1
|
Nguyen JB, Marshall CW, Cook CN. The buzz within: the role of the gut microbiome in honeybee social behavior. J Exp Biol 2024; 227:jeb246400. [PMID: 38344873 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.246400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
Gut symbionts influence the physiology and behavior of their host, but the extent to which these effects scale to social behaviors is an emerging area of research. The use of the western honeybee (Apis mellifera) as a model enables researchers to investigate the gut microbiome and behavior at several levels of social organization. Insight into gut microbial effects at the societal level is critical for our understanding of how involved microbial symbionts are in host biology. In this Commentary, we discuss recent findings in honeybee gut microbiome research and synthesize these with knowledge of the physiology and behavior of other model organisms to hypothesize how host-microbe interactions at the individual level could shape societal dynamics and evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J B Nguyen
- Department of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA
| | - C W Marshall
- Department of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA
| | - C N Cook
- Department of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cook CN. Progress developing the concept of other effective area-based conservation measures. Conserv Biol 2024; 38:e14106. [PMID: 37144483 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
In 2010, the introduction of other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs) into international policy caused a paradigm shift in area-based conservation, which included consideration of areas outside formal protected areas and places where biodiversity conservation may not be a management objective for the site. Despite the importance of this shift for global conservation, conservation science and policy have been slow to engage with the concept of OECMs. As the world moves toward protecting 30% of the Earth by 2030, it is imperative to develop evidence-based guidance for how to identify effective conservation measures, especially tools to help evaluate and monitor the biodiversity outcomes associated with potential OECMs. To understand the current progress in developing the concept of OECMs, I evaluated the peer-reviewed literature to consolidate and synthesize current knowledge. I conducted a thematic analysis of papers to identify the types of challenges and opportunities being discussed and lessons from studies evaluating the effectiveness of OECMs. Only 105 studies mentioned OECMs, and those that did rarely move beyond superficial mention of OECMs as part of area-based conservation. Around one-half of studies listed potential risks or benefits of OECMs but none provided evidence these issues have materialized. Twenty-three studies attempted to identify potential OECMs, although specific case studies were rare. The 7 studies that evaluated existing OECMs were highly critical of how they had been implemented to date. Studies that evaluated conservation outcomes were extremely rare, and suggested effectiveness must be judged on a case-by-case basis. The current literature not only leaves many gaps in the science required to operationalize the concept of OECMs, but also often raises additional questions that need to be addressed. If these gaps are not filled by robust science, the promised benefits for biodiversity from OECMs may never be realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cook CN, Redford KH, Schwartz MW. Species conservation in the era of genomic science. Bioscience 2023; 73:885-890. [PMID: 38162573 PMCID: PMC10755706 DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biad098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
The exponential increase in the availability of genomic data, derived from sequencing thousands of loci or whole genomes, provides exciting new insights into the diversity of life. However, it can also challenge established species concepts and existing management regimes derived from these concepts. Genomic data can help inform decisions about how to manage genetic diversity, but policies that protect identified taxonomic entities can generate conflicting recommendations that create challenges for practitioners. We outline three dimensions of management concern that arise when facing new and potentially conflicting interpretations of genomic data: defining conservation entities, deciding how to manage diversity, and evaluating the risks and benefits of management actions. We highlight the often-underappreciated role of values in influencing management choices made by individuals, scientists, practitioners, the public, and other stakeholders. Such values influence choices through mechanisms such as the Rashomon effect, whereby management decisions are complicated by conflicting perceptions of the causes and consequences of the conservation problem. To illustrate how this might operate, we offer a hypothetical example of this effect for the interpretation of genomic data and its implications for conservation management. Such value-based decisions can be challenged by the rigidity of existing management regimes, making it difficult to achieve the necessary flexibility to match the changing biological understanding. We finish by recommending that both conservation geneticists and practitioners reflect on their respective values, responsibilities, and roles in building a more robust system of species management. This includes embracing the inclusion of stakeholders in decision-making because, as in many cases, there are not objectively defensible right or wrong decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N Cook
- Monash University's School of Biological Sciences, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kent H Redford
- University of New England's Department of Environmental Studies, Biddeford, Maine, United States
| | - Mark W Schwartz
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cooke SJ, Cook CN, Nguyen VM, Walsh JC, Young N, Cvitanovic C, Grainger MJ, Randall NP, Muir M, Kadykalo AN, Monk KA, Pullin AS. Environmental evidence in action: on the science and practice of evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision-making. Environ Evid 2023; 12:10. [PMID: 37220478 PMCID: PMC10191815 DOI: 10.1186/s13750-023-00302-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
In civil society we expect that policy and management decisions will be made using the best available evidence. Yet, it is widely known that there are many barriers that limit the extent to which that occurs. One way to overcome these barriers is via robust, comprehensive, transparent and repeatable evidence syntheses (such as systematic reviews) that attempt to minimize various forms of bias to present a summary of existing knowledge for decision-making purposes. Relative to other disciplines (e.g., health care, education), such evidence-based decision-making remains relatively nascent for environment management despite major threats to humanity, such as the climate, pollution and biodiversity crises demonstrating that human well-being is inextricably linked to the biophysical environment. Fortunately, there are a growing number of environmental evidence syntheses being produced that can be used by decision makers. It is therefore an opportune time to reflect on the science and practice of evidence-based decision-making in environment management to understand the extent to which evidence syntheses are embraced and applied in practice. Here we outline a number of key questions related to the use of environmental evidence that need to be explored in an effort to enhance evidence-based decision-making. There is an urgent need for research involving methods from social science, behavioural sciences, and public policy to understand the basis for patterns and trends in environmental evidence use (or misuse or ignorance). There is also a need for those who commission and produce evidence syntheses, as well as the end users of these syntheses to reflect on their experiences and share them with the broader evidence-based practice community to identify needs and opportunities for advancing the entire process of evidence-based practice. It is our hope that the ideas shared here will serve as a roadmap for additional scholarship that will collectively enhance evidence-based decision-making and ultimately benefit the environment and humanity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven J. Cooke
- Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 Canada
| | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, 25 Rainforest Walk, Clayton, VIC 3800 Australia
| | - Vivian M. Nguyen
- Canadian Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 Canada
| | - Jessica C. Walsh
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, 25 Rainforest Walk, Clayton, VIC 3800 Australia
| | - Nathan Young
- School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies, University of Ottawa, 20 University Private, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5 Canada
| | | | - Matthew J. Grainger
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research-NINA, Torgarden, 5685, 7485 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Nicola P. Randall
- Centre for Evidence Based Agriculture, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, TF10 8NB UK
| | - Matt Muir
- U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803 USA
| | - Andrew N. Kadykalo
- Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, 111 Lakeshore Blvd, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X 3V9 Canada
| | - Kathryn A. Monk
- Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP UK
| | - Andrew S. Pullin
- School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2DG UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ednie G, Kapoor T, Koppel O, Piczak ML, Reid JL, Murdoch AD, Cook CN, Sutherland WJ, Cooke SJ. Foresight science in conservation: Tools, barriers, and mainstreaming opportunities. Ambio 2023; 52:411-424. [PMID: 36287382 PMCID: PMC9607712 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-022-01786-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Foresight science is a systematic approach to generate future predictions for planning and management by drawing upon analytical and predictive tools to understand the past and present, while providing insights about the future. To illustrate the application of foresight science in conservation, we present three case studies: identification of emerging risks to conservation, conservation of at-risk species, and aid in the development of management strategies for multiple stressors. We highlight barriers to mainstreaming foresight science in conservation including knowledge accessibility/organization, communication across diverse stakeholders/decision makers, and organizational capacity. Finally, we investigate opportunities for mainstreaming foresight science including continued advocacy to showcase its application, incorporating emerging technologies (i.e., artificial intelligence) to increase capacity/decrease costs, and increasing education/training in foresight science via specialized courses and curricula for trainees and practicing professionals. We argue that failure to mainstream foresight science will hinder the ability to achieve future conservation objectives in the Anthropocene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle Ednie
- Biology Department, University of Ottawa, 75 Laurier Ave. E, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5 Canada
| | - Tyreen Kapoor
- Biology Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 Canada
| | - Olga Koppel
- Biology Department, University of Ottawa, 75 Laurier Ave. E, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5 Canada
| | - Morgan L. Piczak
- Biology Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 Canada
| | - Jessica L. Reid
- Biology Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 Canada
| | - Alyssa D. Murdoch
- Biology Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 Canada
- Wildlife Conservation Society Canada, 169 Titanium Way, Whitehorse, YK Y1A 0E9 Canada
| | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800 Australia
| | - William J. Sutherland
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ UK
- Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine’s (BioRISC), St Catharine’s College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1RL UK
| | - Steven J. Cooke
- Biology Department, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 Canada
- Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thompson LM, Thurman LL, Cook CN, Beever EA, Sgrò CM, Battles A, Botero CA, Gross JE, Hall KR, Hendry AP, Hoffmann AA, Hoving C, LeDee OE, Mengelt C, Nicotra AB, Niver RA, Pérez‐Jvostov F, Quiñones RM, Schuurman GW, Schwartz MK, Szymanski J, Whiteley A. Connecting research and practice to enhance the evolutionary potential of species under climate change. Conservat Sci and Prac 2023. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.12855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M. Thompson
- U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), National Climate Adaptation Science Center and the University of Tennessee Knoxville Tennessee USA
| | | | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological Sciences Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | - Erik A. Beever
- USGS, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center and Montana State University Bozeman Montana USA
| | - Carla M. Sgrò
- School of Biological Sciences Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | | | | | - John E. Gross
- National Park Service (NPS) Climate Change Response Program Fort Collins Colorado USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Olivia E. LeDee
- USGS, Midwest Climate Adaptation Science Center Saint Paul Minnesota USA
| | | | | | - Robyn A. Niver
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Branch of Listing and Policy Support Bailey's Crossroads Virginia USA
| | | | - Rebecca M. Quiñones
- Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Westborough Massachusetts USA
| | - Gregor W. Schuurman
- National Park Service (NPS) Climate Change Response Program Fort Collins Colorado USA
| | - Michael K. Schwartz
- U.S. Forest Service, National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation Missoula Montana USA
| | - Jennifer Szymanski
- USFWS, Branch of SSA Science Support, Division of Endangered Species Onalaska Wisconsin USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hilton M, Cook CN. Defining performance thresholds for effective management of biodiversity within protected areas. Conserv Biol 2022; 36:e13963. [PMID: 35661263 PMCID: PMC10087165 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
Performance thresholds are an important tool for determining successful conservation outcomes. They provide an objective means of defining good ecological condition and have been endorsed as an essential part of best practice in protected area (PA) management within the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas Standard. With a growing number of PAs attaining Green List status globally, thresholds developed by PAs on the Green List present an excellent resource with which to identify the attributes of well-defined performance thresholds. We examined 349 thresholds associated with PAs on the Green List to determine whether they were specific and measurable (i.e., factors recognized as essential for setting well-defined targets). We assessed whether thresholds were defined quantitatively and whether definitions included ambiguous terms (e.g., stable numbers). We identified six different ways thresholds were expressed and found that many thresholds were expressed as management objectives, rather than ecological condition thresholds, although this trend improved over time. Approximately one-half of the performance thresholds lacked the necessary specificity to delineate successful outcomes. Our results enabled us to develop a checklist of information required to set robust performance thresholds. Recommendations include that thresholds should be quantitatively defined, including quantitative estimates of the limits of acceptable change (LAC) around the target condition. To ensure transparency, a rationale and associated evidence should be provided to support the threshold and the LAC. When accompanied by a rationale and quantitative estimate of the current condition of the value, unambiguously defined thresholds with a quantitative LAC provide an objective means of demonstrating that successful conservation outcomes have been achieved. These recommendations will help conservation managers apply the Green List Standard and improve the measurement of conservation outcomes more broadly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairi Hilton
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carly N Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Groce JE, Cook CN. Maintaining landholder satisfaction and management of private protected areas established under conservation agreements. J Environ Manage 2022; 305:114355. [PMID: 34953226 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Revised: 12/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Permanent protection of biodiversity on private lands is achieved through various mechanisms around the world. In Australia, conservation covenants are widely used to dedicate private lands to biodiversity conservation. The permanency of covenants necessitates similarly long-term commitment by landholders to meet and maintain the conservation obligations under the covenant. To better understand the effectiveness of conservation covenants as a tool for on-going environmental stewardship, we examined the relationship between landholders' initial motivations to covenant, their current perspectives on covenants and their management practices. We compared two groups of covenantors, those who initiated a covenant (original signees) and those who acquired a property with a covenant already in place (successive owners). We found the motivations and views of original signees and successive owners were similar overall, showing strong pro-environmental perspectives, and the majority of landholders were continuing to undertake management activities for the benefit of biodiversity. A small portion of respondents were dissatisfied with the covenant mechanism or covenant provider. This group tended to include successive owners and landholders who covenanted for regulatory reasons or financial incentives. Fewer dissatisfied landholders were actively managing the covenanted land compared to those who were satisfied. Considering the impending increase in successive owners as aging covenantors transfer ownership of their properties, the growing potential for covenants required under regulatory arrangements, and decreasing support within covenanting programs, this study identifies a risk that the satisfaction of landholders may decrease over time. Recognizing and addressing the challenges faced by landholders can bolster the commitment to covenant obligations and the longevity of covenants as a mechanism for positive conservation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie E Groce
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
| | - Carly N Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hilton M, Walsh JC, Liddell E, Cook CN. Lessons from other disciplines for setting management thresholds for biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 2022; 36:e13865. [PMID: 34811813 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Successful, state-dependent management, in which the goal of management is to maintain a system in a desired state, involves defining the boundaries between different states. Once these boundaries have been defined, managers require a strategic action plan with thresholds that initiate management interventions to either maintain or return the system to a desired state. This approach to management is widely used across diverse industries from agriculture, to medicine, to information technology, but it has only been adopted in conservation management relatively recently. Conservation practitioners have expressed a willingness to integrate this structured approach in their management systems, but they have also voiced concerns, including lack of a robust process for doing so. Given the widespread use of state-dependent management in other fields, we conducted an extensive review of the literature on threshold-based management to gain insight into how and where it is applied and identify potential lessons for conservation management. We identified 22 industries using 75 different methods for setting management thresholds in 843 studies. Methods spanned six broad approaches, including expert driven, statistical, predictive, optimization, experimental, and artificial intelligence methods. The objectives of each of these studies influenced the approaches used, including the methods for setting thresholds and selecting actions, and the number of thresholds set. The role of value judgments in setting thresholds was clear; studies across all industries frequently involved experts in setting thresholds, often accompanied by computational tools to simulate the consequences of proposed thresholds under different conditions. Of the 30 conservation studies examined, two-thirds used expert-driven methods, consistent with prior evidence that experience-based information often drives conservation management decisions. The methods we identified from other disciplines could help conservation decision makers set thresholds for management interventions in different contexts, linking monitoring to management actions and ensuring that conservation interventions are timely and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mairi Hilton
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica C Walsh
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Erin Liddell
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carly N Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Camerlenghi E, McQueen A, Delhey K, Cook CN, Kingma SA, Farine DR, Peters A. Cooperative breeding and the emergence of multilevel societies in birds. Ecol Lett 2022; 25:766-777. [PMID: 35000255 DOI: 10.1111/ele.13950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Multilevel societies (MLSs), where social levels are hierarchically nested within each other, are considered one of the most complex forms of animal societies. Although thought to mainly occurs in mammals, it is suggested that MLSs could be under-detected in birds. Here, we propose that the emergence of MLSs could be common in cooperatively breeding birds, as both systems are favoured by similar ecological and social drivers. We first investigate this proposition by systematically comparing evidence for multilevel social structure in cooperative and non-cooperative birds in Australia and New Zealand, a global hotspot for cooperative breeding. We then analyse non-breeding social networks of cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus) to reveal their structured multilevel society, with three hierarchical social levels that are stable across years. Our results confirm recent predictions that MLSs are likely to be widespread in birds and suggest that these societies could be particularly common in cooperatively breeding birds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ettore Camerlenghi
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexandra McQueen
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kaspar Delhey
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Carly N Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sjouke A Kingma
- Department of Animal Sciences, Behavioural Ecology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Damien R Farine
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.,Department of Collective Behavior, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Anne Peters
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cook CN, Beever EA, Thurman LL, Thompson LM, Gross JE, Whiteley AR, Nicotra AB, Szymanski JA, Botero CA, Hall KR, Hoffmann AA, Schuurman GW, Sgrò CM. Supporting the adaptive capacity of species through more effective knowledge exchange with conservation practitioners. Evol Appl 2021; 14:1969-1979. [PMID: 34429742 PMCID: PMC8372063 DOI: 10.1111/eva.13266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
There is an imperative for conservation practitioners to help biodiversity adapt to accelerating environmental change. Evolutionary biologists are well-positioned to inform the development of evidence-based management strategies that support the adaptive capacity of species and ecosystems. Conservation practitioners increasingly accept that management practices must accommodate rapid environmental change, but harbour concerns about how to apply recommended changes to their management contexts. Given the interest from both conservation practitioners and evolutionary biologists in adjusting management practices, we believe there is an opportunity to accelerate the required changes by promoting closer collaboration between these two groups. We highlight how evolutionary biologists can harness lessons from other disciplines about how to foster effective knowledge exchange to make a substantive contribution to the development of effective conservation practices. These lessons include the following: (1) recognizing why practitioners do and do not use scientific evidence; (2) building an evidence base that will influence management decisions; (3) translating theory into a format that conservation practitioners can use to inform management practices; and (4) developing strategies for effective knowledge exchange. Although efforts will be required on both sides, we believe there are rewards for both practitioners and evolutionary biologists, not least of which is fostering practices to help support the long-term persistence of species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVICAustralia
| | - Erik A. Beever
- Northern Rocky Mountain Science CenterU.S. Geological SurveyBozemanMTUSA
- Department of EcologyMontana State UniversityBozemanMTUSA
| | - Lindsey L. Thurman
- Northwest Climate Adaptation Science CenterU.S. Geological SurveyCorvallisORUSA
| | - Laura M. Thompson
- National Climate Adaptation Science CenterU.S. Geological SurveyRestonVAUSA
- Department of Forestry, Wildlife and FisheriesUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleTNUSA
| | - John E. Gross
- Climate Change Response ProgramU.S. National Park ServiceFort CollinsCOUSA
| | - Andrew R. Whiteley
- Wildlife Biology ProgramDepartment of Ecosystem and Conservation SciencesFranke College of Forestry and ConservationUniversity of MontanaMissoulaMTUSA
| | - Adrienne B. Nicotra
- Division of Ecology and EvolutionResearch School of BiologyAustralian National UniversityCanberraACTAustralia
| | | | | | | | - Ary A. Hoffmann
- School of BioSciencesBio21 InstituteThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVICAustralia
| | | | - Carla M. Sgrò
- School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVICAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Roberts KE, Cook CN, Beher J, Treml EA. Assessing the current state of ecological connectivity in a large marine protected area system. Conserv Biol 2021; 35:699-710. [PMID: 32623761 PMCID: PMC8048790 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) is a critical step in ensuring the continued persistence of marine biodiversity. Although the area protected in MPAs is growing, the movement of individuals (or larvae) among MPAs, termed connectivity, has only recently been included as an objective of many MPAs. As such, assessing connectivity is often neglected or oversimplified in the planning process. For promoting population persistence, it is important to ensure that protected areas in a system are functionally connected through dispersal or adult movement. We devised a multi-species model of larval dispersal for the Australian marine environment to evaluate how much local scale connectivity is protected in MPAs and determine whether the extensive system of MPAs truly functions as a network. We focused on non-migratory species with simplified larval behaviors (i.e., passive larval dispersal) (e.g., no explicit vertical migration) as an illustration. Of all the MPAs analyzed (approximately 2.7 million km2 ), outside the Great Barrier Reef and Ningaloo Reef, <50% of MPAs (46-80% of total MPA area depending on the species considered) were functionally connected. Our results suggest that Australia's MPA system cannot be referred to as a single network, but rather a collection of numerous smaller networks delineated by natural breaks in the connectivity of reef habitat. Depending on the dispersal capacity of the taxa of interest, there may be between 25 and 47 individual ecological networks distributed across the Australian marine environment. The need to first assess the underlying natural connectivity of a study system prior to implementing new MPAs represents a key research priority for strategically enlarging MPA networks. Our findings highlight the benefits of integrating multi-species connectivity into conservation planning to identify opportunities to better incorporate connectivity into the design of MPA systems and thus to increase their capacity to support long-term, sustainable biodiversity outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey E. Roberts
- School of Marine and Atmospheric SciencesStony Brook University, Stony BrookNew York
- School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Jutta Beher
- School of BioSciencesThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Eric A. Treml
- School of BioSciencesThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative EcologyDeakin UniversityGeelongVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Salafsky N, Boshoven J, Cook CN, Lee A, Margoluis R, Marvin A, Schwartz MW, Stem C. Generic theories of change for conservation strategies: A new series supporting evidence‐based conservation practice. Conservat Sci and Prac 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Aileen Lee
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Palo Alto California USA
| | | | | | - Mark W. Schwartz
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy University of California Davis California USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ivanova IM, Cook CN. The role of privately protected areas in achieving biodiversity representation within a national protected area network. Conservat Sci and Prac 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Affiliation(s)
- Mark W. Schwartz
- Department of Environmental Science and PolicyUniversity of California Davis California USA
| | - Jenny A. Glikman
- Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados (IESA‐CSIC) Córdoba Spain
| | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological SciencesMonash University Clayton Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liddell E, Cook CN, Sunnucks P. Evaluating the use of risk assessment frameworks in the identification of population units for biodiversity conservation. Wildl Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1071/wr18170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
ContextManaging small, isolated populations requires conservation practitioners to weigh up the risks of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression when assessing alternative management actions aimed at preventing species extinction. Accordingly, it is important that research intended to guide these management decisions provides the relevant evidence to inform them.
AimsTo determine the extent to which studies that use genetic analyses to characterise population units for conservation consider the key theoretical concepts necessary for making sound management recommendations regarding the desirability of gene flow among units, notably the consequences and relative risks of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression.
MethodsA systematic search was conducted of peer-reviewed literature for studies that attempted to identify population units of threatened birds and mammals. Using content analysis, the theoretical framing of these studies was assessed, based on the discussion of key concepts concerning differences among populations.
Key resultsThere has been a significant increase over time in the number of published studies that use genetics to identify population units for conservation. Many do not consider theoretical concepts relevant to the effective management of fragmented populations of threatened species. Mammals were more common than birds as focal species of studies, but the number of concepts used in the framing of the studies was similar for these two taxa, despite differences in their ecology and biology that might be expected to affect perceptions of distinctiveness. Nevertheless, species of greater conservation concern tended to have a slightly more comprehensive theoretical framing.
ConclusionsThere is great potential for more studies to implement theoretical guidelines and practical decision support tools when considering the best course of action for identifying appropriate population units for conservation management.
ImplicationsThe gap in the identified literature is likely to be impacting the ability of conservation practitioners to make evidence-informed decisions about how to manage the genetic health of threatened species; it would be valuable to improve this situation.
Collapse
|
17
|
Roux DJ, Kingsford RT, Cook CN, Carruthers J, Dickson K, Hockings M. The case for embedding researchers in conservation agencies. Conserv Biol 2019; 33:1266-1274. [PMID: 30950531 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Although protected areas represent a pivotal response to escalating anthropogenic threats, they face many pressures, inside and outside their boundaries. Amid these challenges, effective conservation is guided by evidence-based decision making supported by dynamic processes of learning and knowledge exchange. Although different models promote knowledge exchange, embedding research scientists within conservation agencies is best suited to supporting evidence-based conservation. Based on available literature and our experiences on several continents, we considered the benefits, challenges, and opportunities associated with embedding research scientists within conservation agencies and the research required to better understand the effectiveness of the embedding model for evidence-based conservation. Embedded researchers provide long-term commitment to building social capital among academic and nonacademic stakeholders; act as skilled gatekeepers who increase 2-way flow of knowledge between scientists and managers; attract, coordinate, and support management-relevant external research projects; drive the design and maintenance of long-term monitoring; and align their research with information needs. Notwithstanding the many benefits, research capacity of conservation agencies is declining worldwide. A significant challenge is that the values, structures, functions, and effectiveness of the embedding model of knowledge exchange remain poorly evaluated and documented. Also, embedded researchers have to balance their desire for creativity and flexibility with the standardization and quality control required by their public sector agencies; may be perceived as not credible because they are not truly independent of their agency; and have to couple scientific productivity with skills for transdisciplinary research, social facilitation, and stakeholder engagement. Systematic research on embedding and other models of knowledge exchange, across different world contexts, is required to better understand the benefits, costs, and institutional arrangements associated with different models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk J Roux
- Scientific Services, South African National Parks, PO Box 4283, George, 6539, South Africa
- Sustainability Research Unit, Nelson Mandela University, Private Bag X6531, George, 6530, South Africa
| | - Richard T Kingsford
- Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Carly N Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Jane Carruthers
- Department of History, University of South Africa, P.O. Box 392, Pretoria, 0003, South Africa
- Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa
| | - Katrina Dickson
- Australian Centre for Agriculture and Law, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia
| | - Marc Hockings
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cook CN, Sgrò CM. Conservation practitioners' understanding of how to manage evolutionary processes. Conserv Biol 2019; 33:993-1001. [PMID: 30866093 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Revised: 11/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Both academics and practitioners consider a lack of knowledge about evolutionary theory to be a general barrier to effectively managing genetic diversity. However, it is challenging to judge practitioners' level of understanding and how this influences their management decisions. Knowledge built through experience may be difficult for practitioners to articulate, but could nonetheless result in appropriate management strategies. To date, researchers have assessed only the explicit (formal) knowledge practitioners have of evolutionary concepts. To explore practitioners' understanding of evolutionary concepts, it is necessary to consider how they might apply explicit and implicit knowledge to their management decisions. Using an online survey, we asked Australian practitioners to respond to 2 common management scenarios in which there is strong evidence that managing genetic diversity can improve outcomes: managing small, isolated populations and sourcing seeds for restoration projects. In describing their approach to these scenarios, practitioners demonstrated a stronger understanding of the effective management of genetic diversity than the definitions of the relevant concepts. However, their management of genetic diversity within small populations was closer to best practice than for restoration projects. Moreover, the risks practitioners described in implementing best practice management were more likely to affect their approach to restoration than translocation projects. These findings provide evidence that strategies to build the capacity of practitioners to manage genetic diversity should focus on realistic management scenarios. Given that practitioners recognize the importance of adapting their practices and the strong evidence for the benefits of actively managing genetic diversity, there is hope that better engagement by evolutionary biologists with practitioners could facilitate significant shifts toward evolutionarily enlightened management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Carla M Sgrò
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Golden Kroner RE, Qin S, Cook CN, Krithivasan R, Pack SM, Bonilla OD, Cort-Kansinally KA, Coutinho B, Feng M, Martínez Garcia MI, He Y, Kennedy CJ, Lebreton C, Ledezma JC, Lovejoy TE, Luther DA, Parmanand Y, Ruíz-Agudelo CA, Yerena E, Morón Zambrano V, Mascia MB. The uncertain future of protected lands and waters. Science 2019; 364:881-886. [DOI: 10.1126/science.aau5525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Protected areas are intended to safeguard biodiversity in perpetuity, yet evidence suggests that widespread legal changes undermine protected area durability and efficacy. We documented these legal changes—protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) events—in the United States and Amazonian countries and compiled available data globally. Governments of the United States and Amazonian countries enacted 269 and 440 PADDD events, respectively. Between 1892 and 2018, 73 countries enacted 3749 PADDD events, removing 519,857 square kilometers from protection and tempering regulations in an additional 1,659,972 square kilometers; 78% of events were enacted since 2000. Most PADDD events (62%) are associated with industrial-scale resource extraction and development, suggesting that PADDD may compromise biodiversity conservation objectives. Strategic policy responses are needed to address PADDD and sustain effective protected areas.
Collapse
|
20
|
Groce JE, Farrelly MA, Jorgensen BS, Cook CN. Using social-network research to improve outcomes in natural resource management. Conserv Biol 2019; 33:53-65. [PMID: 29738621 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
The conservation and management of natural resources operates in social-ecological systems in which resource users are embedded in social and environmental contexts that influence their management decisions. Characterizing social networks of resource users can be used to inform understanding of social influences on decision making, and social network analysis (SNA) has emerged as a useful technique to explore these relationships. We synthesized how SNA has been used in 85 studies of natural resource management. We considered how social networks and social processes (e.g., interactions between individuals) influence each other and in turn influence social outcomes (e.g., decisions or actions) that affect environmental outcomes (e.g., improved condition). Descriptive methods were used in 58% of the studies to characterize social processes, and 42% of the studies compared multiple networks or multiple points in time to assess social or environmental outcomes. In 4 studies, authors assessed network interventions intended to affect social processes or environmental outcomes. The heterogeneity in case studies, methods, and analyses preclude general lessons. Thus, to structure and further learning about the role of social networks in achieving environmental outcomes, we created a typology that deconstructs social processes, social outcomes, and environmental outcomes into themes and options of social and ecological measures within each. We suggest shifts in research foci toward intervention studies to aid in understanding causality and inform the design of conservation initiatives. There is a need to develop clearer justification and guidance around the proliferation of network measures. The use of SNA in natural resource management is expanding rapidly; thus, now is the time for the conservation community to build a more rigorous evidence base to demonstrate the extent to which social networks can play a role in achieving desired social and environmental outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie E Groce
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Megan A Farrelly
- School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Bradley S Jorgensen
- Monash Sustainability Institute, 8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Carly N Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia
| | - Carla M. Sgrò
- School of Biological Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Clements HS, Kerley GIH, Cumming GS, De Vos A, Cook CN. Privately protected areas provide key opportunities for the regional persistence of large‐ and medium‐sized mammals. J Appl Ecol 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley S. Clements
- School of Biological SciencesMonash University Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Centre for Complex Systems in TransitionStellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa
| | - Graham I. H. Kerley
- Centre for African Conservation EcologyNelson Mandela University Port Elizabeth South Africa
| | - Graeme S. Cumming
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef StudiesJames Cook University Townsville QLD Australia
| | - Alta De Vos
- Department of Environmental ScienceRhodes University Grahamstown South Africa
| | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological SciencesMonash University Melbourne Vic. Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cook CN, Sgrò CM. Understanding managers' and scientists' perspectives on opportunities to achieve more evolutionarily enlightened management in conservation. Evol Appl 2018; 11:1371-1388. [PMID: 30151046 PMCID: PMC6099810 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Accepted: 03/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite wide acceptance that conservation could benefit from greater attention to principles and processes from evolutionary biology, little attention has been given to quantifying the degree to which relevant evolutionary concepts are being integrated into management practices. There has also been increasing discussion of the potential reasons for a lack of evolutionarily enlightened management, but no attempts to understand the challenges from the perspective of those making management decisions. In this study, we asked conservation managers and scientists for their views on the importance of a range of key evolutionary concepts, the degree to which these concepts are being integrated into management, and what would need to change to support better integration into management practices. We found that while managers recognize the importance of a wide range of evolutionary concepts for conservation outcomes, they acknowledge these concepts are rarely incorporated into management. Managers and scientists were in strong agreement about the range of barriers that need to be overcome, with a lack of knowledge reported as the most important barrier to better integration of evolutionary biology into conservation decision-making. Although managers tended to be more focused on the need for more training in evolutionary biology, scientists reported greater engagement between managers and evolutionary biologists as most important to achieve the necessary change. Nevertheless, the challenges appear to be multifaceted, and several are outside the control of managers, suggesting solutions will need to be multidimensional.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVICAustralia
| | - Carla M. Sgrò
- School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVICAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Flores-Langarica A, Müller Luda K, Persson EK, Cook CN, Bobat S, Marshall JL, Dahlgren MW, Hägerbrand K, Toellner KM, Goodall MD, Withers DR, Henderson IR, Johansson Lindbom B, Cunningham AF, Agace WW. CD103 +CD11b + mucosal classical dendritic cells initiate long-term switched antibody responses to flagellin. Mucosal Immunol 2018; 11:681-692. [PMID: 29346347 PMCID: PMC5912514 DOI: 10.1038/mi.2017.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Antibody responses induced at mucosal and nonmucosal sites demonstrate a significant level of autonomy. Here, we demonstrate a key role for mucosal interferon regulatory factor-4 (IRF4)-dependent CD103+CD11b+ (DP), classical dendritic cells (cDCs) in the induction of T-dependent immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin A (IgA) responses in the mesenteric lymph node (MLN) following systemic immunization with soluble flagellin (sFliC). In contrast, IRF8-dependent CD103+CD11b- (SP) are not required for these responses. The lack of this response correlated with a complete absence of sFliC-specific plasma cells in the MLN, small intestinal lamina propria, and surprisingly also the bone marrow (BM). Many sFliC-specific plasma cells accumulating in the BM of immunized wild-type mice expressed α4β7+, suggesting a mucosal origin. Collectively, these results suggest that mucosal DP cDC contribute to the generation of the sFliC-specific plasma cell pool in the BM and thus serve as a bridge linking the mucosal and systemic immune system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Flores-Langarica
- Institute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - K Müller Luda
- Immunology Section, Lund University, BMC D14 Sölvegatan 19, S-221 84. Lund 22184, Sweden
| | - E K Persson
- Immunology Section, Lund University, BMC D14 Sölvegatan 19, S-221 84. Lund 22184, Sweden
| | - C N Cook
- Institute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - S Bobat
- Institute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - J L Marshall
- Institute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - M W Dahlgren
- Immunology Section, Lund University, BMC D14 Sölvegatan 19, S-221 84. Lund 22184, Sweden
| | - K Hägerbrand
- Immunology Section, Lund University, BMC D14 Sölvegatan 19, S-221 84. Lund 22184, Sweden
| | - K M Toellner
- Institute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - M D Goodall
- Institute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - D R Withers
- Institute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - I R Henderson
- Institute of Microbiology and Infection, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - B Johansson Lindbom
- Immunology Section, Lund University, BMC D14 Sölvegatan 19, S-221 84. Lund 22184, Sweden
- Division of Immunology and Vaccinology, National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU). Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | - A F Cunningham
- Institute of Immunology & Immunotherapy, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- Institute of Microbiology and Infection, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - W W Agace
- Immunology Section, Lund University, BMC D14 Sölvegatan 19, S-221 84. Lund 22184, Sweden
- Division of Immunology and Vaccinology, National Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU). Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Clements HS, Kearney SG, Cook CN. Moving from representation to persistence: The capacity of Australia's National Reserve System to support viable populations of mammals. DIVERS DISTRIB 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley S. Clements
- School of Biological Sciences; Monash University; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Stephen G. Kearney
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences; University of Queensland; Brisbane Qld Australia
| | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological Sciences; Monash University; Melbourne Vic. Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Biggs D, Smith RJ, Adams VM, Brink H, Cook CN, Cooney R, Holden MH, Maron M, Phelps J, Possingham HP, Redford KH, Scholes RJ, Sutherland WJ, Underwood FM, Milner-Gulland EJ. Response—Ivory crisis. Science 2018; 360:277-278. [DOI: 10.1126/science.aat1596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Duan Biggs
- Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Martine Maron
- University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Biggs D, Holden MH, Braczkowski A, Cook CN, Milner-Gulland EJ, Phelps J, Scholes RJ, Smith RJ, Underwood FM, Adams VM, Allan J, Brink H, Cooney R, Gao Y, Hutton J, Macdonald-Madden E, Maron M, Redford KH, Sutherland WJ, Possingham HP. Breaking the deadlock on ivory. Science 2017; 358:1378-1381. [DOI: 10.1126/science.aan5215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
28
|
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly de Bie
- School of BioSciences; University of Melbourne; Parkville Vic. Australia
- Parks Victoria Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | | | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological Sciences; Monash University; Clayton Vic. Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cook CN, Valkan RS, Mascia MB, McGeoch MA. Quantifying the extent of protected-area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement in Australia. Conserv Biol 2017; 31:1039-1052. [PMID: 28186345 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2016] [Revised: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 02/03/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The use of total area protected as the predominant indicator of progress in building protected area (PA) networks is receiving growing criticism. Documenting the full dynamics of PA networks, both in terms of the gains and losses in protection, provides a much more informative approach to tracking progress. To this end, documentation of PA downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) has increased. Studies of PADDD events generally fail to place these losses in the context of gains in protection; therefore, they omit important elements of PA network dynamics. To address this limitation, we used a spatially explicit approach to identify every parcel of land added to and excised from the Australian terrestrial PA network and PAs that had their level of protection changed over 17 years (1997-2014). By quantifying changes in the spatial configuration of the PA network with time-series data (spatial layers for nine separate time steps), ours is the first assessment of the dynamics (increases and decreases in area and level of protection) of a PA network and the first comprehensive assessment of PADDD in a developed country. We found that the Australian network was highly dynamic; there were 5233 changes in area or level of protection over 17 years. Against a background of enormous increases in area protected, we identified over 1500 PADDD events, which affected over one-third of the network, which were largely the result of widespread downgrading of protection. We believe our approach provides a mechanism for robust tracking of trends in the world's PAs through the use of data from the World Database on Protected Areas. However, this will require greater transparency and improved data standards in reporting changes to PAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Rebecca S Valkan
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | | | - Melodie A McGeoch
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Addison PFE, Flander LB, Cook CN. Towards quantitative condition assessment of biodiversity outcomes: Insights from Australian marine protected areas. J Environ Manage 2017; 198:183-191. [PMID: 28460325 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2016] [Revised: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Protected area management effectiveness (PAME) evaluation is increasingly undertaken to evaluate governance, assess conservation outcomes and inform evidence-based management of protected areas (PAs). Within PAME, quantitative approaches to assess biodiversity outcomes are now emerging, where biological monitoring data are directly assessed against quantitative (numerically defined) condition categories (termed quantitative condition assessments). However, more commonly qualitative condition assessments are employed in PAME, which use descriptive condition categories and are evaluated largely with expert judgement that can be subject to a range of biases, such as linguistic uncertainty and overconfidence. Despite the benefits of increased transparency and repeatability of evaluations, quantitative condition assessments are rarely used in PAME. To understand why, we interviewed practitioners from all Australian marine protected area (MPA) networks, which have access to long-term biological monitoring data and are developing or conducting PAME evaluations. Our research revealed that there is a desire within management agencies to implement quantitative condition assessment of biodiversity outcomes in Australian MPAs. However, practitioners report many challenges in transitioning from undertaking qualitative to quantitative condition assessments of biodiversity outcomes, which are hampering progress. Challenges include a lack of agency capacity (staff numbers and money), knowledge gaps, and diminishing public and political support for PAs. We point to opportunities to target strategies that will assist agencies overcome these challenges, including new decision support tools, approaches to better finance conservation efforts, and to promote more management relevant science. While a single solution is unlikely to achieve full evidence-based conservation, we suggest ways for agencies to target strategies and advance PAME evaluations toward best practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prue F E Addison
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PS, United Kingdom; Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia; School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
| | - Louisa B Flander
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
| | - Carly N Cook
- School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rog SM, Cook CN. Strengthening governance for intertidal ecosystems requires a consistent definition of boundaries between land and sea. J Environ Manage 2017; 197:694-705. [PMID: 28437778 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/16/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The protection of intertidal ecosystems is complex because they straddle both marine and terrestrial realms. This leads to inconsistent characterisation as marine and/or terrestrial systems, or neither. Vegetated intertidal ecosystems are especially complex to classify because they can have an unclear border with terrestrial vegetation, causing confusion around taxonomy (e.g., mangrove-like plants). This confusion and inconsistency in classification can impact these systems through poor governance and incomplete protection. Using Australian mangrove ecosystems as a case study, we explore the complexity of how land and sea boundaries are defined among jurisdictions and different types of legislation, and how these correspond to ecosystem boundaries. We demonstrate that capturing vegetated intertidal ecosystems under native vegetation laws and prioritizing the mitigation of threats with a terrestrial origin offers the greatest protection to these systems. We also show the impact of inconsistent boundaries on the inclusion of intertidal ecosystems within protected areas. The evidence presented here highlights problems within the Australian context, but most of these issues are also challenges for the management of intertidal ecosystems around the world. Our study demonstrates the urgent need for a global review of legislation governing the boundaries of land and sea to determine whether the suggestions we offer may provide global solutions to ensuring these critical systems do not fall through the cracks in ecosystem protection and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie M Rog
- School for Biological Sciences, Monash University, 25 Rainforest Walk, Melbourne 3800, Australia.
| | - Carly N Cook
- School for Biological Sciences, Monash University, 25 Rainforest Walk, Melbourne 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schwartz MW, Cook CN, Pressey RL, Pullin AS, Runge MC, Salafsky N, Sutherland WJ, Williamson MA. Decision Support Frameworks and Tools for Conservation. Conserv Lett 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/conl.12385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark W. Schwartz
- The John Muir Institute of the Environment; University of California; Davis CA 95616 USA
| | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological Sciences; Monash University; Clayton Victoria 3800 Australia
| | - Robert L. Pressey
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies; James Cook University; Townsville Queensland Australia
| | - Andrew S. Pullin
- Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation; Bangor University; Bangor Gwynedd LL57 2UW UK
| | - Michael C. Runge
- Patuxent Wildlife Research Center; U.S. Geological Survey; Laurel MD 20708 USA
| | | | - William J. Sutherland
- Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology; University of Cambridge; Cambridge CB2 3QZ UK
| | - Matthew A. Williamson
- The John Muir Institute of the Environment; University of California; Davis CA 95616 USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cook CN, Sgrò CM. Aligning science and policy to achieve evolutionarily enlightened conservation. Conserv Biol 2017; 31:501-512. [PMID: 27862324 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2016] [Revised: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 11/02/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
There is increasing recognition among conservation scientists that long-term conservation outcomes could be improved through better integration of evolutionary theory into management practices. Despite concerns that the importance of key concepts emerging from evolutionary theory (i.e., evolutionary principles and processes) are not being recognized by managers, there has been little effort to determine the level of integration of evolutionary theory into conservation policy and practice. We assessed conservation policy at 3 scales (international, national, and provincial) on 3 continents to quantify the degree to which key evolutionary concepts, such as genetic diversity and gene flow, are being incorporated into conservation practice. We also evaluated the availability of clear guidance within the applied evolutionary biology literature as to how managers can change their management practices to achieve better conservation outcomes. Despite widespread recognition of the importance of maintaining genetic diversity, conservation policies provide little guidance about how this can be achieved in practice and other relevant evolutionary concepts, such as inbreeding depression, are mentioned rarely. In some cases the poor integration of evolutionary concepts into management reflects a lack of decision-support tools in the literature. Where these tools are available, such as risk-assessment frameworks, they are not being adopted by conservation policy makers, suggesting that the availability of a strong evidence base is not the only barrier to evolutionarily enlightened management. We believe there is a clear need for more engagement by evolutionary biologists with policy makers to develop practical guidelines that will help managers make changes to conservation practice. There is also an urgent need for more research to better understand the barriers to and opportunities for incorporating evolutionary theory into conservation practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Carla M Sgrò
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Giehl ELH, Moretti M, Walsh JC, Batalha MA, Cook CN. Scientific Evidence and Potential Barriers in the Management of Brazilian Protected Areas. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0169917. [PMID: 28068424 PMCID: PMC5221784 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2016] [Accepted: 12/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Protected areas are a crucial tool for halting the loss of biodiversity. Yet, the management of protected areas is under resourced, impacting the ability to achieve effective conservation actions. Effective management depends on the application of the best available knowledge, which can include both scientific evidence and the local knowledge of onsite managers. Despite the clear value of evidence-based conservation, there is still little known about how much scientific evidence is used to guide the management of protected areas. This knowledge gap is especially evident in developing countries, where resource limitations and language barriers may create additional challenges for the use of scientific evidence in management. To assess the extent to which scientific evidence is used to inform management decisions in a developing country, we surveyed Brazilian protected area managers about the information they use to support their management decisions. We targeted on-ground managers who are responsible for management decisions made at the local protected area level. We asked managers about the sources of evidence they use, how frequently they assess the different sources of evidence and the scientific content of the different sources of evidence. We also considered a range of factors that might explain the use of scientific evidence to guide the management of protected areas, such as the language spoken by managers, the accessibility of evidence sources and the characteristics of the managers and the protected areas they manage. The managers who responded to our questionnaire reported that they most frequently made decisions based on their personal experience, with scientific evidence being used relatively infrequently. While managers in our study tended to value scientific evidence less highly than other sources, most managers still considered science important for management decisions. Managers reported that the accessibility of scientific evidence is low relative to other types of evidence, with key barriers being the low levels of open access research and insufficient technical training to enable managers to interpret research findings. Based on our results, we suggest that managers in developing countries face all the same challenges as those in developed countries, along with additional language barriers that can prevent greater use of scientific evidence to support effective management of protected areas in Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo L. H. Giehl
- Department of Ecology and Zoology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
- Department of Botany, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
- * E-mail:
| | - Marcela Moretti
- Environmental Management and Analysis, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jessica C. Walsh
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Marco A. Batalha
- Department of Botany, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rog SM, Clarke RH, Cook CN. More than marine: revealing the critical importance of mangrove ecosystems for terrestrial vertebrates. DIVERS DISTRIB 2016. [DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie M. Rog
- School of Biological Sciences; Monash University; Clayton Vic. 3800 Australia
| | - Rohan H. Clarke
- School of Biological Sciences; Monash University; Clayton Vic. 3800 Australia
| | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological Sciences; Monash University; Clayton Vic. 3800 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Affiliation(s)
- Prue F. E. Addison
- Department of Zoology; University of Oxford; Oxford OX1 3PS UK
- School of BioSciences; University of Melbourne; Parkville VIC 3010 Australia
| | - Carly N. Cook
- School of Biological Sciences; Monash University; Clayton VIC 3800 Australia
| | - Kelly de Bie
- School of BioSciences; University of Melbourne; Parkville VIC 3010 Australia
- Parks Victoria; 535 Bourke St Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Addison PFE, Flander LB, Cook CN. Are we missing the boat? Current uses of long-term biological monitoring data in the evaluation and management of marine protected areas. J Environ Manage 2015; 149:148-156. [PMID: 25463580 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2014] [Revised: 09/29/2014] [Accepted: 10/19/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Protected area management agencies are increasingly using management effectiveness evaluation (MEE) to better understand, learn from and improve conservation efforts around the globe. Outcome assessment is the final stage of MEE, where conservation outcomes are measured to determine whether management objectives are being achieved. When quantitative monitoring data are available, best-practice examples of outcome assessments demonstrate that data should be assessed against quantitative condition categories. Such assessments enable more transparent and repeatable integration of monitoring data into MEE, which can promote evidence-based management and improve public accountability and reporting. We interviewed key informants from marine protected area (MPA) management agencies to investigate how scientific data sources, especially long-term biological monitoring data, are currently informing conservation management. Our study revealed that even when long-term monitoring results are available, management agencies are not using them for quantitative condition assessment in MEE. Instead, many agencies conduct qualitative condition assessments, where monitoring results are interpreted using expert judgment only. Whilst we found substantial evidence for the use of long-term monitoring data in the evidence-based management of MPAs, MEE is rarely the sole mechanism that facilitates the knowledge transfer of scientific evidence to management action. This suggests that the first goal of MEE (to enable environmental accountability and reporting) is being achieved, but the second and arguably more important goal of facilitating evidence-based management is not. Given that many MEE approaches are in their infancy, recommendations are made to assist management agencies realize the full potential of long-term quantitative monitoring data for protected area evaluation and evidence-based management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P F E Addison
- School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
| | - L B Flander
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - C N Cook
- School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cook CN, Wintle BC, Aldrich SC, Wintle BA. Using strategic foresight to assess conservation opportunity. Conserv Biol 2014; 28:1474-1483. [PMID: 25381735 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2014] [Revised: 07/04/2014] [Accepted: 07/07/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The nature of conservation challenges can foster a reactive, rather than proactive approach to decision making. Failure to anticipate problems before they escalate results in the need for more costly and time-consuming solutions. Proactive conservation requires forward-looking approaches to decision making that consider possible futures without being overly constrained by the past. Strategic foresight provides a structured process for considering the most desirable future and for mapping the most efficient and effective approaches to promoting that future with tools that facilitate creative thinking. The process involves 6 steps: setting the scope, collecting inputs, analyzing signals, interpreting the information, determining how to act, and implementing the outcomes. Strategic foresight is ideal for seeking, recognizing, and realizing conservation opportunities because it explicitly encourages a broad-minded, forward-looking perspective on an issue. Despite its potential value, the foresight process is rarely used to address conservation issues, and previous attempts have generally failed to influence policy. We present the strategic foresight process as it can be used for proactive conservation planning, describing some of the key tools in the foresight tool kit and how they can be used to identify and exploit different types of conservation opportunities. Scanning is an important tool for collecting and organizing diverse streams of information and can be used to recognize new opportunities and those that could be created. Scenario planning explores how current trends, drivers of change, and key uncertainties might influence the future and can be used to identify barriers to opportunities. Backcasting is used to map out a path to a goal and can determine how to remove barriers to opportunities. We highlight how the foresight process was used to identify conservation opportunities during the development of a strategic plan to address climate change in New York State. The plan identified solutions that should be effective across a range of possible futures. Illustrating the application of strategic foresight to identify conservation opportunities should provide the impetus for decision makers to explore strategic foresight as a way to support more proactive conservation policy, planning, and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N Cook
- School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Cook CN, Inayatullah S, Burgman MA, Sutherland WJ, Wintle BA. Strategic foresight: how planning for the unpredictable can improve environmental decision-making. Trends Ecol Evol 2014; 29:531-41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2014] [Revised: 07/07/2014] [Accepted: 07/08/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
40
|
Cook CN, Carter RWB, Hockings M. Measuring the accuracy of management effectiveness evaluations of protected areas. J Environ Manage 2014; 139:164-171. [PMID: 24698991 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2013] [Revised: 01/22/2014] [Accepted: 02/23/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Evaluating the effectiveness of protected area management to help improve management outcomes is becoming an increasingly common practice. The evaluation tools developed and implemented in over 100 countries generally rely on the expert judgements of protected area managers. Despite the growing collection and use of management effectiveness evaluation data, there have been no previous attempts to measure the accuracy of these data. We measured the accuracy of managers' judgements about the conditions in their reserves by collecting independent field data. We also assessed how accurately the evaluation tool reflected managers' views by conducting semi-structured interviews with 23 protected area managers from New South Wales, Australia. We found that managers made highly accurate judgements of the extent of a common weed species, Rubus fruticosus (blackberry), but often misinterpreted the scope, scale and timeframe of the evaluation. These framing effects can lead to error being introduced into the evaluation dataset, affecting the precision of evaluations such that they cannot be reliably compared among reserves. We suggest that the wording of evaluation questions needs to be explicit about the assessment frame to minimize the influence of framing effects on management effectiveness evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N Cook
- School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia; Quantitative and Applied Ecology Group, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
| | - R W Bill Carter
- Sustainability Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD 4558, Australia.
| | - Marc Hockings
- School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cook CN, Possingham HP, Fuller RA. Contribution of systematic reviews to management decisions. Conserv Biol 2013; 27:902-15. [PMID: 24001025 PMCID: PMC4232040 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2012] [Accepted: 03/24/2013] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Systematic reviews comprehensively summarize evidence about the effectiveness of conservation interventions. We investigated the contribution to management decisions made by this growing body of literature. We identified 43 systematic reviews of conservation evidence, 23 of which drew some concrete conclusions relevant to management. Most reviews addressed conservation interventions relevant to policy decisions; only 35% considered practical on-the-ground management interventions. The majority of reviews covered only a small fraction of the geographic and taxonomic breadth they aimed to address (median = 13% of relevant countries and 16% of relevant taxa). The likelihood that reviews contained at least some implications for management tended to increase as geographic coverage increased and to decline as taxonomic breadth increased. These results suggest the breadth of a systematic review requires careful consideration. Reviews identified a mean of 312 relevant primary studies but excluded 88% of these because of deficiencies in design or a failure to meet other inclusion criteria. Reviews summarized on average 284 data sets and 112 years of research activity, yet the likelihood that their results had at least some implications for management did not increase as the amount of primary research summarized increased. In some cases, conclusions were elusive despite the inclusion of hundreds of data sets and years of cumulative research activity. Systematic reviews are an important part of the conservation decision making tool kit, although we believe the benefits of systematic reviews could be significantly enhanced by increasing the number of reviews focused on questions of direct relevance to on-the-ground managers; defining a more focused geographic and taxonomic breadth that better reflects available data; including a broader range of evidence types; and appraising the cost-effectiveness of interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N Cook
- Quantitative and Applied Ecology Group, The School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Cook CN, Mascia MB, Schwartz MW, Possingham HP, Fuller RA. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary. Conserv Biol 2013; 27:669-78. [PMID: 23574343 PMCID: PMC3761186 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2012] [Accepted: 01/08/2013] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
There are many barriers to using science to inform conservation policy and practice. Conservation scientists wishing to produce management-relevant science must balance this goal with the imperative of demonstrating novelty and rigor in their science. Decision makers seeking to make evidence-based decisions must balance a desire for knowledge with the need to act despite uncertainty. Generating science that will effectively inform management decisions requires that the production of information (the components of knowledge) be salient (relevant and timely), credible (authoritative, believable, and trusted), and legitimate (developed via a process that considers the values and perspectives of all relevant actors) in the eyes of both researchers and decision makers. We perceive 3 key challenges for those hoping to generate conservation science that achieves all 3 of these information characteristics. First, scientific and management audiences can have contrasting perceptions about the salience of research. Second, the pursuit of scientific credibility can come at the cost of salience and legitimacy in the eyes of decision makers, and, third, different actors can have conflicting views about what constitutes legitimate information. We highlight 4 institutional frameworks that can facilitate science that will inform management: boundary organizations (environmental organizations that span the boundary between science and management), research scientists embedded in resource management agencies, formal links between decision makers and scientists at research-focused institutions, and training programs for conservation professionals. Although these are not the only approaches to generating boundary-spanning science, nor are they mutually exclusive, they provide mechanisms for promoting communication, translation, and mediation across the knowledge-action boundary. We believe that despite the challenges, conservation science should strive to be a boundary science, which both advances scientific understanding and contributes to decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N Cook
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Cook CN, Carter RWB, Fuller RA, Hockings M. Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions. J Environ Manage 2012; 113:341-346. [PMID: 23062270 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2012] [Revised: 08/29/2012] [Accepted: 09/06/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Protected area managers often fail to use empirical evidence for their management decisions, yet it is unclear whether this arises from a lack of available data, difficulty in interpreting scientific information for management application, or because managers do not value science for their decisions. To better understand the use of evidence for management decisions, we asked protected area managers in Australia what information is important when making decisions, the types of evidence they find most valuable, and the types of evidence they have for their protected areas. Managers described a complex array of information needed for management decisions, with nine different factors representing decisions about individual management issues and how to prioritize management actions. While managers reported less access to empirical evidence than other sources, this is not because they do not value it, reporting it to be the most valuable source of evidence. Instead, they make up the shortfall in empirical evidence with experience and information synthesized from multiple lines of evidence, which can provide important context for their decisions. We conclude that managers value a diversity of evidence because they face complex conservation decisions. Therefore, while empirical evidence can play an important role, alone this cannot provide all the knowledge managers need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly N Cook
- School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
Cook CN, Wardell-Johnson G, Keatley M, Gowans SA, Gibson MS, Westbrooke ME, Marshall DJ. Is what you see what you get? Visual vs. measured assessments of vegetation condition. J Appl Ecol 2010. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01803.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
46
|
Hockings M, Cook CN, Carter RW, James R. Accountability, reporting, or management improvement? Development of a state of the parks assessment system in New South Wales, Australia. Environ Manage 2009; 43:1013-1025. [PMID: 19290568 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9277-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2008] [Revised: 01/10/2009] [Accepted: 01/12/2009] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Management effectiveness evaluation has been recognized as an important mechanism for both reporting on and improving protected area management. The Convention on Biological Diversity's program of work on protected areas calls on all countries to implement such systems. In 2004, the first whole of system assessment of park management effectiveness, based on the IUCN-WCPA Management Effectiveness Evaluation Framework, was undertaken in New South Wales, Australia as part of a State of the Parks reporting requirement. This article describes the development of the State of the Parks assessment tool, its elements, and how it addresses the management effectiveness difficulties associated with assessments conducted across an extensive and diverse range of park types. The importance of engaging staff, at all levels, throughout the process is highlighted, as well as the adjustments made to the assessment tool based on staff feedback. While some results are presented, the main purpose of the article is to identify and discuss important procedural and methodological considerations. These include balancing quantitative and qualitative assessment approaches, achieving a comprehensive understanding of the management processes, and responding to any problems associated with assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Hockings
- School of Integrative Systems, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Over the past 30 years, numerous attempts to understand the relationship between offspring size and fitness have been made, and it has become clear that this critical relationship is strongly affected by environmental heterogeneity. For marine invertebrates, there has been a long-standing interest in the evolution of offspring size, but there have been very few empirical and theoretical examinations of post-metamorphic offspring size effects, and almost none have considered the effect of environmental heterogeneity on the offspring size/fitness relationship. We investigated the post-metamorphic effects of offspring size in the field for the colonial marine invertebrate Botrylloides violaceus. We also examined how the relationship between offspring size and performance was affected by three different types of intraspecific competition. We found strong and persistent effects of offspring size on survival and growth, but these effects depended on the level and type of intraspecific competition. Generally, competition strengthened the advantages of increasing maternal investment. Interestingly, we found that offspring size determined the outcome of competitive interaction: juveniles that had more maternal investment were more likely to encroach on another juvenile's territory. This suggests that mothers have the previously unrecognized potential to influence the outcome of competitive interactions in benthic marine invertebrates. We created a simple optimality model, which utilized the data generated from our field experiments, and found that increasing intraspecific competition resulted in an increase in predicted optimal size. Our results suggest that the relationship between offspring size and fitness is highly variable in the marine environment and strongly dependent on the density of conspecifics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin J Marshall
- University of Oregon, Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, Charleston 97420, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
|