Effect of long-term exposure to insulin lispro on the induction of antibody response in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes

Insulin Autoimmune Syndrome: A Chinese Expert Consensus Statement

Insulin autoimmune syndrome (IAS) is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by spontaneous hypoglycemia. The incidence of IAS is higher in East Asian populations compared to other populations. Delayed diagnosis and treatment can lead to recurrent hypoglycemia, significant glucose fluctuations, and adverse clinical outcomes, including life-threatening situations. Currently, no standardized guidelines exist for the diagnosis and treatment of IAS. This consensus aims to provide a systematic summary of the epidemiology, triggers, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of IAS, with the objective of standardizing its clinical management.

Lipohypertrophy and Insulin. An Old Dog that Needs New Tricks

OBJECTIVE

To review the current status of practical knowledge related to insulin-associated lipohypertrophy (LH) - an accumulation of fatty subcutaneous nodules commonly caused by repeated injections and/or infusions of insulin into the same site.

METHODS

Review of published literature with additional contributions from leading multidisciplinary experts with the emphasis on clinical aspects including pathophysiology, clinical and economic consequences, diagnosis, prevention and treatment.

RESULTS

LH is the most common dermatologic complication of insulin therapy. Risk factors for the development of lipohypertrophy include repeated delivery of large amounts of insulin into the same location over time, repeated injection trauma to the skin and subcutaneous tissue, and multiple injections using the same needle. Subcutaneous insulin injection in skin areas with lipohypertrophy is associated with reduced pain; however, this problem can interfere with insulin absorption, thereby increasing the likelihood of glucose variability, hypo- and hyperglycemia when a site is changed. Modern visualization technology of the subcutaneous space with ultrasound can demonstrate lipohypertrophy early in the course of its development.

CONCLUSIONS

The physiological and psychological consequences of developing insulin lipohypertrophy can be prevented and treated with education focusing on insulin injection techniques.

Exogenous insulin antibody syndrome in a patient with diabetes secondary to total pancreatectomy

Exogenous insulin can induce insulin antibodies that have a low affinity/high binding capacity. Similar to what is observed in insulin autoimmune syndrome, these insulin antibodies can cause fasting hypoglycemia and postprandial hyperglycemia, a phenomenon known as "exogenous insulin antibody syndrome" (EIAS). Cases of EIAS in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes have been sporadically reported, mainly in Asia. However, there has been no report on EIAS in patients with diabetes secondary to total pancreatectomy treated with insulin analogs. A 74-year-old man with diabetes after total pancreatectomy had been treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using an insulin analog, lispro, and developed recurrent early morning hypoglycemia even after discontinuation of nocturnal basal insulin. His fasting serum lispro level was high even approximately 9 h after the last lispro dose. He had a high titer (72.7%) of insulin antibodies, and a Scatchard analysis revealed low affinity/high binding capacity. These findings suggested that the patient's recurrent early morning hypoglycemia was associated with insulin antibodies against lispro, and we, therefore, switched from lispro to another insulin analog, glulisine. His hypoglycemia improved, accompanied by a dramatic decrease in his insulin antibodies and serum glulisine levels. Early morning hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes secondary to total pancreatectomy may often be explained by high glycemic variability, malnutrition, and/or glucagon deficiency. However, in cases of recurrent early morning hypoglycemia, EIAS should be considered as a potential differential diagnosis.

Hypoglycemia Caused by Exogenous Insulin Antibody Syndrome: A Large Single-Center Case Series From China

CONTEXT

Exogenous insulin antibody syndrome (EIAS) can lead to unexpected and potentially life-threatening recurrent hypoglycemia.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to better define autoimmune hypoglycemia caused by EIAS in patients with diabetes and shed light on the improvements in the identification and intervention for this rare but possibly life-threatening condition.

METHODS

We summarized the clinical characteristics of autoimmune hypoglycemia caused by EIAS in 23 patients with diabetes. Furthermore, we performed human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotyping of 10 patients.

RESULTS

We identified a high frequency of autoimmune comorbidities (21.7%), food or drug allergy (48%), insulin allergy (30%), lipodystrophy at the insulin injection sites (22%), and antinuclear antibodies (25%) in the patients. Alternation between hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia was observed in more than 90% of the patients. Most patients showed a high insulin autoantibody titer (>90%) and inappropriately increased insulin concentration (insulin/C-peptide molar ratio >7, >85%). We detected similar frequencies of DRB1*0405-DQB1*0401 and DRB1*0901-DQB1*0303 compared with previously reported frequencies in type 1 diabetes, and a lower frequency of DRB1*0406 compared with insulin autoimmune syndrome. The spontaneous remission rate exceeded 70%.

CONCLUSION

Predisposing factors for autoimmune hypoglycemia caused by EIAS include a strong autoimmune background. Susceptible HLA genotypes for type 1 diabetes or insulin autoimmune syndrome might not explain susceptibility to this condition. Additionally, insulin autoantibodies and the insulin/C-peptide molar ratio are reliable screening options. The prognosis for this condition is favorable. Monitoring of insulin and insulin autoantibodies may contribute to treatment effectiveness.

Association of subclass distribution of insulin antibody with glucose control in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective observational study

Objective

To examine the distribution and effects of the subclass of insulin antibodies on glucose control and side events in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with premixed insulin analog.

Methods

A total of 516 patients treated with premixed insulin analog were sequentially enrolled from the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from June 2016 to August 2020. Subclass-specific insulin antibodies (IAs) (IgG1-4, IgA, IgD, IgE, and IgM) were detected in IA-positive patients by electrochemiluminescence. We analyzed glucose control, serum insulin, and insulin-related events between IA-positive and IA-negative groups, as well as among patients with different IA subclasses.

Results

Overall, 98 of 516 subjects (19.0%) were positive for total IAs after premixed insulin analog therapy; of these participants, 92 had subclass IAs, and IgG-IA was the predominant subclass, followed by IgE-IA. IAs were associated with serum total insulin increase and local injection-site reactions but not glycemic control and hypoglycemia. In the subgroup analysis in patients with IA-positive, the IgE-IA and IA subclass numbers were more associated with increased serum total insulin levels. Additionally, IgE-IA might be correlated more strongly with local responses and weakly with hypoglycemia, while IgM-IA might be correlated more strongly with hypoglycemia.

Conclusion

We concluded that IAs or IA subclasses might be associated with unfavorable events in patients receiving premixed insulin analog therapy, which can be used as an adjunctive monitoring indicator in clinical insulin trials.

Combined detection of islet autoantibodies for clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in the low-prevalence population

CONTEXT

Single positive islet autoantibodies (IAbs), sometimes detected in healthy individuals and low risk type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients, are considered to be irrelevant to the development of diabetes, making it difficult to diagnose and classify adult-onset diabetics.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the significance and clinical value of IAbs in T1D diagnosis in the low-prevalence population; and to explore whether electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-IAb detection assay can improve the clinical utility of IAbs in the immunodiagnosis of T1D in the low-prevalence population.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

A total of 633 newly-diagnosed adult-onset diabetic patients (≥18 years old) were divided into two groups according to their clinical phenotypes: 575 patients with age at diagnosis ≥35 years and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 24 kg/m2 were considered a low-prevalence population (population with a low prevalence of T1D) and the other 58 patients were considered a high-prevalence population. All the samples from 633 participants were tested with IAbs using standard radiobinding assays (RBA) and electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assay, in parallel.

RESULTS

Compared with the high-prevalence population, fewer positive IAbs (94/575, 16.3% vs. 28/58, 48.3%) were detected in the low-prevalence population, and more of which (69/94, 73.4% vs. 9/28, 32.2%) were positive for a single IAb, with GADA being the most prevalent single-IAb. Single-IAb detection in the low-prevalence population did not always suggest T1D phenotype. Combined detection of IAbs by RBA and ECL assays had a significant clinical utility to distinguish autoimmune diabetes in the low-prevalence population with low BMI, poor β-cell function at the diagnosis, and an accelerated decline in β-cell function during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined autoantibody detection by RBA and ECL assays improved differentiating autoimmune from non-autoimmune diabetes in the low-prevalence population.

Insulin allergy: a diagnostic and therapeutic strategy based on a retrospective cohort and a case-control study

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Insulin allergy is a rare but significant clinical challenge. We aimed to develop a management workflow by (1) validating clinical criteria to guide diagnosis, based on a retrospective cohort, and (2) assessing the diagnostic performance of confirmatory tests, based on a case-control study.

METHODS

In the retrospective cohort, patients with suspected insulin allergy were classified into three likelihood categories according to the presence of all (likely insulin allergy; 26/52, 50%), some (possible insulin allergy; 9/52, 17%) or none (unlikely insulin allergy; 17/52, 33%) of four clinical criteria: (1) recurrent local or systemic immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reactions; (2) reactions elicited by each injection; (3) reactions centred on the injection sites; and (4) reactions observed by the investigator (i.e. in response to an insulin challenge test). All underwent intradermal reaction (IDR) tests. A subsequent case-control study assessed the diagnostic performance of IDR, skin prick and serum anti-insulin IgE tests in ten clinically diagnosed insulin allergy patients, 24 insulin-treated non-allergic patients and 21 insulin-naive patients.

RESULTS

In the retrospective cohort, an IDR test validated the clinical diagnosis in 24/26 (92%), 3/9 (33%) and 0/14 (0%) likely, possible and unlikely insulin allergy patients, respectively. In the case-control study, an IDR test was 80% sensitive and 100% specific and identified the index insulin(s). The skin prick and IgE tests had a marginal diagnostic value. Patients with IDR-confirmed insulin allergy were treated using a stepwise strategy.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Subject to validation, clinical likelihood criteria can effectively guide diabetologists towards an insulin allergy diagnosis before undertaking allergology tests. An IDR test shows the best diagnostic performance. A progressive management strategy can subsequently be implemented. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion is ultimately required in most patients.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT01407640.

Immunogenicity of LY2963016 insulin glargine and Lantus® insulin glargine in Chinese patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS

To evaluate the immunogenicity of LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar) versus originator insulin glargine (IGlar [Lantus®]) in Chinese patients with type 1 (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ABES and ABET were prospective, randomized, active control, open-label, phase III studies, which enrolled Chinese patients with T1DM (N = 272) and T2DM (N = 536), respectively. Using data from these trials, immunogenicity of LY IGlar and IGlar was evaluated by comparing the proportion of patients with detectable anti-insulin glargine antibodies and the median antibody levels (percent binding) between the treatment groups. The incidence of anti-insulin antibodies and treatment-emergent antibody response (TEAR) were compared using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's chi-squared test. Levels of anti-insulin antibodies were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. We also evaluated the relationship between antibody formation or TEAR and clinical outcomes using analysis of covariance, negative binomial regression, or partial correlations.

RESULTS

There were no significant treatment differences in the incidence of detectable anti-insulin antibodies, median antibody levels or TEAR, overall or at Week 24 with last observation carried forward, and median antibody levels were low (<5%) after 24 weeks of treatment, in patients with T1DM or T2DM. Levels of anti-insulin antibodies and development of TEAR were not associated with efficacy (glycated haemoglobin, insulin dose [U/kg/d] and hypoglycaemia) or safety outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The immunogenicity profiles of LY IGlar and IGlar are similar, with low levels of anti-insulin antibodies observed for both insulins. No association was observed between antibody levels or TEAR status and clinical outcomes.

Similar immunogenicity profiles between the proposed biosimilar MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine in patients with diabetes mellitus: the phase 3 INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2 studies

BACKGROUND

MYL-1501D is a proposed biosimilar to insulin glargine. The noninferiority of MYL-1501D was demonstrated in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes in 2 phase 3 trials. Immunogenicity of MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine was examined in both studies.

METHODS

INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2 were multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group studies. In INSTRIDE 1, patients with type 1 diabetes received MYL-1501D or insulin glargine over a 52-week period. In INSTRIDE 2, patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antidiabetic drugs, insulin naive or not, received MYL-1501D or reference insulin glargine over a 24-week period. Incidence rates and change from baseline in relative levels of antidrug antibodies (ADA) and anti-host cell protein (anti-HCP) antibodies in both treatment groups were determined by a radioimmunoprecipitation assay and a bridging immunoassay, respectively. Results were analyzed using a mixed-effects model (INSTRIDE 1) or a nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test (INSTRIDE 2).

RESULTS

Total enrollment was 558 patients in INSTRIDE 1 and 560 patients in INSTRIDE 2. The incidence of total and cross-reactive ADA was comparable between treatment groups in INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2 (P > 0.05 for both). A similar proportion of patients had anti-HCP antibodies in both treatment groups in INSTRIDE 1 at week 52 (MYL-1501D, 93.9 %; reference insulin glargine, 89.6 %; P = 0.213) and in INSTRIDE 2 at week 24 (MYL-1501D, 87.3 %; reference insulin glargine, 86.9 %; P > 0.999).

CONCLUSIONS

In INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2, similar immunogenicity profiles were observed for MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, respectively.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, INSTRIDE 1 ( NCT02227862 ; date of registration, August 28, 2014); INSTRIDE 2 ( NCT02227875 ; date of registration, August 28, 2014).

Insulin Therapy and Diabetic Pregnancy

BACKGROUND

A good metabolic control before conception and throughout pregnancy with diabetes decreases the risk of short- and long-term adverse outcomes of the mothers and their offsprings. Insulin treatment remains the gold standard treatment recommended for any type of diabetes. New technologies including new insulins and insulin analogues, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion without and with sensors, the low-glucose predictive suspension function, and closed-loop systems that persistently and automatically self-adjust according to patients' continuous glucose monitoring readings have expanded the offer to clinicians for achieving tight glucose control.

AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY

Unsafe effects of insulin and insulin analogues in pregnancy with diabetes could be linked with changes in insulin immunogenicity, teratogenicity, and mitogenicity. Second-generation insulin analogues need to be tested and proven. Effectiveness and safety of new insulin delivery systems in real life of diabetic women in pregnancy need further confirmations.

SOURCES

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, randomized controlled trials, systematic review and meta-analysis, observational prospective and retrospective studies, case series reports for the most recent insulin analogues, published in English impacted journals, and consensus statements from scientific societies I excluded 60 from 221 papers as not suitable for the purpose of the subject.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous insulin infusion can be safely used during pregnancy and delivery of well-trained women. Sensors are increasingly accurate tools that improve the efficacy and safety of integrated systems' functioning. Continuous glucose monitoring provides metrics ("time in range" time in "hypoglycemia" and in "hyperglycemia," glucose variability, average glucose levels in different time intervals) used as a guide to diabetes management; these new metrics are object of discussion in special populations. Randomized controlled trials have shown that sensor-augmented pump therapy improves pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes. Closed-loop insulin delivery provides better glycemic control than sensor-augmented pump therapy during pregnancy, before, and after delivery.

CONCLUSION

Second-generation insulin analogues and newer insulin infusion systems that automatically self-adjust according to patients continuous glucose monitor readings are important tools improving the treatment and quality of life of these women. Multi-institutional and disciplinary teams are working to develop and evaluate a pregnancy-specific artificial pancreas.

Enhancement of postprandial endogenous insulin secretion rather than exogenous insulin injection ameliorated insulin antibody-induced unstable diabetes: a case report

BACKGROUND

Insulin injection, especially with insulin analogs, occasionally induces the production of insulin antibodies with high binding capacity and low affinity, similar to the insulin autoantibodies characteristic of insulin autoimmune syndrome (IAS). Production of these "IAS-like" insulin antibodies causes marked glycemic fluctuations with postprandial hyperglycemia and fasting hypoglycemia.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 66-year-old man with a 27-year history of diabetes was admitted because of marked glycemic fluctuations. Human insulin treatment had been initiated at age 56, followed by multiple daily injections of insulin analogs 5 years later. After the initial year of insulin analog treatment, the patient began to experience frequent morning hypoglycemic attacks and day-time hyperglycemia. Marked hyperinsulinemia (4500 μU/mL) and high titers of insulin antibodies (80.4%) with high binding capacity and low affinity indicated that IAS-like insulin antibodies were causing severe glucose fluctuations. Altering insulin formulations (insulin aspart → regular human insulin→ insulin lispro) proved to be ineffective. After several therapeutic trials, cessation of exogenous insulin and addition of mitiglinide to liraglutide with voglibose finally attenuated glycemic fluctuations with increased postprandial insulin secretion. Continuous glucose monitoring revealed improvement of morning hypoglycemia and postprandial hyperglycemia with smaller mean amplitude of glycemic excursion. Therefore, compared to exogenously injected insulin, endogenously secreted insulin directly and rapidly acts on hepatocytes and suppresses postprandial glucose output.

CONCLUSIONS

Proper enhancement of postprandial endogenous insulin aimed at suppressing postprandial glucose output without stimulating excessive glucose uptake in the periphery is potentially useful for treating diabetes with insulin antibody-induced glycemic instability.

Insulin allergy can be successfully managed by a systematic approach

Background

Type I insulin allergy can be a challenging condition, and there is no international consensus on how to establish the diagnosis. Measurement of specific IgE and skin testing have been cornerstones in the diagnostic work-up. However, these tests have limitations, mainly lack of correlation between test results and clinical findings. At the Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, patients with suspected insulin allergy have been evaluated since 2003. The aim of this study was to establish a systematic approach to diagnose and treat patients with insulin allergy.

Methods

The study was conducted retrospectively by retrieving data from the Allergy Centre database on patients with suspected insulin allergy evaluated from 2003 to 2017. The examination comprised a comprehensive medical history, specific IgE against insulin and intracutaneous tests (ICT) with different insulins.

Results

A total of 144 patients were examined on suspicion of insulin allergy of which 110 had negative specific IgE in serum. Of the remaining 34 patients, 33 had ICT performed; 2 had negative ICTs, while 31 had one or more positive ICT. All 34 patients had mild symptoms, and 4 could obtain symptom relief with antihistamines or local steroids, 9 could be managed with oral antidiabetics, and 7 were switched to other insulins. The final 14 patients were offered an insulin pump because of reactions to many different insulins, many positive ICTs, unmanageable diabetes, young age and compliance, or convenience.

Conclusion

Insulin allergy can be managed by a systematic approach, and symptom relief is obtainable in most patients.

A Review of Basal-Bolus Therapy Using Insulin Glargine and Insulin Lispro in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus

Basal-bolus therapy (BBT) refers to the combination of a long-acting basal insulin with a rapid-acting insulin at mealtimes. Basal insulin glargine 100 U/mL and prandial insulin lispro have been available for many years and there is a substantial evidence base to support the efficacy and safety of these agents when they are used in BBT or basal-plus therapy for patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM, T2DM). With the growing availability of alternative insulins for use in such regimens, it seems timely to review the data regarding BBT with insulin glargine 100 U/mL and insulin lispro. In patients with T1DM, BBT with insulin glargine plus insulin lispro provides similar or better glycemic control and leads to less nocturnal hypoglycemia compared to BBT using human insulin as the basal and/or prandial component, and generally provides similar glycemic control and rates of severe hypoglycemia to those achieved with insulin lispro administered by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Studies evaluating BBT with insulin glargine plus insulin lispro in patients with T2DM also demonstrate the efficacy and safety of these insulins. Available data suggest that BBT with insulin glargine and insulin lispro provides similar levels of efficacy and safety in pediatric and adult populations with T1DM and in adult patients and those aged more than 65 years with T2DM. These insulin preparations also appear to be safe and effective for controlling T2DM in people of different ethnicities and in patients with T1DM or T2DM and comorbidities.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company.

Inverse association of insulin antibody levels with insulin sensitivity in adults with Type 1 diabetes

AIMS

Insulin resistance may contribute to the pathogenesis of autoimmune-mediated diabetes. Antibodies against β-cell-associated molecules, comprising islet cell antigen (ICA), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and insulin, characterize the autoimmune process. Because the link between insulin resistance and autoimmunity might be relevant for disease progression and treatment, we hypothesized that insulin resistance associates positively with β-cell-directed antibodies in newly diagnosed Type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

Within the German Diabetes Study, an observational study including adults with newly diagnosed diabetes, 142 adults [84 men, 58 women; age 33.1 (26.4, 41.9) years; diabetes duration 6.3 (4.2, 9.1) months] positive for at least one antibody against ICA, GAD or insulin underwent hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp tests to assess insulin sensitivity (M-value) in a cross-sectional setting.

RESULTS

Insulin-directed antibodies were inversely correlated with M-values (β = -0.039). Albeit not strong, the association persisted after adjustment for age, sex and BMI, and even after further adjustment for confounders reflecting exposure to exogenous insulin and residual β-cell secretory capacity. Correlation network-based analyses revealed a complex interaction between levels of fasting insulin and of insulin antibodies with respect to their relationship with the M-value. GAD- or ICA-directed antibodies did not correlate with insulin sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with recent-onset Type 1 diabetes expressing at least one β-cell-directed antibody, insulin sensitivity is inversely related to insulin antibody titres, but not to other autoantibodies. Our finding may allow for the identification of insulin resistance in adults with high levels of insulin antibodies.

Exogenous insulin antibody syndrome (EIAS): a clinical syndrome associated with insulin antibodies induced by exogenous insulin in diabetic patients

Insulin has been used for diabetes therapy and has achieved significant therapeutic effect. In recent years, the use of purified and recombinant human insulin preparations has markedly reduced, but not completely suppressed, the incidence of insulin antibodies (IAs). IAs induced by exogenous insulin in diabetic patients is associated with clinical events, which is named exogenous insulin antibody syndrome (EIAS). The present review is based on our research and summarizes the characterization of IAs, the factors affecting IA development, the clinical significance of IAs and the treatments for EIAS.

Effectiveness of Non-Primary Care-Based Smoking Cessation Interventions for Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Literature Review

Diabetes is a chronic disease that affects over 25 million adults, many of whom are smokers. The negative health impact of diabetes and comorbid smoking is significant and requires comprehensive interdisciplinary management. The National Diabetes Education Program has identified specific providers, known as PPOD, who include pharmacists, podiatrists, optometrists, and dentists, as key individuals to improve diabetes-related clinical outcomes. These providers are encouraged to work together through interdisciplinary collaboration and to implement evidence-based strategies as outlined in the PPOD toolkit. The toolkit encourages healthcare providers to ask, advise, and assist patients in their efforts to engage in risk reduction and healthy behaviors, including smoking cessation as an important risk factor. While individual PPOD providers have demonstrated effective smoking cessation interventions in adults with other acute and chronic systemic diseases, they lack specific application and focus on adults with diabetes. This literature review examines the current role of PPOD providers in smoking cessation interventions delivered to adults with diabetes.

Diabetes Diagnosis and Weight Loss in Middle-Aged Adults

Using three waves of Health and Retirement Study data, this study investigated whether (a) self-reported physician-diagnosed diabetes prior to 1994 predicted weight loss between 1994 and 1996 in adults who were aged 51 to 61 and relatively healthy but overweight in 1992 (n = 2,642) and (b) socioeconomic status influenced that relationship. The authors found that these overweight middle-aged adults were at least 50% more likely to report that they lost at least 10 pounds of excess body weight if they had been diagnosed with diabetes than if they had not. Furthermore, the authors found that neither education nor net worth predicted weight loss in these adults. Identifying the social, psychological, and physiological mechanisms linking chronic conditions and health behaviors can inform policy makers and health care providers and enhance the development of effective interventions to prevent or reduce health risks in middle-aged and older adults.

Immunological hypoglycemia associated with insulin antibodies induced by exogenous insulin in 11 Chinese patients with diabetes

AIMS

To investigate the characteristics of immunological hypoglycemia associated with insulin antibodies (IAbs) induced by exogenous insulin in Chinese patients with diabetes.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with immunological hypoglycemia due to IAbs were retrospectively analyzed by screening patients with diabetes discharged from West China Hospital from 2007 to 2013.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients (eight men and three women) were identified. Insulin-C-peptide separation was found in all patients via insulin and C-peptide release test. Previous insulin use was ceased after admission and was switched to oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) (8/11), lifestyle modification only (2/11), or regular human insulin (1/11). Hypoglycemia was ameliorated after a median of 20 days (interquartile range [IQR], 11-40), while IAbs turned negative after a median of 17 months (IQR, 4-19), and serum immunoreactive insulin (IRI) levels dropped substantially after a median of 22 months (IQR, 9-32) in these cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In insulin-treated patients with unexpected and refractory hypoglycemia even after insulin therapy was gradually reduced or even withdrawn, IAbs induced by exogenous insulin should be considered, and insulin withdrawal might be promptly needed. The course of immunological hypoglycemia was benign and self-limited.

Safety of rapid-acting insulin analogs versus regular human insulin

Insulin is the most effective treatment for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. There are several differences in the safety profiles of each type of insulin, including rapid-acting insulin analogs and regular human insulin. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of those insulin types also differ, as do their safety parameters. Treatment with rapid-acting analogs results in less hypoglycemia overall and decreased frequency of both severe and nocturnal hypoglycemia. In addition, the more rapid onset and shorter duration of action of rapid-acting insulin analogs are associated with greater control of postprandial glucose than regular human insulin. This review will describe the similarities and differences between the safety profiles of rapid-acting insulin analogs.

Generalized allergy due to zinc in insulin treated with zinc-free insulin

Allergy to insulin became a rare complication due to the introduction of recombinant human insulin preparations. Nevertheless, allergic reactions to components of such preparations can occur. We report a case of a 61-year-old man with an atopic background and affected by diabetes mellitus type 2 since 27 years, who experienced generalized allergy to insulin at the moment of switching oral anti-diabetics to insulin. Prick tests revealed an allergy specifically to zinc, and the patient was treated with zinc-free glulisine insulin. After 8 months of such treatment, patient's glucose is stable and he never experienced allergic reactions to insulin injections. Even insulin allergy due specifically to zinc is rare, such complication must be assessed especially in a patient suffering from multiple allergies.

Etiopathogenesis of insulin autoimmunity

Autoimmunity against pancreatic islet beta cells is strongly associated with proinsulin, insulin, or both. The insulin autoreactivity is particularly pronounced in children with young age at onset of type 1 diabetes. Possible mechanisms for (pro)insulin autoimmunity may involve beta-cell destruction resulting in proinsulin peptide presentation on HLA-DR-DQ Class II molecules in pancreatic draining lymphnodes. Recent data on proinsulin peptide binding to type 1 diabetes-associated HLA-DQ2 and -DQ8 is reviewed and illustrated by molecular modeling. The importance of the cellular immune reaction involving cytotoxic CD8-positive T cells to kill beta cells through Class I MHC is discussed along with speculations of the possible role of B lymphocytes in presenting the proinsulin autoantigen over and over again through insulin-carrying insulin autoantibodies. In contrast to autoantibodies against other islet autoantigens such as GAD65, IA-2, and ZnT8 transporters, it has not been possible yet to standardize the insulin autoantibody test. As islet autoantibodies predict type 1 diabetes, it is imperative to clarify the mechanisms of insulin autoimmunity.

Pan-insulin allergy and severe lipoatrophy complicating Type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

  Insulin allergy is a rare complication of insulin use. Localized lipoatrophy is also known to occur following subcutaneous injections of insulin.

CASE REPORT

  A 53-year-old non-obese female patient with Type 2 diabetes displayed local allergic-type symptoms to all available insulin preparations. This was complicated by the development of severe lipoatrophy on her abdominal and thigh injection sites and subsequently resulted in suboptimal glycaemic control.

CONCLUSIONS

  Whilst uncommon, insulin allergy and lipoatrophy can cause major problems in diabetic management. Potential pathophysiological mechanisms and a stepwise approach to management are discussed.

Immunogenicity of different brands of human insulin and rapid-acting insulin analogs in insulin-naïve children with type 1 diabetes

AIMS

To determine (i) whether insulin preparations produced by three companies induce the same immune responses in insulin-naïve children with type 1 diabetes (T1DM); (ii) if switching from human insulin to rapid-acting insulin analogs influences this immune response; and (iii) if different insulin brands produce different clinical results during the first 2 yr after T1DM diagnosis.

METHODS

Insulin antibodies (IA) were measured for 140 patients aged 1.4-17.6 yr. Regular human insulin, neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) human insulin, and rapid-acting insulin analogs (lispro or aspart) taken by the patients were produced by one of three companies: Bioton, Poland (A), Eli Lilly, USA (B) and NovoNordisk, Denmark (C).

RESULTS

Positive IA levels were found in 112 patients (80.0%) at baseline and in 137 (97.9%) at 6 and at 24 months after T1DM diagnosis. There was no difference in IA levels among patients taking insulin preparations produced by different companies at 6 months (mean ± SD, A 27.8 ± 15.7%; B 25.3 ± 15.4%; C 24.5 ± 14.2; p = 0.54) or at 24 months (A 25.6 ± 17.8%; B29.6 ± 17.0%; C 26.2 ± 17.0%; p = 0.52); HbA(1c) and daily insulin dose did not differ significantly either. After 24 months, IA levels were similar for those who had used human insulin (mean ± SD, 25.7 ± 17.2%) and for those that had added rapid-acting analogs (28.1 ± 17.3%, p = 0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Three brands of insulin preparations did not differ with respect to immunogenicity. Rapid-acting analogs did not increase IA levels in patients previously treated with human insulin only. Patients using insulin preparations of different brands did not differ with respect to daily insulin dose or HbA(1c) .

Impact of product-related factors on immunogenicity of biotherapeutics

All protein therapeutics have the potential to be immunogenic. Several factors, including patient characteristics, disease state, and the therapy itself, influence the generation of an immune response. Product-related factors such as the molecule design, the expression system, post-translational modifications, impurities, contaminants, formulation and excipients, container, closure, as well as degradation products are all implicated. However, a critical examination of the available data shows that clear unequivocal evidence for the impact of these latter factors on clinical immunogenicity is lacking. No report could be found that clearly deconvolutes the clinical impact of the product attributes on patient susceptibility. Aggregation carries the greatest concern as a risk factor for immunogenicity, but the impact of aggregates is likely to depend on their structure as well as on the functionality (e.g., immunostimulatory or immunomodulatory) of the therapeutic. Preclinical studies are not yet capable of assessing the clinically relevant immunogenicity potential of these product-related factors. Simply addressing these risk factors as part of product development will not eliminate immunogenicity. Minimization of immunogenicity has to begin at the molecule design stage by reducing or eliminating antigenic epitopes and building in favorable physical and chemical properties.

Circulating insulin antibodies: influence of continuous subcutaneous or intraperitoneal insulin infusion, and impact on glucose control

The purification of animal insulin preparations and the use of human recombinant insulin have markedly reduced the incidence, but not completely suppressed, the development of anti-insulin antibodies (IAs). Advances in technologies concerning the mode of delivery of insulin, i.e. continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), continuous peritoneal insulin infusion (CPII) and more recently inhaled insulin administration, appear to significantly increase circulating levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-IAs in diabetic patients. However, the increase is usually moderate and mostly transient as compared to previous observations with poorly purified animal insulin preparations. The clinical impact of these circulating anti-IAs remains unclear. Nevertheless, several studies have suggested that antibodies could retard insulin action, leading to a worsening of postprandial hyperglycaemia and/or serve as a carrier, thus leading to unexpected hypoglycaemia. CPII may be associated with more marked and sustained increase in IAs levels, possibly related to the use of an unstable insulin and the formation of immunogenic aggregates of insulin. The possible clinical consequences of these high levels of IAs remain to be evaluated because a low-glucose morning syndrome or severe insulin resistance with ketone bodies production have been reported in some cases. In conclusion, even if CSII and CPII may promote the development of circulating IAs, this increase does not lead to immunological insulin resistance, compared to that previously described with animal non-purified insulin preparations, and seems to have only marginal influence on blood glucose control or complications in most diabetic patients.

Insulin glulisine in the management of diabetes

Insulin glulisine is appealing in principle, but the advantages of this drug over the other rapid-acting insulin analogs are still relatively unknown. The frequency of hypoglycemia, convenience in the timing of administration, and improvements in terms of HbA(1c) seem similar among the rapid-acting insulin analogs, including insulin glulisine. Only properly randomized long-term clinical studies with insulin glulisine will reveal the true value of this novel insulin analog.

Severe insulin resistance due to anti-insulin antibodies: response to plasma exchange and immunosuppressive therapy

Anti-insulin antibodies have been described in two contexts: in insulin-naive individuals (so-called 'insulin autoimmune syndrome') and in patients with insulin-treated diabetes, in whom antibodies are rarely of clinical significance. We report the case of an 68-year-old woman who exhibited a local allergic reaction to subcutaneous insulin followed by severe insulin resistance, evidenced by poor glycaemic control despite treatment with > 3.5 U/kg of insulin per day. She was found to have circulating polyclonal anti-insulin antibodies of the IgG subtype and responded clinically to a course of plasma exchange and immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and, subsequently, intravenous immunoglobulin. Falling titres of antibodies on this regimen correlated with improved glycaemic control. This case suggests that clinicians should be alert to the possibility of insulin resistance due to anti-insulin antibodies and that immunosuppression in this situation may be a valuable therapeutic option.

Antibody response to insulin in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed Type 1 diabetes

AIMS

To compare levels of insulin antibodies in children and adolescents after initiation of insulin therapy using either insulin aspart (IAsp) or human insulin (HI) in combination with Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, and to investigate the relationships between insulin antibodies and HbA(1c) and insulin dose.

METHODS

IAsp-specific antibodies (IAsp-Ab) and antibodies cross-reacting with HI and IAsp (HI-cross-Ab) were analysed by radioimmunoassay at diagnosis of diabetes and every 3-6 months for 30 months. Seventy-two patients (HI = 30, IAsp = 42) with Type 1 diabetes, aged 2-17 years were included. Data on HbA(1c), insulin dose and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

IAsp-Ab levels remained low throughout the study. After 9 months, the level of HI-cross-Ab increased [mean (SD) HI, 48.8% (21.53); IAsp, 40.2% (17.92)] and remained elevated. Repeated measurement analysis of HI-cross-Ab levels showed no significant difference between treatments (P = 0.16). HI-cross-Ab were significantly associated with total insulin dose (U/kg) (P = 0.001) and time (P < 0.0001), but not with HbA(1c) (P = 0.24). Mean (+/- SD) HbA(1c) was similar at diagnosis (HI 9.5 +/- 1.97%; IAsp 9.6 +/- 1.62%); HbA(1c) then decreased and stabilized to about 6.0% in both groups. Few SAEs were reported, the majority being hypoglycaemic episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with IAsp and with HI was associated with an increase in HI-cross-Ab in insulin-naive children, but this did not influence treatment efficacy or safety. These results support the safe use of IAsp in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes.

Immunological responses to exogenous insulin

Regardless of purity and origin, therapeutic insulins continue to be immunogenic in humans. However, severe immunological complications occur rarely, and less severe events affect a small minority of patients. Insulin autoantibodies (IAAs) may be detectable in insulin-naive individuals who have a high likelihood of developing type 1 diabetes or in patients who have had viral disorders, have been treated with various drugs, or have autoimmune disorders or paraneoplastic syndromes. This suggests that under certain circumstances, immune tolerance to insulin can be overcome. Factors that can lead to more or less susceptibility to humoral responses to exogenous insulin include the recipient's immune response genes, age, the presence of sufficient circulating autologous insulin, and the site of insulin delivery. Little proof exists, however, that the development of insulin antibodies (IAs) to exogenous insulin therapy affects integrated glucose control, insulin dose requirements, and incidence of hypoglycemia, or contributes to beta-cell failure or to long-term complications of diabetes. Studies in which pregnant women with diabetes were monitored for glycemic control argue against a connection between IAs and fetal risk. Although studies have shown increased levels of immune complexes in patients with diabetic microangiopathic complications, these immune complexes often do not contain insulin or IAs, and insulin administration does not contribute to their formation. The majority of studies have shown no relationship between IAs and diabetic angiopathic complications, including nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy. With the advent of novel insulin formulations and delivery systems, such as insulin pumps and inhaled insulin, examination of these issues is increasingly relevant.

Allergy reactions to insulin: effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and insulin analogues

The purification of animal insulin preparations and the use of human recombinant insulin have markedly reduced the incidence but not completely suppressed the occurrence of insulin allergy manifestations. Advances in technologies concerning the mode of delivery of insulin, i.e. continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), and the use of insulin analogues, resulting from the alteration in the amino acid sequence of the native insulin molecule, may influence the immunogenicity and antigenicity of native insulin. Instead of increasing allergy reactions, CSII has been reported to represent a successful alternative treatment in diabetic patients presenting local or generalized allergy to insulin or other components (zinc, protamine) of conventional treatment. Most recent reports concern CSII-treated patients using short-acting insulin analogues (essentially insulin lispro), although the precise role of these insulin analogues remains unclear as allergy to them has also been described. Finally, data on antigenicity and immunogenicity of long-acting insulin analogues (glargine, detemir), which may mimic the basal insulin delivery with CSII, remain scarce at present.

Insulin antibodies with pulmonary delivery of insulin

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Delivery of insulin to the deep lung presents unique challenges to the body's mucosal defense system. Pulmonary mucosal defense has the ability to discriminate between self and non-self antigens and has the potential for induction of immunologic tolerance. Published data concerning the immunogenicity of inhaled human insulin in drug trials will be reviewed, and data regarding the possible adverse effects of anti-insulin antibody development will be presented. Examination of the immunologic safety of inhaled human insulin will include discussion of comparator studies, factors affecting immunogenicity, the effects of insulin immunity on glycemic control and pulmonary function, and the relationship of insulin antibodies to dose requirements, pharmacodynamics, and hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled human insulin, whether formulated as a powder or liquid, has been shown to be more immunogenic than comparator insulins given by subcutaneous routes; however, adverse effects of antibody formation have not been demonstrated.

Lipodystrophy reactions to insulin: effects of continuous insulin infusion and new insulin analogs

Management of diabetes mellitus can be responsible for cutaneous adverse events. For example, lipoatrophy or lipohypertrophy can develop at the site of insulin injections. Lipohypertrophy remains a frequent complication of insulin therapy irrespective of the insulin source and mode of administration. Lipoatrophy at insulin injection sites is considered to be an immune complex-mediated inflammatory lesion; however, it has become a rare event since the advent of human insulin. Nowadays, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) using a portable pump and/or injections of insulin analogs with an altered amino acid sequence compared with native insulin may cause lipodystrophy in diabetic patients. Some case reports describe the recovery of lipoatrophy following the use of CSII and/or short-acting insulin analogs. Conversely, exceptional cases of lipoatrophy have occurred in patients receiving lispro insulin analog via CSII. Lipodystrophy reactions remain a potential problem when managing diabetic patients with new insulin therapy technologies.

Insulin Lispro

Insulin lispro, alone (Humalog) or as premixture (Humalog Mix25 or Humalog Mix50) is indicated for the treatment of hyperglycaemia in diabetes mellitus in many countries worldwide. It is a recombinant human insulin analogue and, except for the transposition of two amino acids, is identical to endogenous human insulin. Insulin lispro has a faster onset of action and shorter duration of activity than regular human insulin, and the time-action profile of insulin lispro mimics that of the physiological response of endogenous human insulin to food intake. In diabetic patients, from young children to the elderly, it has demonstrated postprandial blood glucose control similar to or better than that achieved with regular human insulin, without an increased risk of hypoglycaemia. In some trials, the risk of hypoglycaemia, including nocturnal episodes, was less in insulin lispro recipients than in regular human insulin recipients. Insulin lispro alone, or as a premixture with the longer-acting insulin neutral protamine lispro, can be administered immediately before or after meals. This convenient and flexible injection schedule may enable patients, including those with a non-routine lifestyle or unpredictable eating or exercising habits, to achieve the tight glycaemic control required to minimise long-term complications of diabetes and contributes to patient satisfaction with treatment.

Systemic allergy to human insulin and its rapid and long acting analogs: successful treatment by continuous subcutaneous insulin lispro infusion

Since the introduction of highly purified human recombinant insulin, allergy to insulin has become a very rare clinical situation, encountered in less than 1% of patients. It results in potentially life-threatening immediate or delayed, local and general manifestations. Different treatments of unequal efficiency have been proposed, the use of insulin analogs showing benefits in certain situations. We report the case of a type 2 diabetic patient who presented local reactions and then an anaphylactic shock after the introduction of insulin analog premixes. Intra-dermal reactions performed with porcine, human and insulin analogs preparations (aspart, lispro, glargine) were all positive, as well as the specific anti-insulin IgE measurement. Because we could not achieve normoglycaemia with maximal oral treatment and low caloric diet, we decided to attempt a desensitisation by continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin lispro, since the lowest skin reaction was obtained with this insulin. We were able to induce a tolerance, by means of very low basal rate, very slowly increased, without any boluses, and maintaining antihistamine therapy. Six months later, the patient remains free of any symptom and has achieved a quite good glycaemic control. We describe for the first time a case of allergy to human insulin and to all available rapid and long acting analogs. We show the interest of a treatment with CSII of analogs in order to induce tolerance.

Insulin allergy and resistance successfully treated by desensitisation with Aspart insulin

A 25-year-old, with type I Diabetes Mellitus with a previous diagnosis of Protamine Allergy but not to human Insulin, started to notice anaphylactic reactions inmmediatly after bolus with Insulin. Skin prick and intradermal test were positive to all insulins. Skin tests to other potential allergens resulted negative. Examination after bolus of Human Insulin revealed urticaria. Daily insulin requirement were around 2-2,4 U/Kg/day. Slow desensitisation with Aspart insulin, the insulin with lowest size of skin test, was performed using subcutaneous insulin pump. Six months after the end of desensitisation his daily insulin requirement decreased to 0.8 U/Kg/day and oral corticosteroids are being reduced with no symptoms.

Safety and side effects of the insulin analogues

The analogue insulins were developed to more clearly mimic the basal and prandial components of insulin secretion for subjects with diabetes mellitus. Analogues are now widely used and have largely taken over from the conventional human recombinant insulins. It is important that these insulins are not only as effective as their predecessors, but are also safe and well-tolerated. In this manuscript, the authors review the adverse effects reported with analogue insulins and make a comparison with standard insulin treatments.

A rational clinical approach to suspected insulin allergy: status after five years and 22 cases

AIMS

Allergy to recombinant human (rDNA) insulin preparations is a rare complication of insulin therapy. However, insulin preparations contain several allergens, and several disorders can resemble insulin allergy. Studies evaluating the diagnostic procedures on suspected insulin allergy are extremely few.

METHODS

Since January 1998, we have used a standardized investigative procedure during admittance to the medical ward allowing observation and repeated recording of reactions to intradermal skin test (performed with a commercially available kit containing isolated insulin allergens). Data on all investigated cases until April 2003 were collected retrospectively, and self-reported efficacy of intervention was compared to clinical data.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were included. In nine (41%) cases, non-insulin allergic causes were discovered and successfully treated: poor injection technique (n = 5), skin disease (n = 3) and other systemic allergy (n = 1). Nine other patients were found to be allergic to protamine (n = 3) or rDNA insulin (n = 6), and specific treatment was associated with relief in 8 patients (89%). Four patients had local reactions of unknown causes but symptom relief was obtained in three cases by unspecific therapy. Overall, 20 (91%) reported relief of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Our standardized investigative procedure of suspected insulin preparation (IP) allergy was associated with relief of symptoms in > 90% of patients. IP allergy was diagnosed in 41%, and intradermal testing with isolated insulin allergens was a prerequisite in identification of culprit allergen and targeting of treatment.

Intensive therapy with inhaled insulin via the AERx insulin diabetes management system: a 12-week proof-of-concept trial in patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To compare the glycemic control of inhaled insulin via the AERx insulin diabetes management system (iDMS) with that of subcutaneous (SC) insulin, both combined with NPH insulin at bedtime, in patients with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The AERx iDMS uses a liquid insulin formulation to achieve flexible precise mealtime dosing (with increments corresponding to 1 IU administered subcutaneously) and ensures insulin delivery only when the breathing technique is optimal. This trial in patients with type 2 diabetes compared the glycemic control (HbA(1c)) achieved by inhaled insulin administered via AERx iDMS with that using SC insulin. This was a randomized, 12-week, open-label, parallel, multicenter, multinational trial in 107 nonsmoking patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age 59 years, mean duration of diabetes 11.9 years). Patients were randomized to receive either inhaled fast-acting human insulin via AERx iDMS immediately before meals or SC fast-acting human insulin administered 30 min before meals, both in combination with evening NPH insulin.

RESULTS

Baseline and demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in HbA(1c) between the AERx and SC groups after 12 weeks of treatment (7.84 +/- 0.77 vs. 7.76 +/- 0.77%, P = 0.60). Fasting serum glucose was significantly lower in the AERx group compared with the SC group by the end of the trial (8.9 +/- 3.8 vs. 10.8 +/- 3.7 mmol/l, P = 0.01) with a similar NPH dose in the two groups (0.23 vs. 0.23 IU/kg, P = 0.93). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the intra-subject variability of fasting or prandial blood glucose increment. Adverse events were similar in the two groups. No major safety concerns were raised during the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 2 diabetes, preprandial inhaled insulin via AERx iDMS is as effective as preprandial SC insulin injection in achieving glycemic control with similar tolerability.