Hepatitis B reactivation in occult viral carriers undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A prospective study

Vaccination of Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To guide the vaccination of adults with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies.

METHODS

A systematic literature review identified systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and nonrandomized studies on the efficacy and safety of vaccines used by adults with cancer or their household contacts. This review builds on a 2013 guideline by the Infectious Disease Society of America. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2013, to February 16, 2023. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 102 publications were included in the systematic review: 24 systematic reviews, 14 RCTs, and 64 nonrandomized studies. The largest body of evidence addressed COVID-19 vaccines.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The goal of vaccination is to limit the severity of infection and prevent infection where feasible. Optimizing vaccination status should be considered a key element in the care of patients with cancer. This approach includes the documentation of vaccination status at the time of the first patient visit; timely provision of recommended vaccines; and appropriate revaccination after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or B-cell-depleting therapy. Active interaction and coordination among healthcare providers, including primary care practitioners, pharmacists, and nursing team members, are needed. Vaccination of household contacts will enhance protection for patients with cancer. Some vaccination and revaccination plans for patients with cancer may be affected by the underlying immune status and the anticancer therapy received. As a result, vaccine strategies may differ from the vaccine recommendations for the general healthy adult population vaccine.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

Outcomes of Cessation of Nucleos(t)ide Analog Administration on Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Nationwide Retrospective Study

Monitoring of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA and HBV-DNA-guided preemptive therapy using nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) are recommended to prevent the development of hepatitis due to HBV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in recipients with resolved HBV infection. However, little is known about the appropriate duration of NA treatment and the effect of NA cessation on the recurrence of HBV reactivation. This study aimed to clarify the consequences of NA cessation in allo-HSCT recipients with resolved HBV infection who experienced HBV reactivation following transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of recipients with resolved HBV infection (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-negative, anti-HBc-positive) before allo-HSCT who had been diagnosed with HBV reactivation (HBsAg-positive and/or HBV-DNA detectable) after allo-HSCT between January 2010 and December 2020. A total of 72 patients from 16 institutions were registered (median age, 60 years; age range, 27 to 73 years; 42 males and 30 females). The day of initial HBV reactivation ranged from day 10 to day 3034 after allo-HSCT (median, 513 days). Anti-HBs were lost in >80% of the patients at the time of HBV reactivation. All 72 patients received preemptive NAs, and no fatal HBV reactivation-related hepatitis was observed. HBV-DNA without hepatitis was continuously detected in 5 patients during the follow-up period. Administration of NAs was discontinued in 24 of 72 patients (33%) by physician decision. Second HBV reactivation occurred in 11 of the 24 patients (46%) in whom administration of NAs was discontinued. The duration of NA treatment did not differ significantly between patients with or without second HBV reactivation. The frequency of further HBV reactivation tended to be lower in patients with an anti-HBs titer of >10 mIU/mL at the time of NA cessation. Multiple reactivations of HBV after NA cessation was common in patients with HBV reactivation who underwent allo-HSCT despite the long duration of NAs. Careful monitoring of HBV-DNA is important even after the discontinuation of NAs in the case with HBV reactivation after allo-HSCT, because multiple reactivations could occur. Active immunization by HB vaccine might be effective for suppressing further HBV reactivation after cessation of NAs.

Epstein-Barr virus reactivation correlates with worse outcomes for patients exposed to hepatitis B virus after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)has a high, chronic infection rate in Asian populations, but only few studies have analyzed the effect of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) or Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in patients exposed to HBV after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of these patients. We conducted a retrospective research including 61 patients exposed to HBV after undergoing haplo-HSCT. The patients were classified into two groups: the CMV reactivation group and no CMV reactivation group. The results were compared between the two groups using the K-W test for continuous variables, Pearson's chi-square test for categorical variables, Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS), and a Cox proportional hazards model to analyze multivariable influences. The 3-year cumulative HBV reactivation rate was 8.2%. The median duration of HBV reactivation was 16 months (16-22 months) after haplo-HSCT. The CMV reactivation group had a higher cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation than the group without CMV reactivation. The EBV reactivation was substantially higher in the CMV reactivation group compared to that in the no CMV reactivation group (37.0% vs.5.9% respectively; P = 0.002). Furthermore, EBV reactivation was a risk factor for 1-year LFS and 1-year OS. Based on our data, EBV reactivation was related to worse outcomes in patients exposed to HBV after haplo-HSCT, whereas CMV reactivation was not.

Spotlight on the impact of viral infections on Hematopoietic Stem Cells (HSCs) with a focus on COVID-19 effects

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are known for their significant capability to reconstitute and preserve a functional hematopoietic system in long-term periods after transplantation into conditioned hosts. HSCs are thus crucial cellular targets for the continual repair of inherited hematologic, metabolic, and immunologic disorders. In addition, HSCs can undergo various fates, such as apoptosis, quiescence, migration, differentiation, and self-renewal. Viruses continuously pose a remarkable health risk and request an appropriate, balanced reaction from our immune system, which as well as affects the bone marrow (BM). Therefore, disruption of the hematopoietic system due to viral infection is essential. In addition, patients for whom the risk-to-benefit ratio of HSC transplantation (HSCT) is acceptable have seen an increase in the use of HSCT in recent years. Hematopoietic suppression, BM failure, and HSC exhaustion are all linked to chronic viral infections. Virus infections continue to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in HSCT recipients, despite recent advancements in the field. Furthermore, whereas COVID-19 manifests initially as an infection of the respiratory tract, it is now understood to be a systemic illness that significantly impacts the hematological system. Patients with advanced COVID-19 often have thrombocytopenia and blood hypercoagulability. In the era of COVID-19, Hematological manifestations of COVID-19 (i.e., thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia), the immune response, and HSCT may all be affected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus in various ways. Therefore, it is important to determine whether exposure to viral infections may affect HSCs used for HSCT, as this, in turn, may affect engraftment efficiency. In this article, we reviewed the features of HSCs, and the effects of viral infections on HSCs and HSCT, such as SARS-CoV-2, HIV, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, HIV, etc. Video Abstract.

Predicting the loss of hepatitis B surface antigen following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with chronic HBV infection

Clearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is an ideal therapeutic goal for patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the most effective therapy for a variety of haematological diseases. For patients with chronic HBV infection who received allo-HSCT, recipient hepatitis B serological status might change after allo-HSCT; however, data on the loss of HBsAg following allo-HSCT are relatively rare. We first reviewed patients with chronic HBV infection who received allo-HSCT in our centre from 2010 to 2020, and 125 patients were included in our study. A total of 62 patients (49.6%) with chronic HBV infection achieved HBsAg loss after allo-HSCT. Positivity for HBeAb and HBsAb in donors as well as no cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection were identified as independent risk factors for HBsAg loss after allo-HSCT. A predictive model including positivity for HBeAb and HBsAb in donors and no CMV infection was subsequently developed and performed well with effective discrimination and calibration. In addition, patients could benefit when this model is used in the clinic, as revealed via decision-curve analysis (DCA). However, multicentre prospective studies are required for validation.

Occult hepatitis B in patients with cancer during immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy: A real-life retrospective single-center cohort study

Introduction

Few data about the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the patients with solid tumor with Occult Hepatitis B Virus (OBI) are available. According to the Taormina Workshop on Occult HBV Infection Faculty Members we defined as potential-OBI (pOBI) the HBV DNA negativity with anti-hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) positivity (pOBI seropositive), and the patients with HBsAg-negative and anti-HBc-negative and Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs)-negative are defined pOBI seronegative. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of OBI in patients with solid tumors undergoing ICIs with or without chemotherapy and the incidence of reactivation (HBVr).

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled all HBsAg negative subjects who had received ICIs for at least three months. HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were repeated every 3 months until the end of the study and/or in case of ALT alterations. A univariate analysis was conducted in order to study for each variable available its ability to distinguish a potential OBI seropositive patient from a seronegative one.

Results

150 patients in our Oncology Unit were eligible. One hundred and seventeen patients (78%) received ICI as monotherapy, whereas 33 patients (22%) were treated with chemo-immunotherapy. The mainly used drugs for the ICI monotherapy were Pembrolizumab (47%), Nivolumab (33%) and Atezolizumab (11%). The prevalence of pOBI seropositive patients was 25.3%. We did not observe alterations of liver biochemistry nor HBVr.

Discussion

This study highlights that about a quarter of our population had a potential occult hepatitis B. Immunotherapy might be considered as low risk of reactivation, regardless of the potential presence of episomal covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in the liver, but the correct management still represents a challenge for oncologists and hepatologists.

Protective Effect of Neonatal Hepatitis B Vaccine Against HBV Breakthrough Infection in Children with Leukemia: A Real-world Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hepatitis B vaccine is the most effective preventive measure against hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, the risk of HBV breakthrough infection in fully immunized children (neonatal hepatitis B immunization) who receive immunosuppressive therapy and transfusion of blood components is not well characterized. In this real-world study, we aimed to investigate the immune protection conferred by neonatal hepatitis B vaccine in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who were treated with immunosuppressive therapy and blood component transfusions.

METHODS

Children with ALL who had received all three doses of neonatal hepatitis B vaccine were included in this study. HBV seromarkers were detected before and after the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 1,011 children with ALL who were fully vaccinated against hepatitis B in infancy before the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy were eligible for inclusion. HBV infection was detected in four of 410 children (0.98%) with an HBsAg test after the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy. The median interval from treatment initiation was 19 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Three doses of neonatal hepatitis B vaccine conferred adequate protection. In endemic regions, there is a low risk of HBV breakthrough infection in fully immunized children with immunosuppressive therapy.

Occult Hepatitis B Virus Infection: An Update

Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (OBI) refers to a condition in which replication-competent viral DNA is present in the liver (with detectable or undetectable HBV DNA in the serum) of individuals testing negative for the HBV surface antigen (HBsAg). In this peculiar phase of HBV infection, the covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) is in a low state of replication. Many advances have been made in clarifying the mechanisms involved in such a suppression of viral activity, which seems to be mainly related to the host's immune control and epigenetic factors. OBI is diffused worldwide, but its prevalence is highly variable among patient populations. This depends on different geographic areas, risk factors for parenteral infections, and assays used for HBsAg and HBV DNA detection. OBI has an impact in several clinical contexts: (a) it can be transmitted, causing a classic form of hepatitis B, through blood transfusion or liver transplantation; (b) it may reactivate in the case of immunosuppression, leading to the possible development of even fulminant hepatitis; (c) it may accelerate the progression of chronic liver disease due to different causes toward cirrhosis; (d) it maintains the pro-oncogenic properties of the "overt" infection, favoring the development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Occult hepatitis B virus infection in hepatitis C virus negative chronic liver diseases

Data concerning the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) occult infection (OBI) varies greatly in the different studies according to the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic approaches and the HBV prevalence in the different populations examined. The clinical implications of OBI are still debated. While the impact of OBI in HBV transmission as well as in HBV reactivation under immunosuppression are well established, the role of OBI in liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development are still not definitively elucidated. It has been hypothesized that OBI might contribute to worsening the liver disease course when other causes of liver damage co-exist. Furthermore, much evidence suggests a role of OBI in the hepato-carcinogenesis processes through both indirect and direct oncogenic mechanisms that might favour HCC development. Data on the OBI clinical implications mainly come from studies performed in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, HCV prevalence has dramatically fallen in the past years also because of the advent of specific and highly effective direct acting antivirals, with a consequent abrupt change of the worldwide scenario of chronic liver disease. Information about OBI prevalence and possible clinical impact in non-HCV-related liver disease are fragmentary, and the objective of this review is to critically summarize the available data in this field.

Global prevalence of occult hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors associated with occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (OBI) in the global population. We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane and Web of Science from database inception through 27 Dec, 2018. Studies reporting HBV-DNA serological data in previously undiagnosed hepatitis B patients were included. The data were further categorized according to the presence of risk factors. After an initial screening of 2,325 records, we finally included 98 articles about the prevalence of OBI from 34 countries and regions. The OBI prevalence was 0.82% (95% CI:0.69-0.96) in the general population, 16.26% (95% CI:10.97-22.34) in HIV patients, 13.99% (95% CI:8.33-20.79) in patients with other liver diseases, 4.25% (95% CI:1.64-7.87) in haemodialysis patients and 5.14% (95% CI:2.26-9.01) patients with other risk factors. In conclusion, OBI prevalence varies significantly across different populations and nations, which deserve attention from the public health authorities. Our results generate further epidemiological data to identify the population with OBI, which has important clinical implications in finding these high-risk populations to design preventive and management strategies.

Hepatitis B virus vaccination after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation prevents post-transplant HBV reactivation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplant (HCT) recipients with evidence of pre-transplantation resolved HBV infection is an important cause of morbidity, usually occurring a year or later after HCT.

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively studied a cohort of allogeneic HCT recipients with resolved HBV infection, some of whom were vaccinated for HBV following transplantation, to understand if post-HCT HBV vaccination influenced the risk of HBV reactivation.

STUDY DESIGN

The study included all patients with resolved HBV who underwent allogeneic HCT at our institution between 1/1/2000 and 12/31/2015, where HBV vaccination starting at 1 year after HCT became standard in 2012 and antiviral prophylaxis is not utilized. Resolved HBV infection was defined as positive HBV-core IgG (HBcAb), negative HBV-surface antigen (HBsAg) and undetectable HBV DNA before HCT. HBV reactivation was defined as development of detectable HBsAg and HBV DNA after HCT. Follow up for outcomes concluded 1/1/2018.

RESULTS

Among 136 patients with resolved HBV before HCT, 19 developed reactivation during follow up (cumulative incidence 14%). Median time to HBV reactivation was 21 months (range, 2-47 months). The cumulative probability of HBV reactivation among HCT recipients who survived for a year or more after transplant without early HBV reactivation and were HBV-vaccinated versus those who were unvaccinated was 2.9% vs. 10.0 % at two years and 6.6% vs. 26.5% at 4 years post-HCT (P = 0.03, Gray's test). In a time-dependent Cox model, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of HBV reactivation in patients with pre-transplant HBsAb levels greater than 10 IU/L was 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.90). The aHR of HBV reactivation in patients who were vaccinated with 2 or more doses of recombinant HBV vaccine after HCT was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.04-0.80) compared to those who received 1 or no post-HCT vaccine doses.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV reactivation is a late complication of allogeneic HCT in at-risk recipients, particularly in those with low pre-HCT HBsAb. HBV vaccination starting 1 year after HCT may be protective.

Highly Sensitive HBsAg, Anti-HBc and Anti HBsAg Titres in Early Diagnosis of HBV Reactivation in Anti-HBc-Positive Onco-Haematological Patients

The role of novel HBV markers in predicting Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBV-R) in HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive oncohaematological patients was examined. One hundred and seven HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive oncohaematological patients, receiving anti-HBV prophylaxis for >18 months, were included. At baseline, all patients had undetectable HBV DNA, and 67.3% were anti-HBs positive. HBV-R occurred in 17 (15.9%) patients: 6 during and 11 after the prophylaxis period. At HBV-R, the median (IQR) HBV-DNA was 44 (27–40509) IU/mL, and the alanine aminotransferase upper limit of normal (ULN) was 44% (median (IQR): 81 (49–541) U/L). An anti-HBc > 3 cut-off index (COI) plus anti-HBs persistently/declining to <50 mIU/mL was predictive for HBV-R (OR (95% CI): 9.1 (2.7–30.2); 63% of patients with vs. 15% without this combination experienced HBV-R (p < 0.001)). The detection of highly sensitive (HS) HBsAg and/or HBV-DNA confirmed at >2 time points, also predicts HBV-R (OR (95% CI): 13.8 (3.6–52.6); 50% of positive vs. 7% of negative patients to these markers experienced HBV-R (p = 0.001)). HS-HBs and anti-HBc titration proved to be useful early markers of HBV-R. The use of these markers demonstrated that HBV-R frequently occurs in oncohaematological patients with signs of resolved HBV infection, raising issues of proper HBV-R monitoring.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation Associated With Therapeutic Interventions

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation associated with various therapeutic interventions is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with current or resolved HBV infection. Because no curative treatment for HBV infection is yet available, there are many individuals at risk for HBV reactivation in the general population. Populations at risk for HBV reactivation include patients who are currently infected with HBV or who have been exposed to HBV in the past. HBV reactivation and its potential consequences is a concern when these populations are exposed to anti-cancer chemotherapy, immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapies for the management of various malignancies, rheumatologic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, or solid-organ or hematologic stem cell transplantation. Accordingly, it has become important to understand the basics of HBV reactivation and the mechanisms by which certain therapies are more susceptible to HBV reactivation. This review aims to raise the awareness of HBV reactivation and to understand the mechanisms and the risks of HBV reactivation in various clinical settings.

Phenotypic Changes of PD-1 and GITR in T Cells Are Associated With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Seroclearance

BACKGROUND

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) possess hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific immunoregulatory effects in chronic HBV infection. The role of Tregs in spontaneous seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) remains to be determined.

METHODS

We recruited treatment-naive chronic HBV patients achieving spontaneous HBsAg seroclearance (experimental group) and matched HBsAg-positive controls. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated using the Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation method. The frequency of Tregs and inhibitory phenotypes and immunoregulatory cytokines of Tregs were detected by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients with HBsAg seroclearance (mean age: 52.40±6.00 y, 55.6% male) and 27 matched controls were recruited. Median HBsAg and HBV DNA levels in the control group were 2.80 (1.24 to 3.43) and 3.16 (1.68 to 3.85) log IU/mL, respectively. Mean frequencies of Tregs and expressions of FoxP3+ Tregs were comparable in both groups (both P>0.05). The mean expression of programmed death 1 (PD-1) and glucocorticoid-induced TNFR family-related gene (GITR) in total CD4+ T cells were significantly downregulated in the experimental group when compared with the control group (10.62% vs. 13.85%, P=0.003; 16.20% vs. 27.02%, P=0.002, respectively). When compared with the control group, PD-1+CD4+ Tregs expression in the experimental group was significantly downregulated (13.85% vs. 10.62%, P=0.003). A similar phenomenon was noted for GITR+CD8+ Tregs (20.16% vs. 14.08%, P=0.049). Intracellular cytokine productions showed no significant differences (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The reduced expression of PD-1 and GITR might attenuate the immunosuppressive capability of Tregs. Decreased expression on CD4+ T cells might represent an enhanced antiviral function, playing a role in initiating the "functional cure" of chronic HBV infection.

Detection of the hepatitis B surface antigen in patients with occult hepatitis B using an assay with enhanced sensitivity

Patients with occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) have undetectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) by conventional assays but detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in blood/liver. We evaluated the key performance characteristics of a sensitive HBsAg assay (ARCHITECT HBsAg Next Qualitative Assay, referred as NEXT) with respect to HBsAg detection. Assay precision, sample carryover and seroconversion sensitivity of NEXT were evaluated. HBsAg was measured by NEXT in 1,138 individuals, including 1,038 patients who attended liver clinics in a tertiary hospital (200 HBV DNA-positive blood donors whose HBsAg was undetectable by conventional assays, and 38 patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, 800 chronic hepatitis B patients with HBsAg seroclearance) and 100 HBsAg-negative subjects recruited from a community project. The within-run and within-laboratory coefficients of variation were <6% for the positive sample pools. In 9 seroconversion panels tested, NEXT allowed an earlier HBsAg detection than conventional assays. NEXT detected HBsAg in 10/200 (5%) HBsAg-negative blood donors, 1/20 (5%) and 0/18 HBsAg-negative patients with and without HBV reactivation respectively, and 59/800 (7.3%) patients with HBsAg seroclearance. HBsAg was detectable by NEXT in 27.8%, 8.2%, 6.9%, 3.8% and 1.9% samples at <3, 3-5, >5-8, >8-11, and >11 years after HBsAg seroclearance, respectively. Seven out of 100 HBsAg-negative community identified subjects was tested positive by NEXT. Comparing with conventional HBsAg assays, NEXT demonstrated a higher sensitivity and conferred an increment of 5-7% detection rate in patients with OBI, thereby helping in identifying HBV carriers and prevention of OBI-associated HBV transmission and reactivation.

Controversies in Treating Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection: Discordant Serologic Results

Despite effective vaccines and approved therapeutic agents, hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains a prevalent global health problem. Current guidelines rely on a combination of serologic, virological, and biochemical markers to identify the phase in the natural history of chronic HBV infection. Discordant serologic results can occur, which may lead to misclassification. Commonly encountered results that differ from the typical profiles seen in chronic HBV infection are described. For each scenario, the frequency of occurrence, possible explanations, and recommendations for clinical management are discussed. Recognition of discordant serologic findings is crucial for optimal clinical decision.

Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Patients Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Considering a steady increase in the number of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (allo-HSCT) worldwide and the significant proportion of the world’s population that has been exposed to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, HBV reactivation following allo-HSCT remains an important issue for post-transplant morbidity and mortality. Antiviral prophylaxis can reduce HBV replication, severity of HBV-related hepatitis, and mortality; therefore, identification of patients at risk is crucial. It is recommended that all recipients and donors should be screened for active or prior HBV infection, including HBsAg, antiHBc, and antiHBs. Adoptive immunity transfer from the donor seems to have protective effects against HBV reactivation. Antiviral prophylaxis should be initiated in all HBsAg-positive patients. HBsAg-negative, antiHBc-positive patients remain at risk; therefore, antiviral prophylaxis should be considered if baseline serum HBV DNA is detectable. In HBsAg-negative, antiHBc-positive patients without detectable HBV DNA, close monitoring of viral load with an on-demand therapy is necessary. Entecavir or tenofovir rather than lamivudine are more appropriate for the emergence of lamivudine resistance. The treatment duration remains unclear, with 6- to 12-month therapy after cessation of immunosuppressive therapy commonly recommended. Here we review the updated evidence and recent recommendations regarding HBV reactivation in patients undergoing allo-HSCT for individualized therapy.

APASL clinical practice guideline on hepatitis B reactivation related to the use of immunosuppressive therapy

BACKGROUND & AIM

Hepatitis B reactivation related to the use of immunosuppressive therapy remains a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality in hepatitis B endemic Asia-Pacific region. This clinical practice guidelines aim to assist clinicians in all disciplines involved in the use of immunosuppressive therapy to effectively prevent and manage hepatitis B reactivation.

METHODS

All publications related to hepatitis B reactivation with the use of immunosuppressive therapy since 1975 were reviewed. Advice from key opinion leaders in member countries/administrative regions of Asian-Pacific Association for the study of the liver was collected and synchronized. Immunosuppressive therapy was risk-stratified according to its reported rate of hepatitis B reactivation.

RECOMMENDATIONS

We recommend the necessity to screen all patients for hepatitis B prior to the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy and to administer pre-emptive nucleos(t)ide analogues to those patients with a substantial risk of hepatitis and acute-on-chronic liver failure due to hepatitis B reactivation.

Update on the management and treatment of viral hepatitis

This review aims to summarize the current evidence on the treatment of viral hepatitis, focusing on its clinical management. Also, future treatment options and areas of potential research interest are detailed. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for primary studies published within the last ten years. Keywords included hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus, hepatitis D virus (HDV), hepatitis E virus, and treatment. Outcomes reported in the studies were summarized, tabulated, and synthesized. Significant advances in viral hepatitis treatment were accomplished, such as the advent of curative therapies for hepatitis C and the development and improvement of hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and hepatitis E vaccination. Drugs that cure hepatitis B, going beyond viral suppression, are so far unavailable; however, targeted antiviral drugs against HBV (immunomodulatory therapies and gene silencing technologies) are promising approaches to eradicating the virus. Ultimately, high vaccination coverage and large-scale test-and-treat programmes with high screening rates may eliminate viral hepatitis and mitigate their burden on health systems. The development of curative hepatitis C treatment renewed the enthusiasm for curing hepatitis B, albeit further investigation is required. Novel therapeutic options targeting HDV life cycle are currently under clinical investigation.

Molecular Mechanisms during Hepatitis B Infection and the Effects of the Virus Variability

The immunopathogenesis and molecular mechanisms involved during a hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have made the approaches for research complex, especially concerning the patients’ responses in the course of the early acute stage. The study of molecular bases involved in the viral clearance or persistence of the infection is complicated due to the difficulty to detect patients at the most adequate points of the disease, especially in the time lapse between the onset of the infection and the viral emergence. Despite this, there is valuable data obtained from animal and in vitro models, which have helped to clarify some aspects of the early immune response against HBV infection. The diversity of the HBV (genotypes and variants) has been proven to be associated not only with the development and outcome of the disease but also with the response to treatments. That is why factors involved in the virus evolution need to be considered while studying hepatitis B infection. This review brings together some of the published data to try to explain the immunological and molecular mechanisms involved in the different stages of the infection, clinical outcomes, viral persistence, and the impact of the variants of HBV in these processes.

Hepatitis B Seropositive Status in Recipients or Donors Is Not Related to Worse Outcomes after Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) has a high rate of chronic infection in Asian populations, and only limited studies have been performed to analyze the impact of HBV-seropositive haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) recipients and donors. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect on clinical outcomes in those patients. We conducted a retrospective study enrolling 237 consecutive patients undergoing first haplo-HSCT. The patients were classified into 3 groups: recipient HBV-positive group (R+D-; n = 62), donor HBV-positive group (D+; n = 83), and HBV-negative group (R-D-; n = 92). Corresponding prophylactic antiviral treatment was given in the R+D- and D+ groups. The results were compared among the 3 groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables, Pearson's chi-square test for categorical variables, the competing-risk method to evaluate cumulative incidence, Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and a Cox proportional hazard model to analyze multivariable influences. The 3-year cumulative HBV reactivation rate was 4.2%. The median time to HBV reactivation was 845 days (range, 545 to 1439 days) after haplo-HSCT. The R+D- group tended to have a higher cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation compared with the D+ group (11.8% versus 3.1%; P = .080). Significant differences in the causes of hepatic damage were observed among the 3 groups (P = .017), and all patients with acute hepatitis B after haplo-HSCT were from the R+D- group. Multivariate analysis showed that pretransplantation HBV status was associated with cytomegalovirus reactivation (R+D- versus R-D-: hazard ratio, 1.514; 95% confidence interval, 1.060 to 2.163; P = .023). The 3-year OS and DFS, 3-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM), rates of relapse and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and causes of death were comparable among the 3 groups. Pretransplantation HBV serostatus had no significant effect on OS, DFS, NRM, relapse, or GVHD in the multivariate analysis. Based on our data, seropositivity for hepatitis B surface antigen (HbsAg) or core antibody (HBcAb) in donors or recipients before transplantation did not negatively affect the overall outcome after haplo-HSCT under the premise of proper antiviral prophylaxis along with regular post-transplantation surveillance, and HBV seropositivity should not be considered a contraindication to haplo-HSCT.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation with Discontinuation of Nucleoside Analogue in Patients Who Received Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is known to occur frequently after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The reactivation can be prevented by nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA), but it is unclear how long NA should be continued. Here, we report 3 cases of HBV reactivation with discontinuation of NA following the discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapies after HSCT. Three male patients aged 34, 59, and 54 years received allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia, mixed phenotype acute leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome, respectively. Before HSCT, 2 patients were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and 1 patient was negative for HBsAg and positive for antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen. NA (lamivudine or entecavir) was started at the same time as HSCT and stopped after the discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapies. In all patients, the serum HBV DNA levels were increased after the discontinuation of NAs. Two of the three patients developed severe hepatitis with high levels of HBV DNA (7.5 and 7.4 log IU/mL, respectively). A patient without hepatitis was re-administered NA soon after the HBV DNA started to increase (3.3 log IU/mL). Interestingly, the 2 patients who developed hepatitis cleared HBsAg promptly after the recovery from hepatitis and they could stop NAs without the reversion of HBsAg. It was speculated that transplanted immune cells, which were naïve for HBV, react strongly with HBV antigens that were increased after the NA discontinuation. The discontinuation of NA after allo-HSCT is not recommended generally because strong hepatitis might be induced even after several years.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The high morbidity of HBV reactivation following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is partially due to the intense immunologic potency of complex therapeutic regimens, the use of antithymocyte globulin and calcineurin inhibitors to prevent graft versus-host disease (GVHD), prolonged immune reconstitution, and hematological malignancies infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Immunosuppression results in the reactivation of HBV replication from covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) residing in hepatocytes. However, the role of viral mutations during HBV reactivation needs to be validated. All individuals scheduled to receive allo-HSCT or wish to donate stem cells should be screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies to hepatitis B core (anti-HBc), and HBV-DNA. HBsAg-positive recipients of allo-HSCT have a high risk of HBV reactivation; thus, they should receive prophylactic antiviral therapy. The high barrier to resistance nucleos(t)-ide analogs (NAs) seems to be superior to the low barrier agents. Resolved-HBV recipients have a lower risk of HBV reactivation than HBsAg-positive recipients. Although prophylactic antiviral therapy remains controversial, regular monitoring of alanine transaminase (ALT) and HBV-DNA combined with preemptive antiviral treatment may be an optimized strategy. However, optimal antiviral therapy duration and time intervals for monitoring remain to be established. Accepting stem cells from HBsAg-positive donors is associated with a risk of developing HBV-related hepatitis. The overall intervention strategy, including donors and recipients, may decrease the risk of HBV-related hepatitis following HSCT from HBsAg positive stem cells. In this review, we summarize the issues of HBV in allo-HSCT, including HBV reactivation mechanism, HBsAg-positive recipients, HBV-resolved infection recipients, and donor-related factors, and discuss their significance.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation 55 Months Following Chemotherapy Including Rituximab and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Malignant Lymphoma

A 54-year-old woman underwent chemotherapy including rituximab and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (auto-PBSCT) for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Before the treatment, she exhibited a resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. She was diagnosed with HBV reactivation based on positive serum HBV-DNA test results, 55 months after her last treatment. Subsequently, he was treated with tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) therapy and her liver function improved. Patients undergoing chemotherapy including rituximab and auto-PBSCT are at a high risk of HBV reactivation. In such cases, careful and long-term observations may be required to detect HBV reactivation.

Monitoring by viral load and quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen in patients with hepatitis B virus infection receiving immunosuppressive therapy

OBJECTIVES

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients on immunosuppressive therapy is a critical issue. We aimed to verify the monitoring strategies of hepatitis B virus DNA and quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen in patients receiving therapies with moderate risk.

METHODS

We enrolled 25 patients with autoimmune diseases receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Liver function, hepatitis B virus DNA, and quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen were followed-up every 2 months for 24 months. The hepatitis B virus reactivation was defined as hepatitis B virus DNA reappearance or increase of >1 log IU/mL.

RESULTS

Patients who were hepatitis B surface antigen positive with (n = 12) or without (n = 6) antiviral prophylaxis and hepatitis B surface antigen negative (n = 7) were analyzed, and the reactivation rates were 0%, 50% and 14%, respectively. Antiviral prophylaxis prevented hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients (P = 0.025). Administration of high-risk steroid doses was the sole factor related to the sign of quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen increase of >0.5 log IU/mL in the first 12 months (P = 0.035, risk ratio = 0.098, 95% confidence interval = 0.011-0.847). Furthermore, no patient experienced hepatic decompensation or failure.

CONCLUSION

Monitoring hepatitis B virus DNA and quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen every 2 months is safe. However, antiviral prophylaxis can prevent hepatitis B virus reactivation. For patients under steroid therapy in high-risk doses, quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen increase of >0.5 log IU/mL may signify hepatitis B virus reactivation.

Prevalence of occult HBV infection in Western countries

Due to a lack of standardized tests, it is difficult to obtain prevalence data and define the real impact of occult HBV infection (OBI) in Western countries. The present review article addresses the prevalence of OBI, defined as presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in liver tissue or plasma in HBsAg-negative subjects, in Western countries. This varies in different studies according to the different methodologies used (based on serology vs virology), to the sample analyzed for the diagnosis (liver tissue vs plasma), to the different populations studied, to the different geographical variations in the HBV spread, to the host characteristics (age, gender, risk factors for acquiring HBV infection) and to the presence of other parenteral infections (hepatitis C virus and/or human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] infections). Considering the different liver diseases analyzed, that is in patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis or advanced liver fibrosis, the prevalence of OBI ranges 4% to 38%. Considering the different populations studied, in the case of parenteral blood exposure it is about 45%, in patients with chronic hepatitis C it is estimated at about 52%, in HIV-infected patients it ranges from 0% to 45%, in blood donors from 0% to 22.7% and in hemodialysis patients it ranges from 0% to 54%. In conclusion, OBI is a virological entity to be considered when performing the patient's evaluation for immunosuppressive diseases, liver pathologies, or for blood transfusions. Knowing the prevalence and clinical impact of OBI will allow better patient management.

Moving towards core antigen for the management of patients with overt and occult HBV infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection encompasses a wide virologic and clinical spectrum with heterogeneous outcomes. The natural history of chronic HBV infection ranges from an inactive carrier state (hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic infection) to progressive chronic hepatitis that may evolve in end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. The issue becomes even more complicated when we consider the unique biology of the virus; the HBV covalently-closed-circular DNA, that acts as virus transcription template, is the key factor responsible of the persistence of the infection even after hepatitis B surface antigen loss. In the last decade, novel serological and immunological biomarkers associated to the core protein of HBV have been approached in different clinical conditions. Remarkable results have been obtained both in the setting of overt and occult HBV infection. Here, we reviewed the meaning and the potential clinical applications of the measurement of core antigen and antibodies.

Occult hepatitis B infection and hepatocellular carcinoma: Epidemiology, virology, hepatocarcinogenesis and clinical significance

Occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) refers to a condition where replication-competent HBV DNA is present in the liver, with or without HBV DNA in the blood, in individuals with serum HBsAg negativity assessed by currently available assays. The episomal covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in OBI is in a low replicative state. Viral gene expression is mediated by epigenetic control of HBV transcription, including the HBV CpG island methylation pathway and post-translational modification of cccDNA-bound histone, with a different pattern from patients with chronic HBV infection. The prevalence of OBI varies tremendously across patient populations owing to numerous factors, such as geographic location, assay characteristics, host immune response, coinfection with other viruses, and vaccination status. Apart from the risk of viral reactivation upon immunosuppression and the risk of transmission of HBV, OBI has been implicated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development in patients with chronic HCV infection, those with cryptogenic or known liver disease, and in patients with HBsAg seroclearance after chronic HBV infection. An increasing number of prospective studies and meta-analyses have reported a higher incidence of HCC in patients with HCV and OBI, as well as more advanced tumour histological grades and earlier age of HCC diagnosis, compared with patients without OBI. The proposed pathogenetic mechanisms of OBI-related HCC include the influence of HBV DNA integration on the hepatocyte cell cycle, the production of pro-oncogenic proteins (HBx protein and mutated surface proteins), and persistent low-grade necroinflammation (contributing to the development of fibrosis and cirrhosis). There remain uncertainties about exactly how, and in what order, these mechanisms drive the development of tumours in patients with OBI.

Humanized anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy is safe and effective in lymphoma and leukemia patients with chronic and resolved hepatitis B virus infection

Chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapy is a promising treatment for CD19⁺ B-cell malignancies. However, elimination of B cells by anti-CD19 CAR-T cells may lead to the reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and related hepatitis in patients with HBV infection. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of humanized anti-CD19 CAR-T (hCAR-T) therapy in B-cell malignancies with HBV infection. Twenty relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients with HBV infection were treated with hCAR-T therapy. Among them, five hepatitis B antigen-positive patients who received antiviral prophylaxis did not develop HBV reactivation, including two patients who received both hCAR-T and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Among 15 patients with resolved HBV infection, two received antiviral prophylaxis, and the other 13 did not experience HBV reactivation without antiviral prophylaxis. One patient with resolved HBV infection experienced HBV reactivation 6 months after hCAR-T therapy and sequential allo-HSCT. Moreover, HBV infection did not affect in vivo expansion of hCAR-T cells or increase the risk of severe cytokine release syndrome. In conclusion, hCAR-T therapy is safe and effective in DLBCL and ALL patients with chronic and resolved HBV infection under proper antiviral prophylaxis.

Recommendations for screening, monitoring, prevention, and prophylaxis of infections in adult and pediatric patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy: a position paper

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is one of the most promising emerging treatments for B-cell malignancies. Recently, two CAR T-cell products (axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel) have been approved for patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia; many other CAR-T constructs are in research for both hematological and non-hematological diseases. Most of the patients receiving CAR-T therapy will develop fever at some point after infusion, mainly due to cytokine release syndrome (CRS). The onset of CRS is often indistinguishable from an infection, which makes management of these patients challenging. In addition to the lymphodepleting chemotherapy and CAR T cells, the treatment of complications with corticosteroids and/or tocilizumab increases the risk of infection in these patients. Data regarding incidence, risk factors and prevention of infections in patients receiving CAR-T cell therapy are scarce. To assist in patient care, a multidisciplinary team from hospitals designated by the Spanish Ministry of Health to perform CAR-T therapy prepared these recommendations. We reviewed the literature on the incidence, risk factors, and management of infections in adult and pediatric patients receiving CAR-T cell treatment. Recommendations cover different areas: monitoring and treatment of hypogammaglobulinemia, prevention, prophylaxis, and management of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections as well as vaccination prior and after CAR-T cell therapy.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation: What Is the Issue, and How Should It Be Managed?

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation, in the background of cleared and overt chronic HBV infection, can be seen in patients receiving immunosuppressive agents. Risk of reactivation is variably associated with HBV serologic status and types of immunosuppressive therapy. Prevention of HBV reactivation by antiviral prophylaxis is an effective strategy to reduce morbidity and mortality in those with immunocompromised states. This article defines HBV reactivation, discusses risk stratification and common medications that can induce HBV reactivation as well as guideline recommendations for prevention of HBV reactivation, and describes the prognosis and management of patients who experience HBV reactivation.

Hepatitis B reactivation: diagnosis and management

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation can be induced by treatments that attenuate the immunological control over HBV, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The risk of HBV reactivation is determined by host immunity, viral factors, and the type and dose of treatments. Nevertheless, the risk of HBV reactivation for a growing number of novel therapies remains uncertain and needs to be carefully examined. Identification of patients at risk and administration of prophylactic antiviral agents are critical to prevent HBV reactivation. Early diagnosis and initiation of antiviral treatment are the keys to avoid devastating outcomes.

AREA COVERED

We summarized the latest evidence and recommendations for risk stratification, early diagnosis, prophylaxis, and management of HBV reactivation.

EXPERT OPINION

Universal screening, adequate prophylaxis, and close monitoring are essential for the prevention of HBV reactivation. Risk stratification of patients at risk with appropriate antiviral prophylaxis can prevent HBV reactivation effectively. Several emerging biomarkers have been proved to help determine the risk precisely. Early detection and timely administration of antiviral agents are crucial for management. Further studies on the precision of risk stratification as well as the optimal duration of prophylaxis and treatment are needed to establish an individualized strategy.

The prevalence of occult HBV infection in immunized children with HBsAg-positive parents: a hospital-based analysis

Background and object

The risk of occult HBV infection (OBI) in children whose mothers are HBV carriers has received more widespread attention, but there were few reports to focus on the children with HBsAg-positive parents. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of OBI in immunized children with HBsAg-positive parents.

Methods

HBV-vaccinated Chinese hospitalized children with HBsAg-positive parents were analyzed in our investigation. Eligible subjects were tested using a standard nested PCR for all HBV genes, and analyzed by direct sequencing.

Results

There were 327 HBsAg-negative children included in the study out of about 9800 involved HBV-vaccinated hospitalized children. The positive rate of OBI was 3.1% (10/327) in the eligible children and 14.1% (46/327) with HBV DNA detectable. No significant differences were found between one and at least two regions positive groups (p > 0.05). The proportions of HBV DNA detectable in children with HBV father-carriers and mother-carriers were similar. The risk factors for HBV DNA-positive children could be male, anti-HBs levels, and anti-HBc positive.

Conclusion

There are 3.1% of OBIs and 14.1% of suspected OBI in vaccinated children with HBsAg-positive parents. The potential risk of suspected OBI in children with HBsAg-positive father should not be ignored. Anti-HBc positivity may be a useful seromarker for suspected OBI screening in vaccinated children. To prevent HBV breakthrough infection, accurate and convenient method is needed to detect OBI timely and exhaustively.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s12072-020-10055-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[Prophylactic Antiviral Treatment in Immunosuppressed Chronic Hepatitis B Patients]

Improved management of chronic hepatitis B patients with oral nucleos(t)ide analogues has increased the number of these patients who are getting older and have other accompanying comorbidities. These comorbidities frequently require various immunosuppression treatments and/or cytotoxic chemotherapy. Not only the patients who are positive for HBsAg, but also the patients who are positive for isolated anti-HBc are at risk for hepatitis B reactivation during immunosuppression. Prophylactic antiviral treatment with oral nucleos(t)ide analogues with high genetic barriers can decrease the risks of HBV reactivation, HBV reactivation- associated hepatitis, and mortality in these patients. It is crucial to screen HBV markers in all of the patients who have to undergo immunosuppression, be administered prophylactic antiviral treatment in the high risk groups, and be monitored for HBV reactivation during and after immunosuppression and/or cytotoxic chemotherapy. This study summarizes the recommendations from the recently updated guidelines from Korea, United States, and Europe.

No evidence of occult HBV infection in population born after mass vaccination

Despite access to efficient hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine and universal immunization schedules, HBV infection remains a global health concern. HBV infection has decreased by this program. Nevertheless, breakthrough infections occur due to generation of occult HBV infection (OBI) and surface gene mutants in the immunized population. We aimed to determine the presence of OBI in a population born after initiation of nationwide HBV vaccination in Tehran, Iran. A HBV mass vaccination schedule was launched in Iran in 1993. For this study, we enrolled 1120 cases younger than 24 years. ELISA was applied to evaluate the presence of HBsAg, anti-HBs and anti-HBc. HBV-DNA presence was determined in all HBsAg-negative cases using nested polymerase chain reaction. The prevalence of HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HBs was 0.1, 0.54 and 39.9% respectively. Out of 6 anti-HBc-positive individuals, 4 cases also had anti-HBs. One case revealed HBsAg co-existence and the other one showed isolated anti-HBc. HBV-DNA was not detected in HBsAg-negative specimens. A very low prevalence of HBsAg and isolated anti-HBc was observed and no occult HBV infection was detected. It seems that evasion mutants are not a potential threat for HBV universal immunization efficacy in the vaccinated population.

Role of hepatitis B antibody in predicting reactivation of resolved hepatitis B virus infection in leukemia patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Quantification of anti-HBs and anti-HBc predicts the risk of HBV reactivation (HBVr) in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab treatment. However, it remains unclear whether the quantification is predictive of HBVr in leukemia patients undergoing immunosuppression.

METHODS

and patients: Clinical and laboratory data of the leukemia patients with resolved HBV infection diagnosed between January 2013 and March 2018 were retrospectively collected. Data series of HBV seromarkers and HBV DNA levels before the patients receiving chemotherapy and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and during follow-up duration were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 533 leukemia patients with resolved HBV infection were included. The incidences of HBVr were 5.7% (25/441) and 2.2% (2/92) in patients receiving HSCT and chemotherapy, respectively. In patients receiving HSCT, acute lymphoid leukemia had a significantly higher incidence of HBVr than acute myeloid leukemia (8.9% vs 3.9%, P < 0.05). The incidence varied almost zero to 40% due to the differences in the profiles of HBV antibodies. High anti-HBs (cut-off of 79.2 IU/L) or low anti-HBc levels (cut-off of 4.475, S/CO) at baseline were associated with a low risk of HBVr. Anti-HBe status did not affect the incidence of HBVr. However, the cut-offs were only predictive of HBVr in the patients who had negative anti-HBe.

CONCLUSION

The baseline profiles of HBV antibodies are predictive of the risk of HBVr in leukemia patients undergoing immunosuppression. However, seronegative anti-HBe is a prerequisite for using baseline anti-HBs and anti-HBc quantification to predict HBVr risk.

A Territorywide Prevalence Study on Blood-Borne and Enteric Viral Hepatitis in Hong Kong

BACKGROUND

Viral hepatitis epidemiological data are important for the World Health Organization plan of eliminating viral hepatitis. We aimed to document the prevalence of viral hepatitis A to E in Hong Kong.

METHODS

This community-based study was open to all Hong Kong Chinese citizens aged ≥18 years. Baseline data and risk factors were collected. Hepatitis A-E serology was measured, including hepatitis B e antigen, antibodies to hepatitis B e antigen, antibodies to hepatitis D, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive participants, and antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen and antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) in HBsAg-negative participants. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA and genotypes were determined in anti-HCV-positive participants.

RESULTS

A total of 10 256 participants were recruited from February 2015 to July 2016. Overall HBsAg seroprevalence was 7.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3%-8.3%), which was reduced significantly with HBV vaccination (odds ratio, 0.15 [95% CI, .11-.21]). Among HBsAg-negative participants, anti-HBc seroprevalence increased from 5.4% (<26 years) to 60.1% (>65 years). No hepatitis D virus (HDV) cases were detected. Anti-HCV positivity was 0.5% (95% CI, .3%-.6%). Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) and hepatitis E virus (anti-HEV) was 65.2% (95% CI, 64.2%-66.1%) and 33.3% (95% CI, 32.4%-34.2%), respectively, and were influenced by age, family income, and being born in mainland China.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV seroprevalence remained high despite universal vaccination. High anti-HBc seroprevalence underlines the potential issue of HBV reactivation during profound immunosuppression. HCV and HDV remained uncommon. Anti-HAV seroprevalence had decreased whereas anti-HEV seroprevalence had risen.

A prospective trial of vaccine to prevent hepatitis B virus reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation reportedly occurs frequently after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in resolved HBV-infected patients. Here, 50 patients with resolved HBV infections and scheduled to undergo HSCT were enrolled; all subjects were vaccinated with three doses of hepatitis B vaccine 12 months after HSCT and the incidence of HBV reactivation was monitored. The patients' characteristics were: median age, 61 (34-72) years; male/female, 27/19; allogeneic/autologous, 40/6; bone marrow/peripheral blood stem cells/cord blood, 26/16/4. Of the 46 patients who underwent HSCT, 19 were excluded and did not make it to vaccination due to relapse of underlying disease, HBV reactivation within 12 months of HSCT, or transfer of patients. The remaining 27 were vaccinated 12 months after HSCT and monitored for 2 years. Six showed HBV reactivation, with a 2-year cumulative reactivation incidence of 22.2%; the same incidence was 27.3% only in allogeneic HSCT patients. Factors associated with HBV reactivation included the discontinuation of immunosuppressants (P = 0.0379) and baseline titers of antibody against hepatitis B surface antigen (P = 0.004). HBV reactivation with vaccination following HSCT could occur despite maintenance of serum anti-HBs at more than protective levels.

Determining Whether Prophylactic Antiviral Treatment Is Necessary in HBsAg-Negative/HBcAb-Positive Patients Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The incidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is high in the Asian population. Increasing attention is being given to the risk of HBV reactivation in hepatitis B core antibody-positive [HBcAb(+)] patients during immunosuppressive therapy. Knowledge of HBV reactivation in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is limited. Moreover, the effect of hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) on HBV reactivation in HBcAb(+) patients during HSCT remains uncertain. We sought to investigate the role of HBsAb and the need for prophylactic antiviral treatment in hepatitis B surface antigen-negative [HBsAg(-)]/HBcAb(+) patients during HSCT. We classified 665 HBsAg(-) HSCT recipients into 4 groups: HBcAb(-)HBsAb(-) (n = 189), HBcAb(-)HBsAb(+) (n = 176), HBcAb(+)HBsAb(-) (n = 49), and HBcAb(+)HBsAb(+) (n = 251). HBV reactivation was identified in 16 patients after HSCT. The median time to HBV reactivation was 645 days (range, 455 to 1957 days) after transplantation. The cumulative HBV reactivation rate was significantly higher in the HBcAb(+)HBsAb(-) group compared with the HBcAb(+)HBsAb(+), HBcAb(-)HBsAb(-), and HBcAb(-)HBsAb(+) groups, respectively (P< .001). Notably, the risk of HBV reactivation was significantly higher in the HBcAb(+)HBsAb(-) group compared with the HBcAb(+)HBsAb(+) group (P= .007; hazard ratio, 4.750; 95% confidence interval, 1.531 to 14.737). Our results point to a protective role of HBsAb in HBV-resolved patients undergoing HSCT and indicate that prophylactic anti-HBV treatment might not be mandatory for HBsAg(-), HBcAb(+)HBsAb(+) patients following HSCT. The surveillance protocol of intense follow-up early (HBV DNA and HBsAg monthly) might not be necessary.

HBV Reactivation in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Narrative Review

HBV reactivation (HBVr) can occur due to the ability of HBV to remain latent in the liver as covalently closed circular DNA and by the capacity of HBV to alter the immune system of the infected individuals. HBVr can occur in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with a clinical spectrum that ranges from asymptomatic infection to fulminant hepatic failure. The risk of HBVr is determined by a complex interplay between host immunity, virus factors, and immunosuppression related to HSCT. All individuals who undergo HSCT should be screened for HBV. HSCT patients positive for HBsAg and also those HBcAb-positive/HBsAg-negative are at high risk of HBV reactivation (HBVr) due to profound and prolonged immunosuppression. Antiviral prophylaxis prevents HBVr, decreases HBVr-related morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic or previous HBV. The optimal duration of antiviral prophylaxis remains to be elucidated. The vaccination of HBV-naïve recipients and their donors against HBV prior to HSCT has an important role in the prevention of acquired HBV infection. This narrative review provides a comprehensive update on the current concepts, risk factors, molecular mechanisms, prevention, and management of HBVr in HSCT.

Early Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Seroclearance Following Antiviral Treatment in Patients with Reactivation of Resolved Hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Long-term results on hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients with resolved infection during anti-cancer therapy are unknown. This study investigated long-term risk and therapeutic endpoints including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance following antiviral therapy in patients developing reactivation of resolved HBV.

METHODS

The study included 528 consecutive HBsAg-negative/hepatitis B core antibody-positive patients who underwent rituximab treatment or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) between 2006 and 2016. Long-term outcomes of patients with reactivation after antiviral therapy were examined in comparison with 37 HBsAg-positive chronic carriers under the same medical settings.

RESULTS

The 7-year cumulative rate of HBV reactivation was 10.8% and 57.9% in patients receiving rituximab treatment and HSCT, respectively. After antiviral initiation, patients with reactivation of resolved HBV showed significantly higher 1-year cumulative rates of hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion (69.2% vs. 22.6%, P = 0.008) and HBsAg seroclearance (61.8% vs. 3.3%, P < 0.001) than chronic HBsAg carriers. Reactivation of resolved HBV was independently predictive of HBsAg seroclearance in a combined group of reactivated patients and chronic HBsAg carriers. Low viral load at reactivation was predictive of HBsAg seroclearance in reactivated patients. The majority of patients with HBsAg seroclearance developed anti-HBs. None of the reactivated patients who achieved HBsAg seroclearance relapsed after cessation of antiviral therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg seroclearance rapidly occurs following antiviral therapy for reactivation of resolved HBV infection, suggesting distinct clinical phenotypes as well as shorter duration of HBV infection associated with this particular disease setting-HBV reactivation.

Workup and Management of Immune-Mediated Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Toxicities That Develop During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of a wide range of cancer types, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Workup and management of immune-mediated hepatitis, pancreatitis, or cholangitis that develops during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment can be challenging. Immune-mediated hepatitis can be particularly challenging if patients have underlying viral hepatitis or autoimmune hepatitis. Patients with positive hepatitis B virus DNA should be referred to a hepatologist for antiviral therapy prior to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. With untreated hepatitis C virus (HCV) and elevated liver enzymes, a liver biopsy should be obtained to differentiate between HCV infection and immune-mediated hepatitis due to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy. If autoimmune serologies are negative, then this supports a case of immune-mediated hepatitis secondary to anti-PD-1 therapy, rather than autoimmune hepatitis. In this case, an empiric steroid therapy is reasonable; however, if the patient does not respond to steroid therapy in 3-5 days, then liver biopsy should be pursued. The incidence of immune checkpoint-induced pancreatitis is low, but when it does occur, diagnosis is not straightforward. Although routine monitoring of pancreatic enzymes is not generally recommended, when pancreatitis is suspected, serum levels of amylase and lipase should be checked. Once confirmed, a steroid or other immunosuppressant (if steroids are contraindicated) should be administered along with close monitoring, and a slow tapering dosage once the pancreatitis is under control. Patients should then be monitored for recurrent pancreatitis. Finally, immune therapy-related cholangitis involves elevated bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase and, once diagnosed, is managed in the same way as immune-mediated hepatitis. KEY POINTS: Immune-mediated hepatitis, pancreatitis, and cholangitis are found in patients receiving or who have previously received immune checkpoint inhibitors. To work up immune-mediated hepatitis, viral, and autoimmune serologies, liver imaging will help to differentiate immune-mediated hepatitis from hepatitis of other etiology. Hepatology consult may be considered in patients with a history of chronic liver disease who developed hepatitis during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Liver biopsy should be considered to clarify the diagnosis for case in which the hepatitis is refractory to steroid or immunosuppressant treatment. Immune-mediated pancreatitis is treated with steroid or other immunosuppressant with a slow tapering and should be monitored for recurrence.

Prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection reactivation - recommendations of the Working Group for prevention of HBV reactivation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the main causes of chronic liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma. After infection the majority of HBV-infected patients achieve immune control leading to HBV-DNA stabilization at a low level. The risk of HBV reactivation rises significantly when HBV-infected patients receive immunosuppressive treatments. Presented recommendations provide guidelines for management of patients scheduled or undergoing therapies, which through their immunomodulatory activity contribute to the impairment of antiviral immunity, including chemotherapy, immunosuppressive treatment or biological therapy.