Applying mixed methods to pilot feasibility studies to inform intervention trials

"It Took Away the Trauma of Failing": A Mixed Methods Feasibility Trial of an Open Goals Physical Activity Program

Open goals (e.g. to "see how many steps you can reach today") may be a promising strategy for promoting physical activity. The findings from initial studies, typically based on single sessions of exercise, showed that open goals can produce at least as much activity as specific goals (e.g. to reach 10,000 steps a day), while promoting more positive experiences and higher intentions to repeat the activity, especially among less active individuals. However, the feasibility of using open goals over a longer duration remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we examined the feasibility of using open goals in a 10-week step-based physical activity program. A single-arm mixed methods design was used, involving 15 healthy adults (13 female; Mage = 42.53) with low to moderate physical activity levels. Participants were provided with a pedometer, diary, and open goals for each week, alongside brief support sessions. The feasibility domains assessed included recruitment, acceptability, adherence, and retention. Quantitative methods assessed physical activity, enjoyment, and self-efficacy, while supplementary qualitative methods explored participants' perceptions of open goals. The study showed high recruitment and retention rates, increased physical activity, and positive psychological experiences, indicating the feasibility of the 10-week open-goal program. Secondary outcomes suggest that open goals may function by increasing enjoyment and self-efficacy while decreasing negative outcomes such as pressure, guilt, and failure. The findings indicate that using open goals in longer-term physical activity programs is feasible, expanding on the limitations of previous single-session designs, and offering recommendations for future trials.

A Flexible Individualised ExeRcise programme for cancer patients during ChEmotherapy (FIERCE): Protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial

BACKGROUND

Exercise is an important tool which has been shown to help patients manage many of the side effects of their cancer treatment, reduce toxicities, and improve prognosis. The benefits of exercise have been well documented, however, performing regular exercise during treatment remains a challenge for most patients. The Flexible Individualised ExeRcise programme for cancer patients during ChEmotherapy (FIERCE) is an exercise programme that has been co-designed by healthcare professionals and people with a personal lived experience of chemotherapy. The primary aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of delivering the FIERCE programme for cancer patients during chemotherapy.

METHODS

The FIERCE study is a randomised controlled feasibility trial which will include 50 participants who are scheduled to receive chemotherapy for the treatment of breast, colorectal, or ovarian cancer. Participants will be randomly allocated to Group 1: FIERCE programme, or Group 2: Self-managed pedometer programme in a 2:1 ratio. Participants will be enrolled in the study for the duration of their chemotherapy treatment. The primary outcome of feasibility will be measured using a mixed-methods approach. Secondary outcomes of cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength, skeletal muscle mass, physical function, fatigue, and quality of life will be measured at baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1).

DISCUSSION

The FIERCE feasibility study aims to explore if a flexible, individualised exercise programme will support individuals to be active during chemotherapy treatment. If proven to be feasible, a large-scale randomised controlled trial will be undertaken focusing on the efficacy of the FIERCE programme on different health outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT06280885.

Pilot Trial of a Transdiagnostic Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)-Based Group Intervention to Reduce Psychological Distress, Facilitate Positive Behavior Change, and Mitigate Inflammation in Older People with HIV

More than half of adults with HIV in the United States are aged 50 or older. Older people with HIV (OPWH) are disproportionately affected by age-related health disparities and non-communicable diseases associated with inflammation. The current pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the feasibility and acceptability, while exploring signals of effects of a transdiagnostic cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) modular group teaching skills to cope with distress, make positive health behavior changes, and ultimately reduce inflammation. Participants were 31 virally undetectable, and psychiatrically stable OPWH (age [Formula: see text]50 years). Participants were randomized 1:1 to enhanced usual care or CBT for HIV and Symptom Management (CHAMP). CHAMP consists of 12-weekly virtual group sessions led by two interventionists. Self-report questionnaires and intravenous blood draws were collected at baseline and follow-up. Intervention participants completed an exit interview. Of those screened eligible, 96.8% (30/31) were randomized (n = 15 per group), 86.7% (13/15) completed the intervention, and 87% (26/30) completed the follow-up. On acceptability questionnaires scaled 0-3, participants reported high satisfaction and the intervention to be of high quality (M(SD)=3.00(0.0) for both). They also indicated their needs were met (2.67(0.50)) and coping improved (2.60(0.52)). Intervention participants showed a mean decrease in anxiety (-1.07(6.08)) and depressive (-1.71(5.37)) symptoms on clinical screeners, and mean increase in quality of life (2.86(3.59)). CHAMP is both feasible and acceptable for OPWH. Exploratory analyses indicate favorable outcomes for improving psychological distress and health-related quality of life.

Implementation of a Quality Improvement Tool "Recover25" to Guide the Care of Patients Experiencing Prolonged Critical Illness: A Mixed-Method Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVES

Few quality improvement (QI) tools are specifically designed to manage the care of patients experiencing prolonged critical illness. This risks omissions in care. To determine the implementation feasibility and clinician acceptability of our QI tool "Recover25," we focused on actionable processes of care for patients with an ICU stay of over 7 days and their families.

DESIGN

Parallel convergent mixed-methods feasibility study conducted between February 2024 and May 2024.

SETTING

A mixed ICU in London, United Kingdom.

SUBJECTS

Patients with an ICU stay of more than 7 days, and the staff who care for them.

INTERVENTIONS

We invited representatives of all ICU professions to a weekly QI round.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We recorded the time completed Recover25, the amount and type of actions generated following Recover25 use (i.e., what new care activities did it prompt), and the number and profession of staff attending each round. We administered the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) questionnaire and conducted semi-structured clinician interviews. We calculated means (sds) or interquartile ranges (IQRs) (percentiles) of time to complete and a number of actions generated. We analyzed and integrated qualitative data using framework analysis informed by the TFA. "Recover 25" was used 34 times (65%) of 52 opportunities with 26 patients. Median (IQR) Recover25 completion time was 9.75 minutes (8.2-14.9 min) with a completion rate of 96% (89-100%). Recover25 usage prompted a median of 1 (IQR) (1-2) new action. There was a mean of 4 (sd 2) interprofessional team members attending each QI round. Nineteen clinicians completed 33 TFA questionnaires and 11 interviews. Recover25 was perceived as acceptable, with 94% reporting it aligned with their principles of good care, 85% perceiving it as a coherent intervention, and 67% perceiving it was effective. Interview data showed participants valued the emphasis on person-centered care and highlighted ways to improve implementation.

CONCLUSION

Recover25 was perceived as feasible to implement and acceptable by staff. Further work is needed to understand the effects on patient experience and outcomes.

Proactive clinical review of patients taking opioid medicines long term for persistent pain led by clinical pharmacists in primary care teams (PROMPPT): a non-randomised mixed methods feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Given the poor long-term effectiveness of opioids for persistent non-cancer pain, and their potential for harm, evidence-based interventions to address opioid overprescribing for persistent pain are needed. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a primary care practice pharmacist-led intervention (PROMPPT review) for patients prescribed opioids for persistent pain and the feasibility of evaluating PROMPPT in a definitive trial.

METHODS

A single-arm study, with mixed methods process evaluation, was conducted in four English primary care practices. Adults prescribed opioids for ≥ 6 months were invited to participate in the Management of Opioids and Persistent Pain (MOPP) study by completing baseline and 3-month follow-up questionnaires. Practices invited a representative sample of MOPP participants to schedule a PROMPPT review, eight of which were audio-recorded. Following the review, pharmacists completed intervention delivery templates, and participants were sent an Acceptability Questionnaire and invited to consent to an interview.

RESULTS

Between November 2020 and May 2021, 148 participants were recruited to the MOPP study. Of these, 123 (83%) completed 3-month follow-up. Of 88 MOPP participants invited for a PROMPPT review, 80 (91%) attended. The review was rated completely acceptable or acceptable in 90% (45/50) of acceptability questionnaires returned. Overall, participants interviewed (n = 15) perceived the review as a good idea and recommended it to others; they preferred face-to-face consultations. Prior to the review, they reported mixed feelings, including feeling 'pleased' to be invited and 'grateful' someone was taking an interest, alongside concerns about what would happen during the review, including opioids being stopped and changes being detrimental. Following the review, those with a clear plan for follow-up/access to the pharmacist felt reassured about making changes to their pain medicines, whilst those advised to arrange follow-up as needed were less satisfied and more likely to report confusion about the plan.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMPPT reviews appeared acceptable to patients, review uptake was high, and the study demonstrated the feasibility of a large definitive trial to evaluate PROMPPT. The review invitation, patient information, and pharmacist training were refined based on the findings ahead of a large cluster randomised controlled trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN, ISRCTN87628403 , registered 31 July 2020.

Telehealth Support From Cardiologists to Primary Care Physicians in Heart Failure Treatment: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study of the Brazilian Heart Insufficiency With Telemedicine Trial

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is a prevalent condition ideally managed through collaboration between health care sectors. Telehealth between cardiologists and primary care physicians is a strategy to improve the quality of care for patients with heart failure. Still, the effectiveness of this approach on patient-relevant outcomes needs to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of telehealth support provided by cardiologists for treating patients with heart failure to primary care physicians from public primary care practices in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

METHODS

We used mixed methods to assess the feasibility of telehealth support. From 2020 to 2022, we tested 2 telehealth approaches: synchronous videoconferences (phase A) and interaction through an asynchronous web platform (phase B). The primary outcome was feasibility. Exploratory outcomes were telehealth acceptability of patients, primary care physicians, and cardiologists; the patients' clinical status; and prescription practices. Qualitative methods comprised content analysis of 3 focus groups and 15 individual interviews with patients, primary care physicians, and cardiologists. Quantitative methods included the baseline assessment of 83 patients; a single-arm, before-and-after assessment of clinical status in 58 patients; and an assessment of guideline-directed medical therapy in 28 patients with reduced ejection fraction measured within 1 year of follow-up. We integrated qualitative and quantitative data using a joint display table and used the A Process for Decision-Making After Pilot and Feasibility Trials framework for feasibility assessment.

RESULTS

Telehealth support from cardiologists to primary care physicians was generally well accepted. As barriers, patients expressed concern about reduced direct access to cardiologists, primary care physicians reported work overload and a lack of relative advantage, and cardiologists expressed concern about the sustainability of the intervention. Quantitative analysis revealed an overall poor baseline clinical status of patients with heart failure, with 53% (44/83) decompensated, as expected. Compliance with guideline-directed medical therapy for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction after telehealth showed a modest improvement for β-blockers (17/20, 85% to 18/19, 95%) and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (14/20, 70% to 15/19, 79%) but a drop in the prescription of spironolactone (16/20, 80% to 15/20, 75%). Neprilysin and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were introduced in 4 and 1 patient, respectively. Missing record data precluded a more precise analysis. The feasibility assessment was positive, favoring the asynchronous modality. Potential modifications include more effective patient and professional recruitment strategies and educational activities to raise awareness of collaborative support in primary care.

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth was feasible to implement. Considering the stakeholders' views and insights on the process is paramount to attaining engagement. Missing data must be anticipated for future research in this setting. Considering the recommended adaptations, the intervention can be studied in a cluster-randomized trial.

A Remote Intervention Based on mHealth and Community Health Workers for Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence in People With HIV: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of antiretroviral therapy (ART), only 66% of people with HIV in the United States achieve viral suppression, largely due to suboptimal ART adherence. Barriers such as limited access to care and forgetfulness impact adherence rates, which must be maintained at ≥95% to prevent viral load rebound. Combination interventions leveraging community health worker (CHW) support and mobile health (mHealth) technologies have the potential to overcome previously identified barriers and provide cost-effective support for improving adherence and viral suppression outcomes in people with HIV.

OBJECTIVE

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of remote delivery of the Community Health Worker and mHealth to Improve Viral Suppression (CHAMPS) intervention, combining the WiseApp, CHW support, and the CleverCap smart pill bottle. A secondary aim was to gather participants' feedback on the usability of the app and pill bottle as well as to better understand their experiences with remote study procedures.

METHODS

This mixed methods pilot study involved 40 participants with HIV, who were randomly assigned to a control group (n=20, 50%) or the CHAMPS intervention (n=20, 50%) over 3 months. The intervention group participated in up to 12 sessions with CHWs and used the WiseApp, paired with a CleverCap smart pill bottle, to support ART adherence. Remote baseline and follow-up visits were conducted via Zoom and included surveys measuring adherence, self-efficacy, and usability (measured by Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale [Health-ITUES] and Poststudy System Usability Questionnaire [PSSUQ]). Semistructured interviews explored participants' experiences with the intervention. Thematic analysis was used to identify key facilitators and barriers based on the Mobile Health Technology Acceptance Model.

RESULTS

Remote delivery of the CHAMPS intervention was feasible, with high usability ratings for both the WiseApp and CleverCap (overall scores on Health-ITUES: mean 4.35, SD 0.58 and PSSUQ: mean 2.04, SD 1.03). In the intervention group, there were nonsignificant improvements in self-reported adherence scores (P=.29) and in self-efficacy scores (P=.07). The adjusted odds ratio for achieving undetectable viral load in the intervention group compared to the control group was 3.01 (95% CI -1.59 to 4.12), indicating a medium effect size in favor of the intervention. Overall study retention was 75% (30/40), with higher retention in the control group. Participants valued the flexibility of remote study procedures, particularly Zoom-based study visits and mailed blood sample kits. Qualitative feedback highlighted the intervention's acceptability and ability to overcome logistical barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

The remote CHAMPS pilot study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of combining mHealth tools with CHW support to promote medication adherence among people with HIV. While further optimization is needed to enhance its impact, this intervention shows potential for improving health outcomes in diverse underserved populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05938413; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05938413.

Acceptability of a Web-Based Health App (PortfolioDiet.app) to Translate a Nutrition Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease in High-Risk Adults: Mixed Methods Randomized Ancillary Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

The Portfolio Diet is a dietary pattern for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction with 5 key categories including nuts and seeds; plant protein from specific food sources; viscous fiber sources; plant sterols; and plant-derived monounsaturated fatty acid sources. To enhance implementation of the Portfolio Diet, we developed the PortfolioDiet.app, an automated, web-based, multicomponent, patient-facing health app that was developed with psychological theory.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effect of the PortfolioDiet.app on dietary adherence and its acceptability among adults with a high risk of CVD over 12 weeks.

METHODS

Potential participants with evidence of atherosclerosis and a minimum of one additional CVD risk factor in an ongoing trial were invited to participate in a remote web-based ancillary study by email. Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a concealed computer-generated allocation sequence to the PortfolioDiet.app group or a control group for 12 weeks. Adherence to the Portfolio Diet was assessed by weighed 7-day diet records at baseline and 12 weeks using the clinical Portfolio Diet Score, ranging from 0 to 25. Acceptability of the app was evaluated using a multifaceted approach, including usability through the System Usability Scale ranging from 0 to 100, with a score >70 being considered acceptable, and a qualitative analysis of open-ended questions using NVivo 12.

RESULTS

In total, 41 participants were invited from the main trial to join the ancillary study by email, of which 15 agreed, and 14 were randomized (8 in the intervention group and 6 in the control group) and completed the ancillary study. At baseline, adherence to the Portfolio Diet was high in both groups with a mean clinical Portfolio Diet Score of 13.2 (SD 3.7; 13.2/25, 53%) and 13.7 (SD 5.8; 13.7/25, 55%) in the app and control groups, respectively. After the 12 weeks, there was a tendency for a mean increase in adherence to the Portfolio Diet by 1.25 (SD 2.8; 1.25/25, 5%) and 0.19 (SD 4.4; 0.19/25, 0.8%) points in the app and control group, respectively, with no difference between groups (P=.62). Participants used the app on average for 18 (SD 14) days per month and rated the app as usable (System Usability Scale of mean 80.9, SD 17.3). Qualitative analyses identified 4 main themes (user engagement, usability, external factors, and added components), which complemented the quantitative data obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

Although adherence was higher for the PortfolioDiet.app group, no difference in adherence was found between the groups in this small ancillary study. However, this study demonstrates that the PortfolioDiet.app is considered usable by high-risk adults and may reinforce dietitian advice to follow the Portfolio Diet when it is a part of a trial for CVD management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02481466; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02481466.

Applying Mixed Methods to Enhance Health Equity in Research on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment

ObjectivesThe NIA health disparities research framework details a life course approach that considers multilevel environmental, sociocultural, behavioral, and biological factors. Mixed methods are well-suited to study complex problems like structural racism, combining the benefits of generalizability with contextualization.MethodsWe draw on experience as faculty in the Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciences to introduce mixed methods research on health equity and disparities in dementia and cognitive impairment.ResultsWe describe common reasons why health science investigators may use mixed methods, provide examples of mixed methods designs, and discuss challenges and practicalities of mixed methods research.DiscussionMany risk factors for dementia are modifiable, so the emphasis of research turns from description to intervention studies that enhance health equity. The information and insights acquired from the use of mixed methods are central in tailoring interventions to populations most affected by Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.

A Randomized Pilot Trial of the Donor Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking (TELL Tool) with Their Children About Their Genetic Origins

INTRODUCTION

Parents who use donated gametes or embryos to form their families struggle with telling their children about their genetic origins. We developed the Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking (TELL Tool) to support parents in disclosure to their children and an eBook attention control.

METHOD

A randomized parallel, two-group, attention-controlled clinical pilot trial was conducted online during COVID-19. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects among parents with children aged 1-16 years were examined.

RESULTS

Over 10 months, our target of 75 parents were enrolled (85% of eligible [95% confidence interval (CI), 76% to 91%]), and 68% (95% CI: 57% to 78%) were retained at 12 weeks. At 4 and 12 weeks, positive trends were found for parental disclosure, telling confidence, and anxiety compared with attention controls.

DISCUSSION

The study protocol is feasible, and the TELL Tool is acceptable to parents and demonstrates a positive effect on parents' ability to tell their children. The results support the implementation of a large efficacy trial.

Developing evaluation metrics to measure the US national institute of health plans to enhance diverse perspectives: a protocol for a consensus-based study

INTRODUCTION

The diversity of participating investigators representing diverse disciplines, career stages, stakeholder groups, regions and types of institutions is essential for the success of large-scale research programmes. In 2021, the National Institutes of Health introduced a requirement for some of its large grants to include a separate section that describes the project's plan for enhancing diverse perspectives (PEDPs). Our project aims to develop consensus-based PEDP evaluation metrics and instruments that can be systematically and sustainably collected across the projects.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Evaluation work is organised into three objectives. First, shared knowledge about PEDP infrastructures, activities and outcomes will be elicited through the review of the PEDP texts of funded projects, with 15 as the target sample size. Data will be analysed using a cultural domain analysis approach and assessed for recurrence and salience of PEDP metrics. Second, consensus-based evaluation metrics will be developed using a three-round Delphi method. The descriptive statistics (mean, SD and IQR) and cultural consensus analyses will be applied to the first and last rounds of the Delphi survey. Third, metrics will be piloted for implementation and validation within one of the Human BioMolecular Atlas Programme sites. Work will be completed by Fall 2025.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The long-term goal of the effort reported in this paper is to develop PEDP common metrics that are generalisable and feasible across diverse projects. This rigorous, focused evaluation development effort aims to inform scientific practices and policies around implementing the plans to enhance diverse perspectives.

Preparing to deliver a stepped wedge cluster-randomised trial to test the effectiveness of daily symptom tracking integrated into electronic health records for managing rheumatoid arthritis: a mixed-methods feasibility trial

BACKGROUND

We sought to assess the feasibility of a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial testing the effectiveness of a complex mHealth intervention called REMORA: a co-designed smartphone app enabling daily, weekly and monthly symptom tracking integrated into electronic health records for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods feasibility trial using a convergent approach with some explanatory sequential elements. Patients were eligible to take part if they were older than ≥18 years of age, had (suspected) RA or undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis, and consented to take part from two outpatient departments. We analysed quantitative app and electronic health record data descriptively. We analysed qualitative data from interviews and clinic observations thematically. We assessed four feasibility domains: recruitment and consent (target: 15 patients per site), intervention uptake (≥70% of recruited participants completed on-boarding, i.e., registered with the app and submitted at least one symptom report), intervention adherence (>50% daily symptom reports provided), and measuring disease activity as the primary outcome (scores available for ≥80% of people with a follow-up clinic visit). Due to time constraints, we only recruited patients to the intervention group, leaving us unable to test the logistics of randomising sites in accordance with the trial's cluster stepped wedge design.

RESULTS

Of 130 people screened, 52 consented. Of those, 32 (62%) completed on-boarding. On-boarded participants provided symptom data on 2384/3771 (63%) of possible days. Among the 48 people who had ≥1 follow-up appointment, at least one disease activity scored was obtained for 46 (96%) of them. Factors related to intervention uptake formed the biggest threat to trial feasibility, including lack of clarity of communication and guidance, access to technology, and personal challenges (e.g., being busy or unwell).

CONCLUSION

We found that delivering a trial to test the effectiveness of integrated symptom tracking in rheumatology outpatient settings was feasible. The future REMORA trial will contribute to the much-needed evidence base for the impact of integrated symptom tracking on care delivery and patient outcomes, including decision-making, patient experience, disease activity, and symptom burden.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This feasibility trial was registered at https://www.isrctn.com/ on 23-Jan-2023 (ISRCTN21226438).

Health literacy of adolescents' responses to a workshop focusing on food, nutrition, climate change and digital technology solutions in Oceania: a multi-site pilot study in Vanuatu

BACKGROUND

Non-communicable diseases (NCD) have become the leading cause of premature death and disability in the Pacific region, with the development of health literacy an important factor for the prevention and control of NCD. Health literacy is an important lifelong asset that can be developed in adolescents through engagement in schooling and curriculum. The aim of this study was to explore Ni-Van adolescents' health literacy knowledge and capabilities regarding food and nutrition, climate change and digital technology solutions.

METHODS

Two Ni-Van schools participated in the study (one urban (School A) and one rural school (School B)), with 44 students (68% female) comprising 14 small groups participating in one workshop and booklet activities in April 2023. The 14 workshop booklet responses were deductively analysed using Nutbeam's health literacy hierarchy.

RESULTS

School  A's booklet responses showed that interactive health literacy responses were dominant (54%), followed by functional (34%) and critical learning activities (12%), whereas School B's responses showed that functional health literacy responses were dominant (65%), followed by interactive (28%) and critical (5%).

CONCLUSION

The findings show that students in both schools were less likely to engage in critical, compared with functional and interactive health literacy levels. This is an important consideration for future workshops, as well as curriculum and teacher training in Vanuatu, as Vanuatu (and other PICTs) are more susceptible to the effects of climate change and food sustainability issues.. Without a focus on developing critical health literacy knowledge and capabilities throughout the schooling years, this is a missed opportunity to create enabling environments that reduce youth exposures to NCD risk factors.

Feasibility of the TRANSITION program as an add-on to regular daily living support for young adults: an open mixed-methods study

PURPOSE

TRANSITION is a structured behavioral and educational program to support young adults with mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental conditions transitioning into adulthood. This study investigated its feasibility as an add-on to regular daily living support in social services.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A non-randomized single-arm mixed method design was used. Twenty-eight service users, aged 19-29, were enrolled to participate in the program for 20 weeks alongside their support workers. They rated their engagement and satisfaction and reported any adverse effects. Eighteen support workers received training in the program. A subsample of service users (n = 11) and support workers (n = 9) was interviewed about their experiences. Qualitative content analysis using an abductive approach and quantitative analyses with descriptive statistics was integrated and mapped to specific feasibility areas in a joint display.

RESULTS

Service users completing the study (n = 26) generally rated satisfaction and engagement highly. While some service users experienced stress related to their participation, no serious adverse events were reported. Service users and support workers highlighted the program's clear structure and focus on specific goals as particularly valuable.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that TRANSITION is a feasible complement to regular support in social service settings. Further evaluation of the program is justified.Implications for rehabilitationThe TRANSITION program is a feasible add-on to regular support in daily living for young adults with mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental conditions.Support workers can deliver the program, although training, practice, and regular supervision are needed.Service users perceive that the program adds clarity and valued direction to their support.The program may help service users and support workers become more aware of the inherent benefits of user engagement in daily living support.

A pilot mixed methods randomized control trial investigating the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally tailored intervention focused on beliefs, mistrust and race-congruent peer support for Black adults with diabetes

Introduction

Black adults disproportionately experience poor glycemic control and medication nonadherence, yet few diabetes self-management programs address their unique health beliefs, provider mistrust and sociocultural barriers to taking diabetes medications. This 6-month pilot randomized feasibility trial compared a culturally tailored diabetes self-management program, incorporating beliefs about diabetes, mistrust, and race-congruent peer support to a standard diabetes program.

Methods

An embedded mixed methods design examined the feasibility of the pilot trial, including recruitment, retention, intervention adherence and participant acceptability. Data were collected through participant self-reported questionnaires, field notes, semi-structured interviews, and focus groups. Qualitative content analysis inductively explored participants' feedback on the program, participation barriers and potential strategies to overcome the challenges. Mixed methods integration was implemented using a side-by-side joint display to compare, synthesize and interconnect the quantitative and qualitative results across all feasibility domains.

Results

Thirteen participants (93%) completed the trial, demonstrating high adherence and retention. Community outreach and a prerequisite orientation using motivational interviewing were feasible and appropriate to recruit potential participants. Participants expressed high satisfaction and acceptability, highlighting the importance of peer support, cultural relevant content and a safe space for sharing experiences. Barriers to participation were identified including schedule conflicts and difficulties in engagement.

Discussion

Future large-scale effectiveness trials should consider combining multimedia into recruitment methods, tailoring the program to address medication-taking goals, and addressing social and environmental barriers to support sustained lifestyle changes.

Using a digital health intervention "INTERCEPT" to improve secondary prevention in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients: protocol for a mixed methods non-randomised feasibility study

Background

Digital health interventions (DHIs) are increasingly used for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of "INTERCEPT", a co-designed DHI developed to improve secondary prevention in hospitalised coronary heart disease patients (CHD).

Methods

This non-randomised, pilot feasibility study with embedded process evaluation will be conducted with a sample of 40 patients in an acute hospital setting. Informed by behaviour change theory, INTERCEPT integrates a smartphone interface, health care professional portal, a fitness wearable and a blood pressure monitor. INTERCEPT is designed to support and motivate patients to set goals, self-monitor lifestyle and medical risk factors, and manage their medications, with the health care professional portal enabling monitoring and communication with patients. Using consecutive sampling, eligible patients will be recruited in two phases, a pre-implementation phase and an implementation phase. Commencing with pre-implementation (1 month duration), participants will not immediately receive INTERCEPT, however, they will be invited to receive INTERCEPT at 3 months follow-up. This will enable early learning about the processes of recruitment and conducting the assessment prior to full scale deployment of INTERCEPT in the next step implementation phase. During the implementation phase (2 months duration), participants will be invited to download INTERCEPT to their smartphone prior to hospital discharge. Qualitative interviews will be conducted among a subset of patients and health care professionals to gain a greater insight into their experience of using INTERCEPT. Primary outcomes will be assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up. Using pre-defined feasibility criteria, including recruitment, retention and engagement rates, together with data on intervention acceptability, will determine the appropriateness of progressing to a definitive trial.

Discussion

This study will provide important insights to help inform the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial of "INTERCEPT" among coronary heart disease patients in a critical health care setting.

Protocol for a feasibility study evaluating a supported self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia (StarStep study)

BACKGROUND

There is a growing evidence base to support the use of self-management interventions for improving quality of life after stroke. However, stroke survivors with aphasia have been underrepresented in research to date. It is therefore unclear if self-management is an appropriate or effective approach for this group. To address this gap in the evidence base, we have developed a supported self-management intervention (the 'Living with Aphasia' intervention) specifically for stroke survivors with aphasia in the first year after stroke. The StarStep study aims to assess the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the intervention (including the feasibility of participant recruitment, the feasibility of delivering facilitator training, the acceptability of the intervention, the fidelity of intervention delivery and outcome data completeness).

METHODS

StarStep is a mixed-methods, non-randomised feasibility study. The Living with Aphasia intervention will be facilitated by speech and language therapists and implemented in two community stroke teams in the north of England. We aim to recruit 30 stroke survivors who have aphasia (and/or their family members) and who are ≤ 12-month post-stroke to participate in data collection for the study. Following informed consent, participants will complete a baseline data collection questionnaire which will include measures of quality of life, symptoms of depression and perceived communicative effectiveness. Follow-up questionnaires will be completed at 3-month post-intervention. Qualitative data collection will include implementation groups and semi-structured interviews with speech and language therapists, semi-structured interviews with stroke survivors with aphasia (and/or their family members) and observations of the delivery of the intervention. A joint display table will be used to integrate findings from each element of data collection in order to consider overall feasibility.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide the information necessary to optimise data collection processes and to optimise the implementation and delivery of the self-management intervention. Feasibility data will inform decision-making regarding progression to a future definitive cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry, trial registration number: ISRCTN10401966. Date of registration: 07/10/2023. URL of trial registry record: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10401966 .

Changes in stress-related outcomes among graduate students following the Mindfulness Ambassador Program: A pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Graduate students face numerous demands, high stress levels, and associated challenges to intra- and inter-personal relationships. Mindfulness may help to ease such challenging experiences. The Mindfulness Ambassador Program (MAP) is a promising group-based program that has not yet been studied among graduate students. The primary objectives of this study were to: (1) explore graduate students' perceptions of stress, and their relationships with themselves and meaningful others; (2) explore graduate students' perspectives of and satisfaction with the MAP; and (3) investigate if participation in the MAP elicited changes in graduate students' perceived levels of stress, self-awareness, interpersonal skills, and/or social connectedness.

METHODS

In this one-group, pre/post mixed-methods pilot study, nine participants completed pre-post questionnaires and participated in a semi-structured interview post-intervention. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, thematic analysis, and paired t-tests.

RESULTS

Pre-intervention, qualitative themes included participants experiencing moderate-to-high stress levels, intrapersonal conflict, interpersonal relationship challenges, and seeing oneself as a work in progress. Post-intervention themes included better stress management, increased consideration for oneself and others, feelings of connection with others, and overall satisfaction with the MAP. Statistically significant improvements were found from pre- to post-intervention in mean score differences for perceived stress (p = .043), private self-awareness (p = .006), awareness of immediate surroundings (p = .044), and social connectedness (p = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Participants reported several benefits from their positive experience participating in the MAP. These findings may be used to inform future mindfulness-based programming for graduate students.

Evaluating the Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness of a Multi-Tiered Multimodal Narrative Intervention Program for Preschool Children

PURPOSE

The present study aims to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a novel multi-tiered narrative intervention program-the multimodal narrative (MMN) program-in Catalan that was co-created to boost preschool children's narrative and pragmatic skills.

METHOD

First, we describe here in detail the novel program, which consisted of a set of interventions oriented around the retelling of a narrative in a multimodal fashion, that is, with an abundant use of appropriate gesture and facial expression and careful attention to the pragmatic aspects of communication. We then describe the results of a self-reported feasibility study (Study 1) after this program was trial-implemented by 31 preschool teachers and speech-language therapists in their respective professional contexts. A pre- and post-intervention pilot study (Study 2) was conducted in which the researchers measured the effect of the MMN intervention on the 51 children who participated in the trial implementation.

RESULTS

Results from Study 1 revealed that most professionals adhered to the intervention protocol, that they found it enjoyable and easy to implement, and that it fostered active participation on the part of children. Results from Study 2 revealed that after the intervention, the narrative and pragmatic skills of all the children had improved.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that a full-fledged implementation of the MMN intervention program is feasible and has the potential to improve children's narrative and pragmatic skills in both clinical and educational contexts.

A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Implementation Outcomes of a Self-Regulation Strategy for Health Education: Perspectives of Clinicians and Older Adults With and Without Traumatic Brain Injury

PURPOSE

Effective self-management is key for older adults with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI) to maintain their health, safety, and independence. Self-regulation is one method of promoting self-management. However, it is essential to examine effective methods of self-regulation interventions to maximize the use of such health promotion.

METHOD

Forty-one older adults (19 with TBI; 22 without TBI) participated in an in-person or telepractice health education intervention for fall prevention with 15 speech-language pathology student clinicians. The intervention was a self-regulation strategy, mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII), for promoting fall prevention. This mixed methods study explored treatment adherence and evaluated implementation outcomes through acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, modifications to treatment, and therapist adherence and client participation.

RESULTS

All participants demonstrated some behavior change. Participants without TBI evaluated the MCII protocol as more acceptable, F(1, 39) = 5.88, p = .018; appropriate, F(1, 39) = 5.34, p = .023; and feasible, F(1, 39) = 9.56, p = .003, than participants with TBI, although all ratings were perceived as neutral or positive. From clinician data, protocol adherence, F(1, 39) = 1.57, p = .22, and client participation, F(1, 39) = 0.10, p = .92, were similar across injury groups, but participants with TBI required more fidelity-consistent modifications to treatment, F(1, 39) = 6.88, p = .012. There were no differences between settings except that those in telepractice had more client participation, F(1, 39) = 21.02, p < .001. Clinicians felt MCII was equally appropriate for both groups in all settings, acceptability: F(1, 48) = 0.082, p = .78; appropriateness: F(1, 48) = 0.554, p = .46; feasibility: F(1, 48) = 0.197, p = .66.

CONCLUSION

MCII may be a feasible tool to provide health education as it offers enough structure and individualization to be considered appropriate and relevant for older adults, and for novice clinicians to administer and modify as needed based on client needs.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28074443.

Feasibility, Acceptability and Modification of a Post-surgical Telehealth Mindfulness-Based Intervention to Enhance Recovery After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Prospective Intervention Study

Background

People who undergo lumbar spine surgery experience variable pain, disability, and quality of life outcomes. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are recommended for chronic low back pain and may be an effective approach for surgical patients.

Objectives

Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a telehealth MBI following lumbar spine surgery and refine the intervention for optimal delivery.

Methods

This was a prospective, mixed-methods, single-arm cohort study with measurements preoperatively and 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. Participants were adults undergoing lumbar spine surgery for a degenerative condition at an academic medical center. A telehealth MBI was delivered one-on-one within 4 weeks after surgery and consisted of 8 weekly sessions modeled after Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Chronic Pain. Outcomes were feasibility (enrollment rate, retention, session attendance, homework completion), acceptability (intervention satisfaction questionnaire and exit interview); and pre- to 3-month postoperative improvements in patient-reported disability, pain, and psychosocial factors including depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, self-efficacy, perceived stress, and dispositional mindfulness.

Results

Fifteen participants who received a laminectomy (n = 3) or fusion with (n = 9)/without (n = 3) laminectomy initiated the MBI. Enrollment (35%) and retention (80%) rates were lower than hypothesized, but participants had high levels of session attendance (80% completed) and home practice (median = 95% days assigned). The MBI was perceived as highly acceptable on the satisfaction questionnaire and exit interviews. Most participants reported improvements at or above established minimal clinically important differences for disability and pain at 3 months postoperatively and improvements in most psychosocial factors. Themes from exit interviews informed future modifications to the intervention.

Conclusions

Delivery of an 8-session, one-on-one, telehealth MBI to patients after lumbar spine surgery is feasible and acceptable and patients perceive meaningful benefits to their surgical recovery from the MBI. Results support fully powered randomized controlled trials to determine longer-term post-surgical effects of the MBI.

Feasibility and acceptability of school-based intervention components to promote healthy weight and well-being among 6-11-year-olds in Denmark: mixed methods findings from the Generation Healthy Kids feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Overweight and obesity among children is a serious public health challenge worldwide which may lead to a range of negative physical, mental, and social consequences in childhood and later in life. There is a strong need for developing new innovative, integrated approaches and programs which can prevent overweight in children effectively and can be embedded into everyday practices. The Generation Healthy Kids intervention is a multi-component, multi-setting intervention aiming to promote healthy weight and well-being in children aged 6-11 years in Denmark. The present study investigates the feasibility and acceptability of 10 selected school-based intervention components and barriers and facilitators for implementation.

METHODS

A seven-week feasibility study was conducted in January to March 2023 among children in 1st and 2nd grade at a Danish public school, testing the multi-component intervention targeting children's meal-, physical activity-, sleep- and screen habits. Process evaluation data were collected using multiple methods (surveys, logbooks, evaluation sheets, registrations, counts, interviews, and observations) and data sources (parents, school staff, and school leader).

RESULTS

Most intervention components were feasible to deliver at the school, but only four components were fully delivered as intended, while the remaining components to some or low degree were delivered as intended. Some components were found acceptable by all/nearly all children (e.g., 40 min of high intensity training three times a week), and others by some or few children (e.g., reusable water bottles and midmorning snack). Intervention activities for the parents and families were found acceptable by all/nearly all participating parents. Parents' acceptability of the intervention activities delivered to their children at school could not be assessed, as only few parents participated in surveys and none in interviews. School staff's acceptability of the intervention tasks they were asked to deliver varied but was overall relatively high. Facilitators and barriers for implementation of intervention components were identified at both individual-, school class-, and school level.

CONCLUSIONS

The study underlines the importance of conducting feasibility studies as preparation for large trials. The findings will be used to refine intervention components, implementation strategies and data collection procedures before the Generation Healthy Kids main trial.

"Optimizing Wellness and Neurorehabilitation with Mindfulness (OWNMindfulness)": feasibility of a novel mindfulness-based rehabilitation intervention for Persisting Symptoms after Concussion

BACKGROUND

Persisting Symptoms after Concussion (PSaC) are common and difficult to treat. Mindfulness-based interventions can support recovery but are rarely included in rehabilitative care. We developed OWNMindfulness, an eight-week live-video mindfulness-based group for PSaC.

PURPOSE

To assess feasibility and preliminary clinical effects of OWNMindfulness.

METHODS

Fourteen individuals with PSaC enrolled in this mixed-methods single-arm feasibility study. We assessed enrollment/retention, adherence, fidelity, instrument completion, safety, and satisfaction. We evaluated preliminary trends in the impact of the intervention on mindfulness (CAMS-R), concussion symptoms (PCSS), and QOL (WHOQOL-BREF). Qualitative analysis of exit interviews explored participants' perceptions of the effects of the intervention, and framework analysis assessed adequacy of the quantitative measures to capture perceived effects.

RESULTS

Feasibility results met a priori benchmarks. Mindfulness, concussion symptoms, and QOL scores improved (CAMS-R: adjusted p = 0.01, large effect size; PCSS: adjusted p = 0.03, moderate effect size; WHOQOL-BREF: not significant, small effect size). Qualitative analysis of interview data found benefits including validation, compassion, self-awareness, self-efficacy, concussion symptoms, resilience, life participation, social relationships, and QOL. Framework analysis demonstrated that quantitative tools captured change in concussion symptoms but did not comprehensively assess the other benefits identified through qualitative methods.

CONCLUSIONS

OWNMindfulness shows preliminary feasibility and promise for improving clinical outcomes. Results suggest the need for additional quantitative tools for comprehensive measurement of the effects and may point to potential mechanisms of action.

Exploring the feasibility of Recovery Management Checkups for Primary Care in a Federally Qualified Health Center

Introduction

Primary care settings present an opportunity for alcohol and substance use disorder (A/SUD) screening and treatment referral. However, there are recognized deficiencies in widely used treatment referral approaches, including acute care connections, vs. those that can support longer-term recovery. Recovery Management Checkups for Primary Care (RMC-PC) is an intervention with an evidence base for improving treatment referral and subsequent recovery for primary care patients; however, the intervention has never been fully implemented outside of a research context. We conducted a feasibility study to inform a future hybrid study of RMC-PC that will test the implementation and effectiveness of the intervention in primary care practice.

Method

We used a convergent mixed method design. The study's setting was a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) located in a large midwestern city. RMC-PC linkage services were administered by one of two treatment linkage managers: an FQHC linkage manager (F-LM) and a research staff linkage manager (R-LM). Quantitative data included (a) rates of positive A/SUD screening among a group of FQHC patients and (b) linkage manager service data (e.g., rate of successful meeting completion and days to completing of key events). Qualitative data included (c) an assessment of linkage manager's motivational interviewing performance and (d) a focus group with FQHC staff focused on their perspectives on RMC-PC implementation determinants. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics, and linkage manager performance was compared. Qualitative data were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive process.

Results

Fifty percent of patients screened met moderate-high A/SUD risk. Eleven of 16 recruited patients completed at least one linkage manager meeting, with 63% completing both meetings. The F-LM delivered RMC-PC services alongside other duties successfully; however, three primary barriers to FQHC implementation were identified (difficulties applying motivational interviewing, incompatibilities of screening with FQHC technology and workflow, and lack of billing mechanism to support services).

Conclusion

RMC-PC is feasible for FQHC staff to deliver, though issues identified must be considered to ensure successful and sustainable implementation. Knowledge gained will inform a packaged implementation strategy that will be used in a future hybrid trial.

Fall Prevention in Older Adults: Insights from Saudi Arabian Physical Therapists on the Otago Exercise Program

Purpose

Falls among older adults are a growing public health concern in Saudi Arabia. The Otago Exercise Program (OEP) is an evidence-based intervention aimed at reducing fall risk in this population. This study assessed the knowledge and attitudes of Saudi Arabian physical therapists toward the OEP and examined potential gender-based differences.

Patients and Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted between November 2023 and April 2024, involving 120 licensed physical therapists from Saudi Arabia, recruited via Email and social media. The survey captured sociodemographic data, knowledge, and attitudes regarding the OEP. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Cramér's V to assess the strength of associations, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

Results

Most physical therapists reported knowledge of the OEP's clinical effectiveness (36.7%), cultural compatibility (35.0%), and fall prevention benefits (28.3%). Gender was not significantly associated with knowledge of clinical effectiveness (χ² = 3.84, p = 0.57), contraindications (χ² = 4.44, p = 0.48), cost-effectiveness (χ² = 4.15, p = 0.52), or fall prevention in older adults (χ² = 2.44, p = 0.78), with moderate effect sizes observed (Cramer's V = 0.233 to 0.467). Attitudes toward the OEP were generally positive, with 51.7% supporting its use in regular aging care and 45.0% expressing confidence in delivering the program. There were no significant gender differences in understanding the OEP's recommendations (χ² = 7.45, p = 0.11) or confidence in program delivery (χ² = 7.62, p = 0.10), although strong association effects were noted (Cramer's V = 0.696 and 0.680, respectively).

Conclusion

This study highlights the strong knowledge and positive attitudes of Saudi physical therapists toward the OEP, underscoring its potential for integration into national healthcare strategies to improve geriatric care and reduce fall-related risks. The findings emphasize the importance of continuous professional development to address knowledge gaps and optimize the implementation of evidence-based fall prevention programs.

Tailoring HIV Care for Black Populations: A Pilot Feasibility Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Research has shown that integrating community health workers (CHWs) into the formal health care system can improve outcomes for people living with HIV, yet there is limited literature exploring this framework among marginalized minority populations.

OBJECTIVE

Herein, we discuss the feasibility of a clinic-embedded CHW strategy to improve antiretroviral therapy adherence among Black people living with HIV in Miami-Dade County, Florida, a designated priority region for the US Department of Health and Human Services' Ending the HIV Epidemic Initiative.

METHODS

From December 2022 to September 2023, three CHWs were trained and integrated into the hospital workflow to provide support as members of the clinical team. Ten Black adults with an HIV viral load over 200 copies/mL were enrolled to received 3 months of CHW support focused on navigating the health system and addressing poor social determinants of health. Intervention feasibility was based on 4 criteria: recruitment rate, demographic composition, study fidelity, and qualitative feedback on CHW perceptions.

RESULTS

Participants were recruited at a rate of 5.7 participants per month, with the sample evenly distributed between men and women. Retention was moderately strong, with 7 (70%) of the 10 participants attending more than 75% of CHW sessions. Qualitative feedback reflected CHW perceptions on clinical interactions and intervention length.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes indicate that a clinic-integrated CHW approach is a feasible and acceptable methodology to address adverse social determinants and improve HIV treatment adherence. By offering targeted social and clinical support, CHWs may be a promising solution to achieve sustained viral suppression and care engagement for Black people living with HIV.

Intervention for School Anxiety and Absenteeism in Children (ISAAC): Mixed-Method Feasibility Study of a Coach-Assisted, Parent-Focused Online Program

The aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic has seen an increase in persistent school absenteeism and Emotionally-Based School Avoidance (EBSA). However, suitable evidence-based psychological interventions are often unavailable. We aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a new parent-focused online program, Intervention for School Anxiety and Absenteeism in Children (ISAAC), which has been co-designed with parents and practitioners. This exploratory mixed-method study recruited participants from three schools in southern England, enrolling N = 9 parents for whom a child, aged 5-11 years, was experiencing signs of EBSA. The intervention consisted of three web-based psychoeducational modules respectively addressing parental stress, accommodating parenting behaviors, and communication with school staff. Module completion was assisted by weekly calls with a non-specialist "coach." Feasibility was measured using indicators of retention, module participation, overall program completion and coaching fidelity. Acceptability was assessed using semi-structured interviews, module ratings and written qualitative feedback. We also explored baseline-post change in parent-reported measures of children's school avoidance, absences, anxiety, parental stress, accommodating parenting behaviors, and quality of parent-school communication. Overall, the intervention was feasible to deliver to parents with six (67%) participants completing the full intervention. Participants found the intervention acceptable across thematic domains of affective attitude, burden, coherence, self-efficacy and perceived effectiveness. Participants particularly appreciated the coach's support. We observed small to moderate reductions in school avoidance behaviours (d with Hedges correction = 0.36), child anxiety (d with Hedges correction = 0.33) and accommodating behaviours (d with Hedges correction = 0.44) at the post timepoint compared to baseline. In conclusion, ISAAC shows early promise with the potential to deliver scalable online support for families affected by emerging EBSA. Future research should move toward establishing effectiveness in a randomized controlled trial.

A Self-Applied Psychological Treatment for Gambling-Related Problems via The Internet: A Pilot, Feasibility Study

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of an online psychological intervention for individuals with gambling-related problems, supported by ecological momentary assessments and interventions (EMAs and EMIs), along with weekly phone-calls, before conducting a randomized controlled trial. Participants were required to complete 3 of the 8 modules of the program based on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and extensions and innovations of CBT. The study measured the outcomes of feasibility (i.e., reach, appropriateness, technology literacy and technology usability, fidelity, and adherence). In terms of reach, 19.8% (n = 11) of the initial population met the inclusion criteria and completed the three modules (mean age = 41; 90.9% men). The perceived appropriateness and the technology usability after the first use were both excellent, fidelity and adherence to the online treatment (73.3%) were adequate. Adherence to the EMAs and the weekly phone calls were more modest (54.51% and 66.67%, respectively). The results of the present study show that an online treatment for gambling problems enhanced by EMA and EMI might be feasible but challenges were noted in terms of reach and adherence to these assessments and calls. These challenges are important to consider for future trials and the scalability of treatments for individuals with gambling disorders.

Pilot trial protocol: community intervention to improve depressive symptoms among Peruvian older adults

BACKGROUND

Non-pharmacological interventions have proven effective at alleviating depression and anxiety symptoms in older adults. Methodological refinement and testing of these interventions in new contexts are needed on a small scale before their effectiveness and implementation can be evaluated. The purpose of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a future large-scale trial comparing an adapted mental health multi-component evidence-based intervention (VIDACTIVA) versus standard care for older adults experiencing depression symptoms in urban, resource-limited settings in Lima, Peru. Furthermore, this study will explore the acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity of implementing the intervention.

METHODS

We will conduct an open-label, mixed methods pilot feasibility study with two parallel groups. A total of 64 older adults, stratified by sex, will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either the "intervention" or "control." Participants will be followed for 22 weeks after enrollment. Those in the intervention group will receive eight VIDACTIVA sessions administered by community health workers (CHWs) over 14 weeks, with an additional eight weeks of follow-up. Participants in the control group will receive two psychoeducation sessions from a study fieldworker and will be directed to health care centers. Standard care does not involve CHWs. We will evaluate screening rates, recruitment strategies, retention rates, the acceptability of randomization, and assessments. Additionally, we will assess preliminary implementation outcomes-acceptability, feasibility, and fidelity-from the perspectives of CHWs (interventionists), older adults (main participants), older adults' relatives, and healthcare professionals.

DISCUSSION

If the findings from this feasibility trial are favorable, a fully powered randomized controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate `both the effectiveness and implementation of the intervention. This research will make a substantial contribution to the field of mental health in older adults, particularly by emphasizing a meticulous examination and documentation of the implementation process. By doing so, this study will offer valuable methodologies and metrics for adapting and assessing mental health interventions tailored to the unique needs of older adults in resource-constrained contexts and diverse cultural settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The current trial registration number is NCT06065020, which was registered on 26th September 2023.

Going virtual: mixed methods evaluation of online versus in-person learning in the NIH mixed methods research training program retreat

BACKGROUND

Despite the central role of mixed methods in health research, studies evaluating online methods training in the health sciences are nonexistent. The focused goal was to evaluate online training by comparing the self-rated skills of scholars who experienced an in-person retreat to scholars in an online retreat in specific domains of mixed methods research for the health sciences from 2015-2023.

METHODS

The authors administered a scholar Mixed Methods Skills Self-Assessment instrument based on an educational competency scale that included domains on: "research questions," "design/approach," "sampling," "analysis," and "dissemination" to participants of the Mixed Methods Research Training Program for the Health Sciences (MMRTP). Self-ratings on confidence on domains were compared before and after retreat participation within cohorts who attended in person (n = 73) or online (n = 57) as well as comparing across in-person to online cohorts. Responses to open-ended questions about experiences with the retreat were analyzed.

RESULTS

Scholars in an interactive program to improve mixed methods skills reported significantly increased confidence in ability to define or explain concepts and in ability to apply the concepts to practical problems, whether the program was attended in-person or synchronously online. Scholars in the online retreat had self-rated skill improvements as good or better than scholars who participated in person. With the possible exception of networking, scholars found the online format was associated with advantages such as accessibility and reduced burden of travel and finding childcare. No differences in difficulty of learning concepts was described.

CONCLUSIONS

Keeping in mind that the retreat is only one component of the MMRTP, this study provides evidence that mixed methods training online was associated with the same increases in self-rated skills as persons attending online and can be a key component to increasing the capacity for mixed methods research in the health sciences.

Development and implementation of a self-directed violence prevention training program for correctional behavioral health providers: a clinical trial study protocol

BACKGROUND

Self-directed violence (SDV) comprises both suicide and self-injury and represents a pressing problem among incarcerated persons. Negative impacts of SDV in correctional settings also extend to behavioral health clinicians (BHCs) (e.g., job turnover). Correctional SDV risk assessment and management standards include staff training as part of the comprehensive approach. The Core Competency Model for Corrections (CCM-C) is a novel, evidence-informed training program for BHCs covering both clinician self-management and clinical care skills.

METHODS

This pilot trial is a type 3 hybrid implementation-effectiveness approach. It will employ a wait-list control sequential cross-over design. Participants (N = 50-100) will be BHCs employed by the North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections. Following stratification for years of clinical experience, BHCs will be randomly assigned to (1) a training group that receives CCM-C immediately and (2) a wait-list control receiving CCM-C approximately 6 weeks later. Electronically administrated survey evaluation will occur across baseline and two follow-up (i.e., 2 weeks after each training session) time points.

DISCUSSION

The primary outcome is feasibility assessed through collaboration with a Corrections Advisory Panel and feedback from BHCs. Secondary effectiveness outcomes that will be evaluated over time include SDV-related knowledge, attitudes, stigma, and intent to use training content. We will examine a tertiary outcome, namely compassion fatigue. Clinical trial limitations and impacts are discussed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT06359574. This study was registered on 04/05/2024.

A pilot study to assess the feasibility and uptake of MindDEC, a mindfulness-based self-management course for type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to investigate the feasibility of a remote mindfulness based self-management intervention for individuals with type 2 diabetes. It is important to further our understanding of how to improve self-management to improve health outcomes and low levels of uptake to self-management courses.

METHOD

29 participants with type 2 diabetes were recruited from the University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS trust. Three groups of participants engaged with a remote mindfulness based self-management intervention, which were delivered sequentially. After each intervention was complete, patient feedback was retrieved and implemented into the following intervention. The quantitative analysis comprised of descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, paired sample t-test and multiple regression analysis. A qualitative analysis was also conducted through reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) to understand participant's perspective on the intervention.

RESULTS

There was a total of 17 who attended the course (59 %) and a total drop out of 12 participants over the three courses (41 %). The qualitative findings reported three main themes: (1) Eating to manage my emotions rather than my diabetes (2) Implementing mindfulness has helped me manage my emotions (3) Medication rather than self-management behaviours control my diabetes. The focus group feedback included participants' appreciation of the community aspect of the intervention and their perception that the current course was more interactive compared to previous interventions. In addition, participants highlighted the importance of offering the course at an earlier stage of diagnosis to provide further support at the beginning of their diabetes journey. No significant findings were reported for the independent sample t-test, paired sample t-test and multiple regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

The qualitative findings suggested that the course was beneficial, especially in demonstrating how mindfulness could aid self-management for individuals living with type 2 diabetes. Further funding and trials are warranted to improve the quality of technology used and to assess impact on diabetes control and mental health.

The effect of a home-based, gamified stability skills intervention on 4-5-year-old children's physical and cognitive outcomes: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Stability skills (e.g., static/dynamic balance) are a precursor for other movement skill development (e.g., jumping, catching). However, young children consistently demonstrate low stability and movement skill ability. There is therefore a need to develop effective strategies to improve stability skills in early childhood.

AIM

To pilot the effect of a home-based gamified stability skills intervention on 4-5-year-old children's physical skills, self-perceptions and cognitions.

METHODS

One-hundred-and-eleven 4-5-year-old children participated from three schools. Two schools were allocated into the intervention group (n = 66 children, 33 boys) and one to the control group (n = 45 children, 25 boys). Stability, fundamental movement skills, perceived motor competence, and cognition were assessed at baseline and at post-intervention. The intervention group was given a booklet detailing the 12-week gamified stability skill intervention. The control group participated in their usual weekly activities.

RESULTS

A series of ANCOVAs controlling for baseline values demonstrated significantly higher stability skills (F(1,93) = 24.79, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.212), fundamental movement skills (F(1,94) = 15.5, p = < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.139), perceived motor competence (F(1,96) = 5.48, p = 0.021, partial η2 = 0.054) and cognition (F(1,96) = 15.5, p = < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.139) at post-test for the intervention versus control groups.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that a home-based, gamified, stability skills intervention enhances stability skills, fundamental movement skills, perceived motor competence and cognition in children aged 4-5-years old.

Move for Life an intervention for inactive adults aged 50 years and older: a cluster randomised feasibility trial

Background

Move for Life (MFL) is a theory-informed intervention that was developed to augment established physical activity (PA) programmes and enable inactive adults aged 50 years and older to be more active. This study examined the feasibility of MFL and sought to provide evidence of its potential for improving PA and associated health outcomes.

Methods

A 3-arm cluster randomised feasibility trial compared MFL intervention, usual provision (UP) and control (CON) groups at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, at 8, 10 or 12- weeks) and 6-month follow up (T2). We used purposive sampling strategies to recruit participants according to characteristics of interest. Feasibility outcomes assessed recruitment, fidelity, adherence, retention and data completion rates based on pre-set criteria. Primary outcomes were accelerometer-based moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA (MVPA) and self-reported compliance with physical activity guidelines (PAGL). Secondary outcomes included light intensity PA (LiPA), standing time, sedentary time, body composition (adiposity), physical function and psychological well-being. We used linear mixed models (continuous outcomes) or generalized estimated equations (categorical outcomes) to estimate group differences over time in the study outcomes.

Results

Progression criteria for feasibility outcomes were met, and 733 individuals were recruited. Considering a 6-month period (T0-T2), while self-reported compliance with PAGL increased in MFL relative to UP and CON and in UP relative to CON, standing time decreased in MFL relative to CON and sedentary time increased in the latter compared to UP. Waist circumference decreased in MFL relative to UP and CON. MFL outperformed UP in the Timed Up and Go Test while MFL and UP increased the distance covered in the Six-Minute Walk Test compared to CON. Psychological well-being increased in MFL relative to CON (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Findings show that MFL is feasible, while data are promising with regards to the potential of improving community PA programmes for adults aged 50 or more years.

Clinical trial registration

https://www.isrctn.com/Registration#ISRCTN11235176.

WeChat mini program in laboratory biosafety education among medical students at Guangzhou Medical University: a mixed method study of feasibility and usability

BACKGROUND

Laboratory biosafety should be a priority in all healthcare institutions. In traditional laboratory safety teaching students typically receive knowledge passively from their teachers without active involvement. The combination of experiential learning and mobile learning may provide students with greater engagement, retention, and application of knowledge. To address this issue, we developed and conducted a convergent mixed methods study to assess the feasibility and usability of a WeChat mini program (WMP) named WeMed for laboratory biosafety education for medical laboratory students at Guangzhou Medical University (GMU).

METHODS

The study was conducted between November 2022 and October 2023 among second-year undergraduate students at GMU. It involved the concurrent collection, analysis, and interpretation of both qualitative and quantitative data to assess feasibility and usability. In the quantitative strand, two evaluations were conducted via online surveys from students (n = 67) after a four-week study period. The System Usability Scale (SUS) was used to evaluate usability, while self-developed questions were used to assess feasibility. Additionally, a knowledge test was administered 6 months after the program completion. In the qualitative strand, fourteen semi-structured interviews were conducted, whereby a reflexive thematic analysis was utilized to analyze the interview data.

RESULTS

The overall SUS score is adequate (M = 68.17, SD = 14.39). The acceptability of the WeMed program is in the marginal high range. Most students agreed that WeMed was useful for learning biosafety knowledge and skills (13/14, 93%), while 79% (11/14) agreed it was easy to use and they intended to continue using it. After 6 months, a significant difference in the knowledge test scores was observed between the WeMed group (n = 67; 2nd year students) and the traditional training group (n = 90; 3rd year students). However, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the absence of a pretest.

CONCLUSION

The combination of experiential learning and mobile learning with WMP is a feasible tool for providing laboratory biosafety knowledge and skills. Ongoing improvements should be made in order to increase long-term acceptance.

Implementing integrated hypertension and diabetes management using the World Health Organization's HEARTS model: protocol for a pilot study in the Guatemalan national primary care system

BACKGROUND

The HEARTS technical package was developed by the World Health Organization to address the implementation gap in cardiovascular disease prevention in low- and middle-income countries. Guatemala is a middle-income country that is currently implementing HEARTS. National authorities in Guatemala are interested in exploring how hypertension and diabetes management can be integrated in HEARTS implementation. The objective of this study is to conduct a feasibility and acceptability pilot trial of integrated hypertension and diabetes management based on HEARTS in the publicly funded primary care system in Guatemala.

METHODS

A single-arm pilot trial for 6 months will be carried out in 11 Ministry of Health primary care facilities starting in September 2023. A planned sample of 100 adult patients diagnosed with diabetes (n = 45), hypertension (n = 45), or both (n = 10) will be enrolled. The intervention will consist of HEARTS-aligned components: Training health workers on healthy-lifestyle counseling and evidence-based treatment protocols, strengthening access to medications and diagnostics, training on risk-based cardiovascular disease management, team-based care and task sharing, and systems monitoring and feedback, including implementation of a facility-based electronic monitoring tool at the individual level. Co-primary outcomes of feasibility and acceptability will be assessed using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Secondary outcomes include clinical effectiveness (treatment with medication, glycemic control, and blood pressure control), key implementation outcomes (adoption, fidelity, usability, and sustainability), and patient-reported outcome measures (diabetes distress, disability, and treatment burden). Using an implementation mapping approach, a Technical Advisory Committee will develop implementation strategies for subsequent scale-up planning.

DISCUSSION

This trial will produce evidence on implementing HEARTS-aligned hypertension and diabetes care in the MOH primary care system in Guatemala. Results also will inform future HEARTS projects in Guatemala and other low- and middle-income countries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06080451. The trial was prospectively registered on October 12, 2023.

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Intervention for Social Work Clients with Children Facing Complex Financial Problems in Finland (FinSoc): A Study Protocol

PURPOSE

Social work clients often face complex financial problems. We have developed a financial social work intervention, FinSoc, to increase financial literacy and economic self-efficacy and reduce financial anxiety among parents with financial problems in Finland. The aim of this pilot randomized controlled trial is to explore the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the intervention. This paper, a study protocol, describes the design and implementation of the trial. Study protocols are articles detailing a priori the research plan, rationale, proposed methods and plans for how a clinical trial will be conducted.

METHOD

This study is a pilot randomized controlled trial with a mixed methods approach applying both quantitative measures and qualitative interviews. Participating social work clients with children are randomly assigned to either the treatment or the waiting list control group at a ratio of 1:1. The treatment group receives the intervention and the control group receives services as usual. The quantitative data from social work clients are collected at three measurement points. Qualitative interviews are conducted post-intervention with both clients receiving, and professionals implementing the intervention. The feasibility is assessed through recruitment and retention rates and the interviews with social work professionals providing the intervention. Acceptability is assessed through feedback from participants on satisfaction with the intervention and usefulness of the specific intervention components. Potential effectiveness is measured by financial literacy, economic self-efficacy and financial anxiety.

DISCUSSION

The intervention is hypothesized to increase financial literacy and economic self-efficacy and reduce financial anxiety among social work clients with children. The results of this pilot study will increase the evidence base of financial social work and offer new insights for developing interventions for clients experiencing financial difficulties.

Evaluating the impact of engaging older adults and service providers as research partners in the co-design of a community mobility-promoting program: a mixed methods developmental evaluation study

BACKGROUND

Increasingly researchers are partnering with citizens and communities in research; less is known about research impacts of this engagement. EMBOLDEN is an evidence-informed, mobility-promoting intervention for older adults co-designed by a 26-person Strategic Guiding Council (SGC) of health/social service providers and older adult citizens. This study evaluated research partners' perceptions of engagement strategies, the engagement context, strengths, areas for improvement, as well as the impacts of the guiding council on older-adult identified priority areas.

METHODS

This study was guided by developmental evaluation, working in partnership with four older adult SGC members who helped to set evaluation priorities, decide methods, and adapt patient-centred evaluation tools. Data sources included a questionnaire, focus groups and document analysis of meeting notes from 16 SGC meetings that took place between December 2019 and February 2022. A thematic approach to analysis guided the coding of focus group transcripts and SGC meeting notes. Convergent mixed methods guided the integration and presentation of qualitative and quantitative data sources in a joint display of evaluation results.

RESULTS

Of 26 SGC members, nine completed the evaluation squestionnaire, and five participated in focus groups. Around two thirds of the SGC commonly attended each meeting. EMBOLDEN's SGC was structured to include a diverse group (across gender, ethnicity and discipline) of older adults and service providers, which was perceived as a strength. Engagement processes were perceived as inclusive and well-facilitated, which stimulated discussion at meetings. Advantages and disadvantages of engaging with the SGC virtually, as compared to in-person (as was the case for the first 3 SGC meetings) were also discussed. Impacts of the SGC were identified across preparatory, execution phase and translational stages of research. Impacts of SGC involvement on members were also described.

CONCLUSION

Older adult research partners played an important role designing, implementing, and evaluating co-design approaches in this study. Older adults and service providers can make important contributions to the design, delivery and sharing results of health research through their lived expertise and connections to community. This project contributes to the growing field of citizen and community engagement in research by offering a participatory approach to engagement evaluation that considers diversity, satisfaction, and impact.

A complex intervention to support breastfeeding: A feasibility and acceptability study

AIMS

The aims of this study are to assess the acceptability and feasibility of a multicomponent intervention to support breastfeeding women and their families and explore its effectiveness.

METHODS

A pilot study with control and intervention groups was conducted using the complex intervention framework in two primary healthcare centres. Overall, 44 childbearing women, their partners/relatives and 20 healthcare professionals participated in the study. The intervention's feasibility and acceptability were measured. The percentage of exclusive breastfeeding rates and women's self-efficacy were measured at pre-intervention, at 10 days postpartum, and again at 2, 4 and 6 months postpartum. Postpartum depression risk was measured at 2 and 6 months postpartum. Professional self-efficacy was measured at pre-intervention and 3 months later.

RESULTS

The intervention was feasible and acceptable. No difference in self-efficacy existed between the intervention and control groups. Preliminary effects of the intervention were found in exclusive breastfeeding percentage and postpartum depression risk in the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

The intervention is feasible and acceptable. The results are promising not only for breastfeeding maintenance but also for preventing postpartum depression and recovering exclusive breastfeeding during pandemics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03944642.

Developing and evaluating the usability of a web-based Diabetic Retinopathy Health Education Program for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVES

To describe the development of a webpage based on the Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol and usability testing of the Diabetic Retinopathy Health Education Profram (DRHEP).

METHODS

The mixed methods pilot feasibility study was carried out between April and September 2021, involving 16 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 5 experts. The usability score was rated according to the System Usability Scale (SUS).

RESULTS

The average SUS score by the experts was 88. The patients gave a higher score of 85 for SUS, with 58 as the lowest. The average SUS score was 72. The findings indicate that the webpage is acceptable, good, and highly usable for users.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of this study signify the relationship between effective health applications and how their design might hamper their effectiveness in changing patients' behavior.

A non-randomised feasibility study of a mHealth follow-up program in bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Behavioural support via mobile health (mHealth) is emerging. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, cost, and potential effect on weight of a mHealth follow-up program in bariatric surgery.

METHODS

This was a non-randomised feasibility study describing intervention development and proof in the concept of a mHealth follow-up program in bariatric surgery. The study compares a prospective cohort with a historical control group and was conducted in a tertiary bariatric surgery service in Australia. The intervention group included individuals who had bariatric surgery (2019-2021) and owned a smart device, and the historical control group received usual postoperative care (2018). The intervention involved usual care plus codesigned biweekly text messages, monthly email newsletters, and online resources/videos over a 6-month period. The primary outcome measures included feasibility (via recruitment and retention rate), acceptability (via mixed methods), marginal costs, and weight 12 months postoperatively. Quantitative analysis was performed, including descriptive statistics and inferential and regression analysis. Multivariate linear regression and mixed-effects models were undertaken to test the potential intervention effect. Qualitative analysis was performed using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

The study included 176 participants (n = 129 historical control, n = 47 intervention group; mean age 56 years). Of the 50 eligible patients, 48 consented to participate (96% recruitment rate). One participant opted out of the mHealth program entirely without disclosing their reason (98% retention rate). The survey response rate was low (n = 16/47, 34%). Participants agreed/strongly agreed that text messages supported new behaviours (n = 13/15, 87%); however, few agreed/strongly agreed that the messages motivated goal setting and self-monitoring (n = 8/15, 53%), dietary change (n = 6/15, 40%), or physical activity (n = 5/15, 33%). Interviews generated four main themes (n = 12): 'motivators and expectations', 'preferences and relevance', 'reinforced information", and 'wanting social support'. The intervention reinforced information, email newsletters were lengthy/challenging to read, and text messages were favoured, yet tailoring was recommended. The intervention cost AUD 11.04 per person. The mean 12-month weight was 86 ± 16 kg and 90 ± 16 kg (intervention and historical control) with no statistically significant difference. Intervention recipients enrolled at 3 months postoperatively demonstrated a statistically significant difference in 12-month weight (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Although this study observed high rates of recruitment and retention, findings should be considered with caution as mHealth may have been embraced more by the intervention cohort as a result of the 2019 coronavirus pandemic. Of the various digital strategies developed and tested, the text message approach was the most acceptable; however, future intervention iterations could be strengthened through tailoring information when possible. The use of email newsletters and online resources/videos requires further testing of effectiveness to determine their value for continued use in bariatric surgery services.

Couple-Oriented Interventions for Mental Health: A Scoping Review

The purpose of this research was to systematically examine and collate evidence on couple-oriented interventions for mental health to identify trends in the literature, review research strategies, and suggest directions for future research. A systematic search included studies relating to couple-oriented interventions for preventing mental disorders and/or promoting mental health. We identified a total of 52 studies, which included 55 articles. Our findings revealed that interventions were delivered through various modes, including face-to-face, telephone, and online, with the majority of couple-oriented interventions operating in conjoint sessions. The most common intervention was for selective prevention, targeting patients with cancer and their partners. This review provided evidence of the applicability of theoretical frameworks, dyad analysis, and measurements associated with couple-oriented interventions. Findings can help family nurse practitioners and health care professionals advance strategies to develop and implement evidence-based, couple-oriented interventions for primary prevention of mental disorders and the promotion of mental health.

Examining the feasibility of a brief parent intervention designed to promote positive food communication with infants

BACKGROUND

Few prevention interventions exist focusing on supporting parents to use positive food communication at mealtimes, for the prevention of disordered eating. "Mealtime chatter matters (MCM)" is a brief intervention designed for parents of infants. The intervention was designed in collaboration with child health nurses (CHNs) to be embedded into usual care. The overall aim of this study was to test the feasibility of the intervention through examining the acceptability of the MCM content and resources and the potential impact of the intervention on parents.

METHODS

This pilot study utilised a mixed methods approach and took place within a regional child health service in Queensland, Australia (October 2021 to June 2022). Participants were parents of infants attending child health education groups and CHNs. The intervention consisted of a brief education session (including accompanying resources), facilitated by a Paediatric Dietitian. The acceptability of MCM content and resources was assessed by both parents and CHNs via self-reported questionnaires and the potential impact on parents assessed via pre-/post-self-reported questionnaires.

RESULTS

Forty-six parents of infants (aged < 8 months) and six CHNs who hosted the intervention and observed the program's delivery participated in the study. MCM content and resources were highly acceptable to parents and CHNs, as both qualitative and quantitative data concurred. How the program may have potentially impacted parenting practices was unclear from the survey results and further investigation is required to better understand these. Tangible lessons and opportunities to further test this intervention were clear from current results.

CONCLUSION

Overall, MCM was acceptable to both parents and CHNs, with the content and resources both being highly valued. Parents reported the content to be informative and engaging and CHNs were keen to have such an intervention available in the future. However, further modification and testing is required of MCM. This feasibility study is an essential first step in supporting parents and CHNs to access an evidence-based intervention with the aim of preventing disordered eating.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (2021/577) and Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (QGC/76618).

Implementing Adolescent Wellbeing and Health Programs in Schools: Insights from a Mixed Methods and Multiple Informant Study

Determining the factors that influence implementation of school-based wellbeing and health programs is essential for achieving desired program effects. Using a convergent mixed-methods, multiple informant design, this study considered factors that influence implementation of health programs for ninth grade students and in what ways implementation is differentially perceived by multiple informants (i.e., participants, instructors, and independent observers). Two types of programs-mindfulness and health education-were implemented with ninth graders (N = 70) in three schools situated in low-resourced urban neighborhoods. Study outcomes were derived from four data sources: (1) focus group participants (N = 45); (2) program instructor fidelity ratings; (3) independent observer fidelity ratings and notes; and (4) instructor open-ended session responses. Using thematic and mixed methods integration analyses, we identified themes related to implementation promoting or challenging factors. Theme names differed when data sources were separately analyzed by informant. Mixed methods integration analysis indicated that four themes were common across all informant groups: (1) competent, attentive, and engaging instructors are essential; (2) programs should involve interactive components (e.g., physical activities, applied learning opportunities); (3) adequate time for program delivery is key for student exposure and engagement; and (4) students' availability and preferences should guide program scheduling. A fifth theme, unique to instructor and observer perspectives, was that program implementation was negatively impacted by distractions from multiple sources, including instructors, students, and settings. Recommendations from students, instructors, and observers for implementation optimization are discussed.

Conscious connected breathing with breath retention intervention in adults with chronic low back pain: protocol for a randomized controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain is a major source of human suffering, and chronic low back pain (cLBP) is among the most prevalent, costly, and disabling of pain conditions. Due to the significant personal and societal burden and the complex and recurring nature of cLBP, self-management approaches that can be practiced at home are highly relevant to develop and test. The respiratory system is one of the most integrated systems of the body, and breathing is bidirectionally related with stress, emotion, and pain. Thus, the widespread physiological and psychological impact of breathing practices and breathwork interventions hold substantial promise as possible self-management strategies for chronic pain. The primary aim of the current randomized pilot study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a conscious connected breathing with breath retention intervention compared to a sham control condition.

METHODS

The rationale and procedures for testing a 5-day conscious connected breathing with breath retention intervention, compared to a deep breathing sham control intervention, in 24 adults (18-65 years) with cLBP is described. Both interventions will be delivered using standardized audio recordings and practiced over 5 days (two times in-person and three times at-home), and both are described as Breathing and Attention Training to reduce possible expectancy and placebo effects common in pain research. The primary outcomes for this study are feasibility and acceptability. Feasibility will be evaluated by determining rates of participant recruitment, adherence, retention, and study assessment completion, and acceptability will be evaluated by assessing participants' satisfaction and helpfulness of the intervention. We will also measure other clinical pain, psychological, behavioral, and physiological variables that are planned to be included in a follow-up randomized controlled trial.

DISCUSSION

This will be the first study to examine the effects of a conscious connected breathing with breath retention intervention for individuals with chronic pain. The successful completion of this smaller-scale pilot study will provide data regarding the feasibility and acceptability to conduct a subsequent trial testing the efficacy of this breathing self-management practice for adults with cLBP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04740710 . Registered on 5 February 2021.

Use of mixed methods research in intervention studies to increase young people's interest in STEM: A systematic methodological review

Introduction

Mixed methods research intervention studies integrate quantitative evaluation approaches, such as randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs, with qualitative research to evaluate the effectiveness, efficacy, or other results of an intervention or program. These types of studies, which have attracted growing attention in recent years, enhance the scope and rigor of the evaluation. While various frameworks that summarize the justifications for carrying out these types of studies and provide implementation guidance have been published in the last few years in the health sciences, we do not know whether such frameworks have been properly implemented in the social and educational sciences. This review examined the methodological features and reporting practices of mixed methods intervention studies aimed at increasing young people's interest in STEM.

Methods

A systematic search was carried out in APA PsycNET, ERIC, ProQuest, Scopus, and Web of Science, and a hand search in 20 journals. We included peer-reviewed English-language articles that reported intervention studies with a quantitative component measuring outcomes specific to increasing secondary school students' interest in STEM fields, a qualitative component conducted before, during, or after the quantitative component, and evidence of integration of both components. Qualitative content analysis and ideal-type analysis were used to synthesize the findings.

Results

We found 34 studies; the majority published in the last ten years. Several patterns of mixed methods application were described in these studies, illustrating the unique insights that can be gained by employing this methodology. The reporting quality of the included studies was generally adequate, especially regarding the justification for using a mixed methods intervention design and the integration of the quantitative and qualitative components. Nonetheless, a few reporting issues were observed, such as a lack of detail in the presentation of the mixed methods design, an inadequate description of the qualitative sampling and analysis techniques, and the absence of joint displays for representing integration.

Discussion

Authors must pay attention to these issues to ensure that the insights obtained by the use of mixed methods research are effectively communicated.

Compas-Y: A mixed methods pilot evaluation of a mobile self-compassion training for people with newly diagnosed cancer

Objective

Compas-Y is a compassionate mind training app that was co-designed to be fully adapted to mobile technology and to people with newly diagnosed cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the use, appreciation and impact of the app.

Methods

Seventy-one people with cancer who created an app account were included (38% breast cancer, 72% diagnosed <4 months ago, 76% received chemotherapy). Participants had very high baseline scores of self-compassion. In a convergent mixed methods design, back-end log-data (n = 71), pre-post surveys (n = 34) and semi-structured interviews (n = 23) collected for >8 weeks and were concurrently analysed using joint displays.

Results

About half of the participants (45%) used 4 of the 6 modules. Compas-Y was highly appreciated, with all content considered relevant and a source of support. Experienced benefits related to improved mental health. Particularly, we found significant changes in anxiety, but not in depression or well-being. In the interviews, people reported experiencing more rest and more positive emotions due to using the app. Process benefits included significant reductions in self-criticism (inadequate self and self-blame), but not self-compassion. In the interviews, people reported improved self-compassion and less self-criticism, more self-awareness, recognition and support, and improved emotion regulation and coping. The surveys did not capture the full range of outcomes that participants reported in the interviews.

Conclusions

Compas-Y is a highly appreciated mobile intervention that supported users in aspects of their mental health. Findings are discussed in terms of reach and adherence, app functionalities, co-design and tailoring of cancer-related and compassion-based eHealth.