Emergence of constitutively active estrogen receptor-α mutations in pretreated advanced estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

Cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) inhibitors as a novel therapeutic strategy for different molecular types of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 7 is aberrantly overexpressed in many types of cancer and is an attractive target for cancer therapy due to its dual role in transcription and cell cycle progression. Moreover, CDK7 can directly modulate the activities of estrogen receptor (ER), which is a major driver in breast cancer. Breast cancer cells have exhibited high sensitivity to CDK7 inhibition in pre-clinical studies.

METHODS

In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the latest insights into CDK7 biology and recent advancements in CDK7 inhibitor development for breast cancer treatment. We also discuss the current application of CDK7 inhibitors in different molecular types of breast cancer to provide potential strategies for the treatment of breast cancer.

RESULTS

Significant progress has been made in the development of selective CDK7 inhibitors, which show efficacy in both triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR+). Moreover, combined with other agents, CDK7 inhibitors may provide synergistic effects for endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. Thus, high-quality studies for developing potent CDK7 inhibitors and investigating their applications in breast cancer therapy are rapidly emerging.

CONCLUSION

CDK7 inhibitors have emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy and have demonstrated significant anti-cancer activity in different subtypes of breast cancer, especially those that have been resistant to current therapies.

Novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) to target hormone receptor positive breast cancer: Elacestrant as the poster-child

INTRODUCTION

Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is the most common breast cancer subtype, and therapeutic management relies primarily on inhibiting ER signaling. In the metastatic setting, ER signaling is typically targeted by selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the latter of which prevent estrogen production. Activating ESR1 mutations are among the most common emergent breast cancer mutations and confer resistance to AIs.

AREAS COVERED

Until 2023, fulvestrant was the only approved SERD; fulvestrant is administered intramuscularly, and in some cases may also have limited efficacy in the setting of certain ESR1 mutations. In 2023, the first oral SERD, elacestrant, was approved for use in ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer and represents a new class of therapeutic options. While the initial approval was as monotherapy, ongoing studies are evaluating elacestrant (as well as other oral SERDs) in combination with other therapies including CDK4/6 inhibitors and PI3K inhibitors, which parallels the current combination uses of fulvestrant.

EXPERT OPINION

Elacestrant's recent approval sheds light on the use of biomarkers such as ESR1 to gauge a tumor's endocrine sensitivity. Ongoing therapeutic and correlative biomarker studies will offer new insight and expanding treatment options for patients with advanced breast cancer.

Dual-target inhibitors based on ERα: Novel therapeutic approaches for endocrine resistant breast cancer

Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), a nuclear transcription factor, is a well-validated therapeutic target for more than 70% of all breast cancers (BCs). Antagonizing ERα either by selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) or selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) forms the foundation of endocrine therapy and has achieved great success in the treatment of ERα positive (ERα+) BCs. Unfortunately, despite initial effectiveness, endocrine resistance eventually emerges in up to 30% of ERα+ BC patients and remains a significant medical challenge. Several mechanisms implicated in endocrine resistance have been extensively studied, including aberrantly activated growth factor receptors and downstream signaling pathways. Hence, the crosstalk between ERα and another oncogenic signaling has led to surge of interest to develop combination therapies and dual-target single agents. This review briefly introduces the synergisms between ERα and another anticancer target and summarizes the recent advances of ERα-based dual-targeting inhibitors from a medicinal chemistry perspective. Accordingly, their rational design strategies, structure-activity relationships (SARs) and biological activities are also dissected to provide some perspectives on future directions for ERα-based dual target drug discovery in BC therapy.

Genomic spectrum of actionable alterations in serial cell free DNA (cfDNA) analysis of patients with metastatic breast cancer

We aimed to study the incidence and genomic spectrum of actionable alterations (AA) detected in serial cfDNA collections from patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients with MBC who underwent plasma-based cfDNA testing (Guardant360®) between 2015 and 2021 at an academic institution were included. For patients with serial draws, new pathogenic alterations in each draw were classified as actionable alterations (AA) if they met ESCAT I or II criteria of the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT). A total of 344 patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) MBC, 95 patients with triple-negative (TN) MBC and 42 patients with HER2-positive (HER2 + ) MBC had a baseline (BL) cfDNA draw. Of these, 139 HR+/HER2-, 33 TN and 13 HER2+ patients underwent subsequent cfDNA draws. In the HR+/HER2- cohort, the proportion of patients with new AA decreased from 63% at BL to 27-33% in the 2nd-4th draws (p < 0.0001). While some of the new AA in subsequent draws from patients with HR+/HER2- MBC were new actionable variants in the same genes that were known to be altered in previous draws, 10-24% of patients had new AA in previously unaltered genes. The incidence of new AA also decreased with subsequent draws in the TN and HER2+ cohorts (TN: 25% to 0-9%, HER2 + : 38% to 14-15%). While the incidence of new AA in serial cfDNA decreased with subsequent draws across all MBC subtypes, new alterations with a potential impact on treatment selection continued to emerge, particularly for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC.

CDK7 in breast cancer: mechanisms of action and therapeutic potential

Cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) serves as a pivotal regulator in orchestrating cellular cycle dynamics and gene transcriptional activity. Elevated expression levels of CDK7 have been ubiquitously documented across a spectrum of malignancies and have been concomitantly correlated with adverse clinical outcomes. This review delineates the biological roles of CDK7 and explicates the molecular pathways through which CDK7 exacerbates the oncogenic progression of breast cancer. Furthermore, we synthesize the extant literature to provide a comprehensive overview of the advancement of CDK7-specific small-molecule inhibitors, encapsulating both preclinical and clinical findings in breast cancer contexts. The accumulated evidence substantiates the conceptualization of CDK7 as a propitious therapeutic target in breast cancer management.

Genomic Landscape of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Data From the SCRUM-Japan Cancer Genome Screening Project

PURPOSE

To understand the mutational landscape of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and tumor tissue of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with abemaciclib + endocrine therapy (ET).

METHODS

Blood samples for ctDNA and/or tissue samples were collected from abemaciclib-treated patients with HR+/HER2- MBC enrolled in the SCRUM-Japan MONSTAR-SCREEN project. Blood samples were collected before abemaciclib initiation (baseline) and at disease progression/abemaciclib discontinuation (post abemaciclib treatment). Clinical and genomic characteristics including neoplastic burden (measured by shedding rate and maximum variant allele frequency [VAF]) were assessed at baseline. Genomic alterations in ctDNA were compared in paired baseline and post abemaciclib treatment samples.

RESULTS

All patients (N = 97) were female (median age, 57 years [IQR, 50-67]). In baseline ctDNA (n = 77), PIK3CA (37%), TP53 (28%), ESR1 (16%), and GATA3 (11%) were the most frequently mutated genes. Baseline tissue samples (n = 79) showed similar alteration frequencies. Among patients with baseline ctDNA data, 30% had received previous ET. ESR1 alteration frequency (35% v 8%; P < .01), median shedding rate (3 v 2), and maximum somatic VAF (4 v 0.8; both P < .05) were significantly higher in ctDNA from patients with previous ET than those without previous ET. In paired ctDNA samples (n = 33), PIK3CA and ESR1 alteration frequencies were higher after abemaciclib treatment than at baseline, though not statistically significant. Among the post-treatment alterations, those newly acquired were detected most frequently in FGF3/4/19 (18%); PIK3CA, TP53, CCND1, and RB1 (all 15%); and ESR1 (12%).

CONCLUSION

We summarized the ctDNA and cancer tissue mutational landscape, including overall neoplastic burden and PIK3CA and ESR1 hotspot mutations in abemaciclib-treated patients with HR+/HER2- MBC. The data provide insights that could help optimize treatment strategies in this population.

PACE: A Randomized Phase II Study of Fulvestrant, Palbociclib, and Avelumab After Progression on Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor and Aromatase Inhibitor for Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) are an important component of treatment for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but it is not known if patients might derive benefit from continuation of CDK4/6i with endocrine therapy beyond initial tumor progression or if the addition of checkpoint inhibitor therapy has value in this setting.

METHODS

The randomized multicenter phase II PACE trial enrolled patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2- MBC whose disease had progressed on previous CDK4/6i and aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:2:1 to receive fulvestrant (F), fulvestrant plus palbociclib (F + P), or fulvestrant plus palbociclib and avelumab (F + P + A). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with F versus F + P.

RESULTS

Overall, 220 patients were randomly assigned between September 2017 and February 2022. The median age was 57 years (range, 25-83 years). Most patients were postmenopausal (80.9%), and 40% were originally diagnosed with de novo MBC. Palbociclib was the most common previous CDK4/6i (90.9%). The median PFS was 4.8 months on F and 4.6 months on F + P (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [90% CI, 0.79 to 1.55]; P = .62). The median PFS on F + P + A was 8.1 months (HR v F, 0.75 [90% CI, 0.50 to 1.12]; P = .23). The difference in PFS with F + P and F + P + A versus F was greater among patients with baseline ESR1 and PIK3CA alterations.

CONCLUSION

The addition of palbociclib to fulvestrant did not improve PFS versus fulvestrant alone among patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2- MBC whose disease had progressed on a previous CDK4/6i plus AI. The increased PFS seen with the addition of avelumab warrants further investigation in this patient population.

US Food and Drug Administration Approval Summary: Elacestrant for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative, ESR1-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved elacestrant for the treatment of postmenopausal women or adult men with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1)-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression after at least one line of endocrine therapy (ET).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Approval was based on EMERALD (Study RAD1901-308), a randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter trial in 478 patients with ER+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer, including 228 patients with ESR1 mutations. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either elacestrant 345 mg orally once daily (n = 239) or investigator's choice of ET (n = 239).

RESULTS

In the ESR1-mut subgroup, EMERALD demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review assessment (n = 228; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77]; P value = .0005). Although the overall survival (OS) end point was not met, there was no trend toward a potential OS detriment (HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.30]) in the ESR1-mut subgroup. PFS also reached statistical significance in the intention-to-treat population (ITT, N = 478; HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.88]; P value = .0018). However, improvement in PFS in the ITT population was primarily attributed to results from patients in the ESR1-mut subgroup. More patients who received elacestrant experienced nausea, vomiting, and dyslipidemia.

CONCLUSION

The approval of elacestrant in ER+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer was restricted to patients with ESR1 mutations. Benefit-risk assessment in the ESR1-mut subgroup was favorable on the basis of a statistically significant improvement in PFS in the context of an acceptable safety profile including no evidence of a potential detriment in OS. By contrast, the benefit-risk assessment in patients without ESR1 mutations was not favorable. Elacestrant is the first oral estrogen receptor antagonist to receive FDA approval for patients with ESR1 mutations.

Identifying prognostic biomarkers for palbociclib add-on therapy in fulvestrant-resistant breast cancer using cell-free DNA sequencing

BACKGROUND

The FUTURE trial (UMIN000029294) demonstrated the safety and efficacy of adding palbociclib after fulvestrant resistance in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced and metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC). In this planned sub-study, cancer panel sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was utilized to explore prognostic and predictive biomarkers for further palbociclib treatment following fulvestrant resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Herein, 149 cfDNA samples from 65 patients with fulvestrant-resistant disease were analysed at the time of palbociclib addition after fulvestrant resistance (baseline), on day 15 of cycle 1, and at the end of treatment using the assay for identifying diverse mutations in 34 cancer-related genes.

RESULTS

During the course of treatment, mutations in ESR1, PIK3CA, FOXA1, RUNX1, TBX3, and TP53 were the most common genomic alterations observed. Analysis of genomic mutations revealed that before fulvestrant introduction, baseline PIK3CA mutations were marginally lower in metastatic aromatase inhibitor (AI)-treated patients compared to adjuvant AI-treated patients (P = 0.063). Baseline PIK3CA mutations were associated with poorer progression-free survival [hazard ratio: 1.62, P = 0.04]. Comparative analysis between baseline and early-changing gene mutations identified poor prognostic factors including early-changing MAP3K1 mutations (hazard ratio: 4.66, P = 0.04), baseline AR mutations (hazard ratio: 3.53, P = 0.04), and baseline PIK3CA mutations (hazard ratio: 3.41, P = 0.02). Notably, the relationship between ESR1 mutations and mutations in PIK3CA, MAP3K1, and TP53 weakened as treatment progressed. Instead, PIK3CA mutations became correlated with TP53 and FOXA1 mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer panel testing for cfDNA identified prognostic and predictive biomarkers for palbociclib add-on therapy after acquiring fulvestrant resistance in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC.

Phase Ia/b Study of Giredestrant ± Palbociclib and ± Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Locally Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Giredestrant is an investigational next-generation, oral, selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader for the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. We present the primary analysis results of the phase Ia/b GO39932 study (NCT03332797).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with ER+, HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy received single-agent giredestrant (10, 30, 90, or 250 mg), or giredestrant (100 mg) ± palbociclib 125 mg ± luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist. Detailed cardiovascular assessment was conducted with giredestrant 100 mg. Endpoints included safety (primary), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy.

RESULTS

As of January 28, 2021, with 175 patients enrolled, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the MTD was not reached. Adverse events (AE) related to giredestrant occurred in 64.9% and 59.4% of patients in the single-agent ± LHRH agonist and giredestrant + palbociclib ± LHRH agonist cohorts, respectively (giredestrant-only-related grade 3/4 AEs were reported in 4.5% of patients across the single-agent cohorts and 3.1% of those with giredestrant + palbociclib). Dose-dependent asymptomatic bradycardia was observed, but no clinically significant changes in cardiac-related outcomes: heart rate, blood pressure, or exercise duration. Clinical benefit was observed in all cohorts (48.6% of patients in the single-agent cohort and 81.3% in the giredestrant + palbociclib ± LHRH agonist cohort), with no clear dose relationship, including in patients with ESR1-mutated tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Giredestrant was well tolerated and clinically active in patients who progressed on prior endocrine therapy. Results warrant further evaluation of giredestrant in randomized trials in early- and late-stage ER+ breast cancer.

Updates in the treatment of HR+HER2- breast cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women in the United States and the second leading cause of cancer death. BC research, diagnostics, drug development, and expansion of therapies for novel indications advances so rapidly that BC treatment standards change month-by-month. Herein we discuss notable advancements in the past year for hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2 negative (HER2-) BC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Radiolabeled estradiol imaging and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have changed our approach to metastatic BC (mBC) detection. Amongst an abundance of therapy options, treatment de-escalation to avoid toxicities is a priority. Promising results with CDK4/6 inhibitors in the curative setting have been demonstrated even as we await final data for use in the metastatic setting. Several novel endocrine therapies are expected to gain FDA-approval in the near future. Antibody-drug conjugates have expanded from other mBC types to HR+HER2- mBC. The PROMISE trial helped define disease recurrence outcomes for premenopausal women seeking pregnancy.

SUMMARY

The diagnostic and treatment landscape for HR+HER2- BC continues to rapidly evolve on multiple fronts.

c-MET-positive circulating tumor cells and cell-free DNA as independent prognostic factors in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Endocrine therapy resistance in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer (BC) is a significant clinical challenge that poses several unmet needs in the management of the disease. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of c-MET-positive circulating tumor cells (cMET+ CTCs), ESR1/PIK3CA mutations, and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentrations in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC).

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients with HR+ mBC were prospectively enrolled during standard treatment at Samsung Medical Center. CTCs were isolated from blood using GenoCTC® and EpCAM or c-MET CTC isolation kits. PIK3CA and ESR1 hotspot mutations were analyzed using droplet digital PCR. CfDNA concentrations were calculated using internal control copies from the ESR1 mutation test. Immunocytochemistry was performed to compare c-MET overexpression between primary and metastatic sites.

RESULTS

The proportion of c-MET overexpression was significantly higher in metastatic sites than in primary sites (p = 0.00002). Survival analysis showed that c-MET+ CTC, cfDNA concentration, and ESR1 mutations were significantly associated with poor prognosis (p = 0.0026, 0.0021, and 0.0064, respectively) in HR+/HER2- mBC. By contrast, EpCAM-positive CTC (EpCAM+ CTC) and PIK3CA mutations were not associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in HR+/HER2- mBC. Multivariate analyses revealed that c-MET+ CTCs and cfDNA concentration were independent predictors of PFS in HR+/HER2- mBC.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring c-MET+ CTC, rather than assessing c-MET expression in the primary BC site, could provide valuable information for predicting disease progression, as c-MET expression can change during treatment. The c-MET+ CTC count and cfDNA concentration could provide complementary information on disease progression in HR+ /HER2- mBC, highlighting the importance of integrated liquid biopsy.

A systematic analysis of the landscape of synthetic lethality-driven precision oncology

BACKGROUND

Synthetic lethality (SL) denotes a genetic interaction between two genes whose co-inactivation is detrimental to cells. Because more than 25 years have passed since SL was proposed as a promising way to selectively target cancer vulnerabilities, it is timely to comprehensively assess its impact so far and discuss its future.

METHODS

We systematically analyzed the literature and clinical trial data from the PubMed and Trialtrove databases to portray the preclinical and clinical landscape of SL oncology.

FINDINGS

We identified 235 preclinically validated SL pairs and found 1,207 pertinent clinical trials, and the number keeps increasing over time. About one-third of these SL clinical trials go beyond the typically studied DNA damage response (DDR) pathway, testifying to the recently broadening scope of SL applications in clinical oncology. We find that SL oncology trials have a greater success rate than non-SL-based trials. However, about 75% of the preclinically validated SL interactions have not yet been tested in clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Dissecting the recent efforts harnessing SL to identify predictive biomarkers, novel therapeutic targets, and effective combination therapy, our systematic analysis reinforces the hope that SL may serve as a key driver of precision oncology going forward.

FUNDING

Funded by the Samsung Research Funding & Incubation Center of Samsung Electronics, the Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Republic of Korea government (MSIT), the Kwanjeong Educational Foundation, the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute (NCI), and Center for Cancer Research (CCR).

Hormone, Targeted, and Combinational Therapies for Breast Cancers: From Humans to Dogs

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer in women. In female dogs, canine mammary gland tumor (CMT) is also the leading neoplasm. Comparative oncology indicates similar tumor behaviors between human BCs (HBCs) and CMTs. Therefore, this review summarizes the current research in hormone and targeted therapies and describes the future prospects for HBCs and CMTs. For hormone receptor-expressing BCs, the first medical intervention is hormone therapy. Monoclonal antibodies against Her2 are proposed for the treatment of Her2+ BCs. However, the major obstacle in hormone therapy or monoclonal antibodies is drug resistance. Therefore, increasing alternatives have been developed to overcome these difficulties. We systemically reviewed publications that reported inhibitors targeting certain molecules in BC cells. The various treatment choices for humans decrease mortality in females with BC. However, the development of hormone or targeted therapies in veterinary medicine is still limited. Even though some clinical trials have been proposed, severe side effects and insufficient case numbers might restrict further explorations. This difficulty highlights the urgent need to develop updated hormone/targeted therapy or novel immunotherapies. Therefore, exploring new therapies to provide more precise use in dogs with CMTs will be the focus of future research. Furthermore, due to the similarities shared by humans and dogs, well-planned prospective clinical trials on the use of combinational or novel immunotherapies in dogs with CMTs to obtain solid results for both humans and dogs can be reasonably anticipated in the future.

Exploring the Spatial Landscape of the Estrogen Receptor Proximal Proteome With Antibody-Based Proximity Labeling

Estrogen receptor α (ERα) drives the transcription of genes involved in breast cancer (BC) progression, relying on coregulatory protein recruitment for its transcriptional and biological activities. Mutation of ERα as well as aberrant recruitment of its regulatory proteins contribute to tumor adaptation and drug resistance. Therefore, understanding the dynamic changes in ERα protein interaction networks is crucial for elucidating drug resistance mechanisms in BC. Despite progress in studying ERα-associated proteins, capturing subcellular transient interactions remains challenging and, as a result, significant number of important interactions remain undiscovered. In this study, we employed biotinylation by antibody recognition (BAR), an innovative antibody-based proximity labeling (PL) approach, coupled with mass spectrometry to investigate the ERα proximal proteome and its changes associated with resistance to aromatase inhibition, a key therapy used in the treatment of ERα-positive BC. We show that BAR successfully detected most of the known ERα interactors and mainly identified nuclear proteins, using either an epitope tag or endogenous antibody to target ERα. We further describe the ERα proximal proteome rewiring associated with resistance applying BAR to a panel of isogenic cell lines modeling tumor adaptation in the clinic. Interestingly, we find that ERα associates with some of the canonical cofactors in resistant cells and several proximal proteome changes are due to increased expression of ERα. Resistant models also show decreased levels of estrogen-regulated genes. Sensitive and resistant cells harboring a mutation in the ERα (Y537C) revealed a similar proximal proteome. We provide an ERα proximal protein network covering several novel ERα-proximal partners. These include proteins involved in highly dynamic processes such as sumoylation and ubiquitination difficult to detect with traditional protein interaction approaches. Overall, we present BAR as an effective approach to investigate the ERα proximal proteome in a spatial context and demonstrate its application in different experimental conditions.

[Mechanisms of cancer drug resistance]

Despite decades of research into the molecular mechanisms of cancer and the development of new treatments, drug resistance persists as a major problem. This is in part due to the heterogeneity of cancer, including the diversity of tumor cell lineage and cell plasticity, the spectrum of somatic mutations, the complexity of microenvironments, and immunosuppressive characteristic, then necessitating the use of many different therapeutic approaches. We summarize here the biological causes of resistance, thus offering new perspectives for tackle drug resistance.

Estrogen receptor positive breast cancer: contemporary nuances to sequencing therapy

The treatment landscape of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer has evolved dramatically in recent years. While the combination of endocrine therapy and a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor is accepted as standard first-line treatment in most settings without visceral crisis, newer therapies have challenged traditional treatment models where cytotoxic chemotherapy was previously felt to be the only second-line option at time of progression. The incorporation of next-generation sequencing has led to the identification of molecular targets for therapeutic agents, including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and ESR1, though similar pathways can be targeted even in the absence of a mutation, such as with use of inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin. Current data also supports the use of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors beyond progression, even prior to the patient's first introduction to chemotherapy. The abundance of therapeutic options not only delay time to cytotoxic chemotherapy and antibody-drug conjugate initiation, but has resulted in improvement in breast cancer survivorship. Many unanswered questions remain, however, as to the most efficacious way to sequence these novel agents. To assist in this decision-making, we will review the existing data on systemic therapy and propose a treatment paradigm.

ESR1 mutations in HR+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer: Enhancing the accuracy of ctDNA testing

Activating mutations of the estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) are common mechanisms of endocrine therapy (ET) resistance in hormone receptor-positive (HR + )/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Recent clinical findings emphasize that both old and new generations of selective ER degraders (SERDs) demonstrate enhanced clinical effectiveness in patients with MBC who have detectable ESR1 mutations via liquid biopsy. This stands in contrast to individuals with MBC carrying these mutations and undergoing conventional endocrine monotherapies like aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive alternative to conventional tissue-based testing for identifying ESR1 mutations. Within the context of the PADA-1 and EMERALD trials, distinct molecular methodologies and assays, specifically digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), have been employed to evaluate the mutational status of ESR1 within ctDNA. This manuscript critically examines the advantages and indications of various ctDNA testing methods on liquid biopsy for HR+/HER2-negative MBC. Specifically, we delve into the capabilities of ddPCR and NGS in identifying ESR1 mutations. Each methodology boasts unique strengths and limitations: ddPCR excels in its analytical sensitivity for pinpointing hotspot mutations, while NGS offers comprehensive coverage of the spectrum of ESR1 mutations. The significance of meticulous sample handling and timely analysis is emphasized, acknowledging the transient nature of cfDNA. Furthermore, we underscore the importance of detecting sub-clonal ESR1 mutations, as these variants can exert a pivotal influence on predicting both endocrine therapy resistance and responsiveness to SERDs. In essence, this work discusses the role of ctDNA analysis for detecting ESR1 mutations and their implications in tailoring effective therapeutic strategies for HR+/HER2- MBC.

ERα/PR crosstalk is altered in the context of the ERα Y537S mutation and contributes to endocrine therapy-resistant tumor proliferation

The constitutively active ESR1 Y537S mutation is associated with endocrine therapy (ET) resistance and progression of metastatic breast cancer through its effects on estrogen receptor (ERα) gene regulatory functions. However, the complex relationship between ERα and the progesterone receptor (PR), known as ERα/PR crosstalk, has yet to be characterized in the context of the ERα Y537S mutation. Using proximity ligation assays, we identify an increased physical interaction of ERα and PR in the context of the ERα Y537S mutation, including in the nucleus where this interaction may translate to altered gene expression. As such, more than 30 genes were differentially expressed in both patient tumor and cell line data (MCF7 and/or T47D cells) in the context of the ERα Y537S mutation compared to ERα WT. Of these, IRS1 stood out as a gene of interest, and ERα and PR occupancy at chromatin binding sites along IRS1 were uniquely altered in the context of ERα Y537S. Furthermore, siRNA knockdown of IRS1 or treatment with the IRS1 inhibitor NT-157 had a significant anti-proliferative effect in ERα Y537S cell lines, implicating IRS1 as a potential therapeutic target for restoring treatment sensitivity to patients with breast cancers harboring ERα Y537S mutations.

The Diversity of Liquid Biopsies and Their Potential in Breast Cancer Management

Analyzing blood as a so-called liquid biopsy in breast cancer (BC) patients has the potential to adapt therapy management. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and other blood components mirror the tumoral heterogeneity and could support a range of clinical decisions. Multi-cancer early detection tests utilizing blood are advancing but are not part of any clinical routine yet. Liquid biopsy analysis in the course of neoadjuvant therapy has potential for therapy (de)escalation.Minimal residual disease detection via serial cfDNA analysis is currently on its way. The prognostic value of blood analytes in early and metastatic BC is undisputable, but the value of these prognostic biomarkers for clinical management is controversial. An interventional trial confirmed a significant outcome benefit when therapy was changed in case of newly emerging cfDNA mutations under treatment and thus showed the clinical utility of cfDNA analysis for therapy monitoring. The analysis of PIK3CA or ESR1 variants in plasma of metastatic BC patients to prescribe targeted therapy with alpesilib or elacestrant has already arrived in clinical practice with FDA-approved tests available and is recommended by ASCO. The translation of more liquid biopsy applications into clinical practice is still pending due to a lack of knowledge of the analytes' biology, lack of standards and difficulties in proving clinical utility.

Mathematical Modeling Identifies Optimum Palbociclib-fulvestrant Dose Administration Schedules for the Treatment of Patients with Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer

Cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors such as palbociclib are approved for the treatment of metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapies and significantly improve outcomes in patients with this disease. However, given the large number of possible pairwise drug combinations and administration schedules, it remains unclear which clinical strategy would lead to best survival. Here, we developed a computational, cell cycle-explicit model to characterize the pharmacodynamic response to palbociclib-fulvestrant combination therapy. This pharmacodynamic model was parameterized, in a Bayesian statistical inference approach, using in vitro data from cells with wild-type estrogen receptor (WT-ER) and cells expressing the activating missense ER mutation, Y537S, which confers resistance to fulvestrant. We then incorporated pharmacokinetic models derived from clinical data into our computational modeling platform. To systematically compare dose administration schedules, we performed in silico clinical trials based on integrating our pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic models as well as considering clinical toxicity constraints. We found that continuous dosing of palbociclib is more effective for lowering overall tumor burden than the standard, pulsed-dose palbociclib treatment. Importantly, our mathematical modeling and statistical analysis platform provides a rational method for comparing treatment strategies in search of optimal combination dosing strategies of other cell-cycle inhibitors in ER+ breast cancer.

SIGNIFICANCE

We created a computational modeling platform to predict the effects of fulvestrant/palbocilib treatment on WT-ER and Y537S-mutant breast cancer cells, and found that continuous treatment schedules are more effective than the standard, pulsed-dose palbociclib treatment schedule.

Metastatic ER+ Breast Cancer: Mechanisms of Resistance and Future Therapeutic Approaches

Endocrine therapy is the main treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. However, advanced tumors develop resistance to endocrine therapy, rendering it ineffective as the disease progresses. There are several molecular mechanisms of primary and secondary endocrine resistance. Resistance can develop due to either alteration of the estrogen receptor pathway (e.g., ESR1 mutations) or upstream growth factors signaling pathways (e.g., PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway). Despite progress in the development of molecularly targeted anticancer therapies, the emergence of resistance remains a major limitation and an area of unmet need. In this article, we review the mechanisms of acquired endocrine resistance in HR+ advanced breast cancer and discuss current and future investigational therapeutic approaches.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology CXIII: Nuclear Receptor Superfamily-Update 2023

The NR superfamily comprises 48 transcription factors in humans that control a plethora of gene network programs involved in a wide range of physiologic processes. This review will summarize and discuss recent progress in NR biology and drug development derived from integrating various approaches, including biophysical techniques, structural studies, and translational investigation. We also highlight how defective NR signaling results in various diseases and disorders and how NRs can be targeted for therapeutic intervention via modulation via binding to synthetic lipophilic ligands. Furthermore, we also review recent studies that improved our understanding of NR structure and signaling. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Nuclear receptors (NRs) are ligand-regulated transcription factors that are critical regulators of myriad physiological processes. NRs serve as receptors for an array of drugs, and in this review, we provide an update on recent research into the roles of these drug targets.

ESR1 Gene Mutations and Liquid Biopsy in ER-Positive Breast Cancers: A Small Step Forward, a Giant Leap for Personalization of Endocrine Therapy?

The predominant forms of breast cancer (BC) are hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumors characterized by the expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) and/or progesterone receptors (PRs). Patients with HR+ tumors can benefit from endocrine therapy (ET). Three types of ET are approved for the treatment of HR+ BCs and include selective ER modulators, aromatase inhibitors, and selective ER downregulators. ET is the mainstay of adjuvant treatment in the early setting and the backbone of the first-line treatment in an advanced setting; however, the emergence of acquired resistance can lead to cancer recurrence or progression. The mechanisms of ET resistance are often related to the occurrence of mutations in the ESR1 gene, which encodes the ER-alpha protein. As ESR1 mutations are hardly detectable at diagnosis but are present in 30% to 40% of advanced BC (ABC) after treatment, the timeline of testing is crucial. To manage this resistance, ESR1 testing has recently been recommended; in ER+ HER2- ABC and circulating cell-free DNA, so-called liquid biopsy appears to be the most convenient way to detect the emergence of ESR1 mutations. Technically, several options exist, including Next Generation Sequencing and ultra-sensitive PCR-based techniques. In this context, personalization of ET through the surveillance of ESR1 mutations in the plasma of HR+ BC patients throughout the disease course represents an innovative way to improve the standard of care.

Allele-Specific Gene Regulation, Phenotypes, and Therapeutic Vulnerabilities in Estrogen Receptor Alpha-Mutant Endometrial Cancer

Activating estrogen receptor alpha (ER; also known as ESR1) mutations are present in primary endometrial and metastatic breast cancers, promoting estrogen-independent activation of the receptor. Functional characterizations in breast cancer have established unique molecular and phenotypic consequences of the receptor, yet the impact of ER mutations in endometrial cancer has not been fully explored. In this study, we used CRISPR-Cas9 to model the clinically prevalent ER-Y537S mutation and compared results with ER-D538G to discover allele-specific differences between ER mutations in endometrial cancer. We found that constitutive activity of mutant ER resulted in changes in the expression of thousands of genes, stemming from combined alterations to ER binding and chromatin accessibility. The unique gene expression programs resulted in ER-mutant cells developing increased cancer-associated phenotypes, including migration, invasion, anchorage-independent growth, and growth in vivo. To uncover potential treatment strategies, we identified ER-associated proteins via Rapid Immunoprecipitation and Mass Spectrometry of Endogenous Proteins and interrogated two candidates, CDK9 and NCOA3. Inhibition of these regulatory proteins resulted in decreased growth and migration, representing potential novel treatment strategies for ER-mutant endometrial cancer.

IMPLICATIONS

This study provides insight into mutant ER activity in endometrial cancer and identifies potential therapies for women with ER-mutant endometrial cancer.

Overexpression of BQ323636.1 contributes to anastrozole resistance in AR+ve/ER+ve breast cancer

Aromatase inhibitors (Ais) are used as adjuvant endocrine therapy for oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+ve) post-menopausal breast cancer patients. Ais, by inhibiting the enzyme aromatase, block the conversion of androgen to oestrogen, reducing oestrogen levels. Resistance to Ais limits their clinical utilisation. Here, we show that overexpression of BQ323636.1 (BQ), a novel splice variant of nuclear co-repressor NCOR2, is associated with resistance to the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor anastrozole in ER+ve post-menopausal breast cancer. Mechanistic study indicates that BQ overexpression enhances androgen receptor (AR) activity and in the presence of anastrozole, causes hyper-activation of AR signalling, which unexpectedly enhanced cell proliferation, through increased expression of CDK2, CDK4, and CCNE1. BQ overexpression reverses the effect of anastrozole in ER+ve breast cancer in an AR-dependent manner, whilst co-treatment with the AR antagonist bicalutamide recovered its therapeutic effect both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, for BQ-overexpressing breast cancer, targeting AR can combat anastrozole resistance. Clinical study of 268 primary breast cancer samples of ER+ve patients who had been treated with non-steroidal Ais showed 32.5% (38/117) of cases with combined high nuclear expression of BQ and AR, which were found to be significantly associated with Ai resistance. Non-steroidal Ai-treated patients with high nuclear expression of both BQ and AR had poorer overall, disease-specific, and disease-free survival. These findings suggest the importance of assessing BQ and AR expression status in the primary ER+ve breast tumour prior to Ai treatment. This may save patients from inappropriate treatment and enable effective therapy to be given at an early stage. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Therapeutic resistance to anti-oestrogen therapy in breast cancer

The hormone receptor oestrogen receptor-α (ER) orchestrates physiological mammary gland development, breast carcinogenesis and the progression of breast tumours into lethal, treatment-refractory systemic disease. Selective antagonism of ER signalling has been one of the most successful therapeutic approaches in oncology, benefiting patients as both a cancer preventative measure and a cancer treatment strategy. However, resistance to anti-oestrogen therapy is a major clinical challenge. Over the past decade, we have gained an understanding of how breast cancers evolve under the pressure of anti-oestrogen therapy. This is best depicted by the case of oestrogen-independent mutations in the gene encoding ER (ESR1), which are virtually absent in primary breast cancer but highly prevalent (20-40%) in anti-oestrogen-treated metastatic disease. These and other findings highlight the 'evolvability' of ER+ breast cancer and the need to understand molecular processes by which this evolution occurs. Recent development and approval of next-generation ER antagonists to target ESR1-mutant breast cancer underscores the clinical importance of this evolvability and sets a new paradigm for the treatment of ER+ breast cancers.

Estrogen Receptor Signaling in Breast Cancer

Estrogen receptor (ER) signaling is a critical regulator of cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival in breast cancer (BC) and other hormone-sensitive cancers. In this review, we explore the mechanism of ER-dependent downstream signaling in BC and the role of estrogens as growth factors necessary for cancer invasion and dissemination. The significance of the clinical implications of ER signaling in BC, including the potential of endocrine therapies that target estrogens' synthesis and ER-dependent signal transmission, such as aromatase inhibitors or selective estrogen receptor modulators, is discussed. As a consequence, the challenges associated with the resistance to these therapies resulting from acquired ER mutations and potential strategies to overcome them are the critical point for the new treatment strategies' development.

The Treatment Landscape of Elderly Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Her2 Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Current Perspectives and Future Directions

Breast cancer (BC) in elderly women is an increasing health issue due to demographic changes. BC tends to present later and may receive less than standard treatment options. More often, BC in elderly patients is endocrine-positive (HR+). The treatment of elderly patients with metastatic BC (mBC) represents a therapeutic challenge. In recent years, the treatment landscape of patients that are HR+/Her2-negative has changed due to the introduction in clinical practice of new targeted drugs, which have improved patient outcomes. Elderly patients are a small percentage of all patients enrolled in clinical trials and, to date, there are no standardized guidelines that define the best treatment option for this patient population. This can lead to undertreatment or overtreatment, impacting patient morbidity and mortality. Geriatric Assessment tools to tailor the treatment in elderly patients are underused because they are long and difficult to apply in a busy routine clinical practice. For all these reasons, there is an urgent need to produce data about the best treatment for elderly patients with HR+ mBC. Herein, we report data from randomized clinical trials and real-world evidence on the therapeutic options for HR+ Her2-negative mBC elderly patients and explore future treatment directions.

Emerging systemic therapy options beyond CDK4/6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

Endocrine therapy (ET) with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) is currently the standard first-line treatment for most patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) negative advanced breast cancer. However, resistance to ET and CDK4/6i inevitably ensues. The optimal post-progression treatment regimens and their sequencing continue to evolve in the rapidly changing treatment landscape. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of resistance to ET and CDK4/6i, which can be broadly classified as alterations affecting cell cycle mediators and activation of alternative signaling pathways. Recent clinical trials have been directed at the targets and pathways implicated, including estrogen and androgen receptors, PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK pathways, tyrosine kinase receptors such as FGFR and HER2, homologous recombination repair pathway, other components of the cell cycle and cell death. We describe the findings from these clinical trials using small molecule inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates and immunotherapy, providing insights into how these novel strategies may circumvent treatment resistance, and discuss how some have not translated into clinical benefit. The challenges posed by tumor heterogeneity, adaptive rewiring of signaling pathways and dose-limiting toxicities underscore the need to elucidate the latest tumor biology in each patient, and develop treatments with improved therapeutic index in the era of precision medicine.

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers with therapeutic targets in breast cancer: A 2022 update on current developments, evidence, and recommendations

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and validate the recent and emerging data for prognostic and predictive biomarkers with therapeutic targets in breast cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search from January 2015 to March 2022 was performed using the key terms breast cancer, clinical practice guidelines, gene mutations, genomic assay, immune cancer therapy, predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers, and targeted therapies.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant clinical trials, meta-analyses, seminal articles, and published evidence- and consensus-based clinical practice guidelines in the English language were identified, reviewed and evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Breast cancer is a biologically heterogeneous disease, leading to wide variability in treatment responses and survival outcomes. Biomarkers for breast cancer are evolving from traditional biomarkers in immunohistochemistry (IHC) such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) to genetic biomarkers with therapeutic implications (e.g. breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 [BRCA1/2], estrogen receptor α [ESR1] gene mutation, HER2 gene mutation, microsatellite instability [MSI], phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase catalytic subunit 3Cα [PIK3CA] gene mutation, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase [NTRK] gene mutation). In addition, current data are most robust for biomarkers in immunotherapy (e.g. programmed cell death receptor ligand-1 [PD-L1], microsatellite instability-high [MSI-H] or deficient mismatch repair [dMMR]). Oncotype DX assay remains the best validated gene expression assay that is both predictive and prognostic whereas MammaPrint is prognostic for genomic risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomarker-driven therapies have the potential to confer greater therapeutic advantages than standard-of-care therapies. The purported survival benefits associated with biomarker-driven therapies should be weighed against their potential harms.

Validation of liquid biopsy for ESR1-mutation analysis in hormone-sensitive breast cancer: a pooled meta-analysis

Several retrospective and prospective studies have shown that genomic alterations in Estrogen-receptor one (ESR1) can be characterized not only in tissue samples but also by sequencing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in liquid biopsy. Therefore, liquid biopsy is a potential noninvasive surrogate for tissue biopsy. This meta-analysis was designed to compare the prevalence of ESR 1 mutation detected with liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy. A pooled meta-analysis of studies published between 1 January 2007 and 1 March 2021 was conducted regarding the methodologies used for ESR1 mutation analysis. Liquid biopsy is a valid, inexpensive, and attractive noninvasive alternative to tumor biopsies for the identification of ESR1 mutations. Liquid biopsy for ESR 1 analysis would facilitate regular testing, allowing monitoring of the sensitivity to ET and guiding treatment strategies.

SCR-6852, an oral and highly brain-penetrating estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), effectively shrinks tumors both in intracranial and subcutaneous ER + breast cancer models

BACKGROUND

Targeted estrogen receptor degradation has been approved to effectively treat ER + breast cancers. Due to the poor bioavailability of fulvestrant, the first generation of SERD, many efforts were made to develop oral SERDs. With the approval of Elacestrant, oral SERDs demonstrated superior efficacy than fulvestrant. However, due to the poor ability of known SERDs to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB), breast cancer patients with brain metastasis cannot benefit from clinical SERDs.

METHODS

The ER inhibitory effects were evaluated on ERα protein degradation, and target genes downregulation. And anti-proliferation activities were further determined in a panel of ER + breast cancer cell lines. The subcutaneous and intracranial ER + tumor models were used to evaluate the efficacy of anti-tumor effects. Brain penetrability was determined in multiple animal species.

RESULTS

SCR-6852 is a novel SERD and currently is under early clinical evaluation. In vitro studies demonstrated that it strongly induced both wildtype and mutant ERα degradation. It potently inhibited cell proliferation in a panel of ER + breast cancer cell lines, including the cell lines containing ESR1 mutations (Y537 and D538). Furthermore, SCR-6852 exhibited pure antagonistic activities on the ERɑ signal axis identified both in vitro and in vivo. Oral administration of SCR-6852 at 10 mg/kg resulted in tumor shrinkage which was superior to Fulvestrant at 250 mg/kg, notably, in the intracranial tumor model, SCR-6852 effectively inhibited tumor growth and significantly prolonged mice survival, which correlated well with the high exposure in brains. In addition to mice, SCR-6852 also exhibited high brain penetrability in rats and dogs.

CONCLUSIONS

SCR-6852 is a novel SERD with high potency in inducing ERα protein degradation and pure antagonistic activity on ERɑ signaling in vitro and in vivo. Due to the high brain penetrability, SCR-6852 could be used to treat breast patients with brain metastasis.

The Efficacy of CB-103, a First-in-Class Transcriptional Notch Inhibitor, in Preclinical Models of Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of CB-103 was evaluated in preclinical models of both ER+ and TNBC. Furthermore, the therapeutic efficacy of combining CB-103 with fulvestrant in ER+ BC and paclitaxel in TNBC was determined.

METHODS

CB-103 was screened in combination with a panel of anti-neoplastic drugs. We evaluated the anti-tumor activity of CB-103 with fulvestrant in ESR1-mutant (Y537S), endocrine-resistant BC xenografts. In the same model, we examined anti-CSC activity in mammosphere formation assays for CB-103 alone or in combination with fulvestrant or palbociclib. We also evaluated the effect of CB-103 plus paclitaxel on primary tumors and CSC in a GSI-resistant TNBC model HCC1187. Comparisons between groups were performed with a two-sided unpaired Students' t-test. A one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-analysis was performed to analyze the in vivo efficacy study results.

THE RESULTS

CB-103 showed synergism with fulvestrant in ER+ cells and paclitaxel in TNBC cells. CB-103 combined with fulvestrant or paclitaxel potently inhibited mammosphere formation in both models. Combination of CB-103 and fulvestrant significantly reduced tumor volume in an ESR1-mutant, the endocrine-resistant BC model. In a GSI-resistant TNBC model, CB-103 plus paclitaxel significantly delayed tumor growth compared to paclitaxel alone.

CONCLUSION

our data indicate that CB-103 is an attractive candidate for clinical investigation in endocrine-resistant, recurrent breast cancers with biomarker-confirmed Notch activity in combination with SERDs and/or CDKis and in TNBCs with biomarker-confirmed Notch activity in combination with taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens.

Modeling the novel SERD elacestrant in cultured fulvestrant-refractory HR-positive breast circulating tumor cells

PURPOSE

Metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer initially responds to serial courses of endocrine therapy, but ultimately becomes refractory. Elacestrant, a new generation FDA-approved oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) and antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy in a subset of women with advanced HR+breast cancer, but there are few patient-derived models to characterize its effect in advanced cancers with diverse treatment histories and acquired mutations.

METHODS

We analyzed clinical outcomes with elacestrant, compared with endocrine therapy, among women who had previously been treated with a fulvestrant-containing regimen from the recent phase 3 EMERALD Study. We further modeled sensitivity to elacestrant, compared with the currently approved SERD, fulvestrant in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models and cultured circulating tumor cells (CTCs).

RESULTS

Analysis of the subset of breast cancer patients enrolled in the EMERALD study who had previously received a fulvestrant-containing regimen indicates that they had better progression-free survival with elacestrant than with standard-of-care endocrine therapy, a finding that was independent estrogen receptor (ESR1) gene mutations. We modeled elacestrant responsiveness using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models and in ex vivo cultured CTCs derived from patients with HR+breast cancer extensively treated with multiple endocrine therapies, including fulvestrant. Both CTCs and PDX models are refractory to fulvestrant but sensitive to elacestrant, independent of mutations in ESR1 and Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate 3-Kinase Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PIK3CA) genes.

CONCLUSION

Elacestrant retains efficacy in breast cancer cells that have acquired resistance to currently available ER targeting therapies. Elacestrant may be an option for patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer whose disease progressed on fulvestrant in the metastatic setting.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

Serial endocrine therapy is the mainstay of management for metastatic HR+breast cancer, but acquisition of drug resistance highlights the need for better therapies. Elacestrant is a recently FDA-approved novel oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), with demonstrated efficacy in the EMERALD phase 3 clinical trial of refractory HR+breast cancer. Subgroup analysis of the EMERALD clinical trial identifies clinical benefit with elacestrant in patients who had received prior fulvestrant independent of the mutational status of the ESR1 gene, supporting its potential utility in treating refractory HR+breast cancer. Here, we use pre-clinical models, including ex vivo cultures of circulating tumor cells and patient-derived xenografts, to demonstrate the efficacy of elacestrant in breast cancer cells with acquired resistance to fulvestrant.

Implications of tumour heterogeneity on cancer evolution and therapy resistance: lessons from breast cancer

Tumour heterogeneity is pervasive amongst many cancers and leads to disease progression, and therapy resistance. In this review, using breast cancer as an exemplar, we focus on the recent advances in understanding the interplay between tumour cells and their microenvironment using single cell sequencing and digital spatial profiling technologies. Further, we discuss the utility of lineage tracing methodologies in pre-clinical models of breast cancer, and how these are being used to unravel new therapeutic vulnerabilities and reveal biomarkers of breast cancer progression. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Evaluating steroid hormone receptor interactions using the live-cell NanoBRET proximity assay

Steroid hormone receptors play a crucial role in the development and characterization of the majority of breast cancers. These receptors canonically function through homodimerization, but physical interactions between different hormone receptors play a key role in cell functions as well. The estrogen receptor (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PR), for example, are involved in a complex set of interactions known as ERα/PR crosstalk. Here, we developed a valuable panel of nuclear receptor expression plasmids specifically for use in NanoBRET assays to assess nuclear receptor homo- and heterodimerization. We demonstrate the utility of this assay system by assessing ERα/PR physical interaction in the context of the endocrine therapy resistance-associated ERα Y537S mutation. We identify a role of the ERα Y537S mutation beyond that of constitutive activity of the receptor; it also increases ERα/PR crosstalk. In total, the NanoBRET assay provides a novel avenue for investigating hormone receptor crosstalk. Future research may use this system to assess the effects of other clinically significant hormone receptor mutations on hormone receptor crosstalk.

Development of a Detection System for ESR1 Mutations in Circulating Tumour DNA Using PNA-LNA-Mediated PCR Clamping

Although circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA)-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a less invasive method for assessing ESR1 mutations that are essential mechanisms of endocrine therapy resistance in patients with oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, adequate amounts of DNA are required to assess polyclonal ESR1 mutations. By combining a peptide nucleic acid and locked nucleic acid polymerase chain reaction (PNA-LNA PCR) clamping assay, we have developed a novel detection system to screen for polyclonal ESR1 mutations in ctDNA. A validation assay was prospectively performed on clinical samples and compared with the NGS results. The PNA-LNA PCR clamp assay was validated using six and four blood samples in which ESR1 mutations were detected by NGS and no mutations were detected, respectively. The PNA-LNA assay results were comparable with those of NGS. We prospectively assessed the concordance between the PNA-LNA PCR clamp method and NGS. Using the PNA-LNA PCR clamp method, ESR1 mutations were detected in 5 out of 18 samples, including those in which mutations were not detected by NGS due to small amounts of ctDNA. The PNA-LNA PCR clamping method is a highly sensitive and minimally invasive assay for polyclonal ESR1 mutation detection in the ctDNA of patients with breast cancer.

Clinical Management of Potential Toxicity of Abemaciclib and Approaches to Ensure Treatment Continuation

INTRODUCTION

The association between abemaciclib dose reduction and treatment adherence is not clear. In this study, we examined real-world data of Japanese patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) to determine how abemaciclib dose reduction is related to treatment continuation.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study involved 120 consecutive patients with ABC who received abemaciclib from December 2018 to March 2021. The time to treatment failure (TTF) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a TTF of >365 days (TTF365).

RESULTS

According to the dose reduction during treatment, the patients were classified into 100, 200, and 300 mg/day abemaciclib groups. The 300 mg/day group had a TTF of 7.4 months, whereas the 100 and 200 mg/day groups had significantly longer TTFs (17.9 and 17.3 months, respectively; P = 0.0002). In this study, relative to the 300 mg/day arm, TTF was improved in 200mg/day arm and 100 mg/day arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.93) and [HR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.74). For patients who received 300mg/day of abemaciclib dose arm, 200mg/day, and 100mg/day, the median TTF was 7.4 ,17.9 and 17.3 months. The frequently reported adverse effects (AEs) were anemia, increased blood creatinine levels, diarrhea, and neutropenia (90%, 83%, 83%, and 75% of the patients, respectively). Neutropenia, fatigue, and diarrhea were the top AEs causing dose reduction. A multivariate analysis that examined factors associated with achieving TTF 365 confirmed that dose down was an important factor (odds ratio: 3.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.68-9.36, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the 100 and 200 mg/day groups had a longer TTF than the 300 mg/day group, and dose reduction was identified as an important factor in achieving longer TTF.

Estrogen receptor alpha mutations regulate gene expression and cell growth in breast cancer through microRNAs

Estrogen receptor α (ER) mutations occur in up to 30% of metastatic ER-positive breast cancers. Recent data has shown that ER mutations impact the expression of thousands of genes not typically regulated by wildtype ER. While the majority of these altered genes can be explained by constant activity of mutant ER or genomic changes such as altered ER binding and chromatin accessibility, as much as 33% remain unexplained, indicating the potential for post-transcriptional effects. Here, we explored the role of microRNAs in mutant ER-driven gene regulation and identified several microRNAs that are dysregulated in ER mutant cells. These differentially regulated microRNAs target a significant portion of mutant-specific genes involved in key cellular processes. When the activity of microRNAs is altered using mimics or inhibitors, significant changes are observed in gene expression and cellular proliferation related to mutant ER. An in-depth evaluation of miR-301b led us to discover an important role for PRKD3 in the proliferation of ER mutant cells. Our findings show that microRNAs contribute to mutant ER gene regulation and cellular effects in breast cancer cells.

Exposure, toxicological mechanism of endocrine disrupting compounds and future direction of identification using nano-architectonics

Endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDC) are a group of exogenous chemicals that structurally mimic hormones and interfere with the hormonal signaling cascade. EDC interacts with hormone receptors, transcriptional activators, and co-activators, altering the signaling pathway at both genomic and non-genomic levels. Consequently, these compounds are responsible for adverse health ailments such as cancer, reproductive issues, obesity, and cardiovascular and neurological disorders. The persistent nature and increasing incidence of environmental contamination from anthropogenic and industrial effluents have become a global concern, resulting in a movement in both developed and developing countries to identify and estimate the degree of exposure to EDC. The U.S. Environment Protection Agency (EPA) has outlined a series of in vitro and in vivo assays to screen potential endocrine disruptors. However, the multidisciplinary nature and concerns over the widespread application demand alternative and practical techniques for identifying and estimating EDC. The review chronicles the state-of-art 20 years (1990-2023) of scientific literature regarding EDC's exposure and molecular mechanism, highlighting the toxicological effects on the biological system. Alteration in signaling mechanisms by representative endocrine disruptors such as bisphenol A (BPA), diethylstilbestrol (DES), and genistein has been emphasized. We further discuss the currently available assays and techniques for in vitro detection and propose the prominence of designing nano-architectonic-sensor substrates for on-site detection of EDC in the contaminated aqueous environment.

Detection of Ultra-Rare ESR1 Mutations in Primary Breast Cancer Using LNA-Clamp ddPCR

ESR1 mutations in breast cancer are one of the mechanisms of resistance to aromatase inhibitors. These mutations are common in metastatic breast cancer; however, these are rare in primary breast cancer. However, these data have been analyzed mainly in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue; thus, rare mutations that may be present in primary breast cancer may be overlooked. In this study, we developed a highly sensitive mutation detection method called locked nucleic acid (LNA)-clamp droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and validated it. The mutation detection sensitivity was substantiated to 0.003%. Then, we used this method to analyze ESR1 mutations in fresh-frozen (FF) tissues of primary breast cancer. cDNA extracted from the FF tissues of 212 patients with primary breast cancers were measured. Twenty-eight ESR1 mutations were found in twenty-seven (12.7%) patients. Sixteen (7.5%) patients had Y537S mutations and twelve (5.7%) had D538G mutations. Two mutations with a variant allele frequency (VAF) of ≥0.1% and twenty-six mutations with a VAF of <0.1% were found. By using this LNA-clamp ddPCR, this study demonstrated the presence of minor clones with a VAF of <0.1% in primary breast cancer.

Novel Estrogen Receptor-Targeted Agents for Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

It has become clear that patients whose cancers have progressed post-CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy (CDK4/6i) are not deriving the same magnitude of benefit to subsequent standard endocrine therapy as historical studies would suggest. For example, anticipated duration of benefit to fulvestrant prior to CDK4/6i historically was ~ 5-6 months, and data from the VERONICA and EMERALD trials report less than 2 months. This has magnified our need for novel endocrine agents. Some have argued that patients post-CDK4/6i may just have more endocrine-resistant tumors and perhaps should just receive chemotherapy. While this may be appropriate for some, we do not currently have an assay that reliably predicts whose cancers remain endocrine sensitive and whose are endocrine resistant. ESR1 mutations can enrich for patients whose tumors are more likely to be heavily dependent on estrogen, but this is certainly not the whole answer and many patients without ESR1 mutations continue to derive benefit from subsequent endocrine agents. Most patients would strongly prefer the side effect profile of endocrine agents compared to chemotherapy, and thus, premature use of cytotoxic agents when subsequent ER targeting can control disease is not preferred. These novel ER targeting agents (PROTAC, SERD, SERCA, CERAN) hold great promise to not only outperform standard agents like fulvestrant, but also offer the promise of agents with a different side effect profile that may be more advantageous when compared to menopausal symptoms, hot flashes, arthralgias, and sexual side effects so commonly seen with AIs. We also are likely to see these novel agents move to earlier lines, whether that be 1st line in combination with CDK4/6i or even adjuvant disease.

Overview of the therapeutic strategies for ER positive breast cancer

Estrogen Receptor is the driving transcription factor in about 75% of all breast cancers, which is the target of endocrine therapies, but drug resistance is a common clinical problem. ESR1 point mutations at the ligand binding domain are frequently identified in metastatic tumor and ctDNA (Circulating tumor DNA) derived from ER positive breast cancer patients with endocrine therapies. Although endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy have demonstrated preclinical and clinical benefits for breast cancer, the development of resistance remains a significant challenge and the detailed mechanisms, and potential therapeutic targets in advanced breast cancer yet to be revealed. Since a crosstalk between tumor and tumor microenvironment (TME) plays an important role to grow tumor and metastasis, this effect could serve as key regulators in the resistance of endocrine therapy and the transition of breast cancer cells to metastasis. In this article, we have reviewed recent progress in endocrine therapy and the contribution of TME to ER positive breast cancer.

Filling the Gap after CDK4/6 Inhibitors: Novel Endocrine and Biologic Treatment Options for Metastatic Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

The rise of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors has rapidly reshaped treatment algorithms for hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer, with endocrine treatment (ET) plus a CDK4/6-inhibitor currently representing the standard of care in the first line setting. However, treatment selection for those patients experiencing progression while on ET + CDK4/6-inhibitors remains challenging due to the suboptimal activity or significant toxicities of the currently available options. There is also a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of older regimens, such as everolimus + exemestane, post-CDK4/6 inhibition. In this setting of high unmet need, several clinical trials of novel drugs have recently reported encouraging results: the addition of the AKT-inhibitor capivasertib to fulvestrant demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS); the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) elacestrant prolonged PFS compared to traditional ET in a phase 3 trial, particularly among patients with detectable ESR1 mutations; finally, PARP inhibitors are available treatment options for patients with pathogenic BRCA1/2 germline mutations. Overall, a plethora of novel endocrine and biologic treatment options are finally filling the gap between first-line ET and later line chemotherapy. In this review article, we recapitulate the activity of these novel treatment options and their potential role in future treatment algorithms.

Mechanisms of drug resistance in breast cancer liver metastases: Dilemmas and opportunities

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in females worldwide, and the liver is one of the most common sites of distant metastases in breast cancer patients. Patients with breast cancer liver metastases face limited treatment options, and drug resistance is highly prevalent, leading to a poor prognosis and a short survival. Liver metastases respond extremely poorly to immunotherapy and have shown resistance to treatments such as chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Therefore, to develop and to optimize treatment strategies as well as to explore potential therapeutic approaches, it is crucial to understand the mechanisms of drug resistance in breast cancer liver metastases patients. In this review, we summarize recent advances in the research of drug resistance mechanisms in breast cancer liver metastases and discuss their therapeutic potential for improving patient prognoses and outcomes.

Genetic Heterogeneity and Tissue-specific Patterns of Tumors with Multiple PIK3CA Mutations

PURPOSE

To comprehensively characterize tissue-specific and molecular subclasses of multiple PIK3CA (multi-PIK3CA) mutations and assess their impact on potential therapeutic outcomes.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We profiled a pan-cancer cohort comprised of 352,392 samples across 66 tumor types using a targeted hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing panel covering at least 324 cancer-related genes. Molecularly defined subgroups, allelic configuration, clonality, and mutational signatures were identified and tested for association with PI3K inhibitor therapeutic response.

RESULTS

Multi-PIK3CA mutations are found in 11% of all PIK3CA-mutant tumors, including 9% of low tumor mutational burden (TMB) PIK3CA-mutant tumors, and are enriched in breast and gynecologic cancers. Multi-PIK3CA mutations are frequently clonal and in cis on the same allele and occur at characteristic positions across tumor types. These mutations tend to be mutually exclusive of mutations in other driver genes, and of genes in the PI3K pathway. Among PIK3CA-mutant tumors with a high TMB, 18% are multi-PIK3CA mutant and often harbor an apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide (APOBEC) mutational signature. Despite large differences in specific allele combinations comprising multi-PIK3CA mutant tumors, especially across cancer types, patients with different classes of multi-PIK3CA mutant estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers respond similarly to PI3K inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pan-tumor study provides biological insights into the genetic heterogeneity and tissue specificities of multi-PIK3CA mutations, with potential clinical utility to guide PI3K inhibition strategies.

Genomics of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Meta-Analysis and Therapeutic Implications

Breast cancer brain metastases are a challenging daily practice, and the biological link between gene mutations and metastatic spread to the brain remains to be determined. Here, we performed a meta-analysis on genomic data obtained from primary tumors, extracerebral metastases and brain metastases, to identify gene alterations associated with metastatic processes in the brain. Articles with relevant findings were selected using Medline via PubMed, from January 1999 up to February 2022. A critical review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement (PRISMA). Fifty-seven publications were selected for this meta-analysis, including 37,218 patients in all, 11,906 primary tumor samples, 5541 extracerebral metastasis samples, and 1485 brain metastasis samples. We report the overall and sub-group prevalence of gene mutations, including comparisons between primary tumors, extracerebral metastases and brain metastases. In particular, we identified six genes with a higher mutation prevalence in brain metastases than in extracerebral metastases, with a potential role in metastatic processes in the brain: ESR1, ERBB2, EGFR, PTEN, BRCA2 and NOTCH1. We discuss here the therapeutic implications. Our results underline the added value of obtaining biopsies from brain metastases to fully explore their biology, in order to develop personalized treatments.

CDK4/6 Inhibitors Overcome Endocrine ESR1 Mutation-Related Resistance in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

ESR1 mutations contribute to endocrine resistance and occur in a high percentage of hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) cases. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) changed the treatment landscape of HR+ mBC, as they are able to overcome estrogen resistance. The present retrospective study investigates the clinical benefit of CDK4/6i in ESR1 mutant HR+ mBC patients treated with a CDK4/6i as first- or second-line therapy. Plasma was collected at baseline prior to CDK4/6i plus hormone therapy as a first- or second-line treatment. Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) was extracted from plasma, and ESR1 mutation analysis was performed on a ddPCR. Statistical analyses were performed to investigate the predictive power of ESR1 mutations and any association with clinical factors. A total of 42 patients with mBC treated with CDK4/6i plus endocrine therapy as first- (n = 35) or second-line (n = 7) were enrolled. Twenty-eight patients received hormonal therapy (AI or tamoxifen) in the adjuvant setting. ESR1 mutation status in blood was associated with shorter median disease-free survival (DFS) (30 vs. 110 months; p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis confirmed ESR1 mutations as independent factors of resistance in adjuvant hormone therapy. On the contrary, no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in the presence or absence of an ESR1 mutation in patients treated with CDK4/6i as first-line treatment (p = 0.29). No statistically significant correlation between the best response to CDK4/6i and ESR1 mutation was found (p = 0.46). This study indicates that the ESR1 mutation detected in cfDNA is an independent predictive factor of clinical recurrence in the adjuvant setting and that CDK4/6i can overcome ESR1-dependent resistance.

Clinical efficacy of fulvestrant versus exemestane as first-line therapies for Chinese postmenopausal oestrogen-receptor positive /human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 -advanced breast cancer (FRIEND study)

AIM

To compare the efficacies of exemestane and fulvestrant as first-line monotherapies for postmenopausal Chinese women having advanced oestrogen-receptor positive (ER+)/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-breast cancer (ER+/HER2- ABC) after a previous treatment for ≥2 years with an adjuvant non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor.

METHODS

In this randomised, open-label, multi-centre, parallel-controlled phase 2 FRIEND study, 145 postmenopausal ER+/HER2- ABC patients were assigned into fulvestrant (500 mg on days 0, 14 and 28, and then at every 28 ± 3 days, n = 77) and exemestane (25 mg/day, n = 67) groups. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary outcomes were disease control rate, objective response rate, time to treatment failure, duration of response and overall survival. Exploratory end-points included gene mutation-related outcomes and safety.

RESULTS

Fulvestrant was superior to exemestane regarding median PFS times (8.5 versus 5.6 months, p = 0.014, HR = 0.62, 95% confidence intervals: 0.42-0.91), objective response rates (19.5% versus 6.0%, p = 0.017) and time to treatment failure (8.4 versus 5.5 months, p = 0.008). The incidence of adverse or serious adverse events in the two groups was virtually identical. The most frequent mutations in 129 analysed patients were detected in the oestrogen receptor gene 1 (ESR1) (18/14.0%), PIK3CA (40/31.0%) and TP53 (29/22.5%) genes. Fulvestrant produced significant longer PFS times compared to exemestane but only for patients with an ESR1-wild type (8.5 versus 5.8 months) (p = 0.035), although there was a similar trend also for the ESR1 mutation without statistical significance. All patients with c-MYC and BRCA2 mutations had longer PFS times in the fulvestrant versus the exemestane group (p = 0.049, p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Fulvestrant significantly increased overall PFS for ER+/HER2- ABC patients and was well tolerated.

CLINICALTRIALS

NCT02646735, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02646735.