Differential effects of BQ-123 against endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 on the rat vas deferens: evidence for an atypical endothelin receptor

Dual effect of endothelin 1 on angiotensin II-potentiated purinergic neurotransmission in prostatic rat vas deferens

Angiotensin and endothelin are vasoactive peptides with neuromodulatory effect, however their interactions in facilitating neurotransmission are largely unknown. In the present study, effort was made to examine how endothelin 1 modulates angiotensin II-potentiated purinergic neurotransmission in prostatic rat vas deferens. Both peptides facilitated field-stimulated muscle contraction in a concentration-dependent manner with Kd values of 16.97+/-6.47 and 2.46+/-0.83 nM for angiotensin II and endothelin 1, respectively. Hill plot analysis gave Hill constants of 0.91+/-0.15 and 0.97+/-0.26 for angiotensin II and endothelin 1, respectively. Correlation analysis indicated that the extent of potentiation by angiotensin II, but not endothelin 1, was proportional to the basal field-stimulated muscle contraction. In the presence of low concentrations of endothelin 1 (< or = 3 nM), angiotensin II-potentiated field-stimulated contraction was further enhanced by endothelin. However, in the presence of high concentrations of endothelin 1 (> or = 10 nM), a much increased basal field-stimulated contraction was observed, and the addition of angiotensin II did not elicit any further enhancement in the contractile response. Intriguingly, after prolonged exposure of prostatic rat vas deferens to a high concentration of endothelin 1, the addition of angiotensin II induced a refractory response to field-stimulation. Taken together, our result indicated that endothelin 1 augmented angiotensin II-facilitated purinergic neurotransmission in prostatic rat vas deferens at low concentrations, but inhibited gradually at high concentrations.

High affinity interaction of endothelin-3 with recombinant ETA receptors

Pharmacological evidence has suggested that endothelin-3 (ET-3) may act via a novel form of ET receptor that is shared by ETA receptor antagonists but not by ETB receptor selective agonists. This study analyses the properties of interaction of ET-3 with recombinant bovine ETA receptor. Apparent Kd(ET-3) values as low as 50 nM were defined from [125I]ET-1 binding experiments performed at low (5 microg/ml) protein concentrations in the assays. Larger (up to 1 microM) values were artefactually obtained in experiments performed at larger protein concentrations. The three monoiodo ET-3 derivatives were synthetized. ([125I]Y14)ET-3 did not recognize ETA receptors. ([125I]Y6)ET-3 labelled 18% of [125I]ET-1 binding sites with a Kd value of 320 pM. ([125I]Y13)ET-3 labelled 44% of [125I]ET-1 binding sites with a Kd value of 130 pM. High affinity ([125I]Y6)ET-3 and ([125I]Y13)ET-3 bindings were prevented by ET-1 (Kd = 5-7 pM), ET-3 (Kd = 70-250 pM), BQ-123 (Kd = 2 nM) and FR139317 (Kd = 2 nM) but not by low concentrations of 4-AlaET-1, sarafotoxin S6c or IRL1620. The three monoiodo ET-3 derivatives bound to recombinant rat ETB receptors with a pM affinity. The results suggest that ET-3, ([125I]Y6)ET-3 and ([125I]Y13)ET-3 should not be considered as ETB receptor specific ligands.

Influence of ETR-p1/f1 antisense peptide on endothelin-induced constriction in rat renal arcuate arteries

1. This study set out to examine the endothelin receptor subtypes mediating vasoconstriction in the rat renal arcuate artery. This was done in isolated vessels 120-200 microns in diameter, incubated with a selective agonist and the novel 'antisense' peptide to part of the human endothelinA receptor. 2. Groups of vessels (n = 6) were incubated with increasing concentrations of endothelin-1 (ET-1), from 1 to 100 nM, which caused a 65% maximal contraction at the highest dose with an pEC50 of 8.16 +/- 0.11 M. By contrast, in six other vessels sarafotoxin 6c over the same dose range gave a minimal contraction (around 5% of maximum). 3. Preincubation of six vessels with the antisense peptide ETR p1/f1 at 1 microM had no effect on the ET-1 induced vasoconstriction, in terms of displacement of the concentration-response curve or the maximal tension achieved by the agonist. In the six vessels exposed to 4 microM ETR p1/f1, there was a significant shift of the concentration-response curve and a lower pEC50 at 7.78 +/- 0.09 M (P < 0.05). At the highest concentrations of ETR p1/f1, there was a marked suppression of all responses to ET-1, which at the maximal concentrations tested, 0.1 microM, only reached some 10% of the maximal achievable contraction. 4. Increasing ET-1 concentrations up to 2 microM in vessels incubated with 40 microM ETR-p1/f1 showed that the blockade could be overcome and that the relationship was shifted to the right (P < 0.001) by approximately one log unit with a pEC50 of 7.13 +/- 0.11 M. A Schild plot of the data indicated the antagonist to be acting competitively at a single population of receptors. 5. At the highest concentrations tested, 40 microM, ETR-p1/f1 had no effect on noradrenaline-induced contractions, indicating a lack of non-specific actions. 6. Together, these data suggest that at the rat renal arcuate artery the endothelinA receptor is the predominant functional receptor mediating contraction. Furthermore, this study has shown the potential usefulness of this novel type of 'antisense' peptide in blocking receptor activation.

Comparison of the contractile effects and binding kinetics of endothelin-1 and sarafotoxin S6b in rat isolated renal artery

1. To date, only two mammalian endothelin (ET) receptors, termed ETA and ETB, have been cloned, sequenced and characterized. However, several functional studies of isolated blood vessels suggest that ET-1-induced contractions may be mediated by multiple ETA receptors. In this study, the ETA receptors in renal arteries isolated from Wistar rats were characterized by isometric tension recording and radioligand binding techniques. 2. ET-1, sarafotoxin S6b (StxS6b) and ET-3 produced concentration-dependent contraction with similar response maxima in endothelium-denuded arteries, whereas the ETB receptor-selective agonist StxS6c was inactive. ET-1 and StxS6b were equipotent and 30 times more potent than ET-3. This agonist profile, together with the findings that the ETA receptor-selective antagonists, BQ-123 and FR-139317 caused concentration-dependent, rightward shifts of the concentration-effect curves to each agonist indicated that ET-1-induced contractions in rat renal artery were mediated via ETA receptors. 3. BQ-123 and FR-139317 were both significantly more potent inhibitors of contractions induced by StxS6b or ET-3 than of responses to ET-1, raising the possibility that a component of ET-1-induced contraction was mediated through atypical, BQ-123 (or FR-139317)-insensitive ETA receptors. However, in competition binding studies, specific [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-StxS6b binding to rat renal artery sections was completely abolished by BQ-123 in a manner consistent with an action at a single site. Thus, competition binding studies did not provide any supportive evidence of the existence of a BQ-123-insensitive ETA receptor. 4. Additional studies revealed marked differences in the kinetics of [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-StxS6b binding. Following a 3 h period of association of [125I]-ET-1 with its receptors, no significant dissociation of receptor-bound [125I]-ET-1 was observed during a 4 h washout period. In stark contrast, dissociation studies revealed that specific [125I]-StxS6b binding to ETA receptors was reversible (t0.5diss, 100 min). A series of association binding studies were also consistent with the specific binding of [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-StxS6b being irreversible and reversible processes, respectively. 5. Thus, differences in BQ-123 potency against ET-1 and StxS6b-induced contractions in rat renal arteries might be due to differences in the kinetics of agonist binding, rather than due to the existence of atypical ETA receptors.

Expression and localization of endothelin converting enzyme in rat vas deferens

Endothelins (ETs) are a family of vasoconstrictor and mitogenic peptides originally isolated from the endothelial cells. Three isoforms of ET, namely ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3, are generated from their respective intermediate precursors big ETs through specific endoproteolytic cleavage by endothelin converting enzyme (ECE). Using reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), we have isolated a cDNA encoding for ECE from both the prostatic and epididymal halves of rat vas deferens. In situ hybridization using digoxigenin-labeled ECE cDNA probe demonstrated that ECE mRNA is preferentially localized in the inner longitudinal smooth muscle layer adjacent to submucosa region of rat vas deferens. Both ET-1 and big ET-1 at 30 nM potentiated electrically stimulated contractile response of prostatic vas deferens. Pre-incubation of tissue with a metalloprotease ECE inhibitor phosphoramidon (10 microM) strongly inhibited the response to big ET-1, but not to ET-1. On the other hand, big ET-1 failed to elicit contractile response of epididymal vas deferens. Phosphoramidon alone did not affect both the basal and electrically stimulated contractile responses in vas deferens. These data indicate that the circulating ET-1 and its immediate precursor big ET-1 could differentially regulate smooth muscle contractions in the prostatic and epididymal vas deferens of the rat.

Characterization of endothelin receptors in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat vas deferens

As there is increasing evidence that diabetes induces changes in the plasma levels of endothelins (ETs) and in the properties of ET receptors in peripheral tissues, and as there are reports indicating the presence of significant amounts of ET receptors in mammalian vasa deferentia, we studied possible alterations in ET receptor characteristics in the vasa deferentia of the following groups of rats: 8 weeks diabetic (D8), 8 weeks age-matched control (C8), 16 weeks diabetic (D16), 16 weeks diabetic-insulin-treated (started 8 weeks after the onset of diabetes) (DI16), and 16 weeks age-matched control (C16). Diabetes was induced by the i.v. injection of 65 mg/kg streptozotocin (STZ). Diabetic rats had hyperglycemia, hypoinsulinemia, glucosuria, polydipsia, and polyuria and had smaller vasa deferentia than control and diabetic-insulin-treated animals. Receptor binding experiments with [125I]ET-1 demonstrated that the densities of ET receptors in vasa deferentia from D8, C8, D16, DI16, and C16 animals were 377 +/- 11, 255 +/- 24, 315 +/- 18, 210 +/- 12, and 214 +/- 7 fmol/mg of protein, respectively. [125I]ET-1 binding to the ET receptors was inhibited by ET-1 (non-selective), BQ 610 (ETA selective), ET-3 (ETC selective), and IRL 1620 (ETB selective) with the following rank order of Ki values: ET-1 < BQ 610 < ET-3 < < IRL 1620. The pharmacological profile of the ET receptors was similar in all groups and was consistent with the predominance of the ETA receptor subtype in the rat vasa deferentia. Our data indicate that experimental diabetes up-regulates the density of ET receptors in the rat vasa deferentia and that the receptor up-regulation is reversed by insulin treatment.

Endothelins contract guinea-pig pulmonary artery and enhance its adrenergic response via ET(A) receptors

1. This study has pharmacologically characterized endothelin (ET) receptor subtype(s) mediating contraction and enhancement of adrenergic contraction in guinea-pig pulmonary artery. Isometric tension of the isolated endothelium-denuded ring preparations was measured in the presence of indomethacin (10(-5) mol/L) and N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 3 x 10(4) mol/L) to exclude a mechanism via endothelium, cyclo-oxygenase-generated eicosanoids and nitric oxide. 2. In the additional presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX; 3 x 10(-7) mol/L), ET-1 (10(-11)-10(-7) mol/L) concentration-dependently contracted the preparations. The rank order of potency to contract the preparations among ET receptor agonists was ET-1, sarafotoxin (STX)6b > ET-3 > IRL 1620, STX 6c. BQ-123 (7 x 10(-7)-7 x 10(-6) mol/L) concentrations-dependently shifted the concentration-contraction curve for ET-1 to the right in a parallel manner. Pretreatment with STX 6c (3 x 10(-7) mol/L for 30 min) did not significantly desensitize contractions to ET-1, ET-3 or IRL 1620 (P > 0.05; t-test, 10 d.f). 3. ET-1 (10(-10)-10(-9) mol/L) and STX 6b (10(-9)-10(-8) mol/L) significantly enhanced the electrical field stimulation-induced contraction in a BQ-123-sensitive manner (P < 0.05: t-test, 24-38 d.f), while ET-3 (10(-11)-10(-8) mol/L) and STX 6c (10(-11)-10(-7) mol/L) did not affect contractions. ET-1 (10(-11) mol/L) significantly enhanced contractions to exogenous noradrenaline in the presence of TTX (3 x 10(-7) mol/L) (P < 0.05; t-test, 16 d.f.). 4. These data indicate that the BQ-123-sensitive ET(A) receptor mediates both contraction and enhancement of adrenergic contractions in the guinea-pig pulmonary artery.

Failure of BQ123, a more potent antagonist of sarafotoxin 6b than of endothelin-1, to distinguish between these agonists in binding experiments

1. In homogenates of human saphenous vein, [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-S6b each labelled a single population of high affinity binding sites with K(D) values of 0.64 +/- 0.11 nM and 0.55 +/- 0.08 nM respectively. Hill slopes were close to one. However, the density of receptors labelled by [125I]-ET-1 was significantly greater than that by [125I]-S6b (187.6 +/- 23.0 compared to 91.7 +/- 23.6 fmol mg-1 protein, P < 0.02). 2. BQ123, an ET(A-)selective antagonist, inhibited specific [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-S6b binding with equal affinity. BQ123 competed in a biphasic manner for both [125I]-ET-1 (0.1 nM) and [125I]-S6b (0.1 nM) with ET(A) K(D) values of 0.55 +/- 0.17 nM and 0.52 +/- 0.02 nM and ET(B) K(D) values of 14.4 +/- 2.60 microM and 11.2 +/- 0.31 microM respectively. S6b monophasically inhibited 0.1 nM [125I]-ET-1 (K(D) 1.16 +/- 0.9 nM) but competed for 0.25 nM [125I]-ET-1 in a biphasic manner (K(D) high affinity site 1.99 +/- 0.84 nM, K(D) low affinity site 0.68 +/- 0.63 microM, ratio 67% : 33%). 3. BQ123 antagonized the vasoconstrictor responses of ET-1 with a pK(B) value of 6.47 whereas BQ123 exhibited 50 fold higher affinity against S6b-mediated vasoconstriction with a pK(B) value of 8.18. Regression slopes were 0.80 +/- 0.13 and 1.08 +/- 0.11 respectively. 4. In desensitization experiments, S6b (300 nM) did not contract preparations which were no longer responsive to ET-1 whereas a small contraction to ET-1 (300 nM) was obtained in preparations rendered unresponsive to S6b. 5. Medial sections of non-diseased human aorta, which express only ET(A) receptors, were used to compare dissociation rates of the two agonists. The time course for the dissociation of [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-S6b was similar with 20-30% of each ligand dissociating at 4 h. 6. These data suggest that whilst BQ123, in common with other endothelin antagonists, is a much more potent blocker of S6b contractile responses than of ET-1 contractile responses, this is not reflected by the equal affinity of BQ123 determined in competition binding experiments against both [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-S6b. This discrepancy in antagonist potency is probably not due to a marked difference in the rate of dissociation of [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-S6b from endothelin receptors. One possible explanation is that ET-1 is activating an additional population of receptors which may have lower affinity for BQ123. This is suggested by the discrepancy in receptor density identified by [125I]-ET-1 and [125I]-S6b.

Pharmacological characterization of the ETA receptor in the vascular smooth muscle comparing its analogous distribution in the rat mesenteric artery and in the arterial mesenteric bed

The potency of ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3 to contract the isolated perfused rat arterial mesenteric bed was 2.73 +/- 0.57, 1.63 +/- 0.32, and 144 +/- 30 nM, respectively. The vasomotor effect of the ETs was slow in onset, persistent but reversible. Sarafotoxin S6b mimicked the ETs with a potency twofold lower than ET-1; sarafotoxin S6c and the C-terminal hexapeptide of ET-1 was inactive. ETH agonists such as IRL-1620 and AGETB-89 were inactive as vasoconstrictors within the range of concentrations examined. Minor chemical modifications of ET-1 amino acids residues in position 7 or 21 decreased significantly the peptide potency; ET-1 analogues with one or none of the disulfide bonds resulted inactive. The vasomotor effect of ETs was blocked in a competitive, reversible, and selective manner by FR 139317 and BQ-123, the latter being about threefold less potent than the former antagonist. The potency of FR 139317 was 20-fold higher to antagonize ET-3 than ET-1, and threefold higher to block ET-2 than ET-1. In strict analogy to FR 139317, BQ-123 was 12-fold more potent to antagonize ET-3 than ET-1, and fourfold more potent to antagonize ET-2 than ET-1. Upon removal of the endothelial cell layer, the vasomotor potency of ET-1 or the antagonist potency of FR 139317 remained unaltered, suggesting that the vasomotor receptors are localized in the arterial smooth muscles. The ET-1-induced vasomotor responses desensitized, an effect not crossed to noradrenaline (NA); perfusion with 10 microM indomethacin did not alter the vasomotor potency of ET-1, excluding the participation of eicosanoids in the arteriolar effects of ET-1. In isolated rings of the rat mesenteric artery, set to record isometric contractions of the circular muscular layer, the potency of the ETs and their structural analogues was as follows; ET-2 = ET-1 = sarafotoxin S6b > ET-3 > sarafotoxin S6c. The C-terminal hexapeptide of ET-1 and [Ala 1,3,11,15]ET-1 were inactive. The ET-1-induced vasoconstriction was antagonized in a concentration-dependent fashion by FR 139317. These results allow to conclude that the ETA receptors present in the arterial mesenteric circulation are localized in the vascular smooth muscle of the large-sized arteries as well as the smaller arterioles and precapillary vessels of the rat arterial mesenteric bed.

Pharmacological characterization of endothelin receptors in the rabbit iris sphincter muscle: suggestion for the presence of atypical receptors

Pharmacological profiles of endothelin (ET) receptors in the isolated rabbit iris sphincter were characterized. ET isopeptides caused dose-dependent contraction of the preparation. The respective EC50 values for ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3 were 39.4, 58.0 and 84.3 nM, so that ET-1 was twice as potent as ET-3. Sarafotoxin (SRTX) -b, an ET(A)/ET(B) non-selective agonist, caused very potent contraction with an EC50 of 1.13 nM. However, selective ET(B) receptor agonists SRTX-c and IRL 1620 showed no contractile activity up to 1 microM. BQ-123, a selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, shifted the dose-response curves of ET isopeptides to the right. The pA2 value for ET-1 was 5.52 with a slope of 1.06, which is not different from unity, and the pK(B) value for ET-2 was 5.06. Interestingly, very low doses of BQ-123 antagonized responses to ET-3 and SRTX-b, with a Schild plot slope of approximately 0.7 which is significantly different from unity, suggesting receptor heterogeneity. The abscissal intercepts of the Schild plots were -9.29 for ET-3 and -8.53 for SRTX-b. FR 139317, another ET(A) receptor antagonist, also preferentially antagonized responses to ET-3. RES-701-1, a selective ET(B) receptor antagonist, did not shift dose-response curves for ET-1 and ET-3. These results suggest that ET receptors in the rabbit iris sphincter muscle cannot be classified into the ET(A), ET(B) or ET(C) receptor subtypes, so far established. When compared to the established receptor subtypes, ET receptors in this preparation were quite different from the ET(B) receptor, but apparently showed a pharmacological profile most similar to the ET(A) receptor, suggesting the presence of heterogeneous and atypical ET(A) receptors.

Endothelin-3 can both facilitate and inhibit transmitter release in the guinea-pig vas deferens

Endothelin-3 (10 nM) produced a significant facilitation of the release of ATP from the in vitro guinea-pig vas deferens. This effect was converted to an inhibition of release by pretreatment with BQ-123, cyclo-(D-Trp,D-Asp,L-Pro,D-Val,L-Leu), an endothelin ETA receptor antagonist. Desensitization of endothelin ETB receptors by sarafotoxin S6c antagonized, but did not reverse, the facilitatory effect of endothelin-3. The release of noradrenaline was not facilitated by endothelin-3; however, following pretreatment with BQ-123 the release of noradrenaline was reduced by the peptide. These results indicate that there may be both facilitatory and inhibitory prejunctional endothelin receptors and further suggest that the release of the sympathetic nerve cotransmitters ATP and noradrenaline may be differentially modulated.

Endothelins stimulate sodium uptake into rat brain capillary endothelial cells through endothelin A-like receptors

The effect of endothelins (ETs) on sodium/hydrogen (Na+/H+) antiport system was examined in cultured rat brain capillary endothelium (RBEC). ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3 stimulated Na+ uptake into RBEC with similar half-maximal stimulation (EC50) values (0.7, 0.6, and 1.1 nM, respectively). This reaction was inhibited by the Na+/H+ antiport inhibitor, N-(ethyl-N-isopropyl)-amiloride (EIPA). The selective endothelin A (ETA) receptor-antagonist (cyclo-D-Trp-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu (BQ123)), but not endothelin B (ETB) receptor-antagonists ((Cys11, Cys15)-ET-1 (IRL1038) or N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma MeLeu-D-Trp(COOMe)-D-Nle-ONa (BQ788)), inhibited both ET-1- and ET-3-stimulated Na+ uptake, indicating ETA-receptor mediation. The protein kinase C (PKC) activator (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)) failed to stimulate Na+ uptake. The calcium-calmodulin (CaM) inhibitor (W7) reduced ET-1-stimulated Na+ uptake by 50%, whereas the PKC inhibitor (staurosporine) had no effect, indicating that ET-1 stimulation of the Na+/H+ antiport system is linked to a CaM-dependent and PKC-independent pathway.

Evidence for atypical endothelin receptors and for presence of endothelin-converting enzyme activity in the mouse isolated vas deferens

The endothelin receptors controlling sympathetic neurotransmission and the presence of endothelin-converting enzyme were investigated in the mouse vas deferens. Endothelin-1 or endothelin-3 (0.01-100 nM) enhanced contractions evoked by field stimulation, yielding EC50 (geometric mean and 95% confidence limits) of 0.7 nM (0.4-1.6) and 13.7 nM (10.2-14.1) and Emax (mean +/- S.E.M. increase in twitch tension, in mg/10 mg wet tissue) of 473 +/- 35 and 520 +/- 51, respectively. The selective endothelin ETB receptor agonists IRL 1620 (Suc-[Glu9,Ala11,15]endothelin-1) and sarafotoxin S6c were inactive up to 100 nM. Responses to endothelin-3 were progressively inhibited by the selective endothelin ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123 (cyclo[D-Trp-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu]) (10, 30 and 100 nM). At 100 nM, BQ-123 almost abolished the response to endothelin-3 (100 nM). In contrast, at 100, 300 nM and 1 microM, BQ-123 shifted the curve to endothelin-1 to the right only 2-, 5- and 6-fold, respectively. The selective endothelin ETB receptor antagonist BQ-788 (N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methyl-leucyl-D-1-++ +methoxycarbonyltryptophanyl-D-norleucine) (100 nM) did not modify responses to endothelin-1 or endothelin-3 (0.01-100 nM). Big-endothelin-1 (0.3-30 nM) was 10-fold less potent than endothelin-1 in increasing neurogenic responses (EC50 6.8 nM, 4.7-9.6; Emax 457 +/- 37 mg/10 mg wet tissue). Preincubation with phosphoramidon (100 microM) reduced responses to big-endothelin-1, but not endothelin-1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Characterization of endothelin receptors in rat renal artery in vitro

1. The aim of this study was to investigate the function and characteristics of endothelin receptors in rat main branch renal artery in vitro. 2. Endothelin(ET)-1 (mean EC50 = 9.8 nM) was approximately 12 fold more potent than ET-3 (mean EC50 = 120 nM) as a contractile agonist and produced a greater maximum response. In contrast, neither of the ETB receptor-selective agonists, alanine[1,3,11,15]ET-1 nor sarafotoxin S6c, (0.1 nM-1 microM), induced any contractile effect, or any relaxant effect in endothelium-intact preparations pre-contracted with the thromboxane A2 mimetic, U-46619. Sarafotoxin S6c (30 nM) also failed to induce any further contraction in tissues pre-contracted with an EC50 concentration of ET-1. 3. The ETA receptor-selective antagonist, BQ123, behaved as a weak and variable antagonist of the contractile effects of ET-1 (mean pA2 estimates in the range 5.8-6.3). In contrast, BQ123 antagonized ET-3 with a potency (mean pA2 = 7.6) consistent with its affinity for ETA receptors. Co-incubation of BQ123 (3 microM) with the putative ETB receptor-selective antagonist, IRL1038 (10 microM), produced no greater antagonism of ET-1 responses than was induced by BQ123 (3 microM) alone. 4. In conclusion, ETB receptors do not appear to be present in rat main branch renal artery. The contractile effects of ET-3 in this tissue seem to be mediated by ETA receptors. While ETA receptors partly mediate the contractile effects of ET-1, these data raise the possibility that a population of novel BQ123-insensitive endothelin receptors may also contribute to this response.

Endothelin-induced facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission to the rat vas deferens: effects of suramin

Experiments were conducted to elucidate the mechanisms of action of endothelins in facilitating neurotransmission to the rat isolated vas deferens. Endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 potentiated field stimulation-induced contractions and those evoked by ATP and alpha, beta-methylene ATP. Responses to noradrenaline were unaffected. The C-terminal hexapeptide, endothelin-(16-21) was without effect on neurotransmission. The facilitation by endothelin-1 of responses to trains of stimulation (10 Hz for 10 s) was absent in the presence of the P2-purinoceptor antagonist, suramin, in concentrations which antagonised the contractile effects of alpha, beta-methylene ATP, but not those of noradrenaline. Suramin did not affect 1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-5-nitro-4-[2-(trifluoromethyl)- phenyl]-3-pyridine carboxylic acid methyl ester (Bay K 8644)-induced potentiation of contractions in response to field stimulation. These results support the hypothesis that endothelin-induced facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission to the vas deferens is due to potentiation of the postjunctional effects of the co-transmitter, ATP, acting at P2X-purinoceptors, and indicate that this effect is mediated through actions at endothelin receptors that are not of the ETB-subtype.

Endothelin receptor subtypes and their role in transmembrane signaling mechanisms

The endothelins (ETs) are potent vasoactive peptides that appear to be involved in diverse biological actions, for example, contraction, neuromodulation, and neurotransmission, as well as in various pathophysiological conditions, such as renal and heart failure. The diversity of actions of ETs may be explained in terms of (1) the existence of several receptor subtypes and (2) the activation of different signal transduction pathways. This review summarizes the state of the art in this intensively studied field, with particular focus on structural aspects, receptor heterogeneity, coupling of receptors to G-proteins, and signal transduction mechanisms mediated by the activation of ET-receptors.

Endothelin receptor antagonism

Following the original report by Yanagisawa et al. (1988) more than 7 years ago, compelling evidence that ET plays an important role in the local regulation of smooth muscle tone and cell growth has been reported. In addition, many studies point to a significant role for endothelin in nonvascular function. The investigation of the endothelin system has been greatly advanced in the last 2 to 3 years through significant advances in the development of potent and selective ET receptor antagonists. These agents have proven to be essential tools for elucidating the biological significance of the ET system, leading to the realization that antagonism of the ET system may have significant therapeutic potential. As emphasized in this review, the importance of chronic blockade of the ET system may be a critical aspect of future research in this exciting area. Confounding issues remain the lack of information about the role of the ETB receptor, the apparent pharmacological evidence for additional ET receptor subtypes, and species variation in the tissue distribution of ET isoforms and receptor subtypes. Along with the greater ability to understand the endothelin system provided by potent and selective pharmacological agents, is the important contribution of modern molecular biology techniques, highlighted by the insights gained from recent reports of results from ET gene disruption studies. Kurihara et al. (1994) found that ET-1-deficient homozygous mice die at birth of apparent respiratory failure secondary to severe craniofacial abnormalities. Subsequently, Yanagisawa's laboratory has presented and published a series of complementary gene disruption studies. First, Hosoda et al. (1994) demonstrated remarkably, that ETA receptor knockout mice bear morphological abnormalities nearly identical to ET-1 knockout mice. Second, they found that disruption of the ET-3 peptide and ETB receptor genes result in homozygous mice that share identical phenotypic traits (i.e., coloration changes and aganglionic megacolon) which are similar to a previously known natural mutation, the Piebald-Lethal mouse (Hosoda et al., 1994; Baynash et al., 1994). This phenotype has a human corollary known as Hirschsprung's Disease and it is now known that the disease, though multigenic, results from a missense mutation of the ETB receptor gene in some individuals (Puffenberger et al., 1994). Taken together these data indicate that the endothelin system is essential to correct embryonic neural crest development, a completely novel finding within the superfamily of guanine-protein-linked receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Different endothelin receptors involved in endothelin-1- and sarafotoxin S6B-induced contractions of the human isolated coronary artery

1. Endothelin receptors, that mediate contraction of the human isolated coronary artery, were characterized by use of a number of agonists and antagonists. Contraction induced by the non-selective agonists, endothelin (ET)-1 and sarafotoxin S6b, was compared in endothelium-intact and endothelium-denuded ring segments. The effects of ET-1 and BQ-123 (an ETA receptor antagonist) were investigated both in ring segments and in spirally cut strips. Lastly, the effect of phosphoramidon was studied on contraction induced by big-ET-1. 2. The order of agonist potency (pD2) in endothelium-intact coronary artery ring segments was: ET-1 (8.27) approximately sarafotoxin S6b (8.16) > big-ET-1 (< 7.1) approximately ET-3 (< 6.9). [Ala1,3,11,15]ET-1 (ETB receptor agonist) caused significant contraction only at 1 microM, whereas 0.3 microM big-ET-3 had no effect. Removal of the endothelium in ring segments did not affect the contractile response to ET-1 or to sarafotoxin S6b. 3. After a full concentration-response curve had been obtained to ET-1 or sarafotoxin S6b, further contractions of the endothelium-intact coronary artery segments could only be achieved by applying ET-1 in segments exposed to sarafotoxin S6b, and not the reverse. 4. BQ-123 (0.1 microM) antagonized contractions of endothelium-intact ring segments induced by sarafotoxin S6b (pKB 7.86). Only 10 microM BQ-123 antagonized contractions induced by ET-1 (pKB 5.75). FR139317 was also more potent against sarafotoxin S6b (pKB 8.24-8.47) than against ET-1 (pKB 6.11). [Ala1,3,11,15]ET-1 (1 microM) had no effect on the contractile response to ET-1 or to sarafotoxin S6b. 5. In strip preparations with intact endothelium, the pD2 of ET-l increased to 9.04 =/- 0.16 (vs.8.50 +/- 0.07 in rings), and BQ-123 (1 microM) caused a rightward shift of the ET-l induced concentration response curve (pKB 6.62 vs. 5.75 in rings).6. Contractile responses to big-ET-1 of endothelium-intact coronary artery segments were attenuated in the presence of phosphoramidon (100 microM), indicating conversion of big-ET-1 to ET-1 within the coronary artery segment.7. The present study indicates that ET-1 and sarafotoxin S6b contract the human isolated coronary artery via different receptors, which can probably be best characterized as subtypes of the ETA receptor.Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the type of preparation (ring or strip) may affect the potency of ET-1 as an agonist and of BQ-123 as an antagonist.

Characterization of receptors mediating vascular responses to endothelin-1 in the conscious rat

1. The present study has determined the receptors mediating the vascular responses (pressor and depressor actions and vascular permeability effect) to endothelin-1 (ET-1) in the conscious rat by using the novel non-peptide ETA/ETB receptor antagonist, bosentan (Ro 47-0203, 4-tert-butyl-N-[6-(2 hydroxyethoxy)-5-(2-methoxy-phenoxy)-2,2'-bipyrimidine- 4-yl]benzene-sulphonamide), the ETA receptor-selective antagonist, FR 139317 and the ETB receptor-selective peptide agonist, IRL 1620. 2. Bolus injection of ET-1 (1 nmol kg-1, i.v.) resulted in a prolonged pressor effect (maximum increase in mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) was 47 +/- 3 mmHg, n = 6) preceded by a transient depressor response (maximum decrease in MABP was 17 +/- 1 mmHg). Both these responses were inhibited by bosentan (1-20 mg kg-1, i.v. bolus) in a dose-dependent manner. The maximum inhibition of ET-induced depressor and pressor responses did not exceed 53 and 87%, respectively. FR 139317 (2.5 mg kg-1, i.v.) attenuated the pressor response to ET-1 by 75% without affecting the depressor response. Furthermore, FR 139317, but not bosentan, prolonged the depressor action of ET-1. Corresponding to changes in blood pressure, a small transient tachycardia (delta heart rate 15 +/- 5 beats min-1) followed by a sustained bradycardia (delta heart rate -48 +/- 10 beats min-1, n = 6) was observed following injection of 1 nmol kg-1 ET-1. FR 139317 and bosentan (10 mg kg-1) inhibited ET-1-induced bradycardia by 79% and 71%, respectively.ET-l-induced tachycardia was significantly attenuated by bosentan,but not FR 139317.3. The ETB receptor agonist, IRL 1620 (0.1-2 micro molkg-1, i.v.) produced biphasic dose-dependent changes in MABP with an initial transient fall followed by a prolonged pressor action. The maximum decrease and increase in MABP were 11 +/- 2 and 19 +/- 3 mmHg, respectively (n = 5). These changes in MABP were accompanied by a transient tachycardia (Delta heart rate 9+/- 3 beats min-1) and prolonged bradycardia (Delta heart rate -17+/-11 beats min-1), respectively. Pretreatment of the animals with FR139317 (2.5 mg kg-1, i.v.) did not affect IRL 1620 (1 nmol kg-1)-induced changes in MABP and heart rate, whereas both the depressor and pressor actions of IRL 1620 and the accompanying tachycardia and bradycardia were almost completely inhibited by bosentan (10mgkg-1).4. ET-1 (1 nmol kg-1) enhanced albumin extravasation in the upper and lower bronchi, spleen, kidney,stomach and duodenum (up to 246%) as measured by the extravasation of Evans blue dye. FR 139317(2.5mgkg-1) completely inhibited ET-l-induced protein extravasation in the stomach and duodenum,whereas 40-75% inhibition was observed in the other vascular beds studied. The permeability effect of ET-l was almost completely inhibited by bosentan (10mgkg-1) in all vascular beds studied.5. IRL 1620 (0.4 or 1 nmol kg-1, i.v.) enhanced albumin extravasation (up to 219%) in the upper and lower bronchi, spleen and kidney in a dose-dependent manner. Unlike ET-1, IRL 1620 failed to increase albumin extravasation in the stomach and duodenum.6. The present study demonstrates in the conscious rat that ETA and ETB receptors are responsible for mediating the majority of the pressor response to ET-l and suggest that a small component of the ET-l pressor response might be mediated via a non-ETA, non-ETB receptor, whereas ETB and perhaps a non-ETA, non-ETB receptor may mediate the depressor action of ET-1. Furthermore, the ET-1 induced albumin extravasation is mediated solely via ETA receptors in the stomach and duodenum, whereas both ETA and ETB receptors are involved in the permeability effect of ET-l in the bronchial, splenic and renal vascular beds.

The current endothelin receptor classification: time for reconsideration?

The possible involvement of endothelins in a variety of diseases has attracted the attention of many pharmacologists in search of a novel therapeutic approach. The rapid development of endothelin research has resulted in the molecular characterization and pharmacological recognition of ETA and ETB receptors, and in the development of compounds selective for these receptors. However, the characterization of receptors in various assays has shown that a number of effects are mediated by receptors that do not fit the present criteria for ETA or ETB receptors. In this article, Willem Bax and Pramod Saxena address endothelin receptors in general, and atypical receptors in particular.

Endothelin-induced contraction and relaxation of rat isolated basilar artery: effect of BQ-123

In ring segments from rat basilar artery (BA) the endothelin (ET) peptides ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3 induced concentration-related contractions. The order of potency was ET-1 = ET-2 > ET-3, while no differences occurred in the maximum contraction. The selective ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (10(-10)-10(-4) M) alone elicited a small contraction only at 10(-4) M. In the presence of BQ-123 (10(-7)-10(-5) M), the concentration-response curve for ET-1 was shifted to the right without any decrease in maximum contraction, indicating competitive inhibition of ET-1 binding to the ETA receptor by BQ-123. The pA2 value calculated for BQ-123 was 6.935; the slope of the regression curve was 0.734. In contrast to ET-1, the contractile action of ET-3 was abolished by 10(-5) M BQ-123. In segments precontracted with 10(-6) M serotonin, ET-3, but not ET-1, induced relaxation at low concentrations (10(-11)-10(-8) M), with maximum relaxation amounting to 17.8 +/- 14.7% of precontraction (mean +/- SD; n = 16). The relaxant action of ET-3 was abolished in vessels incubated with NG-nitro-L-arginine (10(-5) M), an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase. These results indicate that the ET-induced contraction of the isolated rat BA involves activation of the ETA receptor. The ET-3-induced relaxation of precontracted rat BA is apparently mediated by release of nitric oxide from the endothelium.

Characterization of endothelin (ET) receptors in the isolated gall bladder of the guinea-pig: evidence for an additional ET receptor subtype

1. We have characterized the receptors mediating contractions induced by endothelin-1 (ET-1), ET-2, ET-3 and the ETB-selective receptor agonists, sarafotoxin 6c (SX6c), IRL 1620, BQ-3020, [Ala1,3,11,15]ET-1 and ET (16-21) in strips of the isolated gall bladder of the guinea-pig (GPGB). We used as antagonists BQ-123 (ETA receptor selective) and PD 145065 (ETA/ETB receptor non-selective). 2. ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3 (10(-10) M to 3 x 10(-7) M) caused similar slowly-developing concentration-dependent contractions of the GPGB. Contractile effects induced by ET-1, ET-2 or ET-3 (at 3 x 10(-7) M) were also similar (230 +/- 25, 241 +/- 7 and 287 +/- 37% of that to histamine at 5 x 10(-6) M, n = 7, 6, 12, respectively). However, the threshold concentration for ET-1 or ET-2 was 10(-10) M whereas it was 3 x 10(-9) M for ET-3. 3. SX6c (10(-10) M to 3 x 10(-7) M) also caused slowly-developing concentration-dependent contractions at a threshold concentration of 10(-10) M (n = 16). However, the contraction caused by SX6c at 3 x 10(-7) M was 116 +/- 9% of that to histamine at 5 x 10(-6) M, which was half of that induced by the same concentration of the ET isopeptides. The contraction induced by IRL 1620 at 3 x 10-7 M (n = 9) was 43 +/- 9% of that to histamine at 5 x 10-6 M, which was one fifth of that produced by the same concentration of ET-1. Contractions induced by BQ-3020 or [Ala1,3,11,15]ET-I at 3 x 10-7 M were even less than those produced by IRL 1620. ET (16-21) was inactive up to 10-5 M. Addition of a concentration of 3 x 10-7 M of ET-1 to tissues with developed contractions induced by the bolus addition of 3 x 10-7 M SX6c caused a further contraction of the GPGB to the level observed with ET-1 alone at 3 x 10-7M (n = 8).4. BQ-123 (10-5 M) did not affect the concentration-response curve to ET-1 and the contraction induced by 3 x 10- M was also not affected (n = 5; 239 +/- 19% of histamine at 5 x 10-6 M). PD 145065(10-5 M) shifted the ET-1 concentration-response curve to the right and the contraction induced by ET-1at 3 x 10-7 M was inhibited by 15% (n = 6; NS). A higher concentration of BQ-123 (10-4 M) caused a significant shift to the right of the ET-1 concentration-response curve similar to that caused by PD 145065 (10-s M) and caused a 24% (n = 6; NS) inhibition of the contractions induced by ET-1 at 3 x 10-7 M. PD 145065 (10-4 M) abolished contractions induced by ET-1 (up to 10- M) and inhibited the response to ET-1 at 3 x 10-7 M by 52% (n = 4; P< 0.05).5. Contractions induced by ET-3 were more sensitive to inhibition by the antagonists. BQ-123 (10-6,10-5 or 10-4 M) inhibited responses to 3 x 10-7 M ET-3 by 66, 71 and 83%, respectively (n = 5, 5, 3;P< 0.05). PD 145065 (10-6, 10-5 or 10-4 M) attenuated more strongly than did BQ-123 the contractions induced by ET-3. For instance, the contractions caused by ET-3 at 3 x 10-7 M were decreased by 73 and 80% (n = 5, 5; P<0.05) in the presence of PD 145065 (10-6 or 10-5 M, respectively). PD 145065(10-4 M) completely abolished contractions to ET-3 (n = 4; up to 3 x 10-7M).6. Contractions induced by SX6c, especially those observed at concentrations lower than 10-8 M, were attenuated by BQ-123 (up to 10-4 M). PD 145065 (10-5M) shifted to the right the concentration response curve to SX6c and inhibited by 38% (P<0.05) the contractions induced by 3 x 10-7M.However, the contractions induced by a bolus addition of a high concentration of SX6c (3 x 10-7 M)and the subsequent addition of an identical concentration of ET-1 on top of SX6c were not affected byBQ-123 (10-6 or 10-5 M).7. These results suggest that ETB receptors are involved in the contractions induced by endothelins in the GPGB. However, SX6c and other selective ETB agonists produced only half or less than half of the contractile response induced by non-selective agonists. In addition, the responses to ET-1 but not to ET-3, were insensitive to the antagonist action of BQ-123 at 10-5 M whereas BQ-123 or PD 145065 at 10-5 M strongly antagonized contractions induced by ET-3. Finally, BQ-123 at 10-4 M inhibited contractions to ET-1 and SX6c. Thus, within the GPGB there may well be additional ET receptor(s) not conforming to the established ETA/ETB receptor subtype classification, as well as ETB receptors.

Characterisation of the endothelin receptor mediating contraction of human pulmonary artery using BQ123 and Ro 46-2005

We have characterised the endothelin receptor mediating contraction of human isolated pulmonary artery. Endothelin-1 induced a concentration-dependent contraction of human endothelium-denuded pulmonary artery (EC50 5.6 nM). In contrast, endothelin-3 produced only a small contraction (approximately 12% of maximum endothelin-1 response) at the highest concentration tested (1 microM). The ETB receptor-selective agonist, sarafotoxin S6c (0.1 nM to 1 microM) did not cause contraction of human pulmonary artery. Pretreatment of human pulmonary artery with BQ123 (1-10 microM), an ETA receptor-selective blocking drug, resulted in a concentration-dependent, surmountable antagonism of endothelin-1-induced contractions (apparent pKB 6.6-7.0). Schild analyses yielded a shallow slope (0.58), which was significantly less than unity and, consequently, the calculated pA2 (8.1) was greater than the individual pKB values. Pretreatment of human pulmonary artery with Ro 46-2005 (30 microM), a non-peptide. non-selective endothelin receptor-blocking drug, resulted in a surmountable antagonism of endothelin-1-induced contractions (apparent pKB 5.5). In conclusion, endothelin-1-induced contraction of human pulmonary artery appears to be mediated predominantly via ETA receptors, although the shallow Schild slope observed with BQ123 indicates possible receptor heterogeneity.

Endothelin-1-induced myocardial ischaemia and oedema in the rat: involvement of the ETA receptor, platelet-activating factor and thromboxane A2

1. The objectives of the present experiments were to assess the role of ETA receptors in mediating endothelin-1 (ET-1)-induced myocardial ischaemia and oedema and to study the involvement of platelet-activating factor (PAF) and thromboxane A2 (TxA2) in these actions of ET-1 in rats. 2. Intravenous bolus injection of ET-1 (0.1-2 nmol kg-1) into anaesthetized rats induced ST segment elevation of the electrocardiogram in a dose-dependent manner without causing arrhythmias. ST segment elevation developed within 20-90 s and persisted for at least 10-20 min following administration of ET-1. 3. Pretreatment of the animals with the selective endothelin ETA receptor antagonist, FR 139317 (2.5 mg kg-1, i.v.) inhibited by 86% the ST segment elevation elicited by ET-1 (1 nmol kg-1). Pretreatment with intravenous administration of BM 13505 (1 mg kg-1), a TxA2 receptor antagonist, OKY-046 (10 mg kg-1), a thromboxane synthase inhibitor or the specific PAF receptor antagonist, WEB 2086 (1 mg kg-1) or BN 52021 (10 mg kg-1) markedly suppressed ST segment elevation in response to ET-1. Infusion of indomethacin (3 mg kg-1 bolus plus 2 mg kg-1 h-1) did not significantly affect ET-1-induced ST segment elevation. 4. Bolus injection of ET-1 (1 nmol kg-1, i.v.) to conscious rats resulted in a prolonged pressor effect preceded by a transient depressor response. Corresponding to changes in blood pressure, a small transient tachycardia was followed by a sustained bradycardia. ET-l enhanced albumin leakage by 87 and 120% in the left ventricle and right atrium, respectively, as measured by the extravasation of Evans blue dye.5. The selective ETA receptor antagonist, FR 139317 (2.5 mg kg-1) significantly blunted the pressor action of ET-1 and the accompanying bradycardia without affecting the depressor response. Furthermore,FR 139317 almost completely abolished the permeability effect of ET-l in both vascular beds studied.6. Pretreatment of the animals with BM 13505 (1 mg kg-1), OKY-046 (10mg kg-1), WEB 2086(1 mg kg-1) or BN 52021 (10mg kg-1) significantly reduced ET-1 (1 nmol kg-1)-induced albumin extravasation both in the left ventricle and right atrium. The PAF receptor antagonists, WEB 2086 and BN 52021 were equally potent inhibitors in the left ventricle, whereas BN 52021 appeared to be a more potent inhibitor than WEB 2086 in the right atrium. Pretreatment with indomethacin (3 mg kg-1 plus 2 mg kg-1 h-1) did not modify the permeability response to ET-1. None of these compounds affected significantly ET-l-induced changes in mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate.7. These results indicate that intravenous administration of ET-1 provokes ST segment elevation and myocardial oedema and suggest that these events are mediated, in part, through release of secondary mediators, such as PAF and TxA2 via the activation of ETA receptors.

Evidence for a differential location of vasoconstrictor endothelin receptors in the vasculature

1. There are at least two subtypes of vascular endothelin (ET) receptors. Stimulation of the ETA receptors on vascular smooth muscle cells leads to vasoconstriction, whereas activation of the ETB receptors on endothelial cells elicits vasodilatation. Several reports in the literature have suggested the presence of a vasoconstrictor non-ETA receptor on vascular smooth muscle which has pharmacological similarities to the ETB receptor. The present study was undertaken to determine the location of this ETB-like receptor within the vascular system. 2. Fourteen vascular smooth muscle preparations from six species were used to determine the effect of the ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123, on concentration-response curves elicited by ET-1 and the ability of the ETB receptor agonist, sarafotoxin S6c, to cause contraction. The vessels fell into two categories. One group was sensitive to BQ-123 and insensitive to sarafotoxin S6c and, thus, probably contained ETA receptors. The other group, with vasoconstrictor ETB-like receptors, was insensitive to BQ-123 and sensitive to sarafotoxin S6c. 3. Vessels from cynomolgus monkeys, when studied in vitro, appeared to contain primarily ETA receptors, although the potency of BQ-123 was quite variable, suggesting the possibility of ETA receptor subtypes. In contrast, both ET-1 and sarafotoxin S6c, given as intravenous injections in conscious monkeys, produced transient, equipotent, and dose-related increases in blood pressure. The highest dose of sarafotoxin S6c (1 nmol kg-1, i.v.) also caused a marked secondary depressor response (-80 +/- 6 mmHg) that lasted approximately 10 min. The pressor responses suggest that the vasoconstrictor ETB-like receptors are present in cynomolgus monkeys. 4. The data suggest the presence of two distinct vasoconstrictor ET receptor subtypes on smooth muscle cells. The ETA receptors are primarily located on the high pressure side of the circulation. The vasoconstrictor ETB-like receptors appear to be concentrated on the low pressure side.

Endothelin receptors mediating functional responses in human small arteries and veins

1. In the present study, responses of human omental small arteries and veins to endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 were characterized by use of the ETB receptor selective agonist, sarafotoxin S6c, the ETA receptor antagonist, BQ123, the ETB receptor antagonist, IRL1038, the NO-synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA, 300 microM) and indomethacin (10 microM). 2. Small arteries (internal diameter 413 +/- 22 microns) and parallel running veins (646 +/- 35 microns) were mounted in a myograph under a normalized tension equivalent to 90% of a transmural pressure of 100 mmHg and 19 mmHg in vivo, respectively. 3. In small arteries and veins, endothelin-1 caused a concentration-dependent increase in wall tension (Emax = 3.90 +/- 0.56 mN mm-1 and 1.90 m +/- 0.32 mN mm-1 respectively, P < 0.05) and was equipotent (arteries: pD2 = 8.91 +/- 0.11; veins: pD2 = 8.63 +/- 0.08, NS). In endothelium intact arteries, L-NMMA significantly enhanced the sensitivity to endothelin-1 (pD2 control: 8.92 +/- 0.16; pD2 L-NMMA: 9.37 +/- 0.11; P < 0.05). L-NMMA did not affect the sensitivity of veins to endothelin-1. Indomethacin was without effect in arteries and veins. In veins, endothelin-3 was about a hundred times less potent than endothelin-1 and showed a biphasic response curve. Small arteries did not contract to endothelin-3. Neither small arteries nor veins contracted to sarafotoxin S6c. Furthermore, no relaxation to endothelin-1 or sarafotoxin S6c was seen in any precontracted vessels. 4. BQ123 (0.03-3 MicroM) produced a concentration-dependent rightward parallel displacement of the endothelin-l concentration-response curve in small arteries and veins yielding pA2 values of 7.09 and 7.48 respectively. The slope of the Schild plot in arteries and veins was 1.26 +/- 0.24 (NS from unity) and 0.61 +/- 0.13 (P <0.05 compared to unity) respectively. IRL1038 (3 MicroM) did not affect the potency of endothelin-1 in arteries and veins. In veins, the low sensitivity component (pD2 = 7.16 +/- 0.08) of the biphasic response curve to endothelin-3 was completely blocked by BQ123 (3 MicroM), whereas the high sensitivity component (pD2 = 8.66 +/- 0.08) was resistant to BQ123 (3 MicroM) and IRL1038 (3 MicroM).5. These results indicate that contractions of human small vessels to endothelin-l are predominantly mediated by ETA receptors and that nitric oxide modulates the response to endothelin-l in small arteries but not in veins. The different antagonistic potency of BQ123 against endothelin-l and the differential endothelin-1/endothelin-3 potency ratios in arteries and veins provide evidence for the hypothesis that ETA receptors in human small arteries are different from ETA receptors in human small veins. There is no evidence of contractions mediated by 'classical' ETB receptors in these vessels, but small veins appear to contain a functional non ETA/non ETB receptor with a high affinity for endothelin-3.