Screening for ROS1 gene rearrangements in non-small-cell lung cancers using immunohistochemistry with FISH confirmation is an effective method to identify this rare target

ROS1 immunohistochemistry as a potential predictive biomarker for ROS1-targeted therapy in breast cancer: impact of antibody clone selection

AIMS

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) may show targetable vulnerabilities secondary to the characteristic loss of the cell adhesion protein E-cadherin. Specifically, a synthetic lethal interaction was identified between E-cadherin loss and ROS1 inhibition. Several clinical trials are currently under way to assess the efficacy of ROS1 inhibitors in ILC; however, ROS1 expression has not been confirmed in ILC tumours and ROS1 has not been validated as a biomarker in the breast cancer setting. This study aimed to (i) examine ROS1 expression in a large cohort of breast cancer cases and (ii) investigate the biology and clinical significance of ROS1 positivity in breast cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ROS1 immunohistochemistry was performed on a large cohort of ILC (n = 274) and invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST; n = 431) cases with extensive clinicopathological data. The staining performance of four ROS1 antibody clones was compared. There was marked variation in ROS1 status according to antibody clone. D4D6 and SP384 were negative in almost all breast cancer cases, whereas EP282 and EPMGHR2 were positive in 37 and 47% of ILC cases, and 49 and 74% of NST cases, respectively. Only data from clones D4D6 and SP384 were highly concordant, while EP282 and EPMGHR2 were positive in distinct breast cancer subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of ROS1 status in breast cancer appears to be highly antibody clone-dependent. ROS1 antibody clone selection will be an important consideration in the design of clinical trials investigating the clinical validity of ROS1 as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer.

The molecular characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer in the Northern Territory's Top End

AIM

Indigenous Australians with lung cancer have poorer survival than non-Indigenous Australians. The reasons for the disparity are not fully understood and this study hypothesized that there may be a difference in the molecular profiles of tumors. The aim of this study, therefore, was to describe and compare the characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Northern Territory's Top End, between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients, and describe the molecular profile of tumors in the two groups.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all adults with a new diagnosis of NSCLC in the Top End from 2017 to 2019. Patient characteristics assessed were Indigenous status, age, sex, smoking status, disease stage, and performance status. Molecular characteristics assessed were epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Student's t-test and Fisher's Exact Test were used in the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 152 patients diagnosed with NSCLC in the Top End from 2017-2019. Thirty (19.7%) were Indigenous and 122 (80.3%) were non-Indigenous. Indigenous patients compared to non-Indigenous patients were younger at diagnosis (median age 60.7 years versus 67.1 years, p = 0.00036) but were otherwise similar in demographics. PD-L1 expression was similar between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients (p = 0.91). The only mutations identified among stage IV non-squamous NSCLC patients were EGFR and KRAS but testing rates and overall numbers were too small to draw conclusions about differences in prevalence between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to investigate the molecular characteristics of NSCLC in the Top End.

Rediscovering immunohistochemistry in lung cancer

Several observations indicate that protein expression analysis by immunohistochemistry (IHC) remains relevant in individuals with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when considering targeted therapy, as an early step in diagnosis and for therapy selection. Since the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), the role of IHC in testing for NSCLC biomarkers has been forgotten or ignored. We discuss how protein-level investigations maintain a critical role in defining sensitivity to lung cancer therapies in oncogene- and non-oncogene-addicted cases and in patients eligible for immunotherapy, suggesting that IHC testing should be reconsidered in clinical practice. We also argue how a panel of IHC tests should be considered complementary to NGS and other genomic assays. This is relevant to current clinical diagnostic practice but with potential future roles to optimize the selection of patients for innovative therapies. At the same time, strict validation of antibodies, assays, scoring systems, and intra- and interobserver reproducibility is needed.

Concordance of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in the Detection of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) and Ros Proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) Gene Rearrangements in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: A 4.5-Year Experience Highlighting Challenges and Pitfalls

CONTEXT.—

ALK and ROS1 rearrangements are essential biomarkers to be tested in advanced lung adenocarcinomas. While D5F3 Ventana assay is a companion diagnostic for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-targeted therapy, immunohistochemistry is only a screening tool for detecting ROS1 rearrangement. Confirmation by cytogenetic or molecular techniques is necessary.

OBJECTIVE.—

To evaluate the utility of ALK and ROS1 fluorescence in situ hybridization as a complement to immunohistochemistry in routine predictive biomarker testing algorithms.

DESIGN.—

The study was ambispective, spanning 4.5 years during which lung adenocarcinoma samples were subjected to EGFR mutation testing by real-time polymerase chain reaction and ALK/ROS1 rearrangement testing by immunohistochemistry (Ventana D5F3 assay for anaplastic lymphoma kinase protein; manual assay with D4D6 clone for Ros proto-oncogene 1 protein). Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed in all anaplastic lymphoma kinase equivocal and Ros proto-oncogene 1 immunopositive cases.

RESULTS.—

Of 1874 samples included, EGFR mutations were detected in 27% (481 of 1796). Anaplastic lymphoma kinase immunohistochemistry was positive in 10% (174 of 1719) and equivocal in 3% (58 of 1719) of samples tested. ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization showed 81% (77 of 95) concordance with immunohistochemistry. Ros proto-oncogene 1 immunopositivity was noted in 13% (190 of 1425) of cases, with hybridization-confirmed rearrangements in 19.3% (26 of 135) of samples, all of which showed diffuse, strong- to moderate-intensity, cytoplasmic staining in tumor cells. Ros proto-oncogene 1 protein overexpression without rearrangement was significantly common in EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged adenocarcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Immunostaining is a robust method for ALK-rearrangement testing, with fluorescence in situ hybridization adding value in the rare equivocal stained case. ROS1-rearrangement testing is more cost-effective if immunohistochemistry is followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization after excluding EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged adenocarcinomas.

ROS1 fusions in resected stage I-III adenocarcinoma: Results from the European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape project

BACKGROUND

ROS1 fusion is a relatively low prevalence (0.6-2.0%) but targetable driver in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Robust and low-cost tests, such as immunohistochemistry (IHC), are desirable to screen for patients potentially harboring this fusion. The aim was to investigate the prevalence of ROS1 fusions in a clinically annotated European stage I-III LUAD cohort using IHC screening with the in vitro diagnostics (IVD)-marked clone SP384, followed by confirmatory molecular analysis in pre-defined subsets.

METHODS

Resected LUADs constructed in tissue microarrays, were immunostained for ROS1 expression using SP384 clone in a ready-to-use kit and Ventana immunostainers. After external quality control, analysis was performed by trained pathologists. Staining intensity of at least 2+ (any percentage of tumor cells) was considered IHC positive (ROS1 IHC + ). Subsequently, ROS1 IHC + cases were 1:1:1 matched with IHC0 and IHC1 + cases and subjected to orthogonal ROS1 FISH and RNA-based testing.

RESULTS

The prevalence of positive ROS1 expression (ROS1 IHC + ), defined as IHC 2+/3+, was 4 % (35 of 866 LUADs). Twenty-eight ROS1 IHC + cases were analyzed by FISH/RNA-based testing, with only two harboring a confirmed ROS1 gene fusion, corresponding to a lower limit for the prevalence of ROS1 gene fusion of 0.23 %. They represent a 7 % probability of identifying a fusion among ROS1 IHC + cases. Both confirmed cases were among the only four with sufficient material and H-score ≥ 200, leading to a 50 % probability of identifying a ROS1 gene fusion in cases with an H-score considered strongly positive. All matched ROS1 IHC- (IHC0 and IHC1 + ) cases were also found negative by FISH/RNA-based testing, leading to a 100 % probability of lack of ROS1 fusion for ROS1 IHC- cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of ROS1 fusion in an LUAD stage I-III European cohort was relatively low. ROS1 IHC using SP384 clone is useful for exclusion of ROS1 gene fusion negative cases.

The rapidly changing field of predictive biomarkers of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide in both men and women, however mortality in the US and EU are recently declining in parallel with the gradual cut of smoking prevalence. Consequently, the relative frequency of adenocarcinoma increased while that of squamous and small cell carcinomas declined. During the last two decades a plethora of targeted drug therapies have appeared for the treatment of metastasizing non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). Personalized oncology aims to precisely match patients to treatments with the highest potential of success. Extensive research is done to introduce biomarkers which can predict the effectiveness of a specific targeted therapeutic approach. The EGFR signaling pathway includes several sufficient targets for the treatment of human cancers including NSCLC. Lung adenocarcinoma may harbor both activating and resistance mutations of the EGFR gene, and further, mutations of KRAS and BRAF oncogenes. Less frequent but targetable genetic alterations include ALK, ROS1, RET gene rearrangements, and various alterations of MET proto-oncogene. In addition, the importance of anti-tumor immunity and of tumor microenvironment has become evident recently. Accumulation of mutations generally trigger tumor specific immune defense, but immune protection may be upregulated as an aggressive feature. The blockade of immune checkpoints results in potential reactivation of tumor cell killing and induces significant tumor regression in various tumor types, such as lung carcinoma. Therapeutic responses to anti PD1-PD-L1 treatment may correlate with the expression of PD-L1 by tumor cells. Due to the wide range of diagnostic and predictive features in lung cancer a plenty of tests are required from a single small biopsy or cytology specimen, which is challenged by major issues of sample quantity and quality. Thus, the efficacy of biomarker testing should be warranted by standardized policy and optimal material usage. In this review we aim to discuss major targeted therapy-related biomarkers in NSCLC and testing possibilities comprehensively.

Comparison of Different ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Clones and Consistency with Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Background

The study of ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has gained importance as it enables personalized treatment of NSCLC with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Therefore, it is important that the ROS1 assessment tests become more standardized. In this study, we compared the two immunohistochemistry (IHC) antibodies (D4D6 and SP384 clones) and consistency with the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results in NSCLC.

Aims

To investigate the effectiveness of the commonly used two IHC antibodies (SP384 and D4D6 clones) to detect ROS1 rearrangement in NSCLC.

Study Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Methods

The study included 103 samples diagnosed with NSCLC, confirmed using IHC and FISH ROS1 results (14 positives, four discordant, and 85 consecutive negatives), with sufficient tissue samples (≥ 50 tumor cells). All samples were initially tested with ROS1-IHC antibodies (D4D6 and SP384 clones); their ROS1 status was then analyzed using the FISH method. Finally, samples with discordant IHC and FISH results were confirmed using the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction method.

Results

The sensitivity of SP384 and D4D6 clones of ROS1 antibody was 100% with a ≥ 1 + cut-off. When the ≥ 2 + cut-off was used, the sensitivity rate for the SP384 clone was 100%, whereas the sensitivity for the D4D6 clone was 42.86%. ROS1 FISH rearranged samples were positive for both clones, but SP384 had generally higher intensity than D4D6. The mean IHC score was + 2 for SP384 and + 1.17 for D4D6. SP384 mostly tended to have a higher IHC score intensity, which made the evaluation easier than D4D6. SP384 has a higher sensitivity than D4D6. However, false positives were found in both clones. There was no significant correlation between ROS1 FISH-positivity percentage with SP384 (p = 0.713, p = 0.108) and D4D6 (p = 0.26, p = -0.323) IHC staining intensity. The staining patterns of both clones were similar (homogeneity/heterogeneity).

Conclusion

Our findings show that the SP384 clone is more sensitive than D4D6. However, SP384 can also cause false positive results like D4D6. Knowing the variable diagnostic performance of different ROS1 antibodies before using them in clinical applications is necessary. IHC-positive results should be confirmed using FISH.

"Evaluation of ROS1 expression and rearrangements in a large cohort of early-stage lung cancer"

BACKGROUND

ROS1 fusion is an infrequent, but attractive target for therapy in patients with metastatic non- small-cell lung cancer. In studies on mainly late-stage disease, the prevalence of ROS1 fusions is about 1-3%. In early-stage lung cancer ROS1 might also provide a fruitful target for neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. In the present study, we investigated the prevalence of ROS1 fusion in a Norwegian cohort of early-stage lung cancer. We also explored whether positive ROS1 immunohistochemical (IHC) stain was associated with certain mutations, clinical characteristics and outcomes.

METHODS

The study was performed using biobank material from 921 lung cancer patients including 542 patients with adenocarcinoma surgically resected during 2006-2018. Initially, we screened the samples with two different IHC clones (D4D6 and SP384) targeting ROS1. All samples that showed more than weak or focal staining, as well as a subgroup of negative samples, were analyzed with ROS1 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) with a comprehensive NGS DNA and RNA panel. Positive ROS1-fusion was defined as those samples positive in at least two of the three methods (IHC, FISH, NGS).

RESULTS

Fifty cases were IHC positive. Of these, three samples were both NGS and FISH-positive and considered positive for ROS1 fusion. Two more samples were FISH positive only, and whilst IHC and NGS were negative. These were also negative with Reverse Transcription quantitative real time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR). The prevalence of ROS1 fusion in adenocarcinomas was 0.6%. All cases with ROS1 fusion had TP53 mutations. IHC-positivity was associated with adenocarcinoma. Among SP384-IHC positive cases we also found an association with never smoking status. There was no association between positive IHC and overall survival, time to relapse, age, stage, sex or pack-year of smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

ROS1 seems to be less frequent in early-stage disease than in advanced stages. IHC is a sensitive, but less specific method and the results need to be confirmed with another method like FISH or NGS.

A Real-World Experience from a Single Center (LPCE, Nice, France) Highlights the Urgent Need to Abandon Immunohistochemistry for ROS1 Rearrangement Screening of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The detection of ROS1 rearrangements in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (NS-NSCLC) permits administration of efficient targeted therapy. Detection is based on a testing algorithm associated with ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by ROS1 FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) to confirm positivity. However, (i) ROS1 rearrangements are rare (1-2% of NS-NSCLC), (ii) the specificity of ROS1 IHC is not optimal, and (iii) ROS1 FISH is not widely available, making this algorithm challenging to interpret time-consuming. We evaluated RNA NGS, which was used as reflex testing for ROS1 rearrangements in NS-NSCLC with the aim of replacing ROS1 IHC as a screening method. ROS1 IHC and RNA NGS were prospectively performed in 810 NS-NSCLC. Positive results were analyzed by ROS1 FISH. ROS1 IHC was positive in 36/810 (4.4%) cases that showed variable staining intensity while NGS detected ROS1 rearrangements in 16/810 (1.9%) cases. ROS1 FISH was positive in 15/810 (1.8%) of ROS1 IHC positive cases and in all positive ROS1 NGS cases. Obtaining both ROS1 IHC and ROS1 FISH reports took an average of 6 days, while obtaining ROS1 IHC and RNA NGS reports took an average of 3 days. These results showed that systematic screening for the ROS1 status using IHC must be replaced by NGS reflex testing.

Evaluation of the Molecular Landscape in PD-L1 Positive Metastatic NSCLC: Data from Campania, Italy

Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have increased and improved the treatment options for patients with non-oncogene-addicted advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the role of ICIs in oncogene-addicted advanced stage NSCLC patients is still debated. In this study, in an attempt to fill in the informational gap on the effect of ICIs on other driver mutations, we set out to provide a molecular landscape of clinically relevant oncogenic drivers in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive NSCLC patients. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data on 167 advanced stage NSCLC PD-L1 positive patients (≥1%) who were referred to our clinic for molecular evaluation of five driver oncogenes, namely, EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, ALK and ROS1. Results: Interestingly, n = 93 (55.7%) patients showed at least one genomic alteration within the tested genes. Furthermore, analyzing a subset of patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50% and concomitant gene alterations (n = 8), we found that n = 3 (37.5%) of these patients feature clinical benefit with ICIs administration, despite the presence of a concomitant KRAS gene alteration. Conclusions: In this study, we provide a molecular landscape of clinically relevant biomarkers in NSCLC PD-L1 positive patients, along with data evidencing the clinical benefit of ICIs in patient NSCLC PD-L1 positive alterations.

Correlation of ROS1 (D4D6) Immunohistochemistry with ROS1 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay in a Contemporary Cohort of Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas

Sambit K. MohantyObjective  Repressor of Silencing ( ROS1 ) gene rearrangement in the lung adenocarcinomas is one of the targetable mutually exclusive genomic alteration. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), next-generation sequencing, and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays are generally used to detect ROS1 gene alterations. We evaluated the correlation between ROS1 IHC and FISH analysis considering FISH as the gold standard method to determine the utility of IHC as a screening method for lung adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods  A total of 374 advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients were analyzed for ROS1 IHC on Ventana Benchmark XT platform using D4D6 rabbit monoclonal antibody. FISH assay was performed in parallel in all these cases using the Vysis ROS1 Break Apart FISH probe. Statistical Analysis  The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were evaluated. Results  A total of 17 tumors were positive either by IHC or FISH analysis or both (true positive). Four tumors were positive by IHC (H-score range: 120-270), while negative on FISH analysis (false positive by IHC). One tumor was IHC negative, but positive by FISH analysis (false negative). The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 94.4% (confidence interval [CI]: 72.71-99.86%), 63.6% (CI: 30.79-89.07%), 2.6 (CI: 1.18-5.72), 0.09 (CI: 0.01-0.62), 80.95% (CI: 65.86-90.35%), 87.5% (CI: 49.74-98.02%), and 82.76%, respectively. Conclusion   ROS1 IHC has high sensitivity at a cost of lower specificity for the detection of ROS1 gene rearrangement. All IHC positive cases should undergo a confirmatory FISH test as this testing algorithm stands as a reliable and economic tool to screen ROS1 rearrangement in lung adenocarcinomas.

Clinical Utility of Next-generation Sequencing in Real-world Cases: A Single-institution Study of Nine Cases

BACKGROUND/AIM

Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a well-established technique to detect pathogenic alterations in tumors. Indeed, it is the cornerstone of targeted therapy in precision medicine. We investigated the clinical utility of next-generation sequencing in real-world cases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively selected six representative cancer cases, wherein targeted NGS played a pivotal role in the diagnosis and treatment of patients. Additionally, we analyzed three cases with rare, unusual pathogenic alterations.

RESULTS

Our NGS analysis revealed that four patients had TPR-ROS1, EGFR-RAD51, and NCOA4-RET fusions and MET exon 14 skipping mutation, respectively, which can be treated with targeted therapy. Furthermore, we used NGS as a diagnostic tool to confirm the origin of unknown primary malignant tumors in two cases. Interestingly, NGS also helped us identify the following cases: patients exhibiting BRCA1 and TP53 mutations that exhibited histological and immunohistochemical characteristics consistent with endometrioid carcinoma, patients with high-grade serous carcinoma not possessing a TP53 mutation, and patients with small cell lung cancer with a ERBB2 mutation and displaying no loss of RB1.

CONCLUSION

We recommend targeted NGS for the diagnoses and targeted therapy of cancer patients.

The role of next-generation sequencing in detecting gene FUSIONS with KNOWN and UNKNOWN partners: A single-center experience with methodologies' integration

AIMS

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is becoming a new gold standard for determining molecular predictive biomarkers. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of NGS in detecting gene fusions, focusing on comparing gene fusions with known and unknown partners.

METHODS

We collected all gene fusions from a consecutive case series using an amplicon-based DNA/RNA NGS platform and subdivided them into two groups: gene fusions with known partners and gene fusions with unknown partners. Gene fusions involving ALK, ROS1 and RET were also examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).

RESULTS

Overall, 1174 malignancies underwent NGS analysis. NGS detected gene fusions in 67 cases (5.7%), further subdivided into 43 (64.2%) with known partners and 24 (35.8%) with unknown partners. Gene fusions were predominantly found in non-small cell lung carcinomas (52/67, 77.6%). Gene fusions with known partners frequently involved ALK (20/43, 46.5%) and MET (9/43, 20.9%), while gene fusions with unknown partners mostly involved RET (18/24, 75.0%). FISH/IHC confirmed rearrangement status in most (89.3%) of the gene fusions with known partners, but in only one (4.8%) of the gene fusions with unknown partners, with a significant difference (p<0.001). In 17 patients undergoing targeted therapy, the log-rank test revealed that the overall survival was higher in the known partner group than in the unknown partner group (p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

NGS is a reliable method for detecting gene fusions with known partners, but it is less accurate in identifying gene fusions with unknown partners, for which further analyses (such as FISH) are required.

ROS1 rearrangements in lung adenocarcinomas are defined by diffuse strong immunohistochemical expression of ROS1

A small subset of lung adenocarcinomas harbour ROS1 gene arrangements and are amenable to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Current practice in Australia involves screening for ROS1 rearrangements in adenocarcinomas using ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) followed by confirmatory molecular testing such as fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), if other known genetic driver alterations are absent. The best threshold to determine ROS1 IHC positivity is not well defined, however, and this study aims to determine the optimal threshold for ROS1 IHC screening to identify ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas. A total of 177 lung adenocarcinomas tested for a ROS1 rearrangement by FISH at our institution between 2017 and 2020 due to presence of ROS1 IHC staining were included in the study. ROS1 IHC staining was assessed by scoring the staining intensity (0, 1, 2, or 3+) and multiplying by the percentage of positive cells to generate an H-score. IHC H-scores were compared with FISH. Of 177 cases, 32 (18%) were ROS1 FISH-positive and 145 (82%) were negative. FISH-positive cases had a median H-score of 300 (range 200-300; mean 290.3) and negative cases had a median H-score of 40 (range 0-300; mean 63). All FISH-positive cases showed strong and diffuse IHC positivity. Using a threshold H-score of 200, the sensitivity of identifying ROS1 rearrangements was 100% and the specificity was 95% amongst cases referred with ROS1 IHC positivity. Adenocarcinomas with a FISH-confirmed ROS1 rearrangement demonstrate diffuse, strong (2-3+) IHC staining. Cases with weak, patchy ROS1 IHC staining are not associated with ROS1 rearrangements and in these cases FISH testing is of little to no utility.

ROS1 rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer: screening by immunohistochemistry using proportion of cells staining without intensity and excluding cases with MAPK pathway drivers improves test performance

Therapeutically actionable ROS1 rearrangements have been described in 1-3% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Screening for ROS1 rearrangements is recommended to be by immunohistochemistry (IHC), followed by confirmation with fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) or sequencing. However, in practise ROS1 IHC presents difficulties due to conflicting scoring systems, multiple clones and expression in tumours that are wild-type for ROS1. We assessed ROS1 IHC in 285 consecutive cases of NSCLC with non-squamous histology over a nearly 2-year period. IHC was scored with ROS1 clone D4D6 (n=270), clone SP384 (n=275) or both clones (n=260). Results were correlated with ROS1 break-apart FISH (n=67), ALK status (n=194), and sequence data of EGFR (n=178) and other drivers, where possible. ROS1 expression was detected in 161/285 cases (56.5%), including 13/14 ROS1 FISH-positive cases. There was no ROS1 expression in one ROS1 FISH-positive case in which sequencing detected an ALK-EML4 fusion, but not a ROS1 fusion. The other 13 ROS1 FISH-positive cases showed moderate to strong staining with both IHC clones. However, one case with a TPM3-ROS1 fusion would have been scored as negative with SP384 and D4D6 clones by some previous criteria. ROS1 expression was also detected in 58/285 cases (20.4%) that had driver mutations in genes other than ROS1. A sensitivity of 100% for detecting a ROS1 rearrangement by FISH was achieved by omitting intensity from the IHC scoring criteria and expression in >0% cells with D4D6 or in ≥50% cells with SP384. Excluding cases with driver events in any MAPK pathway gene (e.g., in ALK, EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, ERBB2 and MET) substantially reduced the number of cases proceeding to ROS1 FISH. Only 15.9% of MAPK-negative NSCLC would proceed to FISH for an IHC threshold of >0% cells with D4D6, with a specificity of 42.4%. For a threshold of ≥50% cells with SP384, only 18.5% of MAPK-negative cases would proceed to FISH, with a specificity of 31.4%. Based on our data we suggest an algorithm for screening for ROS1 rearrangements in NSCLC in which ROS1 FISH is only performed in cases that have been demonstrated to lack activating mutations in any MAPK pathway gene by comprehensive sequencing and ALK IHC, and show staining at any intensity in ≥50% of cells with clone SP384, or >0% cells with D4D6.

Canadian ROS proto-oncogene 1 study (CROS) for multi-institutional implementation of ROS1 testing in non-small cell lung cancer

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene rearrangements show dramatic response to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib. Current best practice guidelines recommend that all advanced stage non-squamous NSCLC patients be also tested for ROS1 gene rearrangements. Several studies have suggested that ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the D4D6 antibody may be used to screen for ROS1 fusion positive lung cancers, with assays showing high sensitivity but moderate to high specificity. A break apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test is then used to confirm the presence of ROS1 gene rearrangement. The goal of Canadian ROS1 (CROS) study was to harmonize ROS1 laboratory developed testing (LDT) by using IHC and FISH assays to detect ROS1 rearranged lung cancers across Canadian pathology laboratories. Cell lines expressing different levels of ROS1 (high, low, none) were used to calibrate IHC protocols after which participating laboratories ran the calibrated protocols on a reference set of 24 NSCLC cases (9 ROS1 rearranged tumors and 15 ROS1 non-rearranged tumors as determined by FISH). Results were compared using a centralized readout. The stained slides were evaluated for the cellular localization of staining, intensity of staining, the presence of staining in non-tumor cells, the presence of non-specific staining (e.g. necrosis, extracellular mater, other) and the percent positive cells. H-score was also determined for each tumor. Analytical sensitivity and specificity harmonization was achieved by using low limit of detection (LOD) as either any positivity in the U118 cell line or H-score of 200 with the HCC78 cell line. An overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of up to 100% and 99% respectively was achieved for ROS1 IHC testing (relative to FISH) using an adjusted H-score readout on the reference cases. This study confirms that LDT ROS1 IHC assays can be highly sensitive and specific for detection of ROS1 rearrangements in NSCLC. As NSCLC can demonstrate ROS1 IHC positivity in FISH-negative cases, the degree of the specificity of the IHC assay, especially in highly sensitive protocols, is mostly dependent on the readout cut-off threshold. As ROS1 IHC is a screening assay for a rare rearrangements in NSCLC, we recommend adjustment of the readout threshold in order to balance specificity, rather than decreasing the overall analytical and diagnostic sensitivity of the protocols.

Reflex ROS1 IHC Screening with FISH Confirmation for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Cost-Efficient Strategy in a Public Healthcare System

ROS1 rearrangements are identified in 1-2% of lung adenocarcinoma cases, and reflex testing is guideline-recommended. We developed a decision model for population-based ROS1 testing from a Canadian public healthcare perspective to determine the strategy that optimized detection of true-positive (TP) cases while minimizing costs and turnaround time (TAT). Eight diagnostic strategies were compared, including reflex single gene testing via immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and biomarker-informed (EGFR/ALK/KRAS wildtype) testing initiated by pathologists and clinician-initiated strategies. Reflex IHC screening with FISH confirmation of positive cases yielded the best results for TAT, TP detection rate, and cost. IHC screening saved CAD 1,000,000 versus reflex FISH testing. NGS was the costliest reflex strategy. Biomarker-informed testing was cost-efficient but delayed TAT. Clinician-initiated testing was the least costly but resulted in long TAT and missed TP cases, highlighting the importance of reflex testing. Thus, reflex IHC screening for ROS1 with FISH confirmation provides a cost-efficient strategy with short TAT and maximizes the number of TP cases detected.

Screening for ROS1 fusions in patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinomas using the VENTANA ROS1 (SP384) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody

Introduction: The development of several ROS1 inhibitors means that the importance of accurately identifying ROS1-positive lung cancer patients has never been greater. Therefore, it is crucial that ROS1 testing assays become more standardized.Areas covered: Based on primary literature, combined with personal diagnostic and research experience, this review provide a pragmatic update on the use of the recently released VENTANA ROS1 (SP384) Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody.Expert opinion: This assay provides high sensitivity, so it is an excellent analytical option when screening for ROS1 fusions in patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinomas.

Predictive molecular pathology of lung cancer in Germany with focus on gene fusion testing: Methods and quality assurance

Predictive molecular testing has become an important part of the diagnosis of any patient with lung cancer. Using reliable methods to ensure timely and accurate results is inevitable for guiding treatment decisions. In the past few years, parallel sequencing has been established for mutation testing, and its use is currently broadened for the detection of other genetic alterations, such as gene fusion and copy number variations. In addition, conventional methods such as immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization are still being used, either for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue or for cytological specimens. For the development and broad implementation of such complex technologies, interdisciplinary and regional networks are needed. The Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) has served as a model of centralized testing and decentralized treatment of patients and incorporates all German comprehensive cancer centers. Internal quality control, laboratory accreditation, and participation in external quality assessment is mandatory for the delivery of reliable results. Here, we provide a summary of current technologies used to identify patients who have lung cancer with gene fusions, briefly describe the structures of NGM and the national NGM (nNGM), and provide recommendations for quality assurance.

FISH patterns of ROS1, MET, and ALK with a correlation of ALK immunohistochemistry in lung cancer: a case for introducing ALK immunohistochemistry 'Equivocal' interpretation category in the Ventana anti-ALK (D5F3) CDx assay - A tertiary cancer center experience

Background

Mutations in ROS1, ALK, and MET genes are targetable alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They can be evaluated by different techniques, most commonly fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Methods

We explored the prevalence of ROS1, ALK, MET mutations, discuss clinicopathological associations and FISH signal patterns on 413 consecutive cases of EGFR negative lung carcinoma from March 2016 to April 2017 using FISH for ALK, ROS1, and MET along with ALK (D5F3) IHC.

Results

ROS1 gene rearrangement, ALK positivity (IHC and/or FISH), and MET amplification were seen in 18/358 (5%) cases, 76/392 cases (19.4%), and 10/370 (2.7%) cases, respectively. ALK FISH and ALK IHC were positive in 51/300 (17%) and 58/330 cases (17.57%), respectively, while 8/330 (2.4%) cases were ALK IHC "equivocal" of which 3/8 (37.5%) were ALK FISH positive. Of ALK FISH and IHC co-tested cases, 43/238 (18.07%) cases were positive by both techniques, while 15/43 (34.88%) of ALK positive cases showed discordant ALK FISH and IHC results. All ROS1 rearranged and MET amplified cases were adenocarcinoma. Signet ring cell histology was associated with 78.57% likelihood of being either ALK or ROS1 positive. Genomic heterogeneity was seen in 30% of MET amplified cases.

Conclusions

ALK/ROS1/MET gene alterations were found in 25.18% of NSCLC cases. An ALK IHC "equivocal" interpretation category should be incorporated into practice. Atypical patterns of ROS1 and genomic heterogeneity need to be evaluated further for any clinical relevance.

High prevalence of ROS1 gene rearrangement detected by FISH in EGFR and ALK negative lung adenocarcinoma

ROS1 rearrangement has become an important biomarker for targeted therapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of ROS1 rearrangement in Chinese LUAD with EGFR wild-type and ALK fusion-negative status, and analyze the relationship with their clinicopathological characteristics. A large cohort of 589 patients of LUAD with EGFR/ALK wild-type, diagnosed between April 2014 and June 2018, was retrospectively analyzed. ROS1 rearrangement in all these cases was detected by FISH, and 8 selected cases with different positive and negative signals were confirmed by NGS. As a result, total of 56 cases with ROS1 rearrangements out of 589 LUADs (9.51%) were identified by FISH. The frequency of ROS1 rearrangement in women was 22.15% (35/158), which was statistically higher than 4.87% (21/431) in men (P < 0.001). The ROS1 positive rate in the patients with age < 50 years old (25.29%, 22/87) was statistically higher than that in the patients with age ≥ 50 (6.77%, 34/502) (P < 0.001). There was a trend that the frequency of ROS1 rearrangement in LUAD with stage III-IV was higher than that in stage I-II (9.56%, 39/408 vs 2.50%, 1/40), although it did not reach significant difference (P = 0.135). 37 out of 56 cases of ROS1 rearranged LUAD showed solid (n = 20, 35.71%) and invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 17, 30.36%) pathological subtypes. The median OS for patients of ROS1 rearranged LUAD treated with TKIs (n = 29) was 49.69 months (95% CI: 36.71, 62.67), compared with 32.55 months (95% CI: 23.24, 41.86) for those who did not receive TKI treatment (n = 16) (P = 0.040). The NGS results on ROS1 rearrangement in all the 8 cases were concordant with FISH results. In conclusion, high prevalence of ROS1 rearrangements occurs in EGFR/ALK wild-type LUAD detected by FISH, especially in younger, female, late stage patients, and in histological subtypes of solid and invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Precision medicine in non-small cell lung cancer: Current applications and future directions

Advances in biomarkers, targeted therapies, and immuno-oncology have transformed the clinical management of patients with advanced NSCLC. For oncogene-driven tumors, there are highly effective targeted therapies against EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, TRK, RET, and MET. In addition, investigational therapies for KRAS, NRG1, and HER2 have shown promising results and may become standard-of-care in the near future. In parallel, immune-checkpoint therapy has emerged as an indispensable treatment modality, especially for patients lacking actionable oncogenic drivers. While PD-L1 expression has shown modest predictive utility, biomarkers for immune-checkpoint inhibition in NSCLC have remained elusive and represent an area of active investigation. Given the growing importance of biomarkers, optimal utilization of small tissue biopsies and alternative genotyping methods using circulating cell-free DNA have become increasingly integrated into clinical practice. In this review, we will summarize the current landscape and emerging trends in precision medicine for patients with advanced NSCLC with a special focus on predictive biomarker testing.

Evaluation of a new diagnostic immunohistochemistry approach for ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

ROS1 rearrangement is an oncogenic driver of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accurate detection of ROS1 rearrangements in clinical tumor samples is vital. In this study, a new immunohistochemistry (IHC) monoclonal antibody (mAb) 1A1 assay was evaluated in patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

A cohort (cohort A) of 22 positive ROS1 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) samples were studied to evaluate the IHC-1A1 assay by comparing IHC-D4D6 mAb and another cohort (cohort B) of 178 consecutive cases to verify the assay by comparison using the RT-PCR method. IHC results with 2+ (H-score > 100) or 3+ staining was considered ROS1-positive.

RESULTS

In cohort A, ROS1 protein expression was evaluated in 22 samples by IHC-D4D6 and IHC-1A1 assays. For IHC-1A1, one patient was 1+ and 11 patients were 1+ for IHC-D4D6. ROS1 2-3+ was found in 36.4 % (8/22) of samples with IHC-D4D6 and 90.9 % (20/22) with IHC-1A1.The mean H-score of the 1A1 ROS1 2-3+ cases was 203.5. With the D4D6 clone, the mean H-score of the D4D6 ROS1 2∼3+ cases was 182.5. In the 178 NSCLC patients in cohort B, ROS1 rearrangement was detected with IHC and RT-PCR assays. Two patients had tumors with ROS1 IHC-1A1 3+ and one patient was IHC-1A1 2+. Among the three patients, two were confirmed to have ROS1 rearrangement by RT-PCR. None of the 175 ROS1 IHC-1A1 0-1+ samples were ROS1-positive by RT-PCR.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that the new IHC-1A1 ROS1 clone is a sensitive preliminary method and may be another excellent screening method in addition to the original IHC detection method to detect ROS1 gene rearrangements.

Australian consensus statement for best practice ROS1 testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the leading cause of death from cancer globally. Diagnosis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with 5-year relative survival of 3.2%. ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) is an oncogenic driver of NSCLC occurring in up to 2% of cases and commonly associated with younger age and a history of never or light smoking. Results of an early trial with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib that inhibits tumours that harbour ROS1 rearrangements have shown an objective response rate (ORR) of 72% (95% CI 58-83%), median progression free survival (PFS) of 19.3 months (95% CI 15.2-39.1 months) and median overall survival (OS) of 51.4 months (95% CI 29.3 months to not reached). Therefore, with the availability of highly effective ROS1-targeted TKI therapy, upfront molecular testing for ROS1 status alongside EGFR and ALK testing is recommended for all patients with NSCLC. We review the tissue requirements for ROS1 testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) and we present a testing algorithm for advanced NSCLC and consider how the future of pathology testing for ROS1 may evolve.

Comparison of in Situ and Extraction-Based Methods for the Detection of ROS1 Rearrangements in Solid Tumors

Clinical data confirmed that patients with ROS1 rearrangement are sensitive to specific inhibitors. Therefore, reliable detection of ROS1 rearrangements is essential. Several diagnostic techniques are currently available. However, previous studies were hampered by the low number of ROS1-positive samples. Thirty-five samples, including 32 ROS1 fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)-positive and three ROS1 FISH-negative samples were evaluated by ROS1 chromogenic in situ hybridization, ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) immunohistochemistry (IHC), an Agilent SureSelect^{XT HS} custom panel, the Archer FusionPlex Comprehensive Thyroid and Lung panel, and a custom NanoString fusion panel. Some samples were additionally analyzed with the Illumina TruSight Tumor 170 assay. Eleven samples were ROS1 FISH positive by a break-apart signal pattern. In all 11 samples, a ROS1 fusion was confirmed by at least one other method. The other 21 samples tested ROS1 FISH positive by an isolated 3' green signal pattern. Ten of 21 samples could be confirmed by at least two other methods. The other 11 samples tested negative by ROS1 IHC and at least one other method, indicating a false-positive ROS1 FISH result. Our study found that all ROS1 FISH-positive samples with isolated 3' green signals should be confirmed by another method. When sufficient material is available, extraction-based parallel sequencing approaches for the verification of these cases might be preferable.

Crizotinib inhibition of ROS1-positive tumours in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Canadian perspective

The ros1 kinase is an oncogenic driver in non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc). Fusion events involving the ROS1 gene are found in 1%-2% of nsclc patients and lead to deregulation of a tyrosine kinase-mediated multi-use intracellular signalling pathway, which then promotes the growth, proliferation, and progression of tumour cells. ROS1 fusion is a distinct molecular subtype of nsclc, found independently of other recognized driver mutations, and it is predominantly identified in younger patients (<50 years of age), women, never-smokers, and patients with adenocarcinoma histology. Targeted inhibition of the aberrant ros1 kinase with crizotinib is associated with increased progression-free survival (pfs) and improved quality-of-life measures. As the sole approved treatment for ROS1-rearranged nsclc, crizotinib has been demonstrated, through a variety of clinical trials and retrospective analyses, to be a safe, effective, well-tolerated, and appropriate treatment for patients having the ROS1 rearrangement. Canadian physicians endorse current guidelines which recommend that all patients with nonsquamous advanced nsclc, regardless of clinical characteristics, be tested for ROS1 rearrangement. Future integration of multigene testing panels into the standard of care could allow for efficient and cost-effective comprehensive testing of all patients with advanced nsclc. If a ROS1 rearrangement is found, treatment with crizotinib, preferably in the first-line setting, constitutes the standard of care, with other treatment options being investigated, as appropriate, should resistance to crizotinib develop.

Assessment of a New ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Clone (SP384) for the Identification of ROS1 Rearrangements in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: the ROSING Study

INTRODUCTION

The ROS1 gene rearrangement has become an important biomarker in NSCLC. The College of American Pathologists/International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/Association for Molecular Pathology testing guidelines support the use of ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a screening test, followed by confirmation with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or a molecular test in all positive results. We have evaluated a novel anti-ROS1 IHC antibody (SP384) in a large multicenter series to obtain real-world data.

METHODS

A total of 43 ROS1 FISH-positive and 193 ROS1 FISH-negative NSCLC samples were studied. All specimens were screened by using two antibodies (clone D4D6 from Cell Signaling Technology and clone SP384 from Ventana Medical Systems), and the different interpretation criteria were compared with break-apart FISH (Vysis). FISH-positive samples were also analyzed with next-generation sequencing (Oncomine Dx Target Test Panel, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

RESULTS

An H-score of 150 or higher or the presence of at least 70% of tumor cells with an intensity of staining of 2+ or higher by the SP384 clone was the optimal cutoff value (both with 93% sensitivity and 100% specificity). The D4D6 clone showed similar results, with an H-score of at least 100 (91% sensitivity and 100% specificity). ROS1 expression in normal lung was more frequent with use of the SP384 clone (p < 0.0001). The ezrin gene (EZR)-ROS1 variant was associated with membranous staining and an isolated green signal FISH pattern (p = 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The new SP384 ROS1 IHC clone showed excellent sensitivity without compromising specificity, so it is another excellent analytical option for the proposed testing algorithm.

The Role of Ancillary Techniques in Pulmonary Cytopathology

Ancillary techniques play an essential role in pulmonary cytopathology. Immunoperoxidase and special stains are by far the most common ancillary techniques used in cytopathology; however, the role of molecular diagnosis is growing, especially in the fields of pulmonary oncology and infectious disease. In this article, we review the uses of ancillary techniques in lung tumor diagnosis, lung tumor classification, predictive marker determination, primary versus metastasis differential diagnosis, and infectious organism detection.

Multicenter Evaluation of a Novel ROS1 Immunohistochemistry Assay (SP384) for Detection of ROS1 Rearrangements in a Large Cohort of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients

INTRODUCTION

The detection of a ROS1 rearrangement in advanced and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) led to a targeted treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors with favorable progression-free survival and overall survival of the patients. Thus, it is mandatory to screen for the ROS1 rearrangement in all these patients. ROS1 rearrangements can be detected using break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which is the gold standard; however, ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) can be used as a screening test because it is widely available, easy and rapid to perform, and cost-effective.

METHODS

We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and interpathologist agreement of two anti-ROS1 IHC clones, SP384 (Ventana, Tucson, Arizona) and D4D6 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, Massachusetts), in a training cohort of 51 positive ROS1 FISH LUAD cases, and then in a large validation cohort of 714 consecutive cases of LUAD from six routine molecular pathology platforms.

RESULTS

In the two cohorts, the SP384 and D4D6 clones show variable sensitivity and specificity rates on the basis of two cutoff points greater than or equal to 1+ (all % tumor cells) and greater than or equal to 2+ (>30% stained tumor cells). In the validation cohort, the D4D6 yielded the best accuracy for the presence of a ROS1 rearrangement by FISH. Interpathologist agreement was moderate to good (interclass correlation 0.722-0.874) for the D4D6 clone and good to excellent (interclass correlation: 0.830-0.956) for the SP384 clone.

CONCLUSIONS

ROS1 IHC is an effective screening tool for the presence of ROS1 rearrangements. However, users must be acutely aware of the variable diagnostic performance of different anti-ROS1 antibodies before implementation into routine clinical practice.

Decreased expression of NEDD4L contributes to NSCLC progression and metastasis

Recent evidence indicated that neural precursor cell expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4-like (NEDD4L) has a critical role in the regulation of cellular processes such as apoptosis, transport and metastasis, and is downregulated in several types of cancers. However, the role of NEDD4L in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been fully elucidated. In this study, we demonstrated that NEDD4L was downregulated in NSCLCs. This downregulation correlated with lymph node invasion, advanced stage and poor survival. In vitro experiments revealed that NEDD4L significantly suppressed cell proliferation, migration and invasion abilities. Further in vivo assay demonstrated that knocking down of NEDD4L enhanced the tumor metastasis of NSCLC cells. Moreover, we found that Polycomb group protein enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) mediated H3K27 methylation was involved in the downregulation of NEDD4L. Knocking down of EZH2 restored the expression of NEDD4L. Further examined by luciferase reporter assay indicated the EZH2 regulated the transcription activity of NEDD4L. In clinical samples, EZH2 was inversely correlated with NEDD4L expression. In summary, NEDD4L acted as a tumor suppressor gene in NSCLC and targeting EZH2 could upregulate NEDD4L expression, which might serve as a novel approach for NSCLC.

Diagnostic and Predictive Immunohistochemistry for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas

Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) accounts for significant morbidity and mortality worldwide, with most patients diagnosed at advanced stages and managed increasingly with targeted therapies and immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss diagnostic and predictive immunohistochemical markers in NSCLC, one of the most common tumors encountered in surgical pathology. We highlight 2 emerging diagnostic markers: nuclear protein in testis (NUT) for NUT carcinoma; SMARCA4 for SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors. Given their highly aggressive behavior, proper recognition facilitates optimal management. For patients with advanced NSCLCs, we discuss the utility and limitations of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the "must-test" predictive biomarkers: anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ROS1, programmed cell death protein 1, and epidermal growth factor receptor. IHC using mutant-specific BRAF V600E, RET, pan-TRK, and LKB1 antibodies can be orthogonal tools for screening or confirmation of molecular events. ERBB2 and MET alterations include both activating mutations and gene amplifications, detection of which relies on molecular methods with a minimal role for IHC in NSCLC. IHC sits at the intersection of an integrated surgical pathology and molecular diagnostic practice, serves as a powerful functional surrogate for molecular testing, and is an indispensable tool of precision medicine in the care of lung cancer patients.

Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization in Surgical Pathology Practice

There have been rapid and significant advances in diagnostic and predictive molecular techniques in recent years with profound impact on patient care. In situ hybridization (ISH) studies have become well entrenched in surgical pathology practice and their role in the evaluation of HER2 in breast carcinoma and their diagnostic utility in soft tissue pathology are well known. Fluorescent ISH is being increasingly used in other sites such as the head and neck and the gynecologic tract. Like most tests in surgical pathology, ISH studies require good quality tissue, correlation with clinical and histopathologic findings, and adherence to guidelines for optimal assay performance and interpretation. Although ISH studies are largely performed in tertiary centers, the tissue is often processed by a variety of laboratories and the referring pathologists are required to discuss the need, relevance, and significance of these tests and the results with their clinical colleagues. Here we review the predictive and diagnostic utility of fluorescent ISH studies in a variety of organ systems, the preanalytical factors that may affect the results, and the pitfalls in the interpretation that all practicing surgical pathologists should be aware of.

An Update on Predictive Biomarkers for Treatment Selection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

It is now widely established that management of lung cancer is much more complex and cannot be centered on the binary classification of small-cell versus non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung cancer is now recognized as a highly heterogeneous disease that develops from genetic mutations and gene expression patterns, which initiate uncontrolled cellular growth, proliferation and progression, as well as immune evasion. Accurate biomarker assessment to determine the mutational status of driver mutations such as EGFR, ALK and ROS1, which can be targeted by specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors, is now essential for treatment decision making in advanced stage NSCLC and has shifted the treatment paradigm of NSCLC to more individualized therapy. Rapid advancements in immunotherapeutic approaches to NSCLC treatment have been paralleled by development of a range of potential predictive biomarkers that can enrich for patient response, including PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden. Here, we review the key biomarkers that help predict response to treatment options in NSCLC patients.

Biomarkers for ALK and ROS1 in Lung Cancer: Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization

CONTEXT

- A small proportion of non-small cell lung cancers harbor rearrangements of ALK or ROS1 genes, and these tumors are sensitive to targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors. It is crucial for pathologists to accurately identify tumors with these genetic alterations to enable patients to access optimal treatments and avoid unnecessary side effects of less effective agents. Although a number of different techniques can be used to identify ALK- and ROS1-rearranged lung cancers, immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization are the mainstays.

OBJECTIVE

- To review the role of immunohistochemistry in assessment of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in lung cancer, focusing on practical issues in comparison with other modalities such as fluorescence in situ hybridization.

DATA SOURCES

- This manuscript reviews the current literature on ALK and ROS1 detection using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization as well as current recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

- Although fluorescence in situ hybridization remains the gold standard for detecting ALK and ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer, immunohistochemistry plays an important role and can be an effective screening method for detection of these genetic alterations, or a diagnostic test in the setting of ALK.

Fibroblast growth factor-21 is a potential diagnostic factor for patients with gestational diabetes mellitus

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a metabolic disease with symptoms of hyperglycemia, insulin resistance and fetal maldevelopment. Evidence has indicated that fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-21 is a multifunctional protein and exhibits potential therapeutic value for metabolic diseases. The present study investigated the diagnostic value of FGF-21 serum levels in patients with GDM (n=50) and age-matched healthy individuals (n=50). It was demonstrated that the gene and protein expression levels of FGF-21 were downregulated in adipose cells in patients with GDM compared with those in healthy individuals. The results also indicated that the serum levels of FGF-21 were downregulated in patients with GDM compared with those in healthy individuals. In addition, it was demonstrated that blood glucose and blood pressure were higher in patients with GDM compared with those in healthy individuals. GDM patients had a markedly higher insulin resistance and glucose tolerance than healthy individuals. However, GDM patients had significantly lower serum levels of insulin than healthy individuals. It was observed that the serum levels of FGF-21 were positively correlated with those of glucose in GDM patients. In conclusion, these results indicate that decreased FGF-21 levels are associated with the risk of GDM, suggesting that FGF-21 may be a potential diagnostic factor for GDM.

Clinicopathological significance and diagnostic approach of ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis: ROS1 in non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of ROS1 rearrangement and concordance between ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and molecular tests in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

The study included 10,898 NSCLC cases from 21 eligible studies. ROS1 rearrangement rates were evaluated in NSCLC by a meta-analysis, including subgroup analyses. In addition, we performed a concordance analysis and a diagnostic test accuracy review of ROS1 IHC in NSCLC.

RESULTS

The estimated overall rate of ROS1 rearrangement and IHC positivity was 2.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5, 3.7). In the subgroup analysis, which was based on tumor subtype, the rate of ROS1 rearrangement and IHC positivity was 2.9% (95% CI 1.9, 4.5) and 0.6% (95% CI 0.3, 1.2) in adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma, respectively. The overall concordance rate between ROS1 IHC and molecular tests was 93.4% (95% CI 78.3, 98.2). In ROS1 IHC positive and negative cases, the concordance rates were 79.0% (95% CI 43.3, 94.9) and 97.0% (95% CI 83.3, 99.5), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and the specificity of ROS1 IHC were 0.90 (95% CI 0.70, 0.99) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.79, 0.84), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the curve of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 118.01 (95% CI 11.81, 1179.67) and 0.9417, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The rates of ROS1 rearrangement differed by tumor histologic subtype in NSCLC. ROS1 IHC may be useful for the detection of ROS1 rearrangement in NSCLC. Detailed criteria for evaluating ROS1 IHC are needed before it can be applied in daily practice.

Any Place for Immunohistochemistry within the Predictive Biomarkers of Treatment in Lung Cancer Patients?

The identification of certain genomic alterations (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF) or immunological markers (PD-L1) in tissues or cells has led to targeted treatment for patients presenting with late stage or metastatic lung cancer. These biomarkers can be detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or by molecular biology (MB) techniques. These approaches are often complementary but depending on, the quantity and quality of the biological material, the urgency to get the results, the access to technological platforms, the financial resources and the expertise of the team, the choice of the approach can be questioned. The possibility of detecting simultaneously several molecular targets, and of analyzing the degree of tumor mutation burden and of the micro-satellite instability, as well as the recent requirement to quantify the expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells, has led to case by case development of algorithms and international recommendations, which depend on the quality and quantity of biological samples. This review will highlight the different predictive biomarkers detected by IHC for treatment of lung cancer as well as the present advantages and limitations of this approach. A number of perspectives will be considered.

CEP72-ROS1: A novel ROS1 oncogenic fusion variant in lung adenocarcinoma identified by next-generation sequencing

ROS1 rearrangement is a validated therapeutic driver gene in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and represents a small subset (1–2%) of NSCLC. A total of 17 different fusion partner genes of ROS1 in NSCLC have been reported. The multi‐targeted MET/ALK/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in ROS1‐rearranged NSCLC. Consequently, ROS1 detection assays include fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and real‐time PCR. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) assay covers a range of fusion genes and approaches to discover novel receptor‐kinase rearrangements in lung cancer. A 63‐year‐old male smoker with stage IV NSCLC (TxNxM1) was detected with a novel ROS1 fusion. Histological examination of the tumor showed lung adenocarcinoma. NGS analysis of the hydrothorax cellblocks revealed a novel CEP72‐ROS1 rearrangement. This novel CEP72‐ROS1 fusion variant is generated by the fusion of exons 1–11 of CEP72 on chromosome 5p15 to exons 23–43 of ROS1 on chromosome 6q22. The predicted CEP72‐ROS1 protein product contains 1202 amino acids comprising the N‐terminal amino acids 594–647 of CEP72 and C‐terminal amino acid 1‐1148 of ROS1. CEP72‐ROS1 is a novel ROS1 fusion variant in NSCLC discovered by NGS and could be included in ROS1 detection assay, such as reverse transcription PCR. Pleural effusion samples show good diagnostic performance in clinical practice.

Immunohistochemistry for predictive biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer

In the era of targeted therapy, predictive biomarker testing has become increasingly important for non-small cell lung cancer. Of multiple predictive biomarker testing methods, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is widely available and technically less challenging, can provide clinically meaningful results with a rapid turn-around-time and is more cost efficient than molecular platforms. In fact, several IHC assays for predictive biomarkers have already been implemented in routine pathology practice. In this review, we will discuss: (I) the details of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1) IHC assays including the performance of multiple antibody clones, pros and cons of IHC platforms and various scoring systems to design an optimal algorithm for predictive biomarker testing; (II) issues associated with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) IHC assays; (III) appropriate pre-analytical tissue handling and selection of optimal tissue samples for predictive biomarker IHC.

ROS1 [corrected]

ROS1 is a receptor tyrosine kinase that has recently been shown to undergo gene rearrangements in~1%-2% of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and in a variety of other tumours including cholangiocarcinoma, gastric carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma and in spitzoid neoplasms, glioblastoma and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours. The ROS1 gene fusion undergoes constitutive activation, regulates cellular proliferation and is implicated in carcinogenesis. ROS1 fusions can be detected by fluorescence in situ hybridisation, real-time PCR, sequencing-based techniques and immunohistochemistry-based methods in clinical laboratories. The small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, crizotinib has been shown to be an effective inhibitor of ROS1 and has received Food and Drug Administration approval for treatment of advanced NSCLC. The current review is an update on the clinical findings and detection methods of ROS1 in clinical laboratories in NSCLC and other tumours.

Expectations and Projections for the Future of Nongynecolgical Cytology 10 Years Ago: Did They Materialize and How Did We Do?

In 2007, an article entitled "How Technology Is Reshaping the Practice of Nongynecologic Cytology: Frontiers of Cytology Symposium" [Bibbo: Acta Cytol 2007;51:123-152] was published. The moderator and editor was Marluce Bibbo, previous Editor-in-Chief of Acta Cytologica, and 17 participants from countries throughout the world were asked to answer how new technologies were being applied in their respective laboratories and whether future advances and challenges can be predicted. Ten years later, two previous participants in this Golden Anniversary Cytology Symposium were asked by Kari Syrjänen, current Editor-in-Chief of Acta Cytologica, to make a reappraisal of the 2007 predictions.

Detection of ROS1 rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer: current and future perspectives

ROS1 rearrangement characterizes a small subset (1%-2%) of non-small cell lung cancer and is associated with slight/never smoking patients and adenocarcinoma histology. Identification of ROS1 rearrangement is mandatory to permit targeted therapy with specific inhibitors, demonstrating a significantly better survival when compared with conventional chemotherapy. Detection of ROS1 rearrangement is based on in situ (immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization) and extractive non-in situ assays. While fluorescence in situ hybridization still represents the gold standard in clinical trials, this technique may fail to recognize rearrangements of ROS1 with some gene fusion partner. On the other hand, immunohistochemistry is the most cost-effective screening technique, but it seems to be characterized by low specificity. Extractive molecular assays are expensive and laborious methods, but they specifically recognize almost all ROS1 fusions using a limited amount of mRNA even from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues. This review is a discussion on the present and futuristic diagnostic scenario of ROS1 identification in lung cancer.

Immunohistochemistry of Pulmonary Biomarkers: A Perspective From Members of the Pulmonary Pathology Society

The use of immunohistochemistry for the determination of pulmonary carcinoma biomarkers is a well-established and powerful technique. Immunohistochemisty is readily available in pathology laboratories, is relatively easy to perform and assess, can provide clinically meaningful results very quickly, and is relatively inexpensive. Pulmonary predictive biomarkers provide results essential for timely and accurate therapeutic decision making; for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, predictive immunohistochemistry includes ALK and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) (ROS1, EGFR in Europe) testing. Handling along proper methodologic lines is needed to ensure patients receive the most accurate and representative test outcomes.

Nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: diagnostic difficulties in small biopsies and cytological specimens

The pathological and molecular classification of lung cancer has become substantially more complex over the past decade. For diagnostic purposes on small samples, additional stains are frequently required to distinguish between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Subsequently, for advanced nonsquamous cell nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients, predictive analyses on epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase and ROS1 are required. In NSCLCs negative for these biomarkers, programmed death ligand-1 immunohistochemistry is performed. Small samples (biopsy and cytology) require “tissue” management, which is best achieved by the interaction of all physicians involved.