1
|
Rosdahl A, Hellgren F, Norén T, Smolander J, Wopenka U, Loré K, Hervius Askling H. Cellular and humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine BNT162b2 in adults with Chronic Kidney Disease G4/5. New Microbes New Infect 2024; 62:101458. [PMID: 39282145 PMCID: PMC11400989 DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2024.101458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The mRNA vaccines have proven to be very effective in preventing severe disease and death from SARS-CoV-2 in the general population. However, in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in dialysis or with kidney transplants (KT) the vaccine responses vary, with severe breakthrough infections as a consequence. In this intervention study we investigated the magnitude and quality of the responses to mRNA vaccination administered prior to kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Twenty patients with CKD G4/5 and nine healthy controls were followed for 12 months after receiving two doses of BNT162b2 four weeks apart and a booster dose after 3-6 months. Induction of anti-Spike and anti-RBD IgG in plasma followed the same kinetics in CKD patients and controls, with a trend towards higher titers in controls. In accordance, there was no differences in the establishment of Spike-specific memory B-cells between groups. In contrast, the CKD patients showed lower levels of anti-Spike IgG in saliva and Spike-specific CD8+ T-cells in blood, possibly influencing the capacity of viral clearance which can contribute to an elevated risk of severe breakthrough infections. In conclusion, we found that CKD patients, despite having a reduced mucosal and cytotoxic immunity to BNT162b2, demonstrated a serological response in plasma similar to healthy controls. This suggests that immunization prior to RRT is efficient and motivated. (EudraCT-nr 2021-000988-68).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Rosdahl
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Fredrika Hellgren
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | - Torbjörn Norén
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | | | - Ursula Wopenka
- Department of Renal Medicine, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Karin Loré
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | - Helena Hervius Askling
- Academic Specialist Center, Stockholm County Healthcare Area, Region Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mateo-Urdiales A, Fabiani M, Mayer F, Sacco C, Belleudi V, Da Cas R, Fotakis EA, De Angelis L, Cutillo M, Petrone D, Morciano C, Cannone A, Del Manso M, Riccardo F, Bella A, Menniti-Ippolito F, Pezzotti P, Spila Alegiani S, Massari M. Risk of breakthrough infection and hospitalisation after COVID-19 primary vaccination by HIV status in four Italian regions during 2021. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1569. [PMID: 38862939 PMCID: PMC11165887 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19071-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As of 2024, vaccination remains the main mitigation measure against COVID-19, but there are contradictory results on whether people living with HIV (PLWH) are less protected by vaccines than people living without HIV (PLWoH). In this study we compared the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 hospitalisation following full vaccination in PLWH and PLWoH. METHODS We linked data from the vaccination registry, the COVID-19 surveillance system and from healthcare/pharmacological registries in four Italian regions. We identified PLWH fully vaccinated (14 days post completion of the primary cycle) and matched them at a ratio of 1:4 with PLWoH by week of vaccine administration, age, sex, region of residence and comorbidities. Follow-up started on January 24, 2021, and lasted for a maximum of 234 days. We used the Kaplan-Meier estimator to calculate the cumulative incidence of infection and COVID-19 hospitalisation in both groups, and we compared risks using risk differences and ratios taking PLWoH as the reference group. RESULTS We matched 42,771 PLWH with 171,084 PLWoH. The overall risk of breakthrough infection was similar in both groups with a rate ratio (RR) of 1.10 (95% confidence interval (CI):0.80-1.53). The absolute difference between groups at the end of the study period was 8.28 events per 10,000 person-days in the PLWH group (95%CI:-18.43-40.29). There was a non-significant increase the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation among PLWH (RR:1.90; 95%CI:0.93-3.32) which corresponds to 6.73 hospitalisations per 10,000 individuals (95%CI: -0.57 to 14.87 per 10,000). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest PLWH were not at increased risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 hospitalisation following a primary cycle of mRNA vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Massimo Fabiani
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Flavia Mayer
- National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Sacco
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
- European Programme on Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Valeria Belleudi
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Da Cas
- National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Emmanouil Alexandros Fotakis
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
- European Programme on Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Luigi De Angelis
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Maria Cutillo
- National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Petrone
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Morciano
- National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Cannone
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Del Manso
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Flavia Riccardo
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonino Bella
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Patrizio Pezzotti
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Massari
- National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cheng YL, Chang SS, Chao CH, Chen PT, Lin YL, Syu GD, Lee NY, Chen PL, Ko WC, Ho TS. Optimizing SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses in kidney transplant recipients: an urgent need. Microbiol Spectr 2024; 12:e0000424. [PMID: 38747636 PMCID: PMC11237705 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00004-24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have been identified as a population at increased risk for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes. This study focused on understanding the immune response of KTRs post-vaccination, specifically examining both serological and cellular responses to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Thirteen individuals, including seven KTRs and six healthy donors, were evaluated for antibody levels and T cell responses post-vaccination. The study revealed that KTRs had significantly lower serological responses, including reduced anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) binding antibodies and neutralizing antibodies against the Wuhan, Delta, and Omicron BA.2 strains. Additionally, KTRs demonstrated weaker CD8 T cell cytotoxic responses and lower Th1 cytokine secretion, particularly IFN-γ, after stimulation with variant spike peptide pools. These findings highlight the compromised immunity in KTRs post-vaccination and underscore the need for tailored strategies to bolster immune responses in this vulnerable group. Further investigations are warranted into the mechanisms underlying reduced vaccine efficacy in KTRs and potential therapeutic interventions. IMPORTANCE Some studies have revealed that KTRs had lower serological response against SARS-CoV-2 than healthy people. Nevertheless, limited studies investigate the cellular response against SARS-CoV-2 in KTRs receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Here, we found that KTRs have lower serological and cellular responses. Moreover, we found that KTRs had a significantly lower IFN-γ secretion than healthy individuals when their PBMCs were stimulated with SARS-CoV-2 spike peptide pools. Thus, our findings suggested that additional strategies are needed to enhance KTR immunity triggered by the vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Ling Cheng
- Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Shen-Shin Chang
- Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chiao-Hsuan Chao
- Department of Medical Laboratory and Regenerative Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Ta Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Lan Lin
- Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Guan-Da Syu
- Department of Biotechnology and Bioindustry Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Nan-Yao Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Po-Lin Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chien Ko
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Tzong-Shiann Ho
- Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital Dou-Liou Branch, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Yunlin, Taiwan
- Center of Infectious Disease and Signaling Research, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Inoue K, Hori S, Tomizawa M, Yoneda T, Nakai Y, Miyake M, Tanaka N, Fujimoto K. Risks of infection and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 in kidney transplant recipients: A single-center cohort study. Transpl Immunol 2024; 84:102023. [PMID: 38452985 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2024.102023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known to be high in kidney transplant recipients; however, the risk factors for COVID-19 infection in these patients has not been studied extensively. Therefore, we explored the predictors of COVID-19 infection and severity in kidney transplant recipients in Japan. METHODS This study included kidney transplant recipients who were regularly followed-up at our hospital from February 2021 to March 2023. We retrospectively reviewed the patients' medical charts; obtained their clinical information, including comorbidities, immunosuppressant usage, and presence of COVID-19 infection; and assessed the risk of COVID-19 infection and severity. Severe illness was defined as a decrease in oxygen saturation. RESULTS Among the 155 patients, 50 (32.3%) were infected with COVID-19. Multivariate analysis revealed that recipients taking >5 mg of prednisolone or taking tacrolimus instead of cyclosporine were at higher risk of infection (odds ratio [OR] 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-5.40; OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.03-5.07, respectively). Furthermore, of the 50 infected recipients, 42 had minor illness and eight had severe illness. Multivariate analysis revealed that recipients taking >5 mg of prednisolone were at a higher risk of severity (OR, 11.60, 95% CI 1.19-113.00). CONCLUSION In kidney transplant recipients, the infection rate and severity of COVID-19 tended to increase with higher maintenance doses of steroids. Recipients taking >5 mg of prednisolone should be considered a switch from tacrolimus to cyclosporine because cyclosporine may inhibit viral replication and reduce the risk of infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuniaki Inoue
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan
| | - Shunta Hori
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Tomizawa
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan
| | - Tatsuo Yoneda
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan
| | - Yasushi Nakai
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan
| | - Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan
| | - Nobumichi Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; Department of Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Romero A, Laurent C, Lebourg L, Lemée V, Hanoy M, Le Roy F, Grange S, Lemoine M, Guerrot D, Bertrand D. Anti SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies in Pre-Exposure or Post-Exposure in No- or Weak Responder to Vaccine Kidney Transplant Recipients: Is One Strategy Better than Another? Viruses 2024; 16:381. [PMID: 38543747 PMCID: PMC10975193 DOI: 10.3390/v16030381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are likely to develop severe COVID-19 and are less well-protected by vaccines than immunocompetent subjects. Thus, the use of neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to confer a passive immunity appears attractive in KTRs. Methods: This retrospective monocentric cohort study was conducted between 1 January 2022 and 30 September 2022. All KTRs with a weak antibody response one month after three doses of mRNA vaccine (anti spike IgG < 264 (BAU/mL)) have received tixagevimab-cilgavimab in pre-exposure (group 1), post-exposure (group 2) or no specific treatment (group 3). We compared COVID-19 symptomatic hospitalizations, including intensive care unit hospitalizations, oxygen therapy, and death, between the three groups. Results: A total of 418 KTRs had SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2022. During the study period, we included 112 KTRs in group 1, 40 KTRs in group 2, and 27 KTRs in group 3. The occurrence of intensive care unit hospitalization, oxygen therapy, and COVID-19 death was significantly increased in group 3 compared to group 1 or 2. In group 3, 5 KTRs (18.5%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, 7 KTRs (25.9%) needed oxygen therapy, and 3 KTRs (11.1%) died. Patients who received tixagevimab-cilgavimab pre- or post-exposure had similar outcomes. Conclusions: This retrospective real-life study supports the relative effectiveness of tixagevimab-cilgavimab on COVID-19 infection caused by Omicron, used as a pre- or post-exposure therapy. The continued evolution of Omicron variants has made tixagevimab-cilgavimab ineffective and reinforces the need for new therapeutic monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 active on new variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anais Romero
- Department of Nephrology and Hemodialysis, Hôpital de la Croix Rouge, 76230 Bois Guillaume, France;
| | - Charlotte Laurent
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Hemodialysis, 1 Rue de Germont, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France; (C.L.); (L.L.); (M.H.); (F.L.R.); (S.G.); (M.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Ludivine Lebourg
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Hemodialysis, 1 Rue de Germont, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France; (C.L.); (L.L.); (M.H.); (F.L.R.); (S.G.); (M.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Veronique Lemée
- Department of Virology, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France;
| | - Mélanie Hanoy
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Hemodialysis, 1 Rue de Germont, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France; (C.L.); (L.L.); (M.H.); (F.L.R.); (S.G.); (M.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Frank Le Roy
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Hemodialysis, 1 Rue de Germont, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France; (C.L.); (L.L.); (M.H.); (F.L.R.); (S.G.); (M.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Steven Grange
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Hemodialysis, 1 Rue de Germont, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France; (C.L.); (L.L.); (M.H.); (F.L.R.); (S.G.); (M.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Mathilde Lemoine
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Hemodialysis, 1 Rue de Germont, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France; (C.L.); (L.L.); (M.H.); (F.L.R.); (S.G.); (M.L.); (D.G.)
| | - Dominique Guerrot
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Hemodialysis, 1 Rue de Germont, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France; (C.L.); (L.L.); (M.H.); (F.L.R.); (S.G.); (M.L.); (D.G.)
- INSERM U1096, University of Rouen Normandy, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Dominique Bertrand
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Hemodialysis, 1 Rue de Germont, Rouen University Hospital, 76000 Rouen, France; (C.L.); (L.L.); (M.H.); (F.L.R.); (S.G.); (M.L.); (D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
New J, Cham J, Smith L, Puglisi L, Huynh T, Kurian S, Bagsic S, Fielding R, Hong L, Reddy P, Eum KS, Martin A, Barrick B, Marsh C, Quigley M, Nicholson LJ, Pandey AC. Effects of antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents on postvaccination SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections, antibody response, and serological cytokine profile. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e008233. [PMID: 38296596 PMCID: PMC10831464 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite immunization, patients on antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents have a heightened risk of COVID-19 infection. However, accurately attributing this risk to specific medications remains challenging. METHODS An observational cohort study from December 11, 2020 to September 22, 2022, within a large healthcare system in San Diego, California, USA was designed to identify medications associated with greatest risk of postimmunization SARS-CoV-2 infection. Adults prescribed WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classified antineoplastic and immunomodulating medications were matched (by age, sex, race, and number of immunizations) with control patients not prescribed these medications yielding a population of 26 724 patients for analysis. From this population, 218 blood samples were collected from an enrolled subset to assess serological response and cytokine profile in relation to immunization. RESULTS Prescription of WHO ATC classified antineoplastic and immunomodulatory agents was associated with elevated postimmunization SARS-CoV-2 infection risk (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.63). While multiple immunization doses demonstrated a decreased association with postimmunization SARS-CoV-2 infection risk, antineoplastic and immunomodulatory treated patients with four doses remained at heightened risk (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.43). Risk variation was identified among medication subclasses, with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibiting monoclonal antibodies, calcineurin inhibitors, and CD20 monoclonal antibody inhibitors identified to associate with increased risk of postimmunization SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antineoplastic and immunomodulatory treated patients also displayed a reduced IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 epitopes alongside a unique serum cytokine profile. CONCLUSIONS Antineoplastic and immunomodulating medications associate with an elevated risk of postimmunization SARS-CoV-2 infection in a drug-specific manner. This comprehensive, unbiased analysis of all WHO ATC classified antineoplastic and immunomodulating medications identifies medications associated with greatest risk. These findings are crucial in guiding and refining vaccination strategies for patients prescribed these treatments, ensuring optimized protection for this susceptible population in future COVID-19 variant surges and potentially for other RNA immunization targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob New
- Medicine, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jason Cham
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Lana Smith
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Leah Puglisi
- Medicine, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Tridu Huynh
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Sunil Kurian
- Scripps Organ Transplantation Research & Biorepository, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | | | - Russel Fielding
- Strategy & Planning, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Lee Hong
- Medicine, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Priya Reddy
- Medicine, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Ki Suk Eum
- Medicine, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
- Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Pacific Islands Healthcare System, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Allison Martin
- Scripps Organ Transplantation Research & Biorepository, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Bethany Barrick
- Scripps Organ Transplantation Research & Biorepository, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Christopher Marsh
- Scripps Organ Transplantation Research & Biorepository, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | | | - Laura J Nicholson
- Medicine, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Amitabh C Pandey
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
- Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
- Medicine, Southeast Veterans Health Care System, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Messchendorp AL, Sanders JSF, Abrahams AC, Bemelman FJ, Bouwmans P, van den Dorpel RMA, Hilbrands LB, Imhof C, Reinders MEJ, Rispens T, Steenhuis M, ten Dam MAGJ, Vart P, de Vries APJ, Hemmelder MH, Gansevoort RT. Incidence and Severity of COVID-19 in Relation to Anti-Receptor-Binding Domain IgG Antibody Level after COVID-19 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Viruses 2024; 16:114. [PMID: 38257814 PMCID: PMC10820724 DOI: 10.3390/v16010114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) elicit an impaired immune response after COVID-19 vaccination; however, the exact clinical impact remains unclear. We therefore analyse the relationship between antibody levels after vaccination and the risk of COVID-19 in a large cohort of KTRs. All KTRs living in the Netherlands were invited to send a blood sample 28 days after their second COVID-19 vaccination for measurement of their IgG antibodies against the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (anti-RBD IgG). Information on COVID-19 was collected from the moment the blood sample was obtained until 6 months thereafter. Multivariable Cox and logistic regression analyses were performed to analyse which factors affected the occurrence and severity (i.e., hospitalization and/or death) of COVID-19. In total, 12,159 KTRs were approached, of whom 2885 were included in the analyses. Among those, 1578 (54.7%) became seropositive (i.e., anti-RBD IgG level >50 BAU/mL). Seropositivity was associated with a lower risk for COVID-19, also after adjusting for multiple confounders, including socio-economic status and adherence to COVID-19 restrictions (HR 0.37 (0.19-0.47), p = 0.005). When studied on a continuous scale, we observed a log-linear relationship between antibody level and the risk for COVID-19 (HR 0.52 (0.31-0.89), p = 0.02). Similar results were found for COVID-19 severity. In conclusion, antibody level after COVID-19 vaccination is associated in a log-linear manner with the occurrence and severity of COVID-19 in KTRs. This implies that if future vaccinations are indicated, the aim should be to reach for as high an antibody level as possible and not only seropositivity to protect this vulnerable patient group from disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Lianne Messchendorp
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan F. Sanders
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Alferso C. Abrahams
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike J. Bemelman
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Amsterdam Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Bouwmans
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- CARIM School for Cardiovascular Disease, University of Maastricht, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Luuk B. Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Céline Imhof
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies E. J. Reinders
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Theo Rispens
- Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research, 1006 AD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice Steenhuis
- Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin Research, 1006 AD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc A. G. J. ten Dam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Priya Vart
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Aiko P. J. de Vries
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Nephrology and Leiden Transplant Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marc H. Hemmelder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ron T. Gansevoort
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Urra JM, Castro P, Jiménez N, Moral E, Vozmediano C. Partial recovery of SARS-CoV-2 immunity after booster vaccination in renal transplant recipients. CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS 2023; 3:1-5. [PMID: 38014395 PMCID: PMC9741556 DOI: 10.1016/j.clicom.2022.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has been especially detrimental to patients with end-stage renal disease. History with other vaccines suggests that patients with renal disease may not respond adequately to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The aim of this study is to evaluate the immunity to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in renal patients. Post SARS-CoV-2 vaccination first, and after the booster dose, antibodies and cellular immunity were studied in patients on hemodialysis (N = 20), peritoneal dialysis (N = 10) and renal transplantation (N = 10). After the two doses of vaccine, there was an effective immunity in dialysis patients, with 100% seroconversion and 87% detection of cellular immunity (85% in hemodialysis and 90% in peritoneal dialysis). In contrast, in renal transplant recipients there was only 50% seroconversion and cellular immunity was detected in 30% of patients. After the booster dose, all dialysis patients achieved a cellular and antibody immunity, whereas in transplant patients, despite improvement, 20% did not produce antibodies and in 37.5% cellular immunity could not be detected. The mRNA vaccine plus booster performs excellently in dialysis patients, whereas in kidney transplant recipients, despite the booster, complete immunization is not achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Urra
- Immunology, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
- Facultad de Medicina de Ciudad Real, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha (UCLM), Spain
| | - P Castro
- Nephrology, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - N Jiménez
- Immunology, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - E Moral
- Nephrology, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - C Vozmediano
- Facultad de Medicina de Ciudad Real, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha (UCLM), Spain
- Nephrology, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hori S, Tomizawa M, Yoneda T, Inoue K, Onishi K, Morizawa Y, Gotoh D, Nakai Y, Miyake M, Torimoto K, Tanaka N, Fujimoto K. Chronological Changes in Emotional Status and Vaccine Implementation Rate Among Patients on the Waiting List for Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation During the Prolonged COVID-19 Pandemic. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:2354-2361. [PMID: 37872064 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the emotional attributes and vaccine implementation rate of patients waiting for kidney transplants during the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS We included 145 patients who were on the waiting list at our institution. Clinical information was obtained from medical charts, and emotional changes were assessed using a telephone questionnaire comprising 13 questions, including vaccine implementation. We also investigated factors affecting the decision to accept or decline deceased-donor kidney transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS Of the 145 patients, 121 (83.4%) provided informed consent and completed the questionnaire. The median age at registration on the waiting list for deceased-donor kidney transplantation and the median waiting period was 45.5 years and 103 months, respectively. This cohort comprised 84 males and 37 females. Twenty patients (16.5%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, and 15 (12.4%) were more curious about deceased-donor kidney transplantation. One hundred patients (82.6%) were vaccinated against COVID-19 more than thrice. Thirty patients (24.8%) declined, and 91 patients (75.2%) accepted an organ transplant offer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multivariate analysis revealed that the long-term waiting period (P = .038) and anxiety about COVID-19, such as visiting the transplant facility (P < .0001) and prudence over time (P < .0001), were independent factors influencing the decline of a kidney transplant offer. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that some patients hesitated to undergo deceased-donor kidney transplantation during the pandemic. There is a need to develop an appropriate system to ensure safe and secure kidney transplantation during prolonged pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunta Hori
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | | | - Tatsuo Yoneda
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Kuniaki Inoue
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Kenta Onishi
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | | | - Daisuke Gotoh
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Yasushi Nakai
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | | | - Nobumichi Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan; Department of Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara Medical University, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kronbichler A, Gregg LP, Bargman JM. The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Special Challenge for the Journal's Editors. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 34:1945-1947. [PMID: 37907451 PMCID: PMC10703082 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Kronbichler
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - L. Parker Gregg
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Selzman Institute for Kidney Health, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
- Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Houston, Texas
| | - Joanne M. Bargman
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen Q, Chia A, Hang SK, Lim A, Koh WK, Peng Y, Gao F, Chen J, Ho Z, Wai LE, Kunasegaran K, Tan AT, Le Bert N, Loh CY, Goh YS, Renia L, Dong T, Vathsala A, Bertoletti A. Engineering immunosuppressive drug-resistant armored (IDRA) SARS-CoV-2 T cells for cell therapy. Cell Mol Immunol 2023; 20:1300-1312. [PMID: 37666955 PMCID: PMC10616128 DOI: 10.1038/s41423-023-01080-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients receive immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) and are susceptible to developing severe COVID-19. Here, we analyze the Spike-specific T-cell response after 3 doses of mRNA vaccine in a group of SOT patients (n = 136) treated with different ISDs. We demonstrate that a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (Pred) treatment regimen strongly suppressed the mRNA vaccine-induced Spike-specific cellular response. Such defects have clinical consequences because the magnitude of vaccine-induced Spike-specific T cells was directly proportional to the ability of SOT patients to rapidly clear SARS-CoV-2 after breakthrough infection. To then compensate for the T-cell defects induced by immunosuppressive treatment and to develop an alternative therapeutic strategy for SOT patients, we describe production of 6 distinct SARS-CoV-2 epitope-specific ISD-resistant T-cell receptor (TCR)-T cells engineered using the mRNA electroporation method with reactivity minimally affected by mutations occurring in Beta, Delta, Gamma, and Omicron variants. This strategy with transient expression characteristics marks an improvement in the immunotherapeutic field and provides an attractive and novel therapeutic possibility for immunosuppressed COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Chen
- Emerging Infectious Disease Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Adeline Chia
- Emerging Infectious Disease Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shou Kit Hang
- Emerging Infectious Disease Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Amy Lim
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wee Kun Koh
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yanchun Peng
- MRC Human Immunology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Fei Gao
- MRC Human Immunology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jili Chen
- MRC Human Immunology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Zack Ho
- Lion TCR Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lu-En Wai
- Lion TCR Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kamini Kunasegaran
- Emerging Infectious Disease Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Anthony Tanoto Tan
- Emerging Infectious Disease Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nina Le Bert
- Emerging Infectious Disease Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chiew Yee Loh
- A*STAR ID labs, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yun Shan Goh
- A*STAR ID labs, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Laurent Renia
- A*STAR ID labs, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tao Dong
- MRC Human Immunology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anantharaman Vathsala
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Antonio Bertoletti
- Emerging Infectious Disease Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
- Singapore Immunology Network, A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Quiroga B, Soler MJ, Ortiz A, de Sequera P. Lessons from SENCOVAC: A prospective study evaluating the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum. Nefrologia 2023; 43:676-687. [PMID: 37150670 PMCID: PMC10160849 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2023.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has negatively impacted on patients of the whole CKD spectrum, causing high rates of morbi-mortality. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines opened a new era, but patients with CKD (including kidney transplant, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis) were systematically excluded from pivotal clinical trials. The Spanish Society of Nephrology promoted the multicentric national SENCOVAC study aimed at assessing immunological responses after vaccination in patients with CKD. During the first year after vaccination, patients with non-dialysis CKD and those on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis presented good anti-Spike antibody responses to vaccination, especially after receiving the third and fourth doses. However, kidney transplant recipients presented suboptimal responses after any vaccination schedule (initial, third and fourth dose). Especially worrisome is the situation of a patients with a persistently negative humoral response that do not seroconvert after boosters. In this regard, monoclonal antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 have been approved for high-risk patients, although they may become obsolete as the viral genome evolves. The present report reviews the current status of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum with emphasis on lessons learned from the SENCOVAC study. Predictors of humoral response, including vaccination schedules and types of vaccines, as well as the integration of vaccines, monoclonal antibodies and antiviral agents are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borja Quiroga
- IIS-La Princesa, Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Soler
- Nephrology Department, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain.
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain; IIS-Fundación Jiménez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Fundación Renal Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo-IRSIN, REDinREN, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Patricia de Sequera
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain; Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor - Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fylaktou A, Stai S, Kasimatis E, Xochelli A, Nikolaidou V, Papadopoulou A, Myserlis G, Lioulios G, Asouchidou D, Giannaki M, Yannaki E, Tsoulfas G, Papagianni A, Stangou M. Humoral and Cellular Immunity Are Significantly Affected in Renal Transplant Recipients, following Vaccination with BNT162b2. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1670. [PMID: 38006002 PMCID: PMC10674678 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11111670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) tend to mount weaker immune responses to vaccinations, including vaccines against the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS Humoral immunity was assessed using anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) and neutralizing antibodies (NAb) serum levels measured by ELISA, and cellular immunity was assessed using T-, B-, NK, natural killer-like T (NKT)-cell subpopulations, and monocytes measured by flow cytometry, and also specific T-cell immunity, at predefined time points after BNT162b2 vaccination, in 57 adult RTRs. RESULTS Administration of three booster doses was necessary to achieve anti-RBD and NAb protective levels in almost all patients (92.98%). Ab production, at several time points, was positively correlated with the corresponding renal function and inversely correlated with hemodialysis vintage (HDV) and treatment with mycophenolic acid (MPA). A gradual rise in several cell subpopulations, including total lymphocytes (p = 0.026), memory B cells (p = 0.028), activated CD4 (p = 0.005), and CD8 cells (p = 0.001), was observed even after the third vaccination dose, while a significant reduction in CD3+PD1+ (p = 0.002), NKT (p = 0.011), and activated NKT cells (p = 0.034) was noted during the same time interval. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cells were present in 41% of the patients who were unable to develop Nabs, and their positivity rates four months after the second dose were in inverse correlation with monocytes (p = 0.045) and NKT cells (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell responses preceded the humoral ones, while two booster doses were needed for this group of immunocompromised patients to mount a protective immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asimina Fylaktou
- Department of Immunology, National Histocompatibility Center, Hippokration General Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.F.); (A.X.); (V.N.); (D.A.)
| | - Stamatia Stai
- Department of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.S.); (E.K.); (G.L.); (A.P.)
- School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Efstratios Kasimatis
- Department of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.S.); (E.K.); (G.L.); (A.P.)
| | - Aliki Xochelli
- Department of Immunology, National Histocompatibility Center, Hippokration General Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.F.); (A.X.); (V.N.); (D.A.)
| | - Vasiliki Nikolaidou
- Department of Immunology, National Histocompatibility Center, Hippokration General Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.F.); (A.X.); (V.N.); (D.A.)
| | - Anastasia Papadopoulou
- Hematology Department-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Unit, Gene and Cell Therapy Center, “George Papanikolaou” Hospital, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.P.); (M.G.); (E.Y.)
| | - Grigorios Myserlis
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Hippokration Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Georgios Lioulios
- Department of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.S.); (E.K.); (G.L.); (A.P.)
- School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Despoina Asouchidou
- Department of Immunology, National Histocompatibility Center, Hippokration General Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.F.); (A.X.); (V.N.); (D.A.)
| | - Maria Giannaki
- Hematology Department-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Unit, Gene and Cell Therapy Center, “George Papanikolaou” Hospital, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.P.); (M.G.); (E.Y.)
| | - Evangelia Yannaki
- Hematology Department-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Unit, Gene and Cell Therapy Center, “George Papanikolaou” Hospital, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (A.P.); (M.G.); (E.Y.)
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Hippokration Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Aikaterini Papagianni
- Department of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.S.); (E.K.); (G.L.); (A.P.)
- School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Maria Stangou
- Department of Nephrology, Hippokration Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece; (S.S.); (E.K.); (G.L.); (A.P.)
- School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Imhof C, Messchendorp L, van Baarle D, Gansevoort RT, Van Leer-Buter C, Sanders JSF. The Time-Dependent Association of Torque Teno Virus Load with the Level of SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG Antibodies Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Viruses 2023; 15:2189. [PMID: 38005867 PMCID: PMC10674182 DOI: 10.3390/v15112189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) show an impaired humoral immune response to COVID-19 vaccination due to their immunocompromised status. Torque teno virus (TTV) is a possible marker of immune function. This marker may be helpful in predicting the immune response after COVID-19 vaccination in order to decide which vaccination strategy should be applied. We therefore investigated whether TTV load is associated with the humoral response after COVID-19 vaccination. Of the KTR who participated in two prospective vaccination studies and received two to four doses of the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine, 122 were included. TTV load was measured prior to vaccination, and S1 IgG antibody levels were measured 28 days after vaccination. TTV load was independently inversely associated with S1 IgG antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination (B: -2.19 (95% CI: -3.6--0.8), p = 0.002). Interestingly, we found a significant interaction between TTV load and time after transplantation (p = 0.005). When patients were longer after transplantation, TTV load was less predictive for S1 IgG antibody response after vaccination compared to patients that were shorter after transplantation. Our data suggest that TTV load is a good marker in predicting COVID-19 vaccination antibody response and may be helpful in selecting a strategy shortly after transplantation. However, this marker should be handled with caution longer after transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Imhof
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lianne Messchendorp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Debbie van Baarle
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ron T. Gansevoort
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Coretta Van Leer-Buter
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan F. Sanders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang D, Zhou C, Wang C, Guo S, Zhang Y, Lv H, Zhou FH. COVID-19 Vaccine in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Bibliometric-Based Analysis of Trends. Transplant Proc 2023; 55:1771-1783. [PMID: 37481393 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global community has been affected by COVID-19, which emerged in December 2019. Since then, many studies have been conducted on kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and COVID-19. This study aimed to perform a bibliometric and visual analysis of the published relationship between KTRs and COVID-19. OBJECTIVE To discuss the current status, hot spots, and development trend of research on KTRs vaccination with the COVID-19 vaccine and to provide a reference for researchers in related fields. METHODS Visual analysis of countries/regions, institutions, authors, references cited, and keywords for 2020 to 2023 via Microsoft Office Excel 2019 and CiteSpace (6.1.R6) based on the Web of Science core database. RESULTS A total of 366 publications were included after screening, with a rapid increase in the global literature studying the COVID-19 vaccine of KTRs. The US has the highest number of publications, indicating that it is the leading country in this field of research. Charite University of Medicine Berlin and Schrezenmeier E are the most published institutions and authors, respectively. "Antibody Response After a Third Dose of the messenger RNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Minimal Serologic Response to 2 Doses" is the most central co-cited reference; The keywords "kidney transplant recipient," "covid 19 vaccine," and "mortality" have become hot topics of research. The keywords "humoral response" and "bnt162b2" are the latest research frontiers for detecting bursts. CONCLUSIONS This paper analyzed the current status and trends of vaccination studies in KTRs through bibliometric analysis. Several studies support the vaccination of KTRs with the COVID-19 vaccine. However, the evidence for improving vaccine efficacy by adjustment of immunosuppression is still limited, and future studies on vaccination will remain a hot topic in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Wang
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China; Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Chuan Zhou
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Chao Wang
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Sheng Guo
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China; Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yunfeng Zhang
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China; Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Haoxuan Lv
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Feng-Hai Zhou
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China; The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hamaya T, Hatakeyama S, Yoneyama T, Tobisawa Y, Kodama H, Fujita T, Murakami R, Mori K, Okamoto T, Yamamoto H, Yoneyama T, Hashimoto Y, Saitoh H, Narumi S, Tomita H, Ohyama C. Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine on in ABO blood type incompatible kidney transplant recipients treated with low-dose rituximab. Sci Rep 2023; 13:15098. [PMID: 37699969 PMCID: PMC10497504 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42406-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the humoral response after the second and third doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in ABO blood type incompatible kidney transplant (KT) recipients treated with rituximab. This retrospective study conducted between June 2021 and June 2022 included 131 KT recipients and 154 nontransplant controls who had received mRNA vaccines. We compared the seropositivity (anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibody titer ≥ 0.8 U/mL) after the second and third vaccinations. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of pretransplant vaccination for seropositivity. Of the 131 KT recipients, 50 had received the third dose of mRNA vaccine. The antibody titer was significantly increased after the third dose of mRNA vaccine. The seropositivity rate after the third dose of mRNA vaccine increased from 36 to 70%. We observed no significant difference in seropositivity after the third dose of mRNA vaccine in ABO incompatibility, rituximab use, mycophenolate mofetil use, and age at KT. Of the nine recipients who had received the second or third dose of the mRNA vaccine prior to the KT, eight of the recipients were seropositive both before and after the KT. Our results suggest that ABO incompatibility or rituximab use was not significantly associated with seropositivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoko Hamaya
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan.
| | - Tohru Yoneyama
- Department of Glycotechnology, Center for Advanced Medical Research, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Yuki Tobisawa
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Hirotake Kodama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Takeshi Fujita
- Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Reiichi Murakami
- Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Mori
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Teppei Okamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Hayato Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yoneyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Hisao Saitoh
- Department of Urology, Oyokyo Kidney Research Institute, 90 Kozawayamazaki, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8243, Japan
| | - Shunji Narumi
- Department of Transplant Nephrology and Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Tomita
- Department of Cardiology and Nephrology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
- Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pommerolle P, Laurent P, Presne C, Brazier F, Jaureguy M, Poulain C, Flahaut G, Mazouz H, Brochot E, Choukroun G, Fourdinier O. Factors That Predict a Sustained Humoral Response to COVID-19 Vaccines in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Adv Ther 2023; 40:3956-3970. [PMID: 37392339 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02580-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) produce a weak humoral response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. However, the factors associated with the quality of the serological response to three doses of COVID-19 vaccine have not been unambiguously identified. METHODS We included KTRs followed in the Nephrology Department at Amiens University Hospital (Amiens, France) between June and December 2021 who had received three doses of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (or two doses plus an episode of polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19). The lack of a humoral response was defined as an antibody titer below 7.1 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL, and an optimal response was defined as an antibody titer above 264 BAU/mL. RESULTS Of the 371 patients included, 246 (66.3%) were seropositive, and 97 (26.1%) had an optimal response. In a multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with seropositivity was a history of COVID-19 [odds ratio (OR) 87.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) (7.88-965.0); p < 0.0001], while the main factors associated with non-response were female sex [OR 0.28; 95%CI (0.15-0.51); p < 0.0001], less than 36 months between kidney transplantation and vaccination [OR 0.26; 95%CI (0.13-0.52); p < 0.0001], a higher creatinine level [OR 0.33; 95%CI (0.19-0.56); p < 0.0001], the use of tacrolimus [OR 0.23; 95%CI (0.12-0.45); p < 0.0001], the use of belatacept [OR 0.01; 95%CI (0.001-0.20); p = 0.002] and three-drug immunosuppression [OR 0.39; 95%CI (0.19-0.78); p = 0.015]. A history of COVID-19 was associated with an optimal response [OR 4.03; 95%CI (2.09-7.79); p < 0.0001], while an older age at vaccination [OR 0.97; 95%CI (0.95-0.99); p = 0.002], less than 36 months between kidney transplantation and vaccination [OR 0.35; 95%CI (0.18-0.69); p = 0.002], a higher creatinine level [OR 0.60; 95%CI (0.38-0.93); p = 0.02], three-drug immunosuppression [OR 0.45; 95%CI (0.27-0.76); p = 0.003] were associated with a poorer response. CONCLUSION We identified factors associated with a humoral response to a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in KTRs. These findings might help physicians to optimize vaccination in KTRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Pommerolle
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation Department, Amiens University Hospital, 80000, Amiens, France.
| | - Pierre Laurent
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation Department, Amiens University Hospital, 80000, Amiens, France
| | - Claire Presne
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation Department, Amiens University Hospital, 80000, Amiens, France
| | - François Brazier
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation Department, Amiens University Hospital, 80000, Amiens, France
| | - Maïté Jaureguy
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation Department, Amiens University Hospital, 80000, Amiens, France
| | - Coralie Poulain
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation Department, Amiens University Hospital, 80000, Amiens, France
| | - Gauthier Flahaut
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation Department, Amiens University Hospital, 80000, Amiens, France
| | - Hakim Mazouz
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation Department, Amiens University Hospital, 80000, Amiens, France
| | - Etienne Brochot
- Virology Department, Amiens University Hospital, 80000, Amiens, France
| | - Gabriel Choukroun
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation Department, Amiens University Hospital, 80000, Amiens, France
| | - Ophélie Fourdinier
- Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation Department, Amiens University Hospital, 80000, Amiens, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Udomkarnjananun S, Gatechompol S, Leelahavanichkul A, Kerr SJ. Cellular immune response of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1220148. [PMID: 37575225 PMCID: PMC10415203 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1220148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence has demonstrated inferior humoral immune responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients compared to the general population. However, data on cellular immune responses in this population have not been established. Methods We searched the MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases and included studies reporting cellular immune response rates in kidney transplant recipients after receiving SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Studies that reported factors associated with cellular immune responders or non-responders were also included (PROSPERO: CRD42022375544). Results From a total of 1,494 articles searched, 53 articles were included in the meta-analysis. In all, 21 studies assessed cellular immune response by interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (IFN-γ ELISPOT), 22 studies used interferon-γ release assay (IGRA), and 10 studies used flow cytometric analysis. The pooled response rate after two doses (standard regimen) and three doses of vaccination was 47.5% (95%CI 38.4-56.7%) and 69.1% (95%CI 56.3-80.6%) from IFN-γ ELISPOT, 25.8% (95%CI 19.7-32.4%) and 14.7% (95%CI 8.5-22.2%) from IGRA, and 73.7% (95%CI 55.2-88.8%) and 86.5% (95%CI 75.3-94.9%) from flow cytometry, respectively. Recipients with seroconversion were associated with a higher chance of having cellular immune response (OR 2.58; 95%CI 1.89-3.54). Cellular immune response in kidney transplant recipients was lower than in dialysis patients (OR 0.24; 95%CI 0.16-0.34) and the general population (OR 0.10; 95%CI 0.07-0.14). Age and immunosuppressants containing tacrolimus or corticosteroid were associated with inferior cellular immune response. Conclusion Cellular immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients was lower than in dialysis patients and the general population. Age, tacrolimus, and corticosteroid were associated with poor response. Cellular immune response should also be prioritized in vaccination studies. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022375544.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suwasin Udomkarnjananun
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- Excellence Center for Organ Transplantation (ECOT), King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
- Renal Immunology and Transplantation Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Asada Leelahavanichkul
- Center of Excellence on Translational Research in Inflammation and Immunology (CETRII), Department of Microbiology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Immunology Unit, Department of Microbiology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Stephen J. Kerr
- HIV-NAT, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Bangkok, Thailand
- Biostatistics Excellence Centre, Research Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bertrand D, Brunel M, Lebourg L, Scemla A, Lemoine M, Amrouche L, Laurent C, Legendre C, Guerrot D, Anglicheau D, Sberro-Soussan R. Conversion From Intravenous In-Hospital Belatacept Injection to Subcutaneous Abatacept Injection in Kidney Transplant Recipients During the First COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Order in France. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11328. [PMID: 37554319 PMCID: PMC10405172 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
The first COVID-19 stay-at-home order came into effect in France on 17 March 2020. Immunocompromised patients were asked to isolate themselves, and outpatient clinic visits were dramatically reduced. In order to avoid visits to the hospital by belatacept-treated kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) during the initial period of the pandemic, we promptly converted 176 KTRs at two French transplant centers from once-monthly 5 mg/kg in-hospital belatacept infusion to once-weekly 125 mg subcutaneous abatacept injection. At the end of follow-up (3 months), 171 (97.16%) KTRs survived with a functioning graft, 2 (1.14%) had died, and 3 (1.70%) had experienced graft loss. Two patients (1.1%) experienced acute T cell-mediated rejection. Nineteen patients (10.80%) discontinued abatacept; 47% of the KTRs found the use of abatacept less restrictive than belatacept, and 38% would have preferred to continue abatacept. Mean eGFR remained stable compared to baseline. Seven patients (3.9%) had COVID-19; among these, two developed severe symptoms but survived. Only one patient had a de novo DSA. Side effects of abatacept injection were uncommon and non-severe. Our study reports for the first time in a large cohort that once-weekly injection of abatacept appears to be feasible and safe in KTRs previously treated with belatacept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique Bertrand
- Department of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Mélanie Brunel
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Ludivine Lebourg
- Department of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Anne Scemla
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Mathilde Lemoine
- Department of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Lucile Amrouche
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Charlotte Laurent
- Department of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Guerrot
- Department of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
- INSERM U1096, University of Rouen Normandy, Rouen, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Rebecca Sberro-Soussan
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lautem A, Boedecker-Lips SC, Schneider E, Runkel S, Feist C, Lang H, Weinmann-Menke J, Koch M. The Cellular and Humoral Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Messenger RNA Vaccines Is Significantly Better in Liver Transplant Patients Compared with Kidney Transplant Patients. Pathogens 2023; 12:910. [PMID: 37513757 PMCID: PMC10383075 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12070910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients after organ transplantation have impaired immune response after vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. So far, published studies have reported quite different response rates to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, ranging from 15-79% in liver and kidney transplant recipients. Up to one year after the first vaccine dose, we analyzed the humoral and cellular immune response of 21 liver transplant (LTX) patients after vaccination with mRNA vaccines compared with 28 kidney transplant (KTX) patients. We evaluated IgG against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein as well as SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells using an ELISpot assay that detected IFN-γ- and/or IL-2-expressing T cells. We found a cellular and/or humoral immune response in 100% of the LTX patients compared with 68% of the KTX patients. Antibody titers against the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 were significantly higher in the LTX group, and significantly more LTX patients had detectable specific IL-2-producing T cells. The immunosuppression applied in our LTX cohort was lower compared with the KTX cohort (14% triple therapy in LTX patients vs. 79% in KTX patients). One year after the first vaccination, breakthrough infections could be detected in 41% of all organ transplant patients. None of those patients suffered from a severe course of COVID-19 disease, indicating that a partial vaccination response seemed to offer protection to immunosuppressed patients. The better immune response of LTX patients after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination might be due to less intense immunosuppressive therapy compared with KTX patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Lautem
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, D 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Simone Cosima Boedecker-Lips
- Department of Nephrology, I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, D 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Elisa Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, D 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Stefan Runkel
- Blood Transfusion Center, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, D 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Christina Feist
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, D 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Hauke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, D 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Julia Weinmann-Menke
- Department of Nephrology, I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, D 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Martina Koch
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, D 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
von Moos S, Rho E, Dammann M, Kokkonen SM, Mueller TF, Schachtner T. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Mycophenolic Acid Identifies Kidney Transplant Recipients Responsive to Two SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Doses. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11286. [PMID: 37448450 PMCID: PMC10336200 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Immune-responsiveness to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination is reduced in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Previous reports point to a role of mycophenolic acid (MPA). Our observational cohort study included all KTRs at University Hospital Zurich receiving two SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine doses more than 6 months post-transplantation, who were assessed by measuring anti-spike immunoglobulin G (IgG). We applied principles of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to correlate MPA exposure and lymphocyte counts with SARS-CoV-2 IgG. MPA trough levels differ largely among KTRs with a median of 3.1 mg/L (range 0.7-9.5 mg/L). 34 of 84 KTRs (40%) developed positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG after two vaccine doses. KTRs who developed positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG showed significantly higher eGFR (p < 0.001), lower MPA trough levels (p < 0.001) and higher CD19+ lymphocytes (p < 0.001). MPA trough levels <2.5 mg/l and CD19+ lymphocytes >40/μl identify KTRs with seroconversion. Upon logistic regression, MPA trough levels <2.5 mg/L were associated with a 7-fold (CI 95%: 1.589-29.934) and ciclosporin use with a 6-fold (CI 95%: 1.148-30.853) increase in the odds of seroconversion. Our study indicates that immune-responsiveness to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines correlates with MPA exposure measured by MPA trough level but argues against a class effect of MPA. TDM-guided MPA dosing may be a strategy to increase seroconversion rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Schachtner
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Saad Albichr I, Mzougui S, Devresse A, Georgery H, Goffin E, Kanaan N, Yombi JC, Belkhir L, De Greef J, Scohy A, Rodriguez-Villalobos H, Kabamba-Mukadi B. Evaluation of a commercial interferon-γ release assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response after vaccination. Heliyon 2023; 9:e17186. [PMID: 37325456 PMCID: PMC10256590 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Evidence regarding the role of cellular immunity in protecting against COVID-19 is emerging. To better assess immune status, simple and robust assays measuring specific T-cell responses associated with humoral responses are needed. We aimed to evaluate the Quan-T-Cell SARS-CoV-2 test for measuring cellular immune responses in vaccinated healthy and immunosuppressed subjects. Methods T-cell responses were assessed in healthy vaccinated and unvaccinated and unexposed healthcare workers to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the EUROIMMUN SARS-CoV-2 Quan-T-Cell IGRA test performed on vaccinated kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Results The EUROIMMUN SARS-CoV-2 Quan-T-Cell IGRA test showed good sensitivity (87.2%) and specificity (92.3%) at the calculated 147 mIU/mL cutoff, with an 88.33% accuracy. In KTRs, specific cellular immunity was lower than the antibody response; however, those with a positive IGRA result produced as much IFN-γ as healthy individuals. Conclusions The EUROIMMUN SARS-CoV-2 Quan-T-Cell IGRA test showed good sensitivity and specificity for the detection of specific T-cell responses against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. These results present an additional tool for better management of COVID-19, especially in vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imane Saad Albichr
- Department of Microbiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Samy Mzougui
- Department of Microbiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arnaud Devresse
- Department of Nephrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
- Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hélène Georgery
- Department of Nephrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eric Goffin
- Department of Nephrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nada Kanaan
- Department of Nephrology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean Cyr Yombi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Disease, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Leila Belkhir
- Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Disease, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julien De Greef
- Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Disease, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anaïs Scohy
- Department of Microbiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Benoît Kabamba-Mukadi
- Department of Microbiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Poli MC, Vial C, Rey-Jurado E, González N, Cortés LJ, Hormazabal J, Ramírez-Riffo C, de la Cruz J, Ulloa C. A Third Dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Improves Immune Response in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11051012. [PMID: 37243116 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11051012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination in these patients is prioritized, and monitoring of the immune response is paramount to define further vaccination strategies. This prospective study included a cohort of 100 adult CKD patients: 48 with kidney transplant (KT) and 52 on hemodialysis without prior COVID-19. The patients were assessed for humoral and cellular immune responses after four months of an anti-SARS-CoV-2 primary two-dose vaccination scheme (CoronaVac or BNT162b2) and one month after a booster third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine. We identified poor cellular and humoral immune responses in the CKD patients after a primary vaccination scheme, and these responses were improved by a booster. Robust polyfunctional CD4+ T cell responses were observed in the KT patients after a booster, and this could be attributed to a higher proportion of the patients having been vaccinated with homologous BNT162b2 schemes. However, even after the booster, the KT patients exhibited lower neutralizing antibodies, attributable to specific immunosuppressive treatments. Four patients suffered severe COVID-19 despite three-dose vaccination, and all had low polyfunctional T-cell responses, underscoring the importance of this functional subset in viral protection. In conclusion, a booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in CKD patients improves the impaired humoral and cellular immune responses observed after a primary vaccination scheme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cecilia Poli
- Departamento de Pediatría, Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago 7650568, Chile
- Programa de Inmunogenética e Inmunología Traslacional, Instituto de Ciencias e Innovación en Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago 7610658, Chile
| | - Cecilia Vial
- Programa Hantavirus y Zoonosis, Instituto de Ciencias e Innovación en Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago 7610658, Chile
| | - Emma Rey-Jurado
- Programa de Inmunogenética e Inmunología Traslacional, Instituto de Ciencias e Innovación en Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago 7610658, Chile
| | - Natalia González
- Programa de Inmunogenética e Inmunología Traslacional, Instituto de Ciencias e Innovación en Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago 7610658, Chile
- Programa Hantavirus y Zoonosis, Instituto de Ciencias e Innovación en Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago 7610658, Chile
| | - Lina Jimena Cortés
- Programa Hantavirus y Zoonosis, Instituto de Ciencias e Innovación en Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago 7610658, Chile
| | - Juan Hormazabal
- Programa Hantavirus y Zoonosis, Instituto de Ciencias e Innovación en Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago 7610658, Chile
| | - Carolina Ramírez-Riffo
- Programa Hantavirus y Zoonosis, Instituto de Ciencias e Innovación en Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago 7610658, Chile
| | - Javiera de la Cruz
- Programa de Inmunogenética e Inmunología Traslacional, Instituto de Ciencias e Innovación en Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago 7610658, Chile
| | - Camilo Ulloa
- Departamento de Medicina Interna, Unidad de Nefrología y Trasplante Renal, Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago 7650568, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
den Hartog Y, Malahe SRK, Rietdijk WJR, Dieterich M, Gommers L, Geers D, Bogers S, van Baarle D, Diavatopoulos DA, Messchendorp AL, van der Molen RG, Remmerswaal EBM, Bemelman FJ, Gansevoort RT, Hilbrands LB, Sanders JS, GeurtsvanKessel CH, Kho MML, Reinders MEJ, de Vries RD, Baan CC. Th 1-dominant cytokine responses in kidney patients after COVID-19 vaccination are associated with poor humoral responses. NPJ Vaccines 2023; 8:70. [PMID: 37198189 DOI: 10.1038/s41541-023-00664-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Cytokines are regulators of the immune response against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, the contribution of cytokine-secreting CD4+ and CD8+ memory T cells to the SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral immune response in immunocompromised kidney patients is unknown. Here, we profiled 12 cytokines after stimulation of whole blood obtained 28 days post second 100 μg mRNA-1273 vaccination with peptides covering the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S)-protein from patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4/5, on dialysis, kidney transplant recipients (KTR), and healthy controls. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis revealed two distinct vaccine-induced cytokine profiles. The first profile was characterized by high levels of T-helper (Th)1 (IL-2, TNF-α, and IFN-γ) and Th2 (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13) cytokines, and low levels of Th17 (IL-17A, IL-22) and Th9 (IL-9) cytokines. This cluster was dominated by patients with CKD, on dialysis, and healthy controls. In contrast, the second cytokine profile contained predominantly KTRs producing mainly Th1 cytokines upon re-stimulation, with lower levels or absence of Th2, Th17, and Th9 cytokines. Multivariate analyses indicated that a balanced memory T cell response with the production of Th1 and Th2 cytokines was associated with high levels of S1-specific binding and neutralizing antibodies mainly at 6 months after second vaccination. In conclusion, seroconversion is associated with the balanced production of cytokines by memory T cells. This emphasizes the importance of measuring multiple T cell cytokines to understand their influence on seroconversion and potentially gain more information about the protection induced by vaccine-induced memory T cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvette den Hartog
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Reshwan K Malahe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim J R Rietdijk
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Dieterich
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lennert Gommers
- Department of Viroscience, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daryl Geers
- Department of Viroscience, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne Bogers
- Department of Viroscience, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Debbie van Baarle
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Dimitri A Diavatopoulos
- Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Lianne Messchendorp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Renate G van der Molen
- Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ester B M Remmerswaal
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Renal Transplant Unit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron T Gansevoort
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Stephan Sanders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marcia M L Kho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies E J Reinders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rory D de Vries
- Department of Viroscience, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carla C Baan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhang L, Yang J, Deng M, Xu C, Lai C, Deng X, Wang Y, Zhou Q, Liu Y, Wan L, Li P, Fang J, Hou J, Lai X, Ma F, Li N, Li G, Kong W, Zhang W, Li J, Cao M, Feng L, Chen Z, Chen L, Ji T. Blood unconjugated bilirubin and tacrolimus are negative predictors of specific cellular immunity in kidney transplant recipients after SAR-CoV-2 inactivated vaccination. Sci Rep 2023; 13:7263. [PMID: 37142713 PMCID: PMC10158706 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29669-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is poor in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The factors related to poor immunogenicity to vaccination in KTRs are not well defined. Here, observational study demonstrated no severe adverse effects were observed in KTRs and healthy participants (HPs) after first or second dose of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine. Different from HPs with excellent immunity against SARS-CoV-2, IgG antibodies against S1 subunit of spike protein, receptor-binding domain, and nucleocapsid protein were not effectively induced in a majority of KTRs after the second dose of inactivated vaccine. Specific T cell immunity response was detectable in 40% KTRs after the second dose of inactivated vaccine. KTRs who developed specific T cell immunity were more likely to be female, and have lower levels of total bilirubin, unconjugated bilirubin, and blood tacrolimus concentrations. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that blood unconjugated bilirubin and tacrolimus concentration were significantly negatively associated with SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell immunity response in KTRs. Altogether, these data suggest compared to humoral immunity, SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell immunity response are more likely to be induced in KTRs after administration of inactivated vaccine. Reduction of unconjugated bilirubin and tacrolimus concentration might benefit specific cellular immunity response in KTRs following vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Zhang
- Kidney Transplant Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
- Department of Organ Transplantation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiaqing Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Deng
- Clinical Laboratory Medicine Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Chuanhui Xu
- Neurosurgery Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Changchun Lai
- Clinical Laboratory Medicine Department, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, 525000, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuanying Deng
- Kidney Transplant Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, 510317, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Zhou
- Clinical Laboratory Medicine Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Yichu Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health (GIBH), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510530, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Wan
- Clinical Laboratory Medicine Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Pingchao Li
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health (GIBH), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510530, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiali Fang
- Kidney Transplant Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingcai Hou
- Organ Transplant Department, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, 528403, People's Republic of China
| | - Xingqiang Lai
- Kidney Transplant Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Feifei Ma
- Obstetrical Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Ning Li
- Clinical Laboratory Medicine Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Guanghui Li
- Kidney Transplant Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Weiya Kong
- Clinical Laboratory Medicine Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Weiting Zhang
- Kidney Transplant Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiali Li
- Kidney Transplant Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Mibu Cao
- Kidney Transplant Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China
| | - Liqiang Feng
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health (GIBH), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510530, People's Republic of China
- State Key Laboratories of Respiratory Diseases, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory of Infectious Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- Bioland Laboratory (GRMH-GDL), Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510530, People's Republic of China
| | - Zheng Chen
- Kidney Transplant Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China.
| | - Ling Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, People's Republic of China.
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health (GIBH), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510530, People's Republic of China.
- State Key Laboratories of Respiratory Diseases, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory of Infectious Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Tianxing Ji
- Clinical Laboratory Medicine Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Akimoto S, Onoe T, Morimoto H, Yamaguchi S, Shibata Y, Tazuma S, Sada H, Shimada N, Tazawa H, Suzuki T, Sudo T, Shimizu Y, Tashiro H. Analysis of Acquisition of COVID-2019 Neutralizing Antibodies in Organ Transplant Recipients. Transplant Proc 2023:S0041-1345(23)00251-8. [PMID: 37147198 PMCID: PMC10080280 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study confirmed the kinetics of antibodies acquired by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in solid-organ transplant recipients and examined their association with the development of COVID-19 and immunosuppressive status in organ transplant recipients. METHODS We measured COVID-19 neutralizing antibody titer in 21 organ transplant recipients vaccinated with the COVID-19 vaccine and 14 nontransplant recipients (control group) 3 times before and at 1 and 6 months after the third dose of vaccine. By confirming the kinetics of the acquired antibodies, we examined the relevance of the background characteristics of organ transplant recipients, such as the development of infectious diseases and immunosuppressive status. RESULTS The proportion of patients with neutralizing antibodies was significantly higher in the nontransplant group than in the transplant group. Neutralizing antibody titers were significantly lower in transplant recipients when they were compared before the third dose and 1 month later. In the transplant recipient group, 11 patients were positive, and 10 were negative for neutralizing antibodies. When the causal relationship between the neutralizing antibody titer and background was examined, a positive correlation was found between the antibody titer and the number of years since transplantation, and a negative correlation was found between the tacrolimus trough values, amount of mycophenolate mofetil or steroids taken internally, and antibody titer. CONCLUSION This study suggests that the effectiveness of vaccination in transplant recipients is associated with the post-transplant period before vaccination and the dose of immunosuppressive agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuji Akimoto
- National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Surgery, Hiroshima, Japan.
| | - Takashi Onoe
- National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Surgery, Hiroshima, Japan; National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Clinical Research, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Morimoto
- Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Transplant Surgery, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Shinji Yamaguchi
- National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Surgery, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Shibata
- National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Surgery, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Sho Tazuma
- National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Surgery, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Haruki Sada
- National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Surgery, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Norimitsu Shimada
- National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Surgery, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Tazawa
- National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Surgery, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takahisa Suzuki
- National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Surgery, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sudo
- National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Surgery, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yosuke Shimizu
- National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Surgery, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Tashiro
- National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Surgery, Hiroshima, Japan; National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Clinical Research, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Notarte KI, Catahay JA, Peligro PJ, Velasco JV, Ver AT, Guerrero JJ, Liu J, Lippi G, Benoit SW, Henry BM, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C. Humoral Response in Hemodialysis Patients Post-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination: A Systematic Review of Literature. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11040724. [PMID: 37112636 PMCID: PMC10142871 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has infected over 600 million individuals and caused nearly 7 million deaths worldwide (10 January 2023). Patients with renal disease undergoing hemodialysis are among those most adversely affected, with an increased predisposition to SARS-CoV-2 infection and death. This systematic review aimed to pool evidence assessing the humoral response of hemodialysis patients (HDP) post-mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. A systematic search of the literature was performed through MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, as well as medRxiv and bioRxiv preprint servers up to 10 January 2023. Cohort and case-control studies were included if they reported an immune response in one group of patients undergoing hemodialysis who received mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination compared with another group of patients receiving the same vaccine but not on hemodialysis. The methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was not deemed appropriate due to the high heterogeneity between studies. From the 120 studies identified, nine (n = 1969 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 8/9, 88%) were of high or medium methodological quality (≥6/9 stars). The results revealed that HDP developed lower antibody levels across all timepoints post-vaccination when compared with controls. Patients with chronic kidney disease elicited the highest antibody immune response, followed by HDP and, lastly, kidney transplant recipients. Overall, post-vaccination antibody titers were comparatively lower than in the healthy population. Current results imply that robust vaccination strategies are needed to address waning immune responses in vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kin Israel Notarte
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Jesus Alfonso Catahay
- Department of Medicine, Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| | | | | | - Abbygail Therese Ver
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Santo Tomas, Manila 1008, Philippines
| | - Jonathan Jaime Guerrero
- Learning Unit IV, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila 1001, Philippines
| | - Jin Liu
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Giuseppe Lippi
- Section of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy
| | - Stefanie W Benoit
- Clinical Laboratory, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45103, USA
| | - Brandon Michael Henry
- Clinical Laboratory, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
T-Cell Response and Antibody Production Induced by the COVID-19 Booster Vaccine in Japanese Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Treated with Hemodialysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11030653. [PMID: 36992238 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11030653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Humoral and cellular responses are critical in understanding immune responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. Here, we evaluated these responses in hemodialysis (HD) patients after the booster vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin (IgG) levels, neutralizing antibody titers, and the T-SPOT®.COVID test (T-SPOT) were measured prior to, three weeks after, and three months after the booster administration. The HD group had significantly higher SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels and neutralizing antibody titers against the original strain at three weeks and three months after the booster vaccination compared to the control group, albeit the HD group had lower SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels and neutralizing antibody titers before the booster administration. Moreover, the HD group had significantly higher T-SPOT levels at all three time points compared to the control group. The HD group also had significantly higher local and systemic adverse reaction rates than the control group. By booster vaccination, HD patients could acquire more effective SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immunity than the control group.
Collapse
|
29
|
Mavrovouniotis I, Fylaktou A, Stagou M, Ouranos K, Lioulios G, Evgenikaki E, Exindari M, Gioula G. Cellular and Humoral Responses in Dialysis Patients after Vaccination with the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 Vaccines. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:life13020474. [PMID: 36836831 PMCID: PMC9967689 DOI: 10.3390/life13020474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 has raised considerable concern about the detrimental effects it can induce in public health, with the interest of the scientific community being focused on the development of preventive and therapeutic approaches. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are amongst vulnerable populations for critical illness owing to the presence of other comorbidities, their defective immune system, and their inability of self-isolation. To date, vaccination constitutes the most promising method to manage viral dispersion. Therefore, it is particularly important to investigate the effectiveness of available vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in this risk group. Here, we summarize initial experience regarding the humoral and cellular immune responses elicited in dialysis patients after completion of the recommended vaccination regimen, as well as after booster dose administration, with one of the two mRNA vaccines, namely, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273. In conclusion, a significantly diminished and delayed immune pattern was observed in ESRD patients compared to healthy population, with a peak in antibody titers occurring 3-5 weeks after the second dose. A booster dose significantly augmented the immune response in dialysis patients with either mRNA-based vaccine. Variables adversely correlating with the weak immunogenicity observed in dialysis patients include immunosuppressive therapy, older age, comorbidities, longer time in hemodialysis treatment, and higher body mass index. On the contrary, previous COVID-19 infection and administration of the mRNA-1273 vaccine are deemed to induce a more favorable immune response. Further investigation is needed to thoroughly understand the efficacy of mRNA-based vaccines in hemodialysis patients and define predictive factors that can influence it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilias Mavrovouniotis
- Microbiology Department, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Asimina Fylaktou
- National Peripheral Histocompatibility Center, Immunology Department, Hippokration General Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Maria Stagou
- Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokration Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Ouranos
- Microbiology Department, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Correspondence:
| | - Georgios Lioulios
- Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Hippokration Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Efthimia Evgenikaki
- National Peripheral Histocompatibility Center, Immunology Department, Hippokration General Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Maria Exindari
- Microbiology Department, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgia Gioula
- Microbiology Department, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Reeg DB, Hofmann M, Neumann-Haefelin C, Thimme R, Luxenburger H. SARS-CoV-2-Specific T Cell Responses in Immunocompromised Individuals with Cancer, HIV or Solid Organ Transplants. Pathogens 2023; 12:pathogens12020244. [PMID: 36839516 PMCID: PMC9966413 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12020244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Adaptive immune responses play an important role in the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. While evaluations of the virus-specific defense often focus on the humoral response, cellular immunity is crucial for the successful control of infection, with the early development of cytotoxic T cells being linked to efficient viral clearance. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 induces both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses and permits protection from severe COVID-19, including infection with the currently circulating variants of concern. Nevertheless, in immunocompromised individuals, first data imply significantly impaired SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses after both natural infection and vaccination. Hence, these high-risk groups require particular consideration, not only in routine clinical practice, but also in the development of future vaccination strategies. In order to assist physicians in the guidance of immunocompromised patients, concerning the management of infection or the benefit of (booster) vaccinations, this review aims to provide a concise overview of the current knowledge about SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular immune responses in the vulnerable cohorts of cancer patients, people living with HIV (PLWH), and solid organ transplant recipients (SOT). Recent findings regarding the virus-specific cellular immunity in these differently immunocompromised populations might influence clinical decision-making in the future.
Collapse
|
31
|
Crane C, Phebus E, Ingulli E. Antibody response to 2- and 3-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in pediatric and adolescent kidney transplant recipients. Pediatr Nephrol 2023; 38:611-614. [PMID: 35759003 PMCID: PMC9244318 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-022-05661-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 05/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Additional "booster" doses of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have become standard of care for immunosuppressed patients, including kidney transplant recipients (KTR). While these additional doses have been shown to be efficacious in the adult KTR population, there is paucity of data for pediatric and adolescent KTR. METHODS We conducted a retrospective single-center observational study to determine the proportion of pediatric and adolescent KTR who seroconverted following two- and three-dose regimens of an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine series. RESULTS Forty-three pediatric and adolescent KTR at our center received at least two doses of an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Seroconversion was noted in 56% of those who received a 2-dose series and increased to 85% in those who received a third dose. In the 16 patients who did not seroconvert after a two-dose series, 12 (75%) seroconverted following the third dose. No serious adverse effects of immunization were noted. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate that additional SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses are not only safe and efficacious in pediatric and adolescent KTR, but may be necessary to optimize antibody response. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarkson Crane
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Rady Children's Hospital, University of California at San Diego, 3020 Children's Way MC 5173, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA.
| | - Erin Phebus
- Kidney Transplant Program, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Ingulli
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Rady Children's Hospital, University of California at San Diego, 3020 Children's Way MC 5173, San Diego, CA, 92123, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kawashima M, Saito H, Nishiuchi T, Yoshimura H, Wakui M, Tani Y, Nishikawa Y, Omata F, Takita M, Zhao T, Yamamoto C, Kobashi Y, Kawamura T, Sugiyama A, Nakayama A, Kaneko Y, Sawano T, Shibuya K, Kazama J, Shineha R, Tsubokura M. Antibody and T-Cell Responses against SARS-CoV-2 after Booster Vaccination in Patients on Dialysis: A Prospective Observational Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11020260. [PMID: 36851137 PMCID: PMC9962042 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Intensive vaccination is recommended for populations more vulnerable to COVID-19 infection, although data regarding the built of immunity after vaccination for dialysis patients are lacking. This prospective, observational cohort study of maintenance hemodialysis patients examined IgG antibody levels against the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S1) protein, neutralizing activity, and interferon gamma levels after the third dose of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine. Humoral immunity was repeatedly measured for up to two months. The study includes 58 patients on hemodialysis. Median neutralizing antibodies reached a maximum at 56 and 9 days after booster vaccination with BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, respectively. The median IgG antibody titer reached a maximum of 3104.38 and 7209.13 AU/mL after 16 days of booster dose, and cellular immunity was positive in 61.9% and 100% of patients with BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccination, respectively. By repeating the measurements over a period of two months, we clarified the chronological aspects of the acquisition of humoral immunity in dialysis patients after a booster COVID-19 vaccination; most dialysis patients acquired not only humoral immunity, but also cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Future research should investigate the continued long-term dynamics of antibody titers and cellular immunity after the third or further vaccinations, evaluating the need for additional vaccinations for hemodialysis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moe Kawashima
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1247, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Saito
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1247, Japan
- Soma Central Hospital, Fukushima 976-0016, Japan
| | | | - Hiroki Yoshimura
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1247, Japan
- School of Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8511, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Wakui
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 108-8345, Japan
| | - Yuta Tani
- Medical Governance Research Institute, Tokyo 1080074, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Nishikawa
- Soma Central Hospital, Fukushima 976-0016, Japan
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Hirata Central Hospital, Fukushima 963-8202, Japan
| | - Fumiya Omata
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Hirata Central Hospital, Fukushima 963-8202, Japan
| | - Morihito Takita
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1247, Japan
| | - Tianchen Zhao
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1247, Japan
| | - Chika Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1247, Japan
| | - Yurie Kobashi
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1247, Japan
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Hirata Central Hospital, Fukushima 963-8202, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kawamura
- Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan
- Isotope Science Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan
| | - Akira Sugiyama
- Isotope Science Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan
| | - Aya Nakayama
- Isotope Science Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan
| | - Yudai Kaneko
- Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan
- Medical & Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd., Tokyo 105-0012, Japan
| | - Toyoaki Sawano
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1247, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Fukushima 972-8322, Japan
| | - Kenji Shibuya
- Tokyo Foundation for Policy Research, Tokyo 106-6234, Japan
| | - Junichiro Kazama
- Department of Nephrology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1247, Japan
| | | | - Masaharu Tsubokura
- Department of Radiation Health Management, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1247, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-245471891
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bailey AJ, Maganti HB, Cheng W, Shorr R, Arianne Buchan C, Allan DS. Humoral and Cellular Response of Transplant Recipients to a Third Dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Transplantation 2023; 107:204-215. [PMID: 36398334 PMCID: PMC9746229 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High rates of nonresponse to 2 doses of mRNA severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine have been reported in transplant recipients. Several studies have investigated the efficacy of a third dose in this population. However, efficacy remains unclear, as response rates vary across studies. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of a third dose of any mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in transplant recipients. METHODS Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis reporting guidelines (PROSPERO:CRD42021281498) were followed. Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to December 2, 2021, without restrictions. All full-text studies reporting on the efficacy of a third dose of any mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in pediatric and adult transplant recipients were included. The National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool for case series and the Cochrane risk of bias tool determined study quality. Meta-analysis was performed via the DerSimonian-Laird random-effect model. RESULTS Of 84 records, 12 studies totaling 1257 patients met inclusion criteria. One study was a randomized controlled trial, whereas all other studies were observational. Across 7 studies (801 patients), humoral response after 3 doses was observed in 66.1% (95% confidence interval, 62.8%-69.4%; I2 = 0%) of transplant recipients. Triple immunosuppression, mycophenolate, antiproliferatives, and belatacept use were associated with reduced odds of humoral response in studies reporting multivariate analyses. Transplant recipients receiving a third dose displayed higher levels of neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 variants (Alpha, Beta, and Delta) compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS A third dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine should be strongly considered in transplant recipients. Limitations included lack of controlled studies and clinically relevant thresholds to determine response to vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian J.M. Bailey
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Canadian Blood Services, Stem Cells and Centre for Innovation, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Harinad B. Maganti
- Canadian Blood Services, Stem Cells and Centre for Innovation, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology and Regenerative Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Wei Cheng
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Risa Shorr
- Library and Information Services, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - C. Arianne Buchan
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - David S. Allan
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Canadian Blood Services, Stem Cells and Centre for Innovation, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology and Regenerative Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Paez-Mayorga J, Campa-Carranza JN, Capuani S, Hernandez N, Liu HC, Chua CYX, Pons-Faudoa FP, Malgir G, Alvarez B, Niles JA, Argueta LB, Shelton KA, Kezar S, Nehete PN, Berman DM, Willman MA, Li XC, Ricordi C, Nichols JE, Gaber AO, Kenyon NS, Grattoni A. Implantable niche with local immunosuppression for islet allotransplantation achieves type 1 diabetes reversal in rats. Nat Commun 2022; 13:7951. [PMID: 36572684 PMCID: PMC9792517 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35629-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic islet transplantation efficacy for type 1 diabetes (T1D) management is limited by hypoxia-related graft attrition and need for systemic immunosuppression. To overcome these challenges, we developed the Neovascularized Implantable Cell Homing and Encapsulation (NICHE) device, which integrates direct vascularization for facile mass transfer and localized immunosuppressant delivery for islet rejection prophylaxis. Here, we investigated NICHE efficacy for allogeneic islet transplantation and long-term diabetes reversal in an immunocompetent, male rat model. We demonstrated that allogeneic islets transplanted within pre-vascularized NICHE were engrafted, revascularized, and functional, reverting diabetes in rats for over 150 days. Notably, we confirmed that localized immunosuppression prevented islet rejection without inducing toxicity or systemic immunosuppression. Moreover, for translatability efforts, we showed NICHE biocompatibility and feasibility of deployment as well as short-term allogeneic islet engraftment in an MHC-mismatched nonhuman primate model. In sum, the NICHE holds promise as a viable approach for safe and effective islet transplantation and long-term T1D management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesus Paez-Mayorga
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico
| | - Jocelyn Nikita Campa-Carranza
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico
| | - Simone Capuani
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
- University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), Shijingshan, Beijing, China
| | - Nathanael Hernandez
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hsuan-Chen Liu
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Gulsah Malgir
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bella Alvarez
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico
| | - Jean A Niles
- Center for Tissue Engineering, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lissenya B Argueta
- Center for Tissue Engineering, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathryn A Shelton
- Department of Comparative Medicine, Michael E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, USA
| | - Sarah Kezar
- Department of Comparative Medicine, Michael E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, USA
| | - Pramod N Nehete
- Department of Comparative Medicine, Michael E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, USA
- The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dora M Berman
- Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Xian C Li
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- Immunobiology and Transplant Science Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Camillo Ricordi
- Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Joan E Nichols
- Center for Tissue Engineering, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A Osama Gaber
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Norma S Kenyon
- Diabetes Research Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Alessandro Grattoni
- Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Quiroga B, Soler MJ, Ortiz A, Sequera PD. Lessons from SENCOVAC: A prospective study evaluating the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum. Nefrologia 2022; 43:S0211-6995(22)00201-6. [PMID: 36540904 PMCID: PMC9756643 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has negatively impacted on patients of the whole CKD spectrum, causing high rates of morbi-mortality. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines opened a new era, but patients with CKD (including kidney transplant, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis) were systematically excluded from pivotal clinical trials. The Spanish Society of Nephrology promoted the multicentric national SENCOVAC study aimed at assessing immunological responses after vaccination in patients with CKD. During the first year after vaccination, patients with non-dialysis CKD and those on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis presented good anti-Spike antibody responses to vaccination, especially after receiving the third and fourth doses. However, kidney transplant recipients presented suboptimal responses after any vaccination schedule (initial, third and fourth dose). Especially worrisome is the situation of a patients with a persistently negative humoral response that do not seroconvert after boosters. In this regard, monoclonal antibodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 have been approved for high-risk patients, although they may become obsolete as the viral genome evolves. The present report reviews the current status of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the CKD spectrum with emphasis on lessons learned from the SENCOVAC study. Predictors of humoral response, including vaccination schedules and types of vaccines, as well as the integration of vaccines, monoclonal antibodies and antiviral agents are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borja Quiroga
- IIS-La Princesa. Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Soler
- Nephrology Department, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain
- IIS-Fundación Jiménez Diaz, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Fundación Renal Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo-IRSIN, REDinREN, Instituto de Investigación Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia de Sequera
- RICORS2040 (Kidney Disease), Spain
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor - Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chen X, Luo D, Mei B, Du J, Liu X, Xie H, Liu L, Su S, Mai G. Immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in solid organ transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022; 29:441-456. [PMID: 36509376 PMCID: PMC9733302 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at increased risks of morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in SOT recipients. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases were searched for eligible reports published from 1 December 2019 to 31 May 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included reports evaluating the humoral immune response (HIR) or cellular immune response rate in SOT recipients after the administration of COVID-19 vaccines. PARTICIPANTS SOT recipients who received COVID-19 vaccines. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess bias in case-control and cohort studies. For randomised-controlled trials, the Jadad Scale was used. METHODS We used a random-effects model to calculate the pooled rates of immune response with 95% CI. We used a risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI for a comparison of immune responses between SOT and healthy controls. RESULTS A total of 91 reports involving 11 886 transplant recipients (lung: 655; heart: 539; liver: 1946; and kidney: 8746) and 2125 healthy controls revealed pooled HIR rates after the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd COVID-19 vaccine doses in SOT recipients were 9.5% (95% CI, 7-11.9%), 43.6% (95% CI, 39.3-47.8%) and 55.1% (95% CI, 44.7-65.6%), respectively. For specific organs, the HIR rates were still low after 1st vaccine dose (lung: 4.4%; kidney: 9.4%; heart: 13.2%; liver: 29.5%) and 2nd vaccine dose (lung: 28.4%; kidney: 37.6%; heart: 50.3%; liver: 64.5%). CONCLUSIONS A booster vaccination enhances the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in SOT; however, a significant share of the recipients still has not built a detectable HIR after receiving the 3rd dose. This finding calls for alternative approaches, including the use of monoclonal antibodies. In addition, lung transplant recipients need urgent booster vaccination to improve the immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinpei Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, China; Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
| | - De Luo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Bingjie Mei
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| | - Juan Du
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
| | - Xiangdong Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The 4th People's Hospital of Zigong City, Zigong, China.
| | - Hui Xie
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, China.
| | - Lin Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, China.
| | - Song Su
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
| | - Gang Mai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
COVID-19 and kidney transplantation. Presse Med 2022; 51:104146. [PMID: 36347343 PMCID: PMC9636029 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2022.104146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic affects the transplant recipients since March 2020. Transplant centers quickly organized themselves to optimize the management of the immunocompromised patients and to progress in the knowledge of this new disease. To this end, a French Registry was created, which includes all solid organ transplant patients who have developed a SARS Cov2 infection. Numerous studies have been carried out using these data to describe this new disease in transplant patients, to characterize its clinical and biological risk factors and to define its prognosis. The 60 days-mortality of transplant patients hospitalized for COVID-19 was evaluated at 23% and renal failure plays a major role in the poor prognosis in addition to the classical risk factors described in the general population. The advent of vaccination has been a great relief but transplanted patients have shown a poor vaccine response keeping them at risk of severe disease even after an adapted vaccination scheme. Specific strategies was proposed in this particularly fragile population like increasing vaccine doses or using anti SARS Cov-2 monoclonal antibodies.
Collapse
|
38
|
Barrios Y, Alava-Cruz C, Marrero-Miranda D, Matheu V. Early riser specific immune cell response by delayed-type hypersensitivity in a kidney transplant patient vaccinated against COVID-19. BMJ Case Rep 2022; 15:15/12/e250509. [PMCID: PMC9748959 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2022-250509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
We present a female kidney transplant patient under conventional immunosuppression therapy. Her humoral immunity study (anti-spike-specific antibodies) was negative after the initial regimen and the third dose of vaccination against COVID-19. The specific ex vivo cellular immune study against spike of SARS-CoV-2 by interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) also remained at non-response levels at different time points despite an optimal non-specific cell immune response assessment. However, the cellular immunity test by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) with spike of SARS-CoV-2 was always positive since the vaccination scheme began. Only after COVID-19 infection has there been a seroconversion of the patient’s antibody tests along with IGRA positivity. The use of DTH test to measure the immune response could be a better and earlier parameter of the actual immune status that helps us to predict the immune response in real life. Hybrid immunity combining vaccine and natural infection could be a stronger stimulator of the specific global immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvelise Barrios
- Immunology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain
| | | | | | - Victor Matheu
- Allergy, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Meshram HS, Kute V, Rane H, Dave R, Banerjee S, Mishra V, Chauhan S. Humoral and cellular response of COVID-19 vaccine among solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transpl Infect Dis 2022; 24:e13926. [PMID: 35924679 PMCID: PMC9538045 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to analyze the humoral and cellular response to standard and booster (additional doses) COVID-19 vaccination in solid organ transplantation (SOT) and the risk factors involved for an impaired response. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published up until January 11, 2022, that reported immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccine among SOT. The study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42022300547. RESULTS Of the 1527 studies, 112 studies, which involved 15391 SOT and 2844 healthy controls, were included. SOT showed a low humoral response (effect size [ES]: 0.44 [0.40-0.48]) in overall and in control studies (log-Odds-ratio [OR]: -4.46 [-8.10 to -2.35]). The humoral response was highest in liver (ES: 0.67 [0.61-0.74]) followed by heart (ES: 0.45 [0.32-0.59]), kidney (ES: 0.40 [0.36-0.45]), kidney-pancreas (ES: 0.33 [0.13-0.53]), and lung (0.27 [0.17-0.37]). The meta-analysis for standard and booster dose (ES: 0.43 [0.39-0.47] vs. 0.51 [0.43-0.54]) showed a marginal increase of 18% efficacy. SOT with prior infection had higher response (ES: 0.94 [0.92-0.96] vs. ES: 0.40 [0.39-0.41]; p-value < .01). The seroresponse with mRNA-12723 mRNA was highest 0.52 (0.40-0.64). Mycophenolic acid (OR: 1.42 [1.21-1.63]) and Belatacept (OR: 1.89 [1.3-2.49]) had highest risk for nonresponse. SOT had a parallelly decreased cellular response (ES: 0.42 [0.32-0.52]) in overall and control studies (OR: -3.12 [-0.4.12 to -2.13]). INTERPRETATION Overall, SOT develops a suboptimal response compared to the general population. Immunosuppression including mycophenolic acid, belatacept, and tacrolimus is associated with decreased response. Booster doses increase the immune response, but further upgradation in vaccination strategy for SOT is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vivek Kute
- Department of NephrologyIKDRC‐ITSAhmedabadIndia
| | - Hemant Rane
- Department of AnaesthesiaIKDRC‐ITSAhmedabadIndia
| | - Ruchir Dave
- Department of NephrologyIKDRC‐ITSAhmedabadIndia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Malik SA, Modarage K, Goggolidou P. A systematic review assessing the effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in chronic kidney disease (CKD) individuals. F1000Res 2022; 11:909. [PMID: 36531259 PMCID: PMC9732501 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.122820.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: SARS-CoV-2 is a coronavirus that has rapidly spread across the world with a detrimental effect on the global population. Several reports have highlighted an increased mortality rate and a higher severity of COVID-19 infection in chronic kidney disease (CKD) individuals. Upon the development of various SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, mRNA vaccines including BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 were deemed safe, with a high efficacy in preventing COVID-19 in the general population. This review investigates whether SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines are as effective in triggering an immune response in Dialysis Patients (DPs) and Kidney Transplant Recipients (KTRs) and if a third dose is required in this population. Methods: A systematic search employing the PRISMA criteria was conducted in several major databases, with the data being extracted from publications for the period January 2021 to May 2022 (PROSPERO: CRD42022338514, June 15, 2022). Results: 80 studies were included in this analysis with a total cohort number of 15,059 participants. Overall, 85.29% (OR = 17.08, 95% CI = 15.84-18.42, I 2 = 98%) and 41.06% (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.48-0.5, I 2 = 95%) of DPs and KTRs included in this review showed positive seroconversion after two doses of either mRNA vaccine, respectively. A total 76% (OR = 6.53, 95% CI = 5.63-7.5, I 2 = 96%) of the cohort given a third dose of an mRNA vaccine demonstrated positive seroconversion, with 61.86% (OR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.95-2.75 I 2 = 95%) of the cohort that was assessed for a cellular response displaying a positive response. Conclusions: This data emphasises a reduced incidence of a positive immune response in DPs and KTRs compared to healthy controls, albeit a better response in DPs than when compared to KTRs alone was observed. A third dose appears to increase the occurrence of an immune response in the overall DP/KTR cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soniya A. Malik
- Research Institute in Healthcare Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY, UK
| | - Kavindiya Modarage
- Research Institute in Healthcare Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY, UK
| | - Paraskevi Goggolidou
- Research Institute in Healthcare Science, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton, WV1 1LY, UK,
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Stich M, Di Cristanziano V, Tönshoff B, Weber LT, Dötsch J, Rammer MT, Rieger S, Heger E, Garbade SF, Burgmaier K, Benning L, Speer C, Habbig S, Haumann S. Humoral immune response and live-virus neutralization of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (BA.1) variant after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in children and young adults with chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol 2022; 38:1935-1948. [PMID: 36409368 PMCID: PMC9684918 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-022-05806-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on humoral immune response to standard COVID-19 vaccination are scarce in adolescent patients and lacking for children below 12 years of age with chronic kidney disease including kidney transplant recipients. METHODS We therefore investigated in this retrospective two-center study (DRKS00024668; registered 23.03.2021) the humoral immune response to a standard two-dose mRNA vaccine regimen in 123 CKD patients aged 5-30 years. A live-virus assay was used to assess the serum neutralizing activity against the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (BA.1) variant. RESULTS Children aged 5-11 years had a comparable rate and degree of immune response to adolescents despite lower vaccine doses (10 µg vs. 30 µg BNT162b2). Treatment with two (odds ratio 9.24) or three or more (odds ratio 17.07) immunosuppressants was an independent risk factor for nonresponse. The immune response differed significantly among three patient cohorts: 48 of 77 (62.3%) kidney transplant recipients, 21 of 26 (80.8%) patients on immunosuppressive therapy, and 19 of 20 (95.0%) patients with chronic kidney disease without immunosuppressive therapy responded. In the kidney transplant recipients, immunosuppressive regimens comprising mycophenolate mofetil, an eGFR of < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and female sex were independent risk factors for nonresponse. Two of 18 (11.1%) and 8 of 16 (50.0%) patients with an anti-S1-RBD IgG of 100-1411 and > 1411 BAU/mL, respectively, showed a neutralization activity against the omicron variant. CONCLUSION A standard mRNA vaccine regimen in immunosuppressed children and adolescents with kidney disease elicits an attenuated humoral immune response with effective live virus neutralization against the omicron variant in approximately 10% of the patients, underlying the need for omicron-adapted vaccination. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Stich
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Veronica Di Cristanziano
- Institute of Virology, University Hospital Cologne and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Burkhard Tönshoff
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lutz Thorsten Weber
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Cologne and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jörg Dötsch
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Cologne and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marian Theodor Rammer
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Cologne and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Susanne Rieger
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Heger
- Institute of Virology, University Hospital Cologne and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sven F Garbade
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kathrin Burgmaier
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Cologne and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Faculty of Applied Healthcare Science, Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Deggendorf, Germany
| | - Louise Benning
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudius Speer
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sandra Habbig
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Cologne and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Sophie Haumann
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Cologne and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Song JW, Hu W, Shen L, Wang FS. Safety and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination in immunocompromised patients. Chin Med J (Engl) 2022; 135:2656-2666. [PMID: 36719354 PMCID: PMC9945070 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000002505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a great threat to public health. Individuals who are immunocompromised because of the progression of the primary disease or receiving immunosuppressive medications are prone to severe COVID-19 complications and poor outcomes. Abundant data have shown that many COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective in large-scale populations; however, these clinical trials have excluded immunocompromised populations. Available evidence indicates that immunocompromised populations have a blunted immune response to other vaccines, raising concerns regarding the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in these populations. Thus, there is an urgent need to delineate the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in these vulnerable populations. Here, we review the characteristics of specific humoral and cellular responses to COVID-19 vaccination in immunocompromised populations, including HIV-infected patients and those receiving immunosuppressive treatment, especially solid organ transplant recipients and those undergoing anti-CD20 treatment. We also addressed the challenges that immunocompromised populations will face in the future pandemic and the need for basic and clinical translational studies to highlight the best vaccination strategies for these populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Wen Song
- Senior Department of Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Wei Hu
- Senior Department of Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing 100039, China
- Department of Emergency, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA Hospital, Beijing 100039, China
| | - Lili Shen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui 233030, China
| | - Fu-Sheng Wang
- Senior Department of Infectious Diseases, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing 100039, China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zhang X, Weng R, Liu F, Xie Y, Jin Y, Li Q, Huang G, Chen J, Wang J, Shen H, Fu H, Mao J. COVID-19 Breakthrough Infections in Vaccinated Kidney Transplant Recipients. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10111911. [PMID: 36423007 PMCID: PMC9696595 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10111911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The administration of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination is the only reliable strategy to prevent COVID-19 and alleviate the severity of COVID-19 in this particular population. The aim of this article was to evaluate the clinical protection by vaccines (breakthrough infections, deaths, and hospitalizations) in KTRs. There were 135 KTRs with COVID-19 breakthrough infections for whom patient-level data were available in PubMed and Web of Science. There was a male predominance (61.4%), 97 were given the standard vaccination regimen, and 38 received three or four doses of the vaccine. The median age was 59.0 (IQR: 49.0−69.0) years. A total of 67 patients were hospitalized, and 10 patients died. In 72.6% of cases, triple-maintenance immunosuppression was employed. The deceased patients were older than the survivors (p < 0.05); an age over 60 years was a risk factor for death (p < 0.05). The KTRs with booster vaccines had a longer time interval from the last vaccine to COVID-19 infection and lower hospitalization rates than the individuals who received the standard vaccination regimen (33.3% vs. 54.8%, p < 0.05). The hospitalized patients were older than the outpatients (p < 0.05). Among 16,820 fully vaccinated or boosted KTRs from 14 centers, there were 633 breakthrough infections (3.58%) and 73 associated deaths (0.41%). The center-level breakthrough infection rates varied from 0.21% to 9.29%. These findings highlight the need for booster doses for KTRs. However, more research is needed to define the long-term effectiveness and immunogenicity of booster doses and to identify methods to boost the protective response to vaccination in these immunocompromised patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojing Zhang
- Department of Nephrology, The Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310052, China
| | - Ruopeng Weng
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310007, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Nephrology, The Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310052, China
| | - Yi Xie
- Department of Nephrology, The Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310052, China
| | - Yanyan Jin
- Department of Nephrology, The Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310052, China
| | - Qiuyu Li
- Department of Nephrology, The Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310052, China
| | - Guoping Huang
- Department of Nephrology, The Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310052, China
| | - Junyi Chen
- Department of Nephrology, The Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310052, China
| | - Jingjing Wang
- Department of Nephrology, The Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310052, China
| | - Huijun Shen
- Department of Nephrology, The Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310052, China
| | - Haidong Fu
- Department of Nephrology, The Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310052, China
| | - Jianhua Mao
- Department of Nephrology, The Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou 310052, China
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Donati G, Gasperoni L, Napoli M, Scrivo A, Zappulo F, Abenavoli C, Hu L, Angelini A, Di Nunzio M, Tringali E, Cingolani A, Marchegiani BC, Rigotti A, La Manna G. Anti-Inflammatory Approach in Chronic Dialysis Patients with SARS-CoV-2: ATA or PMMA Dialyzers? Blood Purif 2022; 52:210-218. [PMID: 36323242 PMCID: PMC9782266 DOI: 10.1159/000526319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High-flux hemodialysis membranes may modulate the cytokine storm of SARS-CoV-2, but their impact on chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients is unknown. The aim of the study was the evaluation of asymmetric cellulose triacetate (ATA) and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) dialyzers on inflammatory markers and clinical outcomes in CHD patients with SARS-CoV-2. METHODS A prospective, observational study on CHD patients with SARS-CoV-2 was carried out. Patients were enrolled from March 2020 to May 2021. Pre- and postdialysis C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were determined at each session. Patients who underwent on-line hemodiafiltration (OLHDF) with a PMMA dialyzer were compared with those treated with OLHDF with a ATA dialyzer. The primary endpoint was the differences in the reduction ratio per session (RR) of CRP, PCT, IL-6, and IL-6 RR >25%. RESULTS We consecutively enrolled 74 CHD patients with COVID-19, 48 were treated with ATA membrane, and 26 with PMMA. Median IL-6 RR was higher in the ATA group compared to PMMA (17.08%, IQR -9.0 to 40.0 vs. 2.95%, IQR -34.63 to 27.32). Median CRP RR was 7.77% (IQR 2.47-13.77) in the ATA group versus 4.8% (IQR -2.65 to 11.38) in the PMMA group (p = 0.0017). Median PCT-RR% was 77.38% (IQR 70.92-82.97) in ATA group versus 54.59% (IQR 42.62-63.16) in the PMMA group (p < 0.0001). A multiple logistic regression analysis with IL-6 RR >25% as the outcome including the membrane employed, pre-dialysis IL-6, CRP, PCT, and ferritin showed that ATA led to a higher probability to reach the outcome (OR 1.891, 95% CI 1.273-2.840, p = 0.0018) while higher CRP favors the risk of lower IL-6 RR values (OR 0.910, 95% CI 0.868-0.949, p ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In SARS-CoV-2 CHD patients treated with OLHDF, ATA showed a better anti-inflammatory profile, regarding IL-6 RR, compared to PMMA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Donati
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy,Surgical, Medical, Dental and Morphological Sciences Department (CHIMOMO), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Gasperoni
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Azienda USL della Romagna, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy
| | - Marianna Napoli
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, S. Orsola University Hospital, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Anna Scrivo
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, S. Orsola University Hospital, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fulvia Zappulo
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, S. Orsola University Hospital, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Chiara Abenavoli
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, S. Orsola University Hospital, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lilio Hu
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, S. Orsola University Hospital, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Angelini
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, S. Orsola University Hospital, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Miriam Di Nunzio
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, S. Orsola University Hospital, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Edoardo Tringali
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, S. Orsola University Hospital, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandra Cingolani
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, S. Orsola University Hospital, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Beatrice Claudia Marchegiani
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, S. Orsola University Hospital, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Angelo Rigotti
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Azienda USL della Romagna, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy
| | - Gaetano La Manna
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit, S. Orsola University Hospital, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy,Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy,*Gaetano La Manna,
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Babel N, Hugo C, Westhoff TH. Vaccination in patients with kidney failure: lessons from COVID-19. Nat Rev Nephrol 2022; 18:708-723. [PMID: 35999285 PMCID: PMC9397175 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-022-00617-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Infection is the second leading cause of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Adequate humoral (antibody) and cellular (T cell-driven) immunity are required to minimize pathogen entry and promote pathogen clearance to enable infection control. Vaccination can generate cellular and humoral immunity against specific pathogens and is used to prevent many life-threatening infectious diseases. However, vaccination efficacy is diminished in patients with CKD. Premature ageing of the immune system and chronic systemic low-grade inflammation are the main causes of immune alteration in these patients. In the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 can have considerable detrimental effects in patients with CKD, especially in those with kidney failure. COVID-19 prevention through successful vaccination is therefore paramount in this vulnerable population. Although patients receiving dialysis have seroconversion rates comparable to those of patients with normal kidney function, most kidney transplant recipients could not generate humoral immunity after two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Importantly, some patients who were not able to produce antibodies still had a detectable vaccine-specific T cell response, which might be sufficient to prevent severe COVID-19. Correlates of protection against SARS-CoV-2 have not been established for patients with kidney failure, but they are urgently needed to enable personalized vaccination regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Babel
- Medical Department I, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
- Center for Translational Medicine and Immune Diagnostics Laboratory, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Center for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT) and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Christian Hugo
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik III, Universitätsklinikum, Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Timm H Westhoff
- Medical Department I, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Falahi S, Sayyadi H, Kenarkoohi A. Immunogenicity of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in hemodialysis patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Sci Rep 2022; 5:e874. [PMID: 36210877 PMCID: PMC9528953 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Vaccine response is a concern in hemodialysis patients. Given that hemodialysis patients were not included in clinical trials, we aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the immunogenicity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines in hemodialysis patients. Methods We searched Scopus, PubMed, Sciencedirect, and finally google scholar databases for studies on COVID-19 mRNA-vaccines immunogenicity in hemodialysis patients up to December 1, 2021. Eligible articles measured antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike or Receptor-Binding Domain Antibody (S/RBD) postimmunization with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. The immunogenicity of the vaccine was evaluated using seroconversion rates measured between 21 and 30 days after the first immunization and between 14 and 36 days post the second dose. We included studies including participants without a history of COVID-19 before vaccination. Healthy controls or health-care workers served as the control groups. After selecting eligible articles, the data were finally extracted from included articles. We used a random effects model to estimate the pooled seroconversion rate after COVID-19 mRNA vaccine administration. We assessed the heterogeneity between studies with the I 2 statistical index. Result We selected 39 eligible citations comprising 806 cases and 336 controls for the first dose and 6314 cases and 927 controls for the second dose for statistical analysis. After the first dose of mRNA vaccines, the seroconversion rate was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.47) and 68% (95% CI: 0.45-0.91) in hemodialysis patients and the control group, respectively. While seroconversion rate after the second dose of mRNA vaccines was 86% (95% CI: 0.81-0.91) and 100% (95% CI: 1.00-1.00) in hemodialysis patients and the control group, respectively. Conclusion Although the immune response of hemodialysis patients to the second dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine is very promising, the seroconversion rate of dialysis patients is lower than healthy controls. Periodically assessment of antibody levels of hemodialysis patients at short intervals is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahab Falahi
- Zoonotic Diseases Research CenterIlam University of Medical SciencesIlamIran
| | - Hojjat Sayyadi
- Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of HealthIlam University of Medical SciencesIlamIran
| | - Azra Kenarkoohi
- Zoonotic Diseases Research CenterIlam University of Medical SciencesIlamIran
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of MedicineIlam University of Medical SciencesIlamIran
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ponticelli C, Campise M. COVID-19 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Candidates and Recipients. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10111808. [PMID: 36366317 PMCID: PMC9692413 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10111808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplant candidates and kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at particular risk of severe complications of COVID-19 disease. In Western countries, mortality in affected hospitalized KTRs ranges between 19% and 50%. COVID-19 vaccination remains the most important measure to prevent the severity of infection in candidates and recipients of kidney transplant. However, the uraemic condition may affect the vaccine-induced immunity in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and in KTRs. Retention of uraemic toxins, dysbiosis, dysmetabolism, and dialysis can diminish the normal response to vaccination, leading to dysfunction of inflammatory and immune cells. In KTRs the efficacy of vaccines may be reduced by the immunosuppressive medications, and more than half of kidney transplant recipients are unable to build an immune response even after four administrations of anti-COVID-19 vaccines. The lack of antibody response leaves these patients at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 disease. The aim of the present review is to focus on the main reasons for the impaired immunological response among candidates and kidney transplant recipients and to highlight some of the present options available to solve the problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mariarosaria Campise
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Carriazo S, Aparicio-Madre MI, Tornero-Molina F, Fernández-Lucas M, Paraiso-Cuevas V, González-Parra E, del Río-Gallegos F, Marques-Vidas M, Alcázar-Arroyo R, Martins-Muñoz J, Sánchez-Villanueva R, Gil-Casares B, Gutiérrez-Martínez E, Martínez-Rubio MP, Ortiz A. Impact of different COVID-19 waves on kidney replacement therapy epidemiology and mortality: REMER 2020. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 37:2253-2263. [PMID: 35927791 PMCID: PMC9384646 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) confers the highest risk of death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, most data refer to the early pandemic waves. Whole-year analysis compared with prior secular trends are scarce. METHODS We present the 2020 REMER Madrid KRT registry, corresponding to the Spanish Region hardest hit by COVID-19. RESULTS In 2020, KRT incidence decreased 12% versus 2019, while KRT prevalence decreased by 1.75% for the first time since records began and the number of kidney transplants (KTs) decreased by 16%. Mortality on KRT was 10.2% (34% higher than the mean for 2008-2019). The 2019-2020 increase in mortality was larger for KTs (+68%) than for haemodialysis (+24%) or peritoneal dialysis (+38%). The most common cause of death was infection [n = 419 (48% of deaths)], followed by cardiovascular [n = 200 (23%)]. Deaths from infection increased by 167% year over year and accounted for 95% of excess deaths in 2020 over 2019. COVID-19 was the most common cause of death (68% of infection deaths, 33% of total deaths). The bulk of COVID-19 deaths [209/285 (73%)] occurred during the first COVID-19 wave, which roughly accounted for the increased mortality in 2020. Being a KT recipient was an independent risk factor for COVID-19 death. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 negatively impacted the incidence and prevalence of KRT, but the increase in KRT deaths was localized to the first wave of the pandemic. The increased annual mortality argues against COVID-19 accelerating the death of patients with short life expectancy and the temporal pattern of COVID-19 mortality suggests that appropriate healthcare may improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sol Carriazo
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz UAM, Madrid, Spain
- RICORS2040; Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel I Aparicio-Madre
- RЄMЭЯ. Oficina Regional de Coordinación de Trasplantes de la Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Emilio González-Parra
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz UAM, Madrid, Spain
- RICORS2040; Madrid, Spain
- Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - María Marques-Vidas
- Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
- Hospital Puerta de Hierro; Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alberto Ortiz
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz UAM, Madrid, Spain
- RICORS2040; Madrid, Spain
- Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
SARS-CoV-2 Spike-specific IFN-γ T-cell Response After COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease, on Dialysis, or Living With a Kidney Transplant. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1387. [PMID: 36284929 PMCID: PMC9584182 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Studies have shown that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is associated with a lower humoral response in vulnerable kidney patients. Here, we investigated the T-cell response following COVID-19 vaccination in kidney patients compared with controls. METHODS Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage G4/5 [estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2], on dialysis, or living with a kidney transplant and controls received 2 doses of the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated at baseline and 28 d after the second vaccination. In 398 participants (50% of entire cohort; controls n = 95, CKD G4/5 n = 81, dialysis n = 78, kidney transplant recipients [KTRs] n = 144)' SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells were measured using an IFN-γ enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot assay. RESULTS A significantly lower SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response was observed after vaccination of patients on dialysis (54.5%) and KTRs (42.6%) in contrast to CDK G4/5 (70%) compared with controls (76%). The use of calcineurin inhibitors was associated with a low T-cell response in KTRs. In a subset of 20 KTRs, we observed waning of the cellular response 6 mo after the second vaccination, which was boosted to some extent after a third vaccination, although T-cell levels remained low. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that vaccination is less effective in these patient groups, with humoral nonresponders also failing to mount an adequate cellular response, even after the third vaccination. Given the important role of T cells in protection against disease and cross-reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 variants, alternative vaccination strategies are urgently needed in these high-risk patient groups.
Collapse
|
50
|
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients—Stratified Analysis of the Humoral Immune Response. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1384. [PMID: 36259077 PMCID: PMC9575732 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and a more severe course of COVID-19.
Collapse
|