Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest

Synergistic and toxicity‑reducing effects of acteoside as an adjuvant therapy of oxaliplatin against hepatocellular carcinoma

Oxaliplatin (OXA) is a first‑line chemotherapy agent for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its application is hindered by low therapeutic sensitivity and severe adverse effects. Acteoside (ACT) has both antitumor and hepatoprotective properties. Therefore, the present study investigated the mechanisms underlying the synergistic and toxicity‑reducing effects of ACT as an adjuvant to OXA in HCC therapy. Liver cancer cell lines and a xenograft mouse model were treated with ACT and/or OXA. In vitro Cell Counting kit‑8, Transwell invasive assay, wound healing assay, cell cycle and apoptosis detection assays assessed cell viability, migration, invasion, cell cycle progression and apoptosis to evaluate the synergistic effects of the combination therapy. In vivo studies examined tumor growth, cell proliferation, survival time and blood biochemical indices. The effects of ACT on OXA‑induced toxicity were also evaluated. Transcriptomics and metabolomics analyses were integrated to elucidate the mechanisms by which ACT enhances OXA efficacy and mitigates its toxicities. The results revealed that ACT synergized with OXA to inhibit HCC progression both in vivo and in vitro. ACT significantly alleviated OXA‑induced toxicity, particularly neurotoxicity. Mechanistically, phosphatidylinositol signaling system‑associated genes/proteins exerted important roles in the anti‑HCC effects of ACT. Western blotting revealed that ACT‑induced upregulation of INPP4B inhibited the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, which may underlie its ability to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of OXA and reduce its toxic effects. In conclusion, ACT enhanced efficacy and reduced the toxicity of OXA in the treatment of HCC, potentially via the regulation of INPP4B to inhibit the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

Phase II trial of organ preservation program using short-course radiation and FOLFOXIRI for rectal cancer (SHORT-FOX): Two-Year primary outcome analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

As patients with rectal cancer with clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy may be safely spared Total Mesorectal Excision (TME), strategies to maximize cCR are needed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-arm phase II study to determine whether dose-escalated short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy/5 fractions + 5 Gy/1 fraction boost) followed by eight cycles of FOLFOXIRI increased cCR rates among adult patients with > T2N0M0 or low T2N0 rectal cancer.

RESULTS

Between 2020 and 2023, we enrolled 37 patients, of whom 27 (73 %) had at least one high-risk feature (cT4, extramural vascular invasion [EMVI], N2, threatened circumferential resection margin, positive lateral node). At primary endpoint assessment, nine (24 %) patients had cCR on both endoscopy and MRI, and pursued organ preservation (OP). Fourteen (38 %) patients had cCR only on endoscopy, nine of whom pursued OP. Of the 18 patients who pursued OP, nine had local regrowth at two years from radiotherapy start, with two-year TME-free survival of 26 %. Baseline factors significantly associated with not achieving OP included age < 50 years and T4 disease. At mid-treatment restaging, patients who achieved OP were significantly less likely to have persistent node positivity, EMVI, and endoscopically visible tumor. Grade 3+ adverse events at least possibly attributed to chemotherapy and radiotherapy occured in 51% and 43% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Short-course radiotherapy with a boost followed by FOLFIXIRI results in OP in one-quarter of patients with high-risk rectal cancer, with poorer response among younger patients and T4 disease. Mid-treatment response may help guide timely decision-making regarding treatment.

Predictive Factors for Chemotherapy Response in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Retrospective Study Utilizing Next-Generation Sequencing

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify predictive factors for chemotherapy response in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) patients.

METHODS

Eligible participants with CRLM who had undergone at least two systemic chemotherapy cycles postdiagnosis were retrospectively analyzed. They were categorized as responders and nonresponders based on tumor size reduction. DNA extracted from tumor tissues was subjected to sequencing. Additionally, a comparative analysis of oncogenic pathways was conducted. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine predictive factors for chemotherapy response.

RESULTS

A total of 230 Chinese patients were analyzed. Significant differences in mutation distribution were found, particularly in the KRAS gene and several specific rare gene mutations (EP300, PTPRK, KMT2A, and ACVR1B), as well as in the PI3K and RTK-RAS pathways between the two groups. Gender, utilization of biological targeted agents (BTAs), KRAS gene mutations, PI3K pathway alterations, and specific rare gene mutations were used to construct a specific efficacy prediction model, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73. Approximately 75% (87/116) of patients could potentially avoid BTAs based on the model's predictions. In a subgroup of 52 patients not using BTAs, simulation indicated that 10 patients could benefit by including BTAs, representing 32% (10 of 31) of initially nonresponsive patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender, utilization of BTAs, and specific gene and pathway mutations may be significant predictors of chemotherapy response in CRLM patients. These findings highlight the role of genetic profiling in refining treatment strategies.

ctDNA variations according to treatment intensity in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor DNA variations (∆ctDNA) were reported to be associated with treatment efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study evaluated ∆ctDNA according to first-line treatment intensity.

METHODS

Patients from two prospective ctDNA collections were divided into Group ≤ 2 drugs and Group ≥ 3 drugs. ∆ctDNA were analysed from baseline to cycle 3 or 4 (C3-4) according to three predefined subgroups: ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_ undetectable, ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_ detectable, and ∆ctDNA < 80%. Impact of ∆ctDNA on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed.

RESULTS

Pretreatment ctDNA was detected in 129/152 (84.9%) of patients. A ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_undetectable was more frequent in Group ≥ 3 than ≤ 2 drugs (respectively 51.5% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.015). Patients with ∆ctDNA ≥ 80%_undetectable had longer survival than other ∆ctDNA subgroups, in Group ≥ 3 drugs (mPFS 11.5 vs 7.8 vs 6.3 months, p = 0.02: mOS 30.2 vs 18.1 vs 16.4 month, p = 0.04) and in Group ≤ 2 drugs (mPFS 8.4 vs 6.0 vs 5.3 months, p = 0.05; mOS 29.6 vs 14.6 vs 14.6 months, p = 0.007).

DISCUSSION

Early ∆ctDNA are associated to treatment intensity in first line mCRC with a significant impact on prognosis.

Irinotecan dosing and pharmacogenomics: a comprehensive exploration based on UGT1A1 variants and emerging insights

Irinotecan is a critical anticancer drug used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer and advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by obstructing topoisomerase 1; however, it can cause minor-to-severe and life-threatening adverse effects. UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A1 (UGT1A1) polymorphisms increase the risk of irinotecan-induced neutropenia and diarrhea. Hence, screening for UGT1A1 polymorphisms before irinotecan-based chemotherapy is recommended to minimize toxicity, whereas liposomes offer the potential to deliver irinotecan with fewer side effects in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This review presents a comprehensive overview of the effects of genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan on UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 variants, incorporating pharmacogenomic research, optimal regimens for metastatic colorectal and pancreatic cancer treatment using irinotecan, guidelines for toxicity reduction, and an evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of UGT1A1 genotype testing.

Prognostic analysis of patients with CRLM based on CRS score: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

To improve prognosis of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), we constructed a nomogram model to improve outcome through risk stratification and decision support.

METHODS

The 389 CRLM patients (273 training set and 116 validation set at a ratio of 7: 3) receiving systematic chemotherapy and synchronously resection with/without radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were retrospectively investigated. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) were mainly endpoint. A normo-gram model was conduct. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), C-index and calibration curve were performed to assess stablity and efficacy of model. The prognosis was evaluated based on Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve.

RESULTS

A total of 389 CRLM patients were included. The median OS and RFS times were 70.20 months (95% CIs: 57.73, 82.68) and 11.70 months (95% CIs: 9.75, 13.65), respectively. These patients were divided into training set and validation set at a ratio of 7: 3. In training set, 1, 3, and 5-year survival rate of OS was 97.38%, 71.18%, and 54.56% as well as RFS was 52.57%, 22.65%, and 21.12%, respectively. Cox model showed that hospital day, R0 resection, RFA, only neoadjuvant chemotherapy and CRS score were independent prognostic factors for CRLM patients. The patients were divided into high-risk group and low-risk group based on cut-off value of score calculated by model. The KM curves were statistically different between two groups (P < 0.01). The ROC curve, DCA and calibration curve showed a good prediction efficacy. the C-index of OS and RFS were 0.72 and 0.68, respectively, which were also verified in the validation set (OS, 0.71; RFS, 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

A good prediction model was developed and validated to assess the prognoses of CRLM patients. Systematic chemotherapy and R0 resection could benefit patients' survival and improve prognosis.

Second-Line Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Meta-analysis Based on Individual Patient-Level Data of Randomized Trials

PURPOSE

While fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens are recommended second-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), there have been no studies comparing different regimens head-to-head.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed individual patient-level meta-analysis based on data from the intention-to-treat population of the phase 2b NIFTY trial (liposomal irinotecan [nal-IRI] plus fluorouracil and leucovorin [5-FU/LV] vs. 5-FU/LV; NCT03542508) and the phase 2 FIReFOX trial (modified oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFOX] vs. modified irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV [mFOLFIRI]; NCT03464968). Pairwise log-rank tests and multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazards modeling with shared frailty to account for the trial's effect were used to compare overall survival (OS) between regimens.

RESULTS

A total of 277 patients were included. The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group (n=88) showed significantly better OS compared to the mFOLFOX group (n=49, pairwise log-rank, p=0.02), and mFOLFIRI group (n=50, p=0.03). Multivariable analysis showed consistent trends in OS with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.39 (mFOLFOX vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 2.07; p=0.11) and 1.36 (mFOLFIRI vs. nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV: 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.03; p=0.13), respectively. Compared to the 5-FU/LV group, the mFOLFOX group and the mFOLFIRI group did not show differences in terms of OS (pairwise log-rank p=0.83 and p=0.58, respectively). The nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV group experienced more frequent diarrhea, while the mFOLFOX group experienced peripheral neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV showed favorable survival outcomes compared to mFOLFOX, mFOLFIRI, or 5-FU/LV. The safety profiles of these regimens should be considered along with efficacy.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI treatment in first-line and second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI compared with mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI in first-line and second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from the perspectives of the USA and China, respectively, and provide a decision-making basis for clinical selection of these two regimens.

DESIGN

The study used a decision-analytic Markov model to simulate the process of mCRC, including three distinct health states: progression-free survival, progressive disease and death. Clinical data were derived from the TRIBE2 trial.Costs and utilities were obtained from local public databases and literature. One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also performed to explore the parameters' uncertainty in this study.

PARTICIPANTS

The main included patients were histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma.

INTERVENTIONS

First-line and second-line treatment with either FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI or mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated over a lifetime horizon as primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients treated with the FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI regimen produced 0.08 QALYs in the USA while 0.04 QALYs in China compared with the mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI regimen. The final ICERs for FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI were US$5127.70 per QALY and US$30 478.33 per QALY in the USA and China, which are below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. In the USA, when the WTP was US$100 000 for each QALY gained, the probability was nearly 99.6% that the FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI treatment was cost-effective. In China, when the WTP was US$36 053.01 (3 × GDP) for each QALY gained, the probability was nearly 54.7% that FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI treatment was cost-effective.

CONCLUSION

Patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOXIRI/FOLFOXIRI as first-line and second-line chemotherapy may improve health outcomes and expend financial resources more efficiently than mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI whether in China or the USA, which benefits not only individual survival but also the health care system from a value perspective.

Beyond chemotherapy: Exploring 5-FU resistance and stemness in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health challenge, demanding continuous advancements in treatment strategies. This review explores the complexities of targeting colorectal cancer stem cells (CSCs) and the mechanisms contributing to resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The efficacy of 5-FU is enhanced by combination therapies such as FOLFOXIRI and targeted treatments like bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab, particularly in KRAS wild-type tumors, despite associated toxicity. Biomarkers like thymidylate synthase (TYMS), thymidine phosphorylase (TP), and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are crucial for predicting 5-FU efficacy and resistance. Targeting CRC-CSCs remains challenging due to their inherent resistance to conventional therapies, marker variability, and the protective influence of the tumor microenvironment which promotes stemness and survival. Personalized treatment strategies are increasingly essential to address CRC's genetic and phenotypic diversity. Advances in immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccines, along with nanomedicine-based therapies, offer promising targeted drug delivery systems that enhance specificity, reduce toxicity, and provide novel approaches for overcoming resistance mechanisms. Integrating these innovative strategies with traditional therapies may enhance the effectiveness of CRC therapy by addressing the underlying causes of 5-FU resistance in CSCs.

Fruquintinib inhibits the migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells by modulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition via TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway

Background

Fruquintinib, a selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitor, has shown considerable efficacy in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. Despite its promising therapeutic effects, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying its therapeutic effects remain incompletely understood. In this study, we explored the functional roles and molecular mechanisms of fruquintinib in CRC therapy.

Material and methods

Human CRC cells (HCT-116 and LOVO) were cultured and treated with fruquintinib. Cell counting kit-8 assay kit (CCK-8) and colony formation assays were performed to investigate the effects of fruquintinib on cell proliferation. Wound healing and transwell assays were conducted to explore the role of fruquintinib on migration and invasion. RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analysis was used to investigate the potential mechanism of fruquintinib in the development of CRC. Western blot was used to measure the protein level.

Results

Fruquintinib significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of colorectal cancer cells. Bioinformatics analysis indicated that fruquintinib modulated the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway, and experimental validation confirmed its regulatory effects on core EMT-associated protein biomarkers. Notably, fruquintinib treatment resulted in the upregulation of E-cadherin and the downregulation of N-cadherin, vimentin, and MMP9. Western blot analysis revealed that fruquintinib dose-dependently suppressed SMAD2/3 expression. Notably, treatment with the TGF-β receptor agonist KRFK TFA attenuated fruquintinib's effect, reversing the upregulation of E-cadherin as well as the downregulatin of N-cadherin and SMAD2/3. Additionally, KRFK TFA partially restored CRC cell migration and invasion in transwell assays, counteracting fruquintinib's inhibitory impact.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that Fruquintinib effectively hampers the migration and invasion of CRC cells by disrupting the EMT process via the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway. This study sheds light on the mechanisms by which fruquintinib inhibits CRC progression and underscores its potential for further clinical investigation.

Extracellular vesicle-mediated gene therapy targets BRAFV600E-mutant colorectal cancer by inhibiting the MEK1/2-ERK1/2 pathway

BACKGROUND

Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) harboring BRAF mutation have a poor prognosis. The median survival time for patients with advanced BRAFV600E-mutant CRC is only approximately one year. Owing to the insensitivity to standard chemotherapy, there are still no effective and highly specific treatment strategies available in clinical practice for CRC patients with BRAF mutation. Therefore, targeting the BRAFV600E mutation site, researching and exploring novel targeted therapies are essential to improve the survival rate of patients with this CRC subtype.

AIM

This study aims to develop a precise therapeutic system for BRAFV600E CRC, based on the carrier properties of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and gene therapy targeting BRAFV600E.

METHOD

We first obtained engineered cells capable of stably producing EVs loaded with BRAFV600E nucleic acid drugs (siBRAFV600E). Next, BRAFV600E-mutant and wild-type CRC cell lines, as well as corresponding subcutaneous and metastasis models, were used to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of EVs-siBRAFV600E and explored the mechanism. Notably, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, which share the same molecular characteristics, pathological features, and heterogeneity as patients do, were utilized to further explore the therapeutic efficacy and mechanisms.

RESULT

EVs-siBRAFV600E specifically inhibited BRAFV600E CRC but didn't affect BRAF wild-type CRC in vitro and vivo. EVs-siBRAFV600E exerts its therapeutic effect by regulating the MEK1/2-ERK1/2 pathway, and it has demonstrated excellent therapeutic efficacy in PDX models.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic EVs we constructed are effective and specific for the BRAFV600E-mutant CRC. This study provides a novel strategy for the treatment of CRC patients with BRAFV600E mutation.

Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Approximately 50% of colorectal cancer patients develop liver metastases. Hepatic metastases represent the most common cause of colorectal cancer-related mortality. Metastasectomy, if possible, represents the most effective treatment strategy; 20% of patients will be cured and more than 50% survive at least 5 years. Nuances to treatment planning hinge on whether patients present with resectable disease upfront, whether the future liver remnant is adequate, and whether the primary tumor, if present, is colon versus rectal in origin. This article discusses considerations impacting our approach to patients with colorectal liver metastases and the role for various multimodal treatment options.

Debate: Improvements in Systemic Therapies for Liver Metastases Will Increase the Role of Locoregional Treatments

The benefit of resection of liver metastases depends on primary diseases. Neuroendocrine tumors are associated with favorable prognosis after resection of liver metastases. Gastric cancer has worse tumor biology, and resection of gastric liver metastases should be performed in selected patients. A multidisciplinary approach is well established for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). Resection remains the only curative treatment of CLM. Chemotherapy and molecular-targeted therapy have improved survival in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Understanding of the following two strategies, conversion therapy and two-stage hepatectomy, are important to make this patient group to be candidates for curative-intent surgery.

Digestive cancers: mechanisms, therapeutics and management

Cancers of the digestive system are major contributors to global cancer-associated morbidity and mortality, accounting for 35% of annual cases of cancer deaths. The etiologies, molecular features, and therapeutic management of these cancer entities are highly heterogeneous and complex. Over the last decade, genomic and functional studies have provided unprecedented insights into the biology of digestive cancers, identifying genetic drivers of tumor progression and key interaction points of tumor cells with the immune system. This knowledge is continuously translated into novel treatment concepts and targets, which are dynamically reshaping the therapeutic landscape of these tumors. In this review, we provide a concise overview of the etiology and molecular pathology of the six most common cancers of the digestive system, including esophageal, gastric, biliary tract, pancreatic, hepatocellular, and colorectal cancers. We comprehensively describe the current stage-dependent pharmacological management of these malignancies, including chemo-, targeted, and immunotherapy. For each cancer entity, we provide an overview of recent therapeutic advancements and research progress. Finally, we describe how novel insights into tumor heterogeneity and immune evasion deepen our understanding of therapy resistance and provide an outlook on innovative therapeutic strategies that will shape the future management of digestive cancers, including CAR-T cell therapy, novel antibody-drug conjugates and targeted therapies.

Discussion on the optimization of personalized medication using information systems based on pharmacogenomics: an example using colorectal cancer

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is a powerful tool for clinical optimization of drug efficacy and safety. However, due to many factors affecting drugs in the real world, PGx still accounts for a small proportion of actual clinical application scenarios. Therefore, based on the information software, pharmacists use their professional advantages to integrate PGx into all aspects of pharmaceutical care, which is conducive to promoting the development of personalized medicine. In this paper, the establishment of an information software platform is summarized for the optimization of a personalized medication program based on PGx. Taking colorectal cancers (CRC) as an example, this paper also discusses the role of PGx in different working modes and participation in drug management of CRC patients by pharmacists with the help of information systems. Finally, we summarized the recommendations of different PGx guidelines to provide reference for the follow-up personalized pharmaceutical care.

Trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab for patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: phase 3 PRESERVE 1 trial

BACKGROUND

In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), improvements in survival from combining leucovorin/fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) with bevacizumab have come at the risk of increased rates of high-grade toxicities. Trilaciclib is indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients receiving standard-of-care chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with untreated mCRC were randomly assigned 1:1 to trilaciclib (n = 164) or placebo (n = 162) prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab for up to 12 cycles (induction), followed by trilaciclib or placebo prior to fluorouracil/leucovorin/bevacizumab (maintenance). Co-primary endpoints were duration of severe (grade 4) neutropenia (DSN) in cycles 1-4 and occurrence of severe neutropenia (SN) during induction. Secondary endpoints included antitumor efficacy, survival, and safety.

RESULTS

The study met its co-primary endpoints. Administering trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab resulted in significant reductions in DSN in cycles 1-4 vs placebo (mean, 0.1 vs 1.3 days; P < .001) and occurrence of SN during induction (1.3% vs 19.7%; adjusted relative risk [96% CI] = 0.07 [0.0 to 0.3]; P < .001). Grade 3/4 adverse events, including neutropenia, diarrhea, and leukopenia, were less frequent with trilaciclib vs placebo (64.8% vs 73.1%). Trilaciclib was associated with fewer chemotherapy dose reductions and delays and with reduced administration of supportive therapies, compared with placebo. Objective response rate (41.6% vs 57.1%; P = .009) and median progression-free survival (10.3 vs 13.1 months; P < .001) were significantly lower with trilaciclib vs placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Administering trilaciclib prior to FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab protected the neutrophil lineage from the effects of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. However, antitumor efficacy endpoints favored placebo.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04607668.

Value of ctDNA in surveillance of adjuvant chemosensitivity and regimen adjustment in stage III colon cancer: a protocol for phase II multicentre randomised controlled trial (REVISE trial)

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care for stage III colon cancer is 3 or 6 months of double-drug regimen chemotherapy following radical surgery. However, patients with positive circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) exhibit a high risk of recurrence risk even if they receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy. The potential benefit of intensified adjuvant chemotherapy, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin and fluoropyrimidine (FOLFOXIRI), for ctDNA-positive patients remains to be elucidated.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre phase II randomised controlled trial aims to investigate the utility of ctDNA in monitoring chemosensitivity and to preliminarily assess whether intensified chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI can increase ctDNA clearance and improve survival outcomes. A total of 60 eligible patients with stage III colon cancer exhibiting postoperatively positive ctDNA before and after two cycles of oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) will be randomly assigned to continue five additional cycles of XELOX (control arm) or switch to eight cycles of FOLFOXIRI (experimental arm). This sequential approach is designed to escalate treatment for patients with persistent ctDNA positivity while avoiding overtreatment in those who may respond well to standard chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the change in ctDNA concentration, defined as the difference between the ctDNA concentration measured after two cycles of XELOX and after the completion or termination of chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints include the ctDNA clearance rate, 2-year disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, chemotherapy-related side effects and quality of life.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the West China Hospital, Sichuan University (approval number: 20231998). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06242418, registered on 27 January 2024).

Optimal treatment strategies for borderline resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) are divided into "initially resectable" and "initially unresectable." The terminology "borderline resectable" continues to be elusive without any common consensus or definition. This narrative review aims to decode the conundrum of "borderline resectable CRLM (BR-CRLM)" and to discuss optimal treatment strategies.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was performed using Medline/PubMed and Web of Science databases with a search period ending on January 1, 2024. Using PubMed, the terms "CRLM," "BR-CRLM," and "management of BR-CRLM" were searched.

RESULTS

The 2016 European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines defined the term "resectability" in CRLM using the "technical (surgical) criteria" and the "oncologically criteria." These 2 criteria form the basis of defining BR-CRLM. Thus, BR-CRLM can be either technically easy but with unfavorable oncologically criteria or technically difficult with favorable oncologically criteria. Although defining BR-CRLM by incorporating both these criteria seems to be the most logical way forward, there is currently a lot of heterogeneity in the literature. It is generally agreed upon that some form of chemotherapy needs to be administered in BR-CRLM before embarking on surgery. Conversion chemotherapy is used in patients with BR-CRLM in which there is a possibility of resection after effective downsizing. Along with improved effective chemotherapy, great strides have been made in pushing the limits of surgery to achieve resectability in this subset of patients.

CONCLUSION

Advanced surgical techniques and locoregional liver-directed therapies coupled with perioperative chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy have made long-term survival benefit, a reality in patients with BR-CRLM. Thus, the time has come to recognize "BR-CRLM" as a distinct entity.

Induction triplet chemotherapy in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma and synchronous metastases, an AGEO-FFCD study

AIM OF THE STUDY

The management of synchronous metastatic rectal cancer (SMRC) is complex and multimodal, involving chemotherapy, surgery and/or radiotherapy. The aim of this study was firstly to confirm the efficacy of the induction FOLFIRINOX, and secondly to evaluate the different therapeutic strategies and outcomes of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This French study combined data from a prospective FFCD trial and a multicenter cohort. Patients included had SMRC and had undergone induction triplet chemotherapy. Two groups of patients were defined according to the resectability of metastases at baseline: resectable (Res) and unresectable (URes). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate.

RESULTS

146 patients were included in 16 French centers and 65 patients in the FFCD1102 trial. In overall population the median age of patients was 59 years, 86% of tumors were of the lower or middle rectum, 33% were well-differentiated, 53% were RAS mutated and 7% BRAF mutated. Triplet induction was associated with 80% of objective response and 92% of disease control. After the induction phase, 69% and 48% of patients of Res and URes groups underwent rectal surgery, and secondary metastases resection was done in 79% and 39% of patients, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) for Res was 56.3 months (95% CI: 22.54-NA). Median OS for URes who had or not secondary metastases resection were 45.1 months (95% CI: 39.89-NA) and 21.1 months (95% CI 17.31-27.1), respectively. Patients with BRAF mutated tumors were more likely to have unresectable disease, and had worse survivals than the patients with RAS mutated or RAS/BRAF wild-type.

CONCLUSION

Triplet induction chemotherapy is a treatment of choice in selected patients with SMRC, allowing to adapt the therapeutic strategy to the response and invasiveness of the various sites.

STRUCTURED ABSTRACT

The management of metastatic rectal cancer is essentially based on three main therapeutic approaches: surgery, radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy. Induction triplet chemotherapy appears as a good choice for fit and young patients. It allows to adapt the therapeutic strategy to the response and invasiveness of the various sites. In this study dedicated to patients undergoing treatment for rectal cancer with synchronous metastases, FOLFIRINOX-based induction chemotherapy was associated with objective response rate of 77% and disease control rate of 92%. These results are similar with those of the FFCD 1102 trial and confirm the efficacy of induction chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX with or without targeted therapy in these patients in daily routine practice. Surgery for metastases is a key factor in determining patient's outcome and triplet induction chemotherapy, associated with high response rates, enables a significant percentage of patients to undergo surgery and appears therefore to be a treatment of choice, particularly for patients whose disease is unresectable at baseline.

Advances in pharmacotherapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) typically have a poor prognosis with historically few treatment options. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is the mainstay of treatment to remove macrometastases into the peritoneum, but residual micrometastases are often left behind. Systemic chemotherapy remains a cornerstone of treatment for micrometastases, but intraperitoneal therapy offers advantages including higher local dose concentration with fewer systemic side effects from treatment.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers advancements in the routes and types of pharmacotherapies for PM in CRC.

EXPERT OPINION

More evidence is needed to justify HIPEC with CRS as the standard of care treatment modality for patients with resectable PM in CRC. New therapies such as oncolytic viruses, biologics, and small-molecule inhibitors may become additional treatment modalities for PM.

Factors Influencing the Duration of Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is mainly treated with 5-Fluoro-Uracil (5-FU), Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan chemotherapies and anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) or anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) targeted therapies. Due to chemotherapy-related toxicity, patients receive induction treatment to achieve tumour response followed by maintenance therapy with less cytotoxic molecules or a chemotherapy-free interval to reduce chemotherapy-related toxicity. In this study, the aim was to determine the patient, cancer and treatment factors that influence the duration of maintenance therapy (DMT).

METHODS

We collected retrospective data on a cohort of 133 patients treated at the Centre Georges François Leclerc (CGFL) cancer centre in Dijon between March 2014 and June 2022. Patients had unresectable or potentially resectable diseases. They received first-line induction treatment with chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy and maintenance treatment, defined as the interruption of at least one chemotherapy agent.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis, age (HR: 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.031), N2 nodal status (HR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.89, p = 0.021) and the presence of peritoneal metastases (HR: 2.05, 95% CI 1.25-3.36, p = 0.004), as well as baseline carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) level (HR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.00-1.20, p = 0.052), were significantly associated to poor DMT. Local treatment of liver metastases also significantly reduced the DMT (HR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.86, p = 0.013). In our cohort, induction triplet chemotherapy significantly increased the CEA delta (70% vs. 44%, p = 0.047) compared to doublet chemotherapy and led to a higher rate of liver surgery (40% vs. 21%, p = 0.014) and a trend for a higher rate of local treatment of metastases (62% vs. 45%, p = 0.059).

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of maintenance therapy is determined by the initial patient and colorectal cancer characteristics. However, it is significantly increased by local treatment of liver metastases. By reducing the tumour burden, a triplet induction chemotherapy regimen increases the rate of liver metastase resection.

Alternating modified CAPOX/CAPIRI plus bevacizumab in untreated unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 2 trial

Previous studies showed encouraging efficacy of alternating FOLFOX/FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase 2 trial (NCT04324476) aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of alternating modified CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin)/modified CAPIRI (capecitabine and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab (anti-VEGF-A antibody) in untreated unresectable mCRC. Induction treatment included capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid D2-8 and D16-22, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 D1, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 D15, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg D1 and 15 for 28-day cycles (up to six cycles). Capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid D2-15 and bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg D1 for 21-day cycles were used as maintenance treatment. 52 patients were included. Median follow-up was 25.0 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS; the primary endpoint) was 11.0 months (95% CI 9.0-12.4). Subgroup analyses showed patients with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio<5 or RAS wild-type disease had longer PFS (both P < 0.05). Objective response and disease control were obtained in 38 (73%; 95% CI 59%-84%) and 49 (94%; 95% CI 84%-99%), respectively. Mean depth of response, conversion and no evidence of disease rates were 46.0% ± 26.3%, 23% and 19%, respectively. Median overall survival was 28.1 months (18.4-34.0). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 17 (33%) patients. No treatment-related death was reported. The most common grade 3-4 TRAE were hypertension (13 [25%]), neutrophil count decreased (three [6%]), and hand-foot syndrome (two [4%]). In addition, grade 3-4 TRAE of diarrhea reported in one [2%] patient and no grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy occurred. Thus, alternating modified CAPOX/CAPIRI plus bevacizumab had promising efficacy and acceptable safety. The regimen may be a novel option for untreated unresectable mCRC.

Real-world outcomes of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the JSCCR-TRIPON study

BACKGROUND

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is a standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, due to the severe toxicities, this regimen is not widely used. There is limited data on the real-world efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from mCRC patients who received FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy at 31 institutions. The initial dose was standardized according to the TRIBE regimen. Induction therapy was defined as a combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and fluorouracil.

RESULTS

Out of 104 patients who met the criteria, the median age was 58 years (range, 16-72). 81% of patients had an eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (PS) of 0. An initial dose reduction was observed in 63% of patients. The median number of preplanned induction therapy cycles was 12 (range, 4-12). The completion of scheduled induction therapy cycles was observed in 45% of patients, with treatment-related toxicities being the main reason for discontinuation (63%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.8 months (95% CI, 10.6-15.0) and 27.9 months (95% CI 21.6-34.2), respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 63.7% and 98.9%, respectively. The R0 resection rate was 21.2%. The main grade 3 or higher toxicities were neutropenia (51%), febrile neutropenia (10%), and nausea/vomiting (5%). No treatment-related deaths were observed.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world clinical setting, FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab demonstrated efficacy and safety comparable to previous clinical trials.

Origin, development and therapy of colorectal cancer from the perspective of a biologist and an oncologist

The intestinal epithelium, a rapidly renewing tissue, is characterized by a continuous cell turnover that occurs through a well-coordinated process of cell proliferation and differentiation. This dynamic is crucial for the long-term function of the gastrointestinal tract. Disruption of this process can lead to colorectal carcinoma, a common malignancy worldwide. The first part of the review focuses on the cellular composition of the epithelium and the molecular mechanisms that control its functions, and describes the pathways that lead to epithelial transformation and tumor progression. This forms the basis for understanding the development and progression of advanced colorectal cancer. The second part deals with current therapeutic approaches and presents the latest treatment options, ongoing clinical trials and new drugs. In addition, the biological and medical perspectives of the adverse effects of therapies and models of regeneration of the intestinal epithelium are highlighted and, finally, future treatment options are discussed.

FOLFOXIRI for First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastases in a Resource-Limited Setting

PURPOSE

FOLFOXIRI is a standard treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases. However, limited data exists on its safety and effectiveness in low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs). This prospective study addresses this gap in a Vietnamese LMIC setting.

METHODS

We enrolled 92 patients with unresectable CRC liver metastases between 2022 and 2023. All patients received FOLFOXIRI every 2 weeks, with routine G-CSF prophylaxis to prevent neutropenia. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) assessed diagnoses and treatment responses. Outcomes were R0/R1 resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), adverse events (AEs), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for surgical patients.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 56 years, with a male predominance (70.7%). The primary tumors were located in the left colon (42.4%), rectum (37%), and right colon (20.7%). Thirty-two patients (34.8%) experienced severe (grade 3 or higher) AEs, with thrombocytopenia (13.1%) and anemia (9.8%) being the most frequent. Most patients (72/87, 82.9%) achieved a partial response. The ORR and DCR were 85.1% and 95.4%, respectively. Fifty-seven patients (62%) achieved resectability, and 54 (58.7%) underwent radical surgery. The R0/R1 resection rate was 88.9%. The median PFS and OS for all patients were 13 and 22 months, respectively. The median RFS of surgical patients was 14 months.

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFOXIRI improves the response rates, R0/R1 resection rates, and survivals for patients with CRC liver metastases. Future research is necessary to improve the prognosis of patients while minimizing toxicities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05362825 dated 5 May 2022.

NEOADJUVANT TREATMENT OF LIVER METASTASES OF COLORECTAL CANCER: PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE

BACKGROUND

Surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) improves the prognosis of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive factors of the histological response of CRLM after neoadjuvant treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective monocentric study including patients with CRLM operated after neoadjuvant treatment. Assessment of histological response was based on the Rubbia-Brandt tumor regression grading score. The scores were grouped into two types of response: Response Group (R) and No Response Group (NR).

RESULTS

The study included 77 patients (mean age=56 years, sex ratio=1.57). Node metastases were noticed in 62% of cases. Synchronous liver metastasis was present in 42 cases (55%) and metachronous liver metastasis in 45%. Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of CT only in 52 patients (68%) and CT with targeted therapy in 25 patients (32%). Chemo-induced lesions were present in 44 patients (57%). Histological response was presented (Group R) in 36 cases (47%) and absent (Group NR) in 41 cases (53%). The overall survival of our patients was 32 months. For Group R, survival was significantly greater (p=0.001). The predictive factors of histological response identified were delay in the onset of liver metastasis greater than 14 months (p=0.027) and neoadjuvant treatment combining CT and targeted therapy (p=0.031). In multivariate analysis, the type of neoadjuvant treatment (p=0.035) was an independent predictive factor of histological response.

CONCLUSIONS

Predictive factors of histological response would allow us to identify patients who would benefit most from neoadjuvant treatment. These patients with CRLM onset of more than 14 months and treated with CT combined with targeted therapy would be the best candidates for a neoadjuvant CT strategy followed by surgical resection.

Targeting the CDK7-MDK axis to suppresses irinotecan resistance in colorectal cancer

AIMS

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major global health issue, with metastatic cases presenting poor prognosis despite advances in chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Irinotecan, a key drug for advanced CRC treatment, faces challenges owing to the development of resistance. This study aimed to understand the mechanisms underlying irinotecan resistance in colorectal cancer.

MAIN METHODS

We created a cell line resistant to irinotecan using HT29 cells. These resistant cells were utilized to investigate the role of the CDK7-MDK axis. We employed bulk RNA sequencing, conducted in vivo experiments with mice, and analyzed patient tissues to examine the effects of the CDK7-MDK axis on the cellular response to irinotecan.

KEY FINDINGS

Our findings revealed that HT29 cells resistant to irinotecan, a crucial colorectal cancer medication, exhibited significant phenotypic and molecular alterations compared to their parental counterparts, including elevated stem cell characteristics and increased levels of cytokines and drug resistance proteins. Notably, CDK7 expression was substantially higher in these resistant cells, and targeting CDK7 effectively decreased their survival and tumor growth, enhancing irinotecan sensitivity. RNA-seq analysis indicated that suppression of CDK7 in irinotecan-resistant HT29 cells significantly reduced Midkine (MDK) expression. Decreased CDK7 and MDK levels, achieved through siRNA and the CDK7 inhibitor THZ1, enhanced the sensitivity of resistant HT29 cells to irinotecan.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our study sheds light on how CDK7 and MDK influence irinotecan resistance in colorectal and highlights the potential of MDK-targeted therapies. We hypothesized that irinotecan sensitivity and overall treatment efficacy would improve by inhibiting MDK. This finding encourages a careful yet proactive investigation of MDK as a therapeutic target to enhance outcomes in colorectal cancer patients.

A phase II trial of UGT1A1 genotype-guided FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for advanced, unresectable colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

FOLFIRI is a standard regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We hypothesized that a pharmacogenomic-directed strategy where more efficient irinotecan metabolizers (UGT1A1 *1/*1 homozygotes and *1/*28 heterozygotes) receive higher-than-standard irinotecan doses would improve progression-free survival (PFS) compared to non-genotype selected historical controls with acceptable toxicity.

METHODS

In this phase II multicenter study irinotecan dosing in first-line FOLFIRI and bevacizumab for mCRC was based on UGT1A1 genotype with *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28 patients receiving 310 mg/m2, 260 mg/m2, and 180 mg/m2, respectively. Primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were investigator and patient-reported adverse events, and estimation of overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

One-hundred patients were enrolled with 91 evaluable for PFS and 83 evaluable for best response. Median PFS was 12.5 months (90% CI 10.9, 15.4), shorter than the anticipated alternative hypothesis of 14 months. PFS by genotype was 12.5 months (90% CI 10.9, 17.4) for *1/*1, 14.6 months (90% CI 11.8, 17.5) for *1/*28, and 6 months (90% CI 2.3, 7.7) for *28/28, respectively. OS was 24.5 months (90% CI 19.1, 30.7) and by genotype was 26.5 (90% CI 19.1, 32.9), 25.9 (90% CI 17.6, 37.7), and 13.4 (90% CI 2.3, 20.5) months for *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28, respectively. G3/4 toxicity was similar between all subgroups, including diarrhea and neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

A pharmacogenomic-directed irinotecan strategy improved PFS in the *1/*1 and *1/*28 genotypes with higher rates of neutropenia and similar rates of diarrhea compared to expected with standard FOLFIRI dosing. However, improvements in response rate and PFS were modest. This strategy should not change standard practice for mCRC patients in the first-line setting.

Triplet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO multicenter real-world study

BACKGROUND

Prior trials validated triplet chemotherapy (Tri-CT) with bevacizumab as first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but real-world data are scarce and practices remain heterogeneous.

AIMS

To evaluate Tri-CT +/- bevacizumab efficacy and safety, and to identify factors influencing treatment decisions.

METHODS

The COLOTRIP retrospective study enrolled mCRC patients treated from 2014 to 2019 in 14 French centers.

RESULTS

Of 299 patients (81% PS 0-1, 58% RAS-mutated and 19% BRAF-mutated), 51% received Tri-CT and 49% Tri-CT + bevacizumab. Metastatic disease was classified as resectable (6.5%), potentially resectable (40%), and unresectable (54%). Bevacizumab use was associated with primary tumor location, mutational status and number of metastases. Median overall survival was 33.5 months in the Tri-CT group and 23.9 months in the Tri-CT + bevacizumab group, with median progression-free survival being 14.5 and 11.4 months. After adjusting for initial characteristics, no difference in survival was noted. Around 30% of patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights several factors influencing Tri-CT use +/- bevacizumab decision and confirms the real-world good oncological outcomes and tolerability of these regimens in mCRC patients. Our results suggest that Tri-CT alone may by an appropriate option for specific subgroups of patients.

Regorafenib plus FOLFIRINOX as first-line treatment for patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (FOLFIRINOX-R trial): a dose-escalation study

PURPOSE

The combination of bevacizumab and FOLFIRINOX is used in patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (RASm-mCRC). Regorafenib, an oral multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has antiangiogenic properties, cytostatic effects and also true cytotoxic effects, unlike bevacizumab. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of the regorafenib-FOLFIRINOX combination in patients with RASm-mCRC.

METHODS

The FOLFIRINOX-R trial was a phase 1/2 study where the dose-escalation part (3 + 3 design with three dose levels, DLs) was completed before its early termination. FOLFIRINOX (14-day cycle) included oxaliplatin (standard dose), folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (150 or 180 mg/m²). Regorafenib (120 or 160 mg daily) was given from day 4 to day 10 of each cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was studied in the first three cycles. Eligibility criteria included ECOG performance status ≤ 1 and not previously treated RASm-mCRC.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (median age: 65 years; min-max: 40-76) were enrolled. DLT could not be evaluated in one patient (DL3) due to poor observance. The median treatment duration and median follow-up were 6.2 (min-max: 2.3-10) and 13.4 (min-max: 3.8-18.0) months, respectively. Dose was modified in 12/13 (92%) patients. One grade 3 hypokalemia occurred at DL2. MTD was not reached at DL3. Grade 3 diarrhea was recorded in 7/13 patients (13 events) equally distributed in all DLs.

CONCLUSION

The RP2D for this regorafenib-FFX combination could not be determined due to a high prevalence of grade 3 diarrhea related to treatment as advised by our Independent Data Monitoring Committee.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03828799.

Overall survival with non-proportional hazards in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Systematic review and network meta-analysis

This study aimed to identify the most effective first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer based on overall survival, identify the most commonly used treatment, and generate a meaningful ranking among all available treatments based on their relative effectiveness. Researchers used the ANOVA parametrization method to fit the second-order fractional polynomial network meta-analysis with a random-effect model. Using a non-proportional hazards network meta-analysis, 46 treatments were compared by considering a combination of direct and indirect evidence extracted from clinical trial studies. Included in the review were 46 trials involving 21350 patients. Between January 2000 and January 2023, researchers conducted a thorough search through Embase, PubMed/Medline, and Scopus. To undertake a secondary analysis of this data, we recreate individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curves and assess the accuracy of that reconstruction. A random-effects model was used to evaluate the pooled overall survival and hazard ratio with a 95 percent confidence interval. The predicted survival curves for the network meta-analysis showed that GOLFIG and FOLFOX + Cetuximab treatments have higher survival, respectively. Our results provide moderate quality evidence and comparative effective estimates for various available first-line treatments for metastasis colorectal cancer based on network meta-analysis.

A multicenter, prospective, non-interventional real-world study to assess the effectiveness of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing neutropenia in patients with gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

Mecapegfilgrastim, a long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factor has been approved for reducing the incidence of infection, particularly febrile neutropenia (FN), in China.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study to examine the safety and effectiveness of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing neutropenia in gastrointestinal patients receiving the chemotherapy, including S-1/capecitabine-based regimens or the fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI)/fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)/fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) regimens.

METHOD

Five hundred and sixty-one gastrointestinal patients from 40 sites across China, between May 2019 and November 2021, were included. The administration of mecapegfilgrastim was prescribed at the discretion of local physicians.

RESULTS

The most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of any grade for all patients was increased white blood cells (2.9%). Grade 3/4 ADRs were observed for anemia (0.2%), decreased white blood cells (0.2%), and decreased neutrophil count (0.2%). Among the 116 patients who received S-1/capecitabine-based chemotherapy throughout all cycles, ADRs of any grade included anemia (1.7%), myalgia (0.9%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (0.9%). No grade 3/4 ADRs were observed. In 414 cycles of patients who underwent S-1/capecitabine-based regimens, only one (0.2%) cycle experienced grade 4 neutropenia. In the FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOXIRI, and FOLFOX chemotherapy regimens, grade 4 neutropenia occurred in one (2.7%) of 37 cycles, four (4.7%) of 85 cycles, and two (1.2%) of 167 cycles, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting, mecapegfilgrastim has proven effective in preventing severe neutropenia in gastrointestinal patients following chemotherapy. This includes commonly used moderate or high-risk FN regimens or regimens containing S1/capecitabine, all of which have demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profiles.

Alliance A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent data have demonstrated that in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach improves compliance with chemotherapy and increases rates of tumor response compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) alone. They further indicate that the optimal sequencing of TNT involves consolidation (rather than induction) chemotherapy to optimize complete response rates. Data, largely from retrospective studies, have also shown that patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after TNT may be managed safely with the watch and wait approach (WW) instead of preemptive total mesorectal resection (TME). However, the optimal consolidation chemotherapy regimen to achieve cCR has not been established, and a randomized clinical trial has not robustly evaluated cCR as a primary endpoint. Collaborating with a multidisciplinary oncology team and patient groups, we designed this NCI-sponsored study of chemotherapy intensification to address these issues and to drive up cCR rates, to provide opportunity for organ preservation, improve quality of life for patients and improve survival outcomes.

METHODS

In this NCI-sponsored multi-group randomized, seamless phase II/III trial (1:1), up to 760 patients with LARC, T4N0, any T with node positive disease (any T, N +) or T3N0 requiring abdominoperineal resection or coloanal anastomosis and distal margin within 12 cm of anal verge will be enrolled. Stratification factors include tumor stage (T4 vs T1-3), nodal stage (N + vs N0) and distance from anal verge (0-4; 4-8; 8-12 cm). Patients will be randomized to receive neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation (LCRT) followed by consolidation doublet (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) or triplet chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX) for 3-4 months. LCRT in both arms involves 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks + 900 cGy boost in 5 fractions with a fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine preferred). Patients will undergo assessment 8-12 (± 4) weeks post-TNT completion. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion will compare cCR between treatment arms. A total number of 312 evaluable patients (156 per arm) will provide statistical power of 90.5% to detect a 17% increase in cCR rate, at a one-sided alpha = 0.048. The primary endpoint for the phase III portion will compare disease-free survival (DFS) between treatment arms. A total of 285 DFS events will provide 85% power to detect an effect size of hazard ratio 0.70 at a one-sided alpha of 0.025, requiring enrollment of 760 patients (380 per arm). Secondary objectives include time-to event outcomes (overall survival, organ preservation time and time to distant metastasis) and adverse event rates. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, plasma and buffy coat, and serial rectal MRIs will be collected for exploratory correlative research. This study, activated in late 2022, is open across the NCTN and had accrued 330 patients as of May 2024. Study support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org .

DISCUSSION

Building on data from modern day rectal cancer trials and patient input from national advocacy groups, we have designed The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial studying chemotherapy intensification via a consolidation chemotherapy approach with the intent to enhance cCR and DFS rates, increase organ preservation rates, and improve quality of life for patients with rectal cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05610163; Support includes U10CA180868 (NRG) and U10CA180888 (SWOG).

Safety of first-line systemic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of first-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer through network meta-analysis.

METHODS

The literature from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was searched from the inception of the databases to August 15, 2023, and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to screen studies. The Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool (RoB 2.0) was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 15.0 and R4.3.1 software to compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) among different treatment regimens.

RESULTS

A total of 53 randomized controlled trials, involving 17,351 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), were ultimately included, encompassing 29 different therapeutic approaches. According to SUCRA rankings, the CAPOX regimen is most likely to rank first in terms of safety, while the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab regimen is most likely to rank last. In terms of specific AEs, the CAPOX regimen, whether used alone or in combination with targeted drugs (bevacizumab and cetuximab), is associated with a reduced risk of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, as well as an increased risk of thrombocytopenia and diarrhea. The FOLFOX regimen, with or without bevacizumab, is linked to an increased risk of neutropenia and peripheral sensory neuropathy. The FOLFIRI/CAPIRI + bevacizumab regimen is associated with a reduced risk of peripheral sensory neuropathy. S-1 and S-1 + oxaliplatin are well-tolerated in terms of gastrointestinal reactions. The FOLFOXIRI regimen, whether used alone or in combination with targeted drugs, is associated with various AEs.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the CAPOX regimen may be the safest option among the first-line systemic treatment regimens for mCRC patients, while the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab regimen may be associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs.

Comparison of systemic treatments for previously treated patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

There is limited evidence of comparative results among different treatments for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who have failed at least one line of previous systemic therapy. We aimed to compare the efficacy of systemic treatments among these patients through this investigation.

Methods

We collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported in English up until July 2023, from databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and prominent conference databases, for this Bayesian network meta-analysis. Phase II or III trials that evaluated at least two therapeutic regimens were included. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS), secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Hazards ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effect size. Subgroup analysis was performed based on metastatic sites. The current systematic review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023420498).

Results

30 RCTs were included, with a total of 13,511 patients. Compared to chemotherapy, multi-targeted therapy (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.87) and targeted therapy plus chemotherapy (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.91) show significant advantages. Targeted therapy (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.54-1.57) and local treatment plus chemotherapy (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.85-1.23) had comparable performance. For patients with liver metastases, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab, aflibercept plus fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy (CTFU), and bevacizumab plus capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy (CTCA) showed the best outcomes in terms of OS. Bevacizumab plus intensified CTFU, bevacizumab plus CTCA, and HAI followed by single-agent chemotherapy (SingleCT) performed the best regarding PFS. For patients with liver-limited metastases, aflibercept plus CTFU is the optimal choice in OS. For PFS, the best options were HAI followed by SingleCT, aflibercept plus CTFU, and panitumumab plus CTFU. For patients with multiple-site metastases, the best treatments were TAS-102 plus bevacizumab, bevacizumab plus CTCA, bevacizumab plus CTFU, and aflibercept plus CTFU.

Conclusion

Multi-targeted therapy and targeted therapy plus chemotherapy are the best treatment mechanisms. TAS-102 plus bevacizumab is superior in OS, the combination of anti-VEGF drugs like bevacizumab and aflibercept with standard chemotherapy is the preferred option for CRLM patients.

Outcomes of Hepatic Artery-Based Therapies and Systemic Multiagent Chemotherapy in Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases (UCRLM) includes locoregional and systemic therapy. A comprehensive analysis capturing long-term outcomes of these treatment options has not been performed.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled outcomes of hepatic artery infusion with systemic chemotherapy (HAI-S), transarterial chemoembolization with systemic chemotherapy (TACE-S), transarterial radioembolization with systemic chemotherapy (TARE-S), doublet (FOLFOX, FOLFIRI), and triplet chemotherapy (FOLFOXIRI).

METHODS

Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), rate of conversion to resection (CTR), and response rate (RR).

RESULTS

A total of 32, 7, 9, and 14 publications were included in the HAI-S, TACE-S, and TARE-S chemotherapy arms. The 6/12/24/36-month OS estimates for HAI-S, TACE-S, TARE-S, FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFOXIRI were 97%/80%/54%/35%, 100%/83%/40%/14%, 82%/61%/34%/21%, 96%/83%/53%/36%, and 96%/93%/72%/55%. Similarly, the 6/12/24/36-month PFS estimates were 74%/44%/19%/14%, 66%/20%/9%/3%, 57%/23%/10%/3%, 69%/30%/12%/7%, and 88%/55%/18%/11%. The corresponding CTR and RR rates were 31, 20%, unmeasurable (TARE-S), 35, 53; and 49, 45, 45, 50, 80%, respectively. The majority of chemotherapy studies included first-line therapy and liver-only metastases, whereas most HAI-S studies were pretreated. On subgroup analysis in first-line setting with liver-only metastases, the HAI-S arm had comparable outcomes to FOLFOXIRI and outperformed doublet chemotherapy regimens. Although triplet chemotherapy appeared to outperform other arms, high toxicity and inclusion of potentially resectable patients must be considered while interpreting results.

CONCLUSIONS

HAI-S and multiagent chemotherapy are effective therapies for UCRLM. To make definitive conclusions, a randomized trial with comparable patient characteristics and line of therapy will be required. The upcoming EA2222 PUMP trial may help to address this question.

Nonoperative Management for Rectal Cancer

ABSTRACT

The treatment paradigm for rectal cancer has been shifting toward de-escalated approaches to preserve patient quality of life. Historically, the standard treatment in the United States for locally advanced rectal cancer has standardly comprised preoperative chemoradiotherapy coupled with total mesorectal excision. Recent data challenge this "one-size-fits-all" strategy, supporting the possibility of omitting surgery for certain patients who achieve a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. Consequently, patients and their physicians must navigate diverse neoadjuvant options, often in the context of pursuing organ preservation. Total neoadjuvant therapy, involving the administration of all chemotherapy and radiation before total mesorectal excision, is associated with the highest rates of clinical complete response. However, questions persist regarding the optimal sequencing of radiation and chemotherapy and the choice between short-course and long-course radiation. Additionally, meticulous response assessment and surveillance are critical for selecting patients for nonoperative management without compromising the excellent cure rates associated with trimodality therapy. As nonoperative management becomes increasingly recognized as a standard-of-care treatment option for patients with rectal cancer, ongoing research in patient selection and monitoring as well as patient-reported outcomes is critical to guide personalized rectal cancer management within a patient-centered framework.

Stage IV Rectal Cancer and Timing of Surgical Approach

Liver metastases are seen in at least 60% of patients with colorectal cancer at some point during the course of their disease. The management of both primary and liver disease is uniquely challenging in rectal cancer due to competing treatments and complex sequence of treatments depending on the clinical presentation of disease. Recently, several novel concepts are shaping new treatment paradigms, including changes in timing, sequence, and duration of therapies combined with potential deescalation of treatment components. Overall, the treatment of this clinical scenario mandates multidisciplinary evaluation and personalization of care; however, there is still considerable debate regarding the timing of liver metastasectomy in the context of the overall treatment plan. Herein, we will discuss the current literature on management of rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis, current treatment approaches with respect to chemotherapy, and role of hepatic artery infusion therapy.

Combination of FOLFOXIRI Drugs with Oncolytic Coxsackie B3 Virus PD-H Synergistically Induces Oncolysis in the Refractory Colorectal Cancer Cell Line Colo320

FOLFOXIRI chemotherapy is a first-line therapy for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), yet its therapeutic efficacy remains limited. Immunostimulatory therapies like oncolytic viruses can complement chemotherapies by fostering the infiltration of the tumor by immune cells and enhancing drug cytotoxicity. In this study, we explored the effect of combining the FOLFOXIRI chemotherapeutic agents with the oncolytic coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) PD-H in the CRC cell line Colo320. Additionally, we examined the impact of the drugs on the expression of microRNAs (miRs), which could be used to increase the safety of oncolytic CVB3 containing corresponding miR target sites (miR-TS). The measurement of cytotoxic activity using the Chou-Talalay combination index approach revealed that PD-H synergistically enhanced the cytotoxic activity of oxaliplatin (OX), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and SN-38. PD-H replication was not affected by OX and SN-38 but inhibited by high concentrations of 5-FU. MiR expression levels were not or only slightly elevated by the drugs or with drug/PD-H combinations on Colo320 cells. Moreover, the drug treatment did not increase the mutation rate of the miR-TS inserted into the PD-H genome. The results demonstrate that the combination of FOLFOXIRI drugs and PD-H may be a promising approach to enhance the therapeutic effect of FOLFOXIRI therapy in CRC.

ALLIANCE A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Background

Recent data have demonstrated that in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach improves compliance with chemotherapy and increases rates of tumor response compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) alone. They further indicate that the optimal sequencing of TNT involves consolidation (rather than induction) chemotherapy to optimize complete response rates. Data, largely from retrospective studies, have also shown that patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy may be managed safely with the watch and wait approach (WW) instead of preemptive total mesorectal resection (TME). However, the optimal consolidation chemotherapy regimen to achieve cCR has not been established, and a randomized clinical trial has not robustly evaluated cCR as a primary endpoint. Collaborating with a multidisciplinary oncology team and patient groups, we designed this NCI-sponsored study of chemotherapy intensification to address these issues and to drive up cCR rates, to provide opportunity for organ preservation, improve quality of life for patients and improve survival outcomes.

Methods

In this NCI-sponsored multi-group randomized, seamless phase II/III trial (1:1), up to 760 patients with LARC, T4N0, any T with node positive disease (any T, N+) or T3N0 requiring abdominoperineal resection or coloanal anastomosis and distal margin within 12 cm of anal verge will be enrolled. Stratification factors include tumor stage (T4 vs T1-3), nodal stage (N+ vs N0) and distance from anal verge (0-4; 4-8; 8-12 cm). Patients will be randomized to receive neoadjuvant long course chemoradiation (LCRT) followed by consolidation doublet (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) or triplet chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX) for 3-4 months. LCRT in both arms involves 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks + 900 cGy boost in 5 fractions with a fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine preferred). Patients will undergo assessment 8-12 (+/- 4) weeks post-TNT completion. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion will compare cCR between treatment arms. A total number of 296 evaluable patients (148 per arm) will provide statistical power of 90.5% to detect an 17% increase in cCR rate, at a one-sided alpha=0.048. The primary endpoint for the phase III portion will compare disease-free survival (DFS) between treatment arms. A total of 285 DFS events will provide 85% power to detect an effect size of hazard ratio 0.70 at a one-sided alpha of 0.025, requiring enrollment of 760 patients (380 per arm). Secondary objectives include time-to event outcomes (overall survival, organ preservation time and time to distant metastasis) and adverse effects. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, plasma and buffy coat in EDTA tubes, and serial rectal MRIs will be collected for exploratory correlative research. This study, activated in late 2022, is open across the NCTN and has a current accrual of 312. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org .

Discussion

Building off of data from modern day rectal cancer trials and patient input from national advocacy groups, we have designed the current trial studying chemotherapy intensification via a consolidation chemotherapy approach with the intent to enhance cCR and DFS rates, increase organ preservation rates, and improve quality of life for patients with rectal cancer.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05610163 ; Support includes U10CA180868 (NRG) and U10CA180888 (SWOG).

Drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with systemic therapy versus systemic therapy alone as first-line treatment for unresectable colorectal liver metastases

Purpose

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with systemic therapy to systemic therapy alone as first-line treatment for unresectable patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

Methods

From December 2017 to December 2022, patients with unresectable CRLM who received systemic therapy with or without DEB-TACE as first-line treatment were included in the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were tumor response, conversion rate and adverse events.

Results

Ninety-eight patients were enrolled in this study, including 46 patients who received systemic therapy combined with DEB-TACE (DEB-TACE group) and 52 patients who received systemic therapy alone (control group). The median PFS was elevated in the DEB-TACE group compared with the control group (12.1 months vs 8.4 months, p = 0.008). The disease control rate was increased in the DEB-TACE group compared with the control group (87.0% vs 67.3%, p = 0.022). Overall response rates (39.1% vs 25.0%; p = 0.133) and conversion rate to liver resection (33.8% vs 25.0%; p = 0.290) were no different between the two groups. The multivariate analysis showed that treatment options, size of liver metastasis, number of liver metastasis, synchronous metastases, and extrahepatic metastases were independent prognostic factor of PFS. Further subgroup analyses illustrated that PFS was beneficial with the DEB-TACE group in patients with age ≥ 60, male, left colon, synchronous metastases, bilobar, number of liver metastasis > 5, extrahepatic metastases, non-extrahepatic metastases, CEA level < 5 (ng/ml), and KRAS wild-type. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities related to DEB-TACE procedures were observed.

Conclusion

In patients with unresectable CRLM, systemic chemotherapy with DEB-TACE as first-line treatment may improve progression-free survival and disease control rate outcomes over systemic chemotherapy alone with manageable safety profile.

Multimodal Treatment of Metastatic Rectal Cancer in a Young Patient: Case Report and Literature Review

Metastatic colorectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary and individualized approach. Herein, we reported the case of a young woman diagnosed with metastatic rectal cancer who received an individualized multimodal treatment strategy that resulted in a remarkable survival. There were several particular aspects of this case, such as the early onset of the disease, the successful use of conversion therapy, the application of liquid biopsy to guide treatment, and the specific nature of the bone metastasis. To offer more insights for navigating such challenges in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, we have conducted a literature review to find more data related to the particularities of this case. The incidence of early onset colorectal cancer is on the rise. Data suggests that it differs from older-onset colorectal cancer in terms of its pathological, epidemiological, anatomical, metabolic, and biological characteristics. Conversion therapy and surgical intervention provide an opportunity for cure and improve outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to approach each case individually, as every patient with limited liver disease should be considered as a candidate for secondary resection. Moreover, liquid biopsy has an important role in the individualized management of metastatic colorectal cancer patients, as it offers additional information for treatment decisions.

First-line Palliative Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: a Population-based Analysis of Delivery and Outcomes in a Single-payer Health System

AIMS

Clinical practice guidelines recommend palliative chemotherapy for most patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, outcomes observed in the real world compared with patients enrolled in clinical trials have not been sufficiently described. The objective of this study was to evaluate the delivery and outcomes of first-line palliative chemotherapy administered to patients with colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice compared with clinical trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using linked health administrative data, we carried out a retrospective population-level cohort study on patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Ontario, Canada from 2010 to 2019. Patient, disease and treatment characteristics were summarised. The primary outcome was median overall survival, stratified by treatment prescribed and age. Demographics and outcomes in this real-world population were compared with those from pivotal clinical trials. A multivariable Cox regression model reporting hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals was used to determine factors associated with survival in patients receiving systemic treatment.

RESULTS

We identified 70 987 patients with a new diagnosis of colorectal cancer, of which 4613 received first-line chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease and formed the study cohort. Fifty-eight per cent were male and the mean age was 63 years. Most had colon cancer (69%), at least one comorbidity (73%) and lived in an urban location (79%). Less than half (47%) had surgery after diagnosis. The most common regimen prescribed was folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with bevacizumab or epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi; n = 2784, 60%). Among all treated patients, the median overall survival was 17.1 months, with survival difference by regimen [median overall survival 18.3 for FOLFIRI with bevacizumab or EGFRi, 19.6 for folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)/capecitabine, oxaliplatin (XELOX) with bevacizumab or EGFRi, 13.6 for FOLFIRI alone and 7.8 for 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine]. Patients aged >80 years were most likely to have received single-agent 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine, and had inferior overall survival compared with their younger counterparts. Compared with pivotal clinical trials, patients in the real world had inferior overall survival outcomes despite similar demographic characteristics (including age and sex).

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world population-based analysis of patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, survival outcomes were inferior to those reported in randomised trials despite similarities in age and sex. This information can be used when counselling patients in routine practice about expected outcomes.

Recent Advances in Therapeutic Strategies to Improve Colorectal Cancer Treatment

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. CRC mortality results almost exclusively from metastatic disease (mCRC) for which systemic chemotherapy is often a preferred therapeutic option. Biomarker-based stratification of mCRC enables the use of precision therapy based on individual tumor mutational profiles. Activating mutations in the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway downstream of EGFR signaling have, until recently, limited the use of EGFR-targeted therapies for mCRC; however, the development of anti-RAS and anti-RAF therapies together with improved strategies to limit compensatory signaling pathways is resulting in improved survival rates in several highly lethal mCRC sub-types (e.g., BRAF-mutant). The use of fluoropyrimidine (FP)-based chemotherapy regimens to treat mCRC continues to evolve contributing to improved long-term survival. Future advances in chemotherapy for mCRC will need to position development relative to the advances made in precision oncology.

Effectiveness of Standard Treatment for Stage 4 Colorectal Cancer: Traditional Management with Surgery, Radiation, and Chemotherapy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the United States comprising 7.9% of all new cancer diagnoses and 8.6% of all cancer deaths. The combined 5-year relative survival rate for all stages is 65.1% but in its most aggressive form, stage 4 CRC has a 5-year relative survival rate of just 15.1%. For most with stage 4 CRC, treatment is palliative not curative, with the goal to prolong overall survival and maintain an acceptable quality of life. The identification of unique cancer genomic and biologic markers allows patient-specific treatment options. Treatment of stage 4 CRC consists of systemic therapy with chemotherapeutic agents, surgical resection if feasible, potentially including resection of metastasis, palliative radiation in select settings, and targeted therapy toward growth factors. Despite advances in surgical and medical management, metastatic CRC remains a challenging clinical problem associated with poor prognosis and low overall survival.

A phase-II study based on dose adjustment according to UGT1A1 polymorphism: is irinotecan underdosed in first-line FOLFIRI regimen for mCRC?

PURPOSE

Irinotecan has considerable importance in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). UDP-glucoronyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 is responsible for the inactivation of SN-38, a metabolite of irinotecan. Depending on UGT1A1 polymorphism, the activity of the UGT enzyme can be reduced leading to more frequent occurrence of adverse events related to irinotecan. The present study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of different doses of irinotecan adjusted according to UGT1A1 polymorphism.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients treated with FOLFIRI as first-line treatment for mCRC were included in this study. The irinotecan dosage was adapted on the basis of UGT1A1 polymorphisms: *1/*1 (370 mg/m2); *1/*28 (310 mg/m2), and *28/*28 (180 mg/m2). The incidence of grades 3 and 4 toxicities (neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhoea) was recorded. Response was assessed according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria.

RESULTS

On the basis of UGT1A1 genotyping, 20 patients were *1/*1 (58.8%), 12 were *1/*28 (35.3%) and 2 were *28/*28 (5.9%). Seven patients experienced at least one severe toxicity, i.e., 21% of the population, amounting to eleven adverse events. Concerning the response rate, 15 patients (44%) had partial or complete response.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that mCRC patients treated with FOLFIRI can tolerate a higher dose of irinotecan than the standard dose, i.e., > 180 mg/m2, on the basis of their UGT1A1 genotype, without increased toxicities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01963182 (registered on 16/10/2013, Clermont-Ferrand, France).

The effective combination therapies with irinotecan for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer worldwide and has become one of the major human disease burdens. In clinical practice, the treatment of colorectal cancer has been closely related to the use of irinotecan. Irinotecan combines with many other anticancer drugs and has a broader range of drug combinations. Combination therapy is one of the most important means of improving anti-tumor efficacy and overcoming drug resistance. Reasonable combination therapy can lead to better patient treatment options, and inappropriate combination therapy will increase patient risk. For the colorectal therapeutic field, the significance of combination therapy is to improve the efficacy, reduce the adverse effects, and improve the ease of treatment. Therefore, we explored the clinical advantages of its combination therapy based on mechanism or metabolism and reviewed the rationale basis and its limitations in conducting exploratory clinical trials on irinotecan combination therapy, including the results of clinical trials on the combination potentiation of cytotoxic drugs, targeted agents, and herbal medicine. We hope that these can evoke more efforts to conduct irinotecan in the laboratory for further studies and evaluations, as well as the possibility of more in-depth development in future clinical trials.

Efficacy and quality of life for FOLFOX/bevacizumab +/- irinotecan in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer-final results of the AIO CHARTA trial

BACKGROUND

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab has demonstrated benefits for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, challenges arise in its clinical implementation due to expected side effects and a lack of stratification criteria.

METHODS

The AIO "CHARTA" trial randomised mCRC patients into clinical Group 1 (potentially resectable), 2 (unresectable/risk of rapid progression), or 3 (asymptomatic). They received FOLFOX/bevacizumab +/- irinotecan. The primary endpoint was the 9-month progression-free survival rate (PFSR@9). Secondary endpoints included efficacy in stratified groups, QoL, PFS, OS, ORR, secondary resection rate, and toxicity.

RESULTS

The addition of irinotecan to FOLFOX/bevacizumab increased PFSR@9 from 56 to 67%, meeting the primary endpoint. The objective response rate was 61% vs. 69% (P = 0.21) and median PFS was 10.3 vs. 12 months (HR 0.83; P = 0.17). The PFS was (11.4 vs. 12.9 months; HR 0.83; P = 0.46) in potentially resectable patients, with a secondary resection rate of 37% vs. 51%. Moreover, Group 3 (asymptomatic) patients had a PFS of 11.1 vs. 16.1 months (HR 0.6; P = 0.14). The addition of irinotecan did not diminish QoL.

CONCLUSION

The CHARTA trial, along with other studies, confirms the efficacy and tolerability of FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for mCRC. Importantly, clinical stratification may lead to its implementation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered as NCT01321957.

The Use of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy for Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in men and women (Siegel et al. in CA Cancer J Clin 72(1):7-33). Over one-half of newly diagnosed individuals will develop liver metastases. Among those with liver-only metastatic disease, only about one in five will be candidates for potentially curable resection.

Artemisia annua L. Polyphenols Enhance the Anticancer Effect of β-Lapachone in Oxaliplatin-Resistant HCT116 Colorectal Cancer Cells

Recent studies suggest that the anticancer activity of β-lapachone (β-Lap) could be improved by different types of bioactive phytochemicals. The aim of this study was to elucidate how the anticancer effect of β-Lap is regulated by polyphenols extracted from Korean Artemisia annua L. (pKAL) in parental HCT116 and oxaliplatin-resistant (OxPt-R) HCT116 colorectal cancer cells. Here, we show that the anticancer effect of β-Lap is more enhanced by pKAL in HCT116-OxPt-R cells than in HCT116 cells via a CCK-8 assay, Western blot, and phase-contrast microscopy analysis of hematoxylin-stained cells. This phenomenon was associated with the suppression of OxPt-R-related upregulated proteins including p53 and β-catenin, the downregulation of cell survival proteins including TERT, CD44, and EGFR, and the upregulation of cleaved HSP90, γ-H2AX, and LC3B-I/II. A bioinformatics analysis of 21 proteins regulated by combined treatment of pKAL and β-Lap in HCT116-OxPt-R cells showed that the enhanced anticancer effect of β-Lap by pKAL was related to the inhibition of negative regulation of apoptotic process and the induction of DNA damage through TERT, CD44, and EGFR-mediated multiple signaling networks. Our results suggest that the combination of pKAL and β-Lap could be used as a new therapy with low toxicity to overcome the OxPt-R that occurred in various OxPt-containing cancer treatments.