Efficacy and Cardiovascular Safety of Roxadustat in Dialysis-Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease: Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies

Roxadustat reduces left ventricular mass index compared to rHuEPO in haemodialysis patients in a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is highly prevalent in haemodialysis (HD) patients and is associated with an increased risk of death. Roxadustat and recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO, abbreviated as EPO) are the main treatment strategies for renal anaemia in HD patients, but it has not been clear whether there is a difference in their effect on LVH.

METHODS

In this multi-centre, prospective, randomized trial of 12-month duration, study participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the roxadustat group or the EPO group. The doses of both treatment regimens were adjusted so that the patients had a haemoglobin level of 10.0-12.0 g per dL. The primary study endpoint was the change from baseline to 12 months in the left ventricular mass index (LVMI, g/m2) measured by echocardiography.

RESULTS

In total, 114 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 50 years, and the median dialysis duration was 33 months. Sixty-one patients were men, and 24 were diabetic. LVMI decreased from 116.18 ± 27.84 to 110.70 ± 25.74 g/m2 in the roxadustat group. However, it increased from 109.35 ± 23.41 to 114.99 ± 28.46 g/m2 in the EPO group, with a significant difference in the change in LVMI between the two groups [-5.48 (-11.60 to 0.65) vs. 5.65 (0.74 to 10.55), p < 0.05]. Changes in left ventricular mass, end-diastolic volume and 6-min walk test seemed superior in the roxadustat group. There were no significant differences in other cardiac geometry, biochemical parameters and major adverse cardiovascular events between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to EPO, roxadustat is more helpful in the regression of LVH in HD patients.

Improving Kidney Disease Care: One Giant Leap for Nephrology

Nephrology is an ever-evolving field of medicine. The importance of such a discipline is related to the high clinical impact of kidney disease. In fact, abnormalities of kidney function and/or structure are common in the general population, reaching an overall prevalence of about 10%. More importantly, the onset of kidney damage is related to a strikingly high risk of cardiovascular events, mortality, and progression to kidney failure which, in turn, compromises quality and duration of life. Attempts to comprehend the pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms involved in kidney disease occurrence have prompted the development and implementation of novel drugs in clinical practice with the aim of treating the 'specific cause' of kidney disease (including chronic kidney disease, glomerular disease, and genetic kidney disorders) and the main immunological complications following kidney transplantation. Herein, we provide an overview of the principal emerging drug classes with proved efficacy in the context of the aforementioned clinical conditions. This can represent a simplified guide for clinical nephrologists to remind them of the vast and heterogeneous armamentarium of drugs that should be used in the present and the future to improve the management of patients suffering from kidney disease.

Risk Factors for Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Dialysis-Dependent CKD: Pooled Analysis of Phase 3 Roxadustat Trials in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Thromboembolic events have occurred in clinical trials of roxadustat. This post hoc analysis explored potential factors related to thromboembolic events in dialysis-dependent patients treated with roxadustat in four phase 3 clinical trials in Japan.

METHODS

Thromboembolic events with onset before and after week 12 were evaluated. Baseline risk factors for thromboembolic events were investigated by Cox regression analyses. Nested case-control analyses using conditional logistic models with matched pairs of case-control data explored relationships between thromboembolic events and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

Of the 444 patients, 56 thromboembolic events were observed in 44 patients during ≤ 52 weeks of treatment. The proportion of venous and arterial thromboembolic events gradually increased after week 12. Baseline risk factors included hemodialysis (vs peritoneal dialysis), advanced age (≥ 65 years), shorter dialysis vintage (< 4 months), and history of thromboembolism. The absence of concomitant intravenous or oral iron therapy (including ferric citrate) was associated with thromboembolic events before week 12 (hazard ratio 11.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.36-37.71; vs presence). Case-control analysis revealed that low average transferrin saturation (< 10%; unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 6.25; 95% CI 1.52-25.62; vs ≥ 20%), high average transferrin level (≥ 2.5 g/L; unadjusted OR 4.36; 95% CI 1.23-15.39; vs < 2.0 g/L), and high average roxadustat dose (≥ 150 mg; unadjusted OR 5.95; 95% CI 1.07-33.16; vs < 50 mg) over the previous 8 weeks before the event onset were associated with thromboembolic events after week 12. However, adjustment for iron status extinguished the significant relationship between roxadustat dose and events. Multivariate case-control analysis showed that increased transferrin from baseline (≥ 1.0 g/L; adjusted OR 7.85; 95% CI 1.82-33.90; vs < 0.5 g/dL) and decreased mean corpuscular volume (< - 2 fL; adjusted OR 5.55; 95% CI 1.73-17.83; vs ≥ 0 fL) were associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events.

CONCLUSION

In addition to established risk factors, iron deficiency may be related to thromboembolic events. Graphical Abstract available for this article.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02780726, NCT02952092, NCT02780141, NCT02779764.

Roxadustat for Patients with Posttransplant Anemia: A Narrative Review

Background

Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are novel oral agents used for renal anemia treatment. Roxadustat, a first-in-class HIF-PHI used for treating anemia in chronic kidney disease patients, has been approved in China, Japan, South Korea, Chile, and Europe. Roxadustat is involved in HIF degradation, which can stimulate endogenous erythropoietin (EPO) production and improve iron utilization. Besides, roxadustat can promote dietary iron uptake and transport. In comparison with traditional erythropoiesis-stimulating agent treatment, it might reduce cardiovascular risk and mortality as it causes only a slight increase in the plasma EPO level. Phase II and III clinical trial reports have shown that roxadustat is effective for treating chronic kidney disease patients. The role of roxadustat in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) needs to be examined as patients with chronic kidney disease are different from those receiving renal transplants.

Summary

Clinical trials have demonstrated that roxadustat effectively increases and maintains hemoglobin levels in patients with dialysis-dependent and non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease by stimulating endogenous EPO production and optimizing iron utilization. Roxadustat has recently been used effectively to treat patients with EPO-resistant anemia. It has also been used for treating patients with posttransplant anemia (PTA), which is a prognostic factor for mortality in KTRs with an iron deficiency and impaired glomerular filtration rate. Here, we examined the findings of four studies in a narrative review and discussed our perspectives regarding this field of study.

Key Messages

Roxadustat significantly improves hemoglobin levels without affecting renal function in KTRs with PTA. It also enhances iron utilization by decreasing ferritin and hepcidin levels and increasing total iron binding capacity, transferrin, and serum iron levels. Roxadustat ameliorates anemia and inflammation, and might have reno-protective effects in KTRs.

A novel scenario in the therapeutic management of anemia of chronic kidney disease: placement and use of roxadustat

Anemia is a frequent and early chronic kidney disease (CKD) complication. Its management is currently based on oral or intravenous iron supplements, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and red blood cell transfusions, when the benefits of transfusion outweigh the risks. Anemia in CKD patients is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Current standard of care is associated with challenges and therefore new treatment approaches have been sought. Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl-hydroxylase enzyme inhibitors are a new class of orally administered drugs used to treat anemia associated with CKD. Small-molecule hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitors have a novel mechanism of action that activates the hypoxia-inducible factor (oxygen-sensing) pathway resulting in a coordinated erythropoietic response, leading to increased endogenous erythropoietin production, improved iron absorption and transport, and reduced hepcidin. Roxadustat is the first hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and reimbursed in Italy by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) for the treatment of adult patients with symptomatic CKD-related anemia. This authorization was based on the outcome of a globally-conducted phase 3 clinical trial program comprising eight pivotal multicenter randomized studies. In the absence of up-to-date guidelines, we performed a critical appraisal of the placement and use of roxadustat in this therapeutic context.

A phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of roxadustat within a US dialysis organization: The DENALI study

INTRODUCTION

Roxadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor approved in several regions for the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). DENALI, a phase 3b study, evaluated the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of roxadustat in patients with anemia of CKD receiving in-center or home dialysis.

METHODS

Eligible patients received open-label roxadustat, dosed three times weekly for 24 weeks, with an optional extension of ≤1 year. Initial dosing depended on erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) dose at screening for patients receiving ESAs (≥6 weeks) and weight-based for those not (total <6 weeks). Primary efficacy endpoints were proportion of patients with mean hemoglobin (Hb) ≥10.0 g/dL averaged over Weeks 16-24, and mean Hb change from baseline to the average during Weeks 16-24. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were assessed.

FINDINGS

Of 281 patients screened, 203 were treated and 201 included in the full analysis set. Overall, 166 patients completed the 24-week treatment period and 126 continued into the extension period. Mean baseline Hb was 10.4 g/dL and 82.6% received in-center hemodialysis. Overall, 84.6% of patients achieved a mean Hb ≥ 10.0 g/dL averaged Weeks 16-24. Mean (standard deviation) Hb change from baseline averaged Weeks 16-24 was 0.5 (1.0) g/dL. Prespecified subgroup analyses were consistent with primary analyses. Dosing adherence was 94%. Overall, 3.0% of patients received a red blood cell transfusion at up to Week 24. TEAEs and TESAEs were reported by 71.4% and 25.6% of patients, respectively. The most frequently reported TESAEs were COVID-19 (n = 5; 2.5%), and acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and sepsis (each n = 4; 2.0%).

DISCUSSION

Roxadustat effectively achieved and/or maintained mean Hb levels ≥10.0 g/dL in patients receiving dialysis. The feasibility of incorporating oral roxadustat into dialysis organizations was successfully demonstrated with high dosing adherence. No new safety signals were identified.

Role of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Cardiovascular Protection in CKD Patients: Reappraisal of Their Impact and Mechanisms

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have markedly reduced the need for blood transfusion for renal anemia and are included in standard therapies for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Various protective effects of ESAs on the cardiovascular system have been discovered through basic research, and the effects have received much attention because the rates of cardiovascular events and mortality are high in CKD patients. However, randomized clinical trials did not provide strong evidence that ESAs exert cardioprotection in humans, including CKD patients. It is difficult to assess the cardioprotective effects of ESAs in CKD patients through the clinical data that has been reported to date because the relationship between hemoglobin level rather than ESA dose and cardiovascular event rates was examined in most studies. Interestingly, recent studies using a rat model of CKD showed that the infarct size-limiting effect of an ESA was lost when its dose was increased to a level that normalized blood hemoglobin levels, suggesting that the optimal dose of an ESA for myocardial protection is less than the dose required to normalize hemoglobin levels. Furthermore, animal models of traditional coronary risk factors or comorbidities were resistant to the cardioprotective effects of ESAs because of interruptions in signal-mediated mechanisms downstream of erythropoietin receptors. In this review, we briefly discuss basic and clinical data on the impact of anemia on coronary and systemic circulation, the effects of CKD on the cardiovascular system, and the multiple pharmacological actions of ESAs to examine whether the ESAs that are prescribed for renal anemia exert any cardioprotection in patients with CKD.

Novel anemia therapies in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

Anemia is common in patients with chronic kidney disease and is associated with a high burden of morbidity and adverse clinical outcomes. In 2012, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) published a guideline for the diagnosis and management of anemia in chronic kidney disease. Since then, new data from studies assessing established and emerging therapies for the treatment of anemia and iron deficiency have become available. Beginning in 2019, KDIGO planned 2 Controversies Conferences to review the new evidence and its potential impact on the management of anemia in clinical practice. Here, we report on the second of these conferences held virtually in December 2021, which focused on a new class of agents-the hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs). This report provides a review of the consensus points and controversies from this second conference and highlights areas that warrant prioritization for future research.

Cardiovascular safety of current and emerging drugs to treat anaemia in chronic kidney disease: a safety review

INTRODUCTION

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the standard of treatment for anemia in chronic kidney disease. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHI) are small molecules that stimulate endogenous erythropoietin synthesis.

AREAS COVERED

The cardiovascular safety of ESAs and HIF-PHIs. We performed a PubMed search using several key words, including anemia, chronic kidney disease, safety, erythropoiesis stimulating agents, HIF-PH inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

ESAs are well-tolerated drugs with a long history of use; there are safety concerns, especially when targeting high hemoglobin levels. HIF-PHIs have comparable efficacy to ESAs in correcting anemia. Contrary to expectations, randomized phase 3 clinical trials have shown that overall HIF-PHIs were non-inferior to ESA or placebo with respect to the risk of cardiovascular endpoints. In addition, some phase 3 trials raised potential safety concerns regarding cardiovascular and thrombotic events, particularly in non-dialysis patients.Today, HIF-PHIs represent an additional treatment option for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. This has made the management of anemia in CKD more complex and heterogeneous. A better understanding of the mechanisms causing hypo-responsiveness to ESAs, combined with an individualized approach that balances ESAs, HIF-PHIs and iron doses, could increase the benefits while reducing the risks.

Iron Parameters in Patients Treated with Roxadustat for Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease

Roxadustat is a novel agent with a distinct mechanism of action compared to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and a potentially different combination of effects on iron parameters. This narrative review describes the effects of roxadustat on iron parameters and on hemoglobin levels in the context of iron supplementation in patients with anemia of non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) or dialysis-dependent (DD) chronic kidney disease (CKD). Roxadustat use was associated with a greater reduction in serum ferritin levels than seen with ESAs and an increase in serum iron levels compared to a decrease with ESAs. Decreases in transferrin saturation in patients treated with roxadustat were relatively small and, in the case of patients with NDD CKD, not observed by Week 52. These changes reflect the concomitant increases in both serum iron and total iron-binding capacity. Compared to placebo and an ESA, roxadustat improved iron availability and increased erythropoiesis while requiring less intravenous iron use. Hepcidin levels generally decreased in patients who received roxadustat compared to baseline values in all CKD populations; these decreases appear to be more robust with roxadustat than with an ESA or placebo. The mechanisms behind the effects of roxadustat and ESAs on iron availability and stores and erythropoiesis appear to differ and should be considered holistically when treating anemia of CKD.

Comparison between the influence of roxadustat and recombinant human erythropoietin treatment on blood pressure and cardio-cerebrovascular complications in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis

Introduction

Roxadustat treatment in PD patients is equivalent to ESAs in increasing hemoglobin (Hb). But blood pressure, cardiovascular parameters, cardio-cerebrovascular complications and prognosis in the two groups before and after treatment has not been sufficiently discussed.

Methods

Sixty PD patients who were treated with roxadustat for renal anemia in our PD center recruited from June 2019 to April 2020 as roxadustat group. PD patients treated with rHuEPO were enrolled at a 1:1 ratio as rHuEPO group using the method of propensity score matching. Hb, blood pressure, cardiovascular parameters, cardio-cerebrovascular complications and prognosis were compared between the two group. All patients were followed up for at least 24 months.

Results

There were no significant differences in baseline clinical data or laboratory values between roxadustat group and rHuEPO group. After 24 months of follow-up, there was no significant difference in Hb levels (p > 0.05). There were no significant changes in blood pressure, or the incidence of nocturnal hypertension before and after treatment in roxadustat group (p > 0.05), while blood pressure significantly increased in rHuEPO group after treatment (p < 0.05). Compared with roxadustat group after follow-up, rHuEPO group had a higher incidence of hypertension, the levels of cardiovascular parameters were worse and cardio-cerebrovascular complications had a higher incidence (p < 0.05). Cox regression analysis showed age, systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and rHuEPO use before baseline were risk factors for cardio-cerebrovascular complications in PD patients, while treatment with roxadustat was a protective factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications.

Conclusion

Compared with rHuEPO, roxadustat had less influence on blood pressure or cardiovascular parameters, and it was associated with a lower risk of cardio-cerebrovascular complications in patients undergoing PD. Roxadustat has a cardio-cerebrovascular protective advantage in PD patients with renal anemia.

A critical review of Roxadustat formulations, solid state studies, and analytical methodology

This review aims to collate information about the analytical methodologies, bioanalytical methodologies, pharmaceutical formulations, solid-state studies, and the current and future market scenario for a relatively new class of drugs, Roxadustat. Roxadustat is a hypoxia-inducible factor propyl hydroxylase inhibitor that significantly increases blood hemoglobin via the action of transcriptional activator HIF. As the molecule has a promising role in stimulating erythropoiesis, it is considered an ideal therapeutic agent for patients with anemia. In the current review, an attempt has been made to compile the pharmacological, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic characteristics of Roxadustat and systematically present product development data. This drug has several polymorphs of cocrystal, co-former, and salt, which have been explained in detail in the current work. The comprehensive review summarizes all the chromatographic methods and is presented in table form. This review has extensively covered Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods used to analyze Roxadustat in the biological matrix. The literature needs more data on forced degradation study, impurity profiling, gas chromatography, analytical methods for assay, dissolution, and different formulation aspects of Roxadustat.

Jian-Pi-Yi-Shen formula restores iron metabolism from dysregulation in anemic rats with adenine-induced nephropathy

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Jian-Pi-Yi-Shen (JPYS) is a herbal decoction being used to relieve the symptoms of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its complications, including anemia, for over twenty years. Nonetheless, it is unclear how JPYS influences renal anemia and iron metabolism.

AIM OF THE STUDY

An analysis of network pharmacology, chemical profiling, and in vivo experiments was conducted to identify the impact of JPYS on JAK2-STAT3 pathway and iron utilization in renal anemia and CKD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The chemical properties of JPYS and its exposed ingredients were detected in vivo. And based on the aforesaid chemical compounds, the potential targets and signaling pathways of JPYS for renal anemia treatment were predicted by network pharmacology. Afterward, an adenine-feeding animal model of CKD-related anemia was developed to verify the mechanism by which JPYS modulates iron recycling to treat renal anemia. Renal injury was estimated by serum creatinine (Scr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), histopathological examinations and fibrosis degree. Western blot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and immunohistochemistry approaches were utilized to assess the levels of JAK2, STAT3 and iron metabolism-related factors.

RESULTS

There were 164 active ingredients identified in JPYS, including prototypes and metabolites in vivo were identified in JPYS, and 21 core targets were found through network pharmacology based on topological characteristics. Combined with the core targets and pathway enrichment analysis, the majority of the candidate targets were associated with the JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathways. Experimental results indicated that JPYS treatment significantly decreased the expression of BUN and Scr, restored renal pathological damage, down-regulated fibrosis degree, and improved hematological parameters such as red blood cell, hemoglobin and hematocrit in CKD rats. Furthermore, JPYS significantly restored iron metabolism from dysregulation by increasing the levels of iron and ferritin in the serum, inhibiting the production of hepcidin in liver and serum, and regulating transferrin receptor 1 in bone marrow. Meanwhile, the expression of JAK2 and STAT3 was suppressed by JPYS treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, JPYS reduces hepcidin levels by inhibiting the activation of JAK2-STAT3 signaling, thereby protecting against iron deficiency anemia.

Safety of Roxadustat Versus Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Patients with Anemia of Non-dialysis-Dependent or Incident-to-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease: Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies

INTRODUCTION

This study was conducted to elucidate the safety of roxadustat, an oral medication, in patients with non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) or incident dialysis dialysis-dependent (ID-DD) chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

Safety results from four phase 3, randomized, open-label studies comparing roxadustat to an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) in men and women with NDD or ID-DD CKD with anemia were pooled and evaluated. Endpoints were time to major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality) and MACE+ (MACE plus congestive heart failure or unstable angina requiring hospitalization), all-cause mortality, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). MACE and MACE+ were evaluated for non-inferiority at 1.8- and 1.3-margins using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). TEAEs were descriptively summarized.

RESULTS

In total, 2142 patients were evaluated (1083 roxadustat; 1059 ESA). Roxadustat was comparable to ESA for risk of MACE (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.61-1.02), MACE+ (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.57-1.05). TEAEs were comparable between roxadustat and ESA groups, including any TEAE [incidence rate per 100 (IR/100) patient-exposure years 56.1 vs. 53.5], TEAEs leading to study drug discontinuation (IR/100 patient-exposure years 6.7 vs. 5.1), and TEAEs leading to death (IR/100 patient-exposure years 6.9 vs. 7.4).

CONCLUSION

There was no evidence of increased risk of cardiovascular events or mortality with roxadustat compared with ESA in patients with anemia who have NDD or ID-DD CKD. Although TEAEs occurred commonly in both the roxadustat and ESA groups, patients infrequently discontinued the study drug because of an adverse event.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

DOLOMITES, 1517-CL-0610 [NCT02021318]; HIMALAYAS, FGCL-4592-063 [NCT02052310]; SIERRAS, FGCL-4592-064 [NCT02273726]; and ROCKIES, D5740C00002 [NCT02174731].

A network meta-analysis of the efficacy of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitors in dialysis chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Five types of HIF-PHIs have been authorized for anemia treatment in CKD patients in China and Japan. These are enarodustat, roxadustat, daprodustat, vadadustat, and molidustat. How effectively they compare to ESAs about clinical results in CKD-DD patients is uncertain. This study examined the RCT evidence about the benefits and risks of HIF-PHIs and ESAs in dialysis CKD patients.

METHODS

We conducted an extensive investigation and network meta-analysis of RCTs. In these RCTs, patients with CKD-DD received one of five different HIF-PHI or ESAs, a placebo, and no medical intervention. Outcomes included hemoglobin, iron parameters, and adverse events, and there were four weeks of follow-up at least. A frequentist framework for multivariate random effects meta-analyzed the results. The effect sizes of categorical variables were displayed as odds ratios. Mean differences were employed for computing continuous outcomes with common units; otherwise, standardized mean differences were applied. The Cochrane tool evaluated the bias risk in RCTs.

RESULTS

26 RCTs with 14945 patients were qualified for inclusion. Compared to the placebo, HIF-PHIs and ESAs dramatically boosted hemoglobin without affecting serum iron. Roxadustat performed better hemoglobin levels than ESAs (MD 0.32, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.53) and daprodustat (0.46, 0.09 to 0.84). Roxadustat (91.8%) was the top hemoglobin treatment among all medical interventions, as determined by the SUCRA ranking. However, roxadustat caused more thrombosis and hypertension than ESAs (1.61, 1.22 to 2.12) and vadadustat (1.36, 1.01 to 1.82). The lowest rates of hypertension and thrombosis were seen in molidustat (80.7%) and ESAs (88.5%). Compared with a placebo, ESAs and HIF-PHIs all affected TSAT levels. Except for molidustat, the other four HIF-PHIs impact different iron parameters. Regarding ferritin reduction, roxadustat (90.9%) and daprodustat (60.9%) came out on top. Enarodustat (80.9%) and roxadustat (74%) placed best and second in lowering hepcidin levels. The former two medicines for TIBC improvement were vadadustat (98.7%) and enarodustat (80.9%).

CONCLUSION

The most effective treatment for hemoglobin correction is roxadustat. The superior efficacy of reducing hepcidin makes roxadustat and enarodustat appropriate for patients with inflammation. However, the increased risk of hypertension and thrombosis associated with roxadustat should be noted. In patients at risk for hypertension and thrombosis, molidustat and ESAs may be preferable options. When administering roxadustat and daprodustat, clinicians should check ferritin to assess iron storage. Lower TSAT in patients receiving HIF-PHIs and ESAs treatment suggests intravenous iron supplements are needed.

Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors and Iron Metabolism

The production of erythropoietin (EPO), the main regulator of erythroid differentiation, is regulated by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). HIF2α seems to be the principal regulator of EPO transcription, but HIF1α and 3α also may have additional influences on erythroid maturation. HIF is also involved in the regulation of iron, an essential component in erythropoiesis. Iron is essential for the organism but is also highly toxic, so its absorption and retention are strictly controlled. HIF also induces the synthesis of proteins involved in iron regulation, thereby ensuring the availability of iron necessary for hematopoiesis. Iron is a major component of hemoglobin and is also involved in erythrocyte differentiation and proliferation and in the regulation of HIF. Renal anemia is a condition in which there is a lack of stimulation of EPO synthesis due to decreased HIF expression. HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) stabilize HIF and thereby allow it to be potent under normoxic conditions. Therefore, unlike erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, HIF-PHI may enhance iron absorption from the intestinal tract and iron supply from reticuloendothelial macrophages and hepatocytes into the plasma, thus facilitating the availability of iron for hematopoiesis. The only HIF-PHI currently on the market worldwide is roxadustat, but in Japan, five products are available. Clinical studies to date in Japan have also shown that HIF-PHIs not only promote hematopoiesis, but also decrease hepcidin, the main regulator of iron metabolism, and increase the total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), which indicates the iron transport capacity. However, concerns about the systemic effects of HIF-PHIs have not been completely dispelled, warranting further careful monitoring.

Updates on Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Renal Anemia

Background

Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease. The hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI) is a new class of oral drugs for the treatment of renal anemia.

Summary

Clinical trials have consistently shown that HIF-PHIs can effectively increase hemoglobin in both the dialysis population and the nondialysis population. The effects of HIF-PHIs in treating renal anemia include promoting endogenous erythropoietin production and facilitating iron mobilization. Several studies suggest that the erythropoiesis effect of roxadustat is less affected by inflammation. Careful monitoring of thromboembolic events and tumor before and during HIF-PHI treatment is necessary.

Key Messages

HIF-PHIs are effective in correcting renal anemia. The long-term safety of HIF-PHIs needs to be further studied.

Pleotropic effects of hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase domain inhibitors: are they clinically relevant?

Anemia is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is mainly caused by insufficient production of erythropoietin from fibrotic kidney. Because anemia impairs quality of life and overall prognosis, recombinant human erythropoietin-related products (erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, ESAs) have been developed to increase hemoglobin level for decades. However, many safety concerns have been announced regarding the use of ESAs, including an increased occurrence of cardiovascular events, vascular access thrombosis, cancer progression, and recurrence. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) is crucial to erythropoietin production, as a result, prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) enzyme inhibitors have been new therapeutic agents for the treatment of anemia in CKD. They can be administered orally, which is a preferred route for patients not undergoing hemodialysis. In clinical trials, PHD inhibitor could induce noninferior effect on erythropoiesis and improve functional iron deficiency compared with ESAs. Although no serious adverse events were reported, safety is still a concern because HIF stabilization induced by PHD inhibitor has pleotropic effects, such as angiogenesis, metabolic change, and cell survival, which might lead to unwanted deleterious effects, including fibrosis, inflammation, cardiovascular risk, and tumor growth. More molecular mechanisms of PHD inhibition and long-term clinical trials are needed to observe these pleotropic effects for the confirmation of safety and efficacy of PHD inhibitors.

Evolving Strategies in the Treatment of Anaemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: The HIF-Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects approximately 10% of the worldwide population; anaemia is a frequent complication. Inadequate erythropoietin production and absolute or functional iron deficiency are the major causes. Accordingly, the current treatment is based on iron and erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs). Available therapy has dramatically improved the management of anaemia and the quality of life. However, safety concerns were raised over ESA use, especially when aiming to reach near-to-normal haemoglobin levels with high doses. Moreover, many patients show hypo-responsiveness to ESA. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) were developed for the oral treatment of anaemia in CKD to overcome these concerns. They simulate the body's exposure to moderate hypoxia, stimulating the production of endogenous erythropoietin. Some molecules are already approved for clinical use in some countries. Data from clinical trials showed non-inferiority in anaemia correction compared to ESA or superiority for placebo. Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase domain inhibitors may also have additional advantages in inflamed patients, improving iron utilisation and mobilisation and decreasing LDL-cholesterol. Overall, non-inferiority was also shown in major cardiovascular events, except for one molecule in the non-dialysis population. This was an unexpected finding, considering the lower erythropoietin levels reached using these drugs due to their peculiar mechanism of action. More data and longer follow-ups are necessary to better clarifying safety issues and further investigate the variety of pathways activated by HIF, which could have either positive or negative effects and could differentiate HIF-PHIs from ESAs.

Effect of Roxadustat versus erythropoietin (EPO) for treating anemia in patients with diabetic kidney disease: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Renal anemia of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) shows higher incidence rate, earlier onset and higher severity than other chronic kidney disease (CKD). Roxadustat, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, improves CKD anemia. This retrospective cohort study evaluates if Roxadustat could effectively treat DKD anemia.

Methods

DKD anemia patients treated with either Roxadustat or erythropoietin (EPO) for 3 months in two hospitals were enrolled. EPO group were matched 1:1 to Roxadustat group based on age, gender and baseline Hb. Baseline data include age, sex, dialysis, height, weight, hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), serum albumin (ALB), serum creatinine (Scr), eGFR, C-reactive protein (CRP), and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH). Primary and secondary outcomes were change of Hb (ΔHb) and Hct (ΔHct), Hb response rate and Hb qualified rate. Sensitivity analyses were performed and the effect size were calculated.

Results

No significant differences were observed in body mass index (BMI), Scr, eGFR, Hct, CRP, and dialysis between the 2 groups (61 subjects each). ALB, iPTH, and DKD stage differed between the 2 groups. After 3-month treatment, Roxadustat significantly increased patients' Hb and Hct. Although ΔHb and ΔHct of the Roxadustat group was higher than those of EPO group, difference in the least-square mean changes (95% CI) were 4.9 (-2.4, 12.1) and 1.2 (-1.1, 3.4), while Cohen's d were 0.18 and 0.14, suggesting that Roxadustat's ability to increase Hb within 3-month was similar to EPO. 78.7% and 54.1% of the patients responded to anti-anemia therapy in the Roxadustat and EPO group, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed the Hb response rate of Roxadustat was 3.30 (1.20, 9.94) times higher than that of EPO. Subgroup analysis suggested that Roxadustat might have better efficacy in treating patients in the advanced stage, with high CRP and iPTH, and low ALB levels.

Conclusions

In DKD patients, Roxadustat improves renal anemia. Effect of Roxadustat is similar to that of EPO.

Comparison of risk of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis between roxadustat and recombinant human erythropoietin in peritoneal dialysis patients: a retrospective comparative cohort study

Background

Roxadustat and recombinant human erythropoietin (rhuEPO) have been approved for the treatment of renal anemia in patients undergoing dialysis. The comparison of risk of peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis between roxadustat and rhuEPO in PD patients remains uncertain. We aimed to compare the risk of PD-associated peritonitis between roxadustat and rhuEPO and examine possible modifiers for the comparison in PD patients.

Methods

A total of 437 PD patients with renal anemia (defined as hemoglobin ≤10.0 g/dL) from 4 centers were selected. Participants were scheduled for follow-up every 1-3 months at each center. We compared differences in baseline characteristics by medication group and 1:1 matching group based on propensity scores. PD-associated peritonitis was defined according to the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to compare the risk of PD-associated peritonitis between roxadustat and rhuEPO in PD patients. Propensity score matching method was used to examine the robustness of results.

Results

A total of 437 participants, including 291 in roxadustat group and 146 in rhuEPO group, were included in the current study, respectively. During a median follow-up of 13.0 (25th-75th, 10.0-15.0) months, PD-associated peritonitis occurred in 68 patients, including 26 of 291 (0.10 episodes per patient-year) patients in the roxadustat group and 42 of 146 (0.27 episodes per patient-year) patients in the rhuEPO group. Overall, compared to patients in the rhuEPO group, the roxadustat group (hazard ratio, 0.345; 95% confidence interval: 0.202-0.589) was associated with a lower risk of PD-associated peritonitis with adjustment of use of roxadustat medication, age, sex, hypertension status, diabetes status, dialysis vintage, serum potassium, hemoglobin, and albumin. Furthermore, the results were consistent with the propensity score analysis. None of the variables, including age, sex, body mass index, PD vintage, presence of residual renal function, hemoglobin, albumin, serum potassium, and C-reactive protein levels, significantly modified the associations.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that compared with rhuEPO, roxadustat may reduce the risk of PD-associated peritonitis in PD patients, highlighting the importance of roxadustat for the prevention of PD-associated peritonitis in PD patients.

Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Prolyl Hydroxyl Domain Inhibitors: From Theoretical Superiority to Clinical Noninferiority Compared with Current ESAs?

Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease; it is mainly treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and iron. Experimental studies extensively investigated the mechanisms involved in the body's response to hypoxia and led to the discovery of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) pathway and the enzymes regulating its function. HIF-prolyl-hydroxyl domain (PHD) inhibitors are a new class of oral drugs developed to treat anemia in chronic kidney disease. By inhibiting the function of PHD enzymes, they mimic the exposure to moderate hypoxia and stimulate the production of endogenous erythropoietin and very likely increase iron availability. Some data also suggest that their efficacy and, consequently, dose needs are less influenced by inflammation than ESAs. Overall, data from phases 2 and 3 clinical development showed efficacy in anemia correction and maintenance for all of the class molecules compared with placebo (superiority) or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (noninferiority). Three molecules, roxadustat, vadadustat, and daprodustat, underwent extensive clinical investigation to assess their safety on hard cardiovascular end points, mortality, and special interest events (including cancer and thrombosis). Aside from vadadustat in the nondialysis population, at the prespecified primary analyses, all three molecules met the noninferiority margin for the risk of major cardiovascular events compared with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents or placebo. The reason for this discrepancy is difficult to explain. Other safety signals came from secondary analyses of some of the other randomized clinical trials, including a higher incidence of thrombosis. A more extensive clinical experience with post-marketing data on hard safety issues is needed to define better when and how to use HIF-PHD inhibitors compared with already available ESAs.

Novel strategies in nephrology: what to expect from the future?

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) will become the fifth global case of death by 2040. Its largest impact is on premature mortality but the number of persons with kidney failure requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) is also increasing dramatically. Current RRT is suboptimal due to the shortage of kidney donors and dismal outcomes associated with both hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney care needs a revolution. In this review, we provide an update on emerging knowledge and technologies that will allow an earlier diagnosis of CKD, addressing the current so-called blind spot (e.g. imaging and biomarkers), and improve renal replacement therapies (wearable artificial kidneys, xenotransplantation, stem cell-derived therapies, bioengineered and bio-artificial kidneys).

Risk of infection in roxadustat treatment for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Background: Many studies demonstrated that roxadustat (FG-4592) could increase hemoglobin (Hb) levels effectively in anemia patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, its safety remains controversial. This study aims to explore the risk of infection for CKD patients treated with roxadustat, especially focused on sepsis.

Methods: We thoroughly searched for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment with roxadustat versus erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) or placebo in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, European Union Clinical Trials Register. Both on and not on dialysis anemia patients with CKD were included. Primary outcomes contained the incidence rates of sepsis. Secondary outcomes included infection-related consequences (septic shock and other infection events), general safety outcomes [all-cause mortality, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs)] and iron parameters. Moreover, a trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to assess if the results were supposed to be a robust conclusion.

Results: Eighteen RCTs (n = 11,305) were included. Overall, the incidence of sepsis (RR: 2.42, 95% CI [1.50, 3.89], p = 0.0003) and cellulitis (RR: 2.07, 95% CI [1.24, 3.44], p = 0.005) were increased in the roxadustat group compared with placebo group. In non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) CKD patients, the incidence of cellulitis (RR 2.01, 95% CI [1.23, 3.28], p = 0.005) was significantly higher in roxadustat group than that in the ESAs or placebo group. Both groups showed similar results in the incidence of septic shock (RR 1.29, 95% CI [0.86, 1.94], p = 0.22). A significant increased risk of all-cause mortality [risk ratios (RR): 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.05, 1.26], p = 0.002] was found in roxadustat treatment, and TSA confirmed the result. Compared with ESAs or placebo, both the incident rates of TEAEs (RR:1.03, 95% CI [1.01, 1.04], p = 0.008) and TESAEs (RR: 1.06, 95% CI [1.02, 1.11], p = 0.002) were significantly increased in roxadustat group. As for iron parameters, changes from baseline (Δ) of hepcidin (MD: -26.46, 95% CI [-39.83, -13.09], p = 0.0001), Δ ferritin and Δ TSAT were remarkably lower in the roxadustat group, while Δ Hb, Δ iron and Δ TIBC increased significantly versus those in ESAs or placebo group.

Conclusion: We found evidence that incidence rates of sepsis and cellulitis are higher in roxadustat group compared with placebo. This may be the result of improved iron homeostasis. The risk of all-cause mortality, TEAEs and TESAEs in CKD patients also increased in patients treated with roxadustat. We need more clinical and mechanistic studies to confirm whether roxadustat really causes infection.

Roxadustat: Not just for anemia

Roxadustat is a recently approved hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that has demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy in the treatment of renal anemia. Recent studies found it also has potential for the treatment of other hypoxia-related diseases. Although clinical studies have not yet found significant adverse or off-target effects of roxadustat, clinicians must be vigilant about these possible effects. Hypoxia-inducible factor regulates the expression of many genes and physiological processes in response to a decreased level of oxygen, but its role in the pathogenesis of different diseases is complex and controversial. In addition to increasing the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor, roxadustat also has some effects that may be HIF-independent, indicating some potential off-target effects. This article reviews the pharmacological characteristics of roxadustat, its current status in the treatment of renal anemia, and its possible effects on other pathological mechanisms.

Roxadustat regulates iron metabolism in dialysis-dependent and non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The effect of roxadustat on iron homeostasis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of roxadustat for the treatment of iron metabolism disorders in dialysis-dependent (DD) and non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) CKD patients.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Internet and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes were changes in serum iron, total iron binding capacity (TIBC), transferrin saturation (TSAT), ferritin, transferrin, and hepcidin. The secondary outcomes included the changes in hemoglobin (Hb) and the incidences of adverse events (AEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs).

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs comprising 4976 participants were included. Compared to the control group, increases in the serum iron (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.27, P < 0.00001), TIBC (SMD = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.22, P < 0.00001) and transferrin levels (WMD = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.69, P < 0.00001) were found in the roxadustat group. Compared to the control group, decreases in the ferritin levels (WMD = -37.82, 95% CI: -59.89 to -15.74, P = 0.0008) and hepcidin levels (WMD = -24.04, 95% CI: -36.28 to -11.79, P = 0.0001) were observed in the roxadustat group. The meta-analysis showed that roxadustat significantly increases Hb levels (WMD = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.12, P < 0.0001). The incidences of AEs and SAEs in the roxadustat group was significantly higher than that in the control group (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.07, P = 0.04; RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.15, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that roxadustat could effectively improve iron metabolism in patients with CKD.

New Approaches to Diabetic Nephropathy from Bed to Bench

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the main cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). DN-related ESKD has the worst prognosis for survival compared with other causes. Due to the complex mechanisms of DN and the heterogeneous presentations, unmet needs exist for the renal outcome of diabetes mellitus. Clinical evidence for treating DN is rather solid. For example, the first Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline was published in October 2020: KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease. In December of 2020, the International Society of Nephrology published 60 (+1) breakthrough discoveries in nephrology. Among these breakthroughs, four important ones after 1980 were recognized, including glomerular hyperfiltration theory, renal protection by renin-angiotensin system inhibition, hypoxia-inducible factor, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Here, we present a review on the pivotal and new mechanisms of DN from the implications of clinical studies and medications.

Are there advantages of daprodustat over erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in treating anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD)?

Anemia is common in CKD and increases the risk of developing heart disease. Although ESAs relieve the symptoms of anemia, they have adverse effects and do not reduce the adverse outcomes associated with anemia. This evaluation is of the phase 3 ASCEND clinical trials of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor daprodustat versus ESAs in subjects with CKD undergoing dialysis or not. Daprodustat was non-inferior to ESAs in increasing hemoglobin, and in the incidence of cardiovascular events and adverse effects. Daprodustat is effective in subjects who are hyporesponsive to ESAs, and this is one circumstance when daprodustat may be preferred to ESAs. However, to become a widely used medicine in subjects with CKD responsive to ESAs, daprodustat needs to be well tolerated, used by a high percentage of subjects over a long time, and be superior to ESAs in improving clinical outcomes. As this may not be the case, there is not a strong basis for recommending daprodustat over ESAs. The other 'dustats' (roxadustat, vadadustat) have also not been shown to be superior to the ESAs, and none have been approved by the FDA to date.

Experience With the Use of a Novel Agent, Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor, for Posttransplant Anemia in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Case Report

In this study, we report on an experience with the use of a novel agent "roxadustat," a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI), for posttransplant anemia (PTA) in renal transplant recipients. Five renal transplant recipients treated as outpatients receiving 150 or 250 µg of "epoetin beta pegol," an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), once every 3 months were converted to roxadustat, an HIF-PHI. The dose was 100 mg 3 times a week taken orally on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Data check was conducted at 1 month and every 3 months after its introduction, and hemoglobin (Hb), ferritin, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) levels were compared. At 1 month after conversion to roxadustat, Hb levels increased in all cases, the use of roxadustat was suspended/decreased in 2 cases who had Hb overshoot at 1 month, and ferritin and TSAT levels decreased in the initial stage of roxadustat conversion. During a 9-month period, Hb levels tended to increase in cases receiving oral iron administration, graft function was hardly affected, and there were no complications such as thrombosis. In conclusion, conversion from ESA to roxadustat was effective in the treatment of PTA. However, our overshoot case suggested that it might be better to start at a low dose in patients with low body weight, those undergoing iron administration, and those receiving a low dose of ESA. Furthermore, the low levels of ferritin and TSAT we observed at an early stage after roxadustat conversion suggested that there was an increased efficiency in iron utilization.

New developments in anaemia treatment - erythropoietin versus prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors?

Anaemia is a very common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal failure. The view of the treatment of anaemia has changed considerably since the introduction of ESAs (erythropoiesis-stimulating agents) into clinical practice, and the safety of this treatment is now prioritised over complete normalisation of haemoglobin (Hb) values. Iron administration is the mainstay of treatment in this group of patients, with intravenous administration proving to be both more effective and safer in both predialysis and dialysis patients. In addition to the long-used ESAs, a number of new agents developed to favourably influence erythropoiesis have recently been tested for the correction of anaemia. Among those with the greatest potential are the HIF-stabilizers (roxadustat, molidustat, vadadustat and daprodustat), which act through stimulation of erythropoiesis genes and thus represent a novel mechanism of action in the treatment of anaemia. In phase 3 clinical trials, these agents have shown the same efficacy in increasing Hb levels as ESAs, but much emphasis has recently been placed on their safety profile. They are orally administered agents and some of them are already approved and used in clinical practice. The first of these, roxadustat, is currently reimbursed also in the Czech Republic. Other molecules affecting anaemia, such as sotatercept, have also been confirmed to be effective in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials and are awaiting results from larger randomised trials.

Roxadustat for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease on Stable Dialysis: A European Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study (PYRENEES)

Introduction

Roxadustat is an orally administered hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor being developed for the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This European, phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study investigated efficacy and safety of roxadustat in patients with end-stage kidney disease on dialysis for at least 4 months.

Methods

Patients were randomized to switch from an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) (epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa) to roxadustat three times/week or to continue their previous ESA. Roxadustat and ESA doses were adjusted to maintain hemoglobin within 10.0–12.0 g/dL during the treatment period (day 1 up to 52–104 weeks). Primary endpoints were hemoglobin change from baseline (CFB) to the average of weeks 28–36 without rescue therapy and hemoglobin CFB to the average of weeks 28–52 regardless of rescue therapy. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed descriptively.

Results

Of 1081 screened patients, 836 were randomized and received treatment (roxadustat, n = 415; ESA, n = 421). The least squares means (95% CI) of the treatment difference (roxadustat − ESA) for hemoglobin CFB to weeks 28–36 (without rescue therapy) and CFB to weeks 28–52 (regardless of rescue therapy) were 0.235 (0.132, 0.339) g/dL and 0.171 (0.082, 0.261) g/dL, respectively, demonstrating non-inferiority of roxadustat to ESA (non-inferiority margin of − 0.75 g/dL). The proportions of patients who achieved target hemoglobin without rescue therapy during weeks 28–36 were 84.2% (roxadustat) and 82.4% (ESA). Roxadustat was superior to ESA in decreasing LDL cholesterol from baseline to the average of weeks 12–28. Serious TEAEs occurred in 50.7% (roxadustat) and 45.0% (ESA) of patients. Common TEAEs in both treatment groups included hypertension, arteriovenous fistula thrombosis, headache, and diarrhea.

Conclusion

Roxadustat was non-inferior to ESAs in maintaining hemoglobin levels in this cohort of patients with anemia of CKD on dialysis for at least 4 months who were previously treated with ESAs. Observed TEAEs were consistent with previous studies.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01904-6.