Complicated intra-abdominal infections worldwide: the definitive data of the CIAOW Study

MORTALITY OF SEPTIC SHOCK SECONDARY TO PEDIATRIC PRIMARY PERITONITIS PREDICTED BY RESPIRATORY QUOTIENT COMBINED WITH LACTATE: A SURVEY FROM TWO CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS IN NORTHWEST CHINA

ABSTRACT

Background: Pediatric sepsis is a life-threatening condition, with extremely high incidence and mortality among critically ill children worldwide. Patients with septic shock are susceptible to intestinal complications due to altered blood flow distribution, and these complications often correlate directly with a poor prognosis. Early detection of low perfusion and appropriate resuscitation are critical components in the management of patients experiencing shock. Nevertheless, significant debate persists regarding the comparative value of various resuscitation targets. While central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) monitoring is frequently advocated, it remains a subject of scrutiny. All pathophysiological mechanisms are intricately linked to cellular hypoxia and energy metabolism, which is why metabolic-related biomarkers, particularly lactate and lactate clearance rate, are highly regarded by critical care experts. Nonetheless, limited research has been conducted on the association between markers of circulatory shock and metabolic disorders in critically ill patients particularly in the field of pediatrics. Physiological indicators, particularly those associated with cell energy metabolism, have shown potentials in predicting sepsis and septic shock. Methods: This was a retrospective study. A total of 63 patients, comprising 30 males and 33 females, who developed septic shock secondary to pediatric primary peritonitis, were admitted to the Intensive Care Department of the Children's Hospital Affiliated to Xi'an Jiaotong University and the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-Care Hospital between December 2016 and December 2021. Based on the primary outcome of 28-day all-cause mortality, patients were assigned into the survival group and nonsurvival group. Demographic and clinical data were compared. Risk factors for the prognosis of septic shock secondary to pediatric primary peritonitis were identified by logistic regression, and their potentials in predicting the 28-day survival were assessed by the receiver operating characteristic and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: Among the 63 eligible patients with septic shock secondary to pediatric primary peritonitis, 47 survived. In comparison to the survival group, the nonsurvival group showed significantly higher proportions of mechanical ventilation, surgical intervention, and use of vasoactive drugs, procalcitonin, activated partial thromboplastin time, respiratory quotient (RQ), lactate (Lac), the Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and the Pediatric Risk of Mortality III score, but lower platelet count, fibrinogen, and mean arterial pressure (all P's < 0.05). RQ (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41, 3.22; P < 0.05) and Lac (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.15, 3.21; P < 0.05) were independent prognostic factors for septic shock secondary to pediatric primary peritonitis. Their combination (RQ < 1.6 + Lac < 4 mmol/L) achieved a better accuracy in predicting the 28-day cumulative survival. Conclusion: RQ combined with Lac offers an excellent performance in predicting mortality of septic shock secondary to pediatric primary peritonitis.

Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in surgical patients with abdominal sepsis in China: a nested case-control study

OBJECTIVES

To delineate the clinical characteristics and investigate the determinants that may affect the prognosis of surgical patients with abdominal sepsis.

DESIGN

A case-control study was nested in a cohort of surgical patients with abdominal sepsis between 2008 and 2022. We extracted patient' medical records to execute descriptive statistical analyses. Multiple logistic regression models and subgroup analysis were employed to elucidate the risk factors of in-hospital mortality.

SETTING

Two tertiary hospitals in China.

PARTICIPANTS

476 surgical patients diagnosed with abdominal sepsis between 2008 and 2022 were analysed.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Descriptive statistics were used to examine pertinent patient information, including demographic details, laboratory findings, surgical interventions and anaesthetic records. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the impact of specific clinical characteristics on outcomes.

RESULTS

476 patients diagnosed with abdominal sepsis were analysed, exhibiting an in-hospital mortality rate of 7.56%. Advanced age (OR 6.77, 95% CI 2.46 to 18.66, p<0.001), the presence of diabetes (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.04 to 6.56, p=0.041) and higher preoperative Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (OR 3.48, 95% CI 1.16 to 10.43, p=0.026) were identified as significant predictors of increased in-hospital mortality risk through a multinomial logistic regression model. Conversely, individuals afflicted with biliary diseases (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.64, p=0.010) demonstrated a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality. Subgroup analysis revealed that low serum albumin levels emerged as a risk factor for in-hospital mortality in the patients with gastrointestinal diseases (OR 20.23, 95% CI 2.21 to 184.84, p=0.008) or advanced age (OR 10.52, 95% CI 2.29 to 48.31, p=0.002) through multinomial logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analysis, we delineated the clinical characteristics of surgical patients with abdominal sepsis and pinpointed risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality. These findings underscore the necessity for more tailored perioperative management strategies for patients with sepsis characterised by advanced age, diabetes, higher preoperative SOFA score and reduced preoperative albumin levels. Clinicians should prioritise early recognition and aggressive management of these high-risk individuals, including timely surgical intervention, optimisation of nutritional status and vigilant monitoring of organ function. These insights underscore the critical role of individualised care in enhancing the prognosis of surgical patients with abdominal sepsis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2400081823.

Combination of radiomic and clinical characteristics to predict mortality in patients with colorectal perforation

PURPOSE

We aim to construct and verify a model combining radiomic and clinical data to predict early mortality in patients with colorectal perforation in a two-center study.

METHODS

Data from 147 patients at Xiaogan Central Hospital (2014-2024) and 52 patients at Southern Hospital of Southern Medical University (2021-2023) were collected for model training and validation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with mortality. Radiomic characteristics from CT scans were extracted via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to construct an imaging score. A nomogram was developed by integrating the findings from the multivariate analysis. Predictive performance was evaluated via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and clinical utility was assessed via decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

Univariate analysis highlighted age, ASA classification, shock index, rad-score, white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil (N) and lymphocyte (L) counts, sodium (Na+), creatinine (Cr), and procalcitonin (PCT) as significant prognostic indicators for mortality (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed age, ASA classification, PCT, and rad-score as independent prognostic factors. The radiomic combined with clinical characteristics nomogram (RCCCN) includes four variables: the patient's age, ASA classification, PCT level, and rad-score. The RCCCN model demonstrated excellent predictive performance for mortality risk in the validation cohort (AUC: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.84-0.99) with good calibration.

CONCLUSION

A nomogram combining radiomic features and clinical characteristics effectively predicts mortality in patients with colorectal perforation, providing a valuable tool for clinical decision-making and patient management.

Epidemiological analysis of intra-abdominal infections in Italy from the Italian register of complicated intra-abdominal infections-the IRIS study: a prospective observational nationwide study

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are common and severe surgical emergencies associated with high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been a worldwide increase in antimicrobial resistance associated with intra-abdominal infections, responsible for a significant increase in mortality rates. To improve the quality of treatment, it is crucial to understand the underlying local epidemiology, clinical implications, and proper management of antimicrobial resistance, for both community- and hospital-acquired infections. The IRIS study (Italian Register of Complicated Intra-abdominal InfectionS) aims to investigate the epidemiology and initial management of complicated IAIs (cIAIs) in Italy.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This is a prospective, observational, nationwide (Italy), multicentre study. approved by the coordinating centre ethic committee (Local Research Ethics Committee of Pisa (Prot n 56478//2019). All consecutively hospitalized patients (older than 16 years of age) with diagnosis of cIAIs undergoing surgery, interventional drainage or conservative treatment have been included.

RESULTS

4530 patients included from 23 different Italian hospitals. Community Acquired infection represented the 70.9% of all the cases. Among appendicitis, we found that 98.2% of the cases were community acquired (CA) and 1.8% Healthcare-associated (HA) infections. We observed that CA represented the 94.2% and HA 5.8% of Gastro Duodenal perforation cases. The majority of HA infections were represented by colonic perforation and diverticulitis (28.3%) followed by small bowel occlusion (19%) and intestinal ischemia (18%). 27.8% of patients presented in septic shock. Microbiological Samples were collected from 3208 (70.8%) patients. Among 3041 intrabdominal sample 48.8% resulted positive. The major pathogens involved in intra-abdominal infections were found to be E.coli (45.6%). During hospital stay, empiric antimicrobial therapy was administered in 78.4% of patients. Amoxicillin/clavulanate was the most common antibiotic used (in 30.1% appendicitis, 30% bowel occlusion, 30.5% of cholecystitis, 51% complicated abdominal wall hernia, 55% small bowel perforation) followed by piperacillin/tazobactam (13.3% colonic perforation and diverticulitis, 22.6% cholecystitis, 24.2% intestinal ischemia, 28.6% pancreatitis). Empiric antifungal therapy was administered in 2.6% of patients with no sign of sepsis, 3.1% of patients with clinical sign of sepsis and 4.1% of patients with septic shock. Azoles was administered in 49.2% of patients that received empiric antifungal therapy. The overall mortality rate was 5.13% (235/4350). 16.5% of patients required ICU (748/4350). In accordance with mortality, it is important to highlight that 35.7% of small bowel perforation, 27.6% of colonic perforation and diverticulitis, 25.6% of intestinal ischemia and 24.6% of gastroduodenal complications required ICU.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic stewardship programs and correct antimicrobial and antimycotic prescription campaigns are necessary to ulteriorly improve the adequacy of drug usage and reduce the resistances burden. This will help in improving the care and the cure of the next generations.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam disrupts Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms under static and dynamic conditions

BACKGROUND

Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms limit the efficacy of currently available antibacterial therapies and pose significant clinical challenges. Pseudomonal biofilms are complicated further when other markers of persistence such as mucoid and hypermutable phenotypes are present. There is currently a paucity of data regarding the activity of the newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftolozane/tazobactam against P. aeruginosa biofilms.

METHODS

We evaluated the efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam against clinical P. aeruginosa isolates, the laboratory isolate PAO1 and its isogenic mutS-deficient hypermutator derivative (PAOMS) grown under static and dynamic biofilm conditions. The clinical isolate collection included strains with mucoid and hypermutable phenotypes.

RESULTS

Ceftolozane/tazobactam exposure led to a bactericidal (≥3 log cfu/cm2) biofilm reduction in 15/18 (83%) clinical isolates grown under static conditions, irrespective of carbapenem susceptibility or mucoid phenotype, with greater activity compared with colistin (P < 0.05). Dynamically grown biofilms were less susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam with active biofilm reduction (≥1 log cfu/cm2) observed in 2/3 isolates. Hypermutability did not affect the antibiofilm efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam in either static or dynamic conditions when comparing PAO1 and PAOMS. Consistent with the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam as a potent inhibitor of PBP3, dramatic impacts on P. aeruginosa morphology were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that ceftolozane/tazobactam has encouraging properties in the treatment of P. aeruginosa biofilm infections, and its activity is not diminished against mucoid or hypermutable variants at the timepoints examined.

Intraoperative Low-Dose Glucocorticoids in Surgical Patients With Abdominal Sepsis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Background and Aims

Abdominal sepsis refers to a severe and potentially life-threatening condition characterized by the presence of infection, inflammation, and tissue damage within the abdominal cavity. Glucocorticoids (GCs) play an important role in regulation of the host immune and inflammation responses involved in sepsis and surgery. This study aimed to investigate the potential impact of intraoperative GCs administration on the clinical outcome of surgical patients with abdominal sepsis.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort of surgical patients afflicted with abdominal sepsis at two medical centers from January 2008 to December 2022. Patients were classified into low-GCs, high-GCs, and non-GCs groups according to the dosage of steroids used intraoperatively, and in-hospital mortality was designated as the primary outcome.

Results

This study included a total of 476 patients, with 217 in the non-GCs group, 213 in the low-GCs group, and 46 in the high-GCs group. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 7.56%. After propensity score matching (PSM), there were 168 cases in both the low-GCs group and the non-GCs group, with no significant differences observed between the groups regarding mortality rate, length of hospital-stay, and duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay. In patients with septic shock, the use of low-dose GCs increased the urine output and decreased the requirements for vasopressors on the first postoperative day, however, it had no impact on the in-hospital mortality or ICU stay. Moreover, prophylactic use of GCs during anesthesia induction did not decrease the incidence of intraoperative hypotension or necessity of vasopressors use.

Conclusion

Intraoperative administration of low-dose GCs demonstrates a transient improvement in hemodynamics of patients with septic shock, however, it did not lead to improved clinical outcomes. Further research remains necessary to elucidate the optimal perioperative dosing strategy.

Predicting and managing intra-abdominal collections by image guided percutaneous drainage after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy: A five-year experience with 1313 patients

INTRODUCTION

Intraabdominal collections (IACs) are common following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Inflammatory biomarkers and nutritional index (NI) may predict IACs. Management of IACs with image guided percutaneous drainage (IGPD) is an alternative to laparotomy.

AIM

To identify factors that predict IACs following CRS and HIPEC and to review outcomes following IGPD.

METHOD

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a national referral centre including patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC who developed IACs treated with IGPD, between January 2018 and March 2022. Propensity score matched cases were compared to evaluate the prediction of IACs. The outcomes of IGPD were reviewed.

RESULTS

Intraabdominal collections developed in 106 (8.0 %) of 1313 patients and 101/106 underwent IGPD, under Ultrasound or CT guidance. Laparotomy was required in 5/106. In those undergoing IGPD, pre- and postoperative CRP and neutrophils were significantly elevated while pre- and postoperative albumin and NI were significantly lower than propensity score matched controls. The postoperative CRP and neutrophil count, and pre and postoperative albumin and mGPS were identified as independent predictors in multivariable analysis. IGPD improved clinical condition in 94 %. In 15/106(14.8 %) the aetiology of the IAC was anastomotic leak with left subphrenic collections the most common (24/101, 24 %). There were 4 major complications, 2 perforations of bladder during IGPD insertion and 2 post drain removal bleeds.

CONCLUSION

Intraabdominal collections following CRS and HIPEC can be predicted by inflammatory markers and nutritional index. Prompt use of IGPD results in good outcomes avoiding the need for laparotomy.

Antibacterial and antifungal drug concentrations in intra-abdominal abscesses: a prospective clinical study

Secondary peritonitis with intra-abdominal abscesses (IAA) is difficult to treat because of the supposed low rate of penetration of antimicrobial drugs at the site of infection. However, clinical data about the actual bioavailability of antimicrobial drugs in IAA are scarce. This prospective observational study aimed at assessing the drug penetration in IAA of the antibiotics (piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems) and antifungals (fluconazole, echinocandins) that are usually recommended for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. Patients with IAA who underwent a radiological or surgical drainage procedure were included. Antimicrobial drug concentrations were measured in IAA (CIAA) and in a simultaneous plasma sample (Cplasma) to assess the CIAA/Cplasma ratio. The pharmacodynamic target was defined as a CIAA equal or superior to the clinical breakpoints of susceptibility of the most relevant intra-abdominal pathogens. Clinical outcomes were assessed at hospital discharge. A total of 54 antimicrobial drug measurements were performed in 39 IAA samples originating from 36 patients. Despite important inter-individual variability, piperacillin-tazobactam exhibited the highest CIAA/Cplasma ratios (median 2). The rates of target achievement were 75%-80% for piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem but 0% for imipenem and ertapenem. These results tended to correlate with clinical outcomes (96% success rate versus 73%, respectively, P = 0.07). Among antifungals, fluconazole exhibited higher CIAA/Cplasma ratios and rates of target achievement compared to echinocandins. However, no differences in clinical outcomes were observed. These results provide unique information about antimicrobial drug penetration in IAA in real clinical conditions and suggest that piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem may have better efficacy compared to imipenem or ertapenem.

Predictive Utility of the HALP and Modified HALP Score for the Assessment of Operative Complications in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis

Background and Objectives: The aim of the present study was to calculate HALP and modified HALP scores for patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis (AC) and to determine the predictive utility of these scores for surgical timing and morbidity in patients who underwent surgery for AC. Materials and Methods: This study included data from 641 patients who underwent surgery for AC between January 2010 and May 2023. The HALP score was calculated using the formula hemoglobin (g/L) × albumin (g/L) × lymphocyte (109/L)/platelets (109/L). The modified HALP score was calculated using the formula hemoglobin (g/L) × albumin (g/L) × lymphocyte (109/L) × platelets (109/L). Results: The mean HALP score was 46.81, and the mean modified HALP score was 2,758,401.21. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was successfully completed in 582 (90.8%) patients. When examining the relationship between HALP and modified HALP scores and the procedure type, a statistically significant difference was found in the distribution of median HALP and modified HALP scores between the LC and laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy (LTOC) groups. For patients with a HALP score < 34.43 and modified HALP score < 2,077,019, the likelihood of conversion to open surgery increased, with a sensitivity of 65.5% vs. 58.8% and a specificity of 66.1% vs. 59.3%. In patients who underwent surgery, there was a significant difference in the LTOC between the HALP score and modified HALP score cut-off groups (p < 0.001 and, p = 0.007). Conclusions: Evaluation of the HALP score is a promising and valuable assessment method for designing appropriate treatment and management strategies for patients with AC.

A Simple Nomogram for Predicting the Development of ARDS in Postoperative Patients with Gastrointestinal Perforation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe form of organ dysfunction and a common postoperative complication. This study aims to develop a predictive model for ARDS in postoperative patients with gastrointestinal perforation to facilitate early detection and effective prevention.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective study, clinical data were collected from postoperative patients with gastrointestinal perforation admitted to the ICU in Hebei Provincial People's Hospital from October 2017 to May 2024. Univariate analysis and multifactorial logistic regression analysis were used to determine the independent risk factors for developing ARDS. Nomograms were developed to show predictive models, and the discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness of the models were assessed using the C-index, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Two hundred patients were ultimately included for analysis. In the development cohort, 38 (27.1%) of 140 patients developed ARDS, and in the internal validation cohort, 13 (21.7%) of 60 patients developed ARDS. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the site of perforation (OR = 0.164, P = 0.006), the duration of surgery (OR = 0.986, P = 0.008), BMI (OR = 1.197, P = 0.015), SOFA (OR = 1.443, P = 0.001), lactate (OR = 1.500, P = 0.017), and albumin (OR = 0.889, P = 0.007) as the independent risk factors for ARDS development. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.921 (95% CI: 0.869, 0.973) for the development cohort and 0.894 (95% CI: 0.809, 0.978) for the validation cohort. The calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrate that the nomogram possesses good predictive value and clinical practicability.

Conclusion

Our research introduced a nomogram that integrates six independent risk factors, facilitating the precise prediction of ARDS risk in postoperative patients following gastrointestinal perforation.

Concentrations of ceftazidime and avibactam in bile fluid-a prospective phase IIb study

BACKGROUND

The rise in carbapenem-resistant bacteria and the limited number of effective antibiotics pose a major health-care threat. The combination of ceftazidime (CAZ) and avibactam (AVI) represents an approved treatment option for carbapenem-resistant intra-abdominal infections. However, data on the pharmacokinetic profile of AVI in the hepatobiliary compartment is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To provide clinical in vivo data on the concentration of AVI in bile fluid as a surrogate for hepatobiliary excretion.

METHODS

A single dose of 2000/500 mg CAZ/AVI was administered prolonged over 2 h to 10 patients prior to abdominal surgery, with bile samples available in nine patients in this phase IIb study (DRKS-ID: DRKS00023533). Antibiotic concentrations in plasma (0-8 h), bile (after resection) and pharmacodynamic parameters were determined.

RESULTS

The mean concentration across individuals in bile was 33.5 mg/L (±20.5 mg/L) for CAZ and 7.1 mg/L (±3.5 mg/L) for AVI, resulting in bile/plasma ratios of 0.58 (±0.26) and 0.61 (±0.18). The Cmax in plasma was 87.2 mg/L (±25.0 mg/L) for CAZ and 18.6 mg/L (±6.29 mg/L) for AVI, with AUC0-∞ values of 351 h·mg/L (±104 h·mg/L) and 72.1 h·mg/L (±32.1 h·mg/L), respectively. Plasma concentrations of both CAZ and AVI remained more than 50% of the dosing interval above the minimum inhibitory concentrations (T>MIC > 50%; MICCAZ = 8 mg/L, MICAVI = 1 mg/L) in all patients. No antibiotic-associated side effects were reported during the 30-day follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The concentrations of CAZ and AVI in bile suggest their potential as a valuable therapeutic option for multi-resistant biliary infections.

Clinical update on acute cholecystitis and biliary pancreatitis: between certainties and grey areas

Acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) and acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) are significant complications of gallstone disease. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of current management practices for ACC and ABP. The Tokyo Guidelines (TG) and World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines recommend early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) as the treatment of choice for ACC. High-risk patients may benefit from alternative treatments like biliary drainage, with emerging techniques such as endoscopic drainage showing promise. ABP requires prompt diagnosis and intervention. The Revised Atlanta Classification (RAC) criteria are used for diagnosis, with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and cholecystectomy as primary treatments. Minimally invasive approaches are preferred for managing complications like infected pancreatic necrosis, with the endoscopic step-up method showing superior outcomes. The management of ACC and ABP continues to evolve. Future research is needed to refine guidelines further and address existing controversies, ultimately improving patient outcomes in these acute biliary conditions.

Intra-abdominal infection and sepsis in immunocompromised intensive care unit patients: Disease expression, microbial aetiology, and clinical outcomes

We compared epidemiology of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) between immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised ICU patients and identified risk factors for mortality. We performed a secondary analysis on the "AbSeS" database, a prospective, observational study with IAI patients from 309 ICUs in 42 countries. Immunocompromised status was defined as either neutropenia or prolonged corticosteroids use, chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the past year, bone marrow or solid organ transplantation, congenital immunodeficiency, or immunosuppressive drugs use. Mortality was defined as ICU mortality at any time or 28-day mortality for those discharged earlier. Associations with mortality were assessed by logistic regression. The cohort included 2589 patients of which 239 immunocompromised (9.2 %), most with secondary peritonitis. Among immunocompromised patients, biliary tract infections were less frequent, typhlitis more frequent, and IAIs were more frequently healthcare-associated or early-onset hospital-acquired compared with immunocompetent patients. No difference existed in grade of anatomical disruption, disease severity, organ failure, pathogens, and resistance patterns. Septic shock was significantly more frequent in the immunocompromised population. Mortality was similar in both groups (31.1% vs. 28.9 %; p = 0.468). Immunocompromise was not a risk factor for mortality (OR 0.98, 95 % CI 0.66-1.43). Independent risk factors for mortality among immunocompromised patients included septic shock at presentation (OR 6.64, 95 % CI 1.27-55.72), and unsuccessful source control with persistent inflammation (OR 5.48, 95 % CI 2.29-12.57). In immunocompromised ICU patients with IAI, short-term mortality was similar to immunocompetent patients, despite the former presented more frequently with septic shock, and septic shock and persistent inflammation after source control were independent risk factors for death.

Neutrophil Hitchhiking Enhances Liposomal Dexamethasone Therapy of Sepsis

Sepsis is characterized by a dysregulated immune response and is very difficult to treat. In the cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) mouse model, we show that nanomedicines can effectively alleviate systemic and local septic events by targeting neutrophils. Specifically, by decorating the surface of clinical-stage dexamethasone liposomes with cyclic arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (cRGD) peptides, we promote their engagement with neutrophils in the systemic circulation, leading to their prominent accumulation at primary and secondary sepsis sites. cRGD-targeted dexamethasone liposomes potently reduce immature circulating neutrophils and neutrophil extracellular traps in intestinal sepsis induction sites and the liver. Additionally, they mitigate inflammatory cytokines systemically and locally while preserving systemic IL-10 levels, contributing to lower IFN-γ/IL-10 ratios as compared to control liposomes and free dexamethasone. Our strategy addresses sepsis at the cellular level, illustrating the use of neutrophils both as a therapeutic target and as a chariot for drug delivery.

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Risk Assessment in Adults and Children

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides a recommendation for risk stratification according to severity of illness score. The panel's recommendation is based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adheres to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

Measuring serum and drainage fluid interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α levels for early detection of infectious complications after minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) are inflammatory cytokines produced in response to biological invasion or infection. Their levels are elevated in the blood and locally. We examined whether measuring IL-6 and TNF-α levels in serum or drainage fluid on postoperative day (POD) 1 could detect infectious complications after minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer.

METHODS

This cohort study included 205 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer between November 2020 and July 2023. We measured serum and drainage fluid IL-6 and TNF-α levels on POD 1 after gastrectomy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created to compare the diagnostic values of each cytokine and serum C-reactive protein levels for detecting postoperative infectious complications.

RESULTS

IL-6 and TNF-α levels in the serum or drainage fluid were significantly higher in patients with an infectious complication. In addition, drainage fluid IL-6 levels were significantly different in patients with versus without intra-abdominal abscess. In the ROC curve analysis, serum and drainage fluid IL-6 had the highest AUC values for any infectious complication and intra-abdominal abscess, respectively. POD 1 serum IL-6 level above 47 pg/mL could detect any infectious complication with sensitivity of 74.1 % and specificity of 71.8 %. POD 1 drainage fluid IL-6 level above 14,750 pg/mL had 100 % sensitivity for detecting intra-abdominal abscess with specificity of 56.0 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of IL-6 levels in blood and drainage fluid on POD 1 is valuable for early detection of postoperative infectious complications or intra-abdominal abscess after gastric cancer surgery.

Microbiological profiles and clinical outcomes of critically ill surgical patients with lower gastrointestinal perforation in Japan: a single-center retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Lower gastrointestinal perforation (LGP) is a surgical emergency disease that can result in secondary bacterial peritonitis. Microbiological studies on LGP are rare. The present study aimed to ascertain the microbiological profile of LGP in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at our institute after surgery. In addition, we investigated whether initial empirical therapy with vancomycin was associated with in-hospital mortality, duration of ICU stay, and duration of ventilator support.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted at Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Japan. The study population included all patients diagnosed with LGP who were admitted to the ICU after emergency surgery between 2017 and 2023. The primary outcome assessed was the microbiological profile of microorganisms isolated from ascites fluid and blood of the participants. The secondary end-points were in-hospital mortality, duration of ICU stay, and duration of ventilator support. We performed univariate and multivariate regression analyses to evaluate the end-points.

RESULTS

During the study period, 89 patients were included in the analysis. The most commonly identified pathogen from the ascites cultures was Escherichia coli (65.2%), followed by Enterococcus spp. (51.7%). E. faecium was identified in 16 (18.0%) ascites samples. The microbiological profile of critically ill patients with LGP admitted to the ICU after surgery was similar to that of previous studies on intra-abdominal infection (IAI). Therefore, the initial empirical therapy in the IAI guidelines is more appropriate for LGP. Multivariate regression analysis suggested that the combination of initial empirical therapy with vancomycin was not associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-3.00, p = 0.955), duration of ICU stay (coefficient=-0.92, 95% CI -3.04-1.21, p = 0.393), or duration of ventilator-support (coefficient=-9.03, 95%CI -49.69-31.63, p = 0.659).

CONCLUSION

The microbiological profile of critically ill patients with LGP admitted to the ICU after surgery was similar to that of previous studies on IAI. However, the frequency of E. faecium in the present study was higher than that in previous studies. Initial empirical therapy with drugs such as meropenem in combination with vancomycin for E. faecium was not associated with in-hospital mortality, duration of ICU stay, and duration of ventilator support, after adjusting for confounding factors.

Early Oral Step-Down Versus Continued Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection

Background: Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) require a combined tactic, of source control and antimicrobial therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral step-down antimicrobial therapy in cIAIs after initial intravenous (IV) antimicrobial therapy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included hospitalized adult patients diagnosed with a cIAI who received more than seven days of IV therapy from March 2017 to October 2021. Exclusion criteria included primary/peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis, necrotizing pancreatitis, fistulizing inflammatory bowel disease, or upper gastrointestinal tract infection. Patients were assigned into two groups: IV-only or oral step-down therapy. The primary outcome was infection recurrence, defined as re-initiation of antimicrobial agents after a treatment-free period of more than or equal to three days. Secondary outcomes included treatment escalation, repeat source control procedure, treatment-related complications, and all-cause mortality. Results: The cohort consisted of 248 patients (199 IV-only and 49 oral step-down). Patients receiving IV-only therapy had a shorter median antimicrobial duration than the oral step-down group (13 vs. 23 d; p <0.0001). Infection recurrence occurred in 26 (13.1%) and 6 (12.2%) patients in the IV-only and oral step-down groups, respectively (p = 0.88). Treatment escalation, repeat source control, and 28-day mortality were similar between groups. Oral step-down therapy resulted in more adverse drug events (10.2% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.04). Discussion: Transition to oral step-down after initial IV therapy had a similar rate of infection recurrence as IV-only therapy but was associated with a longer duration of antimicrobial therapy and an increased rate of adverse drug reactions. Larger randomized non-inferiority studies are needed to confirm this approach.

Predicting surgical outcomes of acute diffuse peritonitis: Updated risk models based on real-world clinical data

Aim

The existing predictive risk models for the surgical outcome of acute diffused peritonitis (ADP) need renovation by adding relevant variables such as ADP's definition or causative etiology to pursue outstanding data collection reflecting the real world. We aimed to revise the risk models predicting mortality and morbidities of ADP using the latest Japanese Nationwide Clinical Database (NCD) variable set.

Methods

Clinical dataset of ADP patients who underwent surgery, and registered in the NCD between 2016 and 2019, were used to develop a risk model for surgical outcomes. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality.

Results

After data cleanup, 45 379 surgical cases for ADP were derived for analysis. The perioperative and 30-day mortality were 10.6% and 7.2%, respectively. The prediction models have been created for the mortality and 10 morbidities associated with the mortality. The top five relevant predictors for perioperative mortality were age >80, advanced cancer with multiple metastases, platelet count of <50 000/mL, serum albumin of <2.0 g/dL, and unknown ADP site. The C-indices of perioperative and 30-day mortality were 0.859 and 0.857, respectively. The predicted value calculated with the risk models for mortality was highly fitted with the actual probability from the lower to the higher risk groups.

Conclusions

Risk models for postoperative mortality and morbidities with good predictive performance and reliability were revised and validated using the recent real-world clinical dataset. These models help to predict ADP surgical outcomes accurately and are available for clinical settings.

Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the Italian council for the optimization of antimicrobial use

Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are common surgical emergencies and are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hospital settings, particularly if poorly managed. The cornerstones of effective IAIs management include early diagnosis, adequate source control, appropriate antimicrobial therapy, and early physiologic stabilization using intravenous fluids and vasopressor agents in critically ill patients. Adequate empiric antimicrobial therapy in patients with IAIs is of paramount importance because inappropriate antimicrobial therapy is associated with poor outcomes. Optimizing antimicrobial prescriptions improves treatment effectiveness, increases patients' safety, and minimizes the risk of opportunistic infections (such as Clostridioides difficile) and antimicrobial resistance selection. The growing emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms has caused an impending crisis with alarming implications, especially regarding Gram-negative bacteria. The Multidisciplinary and Intersociety Italian Council for the Optimization of Antimicrobial Use promoted a consensus conference on the antimicrobial management of IAIs, including emergency medicine specialists, radiologists, surgeons, intensivists, infectious disease specialists, clinical pharmacologists, hospital pharmacists, microbiologists and public health specialists. Relevant clinical questions were constructed by the Organizational Committee in order to investigate the topic. The expert panel produced recommendation statements based on the best scientific evidence from PubMed and EMBASE Library and experts' opinions. The statements were planned and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) hierarchy of evidence. On November 10, 2023, the experts met in Mestre (Italy) to debate the statements. After the approval of the statements, the expert panel met via email and virtual meetings to prepare and revise the definitive document. This document represents the executive summary of the consensus conference and comprises three sections. The first section focuses on the general principles of diagnosis and treatment of IAIs. The second section provides twenty-three evidence-based recommendations for the antimicrobial therapy of IAIs. The third section presents eight clinical diagnostic-therapeutic pathways for the most common IAIs. The document has been endorsed by the Italian Society of Surgery.

Open or closed abdomen post laparotomy to control severe abdominal sepsis: a survival analysis

INTRODUCTION

severe abdominal sepsis, accompained by diffuse peritonitis, poses a significant challenge for most surgeons. It often requires repetitive surgical interventions, leading to complications and resulting in high morbidity and mortality rates. The open abdomen technique, facilitated by applying a negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), reduces the duration of the initial surgical procedure, minimizes the accumulation of secretions and inflammatory mediators in the abdominal cavity and lowers the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome and its associated complications. Another approach is primary closure of the abdominal aponeurosis, which involves suturing the layers of the abdominal wall.

METHODS

the objective of this study is to conduct a survival analysis comparing the treatment of severe abdominal sepsis using open abdomen technique versus primary closure after laparotomy in a public hospital in the South of Brazil. We utilized data extracted from electronic medical records to perform both descriptive and survival analysis, employing the Kaplan-Meier curve and a log-rank test.

RESULTS

the study sample encompassed 75 laparotomies conducted over a span of 5 years, with 40 cases employing NPWT and 35 cases utilizing primary closure. The overall mortality rate observed was 55%. Notably, survival rates did not exhibit statistical significance when comparing the two methods, even after stratifying the data into separate analysis groups for each technique.

CONCLUSION

recent publications on this subject have reported some favorable outcomes associated with the open abdomen technique underscoring the pressing need for a standardized approach to managing patients with severe, complicated abdominal sepsis.

Changes of PK/PD of Meropenem in patients with abdominal septic shock and exploration of clinical rational administration plan: a prospective exploratory study

This study aimed to explore the changes of pharmacokinetic parameters after meropenem in patients with abdominal septic shock after gastrointestinal perforation, and to simulate the probability of different dosing regimens achieving different pharmacodynamic goals. The study included 12 patients, and utilized high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to monitor the plasma concentration of meropenem. The probability of target attainment (PTA) for different minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and %fT > 4MIC was compared among simulated dosing regimens. The results showed that in 96 blood samples from 12 patients, the clearance (CL) of meropenem in the normal and abnormal creatinine clearance subgroups were 7.7 ± 1.8 and 4.4 ± 1.1 L/h, respectively, and the apparent volume of distribution (Vd) was 22.6 ± 5.1 and 17.2 ± 5.8 L, respectively. 2. Regardless of the subgroup, 0.5 g/q6h infusion over 6 h regimen achieved a PTA > 90% when MIC ≤ 0.5 mg/L. 1.0 g/q6h infusion regimen compared with other regimen, in most cases, the probability of making PTA > 90% is higher. For patients at low MIC, 0.5 g/q6h infusion over 6 h may be preferable. For patients at high MIC, a dose regimen of 1.0 g/q6 h infusion over 6 h may be preferable. Further research is needed to confirm this exploratory result.

Improving early cholecystectomy rate in acute cholecystitis with an evidence-based local multidisciplinary protocol and a surgical audit: single-center experience through an Acute Care Surgery Division

PURPOSE

To analyze if, after implementation of an evidence-based local multidisciplinary protocol for acute cholecystitis (AC), an intermediate surgical audit could improve early cholecystectomy (EC) rate and other therapeutic indicators.

METHODS

Longitudinal cohort study at a tertiary center. The local protocol, promoted, created, and periodically revised by the Acute Care Surgery Unit (ACSu) was updated and approved on March 2019. A specific registry was prospectively fulfilled with demographics, comorbidity, type of presentation, diagnostic items, therapeutic decision, and clinical course, considering both non-operative management (NOM) or cholecystectomy, early and delayed (EC and DC). Phase 1: April 2019-April 2021. A critical analysis and a surgical audit with the participation of all the involved Departments were then performed, especially focusing on improving global EC rate, considered primary outcome. Phase 2: May 2021-May 2023. Software SPSS 23.0 was used to compare data between phases.

RESULTS

Initial EC rate was significantly higher on Phase 2 (39.3%vs52.5%, p < 0.004), as a significantly inferior rate of patients were initially bailed out from EC to NOM because of comorbidity (14.4%vs8%, p < 0.02) and grade II with severe inflammatory signs (7%vs3%, p < 0.04). A higher percentage of patients was recovered for EC after an initial decision of NOM on Phase 2, but without reaching statistical significance (21.8%vs29.2%, n.s.). Global EC rate significantly increased between phases (52.5%vs66.3%, p < 0.002) without increasing morbidity and mortality. A significant minor percentage of elective cholecystectomies after AC episodes had to be performed on Phase 2 (14%vs6.7%, p < 0.009). Complex EC and those indicated after readmission or NOM failure were usually performed by the ACSu staff.

CONCLUSION

To adequately follow up the implementation of a local protocol for AC healthcare, registering and periodically analyzing data allow to perform intermediate surgical audits, useful to improve therapeutic indicators, especially EC rate. AC constitutes an ideal model to work with an ACSu.

Next-generation microbiological testing in intraabdominal infections with PCR technology

PURPOSE

Intraabdominal infections (IAI) are increasing worldwide and are a major contributor to morbidity and mortality. Among IAI, the number of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) is increasing globally. We tested the Unyvero A50® for intraabdominal infections, compared the detected microorganisms and antibiotic resistance, and compared the results with those of routine microbiology.

METHODS

We prospectively compared samples obtained from surgical patients using PCR-based Unyvero IAI cartridges against routine microbiology for the detection of microorganisms. Additionally, we identified clinical parameters that correlated with the microbiological findings. Data were analyzed using the t-test and Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Sixty-two samples were analyzed. The PCR system identified more microorganisms, mostly Bacteroides species, Escherichia coli, and Enterococcus spp. For bacterial resistance, the PCR system results were fully concordant with those of routine microbiology, resulting in a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) of 100%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the detection of microorganisms were 74%, 58%, 60%, and 72%, respectively. CRP levels were significantly higher in patients with detectable microorganisms. We identified more microorganisms and bacterial resistance in hospital-acquired intra-abdominal infections by using the PCR system.

DISCUSSION

IAI warrants early identification of the microorganisms involved and their resistance to allow for adequate antibiotic therapy. PCR systems enable physicians to rapidly adjust their antibiotic treatment. Conventional microbiological culture and testing remain essential for determining the minimal growth inhibition concentrations for antibiotic therapy.

Comparative phenotypic and genotypic analysis of community-acquired and hospital-acquired intra-abdominal infections among liver transplanted patients

AIM

During liver transplantation, both hospital-acquired (HA) and community-acquired (CA) intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are involved causing life-threatening diseases. Therefore, comparative studies of aerobic and facultative anaerobic HA-IAIs and CA-IAIs after liver transplantation surgery are necessary.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The species of detected isolates (310) from intra-abdominal fluid were identified and classified into hospital-acquired intra-abdominal infections (HA-IAIs) and community-acquired intra-abdominal infections (CA-IAIs). Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii were the most commonly detected species. The resistant phenotypes were commonly detected among the HA-IAIs; however, the virulent phenotypes were the predominant strains of CA-IAIs. Regrettably, the resistance profiles were shocking, indicating the inefficacy of monotherapy in treating these isolates. Therefore, we confirmed the use of empirical combination therapies of amikacin and meropenem for treating all IAIs (FICI ≤ 0.5). Unfortunately, the high diversity and low clonality of all identified HA and CA-IAIs were announced with D-value in the range of 0.992-1.

CONCLUSION

This diversity proves that there are infinite numbers of infection sources inside and outside healthcare centers.

Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy is widely adopted across nearly all surgical subspecialties in the elective setting. Initially finding indication in minor abdominal emergencies, it has gradually become the standard approach in the majority of elective general surgery procedures. Despite many technological advances and increasing acceptance, the laparoscopic approach remains underutilized in emergency general surgery and in abdominal trauma. Emergency laparotomy continues to carry a high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been a growing interest from emergency and trauma surgeons in adopting minimally invasive surgery approaches in the acute surgical setting. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a review of the literature to reach a consensus on the indications and benefits of a laparoscopic-first approach in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies or abdominal trauma.

METHODS

This position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of 54 experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on a position statement.

RESULTS

A total of 323 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized clinical trial, retrospective comparative cohort studies, case series) have been selected from an initial pool of 7409 studies. Evidence demonstrates several benefits of the laparoscopic approach in stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgical emergencies or abdominal trauma. The selection of a stable patient seems to be of paramount importance for a safe adoption of a laparoscopic approach. In hemodynamically stable patients, the laparoscopic approach was found to be safe, feasible and effective as a therapeutic tool or helpful to identify further management steps and needs, resulting in improved outcomes, regardless of conversion. Appropriate patient selection, surgeon experience and rigorous minimally invasive surgical training, remain crucial factors to increase the adoption of laparoscopy in emergency general surgery and abdominal trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

The WSES expert panel suggests laparoscopy as the first approach for stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.

Damage Control Surgery and Transfer in Emergency General Surgery

Selective non traumatic emergency surgery patients are targets for damage control surgery (DCS) to prevent or treat abdominal compartment syndrome and the lethal triad. However, DCS is still a subject of controversy. As a concept, DCS describes a series of abbreviated surgical procedures to allow rapid source control of hemorrhage and contamination in patients with circulatory shock to allow resuscitation and stabilization in the intensive care unit followed by delayed return to the operating room for definitive surgical management once the patient becomes physiologic stable. If appropriately applied, the DCS morbidity and mortality can be significantly reduced.

Primary anastomosis and suturing combined with vacuum-assisted abdominal closure in patients with secondary peritonitis due to perforation of the small intestine: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Intestinal resection and a proximal stoma is the preferred surgical approach in patients with severe secondary peritonitis due to perforation of the small intestine. However, proximal stomas may result in significant nutritional problems and long-term parenteral nutrition. This study aimed to assess whether primary anastomosis or suturing of small intestine perforation is feasible and safe using the open abdomen principle with vacuum-assisted abdominal closure (VAC).

METHODS

Between January 2005 and June 2018, we performed a retrospective chart review of 20 patients (> 18 years) with diffuse faecal peritonitis caused by small intestinal perforation and treated with primary anastomosis/suturing and subsequent open abdomen with VAC.

RESULTS

The median age was 65 years (range: 23-90 years). Twelve patients were female (60%). Simple suturing of the small intestinal perforation was performed in three cases and intestinal resection with primary anastomosis in 17 cases. Four patients (20%) died within 90-days postoperatively. Leakage occurred in five cases (25%), and three patients developed an enteroatmospheric fistula (15%). Thirteen of 16 patients (83%) who survived were discharged without a stoma. The rest had a permanent stoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary suturing or resection with anastomosis and open abdomen with VAC in small intestinal perforation with severe faecal peritonitis is associated with a high rate of leakage and enteroatmospheric fistula formation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved by the Danish Patient Safety Authority (case number 3-3013-1555/1) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (file number 18/28,404). No funding was received.

Application of metagenomic sequencing of drainage fluid in rapid and accurate diagnosis of postoperative intra-abdominal infection: a diagnostic study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative intra-abdominal infection (PIAI) is one of the most serious complications of abdominal surgery, increasing the risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality and prolonging hospital stay. Rapid diagnosis of PIAI is of great clinical value. Unfortunately, the current diagnostic methods of PIAI are not fast and accurate enough.

METHODS

The authors performed an exploratory study to establish a rapid and accurate diagnostic method of PIAI. The authors explored the turnaround time and accuracy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing PIAI. Patients who underwent elective abdominal surgery and routine abdominal drainage with suspected PIAI were enroled in the study. The fresh midstream abdominal drainage fluid was collected for mNGS and culturing.

RESULTS

The authors found that the median sample-to-answer turnaround time of mNGS was dramatically decreased than that of culture-based methods (<24 h vs. 59.5-111 h). The detection coverage of mNGS was much broader than culture-based methods. The authors found 26 species from 15 genera could only be detected by mNGS. The accuracy of mNGS was not inferior to culture-based methods in the 8 most common pathogens detected from abdominal drainage fluid (sensitivity ranged from 75 to 100%, specificity ranged from 83.3 to 100%, and kappa values were higher than 0.5). Moreover, the composition of the microbial spectrum established by mNGS varied between upper and lower gastrointestinal surgery, enhancing the understanding of PIAI pathogenesis.

CONCLUSION

This study preliminarily revealed the clinical value of mNGS in the rapid diagnosis of PIAI and provided a rationale for further research.

Prognostic performance of neutrophil CD64 expression in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections - a prospective study

No study yet analyzed the prognostic abilities of neutrophil CD64 expression (nCD64) in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), therefore our aim was to evaluate the possible association between this biomarker and outcome in such patients. This single-center prospective study was conducted in the Department of Surgical Diseases at a University Hospital 'Prof. Dr. Stoyan Kirkovich' Stara Zagora for the period November 2018 - August 2021. We used flow cytometry to measure the percentage of nCD64 preoperatively and on the 3rd postoperative day (POD) in 62 patients with cIAIs and 31 healthy controls. Of the 62 enrolled patients, nine (14.5%) died during hospitalization. The perioperative expression of nCD64 was significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (p = 0.02 before surgery and p = 0.024 after surgery). ROC Curve analysis revealed the good prognostic value of pre- and postoperative nCD64 levels as mortality predictors (AUROC = 0.744 and 0.765, respectively). Preoperatively, the identified sensitivity and specificity for nCD64 cut-off = 94.8% were 66.7% and 84.6%, respectively and on the 3rd POD for nCD64 cut-off = 84.85% we observed a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 78.8%. Neutrophil CD64 shows good prognostic value in patients with cIAIs both preoperatively and on the 3rd POD.

Source control in emergency general surgery: WSES, GAIS, SIS-E, SIS-A guidelines

Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are among the most common global healthcare challenges and they are usually precipitated by disruption to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Their successful management typically requires intensive resource utilization, and despite the best therapies, morbidity and mortality remain high. One of the main issues required to appropriately treat IAI that differs from the other etiologies of sepsis is the frequent requirement to provide physical source control. Fortunately, dramatic advances have been made in this aspect of treatment. Historically, source control was left to surgeons only. With new technologies non-surgical less invasive interventional procedures have been introduced. Alternatively, in addition to formal surgery open abdomen techniques have long been proposed as aiding source control in severe intra-abdominal sepsis. It is ironic that while a lack or even delay regarding source control clearly associates with death, it is a concept that remains poorly described. For example, no conclusive definition of source control technique or even adequacy has been universally accepted. Practically, source control involves a complex definition encompassing several factors including the causative event, source of infection bacteria, local bacterial flora, patient condition, and his/her eventual comorbidities. With greater understanding of the systemic pathobiology of sepsis and the profound implications of the human microbiome, adequate source control is no longer only a surgical issue but one that requires a multidisciplinary, multimodality approach. Thus, while any breach in the GI tract must be controlled, source control should also attempt to control the generation and propagation of the systemic biomediators and dysbiotic influences on the microbiome that perpetuate multi-system organ failure and death. Given these increased complexities, the present paper represents the current opinions and recommendations for future research of the World Society of Emergency Surgery, of the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery of Surgical Infection Society Europe and Surgical Infection Society America regarding the concepts and operational adequacy of source control in intra-abdominal infections.

The unrestricted global effort to complete the COOL trial

BACKGROUND

Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) has an increasing incidence with mortality rates over 80% in some settings. Mortality typically results from disruption of the gastrointestinal tract, progressive and self-perpetuating bio-mediator generation, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ failure. A further therapeutic option may be open abdomen (OA) management with negative peritoneal pressure therapy (NPPT) to remove inflammatory ascites and attenuate the systemic damage from SCIAS, although there are definite risks of leaving the abdomen open whenever it might possibly be closed. This potential therapeutic paradigm is the rationale being assessed in the Closed Or Open after Laparotomy (COOL trial) ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ). Initially, the COOL trial received Industry sponsorship; however, this funding mandated the use of a specific trademarked and expensive NPPT device in half of the patients allocated to the intervention (open) arm. In August 2022, the 3 M/Acelity Corporation without consultation but within the terms of the contract canceled the financial support of the trial. Although creating financial difficulty, there is now no restriction on specific NPPT devices and removing a cost-prohibitive intervention creates an opportunity to expand the COOL trial to a truly global basis. This document describes the evolution of the COOL trial, with a focus on future opportunities for global growth of the study.

METHODS

The COOL trial is the largest prospective randomized controlled trial examining the random allocation of SCIAS patients intra-operatively to either formal closure of the fascia or the use of the OA with an application of an NPPT dressing. Patients are eligible if they have free uncontained intraperitoneal contamination and physiologic derangements exemplified by septic shock OR severely adverse predicted clinical outcomes. The primary outcome is intended to definitively inform global practice by conclusively evaluating 90-day survival. Initial recruitment has been lower than hoped but satisfactory, and the COOL steering committee and trial investigators intend with increased global support to continue enrollment until recruitment ensures a definitive answer.

DISCUSSION

OA is mandated in many cases of SCIAS such as the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome associated with closure, or a planned second look as for example part of "damage control"; however, improved source control (locally and systemically) is the most uncertain indication for an OA. The COOL trial seeks to expand potential sites and proceed with the evaluation of NPPT agnostic to device, to properly examine the hypothesis that this treatment attenuates systemic damage and improves survival. This approach will not affect internal validity and should improve the external validity of any observed results of the intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

National Institutes of Health ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ).

The unrestricted global effort to complete the COOL trial

BACKGROUND

Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) has an increasing incidence with mortality rates over 80% in some settings. Mortality typically results from disruption of the gastrointestinal tract, progressive and self-perpetuating bio-mediator generation, systemic inflammation, and multiple organ failure. A further therapeutic option may be open abdomen (OA) management with negative peritoneal pressure therapy (NPPT) to remove inflammatory ascites and attenuate the systemic damage from SCIAS, although there are definite risks of leaving the abdomen open whenever it might possibly be closed. This potential therapeutic paradigm is the rationale being assessed in the Closed Or Open after Laparotomy (COOL trial) ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ). Initially, the COOL trial received Industry sponsorship; however, this funding mandated the use of a specific trademarked and expensive NPPT device in half of the patients allocated to the intervention (open) arm. In August 2022, the 3 M/Acelity Corporation without consultation but within the terms of the contract canceled the financial support of the trial. Although creating financial difficulty, there is now no restriction on specific NPPT devices and removing a cost-prohibitive intervention creates an opportunity to expand the COOL trial to a truly global basis. This document describes the evolution of the COOL trial, with a focus on future opportunities for global growth of the study.

METHODS

The COOL trial is the largest prospective randomized controlled trial examining the random allocation of SCIAS patients intra-operatively to either formal closure of the fascia or the use of the OA with an application of an NPPT dressing. Patients are eligible if they have free uncontained intraperitoneal contamination and physiologic derangements exemplified by septic shock OR severely adverse predicted clinical outcomes. The primary outcome is intended to definitively inform global practice by conclusively evaluating 90-day survival. Initial recruitment has been lower than hoped but satisfactory, and the COOL steering committee and trial investigators intend with increased global support to continue enrollment until recruitment ensures a definitive answer.

DISCUSSION

OA is mandated in many cases of SCIAS such as the risk of abdominal compartment syndrome associated with closure, or a planned second look as for example part of "damage control"; however, improved source control (locally and systemically) is the most uncertain indication for an OA. The COOL trial seeks to expand potential sites and proceed with the evaluation of NPPT agnostic to device, to properly examine the hypothesis that this treatment attenuates systemic damage and improves survival. This approach will not affect internal validity and should improve the external validity of any observed results of the intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

National Institutes of Health ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03163095 ).

STOP Signs: A Population-based Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Antibiotic Duration for Complicated Intraabdominal Infection Before and After the Publication of a Landmark RCT

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the STOP-IT randomized controlled trial changed antibiotic prescribing in patients with Complicated Intraabdominal Infection (CIAI).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

CIAI is common and causes significant morbidity. In May 2015, the STOP-IT randomized controlled trial showed equivalent outcomes between four-day and clinically determined antibiotic duration.

METHODS

This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using interrupted time series methods. The STOP-IT publication date was the exposure. Median duration of inpatient antibiotic prescription was the outcome. All adult patients admitted to four hospitals in Calgary, Canada between July 2012 and December 2018 with CIAI who survived at least four days following source control were included. Analysis was stratified by infectious source as appendix or biliary tract (group A) versus other (group B).

RESULTS

Among 4384 included patients, clinical and demographic attributes were similar before vs after publication. In Group A, median inpatient antibiotic duration was 3 days and unchanged from the beginning to the end of the study period [adjusted median difference -0.00 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.37 - 0.37 days]. In Group B, antibiotic duration was shorter at the end of the study period (7.87 vs 6.73 days; -1.14 days, CI-2.37 - 0.09 days), however there was no change in trend following publication (-0.03 days, CI -0.16 - 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

For appendiceal or biliary sources of CIAI, antibiotic duration was commensurate with the experimental arm of STOP-IT. For other sources, antibiotic duration was long and did not change in response to trial publication. Additional implementation science is needed to improve antibiotic stewardship.

Effectiveness of intraoperative peritoneal lavage with saline in patient with intra-abdominal infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Intraoperative peritoneal lavage (IOPL) with saline has been widely used in surgical practice. However, the effectiveness of IOPL with saline in patients with intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) remains controversial. This study aims to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of IOPL in patients with IAIs.

Methods

The databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, CNKI, WanFang, and CBM databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2022. Random-effects models were used to calculate the risk ratio (RR), mean difference, and standardized mean difference. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to rate the quality of the evidence.

Results

Ten RCTs with 1318 participants were included, of which eight studies on appendicitis and two studies on peritonitis. Moderate-quality evidence showed that the use of IOPL with saline was not associated with a reduced risk of mortality (0% vs. 1.1%; RR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.02–6.39]), intra-abdominal abscess (12.3% vs. 11.8%; RR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.70–1.48]; I2 = 24%), incisional surgical site infections (3.3% vs. 3.8%; RR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.18–2.86]; I2 = 50%), postoperative complication (11.0% vs. 13.2%; RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.39–1.41]; I2 = 64%), reoperation (2.9% vs. 1.7%; RR,1.71 [95% CI, 0.74–3.93]; I2 = 0%) and readmission (5.2% vs. 6.6%; RR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.48–1.87]; I2 = 7%) in patients with appendicitis when compared to non-IOPL. Low-quality evidence showed that the use of IOPL with saline was not associated with a reduced risk of mortality (22.7% vs. 23.3%; RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.45–2.09], I2 = 0%) and intra-abdominal abscess (5.1% vs. 5.0%; RR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.16–6.98], I2 = 0%) in patients with peritonitis when compared to non-IOPL.

Conclusion

IOPL with saline use in patients with appendicitis was not associated with significantly decreased risk of mortality, intra-abdominal abscess, incisional surgical site infection, postoperative complication, reoperation, and readmission compared with non-IOPL. These findings do not support the routine use of IOPL with saline in patients with appendicitis. The benefits of IOPL for IAI caused by other types of abdominal infections need to be investigated.

Novel Aspects of the Immune Response Involved in the Peritoneal Damage in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients under Dialysis

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) incidence is growing worldwide, with a significant percentage of CKD patients reaching end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and requiring kidney replacement therapies (KRT). Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a convenient KRT presenting benefices as home therapy. In PD patients, the peritoneum is chronically exposed to PD fluids containing supraphysiologic concentrations of glucose or other osmotic agents, leading to the activation of cellular and molecular processes of damage, including inflammation and fibrosis. Importantly, peritonitis episodes enhance peritoneum inflammation status and accelerate peritoneal injury. Here, we review the role of immune cells in the damage of the peritoneal membrane (PM) by repeated exposure to PD fluids during KRT as well as by bacterial or viral infections. We also discuss the anti-inflammatory properties of current clinical treatments of CKD patients in KRT and their potential effect on preserving PM integrity. Finally, given the current importance of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease, we also analyze here the implications of this disease in CKD and KRT.

circFLNA promotes intestinal injury during abdominal sepsis through Fas-mediated apoptosis pathway by sponging miR-766-3p

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal infections are the second most common cause of sepsis in the intensive care unit. Intestinal epithelial injury due to abdominal sepsis results in a variety of pathological changes, such as intestinal bacteria and toxins entering the blood, leading to persistent systemic inflammation and multiple organ dysfunction. The increased apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells induced by sepsis further exacerbates the progression of sepsis. Although several studies have revealed that circRNAs are involved in intestinal epithelial injury in sepsis, few studies have identified the roles of circRNAs in intestinal epithelial apoptosis.

METHODS

We used laser capture microdissection to obtain purified epithelial cells located in intestinal crypts from four patients with abdominal sepsis induced by intestinal perforation and four samples from age and sex-matched non-septic patients. Microarray analysis of circRNAs was conducted to assess differentially expressed circRNAs between patients with and without sepsis. Lastly, in vitro and in vivo assays were performed to study the mechanism of circFLNA in intestinal epithelial apoptosis during sepsis.

RESULTS

circFLNA was upregulated in the intestinal epithelium after abdominal sepsis induced by intestinal perforation. Inhibition of miR-766-3p impaired si-circFLNA-mediated inhibition of apoptosis and inflammation factor levels in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated HIEC-6 cells. circFLNA aggravated apoptosis and inflammation through the Fas-mediated apoptosis pathway in both LPS-treated HIEC-6 cells and a mouse cecal ligation and puncture model.

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that circFLNA promotes intestinal injury in abdominal sepsis through the Fas-mediated apoptosis pathway by sponging miR-766-3p. The circFLNA/miR-766-3p/Fas axis has potential as a novel therapeutic target for treating intestinal injury in sepsis.

Association of the origin of contamination and species of microorganisms with short-term survival in dogs with septic peritonitis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between anatomical location of contamination and mortality in dogs with gastrointestinal and biliary origin of septic peritonitis.

METHODS

Medical records at two private referral hospitals between 2003 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were included if the origin of contamination was confirmed intraoperatively within the gastrointestinal or biliary tract. Cases were excluded if the dog died or was euthanized intraoperatively or where the data regarding the origin of contamination were not available. The association of anatomical origin with survival was assessed specifying the locations as stomach, small intestine, large intestine and biliary tract. The gastrointestinal tract origin was further subdivided into pylorus, nonpylorus, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum and colon.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate was 75.9% (n = 44/58). There were no significant differences in survival among different anatomical origins of contaminations before or after subdivision (P = 0.349 and 0.832, respectively). Also, there was no association between isolated microorganism species in microbiological culture and the anatomical origin (P = 0.951) and the microorganism species was not associated with survival (P = 0.674).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no association between anatomical location of leakage, microorganism species and survival although further studies are warranted to analyse the relationships between anatomical leakage site and microorganism species as well as microorganism species and mortality.

Subtotal Fenestrating Cholecystectomy: A Safe and Effective Approach to the Difficult Gallbladder

INTRODUCTION

Subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SUB) is an alternative to total laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TOT) when the critical view of safety (CVS) cannot be achieved. Little is known about the clinical factors and postoperative outcomes associated with SUB. The objective was to determine predictive factors and outcomes of SUB as compared to TOT.

METHODS

Clinical data from patients admitted from our emergency department to the acute care surgery service who underwent SUB or TOT by an acute care surgery surgeon for acute biliary disease (2017-2019) were reviewed. Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests were used.

RESULTS

355 patients underwent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis; 28 were SUB (7.9%). SUB patients were more likely to be older (57 versus 43 y; P = 0.015), male (60.7% versus 39.3%; P < 0.001), have a history of cirrhosis or liver disease (14.3% versus 2.1%; P = 0.007), and have a higher Charlson-Comorbidity Index (1 versus 0, P = 0.041). SUB had greater leukocytosis (14.6 versus 10.9; P < 0.001), higher total bilirubin (0.9 versus 0.6; P = 0.021), and a higher Tokyo grade (2 versus 1; P < 0.001), and had operative findings including gallbladder decompression (82.1% versus 23.2%; P < 0.001) and inability to achieve the CVS (78.6% versus 3.4%; P < 0.001). SUB patients had an increased length of stay (4 versus 2 d; P < 0.001) and more 1-y readmissions. No major vascular injuries occurred in either group with one biliary injury in the TOT group.

CONCLUSIONS

SUB patients present with more significant markers of biliary disease and have more complicated intraoperative and postoperative courses. However, the lack of biliary or vascular injuries suggests that SUB may represent a safe alternative when the CVS cannot be achieved.

Korean Guidelines for Use of Antibiotics for Intra-abdominal Infections in Adults

The guidelines are intended to provide practical information for the correct use of antibiotics for intra-abdominal infections in Korea. With the aim of realizing evidence-based treatment, these guidelines for the use of antibiotics were written to help clinicians find answers to key clinical questions that arise in the course of patient care, using the latest research results based on systematic literature review. The guidelines were prepared in consideration of the data on the causative pathogens of intra-abdominal infections in Korea, the antibiotic susceptibility of the causative pathogens, and the antibiotics available in Korea.

Biliary Sepsis Due to Recurrent Acute Calculus Cholecystitis (ACC) in a High Surgical-Risk Elderly Patient: An Unexpected Complication

Acute calculus cholecystitis (ACC) is increasing in frequency within an ageing population, in which biliary tract infection, including cholecystitis and cholangitis, is the second most common cause of sepsis, with higher morbidity and mortality rates. Patient's critical conditions, such as septic shock or anaesthesiology contraindication, may be reasons to avoid laparoscopic cholecystectomy-the first-line treatment of ACC-preferring gallbladder drainage. It can aid in patient's stabilization with also the benefit of identifying the causative organism to establish a targeted antibiotic therapy, especially in patients at high risk for antimicrobial resistance such as healthcare-associated infection. Nevertheless, a recent randomized clinical trial showed that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can reduce the rate of major complications compared with percutaneous catheter drainage in critically ill patients too. On the other hand, among the possibilities to control biliary sepsis in non-operative management of ACC, according to recent meta-analysis, endoscopic gallbladder drainage showed better clinical success rate, and it is gaining popularity because of the potential advantage of allowing gallstones clearance to reduce recurrences of ACC. However, complications that may arise, although rare, can worsen an already weak clinical condition, as happened to the high surgical-risk elderly patient taken into account in our case report.

Genomics and pathotypes of the many faces of Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli is the most researched microbial organism in the world. Its varied impact on human health, consisting of commensalism, gastrointestinal disease, or extraintestinal pathologies, has generated a separation of the species into at least eleven pathotypes (also known as pathovars). These are broadly split into two groups, intestinal pathogenic E. coli (InPEC) and extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC). However, components of E. coli's infinite open accessory genome are horizontally transferred with substantial frequency, creating pathogenic hybrid strains that defy a clear pathotype designation. Here, we take a birds-eye view of the E. coli species, characterizing it from historical, clinical, and genetic perspectives. We examine the wide spectrum of human disease caused by E. coli, the genome content of the bacterium, and its propensity to acquire, exchange, and maintain antibiotic resistance genes and virulence traits. Our portrayal of the species also discusses elements that have shaped its overall population structure and summarizes the current state of vaccine development targeted at the most frequent E. coli pathovars. In our conclusions, we advocate streamlining efforts for clinical reporting of ExPEC, and emphasize the pathogenic potential that exists throughout the entire species.

Sepsis Team Organizational Model to Decrease Mortality for Intra-Abdominal Infections: Is Antibiotic Stewardship Enough?

Introduction. Sepsis is an overwhelming reaction to infection with significant morbidity, requiring urgent interventions in order to improve outcomes. The 2016 Sepsis-3 guidelines modified the previous definitions of sepsis and septic shock, and proposed some specific diagnostic and therapeutic measures to define the use of fluid resuscitation and antibiotics. However, some open issues still exist. Methods. A literature research was performed on PubMed and Cochrane using the terms "sepsis" AND "intra-abdominal infections" AND ("antibiotic therapy" OR "antibiotic treatment"). The inclusion criteria were management of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) and effects of antibiotic stewardships programs (ASP) on the outcome of the patients. Discussion. Sepsis-3 definitions represent an added value in the understanding of sepsis mechanisms and in the management of the disease. However, some questions are still open, such as the need for an early identification of sepsis. Sepsis management in the context of IAI is particularly challenging and a prompt diagnosis is essential in order to perform a quick treatment (source control and antibiotic treatment). Antibiotic empirical therapy should be based on the kind of infection (community or hospital acquired), local resistances, and patient's characteristic and comorbidities, and should be adjusted or de-escalated as soon as microbiological information is available. Antibiotic Stewardship Programs (ASP) have demonstrated to improve antimicrobial utilization with reduction of infections, emergence of multi-drug resistant bacteria, and costs. Surgeons should not be alone in the management of IAI but ideally inserted in a sepsis team together with anaesthesiologists, medical physicians, pharmacists, and infectious diseases specialists, meeting periodically to reassess the response to the treatment. Conclusion. The cornerstones of sepsis management are accurate diagnosis, early resuscitation, effective source control, and timely initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Current evidence shows that optimizing antibiotic use across surgical specialities is imperative to improve outcomes. Ideally every hospital and every emergency surgery department should aim to provide a sepsis team in order to manage IAI.

A Proposal for a Classification Guiding the Selection of Appropriate Antibiotic Therapy for Intra-Abdominal Infections

Adequately controlling the source of infection and prescribing appropriately antibiotic therapy are the cornerstones of the management of patients with intra-abdominal infections (IAIs). Correctly classifying patients with IAIs is crucial to assessing the severity of their clinical condition and deciding the strategy of the treatment, including a correct empiric antibiotic therapy. Best practices in prescribing antibiotics may impact patient outcomes and the cost of treatment, as well as the risk of “opportunistic” infections such as Clostridioides difficile infection and the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance. This review aims to identify a correct classification of IAIs, guiding clinicians in the selection of the best antibiotic therapy in patients with IAIs.

Study of damage control strategy for non-traumatic diseases: a single-center observational study

BACKGROUND

Damage control strategy (DCS) has been introduced not only for trauma but also for acute abdomen, but its indications and usefulness have not been clarified. We examined clinical characteristics of patients who underwent DCS and compared clinical characteristics and results with and without DCS in patients with septic shock.

METHODS

We targeted a series of endogenous abdominal diseases in Kansai Medical University Hospital from April 2013 to March 2019. Clinical characteristics of 26 patients who underwent DCS were examined. Then, clinical characteristics and results were compared between the DCS group (n = 26) and non-DCS group (n = 31) in 57 patients with septic shock during the same period.

RESULTS

All 26 patients who underwent DCS had septic shock, low mean arterial pressure (MAP) before the start of surgery, and required high-dose norepinephrine administration intraoperatively. Their discharge mortality rate was 12%. Among the patients with septic shock, the DCS group had a higher SOFA score (P = 0.008) and MAP was lower preoperatively, but it did not increase even with intraoperative administration of large amounts of fluid replacement and vasoconstrictor. There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality and discharge mortality between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

DCS may be useful in patients with severe septic shock.

Operative management of acute abdomen after bariatric surgery in the emergency setting: the OBA guidelines

BACKGROUND

Patients presenting with acute abdominal pain that occurs after months or years following bariatric surgery may present for assessment and management in the local emergency units. Due to the large variety of surgical bariatric techniques, emergency surgeons have to be aware of the main functional outcomes and long-term surgical complications following the most performed bariatric surgical procedures. The purpose of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the WSES in collaboration with IFSO bariatric experienced surgeons, on the management of acute abdomen after bariatric surgery focusing on long-term complications in patients who have undergone laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

METHOD

A working group of experienced general, acute care, and bariatric surgeons was created to carry out a systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and to answer the PICO questions formulated after the Operative management in bariatric acute abdomen survey. The literature search was limited to late/long-term complications following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

CONCLUSIONS

The acute abdomen after bariatric surgery is a common cause of admission in emergency departments. Knowledge of the most common late/long-term complications (> 4 weeks after surgical procedure) following sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and their anatomy leads to a focused management in the emergency setting with good outcomes and decreased morbidity and mortality rates. A close collaboration between emergency surgeons, radiologists, endoscopists, and anesthesiologists is mandatory in the management of this group of patients in the emergency setting.

The efficacy and safety of eravacycline compared with current clinically common antibiotics in the treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

Eravacycline is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic for the treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). However, the efficacy and safety of eravacycline compared with current clinically common antibiotics remain unknown.

Objective

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of eravacycline and other clinically common antibiotics in China, including tigecycline, meropenem, ertapenem, ceftazidime/avibactam+metronidazole, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin, and ceftriaxone+metronidazole, for the treatment of adults with cIAIs and to provide a reference for clinical choice.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were electronically searched to collect clinical randomized controlled studies (RCTs) comparing different antibiotics in the treatment of patients with cIAIs from inception to June 1, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies.

Results

A total of 4050 articles were initially retrieved, and 25 RCTs were included after screening, involving eight treatment therapies and 9372 patients. The results of network meta-analysis showed that in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the clinically evaluable (CE) population, and the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population, the clinical response rate of eravacycline was not significantly different from that of the other 7 therapies (P > 0.05). In terms of microbiological response rate, eravacycline was significantly better than tigecycline [tigecycline vs. eravacycline: RR = 0.82, 95%CI (0.65,0.99)], and there was no significant difference between the other 6 regimens and eravacycline (P > 0.05). In terms of safety, the incidence of serious adverse events, discontinuation rate, and all-cause mortality of eravacycline were not significantly different from those of the other 7 treatment therapies (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Based on the evidence generated by the current noninferiority clinical trial design, the efficacy and safety of eravacycline for the treatment of adults with cIAIs are not significantly different from those of the other 7 commonly used clinical antibiotics in China. In terms of microbiological response rate, eravacycline was significantly better than tigecycline. In view of the severe multidrug-resistant situation in China, existing drugs have difficulty meeting the needs of clinical treatment, and the new antibacterial drug eravacycline may be one of the preferred options for the treatment of cIAIs in adults.

Cohort cholecystectomies in the Brazilian public system: is access to laparoscopy universal after three decades?

OBJECTIVE

videosurgery in Brazil started in 1990 with the performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, being included by the public health system in 2008. We evaluated the current situation of the use of this technology in the Unified Health System (SUS - Sistema Único de Saúde).

METHODS

from 2013 to 2019, 1,406,654 patients registered at the SUS Informatics Department (DATASUS) were analyzed to calculate the rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) in relation to open cholecystectomies (OC). Patient characteristics, disease presentation and postoperative mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

the LC rate reached 41.5% (growth of 68%) with no decrease in the absolute number of OC. In University Hospitals (UH), the LC rate reached 91.96%. The open technique in emergencies was more associated with male patients, aged 60 years or older, with prolonged hospitalization and in the ICU. Those undergoing LC were less predisposed to postoperative death, both electively (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.42 - 0.56; NNT=20) and urgently (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.20 - 0.25; NNT ≅1), providing a protective effect.

CONCLUSION

despite the increase in the indication of LC, the open technique during the years studied remained stable and the most used in the public health system in Brazil. The effectiveness of public health policies to shorten the complete implementation of videosurgery in SUS needs to be investigated in future epidemiological studies, as well as its impact on postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Temocillin Administered by Continuous Infusion in Patients with Septic Shock Associated with Intra-Abdominal Infection and Ascitic Fluid Effusion

Temocillin is active against Gram-negative bacteria, including many extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales. We studied its pharmacokinetics in plasma and ascitic fluid after intravenous administration of a loading dose of 2 g over 30 min, followed by continuous infusion of 6 g/24 h, to 19 critically-ill patients with septic shock associated with complicated intra-abdominal infection. We established a pharmacokinetic model describing unbound temocillin concentrations in plasma and ascitic fluid and performed Monte-Carlo simulations to evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of unbound concentrations (100% fT > MIC, i.e., unbound concentrations remaining above the MIC during 100% of the time) for the applied and hypothetical dosing regimens. The temocillin AUC in ascitic fluid was 46% of the plasma AUC. Plasma unbound concentrations were best described by a two-compartment model, and an additional compartment was added to describe unbound concentration in ascitic fluid, with renal clearance as a covariate. Dosing simulations showed that 90% PTA was achieved in the plasma with the current dosing regimen for MIC ≤ 16 mg/L (EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint) but not in the ascitic fluid if renal clearance was ≥40 mL/min. Hypothetical dosing with a higher (a) loading dose or (b) infused dose allowed to reach target concentrations in ascitic fluid (a) more rapidly or (b) sustainably, but these simulations need to be evaluated in the clinics for safety and efficacy.