 23-pill group (P = .43). Mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons pain scores were 49 in the 7-pill group, 44 in the 15-pill group, and 40 in the 23-pill group (P = .20).

CONCLUSION

After shoulder surgery, an initial prescription of fewer opioid pills was associated with less maximum possible opioid consumption without an increase in the percentage of patients requesting opioid refills or contacting the provider's office for pain-related concerns. An initial postoperative prescription of fewer 5-mg oxycodone pills may be equally or more effective compared with larger quantities for most patients.

Postoperative Opioid Prescribing via Rule-Based Guidelines Derived from In-Hospital Consumption: An Assessment of Efficacy Based on Postdischarge Opioid Use

BACKGROUND

Many institutions have developed operation-specific guidelines for opioid prescribing. These guidelines rarely incorporate in-hospital opioid consumption, which is highly correlated with consumption. We compare outcomes of several patient-centered approaches to prescribing that are derived from in-hospital consumption, including several experimental, rule-based prescribing guidelines and our current institutional guideline.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective, cohort study of all adults undergoing surgery at a single-academic medical center. Several rule-based guidelines, derived from in-hospital consumption (quantity of opioids consumed within 24 hours of discharge), were used to specify the theoretical quantity of opioid prescribed on discharge. The efficacy of the experimental guidelines was compared with 3 references: an approximation of our institution's tailored prescribing guideline; prescribing all patients the typical quantity of opioids consumed for patients undergoing the same operation; and a representative rule-based, tiered framework. For each scenario, we calculated the penalized residual sum of squares (reflecting the composite deviation from actual patient consumption, with 15% penalty for overprescribing) and the proportion of opioids consumed relative to prescribed.

RESULTS

A total of 1,048 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean (SD) and median (interquartile range [IQR]) quantity of opioids consumed within 24 hours of discharge were 11.2 (26.9) morphine milligram equivalents and 0 (0 to 15) morphine milligram equivalents. Median (IQR) postdischarge consumption was 16 (0 to 150) morphine milligram equivalents. Our institutional guideline and the previously validated rule-based guideline outperform alternate approaches, with median (IQR) differences in prescribed vs consumed opioids of 0 (-60 to 27.25) and 37.5 (-37.5 to 37.5), respectively, corresponding to penalized residual sum of squares of 39,817,602 and 38,336,895, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Rather than relying on fixed quantities for defined operations, rule-based guidelines offer a simple yet effective method for tailoring opioid prescribing to in-hospital consumption.

Association Between Opioid-Related Mortality and History of Surgical Procedure: A Population-Based Case-Control Study

Objective

This study examined whether there is an association between opioid-related mortality and surgical procedures.

Methods

A case-control study design using deceased controls compared individuals with and without opioid death and their exposure to common surgeries in the preceding 4 years. This population-based study used linked death and hospitalization databases in Canada (excluding Quebec) from January 01, 2008 to December 31, 2017. Cases of opioid death were identified and matched to 5 controls who died of other causes by age (±4 years), sex, province of death, and date of death (±1 year). Patients with HIV infection and alcohol-related deaths were excluded from the control group. Logistic regression was used to determine if there was an association between having surgery and death from an opioid-related cause by estimating the crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Covariates included sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and the number of days of hospitalization in the previous 4 years.

Results

We identified 11,865 cases and matched them with 59,345 controls. About 11.2% of cases and 12.5% of controls had surgery in the 4 years before their death, corresponding to a crude OR of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.83-0.94). After adjustment, opioid mortality was associated with surgical procedure with OR of 1.26 (95% CI: 1.17-1.36).

Conclusions

After adjusting for comorbidities, patients with opioid mortality were more likely to undergo surgical intervention within 4 years before their death. Clinicians should enhance screening for opioid use and risk factors when considering postoperative opioid prescribing.

Minimal differences in acute postoperative pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps versus hamstring autograft

Studies are lacking that evaluate early postoperative pain after all-soft-tissue quadriceps tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), particularly in young patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in early postoperative pain between adolescent patients undergoing ACLR with quadriceps tendon versus hamstring autograft. A retrospective review was performed of 60 patients (mean age, 15.6 ± 1.3 years) who underwent ACLR using either quadriceps tendon ( n  = 31) or hamstring ( n  = 29) autografts between January 2017 and February 2020. Intraoperative and postoperative milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs), postanesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay and PACU pain scores were recorded. Pain scores and supplemental oxycodone use were recorded on postoperative days (POD) 1-3. Differences were compared between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, body mass index or concomitant meniscus repairs between the two groups ( P  > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative MMEs, PACU MMEs or PACU length of stay between groups ( P  > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in maximum PACU pain scores (3.7 ± 3.0 vs. 3.8 ± 3.2; P  = 0.89). Maximum pain scores on POD 1-3 were similar between groups ( P  > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in supplemental oxycodone doses between groups on POD 1-3 ( P  > 0.05). Adolescent patients undergoing ACLR with quadriceps tendon and hamstring autografts have similar pain levels and opioid use in the early postoperative period.

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Results in Significant Opioid Reduction in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the effectiveness of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block for pain control intraoperatively in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (primary-27130) (THA), compared to opioid based analgesia. The PENG block is an emerging regional anesthesia technique that aims to provide hip analgesia with preservation of motor function offering benefit over existing regional techniques while reducing overall opioid requirements.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort chart review and analysis.

METHODS

A single-site, retrospective chart review was performed for individuals undergoing THAs at a community hospital from 2019 to 2022 (N = 123). Anesthesia records were collected and observed for multiple data points including peripheral nerve block provided, micrograms of fentanyl administered before and during the case, additional medications given, and additional nerve blocks performed. The demographic data included birth date, sex, and procedure date.

FINDINGS

For statistical analysis only, patients receiving PENG (59) were compared to those receiving only intravenous analgesia (No Block-57). Statistically and clinically significant reductions in fentanyl administration and morphine equivalents were found in the population receiving PENG blocks. The mean intraoperative fentanyl given to the No Block group was 292.98 mcg versus 50.42 mcg in the PENG group (P < .05). Mean morphine equivalents given in the No Block group was 23.51 mg versus 11.21 mg in the PENG group (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Receiving a PENG block preoperatively resulted in clinically and statistically significant opioid reduction during the perioperative period when compared with patients who did not receive a regional block.

Learning from the implementation of a surgical opioid reduction initiative in an integrated health system: a qualitative study among providers and patients

BACKGROUND

Surgical opioid overprescribing can result in long-term use or misuse. Between July 2018 and March 2019, the multicomponent intervention, Minimizing Opioid Prescribing in Surgery (MOPiS) was implemented in the general surgery clinics of five hospitals and successfully reduced opioid prescribing. To date, various studies have shown a positive outcome of similar reduction initiatives. However, in addition to evaluating the impact on clinical outcomes, it is important to understand the implementation process of an intervention to extend sustainability of interventions and allow for dissemination of the intervention into other contexts. This study aims to evaluate the contextual factors impacting intervention implementation.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews held with providers and patients of the general surgery clinics of five hospitals of a single health system between March and November of 2019. Interview questions focused on how contextual factors affected implementation of the intervention. We coded interview transcripts deductively, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify the relevant contextual factors. Content analyses were conducted using a constant comparative approach to identify overarching themes.

RESULTS

We interviewed 15 clinicians (e.g., surgeons, nurses), 1 quality representative, 1 scheduler, and 28 adult patients and identified 3 key themes. First, we found high variability in the responses of clinicians and patients to the intervention. There was a strong need for intervention components to be locally adaptable, particularly for the format and content of the patient and clinician education materials. Second, surgical pain management should be recognized as a team effort. We identified specific gaps in the engagement of team members, including nurses. We also found that the hierarchical relationships between surgical residents and attendings impacted implementation. Finally, we found that established patient and clinician views on opioid prescribing were an important facilitator to effective implementation.

CONCLUSION

Successful implementation of a complex set of opioid reduction interventions in surgery requires locally adaptable elements of the intervention, a team-centric approach, and an understanding of patient and clinician views regarding changes being proposed.

Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors Do Not Affect Healing After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine whether non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors affect healing rate, functional outcomes, and patient satisfaction after rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the use of NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Primary outcomes included healing and retear rate, determined by radiological imaging. Secondary outcomes included shoulder-specific outcome measures and the visual analog scale (VAS). Risk of bias was graded using the Cochrane risk-of-bias v2.0 tool. The GRADE framework was used to assess certainty of findings.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs with a total of 507 patients were included (298 randomized to NSAID/COX-2 vs 209 randomized to control). NSAIDs use did not yield a difference in retear rate (P = .77). NSAIDs were shown to significantly reduce pain in the perioperative period (P = .01); however, no significant difference was present at a minimum of 6 months (P = .11). COX-2 inhibitors did not significantly reduce pain (P = .15). Quantitative analysis of ASES and UCLA scores showed NSAIDs significantly improved functional outcomes versus control (P = .004). COX-2 inhibitors did not significantly improve functional outcomes (P = .15). Two trials were deemed "low" risk of bias, four trials were graded to have "some concerns", and one trial was graded to have "high" risk of bias. Retear rate and functional PROMs were deemed to have "low" certainty. VAS pain scale was graded to have "moderate" certainty.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that NSAIDs do not affect healing rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, but they do significantly improve postoperative pain and functional outcomes. No significant difference was seen in pain or functional outcomes with the use of COX-2 inhibitors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Mismatched Postsurgical Opioid Prescription to Liver Transplant Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a Single High-volume Transplant Center

BACKGROUND

Improper opioid prescription after surgery is a well-documented iatrogenic contributor to the current opioid epidemic in North America. In fact, opioids are known to be overprescribed to liver transplant patients, and liver transplant patients with high doses or prolonged postsurgical opioid use have higher risks of graft failure and death.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 552 opioid-naive patients undergoing liver transplant at an academic center between 2012 and 2019. The primary outcome was the discrepancy between the prescribed discharge opioid daily dose and each patient's own inpatient opioid consumption 24 h before discharge. Variables were analyzed with Wilcoxon and chi-square tests and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Opioids were overprescribed in 65.9% of patients, and 54.3% of patients who required no opioids the day before discharge were discharged with opioid prescriptions. In contrast, opioids were underprescribed in 13.4% of patients, among whom 27.0% consumed inpatient opioids but received no discharge opioid prescription. The median prescribed opioid daily dose was 333.3% and 56.3% of the median inpatient opioid daily dose in opioid overprescribed and underprescribed patients, respectively. Importantly, opioid underprescribed patients had higher rates of opioid refill 1 to 30 and 31 to 90 d after discharge, and the rate of opioid underprescription more than doubled from 2016 to 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioids are both over- and underprescribed to liver transplant patients, and opioid underprescribed patients had higher rates of opioid refill. Therefore, we proposed to prescribe discharge opioid prescriptions based on liver transplant patients' inpatient opioid consumption to provide patient-centered opioid prescriptions.

Feasibility of implementing a screening tool for risk of opioid misuse in a trauma surgical population

Background

As the opioid crisis continues to affect communities across the United States, new interventions for screening and prevention are needed to mitigate its impact. Mental health diagnoses have been identified as a risk factor for opioid misuse, and surgical populations and injury survivors are at high risk for prolonged opioid use and misuse. This study investigated the implementation of a novel opioid risk screening tool that incorporated putative risk factors from a recent study in four trauma units across Wisconsin.

Method

The screening tool was implemented across a 6-month period at four sites. Data was collected via monthly meeting notes and "Plan, Do, Study, Act" (PDSA) forms. Following implementation, focus groups reflected on the facilitators and barriers to implementation. Meeting notes, PDSA forms, and focus group data were analyzed using the consolidated framework for implementation research, followed by thematic analyses, to generate themes surrounding the facilitators and barriers to implementing an opioid misuse screener.

Results

Implementation facilitators included ensuring patient understanding of the screener, minimizing staff burden from screening, and educating staff to encourage engagement. Barriers included infrastructure limitations that prevented seamless administration of the screener within current workflows, overlap of the screener with existing measures, and lack of guidance surrounding treatment options corresponding to risk. Recommended solutions to address barriers include careful timing of screener administration, accommodating workflows, integration of the screening tool within the electronic health record, and evidence-based interventions guided by screener results.

Conclusion

Four trauma centers across Wisconsin successfully implemented a pilot opioid misuse screening tool. Trauma providers and unit staff members believe that this tool would be a beneficial addition to their repertoire if their recommendations were adopted. Future research should refine opioid misuse risk factors and ensure screening items are well-validated with psychometric research supporting treatment responses to screener-indicated risk categories.

Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Practices and Patient Opioid Utilization in Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Patients

INTRODUCTION

Amid a national opioid epidemic, it is essential to review the necessity of opioid prescriptions. Research in adults has demonstrated patients often do not use their entire postoperative opioid prescription. Limited data suggest that the trend is similar in children. This study investigated the prescription volume and postoperative utilization rate of opioids among pediatric orthopaedic surgery patients at our institution.

METHODS

We identified pediatric patients (ages below 18 y old) who presented to our institution for operating room intervention from May 24, 2021, to December 13, 2021. Patient demographics and opioid prescription volume were recorded. Parents and guardians were surveyed by paper "opioid diary" or phone interview between postoperative days 10 to 15, assessing pain level, opioid use, and plans for remaining opioid doses. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Independent t test, and Pearson correlation were used for the analysis of continuous variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for patient demographic variables while analyzing opioid usage relationships.

RESULTS

Prescription volume information was collected for 280 patients during the study period. We were able to collect utilization information for 102 patients (Group 1), whereas the remaining 178 patients contributed only prescription volume data (Group 2). Patients with upper extremity fractures received significantly fewer opioid doses at discharge compared with other procedure types ( P =0.036). Higher BMI was positively correlated with more prescribed opioid doses ( R2 =0.647, P <0.001). The mean opioid utilization rate was 22.37%. A total of 50.6% of patients prescribed opioids at discharge used zero doses. A total of 96.2% of patients used opioids for 5 days or less. Most families had not disposed of excess medication by postoperative day 10.

CONCLUSIONS

We found significant differences in opioid prescribing practices based on patient and procedure-specific variables. In addition, although our pediatric orthopaedic surgery patients had low overall rates of postoperative opioid utilization, there was significant variation in opioid use among procedure types. These results provide insights that can guide opioid prescribing practices for pediatric orthopaedic patients and promote patient education to ensure safe opioid disposal.

Successful implementation of a quality improvement bundle to reduce opioid overprescribing following total hip and knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Opioid overprescribing is commonplace after total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Preliminary data demonstrated that approximately 32% of the opioids prescribed at discharge from our hospital following THA and TKA remain unused. This is a concern given that unused prescribed opioids are available for diversion and may result in misuse and abuse.

METHODS

Pre-intervention data were collected between 1 November 2018 and 10 December 2018. An intervention bundle was then introduced, including education of patients and providers, a standardised pain management algorithm and an autopopulated discharge prescription. The aim of this quality improvement initiative was to reduce the amount of opioid (average oral morphine equivalents (OME)) dispensed (based on the discharge prescription provided) following THA and TKA at our institution by 15% by 1 April 2019.

DESIGN

Using an interrupted time series design, the outcome measure was the amount of opioid (OME) dispensed from the discharge prescription provided. Process measures included the percentage of autopopulated discharge prescriptions, the percentage of patients receiving education at discharge and the percentage of nurses and residents receiving standardised education. Balancing measures included patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management, and the percentage of patients filling the second half of the part-fill or requiring a subsequent opioid prescription.

RESULTS

With 600 patients identified, mean OME dispensed at discharge was reduced by 26.3% (from 522.2 to 384.9 mg) after our interventions started. Utilisation of autopopulated part-fill prescriptions was 95.8%. There was no change in patient satisfaction nor in the proportion of patients requiring an additional opioid prescription post-intervention. Only 39% of patients filled the second half of the part-fill prescription post-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean OME dispensed at discharge per patient was reduced with no change in patient satisfaction after introduction of the intervention bundle.

Application of surface-layer matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging to pharmaceutical-loaded poly(ester urea) films

Polymer thin films are often used in transdermal patches as a method of continuous drug administration for patients with chronic illness. Understanding the drug segregation and distribution within these films is important for monitoring proper drug release over time. Surface-layer matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging (SL-MALDI-MSI) is a unique analytical technique that provides an optical representation of chemical compositions that exist at the surface of polymeric materials. Solvent-free sublimation is employed for application of matrix to the sample surface, so that only molecules in direct contact with the matrix layer are detected. Here, these methodologies are utilized to visualize variations in drug concentration at both the air and substrate interface in pharmaceutical-loaded polymer films.

Comparing Rationale for Opioid Prescribing Decisions after Surgery with Subsequent Patient Consumption: A Survey of the Highest Quartile of Prescribers

BACKGROUND

Opioid prescribing patterns, including those after surgery, have been implicated as a significant contributor to the US opioid crisis. A plethora of interventions-from nudges to reminders-have been deployed to improve prescribing behavior, but reasons for persistent outlier behavior are often unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Our institution employs multiple prescribing resources and a near real-time, feedback-based intervention to promote appropriate opioid prescribing. Since 2019, an automated system has emailed providers when a prescription exceeds the 75th percentile of typical opioid consumption for a given procedure-as defined by institutional data collection. Emails include population consumption metrics and an optional survey on rationale for prescribing. Responses were analyzed to understand why providers choose to prescribe atypically large discharge opioid prescriptions. We then compared provider prescriptions against patient consumption.

RESULTS

During the study period, 10,672 eligible postsurgical patients were discharged; 2,013 prescriptions (29.4% of opioid prescriptions) exceeded our institutional guideline. Surveys were completed by outlier prescribers for 414 (20.6%) encounters. Among patients where both consumption data and prescribing rationale surveys were available, 35.2% did not consume any opioids after discharge and 21.5% consumed <50% of their prescription. Only 93 (39.9%) patients receiving outlier prescriptions were outlier consumers. Most common reasons for prescribing outlier amounts were attending preference (34%) and prescriber analysis of patient characteristics (34%).

CONCLUSIONS

The top quartile of opioid prescriptions did not align with, and often far exceeded, patient postdischarge opioid consumption. Providers cite assessment of patient characteristics as a common driver of decision-making, but this did not align with patient usage for approximately 50% of patients.

Physician Characteristics Associated With Opioid Prescribing After Same-Day Breast Surgery in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Background and Objectives

Opioid overprescribing in patients undergoing breast surgery is a concern, as evidence suggests that minimal or no opioid is needed to manage pain. We sought to describe characteristics of opioid prescribers and determine associations between prescriber's characteristics and high opioid prescribing within 7 days of same-day breast surgery.

Methods

Patients ≥18 years of age who underwent same-day breast surgery in Ontario, Canada from 2012 to 2020 were identified and linked to prescriber data. The primary outcome was current high opioid prescribing defined as >75th percentile of the mean oral morphine equivalents (OME; milligrams). Prescriber characteristics including age, sex, specialty, years in practice, practice setting, and history of high (>75th percentile) opioid prescribing in the previous year were captured. Associations between prescriber characteristics and the primary outcome were estimated in modified Poisson regression models.

Results

The final cohort contained 56,434 patients, 3469 unique prescribers, and 58,656 prescriptions. Over half (1971/3469; 57%) of prescribers wrote ≥1 prescription that was >75th percentile of mean OME of 180 mg, of which 50% were family practice physicians. Adjusted mean OMEs prescribed varied by specialty with family practice specialties prescribing the highest mean OME (614 ± 38 mg) compared to surgical specialties (general surgery [165 ± 9 mg], plastic surgery [198 ± 10 mg], surgical oncology [154 ± 14 mg]). Whereas 73% of first and 31% of second prescriptions were provided by general surgery physicians, family practice physicians provided 2% of first and 51% of second prescriptions. Prescriber characteristics associated with a higher likelihood of high current opioid prescribing were family practice (risk ratio [RR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.79 compared to general surgery), larger community practice setting (RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.05-1.71 compared to urban), and a previous high opioid prescribing behavior (RR, 2.28; 95% CI, 2.06-2.52).

Conclusions

While most studies examine surgeon opioid prescribing, our data suggest that other specialties contribute to opioid overprescribing in surgical patients and identify characteristics of physicians likely to overprescribe.

Variability in Opioid Prescribing Among Plastic Surgery Residents After Bilateral Breast Reduction

BACKGROUND

Prescription opioid misuse in the United States accounts for significant avoidable morbidity and mortality. Over one third of all prescriptions written by surgeons are for opioids. Although opioids continue to provide needed analgesia for surgical patients, there are few guidelines in the plastic surgery literature for their safe and appropriate use after surgery. The consequence is wide variability and excessive opioid prescriptions. Understanding patterns of prescribing among plastic surgery residents is a crucial step toward developing safer practice models for managing postoperative pain.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of discharge opioid prescriptions after bilateral breast reduction at a single academic medical center from 2018 to 2021. Single factor 1-way analysis of variance was used to evaluate prescribing patterns by resident, postgraduate year, attending of record, and patient characteristics for 126 patients. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the degree to which these factors predicted opioid prescriptions.

RESULTS

This analysis revealed significant variability among residents prescribing opioids after bilateral breast reductions ( P < 0.001) irrespective of patient comorbidities and demographics. Residents were found to be the main predictor of opioid prescriptions after surgery ( P < 0.001) with a greater number of morphine milligram equivalents prescribed by the more junior residents ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive and variable opioid prescriptions among plastic surgery residents highlight the need for opioid prescribing education early in surgical training and improved oversight and communication with attending surgeons. Furthermore, implementation of evidence-based opioid-conscious analgesic protocols after common surgical procedures may improve patient safety by standardizing postoperative analgesic prescriptions.

Time trends and patterns in opioid prescription use following orthopaedic surgery in Ontario, Canada, from 2004/2005 to 2017/2018: a population-based study

OBJECTIVES

Increased use of opioids and their associated harms have raised concerns around prescription opioid use for pain management following surgery. We examined trends and patterns of opioid prescribing following elective orthopaedic surgery.

DESIGN

Population-based study.

SETTING

Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Ontario residents aged 66+ years who had elective orthopaedic surgery from April 2004 to March 2018.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative opioid use (short term: within 90 days of surgery, prolonged: within 180 days and chronic: within 1 year), specific opioids prescribed, average duration (days) and amount (morphine milligram equivalents) of the initial prescription by year of surgery.

RESULTS

We included 464 460 elective orthopaedic surgeries in 2004/2005-2017/2018: 80% of patients used opioids within 1 year of surgery-25.1% were chronic users. There was an 8% increase in opioid use within 1 year of surgery, from 75.1% in 2004/2005 to 80.9% in 2017/2018: a 29% increase in short-term use and a decline in prolonged (9%) and chronic (22%) use. After 2014/2015, prescribed opioid amounts initially declined sharply, while the duration of the initial prescription increased substantially. Across categories of use, there was a steady decline in coprescription of benzodiazepines and opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients filled opioid prescriptions after surgery, and many continued filling prescriptions after 3 months. During a period of general increase in awareness of opioid harms and dissemination of guidelines/policies aimed at opioid prescribing for chronic pain, we found changes in prescribing practices following elective orthopaedic surgery. Findings illustrate the potential impact of guidelines/policies on shaping prescription patterns in the surgical population, even in the absence of specific guidelines for surgical prescribing.

Mismatched opioid prescription in patients discharged after neurological surgeries: a retrospective cohort study

ABSTRACT

Although postsurgical overprescription has been well-studied, postsurgical opioid underprescription remains largely overlooked. This retrospective cohort study was to investigate the extent of discharge opioid overprescription and underprescription in patients after neurological surgeries. Six thousand nine hundred forty-nine adult opioid-naive patients who underwent inpatient neurosurgical procedures at the University of California San Francisco were included. The primary outcome was the discrepancy between individual patient's prescribed daily oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME) at discharge and patient's own inpatient daily MME consumed within 24 hours of discharge. Analyses include Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and χ 2 tests, and linear or multivariable logistic regression. 64.3% and 19.5% of patients were opioid overprescribed and underprescribed, respectively, with median prescribed daily MME 360% and 55.2% of median inpatient daily MME in opioid overprescribed and underprescribed patients, respectively. 54.6% of patients with no inpatient opioid the day before discharge were opioid overprescribed. Opioid underprescription dose-dependently increased the rate of opioid refill 1 to 30 days after discharge. From 2016 to 2019, the percentage of patients with opioid overprescription decreased by 24.8%, but the percentage of patients with opioid underprescription increased by 51.2%. Thus, the mismatched discharge opioid prescription in patients after neurological surgeries presented as both opioid overprescription and underprescription, with a dose-dependent increased rate of opioid refill 1 to 30 days after discharge in opioid underprescription. Although we are fighting against opioid overprescription to postsurgical patients, we should not ignore postsurgical opioid underprescription.

Prescription and consumption of opioids after bariatric surgery: a multicenter prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

In the current opioid crisis, bariatric surgical patients are at increased risk of harms related to postoperative opioid overprescribing. This study aimed to assess the extent to which opioids prescribed at discharge after bariatric surgery are consumed by patients.

METHODS

This multicenter prospective cohort study included adult patients (≥ 18yo) undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Preoperative assessments included demographics and patient-reported measures. Information regarding surgical and perioperative care interventions (including discharge prescriptions) was obtained from medical records. Self-reported opioid consumption was assessed weekly up to 30 days post-discharge. Number of opioid pills prescribed and consumed was compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Zero-inflated negative binomial regression was used to identify predictors of post-discharge opioid consumption.

RESULTS

We analyzed 351 patients (mean age 44 ± 11 years, BMI 45 ± 8.0 kg/m2, 77% female, 71% sleeve gastrectomy, length of stay 1.6 ± 0.6 days). The quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge (median 15 pills [IQR 15-16], 112.5 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) [IQR 80-112.5]) was significantly higher than patient-reported consumption (median 1 pill [IQR 0-5], 7.5 MMEs [IQR 0-37.5]) (p < 0.001). Overall, 37% of patients did not take any opioids post-discharge and 78.5% of the opioid pills prescribed were unused. Increased post-discharge opioid consumption was associated with male sex (IRR 1.54 [95%CI 1.14 to 2.07]), higher BMI (1.03 [95%CI 1.01 to 1.05]), preoperative opioid use (1.48 [95%CI 1.04 to 2.10]), current smoking (2.32 [95%CI 1.44 to 3.72]), higher PROMIS-29 depression score (1.03 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.04]), anastomotic procedures (1.33 [95%CI 1.01 to 1.75]), and number of pills prescribed (1.04 [95%CI 1.01 to 1.06]).

CONCLUSION

This study supports that most opioid pills prescribed to bariatric surgery patients at discharge are not consumed. Patient and procedure-related factors may predict opioid consumption. Individualized post-discharge analgesia strategies with minimal or no opioids may be feasible and should be further investigated in future research.

Standardizing Opioids Prescribed at Discharge in Trauma Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Excessive opioid use after sustaining trauma has contributed to the opioid epidemic. Standardizing the quantity of opioids prescribed at discharge can improve prescribing behavior. We hypothesized that adopting new electronic medical record order sets would be associated with decreased morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed at discharge for trauma patients.

METHODS

This was a quasi-experimental study examining opioid prescribing practices at a Level 1 Trauma Center. All patients ages 18-89 admitted to the Trauma Service from January 2017 through March 2021 and hospitalized for at least 2 d were included. In November 2020, new trauma admission and discharge order sets were implemented with recommended discharge opioid quantity based on inpatient opioid usage the day prior to discharge multiplied by five. Postintervention prescribing practices were compared to historical controls. The primary outcome was MME at discharge.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics between preintervention and postintervention cohorts were comparable. There was a significant reduction in median MME prescribed at discharge postintervention (112.5 versus 75.0, P < 0.0001). Median inpatient MME usage also significantly reduced postintervention (184.1 versus 160.5; P < 0.0001). There were trends toward increased ideal prescribing per order set recommendation and a reduction in overprescribing. Patients receiving the recommended opioid quantity at discharge had the lowest opioid refill prescription rate (under: 29.6%, ideal: 7.3%, over: 19.7%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

For trauma patients requiring inpatient opioid therapy, a pragmatic and individualized intervention was associated with a reduced quantity of discharge opioids without negative outcomes. Reduction in inpatient opioid use was also associated with standardizing prescribing practices of surgeons with electronic medical record order sets.

A Standardized Protocol for Opioid Prescribing After Surgery Decreases Total Morphine Equivalents Prescribed

INTRODUCTION

Perioperative opioid analgesia has been extensively reexamined during the opioid epidemic. Multiple studies have demonstrated over prescription of opioids, demonstrating the need for change in prescribing practices. A standard opioid prescribing protocol was implemented to evaluate opioid prescribing trends and practices.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate opioid use after primary ventral, inguinal, and incisional hernia repair and to assess clinical factors that may impact opioid prescribing and consumption. Secondary outcomes include the number of refills, patients without opioid requirement, difference in opioid use based on patient characteristics and adherence to prescribing protocol.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study examining patients undergoing inguinal, primary ventral and incisional hernias between February and November 2019. A standardized prescribing protocol was implemented and utilized for postoperative prescribing. All data was captured in the abdominal core health quality collaborative (ACHQC) and opioid use was standardized via morphine milligram equivalents (MME).

RESULTS

389 patients underwent primary ventral, incisional, and inguinal hernia repair, with a total of 285 included in the final analysis. 170 (59.6%) of patients reported zero opioid use postoperatively. Total opioid MME prescribed and high MME consumption were significantly higher after incisional hernia repair with a greater number of refills were required. Compliance with prescribing protocol resulted in lower MME prescription, but not actual lower MME consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a standardized protocol for opioid prescribing after surgery decreases the total MME prescribed. Compliance with our protocol significantly reduced this disparity, which has the potential for decreasing abuse, misuse, and diversion of opioids by better estimating actual postoperative analgesic requirements.

Opioid prescribing for acute postoperative pain: an overview of systematic reviews related to two consensus statements relevant at patient, prescriber, system and public health levels

BACKGROUND

National guidelines for rational opioid prescribing for acute postoperative pain are needed to optimise postoperative pain control and function whilst minimising opioid-related harm.

OBJECTIVES

This overview of systematic reviews aims to summarise and critically assess the quality of systematic reviews related to the 20 recommendations from two previously published consensus guideline papers (ten relevant at patient and prescriber levels and ten at a system / Public Health level). It also aims to identify gaps in research that require further efforts to fill these in order to augment the evidence behind creating national guidelines for rational opioid prescribing for acute postoperative pain.

METHODS

A systematic database search using PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane was conducted in November 2022. Furthermore, reference lists were reviewed. All identified systematic reviews were assessed for eligibility. Data from each study was extracted using a pre-standardised data extraction form. The methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed by two independent reviewers using the AMSTAR 2 checklist. Descriptive synthesis of the results was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 12 papers were eligible for analysis. Only eight out of the total 20 prioritised recommendations had systematic reviews that provided evidence related to them. These systematic reviews were most commonly of critically low quality.

CONCLUSION

The consensus papers provide guidance and recommendations based on the consensus of expert opinion that is based on the best available evidence. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting many of these consensus statements. Efforts to further analyse interventions that aim to reduce the rates of opioid prescribing and their adverse effects should therefore continue.

Annual Prevalence of Opioid Receipt by South Carolina Medicaid-Enrolled Children and Adolescents: 2000-2020

Understanding patterns of opioid receipt by children and adolescents over time and understanding differences between age groups can help identify opportunities for future opioid stewardship. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, using South Carolina Medicaid data for children and adolescents 0-18 years old between 2000-2020, calculating the annual prevalence of opioid receipt for medical diagnoses in ambulatory settings. We examined differences in prevalence by calendar year, race/ethnicity, and by age group. The annual prevalence of opioid receipt for medical diagnoses changed significantly over the years studied, from 187.5 per 1000 in 2000 to 41.9 per 1000 in 2020 (Cochran-Armitage test for trend, p < 0.0001). In all calendar years, older ages were associated with greater prevalence of opioid receipt. Adjusted analyses (logistic regression) assessed calendar year differences in opioid receipt, controlling for age group, sex, and race/ethnicity. In the adjusted analyses, calendar year was inversely associated with opioid receipt (aOR 0.927, 95% CI 0.926-0.927). Males and older ages were more likely to receive opioids, while persons of Black race and Hispanic ethnicity had lower odds of receiving opioids. While opioid receipt declined among all age groups during 2000-2020, adolescents 12-18 had persistently higher annual prevalence of opioid receipt when compared to younger age groups.

Perioperative opioids: a narrative review contextualising new avenues to improve prescribing

Opioids have dominated the management of perioperative pain in recent decades with higher doses than ever before used in some circumstances. Through the expanding use of opioids, growing research has highlighted their associated side-effects and the intertwined phenomena of acute withdrawal syndrome, opioid tolerance, and opioid-induced hyperalgesia. With multiple clinical guidelines now endorsing multimodal analgesia, a diverse array of opioid-sparing agents emerges and has been studied to variable degrees, including techniques of opioid-free anaesthesia. It remains unclear to what extent such methods should be adopted, yet current evidence does suggest dependence on opioids as the primary perioperative analgesic might not meet the principles of 'rational prescribing' as described by Maxwell. In this narrative review we describe how, using current evidence, a patient-centred rational-prescribing approach can be applied to opioids in the perioperative period. To contextualise this approach, we discuss the historical adoption of opioids in anaesthesia, our growing understanding of associated side-effects and emerging strategies of opioid-sparing and opioid-free anaesthesia. We discuss avenues and challenges for improving opioid prescribing to limit persistent postoperative opioid use and how these may be incorporated into a rational-prescribing approach.

Variation in opioid filling after same-day breast surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain management practices in breast surgery are variable, with recent evidence that approaches for minimizing or sparing opioids can be successfully implemented. We describe opioid filling and predictors of higher doses in patients undergoing same-day breast surgery in Ontario, Canada.

METHODS

In this retrospective population-based cohort study, we used linked administrative health data to identify patients aged 18 years or older who underwent same-day breast surgery from 2012 to 2020. We categorized procedure types by increasing invasiveness of surgery: partial, with or without axillary intervention (P ± axilla); total, with or without axillary intervention (T ± axilla); radical, with or without axillary intervention (R ± axilla); and bilateral. The primary outcome was filling an opioid prescription within 7 or fewer days after surgery. Secondary outcomes were total oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) filled (mg, median and interquartile range [IQR]) and filling more than 1 prescription within 7 or fewer days after surgery. We estimated associations (adjusted risk ratios [RRs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) between study variables and outcomes in multivariable models. We used a random intercept for each unique prescriber to account for provider-level clustering.

RESULTS

Of the 84 369 patients who underwent same-day breast surgery, 72% (n = 60 620) filled an opioid prescription. Median OMEs filled increased with invasiveness (P ± axilla = 135 [IQR 90-180] mg; T ± axilla = 135 [IQR 100-200] mg; R ± axilla = 150 [IQR 113-225] mg, bilateral surgery = 150 [IQR 113-225] mg; p < 0.0001). Factors associated with filling more than 1 opioid prescription were age 30-59 years (v. age 18-29 yr), increased invasiveness (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.70-2.30 bilateral v. P ± axilla), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2 versus 0-1 (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.34-1.69) and malignancy (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.26-1.53).

INTERPRETATION

Most patients undergoing same-day breast surgery fill an opioid prescription within 7 days. Efforts are needed to identify patient groups where opioids may be successfully minimized or eliminated.

Opioid prescription trends among American Head and Neck Society fellowship graduates

BACKGROUND

Opioids are commonly used to manage the pain of head and neck (HN) cancer patients.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of graduates from American Head and Neck Society accredited fellowships from 1997 to 2018. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Part D Provider Utilization and Payment database 2014-2019 was cross-referenced with provider names to identify opioid prescription trends.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2019, there was no significant difference in the average number of opioid beneficiaries per provider (18.02 vs. 18.10, p = 0.586) or opioid claims per provider (28.06 vs. 26.73, p = 0.708). The average total opioid day supply per beneficiary declined from 11.09 to 7.05 days from 2014 to 2019 (p < 0.001). In 2019, providers in the Northeast had the lowest prescribed opioid day supply (3.67 days) compared to those from the South who had the highest (10.32 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid prescription length has significantly declined among HN surgeons, with variations across geographic regions.

The Impact of Peripheral Nerve Block on the Quality of Care After Ankle Fracture Surgery: A Quality Improvement Study

OBJECTIVES

To increase peripheral nerve block (PNB) administration for ankle fracture surgeries (AFSs) at our institution to above 50% by January 1st, 2021.

DESIGN

Longitudinal, single-center quality improvement study conducted at a high-volume tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

All patients undergoing isolated AFS for unimalleolar, bimalleolar, or trimalleolar ankle fracture from July 2017 to April 2021 were included in this study.

INTERVENTION

Interventions implemented to minimize barriers for PNB administration included recruitment and training of expert anesthesiologists in regional anesthesia, procurement of ultrasound machines, implementation of a dedicated block room, and creation of a pamphlet for patients describing multimodal analgesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

The primary outcome was the percentage of patients receiving PNB for AFS. Secondary outcomes included hospital length-of-stay, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption (mean oral morphine equivalent [OME]), proportion of patients not requiring opioid analgesic in PACU, and PACU and 24-hour postoperative nausea/vomiting requiring antiemetic.

RESULTS

The PNB and non-PNB groups included 78 and 157 patients, respectively. PNB administration increased from <5% to 53% after implementation of the improvement bundle. Mean PACU and 24-hour opioid analgesic consumption was lower in the PNB group (PACU OME 38.96 mg vs. 55.42 mg, P = 0.001; 24-hour OME 50.83 mg vs. 65.69 mg, P = 0.008). A greater proportion of patients in the PNB group did not require PACU opioids (62.8% vs. 27.4%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

By performing a root cause analysis and implementing a multidisciplinary, patient-centered improvement bundle, we increased PNB administration for AFSs, resulting in reduced postoperative opioid analgesia consumption.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effectiveness of organizational interventions on appropriate opioid prescribing for noncancer pain upon hospital discharge: A systematic review

This study aims to summarize the effectiveness of organizational interventions on appropriate opioid prescribing for noncancer pain upon hospital discharge. A systematic search was conducted on 6 electronic databases by 2 independent reviewers. We included original research articles reporting on quantitative outcomes of organizational interventions targeting appropriate opioid prescribing on hospital discharge. Quality assessment was performed by 2 independent reviewers. The protocol for this review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42020156104). Out of 173 full texts assessed for eligibility, 43 were included in this review. The majority of studies had a moderate to serious risk of bias (33 out of 43). Most of the studies implemented a multifaceted organizational intervention (16 studies). Other interventions included guideline implementation, prescriber education and default opioid-prescribing quantity changes in electronic medical records. Multiple studies found that the dissemination of patient-specific and procedure-specific guidelines reduced the quantity of opioids prescribed by 44 to 57%. Prescriber education provided with feedback was implemented in 4 studies and resulted in a 33 to 44% decrease in prescribing rates. Lowering the default quantities in the electronic medical records produced a 40% decrease in opioids prescribed in 1 study. Guideline implementation, prescriber education and default opioid-prescribing quantity changes all appear effective in improving the appropriate prescribing of opioids on hospital discharge. However, the extent of reduction of opioid prescribing upon hospital discharge after the implementation of multifaceted intervention strategies appears similar to that of simpler interventions which require fewer resources.

Shared decision-making for postoperative opioid prescribing and preoperative pain management education decreases excess opioid burden

INTRODUCTION

Managing postoperative pain requires an individualized approach in order to balance adequate pain control with risk of persistent opioid use and narcotic abuse associated with inappropriately outsized narcotic prescriptions. Shared decision-making has been proposed to address individual pain management needs. We report here the results of a quality improvement initiative instituting prescribing guidelines using shared decision-making and preoperative pain expectation and management education to decrease excess opioid pills after surgery and improve patient satisfaction.

METHODS

Pre-intervention prescribing habits were obtained by retrospective review perioperative pharmacy records for patients undergoing general surgeries in the 24 months prior to initiation of intervention. Patients scheduled to undergo General Surgery procedures were given a survey at their preoperative visit. Preoperative education was performed by the surgical team as a part of the Informed Consent process using a standardized handout and patients were asked to choose the number of narcotic pills they wished to obtain within prescribing recommendations. Postoperative surveys were administered during or after their 2-week postoperative visit.

RESULTS

131 patients completed pre-intervention and post-intervention surveys. The average prescription size decreased from 12.29 oxycodone pills per surgery prior to institution of pathway to 6.80 pills per surgery after institution of pathway (p < 0.001). The percentage of unused pills after surgery decreased from an estimated 70.5% pre-intervention to 48.5% (p < 0.001) post-intervention. 61.1% of patients with excess pills returned or planned to return medication to the pharmacy with 16.8% of patients reporting alternative disposal of excess medication. Patient-reported satisfaction was higher with current surgery compared to prior surgeries (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Institution of procedure-specific prescribing recommendations and preoperative pain management education using shared decision-making between patient and provider decreases opioid excess burden, resulting in fewer unused narcotic pills entering the community. Furthermore, allowing patients to participate in decision-making with their provider results in increased patient satisfaction.

Predictors of opioid-free discharge after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Post-discharge opioid requirement after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is minimal, yet postoperative opioid prescriptions vary and opioid-free discharges are rare.

STUDY DESIGN

Adult patients who underwent LC from 01/2019-12/2019 were reviewed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of opioid-free discharge.

RESULTS

Of 393 included patients, 330 were discharged with opioids (median 12 oxycodone 5 mg pills) and 63 were discharged without opioids. One opioid-free discharge patient called for a prescription. Older age (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.002-1.041) and non-elective procedure (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.2291-0.8521) were independent predictors of opioid-free discharge.

CONCLUSION

Significant opportunities for opioid reduction or elimination after discharge from LC exist. Non-elective procedure and older age are predictors of opioid-free discharge, and should be considered when individualizing prescription quantities as surgeons strive to reduce or eliminate opioid overprescription.

A Web-based Educational Intervention to Increase Perianesthesia Nurses' Knowledge, Attitude, and Intention to Promote Safe Use, Storage, and Disposal of Opioids

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine if a web-based educational intervention increased knowledge, attitudes, and intention of perianesthesia nurses regarding opioid discharge education (including safe use, storage, and disposal of opioids). Secondary outcomes were to determine Perceived Behavioral Control, subjective norms, and familiarity with American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses (ASPAN) guidance on opioid education.

DESIGN

A pre-test, post-test longitudinal design.

METHODS

An email described the study and had a link for those choosing to participate. The intervention was a web-based voiceover module with patient education scenarios focused on information required for patients before discharge home. Responses to the evidence-based pre-survey, post-survey one, and post-survey two were collected. The survey was developed using components of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Data analysis included descriptive summary and evaluation of changes in knowledge and domains of Theory of Planned Behavior using repeated measures mixed modeling.

FINDINGS

The participants were invited to complete a pre-test survey (n = 672), the immediate post-test (n = 245), and the 4-week post-test (n = 172). The analysis presented is limited to 245 who completed at least the first post-survey. Most were staff nurses (82%), and the majority had a BSN (62%); participants most typically worked in a hospital-based PACU (73%). For all outcomes, there was an immediate increase in the measure following the intervention; this pairwise difference (between pretest and the immediate post-test) was significant in all but one of the models. The immediate and 4-week post-test scores exceeded the corresponding pre-test score, though for Perceived Behavioral Control, attitude, and intention, the degree of increase between baseline and week 4 was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In all cases, both the immediate and 4-week post-test scores exceeded the corresponding pre-test score, though, for three of the TPB constructs, the difference between baseline and week 4 was not significant, while nearly all of the increases between baseline and immediately following the intervention were significant. These findings suggest a more intensive intervention, possibly with the inclusion of booster sessions, may be needed.

Postoperative Pain Medication Utilization in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Sports Orthopaedic Surgery: Characterizing Patient Usage Patterns and Opioid Retention

INTRODUCTION

Opioid overprescribing is a problem in orthopaedic surgery, with many patients having leftover opioid medications after surgery. The purpose of our study was to capture utilization patterns of opioids in pediatric patients undergoing orthopaedic sports medicine surgery, in addition to evaluating patient practices surrounding unutilized opioid medication. Our hypothesis was that there would be low utilization of opioids in this patient population and would in turn contribute to notable overprescribing of opioids and opioid retention in this population.

METHODS

Pediatric patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery for knee and hip pathology were prospectively enrolled. A survey was administered 14 days postoperatively, with questions centered on the patient-reported number of opioids prescribed, number of opioids used, number of days opioids were used, and incidences of leftover opioid medication and disposal of leftover medication. The magnitude of opioid overprescribing was calculated using the reported prescribed and reported used number of opioid pills. Linear regression was used to examine associations between opioids and NSAIDs prescribed.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients reported a mean prescription of 12.0 ± 5.0 pills, with utilization of 4.4 ± 6.1 pills over 2.7 ± 5.1 days. Patients were prescribed 2.73 times the number of opioid pills required on average. One hundred patients (87.7%) reported having unused opioid medication after their surgery, with 71 (71.0%) reporting opioid retention. Regression results showed an association with opioids used and prescribed opioid amount (β = 0.582, R = 0.471, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Overall, our study results help characterize the utilization patterns of opioid medications in the postsurgical pediatric sports orthopaedic population and suggest that orthopaedic surgeons may be able to provide smaller quantities of opioid pills for analgesia than is typically prescribed, which in turn may help reduce the amount of prescription opioid medications present in the community.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Opioid Prescribing Trends After Major Pediatric Ear Surgery: A 12-Year Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative opioid prescriptions tend to exceed children's analgesic needs, but awareness of the opioid epidemic may have driven changes in prescribing behaviors. This study evaluated opioid prescribing patterns after major pediatric ear surgery.

METHODS

This study reviewed all cases of tympanoplasty, tympanomastoidectomy, mastoidectomy, cochlear implantation, otoplasty, and aural atresia repair at a pediatric hospital during 2010-2021. Regressions were conducted to identify opioid prescribing trends over time. Potential covariates were assessed. Returns to the system were reviewed as a balancing measure.

RESULTS

Even without a targeted protocol, opioid prescribing declined significantly. After prescribing peaked in 2012-2013, significant negative trends yielded lower rates of opioid prescriptions, fewer doses per prescription, smaller patient-weight-standardized dose sizes, and less variability (all p < 0.001). In 2012, 96.1% of patients received opioid prescriptions; the rate fell to 13.5% by 2021. For patients ages, 0-6, the annual rate of opioid prescriptions dropped from a maximum of 96.3% in 2012 to 0.0% in 2021. The annual average supply of doses per prescription decreased by 68% between 2013 and 2021, reducing the total days' supply to an evidence-based 3.1 ± 1.6 days. Regressions did not detect changes in returns to the system. Pain-related returns were rare (0.9%) and did not vary by opioid prescriptions (p = 0.37). Prescribing trends were closely correlated with a tonsillectomy-focused protocol that our institution implemented in 2019.

CONCLUSION

Surgeon-driven opioid stewardship has improved with no resultant change in revisit rates. Procedure-specific quality improvement interventions may have broader off-target effects on prescribing behaviors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV Laryngoscope, 2022.

A retrospective study comparing postoperative opioid prescribing practices in an academic medical centre

Background

In the midst of the North American opioid crisis, identifying and intervening on drivers of high-risk opioid prescriptions is an important step towards reducing iatrogenic harm.

Objectives

We aimed to identify factors associated with variations in high-risk opioid discharge prescriptions, following select surgical procedures, to guide future quality improvement initiatives.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 1322 patients who underwent select open pelvic and open abdominal surgeries between January 1 and December 31, 2017, in a tertiary health care centre in Montreal.

Results

Patients who underwent open abdominal surgeries were prescribed significantly higher daily doses of morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (45 mg; interquartile range, 30-60), than patients who underwent either a caesarean delivery (20 mg, 20-20) or a hysterectomy (30 mg, 22-30). After adjustment for multiple potential confounders, abdominal surgery was associated with 4 times the odds of receiving more than 50 MME at hospital discharge compared with pelvic surgeries (odds ratio, 3.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-11.97). The availability of postoperative preprinted order sets with fixed high doses of opioids was also highly associated with the outcome.

Conclusion

In our institution, some surgeries were more likely to receive high-risk opioid prescriptions at discharge. Efforts to optimize safer prescribing practices should address the creation and/or updating of preprinted order sets to reflect current best practice guidelines. This initiative could be overseen by hospital pharmacy and therapeutics committees.