1
|
Goetz MP, Hamilton EP, Campone M, Hurvitz SA, Cortes J, Johnston S, Llombart-Cussac A, Kaufman PA, Toi M, Jerusalem G, Graham H, Wang H, Jansen VM, Litchfield LM, Martin M. Landscape of Baseline and Acquired Genomic Alterations in Circulating Tumor DNA with Abemaciclib Alone or with Endocrine Therapy in Advanced Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:2233-2244. [PMID: 37889120 PMCID: PMC11094424 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify potential predictors of response and resistance mechanisms in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor abemaciclib ± endocrine therapy (ET), baseline and acquired genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were analyzed and associated with clinical outcomes. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN MONARCH 3: postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC and no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting were randomly assigned to abemaciclib or placebo plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). nextMONARCH: women with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer that progressed on/after prior ET and chemotherapy were randomly assigned to abemaciclib alone (two doses) or plus tamoxifen. Baseline and end-of-treatment plasma samples from patients in MONARCH 3 and nextMONARCH (monotherapy arms) were analyzed to identify somatic genomic alterations. Association between genomic alterations and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was assessed. RESULTS Most patients had ≥1 genomic alteration detected in baseline ctDNA. In MONARCH 3, abemaciclib+NSAI was associated with improved mPFS versus placebo+NSAI, regardless of baseline alterations. ESR1 alterations were less frequently acquired in the abemaciclib+NSAI arm than placebo+NSAI. Acquired alterations potentially associated with resistance to abemaciclib ± NSAI included RB1 and MYC. CONCLUSIONS In MONARCH 3, certain baseline ctDNA genomic alterations were prognostic for ET but not predictive of abemaciclib response. Further studies are warranted to assess whether ctDNA alterations acquired during abemaciclib treatment differ from other CDK4/6 inhibitors. Findings are hypothesis generating; further exploration is warranted into mechanisms of resistance to abemaciclib and ET. See related commentary by Wander and Bardia, p. 2008.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erika P. Hamilton
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Tennessee Oncology PLCC, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Mario Campone
- Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Angers Cedex, France
| | | | - Javier Cortes
- Oncology Department, International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quiron Group, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hong Wang
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | | | - Miguel Martin
- Instiuto de Investigacion Santaria Gregorio Maranon, Universidad Complutense, CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Goetz MP, Toi M, Huober J, Sohn J, Trédan O, Park IH, Campone M, Chen SC, Manso LM, Paluch-Shimon S, Freedman OC, O'Shaughnessy J, Pivot X, Tolaney SM, Hurvitz S, Llombart-Cussac A, André V, Saha A, van Hal G, Shahir A, Iwata H, Johnston SRD. Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer: Final overall survival results of MONARCH 3. Ann Oncol 2024:S0923-7534(24)00139-X. [PMID: 38729566 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In MONARCH 2, the addition of abemaciclib to fulvestrant significantly improved both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) with disease progression on prior endocrine therapy (ET). In MONARCH 3, the addition of abemaciclib to a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) as initial therapy for HR+, HER2- ABC significantly improved PFS. Here, we present the prespecified final OS results for MONARCH 3. PATIENTS AND METHODS MONARCH 3 is a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of abemaciclib plus NSAI (anastrozole or letrozole) versus placebo plus NSAI in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC without prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. The primary objective was investigator-assessed PFS; OS was a gated secondary endpoint, and chemotherapy-free survival (CFS) was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS A total of 493 women were randomized 2:1 to receive abemaciclib plus NSAI (n = 328) or placebo plus NSAI (n = 165). After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, there were 198 OS events (60.4%) in the abemaciclib arm and 116 (70.3%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.804; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.637-1.015; P = 0.0664, non-significant). Median OS was 66.8 versus 53.7 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. In the subgroup with visceral disease (sVD), there were 113 OS events (65.3%) in the abemaciclib arm and 65 (72.2%) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.758; 95% CI, 0.558-1.030; P = 0.0757, non-significant). Median OS was 63.7 months versus 48.8 months for abemaciclib versus placebo. The previously demonstrated PFS benefit was sustained, and CFS numerically improved with the addition of abemaciclib. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION Abemaciclib combined with an NSAI resulted in clinically meaningful improvement in median OS (ITT: 13.1 months; sVD: 14.9 months) in patients with HR+ HER2- ABC; however, statistical significance was not reached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - M Toi
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - J Huober
- Breast Center Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Switzerland and University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - J Sohn
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - O Trédan
- Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - I H Park
- National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Korea
| | - M Campone
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France
| | - S-C Chen
- Chang Gung University Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - L M Manso
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Hadassah University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - X Pivot
- Centre Paul Strauss, INSERM 110, Strasbourg, France
| | - S M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - S Hurvitz
- Department of Medicine, UW Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - V André
- Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - A Saha
- Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - A Shahir
- Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - H Iwata
- Department of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - S R D Johnston
- Breast Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang X, Prodduturi N, Thompson KJ, Weinshilboum RM, O'Sullivan CC, Boughey JC, Tizhoosh H, Klee EW, Wang L, Goetz MP, Suman V, Kalari KR. OmicsFootPrint: a framework to integrate and interpret multi-omics data using circular images and deep neural networks. bioRxiv 2024:2024.03.21.586001. [PMID: 38585820 PMCID: PMC10996492 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.21.586001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
The OmicsFootPrint framework addresses the need for advanced multi-omics data analysis methodologies by transforming data into intuitive two-dimensional circular images and facilitating the interpretation of complex diseases. Utilizing Deep Neural Networks and incorporating the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm, the framework enhances model interpretability. Tested with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data, OmicsFootPrint effectively classified lung and breast cancer subtypes, achieving high Area Under Curve (AUC) scores - 0.98±0.02 for lung cancer subtype differentiation, 0.83±0.07 for breast cancer PAM50 subtypes, and successfully distinguishe between invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas in breast cancer, showcasing its robustness. It also demonstrated notable performance in predicting drug responses in cancer cell lines, with a median AUC of 0.74, surpassing existing algorithms. Furthermore, its effectiveness persists even with reduced training sample sizes. OmicsFootPrint marks an enhancement in multi-omics research, offering a novel, efficient, and interpretable approach that contributes to a deeper understanding of disease mechanisms.
Collapse
|
4
|
Goetz MP, Cicin I, Testa L, Tolaney SM, Huober J, Guarneri V, Johnston SRD, Martin M, Rastogi P, Harbeck N, Shahir A, Wei R, André V, Rugo HS, O'Shaughnessy J. Impact of dose reductions on adjuvant abemaciclib efficacy for patients with high-risk early breast cancer: analyses from the monarchE study. NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:34. [PMID: 38671001 PMCID: PMC11053007 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00639-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
In monarchE, adjuvant abemaciclib significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), with sustained benefit beyond the 2-year treatment period. Abemaciclib dose reductions were allowed to proactively manage adverse events. Exploratory analyses to investigate the impact of dose reductions on efficacy were conducted. Across the three patient subgroups as defined by relative dose intensity (≤66%, 66-93%, ≥93%), the estimated 4-year IDFS rates were generally consistent (87.1%, 86.4%, and 83.7%, respectively). In the time-dependent Cox proportional hazard model, the effect of abemaciclib was consistent at the full dose compared to being reduced to a lower dose (IDFS hazard ratio: 0.905; 95% confidence interval: 0.727, 1.125; DRFS hazard ratio: 0.942; 95% confidence interval: 0.742, 1.195). These analyses showed that the efficacy of adjuvant abemaciclib was not compromised by protocol mandated dose reductions for patients with node positive, hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative, high-risk early breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Irfan Cicin
- Istinye University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Laura Testa
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Jens Huober
- Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Breast Centre St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Miguel Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, CIBERONC, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Priya Rastogi
- University of Pittsburgh/UPMC, NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Centre, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Centre München, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ran Wei
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Hope S Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Hellen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joyce O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mutter RW, Chauhan C, Goetz MP, Wright JL. Revisiting Combined Modality Therapy in Older Patients With Luminal Breast Cancer Through the Patient Lens. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2302289. [PMID: 38564696 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Jean L Wright
- Department of Radiation Oncology, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leon-Ferre RA, Jonas SF, Salgado R, Loi S, de Jong V, Carter JM, Nielsen TO, Leung S, Riaz N, Chia S, Jules-Clément G, Curigliano G, Criscitiello C, Cockenpot V, Lambertini M, Suman VJ, Linderholm B, Martens JWM, van Deurzen CHM, Timmermans AM, Shimoi T, Yazaki S, Yoshida M, Kim SB, Lee HJ, Dieci MV, Bataillon G, Vincent-Salomon A, André F, Kok M, Linn SC, Goetz MP, Michiels S. Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. JAMA 2024; 331:1135-1144. [PMID: 38563834 PMCID: PMC10988354 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.3056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Importance The association of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) abundance in breast cancer tissue with cancer recurrence and death in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who are not treated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. Objective To study the association of TIL abundance in breast cancer tissue with survival among patients with early-stage TNBC who were treated with locoregional therapy but no chemotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective pooled analysis of individual patient-level data from 13 participating centers in North America (Rochester, Minnesota; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada), Europe (Paris, Lyon, and Villejuif, France; Amsterdam and Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Milan, Padova, and Genova, Italy; Gothenburg, Sweden), and Asia (Tokyo, Japan; Seoul, Korea), including 1966 participants diagnosed with TNBC between 1979 and 2017 (with follow-up until September 27, 2021) who received treatment with surgery with or without radiotherapy but no adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Exposure TIL abundance in breast tissue from resected primary tumors. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was invasive disease-free survival [iDFS]. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free survival [RFS], survival free of distant recurrence [distant RFS, DRFS], and overall survival. Associations were assessed using a multivariable Cox model stratified by participating center. Results This study included 1966 patients with TNBC (median age, 56 years [IQR, 39-71]; 55% had stage I TNBC). The median TIL level was 15% (IQR, 5%-40%). Four-hundred seventeen (21%) had a TIL level of 50% or more (median age, 41 years [IQR, 36-63]), and 1300 (66%) had a TIL level of less than 30% (median age, 59 years [IQR, 41-72]). Five-year DRFS for stage I TNBC was 94% (95% CI, 91%-96%) for patients with a TIL level of 50% or more, compared with 78% (95% CI, 75%-80%) for those with a TIL level of less than 30%; 5-year overall survival was 95% (95% CI, 92%-97%) for patients with a TIL level of 50% or more, compared with 82% (95% CI, 79%-84%) for those with a TIL level of less than 30%. At a median follow-up of 18 years, and after adjusting for age, tumor size, nodal status, histological grade, and receipt of radiotherapy, each 10% higher TIL increment was associated independently with improved iDFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [0.89-0.94]), RFS (HR, 0.90 [0.87-0.92]), DRFS (HR, 0.87 [0.84-0.90]), and overall survival (0.88 [0.85-0.91]) (likelihood ratio test, P < 10e-6). Conclusions and Relevance In patients with early-stage TNBC who did not undergo adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast cancer tissue with a higher abundance of TIL levels was associated with significantly better survival. These results suggest that breast tissue TIL abundance is a prognostic factor for patients with early-stage TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah Flora Jonas
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Roberto Salgado
- GZA-ZNA-Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vincent de Jong
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jodi M. Carter
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Samuel Leung
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nazia Riaz
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stephen Chia
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gérôme Jules-Clément
- Bioinformatics Core Facility, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm US23, CNRS UMS 3655, Villejuif, France
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Vera J. Suman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Barbro Linderholm
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, and Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | - Shu Yazaki
- National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Sung-Bae Kim
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Jin Lee
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV—IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | | | - Fabrice André
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Marleen Kok
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine C. Linn
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leon-Ferre RA, Carter JM, Zahrieh D, Sinnwell JP, Salgado R, Suman VJ, Hillman DW, Boughey JC, Kalari KR, Couch FJ, Ingle JN, Balkenhol M, Ciompi F, van der Laak J, Goetz MP. Automated mitotic spindle hotspot counts are highly associated with clinical outcomes in systemically untreated early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:25. [PMID: 38553444 PMCID: PMC10980681 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00629-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Operable triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a higher risk of recurrence and death compared to other subtypes. Tumor size and nodal status are the primary clinical factors used to guide systemic treatment, while biomarkers of proliferation have not demonstrated value. Recent studies suggest that subsets of TNBC have a favorable prognosis, even without systemic therapy. We evaluated the association of fully automated mitotic spindle hotspot (AMSH) counts with recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in two separate cohorts of patients with early-stage TNBC who did not receive systemic therapy. AMSH counts were obtained from areas with the highest mitotic density in digitized whole slide images processed with a convolutional neural network trained to detect mitoses. In 140 patients from the Mayo Clinic TNBC cohort, AMSH counts were significantly associated with RFS and OS in a multivariable model controlling for nodal status, tumor size, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (p < 0.0001). For every 10-point increase in AMSH counts, there was a 16% increase in the risk of an RFS event (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.25), and a 7% increase in the risk of death (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.14). We corroborated these findings in a separate cohort of systemically untreated TNBC patients from Radboud UMC in the Netherlands. Our findings suggest that AMSH counts offer valuable prognostic information in patients with early-stage TNBC who did not receive systemic therapy, independent of tumor size, nodal status, and TILs. If further validated, AMSH counts could help inform future systemic therapy de-escalation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Roberto Salgado
- GZA-ZNA-Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rastogi P, O'Shaughnessy J, Martin M, Boyle F, Cortes J, Rugo HS, Goetz MP, Hamilton EP, Huang CS, Senkus E, Tryakin A, Cicin I, Testa L, Neven P, Huober J, Shao Z, Wei R, André V, Munoz M, San Antonio B, Shahir A, Harbeck N, Johnston S. Adjuvant Abemaciclib Plus Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative, High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: Results From a Preplanned monarchE Overall Survival Interim Analysis, Including 5-Year Efficacy Outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:987-993. [PMID: 38194616 PMCID: PMC10950161 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Two years of adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) resulted in a significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) that persisted beyond the 2-year treatment period in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). Here, we report 5-year efficacy results from a prespecified overall survival (OS) interim analysis. In the intent-to-treat population, with a median follow-up of 54 months, the benefit of abemaciclib was sustained with hazard ratios of 0.680 (95% CI, 0.599 to 0.772) for IDFS and 0.675 (95% CI, 0.588 to 0.774) for DRFS. This persistence of abemaciclib benefit translated to continuous separation of the curves with a deepening in 5-year absolute improvement in IDFS and DRFS rates of 7.6% and 6.7%, respectively, compared with rates of 6% and 5.3% at 4 years and 4.8% and 4.1% at 3 years. With fewer deaths in the abemaciclib plus ET arm compared with the ET-alone arm (208 v 234), statistical significance was not reached for OS. No new safety signals were observed. In conclusion, abemaciclib plus ET continued to reduce the risk of developing invasive and distant disease recurrence beyond the completion of treatment. The increasing absolute improvement at 5 years is consistent with a carryover effect and further supports the use of abemaciclib in patients with high-risk EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Rastogi
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Miguel Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, CIBERONC, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Frances Boyle
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Javier Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hope S. Rugo
- USCF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Alexey Tryakin
- N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | | | - Laura Testa
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Jens Huober
- Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Zhimin Shao
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ran Wei
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | | | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre München, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moldoveanu D, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Schulze AK, Goetz MP, Boughey JC. Nodal pCR and overall survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for node positive ER+/Her2- breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 203:419-428. [PMID: 37878154 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07152-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in node-positive (N+) ER+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) is debated, given low total pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. However, the rate and impact of nodal pCR is unknown. We sought to evaluate nodal pCR rates and the impact on overall survival (OS). Further, we sought to validate the association between nodal pCR with age and Ki67. METHODS We queried the National Cancer Database for cN + ER+/HER2- BC patients treated with NAC and surgery. Data from 2010 to 2018 were used to evaluate nodal pCR and OS, with multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling for OS, as well as Ki67 for the years 2018-2019. RESULTS From 2010 to 2018, we identified 19,611 cN + ER+/HER2- BC patients treated with NAC. While total pCR occurred in only 7.4%, nodal pCR rates were nearly double (14.3%). Nodal pCR (+/- breast pCR) was seen in 21.7% and associated with 5-year OS rate of 86.1% (95% CI: 84.9-87.4%) versus 77.1% (95% CI: 76.3-77.9%) in patients without nodal pCR (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, nodal pCR had better OS (adjusted HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.52-0.63, p < 0.001) across all age groups. Of 2,444 patients with available Ki67, those with age < 50 and Ki67 ≥ 20% had the highest nodal pCR at 31.6%. CONCLUSION In cN + ER+/HER2- BC treated with NAC, nodal pCR is common, associated with age and Ki67, and prognostic for OS. These data strongly suggest that for cN + patients, eradication of nodal disease is critical for OS, and total pCR may not be the optimal measure of NAC benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Moldoveanu
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences , Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Courtney N Day
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences , Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy K Schulze
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alkhatib H, Conage-Pough J, Roy Chowdhury S, Shian D, Zaid D, Rubinstein AM, Sonnenblick A, Peretz-Yablonsky T, Granit A, Carmon E, Kohale IN, Boughey JC, Goetz MP, Wang L, White FM, Kravchenko-Balasha N. Patient-specific signaling signatures predict optimal therapeutic combinations for triple negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer 2024; 23:17. [PMID: 38229082 PMCID: PMC10790458 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-023-01921-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous group of tumors which lack estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression. Targeted therapies have limited success in treating TNBC, thus a strategy enabling effective targeted combinations is an unmet need. To tackle these challenges and discover individualized targeted combination therapies for TNBC, we integrated phosphoproteomic analysis of altered signaling networks with patient-specific signaling signature (PaSSS) analysis using an information-theoretic, thermodynamic-based approach. Using this method on a large number of TNBC patient-derived tumors (PDX), we were able to thoroughly characterize each PDX by computing a patient-specific set of unbalanced signaling processes and assigning a personalized therapy based on them. We discovered that each tumor has an average of two separate processes, and that, consistent with prior research, EGFR is a major core target in at least one of them in half of the tumors analyzed. However, anti-EGFR monotherapies were predicted to be ineffective, thus we developed personalized combination treatments based on PaSSS. These were predicted to induce anti-EGFR responses or to be used to develop an alternative therapy if EGFR was not present.In-vivo experimental validation of the predicted therapy showed that PaSSS predictions were more accurate than other therapies. Thus, we suggest that a detailed identification of molecular imbalances is necessary to tailor therapy for each TNBC. In summary, we propose a new strategy to design personalized therapy for TNBC using pY proteomics and PaSSS analysis. This method can be applied to different cancer types to improve response to the biomarker-based treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heba Alkhatib
- The Institute of Biomedical and Oral Research, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9103401, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Jason Conage-Pough
- Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - Sangita Roy Chowdhury
- The Institute of Biomedical and Oral Research, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9103401, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Denen Shian
- The Institute of Biomedical and Oral Research, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9103401, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Deema Zaid
- The Institute of Biomedical and Oral Research, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9103401, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ariel M Rubinstein
- The Institute of Biomedical and Oral Research, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9103401, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Amir Sonnenblick
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tamar Peretz-Yablonsky
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Center, 9103401, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Avital Granit
- Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Center, 9103401, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Einat Carmon
- Department of Surgery, Samson Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel
| | - Ishwar N Kohale
- Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - Judy C Boughey
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Liewei Wang
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Forest M White
- Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
- Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
| | - Nataly Kravchenko-Balasha
- The Institute of Biomedical and Oral Research, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9103401, Jerusalem, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Braune EB, Geist F, Tang X, Kalari K, Boughey J, Wang L, Leon-Ferre RA, D'Assoro AB, Ingle JN, Goetz MP, Kreis J, Wang K, Foukakis T, Seshire A, Wienke D, Lendahl U. Identification of a Notch transcriptomic signature for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2024; 26:4. [PMID: 38172915 PMCID: PMC10765899 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01757-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dysregulated Notch signalling contributes to breast cancer development and progression, but validated tools to measure the level of Notch signalling in breast cancer subtypes and in response to systemic therapy are largely lacking. A transcriptomic signature of Notch signalling would be warranted, for example to monitor the effects of future Notch-targeting therapies and to learn whether altered Notch signalling is an off-target effect of current breast cancer therapies. In this report, we have established such a classifier. METHODS To generate the signature, we first identified Notch-regulated genes from six basal-like breast cancer cell lines subjected to elevated or reduced Notch signalling by culturing on immobilized Notch ligand Jagged1 or blockade of Notch by γ-secretase inhibitors, respectively. From this cadre of Notch-regulated genes, we developed candidate transcriptomic signatures that were trained on a breast cancer patient dataset (the TCGA-BRCA cohort) and a broader breast cancer cell line cohort and sought to validate in independent datasets. RESULTS An optimal 20-gene transcriptomic signature was selected. We validated the signature on two independent patient datasets (METABRIC and Oslo2), and it showed an improved coherence score and tumour specificity compared with previously published signatures. Furthermore, the signature score was particularly high for basal-like breast cancer, indicating an enhanced level of Notch signalling in this subtype. The signature score was increased after neoadjuvant treatment in the PROMIX and BEAUTY patient cohorts, and a lower signature score generally correlated with better clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS The 20-gene transcriptional signature will be a valuable tool to evaluate the response of future Notch-targeting therapies for breast cancer, to learn about potential effects on Notch signalling from conventional breast cancer therapies and to better stratify patients for therapy considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eike-Benjamin Braune
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Xiaojia Tang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Krishna Kalari
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Judy Boughey
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Liewei Wang
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - James N Ingle
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Kang Wang
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Theodoros Foukakis
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | - Urban Lendahl
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jayaraman S, Wu X, Kalari KR, Tang X, Kuffel MJ, Bruinsma ES, Jalali S, Peterson KL, Correia C, Kudgus RA, Kaufmann SH, Renuse S, Ingle JN, Reid JM, Ames MM, Fields AP, Schellenberg MJ, Hawse JR, Pandey A, Goetz MP. Endoxifen downregulates AKT phosphorylation through protein kinase C beta 1 inhibition in ERα+ breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:101. [PMID: 38114522 PMCID: PMC10730845 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00606-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoxifen, a secondary tamoxifen metabolite, is a potent antiestrogen exhibiting estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) binding at nanomolar concentrations. Phase I/II clinical trials identified clinical activity of Z-endoxifen (ENDX), in endocrine-refractory metastatic breast cancer as well as ERα+ solid tumors, raising the possibility that ENDX may have a second, ERα-independent, mechanism of action. An unbiased mass spectrometry approach revealed that ENDX concentrations achieved clinically with direct ENDX administration (5 µM), but not low concentrations observed during tamoxifen treatment (<0.1 µM), profoundly altered the phosphoproteome of the aromatase expressing MCF7AC1 cells with limited impact on the total proteome. Computational analysis revealed protein kinase C beta (PKCβ) and protein kinase B alpha or AKT1 as potential kinases responsible for mediating ENDX effects on protein phosphorylation. ENDX more potently inhibited PKCβ1 kinase activity compared to other PKC isoforms, and ENDX binding to PKCβ1 was confirmed using Surface Plasma Resonance. Under conditions that activated PKC/AKT signaling, ENDX induced PKCβ1 degradation, attenuated PKCβ1-activated AKTSer473 phosphorylation, diminished AKT substrate phosphorylation, and induced apoptosis. ENDX's effects on AKT were phenocopied by siRNA-mediated PKCβ1 knockdown or treatment with the pan-AKT inhibitor, MK-2206, while overexpression of constitutively active AKT diminished ENDX-induced apoptosis. These findings, which identify PKCβ1 as an ENDX target, indicate that PKCβ1/ENDX interactions suppress AKT signaling and induce apoptosis in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xinyan Wu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Krishna R Kalari
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Xiaojia Tang
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Mary J Kuffel
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Elizabeth S Bruinsma
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Shahrzad Jalali
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | | - Cristina Correia
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Rachel A Kudgus
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Scott H Kaufmann
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Santosh Renuse
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - James N Ingle
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Joel M Reid
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Matthew M Ames
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Alan P Fields
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Matthew J Schellenberg
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - John R Hawse
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Akhilesh Pandey
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Goetz MP, Bagegni NA, Batist G, Brufsky A, Cristofanilli MA, Damodaran S, Daniel BR, Fleming GF, Gradishar WJ, Graff SL, Grosse Perdekamp MT, Hamilton E, Lavasani S, Moreno-Aspitia A, O'Connor T, Pluard TJ, Rugo HS, Sammons SL, Schwartzberg LS, Stover DG, Vidal GA, Wang G, Warner E, Yerushalmi R, Plourde PV, Portman DJ, Gal-Yam EN. Lasofoxifene versus fulvestrant for ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with an ESR1 mutation: results from the randomized, phase II ELAINE 1 trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:1141-1151. [PMID: 38072514 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquired estrogen receptor alpha (ER/ESR1) mutations commonly cause endocrine resistance in ER+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Lasofoxifene, a novel selective ER modulator, stabilizes an antagonist conformation of wild-type and ESR1-mutated ER-ligand binding domains, and has antitumor activity in ESR1-mutated xenografts. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this open-label, randomized, phase II, multicenter, ELAINE 1 study (NCT03781063), we randomized women with ESR1-mutated, ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) mBC that had progressed on an aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) to oral lasofoxifene 5 mg daily or IM fulvestrant 500 mg (days 1, 15, and 29, and then every 4 weeks) until disease progression/toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were safety/tolerability. RESULTS A total of 103 patients received lasofoxifene (n = 52) or fulvestrant (n = 51). The most current efficacy analysis showed that lasofoxifene did not significantly prolong median PFS compared with fulvestrant: 24.2 weeks (∼5.6 months) versus 16.2 weeks (∼3.7 months; P = 0.138); hazard ratio 0.699 (95% confidence interval 0.434-1.125). However, PFS and other clinical endpoints numerically favored lasofoxifene: clinical benefit rate (36.5% versus 21.6%; P = 0.117), objective response rate [13.2% (including a complete response in one lasofoxifene-treated patient) versus 2.9%; P = 0.124], and 6-month (53.4% versus 37.9%) and 12-month (30.7% versus 14.1%) PFS rates. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events with lasofoxifene were nausea, fatigue, arthralgia, and hot flushes. One death occurred in the fulvestrant arm. Circulating tumor DNA ESR1 mutant allele fraction (MAF) decreased from baseline to week 8 in 82.9% of evaluable lasofoxifene-treated versus 61.5% of fulvestrant-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS Lasofoxifene demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity versus fulvestrant and was well tolerated in patients with ESR1-mutated, endocrine-resistant mBC following progression on AI plus CDK4/6i. Consistent with target engagement, lasofoxifene reduced ESR1 MAF, and to a greater extent than fulvestrant. Lasofoxifene may be a promising targeted treatment for patients with ESR1-mutated mBC and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester.
| | - N A Bagegni
- Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - G Batist
- Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - A Brufsky
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Magee Women's Hospital, Pittsburgh
| | - M A Cristofanilli
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York
| | - S Damodaran
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Houston
| | | | - G F Fleming
- The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago
| | - W J Gradishar
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago
| | - S L Graff
- Lifespan Cancer Institute/Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence
| | | | - E Hamilton
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville
| | - S Lavasani
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, UC Irvine, Orange
| | | | - T O'Connor
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Buffalo
| | - T J Pluard
- Saint Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City
| | - H S Rugo
- Department of Medicine (Hematology/Oncology), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - S L Sammons
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | | | - D G Stover
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - G A Vidal
- Breast Oncology Division, West Cancer Center, Memphis
| | - G Wang
- Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health, Miami, USA
| | - E Warner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - R Yerushalmi
- Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | - E N Gal-Yam
- Breast Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Damodaran S, O'Sullivan CC, Elkhanany A, Anderson IC, Barve M, Blau S, Cherian MA, Peguero JA, Goetz MP, Plourde PV, Portman DJ, Moore HCF. Open-label, phase II, multicenter study of lasofoxifene plus abemaciclib for treating women with metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer and an ESR1 mutation after disease progression on prior therapies: ELAINE 2. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:1131-1140. [PMID: 38072513 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquired ESR1 mutations in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) drive treatment resistance and tumor progression; new treatment strategies are needed. Lasofoxifene, a next-generation, oral, endocrine therapy and tissue-specific ER antagonist, provided preclinical antitumor activity, alone or combined with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in ESR1-mutated mBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the open-label, phase II, ELAINE 2 trial (NCT04432454), women with ESR1-mutated, ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) mBC who progressed on prior therapies (including CDK4/6i) received lasofoxifene 5 mg/day and abemaciclib 150 mg b.i.d until disease progression/toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS Twenty-nine women (median age 60 years) participated; all but one were previously treated with a CDK4/6i (median duration 2 years). The lasofoxifene-abemaciclib combination was well tolerated with primarily grade 1/2 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most commonly diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and vomiting. One patient (with no prior CDK4/6i) discontinued treatment due to grade 2 diarrhea. No deaths occurred during the study. Median PFS was 56.0 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI) 31.9 weeks-not estimable; ∼13 months]; PFS rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were 76.1%, 56.1%, and 38.8%, respectively. CBR at 24 weeks was 65.5% (95% CI 47.3% to 80.1%). In 18 patients with measurable lesions, ORR was 55.6% (95% CI 33.7% to 75.4%). ESR1-mutant circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) allele fraction decreased from baseline to week 4 in 21/26 (80.8%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Lasofoxifene plus abemaciclib had an acceptable safety profile, was well tolerated, and exhibited meaningful antitumor activity in women with ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2- mBC after disease progression on prior CDK4/6i. Observed decreases in ESR1-mutant ctDNA with lasofoxifene concordant with clinical response suggest target engagement. If the ELAINE 2 findings are confirmed in the initiated, phase III, ELAINE 3 trial, these data could be practice-changing and help address a critical unmet need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Damodaran
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
| | | | - A Elkhanany
- Baylor College of Medicine, Duncan Cancer Center - Breast, Houston
| | | | - M Barve
- Mary Crowley Cancer Research, Dallas
| | - S Blau
- Oncology Division, Northwest Medical Specialties, PPLC, Puyallup
| | - M A Cherian
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus
| | - J A Peguero
- Department of Research, Oncology Consultants PA, Houston
| | - M P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester
| | | | | | - H C F Moore
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lenz L, Neff C, Solimeno C, Cogan ES, Abramson VG, Boughey JC, Falkson C, Goetz MP, Ford JM, Gradishar WJ, Jankowitz RC, Kaklamani VG, Marcom PK, Richardson AL, Storniolo AM, Tung NM, Vinayak S, Hodgson DR, Lai Z, Dearden S, Hennessy BT, Mayer EL, Mills GB, Slavin TP, Gutin A, Connolly RM, Telli ML, Stearns V, Lanchbury JS, Timms KM. Identifying homologous recombination deficiency in breast cancer: genomic instability score distributions differ among breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 202:191-201. [PMID: 37589839 PMCID: PMC10504389 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07046-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A 3-biomarker homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score is a key component of a currently FDA-approved companion diagnostic assay to identify HRD in patients with ovarian cancer using a threshold score of ≥ 42, though recent studies have explored the utility of a lower threshold (GIS ≥ 33). The present study evaluated whether the ovarian cancer thresholds may also be appropriate for major breast cancer subtypes by comparing the genomic instability score (GIS) distributions of BRCA1/2-deficient estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (ER + BC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to the GIS distribution of BRCA1/2-deficient ovarian cancer. METHODS Ovarian cancer and breast cancer (ER + BC and TNBC) tumors from ten study cohorts were sequenced to identify pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, and GIS was calculated using a previously described algorithm. Pathologic complete response (pCR) to platinum therapy was evaluated in a subset of TNBC samples. For TNBC, a threshold was set and threshold validity was assessed relative to clinical outcomes. RESULTS A total of 560 ovarian cancer, 805 ER + BC, and 443 TNBC tumors were included. Compared to ovarian cancer, the GIS distribution of BRCA1/2-deficient samples was shifted lower for ER + BC (p = 0.015), but not TNBC (p = 0.35). In the subset of TNBC samples, univariable logistic regression models revealed that GIS status using thresholds of ≥ 42 and ≥ 33 were significant predictors of response to platinum therapy. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that the GIS thresholds used for ovarian cancer may also be appropriate for TNBC, but not ER + BC. GIS thresholds in TNBC were validated using clinical response data to platinum therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Lenz
- Myriad Genetics, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Chris Neff
- Myriad Genetics, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Cara Solimeno
- Myriad Genetics, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Elizabeth S Cogan
- Myriad Genetics, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | | | | | - Carla Falkson
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - James M Ford
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Andrea L Richardson
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anna Maria Storniolo
- Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Nadine M Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shaveta Vinayak
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 15. AstraZeneca, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Erica L Mayer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Thomas P Slavin
- Myriad Genetics, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Alexander Gutin
- Myriad Genetics, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | | | | | - Vered Stearns
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jerry S Lanchbury
- Myriad Genetics, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Kirsten M Timms
- Myriad Genetics, Inc, 320 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Moldoveanu D, Goetz MP, Boughey JC. ASO Author Reflections: Low Estrogen Receptor (ER) Expression Breast Cancer Behaves More like ER Negative Disease and Influences Management. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6484-6485. [PMID: 37488395 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13985-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Moldoveanu
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Moldoveanu D, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Schulze AK, Goetz MP, Boughey JC. Clinical Behavior, Management, and Treatment Response of Estrogen Receptor Low (1-10%) Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6475-6483. [PMID: 37460743 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13846-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) guide management and impact outcomes of breast cancer (BC). This study compares ER-low (1-10%) with ER-negative (< 1%) and ER-positive (>10%) BC and investigates the significance of PR expression within ER-low disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients with HER2-negative invasive BC were identified from the National Cancer Database 2018-2019. Treatment and outcomes were compared using chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Of 232,762 patients, ER expression was: negative (13.8%), low (2.0%), and > 10% (84.2%). Chemotherapy was given in 83.9% of ER- disease, 82.4% of ER-low/PR- disease, 58.9% of ER-low/PR+ disease, and only in 22.9% of ER+ disease. Within the ER-low subgroup, adjuvant endocrine therapy, recurrence score, and Ki67 varied by PR status (all < 0.01). Patients with ER-low disease selected for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were younger and had higher T and N category, tumor grade, and Ki67. With NAC, pathological complete response (pCR) rates were similar between ER-low/PR- and ER-low/PR+ (39.5% and 38.1%, respectively, p = 0.67), and were closer to the ER- group (39.7%) than the ER+ group (8.4%). On multivariable analysis, the adjusted effect of ER status (1-10% versus > 10%) on chemotherapy administration was odds ratio (OR) 8.2 (95% CI 7.3-9.2, p < 0.001) for PR-negative, and OR 3.3 (95% CI 7.3-9.2, p < 0.001) for PR-positive. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that the tumor features and clinical management of ER-low tumors vary significantly by PR expression. Within ER-low tumors, PR- tumors more closely resemble ER- BC, while PR+ tumors exhibit less aggressive characteristics. In ER-low disease selected for treatment with NAC, response is similar to ER- regardless of PR status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Moldoveanu
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Courtney N Day
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy K Schulze
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moldoveanu D, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Schulze AK, Goetz MP, Boughey JC. ASO Visual Abstract: Clinical Behavior, Management, and Treatment Response of Estrogen Receptor-Low (1-10%) Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6486-6487. [PMID: 37516725 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13998-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Moldoveanu
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Courtney N Day
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy K Schulze
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Veeraraghavan J, Gutierrez C, De Angelis C, Davis R, Wang T, Pascual T, Selenica P, Sanchez K, Nitta H, Kapadia M, Pavlick AC, Galvan P, Rexer B, Forero-Torres A, Nanda R, Storniolo AM, Krop IE, Goetz MP, Nangia JR, Wolff AC, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS, Hilsenbeck SG, Prat A, Osborne CK, Schiff R, Rimawi MF. A Multiparameter Molecular Classifier to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Lapatinib plus Trastuzumab without Chemotherapy in HER2+ Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3101-3109. [PMID: 37195235 PMCID: PMC10923553 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-3753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical trials reported 25% to 30% pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in HER2+ patients with breast cancer treated with anti-HER2 therapies without chemotherapy. We hypothesize that a multiparameter classifier can identify patients with HER2-"addicted" tumors who may benefit from a chemotherapy-sparing strategy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Baseline HER2+ breast cancer specimens from the TBCRC023 and PAMELA trials, which included neoadjuvant treatment with lapatinib and trastuzumab, were used. In the case of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumors, endocrine therapy was also administered. HER2 protein and gene amplification (ratio), HER2-enriched (HER2-E), and PIK3CA mutation status were assessed by dual gene protein assay (GPA), research-based PAM50, and targeted DNA-sequencing. GPA cutoffs and classifier of response were constructed in TBCRC023 using a decision tree algorithm, then validated in PAMELA. RESULTS In TBCRC023, 72 breast cancer specimens had GPA, PAM50, and sequencing data, of which 15 had pCR. Recursive partitioning identified cutoffs of HER2 ratio ≥ 4.6 and %3+ IHC staining ≥ 97.5%. With PAM50 and sequencing data, the model added HER2-E and PIK3CA wild-type (WT). For clinical implementation, the classifier was locked as HER2 ratio ≥ 4.5, %3+ IHC staining ≥ 90%, and PIK3CA-WT and HER2-E, yielding 55% and 94% positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, respectively. Independent validation using 44 PAMELA cases with all three biomarkers yielded 47% PPV and 82% NPV. Importantly, our classifier's high NPV signifies its strength in accurately identifying patients who may not be good candidates for treatment deescalation. CONCLUSIONS Our multiparameter classifier differentially identifies patients who may benefit from HER2-targeted therapy alone from those who need chemotherapy and predicts pCR to anti-HER2 therapy alone comparable with chemotherapy plus dual anti-HER2 therapy in unselected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamunarani Veeraraghavan
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carolina Gutierrez
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carmine De Angelis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert Davis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tao Wang
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tomas Pascual
- Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- SOLTI Cancer Research Group
| | - Pier Selenica
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine Sanchez
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Anne C. Pavlick
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ian E. Krop
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Julie R. Nangia
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jorge S. Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Susan G. Hilsenbeck
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - C. Kent Osborne
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rachel Schiff
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mothaffar F. Rimawi
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schwartz GN, Kaufman PA, Giridhar KV, Marotti JD, Chamberlin MD, Arrick BA, Makari-Judson G, Goetz MP, Soucy SM, Kolling F, Demidenko E, Miller TW. Alternating 17β-Estradiol and Aromatase Inhibitor Therapies Is Efficacious in Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Endocrine-Resistant ER+ Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:2767-2773. [PMID: 37260292 PMCID: PMC10688025 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Strategies to implement estrogen therapy for advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer are underdeveloped. Preclinical data suggest that cycling treatment with 17β-estradiol followed by estrogen deprivation can control tumor growth long-term. PATIENTS AND METHODS Postmenopausal women with advanced ER+/HER2- breast cancer with recurrence or progression on ≥ 1 antiestrogen or aromatase inhibitor (AI)-based therapy were eligible. Patients received 17β-estradiol (2 mg orally, three times a day) for 8 weeks followed by AI (physician's choice) for 16 weeks, alternating treatments on an 8-week/16-week schedule until disease progression. Patients then optionally received continuous single-agent treatment until a second instance of disease progression. Endpoints included 24-week clinical benefit and objective response per RECIST, and tumor genetic alterations. RESULTS Of 19 evaluable patients, clinical benefit rate was 42.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 23.1%-63.9%] and objective response rate (ORR) was 15.8% (95% CI, 5.7%-37.9%). One patient experienced a grade 3 adverse event related to 17β-estradiol. Among patients who received continuous single-agent treatment until a second instance of disease progression, clinical benefit was observed in 5 of 12 (41.7%) cases. Tumor ER (ESR1) mutations were found by whole-exome profiling in 4 of 7 (57.1%) versus 2 of 9 (22.2%) patients who did versus did not experience clinical benefit from alternating 17β-estradiol/AI therapy. The only two patients to experience objective responses to initial 17β-estradiol had tumor ESR1 mutations. CONCLUSIONS Alternating 17β-estradiol/AI therapy may be a promising treatment for endocrine-refractory ER+ breast cancer, including following progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors or everolimus. Further study is warranted to determine whether the antitumor activity of 17β-estradiol differs according to ESR1 mutation status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary N. Schwartz
- Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Peter A. Kaufman
- Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | | - Jonathan D. Marotti
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Mary D. Chamberlin
- Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Bradley A. Arrick
- Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Grace Makari-Judson
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew P. Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Shannon M. Soucy
- Center for Quantitative Biology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Fred Kolling
- Center for Quantitative Biology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Eugene Demidenko
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Todd W. Miller
- Department of Molecular & Systems Biology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Joshi U, Budhathoki P, Gaire S, Yadav SK, Shah A, Adhikari A, Choong G, Couzi R, Giridhar KV, Leon-Ferre RA, Boughey JC, Hieken TJ, Mutter R, Ruddy KJ, Haddad TC, Goetz MP, Couch FJ, Yadav S. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in triple-negative invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 200:217-224. [PMID: 37210429 PMCID: PMC10782581 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06959-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Triple-negative invasive lobular carcinoma (TN-ILC) of breast cancer is a rare disease and the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors are not well-defined. METHODS Women with stage I-III TN-ILC or triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma (TN-IDC) of the breast undergoing mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery between 2010 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database were included. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were used to compare overall survival (OS) and evaluate prognostic factors. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the factors associated with pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS The median age at diagnosis for women with TN-ILC was 67 years compared to 58 years in TN-IDC (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the OS between TN-ILC and TN-IDC in multivariate analysis (HR 0.96, p = 0.44). Black race and higher TNM stage were associated with worse OS, whereas receipt of chemotherapy or radiation was associated with better OS in TN-ILC. Among women with TN-ILC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the 5-year OS was 77.3% in women with a complete pathological response (pCR) compared to 39.8% in women without any response. The odds of achieving pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly lower in women with TN-ILC compared to TN-IDC (OR 0.53, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Women with TN-ILC are older at diagnosis but have similar OS compared to TN-IDC after adjusting for tumor and demographic characteristics. Administration of chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in TN-ILC, but women with TN-ILC were less likely to achieve complete response to neoadjuvant therapy compared to TN-IDC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utsav Joshi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, 14621, USA
| | - Pravash Budhathoki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bronxcare Health System, Bronx, NY, 10457, USA
| | - Suman Gaire
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA
| | - Sumeet K Yadav
- Department of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Mankato, MN, 56001, USA
| | - Anish Shah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bronxcare Health System, Bronx, NY, 10457, USA
| | - Anurag Adhikari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, New York, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Grace Choong
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Rima Couzi
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA
| | | | | | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Robert Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Tufia C Haddad
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Haddad TC, Suman VJ, D'Assoro AB, Carter JM, Giridhar KV, McMenomy BP, Santo K, Mayer EL, Karuturi MS, Morikawa A, Marcom PK, Isaacs CJ, Oh SY, Clark AS, Mayer IA, Keyomarsi K, Hobday TJ, Peethambaram PP, O'Sullivan CC, Leon-Ferre RA, Liu MC, Ingle JN, Goetz MP. Evaluation of Alisertib Alone or Combined With Fulvestrant in Patients With Endocrine-Resistant Advanced Breast Cancer: The Phase 2 TBCRC041 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:815-824. [PMID: 36892847 PMCID: PMC9999287 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
Importance Aurora A kinase (AURKA) activation, related in part to AURKA amplification and variants, is associated with downregulation of estrogen receptor (ER) α expression, endocrine resistance, and implicated in cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i) resistance. Alisertib, a selective AURKA inhibitor, upregulates ERα and restores endocrine sensitivity in preclinical metastatic breast cancer (MBC) models. The safety and preliminary efficacy of alisertib was demonstrated in early-phase trials; however, its activity in CDK 4/6i-resistant MBC is unknown. Objective To assess the effect of adding fulvestrant to alisertib on objective tumor response rates (ORRs) in endocrine-resistant MBC. Design, Setting, and Participants This phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted through the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium, which enrolled participants from July 2017 to November 2019. Postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant, ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative MBC who were previously treated with fulvestrant were eligible. Stratification factors included prior treatment with CDK 4/6i, baseline metastatic tumor ERα level measurement (<10%, ≥10%), and primary or secondary endocrine resistance. Among 114 preregistered patients, 96 (84.2%) registered and 91 (79.8%) were evaluable for the primary end point. Data analysis began after January 10, 2022. Interventions Alisertib, 50 mg, oral, daily on days 1 to 3, 8 to 10, and 15 to 17 of a 28-day cycle (arm 1) or alisertib same dose/schedule with standard-dose fulvestrant (arm 2). Main Outcomes and Measures Improvement in ORR in arm 2 of at least 20% greater than arm 1 when the expected ORR for arm 1 was 20%. Results All 91 evaluable patients (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [11.3] years; 1 American Indian/Alaskan Native [1.1%], 2 Asian [2.2%], 6 Black/African American [6.6%], 5 Hispanic [5.5%], and 79 [86.8%] White individuals; arm 1, 46 [50.5%]; arm 2, 45 [49.5%]) had received prior treatment with CDK 4/6i. The ORR was 19.6%; (90% CI, 10.6%-31.7%) for arm 1 and 20.0% (90% CI, 10.9%-32.3%) for arm 2. In arm 1, the 24-week clinical benefit rate and median progression-free survival time were 41.3% (90% CI, 29.0%-54.5%) and 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-10.0), respectively, and in arm 2 they were 28.9% (90% CI, 18.0%-42.0%) and 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.8), respectively. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events attributed to alisertib were neutropenia (41.8%) and anemia (13.2%). Reasons for discontinuing treatment were disease progression (arm 1, 38 [82.6%]; arm 2, 31 [68.9%]) and toxic effects or refusal (arm 1, 5 [10.9%]; arm 2, 12 [26.7%]). Conclusions and Relevance This randomized clinical trial found that adding fulvestrant to treatment with alisertib did not increase ORR or PFS; however, promising clinical activity was observed with alisertib monotherapy among patients with endocrine-resistant and CDK 4/6i-resistant MBC. The overall safety profile was tolerable. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02860000.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tufia C Haddad
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Vera J Suman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Jodi M Carter
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Katelyn Santo
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Erica L Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Meghan S Karuturi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Aki Morikawa
- Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - P Kelly Marcom
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Sun Young Oh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Amy S Clark
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ingrid A Mayer
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Khandan Keyomarsi
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | - Minetta C Liu
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - James N Ingle
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, Abramson V, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, Anderson B, Burstein HJ, Chew H, Dang C, Elias AD, Giordano SH, Goetz MP, Goldstein LJ, Hurvitz SA, Jankowitz RC, Javid SH, Krishnamurthy J, Leitch AM, Lyons J, Mortimer J, Patel SA, Pierce LJ, Rosenberger LH, Rugo HS, Schneider B, Smith ML, Soliman H, Stringer-Reasor EM, Telli ML, Wei M, Wisinski KB, Young JS, Yeung K, Dwyer MA, Kumar R. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 4.2023. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:594-608. [PMID: 37308117 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Breast Cancer address all aspects of management for breast cancer. The treatment landscape of metastatic breast cancer is evolving constantly. The therapeutic strategy takes into consideration tumor biology, biomarkers, and other clinical factors. Due to the growing number of treatment options, if one option fails, there is usually another line of therapy available, providing meaningful improvements in survival. This NCCN Guidelines Insights report focuses on recent updates specific to systemic therapy recommendations for patients with stage IV (M1) disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jame Abraham
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | - Rebecca Aft
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Doreen Agnese
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | | | | | - Chau Dang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Janice Lyons
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | - Hope S Rugo
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Bryan Schneider
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Mei Wei
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) continues to be the subtype of breast cancer with the highest rates of recurrence and mortality. The lack of expression of targetable proteins such as the estrogen receptor and absence of HER2 amplification have made relying on cytotoxic chemotherapy necessary for decades. In the operable setting, efforts to improve outcomes have focused on escalation of systemic therapy and a shift toward preoperative delivery followed by a response adapted approach to postoperative systemic therapy. An improved understanding of tumor biology has resulted in the identification of subsets of patients with specific molecular features, leading to testing and approval of multiple new targeted therapies for this disease. Furthermore, advances in drug development have led to the approval of antibody-drug conjugates that are redefining classification schemes for breast cancer. This review focuses on the modern management of TNBC, with particular focus on recent updates in the treatment of operable disease, and an overview of the most recent promising advances in the therapeutic landscape of metastatic disease. It discusses the practical challenges and unanswered questions resulting from the approval of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and shares an approach in the clinic on topics for which evidence is lacking. In addition, it provides a glimpse into the future, highlighting challenges and opportunities for biomarker based right-sizing of preoperative therapy, refining evaluation of response to preoperative therapy after surgery, early diagnosis and detection of relapse, and areas of needed research for metastatic TNBC.
Collapse
|
25
|
Tang X, Thompson KJ, Kalari KR, Sinnwell JP, Suman VJ, Vedell PT, McLaughlin SA, Northfelt DW, Aspitia AM, Gray RJ, Carter JM, Weinshilboum R, Wang L, Boughey JC, Goetz MP. Integration of multiomics data shows down regulation of mismatch repair and tubulin pathways in triple-negative chemotherapy-resistant breast tumors. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:57. [PMID: 37226243 PMCID: PMC10207800 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01656-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype. Patients with TNBC are primarily treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The response to NAC is prognostic, with reductions in overall survival and disease-free survival rates in those patients who do not achieve a pathological complete response (pCR). Based on this premise, we hypothesized that paired analysis of primary and residual TNBC tumors following NAC could identify unique biomarkers associated with post-NAC recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS We investigated 24 samples from 12 non-LAR TNBC patients with paired pre- and post-NAC data, including four patients with recurrence shortly after surgery (< 24 months) and eight who remained recurrence-free (> 48 months). These tumors were collected from a prospective NAC breast cancer study (BEAUTY) conducted at the Mayo Clinic. Differential expression analysis of pre-NAC biopsies showed minimal gene expression differences between early recurrent and nonrecurrent TNBC tumors; however, post-NAC samples demonstrated significant alterations in expression patterns in response to intervention. Topological-level differences associated with early recurrence were implicated in 251 gene sets, and an independent assessment of microarray gene expression data from the 9 paired non-LAR samples available in the NAC I-SPY1 trial confirmed 56 gene sets. Within these 56 gene sets, 113 genes were observed to be differentially expressed in the I-SPY1 and BEAUTY post-NAC studies. An independent (n = 392) breast cancer dataset with relapse-free survival (RFS) data was used to refine our gene list to a 17-gene signature. A threefold cross-validation analysis of the gene signature with the combined BEAUTY and I-SPY1 data yielded an average AUC of 0.88 for six machine-learning models. Due to the limited number of studies with pre- and post-NAC TNBC tumor data, further validation of the signature is needed. CONCLUSION Analysis of multiomics data from post-NAC TNBC chemoresistant tumors showed down regulation of mismatch repair and tubulin pathways. Additionally, we identified a 17-gene signature in TNBC associated with post-NAC recurrence enriched with down-regulated immune genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojia Tang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kevin J Thompson
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Krishna R Kalari
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Jason P Sinnwell
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Vera J Suman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Peter T Vedell
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jodi M Carter
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Richard Weinshilboum
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Liewei Wang
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Matthew P Goetz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Carter JM, Chumsri S, Hinerfeld DA, Ma Y, Wang X, Zahrieh D, Hillman DW, Tenner KS, Kachergus JM, Brauer HA, Warren SE, Henderson D, Shi J, Liu Y, Joensuu H, Lindman H, Leon-Ferre RA, Boughey JC, Liu MC, Ingle JN, Kalari KR, Couch FJ, Knutson KL, Goetz MP, Perez EA, Thompson EA. Distinct spatial immune microlandscapes are independently associated with outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer. Nat Commun 2023; 14:2215. [PMID: 37072398 PMCID: PMC10113250 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37806-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The utility of spatial immunobiomarker quantitation in prognostication and therapeutic prediction is actively being investigated in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Here, with high-plex quantitative digital spatial profiling, we map and quantitate intraepithelial and adjacent stromal tumor immune protein microenvironments in systemic treatment-naïve (female only) TNBC to assess the spatial context in immunobiomarker-based prediction of outcome. Immune protein profiles of CD45-rich and CD68-rich stromal microenvironments differ significantly. While they typically mirror adjacent, intraepithelial microenvironments, this is not uniformly true. In two TNBC cohorts, intraepithelial CD40 or HLA-DR enrichment associates with better outcomes, independently of stromal immune protein profiles or stromal TILs and other established prognostic variables. In contrast, intraepithelial or stromal microenvironment enrichment with IDO1 associates with improved survival irrespective of its spatial location. Antigen-presenting and T-cell activation states are inferred from eigenprotein scores. Such scores within the intraepithelial compartment interact with PD-L1 and IDO1 in ways that suggest prognostic and/or therapeutic potential. This characterization of the intrinsic spatial immunobiology of treatment-naïve TNBC highlights the importance of spatial microenvironments for biomarker quantitation to resolve intrinsic prognostic and predictive immune features and ultimately inform therapeutic strategies for clinically actionable immune biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodi M Carter
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Saranya Chumsri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Yaohua Ma
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Xue Wang
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - David Zahrieh
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David W Hillman
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kathleen S Tenner
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Ji Shi
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Heikki Joensuu
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Henrik Lindman
- Department of Oncology, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Roberto A Leon-Ferre
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - James N Ingle
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Krishna R Kalari
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Keith L Knutson
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Edith A Perez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Buhrow SA, Koubek EJ, Goetz MP, Ames MM, Reid JM. Development and validation of a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay for quantification of Z- and E- isomers of endoxifen and its metabolites in plasma from women with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2023; 1221:123654. [PMID: 37004493 PMCID: PMC10249430 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2023.123654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
The selective estrogen receptor modifier tamoxifen (TAM) is widely used for the treatment of women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+ ) breast cancer. Endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent, active metabolite of TAM and is important for TAM's clinical activity. While multiple papers have been published regarding TAM metabolism, few studies have examined or quantified the metabolism of ENDX. To quantify ENDX and its metabolites in patient plasma samples, we have developed and validated a rapid, sensitive, and specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the quantitative determination of the E- and Z-isomers of ENDX (0.5-500 ng/ml) and the ENDX metabolites norendoxifen (1-500 and 0.5-500 ng/ml E and Z, respectfully), ENDX catechol (3.075-307.5 and 1.92-192 ng/ml E and Z, respectfully), 4'-hydroxy ENDX (0.33-166.5 and 0.33-333.5 ng/ml E and Z, respectfully), ENDX methoxycatechol (0.3-300 and 0.2-200 ng/ml E and Z, respectfully), and ENDX glucuronide (2-200 and 3-300 ng/ml E and Z, respectfully) in human plasma. Chromatographic separation was accomplished on a HSS T3 precolumn attached to an Poroshell 120 EC-C18 analytical column using 0.1 % formic acid/water and 0.1 % formic acid/methanol as eluents followed by MS/MS detection. The analytical run time was 6.5 min. Standard curves were linear (R2 ≥ 0.98) over the concentration ranges. The intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy, determined at high-, middle-, and low-quality control concentrations for all analytes, were within the acceptable range of 85 % and 115 %. The average percent recoveries were all above 90 %. The method was successfully applied to clinical plasma samples from a Phase I study of daily oral Z-ENDX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Buhrow
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Emily J Koubek
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Pharmacology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Matthew M Ames
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Pharmacology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Joel M Reid
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Pharmacology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wang X, Emch MJ, Tang X, Yu J, Kalari KR, Wang L, Goetz MP, Hawse JR. Abstract 1689: The role of circular RNAs in triple negative breast cancer and chemotherapy resistance. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-1689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents 15-20% of all breast cancers and is an aggressive subtype. Chemotherapy-based treatments remain the standard of care for TNBC. Unfortunately, chemotherapy resistance is common, and for these patients, outcomes are poor and alternative treatment strategies remain an unmet need. circRNAs are a newly identified class of noncoding RNA molecules with covalently closed circular structures. An increasing number of recent studies including ours have indicated that circRNAs play crucial roles in regulating tumor development and chemoresistance. However, the role of circRNAs in the process of chemotherapy resistance and TNBC progression is not clear.
Materials and Methods: As a first step towards identifying circRNAs that participate in the development of chemoresistance in TNBC cells, and to determine if targeting such circRNAs is a novel and efficacious therapeutic strategy, doxorubicin-resistant (Doxo-R), paclitaxel-resistant (PTX-R), and double-resistant (DP-R) cell lines were generated from MDA-MB-231. Human circRNA microarrays were utilized to profile the expression of approximately 14,000 known circRNAs in normal breast tissue, matched patient-derived xenografts (PDX) generated prior to and following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and TNBC chemosensitive and chemoresistant cell lines. Top hits were validated using RT-PCR.
Results: circRNA microarray profiling identified 429 and 310 transcripts differentially expressed in doxorubicin and paclitaxel resistant cells, respectively, compared to parental chemosensitive cell lines (|FC| ≥ 1.5; p value < 0.05). In comparison to pre-NAC derived xenografts, 1,396 circRNAs were dysregulated among post-NAC PDX models. Further, three circRNAs (hsa_circ_001388, hsa_circ_104652, and hsa_circ_061260) were upregulated in Doxo-R, PTX-R, and post-NAC PDX samples compared to their respective controls. Among these three circRNAs, hsa_circ_001388 (also known as circNSD2) was the only transcript also predicted to be translated into a novel and uncharacterized protein given the presence of a high confidence translation initiation site and IRES sequence. Ongoing studies are aimed at determining the role of circNSD2 protein in breast cancer carcinogenesis, progression, and response to standard of care chemotherapeutics and the mechanistic process by which this protein functions. Additionally, the efficacy of specifically targeting this circRNA as a novel therapeutic approach is being explored.
Conclusions: Increasing knowledge of the important functions of circRNAs underlying drug resistance will provide new opportunities for developing efficacious therapeutic strategies and prognostic/predictive biomarkers for TNBC.
Citation Format: Xiyin Wang, Michael J. Emch, Xiaojia Tang, Jia Yu, Krishna R. Kalari, Liewei Wang, Matthew P. Goetz, John R. Hawse. The role of circular RNAs in triple negative breast cancer and chemotherapy resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1689.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jia Yu
- 1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Joshi U, Budhathoki P, Gaire S, Yadav SK, Shah A, Adhikari A, Choong G, Couzi R, Giridhar K, Leon-Ferre R, Boughey JC, Hieken TJ, Mutter R, Ruddy KJ, Haddad TC, Goetz MP, Couch FJ, Yadav S. Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Triple-Negative Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-2658909. [PMID: 36993608 PMCID: PMC10055567 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2658909/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Triple-negative invasive lobular carcinoma (TN-ILC) of breast cancer is a rare disease and the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors are not well-defined. Methods: Women with stage I-III TN-ILC or triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma (TN-IDC) of the breast undergoing mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery between 2010 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database were included. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were used to compare overall survival (OS) and evaluate prognostic factors. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the factors associated with pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results: The median age at diagnosis for women with TN-ILC was 67 years compared to 58 years in TN-IDC (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the OS between TN-ILC and TN-IDC in multivariate analysis (HR 0.96, p=0.44). Black race and higher TNM stage were associated with worse OS, whereas receipt of chemotherapy or radiation was associated with better OS in TN-ILC. Among women with TN-ILC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the 5-year OS was 77.3% in women with a complete pathological response (pCR) compared to 39.8% in women without any response. The odds of achieving pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly lower in women with TN-ILC compared to TN-IDC (OR 0.53, p<0.001). Conclusion: Women with TN-ILC are older at diagnosis but have similar OS compared to TN-IDC after adjusting for tumor and demographic characteristics. Administration of chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in TN-ILC, but women with TN-ILC were less likely to achieve complete response to neoadjuvant therapy compared to TN-IDC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rima Couzi
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Department of Oncology: Johns Hopkins Medicine Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Leon-Ferre RA, Carter JM, Zahrieh D, Sinnwell JP, Salgado R, Suman V, Hillman D, Boughey JC, Kalari KR, Couch FJ, Ingle JN, Balkenkohl M, Ciompi F, van der Laak J, Goetz MP. Abstract P2-11-34: Mitotic spindle hotspot counting using deep learning networks is highly associated with clinical outcomes in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer who did not receive systemic therapy. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p2-11-34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) exhibit high rates of recurrence and mortality. However, recent studies suggest that a subset of patients (pts) with early-stage TNBC enriched in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have excellent clinical outcomes even in the absence of systemic therapy. Additional histological biomarkers that could identify pts for future systemic therapy escalation/de-escalation strategies are of great interest. TNBC are frequently highly proliferative with abundant mitoses. However, classic markers of proliferation (manual mitosis counting and Ki-67) appear to offer no prognostic value. Here, we evaluated the prognostic effects of automated mitotic spindle hotspot (AMSH) counting on RFS in independent cohorts of systemically untreated early-stage TNBC.
Methods: AMSH counting was conducted with a state-of-the-art deep learning algorithm trained on the detection of mitoses within 2 mm2 areas with the highest mitotic density (i.e. hotspots) in digital H&E images. Details of the development, training and validation of the algorithm were published previously [1] in a cohort of unselected TNBC. We obtained AMSH counts in a centrally confirmed TNBC cohort from Mayo Clinic [2] and focused our analysis on pts who received locoregional therapy but no systemic therapy. Using a fractional polynomial analysis with a multivariable proportional hazards regression model, we confirmed the assumption of linearity in the log hazard for the continuous variable AMSH and evaluated whether AMSH counts were prognostic of RFS. We corroborated our findings in an independent cohort of systemically untreated TNBC pts from the Radboud University Medical Center in the Netherlands (Radboud Cohort). Results are reported at a median follow-up of 8.1 and 6.7 years for the Mayo and Netherlands cohorts, respectively.
Results: Among 182 pts with who did not receive systemic therapy in the Mayo Cohort, 140 (77%) with available AMSH counts were included. The mean age was 61 (range: 31-94), 71% were postmenopausal, 67% had tumors ≤ 2cm, and 83% were node-negative. As expected, most tumors were Nottingham grade 3 (84%) and had a high Ki-67 proliferation index (54% with Ki-67 >30%). Most tumors (73%) had stromal TILs ≤ 30%. The median AMSH count was 18 (IQR: 8, 42). AMSH counts were linearly associated with grade and tumor size, with the proportion of pts with grade 3 tumors and size > 2 cm increasing as the AMSH counts increased (p=0.007 and p=0.059, respectively). In a multivariate model controlling for nodal status, tumor size, and stromal TILs, AMSH counts were independently associated with RFS (p< 0.0001). For every 10-point increase in the AMSH count, we observed a 17% increase in the risk of experiencing an RFS event (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.26). We corroborated our findings in the Radboud Cohort (n=126). The mean age was 68 (range: 40-96), and 81% were node-negative. While the median AMSH count was 36 (IQR: 16-63), higher than in the Mayo Cohort (p=0.004), the prognostic impact was similar, with a significant association between AMSH count and RFS (p=0.028) in a multivariate model corrected for nodal status, tumor size, and stromal TILs. For every 10-point increase in the AMSH count in the Netherlands cohort, we observed a 9% increase in the risk of experiencing an RFS event (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17). RFS rates according to AMSH counts for both cohorts are shown in the Table.
Conclusions: AMSH counting is a new proliferation biomarker that provides prognostic value independent of nodal status, tumor size, and stromal TILs in systemically untreated early-stage TNBC. Plans are underway to evaluate AMSH counts in additional cohorts of systemically untreated TNBC, and in other disease settings such as prior to neoadjuvant systemic therapy. If validated, this biomarker should be prospectively evaluated as a potential selection biomarker in clinical trials of systemic therapy de-escalation.
References:
1. PMID: 29994086
2. PMID: 28913760
Table RFS according to AMSH counts in the Mayo and Radboud Cohorts
Citation Format: Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Jodi M. Carter, David Zahrieh, Jason P. Sinnwell, Roberto Salgado, Vera Suman, David Hillman, Judy C. Boughey, Krishna R. Kalari, Fergus J. Couch, James N. Ingle, Maschenka Balkenkohl, Francesco Ciompi, Jeroen van der Laak, Matthew P. Goetz. Mitotic spindle hotspot counting using deep learning networks is highly associated with clinical outcomes in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer who did not receive systemic therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-34.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Roberto Salgado
- 5GZA-ZNA-Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium; Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Judy C. Boughey
- 8Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery,Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Choong GM, Boughey JC, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Goetz MP. Abstract P2-03-12: Impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) omission in ER+ breast cancer (BC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p2-03-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in ER+ breast cancer (BC) reduces local, distant, and contralateral BC events and improves overall survival (OS). Furthermore, decreased adherence or omission of ET increases the risk of death. However, in ER+ pts with early-stage BC treated with NAC who have a pathologic complete response (pCR), the importance of adjuvant ET may be called into question. We sought to examine the impact of ET omission on the survival of pts with ER+ BC treated with NAC, according to pCR vs residual disease.
Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) 2010-2018 for female pts with stage I-III ER+ BC treated with NAC followed by surgery. pCR was defined as ypT0/ypTis, ypN0. The percent receiving adjuvant ET and the impact of adjuvant ET omission on overall survival (OS) in patients with and without pCR were assessed separately based on HER2 expression. OS was analyzed with adjuvant ET as a time-dependent covariate using Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results: We identified 34,394 pts treated with NAC for ER+ BC (28,434 ER+/HER2-, 5960 ER+/HER2+). Pts with ER+/HER2+ BC were less likely than pts with ER+/HER2- BC to have received adjuvant ET (61.6% vs 88.8%, p< 0.001). Overall, 4505 (13.1%) had pCR (9.1% of ER+/HER2- and 32.0% of ER+/HER2+). Within each subtype, pts with pCR were significantly less likely to start adjuvant ET after surgery than pts with residual disease (78.4% vs 89.8% for ER+/HER2- and 46.5% vs 68.7% for ER+/HER2+, each p< 0.001), Table 1. Regarding those with residual disease, pts with ER+/HER2+ BC were less likely than ER+/HER2- BC to receive adjuvant ET (68.7% vs 89.8%, p< 0.001). Median follow-up was 4.4 years. Among pts with pCR, 5-year OS was 93.2% (95% CI: 92.1-94.4%) for ER+/HER2- BC and 94.3% (95% CI: 93.1-95.5%) for ER+/HER2+ BC (p=0.08), while among patients with residual disease 5-year OS was 81.7% (95% CI: 81.1-82.2%) and 85.7% (95% CI: 84.5-86.9%) for the two subtypes respectively (p< 0.001). On multivariable analysis, omission of adjuvant ET was significantly associated with poorer OS in patients with residual disease for both ER+/HER2- BC (adjusted HR 1.72, p< 0.001) and ER+/HER2+ BC (adjusted HR 1.63, p< 0.001). In contrast, omission of adjuvant ET was not significantly associated with OS in patients with pCR, regardless of HER2 status (ER+/HER2- adjusted HR 1.28, p=0.20; ER+/HER2+ adjusted HR 1.13, p=0.54), Table 1.
Conclusions: In pts receiving NAC for ER+ BC, those with ER+/HER2+ disease were less likely to have received adjuvant ET compared to ER+/HER2- patients, regardless of pCR. In pts with residual disease after NAC, omission of adjuvant ET was associated with significantly higher risk of death. These data provide strong support for interventions to increase utilization of ET, especially for patients with residual disease following NAC. The observation that ET omission did not impact OS in pts with ER+ BC who achieve pCR following NAC is hypothesis generating and may have implications for future de-escalation trials for this subset of patients.
Table 1. Differential use of adjuvant endocrine therapy by subtype and pCR and the impact on overall survival
Citation Format: Grace M. Choong, Judy C. Boughey, Tanya L. Hoskin, Courtney N. Day, Matthew P. Goetz. Impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) omission in ER+ breast cancer (BC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-03-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Judy C. Boughey
- 2Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tanya L. Hoskin
- 3Department of Surgery, Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Leon-Ferre RA, Jonas SF, Salgado R, Loi S, De Jong V, Carter JM, Nielson T, Leung S, Riaz N, Curigliano G, Criscitiello C, Cockenpot V, Lambertini M, Suman V, Linderholm B, Martens JWM, van Deurzen CHM, Timmermans M, Shimoi T, Yazaki S, Yoshida M, Kim SB, Lee HJ, Dieci MV, Bataillon G, Salomon A, Andre F, Kok M, Linn S, Goetz MP, Michiels S. Abstract PD9-05: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes identify early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients with favorable outcomes at 10-year follow-up in the absence of systemic therapy: a pooled analysis of 1835 patients. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd9-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The prognostic value of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a biomarker for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been extensively demonstrated in patients (pts) receiving (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy. In addition, several small studies suggest that a subset of pts with early-stage TNBC and high TILs have excellent long-term outcomes, even in the absence of systemic therapy [1-3]. However, data on the absolute risk of TNBC recurrence according to TIL levels in the absence of systemic therapy are limited and critical to inform the design of future systemic therapy de-escalation clinical trials.
Methods: We conducted an individual patient data pooled analysis of 12 international cohorts of pts with TNBC treated with locoregional therapy but no systemic therapy. TNBC was defined as tumors with estrogen and progesterone receptor of < 1% and HER2 negative (IHC 0, 1+ or IHC 2+ and FISH negative) per local evaluation. TILs were locally assessed in hematoxylin & eosin-stained slides according to the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines (www.tilsinbreastcancer.org). We used the Kaplan-Meier method to assess survival outcomes according to prespecified TIL thresholds: 30% and 50%. Confidence intervals (CI) for survival probabilities were calculated using a percentile bootstrap method. The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival (iDFS, STEEP 2.0 definition). Key secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results: 1,835 pts diagnosed with TNBC between 1982 and 2017 who did not receive systemic therapy were included. The median age at diagnosis was 56 (IQR 38-71). Menopausal status was known in 1,184 women, of whom 78% were post-menopausal. The median tumor size was 2.0 cm (IQR 1.2-2.6). Most pts (87%) had no axillary lymph node involvement (N0). Most tumors were invasive ductal carcinoma (74%) and grade 3 (70%). The median level of TILs was 15% (IQR 5-40). The median duration of follow-up was 30.4 years (95% CI 29.9, 31.1). A total of 950 (52%) iDFS, 828 (45%) RFS, 767 (42%) DDFS events, and 604 (33%) deaths were observed. In multivariable analyses, higher TILs were independently associated with improved iDFS, RFS, DDFS, and OS beyond clinicopathological factors (likelihood ratio p< 10e-6). Each 10% increment in stromal TILs was associated with an 8% (95% CI: 6-11), 10% (95% CI: 7-13), and 13% (95% CI: 10-15) reduction in the risk of experiencing an iDFS, RFS or DDFS event, and with a 12% (95% CI: 9-15) reduction in the risk of death. iDFS, RFS, DDFS and OS rates according to different TIL thresholds and nodal status are shown in the Table. Of note, the RFS estimates (which exclude second non-breast primaries and contralateral breast cancers) were consistently higher than the iDFS counterparts (which include both), consistent with a high rate of contralateral breast cancers and second primary tumors in this cohort. Notably, patients with node-negative—and especially stage I—TNBC with high TILs had excellent survival rates at 10-year follow-up.
Conclusion: TILs are highly prognostic in pts with systemically untreated early-stage TNBC. Pts with pN0 (and especially stage I) TNBC with high TILs exhibited very favorable long-term outcomes even in the absence of systemic therapy. These data define the natural history of TIL-rich TNBC pts and are crucial to identifying the optimal patient population for future chemotherapy and immunotherapy de-escalation clinical trials.
References:
[1] Leon-Ferre et al, 2017, PMID: 28913760
[2] Park et al, 2019, PMID: 31566659
[3] de Jong et al, 2022, PMID: 35353548
Table 5 and 10-year survival endpoints according TIL level, nodal status, and stage
Citation Format: Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Sarah Flora Jonas, Roberto Salgado, Sherene Loi, Vincent De Jong, Jodi M. Carter, Torsten Nielson, Samuel Leung, Nazia Riaz, Giuseppe Curigliano, Carmen Criscitiello, Vincent Cockenpot, Matteo Lambertini, Vera Suman, Barbro Linderholm, John WM Martens, Carolien HM van Deurzen, Mieke Timmermans, Tatsunori Shimoi, Shu Yazaki, Masayuki Yoshida, Sung-Bae Kim, Hee Jin Lee, Maria Vittoria Dieci, Guillaume Bataillon, Anne Salomon, Fabrice Andre, Marleen Kok, Sabine Linn, Matthew P. Goetz, Stefan Michiels. Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes identify early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients with favorable outcomes at 10-year follow-up in the absence of systemic therapy: a pooled analysis of 1835 patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Roberto Salgado
- 3GZA-ZNA-Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium; Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- 4Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia, Australia
| | - Vincent De Jong
- 5Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Samuel Leung
- 8University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nazia Riaz
- 9University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John WM Martens
- 16Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | | | - Mieke Timmermans
- 18ErasmusMC Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | | | - Shu Yazaki
- 20National Cancer Center Hospital–, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Yoshida
- 21Department of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hee Jin Lee
- 23University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Marleen Kok
- 28Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sabine Linn
- 29Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sparano J, Gray RJ, Makower D, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Geyer C, Dees E, Goetz MP, Olson JA, Lively TG, Badve S, Saphner T, Wagner LI, Whelan T, Kaklamani V, Sledge G. Abstract GS1-05: Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx): An Update Including 12-Year Event Rates. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-gs1-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Late recurrence of breast cancer after 5 years accounts for about 50% of recurrences in hormone receptor (HR)-positive early breast cancer (EBC). TAILORx established non-inferiority of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) given for at least 5 years to chemotherapy plus ET (CET) in EBC and a 21-gene recurrence score (RS) of 11-25, although there was some chemotherapy benefit in women
Methods: Eligibility criteria included women 18-75 years with HR-positive, HER2-negative, T1b-T2N0 EBC who agreed to have CT assigned or randomized based on the RS assay. The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in the RS 11-25 group. The “primary analysis” refers to the original prespecified analysis for the primary IDFS endpoint (836 IDFS events at full information in the RS 11-25 group) after a median of 7.5 years. The “updated analysis” was performed after a median followup of 11.0 and 10.4 years in the randomized and overall populations, respectively.
Results:10,253 eligible women enrolled between 4/7/06-10/6/10.The updated analysis includes substantially more events that the primary analysis, including IDFS events (1819 vs. 1210), distant recurrences (561 vs. 384), locoregional +/- distant recurrences (764 vs. 543), and deaths (910 vs. 499). The table provides 5 and 12-year event rates (and standard errors) for all arms, and comparisons of the randomized arms. The primary trial conclusions remain unchanged: ET was non-inferior to CET in the randomized group with a RS 11-25. Although recurrence occurred in < 10% by 12 years for a RS 0-25, late recurrence events beyond 5 years exceeded earlier recurrence. Non-recurrence events occurred in about 13% at 12 years (~1%/year), contributing substantially to the IDFS rates. For women
Conclusions: The current updated analysis confirms findings from the original primary analysis that ET is non-inferior to CET in HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative EBC and a RS 11-25. As in the original primary analysis, the subgroup of women
Citation Format: Joseph Sparano, Robert J. Gray, Della Makower, Kathy S. Albain, Daniel F. Hayes, Charles Geyer, Elizabeth Dees, Matthew P. Goetz, John A. Olson Jr, Tracy G. Lively, Sunil Badve, Thomas Saphner, Lynne I. Wagner, Timothy Whelan, Virginia Kaklamani, George Sledge. Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx): An Update Including 12-Year Event Rates [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kathy S. Albain
- 4Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center
| | - Daniel F. Hayes
- 5University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | | | - John A. Olson
- 9Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chavez M, Miao J, Pusztai L, Goetz MP, Rastogi P, Ganz PA, Mamounas E(T, Paik S, Bandos H, Razaq W, O’Dea A, Kaklamani V, Silber AL, Flaum LE, Andreopolu E, Baar J, Wendt AG, Carney JF, Sharma P, Gralow JR, Lew DL, Barlow WE, Hortobagyi GN. Abstract GS1-07: Results from a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating adjuvant endocrine therapy +/- 1 year of everolimus in patients with high-risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: SWOG S1207. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-gs1-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abnormalities of the PI3kinase/AKT/mTOR signaling network are common in breast cancer (BC) and are associated with endocrine resistance. Everolimus, an mTOR-inhibitor increased PFS when combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in the metastatic setting and is thought to revert endocrine resistance. S1207 is a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the role of everolimus in combination with ET in the adjuvant setting among patients with high-risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative BC (NCT01674140). METHODS: Eligible patients were >18 years of age with histologically confirmed invasive hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative high-risk BC. Four risk groups were defined as: 1) > 2cm node-negative disease (or pN1mi), and either an Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score (RS) > 25 or MammaPrint® high-risk category (MP high); 2) 1-3 positive nodes and either RS >25, MP high or a pathological grade 3 tumor; 3) >4 positive lymph nodes. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible if: 4) after surgery had >1 lymph node involvement. Patients were randomized 1:1 to physician’s choice adjuvant ET in combination with one year of everolimus (10 mg PO daily) or ET plus placebo stratified by risk group. The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) evaluated by a stratified log-rank test. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. The hazard ratio (HR) for treatment efficacy was estimated using Cox regression with stratification by risk groups. Subset analyses included preplanned evaluation within risk group and exploratory analyses of menopausal status and age. RESULTS: 1,939 patients were randomized between September 2013 and May 2019, of them 1,792 were eligible and included in the analysis (896 per arm). Primary reason for ineligibility was timing after chemotherapy/radiation or not high risk. Median age was 54 years (22-85) and 32% were premenopausal. With a median follow-up of 50.5 months, there were 389 IDFS events as of May 2022 (data cutoff). 5-year IDFS was 74.8% among patients treated with everolimus and 73.9% among patients treated with placebo, HR=0.93 (95% CI 0.76-1.14). However, the proportional hazards assumption was violated (p=0.02) suggesting differential treatment effect over time. The HR during the one year of treatment was 0.72 (95% CI 0.47-1.10) while after one year it was 1.00 (95% CI 0.80-1.26). The 5-year OS was 87.6% in the everolimus arm and 85.5% in the placebo arm, HR=0.98 (95% CI 0.75-1.28). Analysis by risk group did not show higher everolimus benefit as risk increased. No difference in IDFS or OS was seen among postmenopausal patients (IDFS HR=1.08 [95% CI 0.85-1.36], OS HR=1.19 [95% CI 0.87-1.61]). Among premenopausal patients, everolimus was associated with improved IDFS (HR=0.63 [95% CI 0.43-0.93]) and OS (HR=0.48 [95% CI 0.26-0.88]). Treatment completion of randomized therapy was lower in the everolimus arm compared to placebo (47.9% v 72.7%). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were noted in 6.5% and 0.5% of patients in the placebo arm and in 31.2% and 3.7% in the everolimus arm respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of one year of adjuvant everolimus to standard adjuvant ET did not improve IDFS or OS and was associated with low completion rate and increased AEs. Among premenopausal patients there was a benefit in IDFS and OS that is hypothesis generating. Future translational studies will evaluate potential predictors of everolimus benefit and drug toxicity.
Citation Format: Marianna Chavez, Jieling Miao, Lajos Pusztai, Matthew P. Goetz, Priya Rastogi, Patricia A. Ganz, Eleftherios (Terry) Mamounas, Soonmyung Paik, Hanna Bandos, Wajeeha Razaq, Anne O’Dea, Virginia Kaklamani, Andrea L.M. Silber, Lisa E. Flaum, Eleni Andreopolu, Joseph Baar, Albert G. Wendt, Jennifer F. Carney, Priyanka Sharma, Julie R. Gralow, Danika L. Lew, William E. Barlow, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi. Results from a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating adjuvant endocrine therapy +/- 1 year of everolimus in patients with high-risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: SWOG S1207 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jieling Miao
- 2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | - Priya Rastogi
- 5UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Patricia A. Ganz
- 6UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, and UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Soonmyung Paik
- 8NRG Oncology, Division of Pathology, Pittsburgh, PA/NRG Oncology
| | - Hanna Bandos
- 9NRG Oncology Biostatistical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Wajeeha Razaq
- 10Oklahoma university of health Sciences, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | | | | | | | | | - Eleni Andreopolu
- 15New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center/Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Joseph Baar
- 16Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Albert G. Wendt
- 17Cancer Center at Saint Joseph’s, Phoenix AZ; CORA CommonSpirit Health Research Institute
| | | | - Priyanka Sharma
- 19University of Kansas Medical Center Westwood, Westwood, KS
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Clark K, Carroll JL, Moreno-Aspitia A, Ernst B, Raheem F, Heil A, Boyer B, Mara K, Goetz MP, Leon-Ferre RA, Giridhar KV, Taraba J. Abstract P4-07-56: Mayo Clinic Enterprise patterns of growth-factor utilization for sacituzumab govitecan (SG)-induced neutropenia among patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p4-07-56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: SG was approved in 2020 for the treatment of metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event in the ASCENT trial was neutropenia (51.2%) with a 6% incidence of febrile neutropenia. 1 Package insert recommendations do not endorse primary prophylactic growth factor support, rather only initiating if severe neutropenia occurs on treatment.2
Objective: This study retrospectively reviewed the utilization of growth factor support in patients (pts) with metastatic TNBC initiated on SG at each Mayo Clinic Enterprise site.
Methods: We performed a multi-center, retrospective review of all pts with TNBC who received SG from January 2021 to December 2021 at Mayo Clinic sites in Minnesota, Florida, Arizona, and its community-based health system network. Data collected included history of neutropenia with previous cycles of SG resulting in a treatment delay, number of cycles, grade of neutropenia and cycle/day of treatment plan when growth factor added. Pts who received only one dose of SG were excluded. The Fisher’s exact test was utilized to compare the difference in the use of primary prophylaxis between sites.
Results: 67 pts received at least two doses of SG. Within this cohort, 42 pts (63%) received growth factor support during treatment with SG. Growth factor support was most often added during the first two cycles (59.5%). A total of 12 patients initiated growth factor with no history of delays related to neutropenia and without neutropenia at the time of administration. Eleven of these pts had growth factor support added on Cycle 1 as primary prophylaxis. Primary prophylaxis was most common at Mayo Clinic – Rochester compared to the other sites (Table 1), however there was not a statistically significant difference (p=0.27). There were 26 pts (39%) with a treatment delay due to neutropenia while receiving SG, of which 21 (81%) were managed with the addition of growth factor (13 pegfilgrastim, 8 filgrastim). The median number of cycles for all pts was 5 (range: 1-25). Pts who received growth factor were treated with a median of 5 cycles (range: 1-25) and pts who did not receive growth factor were treated with a median of 4 cycles (range: 1-19) (p=0.10).
Conclusions: We observed wide variability in the use of prophylactic growth factor between Mayo Clinic sites with SG. The optimal practice of growth factor use with SG warrants further exploration.
References:
1. Bardia A, Hurvitz SA, Tolaney SM, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(16):1529-1541
2. Immunomedics, Inc. Trodelvy (sacituzumab govitecan-hziy) [package insert]. Foster City, CA: Gilead Sciences; 2020.
Table 1: Grade of neutropenia for patients receiving SG when growth factor initiated
Citation Format: Kaylee Clark, Jamie L. Carroll, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Brenda Ernst, Farah Raheem, Ashley Heil, Beth Boyer, Kristin Mara, Matthew P. Goetz, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Karthik V. Giridhar, Jodi Taraba. Mayo Clinic Enterprise patterns of growth-factor utilization for sacituzumab govitecan (SG)-induced neutropenia among patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-56.
Collapse
|
36
|
Jhaveri K, O’Shaughnessy J, Andre F, Goetz MP, Harbeck N, Martín M, Bidard FC, Thomas ZM, Young S, Ismail-Khan R, Smyth LM, Gnant M. Abstract OT1-01-02: EMBER-4: A phase 3 adjuvant trial of imlunestrant vs standard endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with ER+, HER2- early breast cancer (EBC) with an increased risk of recurrence who have previously received 2 to 5 years of adjuvant ET. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-ot1-01-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Adjuvant ET has been the standard of care for patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) EBC. A significant proportion of patients with increased risk still experience disease relapse despite available ET and more optimum ET is needed to prevent patients developing incurable metastatic cancer. Distant recurrence risk ranges from 20% to 40% after 5 years of adjuvant ET, depending on clinicopathological (clin-path) features at diagnosis. Consequently, there is a need to further optimize adjuvant treatment, particularly in those patients who are at increased risk of recurrence. Imlunestrant is an orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) with pure antagonistic properties and the potential to overcome ET resistance. In early phase trials, imlunestrant monotherapy showed favorable safety with pharmacokinetic (PK) exposures exceeding fulvestrant and preliminary efficacy in ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer patients (EMBER, Jhaveri 2022) along with robust biological/pharmacodynamic activity and tolerability in EBC (EMBER-2, Neven). Trial Design: EMBER-4 is a randomized, open-label, global phase 3 study comparing imlunestrant versus physicians’ choice of ET, in patients who are at an increased risk of recurrence based on clin-path features and who have received 2 to 5 years of standard adjuvant ET. Approximately 6,000 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive imlunestrant (400 mg daily) for 5 years or physicians’ choice of adjuvant ET (tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor, AI, dosed per label). Study treatment duration is 5 years. Males and pre-/peri-menopausal women will receive concomitant treatment with a GnRH agonist if receiving imlunestrant or an AI. Stratification factors include time from initial adjuvant ET, use of prior adjuvant cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, nodal status, menopausal status, and geographic region. Eligibility criteria: Eligible patients are adult males and females (pre-, peri- or postmenopausal) with ER+, HER2- EBC who have completed definitive locoregional therapy and have received 2 to 5 years of prior adjuvant ET without disease recurrence, but who are at increased risk of recurrence based on clin-path features at diagnosis. Prior (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy with a CDK4/6- or PARP- inhibitor is permitted. Study endpoints: The primary endpoint is invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), excluding second non-breast primary invasive cancers. Key secondary endpoints include distant relapse-free survival, overall survival, IDFS including second non-breast primary invasive cancers, safety, PK and patient reported outcomes. Recruitment for EMBER-4 begins globally in Q4 2022.
Citation Format: Komal Jhaveri, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Fabrice Andre, Matthew P. Goetz, Nadia Harbeck, Miguel Martín, Francois-Clement Bidard, Zachary M. Thomas, Suzanne Young, Roohi Ismail-Khan, Lillian M. Smyth, Michael Gnant. EMBER-4: A phase 3 adjuvant trial of imlunestrant vs standard endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with ER+, HER2- early breast cancer (EBC) with an increased risk of recurrence who have previously received 2 to 5 years of adjuvant ET [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-01-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Miguel Martín
- 6Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Goetz MP, Gal-Yam E, Stover D, Sammons SL, Graff SL, Wang G, Cristofanilli M, Riordan G, Sloane HS, Carroll D, Plourde PV, Portman DJ. Abstract P5-05-04: Estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with lasofoxifene or fulvestrant in the ELAINE 1 study. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p5-05-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Acquired ESR1 mutations (mutESR1) after long-term endocrine therapy drive treatment resistance, metastasis, and poor prognosis for patients (pts) with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Lasofoxifene (LAS), a selective estrogen receptor modulator, alone or with a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) reduced tumor growth better than fulvestrant (Fulv) in mutESR1 BC xenograft models. ELAINE 1 is a randomized trial of LAS vs Fulv in pts with mutESR1 and prior progression on aromatase inhibitor and CDK4/6i. Preliminary results (ESMO 2022) showed that LAS prolonged median progression-free survival (mPFS) compared with Fulv with a favorable safety profile. Here, we report changes in ESR1 ctDNA mutant allele frequency (MAF) from baseline to 8 wks and their associations with clinical benefit (CB) and mPFS.
Methods: ELAINE 1 pts were randomized to oral LAS 5 mg daily or IM Fulv 500 mg on days 1, 15, and 29, then every 4 wks, until disease progression or severe toxicity. ctDNA mutESR1 mutations (baseline and 8 wks) were assessed using the Sysmex Inostics OncoBeam or SafeSeq assays—which detect mutESR1 at low allele fractions. MAF changes from baseline to wk 8 were characterized as decreased (decrease in ESR1 MAF or fully cleared), increased (increase in MAF), or equivocal (polyclonal patients [>1 mutESR1] with some increasing and decreasing MAF trends); correlations with PFS and CB were explored. Efficacy measures included objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and CB at 24 wks (CB defined as response or stable disease ≥24 wks).
Results: 103 pts received LAS (n=52) or Fulv (n=51). Most common baseline ESR1 variants detected were D538G (56%), Y537S (39%), Y537N (29%), E380Q (22%); 56 (54%) pts were polyclonal. Of the 61 pts with evaluable baseline and wk 8 ctDNA, LAS decreased mutESR1 MAF in 29/35 pts (83% [11 complete clearance]) while Fulv decreased mutESR1 MAF in 16/26 pts (61.5% [6 complete clearance]) (Table).
mPFS with LAS was 8 and 4 mos for pts with decreased/cleared MAF and increased MAF, respectively, and with Fulv was 4.5 and 2.8 mos, respectively (Table). LAS decreased the common mutESR1 variants more frequently than Fulv (median relative change -87.1% vs -14.7%). In pts with decreased MAF, CB was observed in 16/29 LAS pts (55%) and 4/16 Fulv pts (25%). The predictiveness of ESR1 MAF clearance for CB was also explored. Of 11 pts with ESR1 MAF clearance taking LAS, 10 achieved CB, yielding a positive predictive value (PPV) of 90.9%. In contrast, 2/6 pts with ESR1 MAF clearance taking Fulv had CB for a PPV of 33.3%. Sensitivity for predicting CB based on direction of ESR1 MAF change was 94% with LAS and 80% with Fulv. In pts with Y537S MAF (n=33), LAS decreased Y537S in 13/15 (87%), with a median relative MAF decrease of 89%. In marked contrast, Fulv increased Y537S MAF in 11/18 pts (61%), corresponding to an MAF relative increase of 82%. LAS and Fulv resulted in complete clearance of Y537S MAF in 33% and 6% of pts, respectively.
Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that LAS more effectively decreased or cleared mutESR1 than Fulv. Further, mutESR1 clearance was associated with prolonged PFS and more CB in LAS but not Fulv pts, suggesting that LAS results in robust mutESR1 target engagement. Taken together, our data suggest mutESR1 as a potential liquid biomarker for predicting response to LAS in mutESR1, endocrine-resistant mBC pts.
Table. Change from baseline to week 8 in ESR1 MAF and clinical benefit at 24 weeks. CI, confidence interval; MAF, mutant allele fraction; ND, none detected; PFS, progression-free survival.
Citation Format: Matthew P. Goetz, Einav Gal-Yam, Daniel Stover, Sarah L. Sammons, Stephanie L. Graff, Grace Wang, Massimo Cristofanilli, Gary Riordan, Hillary S. Sloane, Dominic Carroll, Paul V. Plourde, David J Portman. Estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with lasofoxifene or fulvestrant in the ELAINE 1 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-05-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel Stover
- 3Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Stephanie L. Graff
- 5Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, USA, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Grace Wang
- 6Miami Cancer Institute at Baptist Health
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Moldoveanu D, Goetz MP, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Boughey JC. Abstract P6-01-22: Age, Ki-67, Nodal pCR and overall survival following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Node Positive ER+/Her2- Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p6-01-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The role of chemotherapy in node positive (N+) luminal breast cancer (BC) is often debated, given low total pathologic complete response (pCR) rates following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and discrepancy in adjuvant chemotherapy benefit. A prior single institution study of cN+ luminal BC showed that pts age < 50 and tumor Ki-67 ≥ 20% had high nodal pCR (> 35%). This study’s goals were 1) to validate Ki-67 and age in relation to nodal pCR and 2) evaluate the prognostic impact of nodal pCR on overall survival (OS).
Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database 2010-2019 for pts with cN+ ER+/HER2- BC treated with NAC and surgery. Breast pCR was defined as ypT0/ypTis and nodal pCR as ypN0/ypN0i+. Ki-67 was available in 2018 & 2019 only and was used to evaluate Ki-67 and nodal pCR. 2010-2018 data were used to evaluate nodal pCR and OS. OS was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results: In 2018-2019, 4,801 pts were identified and 2,473 (51.5%) had Ki-67 available. Nodal pCR was 23.7% and was higher in pts < 50 years old (28.1% vs 21.1%) and in those with Ki67 ≥ 20% (28.4% vs 12.7%), both p < 0.001. Pts < 50 with Ki67 ≥ 20% had the highest nodal pCR at 31.7%, followed by age ≥ 50 with Ki67 ≥ 20% at 26.3%. With Ki67 < 20%, nodal pCR was 15.4% (in age < 50) and 11.3% (in age ≥ 50).
From 2010-2018, we identified 20,084 cN+ ER+/HER2- BC pts treated with NAC. Total pCR was 7.4%, 14.3% had nodal pCR only, 3.8% had breast pCR only, and 74.5% had residual disease in breast and nodes. OS at 5 years was 79.1% and varied by NAC response: 90.8% with total pCR, 83.8% with nodal pCR only, 80.7% with breast pCR only, and 76.9% with residual disease in breast and nodes. Specifically nodal pCR (with or without breast pCR) was seen in 22.0% and was associated with 5-year OS rate of 86.4% compared to 77.1% without nodal pCR, p < 0.001. On multivariable analysis adjusted for other clinical and treatment factors, nodal pCR was associated with better OS (adjusted HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.50-0.61, p < 0.001) in all ages combined and within both the age < 50 and age ≥ 50 subgroups (see Table).
In a subgroup of pts approximating RxPonder entry criteria (defined as cT1-3, N1, Grade I or II, ER+/PR+), results were consistent with the overall cohort: nodal pCR varied by both age (17.5% in age < 50 and 13.6% in age ≥ 50, p < 0.001) and by Ki67 ≥ 20% vs < 20% (16.8% vs 7.9%, p < 0.001) and nodal pCR remained prognostic for OS with adjusted HR 0.63 (95% CI: 0.50-0.81, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: In cN+ ER+/HER2- BC treated with NAC, nodal pCR is more common in pts< 50 and those with high Ki-67 and is highly prognostic for OS. These data strongly suggest that NAC chemotherapy benefit should not be evaluated using total pCR rates in isolation, but for N+ pts to also consider nodal response. Given that nodal pCR is highly prognostic for OS, future neoadjuvant strategies should consider nodal pCR as a potential intermediate biomarker for long term survival.
Multivariable analysis of factors associated with overall survival, including the adjusted effect of nodal pCR
Citation Format: Dan Moldoveanu, Matthew P. Goetz, Tanya L. Hoskin, Courtney N. Day, Judy C. Boughey. Age, Ki-67, Nodal pCR and overall survival following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Node Positive ER+/Her2- Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-01-22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tanya L. Hoskin
- 3Department of Surgery, Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Judy C. Boughey
- 5Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery,Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Johnston S, Toi M, O’Shaughnessy J, Rastogi P, Campone M, Neven P, Huang CS, Huober J, Jaliffe GG, Cicin I, Tolaney S, Goetz MP, Rugo H, Senkus E, Testa L, Mastro LD, Shimizu C, Wei R, Shahir A, Munoz M, Antonio BS, Andre V, Harbeck N, Martín M. Abstract GS1-09: Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer: results from a pre-planned monarchE overall survival interim analysis, including 4-year efficacy outcomes. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-gs1-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Adjuvant abemaciclib (a CDK4 and 6 inhibitor) combined with ET resulted in significant and clinically meaningful improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high risk EBC in the monarchE trial, and is an approved adjuvant therapy for these patients. Here we present efficacy results from a pre-specified overall survival interim analysis (OS IA2) which was planned to occur 2 years (yrs) after the primary outcome analysis. Methods Pts were randomized (1:1) to receive ET for up to 10 yrs +/- abemaciclib for 2 yrs (study treatment period). High-risk EBC was defined as either ≥4 positive axillary lymph nodes (ALN), or 1-3 ALN with either Grade 3 disease and/or tumor ≥5 cm (Cohort 1). While the proliferation biomarker Ki-67 was centrally assessed in all pts with available tissue sample, an additional smaller group of pts with 1-3+ ALN and central Ki-67 ≥20% as the only high-risk feature were included (Cohort 2). The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of both Cohort 1 (5120 pts) and Cohort 2 (517 pts). Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard model. Results At a median follow-up of 42 months, all pts were off abemaciclib. IDFS and DRFS data illustrate a sustained benefit beyond the treatment period. In the ITT population, the HR for IDFS was 0.664 (95% CI: 0.578, 0.762) and DRFS was 0.659 (95% CI: 0.567, 0.767). At 4 yrs, this reflected an improvement in IDFS rates from 79.4% to 85.8% (absolute difference 6.4%), and in DRFS rates from 82.5% to 88.4% (absolute difference 5.9%). The continued separation of the curves was associated with an increase in absolute benefit in IDFS 4-year rates compared to 2-and 3-year IDFS rates (absolute difference 2.8% and 4.8% respectively). While OS remained immature, there was a lower number of deaths observed in the abemaciclib plus ET arm compared to the ET alone arm (157 [5.6%] vs 173 [6.1%], HR 0.929 [95% CI: 0.748, 1.153], p = 0.503), suggesting that the robust benefit in IDFS and DRFS began to translate into a numerically favorable OS HR. As previously described, within Cohort 1, a Ki-67 index of ≥20% was associated with a worse prognosis, but similar abemaciclib treatment effects were observed regardless of Ki-67 index. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusion The clinically meaningful benefit of adjuvant abemaciclib added to ET in HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk EBC persists beyond completion of abemaciclib therapy, yielding an increase in absolute IDFS and DRFS benefit at 4 yrs. While OS remains immature at this time, the lower number of deaths in the abemaciclib arm compared to the ET arm suggest that a survival signal favoring abemaciclib is emerging.
Citation Format: Stephen Johnston, Masakazu Toi, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Priya Rastogi, Mario Campone, Patrick Neven, Chiun Sheng Huang, Jens Huober, Georgina Garnica Jaliffe, Irfan Cicin, Sara Tolaney, Matthew P. Goetz, Hope Rugo, Elżbieta Senkus, Laura Testa, Lucia Del Mastro, Chikako Shimizu, Ran Wei, Ashwin Shahir, Maria Munoz, Belen San Antonio, Valerie Andre, Nadia Harbeck, Miguel Martín. Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer: results from a pre-planned monarchE overall survival interim analysis, including 4-year efficacy outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Masakazu Toi
- 2Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Priya Rastogi
- 4NSABP/NRG Oncology and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center/University of Pittsburgh
| | - Mario Campone
- 5Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Patrick Neven
- 6Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| | - Chiun Sheng Huang
- 7National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Republic of China)
| | - Jens Huober
- 8Kantonsspital St.Gallen, Brustzentrum, Departement Interdisziplinäre medizinische Dienste, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Irfan Cicin
- 10Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey
| | | | | | - Hope Rugo
- 13University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Elżbieta Senkus
- 14Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Laura Testa
- 15Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP)
| | | | - Chikako Shimizu
- 17National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Miguel Martín
- 24Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Pagani O, Walley BA, Fleming GF, Colleoni M, Láng I, Gomez HL, Tondini C, Burstein HJ, Goetz MP, Ciruelos EM, Stearns V, Bonnefoi HR, Martino S, Geyer CE, Chini C, Puglisi F, Spazzapan S, Ruhstaller T, Winer EP, Ruepp B, Loi S, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Regan MM, Francis PA. Adjuvant Exemestane With Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up of the Combined TEXT and SOFT Trials. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1376-1382. [PMID: 36521078 PMCID: PMC10419413 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The combined analysis of SOFT-TEXT compared outcomes in 4,690 premenopausal women with estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive (ER/PgR+) early breast cancer randomly assigned to 5 years of exemestane + ovarian function suppression (OFS) versus tamoxifen + OFS. After a median follow-up of 9 years, exemestane + OFS significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), but not overall survival, compared with tamoxifen + OFS. We now report DFS, DRFI, and overall survival after a median follow-up of 13 years. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the 12-year DFS (4.6% absolute improvement, hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.90; P < .001) and DRFI (1.8% absolute improvement, HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.98; P = .03), but not overall survival (90.1% v 89.1%, HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.11), continued to be significantly improved for patients assigned exemestane + OFS over tamoxifen + OFS. Among patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative tumors (86.0% of the ITT population), the absolute improvement in 12-year overall survival with exemestane + OFS was 2.0% (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.04) and 3.3% in those who received chemotherapy (45.9% of the ITT population). Overall survival benefit was clinically significant in high-risk patients, eg, women age < 35 years (4.0%) and those with > 2 cm (4.5%) or grade 3 tumors (5.5%). These sustained reductions of the risk of recurrence with adjuvant exemestane + OFS, compared with tamoxifen + OFS, provide guidance for selecting patients for whom exemestane should be preferred over tamoxifen in the setting of OFS.[Media: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Pagani
- Interdisciplinary Cancer Service Hospital Riviera-Chablais Rennaz, Vaud, Switzerland
- Geneva University Hospitals, Lugano University and Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Vaud, Switzerland
| | - Barbara A. Walley
- University of Calgary and Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Gini F. Fleming
- The University of Chicago Medical Center and Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago, IL
| | - Marco Colleoni
- Division of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Milan, Italy
| | - István Láng
- Clinexpert-research, Budapest, Hungary (prior affiliation)
- National Institute of Oncology and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Henry L. Gomez
- Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru
- International Breast Cancer Study Group, Lima, Peru
| | - Carlo Tondini
- Osp. Papa Giovanni XXIII and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Harold J. Burstein
- Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School and Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Boston, MA
| | - Matthew P. Goetz
- Mayo Clinic and Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Rochester, MN
| | - Eva M. Ciruelos
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre and SOLTI Breast Cancer Research Cooperative Group, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vered Stearns
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and ECOG-ACRIN, Baltimore, MD
| | - Hervé R. Bonnefoi
- Institut Bergonié Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM U1312, and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Bordeaux, France
| | - Silvana Martino
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute and SWOG, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Charles E. Geyer
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center and NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Claudio Chini
- Deaprment of Medical Oncology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione, Lombardy, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Italy and Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico CRO di Aviano, Aviano, Italy
| | - Simon Spazzapan
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico CRO di Aviano, Aviano, Italy
| | - Thomas Ruhstaller
- University of Basel, Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) and International Breast Cancer Study Group, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Eric P. Winer
- Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School and Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Boston, MA
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine; Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, CT (prior affiliation)
| | - Barbara Ruepp
- International Breast Cancer Study Group Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sherene Loi
- International Breast Cancer Study Group and Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alan S. Coates
- International Breast Cancer Study Group and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard D. Gelber
- International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Frontier Science Foundation, Boston, MA
| | - Aron Goldhirsch
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Milan, Italy
- Deceased
| | - Meredith M. Regan
- International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Prudence A. Francis
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, St Vincent's Hospital, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Breast Cancer Trials Australia & New Zealand, University of Newcastle, Australia; International Breast Cancer Study Group, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bhattacharya SS, Witter TL, Cong AT, Bruinsma ES, Jayaraman S, Goetz MP, Hawse J, Schellenberg M. Abstract P2-24-03: Z-Endoxifen Allosterically Inhibits PKCβI and its Paradoxical Membrane Translocation. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p2-24-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Z-Endoxifen Allosterically Inhibits PKCβI and its Paradoxical Membrane Translocation Sayantani Sarkar Bhattacharya1, Taylor L. Witter1, Anh Q. T. Cong1, Elizabeth Bruinsma2, Swaathi Jayaraman2, Matthew P. Goetz2, John R. Hawse1, and Matthew J. Schellenberg1 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA 55905 2Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA 55905 Background: Z-Endoxifen (ENDX), the active metabolite of tamoxifen (TAM) and a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), exhibited high antitumor activity in endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive breast and other gynecologic cancer. ENDX has also been shown to be a protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor. PKCs participate in diverse cellular functions and their activity is often elevated in breast tumors. Guided by mechanistic insights from our recently determined crystal structure of PKCβI, we sought to determine the effects of ENDX on PKCβI in a breast cancer cell line model. Methods: To determine how ENDX regulates PKC activity, we used a Z’LYTE kinase activity assay. This Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) based biochemical method can detect differential sensitivity of phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated peptides to proteolytic cleavage. We probed changes in activity for conventional and novel PKCs, as well as the purified catalytic domain of conventional PKCs in vitro. Alongside, as kinase activity of PKC relies on its spatial assembly, therefore we studied its intracellular localization using live cell confocal imaging. MCF7 cells expressing YFP-tagged PKCβI were grown in a glass bottom chamber and treated with ENDX and other modulators for relevant time and doses for this study. Images were taken using Zeiss LSM 780 confocal laser scanning microscope and analyzed in Zeiss-ZEN microscope software and GraphPad Prism 9. Results: Our data from an in vitro kinase assay indicates that ENDX inhibits the kinase activity of conventional (PKCβI) and novel (PKC𝛿) PKC isoforms with a similar IC50, however PKCβI catalytic domain is less sensitive to ENDX. We also identified a multi-domain mechanism of PKC inhibition through an allosteric inhibitory mechanism. Our live cell imaging study demonstrated that ENDX promotes the recruitment of PKCβI to the cell membrane in both a dose and time-dependent manner. Moreover, this translocation can also be mitigated by co-treatment with inhibitors of the PKC-regulator PHLPP phosphatases. Conclusion: Taken together, these results suggest the allosteric effects of ENDX trigger PKCβI recruitment to the cell membrane, yet since ENDX also inhibits kinase activity it suggests that ENDX triggers a non-productive interaction with the enzyme and "breaks" the well-known mechanism of PKC activation upon binding the cell membrane. Furthermore, ENDX is likely to trigger dephosphorylation and ultimately degradation, suggesting that ENDX represents a new mechanistic basis for targeting and downregulating PKC in cancer cells. Hence, the current study provides an integrated pattern of highly specific treatments regimen that can exploit PKCβI as a repurposing clinical target in breast cancer.
Citation Format: Sayantani Sarkar Bhattacharya, Taylor L. Witter, Anh T. Cong, Elizabeth S. Bruinsma, Swaathi Jayaraman, Matthew P. Goetz, John Hawse, Matthew Schellenberg. Z-Endoxifen Allosterically Inhibits PKCβI and its Paradoxical Membrane Translocation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-24-03.
Collapse
|
42
|
Jahan N, Taraba J, Giridhar KV, Leon-Ferre RA, Tevaarwerk AJ, Cathcart-Rake E, O’Sullivan CC, Peethambaram P, Hobday TJ, Ruddy K, Mina LA, Advani P, Batalini F, Goetz MP, Haddad TC, Couch FJ, Yadav S. Abstract P4-01-22: Clinical outcomes of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi): the Mayo Clinic experience. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p4-01-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Two poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are currently FDA-approved for the treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in carriers of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2). This study explores the clinical outcomes of MBC patients treated with a PARPi. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included MBC patients treated with a PARPi between January 2017 and February 2022 at Mayo Clinic (Minnesota, Arizona, Florida, and Mayo Clinic Health Systems). We used the Kaplan Meier method to estimate the time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) and the log-rank test to compare different subsets. In addition, predictors of TTF were identified in a multivariate cox-proportional hazard regression model, including age at PARPi initiation, race, ethnicity, histology, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 expression of the tumor, the number of prior therapies, type of PARPi, and PV carrier status (germline BRCA1/2 or PALB2 vs. somatic BRCA1/2 vs. other). Results: Sixty-five patients treated with PARPi (olaparib: 51; talazoparib: 14) were included in the final analysis. Fifty-five patients were carriers of germline PVs in BRCA1 (n=24, 37%), BRCA2 (n=27, 42%) or PALB2 (n=4, 6%), whereas ten patients (15%) had no germline PVs but the tumor had a somatic mutation in the homologous recombination-related (HRR) genes (7 in BRCA1/2, 2 in ATM, and 1 in CDKN2A and CDH1). At the data cutoff, 48 (74%) patients had discontinued PARPi due to progression or death. Fifteen (23%) patients required a dose reduction due to side effects. Occurrence of grade ≥ 3 side effects: anemia in 8, fatigue in 4, neutropenia in 2, and thrombocytopenia in 2 patients. Eight (15.7%) patients in the olaparib group and seven (50%) patients in the talazoparib group required a dose reduction for side effects. No patient on olaparib required drug discontinuation due to side effects, whereas two patients on talazoparib were switched to olaparib due to cytopenias and could tolerate olaparib. Median TTF in the overall population was 8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.4 – 9.6), and there was no difference (p=0.64) in TTF between the olaparib and talazoparib groups. Median TTF in the germline BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 PV carriers were 7, 8, and 11 months, respectively (p=0.57). Among patients with somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, the median TTF was 4 months. Numerically, patients with HER2-positive tumors (n=8) had a shorter TTF compared to HER2-negative tumors (Median TTF: 4 vs. 8 months, p=0.098). No significant difference in TTF was observed by ER or PR status of the tumor, age at initiation of PARPi, the number of prior therapies, and prior use of platinum-based chemotherapy or CDK4/6 inhibitors. In multivariate analysis, HER2 positivity (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.0, 95% CI: 2.2 – 29.4, p=0.002), somatic BRCA1/2 mutations (HR: 7.6, 95% CI: 1.2 – 50.0, p=0.03) and somatic mutations in other HRR genes (HR: 19.1, 95% CI: 3.1 – 118.6, p=0.002) were associated with worse TTF. Conclusions: In the real world, PARPi were well-tolerated with promising time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) benefits comparable to data from clinical trials. Notably, relatively shorter TTF was observed in patients with somatic BRCA1/2 and other HRR gene mutations and HER2-positive MBC. These findings improve our understanding of the role of PARPi in MBC and will help to guide treatment decisions with PARPi in the clinical setting.
Citation Format: Nusrat Jahan, Jodi Taraba, Karthik V. Giridhar, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Amye J. Tevaarwerk, Elizabeth Cathcart-Rake, Ciara C. O’Sullivan, Prema Peethambaram, Timothy J. Hobday, Kathryn Ruddy, Lida A. Mina, Pooja Advani, Felipe Batalini, Matthew P. Goetz, Tufia C. Haddad, Fergus J. Couch, Siddhartha Yadav. Clinical outcomes of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi): the Mayo Clinic experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-22.
Collapse
|
43
|
Haddad TC, Suman V, Giridhar KV, Moreno-Aspitia A, Northfelt D, Ernst B, Sideras K, O’Sullivan CC, Singh R, Desta Z, Taraba J, Goodnature B, Goetz MP, Wang L, Ingle JN. Abstract OT1-04-02: Anastrozole dose escalation for optimal estrogen suppression in postmenopausal early stage breast cancer: A prospective trial. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-ot1-04-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: We performed matched case-control studies utilizing cohorts of postmenopausal women with ER+ breast cancer receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AI) on MA.27 [anastrozole, exemestane] or PreFace [letrozole] to assess the association between estrogen suppression after 6 months of treatment and an early breast cancer (EBC) event within 5 years of AI initiation (Clin Cancer Res 2020;26:2986-98). We found a significant 3.0-fold increase in risk of an EBC event for those taking anastrozole with levels of estrone (E1) ≥1.3 pg/mL and estradiol (E2) ≥0.5 pg/mL, but not for exemestane or letrozole. Given these findings we designed a prospective pharmacodynamic (PD) study to evaluate the impact of anastrozole (1 mg/day: ANA1) on E1 and E2 levels, and among those with inadequate estrogen suppression (IES: E1 ≥1.3 pg/mL and E2 ≥0.5 pg/mL), to evaluate the safety and PD efficacy of high-dose anastrozole (10 mg/day: ANA10), which has been found to be safe in prior clinical trials (Cancer 1998;83:1142-52). Methods: Post-menopausal women with stage I-III, ER ≥1% positive/HER2-negative breast cancer who were candidates for anastrozole were eligible after completion of locoregional therapy and chemotherapy, as clinically indicated. Women who were pre-menopausal at diagnosis were not eligible. All patients received 8-10 weeks of ANA1, after which those with adequate estrogen suppression (AES: E1< 1.3 pg/mL or E2< 0.5 pg/mL) came off study. Those with IES went on to receive ANA10 for 8-10 weeks, followed by letrozole (2.5 mg/day: LET) for 8-10 weeks. All patients were managed at their treating oncologist’s discretion following study discontinuation. E1 and E2 blood levels were measured pre-treatment and after completion of each treatment cycle by a CLIA-approved liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry in the Immunochemical Core Laboratory at Mayo Clinic. With a sample size of 29 patients with IES after ANA1, a one-sided binomial test of proportions with a significance level of 0.05 will have an 87% chance of rejecting the proportion with AES after ANA10 is at most 25% (Ho) when the true proportion is at least 50%. Specifically, the null hypothesis is rejected if the number of women with AES after ANA10 is 12 or more. Data lock was July 6, 2022. Results: Of the 161 women enrolled from April 2020 through May 2022, 3 withdrew consent prior to start of ANA1 and 2 were ineligible; thus, 156 women comprised the study cohort. Median patient age was 64 years (range 44-86), 10% of patients were of Hispanic ethnicity and/or non-white race, and 15% received chemotherapy. Six patients remain on ANA1, and 10 discontinued ANA1 due to refusal (7), adverse event (AE) (2), or COVID-19 (1). Forty-one of the remaining 140 patients (29.3%; 95%CI: 21.9-37.6%) had IES with ANA1. Nine of these 41 patients did not go on to ANA10 due to refusal (6) or AE (3). Of the 32 patients who started ANA10, 8 remain on treatment, 5 discontinued due to refusal (3) or AE (1-grade 2 urinary tract infection; 1-grade 1 palpitations), and 19 had a blood draw 45 days or more after starting ANA10. No grade 3-5 AEs or grade 2 hot flashes or arthralgias were reported. Of these 19 patients, 14 achieved AES with ANA10 (73.7%; 95%CI: 48.8-90.9%). All 19 patients switched to LET of which 3 remain on treatment, 1 is missing E1/E2 data, and 15 had a blood draw 45 days or more after starting LET. Of these 15 patients, 10 maintained AES, 2 acquired AES with LET, and 3 no longer had AES. Anastrozole and letrozole drug levels will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: Approximately 29% of postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2- BC receiving adjuvant anastrozole 1 mg/daily had IES. A majority of these patients achieved AES with dose escalation to ANA10 without tolerability issues. E1 and E2 levels are logical biomarkers given the mechanism of action of anastrozole, and further study utilizing them to determine the optimal dose of anastrozole for a given patient should be performed.
Citation Format: Tufia C. Haddad, Vera Suman, Karthik V. Giridhar, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald Northfelt, Brenda Ernst, Kostandinos Sideras, Ciara C. O’Sullivan, Ravinder Singh, Zeruesenay Desta, Jodi Taraba, Barbara Goodnature, Matthew P. Goetz, Liewei Wang, James N. Ingle. Anastrozole dose escalation for optimal estrogen suppression in postmenopausal early stage breast cancer: A prospective trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-04-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Barbara Goodnature
- 12Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Aspros KGM, Emch MJ, Wang X, Subramaniam M, Hinkle ML, Rodman EPB, Goetz MP, Hawse JR. Disruption of estrogen receptor beta's DNA binding domain impairs its tumor suppressive effects in triple negative breast cancer. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1047166. [PMID: 36926316 PMCID: PMC10011152 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1047166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive sub-type of the disease which accounts for a disproportionately high percentage of breast cancer morbidities and mortalities. For these reasons, a better understanding of TNBC biology is required and the development of novel therapeutic approaches are critically needed. Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) is a reported tumor suppressor that is expressed in approximately 20% of primary TNBC tumors, where it is associated with favorable prognostic features and patient outcomes. Previous studies have shown that ERβ mediates the assembly of co-repressor complexes on DNA to inhibit the expression of multiple growth promoting genes and to suppress the ability of oncogenic transcription factors to drive cancer progression. To further elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which ERβ elicits its anti-cancer effects, we developed MDA-MB-231 cells that inducibly express a mutant form of ERβ incapable of directly binding DNA. We demonstrate that disruption of ERβ's direct interaction with DNA abolishes its ability to regulate the expression of well characterized immediate response genes and renders it unable to suppress TNBC cell proliferation. Loss of DNA binding also diminishes the ability of ERβ to suppress oncogenic NFκB signaling even though it still physically associates with NFκB and other critical co-factors. These findings enhance our understanding of how ERβ functions in this disease and provide a model system that can be utilized to further investigate the mechanistic processes by which ERβ elicits its anti-cancer effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten G. M. Aspros
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Michael J. Emch
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Xiyin Wang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Malayannan Subramaniam
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Megan L. Hinkle
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Esther P. B. Rodman
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Matthew P. Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - John R. Hawse
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cong ATQ, Witter TL, Elizabeth BS, Jayaraman S, Dugan M, Hawse JR, Goetz MP, Schellenberg MJ. Structure study reveals active and inactive conformations of protein kinase C B1. Biophys J 2023; 122:332a. [PMID: 36783680 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.11.1853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anh T Q Cong
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Taylor L Witter
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Maria Dugan
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - John R Hawse
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew J Schellenberg
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Paluch-Shimon S, Neven P, Huober J, Cicin I, Goetz MP, Shimizu C, Huang CS, Lueck HJ, Beith J, Tokunaga E, Contreras JR, de Sant’Ana RO, Wei R, Shahir A, Nabinger SC, Forrester T, Johnston SRD, Harbeck N. Efficacy and safety results by menopausal status in monarchE: adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy in patients with HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231151840. [PMID: 36756142 PMCID: PMC9900651 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231151840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Abemaciclib is the first and only cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitor approved for adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), node-positive, and high-risk early breast cancer (EBC), with indications varying by geography. Premenopausal patients with HR+, HER2- tumors may have different tumor biology and treatment response compared to postmenopausal patients. Objectives We describe the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) for the large subgroup of premenopausal patients with HR+, HER2- EBC in monarchE. Design Randomized patients (1:1) received adjuvant ET with or without abemaciclib for 2 years plus at least 3 additional years of ET as clinically indicated. Methods Patients were stratified by menopausal status (premenopausal versus postmenopausal) at diagnosis. Standard ET (tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor) with or without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist was determined by physician's choice. Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) by menopausal status were assessed at data cutoff on 1 April 2021 (median follow-up of 27 months). Results Among randomized patients, 2451 (43.5%) were premenopausal and 3181 (56.4%) were postmenopausal. The choice of ET for premenopausal patients varied considerably between countries. Treatment benefit was consistent across menopausal status, with a numerically greater effect size in premenopausal patients. For premenopausal patients, abemaciclib with ET resulted in a 42.2% and 40.3% reduction in the risk of developing IDFS and DRFS events, respectively. Absolute improvement at 3 years was 5.7% for IDFS and 4.4% for DRFS rates. Safety profile for premenopausal patients was consistent with the overall safety population. Conclusion Abemaciclib with ET demonstrated clinically meaningful treatment benefit for IDFS and DRFS versus ET alone regardless of menopausal status and first ET, with a numerically greater benefit in the premenopausal compared to the postmenopausal population. Safety data in premenopausal patients are consistent with the overall safety profile of abemaciclib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Patrick Neven
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven - Campus
Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jens Huober
- Breast Center, University of Ulm, Ulm,
Germany
| | - Irfan Cicin
- Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne,
Turkey
| | | | - Chikako Shimizu
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine,
Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chiun-Sheng Huang
- National Taiwan University Hospital,
Taipei,National Taiwan University College of Medicine,
Taipei
| | | | - Jane Beith
- Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW,
Australia
| | - Eriko Tokunaga
- Department of Breast Oncology, National
Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Rosane Oliveira de Sant’Ana
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Instituto do
Câncer do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil,Universidade de Fortaleza, Fortaleza,
Brazil
| | - Ran Wei
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN,
USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and
Obstetrics and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital,
Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wei L, Gao H, Yu J, Zhang H, Nguyen TTL, Gu Y, Passow MR, Carter JM, Qin B, Boughey JC, Goetz MP, Weinshilboum RM, Ingle JN, Wang L. Pharmacological Targeting of Androgen Receptor Elicits Context-Specific Effects in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2023; 83:456-470. [PMID: 36469363 PMCID: PMC9896025 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-1016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in 80% to 90% of estrogen receptor α-positive (ER+) breast cancers. Accumulated evidence has shown that AR is a tumor suppressor and that its expression is associated with improved prognosis in ER+ breast cancer. However, both a selective AR agonist (RAD140) and an AR inhibitor (enzalutamide, ENZ) have shown a therapeutic effect on ER+ breast cancer, so the potential for clinical application of AR-targeting therapy for ER+ breast cancer is still in dispute. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of ENZ and RAD140 in vivo and in vitro in AR+/ER+ breast cancer models, characterizing the relationship of AR and ER levels to response to AR-targeting drugs and investigating the alterations of global gene expression and chromatin binding of AR and ERα after ENZ treatment. In the AR-low setting, ENZ directly functioned as an ERα antagonist. Cell growth inhibition by ENZ in breast cancer with low AR expression was independent of AR and instead dependent on ER. In AR-high breast cancer models, AR repressed ERα signaling and ENZ promoted ERα signaling by antagonizing AR. In contrast, RAD140 activated AR signaling and suppressed AR-high tumor growth by deregulating ERα expression and blocking ERα function. Overall, analysis of the dynamic efficacies and outcomes of AR agonist, and antagonist in the presence of different AR and ERα levels reveals regulators of response and supports the clinical investigation of ENZ in selected ER+ tumors with a low AR/ER ratio and AR agonists in tumors with a high AR/ER ratio. SIGNIFICANCE The ratio of androgen receptor to estrogen receptor in breast cancer dictates the response to AR-targeted therapies, providing guidelines for developing AR-directed treatment strategies for patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lixuan Wei
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Huanyao Gao
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jia Yu
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Huan Zhang
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Thanh Thanh L. Nguyen
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Yayun Gu
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Marie R. Passow
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jodi M. Carter
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bo Qin
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Matthew P. Goetz
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Richard M. Weinshilboum
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - James N. Ingle
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Liewei Wang
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Larsen CM, Garcia Arango M, Dasari H, Arciniegas Calle M, Adjei E, Rico Mesa J, Scott CG, Thompson CA, Cerhan JR, Haddad TC, Goetz MP, Herrmann J, Villarraga HR. Association of Anthracycline With Heart Failure in Patients Treated for Breast Cancer or Lymphoma, 1985-2010. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2254669. [PMID: 36735254 PMCID: PMC9898820 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Anthracyclines increase the risk for congestive heart failure (CHF); however, long-term cumulative incidence and risk factors for CHF after anthracycline therapy are not well defined in population-based studies. OBJECTIVE To compare the long-term cumulative incidence of CHF in patients with breast cancer or lymphoma treated with anthracycline therapy compared with healthy controls from the same community. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective population-based case-control study included data from the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Participants included residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, diagnosed with breast cancer or lymphoma from January 1985 through December 2010 matched for age, sex, and comorbidities with healthy controls, with a final ratio of 1 case to 1.5 controls. Statistical analysis was performed between July 2017 and February 2022. EXPOSURES Cancer treatment and CHF risk factors. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was new-onset CHF, as defined by the modified Framingham criteria. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) to compare the risk of CHF in participants with cancer vs controls, adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, obesity, and smoking history. RESULTS A total of 2196 individuals were included, with 812 patients with cancer and 1384 participants without cancer. The mean (SD) age was 52.62 (14.56) years and 1704 participants (78%) were female. Median (IQR) follow-up was 8.6 (5.2-13.4) years in the case group vs 12.5 (8.7-17.5) years in the control group. Overall, patients with cancer had higher risk of CHF compared with the control cohort even after adjusting for age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and smoking status (HR, 2.86 [95% CI, 1.90-4.32]; P < .001). After adjusting for the same variables, CHF risk was greater for patients with cancer receiving anthracycline (HR, 3.25 [95% CI, 2.11-5.00]; P < .001) and was attenuated and lost statistical significance for patients with cancer not receiving anthracyclines (HR, 1.78 [95% CI, 0.83-3.81]; P = .14). Higher cumulative incidence for patients treated with anthracyclines vs comparator cohort was observed at 1 year (1.81% vs 0.09%), 5 years (2.91% vs 0.79%), 10 years (5.36% vs 1.74%), 15 years (7.42% vs 3.18%), and 20 years (10.75% vs 4.98%) (P < .001). There were no significant differences in risk of CHF for patients receiving anthracycline at a dose of less than 180 mg/m2 compared with those at a dose of 180 to 250 mg/m2 (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.19-1.51]) or at a dose of more than 250 mg/m2 (HR, 1.23 [95% CI, 0.52-2.91]). At diagnosis, age was an independent risk factor associated with CHF (HR per 10 years, 2.77 [95% CI, 1.99-3.86]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this retrospective population-based case-control study, anthracyclines were associated with an increased risk of CHF early during follow-up, and the increased risk persisted over time. The cumulative incidence of CHF in patients with breast cancer or lymphoma treated with anthracyclines at 15 years was more than 2-fold that of the control group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn M. Larsen
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | - Harika Dasari
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Effie Adjei
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Juan Rico Mesa
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - James R. Cerhan
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Tufia C. Haddad
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Matthew P. Goetz
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Joerg Herrmann
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Koubek EJ, Buhrow SA, Safgren SL, Jia L, Goetz MP, Ames MM, Reid JM. Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of Endoxifen in Female Rats and Dogs: Evidence to Support the Use of Endoxifen to Overcome the Limitations of CYP2D6-Mediated Tamoxifen Metabolism. Drug Metab Dispos 2023; 51:183-192. [PMID: 36351835 PMCID: PMC9900863 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.122.000929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoxifen (ENDX) is an active metabolite of tamoxifen (TAM), a drug commonly used for the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and metabolized by CYP2D6. Genetic or drug-induced reductions in CYP2D6 activity decrease plasma ENDX concentrations and TAM efficacy. It was proposed that direct oral administration of ENDX would circumvent the issues related to metabolic activation of TAM by CYP2D6 and increase patient response. Here, we characterized the pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of ENDX in female rats and dogs. Additionally, ENDX exposure was compared following equivalent doses of ENDX and TAM. ENDX exposure was 100-fold and 10-fold greater in rats and dogs, respectively, with ENDX administration compared with an equivalent dose of TAM. In single-dose administration studies, the terminal elimination half-life and plasma clearance values were 6.3 hours and 2.4 L/h per kg in rats given 2 mg/kg i.v. ENDX and 9.2 hours and 0.4 L/h/kg in dogs given 0.5 mg/kg i.v. ENDX, respectively. Plasma concentrations above 0.1 µM and 1 µM ENDX were achieved with 20-mg/kg and 200-mg/kg doses in rats, and concentrations above 1 µM and 10 µM were achieved with 15-mg/kg and 100-mg/kg doses in dogs. Oral absorption of ENDX was linear in rats and dogs, with bioavailability greater than 67% in rats and greater than 50% in dogs. In repeated-dose administration studies, ENDX peak plasma concentrations reached 9 µM in rats and 20 µM in dogs following four daily doses of 200 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg ENDX, respectively. The results indicate that ENDX has high oral bioavailability, and therapeutic concentrations were maintained after repeated dosing. Oral dosing of ENDX resulted in substantially higher ENDX concentrations than a similar dose of TAM. These data support the ongoing development of ENDX to overcome the limitations associated with CYP2D6-mediated metabolism of TAM in humans. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study presents for the first time the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of endoxifen and three key tamoxifen metabolites following repeated oral dosing in female rats and dogs. This study reports that endoxifen has high oral bioavailability, and therapeutic concentrations were maintained after repeated dosing. On the basis of these data, Z-endoxifen (Z-ENDX) was developed as a drug based upon the hypothesis that oral administration of Z-ENDX would overcome the limitations of CYP2D6 metabolism required for full metabolic activation of tamoxifen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily J Koubek
- Departments of Oncology (E.J.K., S.A.B., S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.) and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland (L.J.)
| | - Sarah A Buhrow
- Departments of Oncology (E.J.K., S.A.B., S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.) and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland (L.J.)
| | - Stephanie L Safgren
- Departments of Oncology (E.J.K., S.A.B., S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.) and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland (L.J.)
| | - Lee Jia
- Departments of Oncology (E.J.K., S.A.B., S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.) and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland (L.J.)
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Departments of Oncology (E.J.K., S.A.B., S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.) and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland (L.J.)
| | - Matthew M Ames
- Departments of Oncology (E.J.K., S.A.B., S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.) and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland (L.J.)
| | - Joel M Reid
- Departments of Oncology (E.J.K., S.A.B., S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.) and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (S.L.S., M.P.G., M.M.A., J.M.R.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland (L.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Johnston SRD, Toi M, O'Shaughnessy J, Rastogi P, Campone M, Neven P, Huang CS, Huober J, Jaliffe GG, Cicin I, Tolaney SM, Goetz MP, Rugo HS, Senkus E, Testa L, Del Mastro L, Shimizu C, Wei R, Shahir A, Munoz M, San Antonio B, André V, Harbeck N, Martin M. Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (monarchE): results from a preplanned interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:77-90. [PMID: 36493792 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00694-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 128.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy previously showed a significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival and distant relapse-free survival in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; also known as ERBB2)-negative, node-positive, high-risk, early breast cancer. Here, we report updated results from an interim analysis to assess overall survival as well as invasive disease-free survival and distant relapse-free survival with additional follow-up. METHODS In monarchE, an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who had hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, early breast cancer at a high risk of recurrence with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were recruited from 603 sites including hospitals and academic and community centres in 38 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by means of an interactive web-based response system (block size of 4), stratified by previous chemotherapy, menopausal status, and region, to receive standard-of-care endocrine therapy of physician's choice for up to 10 years with or without abemaciclib 150 mg orally twice a day for 2 years (treatment period). All therapies were administered in an open-label manner without masking. High-risk disease was defined as either four or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or between one and three positive axillary lymph nodes and either grade 3 disease or tumour size of 5 cm or larger (cohort 1). A smaller group of patients were enrolled with between one and three positive axillary lymph nodes and Ki-67 of at least 20% as an additional risk feature (cohort 2). This was a prespecified overall survival interim analysis planned to occur 2 years after the primary outcome analysis for invasive disease-free survival. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03155997, and is ongoing. FINDINGS Between July 17, 2017, and Aug 12, 2019, 5637 patients were randomly assigned (5601 [99·4%] were women and 36 [0·6%] were men). 2808 were assigned to receive abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy and 2829 were assigned to receive endocrine therapy alone. At a median follow-up of 42 months (IQR 37-47), median invasive disease-free survival was not reached in either group and the invasive disease-free survival benefit previously reported was sustained: HR 0·664 (95% CI 0·578-0·762, nominal p<0·0001). At 4 years, the absolute difference in invasive disease-free survival between the groups was 6·4% (85·8% [95% CI 84·2-87·3] in the abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy group vs 79·4% [77·5-81·1] in the endocrine therapy alone group). 157 (5·6%) of 2808 patients in the abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy group died compared with 173 (6·1%) of 2829 patients in the endocrine therapy alone group (HR 0·929, 95% CI 0·748-1·153; p=0·50). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (in 548 [19·6%] of 2791 patients receiving abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy vs 24 [0·9%] of 2800 patients in the endocrine therapy alone group), leukopenia (318 [11·4%] vs 11 [0·4%]), and diarrhoea (218 [7·8%] vs six [0·2%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 433 (15·5%) of 2791 patients receiving abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy versus 256 (9·1%) of 2800 receiving endocrine therapy. There were two treatment-related deaths in the abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy group (diarrhoea and pneumonitis) and none in the endocrine therapy alone group. INTERPRETATION Adjuvant abemaciclib reduces the risk of recurrence. The benefit is sustained beyond the completion of treatment with an absolute increase at 4 years, further supporting the use of abemaciclib in patients with high-risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. Further follow-up is needed to establish whether overall survival can be improved with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in these patients. FUNDING Eli Lilly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joyce O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Priya Rastogi
- University of Pittsburgh/UPMC, NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mario Campone
- Institute de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Centre Rene Cauducheau, Saint-Herblain, Nantes, France
| | - Patrick Neven
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chiun-Sheng Huang
- National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jens Huober
- Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, Breast Centre St Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Irfan Cicin
- Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey
| | | | | | - Hope S Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Hellen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elzbieta Senkus
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Laura Testa
- Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- IRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, UO Breast Unit, Genoa, Italy; Università di Genova, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIM), Genoa, Italy
| | - Chikako Shimizu
- National Centre for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ran Wei
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Centre, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Centre München, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Miguel Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Universidad Complutense, CIBERONC, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|