Comparative Effectiveness of Biologics for Endoscopic Healing of the Ileum and Colon in Crohn's Disease

The efficacy, safety, and persistence of vedolizumab versus adalimumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the efficacy, safety, and treatment persistence of vedolizumab and adalimumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

Through a comprehensive search of three databases up to September 2024, we calculated pooled effect estimates for binary outcomes using risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's I2 and Q statistics, with a random-effects model applied when I2 exceeded 50%, and a fixed-effects model used otherwise. For randomized trials, the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was applied; the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed nonrandomized trials.

RESULTS

We analyzed 12 studies involving 4095 patients. The findings showed that vedolizumab had higher clinical remission and response rates compared to adalimumab (RR: 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.34, P < 0.01; RR: 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22, P = 0.03). However, no significant differences were observed in endoscopic remission between the two treatments (RR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.47-1.18, P = 0.21). Safety outcomes, based on adverse and serious adverse event rates, have no significant differences (RR: 0.67, 95% CI 0.41-1.12, P = 0.13; RR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.36-1.68, P = 0.53). Treatment persistence also showed no significant difference between vedolizumab and adalimumab (RR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.55-1.12, P = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that vedolizumab may be more effective than adalimumab in alleviating symptoms and achieving clinical response. Importantly, this effectiveness is achieved without an increase in adverse events. No significant difference was found in treatment persistence. However, high heterogeneity may weaken the evidence, requiring further randomized trials for confirmation.

Effectiveness of biologics for endoscopic healing in patients with isolated proximal small bowel Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic healing (EH) is a key therapeutic target in Crohn's disease (CD). Proximal small bowel (SB) lesions in patients with CD are associated with a significant risk of strictures and bowel resection. Assessing SB in patients with CD is necessary because of its significant therapeutic implications. The advent of biologic therapies, including infliximab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab, has significantly altered CD treatment. However, data on the efficacy of biologics in achieving EH, specifically in the proximal SB of patients with CD, remain limited.

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of biologics for EH in patients with jejunal and/or proximal ileal CD.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2023, we retrospectively included 110 consecutive patients with isolated proximal SB CD, identified through baseline balloon-assisted enteroscopy. These patients completed 1-year of treatment with infliximab, ustekinumab, or vedolizumab, and underwent a second balloon-assisted enteroscopy at 1 year. Complete EH was defined as a modified Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) of < 3, while EH of the jejunum and proximal ileum was defined as a segmental modified SES-CD of 0.

RESULTS

In total, 64 patients were treated with infliximab, 28 with ustekinumab, and 18 with vedolizumab. The complete EH rate at 1 year was 20.9% (23/110), with 29.6% (19/64) for infliximab, 10.7% (3/28) for ustekinumab, and 5.5% (1/18) for vedolizumab. The median modified SES-CD significantly decreased compared to baseline [5 (2-8) vs 8 (6-9), P < 0.001]. The jejunal and proximal ileal EH rates at 1 year were 30.8% (12/39) and 15.5% (16/103), respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that stricturing or penetrating disease [odds ratio (OR) = 0.261, 95%CI: 0.087-0.778, P = 0.016], prior exposure to biologics (OR = 0.080, 95%CI: 0.010-0.674, P = 0.020), and moderate-to-severe endoscopic disease (OR = 0.277, 95%CI: 0.093-0.829, P = 0.022) were associated with a lower likelihood of achieving EH at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Only 20.9% of patients with isolated proximal SB CD achieved complete EH after 1 year of biologic therapy.

Re-evaluating Methods for Assessing Differences in Response in Ileal vs Colonic Crohn's Disease: A Post-hoc Analysis of the FITZROY Trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The ileum is the most commonly affected segment of the gastrointestinal tract in Crohn's disease [CD]. We aimed to determine whether disease location affects response to filgotinib, a Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitor, in patients with moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease [CD] and applying appropriate methods to account for differences in measuring disease activity in the ileum compared with the colon.

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis of data from the FITZROY phase 2 trial [NCT02048618] compared changes in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [SES-CD] among patients with ileal-dominant and isolated colonic CD treated with 10 weeks of filgotinib 200 mg daily or placebo. A mixed effects model for repeated measures was used to test whether ileal disease responded differently when compared with colonic disease, by evaluating for effect modification using the interaction term of treatment assignment-by-disease location.

RESULTS

Numerically greater proportions of patients with isolated colonic disease compared to ileal-dominant CD achieved clinical remission [CDAI < 150, 75.9% vs 41.6%] and endoscopic response [SES-CD reduction by 50%, 52.5% vs 15.5%] at Week 10. However, after adjusting for baseline disease activity by disease location and within-patient clustering effects, there was no significant difference in treatment response by disease location [mean difference in ΔCDAI between ileal-dominant vs isolated colonic disease + 9.24 [95% CI: -87.19, +105.67], p = 0.85; mean difference in ΔSES-CD -1.93 [95% CI: -7.03, +3.44], p = 0.48.

CONCLUSIONS

Filgotinib demonstrated similar efficacy in ileal-dominant and isolated colonic CD when controlling for baseline disease activity and clustering effects.

Inadequate Efficacy of Biologics for Treating Proximal Ileal Lesions in Crohn's Disease; A Prospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although biologic therapy has revolutionized the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD), surgery remains unavoidable in cases involving ileal complications. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of biologics on proximal ileal lesions using balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE).

METHODS

This open-label multicenter prospective study was conducted at tertiary referral centers in Japan. We enrolled 253 patients with active ileal CD who were treated with biologics (infliximab/adalimumab/ustekinumab/vedolizumab). BAE was performed at week 0 and week 26, and endoscopic findings were centrally assessed. We evaluated the rate of endoscopic remission (defined as having a maximum modified Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease <4) at week 26 and patient prognosis (CD-related hospitalization and surgery).

RESULTS

At baseline, 74 patients (29.2%) had proximal ileal ulcerations without terminal ileal ulcerations. The second BAE showed that endoscopic remission was achieved in 91 patients (36.0%). Of the patients with complete ulcer healing of the terminal ileum, 28.6% (22/77) had residual ulcers in the proximal ileum. The rate of endoscopic remission in the proximal ileum (50.9%) was relatively lower compared with the colon (63.4%) and terminal ileum (56.7%), a trend consistently observed across all treatment agents. After a median follow-up of 134 weeks, residual ulcerations in the proximal ileum were associated with a poorer prognosis (P = .0126 for hospitalization and P = .0014 for surgery).

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of patients with CD exhibited ulcerations in the proximal ileum, which correlated with a poorer prognosis. These lesions proved challenging to heal, regardless of the type of biologic used.

Interpreting modern randomized controlled trials of medical therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Treatment options for the medical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have expanded substantially over the past decade. Multiple classes of advanced therapies, including both monoclonal antibodies and novel oral small molecules, are now available for the treatment of moderately-to-severely active Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, highlighted by the approvals of the first IL23p19 antagonists, selective Janus kinase inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators. These advances have been accompanied by the identification of novel targets and the rapid growth in both the number and size of IBD clinical trials. Over a dozen landmark randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been completed in the past 5 years, including the first head-to-head biologic trials, the first combination biologic studies, and multiple phase III registrational trials of novel compounds with new co-primary and composite end points that will change the treatment landscape for years to come. Importantly, the methodology of RCTs in IBD has evolved substantially, with new trial designs, evaluation of unique patient populations, and different types of efficacy and safety end points being key innovations. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of how modern RCTs of IBD medical therapies have evolved and the implications for their appraisal that will help guide the application of these data to clinical practice.

Bergapten enhances mitophagy to regulate intestinal barrier and Th17/Treg balance in mice with Crohn's disease-like colitis via PPARγ/NF-κB signaling pathway

This study aimed to investigate whether bergapten (BG), a furanocoumarin phytohormone, holds promise for Crohn's disease (CD)-like colitis treatment and to preliminarily explore its potential mechanisms. 2,4,6-Trinitrobenzenesufonic acid (TNBS)-treated mice were applied to establish an in vivo research model, and BG was administered with different concentrations. The status of mice in each group was evaluated by disease activity index (DAI), and the severity was evaluated by pathological sections. The intestinal barrier was assessed by measuring in vivo intestinal permeability, peripheral blood intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) levels, epithelial resistance values, and tight junction protein levels. Markers were then used to assess Th17/Treg levels, mitophagy, and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ/ nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway. BG significantly reduced colon tissue damage in a concentration-dependent manner. DAI scores showed that the loose feces, occult blood, and weight loss of mice in the BG treatment were significantly reduced, and pathological section results revealed reduced inflammatory infiltration and fibrosis. Reduced serum FITC-dextran and I-FABP and increased levels of epithelial resistance and tight junction proteins support that the intestinal barrier was protected upon BG. The proportion of Th17 in mesenteric lymph nodes increased while Treg decreased in the model group. BG treatment effectively reduced the conversion of Treg to Th17. Additionally, BG was found to enhance mitophagy and activate the PPARγ/NF-κB signaling. BG demonstrates promising effects in ameliorating intestinal barrier damage and Th17/Treg imbalance in a murine model of CD-like colitis, while also promoting intracellular mitophagy. The PPARγ/NF-κB signaling pathway may serve as a key mediator of BG's regulatory mechanisms.

Real-World Ustekinumab Experience in Ileum-Dominant Versus Colonic Crohn's Disease

Background

Crohn's disease (CD) presents with diverse phenotypes. It remains unclear if CD location affects therapy efficacy. The aim of this study was to compare the real-world performance of ustekinumab in ileum-dominant and colonic CD.

Methods

We performed a single-center, IRB-approved, retrospective review of all adult CD patients who received ustekinumab. We stratified patients by ileal involvement: ileum-dominant (ileal and ileocolonic) and colonic CD. The primary outcome was the absence of ulcers on follow-up colonoscopy. The secondary outcomes included CRP, calprotectin, surgery, and hospitalization. Chi-square tests (or Fisher's exact test) and 2-sample t-tests (or Wilcoxon's rank-sum test) were used to compare categorical and numeric variables between groups, respectively; analyses were performed using R Computing Software versions 3.6.1.

Results

Eighty-four patients with ileum-dominant CD and 27 patients with colonic CD were treated with ustekinumab. The median time to follow-up endoscopy was 13 months. Follow-up colonoscopy after ustekinumab therapy was ulcer-free in 45% of ileum-dominant CD and 76% of colonic CD (P = .02). Of patients with ulcers prior to starting ustekinumab, 24% of ileum-dominant CD and 67% of colonic CD were ulcer-free (P = .01). There were similar rates of hospitalizations and surgery and no significant differences in mean calprotectin and CRP between the two groups on follow-up after ustekinumab therapy.

Conclusions

This real-world experience of ustekinumab demonstrates higher rates of endoscopic healing among colonic CD when compared to ileum-dominant CD. Disease location may predict endoscopic healing by ustekinumab. Further studies are necessary to expand our understanding of ustekinumab responsiveness to different CD phenotypes.

Reliability and Responsiveness of Histologic Indices for the Assessment of Crohn's Disease Activity

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The operating properties of histologic indices for evaluating Crohn's disease (CD) activity are poorly characterized. We assessed the reliability and responsiveness of existing histologic indices/items used in CD and ulcerative colitis (UC), in addition to 3 novel items, and developed exploratory ileal, colonic, and colonic-ileal CD instruments.

METHODS

Blinded central readers independently reviewed paired baseline and week 12 image sets from the EXTEND trial. Disease activity was scored using 4 indices (the Global Histologic Activity Score, Geboes Score, Nancy Histological Index, and Robarts Histopathology Index) and 3 items identified by an expert panel (mucin depletion, basal plasmacytosis, and ileal pyloric gland metaplasia). Reliability and responsiveness were quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), respectively. Exploratory indices were developed using backward stepwise linear regression analysis. Candidate independent variables were items with an inter-rater ICC ≥0.40 and AUC ≥0.56. The dependent variable was histologic disease activity measured by a 100-mm visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

Paired image sets were available from 55 patients. Substantial to almost perfect inter-rater reliability (ICC, 0.63-0.87) and some responsiveness (AUC, 0.57-0.94) were observed for all existing indices regardless of whether individual colonic and ileal segments, combined colonic segments, or combined colonic and ileal segments were assessed and the calculation method used. Five items were tested as candidate items, and exploratory colonic, ileal, and colonic-ileal indices were developed.

CONCLUSIONS

CD and UC indices were similarly reliable and responsive in measuring histologic CD activity. Exploratory index development did not offer benefit over current histologic instruments.

How comparative studies can inform treatment decisions for Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

As new therapies for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) are approved, there is an increasing need for evidence that clarifies their positioning and sequencing.

AREAS COVERED

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) aims to inform physicians' decisions when they choose which intervention (drug or treatment strategy) to administer to their patients. Pragmatic head-to-head trials represent the best tools for CER, but only a few have been published in the IBD field. Network meta-analyses can point toward the superiority of one drug over another, but they do not reflect everyday clinical practice. Finally, real-world evidence complements that coming from head-to-head trials and network meta-analyses, assessing the real-life effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

EXPERT OPINION

There is insufficient evidence to create a definitive therapeutic algorithm for CD, but some general considerations can be made. Anti-TNF-α agents seemingly represent the most 'sustainable' first-line choice, considering benefit-harm ratio and costs; vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and risankizumab may be considered as first-line choice when safety issues become prominent. In the event of pharmacodynamic failure, out-of-class swap is to be preferred - possibly with anti-IL23p19 as the best option, with unclear data regarding upadacitinib positioning; a second anti-TNF-α could be considered, as a second choice, after pharmacokinetic failure.

Defining Endoscopic Remission in Crohn's Disease: MM-SES-CD and SES-CD Thresholds Associated With Low Risk of Disease Progression

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We assessed Modified Multiplier Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (MM-SES-CD) and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) thresholds that are best associated with low likelihood of long-term disease progression.

METHODS

Data from 61 patients with early Crohn's disease (CD) who participated in the CALM long-term extension study were used as the derivation cohort and validated using the McMaster inflammatory bowel disease database (n = 99). The primary outcome was disease progression (new internal fistula/abscess, stricture, perianal fistula or abscess, CD-related hospitalization or surgery) since the end of the CALM trial. Optimal MM-SES-CD and SES-CD thresholds were determined using the maximum Youden index. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses compared threshold scores of remission definitions on disease progression.

RESULTS

In the derivation cohort, based on the maximum Youden index, the optimal thresholds associated with a low likelihood of disease progression were MM-SES-CD <22.5 and SES-CD <4. A significantly greater proportion of patients with a MM-SES-CD ≥22.5 had disease progression as compared with patients in the derivation cohort with MM-SES-CD <22.5 (10/17 [58.8%] vs 3/44 [6.8%]; P < .001). Similarly, a significantly greater number of patients with SES-CD ≥ 4 had disease progression compared with those with a SES-CD <4 (11/25 [44.0%] vs 2/36 [5.6%]; P < .001). Compared with other clinical or endoscopic remission definitions, which demonstrated poor to fair accuracy, MM-SES-CD <22.5 performed the best for predicting disease progression (area under the curve = 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.94; P < .001). These thresholds were confirmed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

Achievement of MM-SES-CD <22.5 or SES-CD <4 in patients with ileocolonic or colonic CD is associated with low risk of disease progression and may be suitable targets in clinical trials and practice for endoscopic healing.

Personalised therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease being their most common presentations, comprise a spectrum of diverse disease phenotypes, exhibiting variable behaviors ranging from an indolent course to aggressive phenotypes that impact quality of life of these patients. The last two decades have been marked by the development of new medications (biological therapy and novel small molecules) with diverse mechanisms of action, which have revolutionized the management of IBD, thereby enhancing the quality of life for these patients. This landscape of multiple therapeutic options underscores the need to define which medication will benefit each patient the most and at what speed it should be started. The objective of this review is to present personalized approaches for patients with IBD, thus contributing to therapeutic management.

TNF Promoter Hypomethylation Is Associated With Mucosal Inflammation in IBD and Anti-TNF Response

Background and Aims

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic inflammatory conditions influenced heavily by environmental factors. DNA methylation is a form of epigenetic regulation linking environmental stimuli to gene expression changes and inflammation. Here, we investigated how DNA methylation of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) promoter differs between inflamed and uninflamed mucosa of IBD patients, including anti-TNF responders and nonresponders.

Methods

We obtained mucosal biopsies from 200 participants (133 IBDs and 67 controls) and analyzed TNF promoter methylation using bisulfite sequencing, comparing inflamed with uninflamed segments, in addition to paired inflamed/uninflamed samples from individual patients. We conducted similar analyses on purified intestinal epithelial cells from bowel resections. We also compared TNF methylation levels of inflamed and uninflamed mucosa from a separate cohort of 15 anti-TNF responders and 17 nonresponders. Finally, we sequenced DNA methyltransferase genes to identify rare variants in IBD patients and functionally tested them using rescue experiments in a zebrafish genetic model of DNA methylation deficiency.

Results

TNF promoter methylation levels were decreased in inflamed mucosa of IBD patients and correlated with disease severity. Isolated intestinal epithelial cells from inflamed tissue showed proportional decreases in TNF methylation. Anti-TNF nonresponders showed lower levels of TNF methylation than responders in uninflamed mucosa. Our sequencing analysis revealed 2 missense variants in DNA methyltransferase 1, 1 of which had reduced function in vivo.

Conclusion

Our study reveals an association of TNF promoter hypomethylation with mucosal inflammation, suggesting that IBD patients may be particularly sensitive to inflammatory environmental insults affecting DNA methylation. Together, our analyses indicate that TNF promoter methylation analysis may aid in the characterization of IBD status and evaluation of anti-TNF therapy response.

Comparative Efficacy of Advanced Therapies for Achieving Endoscopic Outcomes in Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of advanced therapies for achieving endoscopic outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severely active Crohn's disease.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to August 2, 2023 to identify phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, etrolizumab, vedolizumab, anti-interleukin (IL)12/23p40, anti-IL23p19, or Janus kinase-1 (JAK1) inhibitors, compared with placebo/active comparator, for induction and/or maintenance of remission and reported endoscopic outcomes. Primary outcome was endoscopic response after induction therapy, and endoscopic remission after maintenance therapy. We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis using a frequentist approach, and estimated relative risk (RRs), 95% confidence interval (CI) values, and P score for ranking agents. We used GRADE to ascertain certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 20 RCTs (19 placebo-controlled and 1 head-to-head trial; 5592 patients) were included out of which 12 RCTs reported endoscopic outcomes for the induction phase, 5 reported for the maintenance phase, and 3 reported for both induction and maintenance phases. JAK1 inhibitors (RR, 3·49 [95% CI, 1·48-8·26]) and anti-IL23p19 (RR, 2·30 [95% CI, 1·02-5·18]) agents were more efficacious than etrolizumab (moderate certainty of evidence), and JAK1 inhibitors (RR, 2·34 [95% CI, 1·14-4·80]) were more efficacious than anti-IL12/23p40 agents for inducing endoscopic response (moderate certainty of evidence). JAK1 inhibitors and anti-IL23p19 ranked highest for induction of endoscopic response. There was paucity of RCTs of TNF antagonists reporting endoscopic outcomes with induction therapy. On network meta-analysis of 6 RCTs, all agents except vedolizumab (RR, 1.89 [95% CI, 0.61-5.92]) were effective in maintaining endoscopic remission compared with placebo. TNF antagonists, IL12/23p40, and JAK1 inhibitors were ranked highest.

CONCLUSIONS

On network meta-analysis, JAK1 inhibitors and anti-IL23p19 agents may be the most effective among non-TNF-targeting advanced therapies for inducing endoscopic response. Future head-to-head trials will further inform positioning of different therapies for the management of Crohn's disease.

Rapidly achieving clinical remission in ulcerative colitis indicates better endoscopic and histological outcomes

BACKGROUND

Clinical remission (CR) is the principal short-term treatment target in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, whether rapidly achieving CR indicates better outcomes remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to explore the associations between the timing of CR and therapeutic outcomes in UC.

METHODS

This study included UC patients from the UNIFI trial. Week-2 CR and time to CR were the major variables of interest. Endoscopic remission (ER) at week 52 was the primary outcome. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between variables and outcomes.

RESULTS

Week-2 CR was associated with ER (aOR: 2.37 [95% CI: 1.28, 4.37], p = 0.006) and Histological remission (HR) (aOR: 2.87 [95% CI: 1.42, 5.72], p = 0.003) at week 52. Moreover, C-reactive protein (CRP) remission could further stratify patients without CR and predict week-52 outcomes. Patients with clinical activity + CRP remission (aOR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.26, 0.93], p = 0.039) and clinical activity + CRP activity (aOR: 0.24 [95% CI: 0.11, 0.52], p < 0.001) had gradually decreased likelihood of achieving ER, when compared to those with CR. For time to CR, we found that the earlier to CR, the better endoscopic and histological outcomes patients would attain. Patients achieving CR at weeks 2, 4/8, 12/16 and >16 had gradually reduced proportions of ER (51.9% vs. 40.8% vs. 31.6% vs. 8.8%, p < 0.001) and HR (37.0% vs. 19.8% vs. 17.1% vs. 6.1%, p < 0.001) at week 52. Compared with week 2, achieving CR at weeks 4/8, 12/16 and >16 had 39%, 55% and 92% lower likelihoods of week-52 ER, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Week-2 CR indicates better outcomes in UC patients receiving ustekinumab. Moreover, achieving CR more rapidly is associated with higher probability of ER and HR.

Comparative Efficacy of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Infliximab and Vedolizumab for Maintenance Treatment of TNF-naive Adult Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Infliximab and vedolizumab are widely used to treat Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

AIMS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated comparative efficacy of various regimens for intravenous or subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab during maintenance treatment in CD and UC.

METHODS

Parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by a systematic literature review (CRD42022383401) and included if they evaluated therapeutics of interest for maintenance treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe luminal CD or UC and assessed clinical remission between Weeks 30 and 60. Clinical remission rates in CD or UC and mucosal healing rates in UC were analyzed in a Bayesian network meta-analysis model. Endoscopic outcomes in CD were synthesized by proportional meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 13 RCTs were included in the analyses. All vedolizumab studies randomized induction responders to maintenance treatment; infliximab studies used a treat-through design. Subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks had the highest odds ratio (OR) [95% credible interval] versus placebo for clinical remission during the maintenance phase (CD: 5.90 [1.90-18.2]; UC: 5.45 [1.94-15.3]), with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.91 and 0.82, respectively. For mucosal healing in UC, subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks showed the highest OR (4.90 [1.63-14.1]), with SUCRA value of 0.73, followed by intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (SUCRA value, 0.70). Endoscopic outcomes in CD were better with subcutaneous infliximab 120 mg every 2 weeks than intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous infliximab showed a favorable efficacy profile for achieving clinical remission and endoscopic outcomes during maintenance treatment in CD or UC.

Gut microbiota and metabolites as predictors of biologics response in inflammatory bowel disease: A comprehensive systematic review

Nonresponse to biologic agents in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) poses a significant public health burden, and the prediction of response to biologics offers valuable insights for IBD management. Given the pivotal role of gut microbiota and their endogenous metabolites in IBD, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the potential of fecal microbiota and mucosal microbiota and endogenous metabolomic markers as predictors for biotherapy response in IBD patients. A total of 38 studies were included in the review. Following anti-TNF-α treatment, the bacterial community characteristics of IBD patients exhibited a tendency to resemble those observed in healthy controls, indicating an improved clinical response. The levels of endogenous metabolites butyrate and deoxycholic acid were significantly associated with clinical remission following anti-TNF-α therapy. IBD patients who responded well to vedolizumab treatment had higher levels of specific bacteria that produce butyrate, along with increased levels of metabolites such as butyrate, branched-chain amino acids and acetamide following vedolizumab treatment. Crohn's disease patients who responded positively to ustekinumab treatment showed higher levels of Faecalibacterium and lower levels of Escherichia/Shigella. In conclusion, fecal microbiota and mucosal microbiota as well as their endogenous metabolites could provide a predictive tool for assessing the response of IBD patients to various biological agents and serve as a valuable reference for precise drug selection in clinical IBD patients.

Biologics, small molecule therapies and surgery in small bowel Crohn's disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The terminal ileum and small bowel (SB) are involved in 30-45% of patients with Crohn's disease, while 20% have both small and large bowel involvement. Ileal Crohn's is associated with higher risk of progression to stricturing and penetrating disease 1 , hence it's imperative to utilize effective therapies to induce and maintain clinical and endoscopic remission and prevent intestinal complications. We review the available data of biologics and upadacitinib in small bowel disease, and the emerging data on the role of surgery as first line therapy for isolated Crohn's ileitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most trials assessing drug efficacy do not report efficacy by disease location, and robust data on efficacy of therapies in isolated small bowel Crohn's is sparse. Several studies indicate that small bowel disease is generally less responsive to biologics, and could require higher drug trough levels to achieve endoscopic healing.

SUMMARY

Current therapies for induction and maintenance of remission in moderate to severe Crohn's disease include several classes of monoclonal antibodies and a Janus Kinase inhibitor, upadacitinib. While small bowel Crohn's disease is generally less responsive to treatment, anti-TNFs are still preferred as first line therapy, and the option of early ileocecal resection in early limited ileal disease is gaining interest.

A biomarker-stratified comparison of top-down versus accelerated step-up treatment strategies for patients with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease (PROFILE): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Management strategies and clinical outcomes vary substantially in patients newly diagnosed with Crohn's disease. We evaluated the use of a putative prognostic biomarker to guide therapy by assessing outcomes in patients randomised to either top-down (ie, early combined immunosuppression with infliximab and immunomodulator) or accelerated step-up (conventional) treatment strategies.

METHODS

PROFILE (PRedicting Outcomes For Crohn's disease using a moLecular biomarker) was a multicentre, open-label, biomarker-stratified, randomised controlled trial that enrolled adults with newly diagnosed active Crohn's disease (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≥7, either elevated C-reactive protein or faecal calprotectin or both, and endoscopic evidence of active inflammation). Potential participants had blood drawn to be tested for a prognostic biomarker derived from T-cell transcriptional signatures (PredictSURE-IBD assay). Following testing, patients were randomly assigned, via a secure online platform, to top-down or accelerated step-up treatment stratified by biomarker subgroup (IBDhi or IBDlo), endoscopic inflammation (mild, moderate, or severe), and extent (colonic or other). Blinding to biomarker status was maintained throughout the trial. The primary endpoint was sustained steroid-free and surgery-free remission to week 48. Remission was defined by a composite of symptoms and inflammatory markers at all visits. Flare required active symptoms (HBI ≥5) plus raised inflammatory markers (CRP >upper limit of normal or faecal calprotectin ≥200 μg/g, or both), while remission was the converse-ie, quiescent symptoms (HBI <5) or resolved inflammatory markers (both CRP ≤ the upper limit of normal and calprotectin <200 μg/g) or both. Analyses were done in the full analysis (intention-to-treat) population. The trial has completed and is registered (ISRCTN11808228).

FINDINGS

Between Dec 29, 2017, and Jan 5, 2022, 386 patients (mean age 33·6 years [SD 13·2]; 179 [46%] female, 207 [54%] male) were randomised: 193 to the top-down group and 193 to the accelerated step-up group. Median time from diagnosis to trial enrolment was 12 days (range 0-191). Primary outcome data were available for 379 participants (189 in the top-down group; 190 in the accelerated step-up group). There was no biomarker-treatment interaction effect (absolute difference 1 percentage points, 95% CI -15 to 15; p=0·944). Sustained steroid-free and surgery-free remission was significantly more frequent in the top-down group than in the accelerated step-up group (149 [79%] of 189 patients vs 29 [15%] of 190 patients, absolute difference 64 percentage points, 95% CI 57 to 72; p<0·0001). There were fewer adverse events (including disease flares) and serious adverse events in the top-down group than in the accelerated step-up group (adverse events: 168 vs 315; serious adverse events: 15 vs 42), with fewer complications requiring abdominal surgery (one vs ten) and no difference in serious infections (three vs eight).

INTERPRETATION

Top-down treatment with combination infliximab plus immunomodulator achieved substantially better outcomes at 1 year than accelerated step-up treatment. The biomarker did not show clinical utility. Top-down treatment should be considered standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed active Crohn's disease.

FUNDING

Wellcome and PredictImmune Ltd.

Integrating Evidence to Guide Use of Biologics and Small Molecules for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Advances in science have led to the development of multiple biologics and small molecules for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). This growth in advanced medical therapies has been accompanied by an increase in methodological innovation to study and compare therapies. Guidelines provide an evidence-based approach to integrating therapies into routine practice, but they are often unable to provide timely recommendations as new therapies come to market, and they have limited incorporation of real-world evidence when making recommendations. This limits the scope and usability of guidelines, and a gap remains in defining how best to position and integrate advanced medical therapies for IBD. In this review, we provide a framework for clinicians and researchers to understand key differences in sources of evidence, how different methodologies are applied to study the comparative effectiveness of advanced medical therapies in IBD, and considerations for how these sources of evidence can be used to better integrate current guideline recommendations. Over time, we anticipate this framework will allow for a transition to living guidelines and/or practice recommendations.

TNF promoter hypomethylation is associated with mucosal inflammation in IBD and anti-TNF response

Background and aims

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) are chronic inflammatory conditions influenced heavily by environmental factors. DNA methylation is a form of epigenetic regulation linking environmental stimuli to gene expression changes and inflammation. Here, we investigated how DNA methylation of the TNF promoter differs between inflamed and uninflamed mucosa of IBD patients, including anti-TNF responders and non-responders.

Methods

We obtained mucosal biopsies from 200 participants (133 IBD and 67 controls) and analyzed TNF promoter methylation using bisulfite sequencing, comparing inflamed with uninflamed segments, in addition to paired inflamed/uninflamed samples from individual patients. We conducted similar analyses on purified intestinal epithelial cells from bowel resections. We also compared TNF methylation levels of inflamed and uninflamed mucosa from a separate cohort of 15 anti-TNF responders and 17 non-responders. Finally, we sequenced DNA methyltransferase genes to identify rare variants in IBD patients and functionally tested them using rescue experiments in a zebrafish genetic model of DNA methylation deficiency.

Results

TNF promoter methylation levels were decreased in inflamed mucosa of IBD patients and correlated with disease severity. Isolated IECs from inflamed tissue showed proportional decreases in TNF methylation. Anti-TNF non-responders showed lower levels of TNF methylation than responders in uninflamed mucosa. Our sequencing analysis revealed two missense variants in DNMT1, one of which had reduced function in vivo.

Conclusions

Our study reveals an association of TNF promoter hypomethylation with mucosal inflammation, suggesting that IBD patients may be particularly sensitive to inflammatory environmental insults affecting DNA methylation. Together, our analyses indicate that TNF promoter methylation analysis may aid in the characterization of IBD status and evaluation of anti-TNF therapy response.

Comparative Effectiveness of Biologic Therapies in Preventing Penetrating Complications in Patients With Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Comparative effectiveness of biologics in preventing penetrating disease (PD) in Crohn's disease (CD) is not well established. We compared the risk of developing luminal and perianal PD (LPD and PPD) between biologics used as first-line therapies.

METHODS

Adults (>17 years) with CD who initiated their first biologic (anti-tumor necrosis factor [anti-TNF], ustekinumab [UST], or vedolizumab [VDZ]) were identified from Merative Commercial Database (2006 and 2020). We excluded preexisting PD using a minimum look-back period of 1 year. Cohorts were balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting based on age, sex, comorbidities, prior CD surgery, and CD severity. Pairwise comparisons were performed by Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for immunomodulator exposure, and with biologic exposure treated as a time-dependent variable based on a medication possession ratio of 0.8.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 40,693 patients: 93% anti-TNF, 3% UST, and 4% VDZ. After inverse probability of treatment weighting all comparisons were well balanced. Anti-TNF was protective against LPD (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.78; P < .0001) and PPD (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.96; P = .0045) compared with VDZ and LPD (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.46; P < .0001) compared with UST. There were no significant differences in the risk of LPD and PPD between VDZ and UST. These results were similar after limiting the study period to after 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-TNF therapy was associated with a lower risk of LPD and PPD compared with VDZ, and lower risk of LPD compared with UST. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and to determine potential reasons for these differences.

Use of double-balloon endoscopy and an endoscopic scoring system to assess endoscopic remission in isolated small bowel Crohn's disease after treatment with infliximab

Background

It is unclear how clinical and endoscopic factors affect the attainment of endoscopic remission (ER) in patients with small bowel Crohn's disease (SB-CD) who are infliximab-naïve.

Objectives

We aimed to identify the effect of different factors on attaining ER using double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) evaluation.

Design

A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted from 1 January 2018 to 30 November 2022. Among 262 patients who were screened for isolated SB-CD by baseline DBE, 108 patients were assessed for effectiveness during maintenance infliximab therapy by a second DBE evaluation.

Methods

DBE findings before and after infliximab therapy were compared. ER was defined as a simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) below 3, and segmental ER as SES-CD activity of 0. Multivariate regression with calculations of odds ratios (OR) was used to determine the impact of different factors on attaining ER.

Results

In all, 41 patients (38.0%) achieved ER. An elevated C-reactive protein at week 6 was independently associated with a decreased probability of ER [OR: 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.75-0.98, p = 0.03]. Segmental ER of the terminal ileum, rather than the proximal ileum, was associated with a higher rate of ER (60.9% versus 38.2%, p = 0.01). High baseline SES-CD (⩾16) was unrelated to overall ER. For patients with disease in the terminal ileum, those with moderate/severe disease were less likely to attain segmental ER than those with mild disease [adjusted odds ratios (aOR): 0.27, 95% CI: 0.09-0.83, p = 0.02]. A large ulcer in the terminal ileum was associated with a lower rate of segmental ER (aOR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06-0.56, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

For infliximab-naïve patients with SB-CD, the overall severity of the endoscopic score was unrelated to attainment of ER. Patients were less likely to attain segmental ER if they had greater endoscopic inflammation or larger ulcers in the terminal ileum.

Precision medicine in inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel diseases comprising Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis have emerged as global diseases. Multiple distinct therapeutic mechanisms have allowed us to increase our rates of achieving remission and reducing permanent disease-related morbidity. However, there is limited data to inform relative positioning of different therapies. This review will summarize existing literature on use of clinical decision models to inform relative efficacy of one therapeutic mechanism compared to the other given individual patient characteristics. It will also demonstrate the value of serologic, transcriptomic (from biopsies), and microbiome-based biomarkers in identifying which therapy is most likely to work for a given patient. We will review the existing gaps in the literature in this field and suggest a path forward for future studies to better inform patient care, incorporating the principles of precision medicine in the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

A Review of Available Medical Therapies to Treat Moderate-to-Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The treatment armamentarium for inflammatory bowel disease has expanded rapidly in the past several years with new biologic and small molecule-agents approved for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. This has made treatment selection more challenging with limited but evolving guidance as to where to position each medication. In this review, we discuss the efficacy data for each agent approved in the United States by reviewing their phase 3 trial data and other comparative effectiveness studies. In addition, safety considerations and use in special populations are summarized with proposed algorithms for positioning therapies. The aim is to provide a synopsis of high-impact data and aid in outpatient treatment decision-making for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Early Ileocecal Resection for Crohn's Disease Is Associated With Improved Long-term Outcomes Compared With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Early Crohn's disease (CD) treatment involves anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, whereas ileocecal resection (ICR) is reserved for complicated CD or treatment failure. We compared long-term outcomes of primary ICR and anti-TNF therapy for ileocecal CD.

METHODS

Using cross-linked nationwide registers, we identified all individuals diagnosed with ileal or ileocecal CD between 2003 and 2018 and treated with ICR or anti-TNF agents within 1 year of diagnosis. The primary outcome was a composite of ≥1 of the following: CD-related hospitalization, systemic corticosteroid exposure, CD-related surgery, and perianal CD. We conducted adjusted Cox's proportional hazards regression analyses and determined the cumulative risk of different treatments after primary ICR or anti-TNF therapy.

RESULTS

Of 16,443 individuals diagnosed with CD, 1279 individuals fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 45.4% underwent ICR and 54.6% received anti-TNF. The composite outcome occurred in 273 individuals (incidence rate, 110/1000 person-years) in the ICR group and in 318 individuals (incidence rate, 202/1000 person-years) in the anti-TNF group. The risk of the composite outcome was 33% lower with ICR compared with anti-TNF (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.83). ICR was associated with reduced risk of systemic corticosteroid exposure and CD-related surgery, but not other secondary outcomes. The proportion of individuals on immunomodulator, anti-TNF, who underwent subsequent resection, or were on no therapy 5 years post-ICR was 46.3%, 16.8%, 1.8%, and 49.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that ICR may have a role as first-line therapy in CD management and challenge the current paradigm of reserving surgery for complicated CD refractory or intolerant to medications. Yet, given inherent biases associated with observational data, our findings should be interpreted and applied cautiously in clinical decision making.

Longitudinal Fecal Calprotectin Profiles Characterize Disease Course Heterogeneity in Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The progressive nature of Crohn's disease is highly variable and hard to predict. In addition, symptoms correlate poorly with mucosal inflammation. There is therefore an urgent need to better characterize the heterogeneity of disease trajectories in Crohn's disease by utilizing objective markers of inflammation. We aimed to better understand this heterogeneity by clustering Crohn's disease patients with similar longitudinal fecal calprotectin profiles.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study at the Edinburgh IBD Unit, a tertiary referral center, and used latent class mixed models to cluster Crohn's disease subjects using fecal calprotectin observed within 5 years of diagnosis. Information criteria, alluvial plots, and cluster trajectories were used to decide the optimal number of clusters. Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and analysis of variance were used to test for associations with variables commonly assessed at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Our study cohort comprised 356 patients with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease and 2856 fecal calprotectin measurements taken within 5 years of diagnosis (median 7 per subject). Four distinct clusters were identified by characteristic calprotectin profiles: a cluster with consistently high fecal calprotectin and 3 clusters characterized by different downward longitudinal trends. Cluster membership was significantly associated with smoking (P = .015), upper gastrointestinal involvement (P < .001), and early biologic therapy (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis demonstrates a novel approach to characterizing the heterogeneity of Crohn's disease by using fecal calprotectin. The group profiles do not simply reflect different treatment regimens and do not mirror classical disease progression endpoints.

Reversing the Inflammatory Process-25 Years of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitors

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, peripheral and/or axial spondyloarthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, are characterized by molecular and cellular changes in the immune system. Due to the systemic nature of these diseases, organs such as the liver or cardiovascular system are often affected by the inflammatory process. Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy reduces the activation of pro-inflammatory signaling cascades, mitigates the chronic inflammatory process by restoring cellular balance, and alleviates clinical consequences, such as pain and tissue damage.

The importance of predicting patient responses to monoclonal antibodies for Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory bowel disease that results in relapsing and remitting symptoms but progressive transmural bowel damage leading to significant morbidity. CD results from dysregulation of the immune system related to genetic and environmental factors. While the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting cytokines and adhesion molecules has been shown to improve outcomes in CD patients, their widespread use has been limited due to high costs as well as variable access. Here, we summarize the factors that have been shown to correlate with responsiveness to biologic agents for use in practice.

AREAS COVERED

We summarize the current literature regarding factors that have been shown to influence patient response to various biologic agents including: patient-related factors (e.g. age, gender, weight smoking history); disease-specific factors (e.g. disease duration, location/extension, behavior/phenotype, severity); genetic markers; transcription factors, and the gut microbiome. Finally, we review the utility of prediction models and present data supporting the use of recently developed decision support tools.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical decision support tools developed by machine learning are currently available for the selection of biologic agents in CD patients. We expect these models to become an integral tool for clinicians in the treatment of CD in the coming years.

Personalizing therapy selection in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a complex disease, caused by aberrant immune responses to environmental stimuli where genetic, metabolomic, and environmental variables interact to cause mucosal inflammation. This review sheds light on the different drug and patient related factors that affect personalization of biologics in IBD treatment.

AREAS COVERED

We utilized the online research database PubMed to carry out literature search pertaining to therapies in IBD. We incorporated a combination of primary literature as well as review articles and meta-analyses in writing this clinical review. In this paper, we discuss the mechanisms of action for different biologics, the genotype and phenotype of patients, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of drugs, as factors that influence response rates. We also touch upon the role of artificial intelligence in treatment personalization.

EXPERT OPINION

The future of IBD therapeutics is one of precision medicine, based on the identification of aberrant signaling pathways unique to individual patients as well as exploring the exposome, diet, viruses, and epithelial cell dysfunction as part of disease pathogenesis. We need global cooperation for pragmatic study designs as well as equitable access to machine learning/artificial intelligence technology to reach the unfulfilled potential of IBD care.

Most Placebo-Controlled Trials in Inflammatory Bowel Disease were Underpowered Because of Overestimated Drug Efficacy Rates: Results from a Systematic Review of Induction Studies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Most pharmaceutical clinical trials for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] are placebo-controlled and require effect size estimation for a drug relative to placebo. We compared expected effect sizes in sample size calculations [SSCs] to actual effect sizes in IBD clinical trials.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to March 26, 2021, to identify placebo-controlled induction studies for luminal Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC] that reported an SSC and a primary endpoint of clinical remission/response. Expected effects were subtracted from actual effects, and interquartile ranges [IQRs] for each corresponding median difference were calculated. Linear regression was used to assess whether placebo or drug event rate misspecifications were responsible for these differences.

RESULTS

Of eligible studies, 36.9% [55/149] were excluded because of incomplete SSC reporting, yielding 94 studies [46 CD, 48 UC]. Treatment effects were overestimated in CD for remission (-12.6% [IQR: -16.3 to -1.6%]), in UC for remission (-10.2% [IQR: -16.5 to -5.6%]) and in CD for response (-15.3% [IQR: -27.1 to -5.8%]). Differences observed were due to overestimated drug event rates, whereas expected and actual placebo event rates were similar. A meta-regression demonstrated associations between overestimated treatment effect sizes and several trial characteristics: isolated ileal disease, longer CD duration, extensive colitis [UC], single-centre, phase 2 and no endoscopic endpoint component [UC].

CONCLUSION

Overestimation of IBD therapy efficacy rates resulted in smaller-than-expected treatment effects. These results should be used to inform SSCs and trial design for IBD drug development.

Adalimumab Is Associated With Lower Healthcare Resource and Steroid Use Versus Vedolizumab in Biologic-Naive Crohn's Disease: A Retrospective Claims Database Analysis

Background

We compared real-world healthcare resource utilization (HRU), Crohn's disease (CD)-related complications, and time to systemic corticosteroid discontinuation between patients with CD treated with adalimumab versus vedolizumab as initial biologic.

Methods

Biologic-naïve adults with CD and ≥2 claims between 05/20/2014 and 09/30/2019 for adalimumab or vedolizumab were identified in the IBM MarketScan research database. Patient characteristics were assessed during the 6-month baseline period before biologic initiation (index date). Adalimumab- and vedolizumab-treated patients were propensity score-matched 1:1 on demographics, disease characteristics, and comorbidities with ≥10% prevalence that differed significantly between groups. Categorical, continuous, and time-to-event outcomes between groups during the 12-month follow-up on/after index were compared with chi-square tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and Kaplan-Meier analyses, respectively.

Results

Adalimumab- and vedolizumab-treated patients were matched (n = 461 per group) and baseline characteristics balanced. Significantly fewer adalimumab- versus vedolizumab-treated patients had a CD-related emergency room visit (12-month proportion: 14.5% vs 21.0%; log-rank P < 0.01) or inpatient admission (14.9% vs 20.2%; log-rank P < 0.05). Rates of CD-related surgeries were similar (9.3% vs 11.5%; log-rank P = 0.282). Among patients without internal/perianal abscess or fistula or intestinal stricture at baseline (N ADA = 360, N VDZ = 364), numerically but not significantly fewer adalimumab- versus vedolizumab-treated patients had CD-related complications at 12 months (18.3% vs 22.3%; P = 0.171). Among patients with corticosteroid use at index (N ADA = 143, N VDZ = 139), significantly more adalimumab- versus vedolizumab-treated patients discontinued corticosteroids (12-month proportion: 90.2% vs 76.3%; log-rank P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with CD treated with adalimumab as their first biologic experienced significantly lower CD-related HRU and were more likely to discontinue corticosteroids compared to vedolizumab-treated patients.

Doctor, What Is the Best Crohn's Therapy?

When the only biologics were antitumor necrosis factor agents, it was not hard to treat our sick Crohn's patients. Now with multiple mechanisms of action, the therapeutic landscape is more broad but can be confusing. Trying to compare agents is difficult because head-to-head trials are lacking. A comparative effectiveness methodology allows for indirect comparisons of agents based on the outcome of interest. When deciding what agent is "best" for any specific patient, multiple factors have to be taken into consideration including the primary outcome of interest. In this study, the outcome of mucosal healing is considered.