Neuropeptide Y Y4 receptor homodimers dissociate upon agonist stimulation

Neuropeptide Y receptor interactions regulate its mitogenic activity

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a multifunctional neurotransmitter acting via G protein-coupled receptors - Y1R, Y2R and Y5R. NPY activities, such as its proliferative effects, are mediated by multiple receptors, which have the ability to dimerize. However, the role of this receptor interplay in NPY functions remains unclear. The goal of the current study was to identify NPY receptor interactions, focusing on the ligand-binding fraction, and determine their impact on the mitogenic activity of the peptide. Y1R, Y2R and Y5R expressed in CHO-K1 cells formed homodimers detectable on the cell surface by cross-linking. Moreover, Y1R and Y5R heterodimerized, while no Y2R/Y5R heterodimers were detected. Nevertheless, Y5R failed to block internalization of its cognate receptor in both Y1R/Y5R and Y2R/Y5R transfectants, indicating Y5R transactivation upon stimulation of the co-expressed receptor. These receptor interactions correlated with an augmented mitogenic response to NPY. In Y1R/Y5R and Y2R/Y5R transfectants, the proliferative response started at picomolar NPY concentrations, while nanomolar concentrations were needed to trigger proliferation in cells transfected with single receptors. Thus, our data identify direct and indirect heterotypic NPY receptor interactions as the mechanism amplifying its activity. Understanding these processes is crucial for the design of treatments targeting the NPY system.

Heterologous regulation of Mu-opioid (MOP) receptor mobility in the membrane of SH-SY5Y cells

The dynamic organization of G protein-coupled receptors in the plasma membrane is suspected of playing a role in their function. The regulation of the diffusion mode of the mu-opioid (MOP) receptor was previously shown to be agonist-specific. Here we investigate the regulation of MOP receptor diffusion by heterologous activation of other G protein-coupled receptors and characterize the dynamic properties of the MOP receptor within the heterodimer MOP/neuropeptide FF (NPFF2) receptor. The data show that the dynamics and signaling of the MOP receptor in SH-SY5Y cells are modified by the activation of α2-adrenergic and NPFF2 receptors, but not by the activation of receptors not described to interact with the opioid receptor. By combining, for the first time, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching at variable radius experiments with bimolecular fluorescence complementation, we show that the MOP/NPFF2 heterodimer adopts a specific diffusion behavior that corresponds to a mix of the dynamic properties of both MOP and NPFF2 receptors. Altogether, the data suggest that heterologous regulation is accompanied by a specific organization of receptors in the membrane.

Neuropeptide Y receptors activation protects rat retinal neural cells against necrotic and apoptotic cell death induced by glutamate

It has been claimed that glutamate excitotoxicity might have a role in the pathogenesis of several retinal degenerative diseases, including glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has neuroprotective properties against excitotoxicity in the hippocampus, through the activation of Y1, Y2 and/or Y5 receptors. The principal objective of this study is to investigate the potential protective role of NPY against glutamate-induced toxicity in rat retinal cells (in vitro and in an animal model), unraveling the NPY receptors and intracellular mechanisms involved. Rat retinal neural cell cultures were prepared from newborn Wistar rats (P3-P5) and exposed to glutamate (500 μM) for 24 h. Necrotic cell death was evaluated by propidium iodide (PI) assay and apoptotic cell death using TUNEL and caspase-3 assays. The cell types present in culture were identified by immunocytochemistry. The involvement of NPY receptors was assessed using selective agonists and antagonists. Pre-treatment of cells with NPY (100 nM) inhibited both necrotic cell death (PI-positive cells) and apoptotic cell death (TUNEL-positive cells and caspase 3-positive cells) triggered by glutamate, with the neurons being the cells most strongly affected. The activation of NPY Y2, Y4 and Y5 receptors inhibited necrotic cell death, while apoptotic cell death was only prevented by the activation of NPY Y5 receptor. Moreover, NPY neuroprotective effect was mediated by the activation of PKA and p38K. In the animal model, NPY (2.35 nmol) was intravitreally injected 2 h before glutamate (500 nmol) injection into the vitreous. The protective role of NPY was assessed 24 h after glutamate (or saline) injection by TUNEL assay and Brn3a (marker of ganglion cells) immunohistochemistry. NPY inhibited the increase in the number of TUNEL-positive cells and the decrease in the number of Brn3a-positive cells induced by glutamate. In conclusion, NPY and NPY receptors can be considered potential targets to treat retinal degenerative diseases, such as glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy.

Surface masking shapes the traffic of the neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor

The neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y2 receptor shows a large masked surface population in adherent CHO cells or in forebrain cell aggregates, but not in dispersed cells or in particulates from these sources. This is related to adhesion via acidic motifs in the extracellular N-terminal domain. Masking of the Y2 receptor is lifted by non-permeabilizing mechanical dispersion of cells, which also increases internalization of Y2 agonists. Mechanical dispersion and detachment by EDTA expose the same number of surface sites. As we have already shown, phenylarsine oxide (PAO), a cysteine-bridging agent, and to a lesser extent also the cysteine alkylator N-ethylmaleimide, unmask the surface Y2 sites without cell detachment or permeabilization. We now demonstrate that unmasking by permeabilizing but non-detaching treatment with cholesterol-binding detergents digitonin and edelfosine compares with and overlaps that of PAO. The caveolar/raft cholesterol-targeting macrolide filipin III however produces only partial unmasking. Depletion of the surface sites by N-terminally clipped Y2 agonists indicates larger accessibility for a short highly helical peptide. These findings indicate presence of a dynamic masked pool including majority of the cell surface Y2 receptors in adherent CHO cells. This compartmentalization is obviously involved in the low internalization of Y2 receptors in these cells.

EBI2 regulates CXCL13-mediated responses by heterodimerization with CXCR5

B-cell movement into lymphoid follicles depends on the expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR5 and the recently reported Epstein-Barr virus-induced receptor 2 (EBI2). In cooperation with CXCR5, EBI2 helps to position activated B cells in the follicle, although the mechanism is poorly understood. Using human HEK293T cells and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) techniques, we demonstrate that CXCR5 and EBI2 form homo- and heterodimers. EBI2 expression modulated CXCR5 homodimeric complexes, as indicated by the FRET(50) value (CXCR5 homodimer, 0.9851±0.0784; CXCR5 homodimer+EBI2, 1.7320±0.4905; P<0.05). HEK293T cells expressing CXCR5/EBI2 and primary activated murine B cells both down-modulated CXCR5-mediated responses, such as Ca(2+) flux, cell migration, and MAPK activation; this modulation did not occur when primary B cells were obtained from EBI2(-/-) mice. The mechanism involves a reduction in binding affinity of the ligand (CXCL13) for CXCR5 (K(D): 5.05×10(-8) M for CXCR5 alone vs. 1.49×10(-7) M for CXCR5/EBI2) and in the efficacy (E(max)) of G-protein activation in CXCR5/EBI2-coexpressing cells (42.33±4.3%; P<0.05). These findings identify CXCR5/EBI2 heterodimers as functional units that contribute to the plasticity of CXCL13-mediated B-cell responses.

Pathophysiology of GPCR Homo- and Heterodimerization: Special Emphasis on Somatostatin Receptors

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are cell surface proteins responsible for translating >80% of extracellular reception to intracellular signals. The extracellular information in the form of neurotransmitters, peptides, ions, odorants etc is converted to intracellular signals via a wide variety of effector molecules activating distinct downstream signaling pathways. All GPCRs share common structural features including an extracellular N-terminal, seven-transmembrane domains (TMs) linked by extracellular/intracellular loops and the C-terminal tail. Recent studies have shown that most GPCRs function as dimers (homo- and/or heterodimers) or even higher order of oligomers. Protein-protein interaction among GPCRs and other receptor proteins play a critical role in the modulation of receptor pharmacology and functions. Although ~50% of the current drugs available in the market target GPCRs, still many GPCRs remain unexplored as potential therapeutic targets, opening immense possibility to discover the role of GPCRs in pathophysiological conditions. This review explores the existing information and future possibilities of GPCRs as tools in clinical pharmacology and is specifically focused for the role of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) in pathophysiology of diseases and as the potential candidate for drug discovery.

Neuropeptide Y stimulates retinal neural cell proliferation--involvement of nitric oxide

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a 36 amino acid peptide widely present in the CNS, including the retina. Previous studies have demonstrated that NPY promotes cell proliferation of rat post-natal hippocampal and olfactory epithelium precursor cells. The aim of this work was to investigate the role of NPY on cell proliferation of rat retinal neural cells. For this purpose, primary retinal cell cultures expressing NPY, and NPY Y(1), Y(2), Y(4) and Y(5) receptors [Alvaro et al., (2007) Neurochem. Int., 50, 757] were used. NPY (10-1000 nM) stimulated cell proliferation through the activation of NPY Y(1), Y(2) and Y(5) receptors. NPY also increased the number of proliferating neuronal progenitor cells (BrdU(+)/nestin(+) cells). The intracellular mechanisms coupled to NPY receptors activation that mediate the increase in cell proliferation were also investigated. The stimulatory effect of NPY on cell proliferation was reduced by L-nitroarginine-methyl-esther (L-NAME; 500 microM), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo-[4, 3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ; 20 microM), a soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibitor or U0126 (1 microM), an inhibitor of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK 1/2). In conclusion, NPY stimulates retinal neural cell proliferation, and this effect is mediated through nitric oxide-cyclic GMP and ERK 1/2 pathways.

Dynamic regulation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 homo- and heterodimers

Although homo- and heterodimerization are reported for some chemokine receptors, it remains unclear whether these functional states are in dynamic equilibrium and how receptor/ligand levels influence oligomerization. In human neutrophils and in cell lines that coexpress the chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2, we used fluorescence resonance energy transfer techniques to show that these two receptors form homo- and heterodimers. Receptor expression and ligand activation were found to regulate the balance between these complexes, adapting the response to changes in the milieu. CXCL8, a ligand for both receptors, alters heterodimeric complexes, whereas it stabilizes homodimers and promotes receptor internalization. Oligomerization of receptors, together with the regulation of their expression and desensitization, could thus contribute to the fine control of chemokine functions.

Dimers of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y2 receptor show asymmetry in agonist affinity and association with G proteins

In conditions precluding activation of G proteins, the binding of agonists to dimers of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y2 receptor shows two components of similar size, but differing in affinity. The dimers of all NPY receptors are solubilized as approximately 180-kDa complexes containing one G protein alpha beta gamma trimer. These heteropentamers are stable to excess agonists, chelators, and alkylators. However, dispersion in the weak surfactant cholate releases approximately 300-kDa complexes. These findings indicate that both protomers in the Y2 dimer are associated with G protein heterotrimers, but the extent of interaction depends on affinity for the agonist peptide. The G protein in contact with the first-liganded, higher-affinity protomer should have a stronger interaction with the receptor and a larger probability of activation.

Neuropeptide Y induces gonadotropin-releasing hormone gene expression directly and through conditioned medium from mHypoE-38 NPY neurons

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) regulates reproductive function at the level of the hypothalamus through control of GnRH secretion. However, the direct control of GnRH gene expression by NPY has not yet been studied. GT1-7 neurons were treated with 100 nM of NPY over a 36 h time course. GnRH mRNA levels were significantly increased by NPY up to 12 h. We determined that GT1-7 neurons expressed Y1, Y2, and Y4 NPY receptors, but not Y5. Functional analysis of NPY receptor activation indicated that the Y1/Y4/Y5 receptor agonist [Leu31, Pro34] significantly induced cAMP accumulation in the GT1-7 neurons. Western blot studies demonstrated changes in the phosphorylation status of AKT, ERK1/2, CREB and ATF-1 after NPY exposure. Pharmacological inhibitors of the MAPK and PKA signal transduction pathways attenuated the NPY-mediated increase in GnRH transcription. This NPY-mediated increase in GnRH mRNA was also inhibited with the Y1-receptor specific antagonist BIBP-3226. The mHypoE-38 neurons secrete detectable levels of NPY and can be used as an endogenous source of NPY. Conditioned medium from mHypoE-38 neurons induced an increase in GnRH mRNA, which was inhibited by the Y1 receptor antagonist BIBP-3226. Together, these studies strengthen the evidence for the importance of NPY in the regulation of reproductive function.

Determination of Affinity and Activity of Ligands at the Human Neuropeptide Y Y4Receptor by Flow Cytometry and Aequorin Luminescence

Fluorescence-labeled neuropeptide Y (NPY) has been used in flow cytometric binding assays for the determination of affinity constants of NPY Y1, Y2, and Y5 receptor ligands. Because the binding of fluorescent NPY is insufficient for competition studies at the human Y4 receptor (hY4R), we replaced Glu-4 in hPP with Lys for the derivatization with cyanine-5. Because cy5-[K(4)]hPP has high affinity (Kd 5.6 nM) to the hY4R, it was used as a probe in a flow cytometric binding assay. Specific binding of cy5-[K(4)]hPP to hY4R was visualized by confocal microscopy. The hY(4)R, the chimeric G protein G(qi5) and mitochondrially targeted apoaequorin were stably coexpressed in CHO cells. Aequorin luminescence was quantified in a microplate reader and by a CCD camera. By application of these methods 3-cyclohexyl-N-[(3-1H-imidazol-4-ylpropylamino)(imino)methyl]propanamide (UR-AK49) was discovered as the first nonpeptidic Y4R antagonist (pKi 4.17), a lead to be optimized in terms of potency and selectivity.

Importance of a N-terminal aspartate in the internalization of the neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor

With human neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor expressed in the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, the Asp35Ala mutation, and especially the change of Pro34Asp35 to Ala34Ala35, decrease the compartmentalization and strongly accelerate internalization of the receptor. These changes are not associated with alterations in agonist affinity, G-protein interaction, dimerization, or level of expression of the mutated receptors relative to the wildtype receptor. The proline-flanked aspartate in the N-terminal extracellular segment of the neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor thus apparently has a large role in anchoring and compartmentalization of the receptor. However, the Pro34Ala mutation does not significantly affect the embedding and cycling of the receptor.

The neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y2 receptors are largely dimeric in the kidney, but monomeric in the forebrain

The neuropeptide Y(NPY) Y2 receptors are detected largely as dimers in the clonal expressions in CHO cells and in particulates from rabbit kidney cortex. However, in two areas of the forebrain (rat or rabbit piriform cortex and hypothalamus), these receptors are found mainly as monomers. Evidence is presented that this difference relates to large levels of G proteins containing the Gi alpha -subunit in the forebrain areas. The predominant monomeric status of these Y2 receptors should also be physiologically linked to large synaptic inputs of the agonist NPY. The rabbit kidney and the human CHO cell-expressed Y2 dimers are converted by agonists to monomers in vitro at a similar rate in the presence of divalent cations.

Dimerization of G protein-coupled receptors: new avenues for somatostatin receptor signalling, control and functioning

Somatostatin acts through binding and activation of five G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) termed somatostatin receptors or ssts (sst1-sst5). These receptors, as many other GPCRs are not just monomers but display a differential tendency to homodimerize, which varies depending on the sst subtype. Moreover, there is evidence that pairs of distinct receptors such as ssst2-sst3 and sst1-sst5 crosstalk by establishing a physical interaction, which results in altered pharmacological or/and functional properties. In addition, ssts can also heterodimerize with other families of GPCRs, as opioid and dopamine receptors, originating heterodimers which properties are different to those of their separated receptors. The present review summarizes the current knowledge on ssts homodimerization, heterodimerization, and interaction with other GPCRs, as well as how interactions affect different aspects of the normal functioning of these receptors.

Oligomerization of neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y2 receptors in CHO cells depends on functional pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins

Human neuropeptide Y Y2 receptors expressed in CHO cells are largely oligomeric, and upon solubilization are recovered by density gradient centrifugation as approximately 180 kDa complexes of receptor dimers and G-protein heterotrimers. A large fraction of the receptors is inactivated in the presence of pertussis toxin, in parallel with inactivation of Gi alpha subunits (with half-periods of about 4 h for both). This is accompanied by a very long-lasting loss of receptor dimers and of masked surface Y2 sites (an apparent receptor reserve pre-coupled mainly to Gi alpha subunit-containing G-proteins). However, surface Y2 receptors accessible to large peptide agonists are much less sensitive to the toxin. All surface Y2 receptors are rapidly blocked by Y2 antagonist BIIE0246, with a significant loss of the dimers, but with little change of basal Gi activity. However, both dimers and Y2 receptor compartmentalization are restored within 24 h after removal of the antagonist. In CHO cells, the maintenance and organization of Y2 receptors appear to critically depend on functional pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins.

Pertussis toxin induces parallel loss of neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor dimers and Gi alpha subunit function in CHO cells

Treatment with pertussis toxin in addition to a stable inhibition of G(i)alpha subunits of G-proteins also strongly reduced human neuropeptide Y Y(1) receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. This was reflected in abolition of the inhibition by Y(1) agonists of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase in intact cells, and of Y(1) agonist stimulation of GTPgammaS binding to particulates from disrupted cells. The loss of both receptor and G(i)alpha subunit function was attenuated by ammonium chloride, an inhibitor of acid proteinases, pointing to a chaperoning co-protection of active pertussis toxin-sensitive Galpha subunits and Y(1) receptors. The surface complement of the Y(1) receptor was changed a little in conditions of approximately 85% decrease of the Y(1) population, but the rate of the Y(1) receptor-linked internalization of agonist peptides was reduced about 70%. The preserved receptor fraction consisted of monomers significantly coupled to G(q)alpha subunits. The persistent pertussis toxin-insensitive internalization of agonists with the Y(1) receptor may reflect a rescue or alternative switching that could be important for cell functioning in neuropeptide Y-rich environments. The results are compatible with a loss, due to G(i)alpha subunit inactivation by the toxin, of a large Y(1) receptor reserve constituted of oligomers associating with heterotrimeric G-proteins.

Neuropeptide y receptor selective ligands in the treatment of obesity

Obesity is a serious public health problem throughout the world, affecting both developed societies and developing countries. The central nervous system has developed a meticulously interconnected circuitry in order to keep us fed and in an adequate nutritional state. One of these consequences is that an energy-dense environment favors the development of obesity. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most abundant and widely distributed peptides in the central nervous system of both rodents and humans and has been implicated in a variety of physiological actions. Within the hypothalamus, NPY plays an essential role in the control of food intake and body weight. Centrally administered NPY causes robust increases in food intake and body weight and, with chronic administration, can eventually produce obesity. NPY activates a population of at least six G protein-coupled Y receptors. NPY analogs exhibit varying degrees of affinity and specificity for these Y receptors. There has been renewed speculation that ligands for Y receptors may be of benefit for the treatment of obesity. This review highlights the therapeutic potential of Y(1), Y(2), Y(4), and Y(5) receptor agonists and antagonists as additional intervention to treat human obesity.

Neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor in health and disease

We briefly survey the current knowledge and concepts regarding structure and function of the neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor and its agonists, especially as related to pharmacology of the receptor and its roles in pathological processes. Specific structural features are considered that could be responsible for the known compartmentalization and participation of the receptor in cell and tissue organization. This is further discussed in relation to changes of levels of the Y2 receptor in pathological conditions (especially in epilepsy and drug abuse), to endocytosis and recycling, and to participation in wound healing, retinopathy and angiogenesis. Properties of the receptor and of Y2 agonists are considered and reviewed in connection to the negative regulation of transmitter release, feeding, mood and social behavior. The possible involvement of the Y2 receptor in diabetes, carcinogenesis and bone formation is also reviewed.

Co-expression of neuropeptide Y Y1 and Y5 receptors results in heterodimerization and altered functional properties

Centrally administered neuropeptide Y (NPY) produces anxiolytic and orexigenic effects by interacting with Y1 and Y5 receptors that are colocalized in many brain regions. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that co-expression of Y1 and Y5 receptors results in heterodimerization, altered pharmacological properties and altered desensitization. To accomplish this, the carboxyl-termini of Y1 and Y5 receptors were fused with Renilla luciferase and green fluorescent protein and the proximity of the tagged receptors assessed using bioluminescent resonance energy transfer. Under basal conditions, cotransfection of tagged Y1 receptor and Y5 produced a substantial dimerization signal that was unaffected by the endogenous, nonselective agonists, NPY and peptide YY (PYY). Selective Y5 agonists produced an increase in the dimerization signal while Y5 antagonists also produced a slight but significant increase. In the absence of agonists, selective antagonists decreased dimerization. In functional studies, Y5 agonists produced a greater inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity in Y1/Y5 cells than cells expressing Y5 alone while NPY and PYY exhibited no difference. With PYY stimulation, the Y1 antagonist became inactive and the Y5 antagonist exhibited uncompetitive kinetics in the Y1/Y5 cell line. In confocal microscopy studies, Y1/Y5 co-expression resulted in increased Y5 signaling following PYY stimulation. Addition of both Y1 and Y5 receptor antagonists was required to significantly decrease PYY-induced internalization. Therefore, Y1/Y5 co-expression results in heterodimerization, altered agonist and antagonist responses and reduced internalization rate. These results may account for the complex pharmacology observed when assessing the responses to NPY and analogs in vivo.

Agonist occupancy of a single monomeric element is sufficient to cause internalization of the dimeric beta2-adrenoceptor

A range of studies have indicated that many rhodopsin-like, family A G protein-coupled receptors, including the beta(2)-adrenoceptor, exist and probably function as dimers. It is less clear if receptors internalize as dimers and if agonist occupancy of only one element of a dimer is sufficient to cause internalization of a receptor dimer into the cell. We have used a chemogenomic approach to demonstrate that this is the case. Following expression of the wild type beta(2)-adrenoceptor, isoprenaline but not 1-(3''4'-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-butanone, which does not have significant affinity for the wild type receptor, caused receptor internalization. By contrast, 1-(3'4'-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-butanone, but not isoprenaline that does not have high affinity for the mutated receptor, caused internalization of Asp(113)Serbeta(2)-adrenoceptor. Following co-expression of wild type and Asp(113)Serbeta(2)-adrenoceptors each of isoprenaline and 1-(3'4'-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-butanone caused the co-internalization of both of these two forms of the receptor. Co-expressed wild type and Asp(113)Serbeta(2)-adrenoceptors were able to be co-immunoprecipitated and 1-(3'4'-dihydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-1-butanone produced internalization of the wild type receptor that was not prevented by the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol that binds with high affinity only to the wild type receptor. These results demonstrate that agonist occupancy of either single binding site of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor dimer is sufficient to cause internalization of the dimer and that antagonist occupation of one of the two ligand binding sites is unable to prevent agonist-mediated internalization.

Opsin oligomerization in a heterologous cell system

Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) we studied opsin oligomerization in heterologous expression systems and quantitatively assessed its oligomerization state. BRET2 saturation and competition experiments were performed with live COS-7 cells expressing Rluc-and GFP2-tagged receptor constructs. BRET2 saturation curves obtained were hyperbolic, and the calculated oligomerization state (N = 1 for dimers) suggested that opsin (N = 1.34 +/- 0.25) forms higher oligomers. Very high BRET2 values obtained for the opsin homo-dimer pair indicated a large energy transfer efficiency (E) and for cases where E >> 0.1 a modified saturation curve was proposed. The existence of homo-dimer complexes was additionally supported by competition assay results and was also observed in HEK-293 cells. Furthermore, evidence was provided for homo-and hetero-dimerization of family A (beta2-adrenergic) and B (gastric inhibitory polypeptide, GIP) receptors. In summary, these experiments demonstrate homo-and hetero-dimerization for opsin, beta 2-adrenergic, and GIP receptors.

Technology Insight: modern methods to monitor protein-protein interactions reveal functional TSH receptor oligomerization

The formation of supramolecular structures (dimers or oligomers) is emerging as an important aspect of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) biology. In some cases, GPCR oligomerization is a prerequisite for membrane targeting or function; in others, the relevance of the phenomenon is presently unknown. Although supramolecular structures of GPCRs were initially documented by classical biochemical techniques such as coimmunoprecipitation, many recent advances in the field of GPCR oligomerization have been prompted by the introduction of two new biophysical assays based on Förster's resonance energy transfer-fluorescence resonance energy transfer and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. These modern techniques allow the study of protein-protein interaction in intact cells, and can be used to monitor monomer association and dissociation in vivo. Recently, oligomerization has also been reported in the case of the TSH receptor (TSHR). This review will focus on the previously unsuspected implications that oligomerization has in TSHR physiology and pathology. It is now clear that TSHR oligomerization is constitutive, occurs early during post-translational processing, and may be involved in membrane targeting and activation by the hormone or by stimulating antibodies. Oligomerization between inactive mutants and wild-type TSHR provides a molecular explanation for the dominant forms of TSH resistance.

Tracking of human Y receptors in living cells--a fluorescence approach

Non-invasive methods for studying biological processes in living cells have become very important, also in the field of GPCR biochemistry. Great advancements in the application of fluorescence techniques as well as in the development and improvement of novel fluorophores allow the visualization of dynamic processes. Using these technologies, problems concerning receptor biosynthesis, internalization, recycling and degradation can be investigated. Here we compare the application of the different fluorescent tags EYFP, Lumiotrade mark and SNAPtrade mark to track hY(1) and hY(5) receptors in living cells.

Involvement of neuropeptide Y Y1 receptors in the regulation of LH and GH cells in the pituitary of the catfish, Clarias batrachus: an immunocytochemical study

Although neuropeptide Y (NPY) has been known to influence the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and growth hormone (GH) from the pituitary gland of teleosts, the NPY receptor subtypes involved in the regulatory processes have not been fully defined. An attempt has been made to study the involvement of NPY Y1 receptors, if any, in mediating the NPY-triggered stimulation of the LH and GH secreting cells in the pituitary of the catfish, Clarias batrachus. NPY (10 ng/g of body wt) or NPY Y1 receptor agonist (Leu(31)-Pro(34)-NPY, 3 ng/g of body wt) were administered by the intracranial route and the responses by the LH and GH cells in the pituitary were investigated with the help of immunocytochemistry. Both the agents caused a highly significant decrease (P<0.001) in the immunoreactivity of LH cells. However, the treatment with NPY Y1 receptor antagonist (BIBP 3226, 1 ng/g of body wt), prior to NPY or NPY Y1 agonist, blocked the response by the LH cells; the profile of the cells was quite similar to that of the saline-injected control fish. GH cells also showed similar pattern of responses to these treatments. While NPY and NPY Y1 receptor agonist caused significant (P<0.001) decrease in the GH immunoreactivity, pretreatment with the NPY Y1 antagonist blocked the response. These results suggest that NPY may exercise a secretogogue-like action on the LH and GH cells in the pituitary of C. batrachus via NPY Y1 receptors.

Physiology and gene regulation of the brain NPY Y1 receptor

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most prominent and abundant neuropeptides in the mammalian brain where it interacts with a family of G-protein coupled receptors, including the Y(1) receptor subtype (Y(1)R). NPY-Y(1)R signalling plays a prominent role in the regulation of several behavioural and physiological functions including feeding behaviour and energy balance, sexual hormone secretion, stress response, emotional behaviour, neuronal excitability and ethanol drinking. Y(1)R expression is regulated by neuronal activity and peripheral hormones. The Y(1)R gene has been isolated from rodents and humans and it contains multiple regulatory elements that may participate in the regulation of its expression. Y(1)R expression in the hypothalamus is modulated by changes in energetic balance induced by a wide variety of conditions (fasting, pregnancy, hyperglycaemic challenge, hypophagia, diet induced obesity). Estrogens up-regulate responsiveness to NPY to stimulate preovulatory GnRH and gonadotropin surges by increasing Y(1)R gene expression both in the hypothalamus and the pituitary. Y(1)R expression is modulated by different kinds of brain insults, such as stress and seizure activity, and alteration in its expression may contribute to antidepressant action. Chronic modulation of GABA(A) receptor function by benzodiazepines or neuroactive steroids also affects Y(1)R expression in the amygdala, suggesting that a functional interaction between the GABA(A) receptor and Y(1)R mediated signalling may contribute to the regulation of emotional behaviour. In this paper, we review the state of the art concerning Y(1)R function and gene expression, including our personal contribution to many of the subjects mentioned above.

Current methods used to investigate G protein coupled receptor oligomerisation

Classical models of G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling assume that each receptor functions as a single unit. However, evidence is increasing that GPCRs may form functional assemblies of dimeric or oligomeric units. There are several methods that can be used to give evidence of GPCR oligomerisation that will be discussed in this review. These include co-immunoprecipitation and Western blotting, resonance energy transfer methods and transactivation / complementation of partially functional receptors. One definitive method currently does not exist and there are various advantages and disadvantages to each method depending upon the system considered. Although co-immunoprecipitation and Western blot studies require disruption of the cellular environment and require specific antibodies, they are a good starting point to show that receptor oligomerisation occurs in native systems. Resonance energy transfer techniques provide evidence that receptors are in close proximity, are measured in living cells and some formats may be used for imaging applications. Transactivation / complementation requires extensive modification of the GPCR, but provides evidence that the receptors are in physical contact. Despite great advances being made using these techniques, future challenges involve the development of other methodologies to determine the role of receptor complexes in the pharmacology and physiology of native systems.

Molecular mechanism of 7TM receptor activation--a global toggle switch model

The multitude of chemically highly different agonists for 7TM receptors apparently do not share a common binding mode or active site but nevertheless act through induction of a common molecular activation mechanism. A global toggle switch model is proposed for this activation mechanism to reconcile the accumulated biophysical data supporting an outward rigid-body movement of the intracellular segments, as well as the recent data derived from activating metal ion sites and tethered ligands, which suggests an opposite, inward movement of the extracellular segments of the transmembrane helices. According to this model, a vertical see-saw movement of TM-VI-and to some degree TM-VII-around a pivot corresponding to the highly conserved prolines will occur during receptor activation, which may involve the outer segment of TM-V in an as yet unclear fashion. Small-molecule agonists can stabilize such a proposed active conformation, where the extracellular segments of TM-VI and -VII are bent inward toward TM-III, by acting as molecular glue deep in the main ligand-binding pocket between the helices, whereas larger agonists, peptides, and proteins can stabilize a similar active conformation by acting as Velcro at the extracellular ends of the helices and the connecting loops.

Dimerization of the melanocortin 4 receptor: a study using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer

The melanocortin 4 receptor is important in the regulation of satiety. In this study we have investigated the propensity of the MC4 receptor to homodimerize. MC4 receptors with either a modified green fluorescent protein (GFP(2)) or Renilla luciferase (RLuc) at their C-terminus were constructed. These receptors showed equivalent binding and functional properties to the wild-type MC4 receptor. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer readings indicated that the MC4 receptor exists as a constitutive homodimer, which was not regulated by peptide interaction. The efficiency of MC4 receptor to form homodimers was greatly enhanced compared to its ability to heterodimerize with the kappa opioid receptor.

Evidence for the existence of an additional class of neuropeptide Y receptor sites in rat brain

Five distinct neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors have been cloned thus far. Selective agonists and antagonists have recently been developed allowing for detailed functional studies as to the pathophysiological role of a given subtype as well as receptor binding characteristics and distribution. To precisely investigate the discrete localization and ligand selectivity profile of Y4 and Y5 receptors, a series of selective molecules were used as radioligands and competitors in rat brain tissues. Binding data revealed that Y4 and Y5 receptor-related agonists and antagonists competed with high affinity for specific 125I-[Leu31,Pro34]human peptide YY (hPYY) binding in the presence of BIBO3304 [(R)-N-[[4-(aminocarbonylaminomethyl)-phenyl]-methyl]-N2-(diphenylacetyl)-argininamide trifluoroacetate] to mask Y1 sites as well as specific 125I-labeled human pancreatic polypeptide (hPP) binding. Competition binding profiles were best fitted to a two-site model for both radioligands, suggesting the likely recognition of the Y4 and Y5 subtypes. We were surprised to find that the visualization of these specific binding sites by receptor autoradiography clearly revealed the distinct distribution of specific 125I-[Leu31,Pro34]hPYY (in presence of Y1 and Y5 blockers) and 125I-hPP (in presence of Y5 blocker) binding sites. Moreover, significant amounts of specific 125I-hPP binding were observed in the medial preoptic area, paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, interpeduncular nucleus, and various brainstem nuclei, even after masking Y4 and Y5 receptors. Similar results were obtained using 125I-hPYY(3-36) in presence of Y2 and Y5 blockers. These results suggest the possible existence of at least one additional subtype of NPY receptor sites in the rat brain, with enrichment seen in midbrain and brainstem areas involved in the regulation of food intake and cardiorespiratory parameters.

The CXCR1 and CXCR2 Receptors Form Constitutive Homo- and Heterodimers Selectively and with Equal Apparent Affinities

Both homo- and heterodimeric interactions between the CXCR1 and CXCR2 chemokine receptors were observed following co-expression of forms of these receptors in HEK293 cells using assays, including co-immunoprecipitation, single cell imaging of fluorescence resonance energy transfer, cell surface time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer, and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer. These interactions were constitutive and unaffected by the presence of the agonist interleukin 8 and selective as no significant interactions were noted between either the CXCR1 or CXCR2 receptor and the alpha(1A)-adrenoreceptor. Saturation bioluminescence resonance energy transfer indicated that heteromeric interactions between CXCR1 and CXCR2 were of similar affinity as the corresponding homomeric interactions. A novel endoplasmic reticulum trapping strategy demonstrated that these interactions were initiated during protein synthesis and maturation and prior to cell surface delivery. These studies indicated that CXCR1-CXCR2 heterodimers are as likely to form in cells co-expressing these two chemokine receptors as the corresponding homodimers and stand in contrast to previous studies indicating an inability of the CXCR1 receptor to homodimerize or to interact with the CXCR2 receptor (Trettel, F., Di Bartolomeo, S., Lauro, C., Catalano, M., Ciotti, M. T., and Limatola, C. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 40980-40988).

Monitoring the formation of dynamic G-protein-coupled receptor-protein complexes in living cells

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) play an extremely important role in transducing extracellular signals across the cell membrane with high specificity and sensitivity. They are central to many of the body's endocrine and neurotransmitter pathways, and are consequently a major drug target. It is now clear that GPCRs interact with a range of proteins, including other GPCRs. Identifying and elucidating the function of such interactions will significantly enhance our understanding of cellular function, with the promise of new and improved pharmaceuticals. Biophysical techniques involving resonance energy transfer, namely FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) and BRET (bioluminescence resonance energy transfer), now enable us to monitor the formation of dynamic GPCR-protein complexes in living cells, in real time. Their use has firmly established the concept of GPCR oligomerization, as well as demonstrating GPCR interactions with GPCR kinases, beta-arrestins, adenylate cyclase and a subunit of an inwardly rectifying K+ channel. The present review examines recent technological advances and experimental applications of FRET and BRET, discussing particularly how they have been adapted to extract an ever-increasing amount of information about the nature, specificity, stoichiometry, kinetics and agonist-dependency of GPCR-protein interactions.

Dimerization of alpha1-adrenoceptors

Three distinct genes encode alpha(1)-adrenoceptors. Although homodimers of each subtype have been reported, certain but not all combinations of heterodimers of the alpha(1)-adrenoceptors appear to form. Key studies in this field are reviewed and the approaches that have been applied to monitoring the selectivity and the basis of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor dimerization are discussed.

Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer reveals ligand-induced conformational changes in CXCR4 homo- and heterodimers

Homo- and heterodimerization have emerged as prominent features of G-protein-coupled receptors with possible impact on the regulation of their activity. Using a sensitive bioluminescence resonance energy transfer system, we investigated the formation of CXCR4 and CCR2 chemokine receptor dimers. We found that both receptors exist as constitutive homo- and heterodimers and that ligands induce conformational changes within the pre-formed dimers without promoting receptor dimer formation or disassembly. Ligands with different intrinsic efficacies yielded distinct bioluminescence resonance energy transfer modulations, indicating the stabilization of distinct receptor conformations. We also found that peptides derived from the transmembrane domains of CXCR4 inhibited activation of this receptor by blocking the ligand-induced conformational transitions of the dimer. Taken together, our data support a model in which chemokine receptor homo- and heterodimers form spontaneously and respond to ligand binding as units that undergo conformational changes involving both protomers even when only one of the two ligand binding sites is occupied.

Functional consequences of 7TM receptor dimerization

7TM receptors work as signaling platforms that activate multiple signalling systems at the intracellular face of the plasma membrane. It is an emerging concept that 7TM receptors form homo- and hetero-dimers or -oligomers in vitro and in vivo. Numerous studies suggest dimerization is important for receptor function including agonist/antagonist affinity, efficacy, trafficking, and specificity of signal transduction, yet it remains unknown whether dimerization is a prerequisite for 7TM receptor signaling. The current review provides an overview of the biochemical support for 7TM homodimerization, followed by a discussion of the characteristics of homodimerization, with focus on dimer organization, and the functional consequences of dimerization. Heterodimerization will not generally be discussed in this review although we have included a few examples to illustrate specific points, and a table that summarises the current literature on this subject.

Characterization of a new neuropeptide Y Y5 agonist radioligand: [125I][cPP(1-7), NPY(19-23), Ala31, Aib32, Gln34]hPP

In order to optimally characterize a class of neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors expressed in a tissue enriched with multiple subtypes (Y1, Y2, Y4 and Y5) and to establish its detailed distribution, it is critical to use highly selective and specific probes that possess very low non-specific binding. In that context, we recently reported on the development of [125I][hPP(1-17), Ala31, Aib32]NPY as Y5 receptor radioligand. However, the non-specific binding obtained with this radioligand was too high to allow for detailed receptor autoradiography studies [Br. J. Pharmacol. 139 (2003) 1360]. Iodinated [cPP(1-7), NPY(19-23), Ala31, Aib32, Gln34]hPP may represent a better Y5 radioligand in that regard. Accordingly, [125I][cPP(1-7), NPY(19-23), Ala31, Aib32, Gln34]hPP binding was investigated in rat brain membrane homogenates and its specificity and selectivity established in rat Y1, Y2, Y4 and Y5 transfected HEK293 cells. No specific binding was detected in HEK293 cells transfected with the rat Y1, Y2 or Y4 receptors, while saturable binding was observed in cells transfected with the rat Y5 receptor cDNA and in rat brain membrane homogenates (KD of 0.5-0.7 nM). Competition binding experiments performed in rat brain membrane homogenates demonstrated that specific [125I][cPP(1-7), NPY(19-23), Ala31, Aib32, Gln34]hPP binding was competed with nanomolar affinities by Y5 agonists and antagonists such as [Leu31,Pro34]PYY, PYY(3-36), [cPP(1-7), NPY(19-23), Ala31, Aib32, Gln34]hPP, [Ala31, Aib32]NPY, [hPP(1-17), Ala31, Aib32]NPY, CGP71683A and JCF109, but not by Y1 (BIBP3226 and BIBO3304), Y2 (BIIE0246) and Y4 (GR231118) ligands. Non-specific binding was also lower than that reported for [125I][hPP(1-17), Ala31, Aib32]NPY. Interestingly, detailed analysis of competition binding curves obtained with [Leu31, Pro34]PYY, hPP, PYY(3-36) and [cPP(1-7), NPY(19-23), Ala31, Aib32, Gln34]hPP against specific [125I][cPP(1-7), NPY(19-23), Ala31, Aib32, Gln34]hPP sites were best fitted to a two-site model. Additionally, receptor autoradiography studies revealed the presence of specific [125I][cPP(1-7), NPY(19-23), Ala31, Aib32, Gln34]hPP binding sites in the lateral septum and area postrema while other brain regions contained much lower levels of specific binding. Taken together, these data suggest that [125I][cPP(1-7), NPY(19-23), Ala31, Aib32, Gln34]hPP represents a useful tool to study the unique feature of the Y5 receptor subtype.

Agonist-dependent Dissociation of Human Somatostatin Receptor 2 Dimers

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest and most diverse family of cell surface receptors. Several GPCRs have been documented to dimerize with resulting changes in pharmacology and signaling. We have previously reported, by means of photobleaching fluorescence resonance energy transfer (pbFRET) microscopy and fluorescence correlation spectroscopic analysis in live cells, that human somatostatin receptor (hSSTR) 5 could both homodimerize and heterodimerize with hSSTR1 in the presence of the agonist SST-14. By contrast, hSSTR1 remained monomeric when expressed alone regardless of agonist exposure in live cells. However, the effect of the agonist on other hSSTR members remains unknown. Using pbFRET microscopy and Western blot, we provide evidence for agonist-dependent dissociation of self-associated hSSTR2 stably expressed in CHO-K1 and HEK-293 cells. Furthermore, the dissociation of the hSSTR2 dimer occurred in a concentration-dependent manner. Moreover, blocking receptor dissociation using a cross-linker agent perturbed receptor trafficking. Taking these data together, we suggest that the process of GPCR dimerization may operate differently, even among members of the same family, and that receptor dissociation as well as dimerization may be important steps for receptor dynamics.

Introduction to the reviews on neuropeptide Y

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) was first reported as an abundant peptide in brain tissue in 1982. Shortly thereafter, NPY was found to be a member of a peptide family consisting of the endocrine peptides pancreatic polypeptide (PP) and peptide YY (PYY). These peptides exert most of their biological effects through five G-protein coupled receptors termed Y1, Y2, Y4, Y5 and y6 that mediate either inhibition adenylate cyclase or increases in intracellular calcium. Since the discovery of NPY, a robust a body of literature has developed around the potential functions of this peptide. While initial findings identified NPY is an important contributor to the regulation of feeding, body weight and blood pressure, more recent work as revealed more subtle functions of this peptide and its potential role in affective disorders, bone formation and cravings. The accompanying twelve reviews detail important developments in our understanding of the functional role of NPY.

G Protein-Coupled Receptor Dimerization: Function and Ligand Pharmacology

It is now generally accepted that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can exist as dimers or as part of larger oligomeric complexes. Increasing evidence suggests that a dimer is the minimal functional structure, but considerable variation exists between reports of the effects of agonist ligands on quaternary structure. Many studies have intimated the existence of heterodimeric GPCR pairings. Key questions that remain to be addressed effectively include the prevalence and relevance of these in native tissues and the implications of heterodimerization for pharmacology and, potentially, for drug design.

Neuropeptide Y, ubiquitous and elusive

This paper reviews aspects of NPY research that were emerging in 1985, shortly after the isolation and characterization of the peptide. NPY had become known for its widespread distribution especially in the central and peripheral nervous systems, but also in the gastro-intestinal and respiratory tracts and in fibers innervating smooth muscle around blood vessels. Consistent with its distribution, it was determined that NPY is a potent vasoconstrictor, affects neuroendocrine systems and is involved in appetite regulation--areas of research still relevant today. Through advances in technology knowledge about NPY's role in these and newly discovered physiological functions has deepened considerably. Successful cloning of a series of NPY receptors has opened up new and complex research vistas. Lately, the creation of mice genetically modified for NPY as well as for several receptor subtypes has brought many puzzling observations--followed by questions yet to be answered.