Knee injury outcomes measures

Resilience and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Hand Surgery

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have examined the impact of resiliency on postoperative outcomes in other orthopedic domains, but none to date have done so for hand surgery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing hand surgery at a single institution. We included patients with complete preoperative outcomes scores and 6-month follow-up. All patients completed the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain. Patients were stratified into high-resiliency (HR) and low-resiliency (LR) groups based on the preoperative BRS score, and outcomes between groups were compared.

RESULTS

We identified 91 patients who underwent hand procedures and completed full preoperative and postoperative outcomes measures. There were no observed preoperative differences between the groups in all outcomes scores except the VR-12 Mental Component Score. Postoperatively, the HR group had superior DASH, QuickDASH, and VR-12 (mental and physical component) scores than the LR group. Postoperative pain, as measured by the NRS, was significantly lower in the HR group despite there being no preoperative difference. A larger percentage of patients in the HR group met the minimal clinically important difference in all outcomes except for the VR-12 Mental Component Scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with high preoperative resilience appear to have significantly better clinical outcomes following hand surgery with superior DASH, QuickDASH, and VR-12 scores at 6-month follow-up.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study/Level IV evidence.

Relationships Between PROMIS and Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) Scores in the MARS Cohort at 10-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to evaluate the impact of musculoskeletal conditions and their treatment on patients' quality of life, but they have limitations, such as high responder burden and floor and ceiling effects. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed to address these issues but needs to be further evaluated in comparison with legacy PROMs. The goals of this study were to evaluate the floor and ceiling effects of, the correlations between, and the predictive ability of PROMIS scores compared with traditional legacy measures at 10-year follow-up in a cohort who underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A total of 203 patients (88.7% White; 51.7% female) who underwent revision ACL reconstruction completed the PROMIS via computer adaptive tests as well as legacy PROMs at the cross-sectional, 10-year follow-up of the longitudinal MARS cohort study (MARS cohort n = 1,234). Floor and ceiling effects and Spearman rho correlations between PROMIS and legacy measures are reported. Linear regression with quadratic terms were used to develop and evaluate conversion equations to predict legacy scores from the PROMIS.

RESULTS

No floor or ceiling effects were reported for the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) domain, whereas a floor effect was found for 37.9% of the participants for the PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) domain, and a ceiling effect was found for 34.0% of the participants for the PROMIS Physical Mobility (PM) domain. PROMIS domains correlated moderately with the International Knee Documentation Committee total subjective score (absolute value of rho [|ρ|] = 0.68 to 0.74), fairly to moderately with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores (|ρ| = 0.52 to 0.67), and fairly with the Marx Activity Rating Scale (|ρ| = 0.35 to 0.44). None of the legacy-measure scores were accurately predicted by the PROMIS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The PROMIS PF domain has value in assessing patients 10 years after revision ACL reconstruction. Because of floor and ceiling effects, using the PI and PM domains may not allow for precision when measuring long-term changes in pain and mobility. Although the PROMIS measures correlated with the legacy measures, with effect sizes ranging from fair to moderate, the legacy scores were not accurately predicted by the PROMIS. The results suggest that knee-specific legacy measures should not be eliminated from long-term follow-up when the goal is to capture the specific knee-related information that they provide.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Correlation and conversion between the QuickDASH, Constant Score, and Oxford Shoulder Score in patients with conservatively treated proximal humerus fractures

BACKGROUND

There is significant heterogeneity of outcome measures used in the research of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs). Current evidence regarding the correlation and conversion between the various outcome measures is sparse. This study aims to study the correlation and conversion between the QuickDASH, Constant Score (CS), and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) in conservatively treated PHFs.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of patients (n = 136) with conservatively treated PHFs between August 2017 and April 2020 was conducted. Patients had a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. The 3 outcome measures (QuickDASH, CS, and OSS) were collected at 4 time points-6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after injury. Changes in scores across time and correlation between each pair of outcome measures were calculated. A linear regression model was used to derive conversion equations which were then internally validated.

RESULTS

A significant strong negative correlation was observed between the OSS and QuickDASH (coefficient: -0.746; P < .001), a significant moderate negative correlation was observed between the CS and QuickDASH (coefficient: -0.581; P < .001), and a significant moderate positive correlation was observed between the CS and OSS (coefficient: 0.697; P < .001). The 6 derived regression equations showed low mean differences between predicted and actual values (ranging from -1.21 to 2.51). The correlation between actual and predicted values was moderate to strong, ranging from a coefficient of 0.57 in the conversion from the CS to QuickDASH to 0.74 in the conversion from the CS to OSS and OSS to CS.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of patients with conservatively managed PHFs, moderate to strong correlations were seen in pairwise comparisons of the OSS, QuickDASH, and CS. With linear regression analyses, 6 regression equations were derived to estimate one score from another. On internal validation, there was good agreement between the means of the predicted and actual scores but high within-individual variability. These formulae can help to compare studies with heterogeneous outcome measures and facilitate meta-analyses. However, these equations should not be used to predict one score from another in an individual due to variability when converting individual scores.

Impact of the Number of Patellar Dislocations on Outcomes of Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Background

Patellar dislocation is a common knee injury and up to 35% of those who dislocate the patella can develop recurrent patellar instability. In the setting of recurrent instability, medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is often performed to restore knee stability. There has been recent interest in patient and surgical factors that influence outcomes of MPFL reconstruction. Much of the previous work has focused on influences of anatomic measures; however, patients and injury characteristics may also impact surgical outcomes.

Hypothesis

Patients who experience >2 patellar dislocations before MPFL reconstruction would demonstrate poorer patient-reported outcomes (PROs) compared with those with ≤2 previous dislocations.

Study design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Records were reviewed to identify patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction at a single institution between 2008 and 2016. Patients who underwent concomitant tibial tubercle osteotomy or fixation of an osteochondral fracture were excluded. Patient demographics (age, sex, body mass index [BMI]), number of previous patellar dislocations, and patient anatomic measures (Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, and trochlear sulcus angle) were collected. PROs were assessed with Norwich Patellar Instability score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Marx activity score. Outcomes of patients with >2 patellar dislocations were compared with those with ≤2 dislocations using multiple linear regression analysis.

Results

Medical record review revealed 160 patients who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction (71 with ≥2 dislocations and 89 with >2 dislocations); 95 patients (59%) completed PROs at a median follow-up of 4.6 years postoperation (range, 1.0-12.6 years). Patients with ≥2 dislocations were younger (≥2 dislocations: 20.7 ± 7.3 years, >2 dislocations: 28.5 ± 10.0 years; P < .001), although there were no other differences in demographics or radiographic anatomic measures between groups. Adjusting for age, sex, BMI, CDI, TT-TG distance, and trochlear sulcus angle, patients with >2 dislocations had 13.7 points lower KOOS-Pain (P = .003), 8.3 points lower KOOS-Activities of Daily Living (P = .025), 18.2 points lower KOOS-Sports and Recreation (P = .009), and 19.8 points lower KOOS-Knee-Related Quality of Life (P = .008) subscale scores than patients with ≤2 dislocations. No significant differences in KOOS symptoms subscale, Norwich Patellar Instability, or Marx score were noted between groups.

Conclusion

Patients with >2 patellar dislocations before MPFL reconstruction exhibited poorer PROs at a median of 4.8 years postoperation compared with those who had ≤2 dislocations before surgery, when adjusting for age, sex, BMI, CDI, TT-TG distance, and trochlear sulcus angle.

Outcomes of medial collateral ligament reconstruction with suture-augmented semitendinosus autograft

PURPOSE

This study evaluates patient-reported outcomes among patients who underwent medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction with suture-augmented semitendinosus autograft (SASA).

METHODS

Patients who underwent SASA MCL reconstruction between 2017 and 2022 participated in preoperative and postoperative surveys for patient-reported outcomes: Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Marx Activity Rating Scale (MARS), and Veterans Rand 12 (VR-12). Paired t-tests were performed to compare preoperative and postoperative scores. Postoperative complications were analyzed for all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 19 operations were identified during the study period, and 16 patients were included in the study. Patients reported significant decreases in VAS (mean [95% CI] of -3.86 [-6.09, -1.63], p = 0.0022) and WOMAC (-24.87 [-40.30, -9.4], p = 0.0037) scores postoperatively. Patients also reported significant increases in KOOS (22.60 [9.79, 35.40], p = 0.0019), SANE (38.06 [18.83, 57.27], p = 0.0007), and VR-12 Physical (14.32 [6.38, 22.27], p = 0.0017) scores. Patients did not report significant changes in MARS (0.87 [-1.88, 3.63], p = 0.5081) or VR-12 Mental (-2.90 [-9.37, 3.56], p = 0.3516) scores after surgery. Four patients required reoperation for either arthrofibrosis (n = 3) or ACL reinjury following a multiligament procedure that did not require revision to the MCL reconstruction (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients undergoing MCL reconstruction with SASA, patients reported significant improvement in functional outcomes and reduction in pain postoperatively. SASA is a safe and effective technique for MCL reconstruction.

Increased Body Mass Index is Associated with Worse Mid- To Long-Term Patient Outcomes after Surgical Repair of Multiligamentous Knee Injuries

We evaluated the relationship between elevated body mass index (BMI) and mid- to long-term outcomes after surgical treatment of multiligamentous knee injury (MLKI). Records identified patients treated surgically for MLKI at a single institution. Inclusion criteria: minimum 2 years since surgery, complete demographics, surgical data, sustained injuries to two or more ligaments in one or both knees, and available for follow-up. Patients were contacted to complete patient-reported outcomes assessments and were classified according to mechanism of injury. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict the impact of BMI on outcome scores. A total of 77 patients (72.7% male) were included with a mean age at the time of injury of 29.4 ± 11.0 years and a mean BMI of 30.5 ± 9.4 kg/m2. The mean length of follow-up was 7.4 years. For each 10 kg/m2 increase in BMI, there is a 0.9-point decrease in Tegner activity scale (p = 0.001), a 5-point decrease in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-pain (p = 0.007), a 5-point decrease in KOOS-ADL (p = 0.003), a 10-point decrease in KOOS-QOL (p = 0.002), and an 11-point decrease in KOOS-Sport (p = 0.002). There were no significant correlations with BMI and Pain Catastrophizing Scale or Patient Health Questionnaire scores. Increasing BMI has a negative linear relationship with mid- to long-term clinical outcomes including pain, ability to perform activities of daily living, quality of life, and ability to perform more demanding physical activity after MLKI. BMI does not appear to have a significant relationship with knee swelling and mechanical symptoms or patients' mental health.

Patient Resilience Does Not Conclusively Affect Clinical Outcomes Associated With Arthroscopic Surgery but Substantial Limitations of the Literature Exist

Purpose

To determine whether low resilience is predictive of worse patient-reported outcomes (PROs) or diminished improvements in clinical outcomes after joint preserving and arthroscopic surgery.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Science Direct was performed on September 28, 2022, for studies investigating the relationship between resilience and PROs after arthroscopic surgery in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Results

Nine articles (level II-IV studies) were included in the final analysis. A total of 887 patients (54% male, average age 45 years) underwent arthroscopic surgery, including general knee (n = 3 studies), ACLR-only knee (n = 1 study), rotator cuff repair (n = 4 studies), and hip (n = 1 study). The Brief Resilience Scale was the most common instrument measuring resilience in 7 of 9 studies (78%). Five of 9 studies (56%) stratified patients based on high, normal, or low resilience cohorts, and these stratification threshold values differed between studies. Only 4 of 9 studies (44%) measured PROs both before and after surgery. Three of 9 studies (33%) reported rates of return to activity, with 2 studies (22%) noting high resilience to be associated with a higher likelihood of return to sport/duty, specifically after knee arthroscopy. However, significant associations between resilience and functional outcomes were not consistently observed, nor was resilience consistently observed to be predictive of subjects' capacity to return to a preinjury level of function.

Conclusions

Patient resilience is inconsistently demonstrated to affect clinical outcomes associated with joint preserving and arthroscopic surgery. However, substantial limitations in the existing literature including underpowered sample sizes, lack of standardization in stratifying patients based on pretreatment resilience, and inconsistent collection of PROs throughout the continuum of care, diminish the strength of most conclusions that have been drawn.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of level II-IV studies.

Retrograde intramedullary nailing or locked plating for stabilisation of distal femoral fractures? A comparative study of 193 patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of distal femoral fracture fixation of two different methods, lateral locking plate (LP) or an Intra-medullary nail (IMN), in patients managed in our institution. More specifically, to assess: (a) if there was a difference in functional outcomes between the LP and IMN groups; (b) whether the rate of complications was different between the two groups.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2018 adult patients with distal femoral fractures managed in our unit with either LP or IMN for extra and intra-articular fractures were eligible to participate. Demographic details, fracture type, procedures performed, time to union, complications and functional scores (Oxford Knee Score) were recorded and analysed. The mean follow up was 4 years (12-120 months).

RESULTS

Out of 193 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 93 received an IMN whereas 100 patients were treated with LP. Mean age was 64.2 (18-99) and 70.1 (18-100) for the IMN and LP groups respectively. Overall, the two groups had similar demographics and there was no significant difference in the type of fractures sustained (p > 0.05). The Oxford Knee Score was highest for patients fixed with LP, mean 37.3 (6-48, SD 7.3) versus 28.4 (3-48, SD 14.4), (p =  < 0.02) compared to the IMN group. In terms of complications, the rate of non-union was higher in the LP group 8.6% versus 4% in those patients treated with an IMN, p value < 0.01.

CONCLUSION

While the rate of non-union was higher in the LP group and the functional results were superior in the plating group.

Medial Ball-in-Socket Posterior Cruciate-Sacrificing Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical, Functional and Radiographic Evaluation of 100 Consecutive Implants

The number of performed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) operations is constantly growing. This study proposes an evaluation of a series of patients undergoing medial pivot (MP) TKA surgery from a subjective, clinical and biomechanical point of view. A consecutive series of 100 TKAs implanted in a single centre, by the same surgeon, with a medial parapatellar approach with the sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament and cemented components were evaluated. All patients underwent standardized radiographic and functional clinical evaluation, with standing antero-posterior, lateral and patellar axial views; pre-operatively and post-operatively at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months; and then annually. Results were evaluated using three different patient-related outcome measurement scores (PROMs): the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the new Knee Society Score (nKSS) and the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36). Excellent results in all treated knees were documented using the PROMs: the mean nKSS was 199.8, the mean KOOS was good to excellent in every subscale, and the mean was SF-36 82%. There were no cases of septic or aseptic loosening, vascular damage, neurological damage, or revision surgery for any reason. According to the experience gained, MP implants demonstrated excellent results, being clinically functional in both objective and subjective terms as well as radiographic evaluations, thus resulting in a winning strategy for obtaining a TKA that makes the patient satisfied and able to perform their daily life activities.

Immunity-and-matrix-regulatory cells enhance cartilage regeneration for meniscus injuries: a phase I dose-escalation trial

Immunity-and-matrix-regulatory cells (IMRCs) derived from human embryonic stem cells have unique abilities in modulating immunity and regulating the extracellular matrix, which could be mass-produced with stable biological properties. Despite resemblance to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in terms of self-renew and tri-lineage differentiation, the ability of IMRCs to repair the meniscus and the underlying mechanism remains undetermined. Here, we showed that IMRCs demonstrated stronger immunomodulatory and pro-regenerative potential than umbilical cord MSCs when stimulated by synovial fluid from patients with meniscus injury. Following injection into the knees of rabbits with meniscal injury, IMRCs enhanced endogenous fibrocartilage regeneration. In the dose-escalating phase I clinical trial (NCT03839238) with eighteen patients recruited, we found that intra-articular IMRCs injection in patients was safe over 12 months post-grafting. Furthermore, the effective results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of meniscus repair and knee functional scores suggested that 5 × 107 cells are optimal for meniscus injury treatment. In summary, we present the first report of a phase I clinical trial using IMRCs to treat meniscus injury. Our results demonstrated that intra-articular injection of IMRCs is a safe and effective therapy by providing a permissive niche for cartilage regeneration.

Total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing leads to worse results in patients with patellafemoral osteoarthritis Iwano Stages 3-4: a study based on arthroplasty registry data

PURPOSE

To determine whether the preoperative degree of degeneration of the patellofemoral joint really affects the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery without patella resurfacing and thus to establish a parameter that might serve as a guiding factor to decide whether or not to perform retropatellar resurfacing. It was hypothesized that patients with preoperative mild patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Iwano Stages 0-2) would significantly differ from patients with preoperative severe patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Iwano Stages 3-4) in terms of patient-reported outcome (Hypothesis 1) and revision rates/survival (Hypothesis 2) after TKA without patella resurfacing.

METHODS

Application of a retrospective-comparative design on the basis of Arthroplasty Registry data that included patients with primary TKA without patella resurfacing. Patients were allocated to the following groups based on preoperative radiographic stage of patellofemoral joint degeneration: (a) mild patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Iwano Stage ≤ 2) and (b) severe patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Iwano Stages 3-4). The Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score was assessed preoperative and 1 year postoperative (0: best, 100 worst). In addition, implant survival was calculated from the Arthroplasty Registry data.

RESULTS

In 1209 primary TKA without patella resurfacing, postoperative WOMAC total and WOMAC subscores did not differ significantly between groups, but potentially suffered from type 2 error. Three-year survival was 97.4% and 92.5% in patients with preoperative mild and severe patellofemoral osteoarthritis, respectively (p = 0.002). Five-year survival was 95.8% vs. 91.4% (p = 0.033) and 10-year survival was 93.3% vs. 88.6% (p = 0.033), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

From the study findings, it is concluded that patients with preoperative severe patellofemoral osteoarthritis have significantly higher risks for reoperation than do those with preoperative mild patellofemoral osteoarthritis-when treated with TKA without patella resurfacing. Hence, it is recommended that patella resurfacing be applied in patients with severe Iwano Stage 3 or 4 patellofemoral osteoarthritis during TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective comparative.

Impact of Sports Participation on Achievement of Clinically Relevant Outcomes 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction

Background

Clinically relevant threshold values associated with patient-reported outcome measures after orthopaedic procedures such as anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are important for relating these scores to meaningful postoperative improvement.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to determine the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS-CAT) after ACLR. It was hypothesized that preoperative sport participation would have an impact on PASS achievement.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

Included were consecutive patients who underwent primary assisted ACLR between January 4 and August 1, 2016. Patients were administered the PROMIS-CAT Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference domains preoperatively and at a minimum 2 years postoperatively, with external anchor questions used to determine the PASS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for the entire study population as well as separately for athletes and nonathletes to determine PROMIS PASS thresholds for each population. A previously published PROMIS-PF minimal clinically important difference was used to evaluate postoperative improvement. A post hoc multivariate nominal logistic multivariate analysis was constructed to assess the effects of preoperative patient characteristics on the likelihood of attaining both the minimal clinically important difference and PASS.

Results

In total, 112 patients were included in the study, with 79 (71%) having recreational or higher levels of athletic participation. The PASS for the study population was 56.0 (area under the ROC curve, 0.86) and was unaffected by baseline PROMIS-PF scores but was affected by preoperative athletic participation (56.0 for athletes, 49.0 for nonathletes). A post hoc analysis found 57 patients (51%) achieved the PASS for the PROMIS-PF (cutoff, 56.0), but when the athlete and nonathlete thresholds were applied to their respective patient groups, 66% of athletes and 64% of nonathletes achieved the PASS postoperatively. The multivariate analysis found that sport participation (odds ratio, 6.2; P = .001) but not age, sex, body mass index, or preoperative PROMIS affected the likelihood of achieving the PASS on the PROMIS-PF.

Conclusion

Preoperative athletic participation significantly affected the ability to achieve PASS.

The clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty is compromised by a previously implanted medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical outcome of patients that underwent conversion of a medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to compare that outcome to patients that underwent primary TKA. It was hypothesized that those groups would significantly differ in terms of knee score outcome and implant survival.

METHODS

A retrospective-comparative study was conducted utilizing data from the Federal state's arthroplasty registry. Included were patients from our department that undergone a conversion of a medial UKA to a TKA (UKA-TKA group). The Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) from preoperative and 1-year postoperative was used. Moreover, the implant survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

In the UKA-TKA group, there were 51 cases (age 67 ± 10, 74% women), and in the TKA group, there were 2247 cases (age 69 ± 9, 66% women). The one-year postoperative WOMAC total score was 33 in the UKA-TKA group und 21 in the TKA group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the WOMAC pain, WOMAC stiffness, and WOMAC function scores were significantly worse in the UKA-TKA. After 5 years, the survival rates were 82% and 95% (p = 0.001). The 10-years prosthesis survival was 74% and 91% in the UKA-TKA and TKA groups, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings it is concluded that patients who received a TKA after UKA have inferior results than those that directly receive a TKA. This is true for both patient-reported knee outcome and prosthesis survival. Converting UKA to TKA should not be seen as an easy operation, but should rather be done by surgeons with considerable experience in both primary and revision knee arthroplasty.

An Exploratory Factor Analysis of the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation in Knee Surgery Patients

INTRODUCTION

Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) have been suggested for use in measuring treatment effectiveness. To minimize patient burden, two approaches have been proposed: An orthopedic-specific Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) or computer adaptive testing methods such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The goal of this work was to examine the constructs measured by the SANE and PROMIS system in a military orthopedic population undergoing knee surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 732 patients and 2,166 complete observations, the SANE-Knee PRO and PROMIS surveys for Depression, Anxiety, Pain Interference, Sleep Disturbance, and Physical Function were obtained. A correlation matrix between the PROs was calculated, the number of latent factors to extract was determined via parallel plot, and the final principal axis exploratory factor analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The parallel plot analysis indicated that two latent factors existed. One latent factor corresponded to measures of psychological distress (PROMIS Sleep Disturbance, Depression, and Anxiety) and the second latent factor corresponded to physical capability (SANE, PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Sleep Disturbance). Both PROMIS Physical Function (0.83) and Pain Interference (-0.80) more strongly weigh on the physical capability latent factor than SANE (0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

In a knee surgical population, the SANE, PROMIS Physical Function, and PROMIS Pain Interference measure the same human dimension of physical capability; however, PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference may measure this construct more effectively in isolation. The SANE may be a more viable option to gauge physical capability when computer adaptive testing is not possible.

Patellofemoral articular cartilage damage is associated with poorer patient-reported outcomes following isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of articular cartilage damage on outcomes following medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Record review identified 160 patients who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction at a single institution between 2008 and 2016. Patient demographics, patellofemoral articular cartilage status at surgery, and patient anatomical measures from imaging were obtained via chart review. Patients were contacted and outcomes assessed through collection of Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Marx activity score as well as an assessment for recurrent patellar dislocation. Outcomes of patients with grade 0-II patellofemoral cartilage damage were compared to those of patients with grade III-IV cartilage damage.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two patients (76%) with a minimum of one year follow-up were contacted at a mean of 4.8 years post-operatively. A total of 63 patients (52%) had grade III or IV patellofemoral chondral damage at the time of surgery. The majority of the defects was on the medial patella (46 patients-72%) and the mean patellar defect size was 2.8 cm². Among 93 patients who completed patient-reported outcome scores, the 52 with grade III or IV chondral damage reported a significantly poorer KOOS Quality of Life than the 44 patients with grade 0 to II chondral damage (p = 0.041), controlling for patient age, sex, BMI, and anatomical factors.

CONCLUSION

Patients with grade III or IV articular cartilage damage of the patellofemoral joint at the time of MPFL reconstruction demonstrated poorer KOOS knee-related quality of life than patients without grade III or IV articular cartilage damage at a mean of 4.8 years following isolated MPFL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Returning to Activity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: An Analysis of the Multicenter Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Study (MARS) Cohort at 2 Years Postoperative

BACKGROUND

Patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision report lower outcome scores on validated knee questionnaires postoperatively compared to cohorts with primary ACL reconstruction. In a previously active population, it is unclear if patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are associated with a return to activity (RTA) or vary by sports participation level (higher level vs. recreational athletes).

HYPOTHESES

Individual RTA would be associated with improved outcomes (ie, decreased knee symptoms, pain, function) as measured using validated PROs. Recreational participants would report lower PROs compared with higher level athletes and be less likely to RTA.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

There were 862 patients who underwent a revision ACL reconstruction (rACLR) and self-reported physical activity at any level preoperatively. Those who did not RTA reported no activity 2 years after revision. Baseline data included patient characteristics, surgical history and characteristics, and PROs: International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire, Marx Activity Rating Scale, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. A binary indicator was used to identify patients with same/better PROs versus worse outcomes compared with baseline, quantifying the magnitude of change in each direction, respectively. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate risk factors for not returning to activity, the association of 2-year PROs after rACLR surgery by RTA status, and whether each PRO and RTA status differed by participation level.

RESULTS

At 2 years postoperatively, approximately 15% did not RTA, with current smokers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.3; P = .001), female patients (aOR = 2.9; P < .001), recreational participants (aOR = 2.0; P = .016), and those with a previous medial meniscal excision (aOR = 1.9; P = .013) having higher odds of not returning. In multivariate models, not returning to activity was significantly associated with having worse PROs at 2 years; however, no clinically meaningful differences in PROs at 2 years were seen between participation levels.

CONCLUSION

Recreational-level participants were twice as likely to not RTA compared with those participating at higher levels. Within a previously active cohort, no RTA was a significant predictor of lower PROs after rACLR. However, among patients who did RTA after rACLR, approximately 20% reported lower outcome scores. Most patients with rACLR who were active at baseline improved over time; however, patients who reported worse outcomes at 2 years had a clinically meaningful decline across all PROs.

Preoperative quadriceps muscle strength deficit severity predicts knee function one year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Quadriceps strength is critical for patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction; however, little is known about the relationship between preoperative quadriceps strength deficit and postoperative subjective knee functions. The study aimed to investigate the relationship between preoperative quadriceps strength and postoperative knee function in patients after ACL reconstruction. Seventy-five male patients with primary ACL reconstruction surgery with hamstring autografts between 2014 and 2017 were included. An isokinetic dynamometer assessed quadriceps strength while self-reported knee functions were measured by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores at baseline and 1 year after surgery. The three identified groups (Q1-Q3) were classified according to the preoperative quadriceps muscle strength deficit. Q1 were patients with < 25% quadriceps muscle strength deficit, Q2 showed a 25-45% deficit, and Q3 included those with a deficit > 45%. We compared knee functions between the three groups and examined the associations between preoperative variables and functional knee outcomes. The preoperative quadriceps muscle strength deficit had a negative association with the knee functional scores at 1 year follow-up including the IKDC score (r_s = - 0.397, p = 0.005) and the Lysholm score (r_s = - 0.454, p < 0.001), but not other factors. Furthermore, only the Q1 group, with < 25% deficit in preoperative quadriceps muscle strength, showed a significant correlation in postoperative IKDC score (r = - 0.462, p = 0.030), and Lysholm score (r = - 0.446, p = 0.038). Preoperative quadriceps muscle strength deficit had a significant negative relationship with postoperative function at 1 year following ACL reconstruction.

The Comprehensive Aachen Knee Score: Development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure for patellofemoral pathologies

BACKGROUND

Existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that assess knee pain and symptoms show insufficient quality regarding their psychometric properties. We developed and validated a new PROM assessing knee pain and especially patellofemoral pathologies, the COMPrehensive AaChen Knee Score (COMPACK).

METHODS

We followed a three-phase process of development and validation. (1) Scale development: we conducted a systematic literature research to collect and analyse the most commonly used PROMs for knee and patellofemoral pathologies to identify appropriate items. (2) Pilot testing: we assessed the content validity of the COMPACK based on interviews with patients and health experts regarding relevance, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness of the used items. (3) Field testing: we used the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines to evaluate the structural validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the COMPACK.

RESULTS

The COMPACK scale showed good structural validity, with two subscales measuring pain intensity and frequency. Further, scores of the COMPACK correlated positively with those obtained from the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC) (r = 0.64) and the 12-item Short Form Health Survey subscale of physical function: (r = 0.43). Both the total scale and the two subscales showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.82) and good to excellent test-retest reliability (Cronbach's α > 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

The final COMPACK score was shown to be a valid and reliable instrument and thus meets the most important psychometric quality criteria. In its development, we specifically focused on its content validity, structural validity and applicability.

All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadrupled Semitendinosus: Comparable 2-Year Outcomes in Male and Female Patients

PURPOSE

To determine 2-year functional outcomes using an all-inside quadrupled semitendinosus anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique in male and female patients.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients who underwent quadrupled semitendinosus all-inside hamstring ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon were enrolled. Patient-reported outcome scores collected preoperatively and postoperatively included visual analog scale, Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12; Physical and Mental), Marx Activity Scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).

RESULTS

A total of 100 ACL reconstructions comprising 62 female, and 38 male patients were included in this study. Mean graft diameter was 9.4 mm in female and 9.8 mm in male patients (range, 9-11). Outcome scores demonstrated improvement from preoperative to 2-year postoperative respectively: visual analog scale pain 3.18, 1.07, VR-12 physical 36.35, 52.64, VR-12 mental 53.96, 54.65, KOOS pain 59.17, 89.03, KOOS symptoms 52.64, 80.79, KOOS Activities of Daily Living 69.38, 95.4, KOOS Sport 28.97, 81.25, KOOS Quality of Life 27.54, 71.56, WOMAC Pain 71.56, 92.65, WOMAC Stiffness 60.55, 84.13, and WOMAC Function 69.38, 95.4. Marx activity score decreased from baseline (10.98) to 2 years' postoperatively (8.75). At 2 years, patient expectations were met or exceeded with regards to pain (94%), motion and strength (91%), normal function of daily living (95%), and return to sport (79%).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic all-inside quadrupled semitendinosus ACL reconstruction improves functional outcomes similarly to previous studies between baseline and clinical follow-up at 1-year and 2-years postoperatively and is comparable in both male and female patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Latent Factor Analysis of the PROMIS and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are reporting tools that quantify patients' perceptions of their mental and physical health. Many PROs may inadvertently measure the same or overlapping theoretical constructs (e.g., pain, function, depression, etc.), which is both inefficient and a patient burden. The purpose of this study was to examine the functional relationship of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score and general constructs measured with the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in young patients undergoing shoulder surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was an institutional review board approved retrospective case control of the Military Orthopaedics Tracking Injuries and Outcomes Network using 805 patients and 1,373 observations. All patients underwent shoulder surgery and had multiple observations ranging from 28 days pre-surgery to 428 days post-surgery. Correlation matrices and exploratory factor analysis were used to examine how each of the measured variables (PROMIS physical function, PROMIS pain interference, PROMIS sleep disturbance, PROMIS anxiety, PROMIS depression, and SANE surveys) contribute or "weigh" on latent factors, which are then mapped to a theoretical construct. This statistical method helps uncover structural relationships between measured variables.

RESULTS

The PROMIS and SANE surveys collectively weigh on two latent factors: psychological health (measured variables: PROMIS anxiety [0.95] and PROMIS depression [0.86]) and physical capabilities (measured variables: PROMIS physical function [0.81], PROMIS pain interference [-0.82], PROMIS sleep disturbance [-0.51], and SANE [0.68]). Although the physical capability construct is functionally related to psychological health (-0.45), there is no direct relation between SANE and measures of depression or anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the use of the SANE as a valid single question to assess physical function providing similar information to the PROMIS in regard to measuring physical capabilities. Its simplicity makes it easy to use and implement with minimal uplift or change in workflow.

Detection of Meniscal Tear Effects on Tibial Vibration Using Passive Knee Sound Measurements

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether non-invasive knee sound measurements can provide information related to the underlying structural changes in the knee following meniscal tear. These changes are explained using an equivalent vibrational model of the knee-tibia structure.

METHODS

First, we formed an analytical model by modeling the tibia as a cantilever beam with the fixed end being the knee. The knee end was supported by three lumped components with features corresponding with tibial stiffnesses, and meniscal damping effect. Second, we recorded knee sounds from 46 healthy legs and 9 legs with acute meniscal tears (n = 34 subjects). We developed an acoustic event ("click") detection algorithm to find patterns in the recordings, and used the instrumental variable continuous-time transfer function estimation algorithm to model them.

RESULTS

The knee sound measurements yielded consistently lower fundamental mode decay rate in legs with meniscal tears ( 16 ±13 s ^{- 1}) compared to healthy legs ( 182 ±128 s ^{- 1}), p < 0.05. When we performed an intra-subject analysis of the injured versus contralateral legs for the 9 subjects with meniscus tears, we observed significantly lower natural frequency and damping ratio (first mode results for healthy: [Formula: see text]injured: [Formula: see text]) for the first three vibration modes (p < 0.05). These results agreed with the theoretical expectations gleaned from the vibrational model.

SIGNIFICANCE

This combined analytical and experimental method improves our understanding of how vibrations can describe the underlying structural changes in the knee following meniscal tear, and supports their use as a tool for future efforts in non-invasively diagnosing meniscal tear injuries.

Articular Cartilage Injuries of the Knee: Patient Health Literacy, Expectations for Management, and Clinical Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the orthopedic literature regarding patient understanding of articular cartilage disease, interpret literature reporting patient expectations for surgical management of articular cartilage injuries of the knee, and review patient-reported outcomes and patient satisfaction with management of these injuries.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of the current literature using the PubMed database (1980-current) was performed on July 15, 2017. The search terms used were "patient understanding knee cartilage," "patient satisfaction knee cartilage," "patient expectation knee cartilage," and "patient reported outcomes knee cartilage." All searches were filtered to human studies and English language only and were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Studies not relevant to articular cartilage injury and/or surgical management in the knee were excluded. Additional references were found by backtracing references from obtained articles.

RESULTS

The published study search results for the terms: "patient understanding knee cartilage," "patient satisfaction knee cartilage," "patient expectation knee cartilage," and "patient reported outcomes knee cartilage" displayed a total of 873 studies. Two independent reviewers screen all studies A total of 50 published studies were relevant and included.

CONCLUSION

The subjective and objective clinical outcomes reported are inconsistently obtained resulting in difficulty drawing comparisons between studies. While the relationship between preoperative patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes and patient satisfaction has yet to be well developed, authors have reported patient and injury specific variables associated with superior and inferior outcomes. In conclusion, more work is needed to correlate patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction for cartilage treatments with preoperative expectations and health literacy.

Outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair using transosseous tunnels versus suture anchors: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Two major techniques are used to repair complete quadriceps tendon ruptures, transosseous tunnel (TT) and the suture anchor (SA). There are multiple studies comparing the biomechanical outcomes of repairs performed with TT or SA. Our purpose was to compare the clinical outcomes following quadriceps tendon repair using SA and TT fixation techniques.

METHODS

Three major search engines were used with predetermined keyword searches to perform a systematic review of literature. These studies were independently scanned by two reviewers using PRISMA criterion. All included studies had to include at least one of the following outcome measures: range of motion (ROM), Lysholm score, complications, and/or re-ruptures.

RESULTS

Using three major search engines, 1039 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and screening for inclusion, 49 articles were reviewed. Two independent reviewers searched the studies to meet the inclusion criteria, and eight studies were selected. These eight studies included 156 knees in the TT group and 54 knees in the SA group. The TT group had a significantly better ROM after QT repair (132.5° versus 127.0°, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between the TT group (92.6) and SA group (91.0, p = 0.11). There were significantly more complications in SA groups (9.3% versus 1.3%, p = 0.013), but not a significant difference in re-rupture rate between those undergoing SA vs. TT repair (3.7% versus 0%, p = 0.065). The SA group had a significantly higher age at time of surgery (63.62 vs. 54.32) CONCLUSION: The current study suggests that, following quadriceps tendon rupture, there are no significant differences in functional outcome between TT and SA techniques. Those undergoing TT repair attained a statistically significantly greater final ROM but this difference may not be clinically relevant. There was a statistically significantly higher rate of post-operative complications using SA technique.

Rationale for a Parsimonious Measure of Subjective Knee Function after ACL Reconstruction: A Rasch Analysis

CONTEXT

The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation is the most frequently used patient-reported measure of subjective knee function among individuals with ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Yet, limitations with traditional validation approaches leave it unclear whether the IKDC measures knee function as intended. Rasch analysis offers a robust validation approach, which may enhance clinical interpretation of the IKDC.

OBJECTIVE

1) To assess the psychometric properties, 2) ability to classify health status, and 3) relationships between the IKDC and objective measures of strength and functional performance relative to a newly proposed reduced-item instrument.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-seven individuals with primary, unilateral ACLR (21.9±7.8 years, 6.2±1.0 months post-surgery), and seventy-six age-matched controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Rasch analysis was used to assess the psychometric properties of the IKDC. Receiver-operator-characteristic curves and logistic regression were used to assess the accuracy of classifying ACLR versus control participants. Correlations (Pearson and Spearman) were used to assess relationships between subjective knee function, quadriceps torque, and single-limb hop performance.

RESULTS

Rasch analysis aided the development of a reduced 8-item instrument (IKDC-8), which yielded improved psychometric properties in misfit analysis, percent of variance accounted for by one dimension (IKDC-8=71.5%; IKDC=56.7%), and item reliability. The IKDC was an outstanding diagnostic tool and the IKDC-8 was excellent, correctly classifying 87.2% and 82.7% of cases, respectively. The Hanley-McNeil formula found that there was no significant difference in the areas under the respective ROC curves. Equivalent associations between subjective and objective knee function were observed regardless of instrument used.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed evidence of enhanced reliability and validity for a parsimonious measure of subjective knee function. The proposed instrument reduces the number of items, increases score interpretability as measuring a single construct, and improves the rating scale functioning, while not significantly diminishing its ability to classify ACLR versus control participants or changing existing relationships with objective measures of recovery. We suggest the IKDC-8 may enhance clinical use by reducing administration time, improving the interpretation of the subjective knee function score, and clarifying functional ability.

The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Predictors of Achievement

PURPOSE

To identify thresholds for patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) achievement in a cohort of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) recipients, and to identify factors predictive of PASS achievement.

METHODS

A prospective clinical registry was queried for primary ACLR patients from January 2014 to April 2017 with serial patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) completion at 6, 12, and 24 months. Exclusion criteria included significant concomitant procedures. Knee-based PROMs included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscores. PASS threshold values were calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) analysis. A stepwise multivariate regression identified preoperative and operative predictors of PASS achievement.

RESULTS

A total of 144 primary ACLR patients (30.86 ± 12.78 years, body mass index 25.51 ± 4.64, 41.0% male) were included in the analysis. PASS threshold values were established using ROC curve analysis, all of which exceeded 0.7 on AUC analysis (0.742 to 0.911). Factors impacting odds of PASS achievement in the ACLR cohort included preoperative exercises (odds ratio [OR] 2.95 to 4.74, P = .003 to .038), worker's compensation status (OR 0.25 to 0.28, P = .014 to .033), preoperative scores (OR 1.03 to 1.07, P = .005 to <.001), iliotibial band tenodesis (OR 11.08, P = .010), and anteromedial approach (OR 18.03 to 37.05, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Factors predictive of PASS achievement in recipients of primary ACLR include functional status (e.g., preoperative exercise, preoperative KOOS Sport/Recreation score), worker's compensation status, technique (e.g., anteromedial) and preoperative PROMs. The results of our study are important in better informing shared decision-making models and improving evidence-based guidelines to optimize patient outcomes.

Cross‑cultural adaptation, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Thai version of the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (Thai PRWHE)

PURPOSE

To translate the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) which is widely used as the evaluation in healthcare and research system in wrist/hand disorder patients into Thai (Thai PRWHE) and to examine its psychometric properties.

METHODS

The PRWHE was translated to Thai, including cross-cultural adaptations, following standard guidelines. Psychometric properties were evaluated with 292 wrist/hand musculoskeletal disorder patients. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine test-retest reliability over a 7-day interval. Construct validity was evaluated using two methods: Spearman's rank correlation of related and unrelated subscales and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Responsiveness was analyzed using the standardized response mean (SRM).

RESULTS

All subscales had high Cronbach's alpha (0.91-0.96). Evaluation of the Pain subscale found good correlations with the Thai PRWHE and the Thai version of disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (Thai DASH) questionnaire (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) in related dimensions. Unrelated dimensions, the Total Function subscale of the Thai PRWHE, and the Mobility subscale of the Thai EQ-5D-5L had a weak correlation (r = 0.09, P < 0.12). Comparison of the one-factor solution and the bifactor model found the first-order three-factor solution fitted the data better than other models. The test-retest reliability with 61 patients in each subscale revealed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.94-0.96). In the assessment of responsiveness, the SRM with 54 patients was large (0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

The Thai PRWHE has excellent internal consistency in all modules and good construct validity and reliability for Thai patients and provides a large standardized response mean after treatment.

Technological developments enable measuring and using patient-reported outcomes data in orthopaedic clinical practice

Patient-reported outcomes measures form the backbone of outcomes evaluation in orthopaedics, with most of the literature now relying on these scoring tools to measure change in patient health status. This patient-reported information is increasingly collected routinely by orthopaedic providers but use of the data is typically restricted to academic research. Developments in electronic data capture and the outcome tools themselves now allow use of this data as part of the clinical consultation. This review evaluates the role of patient reported outcomes data as a tool to enhance daily orthopaedic clinical practice, and documents how develop-ments in electronic outcome measures, computer-adaptive questionnaire design and instant graphical display of questionnaire can facilitate enhanced patient-clinician shared decision making.

Gender Differences in Psychological Responses to Recovery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Before Return to Sport

CONTEXT

Female patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are less likely to return to sport than males. Psychological readiness predicts successful return to sport, but it is unclear if psychological experiences differ between males and females during recovery.

OBJECTIVE

To explore gender differences in psychological readiness factors of return to sport after ACLR.

DESIGN

Qualitative study.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 12 male (months since surgery = 6.2 ± 1.2) and 13 female (months since surgery = 6.4 ± 1.3) high school athletes with a history of ACLR.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Participants were interviewed before physician clearance to return to activity. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using deductive thematic coding of 5 themes identified from previous research (psychological distress, self-efficacy, locus of control, athletic identity, and fear of reinjury) and inductive secondary subthematic coding. Gender comparisons were generated within primary themes and secondary subthemes.

RESULTS

All deductive themes were consistently reinforced. Male and female participants reported fear of movement, loss of athletic identity, and motivational mindsets for return to sport and self-improvement. Males reported a stronger sense of internal locus of control using positive internal reinforcement, whereas females described balancing internal and external control and valuing external support systems. Male participants described mood changes influenced by physical and social limitations. Female participants closely monitored their emotions throughout recovery and were influenced by rehabilitation fluctuations.

CONCLUSIONS

Male and female high school athletes described different psychological factors related to return to sport and locus of control as well as psychological distress. Gender-specific psychological interventions may be warranted to overcome psychological barriers after ACLR.

Predictors of clinical outcome following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

The underlying theme throughout this series of studies authored by the Multicenter anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) Revision Study consortium has been to determine the modifiable predictors or risk factors of long-term outcomes of revision ACL reconstruction. The observational studies described and summarized in the manuscript are both clinically relevant and of great interest in finding out the long-term consequences of the intervention and its relationship to the original injury. The successful completion of these studies has important implications for both therapy and future clinical trials. The identification of modifiable risk factors will play an important role in secondary prevention, while the identification of nonmodifiable risk factors will aid us in counseling our patients and making surgical decisions. Thus, we expect a profound clinical impact on patients' care. More importantly, this project represents an important step forward in bringing evidence to bear in clinical decision making in orthopedic surgery.

Clinical outcomes of two-stage total knee arthroplasty using articulating cement spacer in patients with infected arthritic knee: A comparison with arthroscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and recurrence rate of infection between patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery and two-stage total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for infected arthritic knees.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 52 patients (52 knees) with advanced knee joint arthritis who underwent arthroscopic surgery or two-stage TKA using articulating cement spacer (ACS) for knee joint infection between January 2009 and November 2013. Of the 52 patients (52 knees), 38 and 14 patients underwent arthroscopic surgery (AS group) and two-stage TKA using ACS (ACS-TKA group), respectively. Patient-reported outcomes (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and EuroQol-Visual Analog Scales (EQ-VAS)); range of motion; and recurrence rate of infection were evaluated.

RESULTS

Recurrence of infection was observed in 7/38 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery, all of whom received two-stage TKA using ACS. Regarding the functional outcomes of the ACS-TKA group obtained before conversion to TKA and those of the AS group obtained six months after arthroscopic surgery, the former group had better outcomes for KOOS pain, KOOS activities of daily living, KOOS quality of life, and EQ-VAS. Regarding the functional outcomes of the ACS-TKA group obtained during the last follow-up and after conversion to TKA and those of the AS group who underwent TKA after arthroscopic surgery, no significant between-group differences were observed. The infection recurrence rate was higher in the AS than in the ACS-TKA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering infection control and functional outcomes, two-stage TKA using ACS can be an effective alternative treatment for patients with infected arthritic knees.

A Systematic Review of the Outcome Evaluation Tools for the Foot and Ankle

Background. The goal of this systematic review is to determine the most commonly used outcome measurement tools used by foot and ankle specialists and determine their limitations, such as whether they are validated, have floor/ceiling effects, and so on. Methods. A literature search was conducted to identify primary publications between January 1, 2012 and July 1, 2017 that concern care of the foot and ankle and use any established grading criteria to evaluate patients. Results. In 669 publications, 76 scoring systems were used. The 10 most common were American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), visual analog scale (VAS), Short Form-36 (SF-36), Foot Function Index (FFI), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), SF-12, Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), and Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI). AOFAS was used in 393 articles, VAS in 308, and SF-36 in 133 publications. AOFAS, VAS, and SF-36 were used to evaluate 23,352, 20,759, and 13,184 patients respectively. AOFAS and VAS were used simultaneously in 172 publications. Conclusion. While there are many different scoring systems available for foot and ankle specialists to use to assess or demonstrate the effectiveness of treatments, the AOFAS, while it is an unvalidated scoring system, is the most commonly used scoring system in this review. Clinical Relevance. This review presents data about commonly used patient reported outcomes systems in foot and ankle surgery. Levels of Evidence: Level III: Systematic review.

Hip scores: A current concept review

INTRODUCTION

During the past decades, several rating scales have been developed to assess the functional status of patients with hip pain.

SOURCE OF DATA

A search in Medline, PubMed, Cochrane and CINAHL was performedusing combinations of the following'hip', 'scoring system', 'scale', 'scores', 'outcome assessment', 'arthroplasty', 'arthroscopy' and 'clinical evaluation'.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

A total 16 scoring systems are currently available for the evaluation of the hip.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Two types of questionnaires are available: physician-rated and patient-rated questionnaires.

GROWING POINTS

Each hip score consists of different domains. Interpreting these domains becomes sometimes difficult, because, even though they can be common to more than one scoring system, each stresses them in a different way.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Although many scoring systems have been used to evaluate hip function, we are still far from a single outcome evaluation system which is reliable, valid and sensitive.

Triaxial accelerometer can quantify the Lachman test similarly to standard arthrometers

PURPOSE

To assess the relationship between the KiRA triaxial accelerometer and the KT-1000 measurements in the intact, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient, and ACL reconstructed knee joint for the quantification of the Lachman test. Moreover, the intra- and inter-examiner repeatability of the KiRA device will be determined. It was hypothesized that the side-to-side difference of the anterior tibial translation as measured by the KiRA device would be equivalent to the one measured by the KT-1000 during the Lachman test.

METHODS

Sixty patients were divided into three groups and have been prospectively included in the present study. Group_A composed of 20 patients with a diagnosis of an isolated ACL tear. Group_B composed of 20 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with a Single-Bundle Lateral Plasty (SBLP) technique with at least 20 years of follow-up. Group_C was the control group and included 20 patients with no history of ACL lesion. Lachman test has been performed at manual-maximum load on both sides, the involved and the contralateral and analyzed with the two different devices.

RESULTS

The KiRA device in terms of side-to-side difference resulted not statistically different from the measurement of the KT-1000 arthrometer for the three study groups (n.s): Group_A: (4 ± 2 mm KiRA, 4 ± 2 mm KT1000), Group_B: (4 ± 2 mm KiRA, 4 ± 2 mm KT-1000), Group_C: (4 ± 2 mm KiRA, 4 ± 2 mm KT-1000), an excellent intra- (ICC = 0.88-0.89) and inter-examiner (ICC = 0.79) agreement was found for KiRA measurements.

CONCLUSION

The KiRA (I+, Italy) device offers a valid method to quantify the Lacham test.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a valid measure of results after revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Revision ACL reconstruction has been documented to have worse outcomes when compared with primary ACL reconstruction. Understanding positive and negative predictors of PROs will allow surgeons to modify and potentially improve outcome for patients.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to describe PROs after revision ACL reconstruction and test the hypothesis that patient- and technique-specific variables are associated with these outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction were identified and prospectively enrolled by 83 surgeons over 52 sites. Data included baseline demographics, surgical technique and pathology, and a series of validated PRO instruments: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Marx Activity Rating Scale. Patients were followed up at 2 years and asked to complete the identical set of outcome instruments. Multivariate regression models were used to control for a variety of demographic and surgical factors to determine the positive and negative predictors of PRO scores at 2 years after revision surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 1205 patients met the inclusion criteria and were successfully enrolled: 697 (58%) were male, with a median cohort age of 26 years. The median time since their most recent previous ACL reconstruction was 3.4 years. Two-year questionnaire follow-up was obtained from 989 patients (82%). The most significant positive predictors of 2-year IKDC scores were a high baseline IKDC score, high baseline Marx activity level, male sex, and having a longer time since the most recent previous ACL reconstruction, while negative predictors included having a lateral meniscectomy before the revision ACL reconstruction or having grade 3/4 chondrosis in either the trochlear groove or the medial tibial plateau at the time of the revision surgery. For KOOS, having a high baseline score and having a longer time between the most recent previous ACL reconstruction and revision surgery were significant positive predictors for having a better (ie, higher) 2-year KOOS, while having a lateral meniscectomy before the revision ACL reconstruction was a consistent predictor for having a significantly worse (ie, lower) 2-year KOOS. Statistically significant positive predictors for 2-year Marx activity levels included higher baseline Marx activity levels, younger age, male sex, and being a nonsmoker. Negative 2-year activity level predictors included having an allograft or a biologic enhancement at the time of revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

PROs after revision ACL reconstruction are associated with a variety of patient- and surgeon-related variables. Understanding positive and negative predictors of PROs will allow surgeons to guide patient expectations as well as potentially improve outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes of Inside-Out Meniscal Repair According to Anatomic Zone of the Meniscal Tear

Background

There is significant discrepancy in the reported vascularity within the meniscus, and a progressively diminishing blood supply may indicate a differential healing capacity of tears that is dependent on the affected meniscal zone.

Purpose

To examine the outcomes after inside-out meniscal repair in all 3 meniscal vascularity zones.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Patients were included if they underwent inside-out meniscal repair by a single surgeon between 2010 and 2014 and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the meniscal tear location (red-red, red-white, and white-white zones) as determined during an intraoperative assessment. Patient-reported outcome scores were obtained at final follow-up.

Results

A total of 173 patients (mean age, 33.6 ± 14.3 years) were included, with a mean follow-up of 2.9 ± 0.9 years. All patients demonstrated significant improvements with inside-out meniscal repair from preoperatively to postoperatively, regardless of the meniscal tear location. Patients who underwent meniscal repair in the red-red and red-white zones had significantly increased postoperative Tegner, Lysholm, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores compared with patients who underwent meniscal repair in the white-white zone (P < .05). Patients who underwent acute repair (≤6 weeks) demonstrated significantly higher improvements on the Tegner activity scale (acute: 5.8 ± 2.2; chronic: 4.6 ± 2.2; P = .001) and Lysholm score (acute: 85.6 ± 13.3; chronic: 80.8 ± 13.5; P = .025) compared with patients treated beyond 6 weeks from injury, regardless of the meniscal tear zone. Patients with grade IV femoral condyle chondral lesions at the time of surgery had significantly inferior outcomes compared with patients with grade I through III chondral lesions, regardless of the meniscal tear zone. Three patients (1.7%) subsequently underwent revision inside-out repair, and 3 (1.7%) underwent partial meniscectomy.

Conclusion

Patients who underwent inside-out meniscal repair demonstrated significant improvements on subjective outcome measures at a minimum 2-year follow-up, regardless of the meniscal tear zone. Inside-out meniscal repair is recommended for potentially reparable meniscal tears in all 3 vascular zones; however, improved outcomes can be achieved when performed acutely, in the absence of full-thickness femoral condyle chondral injuries, and in the red-red and red-white zones.

High Resiliency Linked to Short-Term Patient Reported Outcomes and Return to Duty Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery

Introduction

Resilience is a psychometric construct of a patient’s ability to recover from adversity and has been used to predict outcomes but its use in orthopedics has been limited. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between resilience and outcomes.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patient who underwent sports knee surgery at a single institution performed by 6 orthopedic surgeons from January 2017 to December 2017. We included active-duty patients with complete preoperative outcomes and a minimum of 6 month follow-up. All patients completed the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), Veteran’s Rand-12 (VR-12), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 43 (PROMIS-43), International Knee Documentation Committee function score (IKDC), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Patients were divided into low resilience (LR) and high resilience (HR) groups based on a score of less than 24 for low and greater than or equal to 24 according to BRS. Outcomes were then compared.

Results

We identified 50 active-duty patients who had complete preoperative and postoperative outcomes at a minimum of 6 months. Mean preoperative and postoperative BRS were significantly different (25.8 HR v 18.6 LR, p < 0.001). We found a difference in postop KOOS in pain, sports, and short form (pain 70.9 HR v 55.7 LR, p = 0.03; sports 50.3 HR v 32.2 LR, p = 0.03; short form (72.1 HR v 62.5 LR, p = 0.04). Similarly, there was a significant difference in postoperative IKDC score (58.0 HR v 44.0 LR, p = 0.03). Similarly we found significant differences in postoperative PROMIS-43 (anxiety 44.4 HR v 60.3 LR, p = 0.004; depression 41.6 HR v 58.1 LR, p = 0.004; fatigue 45.1 HR v 58.6 LR, p = 0.001; sleep 52.6 HR v 62.5 LR, p = 0.02; social participation 36.2 HR v 47.6 LR, p < 0.001). Postoperative VR-12 mental was also statistically different between the two groups (53.5 HR v 41.6 LR; p = 0.01). In addition, 2.3% of the HR group changed MOS as a result of their sports knee surgery compared to 22.2% of the LR group.

Conclusions

Active-military patients with high preoperative resilience appear to have significantly better early postoperative outcomes following sports knee surgery in terms of PROMIS-43, KOOS, and IKDC. There was also a lower rate of changing MOS secondary to sports knee surgery in patients with high resilience.

Anterior and Rotational Knee Laxity Does Not Affect Patient-Reported Knee Function 2 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

While a primary goal of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is to reduce pathologically increased anterior and rotational knee laxity, the relationship between knee laxity after ACL reconstruction and patient-reported knee function remains unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

There would be no significant correlation between the degree of residual anterior and rotational knee laxity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

From a prospective multicenter nested cohort of patients, 433 patients younger than 36 years of age injured in sports with no history of concomitant ligament surgery, revision ACL surgery, or surgery of the contralateral knee were identified and evaluated at a minimum 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction. Each patient underwent Lachman and pivot-shift evaluation as well as a KT-1000 arthrometer assessment along with Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores. A proportional odds logistic regression model was used to predict each 2-year PRO score, controlling for preoperative score, age, sex, body mass index, smoking, Marx activity score, education, subsequent surgery, meniscal and cartilage status, graft type, and range of motion asymmetry. Measures of knee laxity were independently added to each model to determine correlation with PROs.

RESULTS

Side-to-side manual Lachman differences were IKDC A in 246 (57%) patients, IKDC B in 183 (42%) patients, and IKDC C in 4 (<1%) patients. Pivot-shift was classified as IKDC A in 209 (48%) patients, IKDC B in 183 (42%) patients, and IKDC C in 11 (2.5%) patients. The mean side-to-side KT-1000 difference was 2.0 ± 2.6 mm. No significant correlations were noted between pivot-shift or anterior tibial translation as assessed by Lachman or KT-1000 and any PRO. All predicted differences in PROs based on IKDC A versus B pivot-shift and anterior tibial translation were less than 4 points.

CONCLUSION

Neither the presence of IKDC A versus B pivot-shift nor increased anterior tibial translation of up to 6 mm is associated with clinically relevant decreases in PROs 2 years after ACL reconstruction.

Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision cohorts continually report lower outcome scores on validated knee questionnaires than primary ACL cohorts at similar time points after surgery. It is unclear how these outcomes are associated with physical activity after physician clearance for return to recreational or competitive sports after ACL revision surgery.

HYPOTHESES

Participants who return to either multiple sports or a singular sport after revision ACL surgery will report decreased knee symptoms, increased activity level, and improved knee function as measured by validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and compared with no sports participation. Multisport participation as compared with singular sport participation will result in similar increased PROMs and activity level.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 1205 patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction were enrolled by 83 surgeons at 52 clinical sites. At the time of revision, baseline data collected included the following: demographics, surgical characteristics, previous knee treatment and PROMs, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, Marx activity score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). A series of multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the association of IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC, and Marx Activity Rating Scale scores at 2 years after revision surgery by sports participation category, controlling for known significant covariates.

RESULTS

Two-year follow-up was obtained on 82% (986 of 1205) of the original cohort. Patients who reported not participating in sports after revision surgery had lower median PROMs both at baseline and at 2 years as compared with patients who participated in either a single sport or multiple sports. Significant differences were found in the change of scores among groups on the IKDC (P < .0001), KOOS-Symptoms (P = .01), KOOS-Sports and Recreation (P = .04), and KOOS-Quality of Life (P < .0001). Patients with no sports participation were 2.0 to 5.7 times more likely than multiple-sport participants to report significantly lower PROMs, depending on the specific outcome measure assessed, and 1.8 to 3.8 times more likely than single-sport participants (except for WOMAC-Stiffness, P = .18), after controlling for known covariates.

CONCLUSION

Participation in either a single sport or multiple sports in the 2 years after ACL revision surgery was found to be significantly associated with higher PROMs across multiple validated self-reported assessment tools. During follow-up appointments, surgeons should continue to expect that patients who report returning to physical activity after surgery will self-report better functional outcomes, regardless of baseline activity levels.

Influence of graft diameter on patient reported outcomes after hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Several studies have identified graft diameter as a risk factor for failure following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of graft diameter on patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) following ACLR. We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data using a global surgical registry. 153 of 287 patients (53.3%) had complete data for each timepoint. Effect of graft diameter, graft type, femoral tunnel drilling technique, patient age, sex, and body mass index were evaluated.

At 1-year post-operatively, a 1-mm increase in graft diameter was found to correlate with a 5.7-point increase in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) activity of daily living score (P=0.01), a 10.3-point increase in the sport score (P=0.003), and a 9.8-point increase in the quality of life score (P=0.013). At 2- years post-operatively, a 1-mm increase in graft size was found to be marginally correlated with KOOS symptoms and sport scores. Patients undergoing hamstring autograft ACLR, increasing graft diameter can result in improved PROMS, specifically improved KOOS subscale scores at 1 and 2- years post-operative.

Real-Time Three-Dimensional Knee Moment Estimation in Knee Osteoarthritis: Toward Biodynamic Knee Osteoarthritis Evaluation and Training

We investigated differences in knee kinetic variables (external knee adduction, flexion, internal rotation moments, and impulses) between patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and healthy controls during stepping on a custom elliptical trainer; and searched knee kinetic variable candidates for real-time biofeedback and for complementing diagnosis/evaluation on the elliptical trainer based on the knee kinetic variables' associations with the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). Furthermore, we explored potential gait re-training strategies on the elliptical trainer by investigating the knee kinetic variables' associations with 3-D ankle angles. The knee kinetic variables and ankle angles were determined in real-time in a patient group of 10 patients with KOA and an age-and sex-matched control group of 10 healthy subjects. The mean peak external knee adduction moment of the patient group was 47% higher than that of the control group. The KOOS-Sports and Recreational Activities and KOOS-Pain scores were found to be significantly associated with the knee kinetic variables. All the ankle angles were associated with the knee kinetic variables. The findings support the use of the knee kinetic variables on the elliptical trainer to complement KOA diagnosis quantitatively and provide potential real-time KOA gait re-training strategies/guides.

Do Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scales Demonstrate Responsiveness as Well as Disease-Specific Scales in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroscopy?

BACKGROUND

The Patient Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) is an efficient metric able to detect changes in global health.

PURPOSE

To assess the responsiveness, convergent validity, and clinically important difference (CID) of PROMIS compared with disease-specific scales after knee arthroscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A prospective institutional review board-approved study collected PROMIS Physical Function (PF), PROMIS Pain Interference (PI), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) results in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. The change from preoperative to longest follow-up was used in analyses performed to determine responsiveness, convergent validity, and minimal and moderate CID using the IKDC scale as the anchor.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients enrolled, 76 were included. Values of the effect size index (ESI) ranged from near 0 to 1.69 across time points and were comparable across scales. Correlations of the change in KOOS and PROMIS with IKDC ranged from r values of 0.61 to 0.79. The minimal CID for KOOS varied from 12.5 to 17.5. PROMIS PF and PI minimal CID were 3.3 and -3.2. KOOS moderate CID varied from 14.3 to 18.8. PROMIS PF and PI moderate CID were 5.0 and -5.8.

CONCLUSION

The PROMIS PF and PI showed similar responsiveness and CID compared with disease-specific scales in patients after knee arthroscopy. PROMIS PI, PROMIS PF, and KOOS correlations with IKDC demonstrate that these scales are measuring a similar construct. The ESIs of PROMIS PF and PI were similar to those of KOOS and IKDC, suggesting similar responsiveness at 6 months or longer (ESI >1.0). Minimum and moderate CID values calculated for PROMIS PF and PI using IKDC as an anchor were sufficiently low to suggest clinical usefulness.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

PROMIS PF and PI can be accurately used to determine improvement or lack thereof with clinically important changes after knee arthroscopy.

Outcomes of Grade III Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries Treated Concurrently With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate differences in repair and nonoperatively managed grade III medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in a multicenter prospective longitudinal group who underwent unilateral primary ACL reconstruction between 2002 and 2008 were evaluated. Patients with concomitant grade III MCL injuries treated either operatively or nonoperatively were identified. Concurrent injuries, subsequent surgeries, surgical chronicity, and MCL tear location were analyzed. Patient-reported outcomes were measured at time of ACL reconstruction and 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Initially, 3,028 patients were identified to have undergone primary ACL reconstruction during the time frame; 2,586 patients completed 2-year follow-up (85%). Grade III MCL tears were documented in 1.1% (27 of 2,586): 16 operatively managed patients and 11 nonoperatively treated MCLs during ACL reconstruction. The baseline Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were lower in patients who underwent operative MCL treatment. Reoperation rates for arthrofibrosis were 19% after repair and 9% after conservative management (P = .48). At 2 years, both groups significantly improved; however, the nonoperative MCL group maintained superior patient-reported outcomes in terms of minimal clinically important differences, but these differences did not reach statistical significance (KOOS sports/recreation [88.2 vs 74.4, P = .10], KOOS knee-related quality of life [81.3 vs 68.4, P = .13], and International Knee Documentation Committee [87.6 vs 76.0, P = .14]). Tibial-sided MCL injuries were associated with clinically inferior baseline scores compared with femoral-sided MCL (KOOS knee-related quality of life, 34.4 vs 18.5, P = .09), but these differences resolved by 2 years. Surgical chronicity did not influence 2-year outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Both operative and nonoperative management of MCL tears in our patient group demonstrated clinical improvements between study enrollment and 2-year follow-up. MCL surgery during ACL reconstruction was assigned to patients with worse symptoms at enrollment and was associated with worse outcomes at 2 years. A subset of patients with severe combined ACL and medial knee injuries may benefit from operative management; however, that population has yet to be defined.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort.

Temporary postoperative treatment with compartment-unloading knee braces or wedge insoles does not improve clinical outcome after partial meniscectomy

PURPOSE

To investigate whether temporary postoperative compartment-unloading therapy after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM)-with either knee braces or wedge insoles-leads to superior clinical outcome as compared to controls. This difference in clinical outcome was tested in the form of two knee scores, physical activity and general health outcome over the first postoperative year.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) were randomized to one of the following three groups: 12 weeks postoperative knee compartment-unloading therapy with either a knee brace (brace group) or wedge insoles (insole group) or no specific postoperative therapy (control group). Patient-reported outcome was assessed with the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC Score), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the MARX score (physical activity) and the SF-12 (general health).

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were available for analysis. Except for the SF-12 mental score, all other scores showed significant improvement over time. With regard to the hypotheses proposed, no significant group * time interactions were observed for any of the outcome parameters. This means that the group (i.e. the type of postoperative treatment) was not related to the degree of improvement of any of the scores.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that 12 weeks of compartment-unloading therapy-with either a knee brace or wedge insoles-is ineffective with regard to clinical outcome after APM. This applies to the knee score outcome, physical activity and general health outcome over the first year following APM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Randomized controlled trial, Level I.

The Long-Term Impact of Osteoarthritis Following Knee Surgery in Former College Athletes

CONTEXT

Individuals who sustain a knee surgery have been shown to have an increased likelihood to develop osteoarthritis (OA).

OBJECTIVE

Identify the consequences of knee surgery in a cohort of former college athletes.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Research laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

A group of 100 former Division I college athletes aged 40-65 years (60 males and 40 females) participated in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

All individuals self-reported whether they sustained a knee injury during college requiring surgery and if they have been diagnosed with knee OA by a medical physician post knee injury. Individuals were categorized into 3 groups: no history of knee injury requiring surgery (33 males and 24 females; 54.53 [5.95] y), history of knee surgery in college with no diagnosis of OA later in life (4 males and 6 females; 51.26 [7.29] y), and history of knee surgery in college with physician diagnosed OA later in life (23 males and 10 females; 54.21 [7.64] y). All individuals completed the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and short form-36 version 2.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Scores on the KOOS and short form-36 version 2.

RESULTS

A majority (76.7%) of individuals who had a knee surgery in college did develop OA. The largest mean differences were between the healthy knee and surgical knee/OA groups on the KOOS-quality of life scale (mean difference: 49.76; χ2(3) = 44.65; P < .001) and KOOS-sports scale (mean difference: 43.69; χ2(3) = 28.69; P < .001), with the surgical knee/OA group scoring worse.

CONCLUSIONS

Later in life functional limitations were observed in individuals who sustained a knee injury requiring surgery and developed OA. These findings support increased efforts toward prevention of knee injuries and consideration of the long-term implication when making treatment and return to activity decisions.

Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty is better in patients with pre-operative complete joint space collapse

Aim of the study

To determine if pre-operative radiologic minimal joint space width (mJSW) is related to the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (primary hypothesis). Likewise, the aim was to test if pre-operative mJSW is related to prosthesis survival (secondary hypothesis).

Methods

A retrospective comparative analysis was performed. Group 1 was comprised of patients with pre-operative mJSW 0–1 mm. Group 2 were patients with pre-operative mJSW ≥ 2 mm. The clinical outcome was determined with the Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score pre-operatively and one year after TKA. Only patients with pre-operative weight-bearing radiographs and complete WOMAC score data were accepted.

Results

Available for analysis were 377 patients, of whom 188 were allocated to Group 1 (118 female, 70 male, age 70 ± 11 years) and 189 to Group 2 (118 female, 71 male, age 70 ± 13 years). Pre-operative WOMAC total and WOMAC subscores showed no significant differences between groups. Post-operatively, the WOMAC total was significantly better in Group 1 than in Group 2, 10 ± 22 and 19 ± 31, respectively (p < 0.001, Power 97.5%). Similarly, the WOMAC subscores for pain, stiffness, and function were also significantly better in Group 1 than in Group 2. Five-year prosthesis survival was 94.2 and 91.6% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.07, Power 71%).

Discussion

Patients with pre-operative complete joint space collapse (0 to 1 mm mJSW) achieve a significantly better WOMAC result from TKA than do those with a mJSW equal to or greater than 2 mm. From our findings, it is recommended that “complete joint space collapse” especially be used as an indication for TKA surgery.

Conclusion

Our study was underpowered to sufficiently show an effect of pre-operative mJSW on prosthesis survival.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00264-018-4185-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effect of High-Grade Preoperative Knee Laxity on 6-Year Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Knee laxity in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is often assessed through physical examination using the Lachman, pivot shift, and anterior drawer tests. The degree of laxity noted on these examinations may influence treatment decisions and prognosis.

HYPOTHESIS

Increased preoperative knee laxity is associated with increased risk of revision ACL reconstruction, increased risk of contralateral ACL reconstruction, and poorer patient-reported outcomes at 6 years postoperatively.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

2333 patients who underwent primary isolated ACL reconstruction without additional ligament injury were identified. Patients reported by the operating surgeons to have an International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grade D Lachman, anterior drawer, or pivot shift examination were classified as having a high-grade laxity. Multiple logistic regression models were used to evaluate whether having high-grade preoperative laxity was predictive of increased odds of undergoing subsequent revision or contralateral ACL reconstruction within 6 years of the index procedure, controlling for patient age, sex, body mass index, Marx activity level, sport, graft type, medial meniscal treatment, and lateral meniscal treatment. Multiple linear regression modeling was used to evaluate whether having high-grade preoperative laxity was predictive of poorer IKDC or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Knee-Related Quality of Life (KOOS-QOL) scores at 6 years postoperatively, after controlling for baseline score, patient age, ethnicity, sex, body mass index, marital status, smoking status, sport participation, competition level, Marx activity rating score, graft type, and articular cartilage and meniscal status.

RESULTS

In total, 743 of 2325 patients (32.0%) were noted to have high-grade laxity on at least 1 physical examination test. High-grade Lachman was noted in 334 patients (14.4%), high-grade pivot shift was noted in 617 patients (26.5%), and high-grade anterior drawer was noted in 233 patients (10.0%). Six-year revision and contralateral ACL reconstruction data were available for 2129 patients (91.6%). High-grade prereconstruction Lachman was associated with significantly increased odds of ACL graft revision (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.10-2.80, P = .02) and contralateral ACL reconstruction (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.69; P = .019). High-grade prereconstruction pivot shift was associated with significantly increased odds of ACL graft revision (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.19-2.54, P = .002) but not with significantly increased odds of contralateral ACL reconstruction (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.89-1.87; P = .16). High-grade prereconstruction laxity was associated with statistically significantly lower 6-year IKDC (β = -2.26, P = .003), KOOS-QOL (β = -2.67, P = .015), and Marx activity scores (β = -0.54, P = .020), but these differences did not approach clinically relevant differences in patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

High-grade preoperative knee laxity is predictive of increased odds of revision ACL reconstruction and contralateral ACL reconstruction 6 years after ACL reconstruction. Poorer patient-reported outcome scores in the high-grade laxity group were also noted, but the difference did not reach a level of clinical relevance.

Symptomatic anterior cruciate ligament tears treated with percutaneous injection of autologous bone marrow concentrate and platelet products: a non-controlled registry study

Background

Bone marrow concentrate (BMC) has shown promise in the treatment of several orthopedic conditions. This registry study investigated the use of autologous BMC and platelet products for percutaneous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) treatment.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients presenting to a single outpatient interventional musculoskeletal and pain practice with symptomatic grade 1, 2, or 3 ACL tears with less than 1 cm retraction were enrolled. Patients were treated with a percutaneous ACL injection of autologous BMC and platelet products using fluoroscopic guidance. Pre- and post-treatment magnetic resonance imaging analysis was completed for 23 patients using ImageJ software for an objective quantitative analysis of pixel density as a proxy for ACL integrity. Subjective clinical outcome measures collected pre-treatment and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months post-treatment include the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS), the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, and a modified version of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation.

Results

Seventy-seven percent of patients treated with BMC injections into the ACL showed significant improvement (p < 0.01) in objective measures of ACL integrity at an average of 8.8 months (median 4.7 months). The mean of last patient-reported improvement was 72% (SD = 35) at an average of 23 (SD = 10) months post-treatment. Mean scores were found to be significantly different (p < 0.05) for the NPS at 6, 18, and 24 months, and LEFS and IKDC at all time points (i.e. 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months) relative to baseline.

Conclusion

In symptomatic patients with grade 1, 2, or even grade 3 tears with minimal retraction, ACL treatment with percutaneous injection of BMC and platelet products shows promise as a non-surgical alternative. However, a larger randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm these findings.

Trial registration NCT03011398. A Clinical Registry of Orthobiologics Procedures. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03011398?term=orthobiologics&rank=1. Registered 29 December 2016. Enrollment 1 December 2011-retrospectively registered