1
|
Hollis C, Hall CL, Khan K, Le Novere M, Marston L, Jones R, Hunter R, Brown BJ, Sanderson C, Andrén P, Bennett SD, Chamberlain LR, Davies EB, Evans A, Kouzoupi N, McKenzie C, Heyman I, Kilgariff J, Glazebrook C, Mataix-Cols D, Serlachius E, Murray E, Murphy T. Online remote behavioural intervention for tics in 9- to 17-year-olds: the ORBIT RCT with embedded process and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27:1-120. [PMID: 37924247 PMCID: PMC10641713 DOI: 10.3310/cpms3211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Behavioural therapy for tics is difficult to access, and little is known about its effectiveness when delivered online. Objective To investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an online-delivered, therapist- and parent-supported therapy for young people with tic disorders. Design Single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, with 3-month (primary end point) and 6-month post-randomisation follow-up. Participants were individually randomised (1 : 1), using on online system, with block randomisations, stratified by site. Naturalistic follow-up was conducted at 12 and 18 months post-randomisation when participants were free to access non-trial interventions. A subset of participants participated in a process evaluation. Setting Two hospitals (London and Nottingham) in England also accepting referrals from patient identification centres and online self-referrals. Participants Children aged 9-17 years (1) with Tourette syndrome or chronic tic disorder, (2) with a Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-total tic severity score of 15 or more (or > 10 with only motor or vocal tics) and (3) having not received behavioural therapy for tics in the past 12 months or started/stopped medication for tics within the past 2 months. Interventions Either 10 weeks of online, remotely delivered, therapist-supported exposure and response prevention therapy (intervention group) or online psychoeducation (control). Outcome Primary outcome: Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-total tic severity score 3 months post-randomisation; analysis done in all randomised patients for whom data were available. Secondary outcomes included low mood, anxiety, treatment satisfaction and health resource use. Quality-adjusted life-years are derived from parent-completed quality-of-life measures. All trial staff, statisticians and the chief investigator were masked to group allocation. Results Two hundred and twenty-four participants were randomised to the intervention (n = 112) or control (n = 112) group. Participants were mostly male (n = 177; 79%), with a mean age of 12 years. At 3 months the estimated mean difference in Yale Global Tic Severity Scale-total tic severity score between the groups adjusted for baseline and site was -2.29 points (95% confidence interval -3.86 to -0.71) in favour of therapy (effect size -0.31, 95% confidence interval -0.52 to -0.10). This effect was sustained throughout to the final follow-up at 18 months (-2.01 points, 95% confidence interval -3.86 to -0.15; effect size -0.27, 95% confidence interval -0.52 to -0.02). At 18 months the mean incremental cost per participant of the intervention compared to the control was £662 (95% confidence interval -£59 to £1384), with a mean incremental quality-adjusted life-year of 0.040 (95% confidence interval -0.004 to 0.083) per participant. The mean incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was £16,708. The intervention was acceptable and delivered with high fidelity. Parental engagement predicted child engagement and more positive clinical outcomes. Harms Two serious, unrelated adverse events occurred in the control group. Limitations We cannot separate the effects of digital online delivery and the therapy itself. The sample was predominately white and British, limiting generalisability. The design did not compare to face-to-face services. Conclusion Online, therapist-supported behavioural therapy for young people with tic disorders is clinically and cost-effective in reducing tics, with durable benefits extending up to 18 months. Future work Future work should compare online to face-to-face therapy and explore how to embed the intervention in clinical practice. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN70758207; ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03483493). The trial is now complete. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Technology Assessment programme (project number 16/19/02) and will be published in full in Health and Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 18. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Hollis
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, South Block Level E, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte L Hall
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kareem Khan
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Marie Le Novere
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Jones
- Division of Psychiatry and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Beverley J Brown
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charlotte Sanderson
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK/Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Per Andrén
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sophie D Bennett
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK/Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Liam R Chamberlain
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - E Bethan Davies
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Amber Evans
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK/Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalia Kouzoupi
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK/Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caitlin McKenzie
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Isobel Heyman
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK/Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph Kilgariff
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, South Block Level E, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Cristine Glazebrook
- NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative, Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Mataix-Cols
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Serlachius
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elizabeth Murray
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment CTU, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tara Murphy
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), London, UK/Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
- Psychological and Mental Health Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Littlewood E, Chew-Graham CA, Coleman E, Gascoyne S, Sloan C, Ali S, Badenhorst J, Bailey D, Crosland S, Kitchen CEW, McMillan D, Pearson C, Todd A, Whittlesea C, Bambra C, Hewitt C, Jones C, Keding A, Newbronner E, Paterson A, Rhodes S, Ryde E, Toner P, Watson M, Gilbody S, Ekers D. A psychological intervention by community pharmacies to prevent depression in adults with subthreshold depression and long-term conditions: the CHEMIST pilot RCT. Public Health Res 2022. [DOI: 10.3310/ekze0617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Depression is common in people with long-term health conditions, and this combination can lead to worsened health outcomes and increased health-care costs. Subthreshold depression, a risk factor for major depression, is prevalent in this population, but many people remain untreated due to the demand on services. The community pharmacy may be an alternative setting to offer mental health support; however, insufficient evidence exists to support implementation.
Objectives
To conduct a feasibility study and pilot randomised controlled trial of a community pharmacy-delivered psychological intervention aimed at preventing depression in adults with long-term health conditions.
Design
A feasibility study with nested qualitative evaluation and an external pilot, two-arm, 1 : 1 individually randomised controlled trial with nested process and economic evaluations.
Setting
Community pharmacies in the north of England.
Participants
Adults aged ≥ 18 years with subthreshold depression and at least one long-term health condition.
Intervention
A bespoke enhanced support intervention (behavioural activation within a collaborative care framework) involving up to six sessions delivered by trained community pharmacy staff (intervention facilitators) compared with usual care.
Main outcome measures
Recruitment and retention rates, completeness of outcome measures and intervention engagement. The intended primary outcome was depression severity at 4 months, assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Results
In the feasibility study, 24 participants were recruited. Outcome measure completeness was 95–100%. Retention at 4 months was 83%. Seventeen participants (71%) commenced intervention sessions and all completed two or more sessions. Depression symptoms reduced slightly at 4 months. The process evaluation suggested that the intervention was acceptable to participants and intervention facilitators. In the pilot randomised controlled trial, 44 participants (target of 100 participants) were randomised (intervention, n = 24; usual care, n = 20). Outcome measure completeness was 100%. Retention at 4 months was 93%. Eighteen participants (75%) commenced intervention sessions and 16 completed two or more sessions. Depression symptoms reduced slightly at 4 months, with a slightly larger reduction in the usual-care arm, although the small sample size limits any conclusions. The process evaluation reported good acceptability of the intervention and identified barriers associated with study implementation and its impact on core pharmacy functions. The economic analysis revealed some indication of reduced resource use/costs associated with the intervention, but this is limited by the small sample size. Intervention costs were low.
Limitations
The main limitation is the small sample size due to difficulties with recruitment and barriers to implementing the study within existing pharmacy practices.
Conclusions
The community pharmacy represents a new setting to deliver a depression prevention intervention. Recruitment was a challenge and pharmacy staff encountered barriers to effective implementation of the study within busy pharmacy practice. Despite these challenges, good retention rates and intervention engagement were demonstrated, and process evaluation suggested that the intervention was acceptable in this setting. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that community pharmacy staff can be trained to deliver a depression prevention intervention.
Future work
Further work is needed to address barriers to recruitment, intervention delivery and implementation of psychological interventions in the community pharmacy setting.
Trial registration
This trial is registered as ISRCTN11290592.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 10, No. 5. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Claire Sloan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Shehzad Ali
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Jay Badenhorst
- Whitworth Chemists Ltd, Foxhills Industrial Estate, Scunthorpe, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Dean McMillan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Adam Todd
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- School of Pharmacy, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Cate Whittlesea
- University College London School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Clare Bambra
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Claire Jones
- Public Health Team, Adult & Health Services, Durham County Council, Durham, UK
| | - Ada Keding
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Alastair Paterson
- Pharmacy Department, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Shelley Rhodes
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Eloise Ryde
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Research and Development, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Paul Toner
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Centre for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - David Ekers
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Research and Development, Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kennedy E, Spinner L, Lane C, Stynes H, Ranieri V, Carmichael P, Omar R, Vickerstaff V, Hunter R, Wright T, Senior R, Butler G, Baron-Cohen S, Young B, King M. Longitudinal Outcomes of Gender Identity in Children (LOGIC): protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study of children referred to the UK gender identity development service. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045628. [PMID: 34493504 PMCID: PMC8424855 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gender identity development services (GIDS) worldwide have seen a significant increase in referrals in recent years. Many of these referrals consist of children and young people (CYP) who experience gender-related distress. This study aims to improve understanding of outcomes of CYP referred to the UK GIDS, specifically regarding gender identity, mental health, physical health and quality of life. The impact of factors such as co-occurring autism and early social transition on outcomes over time will be explored. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a prospective cohort study of CYP aged 3-14 years when referred to the UK GIDS. Eligible participants will be ≤14 years at the time their referral was accepted and will be on the waitlist for the service when baseline measures are completed. Children aged under 12 years will complete the measures in an interview format with a researcher, while young people aged 12 years and over and their parents/caregivers will complete online or paper-based questionnaires. Participants will complete follow-up measures 12 months and 24 months later. The final sample size is expected to be approximately 500. Logistic regression models will be used to explore associations between prespecified explanatory variables and gender dysphoria. Appropriate regression models will also be used to investigate explanatory variables for other outcomes. Subgroup analyses based on birth-assigned gender, age at referral and co-occurring autistic traits will be explored. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the Health Research Authority and London - Hampstead Research Ethics Committee (reference: 19/LO/0857). The study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at both conferences and stakeholder events. Findings will be used to inform clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eilis Kennedy
- Research & Development Unit, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Research Department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
- Children, Young Adults and Families Directorate, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lauren Spinner
- Research & Development Unit, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chloe Lane
- Research & Development Unit, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hannah Stynes
- Research & Development Unit, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Veronica Ranieri
- Research & Development Unit, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Research Department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Polly Carmichael
- Gender Identity Development Service, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rumana Omar
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Talen Wright
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Senior
- Research & Development Unit, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Children, Young Adults and Families Directorate, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gary Butler
- Gender Identity Development Service, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Endocrinology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon Baron-Cohen
- Autism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bridget Young
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael King
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Greenwood K, Webb R, Gu J, Fowler D, de Visser R, Bremner S, Abramowicz I, Perry N, Clark S, O'Donnell A, Charlton D, Jarvis R, Garety P, Nandha S, Lennox B, Johns L, Rathod S, Phiri P, French P, Law H, Hodgekins J, Painter M, Treise C, Plaistow J, Irwin F, Thompson R, Mackay T, May CR, Healey A, Hooper R, Peters E. The Early Youth Engagement in first episode psychosis (EYE-2) study: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial of implementation, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a team-based motivational engagement intervention to improve engagement. Trials 2021; 22:272. [PMID: 33845856 PMCID: PMC8042707 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05105-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services improve health outcomes for young people with psychosis in the medium-long term, but 25% of young people disengage in the first 12 months with costs to their mental health, families, society and the NHS. This study will evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and implementation of a team-based motivational Early Youth Engagement (EYE-2) intervention. METHOD The study design is a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) with economic evaluation, comparing the EYE-2 intervention + standardised EIP service to standardised EIP service alone, with randomisation at the team level. A process evaluation will evaluate the delivery of the intervention qualitatively and quantitatively across contexts. The setting is 20 EIP teams in 5 sites: Manchester, South London, East Anglia, Thames Valley and Hampshire. Participants are young people (14-35 years) with first episode psychosis, and EIP staff. The intervention is the team-based motivational engagement (EYE-2) intervention, delivered alongside standardised EIP services, and supported by additional training, website, booklets and social groups. The comparator is the standardised EIP service. Both interventions are delivered by EIP clinicians. The primary outcome is time to disengagement (time in days from date of allocation to care coordinator to date of last contact following refusal to engage with EIP service, or lack of response to EIP contact for a consecutive 3-month period). Secondary outcomes include mental and physical health, deaths, social and occupational function, recovery, satisfaction and service use at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. A 12-month within-trial economic evaluation will investigate cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective and from an NHS perspective. DISCUSSION The trial will provide the first test of an engagement intervention in standardised care, with the potential for significant impact on the mental health and wellbeing of young people and their families, and economic benefits for services. The intervention will be highly scalable, supported by the toolkit including manuals, commissioning guide, training and resources, adapted to meet the needs of the diverse EIP population, and based on an in-depth process evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN 51629746 prospectively registered 7th May 2019. Date assigned 10th May 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Greenwood
- R&D, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK. .,School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.
| | - Rebecca Webb
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK
| | - Jenny Gu
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK
| | - David Fowler
- R&D, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK.,School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.,University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | - Stephen Bremner
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK
| | - Iga Abramowicz
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK
| | - Nicky Perry
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Stuart Clark
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK
| | | | - Dan Charlton
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, UK
| | | | - Philippa Garety
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sunil Nandha
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Belinda Lennox
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Louise Johns
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Peter Phiri
- Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul French
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton-under-Lyne, UK.,Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - Heather Law
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Cate Treise
- Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Francis Irwin
- Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | - Carl R May
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Andy Healey
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - Richard Hooper
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Emmanuelle Peters
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-harm (SH; intentional self-poisoning or self-injury regardless of degree of suicidal intent or other types of motivation) is a growing problem in most countries, often repeated, and associated with suicide. Evidence assessing the effectiveness of interventions in the treatment of SH in children and adolescents is lacking, especially when compared with the evidence for psychosocial interventions in adults. This review therefore updates a previous Cochrane Review (last published in 2015) on the role of interventions for SH in children and adolescents. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of psychosocial interventions or pharmacological agents or natural products for SH compared to comparison types of care (e.g. treatment-as-usual, routine psychiatric care, enhanced usual care, active comparator, placebo, alternative pharmacological treatment, or a combination of these) for children and adolescents (up to 18 years of age) who engage in SH. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Specialized Register, the Cochrane Library (Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL] and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [CDSR]), together with MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and PsycINFO (to 4 July 2020). SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing specific psychosocial interventions or pharmacological agents or natural products with treatment-as-usual (TAU), routine psychiatric care, enhanced usual care (EUC), active comparator, placebo, alternative pharmacological treatment, or a combination of these, in children and adolescents with a recent (within six months of trial entry) episode of SH resulting in presentation to hospital or clinical services. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a repeated episode of SH over a maximum follow-up period of two years. Secondary outcomes included treatment adherence, depression, hopelessness, general functioning, social functioning, suicidal ideation, and suicide. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We independently selected trials, extracted data, and appraised trial quality. For binary outcomes, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence internals (CIs). For continuous outcomes, we calculated the mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CIs. The overall quality of evidence for the primary outcome (i.e. repetition of SH at post-intervention) was appraised for each intervention using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included data from 17 trials with a total of 2280 participants. Participants in these trials were predominately female (87.6%) with a mean age of 14.7 years (standard deviation (SD) 1.5 years). The trials included in this review investigated the effectiveness of various forms of psychosocial interventions. None of the included trials evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological agents in this clinical population. There was a lower rate of SH repetition for DBT-A (30%) as compared to TAU, EUC, or alternative psychotherapy (43%) on repetition of SH at post-intervention in four trials (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.82; N = 270; k = 4; high-certainty evidence). There may be no evidence of a difference for individual cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-based psychotherapy and TAU for repetition of SH at post-intervention (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.12 to 7.24; N = 51; k = 2; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain whether mentalisation based therapy for adolescents (MBT-A) reduces repetition of SH at post-intervention as compared to TAU (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.06 to 8.46; N = 85; k = 2; very low-certainty evidence). Heterogeneity for this outcome was substantial ( I² = 68%). There is probably no evidence of a difference between family therapy and either TAU or EUC on repetition of SH at post-intervention (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.07; N = 191; k = 2; moderate-certainty evidence). However, there was no evidence of a difference for compliance enhancement approaches on repetition of SH by the six-month follow-up assessment, for group-based psychotherapy at the six- or 12-month follow-up assessments, for a remote contact intervention (emergency cards) at the 12-month assessment, or for therapeutic assessment at the 12- or 24-month follow-up assessments. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Given the moderate or very low quality of the available evidence, and the small number of trials identified, there is only uncertain evidence regarding a number of psychosocial interventions in children and adolescents who engage in SH. Further evaluation of DBT-A is warranted. Given the evidence for its benefit in adults who engage in SH, individual CBT-based psychotherapy should also be further developed and evaluated in children and adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina G Witt
- Orygen, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sarah E Hetrick
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Children and Young People Satellite, Cochrane Common Mental Disorders, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Gowri Rajaram
- Orygen, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Philip Hazell
- Speciality of Psychiatry, University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tatiana L Taylor Salisbury
- Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ellen Townsend
- Self-Harm Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Keith Hawton
- Centre for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abel KM, Bee P, Gega L, Gellatly J, Kolade A, Hunter D, Callender C, Carter LA, Meacock R, Bower P, Stanley N, Calam R, Wolpert M, Stewart P, Emsley R, Holt K, Linklater H, Douglas S, Stokes-Crossley B, Green J. An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-136. [PMID: 33196410 DOI: 10.3310/hta24590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of life for children and adolescents living with serious parental mental illness can be impaired, but evidence-based interventions to improve it are scarce. OBJECTIVE Co-production of a child-centred intervention [called Young Simplifying Mental Illness plus Life Enhancement Skills (SMILES)] to improve the health-related quality of life of children and adolescents living with serious parental mental illness, and evaluating its acceptability and feasibility for delivery in NHS and community settings. DESIGN Qualitative and co-production methods informed the development of the intervention (Phase I). A feasibility randomised controlled trial was designed to compare Young SMILES with treatment as usual (Phase II). Semistructured qualitative interviews were used to explore acceptability among children and adolescents living with their parents, who had serious mental illness, and their parents. A mixture of semistructured qualitative interviews and focus group research was used to examine feasibility among Young SMILES facilitators and referrers/non-referrers. SETTING Randomisation was conducted after baseline measures were collected by the study co-ordinator, ensuring that the blinding of the statistician and research team was maintained to reduce detection bias. PARTICIPANTS Phase I: 14 children and adolescents living with serious parental mental illness, seven parents and 31 practitioners from social, educational and health-related sectors. Phase II: 40 children and adolescents living with serious parental mental illness, 33 parents, five referrers/non-referrers and 16 Young SMILES facilitators. INTERVENTION Young SMILES was delivered at two sites: (1) Warrington, supported by the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), and (2) Newcastle, supported by the NHS and Barnardo's. An eight-session weekly group programme was delivered, with four to six children and adolescents living with serious parental mental illness per age-appropriate group (6-11 and 12-16 years). At week 4, a five-session parallel weekly programme was offered to the parents/carers. Sessions lasted 2 hours each and focused on improving mental health literacy, child-parent communication and children's problem-solving skills. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Phase ll children and parents completed questionnaires at randomisation and then again at 4 and 6 months post randomisation. Quality of life was self-reported by children and proxy-reported by parents using the Paediatric Quality of Life questionnaire and KIDSCREEN. Semistructured interviews with parents (n = 14) and children (n = 17) who participated in the Young SMILES groups gathered information about their motivation to sign up to the study, their experiences of participating in the group sessions, and their perceived changes in themselves and their family members following intervention. Further interviews with individual referrers (n = 5) gathered information about challenges to recruitment and randomisation. Two focus groups (n = 16) with practitioners who facilitated the intervention explored their views of the format and content of the Young SMILES manual and their suggestions for changes. RESULTS A total of 35 families were recruited: 20 were randomly allocated to Young SMILES group and 15 to treatment as usual. Of those, 28 families [15/20 (75%) in the intervention group and 13/15 (87%) in the control group] gave follow-up data at the primary end point (4 months post baseline). Participating children had high adherence to the intervention and high completion rates of the questionnaires. Children and adolescents living with their parents, who had serious mental illness, and their parents were mainly very positive and enthusiastic about Young SMILES, both of whom invoked the benefits of peer support and insight into parental difficulties. Although facilitators regarded Young SMILES as a meaningful and distinctive intervention having great potential, referrers identified several barriers to referring families to the study. One harm was reported by a parent, which was dealt with by the research team and the NSPCC in accordance with the standard operating procedures. LIMITATIONS The findings from our feasibility study are not sufficient to recommend a fully powered trial of Young SMILES in the near future. Although it was feasible to randomise children and adolescents living with serious parental mental illness of different ages to standardised, time-limited groups in both NHS and non-NHS settings, an intervention like Young SMILES is unlikely to address underlying core components of the vulnerability that children and adolescents living with serious parental mental illness express as a population over time. CONCLUSIONS Young SMILES was widely valued as unique in filling a recognised gap in need. Outcome measures in future studies of interventions for children and adolescents living with serious parental mental illness are more likely to capture change in individual risk factors for reduced quality of life by considering their unmet need, rather than on an aggregate construct of health-related quality of life overall, which may not reflect these young people's needs. FUTURE WORK A public health approach to intervention might be best. Most children and adolescents living with serious parental mental illness remain well most of the time, so, although their absolute risks are low across outcomes (and most will remain resilient most of the time), consistent population estimates find their relative risk to be high compared with unexposed children. A public health approach to intervention needs to be both tailored to the particular needs of children and adolescents living with serious parental mental illness and agile to these needs so that it can respond to fluctuations over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN36865046. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 59. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M Abel
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Penny Bee
- Division of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Lina Gega
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.,Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Judith Gellatly
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Division of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Adekeye Kolade
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Diane Hunter
- National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, London, UK
| | - Craig Callender
- Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St Nicholas Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lesley-Anne Carter
- Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Meacock
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nicky Stanley
- School of Social Work, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Rachel Calam
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Miranda Wolpert
- Evidence Based Practice Unit, University College London, London, UK.,Anna Freud Centre, London, UK
| | - Paul Stewart
- National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, London, UK
| | - Richard Emsley
- Department for Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kim Holt
- Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, University of Northumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Holly Linklater
- Department of Education and Inclusive Pedagogy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Simon Douglas
- Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St Nicholas Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Bryony Stokes-Crossley
- Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St Nicholas Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jonathan Green
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schmidt M, Werbrouck A, Verhaeghe N, Putman K, Simoens S, Annemans L. Universal Mental Health Interventions for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2020; 18:155-175. [PMID: 31605299 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-019-00524-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective mental health interventions may reduce the impact that mental health problems have on young people's well-being. Nevertheless, little is known about the cost effectiveness of such interventions for children and adolescents. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this systematic review were to summarize and assess recent health economic evaluations of universal mental health interventions for children and adolescents aged 6-18 years. METHODS Four electronic databases were searched for relevant health economic studies, using a pre-developed search algorithm. Full health economic evaluations evaluating the cost effectiveness of universal mental health interventions were included, as well as evaluations of anti-bullying and suicide prevention interventions that used a universal approach. Studies on the prevention of substance abuse and those published before 2013 fell outside the scope of this review. Study results were summarised in evidence tables, and each study was subject to a systematic quality appraisal. RESULTS Nine studies were included in the review; in six, the economic evaluation was conducted alongside a clinical trial. All studies except one were carried out in the European Union, and all but one evaluated school-based interventions. All evaluated interventions led to positive incremental costs compared to their comparators and most were associated with small increases in quality-adjusted life-years. Almost half of the studies evaluated the cost effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy-based interventions aimed at the prevention of depression or anxiety, with mixed results. Cost-effectiveness estimates for a parenting programme, a school-based social and emotional well-being programme and anti-bullying interventions were promising, though the latter were only evaluated for the Swedish context. Drivers of cost effectiveness were implementation costs; intervention effectiveness, delivery mode and duration; baseline prevalence; and the perspective of the evaluation. The overall study quality was reasonable, though most studies only assessed short-term costs and effects. CONCLUSION Few studies were found, which limits the possibility of drawing strong conclusions about cost effectiveness. There is some evidence based on decision-analytic modelling that anti-bullying interventions represent value for money. Generally, there is a lack of studies that take into account long-term costs and effects. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019115882.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masja Schmidt
- Department of Public Health, Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Amber Werbrouck
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nick Verhaeghe
- Department of Public Health, Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Putman
- Department of Public Health, Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lieven Annemans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Interuniversity Center for Health Economics Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tubeuf S, Saloniki EC, Cottrell D. Parental Health Spillover in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Evidence from Self-Harming Adolescents in England. Pharmacoeconomics 2019; 37:513-530. [PMID: 30294758 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0722-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This article presents alternative parental health spillover quantification methods in the context of a randomised controlled trial comparing family therapy with treatment as usual as an intervention for self-harming adolescents, and discusses the practical limitations of those methods. METHODS The trial followed a sample of 754 participants aged 11-17 years. Health utilities are measured using answers to the EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) for the adolescent and the Health Utility Index (HUI2) for one parent at baseline, 6 and 12 months. We use regression analyses to evaluate the association between the parent's and adolescent's health utilities as part of an explanatory regression model including health-related and demographic characteristics of both the adolescent and the parent. We then measure cost-effectiveness over a 12-month period as mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using various spillover quantification methods. We propose an original quantification based on the use of a household welfare function along with an equivalence scale to generate a health gain within the family to be added to the adolescent's quality-adjusted life-year gain. RESULTS We find that the parent's health utility increased over the duration of the trial and is significantly and positively associated with adolescent's health utility at 6 and 12 months but not at baseline. When considering the adolescent's health gain only, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is £40,453 per quality-adjusted life-year. When including the health spillover to one parent, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio estimates range from £27,167 per quality-adjusted life-year to £40,838 per quality-adjusted life-year and can be a dominated option depending on the quantification method used. CONCLUSION According to the health spillover quantification method considered, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios vary from within the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) cost-effectiveness threshold range to not being cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy Tubeuf
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
- Institute of Health and Society, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium.
| | - Eirini-Christina Saloniki
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Kent, UK
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Kent, UK
| | - David Cottrell
- Psychological and Social Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ford T, Hayes R, Byford S, Edwards V, Fletcher M, Logan S, Norwich B, Pritchard W, Allen K, Allwood M, Ganguli P, Grimes K, Hansford L, Longdon B, Norman S, Price A, Ukoumunne OC. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Incredible Years® Teacher Classroom Management programme in primary school children: results of the STARS cluster randomised controlled trial. Psychol Med 2019; 49:828-842. [PMID: 30017006 PMCID: PMC6425365 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291718001484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Incredible Years® Teacher Classroom Management (TCM) programme as a universal intervention, given schools' important influence on child mental health. METHODS A two-arm, pragmatic, parallel group, superiority, cluster randomised controlled trial recruited three cohorts of schools (clusters) between 2012 and 2014, randomising them to TCM (intervention) or Teaching As Usual (TAU-control). TCM was delivered to teachers in six whole-day sessions, spread over 6 months. Schools and teachers were not masked to allocation. The primary outcome was teacher-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Total Difficulties score. Random effects linear regression and marginal logistic regression models using Generalised Estimating Equations were used to analyse the outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN84130388. RESULTS Eighty schools (2075 children) were enrolled; 40 (1037 children) to TCM and 40 (1038 children) to TAU. Outcome data were collected at 9, 18, and 30-months for 96, 89, and 85% of children, respectively. The intervention reduced the SDQ-Total Difficulties score at 9 months (mean (s.d.):5.5 (5.4) in TCM v. 6.2 (6.2) in TAU; adjusted mean difference = -1.0; 95% CI-1.9 to -0.1; p = 0.03) but this did not persist at 18 or 30 months. Cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that TCM may be cost-effective compared with TAU at 30-months, but this result was associated with uncertainty so no firm conclusions can be drawn. A priori subgroup analyses suggested TCM is more effective for children with poor mental health. CONCLUSIONS TCM provided a small, short-term improvement to children's mental health particularly for children who are already struggling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamsin Ford
- University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Rachel Hayes
- University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Sarah Byford
- King's College London, King's Health Economics, Box PO24, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Vanessa Edwards
- University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Malcolm Fletcher
- University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Stuart Logan
- University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Brahm Norwich
- Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter, North Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Will Pritchard
- Education and Early Years, Cornwall County Council, 3 West, New County Hall, Treyew Road, Truro, TR1 3AY Truro, TR1 3AY, UK
| | - Kate Allen
- University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Matthew Allwood
- University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Poushali Ganguli
- King's College London, King's Health Economics, Box PO24, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Katie Grimes
- Educational and Counselling Psychology and Special Education, University of British Columbia, 2125 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Lorraine Hansford
- University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Bryony Longdon
- University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Shelley Norman
- University of Exeter, Sir Henry Wellcome Building, Streatham campus, University of Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK
| | - Anna Price
- University of Exeter Medical School, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Obioha C. Ukoumunne
- NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ford T, Hayes R, Byford S, Edwards V, Fletcher M, Logan S, Norwich B, Pritchard W, Allen K, Allwood M, Ganguli P, Grimes K, Hansford L, Longdon B, Norman S, Price A, Russell AE, Ukoumunne OC. Training teachers in classroom management to improve mental health in primary school children: the STARS cluster RCT. Public Health Res 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/phr07060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundPoor mental health in childhood is common, persistent and associated with a range of adverse outcomes that include persistent psychopathology, as well as risk-taking behaviour, criminality and educational failure, all of which may also compromise health. There is a growing policy focus on children’s mental health and the role of schools in particular in addressing this.ObjectivesTo evaluate whether or not the Incredible Years®(IY) Teacher Classroom Management (TCM) training improved children’s mental health, behaviour, educational attainment and enjoyment of school, improved teachers’ mental health and relationship with work, and was cost-effective in relation to potential improvements.DesignA two-arm, pragmatic, parallel-group, superiority, cluster randomised controlled trial.SettingA total of 80 UK schools (clusters) were recruited in three distinct cohorts between 2012 and 2014 and randomised to TCM (intervention) or teaching as usual [(TAU) control] with follow-ups at 9, 18 and 30 months. Schools and teachers were not masked to allocation.ParticipantsEighty schools (n = 2075 children) were randomised: 40 (n = 1037 children) to TCM and 40 (n = 1038 children) to TAU.InterventionsTCM was delivered to teachers in six whole-day sessions, spread over 6 months. The explicit goals of TCM are to enhance classroom management skills and improve teacher–student relationships.Main outcome measuresThe primary planned outcome was the teacher-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Total Difficulties (SDQ-TD) score. Random-effects linear regression and marginal logistic regression models using generalized estimating equations were used to analyse outcomes.ResultsThe intervention reduced the SDQ-TD score at 9 months [adjusted mean difference (AMD) –1.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) –1.9 to –0.1;p = 0.03] but there was little evidence of effects at 18 months (AMD –0.1, 95% CI –1.5 to 1.2;p = 0.85) and 30 months (AMD –0.7, 95% CI –1.9 to 0.4;p = 0.23). Planned subgroup analyses suggested that TCM is more effective than TAU for children with poor mental health. Cost-effectiveness analysis using the SDQ-TD suggested that the probability of TCM being cost-effective compared with TAU was associated with some uncertainty (range of 40% to 80% depending on the willingness to pay for a unit improvement in SDQ-TD score). In terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), there was evidence to suggest that TCM was cost-effective compared with TAU at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence thresholds of £20,000–30,000 per QALY at 9- and 18-month follow-up, but not at 30-month follow-up. There was evidence of reduced disruptive behaviour (p = 0.04) and reductions in inattention and overactivity (p = 0.02) at the 30-month follow-up. Despite no main effect on educational attainment, subgroup analysis indicated that the intervention’s effect differed between those who did and those who did not have poor mental health for both literacy (interactionp = 0.04) and numeracy (interactionp = 0.03). Independent blind observations and qualitative feedback from teachers suggested that teachers’ behaviour in the classroom changed as a result of attending TCM training.LimitationsTeachers were not masked to allocation and attrition was marked for parent-reported data.ConclusionsOur findings provide tentative evidence that TCM may be an effective universal child mental health intervention in the short term, particularly for primary school children who are identified as struggling, and it may be a cost-effective intervention in the short term.Future workFurther research should explore TCM as a whole-school approach by training all school staff and should evaluate the impact of TCM on academic progress in a more thorough and systematic manner.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN84130388.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full inPublic Health Research; Vol. 7, No. 6. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Funding was also provided by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula (NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamsin Ford
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Sarah Byford
- King’s Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Brahm Norwich
- Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Will Pritchard
- Education and Early Years, Cornwall County Council, Truro, UK
| | - Kate Allen
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Poushali Ganguli
- King’s Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Katie Grimes
- Educational and Counselling Psychology and Special Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Anna Price
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Obioha C Ukoumunne
- National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Robinson J, Bailey E, Witt K, Stefanac N, Milner A, Currier D, Pirkis J, Condron P, Hetrick S. What Works in Youth Suicide Prevention? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2018; 4-5:52-91. [PMID: 31193651 PMCID: PMC6537558 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2018] [Revised: 10/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young people require specific attention when it comes to suicide prevention, however efforts need to be based on robust evidence. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies examining the impact of interventions that were specifically designed to reduce suicide-related behavior in young people. FINDINGS Ninety-nine studies were identified, of which 52 were conducted in clinical settings, 31 in educational or workplace settings, and 15 in community settings. Around half were randomized controlled trials. Large scale interventions delivered in both clinical and educational settings appear to reduce self-harm and suicidal ideation post-intervention, and to a lesser extent at follow-up. In community settings, multi-faceted, place-based approaches seem to have an impact. Study quality was limited. INTERPRETATION Overall whilst the number and range of studies is encouraging, gaps exist. Few studies were conducted in low-middle income countries or with demographic populations known to be at increased risk. Similarly, there was a lack of studies conducted in primary care, universities and workplaces. However, we identified that specific youth suicide-prevention interventions can reduce self-harm and suicidal ideation; these types of intervention need testing in high-quality studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Robinson
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, 35 Poplar Road, Vic 3052, Australia
| | - Eleanor Bailey
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, 35 Poplar Road, Vic 3052, Australia
| | - Katrina Witt
- Turning Point, Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, 110 Church Street, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia
| | - Nina Stefanac
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, 35 Poplar Road, Vic 3052, Australia
| | - Allison Milner
- Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 235 Bouverie Street, Vic 3010, Australia
| | - Dianne Currier
- Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 235 Bouverie Street, Vic 3010, Australia
| | - Jane Pirkis
- Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 235 Bouverie Street, Vic 3010, Australia
| | - Patrick Condron
- University Library, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
| | - Sarah Hetrick
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, 35 Poplar Road, Vic 3052, Australia
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Support Building Auckland Hospital, 2 Park Rd, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ougrin D, Corrigall R, Poole J, Zundel T, Sarhane M, Slater V, Stahl D, Reavey P, Byford S, Heslin M, Ivens J, Crommelin M, Abdulla Z, Hayes D, Middleton K, Nnadi B, Taylor E. Comparison of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an intensive community supported discharge service versus treatment as usual for adolescents with psychiatric emergencies: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2018; 5:477-485. [PMID: 29731412 PMCID: PMC5994473 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30129-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Revised: 03/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intensive community treatment to reduce dependency on adolescent psychiatric inpatient care is recommended in guidelines but has not been assessed in a randomised controlled trial in the UK. We designed a supported discharge service (SDS) provided by an intensive community treatment team and compared outcomes with usual care. METHODS Eligible patients for this randomised controlled trial were younger than 18 years and had been admitted for psychiatric inpatient care in the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. Patients were assigned 1:1 to either the SDS or to usual care by use of a computer-generated pseudorandom code with random permuted blocks of varying sizes. The primary outcome was number of inpatient bed-days, change in Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores, and change in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) scores at 6 months, assessed by intention to treat. Cost-effectiveness was explored with acceptability curves based on CGAS scores and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) calculated from the three-level EuroQol measure of health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L), taking a health and social care perspective. This study is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, number ISRCTN82129964. FINDINGS Hospital use at 6 months was significantly lower in the SDS group than in the usual care group (unadjusted median 34 IQR 17-63 vs 50 days, 19-125, p=0·04). The ratio of mean total inpatient days for usual care to SDS was 1·67 (95% CI 1·02-2·81, p=0·04), which decreased to 1·65 (0·99-2·77, p=0·057) when adjusted for differences in hospital use before randomisation. Scores for SDQ and CGAS did not differ between groups. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve based on QALYs showed that the probability of SDS being cost-effective compared with usual care was around 60% with a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000-30 000 per QALY, and that based on CGAS showed at least 58% probability of SDS being cost-effective compared with usual care irrespective of willingness to pay. We recorded no adverse events attributable to SDS or usual care. INTERPRETATION SDS provided by an intensive community treatment team reduced bed usage at 6 months' follow-up but had no effect on functional status and symptoms of mental health disorders compared with usual care. The possibility of preventing admissions, particularly through features such as reduced self-harm and improved reintegration into school, with intensive community treatment should be investigated in future studies. FUNDING South London and Maudsley NHS Trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Ougrin
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | | | - Jason Poole
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Psychology, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Toby Zundel
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mandy Sarhane
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Daniel Stahl
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Paula Reavey
- Department of Psychology, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Sarah Byford
- Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Margaret Heslin
- Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - John Ivens
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Zahra Abdulla
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Hayes
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Benita Nnadi
- Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Eric Taylor
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Risk management is a requirement of clinical governance and a new paradigm for child and adolescent mental health services. Issues are different from those of adult services and a wide range need to be considered, which include not only the risk of harm to self, to others and from others but also from the system (by omission or commission) and to the staff. Systematic policy development, using information from audits, complaints, incidents and inquiries, will be helpful and interagency agreements necessary to promote coordination. The complex regulatory framework is discussed.
Collapse
|
14
|
Bee P, Pedley R, Rithalia A, Richardson G, Pryjmachuk S, Kirk S, Bower P. Self-care support for children and adolescents with long-term conditions: the REfOCUS evidence synthesis. Health Serv Deliv Res 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundSelf-care support (e.g. education, training, peer/professional support) is intended to enhance the self-care capacities of children and young people, while simultaneously reducing the financial burden facing health-care systems.ObjectivesTo determine which models of self-care support for long-term conditions (LTCs) are associated with significant reductions in health utilisation and costs without compromising outcomes for children and young people.DesignSystematic review with meta-analysis.PopulationChildren and young people aged 0–18 years with a long-term physical or mental health condition (e.g. asthma, depression).InterventionSelf-care support in health, social care, educational or community settings.ComparatorUsual care.OutcomesGeneric/health-related quality of life (QoL)/subjective health symptoms and health service utilisation/costs.DesignRandomised/non-randomised trials, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted time series designs.Data sourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ISI Web of Science, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, The Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment database, Paediatric Economic Database Evaluation, IDEAS, reference scanning, targeted author searches and forward citation searching. All databases were searched from inception to March 2015.MethodsWe conducted meta-analyses, simultaneously plotting QoL and health utilisation effects. We conducted subgroup analyses for evidence quality, age, LTC and intervention (setting, target, delivery format, intensity).ResultsNinety-seven studies reporting 114 interventions were included. Thirty-seven studies reported adequate allocation concealment. Fourteen were UK studies. The vast majority of included studies recruited children and young people with asthma (n = 66, 68%). Four per cent of studies evaluated ‘pure’ self-care support (delivered through health technology without additional contact), 23% evaluated facilitated self-care support (≤ 2 hours’/four sessions’ contact), 65% were intensively facilitated (≥ 2 hours’/four sessions’ contact) and 8% were case management (≥ 2 hours’ support with multidisciplinary input). Self-care support was associated with statistically significant, minimal benefits for QoL [effect size (ES) –0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) –0.23 to –0.11], but lacked clear benefit for hospital admissions (ES –0.05, 95% CI –0.12 to 0.03). This finding endured across intervention intensities and LTCs. Statistically significant, minimal reductions in emergency use were observed (ES –0.11, 95% CI –0.17 to –0.04). The total cost analysis was limited by the small number of data. Subgroup analyses revealed statistically significant, minimal reductions in emergency use for children aged ≤ 13 years (ES –0.10, 95% CI –0.17 to –0.04), children and young people with asthma (ES –0.12, 95% CI –0.18 to –0.06) and children and young people receiving ≥ 2 hours per four sessions of support (ES –0.10, 95% CI –0.17 to –0.03). Preliminary evidence suggested that interventions that include the child or young person, and deliver some content individually, may optimise QoL effects. Face-to-face delivery may help to maximise emergency department effects. Caution is required in interpreting these findings.LimitationsIdentification of optimal models of self-care support is challenged by the size and nature of evidence available. The emphasis on meta-analysis meant that a minority of studies with incomplete but potentially relevant data were excluded.ConclusionsSelf-care support is associated with positive but minimal effects on children and young people’s QoL, and minimal, but potentially important, reductions in emergency use. On current evidence, we cannot reliably conclude that self-care support significantly reduces health-care costs.Future workResearch is needed to explore the short- and longer-term effects of self-care support across a wider range of LTCs.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014015452.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penny Bee
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Pedley
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Amber Rithalia
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Steven Pryjmachuk
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Susan Kirk
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hamilton MP, Hetrick SE, Mihalopoulos C, Baker D, Browne V, Chanen AM, Pennell K, Purcell R, Stavely H, McGorry PD. Identifying attributes of care that may improve cost‐effectiveness in the youth mental health service system. Med J Aust 2017; 207:S27-S37. [DOI: 10.5694/mja17.00972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew P Hamilton
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Sarah E Hetrick
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC
- Centre of Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| | | | - David Baker
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Vivienne Browne
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC
- Centre of Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Andrew M Chanen
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC
- Centre of Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Kerryn Pennell
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Rosemary Purcell
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC
- Centre of Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Heather Stavely
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Patrick D McGorry
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne, VIC
- Centre of Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Longhi E, Murray L, Hunter R, Wellsted D, Taylor-Colls S, MacKenzie K, Rayns G, Cotmore R, Fonagy P, Fearon RMP. The NSPCC UK Minding the Baby® (MTB) home-visiting programme, supporting young mothers (aged 14-25) in the first 2 years of their baby's life: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2016; 17:486. [PMID: 27717374 PMCID: PMC5055686 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1618-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2016] [Accepted: 09/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young mothers living in low-income urban settings often are exposed to significant and chronic environmental difficulties including poverty, social isolation and poor education and typically also have to cope with personal histories of abuse and depression. Minding the Baby® (MTB) is an interdisciplinary home-visiting programme developed to support first-time young mothers, which integrates primary care and mental health approaches into a single intensive intervention from the last trimester of pregnancy until the child's second birthday. The primary aim of the intervention is to promote caregiver sensitivity, and, secondarily, to promote both child and maternal socioemotional outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN This is a multisite randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a target recruitment of 200 first-time adolescent mothers (under 26 years of age). One hundred participants will be randomised to the MTB group and they will receive the MTB programme in addition to the usual services available in their areas. Those participants not allocated to MTB will receive Treatment as Usual (TAU) only. Researchers will carry out blind assessments at baseline (before the birth of the baby), and outcome assessments around the child's first and second birthdays. The primary outcome will be the quality of maternal sensitivity and the secondary outcomes will focus on attachment security, child cognitive/language development, behavioural problems, postponed childbearing, maternal mental health and incidents of child protection interventions. DISCUSSION This study evaluates the Minding the Baby® programme in the UK. In particular, this RCT explores the effectiveness of this integrative approach, which focusses on maternal mental issues as well as parent-infant interaction, parental concerns and developmental outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN08678682 (date of registration 3 April 2014).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Longhi
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - Lynne Murray
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Harry Pitt Building, Early Gate, Reading, RG6 7BE UK
- Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, Stellenbosch, 7602 South Africa
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Priment Clinical Trials Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, Royal Free Campus, London, NW3 2PF UK
| | | | | | - Kathryn MacKenzie
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - Gwynne Rayns
- National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), Weston House, 42 Curtain Road, London, EC2A 3NH UK
| | - Richard Cotmore
- National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), Weston House, 42 Curtain Road, London, EC2A 3NH UK
| | - Peter Fonagy
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - Richard M. Pasco Fearon
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cousins L, Whitaker KJ, Widmer B, Midgley N, Byford S, Dubicka B, Kelvin R, Reynolds S, Roberts C, Holland F, Barrett B, Senior R, Wilkinson P, Target M, Fonagy P, Goodyer IM. Clinical characteristics associated with the prescribing of SSRI medication in adolescents with major unipolar depression. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2016; 25:1287-95. [PMID: 27125818 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-016-0849-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2015] [Accepted: 04/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Unipolar major depressions (MD) emerge markedly during adolescence. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) UK recommends psychological therapies, with accompanying selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) prescribed in severe cases only. Here, we seek to determine the extent and rationale of SSRI prescribing in adolescent MD before entering a randomised clinical trial. SSRI prescribing, together with their clinical characteristics was determined in 465 adolescent patients with MD prior to receiving a standardised psychological therapy as part of the Improving mood with psychoanalytic and cognitive therapies (IMPACT) clinical trial. Overall, 88 (19 %) had been prescribed antidepressants prior to psychological treatment. The clinical correlates varied by gender: respectively, depression severity in boys and self-harming behaviours in girls. Prescribing also differed between clinical research centres. Medical practitioners consider severity of depression in boys as an indicator for antidepressant prescribing. Self-injury in girls appears to be utilised as a prescribing aid which is inconsistent with past and current revised UK NICE guidelines.
Collapse
|
18
|
Hawton K, Witt KG, Taylor Salisbury TL, Arensman E, Gunnell D, Townsend E, van Heeringen K, Hazell P. Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD012013. [PMID: 26688129 PMCID: PMC8786270 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-harm (SH; intentional self-poisoning or self-injury) is common in children and adolescents, often repeated, and strongly associated with suicide. This is an update of a broader Cochrane review on psychosocial and pharmacological treatments for deliberate SH first published in 1998 and previously updated in 1999. We have now divided the review into three separate reviews; this review is focused on psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for SH in children and adolescents. OBJECTIVES To identify all randomised controlled trials of psychosocial interventions, pharmacological agents, or natural products for SH in children and adolescents, and to conduct meta-analyses (where possible) to compare the effects of specific treatments with comparison types of treatment (e.g., treatment as usual (TAU), placebo, or alternative pharmacological treatment) for children and adolescents who SH. SEARCH METHODS For this update the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group (CCDAN) Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the CCDAN Specialised Register (30 January 2015). SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials comparing psychosocial or pharmacological treatments with treatment as usual, alternative treatments, or placebo or alternative pharmacological treatment in children and adolescents (up to 18 years of age) with a recent (within six months) episode of SH resulting in presentation to clinical services. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently selected trials, extracted data, and appraised study quality, with consensus. For binary outcomes, we calculated odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). For continuous outcomes measured using the same scale we calculated the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI; for those measured using different scales we calculated the standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI. Meta-analysis was only possible for two interventions: dialectical behaviour therapy for adolescents and group-based psychotherapy. For these analyses, we pooled data using a random-effects model. MAIN RESULTS We included 11 trials, with a total of 1,126 participants. The majority of participants were female (mean = 80.6% in 10 trials reporting gender). All trials were of psychosocial interventions; there were none of pharmacological treatments. With the exception of dialectical behaviour therapy for adolescents (DBT-A) and group-based therapy, assessments of specific interventions were based on single trials. We downgraded the quality of evidence owing to risk of bias or imprecision for many outcomes.Therapeutic assessment appeared to increase adherence with subsequent treatment compared with TAU (i.e., standard assessment; n = 70; k = 1; OR = 5.12, 95% CI 1.70 to 15.39), but this had no apparent impact on repetition of SH at either 12 (n = 69; k = 1; OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.06; GRADE: low quality) or 24 months (n = 69; k = 1; OR = 0.69, 05% CI 0.23 to 2.14; GRADE: low quality evidence). These results are based on a single cluster randomised trial, which may overestimate the effectiveness of the intervention.For patients with multiple episodes of SH or emerging personality problems, mentalisation therapy was associated with fewer adolescents scoring above the cut-off for repetition of SH based on the Risk-Taking and Self-Harm Inventory 12 months post-intervention (n = 71; k = 1; OR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.78; GRADE: moderate quality). DBT-A was not associated with a reduction in the proportion of adolescents repeating SH when compared to either TAU or enhanced usual care (n = 104; k = 2; OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.12 to 4.40; GRADE: low quality). In the latter trial, however, the authors reported a significantly greater reduction over time in frequency of repeated SH in adolescents in the DBT condition, in whom there were also significantly greater reductions in depression, hopelessness, and suicidal ideation.We found no significant treatment effects for group-based therapy on repetition of SH for individuals with multiple episodes of SH at either the six (n = 430; k = 2; OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 5.24; GRADE: low quality) or 12 month (n = 490; k = 3; OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.22 to 2.97; GRADE: low quality) assessments, although considerable heterogeneity was associated with both (I(2) = 65% and 77% respectively). We also found no significant differences between the following treatments and TAU in terms of reduced repetition of SH: compliance enhancement (three month follow-up assessment: n = 63; k = 1; OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.15 to 3.08; GRADE: very low quality), CBT-based psychotherapy (six month follow-up assessment: n = 39; k = 1; OR = 1.88, 95% CI 0.30 to 11.73; GRADE: very low quality), home-based family intervention (six month follow-up assessment: n = 149; k = 1; OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.51; GRADE: low quality), and provision of an emergency card (12 month follow-up assessment: n = 105, k = 1; OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.12 to 2.04; GRADE: very low quality). No data on adverse effects, other than the planned outcomes relating to suicidal behaviour, were reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There are relatively few trials of interventions for children and adolescents who have engaged in SH, and only single trials contributed to all but two comparisons in this review. The quality of evidence according to GRADE criteria was mostly very low. There is little support for the effectiveness of group-based psychotherapy for adolescents with multiple episodes of SH based on the results of three trials, the evidence from which was of very low quality according to GRADE criteria. Results for therapeutic assessment, mentalisation, and dialectical behaviour therapy indicated that these approaches warrant further evaluation. Despite the scale of the problem of SH in children and adolescents there is a paucity of evidence of effective interventions. Further large-scale trials, with a range of outcome measures including adverse events, and investigation of therapeutic mechanisms underpinning these interventions, are required. It is increasingly apparent that development of new interventions should be done in collaboration with patients to ensure that these are likely to meet their needs. Use of an agreed set of outcome measures would assist evaluation and both comparison and meta-analysis of trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Hawton
- Centre for Suicide Research, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK, OX3 7JX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hawton K, Townsend E, Arensman E, Gunnell D, Hazell P, House A, van Heeringen K. WITHDRAWN: Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments for deliberate self harm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD001764. [PMID: 26436718 PMCID: PMC10759787 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001764.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
This review has been withdrawn because the topic has been split into three separate reviews, one on psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults; another on interventions for self‐harm in children and adolescents; and a third on pharmacological interventions for self‐harm in adults. The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Hawton
- Warneford HospitalCentre for Suicide Research, University Department of PsychiatryOxfordUKOX3 7JX
| | - Ellen Townsend
- University of NottinghamSelf‐Harm Research Group, School of PsychologyUniversity ParkNottinghamUKNG7 2RD
| | - Ella Arensman
- University College CorkNational Suicide Research Foundation and Department of Epidemiology and Public HealthCorkIreland
| | - David Gunnell
- University of BristolSchool of Social and Community MedicineCanynge Hall39 Whatley RoadBristolUKBS8 2PR
| | - Philip Hazell
- Sydney Medical SchoolDiscipline of PsychiatryG03 ‐ Thomas Walker HospitalHospital RdConcord WestNew South WalesAustralia2138
| | - Allan House
- University of LeedsLeeds Institute of Health SciencesCharles Thackrah Building101 Clarendon RoadLeedsUKLS2 9LJ
| | - Kees van Heeringen
- Ghent UniversityUnit for Suicide Research, Department of Psychiatry and Medical PsychologyGhentBelgium9000
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Latimer EA, Garièpy G, Greenfield B. Cost-effectiveness of a rapid response team intervention for suicidal youth presenting at an emergency department. Can J Psychiatry 2014; 59:310-8. [PMID: 25007405 PMCID: PMC4079151 DOI: 10.1177/070674371405900604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2013] [Accepted: 12/01/2013] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the cost-effectiveness of a rapid response team (RRT), compared with usual care (UC), for treating suicidal adolescents. METHODS Suicidal adolescents (n = 286) presenting at an emergency department were enrolled in a trial to compare UC with enhanced outpatient care provided by an RRT of health professionals. Functioning (Child Global Assessment Scale) and suicidality (Spectrum of Suicidal Behavior Scale) scores were measured at baseline and 6 months later. Resource use and cost data were collected from several sources during the same period. RESULTS As previously reported, there was no statistically or clinically significant difference in either functioning or suicidality between the groups. Costs of the RRT were lower by $1886, thus -$1886 (95% CI -$4238 to $466), from the perspective of the treating hospital, and by $991, thus -$991 (95% CI -$5580 to $3598), from the perspective of society. If decision makers are not willing to pay for any improvement in functioning or suicidality, the RRT has a 95% probability of being cost-effective from the perspective of the treating hospital. From the point of view of society, the probability of the intervention being cost-effective is about 70% for functioning and 63% for suicidality. The difference between the 2 perspectives is mainly attributable to the cost of hospitalizations outside the treating hospital. CONCLUSIONS An RRT intervention appears to be cost-effective, compared with UC, from the point of view of the treating hospital, but there is no difference from the point of view of society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A Latimer
- Professor, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Research Scientist, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Quebec
| | - Geneviéve Garièpy
- Student, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
| | - Brian Greenfield
- Associate Professor of Clinical Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Division of Child Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; Director, Emergency Psychiatric Service, Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Retzlaff R, von Sydow K, Beher S, Haun MW, Schweitzer J. The efficacy of systemic therapy for internalizing and other disorders of childhood and adolescence: a systematic review of 38 randomized trials. Fam Process 2013; 52:619-652. [PMID: 24329407 DOI: 10.1111/famp.12041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Systemic therapy (ST) is one of the most widely applied psychotherapeutic approaches in the treatment of children and adolescents, yet few systematic reviews exist on the efficacy of ST with this age group. Parallel to a similar study on adults, a systematic review was performed to analyze the efficacy of ST in the treatment of children and adolescents. All randomized or matched controlled trials (RCT) evaluating ST in any setting with child and adolescent index patients were identified by database searches and cross-references, as well as in existing meta-analyses and reviews. Inclusion criteria were: index patient diagnosed with a DSM-IV or ICD-10 listed psychological disorder, or suffering from other clinically relevant conditions, and trial published by December 2011. Studies were analyzed according to their sample, research methodology, interventions applied, and results at end-of-treatment and at follow-up. This article presents findings for internalizing and mixed disorders. Thirty-eight trials were identified, with 33 showing ST to be efficacious for the treatment of internalizing disorders (including mood disorders, eating disorders, and psychological factors in somatic illness). There is some evidence for ST being also efficacious in mixed disorders, anxiety disorders, Asperger disorder, and in cases of child neglect. Results were stable across follow-up periods of up to 5 years. Trials on the efficacy of ST for externalizing disorders are presented in a second article. There is a sound evidence base for the efficacy of ST as a treatment for internalizing disorders of child and adolescent patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruediger Retzlaff
- Institute for Collaborative Psychosomatic Research and Family Therapy, Centre of Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In many countries, national, regional and local inter- and intra-agency collaborations have been introduced to improve health outcomes. Evidence is needed on the effectiveness of locally developed partnerships which target changes in health outcomes and behaviours. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of interagency collaboration between local health and local government agencies on health outcomes in any population or age group. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Public Health Group Specialised Register, AMED, ASSIA, CENTRAL, CINAHL, DoPHER, EMBASE, ERIC, HMIC, IBSS, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, OpenGrey, PsycINFO, Rehabdata, Social Care Online, Social Services Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts, TRoPHI and Web of Science from 1966 through to January 2012. 'Snowballing' methods were used, including expert contact, citation tracking, website searching and reference list follow-up. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), controlled before-and-after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series (ITS) where the study reported individual health outcomes arising from interagency collaboration between health and local government agencies compared to standard care. Studies were selected independently in duplicate, with no restriction on population subgroup or disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently conducted data extraction and assessed risk of bias for each study. MAIN RESULTS Sixteen studies were identified (28,212 participants). Only two were considered to be at low risk of bias. Eleven studies contributed data to the meta-analyses but a narrative synthesis was undertaken for all 16 studies. Six studies examined mental health initiatives, of which one showed health benefit, four showed modest improvement in one or more of the outcomes measured but no clear overall health gain, and one showed no evidence of health gain. Four studies considered lifestyle improvements, of which one showed some limited short-term improvements, two failed to show health gains for the intervention population, and one showed more unhealthy lifestyle behaviours persisting in the intervention population. Three studies considered chronic disease management and all failed to demonstrate health gains. Three studies considered environmental improvements and adjustments, of which two showed some health improvements and one did not.Meta-analysis of three studies exploring the effect of collaboration on mortality showed no effect (pooled relative risk of 1.04 in favour of control, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.17). Analysis of five studies (with high heterogeneity) looking at the effect of collaboration on mental health resulted in a standardised mean difference of -0.28, a small effect favouring the intervention (95% CI -0.51 to -0.06). From two studies, there was a statistically significant but clinically modest improvement in the global assessment of function symptoms score scale, with a pooled mean difference (on a scale of 1 to 100) of -2.63 favouring the intervention (95% CI -5.16 to -0.10).For physical health (6 studies) and quality of life (4 studies) the results were not statistically significant, the standardised mean differences were -0.01 (95% CI -0.10 to 0.07) and -0.08 (95% CI -0.44 to 0.27), respectively. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Collaboration between local health and local government is commonly considered best practice. However, the review did not identify any reliable evidence that interagency collaboration, compared to standard services, necessarily leads to health improvement. A few studies identified component benefits but these were not reflected in overall outcome scores and could have resulted from the use of significant additional resources. Although agencies appear enthusiastic about collaboration, difficulties in the primary studies and incomplete implementation of initiatives have prevented the development of a strong evidence base. If these weaknesses are addressed in future studies (for example by providing greater detail on the implementation of programmes; using more robust designs, integrated process evaluations to show how well the partners of the collaboration worked together, and measurement of health outcomes) it could provide a better understanding of what might work and why. It is possible that local collaborative partnerships delivering environmental Interventions may result in health gain but the evidence base for this is very limited.Evaluations of interagency collaborative arrangements face many challenges. The results demonstrate that collaborative community partnerships can be established to deliver interventions but it is important to agree goals, methods of working, monitoring and evaluation before implementation to protect programme fidelity and increase the potential for effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara L Hayes
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health BoardABM Headquarters1 Talbot GatewayPort TalbotUKSA12 7BR
| | - Mala K Mann
- Information Services, Cardiff UniversitySupport Unit for Research Evidence (SURE)1st Floor, Neuadd MeirionnyddHeath ParkCardiffWalesUKCF14 4YS
| | - Fiona M Morgan
- Information Services, Cardiff UniversitySupport Unit for Research Evidence (SURE)1st Floor, Neuadd MeirionnyddHeath ParkCardiffWalesUKCF14 4YS
| | - Mark J Kelly
- Cardiff University School of MedicineSouth East Wales Trials Unit, Institute of Translation, Innovation Methodologies & EngagementNeuadd MeirionnyddHeath ParkCardiffWalesUKCF14 4YS
| | - Alison L Weightman
- Information Services, Cardiff UniversitySupport Unit for Research Evidence (SURE)1st Floor, Neuadd MeirionnyddHeath ParkCardiffWalesUKCF14 4YS
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ford T, Edwards V, Sharkey S, Ukoumunne OC, Byford S, Norwich B, Logan S. Supporting teachers and children in schools: the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Incredible Years teacher classroom management programme in primary school children: a cluster randomised controlled trial, with parallel economic and process evaluations. BMC Public Health 2012; 12:719. [PMID: 22935476 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2012] [Accepted: 08/14/2012] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Childhood antisocial behaviour has high immediate and long-term costs for society and the individual, particularly in relation to mental health and behaviours that jeopardise health. Managing challenging behaviour is a commonly reported source of stress and burn out among teachers, ultimately resulting in a substantial number leaving the profession. Interventions to improve parenting do not transfer easily to classroom-based problems and the most vulnerable parents may not be easily able to access them. Honing teachers’ skills in proactive behaviour management and the promotion of socio-emotional regulation, therefore, has the potential to improve both child and teacher mental health and well-being and the advantage that it might potentially benefit all the children subsequently taught by any teacher that accesses the training. Methods/Design Cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the Incredible Years teacher classroom management (TCM) course with combined economic and process evaluations. One teacher of children aged 4–9 years, from 80 schools in the South West Peninsula will be randomised to attend the TCM (intervention arm) or to “teach as normal” (control arm). The primary outcome measure will be the total difficulties score from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) completed by the current class teachers prior to randomisation, and at 9, 18 and 30 months follow-up, supplemented by parent SDQs. Secondary measures include academic attainment (teacher report supplemented by direct measurement in a sub-sample), children’s enjoyment of school, and teacher reports of their professional self-efficacy, and levels of burn out and stress, supplemented by structured observations of teachers classroom management skills in a subsample. Cost data for the economic evaluation will be based on parental reports of services accessed. Cost-effectiveness, using the SDQ as the measure of effect, will be examined over the period of the RCT and over the longer term using decision analytic modelling. The process evaluation will use quantitative and qualitative approaches to assess fidelity to model, as well as explore Head teacher and teachers’ experiences of TCM and investigate school factors that influence the translation of skills learnt to practice. Discussion This study will provide important information about whether the Teacher Classroom Management course influences child and teacher mental health and well-being in both the short and long term. It will also provide valuable insights into factors that may facilitate or impede any impact. The trial has been registered with ISCTRN (Controlled Trials Ltd) and assigned an ISRCTN number ISRCTN84130388. (http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/search.html?srch=ISRCTN84130388&sort=3&dir=desc&max=10)
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
This article introduces the role economics can play in deciding whether programs designed to prevent mental disorders, which carry large disease and economic burdens, are a worthwhile use of limited healthcare resources. Fortunately, preventive interventions for mental disorders exist; however, which interventions should be financed is a common issue facing decision makers, and economic evaluation can provide answers. Unfortunately, existing economic evaluations of preventive interventions have limited applicability to local healthcare contexts. An approach to priority setting largely based on economic techniques-Assessing Cost-Effectiveness (ACE)-has been developed and used in Australia to answer questions regarding the economic credentials of competing interventions. Eleven preventive interventions for mental disorders and suicide, mostly psychological in nature, have been evaluated using this approach, with many meeting the criteria of good value for money. Interventions targeting the prevention of suicide, adult and childhood depression, childhood anxiety, and early psychosis have particular merit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Burwood, 3125, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In many countries, national, regional and local inter- and intra-agency collaborations have been introduced in order to improve health outcomes. Evidence is needed on the effectiveness of locally-developed partnerships which target changes in individual health outcomes and behaviours. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of interagency collaboration between local health and local government agencies on health outcomes. SEARCH STRATEGY Twenty-five databases were searched using a highly sensitive search strategy. 'Snowballing' methods were also used, including expert contact, website searching and reference list follow up. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), controlled before-and-after studies (CBAs) and interrupted time series (ITS) where the study reported on interagency collaboration between health and local government agencies. Studies were selected independently in duplicate by two of five authors. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS From the team of five review authors, two authors independently conducted data extraction and assessed risk of bias for each study. MAIN RESULTS Eleven studies were identified, presenting information on a total of 26,686 participants. Owing to the heterogeneity between studies a narrative synthesis was undertaken. The included studies covered a range of topics. Six studies examined mental health initiatives, of which one study showed health benefit; four showed modest improvement in one or more of the outcomes measured, but no clear overall health gain; and one study showed no evidence of health gain. Two studies were related to lifestyle improvements of which one failed to show health gains for the intervention population, while the other showed more unhealthy lifestyle behaviours persisting in the intervention population. Three studies were related to chronic disease management and all three failed to demonstrate health gains. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Collaboration between local health and local government is commonly considered best practice. However, the review did not identify any reliable evidence that inter‑agency collaboration, compared to standard services, leads to health improvement. A few studies identified component benefits but these were not reflected in overall outcome scores and could have resulted from the use of significant additional resources. Although agencies appear enthusiastic about collaboration, methodological flaws in the primary studies and incomplete implementation of initiatives have prevented the development of a strong evidence base. If these flaws are addressed in future studies (for example by providing greater detail on the implementation of programs, using more robust designs, with integrated process evaluations and measurement of health outcomes) it could provide a better understanding of what might work and why.When updating this review, we will analyse any partnership or process evaluations of our included studies to try to identify markers of success in local collaborative partnerships that could inform policy developments in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara L Hayes
- on secondment to Department of Public Health and Health Professions, Welsh Assembly Government, 4th Floor North Wing, Welsh Assembly Government, Cathays Park, Cardiff, Wales, UK, CF10 3NQ
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Green JM, Wood AJ, Kerfoot MJ, Trainor G, Roberts C, Rothwell J, Woodham A, Ayodeji E, Barrett B, Byford S, Harrington R. Group therapy for adolescents with repeated self harm: randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation. BMJ 2011; 342:d682. [PMID: 21459975 PMCID: PMC3069684 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/18/2010] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of group therapy for self harm in young people. DESIGN Two arm, single (assessor) blinded parallel randomised allocation trial of a group therapy intervention in addition to routine care, compared with routine care alone. Randomisation was by minimisation controlling for baseline frequency of self harm, presence of conduct disorder, depressive disorder, and severity of psychosocial stress. PARTICIPANTS Adolescents aged 12-17 years with at least two past episodes of self harm within the previous 12 months. Exclusion criteria were: not speaking English, low weight anorexia nervosa, acute psychosis, substantial learning difficulties (defined by need for specialist school), current containment in secure care. Setting Eight child and adolescent mental health services in the northwest UK. INTERVENTIONS Manual based developmental group therapy programme specifically designed for adolescents who harm themselves, with an acute phase over six weekly sessions followed by a booster phase of weekly groups as long as needed. Details of routine care were gathered from participating centres. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome was frequency of subsequent repeated episodes of self harm. Secondary outcomes were severity of subsequent self harm, mood disorder, suicidal ideation, and global functioning. Total costs of health, social care, education, and criminal justice sector services, plus family related costs and productivity losses, were recorded. RESULTS 183 adolescents were allocated to each arm (total n = 366). Loss to follow-up was low (<4%). On all outcomes the trial cohort as a whole showed significant improvement from baseline to follow-up. On the primary outcome of frequency of self harm, proportional odds ratio of group therapy versus routine care adjusting for relevant baseline variables was 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.44, P = 0.95) at 6 months and 0.88 (0.59 to 1.33, P = 0.52) at 1 year. For severity of subsequent self harm the equivalent odds ratios were 0.81 (0.54 to 1.20, P = 0.29) at 6 months and 0.94 (0.63 to 1.40, P = 0.75) at 1 year. Total 1 year costs were higher in the group therapy arm (£21,781) than for routine care (£15,372) but the difference was not significant (95% CI -1416 to 10782, P = 0.132). CONCLUSIONS The addition of this targeted group therapy programme did not improve self harm outcomes for adolescents who repeatedly self harmed, nor was there evidence of cost effectiveness. The outcomes to end point for the cohort as a whole were better than current clinical expectations. Trial registration ISRCTN 20496110.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Green
- Psychiatry Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Newton AS, Hamm MP, Bethell J, Rhodes AE, Bryan CJ, Tjosvold L, Ali S, Logue E, Manion IG. Pediatric suicide-related presentations: a systematic review of mental health care in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2010; 56:649-59. [PMID: 20381916 PMCID: PMC3012108 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2009] [Revised: 02/08/2010] [Accepted: 02/25/2010] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE We evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for pediatric patients with suicide-related emergency department (ED) visits. METHODS We searched of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, other electronic databases, references, and key journals/conference proceedings. We included experimental or quasiexperimental studies that evaluated psychosocial interventions for pediatric suicide-related ED visits. Inclusion screening, study selection, and methodological quality were assessed by 2 independent reviewers. One reviewer extracted the data and a second checked for completeness and accuracy. Consensus was reached by conference; disagreements were adjudicated by a third reviewer. We calculated odds ratios, relative risks (RRs), or mean differences for each study's primary outcome, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis was deferred because of clinical heterogeneity in intervention, patient population, and outcome. RESULTS We included 7 randomized controlled trials and 3 quasiexperimental studies, grouping and reviewing them according to intervention delivery: ED-based delivery (n=1), postdischarge delivery (n=6), and ED transition interventions (n=3). An ED-based discharge planning intervention increased the number of attended post-ED treatment sessions (mean difference=2.6 sessions; 95% CI 0.05 to 5.15 sessions). Of the 6 studies of postdischarge delivery interventions, 1 found increased adherence with service referral in patients who received community nurse home visits compared with simple placement referral at discharge (RR=1.28; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.56). The 3 ED transition intervention studies reported (1) reduced risk of subsequent suicide after brief ED intervention and postdischarge contact (RR=0.10; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.41); (2) reduced suicide-related hospitalizations when ED visits were followed up with interim, psychiatric care (RR=0.41; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.60); and (3) increased likelihood of treatment completion when psychiatric evaluation in the ED was followed by attendance of outpatient sessions with a parent (odds ratio=2.78; 95% CI 1.20 to 6.67). CONCLUSION Transition interventions appear most promising for reducing suicide-related outcomes and improving post-ED treatment adherence. Use of similar interventions and outcome measures in future studies would enhance the ability to derive strong recommendations from the clinical evidence in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda S Newton
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Byford S, Barrett B, Aglan A, Harrington V, Burroughs H, Kerfoot M, Harrington RC. Lifetime and current costs of supporting young adults who deliberately poisoned themselves in childhood and adolescence. J Ment Health 2009. [DOI: 10.1080/09638230802052179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
29
|
Abstract
Measuring the burden of disease associated with child and adolescent mental disorders is a challenge. The lack of data on cost and intervention effectiveness has impeded the ability to gain support for expenditures for treatment, training and programme development. A better understanding of economic analysis by researchers, clinicians, and advocates can promote initiatives to gain needed economic data to inform policy and programme development. Based on a critical review of the literature and the development of an economic hypothesis, this paper proposes a specific approach to the economic analysis of the burden of child and adolescent mental disorders utilizing accessible outcome data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee Y Hsia
- Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Economic evaluation of the Dangerous and Severe Personality Disorder Programme is essential to ensure value for money. The collection of individual-level service use information is crucial to any such evaluation, but the best way to collect these data in secure facilities is unclear. AIMS To develop a method for the collection of individual-level service use information for prisoners/patients in secure facilities. METHODS Services provided within secure facilities were identified through examination of facility and policy literature, and discussions with managerial and clinical staff. Appropriate methods of measuring the quantities of services used were then explored and a new research tool capable of capturing all relevant services was developed and pilot tested. RESULTS The Secure Facilities Service Use Schedule (SF-SUS) records service use information from records and is capable of capturing data on the use of all individual-level services provided within a secure facility plus external services commonly accessed by occupants. Discussion The SF-SUS is able to collect meaningful individual-level service use information for the economic evaluation of services provided within secure facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Barrett
- Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, Box PO24, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zechmeister I, Kilian R, McDaid D. Is it worth investing in mental health promotion and prevention of mental illness? A systematic review of the evidence from economic evaluations. BMC Public Health 2008; 8:20. [PMID: 18211677 PMCID: PMC2245925 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2007] [Accepted: 01/22/2008] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While evidence on the cost of mental illness is growing, little is known about the cost-effectiveness of programmes in the areas of mental health promotion (MHP) and mental disorder prevention (MDP). The paper aims at identifying and assessing economic evaluations in both these areas to support evidence based prioritisation of resource allocation. Methods A systematic review of health and non health related bibliographic databases, complemented by a hand search of key journals and analysis of grey literature has been carried out. Study characteristics and results were qualitatively summarised. Economic evaluations of programmes that address mental health outcome parameters directly, those that address relevant risk factors of mental illness, as well as suicide prevention interventions were included, while evaluations of drug therapies were excluded. Results 14 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They varied in terms of topic addressed, intervention used and study quality. Robust evidence on cost-effectiveness is still limited to a very small number of interventions with restricted scope for generalisability and transferability. The most favourable results are related to early childhood development programmes. Conclusion Prioritisation between MHP and MDP interventions requires more country and population-specific economic evaluations. There is also scope to retrospectively add economic analyses to existing effectiveness studies. The nature of promotion and prevention suggests that innovative approaches to economic evaluation that augment this with information on the challenges of implementation and uptake of interventions need further development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Zechmeister
- Senior lecturer at the University of Ulm, Department of Psychiatry II, BKH Guenzburg, Ludwig-Heilmeyer-Str, 2, D-89312 Guenzburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Byford S, Barrett B, Roberts C, Wilkinson P, Dubicka B, Kelvin RG, White L, Ford C, Breen S, Goodyer I. Cost-effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and routine specialist care with and without cognitive behavioural therapy in adolescents with major depression. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 191:521-7. [PMID: 18055956 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.038984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major depression is an important and costly problem among adolescents, yet evidence to support the provision of cost-effective treatments is lacking. AIMS To assess the short-term cost-effectiveness of combined selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) together with clinical care compared with SSRIs and clinical care alone in adolescents with major depression. METHOD Pragmatic randomised controlled trial in the UK. Outcomes and costs were assessed at baseline, 12 and 28 weeks. RESULTS The trial comprised 208 adolescents, aged 11-17 years, with major or probable major depression who had not responded to a brief initial psychosocial intervention. There were no significant differences in outcome between the groups with and without CBT. Costs were higher in the group with CBT, although not significantly so (P=0.057). Cost-effectiveness analysis and exploration of the associated uncertainty suggest there is less than a 30% probability that CBT plus SSRIs is more cost-effective than SSRIs alone. CONCLUSIONS A combination of CBT plus SSRIs is not more cost-effective in the short-term than SSRIs alone for treating adolescents with major depression in receipt of routine specialist clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Byford
- King's College London, Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Box P024, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Byford S, Barrett B, Roberts C, Clark A, Edwards V, Smethurst N, Gowers SG. Economic evaluation of a randomised controlled trial for anorexia nervosa in adolescents. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 191:436-40. [PMID: 17978324 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.036806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young people with anorexia nervosa are often admitted to hospital for treatment. As well as being disruptive to school, family and social life, in-patient treatment is expensive, yet cost-effectiveness evidence is lacking. AIMS Cost-effectiveness analysis of three treatment strategies for adolescents with anorexia nervosa. METHOD UK multicentre randomised, controlled trial comparing in-patient psychiatric treatment, specialist out-patient treatment and general out-patient treatment. Outcomes and costs assessed at baseline, 1 and 2 years. RESULTS There were 167 young people in the trial. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcome between the three groups at 2 years. The specialist out-patient group was less costly over the 2-year follow-up (mean total cost 26 738 UK pounds) than the in-patient (34 531 UK pounds) and general out-patient treatment (40 794 UK pounds) groups, but this result was not statistically significant. Exploration of the uncertainty associated with the costs and effects of the three treatments suggests that specialist out-patient treatment has the highest probability of being cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of cost-effectiveness, these results support the provision of specialist out-patient services for adolescents with anorexia nervosa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Byford
- Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Goodyer I, Dubicka B, Wilkinson P, Kelvin R, Roberts C, Byford S, Breen S, Ford C, Barrett B, Leech A, Rothwell J, White L, Harrington R. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and routine specialist care with and without cognitive behaviour therapy in adolescents with major depression: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2007; 335:142. [PMID: 17556431 PMCID: PMC1925185 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39224.494340.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/01/2007] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether a combination of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRIs) and cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) together with clinical care is more effective in the short term than an SSRI and clinical care alone in adolescents with moderate to severe major depression. DESIGN Pragmatic randomised controlled superiority trial. SETTING 6 outpatient clinics in Manchester and Cambridge. PARTICIPANTS 208 adolescents, aged 11-17, with moderate to severe major or probable major depression who had not responded to a brief initial intervention. Adolescents with suicidality, depressive psychosis, or conduct disorder were included. INTERVENTIONS 103 adolescents received an SSRI and routine care; 105 received an SSRI, routine care, and CBT. The trial lasted 12 weeks, followed by a 16 week maintenance phase. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Change in score on the Health of the Nation outcome scales for children and adolescents (primary outcome) from baseline with 12 weeks as the primary and 28 weeks as the follow-up end point. Secondary measures were change in scores on the mood and feelings questionnaire, the revised children's depression rating scale, the children's global assessment scale, and the clinical global impression improvement scale. RESULTS At 12 weeks the treatment effect for the primary outcome was -0.64 (95% confidence interval -2.54 to 1.26, P=0.50). In a longitudinal analysis, there was no difference in effectiveness of treatment for the primary (average treatment effect 0.001, -1.52 to 1.52, P=0.99) or secondary outcome measures. On average there was a decrease in suicidal thoughts and self harm. There was no evidence of a protective effect of cognitive behaviour therapy on suicidal thinking or action. By 28 weeks, 57% were much or very much improved with 20% remaining unimproved. CONCLUSIONS For adolescents with moderate to severe major depression there is no evidence that the combination of CBT plus an SSRI in the presence of routine clinical care contributes to an improved outcome by 28 weeks compared with the provision of routine clinical care plus an SSRI alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCNT 83809224.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Goodyer
- Developmental Psychiatry Section, Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 2AH.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression in childhood and adolescence creates significant burden to individuals, families, and societies by increasing morbidity, increasing mortality, and negatively affecting quality of life during times of significantly depressed mood. Several studies have estimated the cost of depression in the United States and elsewhere, but none have included the costs associated with depression in children or younger adolescents. This paper reviews data currently available on the cost of depression in childhood and the cost effectiveness of interventions to treat and prevent depression in this population. METHODS A systematic review was conducted of published literature related to the cost of depression in children and adolescents and of economic evaluations of interventions to treat or prevent depression in this population. RESULTS Five articles were identified that included any type of data related to the cost of depression in childhood; four articles were identified that conducted economic evaluations of interventions to treat or prevent depression in children or adolescents. CONCLUSIONS Little information on the economic burden of depression in childhood is currently available. Future research in this area needs to include a broad range of costs; long-term outcomes; and costs relevant to decision makers in public and private agencies, such as implementation costs and costs of sustaining intervention fidelity over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances L Lynch
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon 97227-1098, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The full costs of accommodating and supporting young people in the criminal justice system are unknown. There is also concern about the level of mental health needs among young offenders and the provision of appropriate mental health services. AIMS To estimate the full cost of supporting young people in the criminal justice system in England and Wales and to examine the relationship between needs, service use and cost. METHOD Cross-sectional survey of 301 young offenders, 151 in custody and 150 in the community, conducted in six geographically representative areas of England and Wales. RESULTS Mental health service use was low despite high levels of need, particularly in the community. Monthly costs were significantly higher among young people interviewed in secure facilities than in the community (pound 4645 v. pound 1863; P<0.001). Younger age and a depressed mood were associated with greater costs. CONCLUSIONS Young people in the criminal justice system are a significant financial burden not only on that system but also on social services, health and education. The relationship between cost and depressed mood indicates a role for mental health services in supporting young offenders, particularly those in the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Barrett
- Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Box PO24, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Systemische Familientherapie bei Störungen des Kindes- und Jugendalters. Eine Metainhaltsanalyse von 47 randomisierten Primärstudien. Psychotherapeut 2006; 51:107-43. [DOI: 10.1007/s00278-006-0480-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
38
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known regarding children of greatest concern with complex mental health problems. METHOD A one-year prospective study of psychiatric diagnosis, psychosocial functioning, need status and service receipt in 60 children identified as most concerning. RESULTS Thirty-two (53%) had two or more disorders. The mean number of needs per child was five. One year later mean needs were unchanged but with considerable individual variation. Mean weekly costs were £1017 (€1627) (SD = £957 (€1531)). Higher costs related to social factors rather than diagnosis or need. CONCLUSIONS The mean annual cost of services to children with complex mental health problems is ten times that in other studies of children with mental health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew F Clark
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Regional Adolescent Unit, Bolton Salford Trafford Mental Health NHS Trust, Bury New Road, Prestwich, Manchester M25 3BL, UK. E-mail:
| | - Art O'Malley
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Regional Adolescent Unit, Bolton Salford Trafford Mental Health NHS Trust, Bury New Road, Prestwich, Manchester M25 3BL, UK. E-mail:
| | - Adrine Woodham
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Regional Adolescent Unit, Bolton Salford Trafford Mental Health NHS Trust, Bury New Road, Prestwich, Manchester M25 3BL, UK. E-mail:
| | - Barbara Barrett
- Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
| | - Sarah Byford
- Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recognition has grown over recent years of the need for economic information on the impacts of child and adolescent mental health problems and the cost-effectiveness of interventions. METHODS A range of electronic databases were examined using a predefined search strategy to identify economic studies which focused on services, pharmacological interventions and other treatments for children and adolescents with a diagnosed mental health problem or identified as at risk of mental illness. Published studies were included in the review if they assessed both costs and outcomes, with cost-effectiveness being the primary interest. Studies meeting the criteria for inclusion were assessed for quality. RESULTS There are still relatively few economic evaluations in this field. Behavioural disorders have been given relatively greater attention in economic evaluations of child and adolescent mental health. These studies tentatively suggest child behavioural gains and parent satisfaction from parent and child training programmes, although the cost-effectiveness of the location of delivery for behavioural therapies is less clear. In general, the quality of economic evaluations was limited by small sample sizes, constrained measurement of costs, narrow perspectives and over-simple statistical and econometric methods. CONCLUSION Economic evaluations in the field of child and adolescent mental health interventions are few in number and generally poor in quality, although the number of studies being undertaken now appears to be rising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée Romeo
- Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the evidence for the effectiveness of clinical interventions designed to reduce the repetition of deliberate self-harm (DSH) in adolescents and young adults. METHODS Electronic databases were searched for papers describing randomised and clinical control trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies of interventions targeting adolescents and young adults presenting to clinical services following DSH or suicidal ideation. RESULTS Three RCTs, four clinical control trials and three quasi-experimental studies were identified. Group therapy, trialled in a RCT, was the only specific programme which led to a significant reduction in rates of repetition of self-harm. Attendance at follow-up did not improve significantly regardless of the intervention, while one clinically controlled trial of intensive intervention resulted in poorer attendance at follow-up. One quasi-experimental study of family therapy resulted in a significant reduction in suicidal ideation. CONCLUSIONS The evidence base for treatments designed to reduce the repetition of self-harm in adolescents and young adults is very limited. Expensive interventions such as intensive aftercare offer no clear benefit over routine aftercare. Given that deliberate self-harm among young people is a common clinical problem further good quality treatment studies are warranted. Careful consideration should be given to process evaluation to determine which individual components of any given intervention are effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Burns
- 'beyondblue; the national depression initiative' Hawthorn West, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Currently, there are no data available comparing cost-effectiveness of two antidepressants in the primary care setting in the UK. Alongside a randomized, double-blind, 24-week study of mirtazapine and paroxetine, data were prospectively collected on patients' use of hospital and non-hospital services and days off work. Costs were estimated in each treatment arm from National Health Service (NHS) and societal perspectives, and were compared with selected outcome measures (numbers of 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (17-HAMD) responders and changes in Quality of Life in Depression Scale scores between baseline and 24-week endpoint) to explore and compare relative cost-effectiveness. Mirtazapine treatment resulted in a statistically significantly greater improvement in quality of life than paroxetine at endpoint (P=0.021). Although the 17-HAMD response rates were higher for the mirtazapine users at endpoint, the difference (7%) was not statistically significant (P=0.31). However, mean total societal costs per patient were 375 pounds less with mirtazapine (1850 pounds) compared to paroxetine (2225 pounds; P=0.32). Mean total NHS costs per patient were also lower (120 pounds) with mirtazapine (1408 pounds) compared to paroxetine (1528 pounds). The advantage for mirtazapine remained present on all variables analysed after performing sensitivity analyses. The results suggest that mirtazapine may be a cost-effective treatment choice compared to paroxetine for depression in a primary care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee Romeo
- Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This annotation describes the uses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in clinical child psychology and psychiatry. METHOD It explores the scientific basis for randomised designs, the conceptual and methodological issues that can arise when using them, alternative methods, and future directions. RESULTS There are many issues that have to be tackled when using randomised trials to answer questions about the effectiveness of interventions used by child mental health professionals. The most important are conceptual issues concerning the design of these studies, practical issues, and issues about the interpretation of the results. There are some situations in which randomised trials are not possible or ideal and alternative strategies may therefore be needed. Future RCTs should be more explicit about whether their primary purpose is to further scientific knowledge or to evaluate the benefit of a treatment in routine clinical practice. Future trials should also have outcomes of unequivocal significance and be reported in accordance with standardised guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Well-designed and unambiguously reported RCTs usually provide the best possible evidence about the effectiveness of an intervention. RCTs are not, however, the only way of establishing cause and effect and their results should always be interpreted in the light of other evidence.
Collapse
|
43
|
Knapp M, McCrone P, Fombonne E, Beecham J, Wostear G. The Maudsley long-term follow-up of child and adolescent depression: 3. Impact of comorbid conduct disorder on service use and costs in adulthood. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 180:19-23. [PMID: 11772846 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression in childhood or adolescence often has morbidity implications continuing into adulthood, generating needs for specialist services and support. AIMS To estimate the patterns of service use and costs in adulthood of former patients. METHOD Service use and other cost-related data were collected from former patients. Comparisons were made between those people with and without comorbid conduct disorder in childhood and with data for the general population. RESULTS Data on 91 people with depression (only) and 49 with comorbid conduct disorder revealed high adulthood service utilisation rates and costs. Inpatient care and criminal justice services were used more frequently by the comorbid group and total costs were significantly higher. There were also indications of higher service use by the comorbid group than the general adult population. CONCLUSIONS The high and enduring long-term costs associated with childhood depression and conduct disorder give further reason for early and effective intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Knapp
- Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, 7 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8F, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare group therapy with routine care in adolescents who had deliberately harmed themselves on at least two occasions within a year. METHOD Single-blind pilot study with two randomized parallel groups that took place in Manchester, England. Sixty-three adolescents aged 12 through 16 years were randomly assigned to group therapy and routine care or routine care alone. Outcome data on suicide attempts were obtained without knowledge of treatment allocation on all randomized cases (62/63 by direct interview) on average 29 weeks later. The primary outcomes were depression and suicidal behavior. RESULTS In intention-to-treat analyses, adolescents who had group therapy were less likely to be "repeaters" at the end of the study (i.e., to have repeated deliberate self-harm on two or more further occasions) than adolescents who had routine care (2/32 versus 10/31; odds ratio 6.3), but the confidence intervals for this ratio were wide (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 28.7). They were also less likely to use routine care, had better school attendance, and had a lower rate of behavioral disorder than adolescents given routine care alone. The interventions did not differ, however, in their effects on depression or global outcome. CONCLUSIONS Group therapy shows promise as a treatment for adolescents who repeatedly harm themselves, but larger studies are required to assess more accurately the efficacy of this intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wood
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Withington Hospital, South Manchester, England
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Harrington R, Peters S, Green J, Byford S, Woods J, McGowan R. Randomised comparison of the effectiveness and costs of community and hospital based mental health services for children with behavioural disorders. BMJ 2000; 321:1047-50. [PMID: 11053174 PMCID: PMC27511 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7268.1047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that a community based intervention by secondary child and adolescent mental health services would be significantly more effective and less costly than a hospital based intervention. DESIGN Open study with two randomised parallel groups. SETTING Two health districts in the north of England. PARTICIPANTS Parents of 3 to 10 year old children with behavioural disorder who had been referred to child and adolescent mental health services. INTERVENTION Parental education groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Parents' and teachers' reports of the child's behaviour, parental depression, parental criticism of the child, impact of the child's behaviour on the family. RESULTS 141 subjects were randomised to community (n=72) or hospital (n=69) treatment. Primary outcome data were obtained on 115 (82%) cases a year later. Intention to treat analyses showed no significant differences between the community and hospital based groups on any of the outcome measures, or on costs. Parental depression was common and predicted the child's outcome. CONCLUSIONS Location of child mental health services may be less important than the range of services that they provide, which should include effective treatment for parents' mental health problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Harrington
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Manchester M27 4HA, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hawton K, Townsend E, Arensman E, Gunnell D, Hazell P, House A, van Heeringen K. Psychosocial versus pharmacological treatments for deliberate self harm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000:CD001764. [PMID: 10796818 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify and synthesise the findings from all randomised controlled trials that have examined the effectiveness of treatments of patients who have deliberately harmed themselves. SEARCH STRATEGY Electronic databases screened: MEDLINE (from 1966-February 1999); PsycLit (from 1974-March 1999); Embase (from 1980-January 1999); The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR) No.1 1999. Ten journals in the field of psychiatry and psychology were hand searched for the first version of this review. We have updated the hand search of three specialist journals in the field of suicidal research until the end of 1998. Reference lists of papers were checked and trialists contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA All RCTs of psychosocial and/or psychopharmacological treatment versus standard or less intensive types of aftercare for patients who shortly before entering a study engaged in any type of deliberately initiated self-poisoning or self-injury, both of which are generally subsumed under the term deliberate self-harm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Data were extracted from the original reports independently by two reviewers. Studies were categorized according to type of treatment. The outcome measure used to assess the efficacy of treatment interventions for deliberate self-harm was the rate of repeated suicidal behaviour. We have been unable to examine other outcome measures as originally planned (e.g. compliance with treatment, depression, hopelessness, suicidal ideation/thoughts, change in problems/problem resolution). MAIN RESULTS A total of 23 trials were identified in which repetition of deliberate self-harm was reported as an outcome variable. The trials were classified into 11 categories. The summary odds ratio indicated a trend towards reduced repetition of deliberate self-harm for problem-solving therapy compared with standard aftercare (0.70; 0.45 to 1.11) and for provision of an emergency contact card in addition to standard care compared with standard aftercare alone (0.45; 0.19 to 1.07). The summary odds ratio for trials of intensive aftercare plus outreach compared with standard aftercare was 0.83 (0.61 to 1.14), and for antidepressant treatment compared with placebo was 0.83 (0. 47 to 1.48). The remainder of the comparisons were in single small trials. Significantly reduced rates of further self-harm were observed for depot flupenthixol vs. placebo in multiple repeaters (0. 09; 0.02 to 0.50), and for dialectical behaviour therapy vs. standard aftercare (0.24; 0.06 to 0.93). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS There still remains considerable uncertainty about which forms of psychosocial and physical treatments of self-harm patients are most effective, inclusion of insufficient numbers of patients in trials being the main limiting factor. There is a need for larger trials of treatments associated with trends towards reduced rates of repetition of deliberate self-harm. The results of small single trials which have been associated with statistically significant reductions in repetition must be interpreted with caution and it is desirable that such trials are also replicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Hawton
- University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK, OX3 7JX.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|