Creation of a model to predict survival in patients with refractory coeliac disease using a multinational registry

Flow cytometry for the assessment and monitoring of aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes in non-responsive celiac disease and non-celiac enteropathies

BACKGROUND

Few data are available on flow cytometry (FC) for monitoring intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) in refractory celiac disease (RCD), non-responsive celiac disease (NRCD), and non-celiac enteropathies (NCEs).

AIMS

1) To investigate the significance of monitoring IELs immunophenotype with FC in patients with NRCD, RCD and NCEs; 2) to evaluate FC concordance with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and γ-TCR clonality analysis.

METHODS

Patients investigated between January-2012 and February-2023 were divided into two groups: 1)confirmed RCD or NRCD being investigated for persistent symptoms and suspected complications of celiac disease (CD); 2)NCEs lacking clinical/histological response. Clinical/molecular features and outcomes were retrospectively collected and analysed according to presence/absence of aberrant IELs on FC (cut-off≥20 % CD103+sCD3-CD8-iCD3+ IELs).

RESULTS

52 patients (18 RCD,21 NRCD,13 NCEs; 38F, 55±13 years; median follow-up 30 months, IQR 2-58) underwent 100 FC IELs determinations. 22/52 had ≥2 FC determinations and IEL phenotype remained unchanged over time in all them (κ=1.00). Aberrant IEL phenotype in CD was associated with increased mortality (HR 4.2, 95 % CI 1.5-11.9, p < 0.01). No patients with NCEs had an aberrant IEL phenotype at FC, although 3/13 developed lymphoma and 4/13 died. Concordance of FC was fair with both IHC (κ=0.40) and γ-TCR clonality analysis (κ=0.22).

CONCLUSION

FC is accurate for assessing and monitoring IEL phenotype and providing important prognostic information in celiac patients. Further study is needed on its role in NCEs.

Gluten-related Disorders From Bench to Bedside

Celiac disease, non-celiac gluten sensitivity, and wheat allergy comprise 3 of the main conditions with wheat- and gluten-containing foods as the symptom trigger. Distinguishing between these entities can be daunting. In this review, we compare and contrast celiac disease, non-celiac gluten sensitivity, and wheat allergy to allow clinicians to determine which diagnosis fits their patient to facilitate high-quality management and longitudinal care.

Advances in Nonresponsive and Refractory Celiac Disease

Nonresponsive celiac disease (CeD) is relatively common. It is generally attributed to persistent gluten exposure and resolves after correction of diet errors. However, other complications of CeD and disorders clinically mimicking CeD need to be excluded. Novel therapies are being evaluated to facilitate mucosal recovery, which might benefit patients with nonresponsive CeD. Refractory CeD (RCeD) is rare and is divided into 2 types. The etiology of type I RCeD is unclear. A switch to gluten-independent autoimmunity is suspected in some patients. In contrast, type II RCeD represents a low-grade intraepithelial lymphoma. Type I RCeD remains a diagnosis of exclusion, requiring ruling out gluten intake and other nonmalignant causes of villous atrophy. Diagnosis of type II RCeD relies on the demonstration of a clonal population of neoplastic intraepithelial lymphocytes with an atypical immunophenotype. Type I RCeD and type II RCeD generally respond to open-capsule budesonide, but the latter has a dismal prognosis due to severe malnutrition and frequent progression to enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma; more efficient therapy is needed.

Celiac Disease Affects 1% of Global Population-Who Will Manage All These Patients? What Are Criteria to Prioritize Along Risk for Complications?

Celiac disease is a common gastrointestinal condition with an estimated global prevalence of up to 1%. Adequate long-term surveillance of patients is imperative to ensure strict adherence to treatment with a gluten-free diet and the ensuing clinical and histologic recovery. Traditionally, this has been accomplished by means of regular on-site attendance at specialist health care facilities, accompanied for most patients by follow-up endoscopic and laboratory tests. However, the rapidly increasing prevalence of celiac disease and the limited health care resources challenge the current centralized and nonindividualized follow-up strategies. The improved noninvasive surveillance tools and online health care services are further changing the landscape of celiac disease management. There is a clear need for more personalized and on-demand follow-up based on early treatment response and patient-related factors associated with long-term prognosis. Additional scientific evidence on the optimal implementation of follow-up for pediatric and adulthood celiac disease is nevertheless called for.

Refractory celiac disease and its mimickers: a review on pathogenesis, clinical-pathological features and therapeutic challenges

Refractory celiac disease (RCD) and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) are rare, yet severe complications of celiac disease (CD). Over the last decades, several studies have addressed the biology and clinical-pathological features of such conditions, highlighting unique disease patterns and recurrent genetic events. Current classification proposals identify two forms of RCD, namely: (i) type 1 RCD (RCD-I), characterized by phenotypically normal intra-epithelial lymphocytes (IELs); and (ii) type 2 RCD (RCD-II), featuring phenotypically aberrant IELs. While RCD-I likely represents a gluten-independent dysimmune reaction against small bowel epithelial cells, RCD-II is better considered an in situ aggressive T-cell lymphoma, with high rates of progression to overt EATL. The diagnosis of RCD and EATL is often challenging, due to misleading clinical-pathological features and to significant overlap with several CD-unrelated gastro-intestinal disorders. Similarly, the treatment of RCD and EATL is an unmet clinical need for both gastroenterologists and hematologists. Moving from such premises, this review aims to provide a comprehensive view of RCD and EATL, specifically considering their pathogenesis and the many still open issues concerning their diagnosis and clinical management.

American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines Update: Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease

This guideline presents an update to the 2013 American College of Gastroenterology Guideline on the Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease with updated recommendations for the evaluation and management of patients with celiac disease (CD). CD is defined as a permanent immune-mediated response to gluten present in wheat, barley, and rye. CD has a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations that resemble a multisystemic disorder rather than an isolated intestinal disease, and is characterized by small bowel injury and the presence of specific antibodies. Detection of CD-specific antibodies (e.g., tissue transglutaminase) in the serum is very helpful for the initial screening of patients with suspicion of CD. Intestinal biopsy is required in most patients to confirm the diagnosis. A nonbiopsy strategy for the diagnosis of CD in selected children is suggested and discussed in detail. Current treatment for CD requires strict adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD) and lifelong medical follow-up. Most patients have excellent clinical response to a GFD. Nonresponsive CD is defined by persistent or recurrent symptoms despite being on a GFD. These patients require a systematic workup to rule out specific conditions that may cause persistent or recurrent symptoms, especially unintentional gluten contamination. Refractory CD is a rare cause of nonresponsive CD often associated with poor prognosis.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Management of Refractory Celiac Disease: Expert Review

DESCRIPTION

The purpose of this expert review is to summarize the diagnosis and management of refractory celiac disease. It will review evaluation of patients with celiac disease who have persistent or recurrent symptoms, differential diagnosis, nutritional support, potential therapeutic options, and surveillance for complications of this condition.

METHODS

This expert review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership and underwent internal peer review by the CPUC and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These Best Practice Advice (BPA) statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Since systematic reviews were not performed, these BPA statements do not carry formal ratings of the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: In patients believed to have celiac disease who have persistent or recurrent symptoms or signs, the initial diagnosis of celiac disease should be confirmed by review of prior diagnostic testing, including serologies, endoscopies, and histologic findings. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: In patients with confirmed celiac disease with persistent or recurrent symptoms or signs (nonresponsive celiac disease), ongoing gluten ingestion should be excluded as a cause of these symptoms with serologic testing, dietitian review, and detection of immunogenic peptides in stool or urine. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with small bowel biopsies should be performed to look for villous atrophy. If villous atrophy persists or the initial diagnosis of celiac disease was not confirmed, consider other causes of villous atrophy, including common variable immunodeficiency, autoimmune enteropathy, tropical sprue, and medication-induced enteropathy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: For patients with nonresponsive celiac disease, after exclusion of gluten ingestion, perform a systematic evaluation for other potential causes of symptoms, including functional bowel disorders, microscopic colitis, pancreatic insufficiency, inflammatory bowel disease, lactose or fructose intolerance, and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Use flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and T-cell receptor rearrangement studies to distinguish between subtypes of refractory celiac disease and to exclude enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. Type 1 refractory celiac disease is characterized by a normal intraepithelial lymphocyte population and type 2 is defined by the presence of an aberrant, clonal intraepithelial lymphocyte population. Consultation with an expert hematopathologist is necessary to interpret these studies. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Perform small bowel imaging with capsule endoscopy and computed tomography or magnetic resonance enterography to exclude enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma and ulcerative jejunoileitis at initial diagnosis of type 2 refractory celiac disease. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Complete a detailed nutritional assessment with investigation of micronutrient and macronutrient deficiencies in patients diagnosed with refractory celiac disease. Check albumin as an independent prognostic factor. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Correct deficiencies in macro- and micronutrients using oral supplements and/or enteral support. Consider parenteral nutrition for patients with severe malnutrition due to malabsorption. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Corticosteroids, most commonly open-capsule budesonide or, if unavailable, prednisone, are the medication of choice and should be used as first-line therapy in either type 1 or type 2 refractory celiac disease. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Patients with refractory celiac disease require regular follow-up by a multidisciplinary team, including gastroenterologists and dietitians, to assess clinical and histologic response to therapy. Identify local experts with expertise in celiac disease to assist with management. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Patients with refractory celiac disease without response to steroids may benefit from referral to a center with expertise for management or evaluation for inclusion in clinical trials.

Celiac Disease in the Elderly

Purpose of review

This review highlights literature from the past several years and explores the impact on current understanding of celiac disease diagnosis, complications, and management in older adults.

Recent findings

Celiac disease in the elderly is becoming increasingly prevalent but remains underdiagnosed, with a high potential burden of downstream morbidity and modestly increased risk of mortality. Clinical presentations are often related to extraintestinal symptoms and can be subtle. Duodenal biopsy remains the gold-standard for diagnosis in older adults, along with supporting serologies. Refractory celiac disease is a particular concern in the aging population, and treatment for this rare condition remains unsatisfactory. Older adults exhibit lower rates of mucosal healing, though the reasons for this are poorly understood.

Summary

Current understanding of celiac disease in the elderly continues to advance, though significant knowledge gaps persist. Large, prospective studies are needed to further characterize celiac disease pathogenesis, complications, and management in older adults.

Coeliac disease

Coeliac disease is an autoimmune disorder that primarily affects the small intestine, and is caused by the ingestion of gluten in genetically susceptible individuals. Prevalence in the general population ranges from 0·5% to 2%, with an average of about 1%. The development of the coeliac enteropathy depends on a complex immune response to gluten proteins, including both adaptive and innate mechanisms. Clinical presentation of coeliac disease is highly variable and includes classical and non-classical gastrointestinal symptoms, extraintestinal manifestations, and subclinical cases. The disease is associated with a risk of complications, such as osteoporosis and intestinal lymphoma. Diagnosis of coeliac disease requires a positive serology (IgA anti-transglutaminase 2 and anti-endomysial antibodies) and villous atrophy on small-intestinal biopsy. Treatment involves a gluten-free diet; however, owing to the high psychosocial burden of such a diet, research into alternative pharmacological treatments is currently very active.

The global burden of coeliac disease: opportunities and challenges

Coeliac disease is a systemic disorder characterized by immune-mediated enteropathy, which is caused by gluten ingestion in genetically susceptible individuals. The clinical presentation of coeliac disease is highly variable and ranges from malabsorption through solely extra-intestinal manifestations to asymptomatic. As a result, the majority of patients with coeliac disease remain undiagnosed, misdiagnosed or experience a substantial delay in diagnosis. Coeliac disease is diagnosed by a combination of serological findings of disease-related antibodies and histological evidence of villous abnormalities in duodenal biopsy samples. However, variability in histological grading and in the diagnostic performance of some commercially available serological tests remains unacceptably high and confirmatory assays are not readily available in many parts of the world. Currently, the only effective treatment for coeliac disease is a lifelong, strict, gluten-free diet. However, many barriers impede patients' adherence to this diet, including lack of widespread availability, high cost, cross-contamination and its overall restrictive nature. Routine follow-up is necessary to ensure adherence to a gluten-free diet but considerable variation is evident in follow-up protocols and the optimal disease management strategy is not clear. However, these challenges in the diagnosis and management of coeliac disease suggest opportunities for future research.

Successful novel use of tofacitinib for type II refractory coeliac disease

Refractory coeliac disease (RCD) occurs when patients with confirmed CD have continuous or recurrent malabsorption and enteropathy after at least 12 months on a gluten-free diet. Differentiating between type I and type II RCD is key as the latter is associated with T-cell aberrancy and considered prelymphoma, with high mortality rates. Current treatment regimens for type II RCD include corticosteroids, biologics and chemotherapy, but there are no proven therapies for this serious condition. Our patient is a middle-aged woman who developed postpartum type II RCD. When she failed multiple drug classes, we did a trial of tofacitinib. Our clinical experience with use of a janus kinase inhibitor was successful, with no associated adverse events. This is the first report in the literature of RCD remission in response to tofacitinib. The use of this novel agent shows promise in reversing this potentially fatal condition.

Cancer Risk in 47,241 Individuals With Celiac Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Celiac disease (CD) is associated with increased mortality, in part due to cancer. Most studies investigating this cancer risk involved patients diagnosed before widespread increases in CD diagnosis rates and access to gluten-free food. We performed a population-based study of the risk of cancer in CD.

METHODS

We identified all patients in Sweden with CD as defined as duodenal/jejunal villus atrophy, using the Epidemiology Strengthened by histoPathology Reports in Sweden cohort. Each patient was matched to ≤5 controls by age, sex, and county. We used stratified Cox proportional hazards model, following patients from diagnosis until first cancer, or by December 31, 2016.

RESULTS

Among 47,241 patients with CD, 30,080 (64%) were diagnosed since 2000. After a median follow-up of 11.5 years, the incidence of cancer was 6.5 and 5.7 per 1000 person-years in CD patients and controls, respectively. The overall risk of cancer was increased (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.15), but it was only significantly elevated in the first year after CD diagnosis (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 2.22-2.74) and not subsequently (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.97-1.05), although the risks of hematologic, lymphoproliferative, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic cancers persisted. The overall risk was highest in those diagnosed with CD after age 60 years (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.16-1.29) and was not increased in those diagnosed before age 40. The cancer risk was similar among those diagnosed with CD before or after the year 2000.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an increased risk of cancer in CD even in recent years, but this risk increase is confined to those diagnosed with CD after age 40 and is primarily present within the first year of diagnosis.

Frontiers in Celiac Disease: Where Autoimmunity and Environment Meet

Celiac disease is a chronic, immune-mediated enteropathy driven by dietary gluten found in genetically susceptible hosts. It has a worldwide distribution, is one of the most common autoimmune disorders globally, and is the only autoimmune condition for which the trigger is known. Despite advances in characterizing mechanisms of disease, gaps in understanding of celiac disease pathogenesis remain. A "frontier" concept is considering what moves an HLA-DQ2 or DQ8-positive individual from asymptomatic gluten tolerance to celiac disease manifestation. In this arena, environmental triggers, including age at the time of initial gluten exposure, the occurrence of usual childhood viral infections, and microbiome alterations have emerged as key events in triggering the symptomatic disease. Pathologists play a major role in frontier aspects of celiac disease. This includes the discovery that duodenal mucosal histology in follow-up biopsies does not correlate with ongoing patient symptoms, antitissue transglutaminase antibody titers and diet adherence in celiac disease patients. Further, in light of recent evidence that the detection of monoclonal T-cell populations in formalin-fixed biopsies is not specific for type II refractory celiac disease, pathologists should resist performing such analyses until common causes of "apparent" refractoriness are excluded. The promise of therapies in celiac disease has led to clinical trials targeting many steps in the inflammatory cascade, which depend upon a pathologist's confirmation of the initial diagnosis and evaluation of responses to therapies. As pathologists continue to be active participants in celiac disease research, partnering with other stakeholders, we will continue to impact this important autoimmune disease.

Diagnosing coeliac disease: A literature review

Coeliac disease (CD) is an autoimmune gastroenteropathy triggered by gliadin and gliadin-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) complexes. CD is one of the few autoimmune diseases with an accurate, non-invasive serological test. Anti-endomysial, anti-tTG and anti-deaminated gliadin peptides (DGP) antibodies are currently used for serological tests with tTG ELISAs being the superior test. Duodenal biopsy, although invasive, is the gold standard for CD diagnosis. HLA genotyping and flow cytometry can also be used as supplementary tests. The incidence of CD is rising globally although the reasons for this remain unclear. In addition, the true incidence of coeliac disease in African populations remains unknown although recent work suggests that South African populations express the alleles associated with this disease. This review examines the pathogenesis and diagnosis of coeliac disease and considers novel and innovative biomarkers in its diagnosis specifically in an African population.

Cellular and molecular bases of refractory celiac disease

Refractory celiac disease (RCD) encompasses biologically heterogeneous disorders that develop in a small proportion (0.3%) of individuals with celiac disease that are associated with high morbidity. Two broad categories are currently recognized, type I (RCD I) and type II (RCD II), based on immunophenotypic and molecular features of the intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs). RCD I is characterized by a polyclonal expansion of IELs displaying a normal immunophenotype, while RCD II represents a clonal proliferation of immunophenotypically "aberrant" IELs, and is considered a low-grade lymphoproliferative disorder. The pathogenesis of RCD I has not been clarified, but limited studies suggest multifactorial etiology. On the other hand, recent immunologic, molecular and immunophenotypic analyses have proposed lineage-negative innate IELs to be the cell of origin of a proportion of RCD II cases. Furthermore, sequencing studies have identified frequent, recurrent, activating mutations in members of the JAK-STAT pathway in RCD II. This finding, in conjunction with prior in vitro experimental observations, suggests roles of deregulated cytokine signaling in disease pathogenesis. In this review, we describe current understanding of environmental, immune and genetic factors associated with the development of RCD and briefly discuss diagnostic and therapeutic considerations.

Immunophenotypic Spectrum and Genomic Landscape of Refractory Celiac Disease Type II

Refractory celiac disease type II (RCD II), also referred to as "cryptic" enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) or "intraepithelial T-cell lymphoma," is a rare clonal lymphoproliferative disorder that arises from innate intraepithelial lymphocytes. RCD II has a poor prognosis and frequently evolves to EATL. The pathogenesis of RCD II is not well understood and data regarding the immunophenotypic spectrum of this disease and underlying genetic alterations are limited. To gain further biological insights, we performed comprehensive immunophenotypic, targeted next-generation sequencing, and chromosome microarray analyses of 11 RCD II cases: CD4-/CD8- (n=6), CD8+ (n=4), and CD4+ (n=1), and 2 of 3 ensuing EATLs. Genetic alterations were identified in 9/11 (82%) of the RCD II cases. All 9 displayed mutations in members of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, including frequent, recurrent STAT3 (7/9, 78%) and JAK1 (4/9, 44%) mutations, and 9/10 evaluable cases expressed phospho-STAT3. The mutated cases also harbored recurrent alterations in epigenetic regulators (TET2, n=5 and KMT2D, n=5), nuclear factor-κB (TNFAIP3, n=4), DNA damage repair (POT1, n=3), and immune evasion (CD58, n=2) pathway genes. The CD4-/CD8- and other immunophenotypic subtypes of RCD II exhibited similar molecular features. Longitudinal genetic analyses of 4 RCD II cases revealed stable mutation profiles, however, additional mutations were detected in the EATLs, which occurred at extraintestinal sites and were clonally related to antecedent RCD II. Chromosome microarray analysis demonstrated copy number changes in 3/6 RCD II cases, and 1 transformed EATL with sufficient neoplastic burden for informative analysis. Our findings provide novel information about the immunophenotypic and genomic characteristics of RCD II, elucidate early genetic events in EATL pathogenesis, and reveal potential therapeutic targets.

Refractory Celiac Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and prognosis of refractory celiac disease, with a specific emphasis on recent literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

While the pathophysiology of type I refractory celiac disease remains unclear, there have been advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of type II refractory celiac disease. This has included recognition of the significant role of interleukin-15 and somatic mutations in JAK1 or STAT3 in the proliferation of aberrant T cells. This in turn has led to potential novel therapies targeting these factors, one of which has reached the clinical trial stage. The morbidity and mortality associated with type II refractory celiac disease remain significant; however, recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of this condition have led to potential therapeutic options that should be investigated.

Refractory celiac disease type II: An atypical case highlighting limitations of the current classification system

Refractory celiac disease (RCD) is a rare condition associated with high morbidity that develops in individuals with celiac disease. It is known to be biologically heterogeneous, and currently two types are recognized based on immunophenotypic and molecular features, type I (RCD I) and type II (RCD II). Differentiating between RCD I and RCD II is critical, as patients with RCD II have substantially worse outcomes and a high risk of developing enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. However, the current RCD classification is limited in scope, and atypical presentations and immunophenotypes are not recognized at present. Herein, we describe a unique case of RCD II with atypical clinical (primarily neurologic manifestations and lack of significant gastrointestinal symptoms), histopathologic (no villous atrophy), immunophenotypic (virtual absence of cytoplasmic CD3 expression), and molecular features (absence of clonal TR rearrangement and identification of pathogenic STAT3 and KMT2D mutations). This case highlights limitations of the current RCD classification system and the utility of next generation sequencing (NGS) studies in the diagnostic workup of RCD. Future algorithms need to recognize extraintestinal manifestations and incorporate atypical histopathologic and immunophenotypic features, as well as results of NGS analysis for RCD II classification.

Concepts and Instruments for Patient-Reported Outcome Assessment in Celiac Disease: Literature Review and Experts' Perspectives

BACKGROUND

In diseases where there is a large subjective component, such as celiac disease (CD), patient reported-outcomes (PRO) endpoints are highly relevant. However, there is a gap in knowledge about which PRO endpoints and instruments should be used for clinical trials for treatment of celiac disease.

OBJECTIVES

To identify patient-centered symptom, impact, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) concepts in CD and relevant PRO instruments, and to gather expert input on concepts and instruments to inform selection of PRO endpoints for use in clinical trials of new CD treatments.

METHODS

A targeted literature review was conducted to identify symptom, impact, and HRQoL concepts, including those captured in PROs further reviewed against U.S. Food and Drug Administration standards for development and validation as endpoints. US and European clinicians, payers, and a patient advocate (n = 21) were interviewed to assess the identified concepts' relative importance in measuring treatment benefit and to gauge the value of potential PROs as endpoints for market access/reimbursement.

RESULTS

Thirty-four published studies were identified: 27 elucidated patient-centered concepts and 7 detailed the development or validation of PRO instruments. The Celiac Disease Symptom Diary and Celiac Disease Patient Reported Outcome instrument were deemed most appropriate for use as endpoints; however, each had limitations related to conceptual coverage, evidence for measurement properties, and feasibility for use in clinical trials. Experts reported gastrointestinal symptoms as most important to treat, with extra-intestinal symptoms burdensome from the patient perspective as well. Payers emphasized measuring both frequency and severity of symptoms and targeting patients nonresponsive to the gluten-free diet for treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

With emerging treatment options for CD, further work is needed to operationalize PRO symptom endpoints that are meaningful to patients, valued by payers, and acceptable to regulators in demonstrating efficacy.

Celiac Disease

Celiac disease (CD) affects approximately 1% of the general population, although most cases remain unrecognized. Because CD is a multisystem disorder with protean clinical manifestations, a high index of suspicion is needed to make an appropriate diagnosis. A diagnosis of CD is made in a patient who is genetically predisposed based on the presence of compatible clinical features, positive highly specific celiac serologic findings, duodenal biopsies that document enteropathy, and improvement with a gluten-free diet. The differential diagnoses for the clinical features and the histologic findings seen in patients with CD are numerous and need to be considered; because the management of celiac disease consists of a lifelong gluten-free diet, ensuring that the diagnosis is correctly established is of utmost importance. The aim of this review is to provide practicing clinicians with the most current information on the diagnosis and management of CD, including new developments and the approach to controversial issues.

Clinical Insignficance of Monoclonal T-Cell Populations and Duodenal Intraepithelial T-Cell Phenotypes in Celiac and Nonceliac Patients

Refractory celiac disease (RCD) is a rare condition, usually managed at specialized centers. However, gastroenterologists and pathologists in general practices are often the first to consider a diagnosis of RCD in celiac patients with persistent symptoms. The distinction between type I and type II RCD is crucial as patients with RCD II have a shortened life expectancy. The diagnosis of RCD II requires the demonstration of abnormal intraepithelial lymphocytes and/or monoclonal T-cell populations in duodenal biopsies, typically assessed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. We investigated the clinical significance of T-cell receptor gene rearrangements and CD3/CD8 staining in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsies from 32 patients with RCD I (4), RCD II (3), newly diagnosed celiac disease (CD) (10), established CD patients with follow-up biopsies (10), and Helicobacter pylori-associated lymphocytosis (5). Clonal T-cell populations were present in all lymphocytosis groups but not in normal controls. No difference in the frequency of clonal populations or persistence of identical clones was found between RCD I and II patients. The degree of villous blunting did not correlate with clonal status in any group. No difference in the number of CD3/CD8-positive intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 enterocytes was found between groups. We suggest that clonal evaluation of T cells should not be employed routinely in the evaluation of CD patients with persistent symptoms until common causes of "apparent refractoriness" have been excluded. In addition, lymphocyte phenotyping and T-cell clonal analysis appear to be insufficient as stand-alone tests to reliably distinguish RCD I and II.

Safety and efficacy of AMG 714 in patients with type 2 refractory coeliac disease: a phase 2a, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study

BACKGROUND

Refractory coeliac disease type 2 is a rare subtype of coeliac disease with high mortality rates; interleukin 15 (IL-15) is strongly implicated in its pathophysiology. This trial aimed to investigate the effects of AMG 714, an anti-IL-15 monoclonal antibody, on the activity and symptoms of refractory coeliac disease type 2.

METHODS

This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a study of adults with a confirmed diagnosis of refractory coeliac disease type 2. Patients were randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio to receive seven intravenous doses over 10 weeks of AMG 714 (8 mg/kg) or matching placebo. Biopsy samples were obtained at baseline and week 12 for cellular analysis and histology. The change in the proportion of aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes from baseline to week 12 with respect to all intraepithelial lymphocytes was the primary endpoint and was quantified using flow cytometry. Secondary endpoints were the change in aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes with respect to intestinal epithelial cells; intestinal histological scores (villous height-to-crypt depth ratio; VHCD); intraepithelial lymphocyte counts; Marsh score; and patient-reported symptom measures, including the Bristol stool form scale (BSFS) and gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS). Main analyses were done in the per-protocol population of patients who received their assigned treatment, provided evaluable biopsy samples, and did not have major protocol deviations; only patients with non-atypical disease were included in the analyses of aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes, including the primary analysis. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02633020) and EudraCT (2015-004063-36).

FINDINGS

From April 13, 2016, to Jan 19, 2017, 28 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to AMG 714 (n=19) and placebo (n=9). Six patients were not included in the primary analysis because of protocol deviation (one in the AMG 714 group), insufficient biopsy samples (one in the AMG 714 group), and atypical intraepithelial lymphocytes (three in the AMG 714 group and one in the placebo group). At 12 weeks, the least square mean difference between AMG 714 and placebo in the relative change from baseline in aberrant intraepithelial lymphocyte percentage was -4·85% (90% CI -30·26 to 20·56; p=0·75). The difference between the AMG 714 and placebo groups in aberrant intraepithelial lymphocytes with respect to epithelial cells at 12 weeks was -38·22% (90% CI -95·73 to 19·29; nominal p=0·18); the difference in change in Marsh score from baseline was 0·09% (95% CI -1·60-1·90; nominal p=0·92); the difference in VHCD ratio was 10·67% (95% CI -38·97 to 60·31; nominal p=0·66); and the difference in change in total intraepithelial lymphocyte count was -12·73% (95% CI -77·57-52·12); nominal p=0·69). Regarding symptoms, the proportion of patients with diarrhoea per the BSFS score decreased from ten (53%) of 19 at baseline to seven (37%) of 19 at week 12 in the AMG 714 group and increased from two (22%) of nine at baseline to four (44%) of nine at week 12 in the placebo group (nominal p=0·0008); and the difference between the groups in change in GSRS score was -0·14 (SE 0·19; nominal p=0·48). Eight (89%) patients in the placebo group and 17 (89%) in the AMG 714 group had treatment-emergent adverse events, including one (11%) patient in the placebo group and five (26%) in the AMG 714 group who had serious adverse events. The most common adverse event in the AMG 714 group was nasopharyngitis (eight [42%] patients vs one [11%] in the placebo group).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with refractory coeliac disease type 2 who were treated with AMG 714 or placebo for 10 weeks, there was no difference between the groups in terms of the primary endpoint of aberrant intraepithelial lymphocyte reduction from baseline. Effects on symptoms and other endpoints suggest that further research of AMG 714 may be warranted in patients with refractory coeliac disease type 2.

FUNDING

Celimmune and Amgen.

Diagnosis and Treatment Patterns in Celiac Disease

Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated gastrointestinal (GI) disorder driven by innate and adaptive immune responses to gluten. Presentation of CD has changed over time, with non-GI symptoms, such as anemia and osteoporosis, presenting more commonly. With improved screening and diagnostic methods, the reported prevalence of CD has increased globally, and there is considerable global variation in diagnostic and treatment practices. The objective of this study was to describe the current state of CD diagnosis and treatment patterns. A targeted review of literature from MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and screening of relevant conference abstracts was performed. The generally recommended diagnostic approach is GI endoscopy with small bowel biopsy; however, in selected patients, biopsy may be avoided and diagnosis based on positive serology and clinical symptoms. Diagnosis often is delayed; the average diagnostic delay after symptom onset is highly variable and can last up to 12 years. Barriers to accurate and timely diagnosis include atypical presentation, lack of physician awareness about current diagnostic criteria, misdiagnosis, and limited access to specialists. Currently, strict adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD) is the only recommended treatment, which is not successful in all patients. Only one-third of patients are monitored regularly following diagnosis. Unmet needs for CD include improvements in the accuracy and timeliness of diagnosis, and the development of treatments for both refractory CD and GFD nonresponsive CD. Further research should investigate the impact of education about gluten-free eating and the availability of gluten-free foods support adherence and improve outcomes in patients with CD.

Micronutrient Deficiencies Are Common in Contemporary Celiac Disease Despite Lack of Overt Malabsorption Symptoms

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate micronutrient deficiencies in a contemporary cohort of adult patients with newly diagnosed celiac disease (CD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of prospective adults newly diagnosed with CD from January 1, 2000, through October 31, 2014, at Mayo Clinic. Micronutrient data were collected for tissue transglutaminase IgA, zinc, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, ferritin, albumin, copper, vitamin B₁₂, and serum folate. Data were analyzed for absolute number of deficiencies and associations with age, sex, body mass index, presenting symptoms, and tissue transglutaminase IgA; each deficiency was assessed using logistic regression. Deficiencies were compared with age- and sex-matched controls from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

RESULTS

In total, 309 patients with CD (196 women and 113 men; mean age, 46.1±15.1 years; mean body mass index, 25.9 kg/m²) were included. Weight loss was seen in only 25.2% (78/309) of patients. Zinc was deficient in 59.4% (126/212) of patients with CD compared with 33.2% (205/618) of controls (P<.001). Albumin was low in 19.7% (24/122) compared with 1.1% of controls (P<.001). Copper was low in 6.4% (13/204) compared with 2.1% (13/618) of controls (P=.003). Vitamin B₁₂ was low in 5.3% (13/244) compared with 1.8% (11/618) of controls (P=.004). Folate was low in 3.6% (6/159) compared with 0.3% (2/618) of controls (P=.002). 25-Hydroxy vitamin D was low in 19.0% (44/213) compared with 18% (111/618) of controls (P=.72). Ferritin was low in 30.8% (66/214) of patients; no NHANES controls were available for comparison for ferritin.

CONCLUSION

Micronutrient deficiencies remain common in adults with CD despite increased nonclassic presentation. This study provides support for micronutrient assessment at the time of CD diagnosis.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Monitoring of Celiac Disease-Changing Utility of Serology and Histologic Measures: Expert Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical practice update is to define key modalities in the diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease (CD) in adults as well as in children and adolescents.

METHODS

The recommendations outlined in this expert review are based on available published evidence, including cohort and case-control studies of the diagnostic process as well as controlled and descriptive studies of disease management. Best Practice Advice 1: Serology is a crucial component of the detection and diagnosis of CD, particularly tissue transglutaminase-immunoglobulin A (TG2-IgA), IgA testing, and less frequently, endomysial IgA testing. Best Practice Advice 2: Thorough histological analysis of duodenal biopsies with Marsh classification, counting of lymphocytes per high-power field, and morphometry is important for diagnosis as well as for differential diagnosis. Best Practice Advice 2a: TG2-IgA, at high levels (> ×10 upper normal limit) is a reliable and accurate test for diagnosing active CD. When such a strongly positive TG2-IgA is combined with a positive endomysial antibody in a second blood sample, the positive predictive value for CD is virtually 100%. In adults, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and duodenal biopsies may then be performed for purposes of differential diagnosis. Best Practice Advice 3: IgA deficiency is an infrequent but important explanation for why patients with CD may be negative on IgA isotype testing despite strong suspicion. Measuring total IgA levels, IgG deamidated gliadin antibody tests, and TG2-IgG testing in that circumstance is recommended. Best Practice Advice 4: IgG isotype testing for TG2 antibody is not specific in the absence of IgA deficiency. Best Practice Advice 5: In patients found to have CD first by intestinal biopsies, celiac-specific serology should be undertaken as a confirmatory test before initiation of a gluten-free diet (GFD). Best Practice Advice 6: In patients in whom CD is strongly suspected in the face of negative biopsies, TG2-IgA should still be performed and, if positive, repeat biopsies might be considered either at that time or sometime in the future. Best Practice Advice 7: Reduction or avoidance of gluten before diagnostic testing is discouraged, as it may reduce the sensitivity of both serology and biopsy testing. Best Practice Advice 8: When patients have already started on a GFD before diagnosis, we suggest that the patient go back on a normal diet with 3 slices of wheat bread daily preferably for 1 to 3 months before repeat determination of TG2-IgA. Best Practice Advice 9: Determination of HLA-DQ2/DQ8 has a limited role in the diagnosis of CD. Its value is largely related to its negative predictive value to rule out CD in patients who are seronegative in the face of histologic changes, in patients who did not have serologic confirmation at the time of diagnosis, and in those patients with a historic diagnosis of CD; especially as very young children before the introduction of celiac-specific serology.

MANAGEMENT

Best Practice Advice 10: Celiac serology has a guarded role in the detection of continued intestinal injury, in particular as to sensitivity, as negative serology in a treated patient does not guarantee that the intestinal mucosa has healed. Persistently positive serology usually indicates ongoing intestinal damage and gluten exposure. Follow-up serology should be performed 6 and 12 months after diagnosis, and yearly thereafter. Best Practice Advice 11: Patients with persistent or relapsing symptoms, without other obvious explanations for those symptoms, should undergo endoscopic biopsies to determine healing even in the presence of negative TG2-IgA.

Descriptive Study of the Different Tools Used to Evaluate the Adherence to a Gluten-Free Diet in Celiac Disease Patients

Celiac disease (CD) is a genetically conditioned autoimmune process that appears in susceptible people. It can affect people of any age, and slightly predominates in females. It has a fairly homogenous global distribution, with an average prevalence of 1⁻2%, the frequency having increased in recent decades. The only effective treatment is a strict and permanent gluten-free diet (GFD), although the level of compliance is poor, at about 50% of cases. To monitor the effectiveness of the GFD, several procedures involving various approaches are employed: (a) Periodic visits by expert Nutritionists; (b) Clinical follow-up; (c) Serological time controls of specific antibodies; (d) Serial endoscopies with collection of duodenal biopsies; (e) Use of structured questionnaires; and (f) Determination of gluten peptides derived from gluten in faeces and/or urine. All of these procedures are useful when applied, alone or in combination, depending on the cases. Some patients will only need to consult to their doctors, while others will require a multidisciplinary approach to assess their compliance with the GFD. In children, normalization of duodenal mucosa was achieved in 95% of cases within two years, while it is more delayed in adults, whose mucosa take longer time (3⁻5 years) to heal completely.

Clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease in Mexico

Celiac disease, celiac sprue, or gluten-sensitive enteropathy, is a generalized autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammation and atrophy of the small bowel mucosa. It is caused by dietary exposure to gluten and affects genetically predisposed individuals. In Mexico, at least 800,000 are estimated to possibly have the disease, prompting the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología to summon a multidisciplinary group of experts to develop the "Clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease in Mexico" and establish recommendations for the medical community, its patients, and the general population. The participating medical professionals were divided into three working groups and were given the selected bibliographic material by the coordinators (ART, LUD, JMRT), who proposed the statements that were discussed and voted upon in three sessions: two voting rounds were carried out electronically and one at a face-to-face meeting. Thirty-nine statements were accepted, and once approved, were developed and revised by the coordinators, and their final version was approved by all the participants. It was emphasized in the document that epidemiology and risk factors associated with celiac disease (first-degree relatives, autoimmune diseases, high-risk populations) in Mexico are similar to those described in other parts of the world. Standards for diagnosing the disease and its appropriate treatment in the Mexican patient were established. The guidelines also highlighted the fact that a strict gluten-free diet is essential only in persons with confirmed celiac disease, and that the role of gluten is still a subject of debate in relation to nonceliac, gluten-sensitive patients.

Review article: coeliac disease in later life must not be missed

BACKGROUND

The presenting symptoms of coeliac disease are often subtle and the diagnosis is frequently delayed or overlooked. Therefore, especially elderly patients may be denied the benefits conferred by gluten free diet which can be dramatically life-changing.

AIM

To review the occurrence, clinical features, diagnosis and management in coeliac patients detected later in life.

METHODS

To review manuscripts concerned with coeliac disease in the elderly and to derive subgroups of elderly people from publications on the disorder.

RESULTS

Approximately a quarter of all diagnoses are now made at the age of 60 years or more and a fifth at 65 years or over. About 4% are diagnosed at 80 years or above. Around 60% remain undetected, since their symptoms are often subtle: tiredness, indigestion, reduced appetite. Good compliance with gluten free diet, resolution of symptoms and improvement in laboratory indices can be achieved in over 90% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Coeliac disease not uncommonly presents for the first time in older patients and is an important diagnosis to make.

Coeliac disease

Coeliac disease occurs in about 1% of people in most populations. Diagnosis rates are increasing, and this seems to be due to a true rise in incidence rather than increased awareness and detection. Coeliac disease develops in genetically susceptible individuals who, in response to unknown environmental factors, develop an immune response that is subsequently triggered by the ingestion of gluten. The disease has many clinical manifestations, ranging from severe malabsorption to minimally symptomatic or non-symptomatic presentations. Diagnosis requires the presence of duodenal villous atrophy, and most patients have circulating antibodies against tissue transglutaminase; in children, European guidelines allow a diagnosis without a duodenal biopsy provided that strict symptomatic and serological criteria are met. Although a gluten-free diet is an effective treatment in most individuals, a substantial minority develop persistent or recurrent symptoms. Difficulties adhering to a gluten-free diet have led to the development of non-dietary therapies, several of which are undergoing trials in human beings.

Outcome of Referrals for Non-Responsive Celiac Disease in a Tertiary Center: Low Incidence of Refractory Celiac Disease in the Netherlands

Objectives:

Refractory celiac disease (RCD) is a severe cause of non-responsive celiac disease (CD) due to its association with the enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL). Conflicting data exist on the prevalence and the clinical manifestations of RCD type I (RCD I) and type II (RCD II). The aim of the current study was to provide insight in the incidence of RCD and in the distinction with other causes of non-responsive CD.

Methods:

A total of 106 CD patients were referred to our tertiary referral center between January 2006 and December 2011 for evaluation of non-responsive CD. In addition, a questionnaire was sent to all 82 gastroenterology departments in the Netherlands to reveal whether a patient with RCD was currently being evaluated or had been treated between 2006 and 2012.

Results:

During a 6 year period, a total of 31 patients were diagnosed with RCD (19 RCD I and 12 RCD II). The nationwide survey revealed 5 additional patients with RCD I and one patient with RCD II. This leads to an annual incidence of RCD of 0.83/10.000 CD patients. The remaining patients were diagnosed with involuntary gluten ingestion (21.7%), delayed mucosal recovery (11.3%), enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma (7.5%) and autoimmune enteropathy (1.8%).

Conclusions:

This nationwide study reveals a low incidence of RCD in the Netherlands. Nevertheless, RCD is a clinically relevant disease entity in CD patients non-responsive to the gluten-free diet.