Poor prognosis of patients presenting with symptomatic myocardial infarction but without chest pain

Chest pain symptoms during myocardial infarction in patients with and without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Chest pain (CP) is key in diagnosing myocardial infarction (MI). Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at increased risk of an MI but may experience less CP, leading to delayed treatment and worse outcomes. We compared the prevalence of CP in those with and without DM who had an MI.

METHODS

The study population was people with MI presenting to healthcare services. The outcome measure was the absence of CP during MI, comparing those with and without DM. Medline and Embase databases were searched to 18 October 2021, identifying 9272 records. After initial independent screening, 87 reports were assessed for eligibility against the inclusion criteria, quality and risk of bias assessment (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and Newcastle-Ottawa criteria), leaving 22 studies. The meta-analysis followed Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology criteria and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Pooled ORs, weights and 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 232 519 participants from 22 studies and showed an increased likelihood of no CP during an MI for those with DM, compared with those without. This was 43% higher in patients with DM in the cohort and cross-sectional studies (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.62), and 44% higher in case-control studies (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.87).

CONCLUSION

In patients with an MI, patients with DM are less likely than those without to have presentations with CP recorded. Clinicians should consider an MI diagnosis when patients with DM present with atypical symptoms and treatment protocols should reflect this, alongside an increased patient awareness on this issue.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017058223.

Cohort profile: Evaluation of the Methods and Management of Acute Coronary Events (EMMACE) Longitudinal Cohort

AIMS

The Evaluation of the Methods and Management of Acute Coronary Events (EMMACE) longitudinal cohort study aims to investigate health trajectories of individuals following hospitalization for myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

EMMACE is a linked multicentre prospective cohort study of 14 899 patients with MI admitted to 77 hospitals in England who participated in the EMMACE-3 and -4 studies between 1st November 2011 and 24th June 2015. Long-term follow-up of the EMMACE cohorts was conducted through the EMMACE-XL (27th September 2020 to 31st March 2022) and EMMACE-XXL (1st July 2021 to 1st July 2023) studies. EMMACE collected individual participant data for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured by three-level EuroQol five-dimension and visual analogy scale at admission, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 10 years follow-up, as well as medications, medication adherence, beliefs about medicines, Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale, and illness perceptions. Participant data were deterministically linked to the Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP) for information on baseline treatments and comorbidities, Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care (for cause-specific hospitalization data), and the Office for National Statistics (for mortality data) up to 2020.

CONCLUSION

EMMACE is a nationwide prospective cohort that will provide unique insights into fatal and non-fatal outcomes, medication adherence, and HRQoL following MI.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01808027 and NCT01819103.

Reactive Oxygen Species Induced Pathways in Heart Failure Pathogenesis and Potential Therapeutic Strategies

With respect to structural and functional cardiac disorders, heart failure (HF) is divided into HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Oxidative stress contributes to the development of both HFrEF and HFpEF. Identification of a broad spectrum of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced pathways in preclinical models has provided new insights about the importance of ROS in HFrEF and HFpEF development. While current treatment strategies mostly concern neuroendocrine inhibition, recent data on ROS-induced metabolic pathways in cardiomyocytes may offer additional treatment strategies and targets for both of the HF forms. The purpose of this article is to summarize the results achieved in the fields of: (1) ROS importance in HFrEF and HFpEF pathophysiology, and (2) treatments for inhibiting ROS-induced pathways in HFrEF and HFpEF patients. ROS-producing pathways in cardiomyocytes, ROS-activated pathways in different HF forms, and treatment options to inhibit their action are also discussed.

Comparison of Door-to-Balloon Time and 30-Day Mortality According to Symptom Presentation in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background: We hypothesized that symptom presentation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may affect their management and subsequent outcome.

Methods and Results: Using Rural AMI Registry data, 1,337 consecutive patients with AMI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were analyzed. Typical symptoms were defined as any symptoms of chest pain or pressure due to myocardial ischemia. We considered the specific symptoms of dyspnea, nausea, or vomiting as atypical symptoms. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. There were 150 (11.2%) and 1,187 (88.8%) patients who presented with atypical and typical symptoms, respectively. Those who presented with atypical symptoms were significantly older (mean [±SD] age 74±12 vs. 68±13 years; P<0.001) and had a higher Killip class (46.7% vs. 21.8%; P<0.001) than patients presenting with typical symptoms. The prevalence of door-to-balloon time of ≤90 min was significantly lower in patients with atypical than typical symptoms (40.0% vs. 66.3%; P<0.001). At 30 days, there were 55 incidents of all-cause death. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that symptom presentation was associated with 30-day mortality (hazard ratio 2.33; 95% confidence interval 1.20–4.38; P<0.05).

Conclusions: Atypical symptoms in patients with AMI are less likely to lead to timely reperfusion and are associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality.

Comparison of Outcomes of Coronary Revascularization for Acute Myocardial Infarction in Men Versus Women

This study sought to examine the differences in the characteristics and outcomes between men and women who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in contemporary US practice. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients who underwent revascularization for AMI between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2016. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Propensity score matching was utilized to account for differences in baseline characteristics. In total, 3,603,142 patients were included, of whom only 1,180,436 (33%) were women. Compared with men, women were older and had higher prevalence of key co-morbidities including diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney and lung disease (p <0.001). In the PCI cohort, women were significantly less likely to undergo multivessel PCI, to receive mechanical circulatory support, or to undergo atherectomy. In the CABG group, women were more likely to have concomitant valve surgery. In the propensity-matched cohorts, in-hospital mortality was higher for women than men regardless of revascularization strategy: 7.6% versus 6.6% for PCI in ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 2.0% versus 1.9% for PCI in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and 5.7% versus 4.3% for CABG in any AMI (p <0.001). Women also had higher rates of major complications, longer hospitalizations, higher costs, and were less likely to be discharged home (vs nursing facility). These sex-based differences persisted over the study 14-year period. In conclusion, in a contemporary nationwide analysis of propensity score-matched patients, women who undergo revascularization for AMI have worse in-hospital outcomes than men regardless of revascularization mode.

High-Risk Chief Complaints I: Chest Pain-The Big Three (an Update)

Nontraumatic chest pain is a frequent concern of emergency department patients, with causes that range from benign to immediately life threatening. Identifying those patients who require immediate/urgent intervention remains challenging and is a high-risk area for emergency medicine physicians where incorrect or delayed diagnosis may lead to significant morbidity and mortality. This article focuses on the 3 most prevalent diagnoses associated with adverse outcomes in patients presenting with nontraumatic chest pain, acute coronary syndrome, thoracic aortic dissection, and pulmonary embolism. Important aspects of clinical evaluation, diagnostic testing, treatment, and disposition and other less common causes of lethal chest pain are also discussed.

Do patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction without chest pain suffer a poor prognosis?

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have discussed acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients without chest pain, but have not focused on non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This 1-year study investigated whether chest pain presence relates to demographics, risk factors, and outcomes in NSTEMI patients. We retrospectively reviewed 194 patients, 73 without chest pain vs. 121 with chest pain, and compared the differences between clinical presentations, risk factors, medical management, and outcomes of these two groups.

RESULTS

Compared to patients with chest pain, patients without chest pain were significantly older, had lower SBP, higher HR, more cerebrovascular disease, less ischemic heart disease, higher delay to ED (emergency department) visit, lower ED medication prescriptions, lower percutaneous cardiac intervention, and higher in-hospital and one-year mortality rate. In a multivariate logistic regression, the adjusted odds ratios (OR) of patients without chest pain were 4.38 for the elderly, 0.99 for every 1 mmHg increase in SBP, 1.02 for every beat/min HR increase, 0.37 for those with ischemic heart disease, and 5.09 for those with cerebrovascular disease. The adjusted OR of in-hospital mortality were 3.09 for patients without chest pain, 0.32 for those with hypertension, 0.32 for smokers, 3.98 for those with shock, and 0.16 for those with percutaneous cardiac intervention. Finally, the only significantly adjusted OR of one-year mortality was 5.37 for patients without chest pain.

CONCLUSION

NSTEMI patients without chest pain were significantly older, had lower SBP, more tachycardia, more cerebrovascular disease, but less ischemic heart disease. They also experienced higher in-hospital and one-year mortality rates.

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with non-chest pain presentation at the Emergency Department: Insights from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) often presents acutely at the Emergency Department (ED). Although chest pain is a classical symptom, a significant proportion of patients do not present with chest pain. The impact of a non-chest pain (NCP) presentation on ED processes-of-care and outcomes is not fully understood. We utilised a national registry to characterise predictors, processes-of-care, and outcomes of NCP STEMI presentations. Retrospective data for all STEMI cases occurring between 2010 and 2012 were analysed from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry. Cases of inpatient onset, inter-facility transfers, and out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were excluded. Univariable analysis of demographic, clinical, processes-of-care, and outcome variables was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained independent predictors of a NCP presentation and 28-day mortality. Of 4667 STEMI cases, 12.9% presented without chest pain. Patients with NCP presentation were older (median, years = 74 vs. 58; p < 0.001), more likely to be female (39.1% vs. 15.7%; p < 0.001), of the Chinese race (72.5% vs. 62.7%; p < 0.001), and with diabetes (48.6% vs. 36.7%; p < 0.001). These patients were more likely to present with syncope (6.0% vs. 1.9%; p < 0.001) or epigastric pain (10.6% vs. 4.9%; p < 0.001). Patients with NCP presentation were less likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention (27.0% vs. 75.6%; p < 0.001), had longer door-to-balloon time (median, minutes = 83 vs. 63; p < 0.001), and experienced greater mortality at 28 days (31.2% vs. 4.5%; p < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, independent predictors of a NCP presentation included age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.07), diabetes (aOR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.40-2.19), BMI (aOR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.91-0.96), and dyslipidemia (aOR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.91). Absence of chest pain was an independent predictor for 28-day mortality (aOR = 3.46, 95% CI 2.64-4.52). Patients who presented with a NCP STEMI had a distinct clinical profile and experienced poorer outcomes. Routine triage ECG could be considered for patients with high-risk factors and non-classical symptoms.

Typical angina is associated with greater coronary endothelial dysfunction but not abnormal vasodilatory reserve

Background

Typical angina (TA) is defined as substernal chest pain precipitated by physical exertion or emotional stress and relieved with rest or nitroglycerin. Women and elderly patients are usually have atypical symptoms both at rest and during stress, often in the setting of nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

Hypothesis

To further understand this, we performed subgroup analysis comparing subjects who presented with TA vs nontypical angina (NTA) using baseline data of patients with nonobstructive CAD and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) enrolled in a clinical trial.

Methods

155 subjects from the RWISE study were divided into 2 groups based on angina characteristics: TA (defined as above) and NTA (angina that does not meet criteria for TA). Coronary reactivity testing (responses to adenosine, acetylcholine, and nitroglycerin), cardiac magnetic resonance–determined myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI), baseline Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), and Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) scores were evaluated.

Results

The mean age was 55 ± 10 years; Overall, 30% of subjects had TA. Baseline shortness of breath, invasively assessed acetylcholine‐mediated coronary endothelial function, and SAQ score were worse in the TA group (all P < 0.05), whereas adenosine‐mediated coronary flow reserve, MPRI, and DASI score were similar to the NTA group.

Conclusions

Among subjects with CMD and no obstructive CAD, those with TA had more angina pectoris, shortness of breath, and worse quality of life, as well as more severe coronary endothelial dysfunction. Typical angina in the setting of CMD is associated with worse symptom burden and coronary endothelial dysfunction. These results indicate that TA CMD subjects represent a relatively new CAD phenotype for future study and treatment trials.

Do elderly females have a higher risk of acute myocardial infarction? A retrospective analysis of 329 cases at an emergency department. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55:563-567. [PMID: 27590383 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.06.015]

OBJECTIVE

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a medical emergency; a missed or delayed diagnosis of this disease may contribute to a poor outcome and even death. Several studies have found elderly patients with AMI have atypical presentations for diagnosis, therefore we undertook this study to determine the risks among the elderly population, especially in female patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this one-year retrospective study, we reviewed the cases of AMI patients who had visited the emergency department at Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, and who had either been discharged or had died following a diagnosis of AMI (ICD code 410). We compared the differences between the clinical presentations of these two groups as well as the risk factors, medical management, and outcomes.

RESULTS

In our study, only 329 patients (164 elderly; 165 adults) met the defined criteria. The most common symptom of AMI was chest pain, and this was more common in adult patients than in elderly patients (81.8% vs. 60.4%, p < 0.001). In comparison with patients in the adult group, the patients in the elderly group had a significantly higher proportion of females (46.3% vs. 12.7%), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (71.3% vs. 46.7%), presenting with no chest pain (39.6% vs. 18.2%), shortness of breath (17.7% vs. 8.8%), nausea/vomiting/dizziness (7.9% vs. 2.4%), abdominal pain (4.3% vs. 0.6%), diabetes mellitus (45.1% vs. 26.1%), cerebrovascular disease (22.6% vs. 6.1%), longer hospital stays (18.2 ± 31.0 days vs. 9.8 ± 8.2 days), and increased in-hospital mortality rates (15.9% vs. 6.7%).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the adult AMI group, the elderly AMI group had a higher proportion of females, electrocardiography with NSTEMI and no chest-pain complaints, and a larger proportion of elderly patients with diabetes, ischemic heart disease, heart attacks at home and cardiac shock, which had longer hospital stays, and higher mortality rates.

Influence of case definition on incidence and outcome of acute coronary syndromes

OBJECTIVE

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are common, but their incidence and outcome might depend greatly on how data are collected. We compared case ascertainment rates for ACS and myocardial infarction (MI) in a single institution using several different strategies.

METHODS

The Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals serve a population of ∼560 000. Patients admitted with ACS to cardiology or general medical wards were identified prospectively by trained nurses during 2005. Patients with a death or discharge code of MI were also identified by the hospital information department and, independently, from Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP) records. The hospital laboratory identified all patients with an elevated serum troponin-T (TnT) by contemporary criteria (>0.03 µg/L in 2005).

RESULTS

The prospective survey identified 1731 admissions (1439 patients) with ACS, including 764 admissions (704 patients) with MIs. The hospital information department reported only 552 admissions (544 patients) with MI and only 206 admissions (203 patients) were reported to the MINAP. Using all 3 strategies, 934 admissions (873 patients) for MI were identified, for which TnT was >1 µg/L in 443, 0.04-1.0 µg/L in 435, ≤0.03 µg/L in 19 and not recorded in 37. A further 823 patients had TnT >0.03 µg/L, but did not have ACS ascertained by any survey method. Of the 873 patients with MI, 146 (16.7%) died during admission and 218 (25.0%) by 1 year, but ranging from 9% for patients enrolled in the MINAP to 27% for those identified by the hospital information department.

CONCLUSIONS

MINAP and hospital statistics grossly underestimated the incidence of MI managed by our hospital. The 1-year mortality was highly dependent on the method of ascertainment.

Symptom Interpretation in Women With Diabetes and Myocardial Infarction

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to describe the role of diabetes in acute myocardial infarction (MI) symptom interpretation.

Methods

This is a secondary data analysis of a study of treatment-seeking delay in women with acute MI (N = 52). This study included a subsample of those with diabetes (n = 16). Women were interviewed while hospitalized with MI about their actions, thoughts, and feelings from symptom onset to entry into the health care system. Qualitative description was the method of analysis.

Results

Three major themes were identified in the qualitative data: diabetes and decision making, presenting symptoms, and symptom attribution. Not all women included information about diabetes in their story, but those who checked blood sugars generally found it to be elevated. Diabetes was a factor in decision making for more than half of the sample. Presenting symptoms were variable but raised hypotheses about shortness of breath as a common presenting symptom for women with diabetes and MI. The third theme, symptom attribution, revealed confusion as to the cause of symptoms.

Conclusions

These results provide insight into symptom interpretation in women with diabetes and MI. Women with diabetes should consider atypical symptoms such as shortness of breath, gastrointestinal symptoms, and fluctuating blood sugars as reasons to seek care. Education for women with diabetes should include action plans for how to recognize and respond to symptoms. More research on the influence of diabetes on MI symptom attribution and decision making is needed.

Degree of dyspnoea in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: A report from Japanese multicenter registry

BACKGROUND

Degree of dyspnoea is almost universally evaluated in the patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but its clinical implications has not been thoroughly investigated. We aimed to describe the relationship between the severity of dyspnoea and in-hospital outcomes in patients with non-ST elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) complicated with acute heart failure (AHF).

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2014, 3287 consecutive patients with NSTE-ACS were enrolled in the Japanese prospective multicenter PCI registry. Patients complicated with AHF were subclassified based on the self-reported dyspnoea severity: no dyspnoeic symptoms, dyspnoea during moderate activity, mild activity or at rest. The recorded outcomes included in-hospital death, major cardiovascular (ie, cardiac death, shock, stroke or major bleeding) and renal events (ie, contrast-induced acute kidney injury [CI-AKI] or AKI requiring dialysis).

RESULTS

In total, 441 (13.4%) patients had AHF upon presentation, including 76 (17.2%) with dyspnoea during moderate activity, 160 (36.3%) with dyspnoea during mild activity, and 205 (46.5%) with dyspnoea at rest. In-hospital mortality as well as major cardiovascular and renal events increased as dyspnoea severity worsened. After multivariate adjustment, dyspnoea at rest was strongly associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 5.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.56-13.11; P<.001) as well as major cardiovascular (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.46-4.48; P<.001) and renal events (OR, 3.32; 95% CI, 2.05-5.38; P<.001), when compared to the patients without dyspnoea.

CONCLUSIONS

Among NSTE-ACS patients complicated with AHF, both cardiovascular and renal event rates were associated with presence of dyspnoea, and its incidence increased in parallel with dyspnoea severity.

Impact of symptom presentation on in-hospital outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist regarding the association between symptom presentation of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and in-hospital outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed data of the Japanese registry of acute Myocardial INfarction diagnosed by Universal dEfiniTion (J-MINUET). This was a prospective and multicenter registry consisting of 3085 AMI patients with available data of symptoms, who were hospitalized within 48h from onset during July 2012 to March 2014. We defined typical symptoms as any of chest pain or pressure due to myocardial ischemia.

RESULTS

Of this study population, 642 patients (20.8%) had atypical symptoms (atypical group) and the remaining 2443 patients (79.2%) showed typical symptoms (typical group). Compared to the typical group, the atypical group was associated with higher age, more females, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, history of cardiovascular disease, non-ST elevation MI, and Killip class ≥2. In the atypical group, urgent percutaneous coronary intervention was less frequently performed than in the typical group, and in STEMI patients door-to-balloon time was longer in the atypical than typical group. Atypical group had larger infarct size than typical group. Furthermore, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in atypical than in typical group (19.5% vs. 3.3%, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, presence of atypical symptoms was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 3.12, 95% confidence interval 2.19 to 4.47, p<0.001). Moreover, the association between atypical symptoms and mortality was consistent across each subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical symptoms of AMI were associated with less invasive therapy and poor outcome. Attention should be directed to these high-risk patients.

Association between comorbidities and absence of chest pain in acute coronary syndrome with in-hospital outcome

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the impact of comorbidities on the management and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients without chest pain/discomfort (i.e. ACS without typical presentation).

METHODS

Of the 11,458 ACS patients, enrolled by the International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Transitional Countries (ISACS-TC; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01218776), 8.7% did not have typical presentation at the initial evaluation, and 40.2% had comorbidities. The odds of atypical presentation increased proportionally with the number of comorbidities (odds ratio [OR]: 1, no-comorbid; OR: 1.64, 1 comorbidity; OR: 2.52, 2 comorbidities; OR: 4.57, ≥3 comorbidities).

RESULTS

Stratifying the study population by the presence/absence of comorbidities and typical presentation, we found a decreasing trend for use of medications and percutaneous intervention (OR: 1, typical presentation and no-comorbidities; OR: 0.70, typical presentation and comorbidities; OR: 0.23, atypical presentation and no-comorbidities; OR: 0.18, atypical presentation and comorbidities). On the opposite, compared with patients with typical presentation and no-comorbidities (OR: 1, referent), there was an increasing trend (p<0.001) in the risk of death (OR: 2.00, OR: 2.52 and OR: 4.83) in the above subgroups. However, after adjusting for comorbidities, medications and invasive procedures, atypical presentation was not a predictor of in-hospital death. Independent predictors of poor outcome were history of stroke (OR: 2.04), chronic kidney disease (OR: 1.57), diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.49) and underuse of invasive procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

In the ISACS-TC, atypical ACS presentation was often associated with comorbidities. Atypical presentation and comorbidities influenced underuse of in-hospital treatments. The latter and comorbidities are related with poor in-hospital outcome, but not atypical presentation, per se.

The prognostic implications of lack of palpitations in patients hospitalised with atrial fibrillation: observations from a 20-year registry

OBJECTIVES

It is well recognised that patients differ in the clinical presentation of atrial fibrillation (AF), ranging from the typical symptom of palpitations, atypical symptoms in others and a substantial that are asymptomatic. Whether the different patterns of presentation are associated with differences in outcomes is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and the prognostic implications of lack of palpitations among patients hospitalised with AF in a large prospective registry.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients hospitalised with AF in Qatar from 1991 to 2010 was made. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of palpitations on presentation. Clinical characteristics and outcome were analysed.

RESULTS

During the 20-year period, 3850 patients were hospitalised for AF; 1724 (44.8%) had palpitations on presentation while 2126 (55.2%) had no palpitations. Patients who lacked palpitations were 9 years older, had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (64.7% vs. 35.3%), underlying coronary artery disease (CAD; 14.6% vs. 6.2%) and severe left ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography (25.5% vs. 6.6%), (all, p = 0.001). There were 141 deaths among the group with no palpitations compared with 19 among the group with palpitations (6.6% vs. 1.1%). Multivariate analysis of mortality predictors identified 'lack of palpitations' as an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (relative risk 5.56; 95% confidence interval 1.20-25.0, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates for the first time that lack of palpitations as the presenting symptom of patients with AF is associated with worse in-hospital outcome independent of other risk factors or therapy. The underlying mechanisms and the role of confounders warrant further investigation.

Gendered symptom presentation in acute coronary syndrome: a cross sectional analysis

BACKGROUND

The international literature suggests that the symptom presentation of acute coronary syndrome may be different for men and women, yet no definitive conclusion about the existence of gendered presentation in ACS has been provided.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines whether gendered symptom presentation exists in a well-defined sample of men and women with ACS.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A cross-sectional analysis of baseline data pertaining to symptom experience and medical profiles were recorded for all ACS patients who participated in a multi-centered randomized control trial, in 5 hospitals, in Dublin, Ireland.

PARTICIPANTS

: Patients were deemed eligible if they were admitted through the Emergency Department (ED) with a diagnosis of ACS, if they were at least 21 years of age and able to read and converse in English. Patients were excluded if they had serious co-morbidities, cognitive, hearing or vision impairment.

METHODS

Patients were interviewed 2-4 days following their ACS event and data was gathered using the ACS response to symptom index.

RESULTS

The study included 1947 patients of whom 28% (n=545) were women. Chest pain was the most commonly experienced symptom in men and women, reported by 71% of patients. Using logistic regression and adjusting for clinical and demographic variables, women had greater odds of experiencing shortness of breath (50% vs 43%; odds ratio [OR]=1.32; 95% CI=1.08-1.62; p=.006) palpitations (5.5% vs 2.8%; OR=2.17; CI=1.31-3.62; p=.003) left arm pain (34% vs 30.5%; OR=1.27; CI=1.02-1.58; p=.03) back pain (7.5% vs 4.8%; OR=1.56; CI=1.03-2.37; p=.034) neck or jaw pain (21.5% vs 13.8%; OR=1.84; CI=1.41-2.40; p=.001) nausea (28% vs 24%; OR=1.30; CI=1.03-1.65; p=.024) a sense of dread (13.4% vs 10.5%; OR=1.47; CI=1.08-2.00; p=.014) and fatigue (29% vs 21.5%; OR=1.64; CI=1.29-2.07; p=.001) than their male counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Although chest pain is the most commonly experienced symptom by men and women, other ACS symptomology may differ significantly between genders.

Are there symptom differences in patients with coronary artery disease presenting to the ED ultimately diagnosed with or without ACS?

OBJECTIVES

Symptoms are compared among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) admitted to the emergency department with or without acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Sex and age are also assessed.

METHODS

A secondary analysis from the PROMOTION (Patient Response tO Myocardial Infarction fOllowing a Teaching Intervention Offered by Nurses) trial, an multicenter randomized controlled trial, was conducted.

RESULTS

Of 3522 patients with CAD, at 2 years, 565 (16%) presented to the emergency department, 234 (41%) with non-ACS and 331 (59%) with ACS. Shortness of breath (33% vs 25%, P = .028) or dizziness (11% vs 3%, P = .001) were more common in non-ACS. Chest pain (65% vs 77%, P = .002) or arm pain (9% vs 21%, P = .001) were more common in ACS. In men without ACS, dizziness was more common (11% vs 2%; P = .001). Men with ACS were more likely to have chest pain (78% vs 64%; P = .003); both men and women with ACS more often had arm pain (men, 19% vs 10% [P = .019]; women, 26% vs 13% [P = .023]). In multivariate analysis, patients with shortness of breath (odds ratio [OR], 0.617 [confidence interval [CI], 0.410-0.929]; P = .021) or dizziness (OR, .0311 [CI, 0.136-0.708]; P = .005) were more likely to have non-ACS. Patients with prior percutaneous coronary intervention (OR, 1.592 [CI, 1.087-2.332]; P = .017), chest pain (OR, 1.579 [CI, 1.051-2.375]; P = .028), or arm pain (OR, 1.751 [CI, 1.013-3.025]; P <.042) were more likely to have ACS.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CAD, shortness of breath and dizziness are more common in non-ACS, whereas prior percutaneous coronary intervention and chest or arm pain are important factors to include during ACS triage.

Differences in symptom presentation and hospital mortality according to type of acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Chest pain/discomfort (CP) is the hallmark symptom of acute myocardial infarction (MI), but some patients with MI present without CP. We hypothesized that MI type (ST-segment elevation MI [STEMI] or non-STEMI [NSTEMI]) may be associated with the presence or absence of CP.

METHODS

We investigated the association between CP at presentation and MI type, hospital care, and mortality among 1,143,513 patients with MI in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) from 1994 to 2006.

RESULTS

Overall, 43.6% of patients with NSTEMI and 27.1% of patients with STEMI presented without CP. For both MI type, patients without CP were older, were more frequently female, had more diabetes or history of heart failure, were more likely to delay hospital arrival, and were less likely to receive evidence-based medical therapies and invasive cardiac procedures. Multivariable analysis indicated that NSTEMI (vs STEMI) was the strongest predictor of atypical symptoms (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 1.93 [1.91-1.95]). Within the 4 CP/MI type categories, hospital mortality was highest for no CP/STEMI (27.8%), followed by no CP/NSTEMI (15.3%) and CP/STEMI (9.6%), and was lowest for CP/NSTEMI (5.4%). The adjusted odds ratio of mortality was 1.38 (1.35-1.41) for no CP (vs CP) in the STEMI group and 1.31 (1.28-1.34) in the NSTEMI group.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalized patients with NSTEMI were nearly 2-fold more likely to present without CP than patients with STEMI. Patients with MI without CP were less quickly diagnosed and treated and had higher adjusted odds of hospital mortality, regardless of whether they had ST-segment elevation.

High-risk chief complaints I: chest pain--the big three

Chest pain is one of the most frequently seen chief complaints in patients presenting to emergency departments, and is considered to be a "high-risk" chief complaint. The differential diagnosis for chest pain is broad, and potential causes range from the benign to the immediately life-threatening. Although many (if not most) emergency department patients with chest pain do not have an immediately life-threatening condition, correct diagnoses can be difficult to make, incorrect diagnoses may lead to catastrophic therapies, and failure to make a timely diagnosis may contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. Several atraumatic "high-risk" causes of chest pain are discussed in this article, including myocardial infarction and ischemia, thoracic aortic dissection, and pulmonary embolism. Also included are brief discussions of tension pneumothorax, esophageal perforation, and cardiac tamponade.

Prognostic value of selected presenting features of acute coronary syndrome in predicting in-hospital adverse events: insight from the Thai Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship of the presenting features of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to in-hospital adverse events (total and cardiac deaths, heart failure and serious dysrhythmia) and the effects of coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND

Patients with ACS may present with dyspnea, shock and/or cardiac arrest with or without accompanying chest pain.

METHODS

We evaluated 9,373 patients (age 65+/-12 years and 60% males) enrolled in the Thai ACS Registry. Cardiac dyspnea included shortness of breath on exertion, and/or at rest, orthopnea, or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea presumed from cardiac sources. Shock was present if systolic blood pressure was <90 mmHg for >30 min with symptoms of end-organ hypoperfusion. Post cardiac arrest was identified if cardiopulmonary resuscitation was required. We calculated the frequencies of these presenting features and assessed their contribution toward in-hospital adverse events (total and cardiac deaths, heart failure and serious arrhythmias) for the whole ACS and each entity of ACS and the effects of in-hospital interventions, both coronary and medicinal.

RESULTS

Cardiac dyspnea, shock and post cardiac arrest were seen in 32.7%, 9.3%, and 4.2% of patients, respectively. In-hospital adverse events occurred more frequently in patients with these presenting features than those without (p<0.05). Cardiac dyspnea and shock were independent predictors of heart failure and death, respectively, while post cardiac arrest independently identified patients at risk of arrhythmia, total and cardiac death, regardless of the subgroup of ACS. Coronary revascularization significantly reduced the risk of total and cardiac death.

CONCLUSION

These 3 presenting features of ACS portend a poor prognosis, regardless of the subgroup of ACS and should be considered as important early indicators for early intervention.

Symptoms of acute coronary syndrome in women with diabetes: an integrative review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To review studies comparing multiple acute coronary syndrome (ACS) symptoms in white and Latina women with and without diabetes.

METHODS

This empirical integrative review summarizes 8 studies and identifies the limitations of research to date.

RESULTS

There are conflicting results about acute coronary syndrome (ACS) symptoms in women with diabetes. Differences were found in associated ACS symptoms and symptom characteristics; however, some studies found no differences in frequency of chest pain by diabetic status. Diabetes is an independent predictor of "atypical" presentation of acute myocardial infarction in women, and research to date suggests that shortness of breath may be an important ACS symptom in women with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of literature on ACS symptoms in women, particularly Latina women, with diabetes, and results are inconclusive. Future research should examine the full range of ACS symptoms in multiethnic samples of women with diabetes.

The Emergency Department presenting complaint as predictor of in-hospital fatality

BACKGROUND

The relationship between major discharge diagnoses and prediction of in-hospital death has been intensively studied. The relation between the presenting complaint at the Emergency Department (ED) and in-hospital fatality, however, is less well known.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if presenting complaints add information regarding in-hospital fatality risk for nonsurgical ED patients.

METHODS

Investigating the relationship of in-hospital fatality rate and presenting complaint by comparing the presenting complaints, discharge diagnoses and in-hospital fatality for all nonsurgical patients visiting the ED during 1 year.

RESULTS

Of 12,995 nonsurgical admissions, 40% were treated as in-hospital patients. Among these, 328 in-hospital deaths occurred. Age was the most powerful predictor of death in hospitalized patients (P<0.0001). After adjustment for age, the female sex was found to be protective [odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.92, P=0.007)]. Compared with the largest complaint group, chest pain with an in-hospital fatality rate of 2.5%, there was a significantly increased risk of dying among those with stroke-like symptoms (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.35-3.08, P=0.0007), dyspnoea (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.27-3.00, P=0.002) or general disability (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.17-2.79, P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The presenting complaint at the ED carries valuable information of the risk for in-hospital fatality in nonsurgical patients. This knowledge can be valuable in the prioritization between different patient groups in the process of initiating diagnostics and treatment procedures at the ED.

Symptoms across the continuum of acute coronary syndromes: differences between women and men

BACKGROUND

The urgency and level of care provided for acute coronary syndromes partially depends on the symptoms manifested.

OBJECTIVES

To detect differences between women and men in the type, severity, location, and quality of symptoms across the 3 clinical diagnostic categories of acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina, myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation, and myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation) while controlling for age, diabetes, functional status, anxiety, and depression.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 112 women and 144 men admitted through the emergency department and hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes participated. Recruitment took place at 2 urban teaching hospitals in the Midwest. Data were collected during structured interviews in each patient's hospital room. Forty-eight symptom descriptors were assessed. Demographic characteristics, health history, functional status, anxiety, and depression levels also were measured.

RESULTS

Regardless of clinical diagnostic category, women reported significantly more indigestion (beta = 0.25; confidence interval [CI] = 0.01-0.49), palpitations (beta = 0.31; CI = 0.06-0.56), nausea (beta = 0.37; CI = 0.10-0.65), numbness in the hands (beta = 0.29; CI = 0.02-0.57), and unusual fatigue (beta = 0.60; CI = 0.27-0.93) than men reported. Differences between men and women in dizziness, weakness, and new-onset cough did differ by diagnosis. Reports of chest pain did not differ between men and women.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with acute coronary syndromes reported a higher intensity of 5 symptoms (but not chest pain) than men reported. Whether differences between the sexes in less typical symptoms are clinically significant remains unclear.

Symptoms Across the Continuum of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Differences Between Women and Men

Background The urgency and level of care provided for acute coronary syndromes partially depends on the symptoms manifested.

Objectives To detect differences between women and men in the type, severity, location, and quality of symptoms across the 3 clinical diagnostic categories of acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina, myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation, and myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation) while controlling for age, diabetes, functional status, anxiety, and depression.

Methods A convenience sample of 112 women and 144 men admitted through the emergency department and hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes participated. Recruitment took place at 2 urban teaching hospitals in the Midwest. Data were collected during structured interviews in each patient’s hospital room. Forty-eight symptom descriptors were assessed. Demographic characteristics, health history, functional status, anxiety, and depression levels also were measured.

Results Regardless of clinical diagnostic category, women reported significantly more indigestion (β = 0.25; confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.49), palpitations (β = 0.31; CI = 0.06–0.56), nausea (β = 0.37; CI = 0.10–0.65), numbness in the hands (β = 0.29; CI = 0.02–0.57), and unusual fatigue (β = 0.60; CI = 0.27–0.93) than men reported. Differences between men and women in dizziness, weakness, and new-onset cough did differ by diagnosis. Reports of chest pain did not differ between men and women.

Conclusions Women with acute coronary syndromes reported a higher intensity of 5 symptoms (but not chest pain) than men reported. Whether differences between the sexes in less typical symptoms are clinically significant remains unclear.

Epidemiology of acute myocardial infarction with the emphasis on patients who did not reach the coronary care unit and non-AMI admissions

OBJECTIVES

To describe the characteristics and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in a community, with particular emphasis on those who never reached a Coronary Care Unit (CCU) and those in whom the primary diagnosis was something other than a heart attack.

METHODS

Patients hospitalised in the city of Göteborg, Sweden, and discharged (dead or alive) with a diagnosis of AMI.

RESULTS

Among 1423 patient admissions the mean overall age was 75 years (81 years and 79 years in the two subsets). Among all patients, 33% had a history of heart failure and 20% had a history of cerebrovascular disease. The figures were even higher in the two subsets which were evaluated. In overall terms, an invasive strategy (coronary angiography) was used in 32% (in 5% and 9% in the two subsets respectively). The overall one-year and three-year mortality rate was 30% and 44% respectively. The three-year mortality rate among patients not admitted to a CCU was 65% and, among patients with no suspicion of a heart attack on admission, it was 68%.

CONCLUSION

Even in the 21st century, patients with AMI who reach hospital alive run a high risk of death and nearly half are dead within the first three years. In overall terms, patients are characterised by high age and high co-morbidity. Among patients who do not reach a CCU and among patients with no suspicion of AMI on admission, approximately two thirds are dead within the subsequent three years.

'It was not chest pain really, I can't explain it!' An exploratory study on the nature of symptoms experienced by women during their myocardial infarction

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study sought to explore the presenting nature of cardiac symptoms as experienced by women diagnosed with a myocardial infarction. The objectives were to use the participants' own words to gain a detailed understanding of how they perceived their evolving symptoms.

BACKGROUND

Women with coronary heart disease tend to delay seeking help despite experiencing symptoms. The classic hallmarks used to diagnose a myocardial infarction have been based on research primarily involving white middle-aged men with a focus on specific descriptions of chest pain. Whether these hallmarks apply to women in the same way as they apply to men is an area of increasing contention.

DESIGN

Using a purposive sample, a qualitative design was used to investigate the nature of cardiac symptoms experienced by women prior to and at the time of their myocardial infarction.

METHOD

Twelve women participated in semi-structured in-depth tape-recorded interviews conducted while they were in hospital.

RESULTS

Three interlinking themes emerged, which reflect a changing dynamic status in health, mediated by the perceived threat of individual symptoms. These included gradual awareness, not having pain in the chest and reactions to symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

It would appear that symptom presentation and distribution amongst women may not follow the pattern traditionally associated with current understanding of a 'typical' myocardial infarction. These differences together with perceptions about their cardiac symptoms may influence their health-seeking behaviours.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Women with a myocardial infarction may present with non-specific chest symptoms, which are difficult to interpret or recognize by patients and health professionals alike. Skill in recording history and in performing a comprehensive assessment of initial and current symptoms will enable nurses to identify women with a differential diagnosis of chest pain readily. Additionally, to increase awareness of coronary heart disease, nurses must use any opportunity to educate women of all age groups.

Ischaemic symptoms, quality of care and mortality during myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

To study in myocardial infarction (MI) whether documentation of ischaemic symptoms is associated with quality of care and outcomes, and to compare patient reports of ischaemic symptoms during interviews with chart documentation.

DESIGN

Observational acute MI study from 2003 to 2004 (Prospective Registry Evaluating Myocardial Infarction: Event and Recovery).

SETTING

19 diverse US hospitals.

PATIENTS

2094 consecutive patients with MI (10 911 patients screened; 3953 patients were eligible and enrolled) with both positive cardiac enzymes and other evidence of infarction (eg, symptoms, electrocardiographic changes). Transferred patients and those with confounding non-cardiac comorbidity were not included (n = 1859).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Quality of care indicators and adjusted in-hospital survival.

RESULTS

The records of 10% of all patients with MI (217/2094) contained no documented ischaemic symptoms at presentation. Patients without documented symptoms were less likely (p<0.05) to receive aspirin (89% vs 96%) or beta-blockers (77% vs 90%) within 24 hours, reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation MI (7% vs 58%) or to survive their hospitalisation (adjusted odds ratio = 3.2, 95% CI 1.8 to 5.8). Survivors without documented symptoms were also less likely (p<0.05) to be discharged with aspirin (87% vs 93%), beta-blockers (81% vs 91%), ACE/ARB (67% vs 80%), or smoking cessation counselling (46% vs 66%). In the subset of 1356 (65%) interviewed patients, most of those without documented ischaemic symptoms (75%) reported presenting symptoms consistent with ischaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Failure to document patients' presenting MI symptoms is associated with poorer quality of care from admission to discharge, and higher in-hospital mortality. Symptom recognition may represent an important opportunity to improve the quality of MI care.

Women with myocardial infarction are less likely than men to experience chest symptoms

OBJECTIVES

To assess similarities and differences between women and men regarding experience and interpretation of symptoms of acute myocardial infarction before hospital admission.

DESIGN

149 women and 384 men responded to a questionnaire two weeks after hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Men were more likely than women to report chest symptoms. Women were more likely to complain of nausea, palpitations, dyspnoea, fainting, pain in the back and pain between the scapulas than men. Irrespective of sex only half the patients interpreted their symptoms as cardiac. Early onset of chest symptoms, previously diagnosed angina, symptoms in accordance with expectations, symptoms stronger than expected and familiarity with symptoms, all contributed to a cardiac attribution among both sexes. A diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia and prescribed nitroglycerin was related to a cardiac attribution among men only.

CONCLUSION

Women were less likely to experience chest symptoms and more likely to experience atypical symptoms than men. Symptom experience and the patients' expectations of symptoms influenced interpretation and attribution among both sexes.

Epidemiology of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction

The development of heart failure and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction has long been regarded as an ominous complication, significantly increasing the morbidity and short- and long-term mortality of survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Although the incidence of heart failure after myocardial infarction has fallen over the last few decades, it remains common, complicating up to 45% of infarcts. Moreover, up to 60% of myocardial infarcts will result in left ventricular systolic dysfunction, depending on the exact definition used. Those at greatest risk of developing heart failure are the elderly, females, and those with prior myocardial infarction. Advances in the management of acute myocardial infarction have led to reduced in-hospital mortality (even when complicated by heart failure), but longer-term mortality remains high in these patients.

Acute coronary syndromes and their presentation in Asian and Caucasian patients in Britain

OBJECTIVE

To describe and compare demographics and symptom presentation in Asian and Caucasian patients with acute coronary syndromes.

DESIGN

Long-term prospective survey of symptom presentations in two racial groups.

SETTING

A London hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A consecutive series of patients admitted to hospital with acute coronary syndromes between November 2001 and November 2005.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Comparison of demographics and location, character, intensity and symptom distribution at presentation between Asian and Caucasian patients.

RESULTS

Asian patients were younger than Caucasian patients (61 v 69 years, p<0.001) and more had diabetes (43% v 17%, p<0.001). Proportionally, more Asian patients had angina (51% v 37%, p<0.001), but more Caucasian patients had myocardial infarction (63% v 49%, p<0.001) and non-ST elevation infarcts (40% v 29%, p<0.001). Men reported smaller areas of discomfort than women. Asian patients more frequently reported discomfort over the rear of their upper bodies compared to Caucasian patients (46% v 25%, p<0.001) and radiation of discomfort to their arms and necks. A higher percentage of Asian than Caucasian patients demonstrated a "classical" location of symptoms (90% v 82%, p<0.001). Patients with diabetes were more likely to feel no discomfort. A higher percentage of Caucasian than Asian patients presented with "silent" events (13% v 6%, p>0.001), with age being a major determinant.

CONCLUSION

Asian patients were younger, more likely to be diabetic and tended to report a higher intensity of pain and over a greater area of their body, and more frequent discomfort over the rear of their upper thorax than Caucasian patients.

Are There Gender Differences Related to Symptoms of Acute Myocardial Infarction? A Norwegian Perspective

The purpose of this study was to compare symptom presentation and illness behavior among women and men with acute myocardial infarction and assess various aspects that influence prehospital delay. This is a cross-sectional, retrospective study using self-reported questionnaires. The sample consisted of 82 women and men in Norway, up to 65 years of age, with first-time acute myocardial infarction between March and October 1999. The findings demonstrated that the most commonly reported symptom in both genders was chest pain. More than 90% of women and men experienced chest pain, with no difference between the genders. More women than men had nausea as well as pain located in their arms, back, jaw, and throat. More men than women attributed their symptoms to be cardiac in origin. Experiencing pain in the shoulders, attributing symptoms to be noncardiac, consulting a family member, and contacting several medical practitioners increased prehospital delay. During the year before the event, women were more likely to experience fatigue than men. The conclusion of this study is that women experienced a greater diversity of symptoms than men. Acute symptoms, interpretation of symptoms, and illness behavior may influence prehospital delay.