Spatial- and temporal-restricted pattern for amelogenin gene expression during mouse molar tooth organogenesis

ROS-Mediated Enamel Formation Disturbance Characterized by Alternative Cervical Loop Cell Proliferation and Downregulation of RhoA/ROCK in Ameloblasts

Reactive oxygen stress (ROS) is generally accepted as a signal transducer for coordinating the growth and differentiation of tissues and organs in the oral and maxillofacial region. Although ROS has been confirmed to affect the development of enamel, it is not yet known that the specific mechanism of ROS accumulation induced enamel defects. Given the lack of knowledge of the role of ROS in enamel, the aim of the study is to determine how oxidative stress affects cervical cells and ameloblast cells. Using SOD1 knockout mice, we identified a relationship between ROS fluctuations and abnormal enamel structure with HE staining, micro-CT, and scanning electron microscope. Increased ROS induced by H2O2, certified by the DCFH probe, has resulted in a dual effect on the proliferation and differentiation of cervical cells, indicating a higher tendency to proliferate at low ROS concentrations. Ameloblasts transfected with SOD1 siRNA showed a significant reduction of RhoA and ROCK. This study investigates for the first time that SOD1-mediated ROS accumulation disrupted normal enamel structure through alternative cervical loop cell proliferation and downregulation of RhoA and ROCK in ameloblasts, demonstrating the convoluted role of ROS in monitoring the progress of enamel defects.

A Novel AMELX Mutation, Its Phenotypic Features, and Skewed X Inactivation

Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a group of genetic disorders of defective dental enamel. Mutation of AMELX encoding amelogenin on the X chromosome is a major cause of AI. Here we report a Chinese family with hypoplastic and hypomineralized AI. Whole exome analysis revealed a novel mutation c.185delC in exon 5 of AMELX causing the frame shift p.Pro62ArgfsTer47 (or p.Pro62Argfs*47). By sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products and T-vector clones, the mutation was confirmed as homozygous in the proband, hemizygous in her father, and heterozygous in her mother. The proband and her father had small and yellowish teeth with thin and rough enamel that was radiographically indistinguishable from the underlying dentin. Scanning electronic microscopy of 1 maternal tooth showed cracks and exposed loosely packed enamel prisms in affected areas. Consistent with a 25:75 skewing of X inactivation in the peripheral blood DNA as measured by androgen receptor allele methylation, the surface of the mother’s tooth had alternating vertical ridges of transparent normal and white chalky enamel in a 34:66 ratio. In summary, this study provides one of the few phenotypic comparisons of hemizygous and homozygous AMELX mutations and suggests that the skewing of X inactivation in AI contributes to the phenotypic variations in heterozygous carriers of X-linked AI.

DENTAL ENAMEL FORMATION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ORAL HEALTH AND DISEASE

Dental enamel is the hardest and most mineralized tissue in extinct and extant vertebrate species and provides maximum durability that allows teeth to function as weapons and/or tools as well as for food processing. Enamel development and mineralization is an intricate process tightly regulated by cells of the enamel organ called ameloblasts. These heavily polarized cells form a monolayer around the developing enamel tissue and move as a single forming front in specified directions as they lay down a proteinaceous matrix that serves as a template for crystal growth. Ameloblasts maintain intercellular connections creating a semi-permeable barrier that at one end (basal/proximal) receives nutrients and ions from blood vessels, and at the opposite end (secretory/apical/distal) forms extracellular crystals within specified pH conditions. In this unique environment, ameloblasts orchestrate crystal growth via multiple cellular activities including modulating the transport of minerals and ions, pH regulation, proteolysis, and endocytosis. In many vertebrates, the bulk of the enamel tissue volume is first formed and subsequently mineralized by these same cells as they retransform their morphology and function. Cell death by apoptosis and regression are the fates of many ameloblasts following enamel maturation, and what cells remain of the enamel organ are shed during tooth eruption, or are incorporated into the tooth's epithelial attachment to the oral gingiva. In this review, we examine key aspects of dental enamel formation, from its developmental genesis to the ever-increasing wealth of data on the mechanisms mediating ionic transport, as well as the clinical outcomes resulting from abnormal ameloblast function.

Resolving stem and progenitor cells in the adult mouse incisor through gene co-expression analysis

Investigations into stem cell-fueled renewal of an organ benefit from an inventory of cell type-specific markers and a deep understanding of the cellular diversity within stem cell niches. Using the adult mouse incisor as a model for a continuously renewing organ, we performed an unbiased analysis of gene co-expression relationships to identify modules of co-expressed genes that represent differentiated cells, transit-amplifying cells, and residents of stem cell niches. Through in vivo lineage tracing, we demonstrated the power of this approach by showing that co-expression module members Lrig1 and Igfbp5 define populations of incisor epithelial and mesenchymal stem cells. We further discovered that two adjacent mesenchymal tissues, the periodontium and dental pulp, are maintained by distinct pools of stem cells. These findings reveal novel mechanisms of incisor renewal and illustrate how gene co-expression analysis of intact biological systems can provide insights into the transcriptional basis of cellular identity.

Enamel ribbons, surface nodules, and octacalcium phosphate in C57BL/6 Amelx-/- mice and Amelx+/- lyonization

BACKGROUND

Amelogenin is required for normal enamel formation and is the most abundant protein in developing enamel.

METHODS

Amelx^+/+, Amelx^+/- , and Amelx^-/- molars and incisors from C57BL/6 mice were characterized using RT-PCR, Western blotting, dissecting and light microscopy, immunohistochemistry (IHC), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), backscattered SEM (bSEM), nanohardness testing, and X-ray diffraction.

RESULTS

No amelogenin protein was detected by Western blot analyses of enamel extracts from Amelx^-/- mice. Amelx^-/- incisor enamel averaged 20.3 ± 3.3 μm in thickness, or only 1/6th that of the wild type (122.3 ± 7.9 μm). Amelx^-/- incisor enamel nanohardness was 1.6 Gpa, less than half that of wild-type enamel (3.6 Gpa). Amelx^+/- incisors and molars showed vertical banding patterns unique to each tooth. IHC detected no amelogenin in Amelx^-/- enamel and varied levels of amelogenin in Amelx^+/- incisors, which correlated positively with enamel thickness, strongly supporting lyonization as the cause of the variations in enamel thickness. TEM analyses showed characteristic mineral ribbons in Amelx^+/+ and Amelx^-/- enamel extending from mineralized dentin collagen to the ameloblast. The Amelx^-/- enamel ribbons were not well separated by matrix and appeared to fuse together, forming plates. X-ray diffraction determined that the predominant mineral in Amelx^-/- enamel is octacalcium phosphate (not calcium hydroxyapatite). Amelx^-/- ameloblasts were similar to wild-type ameloblasts except no Tomes' processes extended into the thin enamel. Amelx^-/- and Amelx^+/- molars both showed calcified nodules on their occlusal surfaces. Histology of D5 and D11 developing molars showed nodules forming during the maturation stage.

CONCLUSION

Amelogenin forms a resorbable matrix that separates and supports, but does not shape early secretory-stage enamel ribbons. Amelogenin may facilitate the conversion of enamel ribbons into hydroxyapatite by inhibiting the formation of octacalcium phosphate. Amelogenin is necessary for thickening the enamel layer, which helps maintain ribbon organization and development and maintenance of the Tomes' process.

Gastrin-releasing peptide expression and its effect on the calcification of developing mouse incisor

Gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) is considered to be one of the cancer growth factors. This peptide's receptor (GRPR) is known as a G protein-coupled receptor, regulating intracellular calcium storage and releasing signals. This study is the first to investigate the function of GRP during mouse incisor development. We hypothesized that GRP is one of the factors that affects the regulation of calcification during tooth development. To verify the expression pattern of GRP, in situ hybridization was processed during incisor development. GRP was expressed at the late bell stage and hard tissue formation stage in the epithelial tissue. To identify the genuine function of GRP during incisor development, a gain-of-function analysis was performed. After GRP overexpression in culture, the phenotype of ameloblasts, odontoblasts and predentin was altered compared to control group. Moreover, enamel and dentin thickness was increased after renal capsule transplantation of GRP-overexpressed incisors. With these results, we suggest that GRP plays a significant role in the formation of enamel and dentin by regulating ameloblasts and predentin formation, respectively. Thus, GRP signaling is strongly related to calcium acquisition and secretion during mouse incisor development.

MSX2 in ameloblast cell fate and activity

While many effectors have been identified in enamel matrix and cells via genetic studies, physiological networks underlying their expression levels and thus the natural spectrum of enamel thickness and degree of mineralization are now just emerging. Several transcription factors are candidates for enamel gene expression regulation and thus the control of enamel quality. Some of these factors, such as MSX2, are mainly confined to the dental epithelium. MSX2 homeoprotein controls several stages of the ameloblast life cycle. This chapter introduces MSX2 and its target genes in the ameloblast and provides an overview of knowledge regarding its effects in vivo in transgenic mouse models. Currently available in vitro data on the role of MSX2 as a transcription factor and its links to other players in ameloblast gene regulation are considered. MSX2 modulations are relevant to the interplay between developmental, hormonal and environmental pathways and in vivo investigations, notably in the rodent incisor, have provided insight into dental physiology. Indeed, in vivo models are particularly promising for investigating enamel formation and MSX2 function in ameloblast cell fate. MSX2 may be central to the temporal-spatial restriction of enamel protein production by the dental epithelium and thus regulation of enamel quality (thickness and mineralization level) under physiological and pathological conditions. Studies on MSX2 show that amelogenesis is not an isolated process but is part of the more general physiology of coordinated dental-bone complex growth.

Conservation of amelogenin gene expression during tetrapod evolution

Well studied in mammals, amelogenesis is less known at the molecular level in reptiles and amphibians. In the course of extensive studies of enamel matrix protein (EMP) evolution in tetrapods, we look for correlation between changes in protein sequences and temporospatial protein gene expression during amelogenesis, using an evo-devo approach. Our target is the major EMP, amelogenin (AMEL) that plays a crucial role in enamel structure. We focused here our attention to an amphibian, the salamander Pleurodeles waltl. RNAs were extracted from the lower jaws of a juvenile P. waltl and the complete AMEL sequence was obtained using PCR and RACE PCR. The alignment of P. waltl AMEL with other tetrapodan (frogs, reptiles and mammals) sequences revealed residue conservation in the N- and C-terminal regions, and a highly variable central region. Using sense and anti-sense probes synthetized from the P. waltl AMEL sequence, we performed in situ hybridization on sections during amelogenesis in larvae, juveniles, and adults. We demonstrated that (i) AMEL expression was always found to be restricted to ameloblasts, (ii) the expression pattern was conserved through ontogeny, even in larvae where enameloid is present in addition to enamel, and (iii) the processes are similar to those described in lizards and mammals. These findings indicate that high variations in the central region of AMEL have not modified its temporospatial expression during amelogenesis for 360 million years of tetrapod evolution.

Successful reconstruction of tooth germ with cell lines requires coordinated gene expressions from the initiation stage

Tooth morphogenesis is carried out by a series of reciprocal interactions between the epithelium and mesenchyme in embryonic germs. Previously clonal dental epithelial cell (epithelium of molar tooth germ (emtg)) lines were established from an embryonic germ. They were odontogenic when combined with a dental mesenchymal tissue, although the odontogenesis was quantitatively imperfect. To improve the microenvironment in the germs, freshly isolated dental epithelial cells were mixed with cells of lines, and germs were reconstructed in various combinations. The results demonstrated that successful tooth construction depends on the mixing ratio, the age of dental epithelial cells and the combination with cell lines. Analyses of gene expression in these germs suggest that some signal(s) from dental epithelial cells makes emtg cells competent to communicate with mesenchymal cells and the epithelial and mesenchymal compartments are able to progress odontogenesis from the initiation stage.

Binding of amelogenin to MMP-9 and their co-expression in developing mouse teeth

Amelogenin is the most abundant matrix protein in enamel. Proper amelogenin processing by proteinases is necessary for its biological functions during amelogenesis. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) is responsible for the turnover of matrix components. The relationship between MMP-9 and amelogenin during tooth development remains unknown. We tested the hypothesis that MMP-9 binds to amelogenin and they are co-expressed in ameloblasts during amelogenesis. We evaluated the distribution of both proteins in the mouse teeth using immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy. At postnatal day 2, the spatial distribution of amelogenin and MMP-9 was co-localized in preameloblasts, secretory ameloblasts, enamel matrix and odontoblasts. At the late stages of mouse tooth development, expression patterns of amelogenin and MMP-9 were similar to that seen in postnatal day 2. Their co-expression was further confirmed by RT-PCR, Western blot and enzymatic zymography analyses in enamel organ epithelial and odontoblast-like cells. Immunoprecipitation assay revealed that MMP-9 binds to amelogenin. The MMP-9 cleavage sites in amelogenin proteins across species were found using bio-informative software program. Analyses of these data suggest that MMP-9 may be involved in controlling amelogenin processing and enamel formation.

Enamel protein regulation and dental and periodontal physiopathology in MSX2 mutant mice

Signaling pathways that underlie postnatal dental and periodontal physiopathology are less studied than those of early tooth development. Members of the muscle segment homeobox gene (Msx) family encode homeoproteins that show functional redundancy during development and are known to be involved in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions that lead to crown morphogenesis and ameloblast cell differentiation. This study analyzed the MSX2 protein during mouse postnatal growth as well as in the adult. The analysis focused on enamel and periodontal defects and enamel proteins in Msx2-null mutant mice. In the epithelial lifecycle, the levels of MSX2 expression and enamel protein secretion were inversely related. Msx2+/- mice showed increased amelogenin expression, enamel thickness, and rod size. Msx2-/- mice displayed compound phenotypic characteristics of enamel defects, related to both enamel-specific gene mutations (amelogenin and enamelin) in isolated amelogenesis imperfecta, and cell-cell junction elements (laminin 5 and cytokeratin 5) in other syndromes. These effects were also related to ameloblast disappearance, which differed between incisors and molars. In Msx2-/- roots, Malassez cells formed giant islands that overexpressed amelogenin and ameloblastin that grew over months. Aberrant expression of enamel proteins is proposed to underlie the regional osteopetrosis and hyperproduction of cellular cementum. These enamel and periodontal phenotypes of Msx2 mutants constitute the first case report of structural and signaling defects associated with enamel protein overexpression in a postnatal context.

Thickness and microhardness of deciduous tooth enamel with known DLX3 mutation

AIM

To investigate the thickness and hardness of teeth affected by a 2-bp deletion (c.561_562delCT) in the DLX3 gene.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Extracted maxillary deciduous second molar was collected from the affected individual at age 12 years 7 months. Samples were sectioned buccolingually after embedding in epoxy resin. We measured the enamel thickness and microhardness and performed an elemental analysis using an electron probe microanalyser.

RESULTS

On average, the hardness of the enamel with a 2-bp deletion in DLX3 was about 53% of normal enamel hardness. The mutant enamel thickness was about half of the thickness of the normal control. The calcium level in the enamel with the 2-bp deletion was slightly decreased, while the magnesium level was slightly increased, in comparison to levels measured for normal teeth.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that enamel affected by a 2-bp deletion in DLX3 has reduced thickness as well as diminished microhardness. These data may explain the severe attrition and interdental spacing observed in affected individuals.

Ctip2/Bcl11b controls ameloblast formation during mammalian odontogenesis

The transcription factor Ctip2/Bcl11b plays essential roles in developmental processes of the immune and central nervous systems and skin. Here we show that Ctip2 also plays a key role in tooth development. Ctip2 is highly expressed in the ectodermal components of the developing tooth, including inner and outer enamel epithelia, stellate reticulum, stratum intermedium, and the ameloblast cell lineage. In Ctip2(-/-) mice, tooth morphogenesis appeared to proceed normally through the cap stage but developed multiple defects at the bell stage. Mutant incisors and molars were reduced in size and exhibited hypoplasticity of the stellate reticulum. An ameloblast-like cell population developed ectopically on the lingual aspect of mutant lower incisors, and the morphology, polarization, and adhesion properties of ameloblasts on the labial side of these teeth were severely disrupted. Perturbations of gene expression were also observed in the mandible of Ctip2(-/-) mice: expression of the ameloblast markers amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin was down-regulated, as was expression of Msx2 and epiprofin, transcription factors implicated in the tooth development and ameloblast differentiation. These results suggest that Ctip2 functions as a critical regulator of epithelial cell fate and differentiation during tooth morphogenesis.

Physiological implications of DLX homeoproteins in enamel formation

Tooth development is a complex process including successive stages of initiation, morphogenesis, and histogenesis. The role of the Dlx family of homeobox genes during the early stages of tooth development has been widely analyzed, while little data has been reported on their role in dental histogenesis. The expression pattern of Dlx2 has been described in the mouse incisor; an inverse linear relationship exists between the level of Dlx2 expression and enamel thickness, suggesting a role for Dlx2 in regulation of ameloblast differentiation and activity. In vitro data have revealed that DLX homeoproteins are able to regulate the expression of matrix proteins such as osteocalcin. The aim of the present study was to analyze the expression and function of Dlx genes during amelogenesis. Analysis of Dlx2/LacZ transgenic reporter mice, Dlx2 and Dlx1/Dlx2 null mutant mice, identified spatial variations in Dlx2 expression within molar tooth germs and suggests a role for Dlx2 in the organization of preameloblastic cells as a palisade in the labial region of molars. Later, during the secretory and maturation stages of amelogenesis, the expression pattern in molars was found to be similar to that described in incisors. The expression patterns of the other Dlx genes were examined in incisors and compared to Dlx2. Within the ameloblasts Dlx3 and Dlx6 are expressed constantly throughout presecretory, secretory, and maturation stages; during the secretory phase when Dlx2 is transitorily switched off, Dlx1 expression is upregulated. These data suggest a role for DLX homeoproteins in the morphological control of enamel. Sequence analysis of the amelogenin gene promoter revealed five potential responsive elements for DLX proteins that are shown to be functional for DLX2. Regulation of amelogenin in ameloblasts may be one method by which DLX homeoproteins may control enamel formation. To conclude, this study establishes supplementary functions of Dlx family members during tooth development: the participation in establishment of dental epithelial functional organization and the control of enamel morphogenesis via regulation of amelogenin expression.

Epithelial fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 regulates enamel formation

The interaction between epithelial and mesenchymal tissues plays a critical role in the development of organs such as teeth, lungs, and hair. During tooth development, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling is critical for regulating reciprocal epithelial and mesenchymal interactions. FGF signaling requires FGF ligands and their receptors (FGFRs). In this study, we investigated the role of epithelial FGF signaling in tooth development, using the Cre-loxp system to create tissue-specific inactivation of Fgfr1 in mice. In K14-Cre;Fgfr1(fl/fl) mice, the apical sides of enamel-secreting ameloblasts failed to adhere properly to each other, although ameloblast differentiation was unaffected at early stages. Prior to eruption, enamel structure was compromised in the K14-Cre;Fgfr1(fl/fl) mice and displayed severe enamel defects that mimic amelogenesis imperfecta (AI), with a rough, irregular enamel surface. These results suggest that there is a cell-autonomous requirement for FGF signaling in the dental epithelium during enamel formation. Loss of Fgfr1 affects ameloblast organization at the enamel-secretory stage and, hence, the formation of enamel.

Changes in gene-expression during development of the murine molar tooth germ

In a matter of a few days the murine tooth germ develops into a complex, mineralized, structure. Murine 30K microarrays were used to examine gene expression in the mandibular first molar tooth germs isolated at 15.5dpc and at 2DPN. Microarray results were validated using real-time RT-PCR. The results suggested that only 25 genes (3 without known functions) exhibited significantly higher expression at 15.5dpc compared to 2DPN. In contrast, almost 1400 genes exhibited significantly (P<0.015) higher expression at 2DPN compared to 15.5dpc, about half of which were genes with unknown functions. More than 50 of the 783 known genes exhibited higher than 10-fold increase in expression at 2DPN, amongst these were genes coding for enamel matrix proteins which were expressed several 100-fold higher at 2DPN. GO and KEGG analysis showed highly significant associations between families of the 783 known genes and cellular functions relating to energy metabolism, protein metabolism, regulation of cell division, cell growth and apoptosis. The use of bioinformatics analysis therefore yielded a functional profile in agreement with known differences in tissue morphology and cellular composition between these two stages. Such data is therefore useful in directing attention towards genes, or cellular activities, which likely are worthy of further studies as regards their involvement in odontogenesis.

CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein delta (C/EBPdelta) maintains amelogenin expression in the absence of C/EBPalpha in vivo

C/EBPalpha is implicated to regulate mouse amelogenin gene expression during tooth enamel formation in vitro. Because enamel formation occurs during postnatal development and C/EBPalpha-deficient mice die at birth, we used the Cre/loxP recombination system to characterize amelogenin expression in C/EBPalpha conditional knock-out mice. Mice carrying the Cre transgene under the control of the human keratin-14 promoter show robust Cre expression in the ameloblast cell lineage. Mating between mice bearing the floxed C/EBPalpha allele with keratin-14-Cre mice generate C/EBPalpha conditional knock-out mice. Real-time PCR analysis shows that removal of one C/EBPalpha allele from the molar enamel epithelial organ of 3-day postnatal mice results in dramatic decrease in endogenous C/EBPalpha mRNA levels and coordinately altered amelogenin mRNA abundance. Conditional deletion of both C/EBPalpha alleles further diminishes C/EBPalpha mRNA levels; however, rather than ablating amelogenin expression, we observe wild-type amelogenin mRNA abundance levels. We examined C/EBPbeta and nuclear factor YA expression, two transcription factors that had previously been shown to modestly participate in amelogenin expression, in vitro but found no significant changes in either of their mRNA abundance levels comparing conditional knock-out mice with wild-type counterparts. Although the abundance of C/EBPdelta is also unchanged in C/EBPalpha conditional knock-out mice, in vitro we find that C/EBPdelta activates the mouse amelogenin promoter and synergistically cooperates with nuclear factor Y, suggesting that C/EBPdelta can functionally substitute for C/EBPalpha to produce an enamel matrix competent to direct biomineralization.

A new locus for autosomal dominant amelogenesis imperfecta on chromosome 8q24.3

Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a collective term used to describe phenotypically diverse forms of defective tooth enamel development. AI has been reported to exhibit a variety of inheritance patterns, and several loci have been identified that are associated with AI. We have performed a genome-wide scan in a large Brazilian family segregating an autosomal dominant form of AI and mapped a novel locus to 8q24.3. A maximum multipoint LOD score of 7.5 was obtained at marker D8S2334 (146,101,309 bp). The disease locus lies in a 1.9 cM (2.1 Mb) region according to the Rutgers Combined Linkage-Physical map, between a VNTR marker (at 143,988,705 bp) and the telomere (146,274,826 bp). Ten candidate genes were identified based on gene ontology and microarray-facilitated gene selection using the expression of murine orthologues in dental tissue, and examined for the presence of a mutation. However, no causative mutation was identified.

Cloning, sequencing, and expression of the amelogenin gene in two scincid lizards

Our knowledge of the gene coding for amelogenin, the major enamel protein, is mainly based on mammalian sequences. Only two sequences are available in reptiles. To know whether the snake sequence is representative of the amelogenin condition in squamates, we have studied amelogenin in two scincid lizards. Lizard amelogenin possesses numerous conserved residues in the N- and C-terminal regions, but its central region is highly variable, even when compared with the snake sequence. This rapid evolution rate indicates that a single squamate sequence was not representative, and that comparative studies of reptilian amelogenins might be useful to detect the residues which are really important for amelogenin structure and function. Reptilian and mammalian enamel structure is roughly similar, but no data support amelogenin being similarly expressed during amelogenesis. By performing in situ hybridization using a specific probe, we showed that lizard ameloblasts express amelogenin as described during mammalian amelogenesis. However, we have not found amelogenin transcripts in odontoblasts. This indicates that full-length amelogenin is specific to enamel matrix, at least in this lizard.

Establishment of primary cultures for mouse ameloblasts as a model of their lifetime

To understand how the properties of ameloblasts are spatiotemporally regulated during amelogenesis, two primary cultures of ameloblasts in different stages of differentiation were established from mouse enamel epithelium. Mouse primary ameloblasts (MPAs) prepared from immature enamel epithelium (MPA-I) could proliferate, whereas those from mature enamel epithelium (MPA-M) could not. MPA-M but not MPA-I caused apoptosis during culture. The mRNA expression of amelogenin, a marker of immature ameloblasts, was down-regulated, and that of enamel matrix serine proteiase-1, a marker of mature ameloblasts, was induced in MPA-I during culture. Using green fluorescence protein as a reporter, a visualized reporter system was established to analyze the promoter activity of the amelogenin gene. The region between -1102bp and -261bp was required for the reporter expression in MPA-I. These results suggest that MPAs are valuable in vitro models for investigation of ameloblast biology, and that the visualized system is useful for promoter analysis in MPAs.

NF-Y and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha synergistically activate the mouse amelogenin gene

Amelogenin is the major protein component of the forming enamel matrix. In situ hybridization revealed a periodicity for amelogenin mRNA hybridization signals ranging from low to high transcript abundance on serial sections of developing mouse teeth. This in vivo observation led us to examine the amelogenin promoter for the activity of transcription factor(s) that account for this expression aspect of the regulation for the amelogenin gene. We have previously shown that CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPalpha) is a potent transactivator of the mouse X-chromosomal amelogenin gene acting at the C/EBPalpha cis-element located in the -70/+52 minimal promoter. The minimal promoter contains a reversed CCAAT box (-58/-54) that is four base pairs downstream from the C/EBPalpha binding site. Similar to the C/EBPalpha binding site, the integrity of the reversed CCAAT box is also required for maintaining the activity of the basal promoter. We therefore focused on transcription factors that interact with the reversed CCAAT box. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays we demonstrated that NF-Y was directly bound to this reversed CCAAT site. Co-transfection of C/EBPalpha and NF-Y synergistically increased the promoter activity. In contrast, increased expression of NF-Y alone had only marginal effects on the promoter. A dominant-negative DNA binding-deficient NF-Y mutant (NF-YAm29) dramatically decreased the promoter activity both in the absence or presence of exogenous expression of C/EBPalpha. We identified protein-protein interactions between C/EBPalpha and NF-Y by a co-immunoprecipitation analysis. These results suggest that C/EBPalpha and NF-Y synergistically activate the mouse amelogenin gene and can contribute to its physiological regulation during amelogenesis.

Targeted disruption of two small leucine-rich proteoglycans, biglycan and decorin, excerpts divergent effects on enamel and dentin formation

Small leucine-rich proteoglycans have been suggested to affect mineralization of dental hard tissues. To determine the functions of two of these small proteoglycans during the early stages of tooth formation, we characterized the dental phenotypes of biglycan (BGN KO) and decorin deficient (DCN KO) mice and compared them to that of wild type mice. Each targeted gene disruption resulted in specific effects on dentin and enamel formation. Dentin was hypomineralized in both knock out mice, although the effect was more prominent in the absence of decorin. Enamel formation was dramatically increased in newborn biglycan knockout mice but delayed in absence of decorin. Increased enamel formation in the former case resulted from an upregulation of amelogenin synthesis whereas delayed enamel formation in the later case was most probably an indirect consequence of the high porosity of the underlying dentin. Enamelin expression was unchanged in BGN KO, and reduced in DCN KO. Dentin sialoprotein (DSP), a member of the family of phosphorylated extracellular matrix proteins that play a role in dentinogenesis, was overexpressed in BGN-KO odontoblasts and in the sub-odontoblastic layer. In contrast, a decreased expression of DSP was detected in DCN KO. Dentin matrix protein-1 (DMP-1), bone sialoprotein (BSP) and osteopontin (OPN) were upregulated in BGN KO and downregulated in the DCN KO. Despite the strong effects induced by these deficiencies in newborn mice, no significant difference was detected between the three genotypes in adult mice, suggesting that the effects reported here in newborn mice are transient and subjected to self-repair.

Analysis of amelogenin gene (AMGX, AMGY) expression in ameloblastoma

Although the amelogenin gene is expressed in ameloblastoma, the precise expression pattern of X and Y amelogenin genes (AMGX, AMGY) in this tumor has not yet been identified. In this study, we analyzed amelogenin gene expression in 19 samples (9 male, 10 female) of oral ameloblastomas by RT-PCR and detect the chromosomal origin of amelogenin mRNA by restriction enzyme digestion of the RT-PCR product. All tumor samples expressed amelogenin mRNA. We could detect increased level of AMGY expression in all male samples, higher than that of AMEX. It is an interesting finding as in normal male tooth development, the expression of AMGY is very much lower than that of AMGX. We postulate that epigenetic change of sex chromosomes may have some correlations with tumorigenesis of ameloblastoma. We also discuss the other possible mechanisms and points for future studies on this change in expression pattern.

The induction of enamel and dentin complexes by subcutaneous implantation of reconstructed human and murine tooth germ elements

Tooth induction by xenogenic graft of reconstructed human tooth germ components has never been attempted. Here we report our first attempt at a transplantation of human tooth germ components, heterologously recombined with mouse dental epithelia, into immunocompromised animals. Human third molar tooth germs enucleated from young patients as prophylactic treatment for orthodontic reasons were collected. The whole or minced human dental papilla was reconstructed with human- or mouse molar enamel epithelium, and transplanted in the dorsal aspect of C.B-17/Icr-scid Jcl mice. The transplant of human dental papilla reconstructed with human enamel epithelium formed thin dentin and immature enamel layers by 3 to 4 weeks, but remained extremely small in quantity due to a shortage of epithelial components in the graft. The addition of E16 mouse molar enamel organs (n=10-12) to each graft augmented the formation of tooth germ-like structures, but the differentiation of mouse molar ameloblasts was suppressed. However, once a solid layer of mineralized dentin was established, mouse ameloblasts accelerated their differentiation, and completed the enamel matrix formation and maturation within the following 4 weeks, whereas human ameloblasts, which had interacted with human dental papilla, remained in the stage of matrix formation during the same period. These data imply that, in reconstructed transplants, the differentiation of mouse dental epithelia is restrained by putative suppressive factors derived from human dental papilla until they are separated by mineralized dentin layers that serve as a diffusion barrier. The mouse enamel organ nevertheless retains its own phenotypic characteristics and intrinsic timing of cell differentiation and function.

mRNA expression and phenotype of odontogenic tumours in the v-Ha-ras transgenic mouse

Ameloblastomas are the most common odontogenic neoplasia in humans, and although typically considered locally invasive and benign, frequently recur subsequent to surgical resection. The Tg.AC transgenic mouse carrying the v-Ha-ras oncogene has been found to spontaneously develop ameloblastoma-like tumours (35% by 1 year of age) that are rare in the wild type FVB background strain.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to characterise the mRNA expression of genes in the mouse tumours that are either expressed in human ameloblastomas or essential for normal odontogenesis and to correlate the expression to the histological phenotype.

STUDY METHODS

Histological, immunohistochemical and RT-PCR studies were used to evaluate clinically demonstrable odontogenic tumours occurring spontaneously in seven Tg.AC v-Ha-ras transgenic mice (homozygous, at 7 months of age or heterozygous at 11 months of age).

RESULTS

Most genes profiled were expressed in all tumour samples, however three (amelogenin, matrix metalloproteinase-20 (MMP-20) and Dlx7) displayed differential expression. In addition, only the most highly differentiated tumour stained positively for collagen. In most cases, the variable expression could be explained by reference to the histological phenotype, although differences in gene expression were apparent within the Type 2 and the mixed phenotype tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm that many of the genes thought to be important in odontogenesis and odontogenic tumour formation in humans are also expressed in these murine ameloblastoma-like tumours however genes associated with terminal differentiation of ameloblasts demonstrate differential expression between the tumour phenotypes.

Expression, gene regulation, and roles of Fisp12/CTGF in developing tooth germs

Odontogenesis involves multiple events, including tissue-tissue interactions, cell proliferation, and cell differentiation, but the underlying mechanisms of regulation are far from clear. Because Fisp12/CTGF is a signaling protein involved in similar events in other systems, we asked whether it is expressed in developing tooth germs and what roles it may have. Indeed, Fisp12/CTGF transcripts were first expressed by dental laminas, invaginating epithelium, and condensing mesenchyme at the bud stage, and then became abundant in enamel knot and preameloblasts. Fisp12/CTGF was present not only in inner dental epithelium but also in stratum intermedium and underlying dental mesenchyme. Fisp12/CTGF expression decreased markedly in secreting ameloblasts. Tissue reconstitution experiments showed that Fisp12/CTGF expression in dental epithelium required interaction with mesenchyme but was maintained by treatment of epithelium with transforming growth factor-1, a factor regulating Fisp12/CTGF expression in other systems, or with bone morphogenetic protein-2. Loss-of-function studies using CTGF neutralizing antibodies revealed that interference with endogenous factor action in tooth germ explants led to a severe inhibition of proliferation in both epithelium and mesenchyme and a marked delay in cytodifferentiation of ameloblasts and odontoblasts. Treatment of dental epithelial and mesenchymal cells in culture with recombinant CTGF stimulated cell proliferation, whereas treatment with neutralizing antibodies inhibited it. The data demonstrate for the first time that Fisp12/CTGF is expressed during odontogenesis. Expression is confined to specific sites and times, is regulated by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and critical soluble factors, and appears to be needed for proliferation and differentiation along both ameloblast and odontoblast cell lineages.

A comparison of enamelin and amelogenin expression in developing mouse molars

Amelogenin and enamelin are structural proteins in the enamel matrix of developing teeth. The temporal and spatial patterns of enamelin expression in developing mouse molars have not been characterized, while controversy remains with respect to amelogenin expression by odontoblasts and cementoblasts. Here we report the results of in situ hybridization analyses of amelogenin and enamelin expression in mouse molars from postnatal days 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 14, and 21. Amelogenin and enamelin mRNA in maxillary first molars was first observed in pre-ameloblasts on the cusp slopes at day 2. The onsets of amelogenin and enamelin expression were approximately synchronous with the initial accumulation of predentin matrix. Both proteins were expressed by ameloblasts throughout the secretory, transition, and early maturation stages. Enamelin expression terminated in maturation stage ameloblasts on day 9, while amelogenin expression is still detected in maturation stage ameloblasts on day 14. No amelogenin expression was observed in day 21 mouse molars. Amelogenin and enamelin RNA messages were restricted to ameloblasts. No expression was observed in pulp, bone, or along the developing root. We conclude that amelogenin and enamelin are enamel-specific and do not directly participate in the formation of dentin or cementum in developing mouse molars.

The murine amelogenin promoter: developmentally regulated expression in transgenic animals

We are interested in understanding hierarchical regulation pathways that control gene expression in developing teeth. In pursuit of the molecular basis for the regulated expression of amelogenin by developing ameloblasts during tooth formation, we isolated the murine amelogenin promoter. Analysis of this promoter will provide additional details towards the identification of signals generated through instructive-, dissimilar-germ layer interactions that are for responsible for temporal- and spatial-regulation for amelogenin gene expression. Using transgenic mice we demonstrate that a 2263 nucleotide stretch of the murine amelogenin promoter conveys appropriate temporal- and spatial-regulation for amelogenin gene expression in response to instructive-signals. These transgenic animals are useful reagents to further dissect signaling pathways responsible for regulated gene expression by terminally differentiated ameloblasts.

Enamel cell biology. Towards a comprehensive biochemical understanding

Enamel cells ultimately determine the properties of dental enamel. Surprisingly little is known about enamel cell functions at the biochemical and molecular levels. Understanding of both normal and abnormal enamel formation should benefit from elucidation of this area. This paper reviews our recent efforts to establish microscale biochemical analyses of rat enamel cells, and the ensuing initial findings about their protein phenotype (i.e., proteome) and calcium-handling mechanisms. A perspective of the current status of enamel cell research, and where it might head, is also given.

Transgene animal model for protein expression and accumulation into forming enamel

Understanding the cellular and molecular events that regulate the formation of enamel is a major driving force in efforts to characterize critical events during amelogenesis. It is anticipated that through such an understanding, improvements in prevention, diagnosis and treatment-intervention into heritable and acquired diseases of enamel could be achieved. While knowledge of the precise role of an enamel-specific protein in directing the formation of inorganic crystallites remains refractory, progress has been made with other aspects of amelogenesis that can be brought to bear on the subject. One such area of progress has been with the identification of an ameloblast-lineage specific amelogenin gene promoter. This promoter can be used to direct the expression of enamel-specific proteins, as well as the expression of proteins foreign to amelogenesis, into the enamel extracellular matrix where their effect on biomineralization can be ascertained in a prospective manner. The resulting enamel from such animals can be examined by morphologic and biochemical modalities in order to identify the effect of the transgene protein on enamel crystallite formation and subsequent biomineralization. This manuscript outlines such a strategy with the potential for enhancing our understanding of amelogenesis.

Functional antagonism between Msx2 and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha in regulating the mouse amelogenin gene expression is mediated by protein-protein interaction

Ameloblast-specific amelogenin gene expression is spatiotemporally regulated during tooth development. In a previous study, the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPalpha) was identified as a transcriptional activator of the mouse amelogenin gene in a cell type-specific manner. Here, Msx2 is shown to repress the promoter activity of amelogenin-promoter reporter constructs independent of its intrinsic DNA binding activity. In transient cotransfection assays, Msx2 and C/EBPalpha antagonize each other in regulating the expression of the mouse amelogenin gene. Electrophoresis mobility shift assays demonstrate that Msx2 interferes with the binding of C/EBPalpha to its cognate site in the mouse amelogenin minimal promoter, although Msx2 itself does not bind to the same promoter fragment. Protein-protein interaction between Msx2 and C/EBPalpha is identified with co-immunoprecipitation analyses. Functional antagonism between Msx2 and C/EBPalpha is also observed on the stably transfected 2.2-kilobase mouse amelogenin promoter in ameloblast-like LS8 cells. Furthermore, the carboxyl-terminal residues 183-267 of Msx2 are required for protein-protein interaction, whereas the amino-terminal residues 2-97 of Msx2 play a less critical role. Among three family members tested (C/EBPalpha, -beta, and -gamma), Msx2 preferentially interacts with C/EBPalpha. Taken together, these data indicate that protein-protein interaction rather than competition for overlapping binding sites results in the functional antagonism between Msx2 and C/EBPalpha in regulating the mouse amelogenin gene expression.

A tuftelin-interacting protein (TIP39) localizes to the apical secretory pole of mouse ameloblasts

Enamel biomineralization is a complex process that involves interactions between extracellular matrix proteins. To identify proteins interacting with tuftelin, a potential nucleator of enamel crystallites, the yeast two-hybrid system was applied to a mouse tooth expression library and a tuftelin-interacting protein (TIP) was isolated for further characterization. Polyclonal antibodies were prepared against two recombinant variants of this protein. Both antibodies identified a major protein product in tooth organs at 39 kDa, and this protein has been called TIP39. Northern analysis showed TIP39 messenger RNA in multiple organs, a pattern similar to that of tuftelin messenger RNA. In situ hybridization of mandibles of 1-day-old mice detected TIP39 RNA in secretory ameloblasts and odontoblasts. Immunolocalization of TIP39 and tuftelin in cultured ameloblast-like cells showed that these two proteins colocalize. Within the developing tooth organ, TIP39 and tuftelin immunolocalized to the apical pole of secretory ameloblasts (Tomes' processes) and to the newly secreted extracellular enamel matrix. TIP39 amino acid sequence appears to be highly conserved with similarities to proteins in species as diverse as yeast and primates. Available sequence data and the findings reported here suggest a role for TIP39 in the secretory pathway of extracellular proteins.

Identification of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha as a transactivator of the mouse amelogenin gene

Amelogenin expression is ameloblast-specific and developmentally regulated at the temporal and spatial levels. In a previous transgenic mouse analysis, the expression pattern of the endogenous amelogenin gene was recapitulated by a reporter gene driven by a 2. 2-kilobase mouse amelogenin proximal promoter. To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the spatiotemporal expression of the amelogenin gene during odontogenesis, the mouse amelogenin promoter was systematically analyzed in mouse ameloblast-like LS8 cells. Deletion analysis identified a minimal promoter (-70/+52) containing a CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP)-binding site upstream of the TATA box. In transient transfection assays, C/EBPalpha up-regulated the promoter activity in a dose-dependent manner. The C/EBP-binding site was necessary for both C/EBPalpha-mediated transactivation and basal promoter activity. Electrophoresis mobility shift assays demonstrated that C/EBPalpha bound to its cognate site in the amelogenin promoter and that the binding was specific. Endogenous C/EBPalpha was detected in LS8 cells, and overexpression of exogenous C/EBPalpha in LS8 cells was able to increase the expression level of the endogenous amelogenin protein. The activity of the amelogenin promoter in rat parotid Pa-4 cells and Madin-Darby canine kidney cells was minimal, ranging from 20 to 30% of the activity in ameloblast-like cells. Transient transfection experiments showed that C/EBPalpha transactivated the mouse amelogenin reporter gene in Pa-4 cells, but not in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Taken together, these data indicate that C/EBPalpha is a bona fide transcriptional activator of the mouse amelogenin gene in a cell type-specific manner.

Biomineralization, life-time of odontogenic cells and differential expression of the two homeobox genes MSX-1 and DLX-2 in transgenic mice

Msx and Dlx homeobox genes encode for transcription factors that control early morphogenesis. More specifically, Msx-1, Msx-2, and Dlx-2 homeobox genes contribute to the initial patterning of the dentition. The present study is devoted to the potential role of those homeobox genes during the late formation of mineralized tissues, using the rodent incisor as an experimental system. The continuously erupting mandibular incisor allows (1) the coinvestigation of the whole sequences of amelogenesis and dentinogenesis, aligned along the main dental axis in a single sample in situ and (2) the differential characterization of transcripts generated by epithelial and ectomesenchymal odontogenic cells. Northern blot experiments on microdissected cells showed the continuing expression of Msx-2 and Dlx-2 in the later stages of dental biomineralization, differentially in epithelial and ectomesenchymal compartments. Transgenic mice produced with LacZ reporter constructs for Dlx-2 and Msx-1 were used to detect different components of the gene expression patterns with the sensitive beta-galactosidase histoenzymology. The results show a prominent epithelial involvement of Dlx-2, with stage-specific variations in the cells involved in enamel formation. Quantitative analyses identified specific modulations of Dlx-2 expression in ameloblasts depending on the anatomical sites of the incisor, showing more specifically an inverse linear relationship between the Dlx-2 promoter activity level and enamel thickness. This investigation extends the role of homeoproteins to postmitotic stages, which would control secretory cell activity, in a site-specific manner as shown here for Dlx-2.

The structural biology of the developing dental enamel matrix

The biomineralization of the dental enamel matrix with a carbonated hydroxyapatite mineral generates one of the most remarkable examples of a vertebrate mineralized tissue. Recent advances in the molecular biology of ameloblast gene products have now revealed the primary structures of the principal proteins involved in this extracellular mineralizing system, amelogenins, tuftelins, ameloblastins, enamelins, and proteinases, but details of their secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structures, their interactions with other matrix and or cell surface proteins, and their functional role in dental enamel matrix mineralization are still largely unknown. This paper reviews our current knowledge of these molecules, the probable molecular structure of the enamel matrix, and the functional role of these extracellular matrix proteins. Recent studies on the major structural role played by the amelogenin proteins are discussed, and some new data on synthetic amelogenin matrices are reviewed.

Sequential expression of matrix protein genes in developing rat teeth

Tooth organogenesis is dependent on reciprocal and sequential epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and is marked by the appearance of phenotypic matrix macromolecules in both dentin and enamel. The organic matrix of enamel is composed of amelogenins, ameloblastin/amelin, enamelins and tuftelin. Dentin is mainly composed of type I collagen, but its specificity arises from the nature of the non-collagenous proteins (NCPs) involved in mineralization, phosphophoryn (DPP), dentin sialoprotein (DSP), osteocalcin, bone sialoprotein and dentin matrix protein-1 (Dmp1). In this paper, we studied the pattern of expression of four mineralizing protein genes (type I collagen, amelogenin, DSPP and osteocalcin) during the development of rat teeth by in situ hybridization on serial sections. For this purpose, we used an easy and rapid procedure to prepare highly-specific labeled single-stranded DNA probes using asymmetric polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Our results show that type I collagen is primarily expressed in polarizing odontoblasts, followed by the osteocalcin gene expression in the same polarized cells. Concomitantly, polarized ameloblasts start to accumulate amelogenin mRNAs and transiently express the DSPP gene. This latter expression switches over to odontoblasts whereas mineralization occurs. At the same time, osteocalcin gene expression decreases in secretory odontoblasts. Osteocalcin may thus act as an inhibitor of mineralization whereas DSP/DPP would be involved in more advanced steps of mineralization. Amelogenin and type I collagen gene expression increases during dentin mineralization. Their expression is spatially and temporally controlled, in relation with the biological role of their cognate proteins in epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and mineralization.

Aberrant gene expression in epithelial cells of mixed odontogenic tumors

Comparative investigations of odontogenic cells in normally forming teeth and tumors may provide insights into the mechanisms of the differentiation process. The present study is devoted to late phenotypic markers of ameloblast and odontoblast cells, i.e., proteins involved in biomineralization. The in situ expression of amelogenins, keratins, collagens type III and IV, vimentin, fibronectin, osteonectin, and osteocalcin was performed on normal and tumor odontogenic human cells. The pattern of protein expression showed some similarities between ameloblasts and odontoblasts present in normally developing human teeth and cells present in neoplastic tissues of ameloblastic fibroma, ameloblastic fibro-odontomas, and complex odontomas. Amelogenins (for ameloblasts) and osteocalcin (for odontoblasts) were detected in cells with well-organized enamel and dentin, respectively. In contrast, "mixed" cells located in epithelial zones of mixed odontogenic tumors co-expressed amelogenins and osteocalcin, as shown by immunostaining. The presence of osteocalcin transcripts was also demonstrated by in situ hybridization in these cells. Keratins and vimentin were detected in the same epithelial zones. Tumor epithelial cells were associated with various amounts of polymorphic matrix (amelogenin- and osteocalcin-immunoreactive), depending on the types of mixed tumors. No osteocalcin labeling was found in epithelial tumors. This study confirms that the differentiation of normal and tumor odontogenic cells is accompanied by the expression of some common molecules. Furthermore, the gene products present in normal mesenchymal cells were also shown in odontogenic tumor epithelium. These data may be related to a tumor-specific overexpression of the corresponding genes transcribed at an undetectable level during normal development and/or to an epithelial-mesenchymal transition proposed to occur during normal root formation. A plausible explanation for the results is that the odontogenic tumor epithelial cells are recapitulating genetic programs expressed during normal odontogenesis, but the tumor cells demonstrate abnormal expression patterns for these genes.

Cloning, characterization, and tissue expression pattern of mouse tuftelin cDNA

Tuftelin is a protein that has been suggested to function during enamel crystal nucleation. Published sequences for bovine tuftelin cDNA and genomic clones proposed different reading frames that radically affected the derived amino acid sequence of the tuftelin carboxyl-terminus. We have isolated and characterized a full-length mouse cDNA clone and a partial porcine cDNA clone that include the region of the proposed frame-shift. The mouse tuftelin clone is 2572 nucleotides in length, exclusive of the poly(A+) tail. Translation from the 5'-most ATG yields a protein of 390 amino acids with an isotope-averaged molecular mass of 44.6 kDa and an isoelectric point of 5.9. Comparison of the bovine, mouse, and porcine cDNAs supports the revised bovine tuftelin amino acid sequence and suggests that the bovine tuftelin translation initiation codon be re-assigned to a more 5' ATG. Re-assigning the translation initiation codon lengthens the tuftelin protein by 52 amino acids, 51 of which are identical between bovine and mouse. At the carboxyl-terminus, the revised bovine and the mouse sequences match at 39 of the final 42 amino acid positions, compared with 2 identities with the originally published bovine reading frame. Northern blot analysis reveals that tuftelin is not ameloblast-specific but is expressed in multiple tissues, including kidney, lung, liver, and testis. Two tuftelin RNA messages, of 2.6 and 3.2 kb, were detected. DNA sequence characterization of an RT-PCR amplification product confirmed expression of tuftelin in kidney, and identified an alternatively spliced mouse tuftelin mRNA lacking exon 2.

Comparative immunochemical analyses of the developmental expression and distribution of ameloblastin and amelogenin in rat incisors

Mineralized tissues are unique in using proteins to attract and organize calcium and phosphate ions into a structured mineral phase. A precise knowledge of the expression and extracellular distribution of matrix proteins is therefore very important in understanding their function. The purpose of this investigation was to obtain comparative information on the expression, intracellular and extracellular distribution, and dynamics of proteins representative of the two main classes of enamel matrix proteins. Amelogenins were visualized using an antibody and an mRNA probe prepared against the major alternatively spliced isoform in rodents, and nonamelogenins by antibodies and mRNA probes specific to one enamel protein referred to by three names: ameloblastin, amelin, and sheathlin. Qualitative and quantitative immunocytochemistry, in combination with immunoblotting and in situ hybridization, indicated a correlation between mRNA signal and sites of protein secretion for amelogenin, but not for ameloblastin, during the early presecretory and mid- to late maturation stages, during which mRNA signals were detected but no proteins appeared to be secreted. Extracellular amelogenin immunoreactivity was generally weak near secretory surfaces, increasing over a distance of about 1.25 microm to reach a level slightly above an amount expected if the protein were being deposited evenly across the enamel layer. Immunolabeling for ameloblastin showed an inverse pattern, with relatively more gold particles near secretory surfaces and much fewer deeper into the enamel layer. Administration of brefeldin A and cycloheximide to stop protein secretion revealed that the immunoblotting pattern of amelogenin was relatively stable, whereas ameloblastin broke down rapidly into lower molecular weight fragments. The distance from the cell surface at which immunolabeling for amelogenin stabilized generally corresponded to the point at which that for ameloblastin started to show a net reduction. These data suggest a correlation between the distribution of amelogenin and ameloblastin and that intact ameloblastin has a transient role in promoting/stabilizing crystal elongation. (J Histochem Cytochem 46:911-934, 1998)

Model for the examination of evolutionary trends in tooth development

Through the use of serial computerized tomography (C-t) scans, two distinct developmental stages can be identified in mature teeth. C-t scans thus provide a non-destructive method for assessing growth within individual teeth, as well as for comparison of the development of modern and fossil teeth. The second deciduous molar (DM2) and first permanent molar (M1) resemble one another morphologically, despite differences in size and developmental rates. Thus, they provide an excellent model for studying variation in growth within an individual. To test the C-t method, we first examined a recent archaeological sample and then examined teeth from Skhul I. Serial C-t scans were used to compare two distinct developmental stages represented by the dentine-enamel junction (DEJ) and outer enamel surface (OES), respectively, in mandibular DM2 and M1 of 31 archaeological specimens. The difference in form and size between these two surfaces in and between teeth was calculated from intercusp distances measured at the DEJ and OES using the form distance matrix. Intercusp distances at the DEJ and OES of these teeth were then compared to their counterparts in the DM2 and M1 of Skhul I, taken here as representative of early anatomically modern Homo sapiens sapiens. Form differences between paired DM2 and M1 at the DEJ were smaller than those at the OES, supporting the hypothesis that differences between the two teeth increase throughout development. The increase in intercusp distances from the DEJ to OES was found to reflect the angulation of cusps relative to one another, rather than enamel thickness. Form differences between the Skhul DM2 and M1 were smaller than those observed in the recent series, and the recent M1 differed more than the DM2 from its fossil counterpart. The similarities found between the Skhul permanent and deciduous teeth and the recent DM2, may reflect a similar growth pattern. This would contribute to earlier crown completion in the fossil M1.

High expression of human amelogenin in E. coli

A human cDNA, encoding for the 175-amino-acid human amelogenin, was prepared by RT PCR from tooth bud mRNA and sub-cloned into pGEX-KG expression plasmid for over-expression in E. coli. The expressed protein was characterized by SDS-PAGE Western blotting, and N-terminal amino acid sequencing.

Gene expression and localization of amelogenin in the rat incisor

Gene expression and localization of amelogenin were studied in the developing rat incisor by the methods of in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. ISH revealed the first expression of amelogenin mRNA in the inner enamel epithelium of the cervical loop. The signals were clearly observed in pre-ameloblasts in the region bordering on predentin formation and became more intense toward the cells on the initial enamel matrix secretion. The maximal signals were found in the cytoplasm of secretory ameloblasts. From the terminal secretion zone, the signals then became gradually weaker toward the incisal edge but were still evident in the cytoplasm of shortening, transitional ameloblasts and those at the early maturation stage. No signals were found in the cells of the stratum intermedium and stellate reticulum throughout amelogenesis. Immunohistochemistry by means of an antibody against amelogenin C-telopeptide consisting of 12 amino acids revealed immunoreaction in the secretory ameloblasts reacting to the ISH. When a polyclonal antibody against amelogenin was used, immunoreaction was found in the distal ends of ruffle-ended ameloblasts (RA) in the maturation zone. Those results indicated that amelogenin is synthesized by ameloblastic cells from the inner enamel epithelium to the early maturation stage and is then resorbed by the RA.

Cloning, cDNA sequence, and alternative splicing of porcine amelogenin mRNAs

In mammals, the organic matrix of developing enamel is dominated by amelogenins. To investigate the expression of proteins secreted into the developing enamel matrix, we have constructed a porcine enamel organ epithelia-specific cDNA library. The amelogenin fraction of the cDNA library was characterized by the cloning of amelogenin-specific polymerase chain-reaction (PCR) amplification products, 5' and 3' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), and by helper phage rescue of unamplified clones. Clones were characterized that encode porcine amelogenin isoforms 173, 157, 56, 41, and 40 amino acids in length. The structure of the porcine amelogenin gene differs from that of any of those yet described. There are two homologous but distinct exons 1, 2, and 7. One of the two exon 7s can vary in length depending upon the selection of either of two polyadenylation signal/cleavage sites. As a rule, a given exon 1 always pairs with the same exon 2 but can be associated with either exon 7. Despite significant sequence divergence within these exons, no differences are observed in exons 3, 5, and 6. We interpret these findings as evidence of a single amelogenin gene expressed from two promoters; however, the results do not exclude the existence of a second amelogenin gene. The variability generated through the use of alternate promoters and exon 7s primarily affects the non-coding regions of the message. A given amelogenin isoform expressed from the two promoters displays four amino acid differences within the signal peptide, while the secreted proteins are identical. Similarly, the alternative use of exon 7 does not alter the structure of the protein products. The pattern of RNA splicing of amelogenin pre-mRNAs is different for the transcripts expressed from the two promoters. The 173- and the 56-residue amelogenins can be expressed from either promoter, while the 157-residue amelogenin is generated by only one of the two promoters.

Expression of matrix proteins during the development of mineralized tissues

The specific properties of mineralized tissues are defined by the composition of the fraction of the noncollagenous matrix proteins. Because these proteins play a pivotal role in the processes of cell differentiation and activation and of mineralization, their temporal and spatial expression is tightly regulated. Within this study, the expression of the enamel protein amelogenin and of the bone matrix proteins osteopontin, bone sialoprotein, osteocalcin, and osteonectin was investigated by in situ hybridization. Two models that allow observation of the formation of mineralized tissues were chosen. The development of bone and cartilage was observed on murine metatarsals from 15-day-old embryos up to 1-day-old mice. This time covers the periods of initial bone formation as well as onset of resorption of mineralized cartilage and bone. To study gene expression in the mineralized tissues of the dental organ, enamel, dentin, and cementum, developing molars ranging in age from 16-day-old embryos to 14 days after delivery were chosen. Within this time frame, the molars develop from an immature state to the differentiated organ which erupts through the mandibular bone. In the developing metatarsals, osteopontin and bone sialoprotein mRNAs were detected in osteoblasts and hypertrophic chondrocytes at the onset of mineralization. In the tooth organ, only cementoblasts expressed transcripts encoding the two proteins; odontoblasts and ameloblasts did not express these genes. Osteonectin was expressed by osteoblasts and hypertrophic chondrocytes as well, whereas in the molars it was produced exclusively by odontoblasts. Osteocalcin was expressed specifically by osteoblasts in the developing metatarsals. In tooth, osteocalcin transcripts were detected in odontoblasts. Finally, amelogenin was a specific product of ameloblasts. Thus, a sequential and cell type-restricted expression of matrix proteins takes place during the development of the mineralized tissues. The expression patterns of the transcripts encoding the bone matrix proteins suggest different biological roles depending on the time and site of expression.