Questionnaire Study to Investigate the Preferences of Children, Parents, and Healthcare Professionals for Different Formulations of Oral Medicinal Products

Since the acceptability of a medicine can significantly impact therapeutic outcomes, this study aimed to determine and compare the preferences of children, parents, and healthcare professionals for the most commonly used pediatric oral medicine formulations (syrup, mini-tablets, oblong tablets, round tablets) addressing all pediatric age groups, 0-<18 years (y). This survey study employed sex-, age-, and participant group-adapted questionnaires for eight cohorts of participants, i.e., children 6-<12 y, adolescents 12-<18 y, parents of children in four age groups (0-<2 y, 2-<6 y, 6-<12 y, and 12-<18 y), nurses, and pediatricians. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. In the age groups 0-<2 y and 2-<6 y, mini-tablets were preferred over syrup by all participants. In the age group 6-12 y, solid dosage forms were also preferred over syrup by all participants. In the age group 12-<18 y, healthcare professionals preferred solid dosage forms over syrup. Parents preferred higher amounts of mini-tablets and syrup compared to round and oblong tablets, while adolescents' preferences did not differentiate between these formulations. Based on the study results and in contrast to current practice, it is suggested to consider solid dosage forms for future age-appropriate medicinal products already for younger age groups.

Efficacy and safety of STW 5-II for functional dyspepsia treatment: a patient data-based meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a chronic relapsing gastroduodenal disorder with limited treatment options. Herbal products, like the six-herb combination STW5-II, can target multiple FD gastrointestinal symptoms. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of STW 5-II for overall FD, and key symptoms, based on Rome IV criteria.

SUMMARY

We systematically screened the literature for randomized controlled clinical studies testing STW 5-II in FD. Meta-analysis was performed using data from individual patients with at least one key FD symptom (fullness, early satiety, or epigastric pain) of at least moderate severity at baseline. ANCOVA-based meta-analyses were performed on improvements in the total symptom sum score, and single symptoms, after 4 and 8 weeks. Safety data were analyzed by calculating odds ratios (ORs) for all adverse events. Four randomized controlled trials, including 613 patients, were identified, and two were eligible for efficacy analysis. STW 5-II significantly improved the FD symptom sum score (mean difference of 1.74 after 4 weeks, and 2.07 after 8 weeks), and key FD symptoms of fullness (0.28 and 0.29), early satiety (0.25 and 0.26), and epigastric/upper abdominal pain (0.26 and 0.3). Treatment-related or severe adverse events did not differ between STW5-II and placebo.

KEY MESSAGES

The available data support that in patients meeting Rome IV criteria for FD, STW 5-II significantly improves overall FD and key symptoms after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, with no safety difference compared to placebo. Thus, STW 5-II can be considered an effective and safe treatment option for FD.

Evaluating the Acceptability, Swallowability, and Palatability of Film-Coated Mini-Tablet Formulation in Young Children: Results from an Open-Label, Single-Dose, Cross-Over Study

Mini-tablets are advantageous over liquid formulations in overcoming challenges related to stability, taste, and dosage. This open-label, single-dose, cross-over study investigated the acceptability and safety of drug-free, film-coated mini-tablets in children aged 1 month-6 years (stratified: 4-6 years, 2-<4 years, 1-<2 years, 6-<12 months, and 1-<6 months), and their preference for swallowing either a high quantity of 2.0 mm or a low quantity of 2.5 mm diameter mini-tablets. The primary endpoint was acceptability derived from swallowability. The secondary endpoints were investigator-observed palatability, acceptability as a composite endpoint derived from both swallowability and palatability, and safety. Of 320 children randomized, 319 completed the study. Across all tablet sizes, quantities and age groups, acceptability rates based on swallowability were high (at least 87%). Palatability was rated as "pleasant/neutral" in 96.6% of children. The acceptability rates as per the composite endpoint were at least 77% and 86% for the 2.0 mm and 2.5 mm film-coated mini-tablets, respectively. No adverse events or deaths were reported. Recruitment in the 1-<6-months group was stopped early due to coughing-evaluated as "choked on" in three children. Both 2.0 mm and 2.5 mm film-coated mini-tablets are suitable formulations for young children.

Riociguat in pulmonary hypertension and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the haemoDYNAMIC trial

AIMS

The presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) severely aggravates the clinical course of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). To date, neither established heart failure therapies nor pulmonary vasodilators proved beneficial. This study investigated the efficacy of chronic treatment with the oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat in patients with PH-HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre DYNAMIC trial assessed riociguat in PH-HFpEF. Patients were recruited at five hospitals across Austria and Germany. Key eligibility criteria were mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mmHg, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure >15 mmHg, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. Patients were randomized to oral treatment with riociguat or placebo (1:1). Patients started at 0.5 mg three times daily (TID) and were up-titrated to 1.5 mg TID. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 26 in cardiac output (CO) at rest, measured by right heart catheterization. Primary efficacy analyses were performed on the full analysis set. Fifty-eight patients received riociguat and 56 patients placebo. After 26 weeks, CO increased by 0.37 ± 1.263 L/min in the riociguat group and decreased by -0.11 ± 0.921 L/min in the placebo group (least-squares mean difference: 0.54 L/min, 95% confidence interval 0.112, 0.971; P = 0.0142). Five patients dropped out due to riociguat-related adverse events but no riociguat-related serious adverse event or death occurred.

CONCLUSION

The vasodilator riociguat improved haemodynamics in PH-HFpEF. Riociguat was safe in most patients but led to more dropouts as compared to placebo and did not change clinical symptoms within the study period.

A Composite Endpoint for Acceptability Evaluation of Oral Drug Formulations in the Pediatric Population

Introduction

A medicine’s acceptability is likely to have significant impact on pediatric adherence. The importance is underlined in EMA and FDA guidance on this topic where investigation of acceptability is stated as a regulatory expectation. Demonstrating acceptability can be challenging given there is no globally recognized definition and no standardized testing methodology or assessment criteria. Palatability and swallowability are generally recognized as important elements of acceptability, and this work proposes a definition of acceptability using these elements to give a composite endpoint for acceptability for pediatric subjects across all age ranges.

Methods

This composite acceptability endpoint is based on validated assessment methods for swallowability and palatability in children of different age groups using different galenic placebo formulations, in line with criteria proposed by EMA for assessing acceptability in children from newborn to 18 years of age. Data from two studies investigating mini-tablets, oblong tablets, orodispersible films, and syrup were analyzed to establish the validity, expediency, and applicability of the suggested composite acceptability assessment tool.

Results

The new composite endpoint is an efficient and suitable way to distinguish preferences of oral formulations: Mini-tablets and oblong tablets had significantly better acceptability than syrups and orodispersible films.

Conclusion

Since the suggested acceptability criteria takes both swallowability and palatability into account as composite endpoint, it is highly sensitive to detect acceptability differences between oral formulations. It is a well-defined valid approach, which meets regulatory requirements in an appropriate and comprehensive manner and may in future serve as a pragmatic, standardized method to assess and compare acceptability of pediatric formulations with active substances.

Blood glucose response after oral lactulose intake in type 2 diabetic individuals

BACKGROUND

Lactulose is approved for the symptomatic treatment of constipation, a gastrointestinal (GI) complication common in individuals with diabetes. Lactulose products contain carbohydrate impurities (e.g., lactose, fructose, galactose), which occur during the lactulose manufacturing process. These impurities may affect the blood glucose levels of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using lactulose for the treatment of mild constipation. A previous study in healthy subjects revealed no increase in blood glucose levels after oral lactulose intake. However, it is still unclear whether the intake of lactulose increases blood glucose levels in individuals with diabetes.

AIM

To evaluate the blood glucose profile after oral lactulose intake in mildly constipated, non-insulin-dependent subjects with T2DM in an outpatient setting.

METHODS

This prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled, single-center trial was conducted at the Clinical Research Center at the Medical University of Graz, Austria, in 24 adult Caucasian mildly constipated, non-insulin-dependent subjects with T2DM. Eligible subjects were randomized and assigned to one of six treatment sequences, each consisting of four treatments stratified by sex using an incomplete block design. Subjects received a single dose of 20 g or 30 g lactulose (crystal and liquid formulation), water as negative control or 30 g glucose as positive control. Capillary blood glucose concentrations were measured over a period of 180 min post dose. The primary endpoint was the baseline-corrected area under the curve of blood glucose concentrations over the complete assessment period [AUC_{baseline_c (0-180 min)}]. Quantitative comparisons were performed for both lactulose doses and formulations vs water for the equal lactulose dose vs glucose, as well as for liquid lactulose vs crystal lactulose. Safety parameters included GI tolerability, which was assessed at 180 min and 24 h post dose, and adverse events occurring up to 24 h post dose.

RESULTS

In 24 randomized and analyzed subjects blood glucose concentration-time curves after intake of 20 g and 30 g lactulose were almost identical to those after water intake for both lactulose formulations despite the different amounts of carbohydrate impurities (≤ 3.0% for crystals and approx. 30% for liquid). The primary endpoint [AUC_{baseline_c (0-180 min)}] was not significantly different between lactulose and water regardless of lactulose dose and formulation. Also with regard to all secondary endpoints lactulose formulations showed comparable results to water with one exception concerning maximum glucose level. A minor increase in maximum blood glucose was observed after the 30 g dose, liquid lactulose, in comparison to water with a mean treatment difference of 0.63 mmol/L (95% confidence intervals: 0.19, 1.07). Intake of 30 g glucose significantly increased all blood glucose endpoints vs 30 g liquid and crystal lactulose, respectively (all P < 0.0001). No differences in blood glucose response were observed between the different lactulose formulations. As expected, lactulose increased the number of bowel movements and was generally well tolerated. Subjects experienced only mild to moderate GI symptoms due to the laxative action of lactulose.

CONCLUSION

Blood glucose AUC_{baseline_c (0-180 min)} levels in mildly constipated, non-insulin dependent subjects with T2DM are not affected by the carbohydrate impurities contained in 20 g and 30 g crystal or liquid lactulose formulations.

Blood glucose response after oral intake of lactulose in healthy volunteers: A randomized, controlled, cross-over study

AIM

To investigate possible changes of blood glucose levels after oral intake of lactulose in healthy subjects.

METHODS

The study was performed as prospective, randomized, two-part study with 4-way cross-over design with n = 12 in each study arm. Capillary blood glucose levels were determined over a time period of 180 min after intake of a single dose of 10 g or 20 g lactulose provided as crystal or liquid formulation. During the manufacturing process of lactulose, impurities with sugars (e.g., lactose, fructose, galactose) occur. Water and 20 g glucose were used as control and reference. Because lactulose is used as a functional food ingredient, it may also be consumed by people with impaired glucose tolerance, including diabetics. Therefore, it is of interest to determine whether the described carbohydrate impurities may increase blood glucose levels after ingestion.

RESULTS

The blood glucose concentration-time curves after intake of 10 g lactulose, 20 g lactulose, and water were almost identical. None of the three applications showed any changes in blood glucose levels. After intake of 20 g glucose, blood glucose concentration increased by approximately 3 mmol/L (mean C_max = 8.3 mmol/L), reaching maximum levels after approximately 30 min and returning to baseline within approximately 90 min, which was significantly different to the corresponding 20 g lactulose formulations (P < 0.0001). Comparing the two lactulose formulations, crystals and liquid, in the dosage of 10 g and 20 g, there was no difference in the blood glucose profile and calculated pharmacokinetic parameters despite the different amounts of carbohydrate impurities (1.5% for crystals and 26.45% for liquid). Anyhow, the absolute amount of single sugars was low with 0.3 g in crystals and 5.29 g in liquid formulation in the 20 g dosages. Lactulose was well tolerated by most volunteers, and only some reported mild to moderate mainly gastrointestinal side effects.

CONCLUSION

The unchanged blood glucose levels after lactulose intake in healthy subjects suggest its safe use in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of capecitabine and its metabolites following replicate administration of two 500 mg tablet formulations

PURPOSE

To describe concentration versus time profiles of capecitabine and its metabolites 5'-DFUR, 5'-DFCR and 5-FU, depending on tablet formulation and on frequent and/or relevant genetic polymorphisms of cytidine deaminase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, thymidylate synthase and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR).

METHODS

In 46 cancer patients on chronic capecitabine treatment, who voluntarily participated in the study, individual therapeutic doses were replaced on four consecutive mornings by the study medication. The appropriate number of 500 mg test (T) or reference (R) capecitabine tablets was given in randomly allocated sequences TRTR or RTRT (replicate design). Average bioavailability was assessed by ANOVA.

RESULTS

Thirty female and 16 male patients suffering from gastrointestinal or breast cancer (mean age 53.4 years; mean dose 1739 mg) were included. The T/R ratios for AUC0-t(last) and C max were 96.7 % (98 % CI 90.7-103.2 %) and 87.2 % (98 % CI 74.9-101.5 %), respectively. Within-subject variability for AUC0-t(last) and C max (coefficient of variation for R) was 16.5 and 30.2 %, respectively. Similar results were seen for all metabolites. No serious adverse events occurred. For the MTHFR C677T (rs1801133) genotype, an increasing number of 677C alleles showed borderline correlation with an increasing elimination half-life of capecitabine (p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of absorption was similar for T and R, but the rate of absorption was slightly lower for T. While such differences are not considered as clinically relevant, formal bioequivalence criteria were missed. A possible, probably indirect role of the MTHFR genotype in pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and/or 5-FU should be investigated in further studies.

Efficacy of the long-acting nitro vasodilator pentaerithrityl tetranitrate in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris receiving anti-anginal background therapy with beta-blockers: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Background

The organic nitrate pentaerithrityl tetranitrate (PETN) has been shown to have ancillary properties that prevent the development of tolerance and endothelial dysfunction. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (‘CLEOPATRA’ study) was designed to investigate the anti-ischaemic efficacy of PETN 80 mg b.i.d. (morning and mid-day) over placebo in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.

Methods and results

A total of 655 patients were evaluated in the intention-to-treat population, randomized to PETN (80 mg b.i.d., n = 328) or placebo (n = 327) and completed the study. Patients underwent treadmill exercise tests at randomization, after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment. Treatment with PETN over 12 weeks did not modify the primary endpoint total exercise duration (TED, P = 0.423). In a pre-specified sub-analysis of patients with reduced exercise capacity (TED at baseline ≤9 min, n = 257), PETN appeared more effective than placebo treatment (P = 0.054). Superiority of PETN over placebo was evident in patients who were symptomatic at low exercise levels (n = 120; P = 0.017). Pentaerithrityl tetranitrate 80 mg b.i.d. was well tolerated, and the overall safety profile was comparable with placebo.

Conclusion

Although providing no additional benefit in unselected patients with known coronary artery disease, PETN therapy, administered in addition to modern anti-ischaemic therapy, could increase exercise tolerance in symptomatic patients with reduced exercise capacity.

Propofol anesthesia in spontaneously breathing children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of two propofol emulsions

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated a propofol-based anesthesia regimen with spontaneous breathing in pediatric patients scheduled for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study propofol formulated with long-chain triglycerides (LCT) and mixed medium-chain/long-chain triglycerides (MCT/LCT) were used. Ninety patients aged 2.4 months to 7.3 years were premedicated with intravenous midazolam. Lidocaine was injected prior to propofol to reduce injection pain. Anesthesia was induced and maintained by propofol. Glycopyrronium bromide was administered for saliva reduction. Hemodynamics, blood oxygen saturation and endtidal capnography were continuously monitored. All patients received additional oxygen. The aggregated propofol dose for induction and maintenance of anesthesia was analyzed for therapeutic equivalence. Incidence of injection pain, laboratory safety values, vital signs, and the adverse event profile were analyzed to compare tolerability and safety.

RESULTS

Propofol anesthesia was safe and successful in all children. Both propofol formulations were equivalent regarding dose requirements (mean induction and maintenance doses for anesthesia 2.0-4.0 mg.kg(-1) and 6.0-8.8 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) respectively; aggregated doses 8-13.26 mg.kg(-1)). There were no differences in drug safety such as hemodynamics, spontaneous breathing, injection pain, and laboratory values. Duration of induction and of recovery from anesthesia were short and all examinations were completed with minimal interruption.

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol-based short-term anesthesia was well suited for anesthesia during MRI procedures in the studied pediatric patients. There were no clinically relevant differences between the two propofol formulations.

The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of an intravenous infusion of the new hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%, 500 mL) in mild-to-severe renal impairment

Hydroxyethyl starches (HES) are almost exclusively excreted glomerularly, in part after hydrolysis by amylase. HES 130/0.4 (Voluven; Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany) was developed to improve pharmacokinetics whereas preserving the efficacy of volume effect. We studied the dependency of pharmacokinetics of HES 130/0.4 on renal function. Nineteen volunteers with stable, non-anuric renal dysfunction, ranging from almost normal creatinine clearance (CL(cr)) to severe renal impairment (mean CL(cr): 50.6 mL. min(-1). 1.73 m(-2)), were given a single infusion of 500 mL 6% HES 130/0.4 over 30 min. HES plasma concentrations were determined until 72 h, urinary excretion until 72-96 h. CL(cr) had been obtained at least twice before and twice after dosing. Standard pharmacokinetic calculations and regression analysis were performed. Area under the time concentration curve (AUC(0-inf)) clearly depended on renal function comparing subjects with CL(cr) < 50 with those with CL(cr) > or =50 (ratio 1.73). Peak concentration (C(max), 4.34 mg/mL) as well as terminal half-life (16.1 h, model independent) were not affected by renal impairment. At CL(cr) > or =30, 59% of the drug could be retrieved in urine, versus 51% at CL(cr) 15-<30. The mean molecular weight of HES in plasma was 62,704 d at 30 min, showing lower values with increased renal impairment (P = 0.04). Pre-dose amylase concentrations inversely correlated with baseline CL(cr). Residual HES plasma concentrations after 24 h were small in all subjects (< or =0.6 mg/mL). We conclude that HES 130/0.4 (500 mL 6%) can be safely administered to patients even with severe renal impairment, as long as urine flow is preserved, without plasma accumulation.

IMPLICATIONS

Dependency of the pharmacokinetics of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 on renal function was studied. The area under the time concentration curve increased moderately with more severe renal dysfunction; however, small plasma concentrations were observed after 24 h. Terminal half-life and peak concentration remained unaffected by renal impairment.

Dosage form-related food interaction observed in a marketed once-daily nifedipine formulation after a high-fat American breakfast

OBJECTIVE

Objective of the study was the comparison of two nifedipine sustained-release products marketed in Europe. Maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma-concentration curve (AUC) values were derived after administration of single doses (60 mg) of test product and reference product, both approved for once-a-day administration, to 24 healthy male volunteers either after an overnight fast or immediately after a high-fat American breakfast. The study was performed with a randomised, non-blinded, four-period crossover design. Within- and between-product comparisons were determined for fed versus fasted administration considering bioavailability and tolerability of all treatments. Furthermore, in vitro dissolution characteristics of both products were evaluated.

METHODS

Plasma samples were assayed using a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method, and resulting pharmacokinetic parameters were determined model independently according to international requirements and the current European guidelines.

RESULTS

Under fasted conditions the comparison of test and reference products showed a similar extent of bioavailability with a mean ratio of AUC((0-)(infinity)()) of 99% [95% confidence interval (CI) 86%, 114%], but significantly higher C(max) values resulting in a mean ratio of 169% (95% CI 139%, 206%). Accordingly, mean residence time and half-value duration values were smaller for the test product than the reference product. Under fed conditions, a pronounced food effect could be observed for the test product resulting in a pronounced increase of C(max) values. The affiliating point estimate was calculated as 340% with a 95% CI of 279%, 413%. However no remarkable influence of food intake was observed for the reference product.

CONCLUSION

Under fasting conditions the modified-release characteristics of the test product are less pronounced than the reference product. No relevant impact of food intake could be observed for the reference product when switching from fasted to fed state, whereas a significant loss of modified-release characteristics could be detected for the test product under fed conditions resulting in much higher maximum concentrations. Such a phenomenon has been described in literature as "dose-dumping effect".

Formulation-dependent food effects demonstrated for nifedipine modified-release preparations marketed in the European Union

The objective of this study was a comparative investigation of the influence of concomitant food intake on the bioavailability of two nifedipine-containing controlled-release formulations. Adalat OROS and CORAL were compared in a randomised, non-blind, four-way crossover design in 24 healthy, male subjects after single dose administration following a high fat American breakfast or an overnight fast of 12 h, respectively. Plasma samples were withdrawn until 48 h post-dose. In the fasted state, the bioavailability (AUC and C(max) values) was lower for CORAL than for Adalat OROS. Under fed conditions, differences in bioavailability between both products were markedly increased. With respect to the therapeutic use of both products, the most important finding was the significant dose-dumping effect observed after fed administration of CORAL, resulting in nifedipine plasma concentrations of nearly three- to four-fold in 11 of 24 volunteers. The mean ratio of C(max) was 235% comparing CORAL with Adalat OROS under these conditions. The formulation-dependent food interaction observed in this study may be therapeutically relevant, especially in the case of changing administration conditions or switching from one product to the other.

Dose finding strategies involving interim analyses and unbalanced treatment allocation

Dose finding studies usually require the application of multiple test procedures (MTP). A variety of procedures is available for data analyses. Focusing on testing only subset hypotheses of interest requires only limited alpha-adjustment. Specific strategies based on MTP, in particular closed test procedures, which also consider dropping dose groups and unequal group sizes, lead to substantial reduction in total sample size. Of course, strategies discussed here can be extended to comparisons of more than five groups, and they may be generalized to cover equivalence tests, too. For example, one may want to demonstrate therapeutical equivalence of two dose regimens like b.i.d. and o.d. administrations of the drug.

Evaluation of the bioequivalence of tablet and capsule formulations of granisetron in patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy for malignant disease

Granisetron is a novel, highly specific 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist given prophylactically to patients undergoing chemotherapy. An open, randomized, crossover trial was performed with 37 patients (24 females and 13 males) undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy for malignant disease to compare an oral tablet (1-mg tablet given twice daily) with a clinical-trial capsule (1-mg capsule given twice daily). Complete pharmacokinetic data were determined for 24 patients (14 females and 10 males). The concentration of granisetron in plasma was measured by HPLC; the limit of quantitation was 0.2 ng/mL. The bioavailability evaluation was based mainly on the area under the curve (AUC) (mean values: 52.1 ng.h/mL for the capsule and 54.2 ng.h/mL for the tablet) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) (mean values: 7.42 ng/mL for the capsule and 8.18 ng/mL for the tablet) measured at the steady state after 7 days of continuous therapy. Wide interpatient variability in plasma granisetron levels after oral administration was observed. The 90% standard confidence interval for the geometric mean ratio overlapped the critical range, 0.8-1.25. Point estimates for AUC and Cmax based on two one-sided t tests and log-transformed data showed that the upper limit of the confidence interval was not within 20% of the mean for the capsule; the corresponding power analysis values for AUC and Cmax were 0.89 and 0.81, respectively. Despite bioequivalence not being proven, any differences that exist between the two formulations are likely to be small. There was no difference in efficacy or safety between the two formulations assessed.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of oral nitrendipine solution in hypertensive patients with advanced renal failure

Nitrendipine solution 5 mg.ml-1 in the dose of 5 mg was given orally to 20 patients with chronic renal failure and elevated diastolic blood pressure (> or = 110 mmHg), of whom 10 were on maintenance haemodialysis (endogenous creatinine clearance < 5 ml.min-1) and 10 were at the predialysis stage (endogenous creatinine clearance 5-20 ml.min-1). The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of kidney function and/or dialysis treatment on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of a solution of nitrendipine and to assess its antihypertensive efficacy. After 10 min there was a significant reduction in blood pressure from 188/113 to 173/100 (patients not dependent on dialysis) and from 197/112 to 161/94 mmHg (patients dependent on dialysis). The maximum fall in blood pressure (approximately 30%) was attained after 90 min in the dialysis patients and after 120 min in the non-dialysis group. Blood pressure increased again about 3 h after the administration of nitrendipine but it was still below baseline after 12 h. The terminal elimination half-life (4.1 h in the dialysis patients and 3.6 h in non-dialysis patients) was similar to that observed in patients with normal renal function. The pharmacokinetics of nitrendipine did not differ between the dialysis and non-dialysis groups. There was a correlation between plasma concentration and the blood pressure reduction. The maximum plasma concentration of nitrendipine was reached after 0.5 h (median) and did not differ between the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite of the prodrug repirinast

The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite of the new antiasthmatic drug repirinast was investigated in two different studies after oral administration of 300 mg of repirinast. In each study, 12 healthy volunteers received the repirinast dose under fasting or fed conditions in a crossover manner. In one study, a high-fat meal (American breakfast) was used and in another study, a low-fat, high-carbohydrate meal (continental breakfast) was used. Concentrations of the active metabolite in plasma and urine were determined by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. After administration of repirinast with a low-fat and a high-fat meal, the relative bioavailability of the active metabolite increased by factors of 1.9 and 2.4, respectively, as expressed by area under the curve of concentration versus time from 0 to 12 h. The amount excreted into urine doubled after drug administration with both types of food and accounted for approximately 8% of the dose under fasting conditions and approximately 16% of the dose under fed conditions. Maximum concentrations in plasma were different between the two studies: mean maximum concentrations in plasma increased by factors of 1.7 and 3.2 after administration of drug with a low-fat (drug intake immediately after breakfast) and a high-fat breakfast (drug intake just before breakfast), respectively, compared with fasting conditions.

Pharmacokinetics of the active metabolite of the prodrug repirinast in healthy Caucasian volunteers after a single oral dose

The pharmacokinetics of BAY w 8199, the active metabolite of the prodrug repirinast (BAY u 2372), has been investigated after oral administration of 150, 300 and 450 mg repirinast to twelve healthy male Caucasians. Plasma BAY w 8199 concentrations were very variable between subjects. The mean peak level (geom.mean; 1s-range) was 0.14 (0.08-0.25), 0.19 (0.13-0.29) and 0.24 (0.14-0.42) mg/l after the 150, 300 and 450 mg doses, respectively. Peak levels were reached 0.5-2.5 h after drug intake. Terminal half-lives were calculated as 5.9 h (150 mg), 8.0 h (300 mg) and 9.8 h (450 mg). The dose proportionality of the plasma profiles of BAY w 8199 and of its excretion in urine was demonstrated by testing several parameters. About 7.4% of each dose (calculated as BAY w 8199) was excreted in urine over 36 h. The renal clearance of about 27 l/h suggests that BAY w8199 is excreted by tubular secretion in addition to glomerular filtration.

Therapeutic potentials of acarbose as first-line drug in NIDDM insufficiently treated with diet alone

OBJECTIVE

Acarbose inhibits alpha-glucosidases of the small intestine and thus delays glucose release from complex carbohydrates. Therefore, its efficacy and acceptability as a first-line drug in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) insufficiently treated with diet alone was tested in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Ninety-four NIDDM subjects, aged 43-70 yr with average body mass index of 28 kg/m2 and undergoing a pretreatment period of at least 3 mo with diet alone, were treated with 100 mg acarbose three times daily or placebo for 24 wk. The patients were recruited after a 4-wk screening period of dietary reinforcement. The inclusion limits for patients termed diet not satisfactory were fasting blood glucose (FBG) greater than or equal to 7.8 mM and/or postprandial blood glucose (BG) greater than or equal to 10 mM.

RESULTS

FBG was lowered in the acarbose group from 9.8 to 8.4 mM and in the placebo group from 10.2 to 9.6 mM after 24 wk (P = 0.007 vs. placebo). The most impressive therapeutic effect was a highly significant reduction of postprandial hyperglycemia for at least 5 h after the test meal (1-h postprandial BG with acarbose 10.4 mM and placebo 13.5 mM at 24 wk, P less than 0.001) accompanied by a significant decrease in HbA1 (acarbose 8.65%, placebo 9.32%, P = 0.003). Whereas C-peptide and fasting serum insulin were not significantly affected by acarbose, postprandial insulin increment was approximately 30% lower after 24 wk compared with placebo. Furthermore, acarbose significantly reduced 1-h postprandial triglyceride levels. After an initial phase of greater than 4 wk (when 76.6% in the acarbose group vs. 28% on placebo complained about flatulence, P less than 0.001), the drug was well accepted. At the end of the study, only 32% showed mild or moderate gastrointestinal sensations.

CONCLUSIONS

Extrapolation shows that acarbose is an efficient and acceptable drug for the treatment of NIDDM with poor metabolic control by diet alone. It has beneficial effects on postprandial hyperinsulinemia and postprandial hypertriglyceridemia.

Effect of rioprostil, an oral prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) analogue, on lower esophageal sphincter pressure and on the motility of the distal esophagus in healthy volunteers

The influence of rioprostil on the resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LESP) and on the bolus-stimulated contraction wave amplitude of primary peristalsis was investigated in 9 healthy male volunteers receiving placebo or 300 and 600 micrograms of rioprostil orally in a randomised, double-blind, threefold cross over study. Manometry was performed using the low-compliance pneumohydraulic infusion system. Rioprostil in a dose of 600 micrograms slightly increased LESP and contraction wave amplitudes measured 5 cm and 10 cm above LES. The duration of the peristaltic contractions was not altered. We conclude that rioprostil in doses which inhibit effectively gastric acid and pepsin secretion and heal peptic ulcers has no inhibitory effects on esophageal motility. Thus rioprostil may be a candidate to treat reflux esophagitis and studies are warranted to establish its efficacy.

[Follow-up of hip endoprostheses following completion of true stress conditions over a 10-year period]

Results of a long term followup with total hip-replacement of the Endo-Klinik are presented. The analysed data-material exhibits a relative homogeneity because of a large series of one system of prostheses and homogeneous technique in surgery. Thus, analytic statistical methods (life-tables and regression models) could be used. In this way, prognostic factors on the durability of total hip replacement could be determined. These are essentially: long practical experience of the surgeon with one matured prosthesis-system, type of hip-joint disease, and the age of the patient. It is assumed, that in well organized special centres for joint replacement the failure rate could be reduced generally.

Multiparametric tumor marker (CA 19-9, CEA, AFP, POA) analyses of pancreatic juices and sera in pancreatic diseases

With respect to their diagnostic utility CA 19-9, CEA, AFP and POA were determined in pancreatic secretions and serum of patients suffering from pancreatic cancer (n = 76/55) or chronic pancreatitis (n = 79/45) and of controls (n = 81/42), respectively. While the determination of AFP and POA both in pancreatic secretions and serum does not permit a differential diagnosis, serum CEA (greater than 10 ng/ml) and CA 19-9 (greater than 50 U/ml) levels were indicative of pancreatic cancer in 30% and 83%, respectively, with a rate of false positive results of 5% and 8.5% confined to the chronic pancreatitis patients. A combination of tumor marker analyses, that is, serum CA 19-9 (greater than 50 U/ml) and pancreatic secretion CEA (greater than 70 ng/ml), proved to be positive in 92.9% of tumor patients with a maximum of 10.5% false positives. Likewise, values of serum CA 19-9 (greater than 50 U/ml) and serum CEA (greater than 10 ng/ml) were found in 85.8% of the pancreatic cancer patients with only 8.8% false positives, which were confined to the chronic pancreatitis patients. These results indicate the superiority of multiparametric tumor marker analyses for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, especially when including new monoclonal antibody defined tumor markers.