Immune tolerance therapy for haemophilia

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Biological Modalities - Lessons from Hemophilia A Therapies

The introduction and development of biologics such as therapeutic proteins, gene-, and cell-based therapy have revolutionized the scope of treatment for many diseases. However, a significant portion of the patients develop unwanted immune reactions against these novel biological modalities, referred to as immunogenicity, and no longer benefit from the treatments. In the current review, using Hemophilia A (HA) therapy as an example, we will discuss the immunogenicity issue of multiple biological modalities. Currently, the number of therapeutic modalities that are approved or recently explored to treat HA, a hereditary bleeding disorder, is increasing rapidly. These include, but are not limited to, recombinant factor VIII proteins, PEGylated FVIII, FVIII Fc fusion protein, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, gene replacement therapy, gene editing therapy, and cell-based therapy. They offer the patients a broader range of more advanced and effective treatment options, yet immunogenicity remains the most critical complication in the management of this disorder. Recent advances in strategies to manage and mitigate immunogenicity will also be reviewed.

Clinical Care of Bone Health in Patients on the Immune Tolerance Induction's Protocols With an Immunosuppressive Agent for Inhibitor Eradication in Hemophilia

Nowadays, the development of factor VIII and IX inhibitors in patients with hemophilia is considered as the most challenging in the treatment of hemophilia. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy is an approach for eradication of inhibitors. Some ITI protocols are routinely in use for the eradication of inhibitors in patients with hemophilia. Moreover, such a therapeutic regimen may facilitate the tendency to reduced bone density in patients with inhibitor. This study scheduled to investigate whether that predisposing role of ITI protocols with an immunosuppressive agent has considered or not. By a literature review, published ITI protocols in hemophilia with inhibitors were evaluated. Among them, 51 papers found and studied thoroughly. None of them had performed the bone mineral examination in patients with hemophilia and inhibitor under treatment. Since there are 2 coexisting facilitating factors in these protocols, considering the bone mineral density study for patients with inhibitor who are undergoing ITI protocols with an immunosuppressive agent is recommended.

Prophylaxis for hemophilia A without inhibitors: treatment options and considerations

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A is a bleeding disorder traditionally managed with standard half-life (SHL) factor (F) VIII concentrates. Extended half-life (EHL) FVIII products and emicizumab-kywh, a nonfactor therapy, are newer treatment options. Additional nonfactor agents and gene therapy are expected to reach the market in the near future.

AREAS COVERED

A PubMed (MEDLINE) search from 1962 to April 2020 related to hemophilia A, its management, and the products currently available for prophylaxis was performed to comprehensively review these topics and analyze the benefits and drawbacks of each therapeutic.

EXPERT OPINION

Prophylaxis with SHL FVIII concentrates remains the standard of care for patients with severe hemophilia A and may also be considered for selected individuals with moderate disease. Several years of real-world experience with EHL FVIII, emicizumab-kywh, and other agents in development will be necessary to determine their ultimate roles in the prevention of bleeding and its complications. Gene therapy may not provide a permanent cure for hemophilia A.

Emicizumab should be prescribed independent of immune tolerance induction

This article has a companion Point by Young.

The evolution of comprehensive haemophilia care in the United States: perspectives from the frontline

The establishment of dedicated comprehensive treatment centres more than a half century ago transformed the management of haemophilia in the United States. Formerly, a disease associated with crippling disability and premature death, today, persons with haemophilia who are treated appropriately from infancy and do not develop inhibitors can expect a normal life expectancy and relatively few bleeding episodes. The evolution of the comprehensive haemophilia care, while chastened by the viral epidemics of the 1980s, has been marked by ongoing advances, including prophylaxis, immune tolerance induction, new drugs and gene therapy research. Current challenges include sustaining the comprehensive care model despite decreased funding and expanding the delivery and affordability of comprehensive haemophilia care.

Advances in the clinical management of inhibitors in hemophilia A and B

Inhibitors to factor (F)VIII or FIX are the most serious and challenging complication of hemophilia treatment, increasing morbidity and mortality because bleeds no longer respond to standard clotting factor replacement therapy. For patients with high-titer inhibitors, immune tolerance induction achieved through regular factor exposure is the only proven therapy capable of Inhibitor eradication and is almost always indicated for inhibitors of recent onset. Bypassing therapy is used to treat and prevent bleeding, but neither of the two currently available bypassing agents has the predictable hemostatic efficacy of factor replacement in hemophilia patients without inhibitors. Major research efforts are focused on the development of new, more potent therapies for the management of patients with inhibitors.

How I use bypassing therapy for prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors

Inhibitor development poses a significant challenge in the management of hemophilia because once an inhibitor is present, bleeding episodes can no longer be treated with standard clotting factor replacement therapy. Consequently, patients with inhibitors are at increased risk for difficult-to-control bleeding and complications, particularly arthropathy and physical disability. Three clinical trials in patients with inhibitors have demonstrated that prophylaxis with a bypassing agent reduces joint and other types of bleeding and improves health-related quality of life compared with on-demand bypassing therapy. In hemophilia patients without inhibitors, the initiation of prophylaxis with factor (F) VIII or FIX prior to the onset of recurrent hemarthroses can prevent the development of joint disease. Whether this is also true for bypassing agent prophylaxis remains to be determined.

Factor VIII therapy for hemophilia A: current and future issues

Hemophilia A is a congenital, recessive, X-linked bleeding disorder that is managed with infusions of plasma-derived or recombinant factor (F) VIII. The primary considerations in FVIII replacement therapy today are the: 1) immunogenicity of FVIII concentrates, 2) role of longer-acting FVIII products, 3) prophylactic use of FVIII in children and adults with severe hemophilia A, and 4) affordability and availability of FVIII products. Improving patient outcomes by increasing the use of FVIII prophylaxis, preventing or eliminating FVIII inhibitors, and expanding access to FVIII concentrates in developing countries are the major challenges confronting clinicians who care for patients with hemophilia A.

Immune Tolerance Therapy in Patients with Acquired Hemophilia

Acquired hemophilia is a rare disorder with an estimated annual incidence of 0.2-1 cases per million individuals. The etiology of the disorder remains obscure, although approximately half of all cases are associated with other underlying conditions. In acquired hemophilia, the severe hemorrhagic diathesis is caused by the development of autoantibodies directed against a clotting factor, most commonly factor VIII. These autoantibodies inhibit normal coagulation and lead to bleeding complications, which can be life-threatening in a high percentage of cases. Prompt diagnosis and appropriate management of the disorder enable effective control; the short- and long-term aims of therapy are to terminate the acute bleed and eliminate or reduce the inhibitor, respectively. Immune tolerance therapy has been shown to successfully eradicate or suppress inhibitors in patients with congenital hemophilia A and may be applicable to patients with acquired hemophilia. Here we present preliminary data on the use of immune tolerance therapy in patients with acquired hemophilia and discuss possible treatment strategies.

The literature on inhibitors: articles that influence my management of patients with hemophilia A and high-titer inhibitors

High-titer inhibitors represent the greatest management challenge faced by clinicians who treat patients with hemophilia A, as bleeding episodes no longer respond to standard factor VIII replacement therapy. Over the last seven decades, major strides have been made in inhibitor treatment. This article focuses on the seminal clinical observations and studies that provided the foundation for these advances in hemophilia care.

Cost-utility analysis of immune tolerance induction therapy versus on-demand treatment with recombinant factor VII for hemophilia A with high titer inhibitors in Iran

Background

In developing countries, the treatment of hemophilia patients with inhibitors is presently the most challenging and serious issue in hemophilia management, direct costs of clotting factor concentrates accounting for >98% of the highest economic burden absorbed for the health care of patients in this setting. In the setting of chronic diseases, cost-utility analysis, which takes into account the beneficial effects of a given treatment/health care intervention in terms of health-related quality of life, is likely to be the most appropriate approach.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy with plasma-derived factor VIII concentrates versus on-demand treatment with recombinant-activated FVIIa (rFVIIa) in hemophilia A with high titer inhibitors from an Iranian Ministry of Health perspective.

Methods

This study was based on the study of Knight et al, which evaluated the cost- effectiveness ratios of different treatments for hemophilia A with high-responding inhibitors. To adapt Knight et al’s results to the Iranian context, a few clinical parameters were varied, and cost data were replaced with the corresponding Iranian estimates of resource use. The time horizon of the analysis was 10 years. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed, varying the cost of the clotting factor, the drug dose, and the administration frequency, to test the robustness of the analysis.

Results

Comparison of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios between the three ITI protocols and the on-demand regimen with rFVIIa shows that all three ITI protocols dominate the on-demand regimen with rFVIIa. Between the ITI protocols the low-dose ITI protocol dominates both the Bonn ITI protocol and the Malmö ITI protocol and would be the preferred ITI protocol. All of the three ITI protocols dominate the on-demand strategy, as they have both a lower average lifetime cost and higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. The cost per QALY gained for the Bonn ITI protocol compared with the Malmö ITI protocol was $249,391.84. The cost per QALY gained for the Bonn ITI protocol compared with the low-dose ITI protocol was $842,307.69.

Conclusion

The results of data derived from our study suggest that the low-dose ITI protocol may be a less expensive and/or more cost-effective option compared with on-demand first-line treatment with rFVIIa.

Anti-inhibitor coagulant complex prophylaxis in hemophilia with inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe hemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors are at increased risk for serious bleeding complications and progression to end-stage joint disease. Effective strategies to prevent bleeding in such patients have not yet been established.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with hemophilia A who were older than 2 years of age, had high-titer inhibitors, and used concentrates known as bypassing agents for bleeding in a prospective, randomized, crossover study comparing 6 months of anti-inhibitor coagulant complex (AICC), infused prophylactically at a target dose of 85 U per kilogram of body weight (±15%) on 3 nonconsecutive days per week, with 6 months of on-demand therapy (AICC at a target dose of 85 U per kilogram [±15%] used for bleeding episodes). The two treatment periods were separated by a 3-month washout period, during which patients received on-demand therapy for bleeding. The primary outcome was the number of bleeding episodes during each 6-month treatment period.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients underwent randomization; 26 patients completed both treatment periods and could be evaluated per protocol for the efficacy analysis. As compared with on-demand therapy, prophylaxis was associated with a 62% reduction in all bleeding episodes (P<0.001), a 61% reduction in hemarthroses (P<0.001), and a 72% reduction in target-joint bleeding (≥3 hemarthroses in a single joint during a 6-month treatment period) (P<0.001). Thirty-three randomly assigned patients received at least one infusion of the study drug and were evaluated for safety. One patient had an allergic reaction to the study drug.

CONCLUSIONS

AICC prophylaxis at the dosage evaluated significantly and safely decreased the frequency of joint and other bleeding events in patients with severe hemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors. (Funded by Baxter BioScience; Pro-FEIBA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00221195.).

The use of a single von Willebrand factor-containing, plasma-derived FVIII product in hemophilia A immune tolerance induction: the US experience

BACKGROUND

Inhibitors are a serious complication for patients with severe hemophilia A. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the primary method for eradicating these inhibitors. The role of type of concentrate and in particular the use of von Willebrand factor-containing, plasma-derived factor VIII (VWF/pd-FVIII) concentrate in primary or rescue ITI remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To report retrospective collection of data on the use of a single VWF/pd-FVIII concentrate in primary and rescue ITI.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of hemophilia A inhibitor patients at 11 US institutions who received VWF/pd-FVIII concentrate in primary or rescue ITI.

RESULTS

Primary ITI was carried out in eight inhibitor patients with a 75% complete and partial success. Secondary ITI was carried out in 25 inhibitor patients, with 52% attaining complete or partial success.

CONCLUSIONS

This report represents the largest group of primarily pediatric, high-titer inhibitor patients treated with a single VWF/pd-FVIII concentrate. It adds retrospective data to the use of VWF-containing plasma-derived factor VIII concentrate in primary and rescue ITI, particularly in those patients with characteristics of poor response to ITI.

[Conditions causing copious bleeding important for dental medicine practice]

<Zakljucak> Dobro poznavanje mogucih uzoraka prekomernog krvarenja, kao i stomatoloskih postupaka u toku oralnohirurskih intervencija kod obolelih od trombocitopenije, hemofilije, u slucaju snizene koncentracije faktora zavisnih od vitamina K i predozirane antitrombotske terapije, omogucava adekvatnu i blagovremenu oralnohirursku hemostazu u skladu sa predvidjenim protokolom lecenja. Ukoliko je, medjutim, oralnohirurska intervencija propracena produzenim krvarenjem u trajanju od nekoliko sati ili dana, bez pouzdanih anamnestickih podataka i pismene medicinske dokumentacije, problem postaje veliki. U takvim situacijama, podsecanje na stanja koja izazivaju prekomerno krvarenje, kao i na stomatoloske postupke u toku oralnohirurskih intervencija kod takvih bolesnika, moze biti dragocen doprinos dobroj stomatoloskoj praksi.

Experience with a third generation recombinant factor VIII concentrate (Advate) for immune tolerance induction in patients with haemophilia A

The development of an inhibitor represents one of the most challenging complications in patients with haemophilia A. Optimal management is immune tolerance induction (ITI), typically through the administration of high doses of factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate. Among 12 patients who underwent ITI using Advate, a third-generation recombinant FVIII product that is free of animal and human protein additives, tolerance was achieved in nine (75%), including seven of 10 patients (70%) with high-titre inhibitors. ITI is ongoing in two patients and not yet successful; immune tolerance failed in the third patient. The median time to success was 4.0 months for group as a whole and for patients with high-titre inhibitors. Treatment was well tolerated, and no adverse events were observed. Advate was found to be equivalent to other FVIII products with regard to both ITI success rates and the incidence of adverse effects when used in these immune tolerance regimens.

Passive transfer of polyethylene glycol to liposomal-recombinant human FVIII enhances its efficacy in a murine model for hemophilia A

The replacement therapy using recombinant human FVIII (rFVIII) is the first line of therapy for hemophilia A. Approximately 15-30% of the patients develop inhibitory antibodies. Recently, we reported that liposomes composed of phosphatidylserine (PS) could reduce the immunogenicity of rFVIII. However, PS containing liposomal-rFVIII is likely to reduce the systemic exposure and efficacy of FVIII due to rapid uptake of the PS containing liposomes by the reticuloendothelial system (RES). Here, we investigated whether phosphatidylserine (PS) liposomes containing Polyethylene glycol (PEG) (PEGylated), could reduce the immunogenicity of rFVIII and reverse the reduction in systemic exposure of rFVIII. Animals given PEGylated liposomal-rFVIII had lower total and inhibitory anti-rFVIII antibody titers, compared to animals treated with rFVIII alone. The mean stimulation index of CD4+ T-cells from animals given PEGylated liposomal-rFVIII also was lower than for animals that were given rFVIII alone. Pharmacokinetic studies following intravenous dosing indicated that the systemic exposure (area under the activity curve, AUAC(0-24h)) of PEGylated liposomal-rFVIII was approximately 59 IU/mL x h and significantly higher than that of non-PEGylated liposomal-rFVIII (AUAC(0-24h) approximately 36 IU/mL x h). Based on these studies, we speculate that PEGylated PS-containing liposomal rFVIII may improve efficacy of rFVIII.

From theory to practice: applying current clinical knowledge and treatment strategies to the care of hemophilia a patients with inhibitors

Two bypassing agents are currently available to circumvent the need for factor FVIII in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors: the activated prothrombin complex FEIBA VH and recombinant activated factor VII (NovoSeven. Both products are highly effective in controlling bleeding in the presence of inhibitory alloantibodies, yet their hemostatic efficacy can be unpredictable. As the results of the FEIBA NovoSeven( Comparative (FENOC) study illustrate, patients may respond better to one bypassing agent than the other. Furthermore, guidelines from an expert panel reflect that responsiveness to bypassing therapy may change from one bleed to the next in the same patient and even from hour to hour during the course of a single bleeding event. These findings underscore the need to have both bypassing products available to treat bleeding episodes in inhibitor patients, to frequently evaluate the efficacy of hemostasis during the course of a bleeding event, and to switch products early if the response to treatment is unsatisfactory.

Phosphatidylserine containing liposomes reduce immunogenicity of recombinant human factor VIII (rFVIII) in a murine model of hemophilia A

Factor VIII (FVIII) is a multidomain protein that is deficient in hemophilia A, a clinically important bleeding disorder. Replacement therapy using recombinant human FVIII (rFVIII) is the main therapy. However, approximately 15-30% of patients develop inhibitory antibodies that neutralize rFVIII activity. Antibodies to epitopes in C2 domain, which is involved in FVIII binding to phospholipids, are highly prevalent. Here, we investigated the effect of phosphatidylserine (PS)-containing liposomes, which bind to C2 domain with high affinity and specificity, upon the immunogenicity of rFVIII. Circular dichroism studies showed that PS-containing liposomes interfered with aggregation of rFVIII. Immunogenicity of free- versus liposomal-rFVIII was evaluated in a murine model of hemophilia A. Animals treated with s.c. injections of liposomal-rFVIII had lower total- and inhibitory titers, compared to animals treated with rFVIII alone. Antigen processing by proteolytic enzymes was reduced in the presence of liposomes. Animals treated with s.c. injections of liposomal-rFVIII showed a significant increase in rFVIII plasma concentration compared to animals that received rFVIII alone. Based on these studies, we hypothesize that specific molecular interactions between PS-containing bilayers and rFVIII may provide a basis for designing lipidic complexes that improve the stability, reduce the immunogenicity of rFVIII formulations, and permit administration by s.c. route.

Factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) - addressing safety issues

Bypassing therapy is usually necessary to control or prevent bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A or B and high-titre inhibitors. Factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) has a long history of successful use in the acute, surgical and prophylactic treatment settings, but safety concerns have made some reluctant to administer this bypassing agent. A review of the literature and clinical trial data show that FEIBA has a low prevalence of thrombosis, a low prevalence of anamnesis that does not impact haemostatic efficacy and an excellent record of pathogen safety and clinical tolerability.

International workshop on immune tolerance induction: consensus recommendations

Although immune tolerance induction (ITI) has been used for 30 years to eliminate inhibitors and restore normal factor pharmacokinetics in patients with hemophilia, there is a paucity of scientific evidence to guide therapeutic decision-making. In an effort to provide direction for physicians and hemophilia treatment center staff members, an international panel of hemophilia opinion leaders met to develop consensus recommendations for ITI in patients with severe and mild hemophilia A and hemophilia B. These recommendations draw on the available published literature and the collective clinical experience of the group and are rated based on the level of supporting evidence.

Use of FEIBA for invasive or surgical procedures in patients with severe hemophilia A or B with inhibitors

Achieving hemostasis in patients with hemophilia A or B is complicated by the presence of inhibitors and is made even more difficult when these individuals require surgery. Over a 4-year period, 6 patients with inhibitors to factor VIII and 1 patient with inhibitors to factor IX underwent surgery or invasive procedures at our institution. A total of 26 procedures were performed, primarily using the bypassing agent FEIBA for bleeding control. Excellent hemostasis was obtained in all cases, adding to accumulating data indicating that FEIBA is safe and effective in hemophilia patients with inhibitors who require surgery.

Application of current knowledge to the management of bleeding events during immune tolerance induction

The development of inhibitors to factor VIII is the most serious adverse event associated with the treatment of haemophilia A, predisposing patients to uncontrollable haemorrhage, disability and premature death. Eradication of inhibitors via immune tolerance induction (ITI) is effective in the majority of patients, but may require months to years to achieve success. In the interim, the treatment and prevention of acute bleeding episodes are primary foci of care. Regrettably, there is a paucity of information regarding management of bleeding episodes in inhibitor patients undergoing tolerization. Until specific data from ongoing clinical trials are available to provide more guidance in this patient group, it is reasonable and useful to rely on the broader base of medical literature pertaining to patients not being tolerized to deduce strategies for controlling acute and perioperative bleeding episodes in inhibitor patients during ITI.

Interaction of dicaproyl phosphatidylserine with recombinant factor VIII and its impact on immunogenicity

Replacement therapy with exogenous recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) to control bleeding episodes results in the development of inhibitory antibodies in 15% to 30% of hemophilia A patients. The inhibitory antibodies are mainly directed against specific and universal immunodominant epitopes located in the C2 domain. Previously we have shown that complexation of O-phospho-L-serine (phosphatidylserine head group) with the phospholipid binding region of the C2 domain can lead to an overall reduction in the immunogenicity of rFVIII. Here, we have investigated the hypothesis that dicaproyl phosphatidylserine, a short-chain water-soluble phospholipid, can reduce the immunogenicity of rFVIII. Circular dichroism and fluorescence spectroscopy studies suggest that dicaproyl phosphatidylserine interacts with rFVIII, causing subtle changes in the tertiary and secondary structure of the protein. Sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay studies indicate that dicaproyl phosphatidylserine probably interacts with the phospholipid binding region of the C2 domain. The immunogenicity of FVIII-dicaproyl phosphatidylserine complexes prepared at concentrations above and below the critical micellar concentrations of the lipid were evaluated in hemophilia A mice. Our results suggest that micellar dicaproyl phosphatidylserine may be useful to reduce the immunogenicity of rFVIII preparations.

Lower inhibitor development in hemophilia A mice following administration of recombinant factor VIII-O-phospho-L-serine complex

Factor VIII is a multidomain protein composed of A1, A2, B, A3, C1, and C2 domains. Deficiency or dysfunction of factor VIII causes hemophilia A, a bleeding disorder. Administration of exogenous recombinant factor VIII as a replacement leads to development of inhibitory antibodies against factor VIII in 15-30% of hemophilia A patients. Hence, less immunogenic preparations of factor VIII are highly desirable. Inhibitory antibodies against factor VIII are mainly directed against immunodominant epitopes in C2, A3, and A2 domains. Further, several universal epitopes for CD4+ T-cells have been identified within the C2 domain. The C2 domain is also known to interact specifically with phosphatidylserine-rich lipid vesicles. Here, we have investigated the hypothesis that complexation of O-phospho-l-serine, the head group of phosphatidylserine, with the C2 domain can reduce the overall immunogenicity of factor VIII. The biophysical (circular dichroism and fluorescence) and biochemical studies (ELISA and size exclusion chromatography) showed that O-phospho-l-serine binds to the phospholipid-binding region in the C2 domain, and this interaction causes subtle changes in the tertiary structure of the protein. O-Phospho-l-serine also prevented aggregation of the protein under thermal stress. The immunogenicity of the factor VIII-O-phospho-l-serine complex was evaluated in hemophilia A mice. The total and inhibitory antibody titers were lower for factor VIII-O-phospho-l-serine complex compared with factor VIII alone. Moreover, factor VIII administered as a complex with O-phospho-l-serine retained in vivo activity in hemophilia A mice. Our results suggest that factor VIII-O-phospho-l-serine complex may be beneficial to increase the physical stability and reduce immunogenicity of recombinant factor VIII preparations.

Prevention of bleeds in hemophilia patients with inhibitors: emerging data and clinical direction

In patients with hemophilia, the development of high-responding inhibitors to factor VIII prevents adequate replacement therapy and results in increased risk of serious bleeding episodes, poor control of joint bleeding, and progressive, debilitating joint disease. Immune tolerance therapy can eradicate inhibitors, but it is not uniformly successful. Emerging data suggest that prophylaxis using activated prothrombin complex concentrates may be effective and safe in reducing the incidence of joint bleeding during immune tolerance therapy and for patients in whom immune tolerance induction fails. However, only controlled clinical trials will ultimately demonstrate whether prophylaxis can prevent joint bleeding and damage, and improve quality of life in patients with inhibitors.