Association of p107 with Sp1: genetically separable regions of p107 are involved in regulation of E2F- and Sp1-dependent transcription

miR-375 inhibits cell growth and correlates with clinical outcomes in tongue squamous cell carcinoma

miR-375 has been implicated in various types of cancers. However, its role in tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of miR-375 on cell growth and the prognosis of TSCC patients. Using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, we evaluated miR-375 expression in TSCC samples and TSCC cell lines. The results showed that miR-375 expression was significantly reduced in the TSCC tissues and cell lines. A low level expression of miR-375 in TSCC patients was related to poor of prognosis. Moreover, the effects of miR-375 overexpression on cell proliferation, the cell cycle and the expression of Sp1 and cyclin D1 were examined in TSCC cells. We demonstrated that overexpression of miR-375 significantly inhibited the cell proliferation and cell cycle progression in TSCC cell lines. Overexpression of miR-375 inhibited Sp1 expression by targeting the 3' untranslated region of the Sp1 transcript. The knockdown of Sp1 expression resulted in the subsequent downregulation of cyclin D1. Taken together, our study suggests that miR-375 inhibits the cell growth, and its expression is correlated with clinical outcomes in TSCC.

A molecular prospective provides new insights into implication of PDYN and OPRK1 genes in alcohol dependence

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) both in coding and non-coding regions govern gene functions prompting differential vulnerability to diseases, heterogeneous response to pharmaceutical regimes and environmental anomalies. These genetic variations, SNPs, may alter an individual׳s susceptibility for alcohol dependence by remodeling DNA-protein interaction patterns in prodynorphin (PDYN) and the κ-opioid receptor (OPRK1) genes. In order to elaborate the underlying molecular mechanism behind these susceptibility differences we used bioinformatics tools to retrieve differential DNA-protein interactions at PDYN and OPRK1 SNPs significantly associated with alcohol dependence. Our results show allele-specific DNA-protein interactions depicting allele-specific mechanisms implicated in differential regulation of gene expression. Several transcription factors, for instance, VDR, RXR-alpha, NFYA, CTF family, USF-1, USF2, ER, AR and predominantly SP family show an allele-specific binding affinity with PDYN gene; likewise, GATA, TBP, AP-1, USF-2, C/EBPbeta, Cart-1 and ER interact with OPRK1 SNPs on intron 2 in an allele-specific manner. In a nutshell, transition of a single nucleotide may modify differential DNA-protein interactions at OPRK1 and PDYN׳s SNPs, significantly associated with pathology that may lead to altered individual vulnerability for alcohol dependence.

Rescue of the transcription factors Sp1 and NFI in human skin keratinocytes through a feeder-layer-dependent suppression of the proteasome activity

Co-culturing human skin keratinocytes along with a feeder layer has proven to considerably improve their proliferative properties by delaying massive induction of terminal differentiation. Through a yet unclear mechanism, we recently reported that irradiated 3T3 (i3T3) fibroblasts used as a feeder layer increase the nuclear content of Sp1, a positive transcription factor (TF) that plays a critical role in many cellular functions including cell proliferation, into both adult skin keratinocytes and newborn skin keratinocytes. In this study, we examined the influence of i3T3 on the expression and DNA binding of NFI, another TF important for cell proliferation and cell cycle progression, and attempted to decipher the mechanism by which the feeder layer contributes at maintaining higher levels of these TFs in skin keratinocytes. Our results indicate that co-culturing both adult skin keratinocytes and newborn skin keratinocytes along with a feeder layer dramatically increases glycosylation of NFI and may prevent it from being degraded by the proteasome.

Next-generation sequencing reveals regional differences of the α-synuclein methylation state independent of Lewy body disease

The α-synuclein gene (SNCA) plays a major role in the aetiology of Lewy body disease (LBD) including Parkinson's disease (PD). Point mutations and genetic alterations causing elevated gene expression are causally linked to familial PD. To what extent epigenetic changes play a role in the regulation of α-synuclein expression and may contribute to the aetiology of sporadic LBD is a matter of debate. We analysed the methylation state of the promoter region and a CpG-rich region of intron 1 of α-synuclein in several brain regions in sporadic LBD and controls using 454 GS-FLX-based high-resolution bisulphite sequencing. Our results indicate that there are significant differences in the level of methylation between different brain areas. The overall methylation levels in the promoter and intron 1 of α-synuclein are rather low in controls and-in contrast to previously reported findings-are not significantly different from LBD. However, single CpG analysis revealed significant hyper- and hypomethylation at different positions in various brain regions and LBD stages. A slight overall increase in methylation related to LBD patients' age was detected.

p107 in the public eye: an Rb understudy and more

p107 and its related family members Rb and p130 are critical regulators of cellular proliferation and tumorigenesis. Due to the extent of functional overlap within the Rb family, it has been difficult to assess which functions are exclusive to individual members and which are shared. Like its family members, p107 can bind a variety of cellular proteins to affect the expression of many target genes during cell cycle progression. Unlike Rb and p130, p107 is most highly expressed during the G1 to S phase transition of the cell cycle in actively dividing cells and accumulating evidence suggests a role for p107 during DNA replication. The specific roles for p107 during differentiation and development are less clear, although emerging studies suggest that it can cooperate with other Rb family members to control differentiation in multiple cell lineages. As a tumor suppressor, p107 is not as potent as Rb, yet studies in knockout mice have revealed some tumor suppressor functions in mice, depending on the context. In this review, we identify the unique and overlapping functions of p107 during the cell cycle, differentiation, and tumorigenesis.

Protein kinase Calpha-induced derepression of the human luteinizing hormone receptor gene transcription through ERK-mediated release of HDAC1/Sin3A repressor complex from Sp1 sites

LH receptor (LHR) gene transcription is subject to repression/derepression through various modes and multiple effectors. Epigenetic silencing and activation of the LHR is achieved through coordinated regulation at both histone and DNA levels. The LHR gene is subject to repression by deacetylation and methylation at its promoter region, where a HDAC/mSin3A repressor complex is anchored at Sp1 sites. The present studies revealed that protein kinase C (PKC) alpha/ERK signaling is important for the activation of LHR promoter activity, and the increase of endogenous transcripts induced by phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) in HeLa cells. Whereas these effects were attributable to PKCalpha activity, the ERK pathway was the downstream effector in LHR activation. PMA caused a significant enhancement of Sp1 phosphorylation at serine residue (s), which was blocked by PKCalpha or ERK inhibition. The interaction of activated phosphorylated ERK with Sp1 and ERK's association with the LHR promoter points to Sp1 as a direct target of ERK. After Sp1 phosphorylation, the HDAC1/mSin3A repressor complex dissociated from Sp1 sites, histone 3 was acetylated, and transcription factor II B and RNA polymerase II were recruited. In addition, overexpression of a constitutively active PKCalpha (PKCalpha CA) strongly activated LHR transcription in MCF-7 cells (devoid of PKCalpha), induced Sp1 phosphorylation at serine residue (s) and caused derecruitment of HDAC1/mSin3A complex from the promoter. These effects were negated by cotransfection of a dominant-negative PKCalpha. In conclusion, these studies have revealed a novel regulatory signaling mechanism of transcriptional control in which the LHR is derepressed through PKCalpha/ERK-mediated Sp1 phosphorylation, causing the release of HDAC1/mSin3A complex from the promoter.

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase Czeta-induced phosphorylation of Sp1 and p107 repressor release have a critical role in histone deacetylase inhibitor-mediated derepression [corrected] of transcription of the luteinizing hormone receptor gene

We have demonstrated that silencing of luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) gene transcription is mediated via a proximal Sp1 site at its promoter. Trichostatin A (TSA) induced histone acetylation and gene activation in JAR cells that prevailed in the absence of changes in Sp1/Sp3 expression, their binding activity, disassociation of the histone deacetylase/mSin3A complex from the Sp1 site, or demethylation of the promoter. This indicated a different mechanism involved in TSA-induced derepression. The present studies have revealed that phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase Czeta (PI3K/PKCzeta)-mediated Sp1 phosphorylation accounts for Sp1 site-dependent LHR gene activation. TSA caused marked phosphorylation of Sp1 at serine 641 in JAR and MCF-7 cells. Blockade of PI3K or PKCzeta activity by specific inhibitors, kinase-deficient mutants, or small interfering RNA abolished the effect of TSA on the LHR gene and Sp1 phosphorylation. PKCzeta was shown to associate with Sp1, and this association was enhanced by TSA. Sp1 phosphorylation at serine 641 was required for the release of the pRb homologue p107 from the LHR gene promoter, while p107 acted as a repressor of the LHR gene. Inhibition of PKCzeta activity blocked the dissociation of p107 from the LHR gene promoter and markedly reduced Sp1 phosphorylation and transcription. These results have demonstrated that phosphorylation of Sp1 by PI3K/PKCzeta is critical for TSA-activated LHR gene expression. These studies have revealed a novel mechanism of TSA action through derecruitment of a repressor from the LHR gene promoter in a PI3K/PKCzeta-induced Sp1 phosphorylation-dependent manner.

Lipopolysaccharide causes Sp1 protein degradation by inducing a unique trypsin-like serine protease in rat lungs

We have previously demonstrated that challenge of rat or mice with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in vivo promotes Sp1 protein degradation. The protease responsible for the LPS-induced Sp1 degradation has not been identified. In this study, we have identified, characterized and partially purified an LPS-inducible Sp1-degrading enzyme (LISPDE) activity from rat lungs. LISPDE activity selectively degraded Sp1, but not nuclear protein, C-fos, p65, I-kappaBalpha and protein actin. Nuclear extract contains approximately 14-fold of the LISPDE activity as that detected in cytoplasmic extract, suggesting that LISPDE is predominantly a nuclear protease. Using biochemical reagents, protease inhibitors and peptide substrates, we have characterized the LISPDE activity. Based on biochemical characteristics, inhibitor profile, and substrate specificity, we have shown that LISPDE activity is not 26S proteasome, caspase or cathepsin-like activity, but is a trypsin-like serine protease activity. Using soybean trypsin inhibitor (SBTI)-sepharose affinity column, we have partially purified the LISPDE protein, which has an estimated molecular mass of 33 kDa and selectively degrades native Sp1 protein. We mapped the initial site for proteolytic cleavage of Sp1 by LISPDE to be located within the region between amino acids 181-328. We conclude that LPS causes Sp1 degradation by inducing a unique trypsin-like serine protease, LISPDE.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat prevents dephosphorylation of Sp1 by TCF-4 in astrocytes

Previous examination of the effect of TCF-4 on transcription of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) promoter in human astrocytic cells found that TCF-4 affects the HIV-1 promoter through the GC-rich domain (nt -80 to nt -68). Here, the physical interaction and a functional consequence of TCF4-Sp1 contact were characterized. It was shown that expression of TCF-4 in U-87 MG (human astrocytic) cells decreased basal and Sp1-mediated transcription of the HIV-1 promoter. Results from a GST pull-down assay, as well as combined immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis of protein extracts from U-87 MG cells, revealed an interaction of Sp1 with TCF-4. Using in vitro protein chromatography, the region of Sp1 that contacts TCF-4 was mapped to aa 266-350. It was also found that, in cell-free extracts, TCF-4 prevented dsDNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK)-mediated Sp1 phosphorylation. Surprisingly, TCF-4 failed to decrease Sp1-mediated transcription of the HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR) and Sp1 phosphorylation in cells expressing HIV-1 Tat. Results from immunoprecipitation/Western blotting demonstrated that TCF-4 lost its ability to interact with Sp1, but not with Tat, in Tat-transfected cells. Taken together, these findings suggest that activity at the HIV-1 promoter is influenced by phosphorylation of Sp1, which is affected by Tat and DNA-PK. Interactions among TCF-4, Sp1 and/or Tat may determine the level of viral gene transcription in human astrocytic cells.

Transcription factor specificity protein 1 (Sp1) is the main regulator of nerve growth factor-induced sphingosine kinase 1 gene expression of the rat pheochromocytoma cell line, PC12

Sphingosine kinase (SPHK) is known to exert an anti-apoptic role in various cells and cell lines. We previously reported that human brain is rich in SPHK1 (Murate et al. 2001). After showing a high expression of SPHK1 in rat brain, we examined the gene expression mechanism using nerve growth factor (NGF)-stimulated rat PC12 cells. With RT-PCR, we found that both rat brain and PC12 utilized exon 1d mostly out of eight untranslated first exons. NGF induced an increase in SPHK enzyme activity and protein about double those in PC12 cells, and NGF-induced SPHK1 mRNA was three times higher than in the control. The minimal 5' promoter was determined, and TrkA specific inhibitor K252a inhibited the NGF-induced promoter activity of SPHK1. The truncation or mutation of putative transcription factor-binding motifs revealed that one specificity protein 1 (Sp1) binding motif of the 5' region of exon 1d is prerequisite. Electrophoresis mobility shift assay confirmed the promoter analysis, indicating increased Sp1 protein binding to this motif after NGF treatment. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay also showed the binding of Sp1 and the promoter region in vivo. These results suggest the signal transduction pathway from NGF receptor TrkA to transcription factor Sp1 protein binding to the promoter Sp1-like motif in NGF-induced rat SPHK1 gene expression.

Regulation of the cyclin D1 and cyclin A1 promoters by B-Myb is mediated by Sp1 binding sites

B-Myb is a highly conserved member of the Myb family of transcription factors which plays an important role during the cell cycle. Previous work has shown that B-Myb is phosphorylated at several sites by cyclin A/Cdk2 in the early S-phase. These phosphorylations increase the transactivation potential of B-Myb by counteracting the repressive function of an inhibitory domain located at the carboxyl-terminus of B-Myb. As yet, only a few genes have been identified as B-Myb target genes. Previous work has suggested that the cyclin D1 gene might be regulated by B-Myb. Here, we have studied the effect of B-Myb on the promoter of the cyclin D1 gene. We show that B-Myb is a potent activator of the cyclin D1 promoter and that this activation is not mediated by Myb binding sites but rather by a group of Sp1 binding sites which have previously been shown to be crucial for cyclin D1 promoter activity. Our data show that the C-terminal domain of B-Myb is required for the activation of the cyclin D1 promoter and that this part of B-Myb interacts with Sp1. Finally, we have found that the promoter of the cyclin A1 gene is also activated by B-Myb by a Sp1 binding site-dependent mechanism. The effect of B-Myb on the promoters of the cyclin A1 and D1 genes is reminiscent of the mechanism that has been proposed for the autoregulation of the B-myb promoter by B-Myb, which also involves Sp1 binding sites. Taken together, our identification of two novel B-Myb responsive promoters whose activation by B-Myb does not involve Myb binding sites extends previous evidence for the existence of a distinct mechanism of transactivation by B-Myb which is dependent on Sp1 binding sites. The observation that this mechanism is not subject to the inhibitory effect of the C-terminal domain of B-Myb but rather requires this domain supports the notion that the Sp1 site-dependent mechanism is already active in the G1-phase prior to the phosphorylation of B-Myb by cyclin A/Cdk2.

Transcriptional Activity of Sp1 Is Regulated by Molecular Interactions between the Zinc Finger DNA Binding Domain and the Inhibitory Domain with Corepressors, and This Interaction Is Modulated by MEK

Sp1 activates the transcription of many cellular and viral genes with the GC-box in either the proximal promoter or the enhancer. Sp1 is composed of several functional domains, such as the inhibitory domain (ID), two serine/threonine-rich domains, two glutamine-rich domains, three C2H2-type zinc finger DNA binding domains (ZFDBD), and a C-terminal D domain. The ZDDBD is the most highly conserved domain among the Sp-family transcription factors and plays a critical role in GC-box recognition. In this study, we investigated the protein-protein interactions occurring at the Sp1ZFDBD and the Sp1ID, and the molecular mechanisms controlling the interaction. Our results found that Sp1ZFDBD and Sp1ID repressed transcription once they were targeted to the proximal promoter of the pGal4 UAS reporter fusion gene system, suggesting molecular interaction with the repressor molecules. Indeed, mammalian two-hybrid assays, GST fusion protein pull-down assays, and co-immunoprecipitation assays showed that Sp1ZFDBD and Sp1ID are able to interact with corepressor proteins such as SMRT, NcoR, and BCoR. The molecular interactions appear to be regulated by MAP kinase/Erk kinase kinase (MEK). The molecular interactions between Sp1ID and the corepressor might explain the role of Sp1 as a repressor under certain circumstances. The siRNA-induced degradation of the corepressors resulted in an up-regulation of Sp1-dependent transcription. The cellular context of the corepressors and the regulation of molecular interaction between corepressors and Sp1ZFDBD or Sp1ID might be important in controlling Sp1 activity.

Dynamic Transcriptional Regulatory Complexes, Including E2F4, p107, p130, and Sp1, Control Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 Gene Expression during Myogenesis

Developmentally controlled transcriptional regulation of myogenic cell proliferation and differentiation via expression of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) gene is positively regulated by Sp1 and negatively regulated by E2F4-based transcriptional complexes. We report that p107 and p130 formed transcriptional complexes with E2F4 on the FGFR1 promoter and repressed FGFR1 gene transcription in myogenic cells. However, in Drosophila melanogaster SL2 cells, only p107 was able to repress Sp1-mediated transactivation of the FGFR1 promoter. Gel shift assays using transfected myoblast nuclear extracts showed that ectopic p107 reduced Sp1 occupancy of the proximal Sp binding site of the FGFR1 promoter, and coimmunoprecipitation studies indicated that Sp1 interacts with p107 but not with p130. Gel shift assays also demonstrated that Sp1 interacted with p107 in E2F4-p107 transcriptional complexes in myoblasts. The nature of the repressor transcriptional complex was altered in differentiated muscle fibers by the relative loss of the E2F4-p107-Sp1 transcription complex and replacement by the repressor E2F4-p130 complex. These findings demonstrate that activation and repression of FGFR1 gene transcription is governed by interplay between Sp1, p107, p130, and E2F4 in distinct transcriptional complexes during skeletal muscle development.

Latency-associated nuclear antigen of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus up-regulates transcription of human telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter through interaction with transcription factor Sp1

Telomerase is required for the maintenance of telomere length and is an important determinant for cell immortalization. In human cells, telomerase activity is due to the expression of its enzymatic subunit, human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). The expression of hTERT is not typically detectable in healthy somatic human cells but is present in cancerous tissues and immortalized cells. We have previously shown that hTERT promoter activity is up-regulated by the Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV)-encoded latency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA). LANA is expressed in all forms of human malignancies associated with KSHV. The hTERT promoter sequence located at positions -130 to +5 contains several Sp1 binding motifs and was shown be important for up-regulation by LANA. In this report, we demonstrate that hTERT promoter activity is due to the direct interaction of LANA with Sp1. The interaction of LANA with Sp1 was demonstrated through in vitro binding experiments and coimmunoprecipitation and is supported by the colocalization of these two molecules in the nuclei of KSHV-infected cells. Moreover, LANA modulates Sp1-mediated transcription in transient GAL4 fusion reporter assays. Mapping of the regions involved in binding and transcriptional activation showed that the amino terminus of LANA is the major site for interaction and up-regulation but that it can cooperate with the carboxy terminus to enhance these functions. An analysis of Sp1 binding to its cognate sequence corroborated the binding data. Together, our results suggest that the interaction of LANA with Sp1 up-regulates the telomerase promoter, potentially contributing to the immortalization of KSHV-infected cells.

The SANT Domain of Human MI-ER1 Interacts with Sp1 to Interfere with GC Box Recognition and Repress Transcription from Its Own Promoter

To gain insight into the regulation of hmi-er1 expression, we cloned a human genomic DNA fragment containing one of the two hmi-er1 promoters and consisting of 1460 bp upstream of the translation initiation codon of hMI-ER1. Computer-assisted sequence analysis revealed that the hmi-er1 promoter region contains a CpG island but lacks an identifiable TATA element, initiator sequence and downstream promoter element. This genomic DNA was able to direct transcription of a luciferase reporter gene in a variety of human cell lines, and the minimal promoter was shown to be located within-68/+144 bp. Several putative Sp1 binding sites were identified, and we show that Sp1 can bind to the hmi-er1 minimal promoter and increase transcription, suggesting that the level of hmi-er1 expression may depend on the availability of Sp1 protein. Functional analysis revealed that hMI-ER1 represses Sp1-activated transcription from the minimal promoter by a histone deacetylase-independent mechanism. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis demonstrated that both Sp1 and hMI-ER1 are associated with the chromatin of the hmi-er1 promoter and that overexpression of hMI-ER1 in cell lines that allow Tet-On-inducible expression resulted in loss of detectable Sp1 from the endogenous hmi-er1 promoter. The mechanism by which this occurs does not involve binding of hMI-ER1 to cis-acting elements. Instead, we show that hMI-ER1 physically associates with Sp1 and that endogenous complexes containing the two proteins could be detected in vivo. Furthermore, hMI-ER1 specifically interferes with binding of Sp1 to the hmi-er1 minimal promoter as well as to an Sp1 consensus oligonucleotide. Deletion analysis revealed that this interaction occurs through a region containing the SANT domain of hMI-ER1. Together, these data reveal a functional role for the SANT domain in the action of co-repressor regulatory factors and suggest that the association of hMI-ER1 with Sp1 represents a novel mechanism for the negative regulation of Sp1 target promoters.

The papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein is ubiquitinated by UbcH7 and Cullin 1- and Skp2-containing E3 ligase

Recurrent infections with high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are associated with human cervical cancers. All HPV-associated cancer tissues express the viral oncoproteins E6 and E7, which stimulate cell growth. The expression of E7 is crucial for both the initiation and the maintenance of HPV-associated cancer. Recent studies showed that the level of E7 in cancer cells is regulated by ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis through the 26S proteasome. In this study, we characterized the enzymes involved in the ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of E7. We show that UbcH7, an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, is specifically involved in the ubiquitination of E7. Furthermore, we show that E7 interacts with the SCF (Skp-Cullin-F box) ubiquitin ligase complex containing Cullin 1 (Cul1) and Skp2 and can be ubiquitinated by the Cul1-containing ubiquitin ligase in vitro. Coimmunoprecipitation analyses revealed that E7 interacts with Skp2 and Cul1 in vivo. Finally, the half-life of E7 was found to be significantly longer in Skp2(-/-) mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) than in wild-type MEFs. Taken together, these results suggest that the Cul1- and Skp2-containing ubiquitin ligase plays a role in the ubiquitination and proteolysis of E7. In HPV type 16-containing cervical carcinoma cell line Caski, E7 localizes to both the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Brief treatment of Caski cells with MG132 (a proteasome inhibitor) causes the accumulation of E7 in discrete nuclear bodies. These nuclear bodies are detergent insoluble and contain polyubiquitinated E7. We suggest that E7 relocates to specific nuclear bodies for proteolysis in HPV-containing epithelial cells.

Interaction between the varicella zoster virus IE62 major transactivator and cellular transcription factor Sp1

The varicella zoster virus (VZV) IE62 protein is involved in the activation of expression of all three kinetic classes of VZV proteins. Analysis of the viral promoter for VZV glycoprotein I has shown that the cellular factor Sp1 is involved in or required for the observed IE62 mediated activation. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments show that the two proteins are present in a complex in VZV-infected cells. Protein affinity pull-down assays using recombinant proteins showed that IE62 and Sp1 interact in the absence of any other viral and cellular proteins. Mapping studies using GST-fusion proteins containing truncations of IE62 and Sp1 have delimited the interacting regions to amino acids 612-778 in Sp1 and amino acids 226-299 in IE62. The region identified in Sp1 is involved in DNA-binding, synergistic Sp1 activation, and Sp1 interaction with cellular transcription factors. The interacting region identified in IE62 overlaps with or borders on sites involved in interactions with the VZV IE4 protein and the cellular factors TBP and TFIIB. Assays using wild-type and mutant promoter elements indicate that Sp1 is involved in recruitment of IE62 to the gI promoter and IE62 enhances Sp1 and TBP binding.

Stability of the Sp3-DNA complex is promoter-specific: Sp3 efficiently competes with Sp1 for binding to promoters containing multiple Sp-sites

The transcription regulatory protein Sp3 shares more than 90% sequence homology with Sp1 in the DNA-binding domain and they bind to the same cognate DNA-element. However, the transcriptional activities of these two Sp-family factors are not equivalent. While Sp1 functions strictly as a transcriptional activator, Sp3 has been shown to be transcriptionally inactive for promoters containing multiple Sp-binding sites. In the present study, we show that the DNA-binding property of Sp3 is promoter dependent and is different from Sp1. The 116 kDa Sp3 polypeptide binds as a monomer to a single Sp-binding site but readily forms slower migrating complexes with adjacent Sp-binding sites. The slower migrating Sp3-DNA complexes are significantly more stable than monomeric Sp3-DNA complexes or multimeric Sp1-DNA complexes. As a consequence, Sp3 can efficiently compete with Sp1 for binding to regions containing multiple Sp sites. The transcription regulatory function of Sp3 is also significantly different from Sp1. Unlike Sp1, Sp3 does not synergistically activate transcription of promoters containing multiple Sp-binding sites. Therefore, although Sp3 is a transcription activator, Sp3 reduces Sp1-dependent transcription of promoters containing adjacent Sp-binding sites by competing with Sp1 for promoter occupancy and thereby blocking the synergistic transactivation function of Sp1. Taken together, this study provides a possible mechanism of the promoter-specific transcription repression function of Sp3.

Regulation of human CETP gene expression: role of SP1 and SP3 transcription factors at promoter sites -690, -629, and -37

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) is a key factor in plasma reverse cholesterol transport and is implicated in the pathophysiology of atherogenic dyslipidemia. Variations observed in plasma CETP mass and activity in both normolipidemic and dyslipidemic individuals may reflect differences in CETP gene expression. We evaluated the respective roles of the Sp1 and Sp3 transcription factors on the promoter activity of the human CETP gene at a new Sp1/Sp3 site identified at position -690, and at two previously described Sp1/Sp3 sites at positions -37 and -629. In transient transfection in HepG2 cells, site-directed mutagenesis using luciferase reporter constructs containing a promoter fragment from +32 to -745 indicated that the new -690 site acts as a repressive element in reducing CETP promoter activity (-22%; P < 0.05); equally, this site exerts an additive effect with the -629 site, inducing marked repression (-42%; P < 0.005). In contrast, in NCTC cells that display a 16-fold lower level of Sp3, the repressive effect at the -690 site was enhanced 2-fold (-45%; P < 0.05), whereas the -629 site exerted no effect. Cotransfection of Sp1 and/or Sp3 in SL2 insect cells lacking endogenous Sp factors demonstrated that Sp1 and Sp3 act as activators at the -690 and -37 sites, whereas Sp3 acts as a repressor at the -629 site. Taken together, our data demonstrate that Sp1 and Sp3 regulate human CETP promoter activity through three Sp1/Sp3 binding sites in a distinct manner, and that the Sp1/Sp3 ratio is a key factor in determining the relative contribution of these sites to total promoter activity.

Modulation of Sp1-dependent transcription by a cis-acting E2F element in dhfr promoter

The dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) promoter contains cis-acting elements for Sp1 and E2F. Here we examined the cooperative regulation of dhfr gene transcription by Sp1 and E2F in human osteosarcoma cells, U2OS. Trichostatin A, an inhibitor of histone deacetylases, markedly stimulated dhfr promoter activity, a response that was enhanced by the deletion of an E2F element. In contrast, deletion of the dhfr Sp1 binding sites completely abolished promoter stimulation by trichostatin A. Cotransfection assays showed that activation of dhfr transcription by expression of E2F1/DP1 requires the reiterated Sp1 elements, whereas activation by Sp1 was enhanced by the deletion of the E2F element. Expression of HDAC1 with Sp1 suppressed promoter activity and suppression was not alleviated by coexpression of E2F1/DP1. These results suggest that HDAC1 acts through Sp1 to repress dhfr promoter activity, and that the E2F element modulates the activity of Sp1 at the dhfr promoter through a cis-acting mechanism.

mSharp-1/DEC2, a basic helix-loop-helix protein functions as a transcriptional repressor of E box activity and Stra13 expression

Transcription factors belonging to the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family play critical roles in the regulation of cellular differentiation of distinct cell types. In this study, we have characterized the DNA-binding and transcriptional properties of the bHLH factor mSharp-1/DEC2. mSharp-1 belongs to the Hairy/Enhancer of Split subfamily of bHLH factors and exhibits the highest structural and sequence identity with Stra13. We show that mSharp-1 specifically binds to the E box motif (CANNTG) as a homodimer and acts as a potent transcriptional repressor of MyoD- and E12-induced E box activity and differentiation. The inhibitory activity of mSharp-1 occurs through several mechanisms including occupancy of E box sites by mSharp-1 homodimers and by direct physical interaction with MyoD and E proteins. Furthermore, by using gel mobility shift assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, we have identified Stra13 as a target for mSharp-1-mediated repression. We demonstrate that transcriptional repression of Stra13 depends, in part, on binding of mSharp-1 to three conserved E box motifs in the Stra13 proximal promoter. Moreover, mSharp-1 directly interacts with the transcriptional activator Sp1 and impairs Sp1 induction of Stra13 promoter. Our results suggest that mSharp-1 functions as a transcriptional repressor by DNA binding dependent and independent mechanisms.

Interaction of Sp1 transcription factor with HIV-1 Tat protein: looking for cellular partners

The Tat protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) trans-activates HIV-1 transcription by functionally interacting with a number of cellular proteins, among which the Sp1 transcription factor. We recently demonstrated that Tat does not directly interact with Sp1 either in vitro or in vivo, and we suggested that other protein(s) could indirectly mediate Tat-Sp1 interaction. In keeping, here we showed that addition of HeLa cell nuclear extracts to purified Tat and Sp1 proteins allows the formation of a Tat/Sp1 complex in in vitro binding assays. In an attempt to identify the partner(s) that bridge Tat and Sp1, we developed a yeast multi-protein system, in which cellular proteins recently shown to play a relevant role in Tat function, namely TATA box-binding protein, cyclin T1, CDK9, and cyclin T1/CDK9 complex, were coexpressed, individually or in pair-wise combination, with Tat and Sp1 hybrids. We demonstrated that none of these candidate partners bridges Tat and Sp1. However, our yeast multi-protein system, which allows simple and rapid detection of interactions among up to four proteins, will be most helpful to further dissect the interaction of Tat and Sp1 with other candidate partners that participate in the assembly of transcriptionally active complexes at the HIV-1 LTR.

High glucose and insulin promote O-GlcNAc modification of proteins, including alpha-tubulin

Increased flux through the hexosamine biosynthesis pathway has been implicated in the development of glucose-induced insulin resistance and may promote the modification of certain proteins with O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc). L6 myotubes (a model of skeletal muscle) were incubated for 18 h in 5 or 25 mM glucose with or without 10 nM insulin. As assessed by immunoblotting with an O-GlcNAc-specific antibody, high glucose and/or insulin enhanced O-GlcNAcylation of numerous proteins, including the transcription factor Sp1, a known substrate for this modification. To identify novel proteins that may be O-GlcNAc modified in a glucose concentration/insulin-responsive manner, total cell membranes were separated by one- or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Selected O-GlcNAcylated proteins were identified by mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. MS sequencing of tryptic peptides identified member(s) of the heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) family and rat alpha-tubulin. Immunoprecipitation/immunoblot studies demonstrated several HSP70 isoforms and/or posttranslational modifications, some with selectively enhanced O-GlcNAcylation following exposure to high glucose plus insulin. In conclusion, in L6 myotubes, Sp1, membrane-associated HSP70, and alpha-tubulin are O-GlcNAcylated; the modification is markedly enhanced by sustained increased glucose flux.

Role for RFX transcription factors in non-neuronal cell-specific inactivation of the microtubule-associated protein MAP1A promoter

Microtubule-associated protein MAP1A is expressed abundantly in mature neurons and is necessary for maintenance of neuronal morphology and localization of some molecules in association with the microtubule-based cytoskeleton. Previous studies indicated that its complementary expression together with MAP1B during nervous system development is regulated at the transcriptional level and that the mouse Map1A gene is transcribed under the control of 5' and intronic promoters. In this study, we investigated the regulatory mechanisms that govern the neuronal cell-specific activation of the MAP1A 5' promoter. We found that two regulatory factor for X box (RFX) binding sites in exon1 of both the mouse and human genes are important for effective transcriptional repression observed only in non-neuronal cells by reporter assays. Among RFX transcription factor family members, RFX1 and 3 mainly interact with repressive elements in vitro. Cotransfection studies indicated that RFX1, which is expressed ubiquitously, down-regulated the MAP1A 5' promoter activity in non-neuronal cells. Unexpectedly, RFX3, which is abundantly expressed in neuronal cells, down-regulated the transactivity as well, when it was expressed in non-neuronal cells. Both RFX1 and 3 did not down-regulate the transactivity in neuronal cells. These results suggest that RFX1 and 3 are pivotal factors in down-regulation of the MAP1A 5' promoter in non-neuronal cells. The cell type-specific down-regulation, however, does not depend simply on which RFX interacts with the elements, but seems to depend on underlying profound mechanisms.

B-Myb overcomes a p107-mediated cell proliferation block by interacting with an N-terminal domain of p107

B-Myb is a cell-cycle regulated transcription factor which is implicated in cell proliferation and has an essential role in early embryonic development. In this study we examined the functions of B-Myb required to overcome G1 arrest in Saos-2 cells induced by the retinoblastoma-related p107 protein. Our results demonstrated that this activity was independent of B-Myb transactivation function, but correlated with its capacity to form an in vivo complex with p107. A large proportion of B-Myb formed complexes with p107 in cotransfected cells, however, B-Myb bound weakly to the related p130 protein and not at all to pRb. In contrast to the E2F transcription factors, which bind the p107 C-terminal pocket domain, B-Myb recognizes an N-terminal p107 region which overlaps the larger cyclin-binding domain. B-Myb and cyclin A2 formed mutually exclusive complexes with p107, and B-Myb enhanced the activity of co-transfected cyclin E kinase activity, implying that B-Myb affects the cell cycle by preventing sequestration of active cyclin/cdk2 complexes. This study defines a novel function of B-Myb and further suggests that the p107 N-terminus provides an interaction domain for transcription factors involved in cell cycle control.

Regulation of the activity of Sp1-related transcription factors

The initiation of transcription is accomplished via interactions of many different proteins with common and gene-specific regulatory motifs. Clearly, sequence-specific transcription factors play a crucial role in the specificity of transcription initiation. A group of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins, related to the transcription factor Sp1, has been implicated in the regulation of many different genes, since binding sites for these transcription factors (GC/GT boxes) are a recurrent motif in regulatory sequences such as promoters, enhancers and CpG islands of these genes. The simultaneous occurrence of several homologous GC/GT box-binding factors precludes a straightforward deduction of their role in transcriptional regulation. In this review, we focus on the connection between functional specificity and biochemical properties including glycosylation, phosphorylation and acetylation of Sp1-related factors.

RelA-associated inhibitor blocks transcription of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by inhibiting NF-kappaB and Sp1 actions

RelA-associated inhibitor (RAI) is an inhibitor of nuclear factor kappaB (NF-kappaB) newly identified by yeast two-hybrid screen as an interacting protein of the p65 (RelA) subunit. In this study, we attempted to examine the effect of RAI on transcription and replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We found that RAI inhibited gene expression from the HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR) even at the basal level. Upon in vitro DNA-binding reactions, RAI could directly block the DNA-binding of p65 subunit of NF-kappaB but not that of the p50 subunit or AP1. We found that RAI could also inhibit the DNA-binding of Sp1 and thus inhibit the basal HIV-1 promoter activity. We further examined the effects of RAI on Sp1 and found that RAI colocalizes with Sp1 in the nucleus and interacts with Sp1 in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, we found that RAI efficiently blocked the HIV-1 replication when cotransfected with a full-length HIV-1 clone. These findings indicate that RAI acts as an efficient inhibitor of HIV-1 gene expression in which both NF-kappaB and Sp1 play major roles.

Sp3 represses gene expression via the titration of promoter-specific transcription factors

We have determined previously that Sp3 encodes three distinct gene products as follows: a full-length protein (Sp3) that is an activator of transcription and two isoforms (M1 and M2) derived via internal translational initiation that function as transcriptional repressors. To identify amino acids and functions required for transcriptional repression, we employed PCR-directed mutagenesis to create a panel of mutated M2 proteins. Biochemical and functional analyses of these mutated proteins indicate that functions encoded by the M2 carboxyl terminus, such as DNA binding activity and the capacity to form multimeric complexes, are not required or sufficient for transcriptional repression. Instead, a 93-amino acid portion of the trans-activation domain was shown to be the minimal portion of M2 required to block Sp-dependent gene expression. Transcriptional analysis of three Sp-dependent promoters showed that mutations sustained by many M2 proteins result in promoter-specific effects. Regions of M2 required for physical interactions with five TATA box-associated factors (TAF(II)s) were mapped, and mutations that disrupt the interaction of M2 with two of these proteins, TAF(II)70 and TAF(II)40, were identified. We conclude that Sp3- mediated transcriptional repression is due, at least in part, to competition for promoter-specific transcription factors.

Sp1- and Sp3-mediated transcriptional regulation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene in chicken skeletal muscle cells

Expression of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) gene in skeletal muscle is positively regulated in proliferating myoblasts and declines during differentiation. We have characterized the cis-regulatory elements in the proximal region of the FGFR1 promoter which render positive transcriptional activity. Multiple elements between -69 and -14 activate the FGFR1 promoter. Myoblast transfections revealed that potential Sp transcription factor binding sites are required for promoter activity. Electromobility shift assays indicated that myoblast nuclear proteins specifically bind to these cis-elements and that differentiated myotube nuclear extracts do not form these same complexes. In addition, Southwestern blot analysis detected binding of the most proximal Sp motif to a Sp1-like protein present in myoblast nuclear extracts but not in myotubes. In corroboration, Sp1 and Sp3 proteins were detected only in myoblasts and not in differentiated myotubes. Finally, transfection of Drosophila SL2 cells showed that Sp1 is a positive regulator of FGFR1 promoter activity and that Sp3 is a coactivator via the proximal Sp binding sites. These studies demonstrate that the FGFR1 promoter is activated by Sp transcription factors in proliferating myoblasts and demonstrate at least part of the mechanism by which FGFR1 gene expression is down-regulated in differentiated muscle fibers.

Sp1 as G1 cell cycle phase specific transcription factor in epithelial cells

Sp1 binding sites have been identified in enhancer/promoter regions of several growth and cell cycle regulated genes, and it has been shown that Sp1 is increasingly phosphorylated in G1 phase of the cell cycle. Interactions of Sp1 with proteins involved in control of cell cycle and tumor formation have been reported. Here we show that expression of Sp1 protein predominates in the G1 phase of the cell cycle in epithelial cells. This is achieved by proteasome-dependent degradation. Inhibition of endogeneous Sp1 activity by a dominant-negative Sp1 mutant was associated with a cell cycle arrest in G1 phase, a strongly reduced expression of cyclin D1, the EGF-receptor and increased levels of p27Kip1. We have thus identified Sp1 as an important regulator of the cell cycle in G1 phase.

The retinoblastoma family: twins or distant cousins?

The destiny of a cell--whether it undergoes division, differentiation or death--results from an intricate balance of many regulators, including oncoproteins, tumor-suppressor proteins and cell-cycle-associated proteins. One of the better-studied tumor suppressors is the retinoblastoma protein, known as pRb or p105. Two recently identified proteins, pRb2/p130 and p107, show structural and functional similarities to pRb, and these proteins and their orthologs make up the retinoblastoma (Rb) family. Members of the family have been found in animals and plants, and a related protein is known in the alga Chlamydomonas. Members of the Rb family are bound and inactivated by viral proteins and, in turn, bind cellular transcription factors and repress their function, and can also form complexes with cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases and with histone deacetylases. They are found in the nucleus and their subnuclear localization depends on binding to the nuclear matrix. Members of the family form part of a signal-transduction pathway called the Rb pathway, which is important in cell-cycle regulation and have roles in growth suppression, differentiation and apoptosis in different organisms and cell types.

Involvement of nuclear transcription factor Sp1 in regulating glucose transporter-1 gene expression during rat trophoblast differentiation

Glucose transporter-1 (GLUT1) is important in placental glucose transport. However, the mechanism of regulation of placental GLUT1 expression remains to be elucidated. We show here that the level of GLUT1 protein in rat choriocarcinoma cells (Rcho-1) decreased during differentiation. To analyze the regulatory mechanism of rat GLUT1 (rGLUT1) gene expression, we transfected rGLUT1 promoter-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase constructs into Rcho-1 cells. Deletion analysis of the rGLUT1 promoter suggested that the region -76/-53 bp was essential for basal transcriptional activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3 bound two GC boxes in the region -99/-33 bp of the rGLUT1 promoter. Mutation analysis of the Sp1 binding sites revealed that the promoter-proximal site located between -76 and -53 bp was essential for basal rGLUT1 promoter activity. Furthermore, the decreased level of GLUT1 may result from a decreased level of Sp1 during differentiation. These findings suggest that Sp1 is involved in the regulation of rGLUT1 gene expression during rat trophoblast differentiation.

Sp1 acts as a repressor of the human adenine nucleotide translocase-2 (ANT2) promoter

The human adenine nucleotide translocator-2 promoter is activated by adjacent Sp1 activation elements centered at nucleotides -79 and -68 (Abox and Bbox, respectively), and is repressed by Sp1 bound to a GC element (Cbox) that lies adjacent to transcription start. Here, we address the mechanism of this unique Sp1-mediated repression using transfected Drosophila SL2 and mammalian cell lines. We show that repression is not due to steric interference with assembly of the transcription machinery, as Sp1 bound to the Cbox can, under certain conditions, activate the promoter. Furthermore, ectopic expression of Sp1 deletion mutants in SL2 cells demonstrates that both the Sp1-mediated repression and activation require the D transactivation domain of Sp1 bound to the Cbox. In addition, repression of ABbox-mediated activation is eliminated by separating the Abox and Bbox. Thus, for Cbox-bound Sp1 to repress, Sp1 must be precisely positioned at the region of the ABboxes. Together, these data suggest that the D transactivation domain mediates interactions by Sp1 complexes on separate GC elements that results in repression of the activating Sp1 species.

Promoter characterization of the human and mouse epilysin (MMP-28) genes

Epilysin (MMP-28) is a recently cloned member of the matrix metalloproteinase family (Lohi et al., J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 10134). It is expressed at highest levels in the skin by basal and suprabasal keratinocytes, and in testis by developing germ cells. To characterize the epilysin promoter, we isolated a 3.0 kb fragment of human genomic DNA containing 5'-flanking sequence of the epilysin gene, and a corresponding 660 bp fragment from the mouse. The 5'-flanking sequences contain no typical TATA-boxes or CCAAT sequences close to the translation initiation sites. RNase protection assay revealed that two transcription start sites are utilized in the human epilysin gene, situated 210 and 230 bp upstream from the translation start site. The promoter contains a GT-box, situated 300 bp upstream from the translation start site, with homology to the consensus binding site for transcription factors of the Sp family. This site is perfectly conserved between the human and mouse promoters. For reporter gene assays a series of constructs with fragments of increasing length of the epilysin promoter were coupled to the firefly luciferase gene. Reporter gene assays indicated that deletion or mutation of the GT-box dramatically reduces the transcriptional activity both in keratinocytes and in spermatogonia. Gel mobility shift assays showed that several nuclear proteins bind specifically to this sequence. Supershift assays with antibodies specific for members of the Sp family identified Sp1 and Sp3 as components of these protein/DNA complexes and hence as possible regulators of the epilysin gene. Our results indicate that the epilysin promoter has distinctive structural and functional features, which may control the unique expression and regulation patterns of the epilysin gene.

Sp1 and krüppel-like factor family of transcription factors in cell growth regulation and cancer

The Sp/KLF family contains at least twenty identified members which include Sp1-4 and numerous krüppel-like factors. Members of the family bind with varying affinities to sequences designated as 'Sp1 sites' (e.g., GC-boxes, CACCC-boxes, and basic transcription elements). Family members have different transcriptional properties and can modulate each other's activity by a variety of mechanisms. Since cells can express multiple family members, Sp/KLF factors are likely to make up a transcriptional network through which gene expression can be fine-tuned. 'Sp1 site'-dependent transcription can be growth-regulated, and the activity, expression, and/or post-translational modification of multiple family members is altered with cell growth. Furthermore, Sp/KLF factors are involved in many growth-related signal transduction pathways and their overexpression can have positive or negative effects on proliferation. In addition to growth control, Sp/KLF factors have been implicated in apoptosis and angiogenesis; thus, the family is involved in several aspects of tumorigenesis. Consistent with a role in cancer, Sp/KLF factors interact with oncogenes and tumor suppressors, they can be oncogenic themselves, and altered expression of family members has been detected in tumors. Effects of changes in Sp/KLF factors are context-dependent and can appear contradictory. Since these factors act within a network, this diversity of effects may arise from differences in the expression profile of family members in various cells. Thus, it is likely that the properties of the overall network of Sp/KLF factors play a determining role in regulation of cell growth and tumor progression.

Sodium butyrate induces transcription from the G alpha(i2) gene promoter through multiple Sp1 sites in the promoter and by activating the MEK-ERK signal transduction pathway

Sodium butyrate, an erythroid differentiation inducer and a histone deacetylase inhibitor, increases G alpha(i2) levels in differentiating K562 cells. Here we show that sodium butyrate induces G alpha(i2) gene transcription via sequences at -50/-36 and -92/-85 in the G alpha(i2) gene promoter. Both sequences contain core sequence motif for Sp1 binding; electrophoretic mobility shift as well as supershift assays confirmed binding to Sp1. Transcription from the G alpha(i2) gene promoter was also activated by two other histone deacetylase inhibitors, trichostatin A and Helminthsporium carbonium toxin (HC toxin), which also induce erythroblastic differentiation in K562 cells. However, hydroxyurea, a potent erythroid differentiation inducer in these cells, did not activate transcription from this gene promoter, indicating that promoter activation is inducer-specific. Mutations within the Sp1 sites at -50/-36 and -92/-85 in the G alpha(i2) gene promoter substantially decreased transcriptional activation by sodium butyrate, trichostatin A, or HC toxin. Transfection with constitutively activated ERKs indicated that this promoter can be activated through the MEK-ERK signal transduction pathway. Inhibition of the MEK-ERK pathway with U0126 or reduction in the expression of endogenous ERK with an antisense oligonucleotide to ERK significantly inhibited sodium butyrate- and HC toxin-induced transcription but had no effect on trichostatin A-induced transcription. Inhibition of the JNK and p38 MAPKs, using selective inhibitors, had no effect on sodium butyrate-induced transcription. In cells in which sodium butyrate induction of promoter activation had been inhibited by various concentrations of U0126, constitutively activated ERK2 reversed this inhibition. These results show that the MEK-ERK signal transduction pathway is important in butyrate signaling, which eventually converges in the cell nucleus.

E2F mediates induction of the Sp1-controlled promoter of the human DNA polymerase epsilon B-subunit gene POLE2

The B-subunits of replicative DNA polymerases from Archaea to humans belong to the same protein family, suggesting that they share a common fundamental function. We report here the gene structure for the B-subunit of human DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE2), whose expression and transcriptional regulation is typical for replication proteins with some unique features. The 75 bp core promoter region, located within exon 1, contains an Sp1 element that is a critical determinant of promoter activity as shown by the luciferase reporter, electrophoretic mobility shift and DNase I footprinting assays. Two overlapping E2F elements adjacent to the Sp1 element are essential for full promoter activity and serum response. Binding sites for E2F1 and NF-1 reside immediately downstream from the core promoter region. Our results suggest that human POLE2 is regulated by two E2F-pocket protein complexes, one associated with Sp1 and the other with NF-1. So far, only one replicative DNA polymerase B-subunit gene promoter, POLA2 encoding the B-subunit of DNA polymerase alpha, has been characterized. Mitogenic activation of the POLE2 promoter by an E2F-mediated mechanism resembles that of POLA2, but the regulation of basal promoter activity is different between these two genes.

Cloning and characterization of the 5'-flanking region of the human transcription factor Sp1 gene

The 5'-flanking region of the human Sp1 gene was cloned and characterized. Sequence analysis of this region showed the absence of both CAAT and TATA boxes and an initiator element. The proximal promoter of the Sp1 gene is a GC-rich region that contains multiple GC boxes and Ap2 binding sites. The major transcription start site is located 63 base pairs upstream of the translation start site. Transfection experiments demonstrate that all the elements necessary to achieve significant basal transcription activity are located between positions -443 and -20 relative to the translational start. Sp1 and Sp3 proteins bind to the downstream GC box located in the proximal promoter of Sp1. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the Sp1 protein activates Sp1 transcription activity; thus the Sp1 gene is autoregulated.

Negative regulatory role of Sp1 in metal responsive element-mediated transcriptional activation

Transcription of mammalian metallothionein (MT) genes is activated by heavy metals via multiple copies of a cis-acting DNA element, the metal-responsive element (MRE). Our previous studies have shown that certain MREs of the human MT-IIA gene (MREb, MREc, MREd, and MREf) are less active than the others (MREa, MREe, and MREg). Gel shift analysis of HeLa cell nuclear proteins revealed that whereas the active MREs strongly bind the transcription factor MTF-1 essential for metal regulation, the less active MREs bind another distinct protein, MREb-BF. This protein recognizes the GC-rich region of MREb rather than the MRE core required for MTF-1 binding. All the MREs recognized by MREb-BF contain the CGCCC and/or CACCC motif, suggesting that the MREb-BF.MRE complex contains Sp1 or related proteins. Supershift analysis using antibodies against Sp1 family proteins as well as gel shift analysis using the recombinant Sp1 demonstrated that Sp1 represents the majority of MREb-BF activity. An MREb mutant with reduced affinity to Sp1 mediated zinc-inducible transcription much more actively than the wild-type MREb. Furthermore, when placed in the native promoter, this mutant MREb raised the overall promoter activity. These results strongly suggest that Sp1 acts as a negative regulator of transcription mediated by specific MREs.

p107 and p130: versatile proteins with interesting pockets

p107 and p130 were originally identified as targets of the transforming domains of viral oncoproteins encoded by small DNA tumor viruses. Together with pRB, the protein product of the retinoblastoma gene (Rb), p107 and p130 represent a family of closely related proteins that play critical roles in the regulation of cell proliferation. p107, p130, and pRB are transcriptional regulators whose activities are coupled to the cell cycle. Each of these proteins associates with E2F and is directly regulated by phosphorylation by cyclin-dependent kinases. In vivo studies of p107 and p130 function have revealed that their roles overlap extensively with one another and with pRB. In addition, the analysis of mice (and cell lines derived from these animals) deficient in these proteins shows that the individual members of this family harbor distinct functions that, at present, are poorly understood. The characterization of tumor cells continues to emphasize the important and somewhat unique role of pRB in tumor suppression, and the evidence linking the specific inactivation of p107 or p130 to tumor development remains quite limited. In this review we summarize the biochemical and functional properties of p107 and p130, and we compare and contrast these properties to those of pRB.

Cooperation of E2F-p130 and Sp1-pRb complexes in repression of the Chinese hamster dhfr gene

In mammalian cells reiterated binding sites for Sp1 and two overlapping and inverted E2F sites at the transcription start site regulate the dhfr promoter during the cell growth cycle. Here we have examined the contributions of the dhfr Sp1 and E2F sites in the repression of dhfr gene expression. In serum-starved cells or during serum stimulation, the Chinese hamster dhfr gene was not derepressed by trichostatin A (TSA), an inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDAC). Immunoprecipitation experiments showed that HDAC1 and hypophosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (pRb) are associated with Sp1 in serum-starved CHOC400 cells. In transfection experiments, reporter plasmids containing the reiterated dhfr Sp1 sites were stimulated 10-fold by TSA, while a promoter containing four dhfr E2F sites and a TATA box was responsive to E2F but was completely unaffected by TSA. HDAC1 did not coprecipitate with p130-E2F DNA binding complexes, the predominant E2F binding activity in cell extracts after serum starvation, suggesting that p130 imposes a TSA-insensitive state on the dhfr promoter. In support of this notion, recruitment of GAL4-p130 to a dihydrofolate reductase-GAL4 reporter rendered the promoter insensitive to TSA, while repression by GAL4-pRb was sensitive to TSA. Upon phosphorylation of pRb and p130 after serum stimulation, the Sp1-pRb and p130-E2F interactions were lost while the Sp1-HDAC1 interaction persisted into S phase. Together these studies suggest a dynamic model for the cooperation of pRb and p130 in repression of dhfr gene expression during withdrawal from the cell cycle. We propose that, during initial phases of cell cycle withdrawal, the binding of dephosphorylated pRb to Sp1-HDAC1 complexes and complexes of E2F-1 -to -3 with DP results in transient, HDAC-dependent suppression of dhfr transcription. Upon withdrawal of cells into G(0), recruitment of p130 to E2F-4-DP-1 complexes at the transcription start site results in a TSA-insensitive complex that cooperates with Sp1-HDAC-pRb complexes to stably repress dhfr promoter activity in quiescent cells.

Integration of the pRB and p53 cell cycle control pathways

Two fundamental molecular pathways, the pRB and p53 pathways, regulate cell growth and cell death. The importance of these pathways in cellular growth control is underscored by the observation that members of these pathways are found mutated in all human cancers. These two pathways have typically been studied and described independently. However, as we discuss here, recent data have revealed an intimate molecular and genetic interaction between the p53 and pRB pathways.

Hyperglycemia-induced mitochondrial superoxide overproduction activates the hexosamine pathway and induces plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression by increasing Sp1 glycosylation

The hexosamine pathway has been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. We determined first that hyperglycemia induced a decrease in glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in bovine aortic endothelial cells via increased production of mitochondrial superoxide and a concomitant 2.4-fold increase in hexosamine pathway activity. Both decreased glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity and increased hexosamine pathway activity were prevented completely by an inhibitor of electron transport complex II (thenoyltrifluoroacetone), an uncoupler of oxidative phosphorylation (carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone), a superoxide dismutase mimetic [manganese (III) tetrakis(4-benzoic acid) porphyrin], overexpression of either uncoupling protein 1 or manganese superoxide dismutase, and azaserine, an inhibitor of the rate-limiting enzyme in the hexosamine pathway (glutamine:fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase). Immunoprecipitation of Sp1 followed by Western blotting with antibodies to O-linked GlcNAc, phosphoserine, and phosphothreonine showed that hyperglycemia increased GlcNAc by 1.7-fold, decreased phosphoserine by 80%, and decreased phosphothreonine by 70%. The same inhibitors prevented all these changes. Hyperglycemia increased expression from a transforming growth factor-beta(1) promoter luciferase reporter by 2-fold and increased expression from a (-740 to +44) plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promoter luciferase reporter gene by nearly 3-fold. Inhibition of mitochondrial superoxide production or the glucosamine pathway prevented all these changes. Hyperglycemia increased expression from an 85-bp truncated plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) promoter luciferase reporter containing two Sp1 sites in a similar fashion (3.8-fold). In contrast, hyperglycemia had no effect when the two Sp1 sites were mutated. Thus, hyperglycemia-induced mitochondrial superoxide overproduction increases hexosamine synthesis and O-glycosylation of Sp1, which activates expression of genes that contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic complications.

pRB and p107 have distinct effects when expressed in pRB-deficient tumor cells at physiologically relevant levels

A key difference among the three structurally similar pRB family members is that only pRB is a tumor suppressor. Identification of distinctive functional differences between pRB and p107/p130 therefore holds promise for a better understanding of the tumor suppression mechanisms of pRB. Enigmatically, pRB and p107 have been shown to have indistinguishable growth suppression activities when studied in the pRB-deficient Saos-2 cell system. In this study, we discovered that, when expressed at physiologically relevant levels, pRB and p107 had distinctive effects in causing growth suppression. pRB induced cellular p130 levels while p107 repressed them. p107, but not pRB, blocked cells inside S phase in addition to G1 arrest. In contrast, no qualitative differences were identified in their abilities to repress the expression of a set of suspected pRB/E2F repression target genes. These results indicate that pRB and p107 possess different growth suppression effects, despite the fact that they have similar E2F repression effects.

Target gene specificity of E2F and pocket protein family members in living cells

E2F-mediated transcription is thought to involve binding of an E2F-pocket protein complex to promoters in the G(0) phase of the cell cycle and release of the pocket protein in late G(1), followed by release of E2F in S phase. We have tested this model by monitoring protein-DNA interactions in living cells using a formaldehyde cross-linking and immunoprecipitation assay. We find that E2F target genes are bound by distinct E2F-pocket protein complexes which change as cells progress through the cell cycle. We also find that certain E2F target gene promoters are bound by pocket proteins when such promoters are transcriptionally active. Our data indicate that the current model applies only to certain E2F target genes and suggest that Rb family members may regulate transcription in both G(0) and S phases. Finally, we find that a given promoter can be bound by one of several different E2F-pocket protein complexes at a given time in the cell cycle, suggesting that cell cycle-regulated transcription is a stochastic, not a predetermined, process.

A set of proteins interacting with transcription factor Sp1 identified in a two-hybrid screening

The two-hybrid system was used to isolate cDNA clones encoding polypeptides that interact with the N-terminal region (activation domains A, B and C) of the Sp1 transcription factor. Among the 65 collected clones, 43 contained cDNA fragments with open reading frames. They corresponded to 13 genes encoding proteins of known function and to 15 genes, the proteins of which have no known function. Six overlapping cDNA clones corresponded to the Hsc70 protein. Host cell factor (HCF-1) and the KIAA0461 gene (encoding a putative Zn-finger protein of unknown function) were both identified through the isolation of three overlapping cDNA clones. Two cDNA fragments encoding the same region of the SREBP-2 transcription factor were independently selected and two overlapping cDNA clones corresponded to the splicing factor SF3A120. Two different cDNA clones encoded the N- and C-terminal region of the Oct-1 transcription factor. Transcription factors Elf-1 and TIEG, as well as HSph2, the putative human homologue of a murine polyhomeotic gene, were each represented by a single clone. Noticeably, for the four identified transcription factors, the DNA-binding domain was excluded from the selected polypeptides. In vitro binding of the selected polypeptides to the Sp1 protein was demonstrated for the four transcription factors and for the SF3A120, Hsc70, HCF-1, HSph2 and pKIAA0461(245) proteins. Four other cDNA clones encoding polypeptides of unknown function were tested in the in vitro binding assay. All four polypeptides were found to interact with Sp1 in this assay.

The Sp-family of transcription factors

GC-boxes and related motifs are frequently occurring DNA-elements present in many promoters and enhancers. In contrast to other elements it was generally thought that the transcription factor Sp1 is the only factor acting through these motifs. The cloning of paralogous genes of the Sp1 factor uncovered the existence of a small protein family consisting of Sp1, Sp2, Sp3 and Sp4. All four proteins exhibit very similar structural features. They contain a highly conserved DNA-binding domain composed of three zinc fingers close the C-terminus and serine/threonine- and glutamine-rich domains in their N-terminal regions. The high degree of structural conservation between these four proteins suggested that they do exert similar functions. Molecular, genetic and biochemical analyses, however, demonstrated that Sp2, Sp3 and Sp4 are not simply functional equivalents of Sp1. Here, I will summarize and discuss recent advances which have been made towards understanding the mode of action and biological function of individual family members.

A tale of three fingers: the family of mammalian Sp/XKLF transcription factors

One of the most common regulatory elements is the GC box and the related GT/CACC box, which are widely distributed in promoters, enhancers and locus control regions of housekeeping as well as tissue-specific genes. For long it was generally thought that Sp1 is the major factor acting through these motifs. Recent discoveries have shown that Sp1 is only one of many transcription factors binding and acting through these elements. Sp1 simply represents the first identified and cloned protein of a family of transcription factors characterised by a highly conserved DNA-binding domain consisting of three zinc fingers. Currently this new family of transcription factors has at least 16 different mammalian members. Here, we will summarise and discuss recent advances that have been directed towards understanding the biological role of these proteins.

Molecular interaction map of the mammalian cell cycle control and DNA repair systems

Eventually to understand the integrated function of the cell cycle regulatory network, we must organize the known interactions in the form of a diagram, map, and/or database. A diagram convention was designed capable of unambiguous representation of networks containing multiprotein complexes, protein modifications, and enzymes that are substrates of other enzymes. To facilitate linkage to a database, each molecular species is symbolically represented only once in each diagram. Molecular species can be located on the map by means of indexed grid coordinates. Each interaction is referenced to an annotation list where pertinent information and references can be found. Parts of the network are grouped into functional subsystems. The map shows how multiprotein complexes could assemble and function at gene promoter sites and at sites of DNA damage. It also portrays the richness of connections between the p53-Mdm2 subsystem and other parts of the network.