Outcomes of NAFLD and MAFLD: Results from a community-based, prospective cohort study

Is MAFLD better than NAFLD in predicting the risk of major cardiovascular diseases? Evidence from a 7-year prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Whether the new standard of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has more pronounced clinical and population screening diagnostic value than nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is unclear. This study evaluated the utility of MAFLD and NAFLD for predicting major cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A prospective cohort study approach was utilized to collect 19,399 study participants without CVD at baseline who completed follow-up from the Jinchang cohort platform during 2011-2017. According to clinical ultrasonic diagnosis results and disease diagnosis criteria, the baseline population was divided into MAFLD, NAFLD, Both-FLD and No-FLD groups. Based on the multifactorial Cox proportional risk model to analyze the relationship between three kinds of patients and CVD, the score prediction model of CVD was constructed with reference to the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and the model was evaluated. Compared with No-FLD, the HRs and 95 % CIs for the risk of CVD development in patients with NAFLD, MAFLD, and Both-FLD were 1.54 (1.34-1.76), 1.57 (1.37-1.79), and 1.62 (1.41-1.87), in that order. The scoring model showed a range of 5.90%-84.59 % risk of CVD in the three groups. As the risk score increased, the risk of developing CVD gradually increased. Evaluation metrics of all three models in the training set and validation set showed that the models have good prediction efficacy.

CONCLUSION

In terms of CVD risk and prognosis, MAFLD had no advantage over NAFLD. However, Both-FLD was found to predict a higher risk of CVD and to have superior predictive efficacy.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease indicates more hepatic fibrosis than nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

The term metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been proposed based on a redefinition of the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) criteria. Our study aimed to address the knowledge gap by comparing the diagnostic accuracy of MAFLD and NAFLD criteria in identifying significant fibrosis among patients with hepatic steatosis. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 2626 patients with hepatic steatosis treated at Beijing Ditan Hospital between January 2009 and December 2022. Patients with viral hepatitis were excluded. Significant fibrosis was defined as a Meta-analysis of Histological Data in Viral Hepatitis (METAVIR) score F ≥ 2. MAFLD and NAFLD were diagnosed in 478 and 428 patients, respectively. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared between the MAFLD+ NAFLD- group (patients who met the criteria for MAFLD but not NAFLD) and MAFLD- NAFLD+ group (patients who met the criteria for NAFLD but not MAFLD). A total of 743 patients with histologically verified hepatic steatosis were analyzed. The MAFLD+ NAFLD- group comprised 163 (21.9%) and the MAFLD- NAFLD+ group comprised 113 (15.2%) patients. Patients in the MAFLD+ NAFLD- group were older and more likely to be male and had higher body mass index and liver stiffness levels than those in the MAFLD- NAFLD+ group. The prevalence of significant fibrosis was higher in the MAFLD+ NAFLD- group than in the MAFLD- NAFLD+ group (43.6% vs 15.9%, P < .001). The MAFLD criteria may be a better indicator of fibrosis than the NAFLD criteria. Fibrosis in patients with MAFLD can be determined by metabolic disorders, not excessive alcohol consumption.

Associations between metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is closely related to metabolic syndrome and remains a major global health burden. The increased prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) worldwide has contributed to the rising incidence of NAFLD. It is widely believed that atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is associated with NAFLD. In the past decade, the clinical implications of NAFLD have gone beyond liver-related morbidity and mortality, with a majority of patient deaths attributed to malignancy, coronary heart disease (CHD), and other cardiovascular (CVD) complications. To better define fatty liver disease associated with metabolic disorders, experts proposed a new term in 2020 - metabolic dysfunction associated with fatty liver disease (MAFLD). Along with this new designation, updated diagnostic criteria were introduced, resulting in some differentiation between NAFLD and MAFLD patient populations, although there is overlap. The aim of this review is to explore the relationship between MAFLD and ASCVD based on the new definitions and diagnostic criteria, while briefly discussing potential mechanisms underlying cardiovascular disease in patients with MAFLD.

Metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease metrics and contributions to liver research

BACKGROUND

The international consensus to revise non-alcoholic fatty liver disease to metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in 2020 attracted significant attention. The impact of the MAFLD definition on the research community has not been objectively assessed. We conducted an analysis of systematically collected literature on MAFLD to understand its research impact.

METHODS

From PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, the literature adopting MAFLD, written in English, and published from 2020 to 10 October 2023 was collected. The publication metrics, including publication counts, publishing journals, author countries, author keywords, and citation information, were analyzed to evaluate the research impact and key topics on MAFLD.

RESULTS

1469 MAFLD-related papers were published in 434 journals with a steady increase in the number. The intense publishing and citations activity on MAFLD indicates the large impact of the redefinition. Topic assessment with keyword and citation analysis revealed a transition from the proposal and discussion of the redefinition to clinical characterization of MAFLD with a focus on metabolic dysfunction. Moreover, the diagnostic criteria for MAFLD showed better performance in predicting hepatic and extrahepatic outcomes compared to NAFLD. The publications were from 99 countries with evidence of strong regional and global collaboration. Multiple international societies and stakeholders have endorsed MAFLD for its utility in clinical practice, improving patient management and promoting multidisciplinary care, while alleviating stigma.

CONCLUSION

This survey provides a quantitative measure of the considerable international impact and contributions of the MAFLD definition towards liver research and as part of the spectrum of cardiometabolic disorders.

Clinical outcomes of MAFLD versus NAFLD: A meta-analysis of observational studies

IMPORTANCE

The recent change in terminology from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) highlights the link between hepatic steatosis and metabolic dysfunction, taking out the stigmata of alcohol.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effects of NAFLD and MAFLD definitions on the risk of overall and cardiovascular (CV) mortality, liver-related events (LRE), nonfatal CV events (CVE), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and extra-hepatic cancers (EHC).

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

We systematically searched four large electronic databases for cohort studies (published through August 2023) that simultaneously used NAFLD and MAFLD definitions for examining the risk of mortality and adverse CV, renal, or oncological outcomes associated with both definitions. In total, 21 eligible cohort studies were identified. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects modelling.

RESULTS

Compared with those with NAFLD, individuals with MAFLD had significantly higher rates of overall mortality (random-effect OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21, p = .004) and CV mortality (random-effect OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.26, p = .004), and a marginal trend towards higher rates of developing CKD (random-effect OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.12, p = .058) and EHC events (random-effect OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.00-1.23, p = .052). We found no significant differences in the risk LREs and nonfatal CVE between MAFLD and NAFLD. Meta-regression analyses identified male sex and metabolic comorbidities as the strongest risk factors related to the risk of adverse clinical outcomes in MAFLD compared to NAFLD.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Individuals with MAFLD have higher rates of overall and CV mortality and higher rates of developing CKD and EHC events than those with NAFLD, possibly due to the dysmetabolic risk profile related to MAFLD.

Liver and cardiovascular outcomes in lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of about 1 million individuals

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is present in lean people. However, the magnitude of the prognostic hepatic and cardiovascular risk in these patients compared to non-lean counterparts remains unclear. We aimed to investigate this topic, and to explore whether these risks change based on factors related to NAFLD severity.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases were searched for cohort studies (published through April 2024) that evaluated liver and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in lean and non-lean individuals with NAFLD and reported unadjusted or adjusted data. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) or hazard ratios (HRs) using a random-effects modeling and performed subgroup and meta-regressions analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 22 studies with over 1 million NAFLD patients (13.0% were lean). Lean NAFLD showed a similar risk of liver-related events in unadjusted analysis (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.49, I2 = 31%), but a higher risk in adjusted analysis (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.17-2.36, I2 = 83%) compared to non-lean NAFLD. Lean NAFLD had a higher risk of liver-related mortality (RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.57-3.15, I2 = 0%; HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.14-4.51, I2 = 0%). For CV outcomes, lean NAFLD had a lower risk of any cardiovascular disease in unadjusted analysis (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.95, I2 = 88%), but similar risk in adjusted analysis (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.02, I2 = 78%), and similar risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.71-1.66, I2 = 85%; HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.78, I2 = 46%) compared to non-lean NAFLD.

CONCLUSIONS

Lean NAFLD patients have worse liver outcomes, but similar CV outcomes compared to non-lean NAFLD patients, highlighting the importance of monitoring both groups closely.

Association between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and myosteatosis measured by computed tomography

BACKGROUND

In 2023, the concept of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) was introduced as an alternative to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to assess the quantity and quality of skeletal muscle using each of these diagnostic classifications.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 18 154 participants (11 551 [63.6%] men and 6603 [36.4%] women, mean age 53.0 ± 8.8). The participants were classified into four categories: neither steatotic liver disease (SLD), NAFLD only, MASLD only or both SLDs. An appendicular skeletal muscle mass adjusted for body mass index of <0.789 for men and <0.512 for women was defined as sarcopenia. The total abdominal muscle area (TAMA) at the L3 vertebral level was segmented into normal-attenuation muscle area (NAMA), low-attenuation muscle area and intermuscular/intramuscular adipose tissue. Myosteatosis was defined by a T-score < -1.0 of the NAMA/TAMA index, which was calculated by dividing the NAMA by the TAMA and multiplying by 100.

RESULTS

Using subjects with neither SLD as a reference, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for sarcopenia were significantly increased in those with MASLD, with adjusted ORs (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 2.62 (1.94-3.54) in the MASLD-only group and 2.33 (1.92-2.82) in the both SLDs group, while the association was insignificant in those with NAFLD only (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 2.16 [0.67-6.94]). The OR for myosteatosis was also elevated in the MASLD groups, with an OR (95% CI) of 1.75 (1.52-2.02) in subjects with MASLD only and 1.70 (1.57-1.84) in those with both SLDs, while it was slightly decreased in subjects with NAFLD only (0.52 [0.29-0.95]).

CONCLUSIONS

Employing the MASLD concept rather than that of the NAFLD proved to be more effective in distinguishing individuals with reduced muscle mass and compromised muscle quality.

Differences in the prevalence of NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD according to changes in the nomenclature in a health check-up using MRI-derived proton density fat fraction

PURPOSE

International expert panels proposed new nomenclatures, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in 2020 and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in 2023, along with revised diagnostic criteria to replace non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to investigate the differences in NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD prevalence with changing nomenclature in a health check-up using magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) to assess hepatic steatosis. We also examined the prevalence of the sub-classifications of steatotic liver disease (SLD) and the differences in characteristics among the sub-categories.

METHODS

We included 844 participants who underwent liver MRI-PDFF at our health check-up clinic between January 2020 and November 2022. Hepatic steatosis was defined as MRI-PDFF ≥ 5%. Participants were categorized according to NAFLD, MAFLD, MASLD, and sub-classifications of SLD.

RESULTS

The prevalence rates of NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD were 25.9%, 29.5%, and 25.2%, respectively. 30.5% of the participants was categorized as SLD. The prevalence rates of the SLD sub-categories were 25.2% for MASLD, 3.7% for MASLD and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD), 0.1% for alcohol-associated liver disease, 1.3% for specific etiology SLD, and 0.1% for cryptogenic SLD. Compared with patients in the MASLD group, those in the MetALD group were younger, predominantly male, and exhibited higher levels of serum aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and triglycerides.

CONCLUSION

The prevalences of NAFLD and MASLD assessed using MRI-PDFF were similar, with MASLD accounting for 97.3% of the patients with NAFLD. The separate MetALD sub-category may have clinical characteristics that differ from those of MASLD.

Impact of Nonalcoholic Hepatic Steatosis on the Warranty Period of a Coronary Artery Calcium Score of 0: Results From the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND

For individuals with a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of 0, CAC rescans at appropriate timings are recommended, depending on individual risk profiles. Although nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, recently redefined as metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, is a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events, its relationship with the warranty period of a CAC score of 0 has not been elucidated.

METHODS

A total of 1944 subjects from the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) with a baseline CAC score of 0, presence or absence of nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis, and at least 1 follow-up computed tomography scan were included. Nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis was defined using nonenhanced computed tomography and liver/spleen attenuation ratio <1. The association between nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis and new CAC incidence (CAC score >0) was evaluated using a Weibull survival model.

RESULTS

Nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis was identified in 268 (14%) participants. Participants with nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis had higher CAC incidence than those without nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis. Nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis was independently associated with new CAC incidence after adjustment for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk factors (hazard ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.05-1.57]; P=0.015). Using a 25% testing yield (25% of participants with zero CAC at baseline would be expected to have developed a CAC score >0), the warranty period of a CAC score of 0 in participants with nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis was shorter than in those without nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis (4.7 and 6.3 years). This association was consistent regardless of sex, race/ethnicity, age, and 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis had an impact on the warranty period of a CAC score of 0. The study suggests that the time period until a CAC rescan should be shorter in those with nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis and a CAC score of 0.

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in lean vs. non-lean MASLD: A comprehensive meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lean metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), characterized by a BMI < 25 kg/m² (or < 23 kg/m² in Asians), presents a challenging prognosis compared to non-lean MASLD. This study examines cardiovascular outcomes in both lean and non-lean MASLD cohorts.

METHODS

In this meta-analysis, pooled odds ratios (ORs) within 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for primary outcomes (cardiovascular mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]) and secondary outcomes (cardiovascular disease [CVD], all-cause mortality, hypertension, and dyslipidemia). Studies comparing lean and non-lean MASLD within the same cohorts were analyzed, prioritizing those with larger sample sizes or recent publication dates.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were identified, encompassing lean MASLD patients (n = 7153; mean age 52.9 ± 7.4; 56 % male) and non-lean MASLD patients (n = 23,514; mean age 53.2 ± 6.8; 63 % male). Lean MASLD exhibited a 50 % increase in cardiovascular mortality odds compared to non-lean MASLD (OR: 1.5, 95 % CI 1.2-1.8; p < 0.0001). MACE odds were 10 % lower in lean MASLD (OR: 0.9, 95 % CI 0.7-1.2; p = 0.7), while CVD odds were 40 % lower (p = 0.01). All-cause mortality showed a 40 % higher odds in lean MASLD versus non-lean MASLD (p = 0.06). Lean MASLD had 30 % lower odds for both hypertension (p = 0.01) and dyslipidemia (p = 0.02) compared to non-lean MASLD.

CONCLUSION

Despite a favorable cardiometabolic profile and comparable MACE rates, lean individuals with MASLD face elevated cardiovascular mortality risk.

Navigating the Nomenclature of Liver Steatosis: Transitioning from NAFLD to MAFLD and MASLD - Understanding Affinities and Differences

The escalating prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represents a significant challenge to public health, with an increasing impact observed across various demographics. This review delivers a comprehensive evaluation of the evolving terminology in steatotic liver disease (SLD), documenting the transition from NAFLD to metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), and progressing to the latest terms, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MASLD) and MASLD with increased alcohol intake (MetALD). We conducted a comprehensive review of literature discussing the benefits and drawbacks of these nomenclatural changes. Clinical evidence supporting MASLD and MetALD, including the implications of alcohol consumption thresholds on disease classification and outcomes, was analyzed. The “MAFLD” and “MASLD” labels align with the pathophysiology of metabolic diseases, afford a positive disease connotation, and facilitate the identification of more severe diseases, such as significant fibrosis or advanced liver disease. However, the MAFLD criteria may underdiagnose lean, non-overweight, or non-obese individuals with MAFLD. The review underscores the understanding of liver diseases linked to metabolic dysfunction and alcohol use. The shift in terminology marks progress towards a clinical diagnosis that reflects underlying pathophysiology. However, additional studies are necessary to assess the longterm effects of these changes and their efficacy in enhancing patient care and health outcomes.

Prevalence and risk factors of MAFLD and its metabolic comorbidities in community-based adults in China: A cross-sectional study

AIMS

There is a growing interest in the co-management of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and its metabolic comorbidities. However, there is insufficient epidemiological data regarding MAFLD and its metabolic comorbidities in China. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of MAFLD and its metabolic comorbidities.

METHODS

9171 participants were recruited in this cross-sectional study, utilizing a multistage, stratified sampling method. All participants underwent a comprehensive assessment. The diagnosis of MAFLD was based on vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE). The prevalence of MAFLD and its metabolic comorbidities was calculated. Binary and ordinary logistic regressions were conducted.

RESULTS

The overall weighted prevalence of MAFLD was 21.18%. Of the 2081 adults with MAFLD, 1866 (89.67%) had more than one metabolic comorbidity, and only 215 (10.33%) did not have comorbidity. Among the population with MAFLD, the prevalence of dyslipidemia, hypertension, hyperuricemia, and diabetes was 67.47%, 43.73%, 39.10%, and 33.88%, respectively. Advanced age, male gender, overweight/obesity, excessive alcohol consumption, and elevated HOMA-IR levels were positively correlated with the number of MAFLD-related metabolic comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of individuals diagnosed with MAFLD presented with metabolic comorbidities. Therefore, engaging in the co-management of MAFLD and its metabolic comorbidities is imperative.

Association between cataract and fatty liver diseases from a nationwide cross-sectional study in South Korea

This study examined the link between fatty liver disease (FLD) and cataracts, as previous research has suggested that FLD may contribute to metabolic syndrome, systemic inflammation, and potentially cataracts. We studied a nationwide cross-sectional cohort of the Fifth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010-2011. FLD was defined as nonalcoholic FLD (NAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated FLD (MAFLD). Multinomial logistic regression was utilized to investigate the relationship between cataracts and FLD after adjustment for potential confounders. Participants with cataracts had higher liver fibrosis scores, including the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS; P < 0.001), fibrosis-4 index (FIB4; P < 0.001), and fatty liver index (FLI; P = 0.001). NAFLD was not associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) for cataracts in the fully adjusted model (OR = 1.23, P = 0.058). MAFLD was significantly associated with a higher OR (OR = 1.34, P = 0.006). After adjusting for all factors, the severity of FLD was linked to an increased risk of cataracts, with significant linear trends (P values for linear trends of NFS, FIB4, and FLI < 0.05). After adjusting for well-known cataract risk factors, MAFLD was significantly associated with cataracts. Our analysis suggests that FLD may serve as an independent risk factor for cataracts.

The Independent Association of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease With Incident Cardiovascular Disease: A GRADE Evaluation of the Evidence Through a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Methods

We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane database and TRIP database. Random-effects model meta-analyses were used to obtain pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. The certainty in evidence was rated using the GRADE tool.

Results

Altogether 36 studies including a total of 7,068,007 participants were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled data from 19 cohort studies demonstrated a significant increase in the risk of non-fatal CVD events in patients with NAFLD (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.33-1.85, I2 = 95%). Pooled data from eight studies showed a significant increase in fatal CVD (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.24-1.57, I2 =27%), and eight cohort studies suggested a significant increase in combined non-fatal and fatal CVD (HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.13-1.76, I2 =80%). Meta-analysis of studies reporting adjusted estimates in NAFLD patients with fibrosis revealed a significant increase in CVD events with acceptable level of heterogeneity (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.25-2.16, I2 = 31%). The anticipated absolute increase in the risk of combined fatal and non-fatal CVD was estimated to be 29 more per thousand with NAFLD; that of fatal CVD events 16 more per thousand and that of non-fatal CVD events 19 more per thousand with NAFLD. The GRADE rating ranged from very low to low for overall and subgroup analyses.

Conclusion

The present systematic review suggests that NAFLD increases the risk of incident CVD. Cohort studies with the ability to analyze subgroup effects based on severity, along with randomized controlled trials that provide experimental evidence demonstrating a decrease in cardiovascular disease events through the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, are necessary to validate and reinforce these findings.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease without overlapping metabolic-associated fatty liver disease and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Re-classifying NAFLD as metabolic-associated fatty liver (MAFLD) has been proposed. While some people fulfil criteria for NAFLD, they do not have MAFLD; and whether NAFLD-only subjects have increased the risk of type 2 diabetes remains unknown. We compared risk of incident T2D in individuals with: (a) NAFLD-only; and (b) MAFLD, to individuals without fatty liver, considering effect modification by sex.

METHODS

246 424 Koreans without diabetes or a secondary cause of ultrasound-diagnosed hepatic steatosis were studied. Subjects were stratified into: (a) NAFLD-only status and (b) NAFLD that overlapped with MAFLD (MAFLD). Cox proportional hazards models with incident T2D as the outcome were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for: (a) and (b). Models were adjusted for time-dependent covariates, and effect modification by sex was analysed in subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 5439 participants had NAFLD-only status and 56 839 met MAFLD criteria. During a median follow-up of 5.5 years, 8402 incident cases of T2D occurred. Multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CI) for incident T2D comparing NAFLD-only and MAFLD to the reference (neither condition) were 2.39 (1.63-3.51) and 5.75 (5.17-6.36) (women), and 1.53 (1.25-1.88) and 2.60 (2.44-2.76) (men), respectively. The increased risk of T2D in the NAFLD-only group was higher in women than in men (p for interaction by sex <0.001) and consistently observed across all subgroups. Risk of T2D was increased in lean participants regardless of metabolic dysregulation (including prediabetes).

CONCLUSIONS

NAFLD-only participants without metabolic dysregulation and the criteria for MAFLD are at increased risk of developing T2D. This association was consistently stronger in women than in men.

Associations between metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and extrahepatic cancers: a cohort in China

Background

To evaluate the associations between a new definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and extrahepatic cancers and compare with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Methods

We enrolled 151,391 Chinese participants in the Kailuan cohort. Hepatic steatosis was detected by abdominal ultrasound. Fine and Gray competing risk regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) between MAFLD and extrahepatic cancers.

Results

MAFLD was associated with increased risk of prostate (HR =1.49, 95% CI: 1.07-2.08) and obesity-related cancers, including thyroid (HR =1.47, 95% CI: 1.01-2.12), kidney (HR =1.54, 95% CI: 1.18-2.00), colorectal (HR =1.15, 95% CI: 0.98-1.34) and breast cancer (HR =1.31, 95% CI: 1.04-1.66). The results were consistent in NAFLD vs. non-NAFLD and MAFLD-NAFLD vs. neither FLD. Compared with the neither FLD group, the NAFLD-only group had a higher risk of extrahepatic cancers (HR =1.57, 95% CI: 1.18-2.09), esophageal (HR =5.11, 95% CI: 2.25-11.62), and bladder cancer (HR =3.36, 95% CI: 1.23-9.17). The additional risk of extrahepatic cancers (HR =1.42, 95% CI: 1.17-1.73), esophageal (HR =4.37, 95% CI: 2.55-7.49), and breast cancer (HR =1.99, 95% CI: 1.01-3.92) was observed in MAFLD with metabolic dysregulation, and kidney (HR =1.83, 95% CI: 1.38-2.43), prostate (HR =1.46, 95% CI: 1.00-2.14) and breast cancer (HR =1.33, 95% CI: 1.02-1.74) was observed in MAFLD with overweight and metabolic dysregulation, as well as colorectal (HR =1.45, 95% CI: 1.07-1.96) and prostate cancer (HR =2.44, 95% CI: 1.42-4.21) in MAFLD with three risk factors. Additionally, MAFLD with excessive alcohol consumption would increase extrahepatic cancers (HR =1.14, 95% CI: 1.01-1.29) and breast cancer (HR =7.27, 95% CI: 2.33-22.69) risk.

Conclusions

MAFLD and NAFLD shared similar excessive risks of obesity-related cancers, suggesting a driving role of FLD in these cancers. Metabolic dysregulation beyond obesity may play additional kidney, colorectal, and prostate cancer risks in MAFLD patients. It may be helpful in the clinic to relieve symptoms by treating metabolic disorders and preventing adverse outcomes of extrahepatic cancers.

Impacts of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease on Acute Coronary Syndrome: Evidence and Controversies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are two clinically common disease entities that share numerous risk factors. This review aimed to discuss the impacts of NAFLD on ACS.

RECENT FINDINGS

In an era of improved control of traditional risk factors, the substantial burden of cardiometabolic abnormalities has caused widespread concern. NAFLD is considered the hepatic component of metabolic syndrome, which can exert an impact on human health beyond the liver. Accumulating studies have demonstrated that NAFLD is closely related to cardiovascular disease, especially coronary artery disease. Interestingly, although recent data have suggested an association between NAFLD and the incidence and outcomes of ACS, the results are not consistent. In this review, we comprehensively summarized evidence and controversies regarding whether NAFLD is a contributor to either the development of ACS or worse outcomes in patients with ACS. The potential pathophysiological and molecular mechanisms involved in the impacts of NAFLD on ACS were also elucidated.

Current understanding and future perspectives on the impact of changing NAFLD to MAFLD on global epidemiology and clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

For the first time in nearly half a century, fatty liver disease has undergone a change in name and definition, from the exclusive term, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), to the inclusion-based, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). This has led investigators across the globe to evaluate the impact the nomenclature change has had on the epidemiology and natural history of the disease.

METHODS

This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview on how the shift in name and diagnostic criteria has influenced point prevalence in different geographic regions, as well as morbidity and mortality risk, whilst highlighting gaps in the literature that need to be addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

MAFLD prevalence is higher than NAFLD prevalence, carries a higher risk of overall mortality, with greater granularity in risk-stratification amongst MAFLD subtypes.

Genetic and metabolic aspects of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) pathogenicity

Background

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease showing a rising prevalence globally. Genetic predisposition plays a key role in the development and progression of the disease pathogenicity.

Main body

This paper summarizes genetic associations based on their influence on several metabolic aspects such as lipid metabolism, glucose metabolism, hepatic iron accumulation and cholesterol metabolism toward the NAFLD pathogenicity. Furthermore, we present variations in some epigenetic characters and the microRNA profile with regard to NAFLD.

Conclusion

As reported in many studies, the PNPLA3 rs738409 variant seems to be significantly associated with NAFLD susceptibility. Other gene variants like TM6SF2 rs58542926, MBOAT7 rs641738 and GCKR variants also appear to be more prevalent among NAFLD patients. We believe these genetic variants may provide insights into new trends in developing noninvasive biomarkers and identify their suitability in clinical practice in the future.

Graphical abstract

An international multidisciplinary consensus statement on MAFLD and the risk of CVD

BACKGROUND

Fatty liver disease in the absence of excessive alcohol consumption is an increasingly common condition with a global prevalence of ~ 25-30% and is also associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Since systemic metabolic dysfunction underlies its pathogenesis, the term metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been proposed for this condition. MAFLD is closely intertwined with obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and atherogenic dyslipidemia, which are established cardiovascular risk factors. Unlike CVD, which has received attention in the literature on fatty liver disease, the CVD risk associated with MAFLD is often underestimated, especially among Cardiologists.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A multidisciplinary panel of fifty-two international experts comprising Hepatologists, Endocrinologists, Diabetologists, Cardiologists and Family Physicians from six continents (Asia, Europe, North America, South America, Africa and Oceania) participated in a formal Delphi survey and developed consensus statements on the association between MAFLD and the risk of CVD. Statements were developed on different aspects of CVD risk, ranging from epidemiology to mechanisms, screening, and management.

CONCULSIONS

The expert panel identified important clinical associations between MAFLD and the risk of CVD that could serve to increase awareness of the adverse metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes of MAFLD. Finally, the expert panel also suggests potential areas for future research.

Differential risk of 23 site-specific incident cancers and cancer-related mortality among patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: a population-based cohort study with 9.7 million Korean subjects

INTRODUCTION

Although an association between metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and cardiovascular disease or overall mortality has been reported, it is unclear whether there is an association between MAFLD and cancer incidence or mortality. We aimed to investigate the differential risk of all- and site-specific cancer incidence and mortality according to MAFLD subgroups categorized by additional etiologies of liver disease.

METHODS

Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we stratified the participants into three groups: (1) single-etiology MAFLD (S-MAFLD) or MAFLD of pure metabolic origin; (2) mixed-etiology MAFLD (M-MAFLD) or MAFLD with additional etiological factor(s) (i.e., concomitant liver diseases and/or heavy alcohol consumption); and (3) non-MAFLD. Hepatic steatosis and fibrosis were defined using the fatty liver index and the BARD score, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to estimate the risk of cancer events.

RESULTS

Among the 9,718,182 participants, the prevalence of S-MAFLD and M-MAFLD was 29.2% and 6.7%, respectively. During the median 8.3 years of follow-up, 510,330 (5.3%) individuals were newly diagnosed with cancer, and 122,774 (1.3%) cancer-related deaths occurred among the entire cohort. Compared with the non-MAFLD group, the risk of all-cancer incidence and mortality was slightly higher among patients in the S-MAFLD group (incidence, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.04; mortality, aHR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04-1.08) and highest among patients with M-MAFLD group (incidence, aHR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.29-1.32; mortality, aHR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.42-1.48, respectively). The M-MAFLD with fibrosis group (BARD score ≥ 2) showed the highest relative risk of all-cancer incidence (aHR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.36-1.39), followed by the M-MAFLD without fibrosis group (aHR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.06-1.11). Similar trends were observed for cancer-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

MAFLD classification, by applying additional etiologies other than pure metabolic origin, can be used to identify a subgroup of patients with poor cancer-related outcomes.

Comparison of Outcomes Between Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) encompasses a range of conditions, from fatty liver to cirrhosis. In response to evolving research and to better reflect the complex metabolic underpinnings, the term metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been proposed. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality between NAFLD and MAFLD patients. The present study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science to identify studies that compared cardiovascular outcomes in MAFLD and NAFLD from inception to July 31, 2023. Outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular events. A total of 11 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The risk of cardiovascular mortality was significantly higher in patients with MAFLD patients compared to NAFLD patients (risk ratio (RR): 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11 to 1.98). The risk of all-cause mortality was higher in MAFLD patients compared to NAFLD, and the difference was statistically significant (RR: 2.80, 95% CI: 2.39 to 3.28). The risk of cardiovascular events was significantly higher in MAFLD patients compared to NAFLD (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.61). The key findings underscore that individuals diagnosed with MAFLD face a notably higher risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular events when compared to those with NAFLD.

Problems and Challenges Associated with Renaming Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease to Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the world’s largest chronic liver disease in the 21st century, affecting 20%–30% of the world’s population. As the epidemiology, etiology, and pathogenesis of NAFLD have been studied in-depth, it has been gradually recognized that most patients with NAFLD have one or more combined metabolic abnormalities known as metabolic syndrome. In 2020, the international expert group changed the name of NAFLD to metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and proposed new diagnostic criteria for MAFLD and MAFLD-related liver cirrhosis, as well as the conceptual framework of other cause-related fatty liver diseases to avoid diagnosis based on the exclusion of other causes and better reflect its pathogenesis. However, there are still many ambiguities in the term, and changing the name does not address the unmet key needs in the field. The change from NAFLD to MAFLD was not just a change of definition. The problems and challenges are summarized as follows: epidemiology, children, rationality of “metabolism,” diagnostic criteria, double/multiple causes, drug discovery, clinical trials, and awareness raising. Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease has complex disease characteristics, and there are still some problems that need to be solved.

The Transition of Cardiovascular Disease Risks from NAFLD to MAFLD

The increased burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) parallels the increased incidence of overweight and metabolic syndrome worldwide. Because of the close relationship between metabolic disorders and fatty liver disease, a new term, metabolic-related fatty liver disease (MAFLD), was proposed by a group of experts to more precisely describe fatty liver disease resulting from metabolic disorders. According to the definitions, MAFLD and NAFLD populations have considerable discrepancies, but overlap does exist. This new definition has a nonnegligible impact on clinical practices, including diagnoses, interventions, and the risk of comorbidities. Emerging evidence has suggested that patients with MAFLD have more metabolic comorbidities and an increased risk of all-cause mortality, particularly cardiovascular mortality than patients with NAFLD. In this review, we systemically summarized and compared the risk and underlying mechanisms of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with NAFLD or MAFLD.

Comparison of cardiovascular mortality between MAFLD and NAFLD: A cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A new diagnostic criterion of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been proposed. However, only few studies have shown that MAFLD predicts cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality better than non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Therefore, a cohort study was conducted to assess this relationship.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Health examination data from health care centers in South Korea were assessed after excluding participants with missing covariates and cancer history (n = 701,664). Liver ultrasonography reports, laboratory and anthropometric data were extracted. Diagnoses of NAFLD and MAFLD were performed according to standard definitions. Participants were categorized based on the presence of NAFLD and MAFLD. In addition, participants were classified into five categories: no fatty liver disease (no FLD), NAFLD-only, MAFLD-only, both FLDs, and alcoholic FLD (AFLD) and non-MAFLD. Multivariable regression modeling was performed. The median follow-up duration was 8.77 years, and 52.56% of participants were men. After stratifying the cohort into no-MAFLD and MAFLD groups, MAFLD was associated with increased CVD mortality (adjusted HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.28). When participants were divided into no-NAFLD and NAFLD groups, there was a non-significant trend towards an increase in CVD mortality in NAFLD group (adjusted HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.95-1.21). When participants were divided into five categories, MAFLD-only group showed increased CVD mortality (adjusted HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.07-1.70) while NAFLD-only group showed no significant association with CVD mortality (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.38-1.19).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, MAFLD is associated with increased CVD mortality in a relatively young Korean population.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease increased the risk of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in China

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was proposed to substitute NAFLD in 2020. This new term highlights the systematic metabolic disturbances that accompany fatty liver. We evaluated the correlations between MAFLD and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis (SCA) based on a nationwide health examination population in China.

METHODS

We performed a nationwide cross-sectional population and a Beijing retrospective cohort from 2009 to 2017. SCA was defined as elevated carotid intima-media thickness. The multivariable logistic and Cox models were used to analyze the association between MAFLD and SCA.

RESULTS

153,482 participants were included in the cross-sectional study. MAFLD was significantly associated with SCA in fully adjusted models, with an odds ratio of 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.62-1.70. This association was consistent in the cohort, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.31. The association between baseline MAFLD and incident SCA increased with hepatic steatosis severity. Subgroup analysis showed an interaction between age and MAFLD, with a higher risk in younger groups (HR:1.67, 95% CI: 1.17-2.40).

CONCLUSION

In this large cross-section and cohort study, MAFLD was significantly associated with the presence and development of SCA. Further, the risk was higher among MAFLD individuals with high hepatic steatosis index and young adults.

An Observational Data Meta-analysis on the Differences in Prevalence and Risk Factors Between MAFLD vs NAFLD

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The shift to redefine nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) as metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) can profoundly affect patient care, health care professionals, and progress within the field. To date, there remains no consensus on the characterization of NAFLD vs MAFLD. Thus, this study sought to compare the differences between the natural history of NAFLD and MAFLD.

METHODS

Medline and Embase databases were searched to include articles on prevalence, risk factors, or outcomes of patients with MAFLD or NAFLD. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted using the generalized linear mix model. Risk factors and outcomes were evaluated in conventional pairwise meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two articles involving 379,801 patients were included. Pooled prevalence of MAFLD was 39.22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.96%-48.15%) with the highest prevalence in Europe and Asia, followed by North America. The current MAFLD Definition only accounted for 81.59% (95% CI, 66.51%-90.82%) of NAFLD diagnoses. Patients had increased odds of being diagnosed with MAFLD compared with NAFLD (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.16-1.63; P < .001). Imaging modality resulted in a significantly higher odds of being diagnosed with MAFLD compared with NAFLD, but not biopsy. MAFLD was significantly associated with males, higher body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, lipids, transaminitis, and greater fibrosis scores compared with NAFLD.

CONCLUSIONS

There were stark differences in the prevalence and risk factors between MAFLD and NAFLD. However, in the use of the MAFLD Definition, a greater emphasis on the management of concomitant metabolic diseases and a collaborative effort is required to explore the complex pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the disease.

MAFLD: How is it different from NAFLD?

"Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD)" is the term suggested in 2020 to refer to fatty liver disease related to systemic metabolic dysregulation. The name change from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to MAFLD comes with a simple set of criteria to enable easy diagnosis at the bedside for the general medical community, including primary care physicians. Since the introduction of the term, there have been key areas in which the superiority of MAFLD over the traditional NAFLD terminology has been demonstrated, including for the risk of liver and extrahepatic mortality, disease associations, and for identifying high-risk individuals. Additionally, MAFLD has been adopted by a number of leading pan-national and national societies due to its concise diagnostic criterion, removal of the requirement to exclude concomitant liver diseases, and reduction in the stigma associated with this condition. The current article explores the differences between MAFLD and NAFLD diagnosis, areas of benefit, some potential limitations, and how the MAFLD terminology has opened up new fields of research.

Metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease: The new nomenclature and its impact

BACKGROUND

In 2020, an international expert panel proposed a new definition of fatty liver: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The MAFLD added the criteria for defining metabolic dysfunctions, which are high-risk factors for liver-related and cardiovascular events. Contrary to the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) definition, it allows the coexistence of MAFLD and significant alcohol use in the same patient.

AIM

To review the existing data that evaluate the clinical profile and long-term outcome difference between the patients identified as MAFLD and NAFLD.

METHODS

Databases MEDLINE via PubMed and EMBASE were searched and relevant publications up to June 28, 2022 were assessed. Studies were included if they involved human participants diagnosed with MAFLD.

RESULTS

A total of 2324 records were reviewed, of which 1575 duplicate citations were removed. Of the 2324 records screened, 207 articles were excluded, and 542 articles were assessed for their eligibility, for which 511 were excluded. The remaining 31 articles were selected for review. MAFLD diagnostic criteria were able to identify more individuals with fatty liver. Studies have shown that patients included using the MAFLD criteria were associated with higher risks of hepatic fibrosis when compared to NAFLD. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease-related, and cancer-related mortality were shown to be higher in MAFLD patients. MAFLD patients also had higher baseline metabolic derangement, and risks of developing obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular events. Of the 3 subtypes, diabetes mellitus has the strongest association with negative outcomes, followed by metabolic dysfunction and elevated body mass index. Within the subtypes of MAFLD, patients with more metabolic conditions at the time of diagnosis had worse hepatic and liver injury compared to those with a single metabolic condition.

CONCLUSION

MAFLD is a new definition of fatty liver disease that is gaining increasing acceptance. It is based on empirical clinical practice on positive inclusion of metabolic risk factors and recent evidence suggests that it helps to identify patients with higher risk for liver-related as well as cardiovascular events.

Lean or diabetic subtypes predict increased all-cause and disease-specific mortality in metabolic-associated fatty liver disease

BACKGROUND

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) encompasses diverse disease groups with potentially heterogeneous clinical outcomes. We investigated the risk of all-cause and disease-specific mortality in MAFLD subgroups.

METHODS

Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, participants were divided into four subgroups: no MAFLD, MAFLD-diabetes, MAFLD-overweight/obese, and MAFLD-lean. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values for all-cause and disease-specific mortality according to MAFLD subgroups were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among 9,935,314 participants, those with MAFLD-diabetes showed the highest risk of all-cause and disease-specific mortality. The HRs (95% CI) for all-cause mortality were 1.61 (1.59-1.63), 1.36 (1.34-1.38), and 1.19 (1.18-1.20) in the MAFLD-diabetes, MAFLD-lean, and MAFLD-overweight/obese groups, respectively. The magnitude of cardiovascular disease and cancer-related risk showed the same pattern. The risk of liver-related mortality in the MAFLD-lean group (HR: 2.84, 95% CI: 2.72-2.97) was comparable with that in the MAFLD-diabetes group (HR: 2.85, 95% CI: 2.75-2.95). When stratified by body mass index, liver-related mortality was the highest in MAFLD-lean individuals in the underweight group (HR, 5.03, 95% CI: 4.23-5.97).

CONCLUSIONS

The MAFLD-lean and MAFLD-diabetes groups had a higher risk of all-cause and disease-specific mortality than did the MAFLD-overweight/obese group. Classifying MAFLD subgroups based on metabolic phenotypes might help risk stratification of patients with MAFLD.

Metabolic associated fatty liver disease better identifying patients at risk of liver and cardiovascular complications

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

A nomenclature of "metabolic associated fatty liver disease" (MAFLD) with a new definition was proposed in 2020 instead of the previous "non-alcoholic fatty liver disease" (NAFLD). Whether it better coheres with the clinical demand remains controversial.

METHODS

The participants with fatty liver on ultrasonography in Taiwan bio-bank cohorts were included. MAFLD is defined as the presence of fatty liver, plus any of the following three conditions: overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), or metabolic dysfunction. The severity of liver fibrosis was determined using fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS). The risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease was assessed using intima-media thickness (IMT) or plaques of carotid duplex ultrasound.

RESULTS

A total of 9,719 subjects (ages 55.9 ± 10.8; males 42.6%) were distributed among 4 groups: "overlapping group", "MAFLD only", "NAFLD only", and "neither fatty liver disease (FLD)" with the percentages of 79.7, 12, 7.1, and 1.2%, respectively. Compared with NAFLD patients, MAFLD patients had a greater percentage of males, higher levels of BMI, waist circumference, HbA1c, and triglyceride. In addition, they had higher levels of serum ALT, AST, GGT, fatty liver index (FLI), NFS, and IMT, but no difference in FIB-4 index and the percentage of carotid plaques. To note, "MAFLD only group" had greater levels of AST, ALT, GGT, FLI, FIB-4, NFS, IMT and a higher percentage of carotid plaques than the "NAFLD only group".

CONCLUSION

The grand, population-based study showed MAFLD with new diagnostic criteria to aid in identifying a greater number of high-risk patients of metabolic, liver, and cardiovascular complications, suggesting MAFLD may be a better nomenclature than NAFLD in clinical practice.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and implications for cardiovascular risk and disease prevention

The newly proposed term "metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease" (MAFLD) is replacing the old term "non-alcoholic fatty liver disease" (NAFLD) in many global regions, because it better reflects the pathophysiology and cardiometabolic implications of this common liver disease. The proposed change in terminology from NAFLD to MAFLD is not simply a single-letter change in an acronym, since MAFLD is defined by a set of specific and positive diagnostic criteria. In particular, the MAFLD definition specifically incorporates within the classification recognized cardiovascular risk factors. Although convincing evidence supports a significant association between both NAFLD and MAFLD, with increased risk of CVD morbidity and mortality, neither NAFLD nor MAFLD have received sufficient attention from the Cardiology community. In fact, there is a paucity of scientific guidelines focusing on this common and burdensome liver disease from cardiovascular professional societies. This Perspective article discusses the rationale and clinical relevance for Cardiologists of the newly proposed MAFLD definition.

Utility of Human Relevant Preclinical Animal Models in Navigating NAFLD to MAFLD Paradigm

Fatty liver disease is an emerging contributor to disease burden worldwide. The past decades of work established the heterogeneous nature of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) etiology and systemic contributions to the pathogenesis of the disease. This called for the proposal of a redefinition in 2020 to that of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) to better reflect the current understanding of the disease. To date, several clinical cohort studies comparing NAFLD and MAFLD hint at the relevancy of the new nomenclature in enriching for patients with more severe hepatic injury and extrahepatic comorbidities. However, the underlying systemic pathogenesis is still not fully understood. Preclinical animal models have been imperative in elucidating key biological mechanisms in various contexts, including intrahepatic disease progression, interorgan crosstalk and systemic dysregulation. Furthermore, they are integral in developing novel therapeutics against MAFLD. However, substantial contextual variabilities exist across different models due to the lack of standardization in several aspects. As such, it is crucial to understand the strengths and weaknesses of existing models to better align them to the human condition. In this review, we consolidate the implications arising from the change in nomenclature and summarize MAFLD pathogenesis. Subsequently, we provide an updated evaluation of existing MAFLD preclinical models in alignment with the new definitions and perspectives to improve their translational relevance.

NAFLD VS MAFLD. The evidence-based debate has come. Time to change?

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects one-third of the world's adult population and is linked to metabolic syndrome. It can progress to steatohepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. During the last four decades, it has been the subject of exhaustive research in multiple aspects to define its epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms and therapy. In 2020, a group of international experts proposed the change of name to metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) with the main objective of making it an inclusive diagnosis prioritizing metabolic abnormalities. However, the change in terminology included the modification of the diagnostic criteria allowing the non-exclusion of other concomitant liver diseases such as alcohol liver disease, and chronic hepatitis B or C. The proposal precipitated a wave of debates among experts based on theoretical opinions on the desirability of the rapid adoption of the new terminology. But it also precipitated a wave of epidemiological and clinical studies which, two years later, have provided clinical evidence on the differences and similarities of the two entities, specially, those that could be considered for future refinements of the diagnostic criteria of MAFLD. Likewise, this evidence may contribute to deciding the time of adoption of this terminology. In this text, we discuss, in general terms, important aspects of the clinical evidence that has been generated to date in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies focusing on clinical characteristics and outcomes, mainly on all-cause and specific mortality of MAFLD.

Factors Associated With Liver Steatosis in People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus on Contemporary Antiretroviral Therapy

BACKGROUND

Given the impact of new antiretroviral drugs on weight and metabolic parameters, their potential contribution to the development of liver steatosis is of concern. We investigated the determinants of liver steatosis in patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS).

METHODS

Between 2019 and 2021, we measured liver stiffness and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) using transient elastography in consecutive SHCS participants at Bern University Hospital. Individuals with viral hepatitis coinfection and pregnant women were excluded. We used multivariable logistic regression to explore factors associated with steatosis.

RESULTS

Of 416 participants, 113 (27.2%) were female, median age was 51 years (interquartile range [IQR], 43-59), 305 (73.3%) were of European origin, and 212 (51.0%) were overweight/obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥25 kg/m2). Liver steatosis (CAP ≥248 dB/m) was present in 212 (51.0%) participants, 11 (5.2%) of whom had significant fibrosis or cirrhosis. One hundred seventy-nine (43.0%) met the criteria for metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). Among 64 individuals with a BMI <25 kg/m2 and liver steatosis, 31 (48.4%) had MAFLD. In multivariable analyses, BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (adjusted odds ratio, 5.76; 95% confidence interval, 3.57-9.29), age ≥50 years (1.88, 1.14-3.09), European origin (3.16, 1.69-5.89), and current use of tenofovir alafenamide (1.70, 1.08-2.69) were associated with liver steatosis. Exposure to integrase inhibitors was not associated with liver steatosis (0.83, 0.51-1.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest a high prevalence of liver steatosis among people with HIV (PWH) on ART in Switzerland. In addition to established risk factors, the use of tenofovir alafenamide was associated with hepatic steatosis.

Cardiometabolic characterization in metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease

Background

To better understand the patient's heterogeneity in fatty liver disease (FLD), metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was proposed by international experts as a new nomenclature for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular risk, assessed through coronary artery calcium (CAC) and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), of patients without FLD and patients with FLD and its different subtypes.

Methods

Cross sectional study of 370 patients. Patients with FLD were divided into 4 groups: FLD without metabolic dysfunction (non-MD FLD), MAFLD and the presence of overweight/obesity (MAFLD-OW), MAFLD and the presence of two metabolic abnormalities (MAFLD-MD) and MAFLD and the presence of T2D (MAFLD-T2D). MAFLD-OW included two subgroups: metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) and metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUHO). The patients without FLD were divided into 2 groups: patients without FLD and without MD (non-FLD nor MD; reference group) and patients without FLD but with MD (non-FLD with MD). EAT and CAC (measured through the Agatston Score) were determined by computed tomography.

Results

Compared with the reference group (non-FLD nor MD), regarding EAT, patients with MAFLD-T2D and MAFLD-MUHO had the highest risk for CVD (OR 15.87, 95% CI 4.26-59.12 and OR 17.60, 95% CI 6.71-46.20, respectively), patients with MAFLD-MHO were also at risk for CVD (OR 3.62, 95% CI 1.83-7.16), and patients with non-MD FLD did not have a significantly increased risk (OR 1.77; 95% CI 0.67-4.73). Regarding CAC, patients with MAFLD-T2D had an increased risk for CVD (OR 6.56, 95% CI 2.18-19.76). Patients with MAFLD-MUHO, MAFLD-MHO and non-MD FLD did not have a significantly increased risk compared with the reference group (OR 2.54, 95% CI 0.90-7.13; OR 1.84, 95% CI 0.67-5.00 and OR 2.11, 95% CI 0.46-9.74, respectively).

Conclusion

MAFLD–T2D and MAFLD–OW phenotypes had a significant risk for CVD. MAFLD new criteria reinforced the importance of identifying metabolic phenotypes in populations as it may help to identify patients with higher CVD risk and offer a personalized therapeutic management in a primary prevention setting.

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Without Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease and the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was proposed to replace nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Some people fulfill diagnostic criteria of NAFLD but not MAFLD (NAFLD without MAFLD), but the clinical implications of NAFLD in these subjects is unknown.

METHODS

We followed cohort of 12,197 men and women 20 years of age or older without metabolic dysfunction (defined by MAFLD criteria), heavy alcohol use, chronic viral hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, or malignancy for their risk of incident metabolic syndrome defined by Adult Treatment Panel III criteria.

RESULTS

By design, none of the study participants had MAFLD at baseline. The prevalence of NAFLD among participants without metabolic dysfunction meeting MAFLD criteria and without significant alcohol intake was 7.6%. During 74,508 person-years of follow-up, 2179 participants developed metabolic syndrome. The fully adjusted hazard ratio for metabolic syndrome comparing participants with NAFLD to those without it was 1.61 (95% confidence interval, 1.42-1.83). The increased risk of incident metabolic syndrome associated with NAFLD persisted for all studied subgroups, and the association was stronger for those with increased waist circumference (P for interaction = .029) and those without elevated triglycerides levels (P for interaction = .047).

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort, participants with NAFLD without MAFLD were at higher risk of developing metabolic syndrome compared to participants with no NAFLD and no MAFLD. Using MAFLD criteria may miss opportunities for early intervention in these subjects.

Global Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of 10 739 607 Individuals

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was proposed as a better definition of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to encompass the metabolic dysregulation associated with NAFLD. This redefinition challenges our understanding of the disease. Hence, this study sought to conduct an updated analysis of the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and associated factors of MAFLD, with a further sensitivity analysis done based on lean and nonobese MAFLD individuals.

METHODS

Medline and Embase databases were searched to include articles on MAFLD. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted using the generalized linear mix model. Associating factors were evaluated in conventional pairwise meta-analysis with sensitivity analysis on lean and nonobese MAFLD.

RESULTS

From pooled analysis involving 3 320 108 individuals, the overall prevalence of MAFLD was 38.77% (95% CI 32.94% to 44.95%); 5.37% (95% CI 4.36% to 6.59%) and 29.78% (95% CI 26.06% to 33.79%) of lean and nonobese individuals, respectively, had MAFLD. Metabolic complications such as hypertension [odds ratio (OR) 2.63, 95% CI 1.85 to 3.74, P < 0.0001 and OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.74 to 2.38, P < 0.0001, respectively] and diabetes (OR 3.80, 95% CI 2.65 to 5.43, P < 0.0001 and OR 3.46, 95% CI 2.81 to 4.27, P < 0.0001, respectively) were found as significant associating factors associated with lean and nonobese MAFLD.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis supports previous studies in reporting MAFLD to affect more than a third of the global population. While exploration of the pathogenic basis of fatty liver disease without metabolic dysregulation is required, the emphasis on management of concomitant metabolic disease in MAFLD can improve multidisciplinary efforts in managing the complex disease.

Liver steatosis and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease among HIV-positive and negative adults in urban Zambia

INTRODUCTION

The growing importance of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and high HIV prevalence in urban African settings may increase the burden of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). We assessed liver steatosis among HIV-positive and negative adults in urban Zambia.

METHODS

Adults 30 years and older who were newly diagnosed with HIV, or tested HIV-negative at two primary care clinics in Lusaka, Zambia, were assessed for liver steatosis. Cardiometabolic data were collected through comprehensive clinical and laboratory assessments. Transient elastography was performed to measure controlled-attenuation parameter (≥248 dB/m). We used multivariable logistic regression models to determine the factors associated with the presence of steatosis.

RESULTS

We enrolled 381 patients, including 154 (40%) antiretroviral therapy-naïve people living with HIV (PLWH) with a median CD4+ count of 247 cells/mm3 and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 23.8 kg/m2. Liver steatosis was observed in 10% of participants overall and was more common among HIV-negative adults than in PLWH (15% vs 3%). The proportion of patients with steatosis was 25% among obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) participants, 12% among those overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2), and 7% among those with a BMI <25 kg/m2. Among patients with a fasting glucose ≥7 mmol/L or confirmed diabetes, 57% had liver steatosis. In multivariable analyses, HIV status (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.18, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.53), confirmed diabetes or elevated fasting glucose (aOR 3.92, 95% CI 1.57 to 9.78) and elevated blood pressure (aOR 2.95, 95% CI 1.34 to 6.48) were associated with steatosis. The association between BMI>25 kg/m2 and liver steatosis was attenuated after adjustment for potential confounders (aOR 1.96, 95% CI 0.88-4.40). Overall, 21 (9%) participants without HIV and 4 (3%) with HIV met the criteria for MAFLD. Among individuals with liver steatosis, 65% (95% CI 49% to 80%) fulfilled criteria of MAFLD, whereas 15 (39%) of them had elevated transaminases and 3 (8%) F2-F4 fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of liver steatosis in this urban cohort of HIV-positive and negative adults in Zambia was low, despite a large proportion of patients with high BMI and central obesity. Our study is among the first to report data on MAFLD among adults in Africa, demonstrating that metabolic risk factors are key drivers of liver steatosis and supporting the adoption of the criteria for MAFLD in African populations.

Prevalence of advanced hepatic fibrosis and comorbidity in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in Korea

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There are several reports on the prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). However, the prevalence of advanced hepatic fibrosis in MAFLD is largely unknown. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of advanced fibrosis in MAFLD.

METHODS

A total of 6775 subjects from nationwide 13 health check-up centres were included in this cross-sectional study. Fatty liver was evaluated using ultrasonography. Significant (≥F2) and advanced (≥F3) hepatic fibrosis were defined by MRE thresholds of 3.0 kPa (range: 2.99-3.65 kPa) and 3.6 kPa (range: 3.4-3.9 kPa) respectively. The sex- and age-standardized prevalence of MAFLD and hepatic fibrosis was estimated.

RESULTS

The sex- and age-standardized prevalence of MAFLD was 33.9%. The prevalence of obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m² ) in MAFLD was 71.1%, and 79.0% of obese subjects had MAFLD. The prevalence of diabetes in MAFLD was 13.3%, and 73.6% of subjects with diabetes had MAFLD. The sex- and age-standardized prevalence of significant (≥F2) and advanced hepatic fibrosis (≥F3) amongst MAFLD was 9.7% (range: 3.0-9.8%) and 3.0% (range: 2.6-4.6%) respectively. The prevalence of advanced hepatic fibrosis in overweight/obese (group I), lean (group II) and diabetic (group III) MAFLD was 2.3%, 3.1% and 9.5% respectively.

CONCLUSION

The sex- and age-standardized prevalence of advanced fibrosis was 3.0% (range: 2.6-4.6%) in subjects with MAFLD.

Malaysian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology consensus statement on metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

The Malaysian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology saw the need for a consensus statement on metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The consensus panel consisted of experts in the field of gastroenterology/hepatology, endocrinology, bariatric surgery, family medicine, and public health. A modified Delphi process was used to prepare the consensus statements. The panel recognized the high and increasing prevalence of the disease and the consequent anticipated increase in liver-related complications and mortality. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in MAFLD patients; therefore, cardiovascular disease risk assessment and management is important. A simple and clear liver assessment and referral pathway was agreed upon, so that patients with more severe MAFLD can be linked to gastroenterology/hepatology care, while patients with less severe MAFLD can remain in primary care or endocrinology, where they are best managed. Lifestyle intervention is the cornerstone in the management of MAFLD. The panel provided a consensus on the use of statin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist, pioglitazone, vitamin E, and metformin, as well as recommendations on bariatric surgery, screening for gastroesophageal varices and hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplantation in MAFLD patients. Increasing the awareness and knowledge of the various stakeholders on MAFLD and incorporating MAFLD into existing noncommunicable disease-related programs and activities are important steps to tackle the disease. These consensus statements will serve as a guide on MAFLD for clinicians and other stakeholders.

MAFLD: Renovation of clinical practice and disease awareness of fatty liver

Recently, international expert panels have proposed a new definition of fatty liver: metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). MAFLD is not just a simple renaming of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The unique feature of MAFLD is the inclusion of metabolic dysfunctions, which are high-risk factors for events. In addition, MAFLD is independent of alcohol intake and the co-existing causes of liver disease. This new concept of MAFLD may have a widespread impact on patients, medical doctors, medical staff, and various stakeholders regarding fatty liver. Thus, MAFLD may renovate clinical practice and disease awareness of fatty liver. In this review, we introduce the definition of and rationale for MAFLD. We further describe representative cases showing how the diagnostic processes differ between MAFLD and NAFLD. We also summarize recent studies comparing MAFLD with NAFLD and discuss the impact of MAFLD on clinical trials, Japanese populations, and disease awareness.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: a year in review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In 2020, a novel comprehensive redefinition of fatty liver disease was proposed by an international panel of experts. This review aims to explore current evidence regarding the impact of this new definition on the current understanding of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and clinical trials for fatty liver disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

The effectiveness of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was compared to the existing criteria for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Recent data robustly suggest the superior utility of MAFLD in identifying patients at high risk for metabolic dysfunction, the hepatic and extra-hepatic complications, as well as those who would benefit from genetic testing, including patients with concomitant liver diseases. This change in name and criteria also appears to have improved disease awareness among patients and physicians.

SUMMARY

The transformation in name and definition from NAFLD to MAFLD represents an important milestone, which indicates significant tangible progress towards a more inclusive, equitable, and patient-centred approach to addressing the profound challenges of this disease. Growing evidence has illustrated the broader and specific contexts that have tremendous potential for positively influencing the diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the momentum accompanying this name change has included widespread public attention to the unique burden of this previously underappreciated disease.