Medication adherence and the risk of severe asthma exacerbations: a systematic review

Optimizing adherence to medication to improve outcomes in asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adherence to medication is essential for asthma control and reducing the risk of exacerbations. Research has accumulated in recent years on causes and consequences of adherence and effective interventions. This review highlights current advances in adherence research and their potential for clinical practice.

FINDINGS

Optimizing adherence to medication can be achieved through interventions that identify individual barriers and train the care team in offering tailored support. Digital technologies that facilitate remote monitoring, patient-provider communication and care coordination are increasingly being integrated into asthma care.

SUMMARY

Adherence determinants reported cover individual, social and health service-related factors. Age and attitudes toward adherence are crucial determinants. Patients' and caregivers' mental health is relevant for adherence and clinical outcomes, highlighting the importance of integrating this aspect into holistic asthma management. Single-site care arrangements are beneficial for adherence. Tailoring adherence interventions to individual needs, using brief questionnaires to assess barriers and recommending evidence-based strategies to address them, have been found useful and feasible across care settings. Digital technologies such as smart inhaler systems and telemedicine-enhanced care have been shown to be effective in randomized controlled trials, yet implementation research highlights challenges to sustaining support on the long-term.

Prevalence and clinical impact of asthma-COPD overlap in severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Patients with asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) have a greater symptom burden, worse respiratory function, and more frequent exacerbations than those with asthma alone. However, only a few studies have investigated the prevalence and clinical course of ACO in severe asthma. This study aimed to examine the comorbid rate of ACO and its clinical impact on severe asthma.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 127 patients with severe asthma from 30 hospitals and clinics. Favorable treatment adherence was ensured, and the prevalence of ACO was assessed using the Japanese Respiratory Society ACO criteria. Patients were categorized into two groups, ACO and non-ACO, and their clinical characteristics were compared. The exacerbation rates with a 3-year follow-up and the annual change in FEV1 with a 5-year follow-up of 105 individuals were evaluated. The exacerbation-free rate was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The prevalence of ACO in severe asthma was 31.5 %. Patients with ACO were older, more frequently male, and had a longer duration of asthma than those without. No significant difference was observed in exacerbation rates between the ACO and non-ACO groups (62.2 % vs. 63.2 %, P = 0.91) or the annual change in FEV1 (-39.2 mL/year vs. -31.2 mL/year, P = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of ACO in our multicenter cohort study on severe asthma was approximately 30 %. The presence of ACO was not an independent risk for exacerbations or decline in FEV1.

Efficacy of medical education combined with extended care on adherence to inhaled glucocorticoids and clinical effects in patients with bronchial asthma

OBJECTIVE

To observe the clinical efficacy of medical education combined with extended care in patients with bronchial asthma and its effect on adherence to inhaled glucocorticoids.

METHODS

Ninety-eight patients with bronchial asthma were divided into the control group and the experimental group, n = 49, by utilizing the random number table method. The control group was given routine education and care as well as routine out-of-hospital instructions, and the experimental group was given medical education and extended care based on the control group. Asthma disease knowledge mastery, asthma control, quality of life, medication adherence and lung function were compared between both groups, and the number of asthma attacks and re-hospitalizations were recorded.

RESULTS

The experimental group performed higher scores of health knowledge, asthma control test and quality of life, rate of complete adherence, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow rate, and FEV1/forced vital capacity. The number of asthma attacks and the times of re-hospitalizations were lower in the experimental group (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Medical education combined with extended care can improve bronchial asthma patients' mastery of asthma disease knowledge, effectively control patients' conditions, enhance patients' quality of life and lung function, increase patients' adherence to inhaled glucocorticoids, and reduce the recurrence of bronchial asthma patients.

Asthma Exacerbation Risk in Pregnancy and Postpartum: Assessing the Impact of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Other Key Factors

BACKGROUND

Asthma, affecting approximately 13% of pregnancies worldwide, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), present in approximately 14%, are both associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. This study aims to address a lack of current knowledge about how GDM affects asthma during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether GDM is associated with an increased risk of asthma exacerbations during pregnancy and the first year postpartum.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health records of pregnant patients with asthma from 2010 to 2023, excluding those with pre-existing diabetes mellitus or concurrent chronic lung diseases. Asthma exacerbations were defined by the need for an oral corticosteroid prescription. Multivariable logistic regression and zero-inflated Poisson regression were used to adjust for age, race, body mass index (BMI), prepregnancy asthma exacerbation history, and insurance status.

RESULTS

Among 10,985 individuals, 1492 had GDM. Patients with GDM were older with higher BMIs. GDM was associated with increased asthma exacerbation risk during pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.67), but not postpartum. Stratified analyses of 4331 individuals with gestational blood glucose measurement showed that each doubling of blood glucose levels doubled the risk of asthma exacerbations during pregnancy (adjusted OR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.45-2.81). Other factors associated with asthma exacerbation included prepregnancy asthma exacerbations, older age, and Medicaid coverage.

CONCLUSION

The association between GDM and increased risk of asthma exacerbations underscores the need for early, universal screening and effective interventions to improve blood glucose control in pregnant individuals with pre-existing asthma.

Does adding digital inhalers to asthma triple therapy result in quadruple therapy?

Digital inhalers: adequate subgroup targeting and cost-effective implementation in asthma care remain key challenges https://bit.ly/3UTWtWv.

Out-of-Pocket Savings Under the Inhaler Price Cap

This cross-sectional study describes potential cost savings for both insured and uninsured users of brand-name inhalers in the US.

Are Treatment Adherence Factors Apparent in Patients with Asthma and to Physicians? Results from the APPaRENT 3 Survey

INTRODUCTION

Patient adherence to regular controller medication is critical for improving clinical outcomes in asthma, which is consistently associated with underlying pathophysiological inflammation. This survey aimed to identify types of treatment nonadherence and associated factors, including patient characteristics that predict poor adherence, in patients with asthma.

METHODS

This cross-sectional online survey involved patients with asthma and physicians managing such patients from Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam) and the Middle East (Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates) included in the Asthma Patients' and Physicians' Perspectives on the Burden and Management of Asthma (APPaRENT) 3 study. Patients and physicians shared their attitudes and beliefs regarding treatment and adherence in asthma management.

RESULTS

Most patients (82%, 1108/1354) reported having ever received treatment with daily controller inhalers, whereas 38% used inhaled relievers at least once daily for symptomatic relief. Among those prescribed maintenance and reliever therapy, 93% were prescribed a separate inhaled reliever, with significant variation by country (P < 0.01). Erratic nonadherence (primary definition) was exhibited by 55% (462/845) of patients including those who reported at least sometimes forgetting inhaler use, with its prevalence increasing with worsening asthma severity. Nonerratic nonadherence was exhibited by 49% (415/847) of patients including those who reported using controller inhalers less than once daily. Physicians reported that 73% of patients adhered to the prescribed regular medication. Regression analysis examining both erratic (primary definition) and nonerratic nonadherence revealed that current inhaled reliever used was the only significant predictor of poor adherence (P = 0.04). Sensitivity analyses revealed that the predictors of poor adherence to controller inhaler varied depending on the definition of nonadherence employed in the study.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed high rates of erratic and nonerratic nonadherence to regular controller inhalers in patients with asthma as well as discordance between adherence rates reported by patients and physicians.

Evaluation of Asthma Course in Patients Hospitalized in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Due to Severe Asthma Exacerbation

Background and Objectives: Childhood asthma represents a significant global public health issue and is the most common chronic disease among children. Hospitalization costs, especially for intensive care, are quite high. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics, prognosis, and preventable risk factors of patients admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) due to severe asthma exacerbations. Materials and Methods: We assessed patients admitted to the Ankara Bilkent City Hospital PICU from January 2013 to December 2022 diagnosed with asthma based on The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria. The collected data encompassed demographic and clinical characteristics, intensive care treatments, hospitalization duration, atopic conditions, and respiratory viral panel results. The current clinical status was assessed using hospital records and caregiver interviews, with a focus on recent emergency admissions, ongoing treatments, exacerbation frequency, and asthma control based on GINA guidelines. Results: The study comprised 83 patients with a mean age of 72.9 (±45.5) months, predominantly male (63.9%). The average follow-up duration post-discharge was 40.7 ± 26.9 months. Patients received respiratory support in the PICU for a mean of 3.8 (±2.8) days and systemic steroid therapy for 4 (±1.5) days. Respiratory viral panel results identified pathogens in 42 patients, with rhinovirus being the most frequent. Post-discharge, 72.3% of patients continued follow-up at pediatric allergy clinics. Of the 60 patients contacted, 67.5% were on current asthma treatment and 48.2% had experienced an exacerbation in the past year. Asthma management steps remained unchanged for 33 patients, decreased for 13, and increased for 47 (44.6%). Asthma maintenance treatments pre-admission and post-discharge showed that 44.6% (n = 47) of the patients required an increase in their GINA treatment step after PICU admission, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). History of atopic dermatitis was a significant risk factor for escalating treatment steps in both univariate and multivariate analyses (p = 0.018, p = 0.03). Conclusions: We found that admission to the PICU due to severe asthma exacerbation not only increases the risk of recurrent asthma exacerbations but also serves as a risk factor for stepping up maintenance treatment according to GINA guidelines during long-term follow-up.

Management of asthma and COPD: Analysis of clinical profiles, post-hospitalization trajectories, and therapeutic interventions

OBJECTIVES

Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) are major global health issues, impacting morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Despite the proven benefits of pharmacist involvement in managing these conditions, their potential in hospitals remains underused. This study aimed to identify patients at high risk of rehospitalization post-exacerbation of asthma or COPD, to target pharmaceutical interventions.

METHODS

Data from the University Hospital for January-December 2019 on adult admissions for asthma/COPD were analyzed, focusing on demographics, hospitalization, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the 140 patients enrolled, a significant majority (91%) underwent adjustments in their treatment regimens during their hospital stay, and nearly 59% faced readmission within six months. A survival analysis highlighted a notable disparity in the rates of rehospitalization-free survival between patients with asthma and those with COPD, identifying COPD patients as having a higher susceptibility to rehospitalization.

CONCLUSION

The study found COPD patients at greater risk but did not specify a priority profile, suggesting the necessity for broad, customized interventions to improve outcomes and reduce healthcare strain.

Asthma control, its related factors, and impact on quality of life among pediatric patients at a tertiary center in Jordan: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric asthma is a common respiratory disease that burdens affected patients, their caregivers, and the entire healthcare system. Uncontrolled asthma ultimately impacts patients' quality of life. There are limited studies examining the factors associated with asthma control and quality of life. Thus, this study aimed to explore factors associated with asthma control and examine the relationship between asthma control and quality of life in children with asthma.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2023 to January 2024 at the Jordan University Hospital, including 136 children aged 7-17 diagnosed with asthma. Asthma control was assessed using the Asthma Control Test (ACT) or Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT). Medication adherence was measured using the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS), and quality of life was evaluated using the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ).

RESULTS

Only 43.4% of patients had proper asthma control. The average quality of life and MMAS scores were 4.9 ± 1.5 and 4.2 ± 1.9, respectively. Uncontrolled asthma was associated with increased hospital admissions (p = 0.008), sensitivity to cold (p = 0.002), spring weather (p = 0.031), and infections (p = 0.001). Patients with controlled asthma had significantly higher quality of life (p < 0.001), but no significant differences in MMAS scores (p = 0.743). On multivariate analysis, QoL score was a positive predictor of control (p < 0.001), while sensitivity to infections were a negative predictor (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Most pediatric patients with asthma at the Jordan University Hospital had poor asthma control. Quality of life remained a positive predictor of control irrespective of adherence to asthma treatment. This highlights the need for caregivers and physicians to focus greater attention on these cases, given the substantial clinical and social challanages they poses for affected children.

A Retrospective Review of Children Admitted With Acute Severe Asthma to the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital Between 2009 and 2019

AIM

There is limited data on the PICU outcomes of children with acute severe asthma (ASA) in South Africa. This study aims to describe the profiles and treatment of all children admitted to our PICU with ASA.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of all children admitted with ASA to the PICU at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital between 01 January 2009 and 31 December 2019.

RESULTS

There were 14 592 PICU admissions over the 11-year period, of which 180 admissions (1.2%) were for ASA. The median, interquartile range (IQR) age on admission was 67 (37-93) months. Almost all children received nebulisations, steroids and magnesium sulphate before PICU admission. Half of the patients were loaded with intravenous salbutamol (n = 96; 53.3%) and about a third (n = 61; 34%) received a salbutamol infusion before PICU admission. Similar proportions received nebulisations and steroids in PICU, 34 children (19%) received magnesium sulphate again in PICU and a total of 130 children (72.2%) received a salbutamol infusion. Most children received non-invasive respiratory support (n = 167; 90.3%), and 18 children (9.7%) required mechanical ventilation for a median (IQR) of 3 (2-4) days. The median PICU stay was 1 (IQR 1-2) day and median hospital stay was 4 (IQR 3-6) days. No children died.

CONCLUSION

There has been an increasing number of children admitted to PICU with ASA over the 11-year period. There has been increased use of HFNC and the duration of PICU support is short.

Trends in polypharmacy among U.S. adults with asthma, 2001-2020

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate trends in polypharmacy prevalence among adults with asthma in the United States.

METHODS

Data from the 2001-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used to estimate the weighted prevalence of polypharmacy. Joinpoint regression analysis was conducted to evaluate trends in polypharmacy. Trends were first evaluated overall and then stratified by asthma severity and asthma control. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with polypharmacy.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2020, a stable trend in polypharmacy among U.S. adults with asthma was observed (average annual percent change [AAPC]=1.02, p=0.71). Trends across different asthma severity were stable (mild asthma: AAPC=2.93, p=0.20; moderate asthma: AAPC=-2.22, p=0.35; severe asthma: AAPC=0.45, p=0.82). Trends in adults with good asthma control and those with poor control stayed constant (good control: AAPC=0.82, p=0.68; poor control: AAPC=-1.22, p=0.82). Several factors, including older age, females, Non-Hispanic Black, health insurance coverage, family income, number of healthcare visits, former smokers, multi-morbidities, asthma severity, and asthma control, were associated with polypharmacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy prevalence has remained constant among U.S. adults with asthma over the past two decades. Despite a stable overall trend, disparities in polypharmacy prevalence persist across different asthma severity and control status, underscoring the need for tailored medication management to improve asthma care.

Cost-related non-adherence to medications among adults with asthma in the USA, 2011-2022

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled asthma is possibly caused by medication non-adherence, and financial hardship can be a major contributor to non-adherence. Since economic conditions and asthma management have changed over time, a comprehensive investigation of cost-related medication non-adherence (CRN) among adults with asthma is crucial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate trends, prevalence and determinants of CRN, and its impact on asthma control among US adults with asthma.

METHODS

Data from 2011 to 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to evaluate trends in the prevalence of CRN. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with CRN. Two additional multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine associations between CRN and asthma-related adverse events, including asthma attacks and emergency room (ER) visits for asthma.

RESULTS

A total of 30 793 adults with asthma were included, representing 8.1% (19.38 million) of the US population. From 2011 to 2022, a declining trend in the prevalence of CRN among US adults with asthma was observed. Approximately every one in six adults with asthma was non-adherent to medications due to cost. Several factors, including demographics and comorbidities, were associated with CRN. Adults with asthma who had CRN were at an increased risk of experiencing asthma attacks (adjusted OR, 1.95; 95% CI 1.78 to 2.13) and ER visits for asthma (adjusted OR, 1.63; 95% CI 1.44 to 1.84).

CONCLUSION

Since asthma is one of the leading chronic diseases, the burden of cost-related non-adherence to medications highlights the need for appropriate policies and social supports to address such problems.

Medication adherence in allergic diseases and asthma: a literature review

Patients' collaboration with healthcare providers, along with their individual dedication to follow medical recommendations, is a crucial component of effective therapy in chronic diseases. If a patient fails to fill their prescription, administers the medication improperly in terms of method and/or dosage, misses follow-up visits, or discontinues the treatment for any reason, these lapses can adversely affect disease management, impairing the effectiveness of symptom relief and prevention of progression and complications. A comparable situation pertains to allergic diseases, which require long-term and consistent treatment to achieve symptom alleviation and control. Research has shown that adherence rates for long-term therapy in chronic diseases have improved marginally over the years and continue to hover at approximately the figure published in a World Health Organization (WHO) report "Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action." from 2003, which had stated that only 50% of patients in developed countries follow medical recommendations and that this rate would be even lower in developing countries. Over 20 years later, literature indicated that there has been only a slight improvement on the matter, leaving room for developing and implementing effective solutions to improve medication compliance. Further investigation on this matter is required. Causes for non-adherence classified by the Global Initiative for Asthma in their main report seem to correspond to those of the report by the WHO. Similar dependency might be determined by other allergic diseases as they fit chronic disease criteria, and the issue of non-adherence affects them too. This literature review seeks to compile and synthesize current insights on factors that influence adherence, as well as explore potential methods for monitoring, evaluating, and improving its outcomes in chronic diseases related to the medical field of allergology, such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, rhinoconjunctivitis, atopic dermatitis, and urticaria.

Adherence Challenges and Strategies in Specific Groups With Asthma: Adolescents, Pregnancy, and Older Adults

Poor adherence to controller therapies is a universal challenge to asthma control. Several high-risk groups, including adolescents, pregnant women, and older adults, have their own unique challenges to adherence. The rates of asthma controller therapy use are low in each of these populations, but secondary to different causes. Adolescents have increased independence and a transition to new self-management responsibilities; pregnant women may be concerned about adverse effects of medications to the fetus; and older adults may have age-related physical and cognitive challenges to effectively taking medication. Only by understanding the nuances of care in these populations can health care professionals develop strategies to address barriers to adherence. Tailored education focused on empowering patients and dispelling misconceptions can serve as tools to improve adherence and ultimately asthma control.

Best practice advice for asthma exacerbation prevention and management in primary care: an international expert consensus

Primary care clinicians play a key role in asthma and asthma exacerbation management worldwide because most patients with asthma are treated in primary care settings. The high burden of asthma exacerbations persists and important practice gaps remain, despite continual advances in asthma care. Lack of primary care-specific guidance, uncontrolled asthma, incomplete assessment of exacerbation and asthma control history, and reliance on systemic corticosteroids or short-acting beta2-agonist-only therapy are challenges clinicians face today with asthma care. Evidence supports the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) + fast-acting bronchodilator treatments when used as needed in response to symptoms to improve asthma control and reduce rates of exacerbations, and the symptoms that occur leading up to an asthma exacerbation provide a window of opportunity to intervene with ICS. Incorporating patient perspectives and preferences when designing asthma regimens will help patients be more engaged in their therapy and may contribute to improved adherence and outcomes. This expert consensus contains 10 Best Practice Advice Points from a panel of primary care clinicians and a patient representative, formed in collaboration with the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG), a clinically led charitable organization that works locally and globally in primary care to improve respiratory health. The panel met virtually and developed a series of best practice statements, which were drafted and subsequently voted on to obtain consensus. Primary care clinicians globally are encouraged to review and adapt these best practice advice points on preventing and managing asthma exacerbations to their local practice patterns to enhance asthma care within their practice.

Unlocking Better Asthma Control: A Narrative Review of Adherence to Asthma Therapy and Innovative Monitoring Solutions

This review addresses the ongoing challenges in asthma management, particularly focusing on patient adherence to inhaler therapy. Asthma, a chronic condition characterized by variable respiratory symptoms and airflow obstruction, can lead to significant morbidity and mortality if not properly managed. Despite advances in inhaler technology and therapeutic options, non-adherence remains a significant barrier to optimal asthma control. This review explores both intentional and unintentional non-adherence, influenced by factors such as age, socioeconomic status, and the complexity of inhaler devices. The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) provides guidelines aimed at improving adherence through targeted interventions, and this review examines their application. Common inhaler technique errors, including incorrect inhalation speed, not exhaling before inhaling, and failure to hold breath post-inhalation, are identified as major contributors to inadequate asthma control. Furthermore, the review explores the emerging role of electronic monitoring devices (EMDs), such as CapMedic and DigiHaler, which offer real-time feedback to enhance inhaler technique and adherence. The role of biomarkers in assessing adherence and the potential of personalized treatment strategies, including biologic therapies, are also discussed. Overall, addressing adherence requires a comprehensive approach that integrates patient education, tailored interventions, and technological innovations to achieve better clinical outcomes in asthma management.

Clinical profile, inhaler technique, and predictors of inhaler adherence among asthma and COPD patients who attended the outpatient emergency department for acute exacerbation

Understanding the patients' clinical profile, barriers to optimal inhaler use, and adherence are crucial in achieving the treatment goal for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to assess the inhaler technique and identify the predictors of inhaler adherence among asthma and COPD patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED). This prospective cross-sectional study recruited patients who presented to the outpatient ED of a tertiary hospital for mild-to-moderate exacerbation from March 2022 to February 2023. Convenience sampling was used in this study. The inhaler techniques and adherence of all subjects were evaluated. Regression analysis was used to identify predictors of inhaler adherence. We recruited 120 subjects with a mean age of 47.8 ± 16.0 and were predominantly asthma patients (n = 85, 70.8%). Most were on regular follow-up (n = 72, 60.0%) and adhered to their inhaler(s) (n = 86, 71.7%). Less than half of the subjects use their inhaler(s) correctly (n = 45, 37.5%). Three predictors of inhaler adherence were identified: regular follow-up (aOR 2.072, p = 0.041), correct inhaler technique (aOR 3.071, p = 0.039), and ability to explain inhalers' mode of action (aOR 10.906, p = 0.031). The high rate of wrong inhaler techniques among asthma and COPD patients is worrisome. Identified predictors of inhaler adherence should be targeted when managing this group of patients. In addition to the exacerbation treatment in the ED, referrals to public primary health clinics for regular follow-ups, evaluation of inhaler techniques, and counseling to enhance patient knowledge are crucial.

Asthma prescribing trends, inhaler adherence and outcomes: a Real-World Data analysis of a multi-ethnic Asian Asthma population

Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) is the mainstay therapy for asthma, but general adherence is low. There is a paucity of real-world inhaler prescribing and adherence data from Asia and at the population level. To address these gaps, we performed a real-world data analysis of inhaler prescribing pattern and adherence in a multi-ethnic Asian asthma cohort and evaluated the association with asthma outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of adult asthma patients (aged ≥18 years) treated in the primary and specialist care settings in Singapore between 2015 to 2019. Medication adherence was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR), and categorised into good adherence (MPR 0.75-1.2), poor adherence (MPR 0.75) or medication oversupply (MPR > 1.2). All statistical analyses were performed using R Studio. 8023 patients, mean age 57 years, were evaluated between 2015 and 2019. Most patients were receiving primary care (70.4%) and on GINA step 1-3 therapies (78.2%). ICS-long-acting beta-2 agonist (ICS-LABA) users increased over the years especially in the primary care, from 33% to 52%. Correspondingly, inpatient admission and ED visit rates decreased over the years. Between 2015 and 2019, the proportion of patients with poor adherence decreased from 12.8% to 10.5% (for ICS) and from 30.0% to 26.8% (for ICS-LABA) respectively. Factors associated with poor adherence included minority ethnic groups (Odds ratio of MPR 0.75-1.2: 0.73-0.93; compared to Chinese), presence of COPD (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.96) and GINA step 4 treatment ladder (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61-0.85). Factors associated with good adherence were male gender (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.28), single site of care (OR 1.22 for primary care and OR 1.76 for specialist care), GINA step 2 treatment ladder (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.50). Good adherence was also associated with less frequent inpatient admission (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.98), greater SABA overdispensing (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.47-1.87) and oral corticosteroids use (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.14). Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) adherence has improved generally, however, poor adherence was observed for patients receiving asthma care in both primary and specialist care, and those from the minority ethnicities.

Over-the-counter short-acting β2-agonist purchase and asthma-related health outcomes: a post hoc analysis of the SABINA III study

This post-hoc analysis of the SABINA III study evaluated the association of short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) prescriptions and self-reported over-the-counter (OTC) SABA purchase in the previous 12 months with asthma-related outcomes using multivariable regression models in 4556 patients (mean age, 48.9 years). Of the 2810 patients prescribed ≥3 SABA canisters, 776 (27.6%) also purchased ≥1 SABA OTC. This subset of 776 patients reported the highest disease burden; 73.2% had ≥1 severe exacerbation and 55.7% had uncontrolled asthma. Asthma-related outcomes worsened with any SABA OTC purchase, regardless of SABA prescriptions; disease burden was the highest in patients with ≥3 SABA prescriptions and ≥1 SABA OTC purchase vs 1-2 SABA prescriptions only (86% lower odds of having at least partly controlled asthma and 124% increased incidence of severe asthma (both P < 0.001). These findings emphasize the need to implement policy changes to restrict SABA purchase without prescriptions and ensure access to affordable asthma care.

National expert consensus on short-acting beta2-agonist overreliance in asthma care in Malaysia

OBJECTIVE

Inappropriate use of short-acting beta2-agonists (SABA) in asthma has been associated with undesired outcomes. This national expert consensus was developed to increase awareness of SABA overuse and provide recommendations on the ways to eliminate SABA overprescription and overreliance in Malaysia.

DATA SOURCES

This expert consensus was developed by searching the PubMed database, using index terms to identify SABA overuse-related burden and recommendations made in asthma guidelines. Consensus recommendations were made via the Delphi method, involving a Malaysian expert committee comprising 13 healthcare professionals (five pulmonologists, four family medicine specialists, two emergency medicine physicians and two pharmacists).

STUDY SELECTIONS

The articles reviewed include randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, observational studies, guidelines, and surveys, with abstracts in English and published up until June 2023. Relevant recommendations were also sourced from verified websites of medical organizations and societies.

RESULTS

Eleven consensus statements were developed, each statement achieving a priori agreement level of at least 70%. The statements reflect SABA overreliance in asthma care, as well as recommendations to eliminate SABA overprescription and overreliance in Malaysia. Supporting evidence in the literature as well as expert committee discussions leading to the development of the finalized statements were elaborated.

CONCLUSION

This national expert consensus discussed the burden of SABA overreliance and made specific recommendations to eliminate SABA overprescription and overreliance in the Malaysian context. This consensus document is anticipated to impart better awareness among Malaysian healthcare providers and contribute to the continuous improvement of asthma care in the country.

Anti-interleukin-5/anti-interleukin-5 receptor α treatment improves self-reported work productivity in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma: a prospective cohort trial

Background

Severe asthma affects the working life of millions of people worldwide. Interleukin (IL)-5/anti-interleukin-5 receptor α (IL-5Rα) antibodies are highly effective in reducing symptoms in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. We analysed effects of anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα treatment on self-reported productivity and absenteeism at work in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

Methods

In this prospective single-centre study, patients with severe eosinophilic asthma received a questionnaire assessing their actual occupational status and the influence asthma has on their work life, productivity and missed days at work prior to initiation of antibody treatment and after 6 and 12 months of therapy. Among others, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) was used.

Results

Out of 54 patients with a median age of 60 years, 27 (50%) were employed. In addition to an increase in asthma control and lung function, self-reported productivity increased significantly with a decrease on the WPAI:SHP from 30% (interquartile range (IQR) 20-50%) to 10% (IQR 0-27.5%) under treatment (p=0.001). Furthermore, self-reported missed days at work were reduced from 2 days·month-1 (IQR 1.75-6 days·month-1) to 0 days·month-1 (IQR 0-2 days·month-1; p=0.067). At baseline 22 employed patients (81%) stated they were affected at work by their asthma. After 12 months of treatment, this number decreased to eight patients (30%; p=0.038).

Conclusions

This prospective analysis could prove the substantial impact severe asthma has on patients' working life. Anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma leads to a significant increase in self-reported productivity at work, and after 12 months of treatment patients state substantially fewer negative effects on their working situation.

Exploration of preferences among people with COPD to inform resource allocation: a discrete choice experiment study

INTRODUCTION

Treatment options for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are numerous but adherence remains a key challenge. We performed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) of patients' preferences in accessing care for the management of COPD. The aim of this study was to understand patients' preferences for modes of accessing care for the management of COPD. This piece of work was then used to inform resource allocation decisions in five integrated care systems (ICSs) in England.

METHODS

People with diagnosed COPD in five ICSs were invited to complete an online survey from August to September 2022. An experimental design built on the principles of minimal overlap, level balance and orthogonality was used to create 20 sets of 11 scenarios for participants to assess. Participants were presented with three hypothetical options and asked to select their most preferred or state that none was preferred. Data were analysed using a hierarchal Bayes algorithm.

RESULTS

Of 82 639 patients with COPD in the study area, 520 completed the survey. The mean health-related quality of life score derived using EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level was 0.57 (0.29). The attributes assigned greatest importance were treatment outcomes, treatment delivery and the type of staff who deliver treatment. Mean utility level scores were substantially higher for little relief (22.75 (SD 78.80)) or some relief from symptoms (20.67 (46.77)) than for complete relief (‒43.42 (83.03)). Of the treatment delivery options, in-person individual appointments were preferred (mean utility score 48.34 (SD 48.14)), and care being provided by healthcare professionals was viewed as very important (77.50 (64.39)).

CONCLUSIONS

The DCE approach can help resource allocation decisions by indicating attributes most important to patients and trade-offs they are willing to make in treatment access and delivery.

Efficacy and safety of Once-Daily Vilanterol/Fluticasone furoate MDI in persistent asthma: Phase 3 OD-INHALE Study

INTRODUCTION

Once-daily inhalers have been shown to improve adherence leading to lesser discontinuation compared to twice- or thrice-daily inhalers in management of asthma. Combination of Vilanterol and Fluticasone Furoate (VI/FF) is approved for management of asthma and COPD and is available as a dry powder inhaler. Pressurized-Metered Dose Inhalers (pMDIs) offer ease-of-use and therapy alternatives for patients with low inspiratory flow. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of a new once-daily pMDI containing VI/FF in individuals diagnosed with persistent asthma.

METHODS

This phase 3, double-blind, randomized controlled study assessed the non-inferiority of VI/FF (12.5 mcg/50 mcg & 12.5 mcg/100 mcg; 2 puffs once-daily) over Formoterol Fumarate and Fluticasone Propionate (FOR/FP, 6 mcg/125 mcg & 6 mcg/250 mcg; 2 puffs twice-daily) in patients with persistent asthma. Primary outcome was change from baseline in trough FEV1 at the end of study (12 weeks). Adverse events and number of exacerbations were used to evaluate safety.

RESULTS

A total of 330 patients were randomized into VI/FF (165) and FOR/FP (165). Trough FEV1 significantly improved in both the groups at week 12, with a mean difference (VI/FF minus FOR/FP) being 54.75 mL (95% CI, 8.42-101.08 mL, p = 0.02). The low dose VI/FF had similar efficacy to that of low dose FOR/FP and high dose VI/FF had similar efficacy to high dose FOR/FP. No serious adverse events were reported during the study.

CONCLUSION

Once daily VI/FF pMDI was non-inferior to twice daily FOR/FP pMDI in patients with persistent asthma.

Does inhaler adherence really matter in severe asthma?

Inhaled therapies, primarily the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), have been the cornerstone of asthma treatment since the 1960s. They have been shown to reduce symptom burden, morbidity and mortality, and potentially avoid unnecessary and unscheduled healthcare. However, some people have severe asthma, defined by an inability to gain or maintain consistent disease control despite appropriate use of high dose ICS-containing inhalers. In this review, we discuss whether it is appropriate to demand adherence to a treatment this cohort are demonstrably resistant to.

Digitally monitored inhaled therapy: a 'smart' way to manage severe asthma?

INTRODUCTION

One of the fundamental challenges of managing patients with severe asthma is treatment adherence, particularly with inhaled corticosteroids. Adherence is difficult to measure objectively and poor adherence is associated with worse outcomes. In this study, assess the ability of a 'smart' inhaler to record adherence in severe asthma patients and measure the impact of this on asthma control.

METHODS

Consecutive consenting patients meeting criteria for biologics had their existing high-dose ICS/LABA//LAMA combination inhaler/s switched to mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium (114/46/136). Routine clinical data, including blood eosinophils, FeNO, and ACQ-6 scores were collected at baseline and at 4 wk. Adherence was then checked on the Propeller Health app, and good adherence was defined as >80% of prescribed usage. Participants were then followed-up at 12 months to record the proportion of patients who were initiated on biologics.

RESULTS

77 patients (mean [SD] age = 50.4 [15.7] years, 67.5% female [n = 52]) participated. 71 participants were able to use the device and 65% (n = 46) of these attained good asthma control and were not initiated on biologics at 12-month follow-up. Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in ACQ6 score at follow-up (2.81 vs. 1.92, p < 0.001 and 3.05 vs. 2.60, p < 0.001, respectively), but there was no statistically significant difference in improvement between groups. Patients with optimal adherence also demonstrated a significant reduction in median FeNO at follow-up (47 ppb vs. 40 ppb, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In severe asthma patients, 'smart' inhalers may represent an effective management tool to improve adherence and asthma control, therefore avoiding the need for patients to commence biological therapies.

Short-acting β2-agonists (SABA) overuse in asthma and patients' perceptions for this behavior

BACKGROUND

Short-acting β2-agonists (SABA) overuse is associated with poor asthma control. The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2019-updated strategy report has therefore taken a paradigm shift in reliever therapy recommendations.

OBJECTIVES

(I) To investigate the status of SABA overuse and medication dispensing patters in asthma in the Netherlands (II) validate dispensing data for SABA overuse identification and (III) understand patients' perspectives towards this SABA-taking behavior to inform future improvement strategies.

METHODS

An annually repeated cross-sectional study was conducted from 2017 to 2021 using pharmacy dispensing data in a real-world setting, including asthma patients aged 18-45 with ≥1 inhaler. A following qualitative study was performed in identified SABA overusing patients with a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews, supported by theoretical frameworks.

RESULTS

Dispensing data was available from 87 % of all community pharmacies (n = 1994) in 2017 and 95 % (n = 2005) in 2021. SABA overuse prevalence was constant for the five study-years with 20.6 % (±0.5 %). Increased ICS-formoterol and decreased SABA dispenses were observed in starters of inhalation therapy in 2021. 53 asthma patients completed the questionnaire of whom 43 patients confirmed SABA overuse, generating a positive predictive value of 81 %. Key behavioral drivers covered 7 themes regarding capability (knowledge; skills; memory, attention and decision process) motivation (emotion; beliefs about-capabilities; consequences) and opportunity (environmental context).

CONCLUSION

SABA overuse remains in one-fifth of asthma patients across the Netherlands, requiring careful attention from healthcare professionals. Dispensing data is a valid measure for SABA overuse in a clinical setting, facilitating patient selection. To meet patients' varied supporting needs, integration of tailored behavioral interventions is essential.

Polypharmacy among adults with asthma in the United States, 2005-2020

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a chronic disease that often requires medication for control. Polypharmacy remains a major issue to medication adherence; however, its evidence among patients with asthma is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prevalence and determinants of polypharmacy and its associations with asthma control among adults with asthma in the United States.

METHODS

Data from the 2005-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were used to estimate the weighted prevalence of polypharmacy. Selected variables, including demographics, comorbidities, prescription medications, and asthma-related adverse events, were extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify factors associated with polypharmacy. Another two sets of multivariable logistic regression models were employed to further assess the association between polypharmacy and asthma-related adverse events: one for asthma attacks and the other for asthma-related emergency department visits.

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2020, polypharmacy prevalence was 34.3% and 14.1% among adults with and without asthma, respectively. Characteristics, including older age (P < 0.01), non-Hispanic Blacks (P < 0.01), health insurance coverage (P < 0.01), number of health care visits (P < 0.01), and multiple comorbidities (P < 0.01), were associated with polypharmacy. Polypharmacy was associated with increased risks of having asthma attacks (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.08-1.76) and asthma-related emergency department visits (odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.09-1.94) among adults with asthma. Among patients taking at least one asthma medication, risks of asthma attacks, and asthma-related emergency department visits did not differ between those with and without polypharmacy.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one in three adults with asthma experienced polypharmacy in the United States. Disparities existed in several characteristics, highlighting the necessity for appropriate care and policies among vulnerable populations. Further validation on the impact of polypharmacy on asthma control is required.

Adherence to inhaled corticosteroid therapy and treatment escalation in the Swedish adult asthma population

BACKGROUND

Patients with uncontrolled asthma should be evaluated for medication adherence. This study aimed to identify characteristics associated with poor adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and to explore adherence prior to treatment escalation.

METHODS

This nationwide longitudinal cohort study included adult asthma patients (n = 30880) with a healthcare visit including Asthma Control Test (ACT) and registered in the Swedish National Airway Register between 1 July 2017 and 28 February 2019 (index date). Patient data was crosslinked to other national registers. Treatment steps two years pre- and one year post-index, were identified by prescribed drugs. Poor adherence was defined as Medication Possession Ratio <80 %.

RESULTS

Poor adherence was identified in 73 % of patients in treatment steps 2-5, where of 35 % had uncontrolled asthma (ACT≤19). In adjusted models, poor adherence was associated with better disease control; ACT≤19 (OR 0.78, 95 % CI 0.71-0.84), short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) overuse (0.69, 0.61-0.79) and exacerbations (0.79, 0.70-0.89) in steps 2-3. Among patients with uncontrolled asthma, poor adherence was associated with SABA overuse (1.71, 1.50-1.95), exacerbations (1.29, 1.15-1.46), current smoking (1.38, 1.21-1.57) and inversely associated with asthma management education (0.85, 0.78-0.93. Similar results were observed in steps 4-5. When investigating post-index treatment, 53 % remained stationary, 30 % stepped down and 17 % escalated treatment. Prior to escalation, 49 % had poor adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor ICS adherence was associated with better asthma control. Among uncontrolled patients, poor adherence was associated with SABA overuse and exacerbations. Our result highlights the importance of asthma management education to improve adherence in uncontrolled patients.

Direct and indirect costs of paediatric asthma in the UK: a cost analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cost of paediatric asthma from a UK National Health Service (NHS) and societal perspective and explore determinants of these costs.

DESIGN

Cost analysis based on data from a large clinical trial between 2017 and 2019. Case report forms recorded healthcare resource use and productivity losses attributable to asthma over a 12-month period. These were combined with national unit cost data to generate estimates of health service and indirect costs.

SETTING

Asthma clinics in primary and secondary care in England and Scotland.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cost per asthma attack stratified by highest level of care received. Total annual health service and indirect costs. Modelled effect of sex, age, severity, number of attacks and adherence on total annual costs.

RESULTS

Of 506 children included in the analysis, 252 experienced at least one attack. The mean (SD) cost per attack was £297 (806) (median £46, IQR 40-138) and the mean total annual cost to the NHS was £1086 (2504) (median £462, IQR 296-731). On average, children missed 6 days of school and their carers missed 13 hours of paid work, contributing to a mean annual indirect cost of £412 (879) (median £30, IQR 0-477). Health service costs increased significantly with number of attacks and participant age (>11 years). Indirect costs increased with asthma severity and number of attacks but were found to be lower in older children.

CONCLUSIONS

Paediatric asthma imparts a significant economic burden on the health service, families and society. Efforts to improve asthma control may generate significant cost savings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN 67875351.

From mesenchymal stem cells to their extracellular vesicles: Progress and prospects for asthma therapy

Asthma is a widespread public health concern, with an increasing incidence. Despite the implementation of current treatment strategies, asthma control, particularly for severe cases, remains suboptimal. Recent research has revealed the encouraging prospects of extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as a viable therapeutic option for alleviating asthma symptoms. Therefore, the present review aims to provide an overview of the current progress and the therapeutic mechanisms of using MSC-derived EVs (MSC-EVs) for asthma treatment. Additionally, different administration approaches for EVs and their impacts on biodistribution and the curative outcomes of EVs are summarized. Notably, the potential benefits of nebulized inhalation of MSC-EVs are addressed. Also, the possibilities and challenges of using MSC-EVs for asthma treatment in clinics are highlighted. Overall, this review is intended to give new insight into the utilization of MSC-EVs as a potential biological drug for asthma treatment.

Oral corticosteroid stewardship: key insights from the Australasian Severe Asthma Registry

BACKGROUND

People with severe asthma remain at risk of toxicity from maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) use and/or frequent OCS burst therapy. Cumulative exposures above 500-1000 mg prednisolone are associated with adverse effects, and recently OCS stewardship principles were promulgated to guide OCS prescription.

AIMS

To examine real-world registry data to quantify OCS burden, ascertain trends over time in prescription and assess whether opportunities to implement steroid-sparing strategies were utilised.

METHODS

Participants were enrolled in the Australasian Severe Asthma Registry for the period 2013-2021. Assessments were taken at enrolment and then annual follow-up, which included asthma control and OCS use. Descriptive analyses were performed, and subgroups were compared at baseline and over time.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and twenty-four participants were evaluated and 215/924 (23%) were taking maintenance OCS at baseline, with 44% and 32% of participants having exposure to ≥500 or 1000 mg of OCS respectively in the prior year. Twelve months later, an additional 10% and 9% of participants reached cumulative doses of 500 or 1000 mg. People exceeding thresholds had ongoing poor asthma control. At baseline, 240/924 (26%) people were treated with asthma biological therapy. An additional 83 (12%) participants were identified as potentially benefiting from this steroid-sparing medication. Of these patients, only 23% commenced a biologic agent in the next 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

A large national asthma registry identifies exposure to toxic cumulative doses of OCS in more than a third of participants, with further subsequent cumulative dose escalation over 2 years. Steroid-sparing strategies were often not employed, highlighting the need for implementation of OCS stewardship initiatives.

The carbon footprint of as-needed budesonide/formoterol in mild asthma: a post hoc analysis

INTRODUCTION

The use of pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and asthma exacerbations necessitating healthcare reviews contribute substantially to the global carbon footprint of healthcare. It is possible that a reduction in carbon footprint could be achieved by switching patients with mild asthma from salbutamol pMDI reliever-based therapy to inhaled corticosteroid-formoterol dry powder inhaler (DPI) reliever therapy, as recommended by the Global Initiative for Asthma.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis included all 668 adult participants in the Novel START trial, who were randomised 1:1:1 to treatment with as-needed budesonide/formoterol DPI, as-needed salbutamol pMDI or maintenance budesonide DPI plus as-needed salbutamol pMDI. The primary outcome was carbon footprint of asthma management, expressed as kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions (kgCO2e) per person-year. Secondary outcomes explored the effect of baseline symptom control and adherence (maintenance budesonide DPI arm only) on carbon footprint.

RESULTS

As-needed budesonide/formoterol DPI was associated with 95.8% and 93.6% lower carbon footprint compared with as-needed salbutamol pMDI (least-squares mean 1.1 versus 26.2 kgCO2e; difference -25.0, 95% CI -29.7 to -20.4; p<0.001) and maintenance budesonide DPI plus as-needed salbutamol pMDI (least-squares mean 1.1 versus 17.3 kgCO2e; difference -16.2, 95% CI -20.9 to -11.6; p<0.001), respectively. There was no statistically significant evidence that treatment differences in carbon footprint depended on baseline symptom control or adherence in the maintenance budesonide DPI arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The as-needed budesonide/formoterol DPI treatment option was associated with a markedly lower carbon footprint than as-needed salbutamol pMDI and maintenance budesonide DPI plus as-needed salbutamol pMDI.

YiQi GuBen capsule alleviates OVA-induced asthma through improving mitochondrial dysfunction

Objective: This study aims to explore the effect of YiQi GuBen capsule on improving mitochondrial dysfunction in an animal model of asthma.Methods: The mice (n = 8) were divided into four groups including control (NC), ovalbumin (OVA), dexamethasone (OVA + DEX), and YiQi GuBen (OVA + YQGB) groups. Firstly, we established an OVA-induced mouse asthma model except for the NC group, which then were treated with dexamethasone and YiQi GuBen capsule. Subsequently, HE staining and Masson staining were used for pathological analysis of mice lung tissues. Next, we used transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to observe the effect of the Yiqi Guben capsule on the ultrastructure of mitochondria. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the ROS level, membrane potential, and the number of mitochondria in lung tissue. Moreover, we analyzed the copy number of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and the expression levels of activator peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) and mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM).Results: The results of the pathological analysis showed that after treatment with the YiQi GuBen capsule, the lung tissue damage was significantly reduced. In addition, we observed that the ultrastructural damage of mitochondria was improved. Flow cytometry proved that after treatment with the YiQi GuBen capsule, the level of ROS in the mitochondria was effectively reduced, while the mitochondrial membrane potential decreased and the number increased significantly. Moreover, we found that the copy number of mtDNA was significantly increased and the expression levels of PGC-1α and TFAM were significantly upgraded.Conclusion: This study suggests YiQi GuBen capsule can effectively improve mitochondrial dysfunction in the OVA-induced mouse model.

Current technological advancement in asthma care

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a common chronic respiratory disease affecting 262 million people globally, causing half a million deaths each year. Poor asthma outcomes are frequently due to non-adherence to medication, poor engagement with asthma services, and a lack of objective diagnostic tests. In recent years, technologies have been developed to improve diagnosis, monitoring, and care.

AREAS COVERED

Technology has impacted asthma care with the potential to improve patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and provide personalized management. We focus on current evidence on home diagnostics and monitoring, remote asthma reviews, and digital smart inhalers. PubMed, Ovid/Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched in November 2023 with no limit by year of publication.

EXPERT OPINION

Advanced diagnostic technologies have enabled early asthma detection and personalized treatment plans. Mobile applications and digital therapeutics empower patients to manage their condition and improve adherence to treatments. Telemedicine platforms and remote monitoring devices have the potential to streamline asthma care. AI algorithms can analyze patient data and predict exacerbations in proof-of-concept studies. Technology can potentially provide precision medicine to a wider patient group in the future, but further development is essential for implementation into routine care which in itself will be a major challenge.

Risk factor analysis and nomogram for predicting poor symptom control in smoking asthmatics

BACKGROUND

Smoking induces and modifies the airway immune response, accelerating the decline of asthmatics' lung function and severely affecting asthma symptoms' control level. To assess the prognosis of asthmatics who smoke and to provide reasonable recommendations for treatment, we constructed a nomogram prediction model.

METHODS

General and clinical data were collected from April to September 2021 from smoking asthmatics aged ≥14 years attending the People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Patients were followed up regularly by telephone or outpatient visits, and their medication and follow-up visits were recorded during the 6-months follow-up visit, as well as their asthma control levels after 6 months (asthma control questionnaire-5, ACQ-5). The study employed R4.2.2 software to conduct univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify independent risk factors for 'poorly controlled asthma' (ACQ>0.75) as the outcome variable. Subsequently, a nomogram prediction model was constructed. Internal validation was used to test the reproducibility of the model. The model efficacy was evaluated using the consistency index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve.

RESULTS

Invitations were sent to 231 asthmatics who smoked. A total of 202 participants responded, resulting in a final total of 190 participants included in the model development. The nomogram established five independent risk factors (P<0.05): FEV1%pred, smoking index (100), comorbidities situations, medication regimen, and good or poor medication adherence. The area under curve (AUC) of the modeling set was 0.824(95%CI 0.765-0.884), suggesting that the nomogram has a high ability to distinguish poor asthma control in smoking asthmatics after 6 months. The calibration curve showed a C-index of 0.824 for the modeling set and a C-index of 0.792 for the self-validation set formed by 1000 bootstrap sampling, which means that the prediction probability of the model was consistent with reality. Decision curve analysis (DCA) of the nomogram revealed that the net benefit was higher when the risk threshold probability for poor asthma control was 4.5 - 93.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

FEV1%pred, smoking index (100), comorbidities situations, medication regimen, and medication adherence were identified as independent risk factors for poor asthma control after 6 months in smoking asthmatics. The nomogram established based on these findings can effectively predict relevant risk and provide clinicians with a reference to identify the poorly controlled population with smoking asthma as early as possible, and to select a better therapeutic regimen. Meanwhile, it can effectively improve the medication adherence and the degree of attention to complications in smoking asthma patients.

Usability and feasibility of the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) Toolkit in daily clinical practice: The BANANA study

The Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) Toolkit links an adherence measurement instrument (the TAI) to proven effective interventions for different causes of non-adherence to inhaled medication. This study aimed to assess the usability and feasibility of the TAI Toolkit in clinical practice. The TAI Toolkit was piloted in eight primary and secondary care settings. Each study site included 10 patients with asthma and/or COPD and suspected non-adherence. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) recorded clinical data and TAI Toolkit outcomes. Data on usability and feasibility were collected in semi-structured interviews and with the System Usability Score (SUS). Of the included patients, 81% were non-adherent, and sporadic non-adherence was the most common (69%). The TAI Toolkit was valued with a mean SUS-score of 85.9 by the HCPs. They found the toolkit to 'be visually attractive', 'easy-to-use' and 'give insight into patients' adherence', thereby offering good potential for its use in clinical practice.

SABINA + Hong Kong: a territory wide study of prescribing trends and outcomes associated with the use of short-acting β2 agonists in the Chinese population

BACKGROUND

Excessive use of short-acting β2 agonists (SABA) in patients with asthma continues to be a notable concern due to its link to higher mortality rates. Global relevance of SABA overuse in asthma management cannot be understated, it poses significant health risk to patients with asthma and imposes burden on healthcare systems. This study, as part of global SABINA progamme, aimed to describe the prescribing patterns and clinical outcomes associated with SABA use in the Chinese population.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study was conducted using anonymized electronic healthcare records of Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) from Hong Kong Hospital Authority (HA). Patients newly diagnosed with asthma between 2011 and 2018 and aged ≥12 years were included, stratified by SABA use (≤2, 3-6, 7-10, or ≥11 canisters/year) during one-year baseline period since asthma diagnosis date. Patients were followed up from one-year post-index until earliest censoring of events: outcome occurrence and end of study period (31 December 2020). Cox proportional regression and negative binomial regression were used to estimate the mortality risk and frequency of hospital admissions associated with SABA use respectively, after adjusting for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose. Outcomes include all-cause, asthma-related, and respiratory-related mortality, frequency of hospital admissions for any cause, and frequency of hospital admissions due to asthma.

RESULTS

17,782 patients with asthma (mean age 46.7 years, 40.8% male) were included and 59.1% of patients were overusing SABA (≥ 3 canisters per year). Each patient was prescribed a median of 5.61 SABA canisters/year. SABA overuse during baseline period was associated with higher all-cause mortality risk compared to patients with ≤2 canisters/year. Association was dose-dependent, highest risk in those used ≥11 canisters/year (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.79) and 3-6 canisters/year (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.50). Higher SABA prescription volume associated with increased frequency of hospital admissions with greatest risk observed in 7-10 canisters/year subgroup (adjusted rate ratio: 4.81, 95% CI: 3.66, 6.37).

CONCLUSIONS

SABA overuse is prevalent and is associated with increased all-cause mortality risk and frequency of hospital admissions among the patients with asthma in Hong Kong.

Risk factors for asthma-related hospital and intensive care admissions in children, adolescents and adults: a cohort study using primary and secondary care data

BACKGROUND

Asthma remains a common cause of hospital admissions across the life course. We estimated the contribution of key risk factors to asthma-related hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in children, adolescents and adults.

METHODS

This was a UK-based cohort study using linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum) and secondary care (Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care) data. Patients were eligible if they were aged 5 years and older and had been diagnosed with asthma. This included 90 989 children aged 5-11 years, 114 927 adolescents aged 12-17 years and 1 179 410 adults aged 18 years or older. The primary outcome was asthma-related hospital admissions from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019. The secondary outcome was asthma-related ICU admissions. Incidence rate ratios adjusted for demographic and clinical risk factors were estimated using negative binomial models. Population attributable fraction (PAF) was estimated for modifiable risk factors.

RESULTS

Younger age groups, females and those from ethnic minority and lower socioeconomic backgrounds had an increased risk of asthma-related hospital admissions. Increasing medication burden, including excessive use of short-acting bronchodilators, was also strongly associated with the primary outcome. Similar risk factors were observed for asthma-related ICU admissions. The key potentially modifiable or treatable risk factors were smoking in adolescents and adults (PAF 6.8%, 95% CI 0.9% to 12.3% and 4.3%, 95% CI 3.0% to 5.7%, respectively), and obesity (PAF 23.3%, 95% CI 20.5% to 26.1%), depression (11.1%, 95% CI 9.1% to 13.1%), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (2.3%, 95% CI 1.2% to 3.4%), anxiety (2.0%, 95% CI 0.5% to 3.6%) and chronic rhinosinusitis (0.8%, 95% CI 0.3% to 1.3%) in adults.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant sociodemographic inequalities in the rates of asthma-related hospital and ICU admissions. Treating age-specific modifiable risk factors should be considered an integral part of asthma management, which could potentially reduce the rate of avoidable hospital admissions.

Risk factors associated with uncontrolled asthma in children - a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We aim to assess the risk factors of uncontrolled asthma in children and adolescents.

METHODS

A systemic search was conducted from electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar) from inception to July 17, 2023. All statistical analyses were conducted in Review Manager 5.4.1. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were selected. A random-effects model was used when heterogeneity was seen to pool the studies, and the result was reported in the odds ratio and the corresponding 95% confidence interval. We also used a narrative approach where it was not feasible to quantitatively assess the outcome.

RESULTS

Ten observational studies were used to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis. A quantitative analysis of five factors was done. Pooled analysis showed a statistically significant risk of uncontrolled asthma in association with past hypersensitivity reactions (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.51 (1.16, 1.98); p = .002; I2 = 84%) and incomplete controller adherence (SMD = 3.15 (1.83, 5.41); p < .0001; I2 = 94%). While non-significant relation was seen in parental asthma (SMD = 1.23 (0.98, 1.55); p = .07; I2 = 15%), oral corticosteroid use (SMD = 0.99 (0.72, 1.36); p = .96; I2 = 81%) and education of caregivers (SMD = 0.99 (0.72, 1.36); p = .96; I2 = 81%). Some other factors were also discussed qualitatively.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that some significant risk factors might cause uncontrolled asthma in children and adolescents like past hypersensitivity reactions and incomplete controller adherence.

The utility of the necessity-concerns framework (NCF) in explaining adherence and parental beliefs about controller medication in Saudi Arabian children with asthma

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess beliefs about asthma controller medications among parents of Saudi Arabian children with asthma and the association between these beliefs and medication adherence using the Necessity-Concerns Framework.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was provided to parents of children with asthma when they brought their children to routine appointments at local public clinics between May 16 and July 10, 2018. Participants electronically filled out validated Arabic versions of the Medication Adherence Reported Scale (MARS) and Beliefs About Medications Questionnaire (BMQ). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study participants, while hierarchical linear regression analysis assessed associations between parental beliefs about controller medications and medication adherence.

RESULTS

A total of 381 parents of children with asthma completed the study survey. The vast majority (89%) of study participants were non-adherent to their children's prescribed medications while only 11% were adherent. Additionally, our study revealed a significantly positive association between adherence and parents' beliefs in the necessity of the medication (p < .001), with concerns about the adverse effects of medication being negatively associated with parental adherence. A higher mean score for medication adherence was reported among the ambivalent groups compared to the accepting, indifferent, and skeptical groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Medication adherence among parents of children with asthma was relatively low. In addition, necessity beliefs were significantly associated with parental adherence to controller medications for their children with asthma. Further studies are warranted to investigate potential factors contributing to poor parental adherence and develop tailored interventions that support parental medication adherence for their asthmatic children.

Digital Self-Management Platform for Adult Asthma: Randomized Attention-Placebo Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Asthma is one of the most common chronic conditions worldwide, with a substantial individual and health care burden. Digital apps hold promise as a highly accessible, low-cost method of enhancing self-management in asthma, which is critical to effective asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a fully remote randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the efficacy of juli, a commercially available smartphone self-management platform for asthma.

METHODS

We conducted a pragmatic single-blind, RCT of juli for asthma management. Our study included participants aged 18 years and older who self-identified as having asthma and had an Asthma Control Test (ACT) score of 19 or lower (indicating uncontrolled asthma) at the beginning of the trial. Participants were randomized (1:1 ratio) to receive juli for 8 weeks or a limited attention-placebo control version of the app. The primary outcome measure was the difference in ACT scores after 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included remission (ACT score greater than 19), minimal clinically important difference (an improvement of 3 or more points on the ACT), worsening of asthma, and health-related quality of life. The primary analysis included participants using the app for 8 weeks (per-protocol analysis), and the secondary analysis used a modified intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis.

RESULTS

We randomized 411 participants between May 2021 and April 2023: a total of 152 (37%) participants engaged with the app for 8 weeks and were included in the per-protocol analysis, and 262 (63.7%) participants completed the week-2 outcome assessment and were included in the modified ITT analysis. Total attrition between baseline and week 8 was 259 (63%) individuals. In the per-protocol analysis, the intervention group had a higher mean ACT score (17.93, SD 4.72) than the control group (16.24, SD 5.78) by week 8 (baseline adjusted coefficient 1.91, 95% CI 0.31-3.51; P=.02). Participants using juli had greater odds of achieving or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference at 8 weeks (adjusted odds ratio 2.38, 95% CI 1.20-4.70; P=.01). There were no between group differences in the other secondary outcomes at 8 weeks. The results from the modified ITT analyses were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Users of juli had improved asthma symptom control over 8 weeks compared with users of a version of the app with limited functionality. These findings suggest that juli is an effective digital self-management platform that could augment existing care pathways for asthma. The retention of patients in RCTs and real-world use of digital health care apps is a major challenge.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) registry ISRCTN87679686; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN87679686.

Development and validation of a score assessing the risk of severe asthma in primary care

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate the Asthma Severity-Health Search (AS-HScore), predicting severe asthma risk in Italian primary care. According to the current asthma treatment guidelines, the AS-HScore intended to serve as a clinical decision support system (CDSS) for General Practitioners (GPs).

METHODS

Using the Health Search Database (HSD), a cohort of 32,917 asthma-diagnosed patients between 2013 and 2021 was identified. The AS-HScore was developed using multivariable Cox regression in a two-part cohort: development and validation. Candidate determinants were estimated and linearly combined to form the score; its predictive accuracy was evaluated in the validation sub-cohort.

RESULTS

AS-HScore performance in the validation cohort revealed a 73% area under the curve (i.e. discrimination power) and a 22% pseudo-R2 (explained variation). Calibration slope of 1.07 indicated strong calibration without rejecting the equivalence hypothesis (p = 0.157). Estimating a mean 10% (SD: 6.8%) 1-year risk of severe asthma, GPs might be provided with risk thresholds for patient categorization.

CONCLUSION

The AS-HScore emerges as an accurate tool predicting severe asthma risk in the Italian primary care. It therefore shows promising application to enhance asthma care by early identification of severe cases. Implementing a score-based CDSS for Italian GPs holds potential for significantly improving asthma management and patients' outcomes.

Recommendations for asthma monitoring in children: A PeARL document endorsed by APAPARI, EAACI, INTERASMA, REG, and WAO

Monitoring is a major component of asthma management in children. Regular monitoring allows for diagnosis confirmation, treatment optimization, and natural history review. Numerous factors that may affect disease activity and patient well-being need to be monitored: response and adherence to treatment, disease control, disease progression, comorbidities, quality of life, medication side-effects, allergen and irritant exposures, diet and more. However, the prioritization of such factors and the selection of relevant assessment tools is an unmet need. Furthermore, rapidly developing technologies promise new opportunities for closer, or even "real-time," monitoring between visits. Following an approach that included needs assessment, evidence appraisal, and Delphi consensus, the PeARL Think Tank, in collaboration with major international professional and patient organizations, has developed a set of 24 recommendations on pediatric asthma monitoring, to support healthcare professionals in decision-making and care pathway design.

Impact of treatment adherence and inhalation technique on asthma outcomes of pediatric patients: a longitudinal study

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the longitudinal relationships, both at between- and within-person levels, that adherence to inhaled corticosteroid-based maintenance treatment and inhalation technique present with symptom control, exacerbations, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents with asthma. Methods: Participants (6-14 years old) from the ARCA (Asthma Research in Children and Adolescents) cohort-a prospective, multicenter, observational study (NCT04480242)-were followed for a period from 6 months to 5 years via computer-assisted telephone interviews and a smartphone application. The Medication Intake Survey-Asthma (MIS-A) was administered to assess the implementation stage of adherence, and the Inhalation Technique Questionnaire (InTeQ) was used to assess the five key steps when using an inhaler. Symptom control was measured with the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), and HRQL was measured with the EQ-5D and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pediatric Asthma Impact Scale (PROMIS-PAIS). Multilevel longitudinal mixed models were constructed separately with symptom control, exacerbation occurrence, EQ-5D, and PROMIS-PAIS as the dependent variables. Results: Of the 360 participants enrolled, 303 (1,203 interviews) were included in the symptom control and exacerbation analyses, 265 (732) in the EQ-5D, and 215 (617) in the PROMIS-PAIS. Around 60% of participants were male subjects, and most of them underwent maintenance treatment with inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting β-agonists in a fixed dose (73.3%). Within-person variability was 83.6% for asthma control, 98.6% for exacerbations, 36.4% for EQ-5D, and 49.1% for PROMIS-PAIS. At the within-person level, patients with higher adherence had better symptom control (p = 0.002) and HRQoL over time (p = 0.016). Patients with a better inhalation technique reported worse HRQoL simultaneously (p = 0.012), but they showed better HRQoL in future assessments (p = 0.012). The frequency of reliever use was associated with symptom control (p < 0.001), exacerbation occurrence (p < 0.001), and HRQoL (p = 0.042); and boys were more likely to present better symptom control and HRQoL than girls. Conclusion: Our results confirm longitudinal associations at the within-person level of the two indicators of quality use of inhalers: for adherence to maintenance treatment with symptom control and HRQoL, and for the inhalation technique with HRQoL. Although treatment adherence was shown to be excellent, a third of the participants reported a suboptimal inhalation technique, highlighting the need for actions for improving asthma management of the pediatric population.

Medication Adherence in Children with Asthma

Asthma is the most common chronic disease in childhood. If untreated, asthma can lead to debilitating daily symptoms which affect quality of life, but more importantly can lead to fatal asthma attacks which unfortunately still occur globally. The most effective treatment strategy for controlling asthma is for the patient to follow a personalised asthma action plan (PAAP) which will invariably include regular use of an inhaled corticosteroid. To examine medication adherence in children with asthma, we collated recent evidence from systematic reviews in this area to address the following 5 key questions; What is adherence? Is there evidence that children are not adhering to preventer medication? Why is adherence poor and what are the barriers to adherence? Does good adherence improve outcomes in asthma? And lastly, how can treatment adherence be improved?

Development and validation of the 15-STARS - A novel self-report pharmacy-based questionnaire to screen for medication non-adherence

BACKGROUND

Published scales measuring medication adherence are myriad. There is a need for a tool that guides towards downstream adherence interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a self-report questionnaire able to detect modifiable determinants of medication non-adherence.

METHODS

Workshops, surveys and meetings were used to identify items. Validation was performed in French and German (Switzerland) between March and April 2022. Face validation, content validation, construct validation, internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed. The questionnaire was finalized in August 2022.

RESULTS

The first draft in English included 13 items divided into four areas. Following translation, validation was performed with 144 patients (63 German-, 81 French-speaking) who were recruited in 35 community pharmacies. Acceptability was good (<5% missing data). Psychometric properties were acceptable with good content validity and moderate construct validity. Internal consistency was acceptable for the French version (Cronbach's alpha = 0.71 [item 1-5] - 0.61 [item 6-9]) and less acceptable for the German version (Cronbach's alpha = 0.43 [item 1-5] - 0.45 [item 6-9]). Test-retest was given for all items (r = 0.52 to 1.0) except item 10 in French (r = 0.25). The final instrument is a 15-item questionnaire called the 15-STARS (Screening Tool for AdheRence to medicineS) that assesses practical difficulties with medicine use, reasons for non-adherence, doses missed, and need for further help.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the validity and clinical utility of the 15-STARS questionnaire. Reliability was inconclusive due to incoherent internal consistency, but explainable by the single-item nature of the scale. This new tool will enable the detection of patients who experience difficulties that negatively influence medication adherence. Pharmacists will be able to propose specific and tailored adherence interventions to the patients. Next steps will focus on evaluating its usefulness for developing targeted interventions that optimize medication adherence in routine care and research settings.