1
|
Kallarakal MA, Cohen G, Ibukun FI, Krummey SM. Marginal Zone B Cells Are Necessary for the Formation of Anti-donor IgG After Allogeneic Sensitization. Transplantation 2024; 108:1357-1367. [PMID: 38361235 PMCID: PMC11136604 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The formation of anti-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antibodies is a significant barrier for many patients awaiting organ transplantation. Patients with preformed anti-MHC antibodies have limited options for suitable donors, and the formation of donor-specific anti-MHC antibodies after transplantation is a harbinger of graft rejection. Despite the recognized importance of anti-MHC antibodies, the mechanisms responsible for the differentiation of B cells after exposure to allogeneic antigens are poorly understood. METHODS To evaluate the differentiation of B cells in response to allogeneic antigen, we used a model of H-2 b C57Bl/6 sensitization with H-2 d antigen. We used a class I MHC tetramer-based approach to identify allogeneic B cells and flow cytometric crossmatch to identify allogeneic IgM and IgG. RESULTS We found that although the formation of anti-H-2 d IgG was robust, few class-switched B cells and germinal center B cells were formed. Antigen-specific B cells did not express classical memory B-cell markers after sensitization but had an IgM + CD21 + marginal zone B-cell phenotype. The frequency of marginal zone B cells increased after sensitization. Depletion of marginal zone B cells before sensitization or skin grafting resulted in a significant diminution of anti-H-2 d IgG and fewer germinal center B cells. Adoptive transfer experiments revealed that marginal zone B cells more efficiently differentiated into germinal center B cells and anti-donor IgG-producing cells than follicular B cells. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate an important role for marginal zone B cells as a reservoir of alloreactive B cells that are activated by allogeneic antigens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gregory Cohen
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Francis I. Ibukun
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Scott M. Krummey
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Loeffler-Wirth H, Lehmann C, Lachmann N, Doxiadis I. Homozygosity in any HLA locus is a risk factor for specific antibody production: the taboo concept 2.0. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1384823. [PMID: 38840925 PMCID: PMC11150536 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1384823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective In a cooperative study of the University Hospital Leipzig, University of Leipzig, and the Charité Berlin on kidney transplant patients, we analysed the occurrence of HLA-specific antibodies with respect to the HLA setup of the patients. We aimed at the definition of specific HLA antigens towards which the patients produced these antibodies. Methods Patients were typed for the relevant HLA determinants using mainly the next-generation technology. Antibody screening was performed by the state-of-the-art multiplex-based technology using microspheres coupled with the respective HLA alleles of HLA class I and II determinants. Results Patients homozygous for HLA-A*02, HLA-A*03, HLA-A*24, HLA-B*07, HLA-B*18, HLA-B*35, HLA-B*44, HLA-C*03, HLA-C*04, and HLA-C*07 in the class I group and HLA-DRB1*01, HLA-DRB1*03, HLA-DRB1*07, HLA-DRB1*15, HLA-DQA1*01, HLA-DQA1*05, HLA-DQB1*02, HLA-DQB1*03(7), HLA-DQB1*06, HLA-DPA1*01, and HLA-DPB1*04 in the class II group were found to have a significant higher antibody production compared to the heterozygous ones. In general, all HLA determinants are affected. Remarkably, HLA-A*24 homozygous patients can produce antibodies towards all HLA-A determinants, while HLA-B*18 homozygous ones make antibodies towards all HLA-B and selected HLA-A and C antigens, and are associated with an elevation of HLA-DRB1, parts of DQB1 and DPB1 alleles. Homozygosity for the HLA class II HLA-DRB1*01, and HLA-DRB1*15 seems to increase the risk for antibody responses against most of the HLA class I antigens (HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C) in contrast to HLA-DQB1*03(7) where a lower risk towards few HLA-A and HLA-B alleles is found. The widely observed differential antibody response is therefore to be accounted to the patient's HLA type. Conclusion Homozygous patients are at risk of producing HLA-specific antibodies hampering the outcome of transplantation. Including this information on the allocation procedure might reduce antibody-mediated immune reactivity and prevent graft loss in a patient at risk, increasing the life span of the transplanted organ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Loeffler-Wirth
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Bioinformatics (IZBI), Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Claudia Lehmann
- Laboratory for Transplantation Immunology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Nils Lachmann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, H & I Laboratory, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universitätzu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ilias Doxiadis
- Laboratory for Transplantation Immunology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salhi S, Congy-Jolivet N, Hebral AL, Esposito L, Vieu G, Milhès J, Kamar N, Del Bello A. Utility of Routine Post Kidney Transplant Anti-HLA Antibody Screening. Kidney Int Rep 2024; 9:1343-1353. [PMID: 38707794 PMCID: PMC11068955 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.02.1394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction De novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) is a strong biomarker associated with the development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft loss after kidney transplantation. This procedure is expensive; however, systematic annual screening was recommended by some national organ transplant agencies or societies even though its clinical utility was not clearly established. Methods To address this question, we retrospectively assessed the incidence of dnDSA according to the test justification (clinically indicated or systematic) in a cohort of low-immunological risk patients, defined by being nonhuman leukocyte antigen (non-HLA)-sensitized and having no previous kidney transplants. Results A total of 1072 patients, for whom 4611 anti-HLA tests were performed, were included in the study. During the follow-up period of 8 (interquartile range, IQR: 5-11) years, 77 recipients developed dnDSA (prevalence of 7.2%). Thirty-five of these dnDSAs (45.5%) were detected during the first year posttransplantation. In 95% of patients with dnDSA, an immunizing event was identified in their medical records. dnDSA was detected in 46 of 4267 systematic screening tests (1.08%) performed. Active and chronic AMR were frequently observed in biopsies performed after systematic DSA testing (17.9% and 15.4%, respectively). Conclusion Our results suggest that the detection by systematic screening of dnDSA in low-immunological risk kidney transplant patients without sensitizing events is a rare event, especially after 1 year. Moreover, in real life, systematic annual screening for dnDSA, seems having a limited impact to detect AMR at an earlier stage compared to patients in whom dnDSA was detected after a clinically indicated test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofiane Salhi
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
- Faculté de santé, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Nicolas Congy-Jolivet
- Faculté de santé, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
- Molecular Immunogenetics Laboratory, EA 3034, Faculté de Médecine Purpan, IFR150 (INSERM), France
- Department of Immunology, CHU de Toulouse, Hôpital de Rangueil, CHU de Toulouse, France
| | - Anne-Laure Hebral
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Laure Esposito
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - Guillaume Vieu
- Etablissement Francais du Sang, CHU de Purpan, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean Milhès
- Faculté de santé, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
- Molecular Immunogenetics Laboratory, EA 3034, Faculté de Médecine Purpan, IFR150 (INSERM), France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
- Faculté de santé, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
- INSERM U1043, IFR–BMT, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France
| | - Arnaud Del Bello
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
- Faculté de santé, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
- INSERM U1297, IFR–BMT, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Comins-Boo A, Irure-Ventura J, Valentin MO, Belmar-Vega L, López Del Moral Cuesta C, Valero San Cecilio R, Rodrigo Calabia E, Renuncio-García M, Castro Hernández C, Mikhalkovich D, Mota Pérez N, Ruiz San Millán JC, López-Hoyos M, San Segundo D. Low-risk delisting strategy in highly sensitized patients without donor offers included in exchange donation programs. One single-center experience. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110806. [PMID: 38664156 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
Donor exchange programs were designed to allocate organs for highly sensitized (HS) patients. The allocation algorithm differs slightly among countries and includes different strategies to improve access to transplants in HS patients. However, many HS patients with a calculated panel reactive of antibodies (cPRA) of 100 % remain on the waiting list for a long time. Some allocation algorithms assume immunological risk, including Imlifidase treatment, to increase the chance of transplantation in very HS patients. Here, we describe our unicenter experience of low-risk delisting strategy in 15 HS patients included in the Spanish donor exchange program without donor offers. After delisting, 7 out of 15 HS patients reduced the cPRA below 99.95 % and impacted the reduction of time on the waiting list (p = 0.01), where 5 out of 7 achieved transplantation. Within those HS that remained above 99.95 %, 1 out of 8 was transplanted. All the HS were transplanted with delisted DSA, and only one with DSA level rebounded early after transplantation. All HS transplanted after delisting maintain graft function. The transplant immunology laboratories are challenged to search intermediate risk assessment methods for delisting high HS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Comins-Boo
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Juan Irure-Ventura
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Maria O Valentin
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Lara Belmar-Vega
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Covadonga López Del Moral Cuesta
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Rosalía Valero San Cecilio
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Emilio Rodrigo Calabia
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Mónica Renuncio-García
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Carolina Castro Hernández
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Dzmitry Mikhalkovich
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Nerea Mota Pérez
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Ruiz San Millán
- Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain
| | - Marcos López-Hoyos
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain; Molecular Biology Department, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - David San Segundo
- Department of Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain; Immunopathology Group, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, 39011 Santander, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Altulea D, van den Born JC, Diepstra A, Bungener L, Terpstra D, Hepkema BG, Lammerts R, Heeringa P, Heidt S, Otten H, Reteig L, Karahan GE, Berger SP, Sanders JS. Memory B-cell derived donor-specific antibodies do not predict outcome in sensitized kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective single-center study. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1360627. [PMID: 38646525 PMCID: PMC11026632 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1360627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Repeated exposure to sensitizing events can activate HLA-specific memory B cells, leading to the production of donor-specific memory B cell antibodies (DSAm) that pose a risk for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This single-center retrospective study aimed to identify DSAm and assess their association with outcomes in a cohort of KTRs with pretransplant serum donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Methods We polyclonally activated pretransplant peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 60 KTRs in vitro, isolated and quantified IgG from the culture supernatant using ELISA, and analyzed the HLA antibodies of eluates with single antigen bead (SAB) assays, comparing them to the donor HLA typing for potential DSAm. Biopsies from 41 KTRs were evaluated for rejection based on BANFF 2019 criteria. Results At transplantation, a total of 37 DSAm were detected in 26 of 60 patients (43%), of which 13 (35%) were found to be undetectable in serum. No significant association was found between pretransplant DSAm and ABMR (P=0.53). Similar results were observed in a Kaplan-Meier analysis for ABMR within the first year posttransplant (P=0.29). Additionally, MFI levels of DSAm showed no significant association with ABMR (P=0.28). Conclusion This study suggests no significant association between DSAm and biopsy-proven clinical ABMR. Further prospective research is needed to determine whether assessing DSAm could enhance existing immunological risk assessment methods for monitoring KTRs, particularly in non-sensitized KTRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dania Altulea
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Joost C. van den Born
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Arjan Diepstra
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Laura Bungener
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Transplantation Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Dagmar Terpstra
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Bouke G. Hepkema
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Transplantation Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Rosa Lammerts
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Transplantation Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Peter Heeringa
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Henny Otten
- Center of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMC Utrecht), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leon Reteig
- Center of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMC Utrecht), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Gonca E. Karahan
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Stefan P. Berger
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan Sanders
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maguire C, Crivello P, Fleischhauer K, Isaacson D, Casillas A, Kramer CS, Copley HC, Heidt S, Kosmoliaptsis V, Meneghini M, Gmeiner M, Schold J, Louzoun Y, Tambur AR. Qualitative, rather than quantitative, differences between HLA-DQ alleles affect HLA-DQ immunogenicity in organ transplantation. HLA 2024; 103:e15455. [PMID: 38575370 PMCID: PMC11003724 DOI: 10.1111/tan.15455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Prolonging the lifespan of transplanted organs is critical to combat the shortage of this life-saving resource. Chronic rejection, with irreversible demise of the allograft, is often caused by the development of donor-specific HLA antibodies. Currently, enumerating molecular (amino acid) mismatches between recipient and donor is promoted to identify patients at higher risk of developing HLA antibodies, for use in organ allocation, and immunosuppression-minimization strategies. We have counseled against the incorporation of such approaches into clinical use and hypothesized that not all molecular mismatches equally contribute to generation of donor-specific immune responses. Herein, we document statistical shortcomings in previous study design: for example, use of individuals who lack the ability to generate donor-specific-antibodies (HLA identical) as part of the negative cohort. We provide experimental evidence, using CRISPR-Cas9-edited cells, to rebut the claim that the HLAMatchmaker eplets represent "functional epitopes." We further used unique sub-cohorts of patients, those receiving an allograft with two HLA-DQ mismatches yet developing antibodies only to one mismatch (2MM1DSA), to interrogate differential immunogenicity. Our results demonstrate that mismatches of DQα05-heterodimers exhibit the highest immunogenicity. Additionally, we demonstrate that the DQα chain critically contributes to the overall qualities of DQ molecules. Lastly, our data proposes that an augmented risk to develop donor-specific HLA-DQ antibodies is dependent on qualitative (evolutionary and functional) divergence between recipient and donor, rather than the mere number of molecular mismatches. Overall, we propose an immunological mechanistic rationale to explain differential HLA-DQ immunogenicity, with potential ramifications for other pathological processes such as autoimmunity and infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chelsea Maguire
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 60611
| | - Pietro Crivello
- Institute for Experimental Cellular Therapy, University Hospital Essen; Essen, Germany. 45127
| | - Katharina Fleischhauer
- Institute for Experimental Cellular Therapy, University Hospital Essen; Essen, Germany. 45127
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf; Essen, Germany. 45127
| | - Dylan Isaacson
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 60611
| | - Aurora Casillas
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 60611
| | - Cynthia S.M. Kramer
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center; Netherlands. 2300-2334
| | - Hannah C. Copley
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge; Cambridge, United Kingdom. CB2 3AX
| | - Sebastian Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center; Netherlands. 2300-2334
| | | | - Maria Meneghini
- Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari; Barcelona, Spain. 08035
| | - Michael Gmeiner
- Department of Economics, London School of Economics; London, United Kingdom. WC2A 2AE
| | - Jesse Schold
- Department of surgery, university of Colorado Anschutz Medical campus; Aurora, CO, USA. 80045
- Department of epidemiology, university of Colorado Anschutz Medical campus; Aurora, CO, USA. 80045
| | - Yoram Louzoun
- Department of mathematics Bar Ilan University; Ramat Gan, Israel. 5290002
| | - Anat R. Tambur
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 60611
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harmacek D, Weidmann L, Castrezana Lopez K, Schmid N, Korach R, Bortel N, von Moos S, Rho E, Helmchen B, Gaspert A, Schachtner T. Molecular diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection: Evaluating biopsy-based transcript diagnostics in the presence of donor-specific antibodies but without microvascular inflammation, a single-center descriptive analysis. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00244-2. [PMID: 38548057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics may identify molecular antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) when microvascular inflammation (MVI) is absent. In this single-center cohort, biopsy-based transcript diagnostics were validated in 326 kidney allograft biopsies. A total of 71 histological AMR and 35 T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) cases were identified as molecular AMR and TCMR in 55% and 63%, respectively. Among 121 cases without MVI (glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis = 0), 45 (37%) donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive and 76 (63%) DSA-negative cases were analyzed. Twenty-one out of the 121 (17%) cases showed borderline changes, or TCMR, while BK nephropathy was excluded. None of the 45 DSA-positive patients showed molecular AMR. Among 76 DSA-negative patients, 2 had mixed molecular AMR/TCMR. All-AMR phenotype scores (sum of R4-R6) exhibited median values of 0.13 and 0.12 for DSA-positive and DSA-negative patients, respectively (P = .84). A total of 13% (6/45) DSA-positive and 11% (8/76) DSA-negative patients showed an all-AMR phenotype score > 0.30 (P = .77). Patients with a higher all-AMR phenotype score showed 33% more histologic TCMR (P = .005). The median all-AMR phenotype scores of glomerular basement membrane double contours = 0 and glomerular basement membrane double contours > 0 biopsies were 0.12 and 0.10, respectively (P = .35). Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics did not identify molecular AMR in cases without MVI. Follow-up biopsies and outcome data should evaluate the clinical relevance of subthreshold molecular alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dusan Harmacek
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Weidmann
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Nicolas Schmid
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Korach
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Bortel
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Seraina von Moos
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Elena Rho
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Birgit Helmchen
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ariana Gaspert
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Schachtner
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abraha J, Rao P, Morris GP. Modes of assay interference and the effectiveness of serum pretreatment approaches in detection of anti-HLA antibodies. J Clin Pathol 2024; 77:284-290. [PMID: 36600574 DOI: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Several modes of assay interference common to immunoassays affect solid-phase single-antigen bead-based immunoassays (SAB) used to detect antibodies against human leucocyte antigens (HLA). Best practice recommendations include methods to address assay interference, though the clinical impact and optimal approaches are undefined. We sought to evaluate assay interference in HLA SAB to identify an efficient approach for avoiding erroneous results. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 14 059 patient samples tested for anti-HLA antibodies was performed. This included 4685 samples tested prior to implementation of serum pretreatment with EDTA and 4982 samples tested with routine EDTA treatment using the same testing algorithm. An algorithm for efficiently identifying and processing samples with suspected interference was evaluated in a separate cohort of 4392 EDTA-treated samples. RESULTS EDTA serum pretreatment reduced assay interference, but did not eliminate all modes of interference. A protocol for identification and testing of samples with suspected interference facilitated efficient detection of interference while reducing the amount of additional testing required. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that a single-method approach is insufficient to address all sources of interference in HLA SAB. A multimodal approach with a proactive screening is a more effective way to minimise risk of erroneous results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Abraha
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Ping Rao
- Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Gerald P Morris
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kosuta I, Kelava T, Ostojic A, Sesa V, Mrzljak A, Lalic H. Immunology demystified: A guide for transplant hepatologists. World J Transplant 2024; 14:89772. [PMID: 38576757 PMCID: PMC10989464 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.89772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation has become standard practice for treating end-stage liver disease. The success of the procedure relies on effective immunosuppressive medications to control the host's immune response. Despite the liver's inherent capacity to foster tolerance, the early post-transplant period is marked by significant immune reactivity. To ensure favorable outcomes, it is imperative to identify and manage various rejection types, encompassing T-cell-mediated, antibody-mediated, and chronic rejection. However, the approach to prescribing immunosuppressants relies heavily on clinical judgment rather than evidence-based criteria. Given that the majority of patients will require lifelong immuno suppression as the mechanisms underlying operational tolerance are still being investigated, healthcare providers must possess an understanding of immune responses, rejection mechanisms, and the pathways targeted by immunosuppressive drugs. This knowledge enables customization of treatments and improved patient care, even though a consensus on an optimal immunosuppressive regimen remains elusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iva Kosuta
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Tomislav Kelava
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Univeristy of Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
- Laboratory for Molecular Immunology, Croatian Institute for Brain Research, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Ana Ostojic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liver Transplant Center, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Vibor Sesa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Liver Transplant Center, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Anna Mrzljak
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Hrvoje Lalic
- Department of Physiology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
- Laboratory for Cell Biology, Croatian Institute for Brain Research, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
- Department of Laboratory Immunology, Clinical Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Naesens M, Roufosse C, Haas M, Lefaucheur C, Mannon RB, Adam BA, Aubert O, Böhmig GA, Callemeyn J, Clahsen-van Groningen M, Cornell LD, Demetris AJ, Drachenberg CB, Einecke G, Fogo AB, Gibson IW, Halloran P, Hidalgo LG, Horsfield C, Huang E, Kikić Ž, Kozakowski N, Nankivell B, Rabant M, Randhawa P, Riella LV, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Schinstock C, Solez K, Tambur AR, Thaunat O, Wiebe C, Zielinski D, Colvin R, Loupy A, Mengel M. The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Report: Reappraisal of microvascular inflammation and the role of biopsy-based transcript diagnostics. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:338-349. [PMID: 38032300 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
The XVI-th Banff Meeting for Allograft Pathology was held at Banff, Alberta, Canada, from 19th to 23rd September 2022, as a joint meeting with the Canadian Society of Transplantation. To mark the 30th anniversary of the first Banff Classification, premeeting discussions were held on the past, present, and future of the Banff Classification. This report is a summary of the meeting highlights that were most important in terms of their effect on the Classification, including discussions around microvascular inflammation and biopsy-based transcript analysis for diagnosis. In a postmeeting survey, agreement was reached on the delineation of the following phenotypes: (1) "Probable antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)," which represents donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-positive cases with some histologic features of AMR but below current thresholds for a definitive AMR diagnosis; and (2) "Microvascular inflammation, DSA-negative and C4d-negative," a phenotype of unclear cause requiring further study, which represents cases with microvascular inflammation not explained by DSA. Although biopsy-based transcript diagnostics are considered promising and remain an integral part of the Banff Classification (limited to diagnosis of AMR), further work needs to be done to agree on the exact classifiers, thresholds, and clinical context of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Candice Roufosse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Mark Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Benjamin A Adam
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jasper Callemeyn
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marian Clahsen-van Groningen
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Institute of Experimental Medicine and Systems Biology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Lynn D Cornell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anthony J Demetris
- UPMC Hepatic and Transplantation Pathology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Gunilla Einecke
- Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Agnes B Fogo
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ian W Gibson
- Department of Pathology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Philip Halloran
- Department of Medicine, Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Heritage Medical Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Luis G Hidalgo
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Edmund Huang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, California, USA
| | - Željko Kikić
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Brian Nankivell
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marion Rabant
- Pathology department, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Parmjeet Randhawa
- Department of Pathology, Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leonardo V Riella
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Division of Nephrology & Multi-Organ Transplant Program, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carrie Schinstock
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kim Solez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Anat R Tambur
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Department of Transplantation Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Medicine and Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Dina Zielinski
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Robert Colvin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Burballa C, Llinàs-Mallol L, Vázquez S, Pérez-Sáez MJ, Arias-Cabrales C, Buxeda A, Hernandez JL, Riera M, Sanz S, Alari-Pahissa E, Federico-Vega J, Eguía J, Pascual J, Redondo-Pachón D, Crespo M. Dynamics of HLA and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies during pregnancy. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110749. [PMID: 38238229 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alloantibodies, especially anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLA antibodies), and autoantibodies, as angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R antibodies), may complicate the access and the course of transplantation. Pregnancy is a known source of HLA antibodies, with most studies evaluating pregnancy-induced sensitization by complement-dependent cytotoxicity assays, mainly after childbirth. AT1R antibodies have been evaluated in the context of preeclampsia. We aimed to evaluate pregnancy as a natural source of HLA antibodies and AT1R antibodies, their dynamics along gestation and the potential factors involved in antibody appearance. METHODS Serum samples from pregnant women were collected during the three trimesters of pregnancy (1T, 2T, 3T). Presence of HLA antibodies was assessed by screening beads on Luminex and AT1R antibodies by ELISA. RESULTS A cohort of 138 pregnant women were included. Samples from all were tested in 1T, 127 in 2T and 102 in 3T. HLA antibodies increased from 29.7 % (1T) to 38.2 % (3T). AT1R antibodies were stable around 30 % along pregnancy. Up to 43.2 % multiparous women had HLA antibodies, with a similar proportion of class I and class II antibodies. In primiparous women HLA antibodies increased along pregnancy (from 17.6 % to 34.1 %), with predominance of class II HLA antibodies. AT1R antibodies were not different in primiparous and multiparous women. CONCLUSIONS Pregnancy is a relevant source of HLA antibodies sensitization, but not of AT1R antibodies. HLA antibodies increased clearly in primiparous women with predominance of class II. The use of newer solid-phase techniques on Luminex evidence a higher degree of HLA sensitization during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Burballa
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Llinàs-Mallol
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Susana Vázquez
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - M José Pérez-Sáez
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Arias-Cabrales
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Buxeda
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Marta Riera
- Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sara Sanz
- Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisenda Alari-Pahissa
- Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Judith Federico-Vega
- Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jorge Eguía
- Laboratori de Referència de Catalunya SA, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Nephrology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Dolores Redondo-Pachón
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Crespo
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Nephropathies Research Group, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Santos E, Spensley K, Gunby N, Worthington J, Roufosse C, Anand A, Willicombe M. Application of HLA molecular level mismatching in ethnically diverse kidney transplant recipients receiving a steroid-sparing immunosuppression protocol. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00161-8. [PMID: 38403189 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Defining HLA mismatch at the molecular compared with the antigen level has been shown to be superior in predicting alloimmune responses, although data from across different patient populations are lacking. Using HLA-Matchmaker, HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II, this study reports on the association between molecular mismatch (MolMM) and de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) in an ethnically diverse kidney transplant population receiving a steroid-sparing immunosuppression protocol. Of the 419 patients, 51 (12.2%) patients had dnDSA. De novo DSA were seen more frequently with males, primary transplants, patients receiving tacrolimus monotherapy, and unfavorably HLA-matched transplants. There was a strong correlation between MolMM load and antigen mismatch, although significant variation of MolMM load existed at each antigen mismatch. MolMM loads differed significantly by recipient ethnicity, although ethnicity alone was not associated with dnDSA. On multivariate analysis, increasing MolMM loads associated with dnDSA, whereas antigen mismatch did not. De novo DSA against 8 specific epitopes occurred at high frequency; of the 51 patients, 47 (92.1%) patients with dnDSA underwent a pretreatment biopsy, with 21 (44.7%) having evidence of alloimmune injury. MolMM has higher specificity than antigen mismatching at identifying recipients who are at low risk of dnDSA while receiving minimalist immunosuppression. Immunogenicity consideration is important, with more work needed on identification, especially across different ethnic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Santos
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Northwest London Pathology NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Katrina Spensley
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK; Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK
| | - Nicola Gunby
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Northwest London Pathology NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Judith Worthington
- Transplantation Laboratory, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - Candice Roufosse
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK; Department of Histopathology, Northwest London Pathology NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - Arthi Anand
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Northwest London Pathology NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michelle Willicombe
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK; Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kardol-Hoefnagel T, Senejohnny DM, Kamburova EG, Wisse BW, Reteig L, Gruijters ML, Joosten I, Allebes WA, van der Meer A, Hilbrands LB, Baas MC, Spierings E, Hack CE, van Reekum FE, van Zuilen AD, Verhaar MC, Bots ML, Drop ACAD, Plaisier L, Melchers RCA, Seelen MAJ, Sanders JS, Hepkema BG, Lambeck AJA, Bungener LB, Roozendaal C, Tilanus MGJ, Voorter CE, Wieten L, van Duijnhoven EM, Gelens MACJ, Christiaans MHL, van Ittersum FJ, Nurmohamed SA, Lardy NM, Swelsen W, van der Pant KAMI, van der Weerd NC, Ten Berge IJM, Hoitsma A, van der Boog PJM, de Fijter JW, Betjes MGH, Roelen DL, Claas FH, Bemelman FJ, Senev A, Naesens M, Heidt S, Otten HG. Determination of the clinical relevance of donor epitope-specific HLA-antibodies in kidney transplantation. HLA 2024; 103:e15346. [PMID: 38239046 DOI: 10.1111/tan.15346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
In kidney transplantation, survival rates are still partly impaired due to the deleterious effects of donor specific HLA antibodies (DSA). However, not all luminex-defined DSA appear to be clinically relevant. Further analysis of DSA recognizing polymorphic amino acid configurations, called eplets or functional epitopes, might improve the discrimination between clinically relevant vs. irrelevant HLA antibodies. To evaluate which donor epitope-specific HLA antibodies (DESAs) are clinically important in kidney graft survival, relevant and irrelevant DESAs were discerned in a Dutch cohort of 4690 patients using Kaplan-Meier analysis and tested in a cox proportional hazard (CPH) model including nonimmunological variables. Pre-transplant DESAs were detected in 439 patients (9.4%). The presence of certain clinically relevant DESAs was significantly associated with increased risk on graft loss in deceased donor transplantations (p < 0.0001). The antibodies recognized six epitopes of HLA Class I, 3 of HLA-DR, and 1 of HLA-DQ, and most antibodies were directed to HLA-B (47%). Fifty-three patients (69.7%) had DESA against one donor epitope (range 1-5). Long-term graft survival rate in patients with clinically relevant DESA was 32%, rendering DESA a superior parameter to classical DSA (60%). In the CPH model, the hazard ratio (95% CI) of clinically relevant DESAs was 2.45 (1.84-3.25) in deceased donation, and 2.22 (1.25-3.95) in living donation. In conclusion, the developed model shows the deleterious effect of clinically relevant DESAs on graft outcome which outperformed traditional DSA-based risk analysis on antigen level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tineke Kardol-Hoefnagel
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Elena G Kamburova
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram W Wisse
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leon Reteig
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje L Gruijters
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irma Joosten
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wil A Allebes
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arnold van der Meer
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marije C Baas
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Spierings
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory (CDL), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis E Hack
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Franka E van Reekum
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan D van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne C Verhaar
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel L Bots
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan C A D Drop
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Loes Plaisier
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rowena C A Melchers
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc A J Seelen
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Stephan Sanders
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Bouke G Hepkema
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annechien J A Lambeck
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Laura B Bungener
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline Roozendaal
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel G J Tilanus
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christina E Voorter
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Wieten
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Tissue Typing Laboratory, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Elly M van Duijnhoven
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle A C J Gelens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten H L Christiaans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans J van Ittersum
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shaikh A Nurmohamed
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neubury M Lardy
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wendy Swelsen
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karlijn A M I van der Pant
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neelke C van der Weerd
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ineke J M Ten Berge
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries Hoitsma
- Dutch Organ Transplant Registry (NOTR), Dutch Transplant Foundation (NTS), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Department of Nephrology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frans H Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aleksandar Senev
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory (HILA), Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henny G Otten
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory (CDL), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rocha Y, Jaramillo A, Neumann J, Hacke K, Palou E, Torres J. Crossmatch assays in transplantation: Physical or virtual?: A review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e36527. [PMID: 38115324 PMCID: PMC10727546 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000036527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The value of the crossmatch test in assessing pretransplant immunological risk is vital for clinical decisions, ranging from the indication of the transplant to the guidance of induction protocols and treatment with immunosuppressants. The crossmatch tests in transplantation can be physical or virtual, each with its advantages and limitations. Currently, the virtual crossmatch stands out for its sensitivity and specificity compared to the physical tests. Additionally, the virtual crossmatch can be performed in less time, allowing for a reduction in cold ischemia time. It shows a good correlation with the results of physical tests and does not negatively impact graft survival. Proper communication between clinicians and the transplant immunology laboratory will lead to a deeper understanding of each patient's immunological profile, better donor-recipient selection, and improved graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrés Jaramillo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Jorge Neumann
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Santa Casa Hospital, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Katrin Hacke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Eduard Palou
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Torres
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Marco I, López-Azor García JC, González Martín J, Severo Sánchez A, García-Cosío Carmena MD, Mancebo Sierra E, de Juan Bagudá J, Castrodeza Calvo J, Hernández Pérez FJ, Delgado JF. De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies after Heart Transplantation: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7474. [PMID: 38068526 PMCID: PMC10707043 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Antibodies directed against donor-specific human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) can be detected de novo after heart transplantation and play a key role in long-term survival. De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs) have been associated with cardiac allograft vasculopathy, antibody-mediated rejection, and mortality. Advances in detection methods and international guideline recommendations have encouraged the adoption of screening protocols among heart transplant units. However, there is still a lack of consensus about the correct course of action after dnDSA detection. Treatment is usually started when antibody-mediated rejection is present; however, some dnDSAs appear years before graft failure is detected, and at this point, damage may be irreversible. In particular, class II, anti-HLA-DQ, complement binding, and persistent dnDSAs have been associated with worse outcomes. Growing evidence points towards a more aggressive management of dnDSA. For that purpose, better diagnostic tools are needed in order to identify subclinical graft injury. Cardiac magnetic resonance, strain techniques, or coronary physiology parameters could provide valuable information to identify patients at risk. Treatment of dnDSA usually involves plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, immunoadsorption, and ritxumab, but the benefit of these therapies is still controversial. Future efforts should focus on establishing effective treatment protocols in order to improve long-term survival of heart transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Marco
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Juan Carlos López-Azor García
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, 28222 Madrid, Spain; (J.C.L.-A.G.); (F.J.H.P.)
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (J.G.M.); (M.D.G.-C.C.); (J.d.J.B.); (J.C.C.)
- School of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier González Martín
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (J.G.M.); (M.D.G.-C.C.); (J.d.J.B.); (J.C.C.)
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Andrea Severo Sánchez
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - María Dolores García-Cosío Carmena
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (J.G.M.); (M.D.G.-C.C.); (J.d.J.B.); (J.C.C.)
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Esther Mancebo Sierra
- Immunology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Javier de Juan Bagudá
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (J.G.M.); (M.D.G.-C.C.); (J.d.J.B.); (J.C.C.)
- School of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Javier Castrodeza Calvo
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (J.G.M.); (M.D.G.-C.C.); (J.d.J.B.); (J.C.C.)
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Juan Francisco Delgado
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Red de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (J.G.M.); (M.D.G.-C.C.); (J.d.J.B.); (J.C.C.)
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28041 Madrid, Spain;
- School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abu-Khader A, Hu Q, Kamar F, Galaszkiewicz I, Wang W, Khan F, Berka N. Low incidence of de novo HLA antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination: A cohort study of patients awaiting kidney transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2023; 25:e14105. [PMID: 37650468 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibodies against human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA Abs) are associated with an increased risk of allograft loss. Herein, we report the prospective follow-up for anti-HLA Abs formation in 103 patients with end-stage kidney disease on the waiting list for transplantation who underwent COVID-19 vaccination. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sera were tested before and after vaccination using Luminex technology. The cohort comprised of 62 males and 41 females with a mean age of 56 ± 14 years. The patients received BNT162b2 (80.4%), mRNA-1273 (18.5%), AZD1222 (0.40%), or ChAdOx1-S (0.80%) vaccine. Patients were tested before and within 119 ± 50, 95 ± 46 and 25 ± 26 days after the first, second, and third dose of the vaccine, respectively. RESULTS No significant change in calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) after vaccination was seen. Although 98.1% of patients had no change in anti-HLA Abs profile or cPRA after vaccination, two patients (1.9%) developed de novo anti-HLA Abs against class I or II HLA antigens. In those two patients, the cPRA changed from 0% and 63% at baseline to 9% and 90% after vaccination, respectively. Both patients received the BNT162b2 mRNA-based vaccine. The earliest detected anti-HLA Abs was 18 days after the first dose. CONCLUSION In rare cases, new anti-HLA antibodies were observed after COVID-19 vaccination, with potential implications for transplantation. The low incidence of this phenomenon is outweighed by the clinical benefits of vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Abu-Khader
- Transplant Immunology and Histocompatibility Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Texas, USA
| | - Qian Hu
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Fareed Kamar
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Iwona Galaszkiewicz
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Alberta, Canada
| | - Wenjie Wang
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Faisal Khan
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Noureddine Berka
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wiebe C, Balshaw R, Gibson IW, Ho J, Shaw J, Karpinski M, Trachtenberg A, Pochinco D, Goldberg A, Birk P, Pinsk M, Rush DN, Nickerson PW. A rational approach to guide cost-effective de novo donor-specific antibody surveillance with tacrolimus immunosuppression. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1882-1892. [PMID: 37543094 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
De novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) after renal transplantation has been shown to correlate with antibody-mediated rejection and allograft loss. However, the lack of proven interventions and the time and cost associated with annual screening for dnDSA are difficult to justify for all recipients. We studied a well-characterized consecutive cohort (n = 949) with over 15 years of prospective dnDSA surveillance to identify risk factors that would help institute a resource-responsible surveillance strategy. Younger recipient age and HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch were independent predictors of dnDSA development. Combining both risk factors into recipient age molecular mismatch categories, we found that 52% of recipients could be categorized as low-risk for dnDSA development (median subclinical dnDSA-free survival at 5 and 10 years, 98% and 97%, respectively). After adjustment, multivariate correlates of dnDSA development included tacrolimus versus cyclosporin maintenance immunosuppression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6; P < .0001) and recipient age molecular mismatch category: intermediate versus low (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.5-4.2; P = .0007), high versus intermediate (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.6-4.2; P = .0002), and high versus low (HR, 6.36; 95% CI, 3.7-10.8; P < .00001). When combined, recipient age and HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch provide a novel data-driven approach to reduce testing by >50% while selecting those most likely to benefit from dnDSA surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Wiebe
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Shared Health Services Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| | - Rob Balshaw
- George and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ian W Gibson
- Shared Health Services Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Pathology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Julie Ho
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Shared Health Services Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jamie Shaw
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Martin Karpinski
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Aaron Trachtenberg
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Aviva Goldberg
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Patricia Birk
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Maury Pinsk
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - David N Rush
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Shared Health Services Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Peter W Nickerson
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Shared Health Services Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gauthier PT, Mackova M, Hirji A, Weinkauf J, Timofte IL, Snell GI, Westall GP, Havlin J, Lischke R, Zajacová A, Simonek J, Hachem R, Kreisel D, Levine D, Kubisa B, Piotrowska M, Juvet S, Keshavjee S, Jaksch P, Klepetko W, Halloran K, Halloran PF. Defining a natural killer cell-enriched molecular rejection-like state in lung transplant transbronchial biopsies. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1922-1938. [PMID: 37295720 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In lung transplantation, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) diagnosed using the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria is uncommon compared with other organs, and previous studies failed to find molecular AMR (ABMR) in lung biopsies. However, understanding of ABMR has changed with the recognition that ABMR in kidney transplants is often donor-specific antibody (DSA)-negative and associated with natural killer (NK) cell transcripts. We therefore searched for a similar molecular ABMR-like state in transbronchial biopsies using gene expression microarray results from the INTERLUNG study (#NCT02812290). After optimizing rejection-selective transcript sets in a training set (N = 488), the resulting algorithms separated an NK cell-enriched molecular rejection-like state (NKRL) from T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR)/Mixed in a test set (N = 488). Applying this approach to all 896 transbronchial biopsies distinguished 3 groups: no rejection, TCMR/Mixed, and NKRL. Like TCMR/Mixed, NKRL had increased expression of all-rejection transcripts, but NKRL had increased expression of NK cell transcripts, whereas TCMR/Mixed had increased effector T cell and activated macrophage transcripts. NKRL was usually DSA-negative and not recognized as AMR clinically. TCMR/Mixed was associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction, reduced one-second forced expiratory volume at the time of biopsy, and short-term graft failure, but NKRL was not. Thus, some lung transplants manifest a molecular state similar to DSA-negative ABMR in kidney and heart transplants, but its clinical significance must be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alim Hirji
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Greg I Snell
- Alfred Hospital Lung Transplant Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Glen P Westall
- Alfred Hospital Lung Transplant Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jan Havlin
- University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Jan Simonek
- University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ramsey Hachem
- Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Daniel Kreisel
- Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Bartosz Kubisa
- Pomeranian Medical University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Stephen Juvet
- Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shaf Keshavjee
- Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Karahan GE, Haasnoot GW, Voogt-Bakker K, Claas FHJ, Roelen D, Heidt S. A modeling approach for mean fluorescence intensity value harmonization and cutoff prediction for luminex single antigen bead assays of two different vendors. HLA 2023; 102:557-569. [PMID: 37130801 DOI: 10.1111/tan.15082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Luminex single antigen bead (SAB) kits from One Lambda (OL) and Lifecodes (LC) are widely used for HLA antibody detection but have substantial differences in design and assay protocol resulting in different mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values. Here, we present a non-linear modeling approach to accurately convert MFI values between two vendors and to establish user-independent MFI cutoffs when analyzing big datasets. HLA antibody data from a total of 47 EDTA-treated sera tested using both OL and LC SAB kits were analyzed. MFI comparisons were made for the common 84 HLA class I and 63 class II beads. In the exploration set (n = 24), a non-linear hyperbola model on raw MFI corrected by locus-specific highest self MFI subtraction yielded the highest correlation (class I r2 : 0.946, class II r2 : 0.898). Performance of the model was verified in an independent validation set (n = 12) (class I r2 : 0.952, class II r2 : 0.911). Furthermore, in an independent cohort of post-transplant serum samples (n = 11) using the vendor-specific MFI cutoffs dictated by the current model, we found 94% accuracy in bead-specific reactivity assignments by the two vendors. We recommend using the non-linear hyperbola modeling approach with self HLA correction and locus-specific analyzes to harmonize MFI values between two vendors in particular research datasets. As there are considerable variations between the two assays, using MFI conversion for individual patient samples is not recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonca E Karahan
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Geert W Haasnoot
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Kim Voogt-Bakker
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frans H J Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dave Roelen
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Battle R, Pritchard D, Peacock S, Hastie C, Worthington J, Jordan S, McCaughlan JA, Barnardo M, Cope R, Collins C, Diaz-Burlinson N, Rosser C, Foster L, Kallon D, Shaw O, Briggs D, Turner D, Anand A, Akbarzad-Yousefi A, Sage D. BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation. Int J Immunogenet 2023; 50 Suppl 2:3-63. [PMID: 37919251 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Battle
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Sarah Peacock
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Sue Jordan
- National Blood Service Tooting, London, UK
| | | | - Martin Barnardo
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rebecca Cope
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Luke Foster
- Birmingham Blood Donor Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Olivia Shaw
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - David Turner
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Arthi Anand
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hachem RR, Zeevi A. What is a clinically significant donor-specific antibody before lung transplantation? Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1657-1658. [PMID: 37301286 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ramsey R Hachem
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
| | - Adriana Zeevi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Aversa M, Kiernan J, Martinu T, Patriquin C, Barth D, Li Q, Huszti E, Ghany R, Cypel M, Keshavjee S, Singer LG, Tinckam K. Outcomes after flow cytometry crossmatch-positive lung transplants managed with perioperative desensitization. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1733-1739. [PMID: 37172694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Our program previously reported successful outcomes following virtual crossmatch (VXM)-positive lung transplants managed with perioperative desensitization, but our ability to stratify their immunologic risk was limited without flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) data before 2014. The aim of this study was to determine allograft and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival following VXM-positive/FCXM-positive lung transplants, which are performed at a minority of programs due to the high immunologic risk and lack of data on outcomes. All first-time lung transplant recipients between January 2014 and December 2019 were divided into 3 cohorts: VXM-negative (n = 764), VXM-positive/FCXM-negative (n = 64), and VXM-positive/FCXM-positive (n = 74). Allograft and CLAD-free survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Five-year allograft survival was 53% in the VXM-negative cohort, 64% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-negative cohort, and 57% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-positive cohort (P = .7171). Five-year CLAD-free survival was 53% in the VXM-negative cohort, 60% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-negative cohort, and 63% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-positive cohort (P = .8509). This study confirms that allograft and CLAD-free survival of patients who undergo VXM-positive/FCXM-positive lung transplants with the use of our protocol does not differ from those of other lung transplant recipients. Our protocol for VXM-positive lung transplants improves access to transplant for sensitized candidates and mitigates even high immunologic risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Aversa
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Kiernan
- HLA Laboratory, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tereza Martinu
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher Patriquin
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Barth
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Qixuan Li
- Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ella Huszti
- Biostatistics Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rasheed Ghany
- Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcelo Cypel
- Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shaf Keshavjee
- Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lianne G Singer
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathryn Tinckam
- HLA Laboratory, Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sharma P, Arora A. Basic Understanding of Liver Transplant Immunology. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2023; 13:1091-1102. [PMID: 37975047 PMCID: PMC10643508 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The liver is a specialized organ and plays an important role in our immune system. The liver constitutes parenchymal cells which are hepatocytes and cholangiocytes (60-80%) and non-parenchymal cells like liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs), hepatic satellite/Ito cells, Kupffer cells, neutrophils, mononuclear cells, T and B lymphocytes (conventional and non-conventional), natural killer cells, and natural killer T (NKT) cells. The liver mounts a rapid and strong immune response, under unfavorable conditions and acts as an immune tolerance to a variety of non-pathogenic antigens. This delicate and dynamic interaction between different kinds of immune cells in the liver maintains a balance between immune screening and immune tolerance. The liver allografts are privileged immunologically; however, allograft rejection is not uncommon and is classified as cell or antibody-mediated. Advancements in transplant immunology help in the prevention of allografts rejection by immune reactions of the host thus leading to better graft and host survival. Fewer patients may not require immunosuppression due to systemic donor-specific T-cell tolerance. The liver tolerance mechanism is poorly studied, and LSEC and unconventional lymphocytes play an important role that dampens T cell response either by inducing apoptosis of cells or inhibiting co-stimulatory pathways. Newer cell-based therapy based on Treg, dendritic cells, and mesenchymal stromal cells will probably change the future of immunosuppression. Various invasive and non-invasive biomarkers and artificial intelligence have also been investigated to predict graft survival, post-transplant complications, and immunotolerance in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Praveen Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Anil Arora
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Heise EL, Chichelnitskiy E, Greer M, Franz M, Aburahma K, Iablonskii P, de Manna ND, Christoph S, Verboom M, Hallensleben M, Boethig D, Avsar M, Welte T, Schwerk N, Sommer W, Haverich A, Warnecke G, Kuehn C, Falk C, Salman J, Ius F. Lung transplantation despite preformed donor-specific antihuman leukocyte antigen antibodies: a 9-year single-center experience. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1740-1756. [PMID: 37225088 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Pretransplant allosensitization to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) increases the recipient's waiting list time and mortality in lung transplantation. Rather than waiting for crossmatch-negative donors, since 2013, recipients with preformed donor-specific antiHLA antibodies (pfDSA) have been managed with repeated IgA- and IgM-enriched intravenous immunoglobulin (IgGAM) infusions, usually in combination with plasmapheresis before IgGAM and a single dose of antiCD20 antibody. This retrospective study presents our 9-year experience with patients transplanted with pfDSA. Records of patients transplanted between February 2013 and May 2022 were reviewed. Outcomes were compared between patients with pfDSA and those without any de novo donor-specific antiHLA antibodies. The median follow-up time was 50 months. Of the 1,043 patients who had undergone lung transplantation, 758 (72.7%) did not develop any early donor-specific antiHLA antibodies, and 62 (5.9%) patients exhibited pfDSA. Among the 52 (84%) patients who completed treatment, pfDSA was cleared in 38 (73%). In pfDSA vs control patients and at 8-year follow-up, respectively, graft survival (%) was 75 vs 65 (P = .493) and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (%) was 63 vs 65 (P = .525). In lung transplantation, crossing the preformed HLA-antibody barrier is safe using a treatment protocol based on IgGAM. Patients with pfDSA have a good 8-year graft survival rate and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction, similar to control patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L Heise
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Evgeny Chichelnitskiy
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Mark Greer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine,Hannover Medical School,Hannover,Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover/Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Franz
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Khalil Aburahma
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Pavel Iablonskii
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Medical Faculty, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Nunzio D de Manna
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stella Christoph
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Murielle Verboom
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael Hallensleben
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Dietmar Boethig
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Murat Avsar
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tobias Welte
- Department of Respiratory Medicine,Hannover Medical School,Hannover,Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover/Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicolaus Schwerk
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology Allergology and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover/Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sommer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover/Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Axel Haverich
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Gregor Warnecke
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover/Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Kuehn
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover/Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Falk
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover/Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jawad Salman
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover/Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabio Ius
- Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplant, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover/Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Meneghini M, Tambur AR. HLA-DQ antibodies in alloimmunity, what makes them different? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2023; 28:333-339. [PMID: 37219535 PMCID: PMC10487393 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW De novo HLA-DQ antibodies are the most frequently observed after solid-organ allotransplantation; and are associated with the worse adverse graft outcomes compared with all other HLA antibodies. However, the biological explanation for this observation is not yet known. Herein, we examine unique characteristics of alloimmunity directed specifically against HLA-DQ molecules. RECENT FINDINGS While investigators attempted to decipher functional properties of HLA class II antigens that may explain their immunogenicity and pathogenicity, most early studies focused on the more expressed molecule - HLA-DR. We here summarize up-to-date literature documenting specific features of HLA-DQ, as compared to other class II HLA antigens. Structural and cell-surface expression differences have been noted on various cell types. Some evidence suggests variations in antigen-presenting function and intracellular activation pathways after antigen/antibody interaction. SUMMARY The clinical effects of donor-recipient incompatibility at HLA-DQ, the risk of generating de novo antibodies leading to rejection, and the inferior graft outcomes indicate increased immunogenicity and pathogenicity that is unique to this HLA antigen. Clearly, knowledge generated for HLA-DR cannot be applied interchangeably. Deeper understanding of features unique to HLA-DQ may support the generation of targeted preventive-therapeutic strategies and ultimately improve solid-organ transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Meneghini
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anat R. Tambur
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Goldsby J, Beermann K, Frankel C, Parish A, Stauffer N, Schandert A, Erkanli A, Reynolds JM. Preemptive immune globulin therapy in sensitized lung transplant recipients. Transpl Immunol 2023; 80:101904. [PMID: 37499884 PMCID: PMC10631014 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sensitized lung transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing donor-specific antibodies, which have been associated with acute and chronic rejection. Perioperative intravenous immune globulin has been used in sensitized individuals to down-regulate antibody production. METHODS We compared patients with a pre-transplant calculated panel reactive antibody ≥25% who did not receive preemptive immune globulin therapy to a historical control that received preemptive immune globulin therapy. Our cohort included 59 patients, 17 patients did not receive immune globulin therapy and 42 patients received therapy. RESULTS Donor specific antibody development was numerically higher in the non-immune globulin group compared to the immune globulin group (58.8% vs 33.3%, respectively, odds ratio 2.80, 95% confidence interval [0.77, 10.79], p = 0.13). Median time to antibody development was 9 days (Q1, Q3: 7, 19) and 28 days (Q1, Q3: 7, 58) in the non-immune globulin and immune globulin groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups in the incidence of primary graft dysfunction at 72 h post-transplant or acute cellular rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction at 12 months. CONCLUSION These findings are hypothesis generating and emphasize the need for larger, randomized studies to determine association of immune globulin therapy with clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Goldsby
- Department of Pharmacy, Duke Health, DUHS Box 3089, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Kristi Beermann
- Department of Pharmacy, Duke Health, DUHS Box 3089, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
| | - Courtney Frankel
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Duke Health, 330 Trent Drive, Box 102352, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Alice Parish
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, Suite 1102, Hock Plaza Box 2721, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Nicolas Stauffer
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, Suite 1102, Hock Plaza Box 2721, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Amanda Schandert
- Department of Pharmacy, Duke Health, DUHS Box 3089, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Alaattin Erkanli
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, Suite 1102, Hock Plaza Box 2721, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - John M Reynolds
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Duke Health, 330 Trent Drive, Box 102352, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zeng S, Crichton ES, Ford ML, Badell IR. Memory T follicular helper cells drive donor-specific antibodies independent of memory B cells and primary germinal center and alloantibody formation. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1511-1525. [PMID: 37302575 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigen antibodies are important immunologic mediators of renal allograft loss and are difficult to control. The inability to permanently eliminate donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is partly due to an incomplete understanding of the cellular mechanisms driving alloantibody formation, recurrence, and maintenance. Memory T follicular helper (mTfh) cells rapidly interact with memory B cells upon antigen re-exposure for anamnestic humoral responses, but little is known about Tfh memory in transplantation. We hypothesized that alloreactive mTfh cells form after transplantation and play a critical role in DSA formation following alloantigen re-encounter. To test this hypothesis, we utilized murine skin allograft models to identify and characterize Tfh memory and interrogate its ability to mediate alloantibody responses. We identified alloreactive Tfh memory as a mediator of accelerated humoral alloresponses independent of memory B cells and primary germinal center, or DSA, formation. Furthermore, we demonstrate that mTfh-driven alloantibody formation is susceptible to CD28 costimulation blockade. These findings provide novel insight into a pathologic role for memory Tfh in alloantibody responses and strongly support shifting therapeutic focus from the singular targeting of B cell lineage cells and alloantibodies themselves to multimodal strategies that include inhibition of mTfh cells to treat DSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan Zeng
- Emory Transplant Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Alves TA, Nascimento E, de Castro LB, Fabreti-Oliveira RA. Impact of HLA eplet mismatch load in immunological outcomes after living donor kidney transplantation. Transpl Immunol 2023; 80:101908. [PMID: 37536379 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION HLA eplets mismatches (eMM) have been associated with negative kidney outcomes after transplantation, such as the development of de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), and early graft loss. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effects of the HLA eMM load on dnDSA development, ABMR, renal function, allograft survival and graft loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study involved 159 living donor kidney transplant patients categorized into groups based on antigen HLA mismatches assessed traditionally and HLA eMM load. Patients had followed for at least one year. The EpViX online program was used to evaluate the HLA eMM load. Cox models were constructed to assess the risk of graft loss. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were carried out. The analyses had performed using the R program and p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS From all 159 patients, 28 (17.6%) lost their allografts. Rejection episodes occurred in 37.1% of patients, 13.6% of whom were ABMR. Patients with rejection episodes had higher HLA-AB (p = 0.032) and HLA-DR (p = 0.008) HLA eMM load, HLA-AB (p = 0.006) and HLA-DR (p = 0.009) antigens mismatches, and higher proportions of the following eMM in the HLA-DR locus: 70R eMM (p = 0.015), 70RE (p = 0.015), 74E (p = 0.015) and 48Q (p = 0.047). In multiple models, the presence of HLA-DR 70qq eMM (HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.47; 9.55) add an increase in creatinine levels at 1-year (HR 3.87, 95% CI 2.30, 6.53) were associated with the risk of graft loss. CONCLUSION The HLA eMM load was related to episodes of rejection and allograft loss. The HLA-DR eMM was most strongly associated with a worse immunologic outcome than eMM mismatches for HLA-AB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thiago Abramo Alves
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; University Hospital of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| | - Evaldo Nascimento
- IMUNOLAB - Laboratory of Histocompatibility, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Institute of Research and Education of the Hospital Santa Casa, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| | | | - Raquel Aparecida Fabreti-Oliveira
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; IMUNOLAB - Laboratory of Histocompatibility, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Townsend M, Pidborochynski T, Cantor RS, Khoury M, Campbell P, Halpin A, Urschel S, Kim D, Nahirniak S, West LJ, Buchholz H, Conway J. Prospective examination of HLA sensitization after VAD implantation in children and adults. Transpl Immunol 2023; 80:101892. [PMID: 37419373 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have improved survival to heart transplantation (HTx). However, VADs have been associated with development of antibodies against human leukocyte antigen (HLA-Ab) which may limit the donor pool and decrease survival post-HTx. Since HLA-Ab development after VAD insertion is poorly understood, the purpose of this prospective single-center study was to quantify the incidence of and evaluate risk factors for HLA-Ab development across the age spectrum following VAD implantation. METHODS Adult and pediatric patients undergoing VAD placement as bridge to transplant or transplant candidacy between 5/2016 and 7/2020 were enrolled. HLA-Ab were assessed pre-VAD and at 1-, 3-, and 12-months post-implant. Factors associated with HLA-Ab development post-VAD implant were explored using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS 15/41 (37%) adults and 7/17 (41%) children developed new HLA-Ab post-VAD. The majority of patients (19/22) developed HLA-Ab within two months of implant. New class I HLA-Ab were more common (87% adult, 86% pediatric). Prior pregnancy was strongly associated with HLA-Ab development in adults post-VAD (HR 16.7, 95% CI 1.8-158, p = 0.01). Of the patients who developed new HLA-Ab post-VAD, in 45% (10/22) the HLA-Ab resolved while in 55% (12/22) the HLA-Ab persisted. CONCLUSION More than one-third of adult and pediatric VAD patients developed new HLA-Ab early after VAD implant with the majority having class I antibodies. Prior pregnancy was strongly associated with post-VAD HLA-Ab development. Further studies are needed to predict regression or persistence of HLA-Ab developed post-VAD, to understand modulation of individuals' immune responses to sensitizing events, and to determine whether transiently detected HLA-Ab post-VAD recur and have long-term clinical impact post-heart transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine Townsend
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | - Tara Pidborochynski
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Ryan S Cantor
- Kirklin Solutions, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Michael Khoury
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Canada Donation And Transplantation Research Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Patricia Campbell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Anne Halpin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Simon Urschel
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Canada Donation And Transplantation Research Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel Kim
- Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Susan Nahirniak
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Lori J West
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Canada Donation And Transplantation Research Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Holger Buchholz
- Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer Conway
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Stollery Children's Hospital, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Alberta Transplant Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hod-Dvorai R, Philogene MC, Timofeeva O, Gimferrer I, Dunckley H, Greenshields A, Jindra P. Utilizing proficiency testing survey data to create advanced educational content: the virtual crossmatch challenge model. Front Genet 2023; 14:1256498. [PMID: 37811147 PMCID: PMC10552184 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1256498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Proficiency testing (PT) surveys include data from laboratories across the world and are ideal for creating advanced educational content, beyond just consensus grading. Educational challenges provide a unique opportunity to probe common laboratory practices and risk assessment, especially in cases where there is no "analyte" tested. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility evaluation between donor and recipient pairs has been traditionally assessed using T-cell and B-cell physical crossmatches. However, advancements in our ability to identify and characterize HLA antibodies using solid phase assays, in combination with changing deceased donor allocation schemes and improved HLA typing, have shifted the paradigm from performing physical crossmatches to the use of the virtual crossmatch (VXM). VXM is a compatibility assessment relying on the interpretation of pre-transplant HLA laboratory data and as such, it is not an "analyte". However, VXM results are used in clinical decision-making. The VXM assessment depends on patient characteristics as well as laboratory and transplant center practices but must ensure safe transplantation outcomes while maintaining equity in access to transplantation. In this manuscript, we describe the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (ASHI) PT Educational VXM Challenge, as a model for creating educational content using PT survey data. We discuss the different components of the VXM Challenge and highlight major findings and learning points acquired from ASHI VXM Challenges performed between 2018-2022, such as the lack of correlation between the VXM and the physical crossmatch in the presence of low level donor-specific antibodies (DSA), or when the DSA were aimed against donor alleles that are not present on the antibody panel, and in the presence of an antibody to a shared eplet. Finally, we show that the VXM Educational Challenge serves as a valuable tool to highlight the strengths and pitfalls of the VXM assessment and reveals differences in testing and result interpretation among participating HLA laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reut Hod-Dvorai
- Department of Pathology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
| | - Mary Carmelle Philogene
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Olga Timofeeva
- Department of Pathology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Idoia Gimferrer
- Department of Immunogenetics/HLA, BloodworksNW, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Heather Dunckley
- New Zealand Transplantation and Immunogenetics Laboratory, New Zealand Blood Service, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Peter Jindra
- Immune Evaluation Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Locke AF, Hickey M, Valenzuela NM, Butler C, Sosa R, Zheng Y, Gjertson D, Reed EF, Zhang Q. Virtual and Reality: An Analysis of the UCLA Virtual Crossmatch Exchanges. Transplantation 2023; 107:1776-1785. [PMID: 36944607 PMCID: PMC10358445 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
The "virtual" crossmatch (VXM) has become a critical tool to predict the compatibility between an organ donor and a potential recipient. Yet, nonstandardized laboratory practice can lead to variability in VXM interpretation. Therefore, UCLA's VXM Exchange survey was designed to understand factors that influence the variability of VXM prediction in the presence of HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA). Thirty-six donor blood samples and 72 HLA reference sera were sent to 35 participating laboratories to perform HLA antibody testing, flow crossmatch (FXM), and VXM from 2014 to 2019, consisting of 144 T/B-cell FXM pairs and 112 T/B-cell VXM pairs. In the FXM survey, 86% T-cell FXM and 84% B-cell FXM achieved >80% concordance among laboratories. In the VXM survey, 81% T-cell VXM and 80% VXM achieved >80% concordance. The concordance between FXM and VXM was 79% for T cell and 87% for B cell. The consensus between VXM and FXM was high with strong DSA. However, significant variability was observed in sera with (1) very high titer antibodies that exit prozone effect; (2) weak-to-moderate DSA, particularly in the presence of multiple weak DSAs; and (3) DSA against lowly expressed antigens. With the increasing use the VXM, standardization and continuous learning via exchange surveys will provide better understanding and quality controls for VXM to improve accuracy across all centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlene F. Locke
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michelle Hickey
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nicole M. Valenzuela
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Carrie Butler
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Rebecca Sosa
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ying Zheng
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David Gjertson
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Elaine F. Reed
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Qiuheng Zhang
- UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
van den Broek DAJ, Meziyerh S, Budde K, Lefaucheur C, Cozzi E, Bertrand D, López del Moral C, Dorling A, Emonds MP, Naesens M, de Vries APJ. The Clinical Utility of Post-Transplant Monitoring of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients: A Consensus Report With Guideline Statements for Clinical Practice. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11321. [PMID: 37560072 PMCID: PMC10408721 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
Solid phase immunoassays improved the detection and determination of the antigen-specificity of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The widespread use of SPI in kidney transplantation also introduced new clinical dilemmas, such as whether patients should be monitored for DSA pre- or post-transplantation. Pretransplant screening through SPI has become standard practice and DSA are readily determined in case of suspected rejection. However, DSA monitoring in recipients with stable graft function has not been universally established as standard of care. This may be related to uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of DSA monitoring as a screening tool. This consensus report aims to appraise the clinical utility of DSA monitoring in recipients without overt signs of graft dysfunction, using the Wilson & Junger criteria for assessing the validity of a screening practice. To assess the evidence on DSA monitoring, the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated workgroup, comprised of experts in transplantation nephrology and immunology, to review relevant literature. Guidelines and statements were developed during a consensus conference by Delphi methodology that took place in person in November 2022 in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the workgroup on subclinical DSA monitoring are presented in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis A. J. van den Broek
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Soufian Meziyerh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Kidney Transplant Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Emanuele Cozzi
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Transplant Immunology Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Dominique Bertrand
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Covadonga López del Moral
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Anthony Dorling
- Department of Inflammation Biology, Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marie-Paule Emonds
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory (HILA), Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aiko P. J. de Vries
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ho J, Schaub S, Jackson AM, Balshaw R, Carroll R, Cun S, De Serres SA, Fantus D, Handschin J, Hönger G, Jevnikar AM, Kleiser M, Lee JH, Li Y, Nickerson P, Pei R, Pochinco D, Shih R, Trinh M, Wang J, Nguyen J, Knechtle S. Multicenter Validation of a Urine CXCL10 Assay for Noninvasive Monitoring of Renal Transplants. Transplantation 2023; 107:1630-1641. [PMID: 36949034 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urine CXCL10 (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10, interferon gamma-induced protein 10 [IP10]) outperforms standard-of-care monitoring for detecting subclinical and early clinical T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and may advance TCMR therapy development through biomarker-enriched trials. The goal was to perform an international multicenter validation of a CXCL10 bead-based immunoassay (Luminex) for transplant surveillance and compare with an electrochemiluminescence-based (Meso Scale Discovery [MSD]) assay used in transplant trials. METHODS Four laboratories participated in the Luminex assay development and evaluation. Urine CXCL10 was measured by Luminex and MSD in 2 independent adult kidney transplant trial cohorts (Basel and TMCT04). In an independent test and validation set, a linear mixed-effects model to predict (log 10 -transformed) MSD CXCL10 from Luminex CXCL10 was developed to determine the conversion between assays. Net reclassification was determined after mathematical conversion. RESULTS The Luminex assay was precise, with an intra- and interassay coefficient of variation 8.1% and 9.3%; showed modest agreement between 4 laboratories (R 0.96 to 0.99, P < 0.001); and correlated with known CXCL10 in a single- (n = 100 urines, R 0.94 to 0.98, P < 0.001) and multicenter cohort (n = 468 urines, R 0.92, P < 0.001) but the 2 assays were not equivalent by Passing-Bablok regression. Linear mixed-effects modeling demonstrated an intercept of -0.490 and coefficient of 1.028, showing Luminex CXCL10 are slightly higher than MSD CXCL10, but the agreement is close to 1.0. After conversion of the biopsy thresholds, the decision to biopsy would be changed for only 6% (5/85) patients showing acceptable reclassification. CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate this urine CXCL10 Luminex immunoassay is robust, reproducible, and accurate, indicating it can be readily translated into clinical HLA laboratories for serial posttransplant surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Ho
- Department of Internal Medicine and Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- Transplant Manitoba, Shared Health Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Transplantation Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- HLA-Diagnostic and Immunogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Robert Balshaw
- George and Fay Yee Center for Healthcare Innovation, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Robert Carroll
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Sylvia Cun
- Thermo Fisher Scientific, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Daniel Fantus
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) and Centre de Recherche du CHUM (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Joelle Handschin
- Transplantation Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Gideon Hönger
- Transplantation Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- HLA-Diagnostic and Immunogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Anthony M Jevnikar
- Department of Medicine, Western University and Multiorgan Transplant Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - Marc Kleiser
- HLA-Diagnostic and Immunogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Yan Li
- Department of Surgery and Immunology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Peter Nickerson
- Department of Internal Medicine and Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- Transplant Manitoba, Shared Health Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- Canadian Blood Services HLA Laboratory, Diagnostic Services of Manitoba, Canada
| | - Rui Pei
- Thermo Fisher Scientific, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Denise Pochinco
- Canadian Blood Services HLA Laboratory, Diagnostic Services of Manitoba, Canada
| | - Remi Shih
- Terasaki Innovation Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Jason Wang
- Thermo Fisher Scientific, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Stuart Knechtle
- Department of Surgery and Immunology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lima ACM, Getz J, do Amaral GB, Loth G, Funke VAM, Nabhan SK, Petterle RR, de Marco R, Gerbase-DeLima M, Pereira NF, Bonfim C, Pasquini R. Donor-specific HLA antibodies are associated with graft failure and delayed hematologic recovery after unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther 2023:S2666-6367(23)01298-8. [PMID: 37220839 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Graft failure (GF) is one of the major concerns after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Although earlier reports have associated the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) with increased risk of GF after unrelated donor allo-HCT, recent studies have failed to confirm this association. OBJECTIVE We sought to validate the presence of DSAs as a risk factor for GF and hematologic recovery in the unrelated donor allo-HCT setting. STUDY DESIGN We retrospectively evaluated 303 consecutive patients who underwent their first unrelated donor allo-HCT at our institution from January 2008 to December 2017. DSA evaluation was performed using 2 Single Antigen Beads (SAB) assays, DSA titration with 1:2, 1:8, and 1:32 dilutions, C1q-binding assay, and absorption/elution protocol to assess possible false-positive DSA reactivity. The primary endpoints were neutrophil and platelet recovery and GF, whereas the secondary endpoint was overall survival. Multivariable analyses were performed using Fine-Gray competing risks regression or Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS The median patient age was 14 years (range, 0-61 years), 56.1% were male, and 52.5% were transplanted for nonmalignant diseases. Eleven patients (3.63%) were DSA-positive. Of them, 10 had preexisting DSAs, and one showed post-transplant de novo DSA. Nine patients had 1 DSA, 1 had 2 DSAs, and 1 had 3 DSAs, with a median MFI of 4334 (range, 588-20,456) and 3581 (range, 227-12,266) in LABScreen and LIFECODES SAB assays, respectively. Overall, 21 patients experienced GF. Of them, 12 had primary graft rejection, 8 had secondary graft rejection, and 1 had primary poor graft function. The cumulative incidences of GF at 28, 100, and 365 days were 4.0% (95% CI, 2.2%-6.6%), 6.6% (95% CI, 4.2%-9.8%), and 6.9% (95% CI, 4.4%-10.2%), respectively. In the multivariable analyses, DSA-positive patients had significantly delayed neutrophil (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; P = .006) and platelet recovery (SHR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.74; P = .0003) than patients without DSAs. In addition, only DSAs were significant predictors of primary GF at 28 days (SHR = 2.78; 95% CI, 1.65-4.68; P = .0001). The Fine-Gray regression also demonstrated that the presence of DSAs was strongly associated with a higher incidence of overall GF (SHR = 7.60; 95%CI, 2.61-22.14; P = .0002). DSA-positive patients with GF had significantly higher median MFI values than DSA-positive patients who achieved engraftment in LIFECODES SAB assay using neat serum (10,334 vs. 1250; P = .006) and in LABScreen SAB at 1:32 dilution (1627 vs. 61; P = .006). All 3 patients with C1q-positive DSAs failed to engraft. DSAs were not predictive of inferior survival (hazard ratio = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.20-1.26, P = .14). CONCLUSIONS Our results validate the presence of DSAs as a significant risk factor for GF and poor hematologic recovery after unrelated donor allo-HCT. Thus, careful pre-transplant DSA evaluation may optimize unrelated donor selection and improve allo-HCT outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Cardoso Martins Lima
- Immunogenetics Laboratory - Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil; Immunogenetics Institute (IGEN), Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | - Joselito Getz
- Immunogenetics Laboratory - Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Geovana Borsato do Amaral
- Immunogenetics Laboratory - Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Gisele Loth
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit - Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil; Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Vaneuza Araújo Moreira Funke
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit - Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Samir Kanaan Nabhan
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit - Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | | | - Renato de Marco
- Immunogenetics Institute (IGEN), Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Maria Gerbase-DeLima
- Immunogenetics Institute (IGEN), Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Noemi Farah Pereira
- Immunogenetics Laboratory - Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Carmem Bonfim
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit - Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil; Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Ricardo Pasquini
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit - Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
DeFilippis EM, Kransdorf EP, Jaiswal A, Zhang X, Patel J, Kobashigawa JA, Baran DA, Kittleson MM. Detection and management of HLA sensitization in candidates for adult heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2023; 42:409-422. [PMID: 36631340 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Heart transplantation (HT) remains the preferred therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. However, for sensitized HT candidates who have antibodies to human leukocyte antigens , finding a suitable donor can be challenging and can lead to adverse waitlist outcomes. In recent years, the number of sensitized patients awaiting HT has increased likely due to the use of durable and mechanical circulatory support as well as increasing number of candidates with underlying congenital heart disease. This State-of-the-Art review discusses the assessment of human leukocyte antigens antibodies, potential desensitization strategies including mechanisms of action and specific protocols, the approach to a potential donor including the use of complement-dependent cytotoxicity, flow cytometry, and virtual crossmatches, and peritransplant induction management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ersilia M DeFilippis
- Center for Advanced Cardiac Care, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Evan P Kransdorf
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Abhishek Jaiswal
- Hartford HealthCare Heart and Vascular Institute, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Xiaohai Zhang
- HLA and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jignesh Patel
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jon A Kobashigawa
- Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - David A Baran
- Cleveland Clinic, Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Weston, Florida
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Altun E, Yavuz M. Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Paired Donation Transplantation: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:325-331. [PMID: 36890053 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the kidney paired donation (KPD) program recipients with the traditional living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) recipients regarding patient and graft survival. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 141 recipients of the KPD program and 141 classic LDKT recipients that we matched for age and sex as controls between July 2005 and June 2019. We compared the 2 transplant groups for patient and kidney survival using the Kaplan-Maier test. We also performed Cox Regression analysis to examine factors affecting patient survival, including transplant type. RESULTS The average follow-up period was 96.17 ± 44.22 months. Of the 282 patients, 88 died in the follow-up period. There was no statistically significant difference in graft and patient survival between the KPD and LDKT groups. In the Cox regression model, including the transplant type, only the serum creatinine level measured in the first month after discharge was a significant factor in predicting patient survival. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study indicate that the KPD program is an effective and reliable method to increase LDKT. Country-wide multicentric studies should confirm the results of this study. In countries where cadaver transplantation is insufficient, efforts should be made to expand the KPD program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eda Altun
- Bahcesehir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Goztepe Medicalpark Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Melike Yavuz
- Bahcesehir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Istanbul
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Halloran PF, Reeve J, Madill-Thomsen KS, Demko Z, Prewett A, Gauthier P, Billings P, Lawrence C, Lowe D, Hidalgo LG. Antibody-mediated Rejection Without Detectable Donor-specific Antibody Releases Donor-derived Cell-free DNA: Results From the Trifecta Study. Transplantation 2023; 107:709-719. [PMID: 36190186 PMCID: PMC9946174 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trifecta (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04239703) is a prospective trial defining relationships between donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), donor-specific antibody (DSA), and molecular findings in kidney transplant biopsies. Previous analyses of double results showed dd-cfDNA was strongly associated with rejection-associated molecules in the biopsy. The present study analyzed the triple results in 280 biopsies, focusing on the question of dd-cfDNA levels in DSA-negative antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). METHODS Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System biopsy testing was performed at Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, dd-cfDNA testing at Natera, Inc, and central HLA antibody testing at One Lambda Inc. Local DSA and histologic diagnoses were assigned per center standard-of-care. RESULTS DSA was frequently negative in both molecular (56%) and histologic (51%) AMR. DSA-negative AMR had slightly less molecular AMR activity and histologic peritubular capillaritis than DSA-positive AMR. However, all AMRs-DSA-positive or -negative-showed elevated %dd-cfDNA. There was no association between dd-cfDNA and DSA in biopsies without rejection. In AMR, %dd-cfDNA ≥1.0 was more frequent (75%) than DSA positivity (44%). In logistic regression, dd-cfDNA percent (area under the curve [AUC] 0.85) or quantity (AUC 0.86) predicted molecular AMR better than DSA (AUC 0.66). However, the best predictions incorporated both dd-cfDNA and DSA, plus time posttransplant (AUC 0.88). CONCLUSIONS DSA-negative AMR has moderately decreased mean molecular and histologic AMR-associated features compared with DSA-positive AMR, though similarly elevated dd-cfDNA levels. In predicting AMR at the time of indication biopsies in this population, dd-cfDNA is superior to DSA, reflecting the prevalence of DSA-negative AMR, but the optimal predictions incorporated both dd-cfDNA and DSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip F. Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Transcriptome Sciences, Inc, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jeff Reeve
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Luis G. Hidalgo
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Tambur AR, Das R. Can We Use Eplets (or Molecular) Mismatch Load Analysis to Improve Organ Allocation? The Hope and the Hype. Transplantation 2023; 107:605-615. [PMID: 36163639 PMCID: PMC9944744 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, there have been calls for implementation of "epitope matching" in deceased-donor organ allocation policies (later changed to "eplet matching"). Emerging data indeed support the use of molecular mismatch load analysis in specific patient groups, with the objective of posttransplant stratification into different treatment arms. For this purpose, the expectation is to statistically categorize patients as low- or high-immune-risk. Importantly, these patients will continue to be monitored' and their risk category, as well as their management, can be adjusted according to on-going findings. However, when discussing deceased donor organ allocation and matching algorithms, where the decision is not modifiable and has lasting impact on outcomes, the situation is fundamentally different. The goal of changing allocation schemes is to achieve the best possible HLA compatibility between donor and recipient. Immunologically speaking, this is a very different objective. For this purpose, the specific interplay of immunogenicity between the donor and any potential recipient must be understood. In seeking compatibility, the aim is not to redefine matching but to identify those mismatches that are "permissible" or' in other words, less immunogenic. In our eagerness to improve transplant outcome, unfortunately, we have conflated the hype with the hope. Terminology is used improperly, and new terms are created in the process with no sufficient support. Here, we call for a cautious evaluation of baseline assumptions and a critical review of the evidence to minimize unintended consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat R. Tambur
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Rajdeep Das
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Muro M, Legaz I. Importance of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and leukocyte antigen/killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genes in liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:766-772. [PMID: 36816626 PMCID: PMC9932425 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i5.766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Many mechanisms have been proposed to explain the hypothetical state of hepatic tolerance, which is described by eventual imbalances or deregulation in the balance of cytokines, mediators, effectors, and regulatory cells in the complex milieu of the liver. In this section, we will comment on the importance of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) as well as the compatibility and pairings of HLA and killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) genotypes in the evolution of liver transplantation. Thus, HLA compatibility, viral infections, and HLA-C/KIR combinations have all been linked to liver transplant rejection and survival. There have been reports of increased risk of acute and chronic rejection with ductopenia, faster graft fibrosis, biliary problems, poorer survival, and even de novo autoimmune hepatitis when DSAs are present in the recipient. Higher mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of the DSAs and smaller graft size were associated with poorer patient outcomes, implying that high-risk patients with preformed DSAs should be considered for selecting the graft placed and desensitization methods, according to the investigators. Similarly, in a combined kidney-liver transplant, a pretransplant with a visible expression of several DSAs revealed that these antibodies were resistant to treatment. The renal graft was lost owing to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The HLA antigens expressed by the transplanted liver graft influenced antibody elimination. Pathologists are increasingly diagnosing AMR in liver transplants, and desensitization therapy has even been employed in situations of AMR, particularly in patients with DSAs in kidney-hepatic transplants and high-class II MFI due to Luminex. In conclusion, after revealing the negative impacts of DSAs with high MFI, pretransplant virtual crossmatch techniques may be appropriate to improve evolution; however, they may extend cold ischemia periods by requiring the donor to be typed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Muro
- Immunology Service, University Clinical Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca-Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), Murcia 30120, Spain
| | - Isabel Legaz
- Department of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute (IMIB), Regional Campus of International Excellence “Campus Mare Nostrum,” Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia 30120, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Llinàs-Mallol L, Raïch-Regué D, Pascual J, Crespo M. Alloimmune risk assessment for antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: A practical proposal. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2023; 37:100745. [PMID: 36572001 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2022.100745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. Although an improvement in graft survival has been observed in the last decades with the use of different immunosuppressive drugs, this is still limited in time with antibody-mediated rejection being a main cause of graft-loss. Immune monitoring and risk assessment of antibody-mediated rejection before and after kidney transplantation with useful biomarkers is key to tailoring treatments to achieve the best outcomes. Here, we provide a review of the rationale and several accessible tools for immune monitoring, from the most classic to the modern ones. Finally, we end up discussing a practical proposal for alloimmune risk assessment in kidney transplantation, including histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA antibodies, HLA molecular mismatch analysis and characterization of peripheral blood immune cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Llinàs-Mallol
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dàlia Raïch-Regué
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Marta Crespo
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Seeking Standardized Definitions for HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplants: A Systematic Review. Transplantation 2023; 107:231-253. [PMID: 35915547 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no standard definition for "HLA incompatible" transplants. For the first time, we systematically assessed how HLA incompatibility was defined in contemporary peer-reviewed publications and its prognostic implication to transplant outcomes. METHODS We combined 2 independent searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from 2015 to 2019. Content-expert reviewers screened for original research on outcomes of HLA-incompatible transplants (defined as allele or molecular mismatch and solid-phase or cell-based assays). We ascertained the completeness of reporting on a predefined set of variables assessing HLA incompatibility, therapies, and outcomes. Given significant heterogeneity, we conducted narrative synthesis and assessed risk of bias in studies examining the association between death-censored graft failure and HLA incompatibility. RESULTS Of 6656 screened articles, 163 evaluated transplant outcomes by HLA incompatibility. Most articles reported on cytotoxic/flow T-cell crossmatches (n = 98). Molecular genotypes were reported for selected loci at the allele-group level. Sixteen articles reported on epitope compatibility. Pretransplant donor-specific HLA antibodies were often considered (n = 143); yet there was heterogeneity in sample handling, assay procedure, and incomplete reporting on donor-specific HLA antibodies assignment. Induction (n = 129) and maintenance immunosuppression (n = 140) were frequently mentioned but less so rejection treatment (n = 72) and desensitization (n = 70). Studies assessing death-censored graft failure risk by HLA incompatibility were vulnerable to bias in the participant, predictor, and analysis domains. CONCLUSIONS Optimization of transplant outcomes and personalized care depends on accurate HLA compatibility assessment. Reporting on a standard set of variables will help assess generalizability of research, allow knowledge synthesis, and facilitate international collaboration in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
42
|
Hricik DE, Armstrong B, Alhamad T, Brennan DC, Bromberg JS, Bunnapradist S, Chandran S, Fairchild RL, Foley DP, Formica R, Gibson IW, Kesler K, Kim SJ, Mannon RB, Menon MC, Newell KA, Nickerson P, Odim J, Poggio ED, Sung R, Shapiro R, Tinckam K, Vincenti F, Heeger PS. Infliximab Induction Lacks Efficacy and Increases BK Virus Infection in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results of the CTOT-19 Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 34:145-159. [PMID: 36195441 PMCID: PMC10101585 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2022040454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) of a kidney transplant (KTx) upregulates TNF α production that amplifies allograft inflammation and may negatively affect transplant outcomes. METHODS We tested the effects of blocking TNF peri-KTx via a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 15-center, phase 2 clinical trial. A total of 225 primary transplant recipients of deceased-donor kidneys (KTx; 38.2% Black/African American, 44% White) were randomized to receive intravenous infliximab (IFX) 3 mg/kg or saline placebo (PLBO) initiated before kidney reperfusion. All patients received rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction and maintenance immunosuppression (IS) with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. The primary end point was the difference between groups in mean 24-month eGFR. RESULTS There was no difference in the primary end point of 24-month eGFR between IFX (52.45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ; 95% CI, 48.38 to 56.52) versus PLBO (57.35 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ; 95% CI, 53.18 to 61.52; P =0.1). There were no significant differences between groups in rates of delayed graft function, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), development of de novo donor-specific antibodies, or graft loss/death. Immunosuppression did not differ, and day 7 post-KTx plasma analyses showed approximately ten-fold lower TNF ( P <0.001) in IFX versus PLBO. BK viremia requiring IS change occurred more frequently in IFX (28.9%) versus PLBO (13.4%; P =0.004), with a strong trend toward higher rates of BKV nephropathy in IFX (13.3%) versus PLBO (4.9%; P =0.06). CONCLUSIONS IFX induction therapy does not benefit recipients of kidney transplants from deceased donors on this IS regimen. Because the intervention unexpectedly increased rates of BK virus infections, our findings underscore the complexities of targeting peritransplant inflammation as a strategy to improve KTx outcomes.Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02495077).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald E Hricik
- Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Tarek Alhamad
- Department of Medicine, Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | | | - Sindhu Chandran
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Robert L Fairchild
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute and the Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - David P Foley
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Richard Formica
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Ian W Gibson
- Departments of Medicine and Pathology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | - S Joseph Kim
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Roslyn B Mannon
- Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Madhav C Menon
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Peter Nickerson
- Departments of Medicine and Pathology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Jonah Odim
- Transplant Branch, Division of Allergy, Immunology and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Emilio D Poggio
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute and the Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Randall Sung
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ron Shapiro
- Departments of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Recanati Miller Transplant Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Kathryn Tinckam
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Flavio Vincenti
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Peter S Heeger
- Departments of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Recanati Miller Transplant Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
The Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System: Assessment of Rejection and Injury in Heart Transplant Biopsies. Transplantation 2023; 107:27-44. [PMID: 36508644 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This review describes the development of the Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System (MMDx) for heart transplant endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs). MMDx-Heart uses microarrays to measure biopsy-based gene expression and ensembles of machine learning algorithms to interpret the results and compare each new biopsy to a large reference set of earlier biopsies. MMDx assesses T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), recent parenchymal injury, and atrophy-fibrosis, continually "learning" from new biopsies. Rejection-associated transcripts mapped in kidney transplants and experimental systems were used to identify TCMR, AMR, and recent injury-induced inflammation. Rejection and injury emerged as gradients of intensity, rather than binary classes. AMR was one-third donor-specific antibody (DSA)-negative, and many EMBs first considered to have no rejection displayed minor AMR-like changes, with increased probability of DSA positivity and subtle inflammation. Rejection-associated transcript-based algorithms now classify EMBs as "Normal," "Minor AMR changes," "AMR," "possible AMR," "TCMR," "possible TCMR," and "recent injury." Additionally, MMDx uses injury-associated transcript sets to assess the degree of parenchymal injury and atrophy-fibrosis in every biopsy and study the effect of rejection on the parenchyma. TCMR directly injures the parenchyma whereas AMR usually induces microcirculation stress but relatively little initial parenchymal damage, although slowly inducing parenchymal atrophy-fibrosis. Function (left ventricular ejection fraction) and short-term risk of failure are strongly determined by parenchymal injury. These discoveries can guide molecular diagnostic applications, either as a central MMDx system or adapted to other platforms. MMDx can also help calibrate noninvasive blood-based biomarkers to avoid unnecessary biopsies and monitor response to therapy.
Collapse
|
44
|
Clinical recommendations for posttransplant assessment of anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies: A Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk consensus document. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:115-132. [PMID: 36695614 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Although anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are commonly measured in clinical practice and their relationship with transplant outcome is well established, clinical recommendations for anti-HLA antibody assessment are sparse. Supported by a careful and critical review of the current literature performed by the Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 working group, this consensus report provides clinical practice recommendations in kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplantation based on expert assessment of quality and strength of evidence. The recommendations address 3 major clinical problems in transplantation and include guidance regarding posttransplant DSA assessment and application to diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics: (1) the clinical implications of positive posttransplant DSA detection according to DSA status (ie, preformed or de novo), (2) the relevance of posttransplant DSA assessment for precision diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection and for treatment management, and (3) the relevance of posttransplant DSA for allograft prognosis and risk stratification. This consensus report also highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides directions for clinical investigations and trials in the future that will further refine the clinical utility of posttransplant DSA assessment, leading to improved transplant management and patient care.
Collapse
|
45
|
Sharma N, Sharma D, Subramaniam K. Curbing proteastasis to combat antibody-mediated rejection post lung transplant. INDIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2023. [DOI: 10.4103/ijot.ijot_33_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
|
46
|
Nishikawa K, Masui S, Ishida H. Virtual crossmatching and epitope analysis in kidney transplantation: What the physician involved in kidney transplantation should know? Int J Urol 2023; 30:7-19. [PMID: 36194790 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Solid-phase single antigen bead (SAB) assay for detection of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies and high-resolution HLA typing have enabled tremendous progress in virtual crossmatch (VXM) technology in recent years. However, misinterpretation of the SAB assay may result in detrimental consequences after kidney transplantation. Meanwhile, epitope analysis could be an effective method to estimate immunizing eplets, which may provide ancillary information for better understanding of the SAB assay. To perform epitope analysis appropriately, it is necessary to understand the basic principles related to histocompatibility testing and the characteristics of the SAB assay. Therefore, knowledge of the properties and limitations of the SAB assay is critical. In this review, we aim to describe the fundamental concepts regarding immunobiological assessment, including HLA, anti-HLA antibodies, and SAB assay, and explain epitope analysis using examples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kouhei Nishikawa
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
| | - Satoru Masui
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tambur AR, Audry B, Glotz D, Jacquelinet C. Improving equity in kidney transplant allocation policies through a novel genetic metric: The Matched Donor Potential. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:45-54. [PMID: 36695620 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The demand for donors' kidneys continues to increase amid a shortage of available donors. Managing policies to thoughtfully allocate this scarce resource is a complex process. Although human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching has been shown to prolong graft survival, its relative contribution to allocation schemes is empirically compromised owing to competing priorities. We explored using a new metric, Matched Donor Potential (MDP), to facilitate improved HLA matching while promoting equity. We interrogated all active kidney waitlist patients (N = 164 427), their corresponding unacceptable antigen files, and all effective donors in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (January 1, 2016-December 31, 2017). Cause-specific hazard functions were evaluated to assess the potential impact of the MDP metric on deceased donor transplant access rates for all candidates. Access was affected by ethnicity, blood group type, and calculated Panel Reactive Antibody (cPRA). Importantly, we show that access to transplantation is influenced by the patient's own HLA makeup regardless of their ethnicity and by the HLA makeup of effective donors. The MDP metric demonstrates a high association with access to transplantation. Adjusting Cox models to include this new metric resulted in improved access to kidney transplantation for waitlist candidates of minority heritage while significantly promoting HLA matching. Thus, the MDP metric accounts for balanced, equitable organ allocation algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat R Tambur
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| | | | - Denis Glotz
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Hopital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tambur AR, Bestard O, Campbell P, Chong AS, Barrio MC, Ford ML, Gebel HM, Heidt S, Hickey M, Jackson A, Kosmoliaptsis V, Lefaucheur C, Louis K, Mannon RB, Mengel M, Morris A, Pinelli DF, Reed EF, Schinstock C, Taupin JL, Valenzuela N, Wiebe C, Nickerson P. Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:133-149. [PMID: 36695615 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk workgroup is a collaborative effort of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics that aims at providing recommendations for clinical testing, highlights gaps in current knowledge, and proposes areas for further research to enhance histocompatibility testing in support of solid organ transplantation. This report provides updates on topics discussed by the previous Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk working groups and introduces 2 areas of exploration: non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and utilization of human leukocyte antigen antibody testing measurement to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-removal therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat R Tambur
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Campbell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Anita S Chong
- Section of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Martha Crespo Barrio
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar & Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mandy L Ford
- Department of Surgery and Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Howard M Gebel
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands
| | - Michelle Hickey
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Annette Jackson
- Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR-S970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Louis
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR-S970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Roslyn B Mannon
- Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Anna Morris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David F Pinelli
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Department of Immunology, Saint Louis Hospital and University Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nicole Valenzuela
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Peter Nickerson
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) have been associated with antibody-mediated rejection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and increased mortality in lung transplant recipients. Our center performs transplants in the presence of DSA, and we sought to evaluate the safety of this practice with respect to graft loss, CLAD onset, and primary graft dysfunction (PGD). METHODS We reviewed recipients transplanted from 2010 to 2017, classifying them as DSA positive (DSA+) or negative. We used Kaplan-Meier estimation to test the association between DSA status and time to death or retransplant and time to CLAD onset. We further tested associations with severe PGD and rejection in the first year using logistic regression and Fisher exact testing. RESULTS Three hundred thirteen patients met inclusion criteria, 30 (10%) of whom were DSA+. DSA+ patients were more likely to be female, bridged to transplant, and receive induction therapy. There was no association between DSA status and time to death or retransplant (log rank P = 0.581) nor death-censored time to CLAD onset (log rank P = 0.278), but DSA+ patients were at increased risk of severe PGD (odds ratio 2.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-7.29; P = 0.031) and more frequent antibody-mediated rejection in the first posttransplant year. CONCLUSIONS Crossing DSA at time of lung transplant was not associated with an increased risk of death or CLAD in our cohort, but patients developed severe PGD and antibody-mediated rejection more frequently. However, these risks are likely manageable when balanced against the benefits of expanded access for sensitized candidates.
Collapse
|
50
|
Has the Time Come for Widespread MHC Class I MICA Genotyping in Solid Organ Transplantation? Transplantation 2022; 106:2269-2270. [PMID: 36436096 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|