Mucosal correlates of protection after influenza viral challenge of vaccinated and unvaccinated healthy volunteers

The induction of systemic antibody titers against hemagglutinin has long been the main focus of influenza vaccination strategies, but mucosal immunity has also been shown to play a key role in the protection against respiratory viruses. By vaccinating and challenging healthy volunteers, we demonstrated that inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) modestly reduced the rate of influenza while predominantly boosting serum antibody titers against hemagglutinin (HA) and HA stalk, a consequence of the low neuraminidase (NA) content of IIV and the intramuscular route of administration. The viral challenge induced nasal and serum responses against both HA and NA. Correlations between mucosal IgA and serum IgG against specific antigens were low, whether before or after challenge, suggesting a compartmentalization of immune responses. Even so, volunteers who developed viral shedding for multiple days had lower baseline titers across both systemic and mucosal compartments as compared to those with no shedding or a single day of shedding. Regression analysis showed that pre-challenge HA inhibition titers were the most consistent correlate of protection across clinical outcomes combining shedding and symptoms, with NA inhibition titers and HA IgG levels only predicting the duration of shedding. Despite the inclusion of data from multiple binding and functional antibody assays against HA and NA performed on both serum and nasal samples, multivariate models were unable to account for the variability in outcomes, emphasizing our imperfect understanding of immune correlates in influenza and the importance of refining models with assessments of innate and cellular immune responses.IMPORTANCEThe devastating potential of influenza has been well known for over 100 years. Despite the development of vaccines since the middle of the 20th century, influenza continues to be responsible for substantial global morbidity and mortality. To develop next-generation vaccines with enhanced effectiveness, we must synthesize our understanding of the complex immune mechanisms culminating in protection. Our study outlines the differences in immune responses to influenza vaccine and influenza infection, identifying potential gaps in vaccine-induced immunity, particularly at the level of the nasal mucosa. Furthermore, this research underscores the need to refine our imperfect models while recognizing potential pitfalls in past and future attempts to identify and measure correlates of protection.

Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in a Large US population Over a Period of 12 Months

Due to a combination of asymptomatic or undiagnosed infections, the proportion of the United States population infected with SARS-CoV-2 was unclear from the beginning of the pandemic. We previously established a platform to screen for SARS-CoV-2 positivity across a representative proportion of the US population, from which we reported that almost 17 million Americans were estimated to have had undocumented infections in the Spring of 2020. Since then, vaccine rollout and prevalence of different SARS-CoV-2 variants have further altered seropositivity trends within the United States population. To explore the longitudinal impacts of the pandemic and vaccine responses on seropositivity, we re-enrolled participants from our baseline study in a 6- and 12- month follow-up study to develop a longitudinal antibody profile capable of representing seropositivity within the United States during a critical period just prior to and during the initiation of vaccine rollout. Initial measurements showed that, since July 2020, seropositivity elevated within this population from 4.8% at baseline to 36.2% and 89.3% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. We also evaluated nucleocapsid seropositivity and compared to spike seropositivity to identify trends in infection versus vaccination relative to baseline. These data serve as a window into a critical timeframe within the COVID-19 pandemic response and serve as a resource that could be used in subsequent respiratory illness outbreaks.

505. Mucosal and Systemic Humoral Immunity Differences between Sexes during Influenza Vaccination and Viral Challenge

Background

In previous influenza challenge studies we observed that the incidence of influenza symptoms was higher in women than in men, and that women experience more symptoms overall. Women also demonstrated lower neuraminidase (NA) inhibition (NAI) antibody titers than men after challenge and regression analysis suggested that NAI titers predict clinical outcomes. We sought to evaluate this using data from a more recent challenge study with more immunologically varied volunteers, while also assessing mucosal immunity.

Methods

We obtained mucosal and serum samples from healthy adults. Half underwent intramuscular quadrivalent influenza vaccination followed by influenza A (H1N1) intranasal challenge while others just challenge alone. Antibody titers and clinical outcomes between sexes were compared.

Results

No significant differences in shedding or symptom outcomes were observed between sexes. Similarly, no differences in systemic titers against NA or hemagglutinin (HA) were seen. Serum total IgG and IgA were also similar between sexes. Prior to vaccination, mucosal IgA titers were significantly lower against HA stalk and NA in women, but these differences disappeared after vaccination. In the unvaccinated group, lower nasal IgA titers were also seen in women pre-challenge. At 7 days post-challenge, differences in mucosal titers between sexes disappeared. However, at 56 days post-challenge, mucosal IgA titers against HA, HA stalk, and NA were all significantly lower in women.

Conclusion

In contrast to our previous findings, no differences in clinical outcomes or systemic NAI titers were observed between men and women, possibly due to differences in underlying immunity between study populations or the lower sample size in this study. However, mucosal differences were noted with women having lower mucosal titers than men against HA stalk and NA at baseline. While influenza vaccination and challenge eliminated differences in the short term, they reappeared 8 weeks after challenge, with all nasal IgA antibody titers (HA, HA stalk, and NA) lower in women. Further studies are necessary to understand the differences in influenza disease and immunity between sexes.

Disclosures

All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Sex Differences in Influenza: The Challenge Study Experience

BACKGROUND

Preclinical animal studies and retrospective human studies suggest that adult females have worse outcomes from influenza than males. Prospective studies in humans are missing.

METHODS

Data from 164 healthy volunteers who underwent Influenza A/California/04/2009/H1N1 challenge were compiled to compare differences between sexes. Baseline characteristics, including hormone levels, hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) titers, neuraminidase-inhibition titers (NAI), and outcomes after challenge were compared. Linear and logistic regression models were built to determine significant predictor variables with respect to outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) titers were similar between the sexes, but neuraminidase-inhibition titers (NAI) were higher in males than females at 4-weeks and 8-weeks post-challenge. Females were more likely to have symptoms (mean 0.96 vs 0.80, p=.003) and to have a higher number of symptoms (median 3 vs 4, p=.011) than males. Linear and logistic regression models showed that pre-challenge NAI titers, but not HAI titers or sex hormone levels, were predictive of all shedding and symptom outcomes of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

Females in our cohorts were more likely to be symptomatic and to have a higher number of symptoms than males. NAI titers predicted all outcomes of interest and may explain differential outcomes between the sexes.

Undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States

Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and delayed implementation of diagnostics have led to poorly defined viral prevalence rates in the United States and elsewhere. To address this, we analyzed seropositivity in 9089 adults in the United States who had not been diagnosed previously with COVID-19. Individuals with characteristics that reflected the U.S. population (n = 27,716) were selected by quota sampling from 462,949 volunteers. Enrolled participants (n = 11,382) provided medical, geographic, demographic, and socioeconomic information and dried blood samples. Survey questions coincident with the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey, a large probability-based national survey, were used to adjust for selection bias. Most blood samples (88.7%) were collected between 10 May and 31 July 2020 and were processed using ELISA to measure seropositivity (IgG and IgM antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and the spike protein receptor binding domain). The overall weighted undiagnosed seropositivity estimate was 4.6% (95% CI, 2.6 to 6.5%), with race, age, sex, ethnicity, and urban/rural subgroup estimates ranging from 1.1% to 14.2%. The highest seropositivity estimates were in African American participants; younger, female, and Hispanic participants; and residents of urban centers. These data indicate that there were 4.8 undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections for every diagnosed case of COVID-19, and an estimated 16.8 million infections were undiagnosed by mid-July 2020 in the United States.

The effect of calcium and magnesium on activity, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a recombinant N1/N2 neuraminidase vaccine

Despite the importance of immunity against neuraminidase (NA), NA content and immunogenicity are neglected in current influenza vaccines. To address this, a recombinant N1/N2 NA vaccine (NAV) was developed. Stability assays were used to determine optimal temperature and buffer conditions for vaccine storage. The effect of divalent cation-related enhancement of NA stability and activity on N1 and N2 immunogenicity and efficacy against viral challenge was assessed. Differences in activity between N1 and N2 and cation-related activity enhancement did not translate into differences in immunogenicity or efficacy. NAV-vaccinated mice showed robust antibody titers against N1 and N2, and after challenge with influenza A (H1N1) virus, decreased viral titers and decreased antiviral and inflammatory responses by transcriptomic analysis. These findings provide guidance for optimal storage and assessment of NA-based vaccines and confirm the importance of NA in influenza vaccination strategies in attenuating viral replication and limiting inflammatory responses necessary to clear infection.

Mapping a Pandemic: SARS-CoV-2 Seropositivity in the United States

Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and delayed implementation of diagnostics have led to poorly defined viral prevalence rates. To address this, we analyzed seropositivity in US adults who have not previously been diagnosed with COVID-19. Individuals with characteristics that reflect the US population (n = 11,382) and who had not previously been diagnosed with COVID-19 were selected by quota sampling from 241,424 volunteers (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04334954). Enrolled participants provided medical, geographic, demographic, and socioeconomic information and 9,028 blood samples. The majority (88.7%) of samples were collected between May 10th and July 31st, 2020. Samples were analyzed via ELISA for anti-Spike and anti-RBD antibodies. Estimation of seroprevalence was performed by using a weighted analysis to reflect the US population. We detected an undiagnosed seropositivity rate of 4.6% (95% CI: 2.6 - 6.5%). There was distinct regional variability, with heightened seropositivity in locations of early outbreaks. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the highest estimated undiagnosed seropositivity within groups was detected in younger participants (ages 18-45, 5.9%), females (5.5%), Black/African American (14.2%), Hispanic (6.1%), and Urban residents (5.3%), and lower undiagnosed seropositivity in those with chronic diseases. During the first wave of infection over the spring/summer of 2020 an estimate of 4.6% of adults had a prior undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection. These data indicate that there were 4.8 (95% CI: 2.8-6.8) undiagnosed cases for every diagnosed case of COVID-19 during this same time period in the United States, and an estimated 16.8 million undiagnosed cases by mid-July 2020.

Influenza A Reinfection in Sequential Human Challenge: Implications for Protective Immunity and "Universal" Vaccine Development

BACKGROUND

Identification of correlates of protection against human influenza A virus infection is important in development of broadly protective ("universal") influenza vaccines. Certain assumptions underlie current vaccine developmental strategies, including that infection with a particular influenza A virus should offer long-term or lifelong protection against that strain, preventing reinfection. In this study we report observations made when 7 volunteers participated in sequential influenza challenge studies where they were challenged intranasally using the identical influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus approximately 1 year apart. We evaluate and describe the outcomes of these 7 rechallenge participants and discuss what these results may suggest about correlates of protection and development of more broadly protective influenza vaccines.

METHODS

Seven participants were enrolled in 2 viral challenge studies at 7.5- to 18.5-month intervals. Both challenge studies used the identical lot of influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 virus administered intranasally. We evaluated pre- and postchallenge hemagglutination inhibition, neuraminidase inhibition, and stalk antibody titers; peripheral blood leukocyte host gene expression response profiles; daily viral detection via nasal wash; and clinical signs and symptoms.

RESULTS

At least 3 of 7 participants demonstrated confirmed laboratory evidence of sequential infection, with 5 of 7 demonstrating clinical evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The data presented in this report demonstrate that sequential infection with the identical influenza A virus can occur and suggest it may not be rare. These data raise questions about immune memory responses in an acute superficial respiratory mucosal infection and their implications in development of broadly protective influenza vaccines. Further investigation of these observations is warranted.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT01646138; NCT01971255.

1524. Sex Differences in Influenza: The Challenge Study Experience

Background

Our understanding of the impact of biological sex on influenza-associated disease and the mechanisms that underpin it is still incomplete. Further investigation of sex-linked effects on influenza pathogenesis and clinical outcomes may help tailor vaccine strategies. Animal studies have shown female mice experience more symptoms than male mice during influenza infection. Similarly, human females of reproductive age have higher rates of influenza and influenza-related hospitalizations. However, data is sometimes conflicting and may be confounded by other important differences in baseline characteristics. Human challenge studies have demonstrated the importance of NAI titers as a correlate of protection and may also provide an ideal opportunity to study sex differences in a homogenous group of participants controlled for confounders.

Methods

Data from 168 volunteers who underwent Influenza A/California/04/2009/H1N1 challenge studies affiliated with NIAID’s LID Clinical Studies Unit were compiled to compare differences between sexes. Participants were included in the analysis if they received a challenge dose of virus of 10⁷ TCID50 and were excluded if they had received any vaccines or experimental therapy during the study period.

Results

Baseline differences between male and female participants were observed in NAI titers but not HAI titers or age. Outcomes of interest included presence of viral shedding/duration which were similar among sexes. However, symptom number and duration were higher among female participants (p=0.008 and p=0.045 respectively). Ongoing data analysis also shows females have lower post-challenge NAI titers than males.

Conclusion

Female participants in our H1N1 challenge studies had more symptoms and a longer duration of symptoms compared to their male counterparts. Differences in NAI titers may potentially explain the observed relationship between sex and symptoms associated with influenza.

Disclosures

All Authors: No reported disclosures

1522. Safety and Efficacy of CR6261 in an Influenza A H1N1 Healthy Human Challenge Model

Background

Influenza virus infections cause significant morbidity and mortality during yearly seasonal epidemics and during sporadic pandemics. It is imperative to identify new targets for vaccines and therapeutics. One such target is the relatively conserved stalk region of the influenza A hemagglutinin (HA) surface protein.

Methods

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, Phase II placebo-controlled trial of a monoclonal antibody that targets the HA stalk (CR6261) in a H1N1pdm09 healthy volunteer human challenge model. CR6261 was infused 24 hours after challenge with H1N1pdm09 and the primary efficacy outcome was area under the curve (AUC) of viral shedding.

Results

Between March 2015-May 2018, 104 healthy volunteers were enrolled and randomized with 91 undergoing influenza challenge, of which 49 participants (54%) received treatment with CR6261 and 42 participants (46%) received placebo. A mean of 1x10⁶ ng/mL of serum CR6261 was detected by 24 hours after infusion. Nasal CR6261 levels reached a peak mean of 5.97x10² ng/ml 2 days after infusion. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome measure between the CR6261 group and placebo (median AUC 48.56 and 25.53 respectively, P=0.31). The severity of illness was compared between the two groups, and no significant difference was observed in number of symptoms, duration of symptoms, or FLU-PRO scores.

Conclusion

CR6261 had no statistically significant effect on AUC of viral shedding, and no clinically significant effect on overall influenza disease. Preexisting anti-neuraminidase (NA) antibody titers were most predictive of reduced influenza disease. Nasal CR6261 levels were much lower compared to serum, which may be a factor in the limited effect of CR6261 on this upper respiratory infection. These results suggest that a monoclonal anti-stalk approach to prevent or treat influenza infection may have limited efficacy. Future approaches should consider including and evaluating anti-stalk antibodies as part of a multi-faceted strategy rather than as a standalone therapeutic or vaccine strategy.

Funding

This study was funded in part by the intramural program of NIAID, NIH, by the NCI Contract No. 75N910D00024, Task Order No. 75N91019F00130, and through a CRADA with Janssen Infectious Diseases and Vaccines.

Disclosures

Amy Lwin, RN, BSN, Janssen Pharmaceutical Company of J&J (Employee) Jerald Sadoff, MD, Janssen Pharmaceutical Company of J&J (Employee)

Safety and Efficacy of CR6261 in an Influenza A H1N1 Healthy Human Challenge Model

BACKGROUND

It is imperative to identify new targets for improved vaccines and therapeutics against influenza and one such target is the relatively conserved stalk region of the influenza A hemagglutinin (HA) surface protein.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, Phase II placebo-controlled trial of a monoclonal antibody that targets the HA stalk (CR6261) in a H1N1pdm09 healthy volunteer human challenge model. A single 50mg/kg dose of CR6261 was infused 24 hours after challenge and the primary efficacy outcome was area under the curve of viral RNA detection over time.

RESULTS

Ninety-one healthy volunteers were randomized and underwent influenza challenge; 49 received CR6261 and 42 placebo. CR6261 had no statistically significant effect on AUC (AUC 48.56 log (copies/mL) x days, IQR 202 vs. AUC 25.53 log (copies/mL) x days, IQR 155), P=0.315), and no clinically significant effect on influenza disease measures including number of symptoms, duration of symptoms, or FLU-PRO scores. Preexisting anti-NA antibody titers were most predictive of reduced influenza disease. CR6261 reached a mean peak serum concentration of 1x10 6 ng/ml 15 minutes after infusion, and a mean peak of 5.97x10 2 ng/ml in the nasal mucosa 2-3 days after infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that a monoclonal anti-stalk approach to prevent or treat influenza infection may be limited in efficacy. Future approaches should consider including and evaluating anti-stalk antibodies as part of a multi-faceted strategy rather than as a standalone therapeutic.

A Dose-finding Study of a Wild-type Influenza A(H3N2) Virus in a Healthy Volunteer Human Challenge Model

BACKGROUND

The development of vaccines and therapeutics has relied on healthy volunteer influenza challenge studies. A validated human infection model with wild-type A(H1N1)pdm09 was reported previously. Our objective was to characterize a wild-type influenza A/Bethesda/MM1/H3N2 challenge virus in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Participants received a single dose of a cell-based, reverse-genetics, Good Manufacturing Practices-produced wild-type influenza A(H3N2)2011 virus intranasally and were isolated at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center for ≥9 days. Dose escalation was performed from 104 to 107 TCID50 (50% tissue culture infectious dose). Viral shedding and clinical disease were evaluated daily.

RESULTS

Of 37 participants challenged, 16 (43%) had viral shedding and 27 (73%) developed symptoms, with 12 (32%) participants experiencing mild to moderate influenza disease (MMID), defined as shedding and symptoms. Only participants receiving 106 and 107 TCID50 experienced MMID at 44% and 40%, respectively. Symptom severity peaked on day 3, whereas most viral shedding occurred 1-2 days after challenge. Only 10 (29%) participants had a ≥4-fold rise in hemagglutination inhibition antibody titer after challenge.

CONCLUSIONS

The A/Bethesda/MM1/H3N2 challenge virus safely induced MMID in healthy volunteers, but caused less MMID than the A(H1N1)pdm09 challenge virus even at the highest dose. There was less detection of shedding though the incidence of symptoms was similar to A(H1N1)pdm09. Fewer serum anti-hemagglutinin (HA) antibody responses with less MMID indicate that preexisting immunity factors other than anti-HA antibody may limit shedding in healthy volunteers. This A/Bethesda/MM1/H3N2 challenge virus can be utilized in future studies to further explore pathogenesis and immunity and to evaluate vaccine candidates.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02594189.

Safety and immunogenicity of a mosquito saliva peptide-based vaccine: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 1 trial

BACKGROUND

In animal models, immunity to mosquito salivary proteins protects animals against mosquito-borne disease. These findings provide a rationale to vaccinate against mosquito saliva instead of the pathogen itself. To our knowledge, no vector salivary protein-based vaccine has been tested for safety and immunogenicity in humans. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of Anopheles gambiae saliva vaccine (AGS-v), a peptide-based vaccine derived from four A gambiae salivary proteins, in humans.

METHODS

In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 1 trial, participants were enrolled at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center in Bethesda, MD, USA. Participants were eligible if they were healthy adults, aged 18-50 years with no history of severe allergic reactions to mosquito bites. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using block randomisation and a computer-generated randomisation sequence, to treatment with either 200 nmol of AGS-v vaccine alone, 200 nmol of AGS-v with adjuvant (Montanide ISA 51), or sterile water as placebo. Participants and clinicians were masked to treatment assignment. Participants were given a subcutaneous injection of their allocated treatment at day 0 and day 21, followed by exposure to feeding by an uninfected Aedes aegypti mosquito at day 42 to assess subsequent risk to mosquito bites in a controlled setting. The primary endpoints were safety and immunogenicity at day 42 after the first immunisation. Participants who were given at least one dose of assigned treatment were assessed for the primary endpoints and analysis was by intention to treat. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03055000, and is closed for accrual.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 15 and Sept 10, 2017, we enrolled and randomly assigned 49 healthy adult participants to the adjuvanted vaccine (n=17), vaccine alone (n=16), or placebo group (n=16). Five participants did not complete the two-injection regimen with mosquito feeding at day 42, but were included in the safety analyses. No systemic safety concerns were identified; however, one participant in the adjuvanted vaccine group developed a grade 3 erythematous rash at the injection site. Pain, swelling, erythema, and itching were the most commonly reported local symptoms and were significantly increased in the adjuvanted vaccine group compared with both other treatment groups (nine [53%] of 17 participants in the adjuvanted vaccine group, two [13%] of 16 in the vaccine only group, and one [6%] of 16 in the placebo group; p=0·004). By day 42, participants who were given the adjuvanted vaccine had a significant increase in vaccine-specific total IgG antibodies compared with at baseline than did participants who were give vaccine only (absolute difference of log₁₀-fold change of 0·64 [95% CI 0·39 to 0·89]; p=0·0002) and who were given placebo (0·62 [0·34 to 0·91]; p=0·0001). We saw a significant increase in IFN-γ production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells at day 42 in the adjuvanted vaccine group compared with in the placebo group (absolute difference of log₁₀ ratio of vaccine peptide-stimulated vs negative control 0·17 [95% CI 0·061 to 0·27]; p=0·009) but we saw no difference between the IFN-γ production in the vaccine only group compared with the placebo group (0·022 [-0·072 to 0·116]; p=0·63).

INTERPRETATION

AGS-v was well tolerated, and, when adjuvanted, immunogenic. These findings suggest that vector-targeted vaccine administration in humans is safe and could be a viable option for the increasing burden of vector-borne disease.

FUNDING

Office of the Director and the Division of Intramural Research at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and National Institutes of Health.

Efficacy of FLU-v, a broad-spectrum influenza vaccine, in a randomized phase IIb human influenza challenge study

FLU-v, developed by PepTcell (SEEK), is a peptide vaccine aiming to provide a broadly protective cellular immune response against influenza A and B. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, phase IIb efficacy and safety trial was conducted. One hundred and fifty-three healthy individuals 18-55 years of age were randomized to receive one or two doses of adjuvanted FLU-v or adjuvanted placebo subcutaneously on days -43 and -22, prior to intranasal challenge on day 0 with the A/California/04/2009/H1N1 human influenza A challenge virus. The primary objective of the study was to identify a reduction in mild to moderate influenza disease (MMID) defined as the presence of viral shedding and clinical influenza symptoms. Single-dose adjuvanted FLU-v recipients (n = 40) were significantly less likely to develop MMID after challenge vs placebo (n = 42) (32.5% vs 54.8% p = 0.035). FLU-v should continue to be evaluated and cellular immunity explored further as a possible important correlate of protection against influenza.

2750. Sequential Influenza A H1N1 and Influenza A H3N2 Challenge Infections in Healthy Volunteers

Background

Seasonal influenza causes significant annual morbidity and mortality. The effects of yearly exposures on immunity are not clear and recent observations have demonstrated that long lasting protection against a matched strain may not naturally occur. The 2018–2019 influenza season consisted of an initial peak of H1N1 infections followed by a wave of H3N2 infections. These consecutive waves raise questions about how influenza immunity is affected by sequential exposure to different influenza strains. Challenge studies provide a unique opportunity to study this phenomenon. Here we describe a subset of participants who were sequentially infected in two separate challenge studies with wild-type H1N1 and H3N2 viruses.

Methods

Healthy volunteers completed two sequential influenza challenge studies at the NIH Clinical Center. Participants were inoculated with reverse genetics, cell-based, GMP wild-type influenza viruses, A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) strains. Participants remained isolated in the hospital for a minimum of 9 days and were monitored daily for viral shedding and clinical symptoms. After discharge, participants were followed for 2 months.

Results

Between 2014 and 2017, 14 healthy volunteers were exposed to Influenza A(H1N1) and Influenza A(H3N2). Time between infections ranged from 2 months to 2 years. Thirteen (93%) participants developed confirmed influenza infection after H1N1 challenge and 9 (64%) after H3N2 challenge. Eight (57%) participants developed confirmed infections after both exposures. Variable degrees of symptoms, shedding, and disease severity were observed. Systemic antibody responses to the HA and NA of both H1N1 and H3N2 varied over time during these sequential infections.

Conclusion

More than half of all participants who completed 2 sequential H1N1 and H3N2 challenge studies demonstrated confirmed infection to both viruses. These sequential infections had varying effects on the disease experienced and the immunity that developed after infection. These observations are important in understanding the impact of sequential exposures on influenza immunity.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

Deep sequencing of 2009 influenza A/H1N1 virus isolated from volunteer human challenge study participants and natural infections

Nasal wash samples from 15 human volunteers challenged with GMP manufactured influenza A/California/04/2009(H1N1) and from 5 naturally infected influenza patients of the 2009 pandemic were deep sequenced using viral targeted hybridization enrichment. Ten single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) positions were found in the challenge virus. Some of the nonsynonymous changes in the inoculant virus were maintained in some challenge participants, but not in others, indicating that virus is evolving away from the Vero cell adapted inoculant, for example SNPs in the neuraminidase. Many SNP sites in challenge patients and naturally infected patients were found, many not identified previously. The SNPs identified, and phylogenetic analyses, showed that intrahost evolution of the virus are different in challenge participants and naturally infected patients. This study, using hybridization enrichment without PCR, provided an accurate and unbiased assessment of differential intrahost viral evolution from a uniform influenza inoculant in humans and comparison to naturally infected patients.

723. Validation of a Wild-Type Influenza A/Texas-Like H3N2 Human Challenge Model with Comparison to the Validated A(H1N1)pdm09 Model

Background

Healthy volunteer challenge studies provide an opportunity to better understand influenza pathogenesis and correlates of protection. The development of vaccines and therapeutics has relied on these studies as will future universal vaccine candidates. The first fully validated wild-type human infection model with A(H1N1)pdm09 was developed at the NIH Clinical Center (CC) in 2012 and this study represents the first validation of a wild-type seasonal H3N2 human infection model. The objective of this study was to characterize a wild-type Influenza A/Texas-like H3N2 challenge virus in healthy volunteers.

Methods

Healthy volunteers were isolated at the NIH CC for a minimum of 9 days. Subjects received a single dose of a reverse genetics, cell-based, GMP, wild-type A H3N2 virus intranasally. Dose escalation was performed from 104 to 107 TCID50. Viral shedding and clinical disease were evaluated daily, including clinician assessments and a validated patient-reported outcome tool, FLU-PRO©.

Results

A total of 37 subjects were challenged. Sixteen (43%) subjects had viral shedding and 27 (73%) developed influenza symptoms, with 12 subjects (32%) experiencing mild-to-moderate influenza disease (MMID) defined as symptoms and shedding. Only subjects receiving the 106 and 107 TCID50 doses experienced MMID at 44% and 40%, respectively. Nose and throat symptoms were most common and peaked by Days 2–3 post-challenge. Although serum antibody responses were observed, many of these responses were limited in a significant number of subjects.

Conclusion

The A/Texas-like H3N2 Influenza challenge virus safely induced MMID in healthy volunteers, but was less effective than the A(H1N1)pdm09 challenge virus. This lower MMID rate of 40% was observed at the 107 TCID50 dose and was driven by less detection of shedding as the incidence of symptoms was similar to A(H1N1)pdm09. The limited serum antibody responses observed demonstrate that preexisting immunity in healthy volunteers against the seasonal H3N2 lineage may limit shedding compared with the more recently emerged seasonal A(H1N1)pdm09 lineage. The successful characterization of this H3N2 model makes future studies using this model to explore viral pathogenesis or evaluate vaccines possible.

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NIAID.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

An Anopheles stephensi Promoter-Trap: Augmenting Genome Annotation and Functional Genomics

The piggyBac transposon was modified to generate gene trap constructs, which were then incorporated into the genome of the Asian malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi and remobilized through genetic crosses using a piggyBac transposase expressing line. A total of 620 remobilization events were documented, and 73 were further characterized at the DNA level to identify patterns in insertion site preferences, remobilization frequencies, and remobilization patterns. Overall, the use of the tetameric AmCyan reporter as the fusion peptide displayed a preference for insertion into the 5'-end of transcripts. Notably 183 - 44882 bp upstream of the An. stephensi v1.0 ab initio gene models, which demonstrated that the promoter regions for the genes of An. stephensi are further upstream of the 5'-proximal regions of the genes in the ab inito models than may be otherwise predicted. RNA-Seq transcript coverage supported the insertion of the splice acceptor gene trap element into 5'-UTR introns for nearly half of all insertions identified. The use of a gene trap element that prefers insertion into the 5'-end of genes supports the use of this technology for the random generation of knock-out mutants, as well as the experimental confirmation of 5'-UTR introns in An. stephensi.