Measurement of anti-DNA antibodies: a reappraisal using five different methods

Undifferentiated connective tissue disease: the diagnoses critically revised-experience of a single center

Although anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) are considered the main entry criteria for a diagnosis of undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), many patients show different rate of ANA positivity and questionable diagnoses. Aim of the study was to revise the UCTD diagnoses and analyse the main predictors of evolution in a monocentric cohort. We retrospectively revised the diagnoses of 331 ANA positive patients, with at least one year of follow-up, classified as UCTD from 2009 and 2017. The diagnosis of UCTD was confirmed in 180 cases (54.4%). The evolution occurred in 18% of cases, after a follow-up of 6.9 (SD: 4.4) years. Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) (OR: 2.39), puffy hands (OR: 6.3), anti-ENA (OR: 2.34), anti-Topoisomerase I antibodies (OR: 4.93), rheumatoid factor (RF) (OR: 2.86) were associated with evolution. Evolution in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) occurred in 5 patients (2.78%) and associated with the addition of new autoantibodies, compared with other evolutions (p: 0.034; OR: 12; 95CI: 1.4-103.4). Evolution in Systemic Sclerosis and pSS was found in 14 (7.8%) and 8 cases (4.4%), respectively. Puffy hands and RF positivity as the predictors of SSc and pSS evolution, respectively. A confirmed diagnosis of UCTD, according with the available criteria, was assessed in about a half patients. The occurrence of puffy hands since the onset defines a patient with a potential evolution into SSc, while the addition of new specific autoantibodies represents a typical "fingerprint" of patients developing SLE. Trial registration: Studio ANACTD np 1318.

Anti-C1q antibodies: a biomarker for diagnosis and management of lupus nephritis. A narrative review

Nephritis is a frequent and severe complication of Systemic Lupus Erythematous (SLE). The clinical course of lupus nephritis (LN) is usually characterized by alternating phases of remission and exacerbation. Flares of LN can lead to deterioration of kidney function, necessitating timely diagnosis and therapy. The presence of autoantibodies against C1q (anti-C1qAb) in the sera of SLE patients has been reported in various studies. Some research suggests that the presence and changes in the titer of anti-C1qAb may be associated with the development of LN, as well as with LN activity and renal flares. However, the exact role of anti-C1qAb in LN remains a subject of debate. Despite variability in the results of published studies, anti-C1qAb hold promise as noninvasive markers for assessing LN activity in SLE patients. Measuring anti-C1qAb levels could aid in diagnosing and managing LN during periods of both inactive disease and renal flares. Nevertheless, larger controlled trials with standardized laboratory assays are necessary to further establish the utility of anti-C1qAb in predicting the reactivation and remission of LN and guiding treatment strategies.

Multiple tolerance checkpoints restrain affinity maturation of B cells expressing the germline precursor of a lupus patient-derived anti-dsDNA antibody in knock-in mice

Anti-dsDNA antibodies are a hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus and are highly associated with its exacerbation. Cumulative evidence has suggested that somatic hypermutation contributes to the high-affinity reactivity of anti-dsDNA antibodies. Our previous study demonstrated that these antibodies are generated from germline precursors with low-affinity ssDNA reactivity through affinity maturation and clonal expansion in patients with acute lupus. This raised the question of whether such precursors could be subject to immune tolerance. To address this, we generated a site-directed knock-in (KI) mouse line, G9gl, which carries germline-reverted sequences of the VH-DH-JH and Vκ-Jκ regions of patient-derived, high-affinity anti-dsDNA antibodies. G9gl heterozygous mice had a reduced number of peripheral B cells, only 27% of which expressed G9gl B cell receptor (BCR). The remaining B cells harbored non-KI allele-derived immunoglobulin heavy (IgH) chains or fusion products of upstream mouse VH and the KI gene, suggesting that receptor editing through VH replacement occurred in a large proportion of B cells in the KI mice. G9gl BCR-expressing B cells responded to ssDNA but not dsDNA, and exhibited several anergic phenotypes, including reduced surface BCR and shortened life span. Further, G9gl B cells were excluded from germinal centers (GCs) induced by several conditions. In particular, following immunization with methylated bovine serum albumin-conjugated bacterial DNA, G9gl B cells occurred at a high frequency in memory B cells but not GC B cells or plasmablasts. Collectively, multiple tolerance checkpoints prevented low-affinity precursors of pathogenic anti-dsDNA B cells from undergoing clonal expansion and affinity maturation in GCs.

An Update on Antibodies to Necleosome Components as Biomarkers of Sistemic Lupus Erythematosus and of Lupus Flares

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with variable clinical expression. It is a potentially devastating condition affecting mostly women and leading to clinically unpredictable outcomes. Remission and flares may, in fact, alternate over time and a mild involvement limited to few articular sites may be followed by severe and widespread organ damage. SLE is the prototype of any autoimmune condition and has, for this reason, attracted the interest of basic immunologists. Therapies have evolved over time and clinical prognosis has, in parallel, been improved. What clinicians still lack is the possibility to use biomarkers of the disease as predictors of outcome and, in this area, several studies are trying to find solutions. Circulating autoantibodies are clearly a milestone of clinical research and the concrete possibility is to integrate, in the future, classical markers of activation (like C3) with target organ autoantibodies. Anti-dsDNA antibodies represent a basic point in any predictive attempt in SLE and should be considered the benchmark for any innovative proposal in the wide field of target organ pathologies related to SLE. DNA is part of the nucleosome that is the basic unit of chromatin. It consists of DNA wrapped around a histone octamer made of 2 copies each of Histone 2A, 2B, 3, and 4. The nucleosome has a plastic organization that varies over time and has the potential to stimulate the formation of antibodies directed to the whole structure (anti-nucleosome) or its parts (anti-dsDNA and anti-Histones). Here, we present an updated review of the literature on antibodies directed to the nucleosome and the nucleosome constituents, i.e., DNA and Histones. Wetriedto merge the data first published more than twenty years ago with more recent results to create a balanced bridge between old dogma and more recent research that could serve as a stimulus to reconsider mechanisms for SLE. The formation of large networks would provide the chance of studying large cohorts of patients and confirm what already presented in small sample size during the last years.

TACI deletion protects against progressive murine lupus nephritis induced by BAFF overexpression

B cells are known to promote the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) via the production of pathogenic anti-nuclear antibodies. However, the signals required for autoreactive B cell activation and the immune mechanisms whereby B cells impact lupus nephritis pathology remain poorly understood. The B cell survival cytokine B cell activating factor of the TNF Family (BAFF) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of SLE and lupus nephritis in both animal models and human clinical studies. Although the BAFF receptor has been predicted to be the primary BAFF family receptor responsible for BAFF-driven humoral autoimmunity, in the current study we identify a critical role for signals downstream of Transmembrane Activator and CAML Interactor (TACI) in BAFF-dependent lupus nephritis. Whereas transgenic mice overexpressing BAFF develop progressive membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, albuminuria and renal dysfunction, TACI deletion in BAFF-transgenic mice provided long-term (about 1 year) protection from renal disease. Surprisingly, disease protection in this context was not explained by complete loss of glomerular immune complex deposits. Rather, TACI deletion specifically reduced endocapillary, but not mesangial, immune deposits. Notably, although excess BAFF promoted widespread breaks in B cell tolerance, BAFF-transgenic antibodies were enriched for RNA- relative to DNA-associated autoantigen reactivity. These RNA-associated autoantibody specificities were specifically reduced by TACI or Toll-like receptor 7 deletion. Thus, our study provides important insights into the autoantibody specificities driving proliferative lupus nephritis, and suggests that TACI inhibition may be novel and effective treatment strategy in lupus nephritis.

In the Absence of Central pre-B Cell Receptor Selection, Peripheral Selection Attempts to Optimize the Antibody Repertoire by Enriching for CDR-H3 Y101

Sequential developmental checkpoints are used to “optimize” the B cell antigen receptor repertoire by minimizing production of autoreactive or useless immunoglobulins and enriching for potentially protective antibodies. The first and apparently most impactful checkpoint requires μHC to form a functional pre-B cell receptor (preBCR) by associating with surrogate light chain, which is composed of VpreB and λ5. Absence of any of the preBCR components causes a block in B cell development that is characterized by severe immature B cell lymphopenia. Previously, we showed that preBCR controls the amino acid content of the third complementary determining region of the H chain (CDR-H3) by using a VpreB amino acid motif (RDR) to select for tyrosine at CDR-H3 position 101 (Y101). In antibodies bound to antigen, Y101 is commonly in direct contact with the antigen, thus preBCR selection impacts the antigen binding characteristics of the repertoire. In this work, we sought to determine the forces that shape the peripheral B cell repertoire when it is denied preBCR selection. Using bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and evaluation of apoptosis, we found that in the absence of preBCR there is increased turnover of B cells due to increased apoptosis. CDR-H3 sequencing revealed that this is accompanied by adjustments to D_H identity, D_H reading frame, J_H, and CDR-H3 amino acid content. These adjustments in the periphery led to wild-type levels of CDR-H3 Y101 content among transitional (T1), mature recirculating, and marginal zone B cells. However, peripheral selection proved incomplete, with failure to restore Y101 levels in follicular B cells and increased production of dsDNA-binding IgM antibodies.

Autoantibodies against complement components in systemic lupus erythematosus – role in the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations

Many complement structures and a number of additional factors, i.e. autoantibodies, receptors, hormones and cytokines, are implicated in the complex pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Genetic defects in the complement as well as functional deficiency due to antibodies against its components lead to different pathological conditions, usually clinically presented. Among them hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis, different types of glomerulonephritis as dense deposit disease, IgA nephropathy, atypical haemolytic uremic syndrome and lupus nephritis are very common. These antibodies cause conformational changes leading to pathological activation or inhibition of complement with organ damage and/or limited capacity of the immune system to clear immune complexes and apoptotic debris. Finally, we summarize the role of complement antibodies in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus and discuss the mechanism of some related clinical conditions such as infections, thyroiditis, thrombosis, acquired von Willebrand disease, etc.

Predictive value of autoantibodies for activity of systemic lupus erythematosus

There is no serologic test that reliably measures disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The ‘gold standard’ is the anti-dsDNA antibody test, which has been used as a marker of disease activity by clinicians in SLE for over 35 years. Anti-dsDNA antibodies perform best in those with lupus nephritis, specifically in the presence of a proliferative lesion [World Health Organization (WHO) class III or IV] on renal biopsy. In one recent meta-analysis, the mean positivelikelihood ratio of anti-dsDNA antibodies as a marker of disease activity in SLE was 4.14, implying the overall predictive effect was small. More recently autoantibodyassays have been developed that show greater promise in gauging SLE disease activity, specifically anti-nucleosome and anti-C1q antibodies (especially with renal disease activity). Other tests thought previously to be lacking in specificity that refinements in ELISA technology now render possibly useful include anti-heparan sulfate, anti-ssDNA and anti-Scl-70 autoantibodies. Other tests that as yet have not been shown to be as reliable (and therefore are not as useful in clinical practice for serial determinationto measure disease activity) include other anti-extractablenuclear antibodies (anti-Ro, La, Sm, RNP), anti-cardiolipinantibodies, and anti-nuclear cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA). New technologies using proteomic determinations show promise as aids in the search for more reliable and feasible autoantibody determinations of disease activity in SLE.

Detection of Antibodies to dsDNA: An Overview of Laboratory Assays

This brief review is focused on different methodologies available for detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies with respect to the best adequacy between biological results of laboratory and clinical significance. A large array of assays has been developed for the measurement of anti-dsDNA. New assays continually introduced have reflected not only technical innovations to avoid difficulties of some assays, but even more with hope to correlate better with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), particularly with its clinical course and exacerbations. Finally, with the development of micro arrays technology new insights into the pathophysiology of autoimmune disease processes should be revealed.

Detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies by computer-aided automated immunofluorescence analysis

INTRODUCTION

NOVA View is a computer aided fluorescence microscope that is used for the automated reading and interpretation of indirect immunofluorescent tests in diagnostic immunology. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the performance of the NOVA View® system for the measurement of anti-dsDNA antibodies using the Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) technology.

METHODS

Analytical performance of NOVA View CLIFT was assessed in repeatability (within run) and reproducibility (between runs and instruments) studies. Two hundred-fifty patient samples (N=200 consecutive samples and N=50 samples from systemic lupus erythematosus patients) were tested to evaluate the agreement between results generated with NOVA View CLIFT, and those obtained with manual microscopic reading of the same slides. Positivity rate in SLE was assessed on the 50 SLE samples.

RESULTS

The NOVA View system showed high level of repeatability and reproducibility within runs, between runs, and between instruments. Agreement of NOVA View software interpretation and digital image reading results with manual microscopic reading results was 96.0%, and the same positivity rate was obtained on SLE samples by NOVA View digital image reading as that of manual microscopic reading (36.0% vs. 38.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Results generated by NOVA View CLIFT were equivalent to those obtained by manual microscopic reading on a large routine sample set. NOVA View demonstrated consistency within and between runs, and between instruments. Automation of CLIFT provides reliability and is a suitable alternative for routine clinical laboratories.

Violation of an evolutionarily conserved immunoglobulin diversity gene sequence preference promotes production of dsDNA-specific IgG antibodies

Variability in the developing antibody repertoire is focused on the third complementarity determining region of the H chain (CDR-H3), which lies at the center of the antigen binding site where it often plays a decisive role in antigen binding. The power of VDJ recombination and N nucleotide addition has led to the common conception that the sequence of CDR-H3 is unrestricted in its variability and random in its composition. Under this view, the immune response is solely controlled by somatic positive and negative clonal selection mechanisms that act on individual B cells to promote production of protective antibodies and prevent the production of self-reactive antibodies. This concept of a repertoire of random antigen binding sites is inconsistent with the observation that diversity (D_H) gene segment sequence content by reading frame (RF) is evolutionarily conserved, creating biases in the prevalence and distribution of individual amino acids in CDR-H3. For example, arginine, which is often found in the CDR-H3 of dsDNA binding autoantibodies, is under-represented in the commonly used D_H RFs rearranged by deletion, but is a frequent component of rarely used inverted RF1 (iRF1), which is rearranged by inversion. To determine the effect of altering this germline bias in D_H gene segment sequence on autoantibody production, we generated mice that by genetic manipulation are forced to utilize an iRF1 sequence encoding two arginines. Over a one year period we collected serial serum samples from these unimmunized, specific pathogen-free mice and found that more than one-fifth of them contained elevated levels of dsDNA-binding IgG, but not IgM; whereas mice with a wild type D_H sequence did not. Thus, germline bias against the use of arginine enriched D_H sequence helps to reduce the likelihood of producing self-reactive antibodies.

Four Anti-dsDNA Antibody Assays in Relation to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Specificity and Activity

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of antibodies against dsDNA is an important diagnostic tool for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and changes in anti-dsDNA antibody levels are also used to assess disease activity. Herein, 4 assays were compared with regard to SLE specificity, sensitivity, and association with disease activity variables.

METHODS

Cross-sectional sera from 178 patients with SLE, of which 11 were followed consecutively, from a regional Swedish SLE register were analyzed for immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-dsDNA by bead-based multiplex assay (FIDIS; Theradig), fluoroenzyme-immunoassay (EliA; Phadia/Thermo Fisher Scientific), Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT; ImmunoConcepts), and line blot (EUROLINE; Euroimmun). All patients with SLE fulfilled the 1982 American College of Rheumatology and/or the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC-12) classification criteria. Healthy individuals (n = 100), patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 95), and patients with primary Sjögren syndrome (n = 54) served as controls.

RESULTS

CLIFT had the highest SLE specificity (98%) whereas EliA had the highest sensitivity (35%). When cutoff levels for FIDIS, EliA, and EUROLINE were adjusted according to SLICC-12 (i.e., double the reference limit when using ELISA), the specificity and sensitivity of FIDIS was comparable to CLIFT. FIDIS and CLIFT also showed the highest concordance (84%). FIDIS performed best regarding association with disease activity in cross-sectional and consecutive samples. Fisher's exact test revealed striking differences between methods regarding associations with certain disease phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

CLIFT remains a good choice for diagnostic purposes, but FIDIS performs equally well when the cutoff is adjusted according to SLICC-12. Based on results from cross-sectional and consecutive analyses, FIDIS can also be recommended to monitor disease activity.

Clinical comparison of QUANTA Flash dsDNA chemiluminescent immunoassay with four current assays for the detection of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies

Introduction. The objective of the present study was to compare QUANTA Flash dsDNA, a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA) on the BIO-FLASH, a rapid-response chemiluminescent analyzer, to three other anti-dsDNA antibody assays and to Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence test (CLIFT). Methods. In the first part of the study, 161 samples, 61 from patients suffering from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and 100 from a disease control group, were tested by QUANTA Flash dsDNA CIA, QUANTA Lite dsDNA SC ELISA, BioPlex 2200 multiplex flow immunoassay (MFI), ImmuLisa dsDNA ELISA, and NOVA Lite CLIFT. A second cohort of 69 SLE patients was then tested by QUANTA Flash dsDNA and CLIFT to expand the study. Results. The overall qualitative agreements varied between 77.0% (NOVA Lite CLIFT versus QUANTA Lite) and 89.4% (ImmuLisa versus NOVA Lite CLIFT). The clinical sensitivities for the anti-dsDNA antibody tests varied from 8.2% (NOVA Lite CLIFT) to 54.1% (QUANTA Lite), while the clinical specificities varied from 88.0% (BioPlex 2200) to 100.0% (NOVA Lite CLIFT). Good correlation was found between QUANTA Flash dsDNA and NOVA Lite CLIFT. Conclusion. Significant variations among dsDNA methods were observed. QUANTA Flash dsDNA provides a good combination of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of SLE and good agreement to CLIFT.

Opposing impact of B cell-intrinsic TLR7 and TLR9 signals on autoantibody repertoire and systemic inflammation

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a multisystem autoimmune disease characterized by autoantibodies targeting nucleic acid-associated Ags. The endosomal TLRs TLR7 and TLR9 are critical for generation of Abs targeting RNA- or DNA-associated Ags, respectively. In murine lupus models, deletion of TLR7 limits autoimmune inflammation, whereas deletion of TLR9 exacerbates disease. Whether B cell or myeloid TLR7/TLR9 signaling is responsible for these effects has not been fully addressed. In this study, we use a chimeric strategy to evaluate the effect of B cell-intrinsic deletion of TLR7 versus TLR9 in parallel lupus models. We demonstrate that B cell-intrinsic TLR7 deletion prevents RNA-associated Ab formation, decreases production of class-switched Abs targeting nonnuclear Ags, and limits systemic autoimmunity. In contrast, B cell-intrinsic TLR9 deletion results in decreased DNA-reactive Ab, but increased Abs targeting a broad range of systemic autoantigens. Further, we demonstrate that B cell-intrinsic TLR9 deletion results in increased systemic inflammation and immune complex glomerulonephritis, despite intact TLR signaling within the myeloid compartment. These data stress the critical importance of dysregulated B cell-intrinsic TLR signaling in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Clinical phenotype associations with various types of anti-dsDNA antibodies in patients with recent onset of rheumatic symptoms. Results from a multicentre observational study

Despite anti-dsDNA antibodies constitute a wide range of specificities, they are considered as the hallmark for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Effects of adjuvants for human use in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-prone (New Zealand black/New Zealand white) F1 mice

The safety of four different adjuvants was assessed in lupus-prone New Zealand black/New Zealand white (BW)F1 mice. Four groups of mice were injected intraperitoneally with incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA), complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), squalene (SQU) or aluminium hydroxide (ALU). An additional group received plain phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (UNT group). Mice were primed at week 9 and boosted every other week up to week 15. Proteinuria became detectable at weeks 17 (IFA group), 24 (CFA group), 28 (SQU and ALU groups) and 32 (UNT group). Different mean values were obtained among the groups from weeks 17 to 21 [week 17: one-way analysis of variance (anova) P = 0·016; weeks 18 and 19: P = 0·048; weeks 20 and 21: P = 0·013] being higher in the IFA group than the others [Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) post-test P < 0·05]. No differences in anti-DNA antibody levels were observed among groups. Anti-RNP/Sm antibody developed at week 19 in only one CFA-treated mouse. Mean mouse weight at week 18 was lower in the ALU group than the IFA (Tukey's HSD post-test P = 0·04), CFA (P = 0·01) and SQU (P < 0·0001) groups, while the mean weight in the SQU group was higher than in the IFA (P = 0·009), CFA (P = 0·013) and UNT (P = 0·005) groups. The ALU group weight decreased by almost half between weeks 29 and 31, indicating some toxic effect of ALU in the late post-immunization period. Thus, SQU was the least toxic adjuvant as it did not (i) accelerate proteinuria onset compared to IFA; (ii) induce toxicity compared to ALU or (iii) elicit anti-RNP/Sm autoantibody, as occurred in the CFA group.

Distinct antibody profile: a clue to primary antiphospholipid syndrome evolving into systemic lupus erythematosus?

We have performed a retrospective study to determine if patients with antiphospholipid syndrome that developed systemic lupus erythematosus (APS/SLE) had distinct clinical and/or serological features. All 80 primary APS (PAPS) patients followed up at our APS unit were included in the study and divided into two groups: 14 APS/SLE and 66 PAPS. Prior or at onset of lupus manifestations, six patients were uniformly negative for lupus and Sjögren autoantibodies, and the other eight patients had persistent positive. In the first year after diagnosis of SLE, three patients remained with negative antibodies, the other seven patients maintained the same antibodies, and four patients developed other antibodies. APS/SLE group had a significant lower mean age at PAPS diagnosis (26.0 ± 8.0 vs. 34.2 ± 11.9 years, p = 0.03) and a longer disease duration (14.0 ± 7.0 vs. 6.0 ± 5.0 years, p < 0.0001). The mean time for PAPS to develop SLE was 5.2 ± 4.3 years. The typical clinical and laboratorial findings of APS did not discriminate both groups of patients. At lupus onset, antinuclear antibodies were more frequently observed in those who evolved to SLE (100 vs. 51.5%, p = 0.0005). Anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), anti-ribosomal P, anti-Ro/SS-A, anti-La/SS-B, and anti-U1RNP antibodies were exclusively found in the APS/SLE patients, whereas anti-Smith (Sm) antibodies were not detected in both groups. The detection of a distinct subgroup of lupus-associated autoantibody in PAPS patients seems to be a hint to overt SLE disease, particularly in those patients with young age at diagnosis.

Autoantibodies against C1q as a Diagnostic Measure of Lupus Nephritis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of C1q autoantibodies in identifying lupus nephritis (LN) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

Citation indexes were searched and 370 articles published from 1977 to 2013 were evaluated. The 31 selected studies included in the meta-analysis were cross-sectional in design. Among the 31 studies, 28 compared anti-C1q antibodies in 2769 SLE patients with (n=1442) and without a history of LN (n=1327). Nine studies examined anti-C1q in 517 SLE patients with active (n=249) and inactive LN (n=268). Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) random effects models were fitted to pool estimates of accuracy across the studies.

RESULTS

Anti-C1q antibodies discriminated between patients with and without a history of LN, with a median specificity of 73.5%. The HSROC model estimated the corresponding sensitivity to be 70.4%. A hypothetical patient with a 55% prior probability of having a history of LN as opposed to no history (the median prevalence across 28 eligible studies) would have a post-test probability of 76.4% following a positive test result (positive predictive value) or 33.0% following a negative test result (negative predictive value). For discriminating active from inactive LN the median specificity of anti-C1q antibodies was 80%, with a corresponding estimated sensitivity value 75.7% based on the HSROC model. A hypothetical patient with a 56% prior probability of active as opposed to inactive LN (the median prevalence across the 9 eligible studies) would have a post-test probability of 82.8% following a positive test result or 27.9% following a negative test result.

CONCLUSIONS

Although C1q antibodies are associated with lupus nephritis the post-test probabilities are not sufficiently convincing to provide reasonable certainty of the presence or absence of history of disease/active disease.

A Novel Method for Real-Time, Continuous, Fluorescence-Based Analysis of Anti-DNA Abzyme Activity in Systemic Lupus

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the production of antibodies against a variety of self-antigens including nucleic acids. These antibodies are cytotoxic, catalytic (hydrolyzing DNA, RNA, and protein), and nephritogenic. Current methods for investigating catalytic activities of natural abzymes produced by individuals suffering from autoimmunity are mostly discontinuous and often employ hazardous reagents. Here we demonstrate the utility of dual-labeled, fluorogenic DNA hydrolysis probes in highly specific, sensitive, continuous, fluorescence-based measurement of DNA hydrolytic activity of anti-ssDNA abzymes purified from the serum of patients suffering from SLE. An assay for the presence and levels of antibodies exhibiting hydrolytic activity could facilitate disease diagnosis, prediction of flares, monitoring of disease state, and response to therapy. The assay may allow indirect identification of additional targets of anti-DNA antibodies and the discovery of molecules that inhibit their activity. Combined, these approaches may provide new insights into molecular mechanisms of lupus pathogenesis.

Comparison and evaluation of different methodologies and tests for detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies on 889 Slovenian patients' and blood donors' sera

Aim

To evaluate four different commercially available assays for anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) detection and compare them with the in-house radioimmunoassay according to Farr (FARR-RIA) in order to select the optimal primary method for use in combination with FARR-RIA.

Methods

Sera from 583 consecutive patients sent to our laboratory for routine diagnosis, 156 selected patients with autoimmune diseases (76 systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE] patients and 80 patients with other autoimmune diseases), and 150 blood donors were tested for anti-dsDNA antibodies with two enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISA), two Crithidia luciliae immunoflourescence tests (CLIFT), and FARR-RIA. The specificities and sensitivities of the tests were calculated and compared.

Results

FARR-RIA and CLIFT 2 showed the highest specificity for SLE (100%), with CLIFT 2 showing higher sensitivity (33% vs 47%). Both ELISAs showed higher sensitivities (>53%) than FARR-RIA but lower specificities (<93%), whereas CLIFT 1 showed the lowest overall agreement with FARR-RIA.

Conclusion

CLIFT 2 was selected as the primary test for use in combination with FARR-RIA. The use of CLIFT 2 reduced the number of sera that needed to be tested by FARR-RIA, the time needed to report the results, and environmental toxicity, cancerogenicity, and radioactivity.

Significant differences in the analytic concordance between anti-dsDNA IgG antibody assays for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus--implications for inter-laboratory testing

BACKGROUND

Anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) autoantibodies are considered hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

To determine concordance between assays for the detection of this marker, we analyzed 100 antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive sera with a homogeneous pattern and titers≥1:160 by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) on HEp-2 cells, 100 consecutive anti-dsDNA IgG ELISA-negative as well as 100 healthy control samples using six commercial ELISAs and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT).

RESULTS

The positivity rates for the ELISAs in the ANA positive group ranged from 55.0 to 88.0% with specificities from 84.0 to 98.0%. The CLIFT had a positivity rate of 68.0% and specificity of 84%. In the previously screened anti-dsDNA IgG-negative group, the positivity rates ranged from 1 to 19%. The overall correlations between the ELISAs ranged from 73.0 to 89.5% and varied from 70.0 to 80.0% among specific ELISAs and CLIFT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show variable degree of concordance between anti-dsDNA IgG ELISAs which may significantly impact inter-laboratory testing as well as the diagnosis and management of SLE patients. Although some of the ELISAs show comparable performance to the CLIFT, the degree of concordance between these assays at high antibody levels suggests that CLIFT is still a relevant confirmatory tool.

Comparison of the Farr radioimmunoassay, 3 commercial enzyme immunoassays and Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test for diagnosis and activity assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUNDS

Among anti-double-strand (ds)DNA antibody assays, Farr radioimmunoassay is decreasingly used because it requires radioactive material and is labor intensive. We evaluated the performance of Farr, three commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Anti-dsDNA antibodies were determined in 99 SLE patients, 101 healthy subjects, and 53 patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

RESULTS

Farr performed better than the 3 EIAs and CLIFT for the diagnosis of SLE at the manufacturer's cut off and at the cut off set to achieve a specificity of 95%. To achieve a similar level of specificity, some EIAs had a decrease in sensitivity which was dramatic for some tests. Farr was also the best at distinguishing patients with quiescent to mildly active disease from patients with more active disease at the cut off value of 93 IU/ml. Using manufacturer's cut off did not allow distinguishing between patients with quiescent and active SLE.

CONCLUSIONS

Farr was the best global test to assess the level of anti-dsDNA antibodies for both diagnosis and disease activity evaluation in SLE with adequately determined cut off values. Some EIA had low performances limiting their use in decision-making regarding diagnosis and/or treatment.

Regulation of lupus-related autoantibody production and clinical disease by Toll-like receptors

Autoantigens that contain DNA, RNA, or self-IgG are preferred targets for autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). B cells promote SLE pathogenesis by producing autoantibodies, activating autoreactive T cells, and secreting cytokines. We discuss how certain autoreactive B cells are selectively activated, with emphasis on the roles of key Toll-like receptors (TLRs). Although TLR7, which recognizes ssRNA, promotes autoimmune disease, TLR9, which recognizes DNA, unexpectedly regulates disease, despite being required for the secretion of anti-chromatin autoantibodies. We describe positive feedback loops involving B cells, T cells, DCs, and soluble mediators, and how these networks are regulated by TLR signals.

Quantitation of autoantibodies in systemic autoimmune diseases: clinically useful?

Serial assessment of levels of autoantibodies has been proposed as being clinically useful in certain systemic autoimmune diseases. In particular, attention has been given to anti-dsDNA antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and ANCA in the ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV). Much controversy exists, however, concerning the value of serial testing in these diseases. We here review the various tests available for quantitation of anti-dsDNA and ANCA, and their capacity to detect changes in autoantibody levels that are associated with changes in clinical disease activity of the respective diseases. It is concluded that changes in anti-dsDNA as measured by the Farr assay and changes in ANCA as assessed by ELISA have predictive value for the occurrence of disease relapses, although this relationship is far from absolute. Consequently, treatment based on changes in levels of the respective autoantibodies only seems at present not justified, in view of the toxicity of currently available immunosuppressive regimens.

Autoantibody Determination in the Diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that usually develops in young women aged 18-50 years and is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies. Diagnosis is difficult as SLE is a great imitator of other diseases. When SLE is suspected clinically in a patient (involvement of two or more organ systems), an initial laboratory evaluation would be antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing. If ANA is negative, SLE is unlikely and results positive at less than 1:40 strongly argue against SLE. Other explanations for organ system involvement should be pursued. Results positive at greater than 1:40 may merit further evaluation for SLE and at times referral to a rheumatologist for a full SLE evaluation. While the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for SLE are primarily a tool for research, they may be useful clinically, in that those patients fulfilling four or more criteria are highly likely to have SLE.

Toll-like Receptor 7 and TLR9 Dictate Autoantibody Specificity and Have Opposing Inflammatory and Regulatory Roles in a Murine Model of Lupus

Antibodies (Abs) to RNA- and DNA-containing autoantigens are characteristic of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We showed previously that Toll-like receptor (TLR) 9, recognizing DNA, is required for the spontaneous generation of DNA autoantibodies, but not for the development of lupus nephritis in susceptible mice. We report that lupus-prone mice deficient in TLR7, a receptor for ssRNA, failed to generate Abs to RNA-containing antigens (Ags) such as Smith (Sm) Ag. TLR9 and TLR7 also had dramatic effects on clinical disease in lupus-prone mice. In the absence of TLR9, autoimmune disease was exacerbated, lymphocytes and plasmacytoid DCs were more activated, and serum IgG and IFN-alpha were increased. In contrast, TLR7-deficient mice had ameliorated disease, decreased lymphocyte activation, and decreased serum IgG. These findings reveal opposing inflammatory and regulatory roles for TLR7 and TLR9, despite similar tissue expression and signaling pathways. These results have important implications for TLR-directed therapy of autoimmune disease.

Toll-like receptor 9 controls anti-DNA autoantibody production in murine lupus

Systemic autoimmune disease in humans and mice is characterized by loss of immunologic tolerance to a restricted set of self-nuclear antigens. Autoantigens, such as double-stranded (ds) DNA and the RNA-containing Smith antigen (Sm), may be selectively targeted in systemic lupus erythematosus because of their ability to activate a putative common receptor. Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), a receptor for CpG DNA, has been implicated in the activation of autoreactive B cells in vitro, but its role in promoting autoantibody production and disease in vivo has not been determined. We show that in TLR9-deficient lupus-prone mice, the generation of anti-dsDNA and antichromatin autoantibodies is specifically inhibited. Other autoantibodies, such as anti-Sm, are maintained and even increased in TLR9-deficient mice. In contrast, ablation of TLR3, a receptor for dsRNA, did not inhibit the formation of autoantibodies to either RNA- or DNA-containing antigens. Surprisingly, we found that despite the lack of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies in TLR9-deficient mice, there was no effect on the development of clinical autoimmune disease or nephritis. These results demonstrate a specific requirement for TLR9 in autoantibody formation in vivo and indicate a critical role for innate immune activation in autoimmunity.

Anti-dsDNA antibodies: still a useful criterion for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus?

The presence of antibodies to dsDNA has been a criterion for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in each of three attempts to classify the disease that have been undertaken by the American College of Rheumatology. The generally good specificity of the test, the fact that it is widely available and often undertaken by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) which is relatively cheap and easy to perform have encouraged its continued presence in the list of lupus criteria. The detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies is not, however, straightforward and the real significance of the presence of these antibodies, their true specificity (or otherwise), the question of whether they are truly linked to disease pathogenicity and how accurately they reflect disease activity are all questions that have been posed in the past 20 years.

Clinical evaluation of cobas core anti-dsDNA EIA quant

The measurement of antibodies to double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) is a useful tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with connective tissue diseases, particularly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The aim of the present study was to compare a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the measurement of anti-dsDNA antibodies, which uses purified double-stranded plasmid DNA as the antigen (anti-dsDNA EIA Quant; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), with an established ELISA. The clinical usefulness of this new ELISA was also assessed. We measured anti-dsDNA antibodies in 398 serum samples that were divided into four groups: 1). routine samples sent to our laboratory for an antinuclear antibody (ANA) test (n=229), 2). samples from blood donors (n=74), 3). samples from patients with SLE (n=48), and 4) samples from patients with other autoimmune diseases (n=47). The methods used were the Cobas Core Anti-dsDNA EIA Quant (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and the Anti-dsDNA test (Gull Diagnostics, Bois d'Arcy, France). We obtained a kappa index and Spearman correlation coefficient in the comparative study, and sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios in the clinical study. The results obtained show a good agreement between the two methods in both the qualitative results (kappa=0.91) and the quantitative data (r=0.854). The best accuracy, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and correlation with active disease were obtained with the Roche anti-dsDNA assay.

Fine binding characteristics of human autoantibodies—partial molecular characterization

The fine binding characteristics of three well-characterized human autoantibodies B3, RH14 (anti-DNA) and UK4 (anti-cardiolipin) in their IgG and cloned Fab formats, were investigated. Although in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice B3 and RH14 both induce proteinuria, only RH14 induces early features of lupus nephritis, whereas UK4 exhibits lupus anticoagulant activity. RH14 exhibited up to 10 fold higher binding to DNA compared to that shown by B3 or UK4 and involved significant electrostatic and phosphate group interactions. Only RH14 exhibited strong anti-Sm cross-reactivity residing on the C-terminus of the antigen as determined by the use of 76 overlapping 15mer peptides. Chain shuffling experiments indicate that anti-Sm/RNP and anti-Jo-1 activities of B3 and UK4 co-exist on one of the two chains (light, B3; heavy, UK4). The present study provides evidence that a human anti-DNA antibody can also be an anti-ENA antibody. Furthermore, the anti-DNA antibodies also exhibited cross-reactivity against glutathione-S-transferase and DNA polymerase PolIV of bacterial origin. This is the first demonstration of the presence of such cross-reactivities on lupus anti-DNA antibodies. We now demonstrate that subsets of sera from the patients with lupus, recognise these antigens. This observation may in some cases provide a mechanism for the common expression of a variety of autoantibodies observed in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Anti-dsDNA antibodies and disease classification in antinuclear antibody positive patients: the role of analytical diversity

BACKGROUND

The presence of "anti-DNA antibodies in abnormal titres" is a well established criterion for SLE classification, but there is no agreement on the performance of this test.

OBJECTIVE

To study the correlation between clinical findings and five different solid and solution phase anti-DNA antibody assays.

METHODS

158 consecutively collected ANA positive sera were studied in a double blind fashion. Anti-DNA antibodies were determined by different solid phase assays (ssDNA-, dsDNA- specific ELISA, EliA anti-dsDNA assay, Crithidia luciliae assay), and by an experimental solution phase anti-DNA assay using biotinylated pUC18 plasmid, human, calf thymus, and E coli DNA. Antibody affinity was determined by surface plasmon resonance. Clinical data were obtained independently of the laboratory analyses and later related to the anti-dsDNA findings.

RESULTS

Anti-dsDNA antibodies were most frequently detected by ELISA, but were not specific for SLE as they were present in up to 30% of other disease groups. Those detected by the Crithidia luciliae assay were predictive for SLE, while antibodies binding in solution phase ELISA using the pUC18 correlated strongly with the Crithidia luciliae assay. Surface plasmon resonance analysis showed that antibody binding to pUC18 was not due to higher relative affinity for dsDNA in general, but apparently to specificity for that plasmid DNA. Serum samples from three patients with lupus nephritis were positive in both pUC18 solution phase and Crithidia luciliae assays.

CONCLUSIONS

Assay principle selection is decisive for the detection of clinically significant anti-DNA antibodies. Revision of the anti-DNA antibody criterion in the SLE classification may be needed.

Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Although much is known about the natural history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the development of SLE autoantibodies before the diagnosis of the disease has not been extensively explored. We investigated the onset and progression of autoantibody development before the clinical diagnosis.

METHODS

The Department of Defense Serum Repository contains approximately 30 million specimens prospectively collected from more than 5 million U.S. Armed Forces personnel. We evaluated serum samples obtained from 130 persons before they received a diagnosis of SLE, along with samples from matched controls.

RESULTS

In 115 of the 130 patients with SLE (88 percent), at least one SLE autoantibody tested was present before the diagnosis (up to 9.4 years earlier; mean, 3.3 years). Antinuclear antibodies were present in 78 percent (at a dilution of 1:120 or more), anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies in 55 percent, anti-Ro antibodies in 47 percent, anti-La antibodies in 34 percent, anti-Sm antibodies in 32 percent, anti-nuclear ribonucleoprotein antibodies in 26 percent, and antiphospholipid antibodies in 18 percent. Antinuclear, antiphospholipid antibodies, anti-Ro, and anti-La antibodies were present earlier than anti-Sm and anti-nuclear ribonucleoprotein antibodies (a mean of 3.4 years before the diagnosis vs. 1.2 years, P=0.005). Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, with a mean onset 2.2 years before the diagnosis, were found later than antinuclear antibodies (P=0.06) and earlier than anti-nuclear ribonucleoprotein antibodies (P=0.005). For many patients, the earliest available serum sample was positive; therefore, these measures of the average time from the first positive antibody test to the diagnosis are underestimates of the time from the development of antibodies to the diagnosis. Of the 130 initial matched controls, 3.8 percent were positive for one or more autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoantibodies are typically present many years before the diagnosis of SLE. Furthermore, the appearance of autoantibodies in patients with SLE tends to follow a predictable course, with a progressive accumulation of specific autoantibodies before the onset of SLE, while patients are still asymptomatic.

Concentrations of circulating matrix metalloproteinase 9 inversely correlate with autoimmune antibodies to double stranded DNA: implications for monitoring disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

AIMS

To compare circulating matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) concentrations with antibodies to single and double stranded DNA (ssDNA and dsDNA) to determine their relation in inflammatory arthritic diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Fibroblast MMP-2 and neutrophil MMP-9 were resolved by gelatin zymography and measured by densitometry. Anti-ssDNA and anti-dsDNA were determined by enzyme immunoassay and samples grouped on antibody content as follows: low anti-ssDNA/low anti-dsDNA antibodies (group 1); high anti-ssDNA/low anti-dsDNA antibodies (group 2); and high anti-ssDNA/high anti-dsDNA antibodies (group 3).

RESULTS

Group 3 samples contained significantly lower amounts of MMP-9 when compared with group 1 samples. Higher molecular weight MMP-9 forms (130 and 225 kDa) were virtually absent. Group 2 samples contained intermediate MMP-9 concentrations. Fibroblast MMP-2 was unchanged in all groups. Mean complement C3 and C4 concentrations showed a consistent, but variably significant, decrease with increasing anti-ssDNA and anti-dsDNA antibodies. The mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate was raised in all patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Neutrophil MMP-9, an inflammatory marker, inversely correlates with anti-dsDNA antibodies, which are a specific marker for SLE, and may be important in monitoring disease activity during antibody deposition in tissues.

Clinical laboratory assays for measuring anti-dsDNA antibodies. Where are we now?

It is over 40 years since anti-dsDNA antibodies were first described in patients with lupus. A wide variety of methods for detecting these immunoglobulins have been established. In this review, we consider the utility and practical problems that the main assays present. The clinical correlations between anti-dsDNA antibodies and clinical activity in patients with lupus is discussed.

Anti-DNA antibodies--overview of assays and clinical correlations

Many authors have studied the links between levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies and disease activity in patients with SLE. Interpretation of these studies must take into account the facts that there are a range of possible assays for anti-dsDNA and a number of indices available for assessing disease activity. A recent study compared levels of various autoantibodies with organ specific disease activity assessed during the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) index. Anti-dsDNA and anti-heparan sulphate levels were more likely to be raised in patients with renal than non-renal disease. Some anti-DNA antibodies are actually anti-nucleosome antibodies, which lose DNA reactivity when purified under dissociating conditions. Patients with SLE have significantly increased levels of nucleosomes in their sera compared with healthy controls. In patients with SLE, reduced clearance of nucleosomes released from apoptotic cells may induce the formation of anti-nucleosome antibodies.

Deficiencies of GM-CSF and interferon gamma link inflammation and cancer

Chronic inflammation contributes to carcinogenesis, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. We report that aged granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-deficient mice develop a systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE)-like disorder associated with the impaired phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. Concurrent deficiency of interferon (IFN)-gamma attenuates the SLE, but promotes the formation of diverse hematologic and solid neoplasms within a background of persistent infection and inflammation. Whereas activated B cells show a resistance to fas-induced apoptosis, antimicrobial therapy prevents lymphomagenesis and solid tumor development. These findings demonstrate that the interplay of infectious agents with cytokine-mediated regulation of immune homeostasis is a critical determinant of cancer susceptibility.

Clinical evaluation of a new automated anti-dsDNA fluorescent immunoassay

The measurement of anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies is a useful tool for the diagnosis and the follow-up of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Anti-dsDNA antibodies are involved in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis and they are, specially the high-avidity antibodies, the most specific antibodies associated with SLE nephritis and active SLE. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical utility of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EUSA) that utilizes a circular double-stranded plasmid DNA as a nucleic acid source, adapted to an automated fluorescence immunoassay (EliA dsDNA, Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany). Also, we compared this method with other immunoassays used in clinical laboratories. We have measured anti-dsDNA antibodies in the serum of 179 patients with a positive result for antinuclear antibodies (ANA). Seventy six sera were from SLE patients (14 men and 62 women), and the other 103 sera (from 20 men and 83 women) constituted the control group. This latter group includes nine Sjogren's syndrome patients, six patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 88 with various other diseases, including connective tissue diseases (n=34), hepatopathies (n= 17; 11 primary biliary cirrhosis and 6 autoimmune hepatitis), and 37 patients with nonautoimmune diseases (viral hepatitis, renal disease, diabetes, exanthema and hypertension). Methods used were "EliA dsDNA" (Pharmacia, Germany), "Varelisa dsDNA" (Pharmacia, Germany), Farr (Amersham, UK) and Chritidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (Vitro-Immun, Germany). We assessed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in the clinical study, and kappa index and scatter plots in the comparative study. The results show a low concordance between methods (kappa < 0.6). The evaluated EliA method shows a very good specificity for SLE (93.2%) and a good sensitivity for active SLE (70.8%).

Mice lacking the p53-effector gene Gadd45a develop a lupus-like syndrome

This study addresses the biological function of the p53-effector genes Gadd45a and p21 in the immune system. We find that Gadd45a is a negative regulator of T cell proliferation because, compared to wild-type cells, Gadd45a(-/-) T cells have a lower threshold of activation and proliferate to a greater extent following primary T cell receptor stimulation. Gadd45a(-/-) mice develop an autoimmune disease, similar to human systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), characterized by high titers of anti-dsDNA, anti-ssDNA, and anti-histone autoantibodies, severe hematological disorders, autoimmune glomerulonephritis, and premature death. Here we show that the lack of both Gadd45a and p21 dramatically accelerates the development of autoimmunity observed in each individual single-gene disruption mutant, demonstrating that these genes play nonredundant roles in the immune response.

C1q deficiency and autoimmunity: the effects of genetic background on disease expression

Gene-targeted C1q-deficient mice have been shown to develop a syndrome reminiscent of human systemic lupus erythematosus with antinuclear Abs and proliferative glomerulonephritis. Initial phenotypic analysis conducted in (129 x C57BL/6) hybrid mice showed that background genes were a significant factor for the full expression of the autoimmune disease. To assess the contribution of background genes in the expression of the autoimmune phenotype, the disrupted C1qa gene was backcrossed for seven generations onto C57BL/6 and MRL/Mp(+/+) strains. These were intercrossed with C57BL/6.lpr/lpr and MRL/Mp-lpr/lpr strains to generate C1q-deficient substrains. In C1q-deficient C57BL/6 mice, no evidence of an autoimmune phenotype was found, and C1q deficiency in both the C57BL/6.lpr/lpr and MRL/Mp-lpr/lpr strains did not modify the autoimmune phenotype observed in wild-type controls. However, in C1q-deficient MRL/Mp(+/+) animals an acceleration of both the onset and the severity of antinuclear Abs and glomerulonephritis was seen. Disease was particularly pronounced in females, which developed severe crescentic glomerulonephritis accompanied by heavy proteinuria. In addition, the C1q-deficient MRL/Mp(+/+) mice had an impairment in the phagocytic clearance of apoptotic cells in vivo. These data demonstrate that the expression of autoimmunity in C1q-deficient mice is strongly influenced by other background genes. The work also highlights the potential value of the C1q-deficient MRL/Mp(+/+) strain as a tool with which to dissect further the underlying mechanisms of the autoimmune syndrome associated with C1q deficiency.

Circulating antibodies to guanosine in systemic lupus erythematosus: correlation with nephritis and polyserositis by acute and longitudinal analyses

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by autoantibodies, including antibodies to the nucleosides of DNA. Guanosine is the most immunogenic nucleoside. In this study serum antiguanosine antibody levels were compared with disease activity, determined by their SLEDI score, in 86 patients with SLE. Sera from these patients were tested, by ELISA, for autoantibodies to guanosine, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Anti-double-stranded DNA levels were also measured by RIA. Resultant values from these assays were correlated with SLE disease activity, and compared with specific features of SLE. The strongest correlation was higher levels of antiguanosine antibodies in patients with active lupus nephritis and polyserositis compared to patients with inactive disease (P < 0.0001). Antiguanosine levels also correlated with arthritis (P < 0.006), CNS lupus (P < 0.005), and hematologic manifestations of SLE (P < 0.002). To test the validity of this association in chronic SLE, serum antiguanosine antibodies were measured in patients with SLE at various phases of disease activity. Twelve patients with SLE had serum samples drawn at active, active-improved, and inactive phases over a 3-7 y period. Differences were significant for serum antiguanosine antibodies in the active group compared to the inactive group (P < 0.05) and the active vs the active-improved group (P < 0.02), unlike those for dsDNA and ssDNA by ELISA or RIA. Antiguanosine antibodies correlated more closely with disease activity in SLE patients in this longitudinal study than either anti-dsDNA or ssDNA antibodies. Thus, antibodies to guanosine correlated as well or better with disease activity than the other anti-DNA antibodies measured and should be considered to contribute to the pathology of SLE, especially lupus nephritis.

Decreases in anti-double-stranded DNA levels are associated with concurrent flares in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To determine the degree to which changes in anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA), as determined by Crithidia and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), precede or coincide with changes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) activity, as measured by 5 clinical indices, the physician's global assessment (PGA), modified SLE Disease Activity Index (M-SLEDAI), modified Lupus Activity Index (M-LAI), Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM), and the modified British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (M-BILAG).

METHODS

Disease activity and anti-dsDNA were measured monthly in 53 SLE patients who were followed up for 1 year. Lupus flare was defined as an increase in PGA of > or = 1.0, M-SLEDAI > or = 3, M-LAI > or = 0.1, SLAM > or = 3, and M-BILAG > or = 4 within a 1-month period. Flare rates were calculated for groups, which were defined by "previous" (1 month prior to the flare) or "concurrent" (at the time of the flare) changes in anti-dsDNA. Logistic regression models were used to determine the significance of the association between recent changes in anti-dsDNA and flare, controlling for the prednisone dosage.

RESULTS

Flares occurred at 12% of visits, based on the PGA measure of disease activity. Using the other indices, flare rates were 19% (M-SLEDAI), 25% (M-LAI), 13% (SLAM), and 12% (M-BILAG). A concurrent decrease in anti-dsDNA (ELISA) was associated with significantly higher flare rates based on PGA (18 of 84, 21%; P = 0.0014), M-SLEDAI (27 of 89, 30%; P = 0.0019), M-LAI (37 of 89, 42%; P = 0.0001), and M-BILAG (19 of 89, 21%; P = 0.0264) scores. Flare rates were also significantly higher after a previous increase in anti-dsDNA (ELISA) based on M-SLEDAI (26 of 93, 30%; P = 0.0022) and M-LAI (34 of 93, 37%; P = 0.0117) scores. Flare rates tended to be lowest when there was a concurrent increase in anti-dsDNA (ELISA). Analysis of specific organ systems showed that a concurrent decrease in anti-dsDNA (ELISA) was significantly associated with increases in renal disease activity. Similar results were obtained using the Crithidia assay.

CONCLUSION

A previous increase in anti-dsDNA levels occurred before SLE flares, as measured by the M-SLEDAI and M-LAI only. However, during lupus flares, including the subset of renal flares, anti-dsDNA levels frequently decreased. We hypothesize that this decrease in anti-dsDNA represents deposition in tissue at the time of flare.

High incidence of antinuclear antibodies that recognize the matrix attachment region

The matrix attachment region (MAR) is a distinctive genomic DNA involved in a variety of nuclear processes through association with the nuclear matrix. Recent studies suggest that nuclear matrix is altered in the process of apoptosis and presented to the immune system, leading to the production of autoantibodies against its protein components. To see whether MARs are also recognized by autoantibodies, a collection of human sera containing antinuclear antibodies was screened for the presence of binding activities against cloned MARs. We found that MAR-binding activities are quite common in these sera. There was a positive correlation among the MAR-binding titers for three different MAR probes. As expected, the MAR-binding activity was copurified with serum IgG, and subclass analysis with affinity-purified IgG on MAR-Sepharose showed a predominance of IgG2 isotype. Several lines of evidence implied that the anti-MAR antibodies detected here is distinct from the ordinary anti-DNA antibodies that are reactive to bulk DNA.

Molecular cloning and expression of the Fabs of human autoantibodies in Escherichia coli. Determination of the heavy or light chain contribution to the anti-DNA/-cardiolipin activity of the Fab

The Fabs of three human autoantibodies (B3/33H11, anti-DNA; UK4, anti-phospholipid) and six related hybrids have been cloned, expressed in Escherichia coli, and purified to homogeneity. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis of the recombinant Fab demonstrated the purified Fab to be of correct size and in assembled form. Protein expression levels of up to 5-9 mg per liter of culture were achievable. A sensitive and reliable comparative anti-DNA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, involving a defined biotinylated 35-mer oligonucleotide in its single- or double-stranded form, is also described. Crithidia assay and anti-DNA or anti-cardiolipin antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analyses demonstrated convincing binding of the recombinant Fab proteins to DNA/cardiolipin, confirming the expression of functional molecule. The comparative DNA/cardiolipin binding analyses of the nine Fabs revealed that the anti-DNA (light, B3/33H11) or anti-cardiolipin (heavy, UK4) activity lies predominantly on one of the two chains. However, a compatible partner chain is necessary for optimum antigen binding activity of the antibody.

The use of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of SLE

ANA IIF is an effective screening assay in patients with clinical features of SLE and will detect most anti-ssDNA, anti-dsDNA, ENAs, and other autoantibodies. False positives are common. The clinical importance cannot be extrapolated from the ANA titre or pattern, although higher titres (> 1/160) are more likely to be important. HEp-2 cells are the most sensitive substrate for ANA detection, but this must be balanced against an increased incidence of insignificant positivity. ANA positive samples should be subjected to more specific assays for the diagnosis of SLE. A combination of ENA (Ro/La/Sm/RNP) and dsDNA assays will detect most patients with SLE as long as the characteristics of the assays used are well understood. ESR and CRP measurements provide useful additional information. Sjogren's syndrome and MCTD will produce overlapping serology with SLE, and anti-dsDNA titres are sometimes seen in autoimmune hepatitis and rheumatoid arthritis. All results should be reported in the light of the clinical details, by an experienced immunologist. A suggested diagnostic protocol is outlined in fig 1. The type of assay used crucially influences the predictive value of the tests. ELISA technology dominates routine laboratory practice, but tends to produce more false positive and true weak positive results, which may reduce the PPV of the test. This can be minimised by using IgG specific conjugates and careful assay validation. The NPV for SLE [figure: see text] is high for most assays but the PPV varies. Where necessary, laboratories should use crithidia or Farr dsDNA assays to confirm dubious ELISA dsDNA results, and ID/IB to confirm dubious ENA results. For monitoring, a precise, quantitative assay is required. It is unclear whether the detection of IgM or low affinity antibodies has a role here. A combination of anti-dsDNA, C3, C4, CRP, and ESR assays provides the most useful clinical information. Anti-ssDNA assays are likely to be useful, and are potentially more robust than anti-dsDNA assays, but require more validation. Local validation of individual assays and EQA participation is essential. Not all assays that apparently measure the same antibody specificities have equal clinical relevance, even within a single technology. Insufficient international or national reference preparations are currently available for many antibody specificities to enable effective standardisation. Quality assurance schemes reveal large differences in units reported by different assays for some analytes, even when calibrated against an IRP or equivalent reference preparation. Serial results can therefore only be compared from the same laboratory at present. Most autoantibodies increase during active disease, but few prospective data are currently available to justify treatment on the basis of rising titres. Further randomised prospective studies are required to examine the importance of antibody isotype and affinity in the monitoring of SLE by individual assay methods. The most important aspect of the appropriate use of laboratory assays is to become familiar with the limitations of the technology currently in use in your local laboratory, and to consult with your clinical immunologist in cases of doubt, preferably before commencing serological screening.