Corticotectal and corticothalamic efferent projections of SIV somatosensory cortex in cat

Functional organization and connectivity of the dorsal column nuclei complex reveals a sensorimotor integration and distribution hub

The dorsal column nuclei complex (DCN-complex) includes the dorsal column nuclei (DCN, referring to the gracile and cuneate nuclei collectively), external cuneate, X, and Z nuclei, and the median accessory nucleus. The DCN are organized by both somatotopy and modality, and have a diverse range of afferent inputs and projection targets. The functional organization and connectivity of the DCN implicate them in a variety of sensorimotor functions, beyond their commonly accepted role in processing and transmitting somatosensory information to the thalamus, yet this is largely underappreciated in the literature. To consolidate insights into their sensorimotor functions, this review examines the morphology, organization, and connectivity of the DCN and their associated nuclei. First, we briefly discuss the receptors, afferent fibers, and pathways involved in conveying tactile and proprioceptive information to the DCN. Next, we review the modality and somatotopic arrangements of the remaining constituents of the DCN-complex. Finally, we examine and discuss the functional implications of the myriad of DCN-complex projection targets throughout the diencephalon, midbrain, and hindbrain, in addition to their modulatory inputs from the cortex. The organization and connectivity of the DCN-complex suggest that these nuclei should be considered a complex integration and distribution hub for sensorimotor information.

From Near-Optimal Bayesian Integration to Neuromorphic Hardware: A Neural Network Model of Multisensory Integration

While interacting with the world our senses and nervous system are constantly challenged to identify the origin and coherence of sensory input signals of various intensities. This problem becomes apparent when stimuli from different modalities need to be combined, e.g., to find out whether an auditory stimulus and a visual stimulus belong to the same object. To cope with this problem, humans and most other animal species are equipped with complex neural circuits to enable fast and reliable combination of signals from various sensory organs. This multisensory integration starts in the brain stem to facilitate unconscious reflexes and continues on ascending pathways to cortical areas for further processing. To investigate the underlying mechanisms in detail, we developed a canonical neural network model for multisensory integration that resembles neurophysiological findings. For example, the model comprises multisensory integration neurons that receive excitatory and inhibitory inputs from unimodal auditory and visual neurons, respectively, as well as feedback from cortex. Such feedback projections facilitate multisensory response enhancement and lead to the commonly observed inverse effectiveness of neural activity in multisensory neurons. Two versions of the model are implemented, a rate-based neural network model for qualitative analysis and a variant that employs spiking neurons for deployment on a neuromorphic processing. This dual approach allows to create an evaluation environment with the ability to test model performances with real world inputs. As a platform for deployment we chose IBM's neurosynaptic chip TrueNorth. Behavioral studies in humans indicate that temporal and spatial offsets as well as reliability of stimuli are critical parameters for integrating signals from different modalities. The model reproduces such behavior in experiments with different sets of stimuli. In particular, model performance for stimuli with varying spatial offset is tested. In addition, we demonstrate that due to the emergent properties of network dynamics model performance is close to optimal Bayesian inference for integration of multimodal sensory signals. Furthermore, the implementation of the model on a neuromorphic processing chip enables a complete neuromorphic processing cascade from sensory perception to multisensory integration and the evaluation of model performance for real world inputs.

Using superior colliculus principles of multisensory integration to reverse hemianopia

The diversity of our senses conveys many advantages; it enables them to compensate for one another when needed, and the information they provide about a common event can be integrated to facilitate its processing and, ultimately, adaptive responses. These cooperative interactions are produced by multisensory neurons. A well-studied model in this context is the multisensory neuron in the output layers of the superior colliculus (SC). These neurons integrate and amplify their cross-modal (e.g., visual-auditory) inputs, thereby enhancing the physiological salience of the initiating event and the probability that it will elicit SC-mediated detection, localization, and orientation behavior. Repeated experience with the same visual-auditory stimulus can also increase the neuron's sensitivity to these individual inputs. This observation raised the possibility that such plasticity could be engaged to restore visual responsiveness when compromised. For example, unilateral lesions of visual cortex compromise the visual responsiveness of neurons in the multisensory output layers of the ipsilesional SC and produces profound contralesional blindness (hemianopia). The possibility that multisensory plasticity could restore the visual responses of these neurons, and reverse blindness, was tested in the cat model of hemianopia. Hemianopic subjects were repeatedly presented with spatiotemporally congruent visual-auditory stimulus pairs in the blinded hemifield on a daily or weekly basis. After several weeks of this multisensory exposure paradigm, visual responsiveness was restored in SC neurons and behavioral responses were elicited by visual stimuli in the previously blind hemifield. The constraints on the effectiveness of this procedure proved to be the same as those constraining SC multisensory plasticity: whereas repetitions of a congruent visual-auditory stimulus was highly effective, neither exposure to its individual component stimuli, nor to these stimuli in non-congruent configurations was effective. The restored visual responsiveness proved to be robust, highly competitive with that in the intact hemifield, and sufficient to support visual discrimination.

Do the Different Sensory Areas Within the Cat Anterior Ectosylvian Sulcal Cortex Collectively Represent a Network Multisensory Hub?

Current theory supports that the numerous functional areas of the cerebral cortex are organized and function as a network. Using connectional databases and computational approaches, the cerebral network has been demonstrated to exhibit a hierarchical structure composed of areas, clusters and, ultimately, hubs. Hubs are highly connected, higher-order regions that also facilitate communication between different sensory modalities. One region computationally identified network hub is the visual area of the Anterior Ectosylvian Sulcal cortex (AESc) of the cat. The Anterior Ectosylvian Visual area (AEV) is but one component of the AESc that also includes the auditory (Field of the Anterior Ectosylvian Sulcus - FAES) and somatosensory (Fourth somatosensory representation - SIV). To better understand the nature of cortical network hubs, the present report reviews the biological features of the AESc. Within the AESc, each area has extensive external cortical connections as well as among one another. Each of these core representations is separated by a transition zone characterized by bimodal neurons that share sensory properties of both adjoining core areas. Finally, core and transition zones are underlain by a continuous sheet of layer 5 neurons that project to common output structures. Altogether, these shared properties suggest that the collective AESc region represents a multiple sensory/multisensory cortical network hub. Ultimately, such an interconnected, composite structure adds complexity and biological detail to the understanding of cortical network hubs and their function in cortical processing.

A Model of the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Multisensory Integration in the Superior Colliculus

Much of the information about multisensory integration is derived from studies of the cat superior colliculus (SC), a midbrain structure involved in orientation behaviors. This integration is apparent in the enhanced responses of SC neurons to cross-modal stimuli, responses that exceed those to any of the modality-specific component stimuli. The simplest model of multisensory integration is one in which the SC neuron simply sums its various sensory inputs. However, a number of empirical findings reveal the inadequacy of such a model; for example, the finding that deactivation of cortico-collicular inputs eliminates the enhanced response to a cross-modal stimulus without eliminating responses to the modality-specific component stimuli. These and other empirical findings inform a computational model that accounts for all of the most fundamental aspects of SC multisensory integration. The model is presented in two forms: an algebraic form that conveys the essential insights, and a compartmental form that represents the neuronal computations in a more biologically realistic way.

A quantitative comparison of the hemispheric, areal, and laminar origins of sensory and motor cortical projections to the superior colliculus of the cat

The superior colliculus (SC) is a midbrain structure central to orienting behaviors. The organization of descending projections from sensory cortices to the SC has garnered much attention; however, rarely have projections from multiple modalities been quantified and contrasted, allowing for meaningful conclusions within a single species. Here, we examine corticotectal projections from visual, auditory, somatosensory, motor, and limbic cortices via retrograde pathway tracers injected throughout the superficial and deep layers of the cat SC. As anticipated, the majority of cortical inputs to the SC originate in the visual cortex. In fact, each field implicated in visual orienting behavior makes a substantial projection. Conversely, only one area of the auditory orienting system, the auditory field of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (fAES), and no area involved in somatosensory orienting, shows significant corticotectal inputs. Although small relative to visual inputs, the projection from the fAES is of particular interest, as it represents the only bilateral cortical input to the SC. This detailed, quantitative study allows for comparison across modalities in an animal that serves as a useful model for both auditory and visual perception. Moreover, the differences in patterns of corticotectal projections between modalities inform the ways in which orienting systems are modulated by cortical feedback. J. Comp. Neurol. 524:2623-2642, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Development of multisensory integration from the perspective of the individual neuron

The ability to use cues from multiple senses in concert is a fundamental aspect of brain function. It maximizes the brain’s use of the information available to it at any given moment and enhances the physiological salience of external events. Because each sense conveys a unique perspective of the external world, synthesizing information across senses affords computational benefits that cannot otherwise be achieved. Multisensory integration not only has substantial survival value but can also create unique experiences that emerge when signals from different sensory channels are bound together. However, neurons in a newborn’s brain are not capable of multisensory integration, and studies in the midbrain have shown that the development of this process is not predetermined. Rather, its emergence and maturation critically depend on cross-modal experiences that alter the underlying neural circuit in such a way that optimizes multisensory integrative capabilities for the environment in which the animal will function.

Laminar and connectional organization of a multisensory cortex

The transformation of sensory signals as they pass through cortical circuits has been revealed almost exclusively through studies of the primary sensory cortices, for which principles of laminar organization, local connectivity, and parallel processing have been elucidated. In contrast, almost nothing is known about the circuitry or laminar features of multisensory processing in higher order, multisensory cortex. Therefore, using the ferret higher order multisensory rostral posterior parietal (PPr) cortex, the present investigation employed a combination of multichannel recording and neuroanatomical techniques to elucidate the laminar basis of multisensory cortical processing. The proportion of multisensory neurons, the share of neurons showing multisensory integration, and the magnitude of multisensory integration were all found to differ by layer in a way that matched the functional or connectional characteristics of the PPr. Specifically, the supragranular layers (L2/3) demonstrated among the highest proportions of multisensory neurons and the highest incidence of multisensory response enhancement, while also receiving the highest levels of extrinsic inputs, exhibiting the highest dendritic spine densities, and providing a major source of local connectivity. In contrast, layer 6 showed the highest proportion of unisensory neurons while receiving the fewest external and local projections and exhibiting the lowest dendritic spine densities. Coupled with a lack of input from principal thalamic nuclei and a minimal layer 4, these observations indicate that this higher level multisensory cortex shows functional and organizational modifications from the well-known patterns identified for primary sensory cortical regions.

Physiological evidence for a trans-basal ganglia pathway linking extrastriate visual cortex and the superior colliculus

Visually responsive regions along the cat's lateral suprasylvian (LS) sulcus provide excitatory inputs to the deep layers of the superior colliculus (SC). It is via this direct cortico-collicular route that LS cortex is thought to enhance the visual activity of SC output neurons and thereby facilitate SC-mediated orientation behaviours. However, it has long been suggested that LS also might influence the SC via an 'indirect' route through the basal ganglia. Such a multi-synaptic route would ultimately modulate SC activity via basal ganglia output neurons in substantia nigra, pars reticulata. Using cortical electrical stimulation, the present experiments in the anaesthetized cat provide a physiological confirmation of this indirect route. Moreover, the patterns of activity evoked in antidromically identified nigro-collicular neurons indicate the involvement of multiple trans-basal ganglia pathways. The most complex evoked patterns consisted of a variable period of inhibition preceded and followed by periods of excitation. Although many neurons displayed only components of this triphasic response, these electrically evoked responses generally matched the characteristics of their responses to natural visual stimuli. Cortical stimulation evoked excitation in all of crossed nigro-collicular neurons and inhibition in the majority of uncrossed nigro-collicular neurons. These data suggest that LS activity accesses multiple trans-basal ganglia circuits that shape nigro-collicular responses that are appropriate for their SC targets. In this way, visual stimuli in one hemifield can be selected as targets for SC-mediated orientation, while simultaneously inhibiting activity in the opposite SC that might generate responses to competing targets.

Cortico-cortical relations of cat somatosensory areas SIV and SV

Sensory cortex is characterized by multiple representations of a given modality which are generally highly interconnected and hierarchically arranged. The cat cerebral cortex contains at least five major areas dedicated to somatosensory processing, yet aside from areas SI and SII, little is known regarding the interconnectivity of the other, higher-level regions, such as SIV and SV. Therefore, this investigation examined the anatomical relationship of somatosensory areas SIV and SV to each other. In adult cats, wheatgerm agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) injected into SIV produced retrogradely labeled neurons in SV in a bilaminar pattern. When biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) was injected into SV, orthogradely labeled axon terminals were found in SIV across all laminae but predominated in supragranular locations. In the reciprocal direction, neurons located in both the supra- and infragranular layers of SIV projected across all laminae of SV, but also in a manner that favored the supragranular layers. Because local inhibitory circuits are critical for specific somatosensory response properties, the distribution of GABA-ergic neurons and their co-localized markers calbindin (CB), calretinin (CR) and parvalbumin (PV) was also compared for SIV and SV using immunocytochemical techniques. Although fundamental differences in laminar arrangement were observed between the different GABA-ergic subtypes, the distribution for each subtype was essentially the same in both SIV and SV. Collectively, these connectional, cytoarchitectonic and organizational similarities indicate that SIV and SV are reciprocally connected and share many somatosensory processing and connectional features.

Multisensory integration in the superior colliculus requires synergy among corticocollicular inputs

Influences from the visual (AEV), auditory (FAES), and somatosensory (SIV) divisions of the cat anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) play a critical role in rendering superior colliculus (SC) neurons capable of multisensory integration. However, it is not known whether this is accomplished via their independent sensory-specific action or via some cross-modal cooperative action that emerges as a consequence of their convergence on SC neurons. Using visual-auditory SC neurons as a model, we examined how selective and combined deactivation of FAES and AEV affected SC multisensory (visual-auditory) and unisensory (visual-visual) integration capabilities. As noted earlier, multisensory integration yielded SC responses that were significantly greater than those evoked by the most effective individual component stimulus. This multisensory "response enhancement" was more evident when the component stimuli were weakly effective. Conversely, unisensory integration was dominated by the lack of response enhancement. During cryogenic deactivation of FAES and/or AEV, the unisensory responses of SC neurons were only modestly affected; however, their multisensory response enhancement showed a significant downward shift and was eliminated. The shift was similar in magnitude for deactivation of either AES subregion and, in general, only marginally greater when both were deactivated simultaneously. These data reveal that SC multisensory integration is dependent on the cooperative action of distinct subsets of unisensory corticofugal afferents, afferents whose sensory combination matches the multisensory profile of their midbrain target neurons, and whose functional synergy is specific to rendering SC neurons capable of synthesizing information from those particular senses.

Axon morphologies and convergence patterns of projections from different sensory-specific cortices of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus onto multisensory neurons in the cat superior colliculus

Corticofugal projections to the thalamus reveal 2 axonal morphologies, each associated with specific physiological attributes. These determine the functional characteristics of thalamic neurons. It is not clear, however, whether such features characterize the corticofugal projections that mediate multisensory integration in superior colliculus (SC) neurons. The cortico-collicular projections from cat anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) are derived from its visual, auditory, and somatosensory representations and are critical for multisensory integration. Following tracer injections into each subdivision, 2 types of cortico-collicular axons were observed. Most were categorized as type I and consisted of small-caliber axons traversing long distances without branching, bearing mainly small boutons. The less frequent type II had thicker axons, more complex branching patterns, larger boutons, and more complex terminal boutons. Following combinatorial injections of 2 different fluorescent tracers into defined AES subdivisions, fibers from each were seen converging onto individual SC neurons and indicate that such convergence, like that in the corticothalamic system, is mediated by 2 distinct morphological types of axon terminals. Nevertheless, and despite the conservation of axonal morphologies across different subcortical systems, it is not yet clear if the concomitant physiological attributes described in the thalamus are directly applicable to multisensory integration.

Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron

For thousands of years science philosophers have been impressed by how effectively the senses work together to enhance the salience of biologically meaningful events. However, they really had no idea how this was accomplished. Recent insights into the underlying physiological mechanisms reveal that, in at least one circuit, this ability depends on an intimate dialogue among neurons at multiple levels of the neuraxis; this dialogue cannot take place until long after birth and might require a specific kind of experience. Understanding the acquisition and usage of multisensory integration in the midbrain and cerebral cortex of mammals has been aided by a multiplicity of approaches. Here we examine some of the fundamental advances that have been made and some of the challenging questions that remain.

Cortex contacts both output neurons and nitrergic interneurons in the superior colliculus: direct and indirect routes for multisensory integration

The ability of cat superior colliculus (SC) neurons to integrate information from different senses is thought to depend on direct projections from regions along the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES). However, electrical stimulation of AES also activates SC output neurons polysynaptically. In the present study, we found that nitric oxide (NO)-containing (nitrergic) interneurons are a target of AES projections, forming a component of this cortico-SC circuitry. The dendritic and axonal processes of these corticorecipient nitrergic interneurons apposed the soma and dendrites of presumptive SC output neurons. Often, an individual cortical fiber targeted both an output neuron and a neighboring nitrergic interneuron that, in turn, contacted the output neuron. Many (46%) nitrergic neurons also colocalized with gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), suggesting that a substantial subset have the potential for inhibiting output neurons. These observations suggest that nitrergic interneurons are positioned to convey cortical influences onto SC output neurons disynaptically via nitrergic mechanisms as well as conventional neurotransmitter systems utilizing GABA and other, possibly excitatory, neurotransmitters. In addition, because NO also acts as a retrograde messenger, cortically mediated NO release from the postsynaptic elements of nitrergic interneurons could influence presynaptic cortico-SC terminals that directly contact output neurons.

Multisensory Versus Unisensory Integration: Contrasting Modes in the Superior Colliculus

The present study suggests that the neural computations used to integrate information from different senses are distinct from those used to integrate information from within the same sense. Using superior colliculus neurons as a model, it was found that multisensory integration of cross-modal stimulus combinations yielded responses that were significantly greater than those evoked by the best component stimulus. In contrast, unisensory integration of within-modal stimulus pairs yielded responses that were similar to or less than those evoked by the best component stimulus. This difference is exemplified by the disproportionate representations of superadditive responses during multisensory integration and the predominance of subadditive responses during unisensory integration. These observations suggest that different rules have evolved for integrating sensory information, one (unisensory) reflecting the inherent characteristics of the individual sense and, the other (multisensory), unique supramodal characteristics designed to enhance the salience of the initiating event.

Multisensory orientation behavior is disrupted by neonatal cortical ablation

The integration of visual and auditory information can significantly amplify the sensory responses of superior colliculus (SC) neurons and the behaviors that depend on them. This response amplification depends on the development of SC inputs that are derived from two regions of cortex: the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) and the rostral lateral suprasylvian sulcus (rLS). Neonatal ablation of these cortico-collicular areas has been shown to disrupt the development of the multisensory enhancement capabilities of SC neurons and the present results demonstrate that it also precludes the development of the normal multisensory enhancements in orientation behavior. Animals with neonatal ablation of AES and rLS were tested at maturity and found unable to benefit from the combination of visual and auditory cues in their efforts to localize targets in contralesional space. In contrast, their ipsilesional multisensory orientation capabilities were indistinguishable from those of normal animals. However, when only one of these cortical areas was removed during early life, later behavioral consequences were negligible. Whether similar compensatory processes would occur in adult animals remains to be determined. These observations, coupled with those from previous studies, also suggest that a surprisingly high proportion of SC neurons capable of multisensory integration must be present for orientation behavior benefits to be realized. Compensatory mechanisms can achieve this if early lesions spare either AES or rLS, but even the impressive plasticity of the neonatal brain cannot compensate for the early loss of both of them.

Somatosensory areas S2 and PV project to the superior colliculus of a prosimian primate, Galago garnetti

As part of an effort to describe the connections of the somatosensory system in Galago garnetti, a small prosimian primate, injections of tracers into cortex revealed that two somatosensory areas, the second somatosensory area (S2) and the parietal ventral somatosensory area (PV), project densely to the ipsilateral superior colliculus, while the primary somatosensory area (S1 or area 3b) does not. The three cortical areas were defined in microelectrode mapping experiments and recordings were used to identify appropriate injection sites in the same cases. Injections of wheat germ agglutinin conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) were placed in S1 in different mediolateral locations representing body regions from toes to face in five galagos, and none of these injections labeled projections to the superior colliculus. In contrast, each of the two injections in the face representation of S2 in two galagos and three injections in face and forelimb representations of PV in three galagos produced dense patches of labeled terminations and axons in the intermediate gray (layer IV) over the full extent of the superior colliculus. The results suggest that the higher-order somatosensory areas, PV and S2, are directly involved in the visuomotor functions of the superior colliculus in prosimian primates, while S1 is not. The somatosensory inputs appear to be too widespread to contribute to a detailed somatotopic representation in the superior colliculus, but they may be a source of somatosensory modulation of retinotopically guided oculomotor instructions.

Evaluating the operations underlying multisensory integration in the cat superior colliculus

It is well established that superior colliculus (SC) multisensory neurons integrate cues from different senses; however, the mechanisms responsible for producing multisensory responses are poorly understood. Previous studies have shown that spatially congruent cues from different modalities (e.g., auditory and visual) yield enhanced responses and that the greatest relative enhancements occur for combinations of the least effective modality-specific stimuli. Although these phenomena are well documented, little is known about the mechanisms that underlie them, because no study has systematically examined the operation that multisensory neurons perform on their modality-specific inputs. The goal of this study was to evaluate the computations that multisensory neurons perform in combining the influences of stimuli from two modalities. The extracellular activities of single neurons in the SC of the cat were recorded in response to visual, auditory, and bimodal visual-auditory stimulation. Each neuron was tested across a range of stimulus intensities and multisensory responses evaluated against the null hypothesis of simple summation of unisensory influences. We found that the multisensory response could be superadditive, additive, or subadditive but that the computation was strongly dictated by the efficacies of the modality-specific stimulus components. Superadditivity was most common within a restricted range of near-threshold stimulus efficacies, whereas for the majority of stimuli, response magnitudes were consistent with the linear summation of modality-specific influences. In addition to providing a constraint for developing models of multisensory integration, the relationship between response mode and stimulus efficacy emphasizes the importance of considering stimulus parameters when inducing or interpreting multisensory phenomena.

Neonatal cortical ablation disrupts multisensory development in superior colliculus

The ability of cat superior colliculus (SC) neurons to synthesize information from different senses depends on influences from two areas of the cortex: the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) and the rostral lateral suprasylvian sulcus (rLS). Reversibly deactivating the inputs to the SC from either of these areas in normal adults severely compromises this ability and the SC-mediated behaviors that depend on it. In this study, we found that removal of these areas in neonatal animals precluded the normal development of multisensory SC processes. At maturity there was a substantial decrease in the incidence of multisensory neurons, and those multisensory neurons that did develop were highly abnormal. Their cross-modal receptive field register was severely compromised, as was their ability to integrate cross-modal stimuli. Apparently, despite the impressive plasticity of the neonatal brain, it cannot compensate for the early loss of these cortices. Surprisingly, however, neonatal removal of either AES or rLS had comparatively minor consequences on these properties. At maturity multisensory SC neurons were quite common: they developed the characteristic spatial register among their unisensory receptive fields and exhibited normal adult-like multisensory integration. These observations suggest that during early ontogeny, when the multisensory properties of SC neurons are being crafted, AES and rLS may have the ability to compensate for the loss of one another's cortico-collicular influences so that normal multisensory processes can develop in the SC.

Distribution across cortical areas of neurons projecting to the superior colliculus in new world monkeys

Surprisingly little is known about the proportions of projections of different areas and regions of neocortex to the superior colliculus in primates. To obtain an overview of such projection patterns, we placed a total of 10 injections of retrograde tracers in the superior colliculus of three New World monkeys (Callithrix, Callicebus, and Aotus). Because cortex was flattened and cut parallel to the surface, labeled corticotectal neurons could be accurately located relative to architectonic boundaries and surface features. While there was variability across cases and injection sites, the summed results clearly support several conclusions. One, three well-defined visual areas, V1 (18%), V2 (14%), and MT (11%), contributed nearly half of the total of labeled cells. Two, several other visual areas (V3, DL, DM, and FST) that are early in the processing hierarchy provided another fifth of the total. Three, inferior temporal visual areas of the ventral stream provided only minor projections. Four, visuomotor fields (FEF, FV, cortex in the region of SEF, and posterior parietal cortex) contained less than 10% of the labeled neurons. Five, few labeled neurons were in auditory or somatosensory areas. The results indicate that cortical inputs to the superior colliculus originate predominantly from early visual areas rather than from multimodal or visuomotor areas.

The development of a dialogue between cortex and midbrain to integrate multisensory information

The anterior ectosylvian (AES) and rostral lateral suprasylvian (rLS) sulci send critical signals to multisensory superior colliculus (SC) neurons that enable them to integrate information from different senses. When either of these areas is temporarily deactivated in adult animals, the ability of SC neurons to integrate multisensory information and, thereby, enhance their responses to cross-modal stimuli is temporarily compromised. As a consequence, the ability to use cross-modal stimuli to enhance SC-mediated behavioral performance is also compromised. In contrast, removal of either one of these areas during early life has little effect on the development of multisensory processes in the SC or on SC-mediated multisensory behaviors and these animals seem very similar to normal controls. These observations suggest that there is considerable plasticity in these cortico-collicular systems during early life, with each area able to compensate for the early loss of the other. However, when both AES and rLS are removed early in life, there appears to be no compensation. The SC neurons now deal with sensory stimuli, even those embedded in multisensory complexes, as if they were there alone, precluding any SC-mediated behavioral benefit to cross-modal stimuli.

Superior colliculus lesions preferentially disrupt multisensory orientation

The general involvement of the superior colliculus (SC) in orientation behavior and the striking parallels between the multisensory responses of SC neurons and overt orientation behaviors have led to assumptions that these neural and behavioral changes are directly linked. However, deactivation of two areas of cortex which also contain multisensory neurons, the anterior ectosylvian sulcus and rostral lateral suprasylvian sulcus have been shown to eliminate multisensory orientation behaviors, suggesting that this behavior may not involve the SC. To determine whether the SC contributes to this behavior, cats were tested in a multisensory (i.e. visual-auditory) orientation task before and after excitotoxic lesions of the SC. For unilateral SC lesions, modality-specific (i.e. visual or auditory) orientation behaviors had returned to pre-lesion levels after several weeks of recovery. In contrast, the enhancements and depressions in behavior normally seen with multisensory stimuli were severely compromised in the contralesional hemifield. No recovery of these behaviors was observed within the 6 month testing period. Immunohistochemical labeling of the SC revealed a preferential loss of parvalbumin-immunoreactive pyramidal neurons in the intermediate layers, a presumptive multisensory population that targets premotor areas of the brainstem and spinal cord. These results highlight the importance of the SC for multisensory behaviors, and suggest that the multisensory orientation deficits produced by cortical lesions are a result of the loss of cortical influences on multisensory SC neurons.

Multiple sensory afferents to ferret pseudosylvian sulcal cortex

While the ferret cerebral cortex is being used with increasing frequency in studies of neural processing and development, little is known regarding the organization of its associational sensory and multisensory regions. Therefore, the present investigation used neuroanatomical methods to identify non-primary visual and somatosensory representations and their potential for multisensory convergence. Tracer injections made into V1 or SI cortex labeled axon terminals within the pseudosylvian sulcal cortex (PSSC). These inputs were distributed according to modality, with visual inputs identified in the lateral aspects of the posterior dorsal bank, and somatosensory inputs found anterior along the dorsal bank, fundus and ventral bank. Somatosensory inputs showed a topographic arrangement, with inputs representing face found more anteriorly than those representing trunk regions. Overlap between these different sensory projections occurred posteriorly in the PSSC and may represent a zone of multisensory convergence. These data are consistent with the presence of associational visual, somatosensory, and multisensory areas within the PSSC.

Cortex controls multisensory depression in superior colliculus

Multisensory depression is a fundamental index of multisensory integration in superior colliculus (SC) neurons. It is initiated when one sensory stimulus (auditory) located outside its modality-specific receptive field degrades or eliminates the neuron's responses to another sensory stimulus (visual) presented within its modality-specific receptive field. The present experiments demonstrate that the capacity of SC neurons to engage in multisensory depression is strongly dependent on influences from two cortical areas (the anterior ectosylvian and rostral lateral suprasylvian sulci). When these cortices are deactivated, the ability of SC neurons to synthesize visual-auditory inputs in this way is compromised; multisensory responses are disinhibited, becoming more vigorous and in some cases indistinguishable from responses to the visual stimulus alone. Although obtaining a more robust multisensory SC response when cortex is nonfunctional than when it is functional may seem paradoxical, these data may help explain previous observations that the loss of these cortical influences permits visual orientation behavior in the presence of a normally disruptive auditory stimulus.

Somatosensation in the superior colliculus of the star-nosed mole

The superior colliculus (or optic tectum in nonmammals) plays a critical role in the visual system and is essential for integrating sensory inputs to guide eye and head movements. However, what is the role of the superior colliculus (SC) in species that depend almost exclusively on touch? In this study we examined the SC of the star-nosed mole, a subterranean mammal that, instead of using vision, explores its environment using its tactile star. The star acts like a mechanosensory eye with a central tactile fovea that is constantly shifted in a saccadic manner. Multiunit microelectrode recordings were used to determine the topography and receptive field organization of somatosensory inputs to the SC and to test for visual and auditory responses. Here we report an SC dominated by somatosensory inputs in which neurons in all layers responded to mechanosensory stimulation, forming a topographic representation of contralateral body dominated by the mechanosensory star. Receptive fields were large, and appendage representations overlapped, suggesting that the SC may use a distributed, population code to guide the saccadic movements of the mole's touch fovea. No auditory or visual responses were recorded from the SC, although neurons in the neighboring inferior colliculus responded to auditory stimuli. Layers IVb-VII were identified, and a layer superficial to IVb contained neurons that responded to somatosensory stimulation, suggesting that there are unique patterns of afferents in the star-nosed mole's SC.

Two corticotectal areas facilitate multisensory orientation behavior

It had previously been shown that influences from two cortical areas, the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) and the rostral lateral suprasylvian sulcus (rLS), play critical roles in rendering superior colliculus (SC) neurons capable of synthesizing their cross-modal inputs. The present studies examined the consequences of selectively eliminating these cortical influences on SC-mediated orientation responses to cross-modal stimuli. Cats were trained to orient to a low-intensity modality-specific cue (visual) in the presence or absence of a neutral cue from another modality (auditory). The visual target could appear at various locations within 45 degrees of the midline, and the stimulus effectiveness was varied to yield an average of correct orientation responses of approximately 45%. Response enhancement and depression were observed when the auditory cue was coupled with the target stimulus: A substantially enhanced probability in correct responses was evident when the cross-modal stimuli were spatially coincident, and a substantially decreased response probability was obtained when the stimuli were spatially disparate. Cryogenic blockade of either AES or rLS disrupted these behavioral effects, thereby eliminating the enhanced performance in response to spatially coincident cross-modal cues and degrading the depressed performance in response to spatially disparate cross-modal cues. These disruptive effects on targets contralateral to the deactivated cortex were restricted to multisensory interactive processes. Orientation to modality-specific targets was unchanged. Furthermore, the pattern of orientation errors was unaffected by cortical deactivation. These data bear striking similarities to the effects of AES and rLS deactivation on multisensory integration at the level of individual SC neurons. Presumably, eliminating the critical influences from AES or rLS cortex disrupts SC multisensory synthesis that, in turn, disables SC-mediated multisensory orientation behaviors.

Cortex governs multisensory integration in the midbrain

Neurons in the superior colliculus (SC), a prominent midbrain structure, are able to synthesize information from different senses. This synthesis plays an important role in determining whether SC-mediated orientation behaviors will be initiated. In some circumstances, multisensory integration in the SC is evident as a response that is significantly enhanced above that evoked by the most effective single-modality stimulus. It can sometimes even exceed the arithmetic sum of the single-modality responses. In other circumstances, multisensory integration is evident as response depression, an effect sometimes powerful enough to eliminate even robust single-modality responses. The conditions that produce multisensory enhancement also increase the probability of orientation responses, and those that produce multisensory response depression decrease the probability of orientation responses. Although one might posit that the capability to integrate cross-modal cues (and, in this case, alter overt behavior) would be evident in all neurons capable of responding to stimuli from two or more sensory modalities, this turns out to be incorrect. When descending influences from the cortex are temporarily inactivated, SC neurons are rendered unable to synthesize their multiple sensory inputs, and animals no longer show enhanced orientation responses. Nevertheless, the ability to respond to cues from multiple sensory modalities is retained at both the single neuron and behavioral levels. Two cortical areas have been implicated in controlling these midbrain processes: the anterior ectosylvian sulcus and the rostral lateral suprasylvian sulcus.

Nonvisual influences on visual-information processing in the superior colliculus

Although visually responsive neurons predominate in the deep layers of the superior colliculus (SC), the majority of them also receive sensory inputs from nonvisual sources (i.e. auditory and/or somatosensory). Most of these 'multisensory' neurons are able to synthesize their cross-modal inputs and, as a consequence, their responses to visual stimuli can be profoundly enhanced or depressed in the presence of a nonvisual cue. Whether response enhancement or response depression is produced by this multisensory interaction is predictable based on several factors. These include: the organization of a neuron's visual and nonvisual receptive fields; the relative spatial relationships of the different stimuli (to their respective receptive fields and to one another); and whether or not the neuron is innervated by a select population of cortical neurons. The response enhancement or depression of SC neurons via multisensory integration has significant survival value via its profound impact on overt attentive/orientation behaviors. Nevertheless, these multisensory processes are not present at birth, and require an extensive period of postnatal maturation. It seems likely that the sensory experiences obtained during this period play an important role in crafting the processes underlying these multisensory interactions.

Two cortical areas mediate multisensory integration in superior colliculus neurons

The majority of multisensory neurons in the cat superior colliculus (SC) are able to synthesize cross-modal cues (e.g., visual and auditory) and thereby produce responses greater than those elicited by the most effective single modality stimulus and, sometimes, greater than those predicted by the arithmetic sum of their modality-specific responses. The present study examined the role of corticotectal inputs from two cortical areas, the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) and the rostral aspect of the lateral suprasylvian sulcus (rLS), in producing these response enhancements. This was accomplished by evaluating the multisensory properties of individual SC neurons during reversible deactivation of these cortices individually and in combination using cryogenic deactivation techniques. Cortical deactivation eliminated the characteristic multisensory response enhancement of nearly all SC neurons but generally had little or no effect on a neuron's modality-specific responses. Thus, the responses of SC neurons to combinations of cross-modal stimuli were now no different from those evoked by one or the other of these stimuli individually. Of the two cortical areas, AES had a much greater impact on SC multisensory integrative processes, with nearly half the SC neurons sampled dependent on it alone. In contrast, only a small number of SC neurons depended solely on rLS. However, most SC neurons exhibited dual dependencies, and their multisensory enhancement was mediated by either synergistic or redundant influences from AES and rLS. Corticotectal synergy was evident when deactivating either cortical area compromised the multisensory enhancement of an SC neuron, whereas corticotectal redundancy was evident when deactivation of both cortical areas was required to produce this effect. The results suggest that, although multisensory SC neurons can be created as a consequence of a variety of converging tectopetal afferents that are derived from a host of subcortical and cortical structures, the ability to synthesize cross-modal inputs, and thereby produce an enhanced multisensory response, requires functional inputs from the AES, the rLS, or both.

Onset of cross-modal synthesis in the neonatal superior colliculus is gated by the development of cortical influences

Many neurons in the superior colliculus (SC) are able to integrate combinations of visual, auditory, and somatosensory stimuli, thereby markedly affecting the vigor of their responses to external stimuli. However, this capacity for multisensory integration is not inborn. Rather, it appears comparatively late in postnatal development and is not expressed until the SC passes through several distinct developmental stages. As shown here, the final stage in this sequence is one in which a region of association cortex establishes functional control over the SC, thus enabling the multisensory integrative capabilities of its target SC neurons. The first example of this corticotectal input was seen at postnatal day 28. For any individual SC neuron, the onset of corticotectal influences appeared to be abrupt. Because this event occurred at very different times for different SC neurons, a period of 3-4 postnatal months was required before the adult-like condition was achieved. The protracted postnatal period required for the maturation of these corticotectal influences corresponded closely with estimates of the peak period of cortical plasticity, raising the possibility that the genesis of these corticotectal influences, and hence the onset of SC multisensory integration, occurs only after the cortex is capable of exerting experience-dependent control over SC neurons.

Mechanisms of within- and cross-modality suppression in the superior colliculus

The present studies were initiated to explore the basis for the response suppression that occurs in cat superior colliculus (SC) neurons when two spatially disparate stimuli are presented simultaneously or in close temporal proximity to one another. Of specific interest was examining the possibility that suppressive regions border the receptive fields (RFs) of unimodal and multisensory SC neurons and, when activated, degrade the neuron's responses to excitatory stimuli. Both within- and cross-modality effects were examined. An example of the former is when a response to a visual stimulus within its RF is suppressed by a second visual stimulus outside the RF. An example of the latter is when the response to a visual stimulus within the visual RF is suppressed when a stimulus from a different modality (e. g., auditory) is presented outside its (i.e., auditory) RF. Suppressive regions were found bordering visual, auditory, and somatosensory RFs. Despite significant modality-specific differences in the incidence and effectiveness of these regions, they were generally quite potent regardless of the modality. In the vast majority (85%) of cases, responses to the excitatory stimulus were degraded by >/=50% by simultaneously stimulating the suppressive region. Contrary to expectations and previous speculations, the effects of activating these suppressive regions often were quite specific. Thus powerful within-modality suppression could be demonstrated in many multisensory neurons in which cross-modality suppression could not be generated. However, the converse was not true. If an extra-RF stimulus inhibited center responses to stimuli of a different modality, it also would suppress center responses to stimuli of its own modality. Thus when cross-modality suppression was demonstrated, it was always accompanied by within-modality suppression. These observations suggest that separate mechanisms underlie within- and cross-modality suppression in the SC. Because some modality-specific tectopetal structures contain neurons with suppressive regions bordering their RFs, the within-modality suppression observed in the SC simply may reflect interactions taking place at the level of one input channel. However, the presence of modality-specific suppression at the level of one input channel would have no effect on the excitation initiated via another input channel. Given the modality-specificity of tectopetal inputs, it appears that cross-modality interactions require the convergence of two or more modality-specific inputs onto the same SC neuron and that the expression of these interactions depends on the internal circuitry of the SC. This allows a cross-modality suppressive signal to be nonspecific and to degrade any and all of the neuron's excitatory inputs.

Cortical somatosensory and trigeminal inputs to the cat superior colliculus: light and electron microscopic analyses

Two different axonal transport tracers were used in single animals to test the hypothesis that the expansive intermediate gray layer of the cat superior colliculus (stratum griseum intermediale, SGI) is composed of sensorimotor domains. The results show that two sensory pathways, the trigeminotectal and the corticotectal arising from the fourth somatosensory area, commingle in patches across the middle tier of the SGI. Furthermore, the data reveal that tectospinal cells are distributed within these patches. Taken together, these results show a commingling of functionally related afferents and a consistent spatial relationship between these afferents and tectospinal neurons. These relationships indicate that the SGI consists of domains that can be distinguished by their unique combinations of afferent and efferent connections. The ultrastructural characteristics and synaptic relationships of these somatosensory afferent pathways suggest that they have distinct roles within the sensorimotor domain of the SGI. The trigeminotectal terminals are relatively small, contain round vesicles and make asymmetrical synapses on small, presumably distal, dendrites. We submit that these trigeminal terminals bestow the basic receptive field properties upon SGI neurons. In contrast, the somatosensory corticotectal terminals are relatively large, contain round vesicles, make asymmetrical synapses, participate in triads, and are presynaptic to proximal dendrites. We suggest that these cortical terminals bestow integrative abilities on SGI neurons.

Interlaminar connections of the superior colliculus in the tree shrew. III: The optic layer

These experiments were designed to test the idea that the optic layer in the tree shrew, Tupaia belangeri, is functionally distinct and provides a link between the visuosensory superficial and the premotor intermediate layers of the superior colliculus. First, cells in the optic layer were intracellularly labeled with biocytin in living brain slices. Compared to cells in the adjacent lower part of the superficial gray layer, which have apical dendrites that ascend toward the tectal surface, optic layer cells have dendritic fields that are restricted for the most part to the optic layer itself. The differences in dendritic-field location imply that superficial gray and optic layer cells have different patterns of input. The axons of optic layer cells terminate densely within the optic layer and, in addition, project in a horizontally restricted fashion to the overlying superficial gray and subjacent intermediate gray layers. This pattern also is different from the predominantly descending interlaminar projections of lower superficial gray layer cells. Next, cells in the intermediate gray layer were labeled in order to examine the relationships between optic layer cells and these subjacent neurons that project from the superior colliculus to oculomotor centers of the brain stem. Neurons in the upper part of the intermediate gray layer send apical dendrites into the optic layer and therefore can receive signals from the superficial gray layer either directly, from descending axons of lower superficial gray layer cells, or indirectly, through intervening optic layer cells. In contrast, lower intermediate gray layer cells have more radiate dendritic fields that are restricted to the intermediate gray layer. Thus, these lower cells must depend on descending projections from optic or upper intermediate gray layer cells for signals from the superficial gray layer. Together, these results support the idea that the optic layer is a distinct lamina that provides a link between the superficial and intermediate gray layers. They also are consistent with the traditional view that descending intracollicular projections play a role in the selection of visual targets for saccades.

Sensory response properties of cortical neurons in the anterior ectosylvian sulcus of cats: intracellular recording and labeling

Visual and auditory sensory responses of cortical neurons in the caudal half of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) of cats were examined under alpha-chloralose anesthesia, using intracellular recording and labeling techniques. Stable intracellular recordings were obtained from 155 neurons, and 141 neurons exhibited responses to sensory stimuli. Of 141 sensory neurons, 74 (52%) were bimodal neurons that responded to both visual and auditory stimuli, and 67 (48%) were unimodal showing sensory responses only to visual (25) or auditory stimulation (42). Forty-five neurons (35 pyramidal neurons, 5 non-pyramidal neurons, 5 not classified) responsive to sensory stimuli were labeled with biocytin. The percentage of bimodal neurons of the biocytin-labeled neurons was 40% (4/10) in layer II, 50% (10/20) in layer III-IV, 70% (7/10) in layer V and 60% (3/5) in layer VI. Thus the convergence of visual and auditory inputs on single neurons was most intense in layer V. Auditory response latencies were in a narrow range from 10 to 40 ms, whereas visual response latencies were in a wide range from 15 to 100 ms. Late visual responses (> 60 ms) were more commonly elicited in biomodal neurons than in visual unimodal neurons. Visual responses in layer II were all elicited over 40 ms, whereas early visual responses within 40 ms were observed in the other cortical layers. A subgroup of neurons (22/141) had a propensity to exhibit a burst discharge, a train of three to seven action potentials on a depolarizing envelope in response to sensory stimuli. Their specific distribution in cortical tissue was suggested by the result that six out of nine biocytin-labeled neurons (seven pyramidal neurons, two non-pyramidal neurons) showing burst discharges to sensory stimuli were observed in layer V. These results are considered to signify some aspects of intracortical organization related to the cross-modal integration of sensory inputs.

Comparisons of cross-modality integration in midbrain and cortex

Multisensory neurons are abundant in the superior colliculus and anterior ectosylvian cortex of the cat. Despite the fact that these areas receive inputs from different regions, and are likely to be involved in different functional roles, there multisensory neurons have many fundamental similarities. They all have multiple receptive fields, one for each sensory input, and these receptive fields overlap one another. It is this spatial correspondence among receptive fields that determines the manner in which both populations of neurons integrate the inputs they receive from different sensory channels. Several principles of integration characterize both cortical and midbrain multisensory neurons, and these constancies in the fundamentals of cross-modality integration are likely to provide a basis for coherence at different levels of the neuraxis. Yet there are also obvious differences in these populations of multisensory neurons. Cortical receptive fields are significantly larger than those in the midbrain, have a lower incidence of suppressive surrounds, and exhibit less cross-modality inhibitory interactions than in the midbrain. Presumably, these differences reflect a greater emphasis on non-spatial aspects of cross-modality integration in cortex than is required by the orientation and localization functions mediated by the superior colliculus.

Visual, somatosensory and auditory modality properties along the feline suprageniculate-anterior ectosylvian sulcus/insular pathway

Physiological properties of single units were investigated in the suprageniculate nucleus (SG) and in the cerebral cortex along the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES), including the insular cortex. The recording was performed with the aid of carbon-filled glass micropipetts in barbiturate-anesthetized cats. The main findings of the study can be summarized as follows. 1. The physiological properties of the cells in the suprageniculate nucleus and in the AES/insular cortex exhibited striking similarities in a series of aspects: (a) The frequencies of occurrence of uni-, bi- and trimodal cells were similar. (b) The majority of the unimodal cells (75% in the AES/insular region and 65% in the SG) has visual sensitivity in both structures. The bimodal and trimodal cells were also dominated by visual sensitivity. (c) The somatosensory and auditory modalities were similarly present in both structures, although less frequently than the visual one. (d) No systematic topological organization was found in either structure. (e) The visual, somatosensory and auditory receptive fields were uniform and covered a fairly large proportion of the personal space. 2. Statistical comparison of some physiological properties of cells situated deep in the AES with those of cells in the insular cortex revealed differences as follows: (a) The insular cortex contained significantly more bi- and trimodal cells than the sulcal areas. (b) Cells in the insular cortex preferred significantly lower stimulus velocities and larger stimuli than cells in the depths of the AES. These results seem to support the notion of a suprageniculate-AES/insular thalamo-cortical multisensory entity. Additionally, the physiological differences between the sulcal AES cortex and gyral insula are in agreement with the morphological differences found earlier in the afferentation of these areas (Norita et al., 1986, 1991).

Afferent connections of the lateralis medialis thalamic nucleus in the cat

We have used anterograde and retrograde horseradish peroxidase tracing methods in this study. Peroxidase injections in the lateralis medialis thalamic nucleus (LM) of the cat resulted in labeled neurons in cortical and subcortical structures that averaged 71% and 29%, respectively. Every LM sector receives abundant projections from the polymodal sylvian anterior cortical area, the reticular thalamic nucleus, and the stratum opticum and intermediate layer of the superior colliculus. Less abundant but consistent projections were detected in cingular, auditory II, lateral suprasylvian and anterior ectosylvian visual cortices, and cortical area 7. A topographical distribution of afferent connections to different LM sectors arising from other cortical and subcortical structures could be established. The ventromedial sector receives connections mainly from the insular agranular, limic and prefrontal cortical areas, as well as from brain stem structures and the contralateral pretectal region. The dorsolateral sector is mainly related to cortical areas and subcortical structures processing visual information. The existence of overlap among neuronal LM populations receiving and sending connections to and from various cortical areas suggests that this nucleus is an appropriate substrate for effective interaction between different and distant cortical areas.

Sensory modality distribution in the anterior ectosylvian cortex (AEC) of cats

Modality specificity of neuronal responses to visual, somesthetic and auditory stimuli was investigated in the anterior ectosylvian cortex (AEC) of cats, using single-unit recording techniques. Seven classes of neurons were found, and according to their responsiveness to sensory stimuli regrouped into three categories: unimodal, bimodal and trimodal. Unimodal cells that responded to only one of the three stimulus modalities formed 59% of the units; 30.2% were bimodal, in that they showed a clear increase of neuronal discharges to two of the three stimulus types; 10.8% were defined as trimodal because they responded to all three stimulus modalities. Although the different categories of cells were intermingled within the AEC, indicating a certain degree of overlap between sensory modalities, some clustering of cell types was nonetheless evident. Thus, the somatosensory responsive cells were mainly located in the anterior two-thirds of the dorsal bank of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus. Visually responsive cells were concentrated on the ventral bank of the sulcus, whereas neurons with an auditory response occupied the banks and fundus of the posterior three-quarters of the sulcus. The histological distribution and physiological properties of AEC neurons suggest that this cortical region is a higher-order associative area whose function may be to integrate information from different sensory modalities.

Corticotectal projections in the cat: anterograde transport studies of twenty-five cortical areas

Retrograde transport studies have shown that widespread areas of the cerebral cortex project upon the superior colliculus. In order to explore the organization of these extensive projections, the anterograde autoradiographic method has been used to reveal the distribution and pattern of corticotectal projections arising from 25 cortical areas. In the majority of experiments, electrophysiological recording methods were used to characterize the visual representation and cortical area prior to injection of the tracer. Our findings reveal that seventeen of the 25 cortical areas project upon some portion of the superficial layers (stratum zonale, stratum griseum superficiale, and stratum opticum, SO). These cortical regions include areas 17, 18, 19, 20a, 20b, 21a, 21b, posterior suprasylvian area (PS), ventral lateral suprasylvian area (VLS), posteromedial lateral suprasylvian area (PMLS), anteromedial lateral suprasylvian area (AMLS), anterolateral lateral suprasylvian area (ALLS), posterolateral lateral suprasylvian area (PLLS), dorsolateral lateral suprasyvian area (DLS), periauditory cortex, cingulate cortex, and the visual portion of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus. While some of these corticotectal projections target all superficial laminae and sublaminae, others are more discretely organized in their laminar-sublaminar distribution. Only the corticotectal projections arising from areas 17 and 18 are exclusively related to the superficial layers. The remaining 15 pathways innervate both the superficial and intermediate and/or deep layers. The large intermediate gray layer (stratum griseum intermedium; SGI) receives projections from almost every cortical area; only areas 17 and 18 do not project ventral to SO. All corticotectal projections to SGI vary in their sublaminar distribution and in their specific pattern of termination. The majority of these projections are periodic, or patchy, and there are elaborate (double tier, bridges, or streamers) modes of distribution. We have attempted to place these findings into a conceptual framework that emphasizes that the SGI consists of sensory and motor domains, both of which contain a mosaic of connectionally distinct afferent compartments (Illing and Graybiel, '85, Neuroscience 14:455-482; Harting and Van Lieshout, '91, J. Comp. Neurol. 305:543-558). Corticotectal projections to the layers ventral to SGI, (stratum album intermediale, stratum griseum profundum, and stratum album profundum) arise from thirteen cortical areas. While an organizational plan of these deeper projections is not readily apparent, the distribution of several corticotectal inputs reveals some connectional parcellation.

Reciprocal connections between the periaqueductal gray matter and other somatosensory regions of the cat midbrain: a possible mechanism of pain inhibition

Lectin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase was injected or implanted in crystalline form into various parts of the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) in the cat. After varying survival periods, the animals were fixed and the mesencephalon was sectioned and incubated for HRP histochemistry. Outside PAG, labelled cells and terminal labelling were observed in the cuneiform, parabrachial and intercollicular nuclei, in the deep and intermediate gray layers of the superior colliculus, in the anterior and posterior pretectal nuclei and in the nucleus of Darkschewitsch. This study has shown that the region of PAG that is known to receive heavy ascending somatosensory input from the spinal cord and to be part of descending pain-inhibiting systems, also has reciprocal connections with other somatosensory areas of the midbrain. The results are discussed in relation to nociception and nociceptive inhibiting mechanisms.

Receptive field properties of somatosensory neurons in the cat superior colliculus

In general, knowledge of the internal organization of receptive fields has played an important role in shaping current understanding of sensory physiology. Such knowledge is particularly important for understanding the function of the superior colliculus, since this structure is at once implicated in spatial localization and has relatively large receptive fields. While this issue has been addressed in the visual and auditory modalities represented in the superior colliculus, there are no previous studies of its somatosensory receptive field organization. Here, the properties of somatosensory receptive fields in the cat superior colliculus were studied quantitatively to determine whether they contain internal non-homogeneities that might aid in the determination of stimulus detail. Of special interest was the possibility that these comparatively large receptive fields would contain areas of differential excitability that could aid in spatial resolution, that within-field spatial summation and/or inhibition would be exhibited, and that the borders of the excitatory receptive field would be flanked by inhibitory regions. The data demonstrate that while inhibition beyond the receptive field borders is a rarity, these somatosensory receptive fields nearly always contain a well-defined area of maximal sensitivity within which the size of the stimulus is a critical feature in determining the magnitude of the response. These best areas are systematically distributed across receptive fields as a function of their location in the structure, and indicate that the resolution of stimulus location and size may be greater than expected on the basis of receptive field size alone.

Somatotopic component of the multisensory map in the deep laminae of the cat superior colliculus

The topographic organization of the somatosensory representation in the deep layers of the cat superior colliculus was reexamined using methods previously used to examine the visuotopy in these layers. This technique identified the distribution of neurons in the superior colliculus that represent a designated region of the body surface (i.e., a dermal image), as well as assessed the differential distribution of deep layer neurons representing different body regions (e.g., face, forelimb, hindlimb, etc.). When the area of densest representation within a dermal image was considered, a well-ordered somatotopy was evident that was similar to the one previously described (Stein et al., '76: J. Neurophysiol. 39:401-419). Each region of the body surface, however, was represented within a surprisingly broad area of the deep layers, which often had considerable overlap with the representations of adjacent body regions. This organization was similar to that of the deep layer visuotopy and emphasizes that the representation of a peripheral stimulus is accomplished by the simultaneous activation of a large population of deep layer neurons. Furthermore, an examination of the convergence patterns on somatosensory-responsive neurons demonstrated that the somatotopy was formed primarily by multisensory neurons. These data indicate that the somatosensory representation is best considered as a component of a comprehensive multisensory functional unit that plays a critical role in effecting behavioral responses to a wide variety of stimuli.

Spatial relationships of axons arising from the substantia nigra, spinal trigeminal nucleus, and pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus within the intermediate gray of the cat superior colliculus

We have utilized two different anterograde transport methods (Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin [PHA-L] immunocytochemistry and autoradiography) in the same experiment to compare the sublaminar location and arrangement of tectopetal axons arising from the substantia nigra pars reticulata, the spinal trigeminal nucleus, and the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus. Our findings reveal that the nigrotectal projection terminates in a patchy fashion within three horizontally oriented sublaminae of the stratum griseum superficiale (SGI), the dorsal, middle and ventral. The middle tier of nigrotectal axons exhibits an exquisite, puzzle-like, complementary spatial relationship with trigeminotectal axons. In contrast, axons arising from the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus overlap with patches of nigrotectal axons within the middle tier. Thus the middle tier of the SGI consists of domains of overlapping nigral and pedunculopontine tegmental inputs which interdigitate with domains rich in somatosensory inputs.

Normal somatotopy in SI of a tyrosinase-negative albino cat

Because of known abnormalities in both the visual and auditory pathways of tyrosinase-negative albino cats, we mapped the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) in one such cat electrophysiologically. We detected absolutely no sign of abnormality in terms of somatotopy, and conclude that if anomalies do exist in the albino somatosensory system, they are either very subtle or lie outside SI.