Access to Oncology Medicines in Canada: Consensus Forum for Recommendations for Improvement

Patient access to new oncology drugs in Canada is only possible after navigating multiple sequential systemic checkpoints for national regulatory approval, health technology assessment (HTA) and collective government price negotiation. These steps delay access and prevent health care providers from being able to prescribe optimal therapy. Eighteen Canadian oncology clinicians from the medicine, nursing and pharmacy professions met to develop consensus recommendations for defining reasonable government performance standards around process and timeliness to improve Canadian cancer patients' access to best care. A modified Delphi methodology was used to identify consensus on 30 questions involving five themes: accountability, disparities, endpoints, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness. It was agreed that greater transparency is required across regulatory and HTA processes. Health professionals in oncology are frustrated for their patients because they are unable to deliver the modern guideline-supported therapies they want to provide due to delays in approval or funding. Canadian health care providers request improvements in timely access to life-saving therapeutics in line with other comparator countries. Clinicians expect urgent improvements in Canadian health systems to give our patients their best chance of survival.

Expert consensus guidelines on management and best practices for tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte cell therapy

Adoptive cell therapy with autologous, ex vivo-expanded, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is being investigated for treatment of solid tumors and has shown robust responses in clinical trials. Based on the encouraging efficacy, tolerable safety profile, and advancements in a central manufacturing process, lifileucel is now the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved TIL cell therapy product. To this end, treatment management and delivery practice guidance is needed to ensure successful integration of this modality into clinical care. This review includes clinical and toxicity management guidelines pertaining to the TIL cell therapy regimen prepared by the TIL Working Group, composed of internationally recognized hematologists and oncologists with expertize in TIL cell therapy, and relates to patient care and operational aspects. Expert consensus recommendations for patient management, including patient eligibility, screening tests, and clinical and toxicity management with TIL cell therapy, including tumor tissue procurement surgery, non-myeloablative lymphodepletion, TIL infusion, and IL-2 administration, are discussed in the context of potential standard of care TIL use. These recommendations provide practical guidelines for optimal clinical management during administration of the TIL cell therapy regimen, and recognition of subsequent management of toxicities. These guidelines are focused on multidisciplinary teams of physicians, nurses, and stakeholders involved in the care of these patients.

Biomarker and pharmacodynamic activity of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) inhibitor SAR439459 as monotherapy and in combination with cemiplimab in a phase I clinical study in patients with advanced solid tumors

SAR439459, a 'second-generation' human anti-transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) monoclonal antibody, inhibits all TGFβ isoforms and improves the antitumor activity of anti-programmed cell death protein-1 therapeutics. This study reports the pharmacodynamics (PD) and biomarker results from phase I/Ib first-in-human study of SAR439459 ± cemiplimab in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03192345). In dose-escalation phase (Part 1), SAR439459 was administered intravenously at increasing doses either every 2 weeks (Q2W) or every 3 weeks (Q3W) with cemiplimab IV at 3 mg/kg Q2W or 350 mg Q3W, respectively, in patients with advanced solid tumors. In dose-expansion phase (Part 2), patients with melanoma received SAR439459 IV Q3W at preliminary recommended phase II dose (pRP2D) of 22.5/7.5 mg/kg or at 22.5 mg/kg with cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W. Tumor biopsy and peripheral blood samples were collected for exploratory biomarker analyses to assess target engagement and PD, and results were correlated with patients' clinical parameters. SAR439459 ± cemiplimab showed decreased plasma and tissue TGFβ, downregulation of TGFβ-pathway activation signature, modulation of peripheral natural killer (NK) and T cell expansion, proliferation, and increased secretion of CXCL10. Conversion of tumor tissue samples from 'immune-excluded' to 'immune-infiltrated' phenotype in a representative patient with melanoma SAR439459 22.5 mg/kg with cemiplimab was observed. In paired tumor and plasma, active and total TGFβ1 was more consistently elevated followed by TGFβ2, whereas TGFβ3 was only measurable (lower limit of quantitation ≥2.68 pg/mg) in tumors. SAR439459 ± cemiplimab showed expected peripheral PD effects and TGFβ alteration. However, further studies are needed to identify biomarkers of response.

Final analysis of phase II results with cemiplimab in metastatic basal cell carcinoma after hedgehog pathway inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC) is a rare condition with no effective second-line treatment options. Cemiplimab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor that blocks the binding of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) to its ligands, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed death-ligand 2 (PD-L2). Here, we present the final analysis of cemiplimab in patients with mBCC after first-line hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HHI) treatment (NCT03132636).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm, phase II study, adults with mBCC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, post-HHI treatment, received cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤93 weeks or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR). Duration of response (DOR) was a key secondary endpoint. Other secondary endpoints were ORR per investigator assessment, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), complete response rate, safety, and tolerability.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were enrolled: 70% were male and the median age of patients was 64 [interquartile range (IQR) 57.0-73.0] years. The median duration of follow-up was 8 months (IQR 4-21 months). The ORR per ICR was 22% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12% to 36%], with 2 complete responses and 10 partial responses. Among responders, the median time to response per ICR was 3 months (IQR 2-7 months). The estimated median DOR per ICR was not reached [95% CI 10 months-not evaluable (NE)]. The disease control rate was 63% (95% CI 49% to 76%) per ICR and 70% (95% CI 56% to 82%) per investigator assessment. The median PFS per ICR was 10 months (95% CI 4-16 months); the median OS was 50 months (95% CI 28 months-NE). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue [23 (43%)] and diarrhoea [20 (37%)]. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Cemiplimab demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumour activity, including durable responses, and an acceptable safety profile in patients with mBCC who had disease progression on or intolerance to HHI therapy.

The Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Resected High-Risk Stage III Cutaneous Melanoma in the Era of Modern Systemic Therapies

Modern adjuvant systemic therapies (STs) have revolutionized the management of stage III melanoma. Currently, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) remains unclear. In this single-center retrospective study, patients with clinically detectable stage III melanoma with high-risk features for lymph node basin (LNB) recurrence and whose tumors were fully resected with complete lymphadenectomy (CLD) between 2010 and 2019 were assessed. We determined the cumulative incidence (CIF) of LNB recurrence and any disease recurrence or progression using competing risk analysis. A total of 108 patients were identified; the median age was 59 years (24-92), and 74 (69%) were men. A total of 51 (42%) received adjuvant RT, 22 (20%) received adjuvant ST, and 35 (32%) received no adjuvant therapy. The advent of ST changed clinical practice, with a significant increase in the use of adjuvant ST and a decrease in the use of RT when comparing practice patterns before and after 2015 (p < 0.001). The 3-year CIF of LNB recurrence was similar in patients treated with adjuvant RT (6.3%) and adjuvant ST (9.8%). The 3-year CIF of any disease recurrence or progression was lower in patients receiving adjuvant ST (24%) compared to those receiving adjuvant RT (52%) or no adjuvant therapy (55%, p = 0.06). Three-year overall survival (OS) was not significantly different in patients treated with ST compared to those not treated with any ST (p = 0.118). Despite ST replacing RT as the dominant adjuvant treatment modality, this change in practice has not resulted in increased LNB recurrence for patients at high risk of LNB recurrence following CLD.

Three-Year Overall Survival with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Tebentafusp, a T-cell receptor-bispecific molecule that targets glycoprotein 100 and CD3, is approved for adult patients who are positive for HLA-A*02:01 and have unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma. The primary analysis in the present phase 3 trial supported a long-term survival benefit associated with the drug.

METHODS

We report the 3-year efficacy and safety results from our open-label, phase 3 trial in which HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive tebentafusp (tebentafusp group) or the investigator's choice of therapy with pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, or dacarbazine (control group), with randomization stratified according to the lactate dehydrogenase level. The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

At a minimum follow-up of 36 months, median overall survival was 21.6 months in the tebentafusp group and 16.9 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.87). The estimated percentage of patients surviving at 3 years was 27% in the tebentafusp group and 18% in the control group. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade in the tebentafusp group were rash (83%), pyrexia (76%), pruritus (70%), and hypotension (38%). Most tebentafusp-related adverse events occurred early during treatment, and no new adverse events were observed with long-term administration. The percentage of patients who discontinued treatment because of adverse events continued to be low in both treatment groups (2% in the tebentafusp group and 5% in the control group). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This 3-year analysis supported a continued long-term benefit of tebentafusp for overall survival among adult HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma. (Funded by Immunocore; IMCgp100-202 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03070392; EudraCT number, 2015-003153-18.).

Autoimmune PaneLs as PrEdictors of Toxicity in Patients TReated with Immune Checkpoint InhibiTors (ALERT)

BACKGROUND

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in a significant proportion of patients. The mechanisms underlying irAEs development are mostly unknown and might involve multiple immune effectors, such as T cells, B cells and autoantibodies (AutoAb).

METHODS

We used custom autoantigen (AutoAg) microarrays to profile AutoAb related to irAEs in patients receiving ICI. Plasma was collected before and after ICI from cancer patients participating in two clinical trials (NCT03686202, NCT02644369). A one-time collection was obtained from healthy controls for comparison. Custom arrays with 162 autoAg were used to detect IgG and IgM reactivities. Differences of median fluorescent intensity (MFI) were analyzed with Wilcoxon sign rank test and Kruskal-Wallis test. MFI 500 was used as threshold to define autoAb reactivity.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients and 14 healthy controls were included in this study. irAEs of grade (G) ≥ 2 occurred in 37/114 patients (32%). We observed a greater number of IgG and IgM reactivities in pre-ICI collections from patients versus healthy controls (62 vs 32 p < 0.001). Patients experiencing irAEs G ≥ 2 demonstrated pre-ICI IgG reactivity to a greater number of AutoAg than patients who did not develop irAEs (39 vs 33 p = 0.040). We observed post-treatment increase of IgM reactivities in subjects experiencing irAEs G ≥ 2 (29 vs 35, p = 0.021) and a decrease of IgG levels after steroids (38 vs 28, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, these results support the potential role of autoAb in irAEs etiology and evolution. A prospective study is ongoing to validate our findings (NCT04107311).

Safety, Immunologic, and Clinical Activity of Durvalumab in Combination with Olaparib or Cediranib in Advanced Leiomyosarcoma: Results of the DAPPER Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Non-inflamed (cold) tumors such as leiomyosarcoma do not benefit from immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) monotherapy. Combining ICB with angiogenesis or PARP inhibitors may increase tumor immunogenicity by altering the immune cell composition of the tumor microenvironment (TME). The DAPPER phase II study evaluated the safety, immunologic, and clinical activity of ICB-based combinations in pretreated patients with leiomyosarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive durvalumab 1,500 mg IV every 4 weeks with either olaparib 300 mg twice a day orally (Arm A) or cediranib 20 mg every day orally 5 days/week (Arm B) until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Paired tumor biopsies, serial radiologic assessments and stool collections were performed. Primary endpoints were safety and immune cell changes in the TME. Objective responses and survival were correlated with transcriptomic, radiomic, and microbiome parameters.

RESULTS

Among 30 heavily pretreated patients (15 on each arm), grade ≥ 3 toxicity occurred in 3 (20%) and 2 (13%) on Arms A and B, respectively. On Arm A, 1 patient achieved partial response (PR) with increase in CD8 T cells and macrophages in the TME during treatment, while 4 had stable disease (SD) ≥ 6 months. No patients on Arm B achieved PR or SD ≥ 6 months. Transcriptome analysis showed that baseline M1-macrophage and B-cell activity were associated with overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Durvalumab plus olaparib increased immune cell infiltration of TME with clinical benefit in some patients with leiomyosarcoma. Baseline M1-macrophage and B-cell activity may identify patients with leiomyosarcoma with favorable outcomes on immunotherapy and should be further evaluated.

Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III/IV Melanoma: 5-Year Efficacy and Biomarker Results from CheckMate 238

PURPOSE

In the phase III CheckMate 238 study, adjuvant nivolumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival versus ipilimumab in patients with resected stage IIIB-C or stage IV melanoma, with benefit sustained at 4 years. We report updated 5-year efficacy and biomarker findings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma were stratified by stage and baseline programmed death cell ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks, both intravenously for 1 year until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was RFS.

RESULTS

At a minimum follow-up of 62 months, RFS with nivolumab remained superior to ipilimumab (HR = 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.86; 5-year rates of 50% vs. 39%). Five-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 58% with nivolumab versus 51% with ipilimumab. Five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 76% with nivolumab and 72% with ipilimumab (75% data maturity: 228 of 302 planned events). Higher levels of tumor mutational burden (TMB), tumor PD-L1, intratumoral CD8+ T cells and IFNγ-associated gene expression signature, and lower levels of peripheral serum C-reactive protein were associated with improved RFS and OS with both nivolumab and ipilimumab, albeit with limited clinically meaningful predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab is a proven adjuvant treatment for resected melanoma at high risk of recurrence, with sustained, long-term improvement in RFS and DMFS compared with ipilimumab and high OS rates. Identification of additional biomarkers is needed to better predict treatment outcome. See related commentary by Augustin and Luke, p. 3253.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Real-World Experience from a Canadian Comprehensive Cancer Centre

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) cemiplimab and pembrolizumab have revolutionized the treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICI in a real-world cSCC population, including patients with conditions that would exclude clinical trial participation. In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we included all non-trial patients with advanced cSCC treated with ICI between 2017 and 2022. We evaluated investigator-assessed best overall response (BOR) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We correlated survival outcomes with age, performance status, immune status and irAEs. Of the 36 patients identified, the best overall response (BOR) to ICI was a partial response (PR) in 41.7%, a complete response (CR) in 27.8%, and stable disease in (SD) 13.9%. The progression-free survival (PFS) rate for 1 year was 58.1%; the median PFS was 21.3 months (95% CI 6.4-NE). The 1-year overall survival (OS) was 76.7%, and the median OS was 38.6 months (95% CI 25.4-NE). Immune-compromised patients, ECOG performance 2-3, and age ≥ 75 years were not significantly associated with PFS or OS. IrAE grades 3-4 were seen in 13.9% of patients. In our Canadian experience with real-world patients, ICI was an effective and safe treatment for advanced cSCC patients. Patients achieved great benefits with ICI regardless of age, immune status or ECOG performance status. We acknowledge the small sample size and retrospective methodology as the main limitations of our study.

Analysis of the Circulating Metabolome of Patients with Cutaneous, Mucosal and Uveal Melanoma Reveals Distinct Metabolic Profiles with Implications for Response to Immunotherapy

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients respond better to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) than mucosal and uveal melanoma patients (MM/UM). Aiming to explore these differences and understand the distinct response to ICI, we evaluated the serum metabolome of advanced CM, MM, and UM patients. Levels of 115 metabolites were analyzed in samples collected before ICI, using a targeted metabolomics platform. In our analysis, molecules involved in the tryptophan-kynurenine axis distinguished UM/MM from CM. UM/MM patients had higher levels of 3-hydroxykynurenine (3-HKyn), whilst patients with CM were found to have higher levels of kynurenic acid (KA). The KA/3-HKyn ratio was significantly higher in CM versus the other subtypes. UM, the most ICI-resistant subtype, was also associated with higher levels of sphingomyelin-d18:1/22:1 and the polyamine spermine (SPM). Overall survival was prolonged in a cohort of CM patients with lower SPM levels, suggesting there are also conserved metabolic factors promoting ICI resistance across melanoma subtypes. Our study revealed a distinct metabolomic profile between the most resistant melanoma subtypes, UM and MM, compared to CM. Alterations within the kynurenine pathway, polyamine metabolism, and sphingolipid metabolic pathway may contribute to the poor response to ICI. Understanding the different metabolomic profiles introduces opportunities for novel therapies with potential synergic activity to ICI, to improve responses of UM/MM.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of gynecologic cancer

Advanced gynecologic cancers have historically lacked effective treatment options. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of cervical cancer and endometrial cancer, offering durable responses for some patients. In addition, many immunotherapy strategies are under investigation for the treatment of earlier stages of disease or in other gynecologic cancers, such as ovarian cancer and rare gynecologic tumors. While the integration of ICIs into the standard of care has improved outcomes for patients, their use requires a nuanced understanding of biomarker testing, treatment selection, patient selection, response evaluation and surveillance, and patient quality of life considerations, among other topics. To address this need for guidance, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline. The Expert Panel drew on the published literature as well as their own clinical experience to develop evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to provide guidance to cancer care professionals treating patients with gynecologic cancer.

Abstract 6667: Pan-cancer assessment of tumour and peripheral T-cell receptor repertoire dynamics in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Introduction: Clinical benefit from Immune Checkpoint Blockade (ICB) is a function of local T-cell specificity for tumor-associated antigens. However, overcoming local T-cell dysfunction necessitates systemic immunity engagement. Therefore, studying the dynamics of both local and peripheral T-cell repertoires in response to ICB is required to identify features of T-cell repertoires associated with pathological response.

Methods: We conducted TCRβ-sequencing on tumor-residing T-cells (n=59), Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) (n=306) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) (n=73) from pre- and multiple on-ICB timepoints collected from patients enrolled in the pan-cancer INvestigator-initiated Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab Immunological Response Evaluation (INSPIRE; NCT02644369) trial. To assess specificity-agnostic shifts in TCR repertoires, we first compared TCR diversity and clonal expansion in longitudinal tumor and PBMC samples. Then, to temporally track the specificity-associated features of local and systemic TCR repertoires, we leveraged a Graph Neural Network (GNN) model that took in unique TCRβ chains as nodes. The connectivity between the nodes was defined by multi-relational edges that represented VJ-gene usage and GLIPHII-identified (Grouping Lymphocyte Interactions by Paratope Hotspots) specificities derived from a compendium of TCR sequences with empirically confirmed specificities. Results: While absolute diversity and clonal expansion values in baseline tumor (n=33) were not associated with response to ICB, changes in these values were informative between pre- and on-ICB tumors. All patients (n=4) with low baseline tumor TCR diversity and lack of clonotypic re-structuring in tumor TCR repertoire on-ICB had either progressive or short-term stable disease. Furthermore, pairwise comparison of pre- and on-ICB tumors for each patient (n=17) revealed that all the patients, irrespective of their pathological response, experienced emergence of new TCR clonotypes (i.e., clonal replacement) in response to ICB, suggesting only a minority of these TCRs might consist of tumor-associated clonotypes. Patients with clinical benefit also had higher degree of GLIPHII-identified clustering at baseline tumor, highlighting the role of both specificity-agnostic and specificity-centric TCR analysis in determining the response to ICB. Analysis of TCR sequences in blood plasma found cfDNA contains a small number of TCR sequences (median 32, range 12-89) enriched for TCRs found in matched tumor tissues, suggesting that cfDNA TCR repertoire may provide an indirect measurement of tumor-residing T-cells.

Conclusions: TCR diversity and functional clonal annotation are emerging biomarkers of ICB response and cfDNA TCR repertoire can potentially be exploited for clinical diagnostics and monitoring.

Citation Format: Shirin Soleimani, Ben X. Wang, Stephanie Pedersen, Jenna Eagles, Jacob Brick, Marcus O. Butler, Scott V. Bratman, Lillian L. Siu, Pamela S. Ohashi, Trevor J. Pugh. Pan-cancer assessment of tumour and peripheral T-cell receptor repertoire dynamics in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6667.

Preliminary clinical outcomes of ADP-A2M4CD8, a next-generation autologous T-cell receptor T-cell therapy, in patients with advanced urothelial cancer

517

Background: ADP-A2M4CD8 is a specific peptide enhanced affinity receptor mixed CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell therapy targeting the cancer testis antigen MAGE-A4 and modified with addition of a CD8α co-receptor designed to provide additional functionality to CD4+ T-cells. ADP-A2M4CD8 has demonstrated an acceptable benefit to risk profile in the Phase 1 SURPASS trial (NCT04044859) in HLA A*02–eligible patients with unresectable or metastatic tumors positive for MAGE-A4.1 Here we report updated clinical outcomes in patients with urothelial cancer (UC). Methods: SURPASS is a first-in-human trial consisting of a modified 3+3 dose-escalation design and an expansion cohort. Autologous T-cells are obtained by leukapheresis, transduced with a self-inactivating lentiviral vector expressing the MAGE-A4-specific T-cell receptor and the CD8α co-receptor, and infused back to the patients as ADP-A2M4CD8 following lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Primary and secondary objectives are safety and anti-tumor activity, respectively. Results: At ESMO 2022, we reported promising results from SURPASS in several tumour types.2 In the 43 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 28%, including 1 complete response and 11 partial responses (PR), and an additional 2 unconfirmed PRs awaiting confirmatory scans (as of August 1, 2022). Data from the 7 evaluable patients in the UC subset (updated September 6, 2022) showed that 3 (43%) had a best overall response of PR, and 1 (14%) had an unconfirmed PR. Disease control rate was 100% (3 PR + 1 unconfirmed PR + 3 stable disease). Adverse events have been consistent with those typically observed with lymphodepletion chemotherapy or cellular therapy. This trial is ongoing; data from additional patients with UC treated by January 2023 and updated translational data will be presented. Conclusions: ADP-A2M4CD8 continues to show an acceptable benefit to risk profile in multiple MAGE-A4+ unresectable or metastatic tumors, and preliminary encouraging evidence of efficacy in UC. An additional treatment cohort has been included in the updated trial protocol to evaluate ADP-A2M4CD8 combined with nivolumab. 1. Hong DS, et al. E-poster 540P: ESMO 2021; Virtual. 2. Hong DS, et al. Ann Oncol 33(suppl_7); S331-S355, Abstract 735MO. ESMO 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04044859 .

Integrated, Longitudinal Analysis of Cell-free DNA in Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanomas are rare tumors arising from melanocytes that reside in the eye. Despite surgical or radiation treatment, approximately 50% of patients with uveal melanoma will progress to metastatic disease, most often to the liver. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing is a promising technology due to the minimally invasive sample collection and ability to infer multiple aspects of tumor response. We analyzed 46 serial cfDNA samples from 11 patients with uveal melanoma over a 1-year period following enucleation or brachytherapy (n = ∼4/patient) using targeted panel, shallow whole genome, and cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing. We found detection of relapse was highly variable using independent analyses (P = 0.06-0.46), whereas a logistic regression model integrating all cfDNA profiles significantly improved relapse detection (P = 0.02), with greatest power derived from fragmentomic profiles. This work provides support for the use of integrated analyses to improve the sensitivity of circulating tumor DNA detection using multi-modal cfDNA sequencing.

Significance

Here, we demonstrate integrated, longitudinal cfDNA sequencing using multi-omic approaches is more effective than unimodal analysis. This approach supports the use of frequent blood testing using comprehensive genomic, fragmentomic, and epigenomic techniques.

Safety and efficacy from the phase 1 SURPASS trial of ADP-A2M4CD8, a next-generation T-cell receptor T-cell therapy, in patients with advanced esophageal, esophagogastric junction, or gastric cancer

349

Background: ADP-A2M4CD8 is a specific peptide enhanced affinity receptor mixed CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell therapy targeting the cancer testis antigen MAGE-A4 and modified with addition of a CD8α co-receptor designed to provide additional functionality to CD4+ T-cells. ADP-A2M4CD8 has demonstrated a favorable benefit to risk profile in the Phase 1 SURPASS trial (NCT04044859) in HLA A*02–eligible patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic tumors positive for MAGE-A4 (Hong DS, et al. E-poster 540P: ESMO 2021; Virtual). Here we report updated clinical outcomes in pts with esophageal, esophagogastric junction (EGJ), or gastric cancer. Methods: SURPASS is a first-in-human trial consisting of a modified 3+3 dose-escalation design and an expansion cohort. Autologous T-cells are obtained by leukapheresis, transduced with a self-inactivating lentiviral vector expressing the MAGE-A4-specific T-cell receptor and the CD8α co-receptor, and infused back to the pts as ADP-A2M4CD8 following lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Primary and secondary objectives are safety and anti-tumor activity, respectively. Results: As September 6, 2022, 13 pts (11 male, 2 female) with esophageal (3), EGJ (8), and gastric cancer (2) received ADP-A2M4CD8 (range: 1.02–9.9x109 transduced T-cells). All pts had adenocarcinoma, median age was 55 years (range: 31–71), median MAGE-A4 expression H-score was 245 (range: 160–300), and pts received median of 2 lines of prior therapy (range 1–5). Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with those typically associated with lymphodepleting chemotherapy, cellular therapy, and/or disease. One pt had a Grade 5 (fatal) AE of pancytopenia. Overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 by investigator review was 15% (2 partial response [PR]). Disease control rate was 77% (2 PR+8 stable disease). This trial is ongoing, and additional data will be presented. Conclusions: Results indicate an acceptable benefit to risk profile and encouraging anti-tumor activity of ADP-A2M4CD8. An additional treatment cohort has been included in the updated SURPASS trial protocol to evaluate ADP-A2M4CD8 combined with nivolumab. A Phase 2, open-label trial in advanced esophageal and EGJ cancers has been initiated (SURPASS-2; NCT04752358). Clinical trial information: NCT04044859 .

Adjuvant Therapy of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Resected Stage IIIB-D or Stage IV Melanoma (CheckMate 915)

PURPOSE

Ipilimumab and nivolumab have each shown treatment benefit for high-risk resected melanoma. The phase III CheckMate 915 trial evaluated adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone in patients with resected stage IIIB-D or IV melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, 1,833 patients received nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks (916 patients) or nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks (917 patients) for ≤ 1 year. After random assignment, patients were stratified by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and stage. Dual primary end points were recurrence-free survival (RFS) in randomly assigned patients and in the tumor PD-L1 expression-level < 1% subgroup.

RESULTS

At a minimum follow-up of approximately 23.7 months, there was no significant difference between treatment groups for RFS in the all-randomly assigned patient population (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.09; P = .269) or in patients with PD-L1 expression < 1% (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14). In all patients, 24-month RFS rates were 64.6% (combination) and 63.2% (nivolumab). Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 32.6% of patients in the combination group and 12.8% in the nivolumab group. Treatment-related deaths were reported in 0.4% of patients in the combination group and in no nivolumab-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab 240 mg once every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks did not improve RFS versus nivolumab 480 mg once every 4 weeks in patients with stage IIIB-D or stage IV melanoma. Nivolumab showed efficacy consistent with previous adjuvant studies in a population resembling current practice using American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition, reaffirming nivolumab as a standard of care for melanoma adjuvant treatment.

Autologous T cell therapy for MAGE-A4+ solid cancers in HLA-A*02+ patients: a phase 1 trial

Affinity-optimized T cell receptors can enhance the potency of adoptive T cell therapy. Afamitresgene autoleucel (afami-cel) is a human leukocyte antigen-restricted autologous T cell therapy targeting melanoma-associated antigen A4 (MAGE-A4), a cancer/testis antigen expressed at varying levels in multiple solid tumors. We conducted a multicenter, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial in patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic solid tumors expressing MAGE-A4, including synovial sarcoma (SS), ovarian cancer and head and neck cancer ( NCT03132922 ). The primary endpoint was safety, and the secondary efficacy endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. All patients (N = 38, nine tumor types) experienced Grade ≥3 hematologic toxicities; 55% of patients (90% Grade ≤2) experienced cytokine release syndrome. ORR (all partial response) was 24% (9/38), 7/16 (44%) for SS and 2/22 (9%) for all other cancers. Median duration of response was 25.6 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI): 12.286, not reached) and 28.1 weeks (95% CI: 12.286, not reached) overall and for SS, respectively. Exploratory analyses showed that afami-cel infiltrates tumors, has an interferon-γ-driven mechanism of action and triggers adaptive immune responses. In addition, afami-cel has an acceptable benefit-risk profile, with early and durable responses, especially in patients with metastatic SS. Although the small trial size limits conclusions that can be drawn, the results warrant further testing in larger studies.

Modification of the HLA-A*24:02 Peptide Binding Pocket Enhances Cognate Peptide-Binding Capacity and Antigen-Specific T Cell Activation

The immunogenicity of a T cell Ag is correlated with the ability of its antigenic epitope to bind HLA and be stably presented to T cells. This presents a challenge for the development of effective cancer immunotherapies, as many self-derived tumor-associated epitopes elicit weak T cell responses, in part due to weak binding affinity to HLA. Traditional methods to increase peptide–HLA binding affinity involve modifying the peptide to reflect HLA allele binding preferences. Using a different approach, we sought to analyze whether the immunogenicity of wild-type peptides could be altered through modification of the HLA binding pocket. After analyzing HLA class I peptide binding pocket alignments, we identified an alanine 81 to leucine (A81L) modification within the F binding pocket of HLA-A*24:02 that was found to heighten the ability of artificial APCs to retain and present HLA-A*24:02–restricted peptides, resulting in increased T cell responses while retaining Ag specificity. This modification led to increased peptide exchange efficiencies for enhanced detection of low-avidity T cells and, when expressed on artificial APCs, resulted in greater expansion of Ag-specific T cells from melanoma-derived tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Our study provides an example of how modifications to the HLA binding pocket can enhance wild-type cognate peptide presentation to heighten T cell activation.

Pre-encoded responsiveness to type I interferon in the peripheral immune system defines outcome of PD1 blockade therapy

Type I interferons (IFN-Is) are central regulators of anti-tumor immunity and responses to immunotherapy, but they also drive the feedback inhibition underlying therapeutic resistance. In the present study, we developed a mass cytometry approach to quantify IFN-I-stimulated protein expression across immune cells and used multi-omics to uncover pre-therapy cellular states encoding responsiveness to inflammation. Analyzing peripheral blood cells from multiple cancer types revealed that differential responsiveness to IFN-Is before anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) treatment was highly predictive of long-term survival after therapy. Unexpectedly, IFN-I hyporesponsiveness efficiently predicted long-term survival, whereas high responsiveness to IFN-I was strongly associated with treatment failure and diminished survival time. Peripheral IFN-I responsive states were not associated with tumor inflammation, identifying a disconnect between systemic immune potential and 'cold' or 'hot' tumor states. Mechanistically, IFN-I responsiveness was epigenetically imprinted before therapy, poising cells for differential inflammatory responses and dysfunctional T cell effector programs. Thus, we identify physiological cell states with clinical importance that can predict success and long-term survival of PD1-blocking immunotherapy.

Abstract CT165: Primary analysis of phase 2 results for cemiplimab in patients with metastatic basal cell carcinoma who progressed on or were intolerant to hedgehog inhibitors

Background: Cemiplimab is the first treatment approved in the US (as cemiplimab-rwlc) for patients with metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC) or locally advanced disease (laBCC) after hedgehog inhibitor (HHI) treatment or for whom an HHI is not appropriate. Cemiplimab provided substantial clinical benefit and an acceptable safety profile in patients with laBCC who discontinued HHI therapy due to progressive disease (PD), intolerance, or no better than stable disease (SD) after 9 months (NCT03132636). Here, we present the primary analysis of the mBCC cohort.

Methods: Patients with mBCC (nodal or distant) post-HHI treatment received cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 93 weeks or until PD. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR). Key secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability, ORR per investigator (INV) assessment, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and complete response (CR) rate (data cutoff date: May 20, 2021).

Results: Fifty-four patients were enrolled (70.4% male; median age 63.5 years [range, 38−90]; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 [66.7%] and 1 [33.3%]). Median duration of follow-up was 8.4 months (range 1.5-36.2). ORR per ICR was 24.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.5-37.6); with 1 CR and 12 partial responses (PRs). ORR per INV was 25.9% (95% CI, 15.0-39.7), with 2 CRs and 12 PRs. Among responders, median time to response per ICR was 4.0 months (range, 2.0−10.5). Estimated median DOR per ICR was 16.7 months (95% CI, 9.8-not evaluable). Disease control rate was 63.0% (95% CI, 48.7-75.7) per ICR and 70.4% (95% CI, 56.4-82.0) per INV. Median OS was not reached. Median PFS per ICR was 8.3 months (95% CI, 4.2-15.9). The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (37.0%), diarrhea (14.8%), pruritus (13.0%), hyperthyroidism (9.3%), and arthralgia (9.3%) as well as hypothyroidism, asthenia, constipation, and maculo-papular rash (7.4% each). There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions: Cemiplimab provided clinically meaningful antitumor activity, including durable responses, and an acceptable safety profile in patients with mBCC who had progressed on or were intolerant to HHI therapy.

Citation Format: Karl Lewis, Ketty Peris, Aleksander Sekulic, Alexander J. Stratigos, Lara Dunn, Zeynep Eroglu, Anne Lynn S. Chang, Michael R. Migden, Suk-Young Yoo, Kosalai Mohan, Ebony Coates, Emmanuel Okoye, Timothy Bowler, Jean-François Baurain, Oliver Bechter, Axel Hauschild, Marcus O. Butler, Leonel Hernandez-Aya, Lisa Licitra, Rogerio I. Neves, Emily S. Ruiz, Frank Seebach, David M. Weinreich, George D. Yancopoulos, Israel Lowy, Priscila Goncalves, Matthew G. Fury. Primary analysis of phase 2 results for cemiplimab in patients with metastatic basal cell carcinoma who progressed on or were intolerant to hedgehog inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT165.

Phase I Study of Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Tebentafusp Using a Step-Up Dosing Regimen and Expansion in Patients With Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

PURPOSE

This phase I study aimed to define the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of tebentafusp, a first-in-class T-cell receptor/anti-CD3 bispecific protein, using a three-week step-up dosing regimen, and to assess its safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary clinical activity in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM).

METHODS

In this open-label, international, phase I/II study, HLA-A*02 or HLA-A*02:01+ patients with mUM received tebentafusp 20 μg once in week 1 and 30 μg once in week 2. Dose escalation (starting at 54 μg) began at week 3 in a standard 3 + 3 design to define RP2D. Expansion-phase patients were treated at the RP2D (20-30-68 μg). Blood and tumor samples were collected for pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics assessment, and treatment efficacy was evaluated for all patients with baseline efficacy data as of December 2017.

RESULTS

Between March 2016 and December 2017, 42 eligible patients who failed a median of two previous treatments were enrolled: 19 in the dose escalation cohort and 23 in an initial dose expansion cohort. Of the dose levels investigated, 68 μg was identified as the RP2D. Most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events regardless of attribution were pyrexia (91%), rash (83%), pruritus (83%), nausea (74%), fatigue (71%), and chills (69%). Toxicity attenuated following the first three doses. The overall response rate was 11.9% (95% CI, 4.0 to 25.6). With a median follow-up of 32.4 months, median overall survival was 25.5 months (range, 0.89-31.1 months) and 1-year overall survival rate was 67%. Treatment was associated with increased tumor T-cell infiltration and transient increases in serum inflammatory mediators.

CONCLUSION

Using a step-up dosing regimen of tebentafusp allowed a 36% increase in the RP2D compared with weekly fixed dosing, with a manageable side-effect profile and a signal of efficacy in mUM.

Long-term survival in advanced melanoma for patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in CheckMate 067

9522

Background: Durable clinical benefit has been achieved with nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI), including an overall survival (OS) of 49% and a melanoma-specific survival (MSS) of 56%, with median MSS not reached (NR) at 6.5-y minimum follow-up. Here we report sustained efficacy outcomes at 7.5 y. Methods: Patients (pts) with previously untreated, unresectable stage III/IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 and stratified by PD-L1 status, BRAF mutation status, and metastasis stage to receive NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg for 4 doses Q3W, followed by NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W (n = 314); NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + placebo (n = 316); or IPI 3 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses + placebo (n = 315) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and OS with NIVO + IPI or NIVO alone versus IPI. Results: With a minimum follow-up of 7.5 y, median OS remained stable at 72.1 mo (NIVO + IPI), 36.9 mo (NIVO), and 19.9 mo (IPI); median MSS was NR, 49.4 mo, and 21.9 mo, respectively (Table). While the objective response rate remained stable at 58% (NIVO + IPI), 45% (NIVO), and 19% (IPI), median duration of response had now been reached for NIVO at 90.8 mo and remains NR and 19.2 mo for NIVO + IPI and IPI, respectively. Subsequent systemic therapy was received by 36%, 49%, and 66% of NIVO + IPI-, NIVO-, and IPI-treated patients, respectively, and median time to that therapy was NR (95% CI, 45.9–NR), 24.7 mo (16.0–38.7), and 8.0 mo (6.5–8.7). Of patients alive at 7.5 y, 106/138 (77%, NIVO + IPI), 80/115 (70%, NIVO), and 27/60 (45%, IPI) were off treatment and had never received subsequent systemic therapy. No change to the safety summary was observed with additional follow-up; updated health-related quality of life data will be reported. Of the 10 new deaths since the 6.5-y follow-up (ie, 5 NIVO + IPI; 3 NIVO; 2 IPI), none were treatment-related; 4 were due to melanoma progression; 1 was due to an unknown cause; and 5 were due to other causes, but not associated with a COVID diagnosis. Conclusions: The 7.5-y follow-up continues to demonstrate the durability of responses with NIVO + IPI and an ongoing survival plateau. A substantial difference in median OS and MSS between patients treated with NIVO + IPI or NIVO was observed in descriptive analyses. Clinical trial information: NCT04540705. [Table: see text]

Development of a remote monitoring program for melanoma/skin oncology patients at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

e18630

Background: The Melanoma/Skin Oncology (MSO) clinic supports > 200 patients on active treatment at any given time. In September 2018, the MSO clinic implemented a nurse-led proactive management program (IMBRASE) to support the monitoring of adverse events (AEs) in patients receiving immunotherapy (IO). Nurses conducted telephone calls at a pre-determined frequency to identify those who required immediate in-person assessment. Despite an initial 40% drop in emergency department visits in the first few months of implementation, insufficient human resources and lack of prioritization of assessments impacted the clinic’s ability to sustain this program. We sought to overcome this limitation by employing digital health technology to monitor and triage on-treatment patients for assessment (eIMBRASE program). Methods: MSO team worked alongside an internal innovation team (Cancer Digital Intelligence) to develop a remote assessment program with an algorithm able to prioritize patients by combining real-time biometrics and automatically scheduled electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) data of individuals undergoing targeted-therapy and IO. This new digital tool will be accessible via smartphone/computer. It will enable patients to send their data to the clinical team and establish priorities based on patients’ complexity of symptoms. Results: eIMBRASE algorithm requires four data points to be displayed for the clinical team: overall priority, cumulative score (CS), biometric alert, and no response alert. The first two points are based on ePROs, for which we established a set of symptoms of interest for each treatment modality. Each symptom can be categorized in 1 of the 6 priority levels. Each priority is associated with a number of complexity points on a logarithmic scale from 0 - 400. After a questionnaire is submitted, a CS is generated for clinicians to determine which patient may be the most complex and deserve priority assessment. Regarding the third data point, oxygen saturation (SpO2) and temperature (T) measures are collected throughout the day and patients are flagged according to the following predefined thresholds: T - red alert > 38.5C, orange 38.1-38.4C, yellow 37.5-38C; and SpO2 - red alert £93%. Patients under the highest risk of AEs, for instance those on anti-CTLA4 + anti-PD1, are required to complete ePROs daily during the first 12 weeks. Patients under low-risk therapies are required to complete ePROs 1x/week. The tool triggers priority-oriented timeframe for medical contact. To minimize the influence of poor electronic literacy, patients will have their apps set up at clinic before treatment initiation. Conclusions: eIMBRASE development presents an alternative way to use digital health tools to potentially improve quality of care for MSO patients. A pilot study will be conducted to assess its feasibility, the impact in patients’ outcomes and satisfaction.

Safety and efficacy results from the expansion phase of the first-in-human study evaluating TGFβ inhibitor SAR439459 alone and combined with cemiplimab in adults with advanced solid tumors

2524

Background: SAR439459 (SAR459) is a human anti-TGFβ monoclonal antibody that neutralizes all isoforms of TGFβ. In preclinical models, combining SAR459 with an anti-PD-1 showed improved anti-tumor activity compared to SAR459 single agent. In the dose escalation, acceptable tolerability was observed, the MTD was not reached and the preliminary RP2D was 22.5mg/kg Q3W when combined with cemiplimab (CEMI; S. Williamson et al. J Clin Oncol 39, 2021[suppl 15; #2510]). Reduction of plasma TGFβ was ≥90% at doses ≥0.25mg/kg Q2W, with a trend of a decrease in intra-tumoral TGFβ (D. Robbrecht et al. JITC 2021;9 [suppl 2; #250]). Here we report safety and efficacy results of the dose expansion. Methods: The expansion phase of this open-label, phase 1/1b study aimed to determine the optimal dose of SAR459 (7.5 mg/kg or 22.5 mg/kg Q3W) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL) resistant to anti-PD(L)1 therapy (Part 2A); and the ORR (confirmed responses) in all treated pts with SAR459 22.5 mg/kg + CEMI 350 mg Q3W in pts with MEL, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), or Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), resistant to anti-PD(L)1; as well as in pts with mesenchymal Colorectal Cancer (CRC) or Urothelial Cancer (UC), anti-PD(L)1 naïve (Part 2B). Results: From October 2019 to September 2021, 109 pts with ECOG PS 0-1 enrolled in Part 2A (14) and Part 2B (95). Overall, the median age was 63 years and 83% of pts received up to 3 prior treatment lines for advanced disease (range 1-8). Based on preliminary data, the ORR in Part 2B was 8% (Table). No significant association between clinical response and plasma TGFb level at baseline or modulation upon treatment was observed. The correlation between tumor TGFb level and clinical benefit is inconclusive due to limited number of tumor biopsies. No response was observed in Part 2A. Overall, 100% of pts had at least one treatment emergent adverse event (AE), 67% were G≥3, 34% related G≥3, 17% G5, and 4% related G5. The limited number of patients treated with SAR459 alone at the RP2D did not allow to demonstrate added toxicity due to the combination. Overall, 51 pts (47%) reported hemorrhagic AE of any grade, 8 pts (7%) had G≥3 and 5 pts (5%) had fatal outcome. The rate of bleeding and severe hemorrhagic AE was higher in HCC pts compared to the other cohorts: 11/14 (79%) pts had a hemorrhagic AE, of which 3 (21%) G≥3 and fatal. An exploratory analysis showed a trend for higher frequency of any grade SAR459-related and fatal hemorrhagic AE in patients with higher exposure. Conclusions: The NCT03192345 study was discontinued due to a lack of efficacy, and a high bleeding risk particularly in pts with HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03192345. [Table: see text]

The addition of fludarabine to cyclophosphamide for lymphodepleting chemotherapy enhances the persistence of infused NY-ESO-1 TCR anticancer therapy TBI-1301

2539

Background: Adoptive transfer of T cell receptor (TCR) gene-engineered T cells can induce durable anti-cancer responses. TBI-1301 is a novel gene therapy produced by engineering autologous lymphocytes to express an NY-ESO-1-specific TCR using a retrovirus vector that encodes siRNA to silence endogenous TCR. In this study, we examined a repeat infusion of TBI-1301 and the addition of fludarabine to cyclophosphamide for pre-infusion lymphodepletion. Methods: Eligibility included informed consent, HLA-A*02:01 or A*02:06 haplotype, and NY-ESO-1 expression by IHC. Eligible patients underwent harvest of PBMC which were processed at the treating site to generate engineered TBI-1301 cells. The study design infused 5x109 cells on day 0 and day 14 to patients following lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide (CY; 750 mg/m2 on day -7 and -6) plus fludarabine (FLU; 30 mg/m2 on day -7 and -6). Repeat infusions were performed in two cohorts: Cohort B - patients who had previously received NY-ESO-1 TCR-transduced cells and Cohort C - NY-ESO-1 TCR treatment naïve patients. Endpoints included safety, efficacy, and biological correlates for persistence of NY-ESO-1-specific T cells post infusion. Results: Ten patients were enrolled in cohorts B and C. Nine patients in total are evaluable for response and toxicity, and no DLTs have been observed. In cohort B, 5 patients (5 synovial sarcoma) were treated, and 5 have received the target dose. In cohort C, 5 patients (3 synovial sarcoma, 2 melanoma) were treated, and 4 have received the target dose. One patient received a single infusion due to bacteremia on week 2. One of 5 patients in cohort B was previously treated with TBI-1301 cells in cohort C. In each cohort, 4 patients experienced grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome. Best overall response by RECIST v1.1 was 3 stable disease, and 2 progressive disease in cohort B; and 2 stable disease and 2 progressive disease in cohort C. When compared to the earlier cohort, biomarker analysis demonstrated substantially longer persistence of transferred TBI-1301 cells in infused patients who received fludarabine (up to 372+ and 460+ days), and the cells displayed a less differentiated phenotype. Conclusions: Repeat infusions of TBI-1301 following lymphodepletion appears to be safe and to possess anti-tumor activity. Addition of FLU to the lymphodepletion regimen may contribute to longer persistence of gene-engineered T cells. Clinical trial information: NCT02869217.

Customized autoantibodies (autoAbs) profiling to predict and monitor immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)

2528

Background: Using a customized microarray, we previously reported that patients (pts) who develop irAEs grade (G)≥2 and those who do not, have different median fluorescent intensity (MFI) levels of specific autoAbs at baseline (pre-ICI). Leveraging a larger dataset, we evaluated whether overall baseline autoAbs elevation and early increases in autoAbs after ICI can predict irAEs as well as if steroid treatment can reduce autoAbs. Methods: Plasma was obtained from pts receiving ICI in two clinical trials (MET4-IO, NCT03686202 and INSPIRE, NCT02644369) and from healthy controls (hc). Collection time points in MET4-IO and INSPIRE studies included: baseline, 3-4 weeks (w), 6-8 w, 24 w and at the end of treatment and baseline and 6 w respectively. Arrays with 162 autoAg customized for frequent irAEs were incubated with plasma and probed with Abs to detect IgG and IgM reactivity. AutoAbs with MFI >500 per individual were compared between hc and pts with and without irAEs G≥2 by the Student-t test. Results: Samples from 114 pts and 14 hc were analyzed (pts characteristics are summarized in the Table). G≥2 irAEs included: hypothyroidism (13), pneumonitis (10), colitis (7), hepatitis (4), skin toxicity (7), infusion reaction (2), pancreatitis (2), meningitis (1), hypophysitis (1), corneal ulcer (1), high creatinine (1), myocarditis (1), myositis (1), diabetes (1), mucositis (1), myasthenia (1) and adrenal failure (1). Hc had less autoAbs with MFI >500 as compared to pts at baseline (median 32 vs 62 p<0.001). IgG with MFI >500 were higher at baseline in pts who developed G≥2 irAEs vs those without G≥2 irAEs (median 39 vs 33, p=0.03). In 23 pts with plasma collected at the time of irAEs, we observed a significant increase of autoAbs with MFI>500 from baseline (median 84 vs 77 p= 0.009). Paired samples at the time of irAEs and after steroids were available for 9/23 pts, showing lower autoAbs after steroid treatment (54 vs 79 p=0.006). No differences in autoAbs with MFI>500 pre and post ICI were seen in pts without G≥2 irAEs (baseline vs first post ICI collection median 58 vs 60, p=0.13). Conclusions: We observed a higher number of IgG with MFI >500 at baseline and a greater increase after ICI administration in individuals with irAEs compared to those without irAEs. Steroid treatment resulted in a decrease in autoAbs. A prospective study is ongoing to validate the potential role of autoAbs for risk stratification and monitoring of irAEs. [Table: see text]

The effect of circadian rhythm on clinical outcome in patients receiving pembrolizumab in the INSPIRE pan-cancer trial

2589

Background: The molecular networks comprising circadian rhythm are expressed in immune cells where they affect immune-related processes. Within the emerging field of chrono-immunotherapy, it has been proposed that immunotherapies should be applied at certain times of day to optimize efficacy. Two recent reports have suggested that earlier administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma may offer improved survival outcomes (Karaboué et al. ASCO 2021, PMID 34780711). Whether this observation applies to other tumour types, or occurs in geographic regions with differing seasonality, is not known. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the time of administration data from the INSPIRE single-centre, phase II, multi-cohort study of pembrolizumab (200 mg IV over 1 hour, q3w to maximum 35 cycles) in patients with advanced solid tumours (NCT02644369). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate PFS and OS. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to assess the association between time of administration and PFS or OS, adjusting for cohort. Fisher’s exact test was used to test for association with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Results: A total of 106 patients (19 head and neck squamous cell, 22 triple negative breast, 21 epithelial ovarian, 12 melanoma, 32 other solid tumours) were accrued between March 21, 2016, and May 9, 2018. Median time of follow-up was 11.5 months. Start of infusion times were obtained for 806 total doses. The median time of administration was 15h06 for the first dose and 15h11 for all doses (range 09h19 – 18h34). No differences in PFS or OS were observed between patients who received their first dose before or after noon, or before or after 15h06. Furthermore, no differences in PFS or OS were observed between patients who received ≥ 50% of their doses before or after noon, or before or after 15h11. There was also no difference in PFS or OS between patients who did or did not have a significant proportion of doses (≥ 20%) after 16h30 (“evening” in previous reports). There were no differences in the frequency of grade ≥ 2 irAEs amongst the various groups. No differences in efficacy were found when individual cohorts were evaluated separately. Finally, no differences in PFS or OS were observed when participants were grouped by season of first dose. Conclusions: Despite previous reports of improved survival with earlier ICI dosing, we did not identify any association of time of pembrolizumab administration with clinical outcomes. Our analysis is limited by small sample size and patient heterogeneity which may hinder identification of smaller associations. It is also unclear whether lower response rates in a pan-cancer population (relative to prior reports in lung cancer and melanoma) might impact correlation analysis. Further studies will be necessary to interrogate this phenomenon and ensure that ICI are optimally applied.

Leveraging personalized circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for detection and monitoring of molecular residual disease in high-risk melanoma

9579

Background: High-risk melanoma has variable prognosis. Adjuvant immuno- (IO) and targeted therapy (TT) are approved for stage III-IV resected disease. However, a significant proportion of patients (pts) are cured by local treatment alone or relapse despite adjuvant therapy. Liquid biopsy with ctDNA assays have been used to predict response to treatment and identify pts at higher risk of progression/death. Personalized ctDNA assays are a highly sensitive approach that may enhance upfront risk stratification and early detection of relapse. Methods: Serial ctDNA Monitoring as a predictive Biomarker in advanced neoplAsms (SAMBA) is a Princess Margaret prospective ctDNA kinetics study (NCT03702309) in high-risk melanoma pts. Plasma is collected pre-op (pre-local treatment, if feasible), post-op (after surgery), and every 3-6 months (m) until radiological progressive disease (rPD). Personalized amplicon based NGS assays by Inivata (RaDaR) were used to detect somatic variants in ctDNA identified through whole-exome sequencing of matched tumor tissue. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of surgery were estimated with the Kaplan Meier and compared with the log-rank test. Results: As of December 2021, 82 of 100 planned pts have been enrolled. A total of 191 samples from 47 pts have been analyzed. Median age was 66 years (27-87), 33 were male (70%). Seven (15%), 30 (64%) and 10 (21%) were stage II/III/IV respectively. All pts had surgery and 8 (17%) adjuvant radiation. No systemic therapy was given to 11 pts (23%); 30 (64%) had IO and 6 (13%) TT. rPD occurred in 13 pts (28%). Median follow up was 24 months. A median of 48 variants were included in the personalized ctDNA panel design (35-52). ctDNA was detected (ctDNA+) at any time point in 12/47 pts (26%), of which 5/12 (42%) were BRAF and NRAS wt on tissue. Median PFS was 4.9 months (m) for ctDNA+ pts and not reached (NR) for ctDNA- pts at post-op (HR = 2.71 CI 0.60-12.31, p = 0.179). Median OS was 23.1 m vs NR in ctDNA+ vs ctDNA- pts (HR = 8.9, CI 1.45-54.77, p = 0.004). Two ctDNA+ pts had neoadjuvant IO and became ctDNA- before surgery. One, free of disease after 12 m, had ctDNA- in 4 follow up samples. The other pt was ctDNA+ in the post-op sample and relapsed within 3 m. Four of 45 (9%) pts had ctDNA+ at post-op. Two of them, including a pt who had neoadjuvant IO, did not receive adjuvant therapy and had rPD within 3 m. The other 2 pts received adjuvant IO; ctDNA cleared and pts remain free of disease at 12 and 34 m. Three pts with rising ctDNA over time experienced rPD after a median of 4 m (2-7). Conclusions: Personalized ctDNA analysis with RaDaR may improve risk of death stratification and selection of pts who could benefit from adjuvant treatment. Detection of ctDNA may precede rPD. Follow-up will continue in pts with rising ctDNA who have not yet had rPD. Pts accrual and sample collection are ongoing, and additional data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03702309.

Real-world changes in the clinical management of resected stage III melanoma at high risk of local recurrence in the era of modern systemic therapies

e21575

Background: Adjuvant systemic therapies (ST) for patients with resected stage III melanoma have improved relapse-free survival; however, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), previously the mainstay adjuvant treatment, is undefined in the modern ST era. Real-world data detailing clinical practice changes and its impact on outcomes are needed to help inform the choice of adjuvant therapy for patients with resected stage III melanoma. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, patients from Princess Margaret Cancer Centre with resected stage III cutaneous melanoma treated between 2010 and 2019 and fitting the 2016 Cancer Care Ontario guidelines for adjuvant RT were included. Demographic, pathological, and clinical data were abstracted from electronic medical records. PFS was defined as the time from lymph node dissection to local-regional recurrence in the treated nodal basin or distant recurrence. OS was defined as time from lymph node dissection to death by any cause. The Log-rank method was applied to assess survival endpoints. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: From 4,959 records reviewed, 109 patients were identified. Median age at time of surgical resection was 59.4 years (23.6-89.8), and 74 (68%) were male. Type of adjuvant therapy and number of local-regional recurrences (LR) are expressed in the table. The median follow-up among those alive at last follow-up was 54.2 months (range 1.9-122). The proportion of patients receiving adjuvant RT was higher between 2010 and 2014 than it was between 2015 and 2019 (59% to 26%), whilst the proportion of those receiving adjuvant ST progressively grew (3% to 50%). LR > 90 days following lymph node dissection as the first site of relapse or synchronously with progression to metastatic disease was rare in patients treated with either adjuvant RT (6.8%) or adjuvant ST (14.3%, chi-square p = 0.33). Median progression free survival was 12.3 months in patients treated with adjuvant RT and 43.8 months in patients treated with adjuvant ST (p = 0.007). Overall survival was not significantly different (p = 0.08). Conclusions: The advent of ST has changed our institution’s clinical practice with ST replacing RT as the primary adjuvant treatment modality. Our data suggests that in the current adjuvant treatment landscape, omission of RT does not seem to increase rates of local-regional recurrences, and patients with resected stage III melanoma can be safely spared from adjuvant RT without detrimental effect on survival.[Table: see text]

Study design of a global molecular disease characterization initiative (MDCI) in oncology clinical trials

e13598

Background: Current clinical trial selection for patients with independent screening for each trial, results in high screen failure and limited options for ineligible patients. MDCI’s concept for patient screening centers around broad molecular analysis and one screening protocol for multiple trials to increase patient inclusion and shorten recruitment time for oncology clinical trials.. Methods: MDCI was designed in collaboration with patients, physicians and study sites. Feedback from the Oncology Patient Council (OPC) was solicited beginning at study conception with input on study design, the informed consent form and the Gather Share Know participant portal. Patients provided specific detailed feedback and user acceptance throughout development to ensure a truly patient-focused approach. To track implementation of feedback, the MDCI team developed a document, which was shared with OPC, recording all feedback received and all actions taken by the study team. Feedback from study sites led to additional flexibility for visits (ie, combining study visits 1 and 2; allowing for telehealth visits for visit 3) and collection of data on medical history and prior therapies to streamline the screening process. Physician input included the acceptance of next generation sequencing (NGS) to determine the best therapy for each patient. Results: The MDCI protocol combines analysis of patient medical history, blood, and tumor assays, including HLA expression, protein analyses and NGS. A trial-matching approach, developed in collaboration with IQVIA, identifies potential clinical trials based on screening results. The Gather Share Know Hub, an optional patient-facing portal, allows patients to view the screening results identified as important for patients and information about ongoing clinical trial options. Patients also have access to a patient-friendly informational video, disease-specific education, credible resources and information on “what to expect” at study visits. Physicians receive clinical reports and molecular profiles from multiple screening tests (available through the Physician Portal), enabling them to make informed, data-driven decisions on the best clinical trial option for each patient. Conclusions: Utilizing a collaborative approach, MDCI was developed as a novel tumor-profiling protocol. MDCI is designed to rapidly prescreen patients for multiple studies at once by evaluating each patient’s tumor and blood genetics as well as their medical and cancer history using a prescreening algorithm. MDCI introduces an individualized approach to patient care with the aim of accelerating the availability of new therapeutic options. Continued feedback is solicited from patients on study design and the Gather Share Know hub through timed questionnaires to further enhance the patient experience. This study (NCT04772053) is funded by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Clinical trial information: NCT04772053.

Increase in serum choline levels predicts for improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced cancers receiving pembrolizumab

Background

Recent studies have demonstrated that T cells can induce vasodilation in a choline-acetyltransferase dependent manner, leading to an increase in T cell migration to infected tissues in response to viral infection, but its role in cancer is unclear. Choline acetyltransferase catalyzes the production of acetylcholine from choline and acetyl-CoA, however, acetylcholine is challenging to quantify due to its extremely short half-life while choline is stable. This study aims to correlate serum choline levels in patients with advanced solid tumors receiving pembrolizumab with treatment outcomes.

Methods

Blood samples were collected at baseline and at week 7 (pre-cycle 3) in patients treated with pembrolizumab in the INvestigator-initiated Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab Immunological Response Evaluation phase II trial (NCT02644369). Samples were analyzed for choline and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Multivariable Cox models were used to assess the association between choline and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) when including ΔctDNA_C3 (the change in ctDNA from baseline to cycle 3), cohort, PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden (TMB). An independent validation cohort from the LIBERATE study (NCT03702309) included patients on early phase trials treated with a PD-1 inhibitor.

Results

A total of 106 pts were included in the analysis. With a median follow-up of 12.6 months, median PFS and OS were 1.9 and 13.7 months, respectively. An increase in serum choline level at week 7 compared with baseline (Δcholine_C3) in 81 pts was significantly associated with a better PFS (aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.83, p=0.009), and a trend toward a better OS (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.12, p=0.119). A combination of ΔctDNA_C3 and Δcholine_C3 was prognostic for both OS and PFS. Multivariable analyses show Δcholine_C3 was a prognostic factor for PFS independent of ΔctDNA_C3, cohort, PD-L1 and TMB. In the independent validation cohort (n=51), an increase in serum choline at cycle 2 was associated with a trend to improved PFS.

Conclusions

This is the first exploratory report of serum choline levels in pan-cancer patients receiving pembrolizumab. The association between improved PFS and Δcholine_C3 suggests a possible role for the cholinergic system in the regulation of antitumor immunity. Further pre-clinical and clinical studies are required to validate this finding.

Trial registration number

NCT03702309.

Peripheral CD4 T cell resistance to type I interferon defines outcome of PD1 blockade therapy in human cancer

Type I interferons (IFN-Is) are paradoxically associated with both the success and failure of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), with increased inflammation in the tumor associated with better response. To understand how IFN-Is modulate the immune response to ICB, we developed a mass cytometry approach to quantify pro- and anti-inflammatory features of IFN-I responsiveness at the single cell level. Using high dimensional analysis we show that the inflammatory responses that are beneficial in the peripheral blood are the opposite of what is considered beneficial in the tumor, thus identifying a functional disconnect between the peripheral and tumor immune compartments. We demonstrate that an initial resistance to IFN-I by CD4 T effector (Teff) cells in the peripheral blood is strongly associated to long-term benefit of anti-PD1 therapy in patients with melanoma, head and neck and lung cancers. By contrast, a strong IFN-I response correlates with progression and low survival probability. Upregulation of PDL1 by IFN-I did not relate to response, however patients with myeloid cells that initially reacted to IFN-I with higher IDO1 induction survived longer after anti-PD1. Single-cell RNA-sequencing stratified based on response to IFN-I identified transcriptional programs associated with therapy response, providing mechanistic insight into the peripheral cell states prior to therapy conducive to anti-PD1 success. Thus, contrary to a benefit of an initially inflamed tumor environment, an initially restrained CD4 Teff inflammatory response to IFN-I averts therapy failure and enables tumor control. This IFN-I response potential is a promising new biomarker for prediction of which patients will benefit most from anti-PD1 therapy.

Supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Foundation Grant FDN148386, the Canadian Cancer Society (CCSRI) Innovation Award No. 706230, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant AI085043, The Terry Fox New Frontiers Grant the Scotiabank Research Chair to D.G.B, the Princess Margaret Hold’em for Life Cancer Research Fellowship (G. M. B).

Turnaround Times in Melanoma BRAF Testing and the Impact on the Initiation of Systemic Therapy at a Single Tertiary Care Cancer Center

PURPOSE

The identification of BRAF mutations in melanoma enables targeted therapy and improves patient outcomes. Barriers to BRAF molecular testing affect the quality of care and therapeutic options.

METHODS

This retrospective study mapped BRAF testing timelines in adult patients with melanoma at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre to identify obstacles to timely BRAF reporting and its impact on the initiation of therapy.

RESULTS

Sixty-six cases were included. The median time between BRAF request and result was 12 days (95% CI, 8 to 15) when the BRAF test was ordered by pathology, compared with 20 days (95% CI, 16 to 23) if the test was requested by another specialist (P < .001). When the BRAF test and biopsy were performed within the same institution, the BRAF median turnaround time (TAT) was 13 days (95% CI, 6 to 19) compared with 19 days (95% CI, 16 to 21) if the sample was transferred from another institution (P = .02). Forty-seven patients received systemic therapy, and 20 had metastatic disease. In the metastatic subgroup, if the BRAF result was available at the first medical oncology visit, the initiation of treatment was 20 days (95% CI, 9.6 to 30.3), but was delayed to 31 days (95% CI, 10.8 to 51.1) if the BRAF result was not available (P = .03).

CONCLUSION

This study showed variations in BRAF test results in TAT. One factor affecting this timeline is the transfer time, which can be streamlined by pathology reflex testing. Delays in TAT affect the timing and type of therapeutic intervention, especially in patients with stage IV disease.

Phase 1 Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Anti-Tumor Activity of ADP-A2M10 SPEAR T-Cells in Patients With MAGE-A10+ Head and Neck, Melanoma, or Urothelial Tumors

Background

ADP-A2M10 specific peptide enhanced affinity receptor (SPEAR) T-cells are genetically engineered autologous T-cells that express a high-affinity melanoma-associated antigen (MAGE)-A10-specific T-cell receptor (TCR) targeting MAGE-A10-positive tumors in the context of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02. ADP-0022-004 is a phase 1, dose-escalation trial to evaluate the safety and anti-tumor activity of ADP-A2M10 in three malignancies (https://clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02989064).

Methods

Eligible patients were HLA-A*02 positive with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), melanoma, or urothelial carcinoma (UC) expressing MAGE-A10. Patients underwent apheresis; T-cells were isolated, transduced with a lentiviral vector containing the MAGE-A10 TCR, and expanded. Patients underwent lymphodepletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide prior to receiving ADP-A2M10. ADP-A2M10 was administered in two dose groups receiving 0.1×10⁹ and >1.2 to 6×10⁹ transduced cells, respectively, and an expansion group receiving 1.2 to 15×10⁹ transduced cells.

Results

Ten patients (eight male and two female) with HNSCC (four), melanoma (three), and UC (three) were treated. Three patients were treated in each of the two dose groups, and four patients were treated in the expansion group. The most frequently reported adverse events grade ≥3 were leukopenia (10), lymphopenia (10), neutropenia (10), anemia (nine), and thrombocytopenia (five). Two patients reported cytokine release syndrome (one each with grade 1 and grade 3), with resolution. Best response included stable disease in four patients, progressive disease in five patients, and not evaluable in one patient. ADP-A2M10 cells were detectable in peripheral blood from patients in each dose group and the expansion group and in tumor tissues from patients in the higher dose group and the expansion group. Peak persistence was greater in patients from the higher dose group and the expansion group compared with the lower dose group.

Conclusions

ADP-A2M10 has shown an acceptable safety profile with no evidence of toxicity related to off-target binding or alloreactivity in these malignancies. Persistence of ADP-A2M10 in the peripheral blood and trafficking of ADP-A2M10 into the tumor was demonstrated. Because MAGE-A10 expression frequently overlaps with MAGE-A4 expression in tumors and responses were observed in the MAGE-A4 trial (NCT03132922), this clinical program closed, and trials with SPEAR T-cells targeting the MAGE-A4 antigen are ongoing.

Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma

PURPOSE

In the phase III CheckMate 067 trial, durable clinical benefit was demonstrated previously with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab. Here, we report 6.5-year efficacy and safety outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 314), nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 316), or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses; n = 315). Coprimary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab. Secondary end points included objective response rate, descriptive efficacy assessments of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone, and safety. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS; descriptive analysis), which excludes deaths unrelated to melanoma, was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Median OS (minimum follow-up, 6.5 years) was 72.1, 36.9, and 19.9 months in the combination, nivolumab, and ipilimumab groups, respectively. Median MSS was not reached, 58.7, and 21.9 months, respectively; 6.5-year OS rates were 57%, 43%, and 25% in patients with BRAF-mutant tumors and 46%, 42%, and 22% in those with BRAF-wild-type tumors, respectively. In patients who discontinued treatment, the median treatment-free interval was 27.6, 2.3, and 1.9 months, respectively. Since the 5-year analysis, no new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSION

These 6.5-year CheckMate 067 results, which include the longest median OS in a phase III melanoma trial reported to date and the first report of MSS, showed durable, improved clinical outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma and, in descriptive analyses, with the combination over nivolumab monotherapy.

Heterogeneity in Survival with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Its Implications for Survival Extrapolations: A Case Study in Advanced Melanoma

Background

Survival heterogeneity and limited trial follow-up present challenges for estimating lifetime benefits of oncology therapies. This study used CheckMate 067 (NCT01844505) extended follow-up data to assess the predictive accuracy of standard parametric and flexible models in estimating the long-term overall survival benefit of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor combination) in advanced melanoma.

Methods

Six sets of survival models (standard parametric, piecewise, cubic spline, mixture cure, parametric mixture, and landmark response models) were independently fitted to overall survival data for treatments in CheckMate 067 (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab, and ipilimumab) using successive data cuts (28, 40, 52, and 60 mo). Standard parametric models allow survival extrapolation in the absence of a complex hazard. Piecewise and cubic spline models allow additional flexibility in fitting the hazard function. Mixture cure, parametric mixture, and landmark response models provide flexibility by explicitly incorporating survival heterogeneity. Sixty-month follow-up data, external ipilimumab data, and clinical expert opinion were used to evaluate model estimation accuracy. Lifetime survival projections were compared using a 5% discount rate.

Results

Standard parametric, piecewise, and cubic spline models underestimated overall survival at 60 mo for the 28-mo data cut. Compared with other models, mixture cure, parametric mixture, and landmark response models provided more accurate long-term overall survival estimates versus external data, higher mean survival benefit over 20 y for the 28-mo data cut, and more consistent 20-y mean overall survival estimates across data cuts.

Conclusion

This case study demonstrates that survival models explicitly incorporating survival heterogeneity showed greater accuracy for early data cuts than standard parametric models did, consistent with similar immune checkpoint inhibitor survival validation studies in advanced melanoma. Research is required to assess generalizability to other tumors and disease stages.

Highlights

Clinical and molecular response to tebentafusp in previously treated patients with metastatic uveal melanoma: a phase 2 trial

In patients with previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma, the historical 1 year overall survival rate is 37% with a median overall survival of 7.8 months. We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study of tebentafusp, a soluble T cell receptor bispecific (gp100×CD3), in 127 patients with treatment-refractory metastatic uveal melanoma (NCT02570308). The primary endpoint was the estimation of objective response rate based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) v1.1. Secondary objectives included safety, overall survival, progression-free survival and disease control rate. All patients had at least one treatment-related adverse event, with rash (87%), pyrexia (80%) and pruritus (67%) being the most common. Toxicity was mostly mild to moderate in severity but was greatly reduced in incidence and intensity after the initial three doses. Despite a low overall response rate of 5% (95% CI: 2-10%), the 1 year overall survival rate was 62% (95% CI: 53-70%) with a median overall survival of 16.8 months (95% CI: 12.9-21.3), suggesting benefit beyond traditional radiographic-based response criteria. In an exploratory analysis, early on-treatment reduction in circulating tumour DNA was strongly associated with overall survival, even in patients with radiographic progression. Our findings indicate that tebentafusp has promising clinical activity with an acceptable safety profile in patients with previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma, and data suggesting ctDNA as an early indicator of clinical benefit from tebentafusp need confirmation in a randomized trial.

CANDIED: A Pan-Canadian Cohort of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

Simple Summary

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (ICI-induced IDDM) is an emerging form of autoimmune diabetes. We describe the characteristics of 34 patients who developed ICI-induced IDDM across five Canadian cancer centres. We observed that presentation with hyperglycemic crisis is common and that patients treated with combination immunotherapy regimens develop ICI-induced IDDM earlier than those treated with monotherapy. Our results suggest that ICI-induced IDDM is irreversible but is associated with high tumor response rates and prolonged survival. The data generated by this study may help clinicians manage ICI-induced IDDM.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is a rare but potentially fatal immune-related adverse event (irAE). In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, we describe the characteristics of ICI-induced IDDM in patients treated across five Canadian cancer centres, as well as their tumor response rates and survival. In 34 patients identified, 25 (74%) were male and 19 (56%) had melanoma. All patients received anti-programed death 1 (anti-PD1) or anti-programmed death ligand-1 (anti-PD-L1)-based therapy. From ICI initiation, median time to onset of IDDM was 2.4 months (95% CI 1.1–3.6). Patients treated with anti-PD1/PD-L1 in combination with an anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 antibody developed IDDM earlier compared with patients on monotherapy (1.4 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.05). Diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in 21 (62%) patients. Amongst 30 patients evaluable for response, 10 (33%) had a complete response and another 10 (33%) had a partial response. Median overall survival was not reached (95% CI NE; median follow-up 31.7 months). All patients remained insulin-dependent at the end of follow-up. We observed that ICI-induced IDDM is an irreversible irAE and may be associated with a high response rate and prolonged survival.

Abstract LBA021: Immune resistance interrogation study (IRIS): Initial report of next generation sequencing (NGS) results in patients with primary versus acquired resistance to anti-PD1/L1 antibodies

Background: The molecular mechanisms underlying primary versus acquired resistance to anti-PD-1/L1 antibodies have not been comprehensively evaluated across different tumor types. Methods: The Immune Resistance Interrogation Study (IRIS; NCT04243720) is a prospective, investigator-initiated study at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, aimed to perform extensive multi-omic characterization of solid tumors with primary resistance (disease progression on first imaging; or stable disease &lt;6 months) versus acquired resistance (partial or complete response; or stable disease ≥6 months) to antiPD-1/L1 agents. A one-time fresh tumor biopsy is collected from patients (pts) who have progressed on anti-PD1/L1 antibody-based treatment as their most recent line of therapy; liquid biopsy or archived FFPE tissue is allowed as alternates when fresh biopsy is insufficient. NGS was performed using Foundation One (324 genes) or Foundation Liquid (309 genes) panels. Frequencies of disrupted genes and variants were compared in pts with primary versus acquired resistance using Fisher’s exact test. The planned samples size of IRIS is 100 pts. Results: Among the first 35 pts enrolled, 22 (63%) had primary resistance and 13 (37%) had acquired resistance. The most common diagnosis was melanoma (17 pts; 49%); followed by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (13 pts; 37%); endometrial cancer (2 pts; 6%); pleural mesothelioma, gastroesophageal junction and colorectal cancer (1 pt each; 3%). Foundation One was performed in 23 pts (66%), 22 of them (63%) had biopsies with sufficient quality for NGS, and 1 (3%) had the analysis performed using archival FFPE tissue. The remaining 12 pts (34%) had Foundation Liquid testing done using liquid biopsy. Thirty-three pts (94%) had at least one oncogenic alteration. Genes most frequently altered included: TP53 in 16 patients (46%), TERT promoter in 12 pts (34%), CDKN2A in 9 pts (26%), PIK3CA in 6 pts (17%), and PTEN in 5 pts (14%). At the variant level, the most frequent alterations were: TERT promoter -146C&gt;T mutation in 6 patients (17%), followed by TERT promoter -124C&gt;T mutation in 5 patients (14%), FGF19/FGF4/FGF3 and CCND1 amplifications in 4 pts each (11%), and MDM2 amplification, CDK4 amplification and CDKN2A loss, detected in 3 pts each (9%). Pts with acquired resistance had a higher frequency of TP53 mutations (9/13 = 69%) compared to primary resistance pts (7/22 = 32%), p=0.04; however this was not significant when corrected for multiple testing. Interestingly, amplifications in CDK4, CCND1, FGF 19/FGF 3/FGF 4, MDM2 and mutations in NF1 were only identified in pts with primary resistant tumors. Conclusions: No significant differences in disrupted genes and variants were observed in the current analysis. However, this can be due to the small number of pts analyzed thus far. Accrual to this study is ongoing. A comparison of alterations in oncogenic pathways is planned to further define the genomic landscape of pts with primary versus acquired resistance to anti-PD1/PDL1 blockade.

Citation Format: Sofia Genta, Farnoosh Abbas Aghababazadeh, Ming S Tsao, Aaron R Hansen, Marcus O Butler, Albiruni R Razak, Philippe L Bedard, Ben X Wang, Pugh J Trevor, Sevan Hakgor, Jeffrey Woo, Benjamin Haibe-Kains, Lillian L Siu, Anna Spreafico. Immune resistance interrogation study (IRIS): Initial report of next generation sequencing (NGS) results in patients with primary versus acquired resistance to anti-PD1/L1 antibodies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr LBA021.

Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of seviprotimut-L polyvalent melanoma vaccine in patients with post-resection melanoma at high risk of recurrence

BACKGROUND

Most patients with advanced melanomas relapse after checkpoint blockade therapy. Thus, immunotherapies are needed that can be applied safely early, in the adjuvant setting. Seviprotimut-L is a vaccine containing human melanoma antigens, plus alum. To assess the efficacy of seviprotimut-L, the Melanoma Antigen Vaccine Immunotherapy Study (MAVIS) was initiated as a three-part multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Results from part B1 are reported here.

METHODS

Patients with AJCC V.7 stage IIB-III cutaneous melanoma after resection were randomized 2:1, with stage stratification (IIB/C, IIIA, IIIB/C), to seviprotimut-L 40 mcg or placebo. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was the primary endpoint. For an hypothesized HR of 0.625, one-sided alpha of 0.10, and power 80%, target enrollment was 325 patients.

RESULTS

For randomized patients (n=347), arms were well-balanced, and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar for seviprotimut-L and placebo. For the primary intent-to-treat endpoint of RFS, the estimated HR was 0.881 (95% CI: 0.629 to 1.233), with stratified logrank p=0.46. However, estimated HRs were not uniform over the stage randomized strata, with HRs (95% CIs) for stages IIB/IIC, IIIA, IIIB/IIIC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.37 to 1.19), 0.72 (95% CI: 0.35 to 1.50), and 1.19 (95% CI: 0.72 to 1.97), respectively. In the stage IIB/IIC stratum, the effect on RFS was greatest for patients <60 years old (HR=0.324 (95% CI: 0.121 to 0.864)) and those with ulcerated primary melanomas (HR=0.493 (95% CI: 0.255 to 0.952)).

CONCLUSIONS

Seviprotimut-L is very well tolerated. Exploratory efficacy model estimation supports further study in stage IIB/IIC patients, especially younger patients and those with ulcerated melanomas.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01546571.

Standard-Dose Pembrolizumab Plus Alternate-Dose Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma: KEYNOTE-029 Cohort 1C, a Phase 2 Randomized Study of Two Dosing Schedules

PURPOSE

Standard-dose pembrolizumab plus alternative-dose ipilimumab (1 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses) were tolerable and had robust antitumor activity in advanced melanoma in cohort B of the phase 1 KEYNOTE-029 study. Cohort C evaluated standard-dose pembrolizumab with two other alternative ipilimumab regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with treatment-naive unresectable stage III/IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for ≤24 months plus ipilimumab 50 mg Q6W for 4 doses (PEM200+IPI50), or the same pembrolizumab regimen plus ipilimumab 100 mg Q12W for 4 doses (PEM200+IPI100). Primary end points were incidence of grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) and objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by independent central review. Per protocol-defined thresholds, grade 3-5 TRAE incidence ≤26% indicated meaningful toxicity reduction and ORR ≥48% indicated no decrease in efficacy versus data reported for other PD-1 inhibitor/ipilimumab combinations.

RESULTS

Median follow-up on February 18, 2019, was 16.3 months in PEM200+IPI50 (N = 51) and 16.4 months in PEM200+IPI100 (N = 51). Grade 3-5 TRAEs occurred in 12 (24%) patients in PEM200+IPI50 and 20 (39%) in PEM200+IPI100. One patient in PEM200+IPI50 died from treatment-related autoimmune myocarditis. Immune-mediated AEs or infusion reactions occurred in 21 (42%) patients in PEM200+IPI50 and 28 (55%) in PEM200+IPI100. ORR was 55% in PEM200+IPI50; 61% in PEM200+IPI100.

CONCLUSIONS

Pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W plus ipilimumab 50 mg Q6W or 100 mg Q12W demonstrated antitumor activity above the predefined threshold; pembrolizumab plus ipilimumab 50 mg Q6W had lower incidence of grade 3-5 TRAEs than the predefined threshold, suggesting a reduction in toxicity. See related commentary by Jameson-Lee and Luke, p. 5153.

Overall Survival Benefit with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Uveal melanoma is a disease that is distinct from cutaneous melanoma, with a low tumor mutational burden and a 1-year overall survival of approximately 50% in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Data showing a proven overall survival benefit with a systemic treatment are lacking. Tebentafusp is a bispecific protein consisting of an affinity-enhanced T-cell receptor fused to an anti-CD3 effector that can redirect T cells to target glycoprotein 100-positive cells.

METHODS

In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned previously untreated HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with metastatic uveal melanoma in a 2:1 ratio to receive tebentafusp (tebentafusp group) or the investigator's choice of therapy with single-agent pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, or dacarbazine (control group), stratified according to the lactate dehydrogenase level. The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 378 patients were randomly assigned to either the tebentafusp group (252 patients) or the control group (126 patients). Overall survival at 1 year was 73% in the tebentafusp group and 59% in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.71; P<0.001) in the intention-to-treat population. Progression-free survival was also significantly higher in the tebentafusp group than in the control group (31% vs. 19% at 6 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.94; P = 0.01). The most common treatment-related adverse events in the tebentafusp group were cytokine-mediated events (due to T-cell activation) and skin-related events (due to glycoprotein 100-positive melanocytes), including rash (83%), pyrexia (76%), and pruritus (69%). These adverse events decreased in incidence and severity after the first three or four doses and infrequently led to discontinuation of the trial treatment (2%). No treatment-related deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with tebentafusp resulted in longer overall survival than the control therapy among previously untreated patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. (Funded by Immunocore; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03070392; EudraCT number, 2015-003153-18.).

An open-label, phase II multicohort study of an oral hypomethylating agent CC-486 and durvalumab in advanced solid tumors

Purpose

To evaluate whether administration of the oral DNA hypomethylating agent CC-486 enhances the poor response rate of immunologically ‘cold’ solid tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab.

Experimental design

PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitor naïve patients with advanced microsatellite stable colorectal cancer; platinum resistant ovarian cancer; and estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer were enrolled in this single-institution, investigator-initiated trial. Two 28 day regimens, regimen A (CC-486 300 mg QD Days 1–14 (cycles 1–3 only) in combination with durvalumab 1500 mg intravenous day 15) and regimen B (CC-486 100 mg QD days 1–21 (cycle 1 and beyond), vitamin C 500 mg once a day continuously and durvalumab 1500 mg intravenous day 15) were investigated. Patients underwent paired tumor biopsies and serial peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) collection for immune-profiling, transcriptomic and epigenomic analyzes.

Results

A total of 28 patients were enrolled, 19 patients treated on regimen A and 9 on regimen B. The combination of CC-486 and durvalumab was tolerable. Regimen B, with a lower dose of CC-486 extended over a longer treatment course, showed less grade 3/4 adverse effects. Global LINE-1 methylation assessment of serial PBMCs and genome-wide DNA methylation profile in paired tumor biopsies demonstrated minimal changes in global methylation in both regimens. The lack of robust tumor DNA demethylation was accompanied by an absence of the expected ‘viral mimicry’ inflammatory response, and consequently, no clinical responses were observed. The disease control rate was 7.1%. The median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI 1.5 to 2.3) and median overall survival was 5 months (95% CI 4.5 to 10).

Conclusions

The evaluated treatment schedules of CC-486 in combination with durvalumab did not demonstrate robust pharmacodynamic or clinical activity in selected immunologically cold solid tumors. Lessons learned from this biomarker-rich study should inform continued drug development efforts using these agents.

Trial registration number

NCT02811497.

Adjuvant nivolumab for stage III/IV melanoma: evaluation of safety outcomes and association with recurrence-free survival

BACKGROUND

Several therapeutic options are now available in the adjuvant melanoma setting, mandating an understanding of their benefit‒risk profiles in order to make informed treatment decisions. Herein we characterize adjuvant nivolumab select (immune-related) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and evaluate possible associations between safety and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the phase III CheckMate 238 trial.

METHODS

Patients with resected stage IIIB-C or IV melanoma received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n=452) or ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks (n=453) for up to 1 year or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. First-occurrence and all-occurrence select TRAEs were analyzed within discrete time intervals: from 0 to 3 months of treatment, from >3-12 months of treatment, and from the last dose (regardless of early or per-protocol treatment discontinuation) to 100 days after the last dose. Possible associations between select TRAEs and RFS were investigated post randomization in 3-month landmark analyses and in Cox model analyses (including a time-varying covariate of select TRAE), within and between treatment groups.

RESULTS

From the first nivolumab dose to 100 days after the last dose, first-occurrence select TRAEs were reported in 67.7% (306/452) of patients. First-occurrence select TRAEs were reported most frequently from 0 to 3 months (48.0%), during which the most common were pruritus (15.5%) and diarrhea (15.3%). Most select TRAEs resolved within 6 months. There was no clear association between the occurrence (or not) of select TRAEs and RFS by landmark analysis or by Cox model analysis within treatment arms or comparing nivolumab to the ipilimumab comparator arm.

CONCLUSION

Results of this safety analysis of nivolumab in adjuvant melanoma were consistent with its established safety profile. In the discrete time intervals evaluated, most first-occurrence TRAEs occurred early during treatment and resolved. No association between RFS and select TRAEs was evident.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02388906.

Pan-cancer analysis of longitudinal metastatic tumors reveals genomic alterations and immune landscape dynamics associated with pembrolizumab sensitivity

Serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring is emerging as a non-invasive strategy to predict and monitor immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapeutic efficacy across cancer types. Yet, limited data exist to show the relationship between ctDNA dynamics and tumor genome and immune microenvironment in patients receiving ICB. Here, we present an in-depth analysis of clinical, whole-exome, transcriptome, and ctDNA profiles of 73 patients with advanced solid tumors, across 30 cancer types, from a phase II basket clinical trial of pembrolizumab (NCT02644369) and report changes in genomic and immune landscapes (primary outcomes). Patients stratified by ctDNA and tumor burden dynamics correspond with survival and clinical benefit. High mutation burden, high expression of immune signatures, and mutations in BRCA2 are associated with pembrolizumab molecular sensitivity, while abundant copy-number alterations and B2M loss-of-heterozygosity corresponded with resistance. Upon treatment, induction of genes expressed by T cell, B cell, and myeloid cell populations are consistent with sensitivity and resistance. We identified the upregulated expression of PLA2G2D, an immune-regulating phospholipase, as a potential biomarker of adaptive resistance to ICB. Together, these findings provide insights into the diversity of immunogenomic mechanisms that underpin pembrolizumab outcomes.

Abstract CT038: Kinetics of radiographic response for tebentafusp (tebe) in previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients (pts) achieving prolonged survival

Background: The phase 3 IMCgp100-202 trial (NCT03070392) (Study 202) in untreated mUM demonstrated improved overall survival (OS), HR=0.51, at the first pre-specified interim analysis. This OS benefit and the promising estimated 12-month OS rate of 62% observed in previously treated mUM pts on the phase 2 IMCgp100-102 trial (Study 102; NCT02570308) is not explained by RECIST responses alone. In this post hoc analysis of Study 102, we describe the tumor kinetics of pts with prolonged survival (OS ≥ 12 mo).

Methods: 127 pts with 2L+ mUM received single agent tebe during the expansion phase of Study 102, where treatment beyond RECIST progression was permitted. Analyses of baseline (BL) and on-treatment tumor measurements, best response and time to progression used in this analysis were adjudicated by an independent radiologic committee.

Results: With 19.5 mo median follow-up, 59% (75/127) of pts had OS ≥ 12 mo. Of these 75, a minority had RECIST partial response (PR: 8%; 6/75) and the rest had a best response of stable disease (SD: 57%; 43/75), progressive disease (PD: 33%; 25/75), or not evaluable (NE: 1%; 1/75). In contrast, among 41% (52/127) of pts with OS &lt; 12 mo, 27% (14/52) had SD, 67% (35/52) had PD, and 6% were NE (3/52) as best response. Pts with OS ≥ 12 mo were more likely to have a largest liver metastasis of &lt; 3 cm (43% vs 23%). There were no major differences in the use of prior immunotherapy between the two OS groups.

Most pts with OS ≥ 12 mo (59%; 44/75) had at least some reduction in the sum of target lesions, regardless of RECIST response. The majority of these 44 pts (64%; 28/44) had durable tumor reduction defined by PFS &gt; 6 mo. In contrast, among OS &lt; 12 mo pts, reduction in the sum of target lesions was infrequent (13%; 7/52), and none were durable.

Most pts with tumor growth as best change in target lesions had OS &lt;12 mo (58%; 38/65) compared to OS ≥ 12 mo (42%; 27/65). Among pts with tumor growth, the median BL tumor burden was lower and the rate of increase over time was slower for pts with OS ≥ 12 mo (BL: 59 mm, W8: 68 mm, W16: 68 mm) compared to pts with OS &lt; 12 mo (BL: 113 mm, W8: 129 mm, W16: 143 mm).

Interestingly, 42% (25/60) of pts with best response of PD had OS ≥ 12 mo including 4 pts with evidence of tumor shrinkage at 6 months or later. The reason for PD (new lesions or growth in index lesions) was comparable between both OS groups. More pts continued treatment beyond progression in the OS ≥ 12 (81%) compared to OS &lt; 12 mo (56%).

Conclusion: Analysis of tumor kinetics while on tebe, the first TCR bispecific to report an OS benefit in a solid tumor, suggests most pts with OS ≥ 12 mo are best described by a new type of immune-related response characterized by durable tumor reduction and slowing rate of tumor growth. RECIST responses therefore capture a minority of patients with OS ≥ 12 mo, while just under half of pts with RECIST PD still had promising OS.

Citation Format: Marcus O. Butler, Takami Sato, Richard D. Carvajal, Joseph J. Sacco, Shaad E. Abdullah, Chris Holland, Howard Goodall, Alexander N. Shoushtari. Kinetics of radiographic response for tebentafusp (tebe) in previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients (pts) achieving prolonged survival [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT038.

Abstract CT002: Phase 3 randomized trial comparing tebentafusp with investigator's choice in first line metastatic uveal melanoma

Background: Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) has a poor prognosis with a 1-yr OS rate of 52%. No systemic treatment has proven an OS benefit in randomized trials. Tebentafusp (tebe), a bispecific consisting of an affinity-enhanced T cell receptor (TCR) fused to an anti-CD3 effector that can redirect T cells to target gp100+ cells, has shown promising activity in previously treated mUM pts. Here, we report the primary analysis of overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat population (ITT) of a Ph3 trial of tebe vs. investigator's choice (IC) as first line (1L) therapy in pts with mUM [NCT03070392].

Materials and Methods: In this randomized, open-label, Ph3 trial, 1L HLA-A*02:01+ pts with mUM were randomized 2:1 to receive tebe or IC of pembrolizumab, ipilimumab or dacarbazine, stratified by LDH. The primary endpoint was OS, defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Dual primary objectives were to evaluate 1) OS in the ITT population by comparing all tebe-randomized pts to all IC-randomized pts; and 2) OS in tebentafusp-treated patients with rash during week 1 versus all IC-treated patients. Secondary endpoints included safety and RECIST-defined overall response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR). Here we present the OS in the ITT population. The study was unblinded by an independent data monitoring committee at the first pre-specified interim analysis. Investigator-reported radiographic-based endpoints were not mature at the first interim analysis. This analysis was conducted on the first interim analysis (data extracted Nov 2020).

Results: 378 pts were randomized to tebe (252) or IC, including pembrolizumab (103), ipilimumab (15) or dacarbazine (7). Tebe significantly prolonged OS compared to IC (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.36-0.71; P&lt;0.0001) in the ITT population, with estimated 1-yr OS rate of 73.2% (95% CI 66.3-78.9) vs 57.5% (95% CI 47.0-66.6), respectively. The OS benefit of tebe was observed in pre-specified subgroups, including by stratification variable of LDH&gt;ULN and versus pembrolizumab IC. Most common TRAEs were skin-related (gp100+ melanocytes) or cytokine-mediated (T cell activation) and included pyrexia, pruritus, and rash. These AEs decreased in frequency and severity after the first 3-4 doses and were generally manageable with standard interventions. In the tebe arm, the rate of treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs was low (&lt;4%), and there were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusions: In 1L treatment of mUM pts, tebe monotherapy significantly improved OS compared to IC; the first investigational therapy to improve OS in pts with mUM. Tebe had a predictable and manageable AE profile with a low rate of related discontinuation. Tebe is the first TCR therapeutic to demonstrate an OS benefit.

Citation Format: Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Jessica C. Hassel, Piotr Rutkowski, Jean-Francois Baurain, Marcus O. Butler, Max Schlaak, Ryan J. Sullivan, Sebastian Ochsenreither, Reinhard Dummer, John M. Kirkwood, Anthony M. Joshua, Joseph J. Sacco, Alexander N. Shoushtari, Marlana Orloff, Richard D. Carvajal, Omid Hamid, Shaad E. Abdullah, Chris Holland, Howard Goodall, Paul Nathan. Phase 3 randomized trial comparing tebentafusp with investigator's choice in first line metastatic uveal melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT002.

Abstract 517: Tebentafusp induces transient systemic inflammation and modifies the micro-environment to sensitize uveal melanoma tumors to cytotoxic CD8 cells

Background: Tebentafusp is a unique investigational TCR-anti-CD3 bispecific fusion protein that targets melanoma-expressed gp100 antigen and has shown monotherapy activity in advanced metastatic melanoma [1, 2, 3]. In a phase I/II trial (NCT02570308) that enrolled late stage metastatic uveal melanoma patients, we explored the effects of tebentafusp on serum cytokines and on the tumor and its micro-environment.

Methods: NCT02570308 was conducted in HLA-A*02:01+ patients with advanced uveal melanoma: This analysis focuses on patients who went through weekly dosing at Cycle 1, Day1 (C1D1, 20mcg) and C1D8 (30mcg), followed by a dose of 68mcg administered weekly at C1D15 onwards. Serum samples and tumor biopsies were taken pre-treatment and at multiple time points post-treatment, and were profiled as follows: a multiplex panel of 11 immune markers (Luminex) in sera from 124 patients; immunohistochemistry (IHC) and genome-wide transcriptional RNAseq analysis of up to 57 paired baseline and on-treatment biopsies at C1D16. Whole slide digital image analysis was used to calculate positive IHC cells per mm2 in the tumor.

Results: Tebentafusp caused transient immune activation as evidenced by significant increases in serum levels of IFNγ and IFNγ-inducible chemokines including CXCL9/10/11 reaching maximal changes at 8-24 hours after dosing (fold change FC: 8-10). Induction of the T cell cytokines IL-2 and IL-10 was accompanied by transient increases in the inflammatory cytokines IL-6, TNFα and the chemokine CCL2 (FC: 5-14).After 3 doses of tebentafusp, a significant increase in CD3 positive immune cells in the tumor was seen (p&lt;0.001; FC=3), particularly cytotoxic CD8+ cells, (p=0.002; FC=2). RNAseq analysis revealed significant induction of IFNα (FC=2) and IFNγ (FC=2) signatures. mRNAs known to be induced by IFNγ and implicated in response to anti-PD1/L1 were significantly increased: CXCL9/10/11, GZMB (FC=3-5). Expression of antigen presentation genes including HLA class 1, TAP1, 2 and PSMB8 was significantly induced (FC=2-3). Homeostasis mechanisms characterized by IDO1 and PD-L1 were induced (FC=4 and 2 respectively); however, low baseline FOXP3 expression levels were unchanged. These immune responses were accompanied by significant reductions in expression levels of tumor-specific melanoma markers gp100 and TYRP1 (30-40% reduction) and tumor proliferation genes including MKI67, BIRC5, CDK2 (20-30% reduction).

Conclusions: Tebentafusp caused transient increases in inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in serum and modified the micro-environment of metastatic uveal melanoma tumors to sensitize to cytotoxic CD8+ cells.[1] NCT01211262; ASCO 2019 [2] Clinical Cancer Research; 2020.[3] #195; ESMO IO; 2020

Citation Format: Marcus O. Butler, Sarah Stanhope, Revashnee Naidoo, Emma Leach, Sarnjeet Kaur, Laura Collins, Shaad Abdullah, Koustubh Ranade, Alexander N. Shoushtari. Tebentafusp induces transient systemic inflammation and modifies the micro-environment to sensitize uveal melanoma tumors to cytotoxic CD8 cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 517.