1
|
Tometich DB, Geiss C, Maconi ML, Chavez M, Hoogland AI, Li X, Nieves-Lopez A, Rodriguez Y, Bryant C, Brohl AS, Eroglu Z, Markowitz J, Tarhini AA, Hwu P, Khushalani NI, Jim HSL. Patient reported outcomes and patient experiences of immune checkpoint modulators for advanced or recurrent melanoma: a mixed methods study. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:330. [PMID: 38709312 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08538-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Little is known about late and long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of immune checkpoint modulators (ICMs) outside clinical trials. We conducted a cross-sectional, mixed-methods study to describe long-term PROs among advanced melanoma patients who began standard of care treatment with ICMs at least 1 year previously. METHODS All participants completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM), assessing 46 immune-related side effects on a 5-point Likert scale, and a subset completed individual interviews. Descriptive statistics were computed for quantitative data and applied thematic analysis was used to examine qualitative data. RESULTS Participants (N = 80) had a mean age of 67 years, and the majority were male (66%), non-Hispanic White (96%), and college graduates (61%). Single-agent nivolumab was the most common first (47%) and current/recent ICM (64%). On the FACT-ICM, 98% of participants reported at least one side effect, and 78% reported moderate or severe side effects. The most common moderate or severe side effects were aching joints (43%) and fatigue (38%). In interviews (n = 20), we identified five themes regarding patients' longer-term experiences after ICMs: lasting fatigue or decline in functioning, minimal side effects, manageable thyroid and pituitary dysfunction, skin conditions can be difficult to manage, and treating the cancer is worth the side effects. CONCLUSIONS Nearly all patients reported side effects of ICMs at least 1 year after starting treatment. Our findings suggest that ICM side effect screening and management-especially for aching joints and fatigue-are indicated during long-term care of people living with advanced melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle B Tometich
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
- University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| | - Carley Geiss
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Melinda L Maconi
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Melody Chavez
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Aasha I Hoogland
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Xiaoyin Li
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | | | - Yvelise Rodriguez
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Crystal Bryant
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Andrew S Brohl
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Zeynep Eroglu
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Joseph Markowitz
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Ahmad A Tarhini
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | | | - Heather S L Jim
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chaudhri A, Lizee G, Hwu P, Rai K. Chromatin Remodelers Are Regulators of the Tumor Immune Microenvironment. Cancer Res 2024; 84:965-976. [PMID: 38266066 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-2244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors show remarkable responses in a wide range of cancers, yet patients develop adaptive resistance. This necessitates the identification of alternate therapies that synergize with immunotherapies. Epigenetic modifiers are potent mediators of tumor-intrinsic mechanisms and have been shown to regulate immune response genes, making them prime targets for therapeutic combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Some success has been observed in early clinical studies that combined immunotherapy with agents targeting DNA methylation and histone modification; however, less is known about chromatin remodeler-targeted therapies. Here, we provide a discussion on the regulation of tumor immunogenicity by the chromatin remodeling SWI/SNF complex through multiple mechanisms associated with immunotherapy response that broadly include IFN signaling, DNA damage, mismatch repair, regulation of oncogenic programs, and polycomb-repressive complex antagonism. Context-dependent targeting of SWI/SNF subunits can elicit opportunities for synthetic lethality and reduce T-cell exhaustion. In summary, alongside the significance of SWI/SNF subunits in predicting immunotherapy outcomes, their ability to modulate the tumor immune landscape offers opportunities for therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apoorvi Chaudhri
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gregory Lizee
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Kunal Rai
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- MDACC Epigenomics Therapy Initiative, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Amaria R, Knisely A, Vining D, Kopetz S, Overman MJ, Javle M, Antonoff MB, Tzeng CWD, Wolff RA, Pant S, Lito K, Rangel K, Fellman B, Yuan Y, Lu KH, Sakellariou-Thompson D, Haymaker CL, Forget MA, Hwu P, Bernatchez C, Jazaeri AA. Efficacy and safety of autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in recurrent or refractory ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e006822. [PMID: 38309721 PMCID: PMC10840042 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-006822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy has shown efficacy in metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and other solid tumors. Our preclinical work demonstrated more robust CD8 predominant TIL production when agonistic anti-4-1BB and CD3 antibodies were used in early ex vivo TIL culture. METHODS Patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal (CRC), pancreatic (PDAC) and ovarian (OVCA) cancers were eligible. Lymphodepleting chemotherapy was followed by infusion of ex vivo expanded TIL, manufactured at MD Anderson Cancer Center with IL-2 and agonistic stimulation of CD3 and 4-1BB (urelumab). Patients received up to six doses of high-dose IL-2 after TIL infusion. Primary endpoint was evaluation of objective response rate at 12 weeks using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 with secondary endpoints including disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS 17 patients underwent TIL harvest and 16 were treated on protocol (NCT03610490), including 8 CRC, 5 PDAC, and 3 OVCA patients. Median age was 57.5 (range 33-70) and 50% were females. Median number of lines of prior therapy was 2 (range 1-8). No responses were observed at 12 weeks. Ten subjects achieved at least one stable disease (SD) assessment for a DCR of 62.5% (95% CI 35.4% to 84.8%). Best response included prolonged SD in a patient with PDAC lasting 17 months. Median PFS and OS across cohorts were 2.53 months (95% CI 1.54 to 4.11) and 18.86 months (95% CI 4.86 to NR), respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicities attributable to therapy were seen in 14 subjects (87.5%; 95% CI 61.7% to 98.4%). Infusion product analysis showed the presence of effector memory cells with high expression of CD39 irrespective of tumor type and low expression of checkpoint markers. CONCLUSIONS TIL manufactured with assistance of 4-1BB and CD3 agonism is feasible and treatment is associated with no new safety signals. While no responses were observed, a significant portion of patients achieved SD suggesting early/partial immunological effect. Further research is required to identify factors associated with resistance and functionally enhance T cells for a more effective therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodabe Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anne Knisely
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David Vining
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Scott Kopetz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael J Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mara B Antonoff
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robert A Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Shubham Pant
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kathryn Lito
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly Rangel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bryan Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Cara L Haymaker
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marie-Andrée Forget
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Chantale Bernatchez
- SVP Discovery & Platforms, Therapeutics Discovery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amir A Jazaeri
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Singh S, Xiao Z, Bavisi K, Roszik J, Melendez BD, Wang Z, Cantwell MJ, Davis RE, Lizee G, Hwu P, Neelapu SS, Overwijk WW, Singh M. Correction: IL-1α Mediates Innate and Acquired Resistance to Immunotherapy in Melanoma. J Immunol 2024; 212:500. [PMID: 38088809 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2300689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
|
5
|
Dukes CW, Potez M, Lancet J, Kuter BJ, Whiting J, Mo Q, Leav B, Wang H, Vanas JS, Cubitt CL, Isaacs-Soriano K, Kennedy K, Rathwell J, Diaz Cobo J, O’Nan W, Sirak B, Dong N, Tan E, Hwu P, Giuliano AR, Pilon-Thomas S. Neutralizing Antibody Response following a Third Dose of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine among Cancer Patients. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 12:13. [PMID: 38250826 PMCID: PMC10818923 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12010013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Cancer patients are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection and have a decreased immune response to vaccination. We conducted a study measuring both the neutralizing and total antibodies in cancer patients following a third dose of the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. Immune responses were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and neutralization assays. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to evaluate the association between patient characteristics and neutralization geometric mean titers (GMTs), and paired t-tests were used to compare the GMTs between different timepoints. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the correlation between total antibody and neutralization GMTs. Among 238 adults diagnosed with cancer, a third dose of mRNA-1273 resulted in a 37-fold increase in neutralization GMT 28 days post-vaccination and maintained a 14.6-fold increase at 6 months. Patients with solid tumors or lymphoid cancer had the highest and lowest neutralization GMTs, respectively, at both 28 days and 6 months post-dose 3. While total antibody GMTs in lymphoid patients continued to increase, other cancer types showed decreases in titers between 28 days and 6 months post-dose 3. A strong correlation (p < 0.001) was found between total antibody and neutralization GMTs. The third dose of mRNA-1273 was able to elicit a robust neutralizing antibody response in cancer patients, which remained for 6 months after administration. Lymphoid cancer patients can benefit most from this third dose, as it was shown to continue to increase total antibody GMTs 6 months after vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W. Dukes
- Department of Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (A.R.G.)
| | - Marine Potez
- Department of Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Jeffrey Lancet
- Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Barbara J. Kuter
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Junmin Whiting
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Qianxing Mo
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Brett Leav
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Haixing Wang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Julie S. Vanas
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | | | - Kimberly Isaacs-Soriano
- Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (A.R.G.)
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Kayoko Kennedy
- Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (A.R.G.)
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Julie Rathwell
- Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (A.R.G.)
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Julian Diaz Cobo
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Wesley O’Nan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Bradley Sirak
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Ning Dong
- Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Elaine Tan
- James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Anna R. Giuliano
- Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (A.R.G.)
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Shari Pilon-Thomas
- Department of Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Center for Immunization and Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA (A.R.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eljilany I, Saghand PG, Chen J, Ratan A, McCarter M, Carpten J, Colman H, Ikeguchi AP, Puzanov I, Arnold S, Churchman M, Hwu P, Conejo-Garcia J, Dalton WS, Weiner GJ, El Naqa IM, Tarhini AA. The T Cell Immunoscore as a Reference for Biomarker Development Utilizing Real-World Data from Patients with Advanced Malignancies Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4913. [PMID: 37894280 PMCID: PMC10605389 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to determine the prognostic value of an immunoscore reflecting CD3+ and CD8+ T cell density estimated from real-world transcriptomic data of a patient cohort with advanced malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in an effort to validate a reference for future machine learning-based biomarker development. METHODS Transcriptomic data was collected under the Total Cancer Care Protocol (NCT03977402) Avatar® project. The real-world immunoscore for each patient was calculated based on the estimated densities of tumor CD3+ and CD8+ T cells utilizing CIBERSORTx and the LM22 gene signature matrix. Then, the immunoscore association with overall survival (OS) was estimated using Cox regression and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. The OS predictions were assessed using Harrell's concordance index (C-index). The Youden index was used to identify the optimal cut-off point. Statistical significance was assessed using the log-rank test. RESULTS Our study encompassed 522 patients with four cancer types. The median duration to death was 10.5 months for the 275 participants who encountered an event. For the entire cohort, the results demonstrated that transcriptomics-based immunoscore could significantly predict patients at risk of death (p-value < 0.001). Notably, patients with an intermediate-high immunoscore achieved better OS than those with a low immunoscore. In subgroup analysis, the prediction of OS was significant for melanoma and head and neck cancer patients but did not reach significance in the non-small cell lung cancer or renal cell carcinoma cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Calculating CD3+ and CD8+ T cell immunoscore using real-world transcriptomic data represents a promising signature for estimating OS with ICIs and can be used as a reference for future machine learning-based biomarker development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Islam Eljilany
- Departments of Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Payman Ghasemi Saghand
- Department of Machine Learning, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - James Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Aakrosh Ratan
- Center for Public Health Genomics, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Martin McCarter
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - John Carpten
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Howard Colman
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | | | - Igor Puzanov
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Susanne Arnold
- University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - Michelle Churchman
- Clinical & Life Sciences Department, Aster Insights, Hudson, FL 34667, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Jose Conejo-Garcia
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | | | - George J. Weiner
- Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Issam M. El Naqa
- Department of Machine Learning, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Ahmad A. Tarhini
- Departments of Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chaudhri A, Bu X, Wang Y, Gomez M, Torchia JA, Hua P, Hung SH, Davies MA, Lizee GA, von Andrian U, Hwu P, Freeman GJ. The CX3CL1-CX3CR1 chemokine axis can contribute to tumor immune evasion and blockade with a novel CX3CR1 monoclonal antibody enhances response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1237715. [PMID: 37771579 PMCID: PMC10524267 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1237715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
CX3CL1 secreted in the tumor microenvironment serves as a chemoattractant playing a critical role in metastasis of CX3CR1 expressing cancer cells. CX3CR1 can be expressed in both cancer and immune-inhibitory myeloid cells to facilitate their migration. We generated a novel monoclonal antibody against mouse CX3CR1 that binds to CX3CR1 and blocks the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 interaction. We next explored the immune evasion strategies implemented by the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis and find that it initiates a resistance program in cancer cells that results in 1) facilitation of tumor cell migration, 2) secretion of soluble mediators to generate a pro-metastatic niche, 3) secretion of soluble mediators to attract myeloid populations, and 4) generation of tumor-inflammasome. The CX3CR1 monoclonal antibody reduces migration of tumor cells and decreases secretion of immune suppressive soluble mediators by tumor cells. In combination with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, this CX3CR1 monoclonal antibody enhances survival in an immunocompetent mouse colon carcinoma model through a decrease in tumor-promoting myeloid populations. Thus, this axis is involved in the mechanisms of resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and the combination therapy can overcome a portion of the resistance mechanisms to anti-PD-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apoorvi Chaudhri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Xia Bu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Yunfei Wang
- Department of Clinical Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Michael Gomez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - James A. Torchia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ping Hua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Shao-Hsi Hung
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Michael A. Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gregory A. Lizee
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ulrich von Andrian
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Immunology & HMS Center for Immune Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Clinical Science, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Gordon J. Freeman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wei CH, Huang L, Kreh B, Liu X, Tyutyunyk-Massey L, Kawakami M, Chen Z, Shi M, Kozlov S, Chan KC, Andresson T, Carrington M, Vuligonda V, Sanders ME, Horowitz A, Hwu P, Peng W, Dmitrovsky E, Liu X. A novel retinoic acid receptor-γ agonist antagonizes immune checkpoint resistance in lung cancers by altering the tumor immune microenvironment. Sci Rep 2023; 13:14907. [PMID: 37689790 PMCID: PMC10492813 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41690-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023] Open
Abstract
All-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA), the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) agonist, regulates cell growth, differentiation, immunity, and survival. We report that ATRA-treatment repressed cancer growth in syngeneic immunocompetent, but not immunodeficient mice. The tumor microenvironment was implicated: CD8+ T cell depletion antagonized ATRA's anti-tumorigenic effects in syngeneic mice. ATRA-treatment with checkpoint blockade did not cooperatively inhibit murine lung cancer growth. To augment ATRA's anti-tumorigenicity without promoting its pro-tumorigenic potential, an RARγ agonist (IRX4647) was used since it regulates T cell biology. Treating with IRX4647 in combination with an immune checkpoint (anti-PD-L1) inhibitor resulted in a statistically significant suppression of syngeneic 344SQ lung cancers in mice-a model known for its resistance to checkpoints and characterized by low basal T cell and PD-L1 expression. This combined treatment notably elevated CD4+ T-cell presence within the tumor microenvironment and increased IL-5 and IL-13 tumor levels, while simultaneously decreasing CD38 in the tumor stroma. IL-5 and/or IL-13 treatments increased CD4+ more than CD8+ T-cells in mice. IRX4647-treatment did not appreciably affect in vitro lung cancer growth, despite RARγ expression. Pharmacokinetic analysis found IRX4647 plasma half-life was 6 h in mice. Yet, RARα antagonist (IRX6696)-treatment with anti-PD-L1 did not repress syngeneic lung cancer growth. Together, these findings provide a rationale for a clinical trial investigating an RARγ agonist to augment check point blockade response in cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Hsin Wei
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, PO Box B, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA
| | - Lu Huang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Blair Kreh
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, PO Box B, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA
| | - Xiuxia Liu
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, PO Box B, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA
| | - Liliya Tyutyunyk-Massey
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, PO Box B, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA
| | - Masanori Kawakami
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, PO Box B, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA
| | - Zibo Chen
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, PO Box B, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA
| | - Mi Shi
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, PO Box B, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA
| | - Serguei Kozlov
- Center for Advanced Preclinical Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - King C Chan
- Protein Characterization Laboratory, Frederick, MD, USA
| | | | - Mary Carrington
- Basic Science Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
- Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Amir Horowitz
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Weiyi Peng
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ethan Dmitrovsky
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, PO Box B, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA
| | - Xi Liu
- Molecular Pharmacology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, PO Box B, Frederick, MD, 21701, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tsimberidou AM, Guenther K, Andersson BS, Mendrzyk R, Alpert A, Wagner C, Nowak A, Aslan K, Satelli A, Richter F, Kuttruff-Coqui S, Schoor O, Fritsche J, Coughlin Z, Mohamed AS, Sieger K, Norris B, Ort R, Beck J, Vo HH, Hoffgaard F, Ruh M, Backert L, Wistuba II, Fuhrmann D, Ibrahim NK, Morris VK, Kee BK, Halperin DM, Nogueras-Gonzalez GM, Kebriaei P, Shpall EJ, Vining D, Hwu P, Singh H, Reinhardt C, Britten CM, Hilf N, Weinschenk T, Maurer D, Walter S. Feasibility and Safety of Personalized, Multi-Target, Adoptive Cell Therapy (IMA101): First-in-Human Clinical Trial in Patients with Advanced Metastatic Cancer. Cancer Immunol Res 2023; 11:925-945. [PMID: 37172100 PMCID: PMC10330623 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-22-0444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
IMA101 is an actively personalized, multi-targeted adoptive cell therapy (ACT), whereby autologous T cells are directed against multiple novel defined peptide-HLA (pHLA) cancer targets. HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors expressing ≥1 of 8 predefined targets underwent leukapheresis. Endogenous T cells specific for up to 4 targets were primed and expanded in vitro. Patients received lymphodepletion (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide), followed by T-cell infusion and low-dose IL2 (Cohort 1). Patients in Cohort 2 received atezolizumab for up to 1 year (NCT02876510). Overall, 214 patients were screened, 15 received lymphodepletion (13 women, 2 men; median age, 44 years), and 14 were treated with T-cell products. IMA101 treatment was feasible and well tolerated. The most common adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (Grade 1, n = 6; Grade 2, n = 4) and expected cytopenias. No patient died during the first 100 days after T-cell therapy. No neurotoxicity was observed. No objective responses were noted. Prolonged disease stabilization was noted in three patients lasting for 13.7, 12.9, and 7.3 months. High frequencies of target-specific T cells (up to 78.7% of CD8+ cells) were detected in the blood of treated patients, persisted for >1 year, and were detectable in posttreatment tumor tissue. Individual T-cell receptors (TCR) contained in T-cell products exhibited broad variation in TCR avidity, with the majority being low avidity. High-avidity TCRs were identified in some patients' products. This study demonstrates the feasibility and tolerability of an actively personalized ACT directed to multiple defined pHLA cancer targets. Results warrant further evaluation of multi-target ACT approaches using potent high-avidity TCRs. See related Spotlight by Uslu and June, p. 865.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | - Anna Nowak
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Katrin Aslan
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Becky Norris
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rita Ort
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer Beck
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Manuel Ruh
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Nuhad K Ibrahim
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Van Karlyle Morris
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas
| | - Bryan K Kee
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas
| | - Daniel M Halperin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas
| | | | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David Vining
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | - Norbert Hilf
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Giuliano A, Kuter B, Pilon-Thomas S, Whiting J, Mo Q, Leav B, Sirak B, Cubitt C, Dukes C, Isaacs-Soriano K, Kennedy K, Ball S, Dong N, Jain A, Hwu P, Lancet J. Safety and immunogenicity of a third dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine among cancer patients. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2023. [PMID: 37377402 PMCID: PMC10354405 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared to the general population, cancer patients are at higher risk of morbidity and mortality following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The immune response to a two-dose regimen of mRNA vaccines in cancer patients is generally lower than in immunocompetent individuals. Booster doses may meaningfully augment immune response in this population. We conducted an observational study with the primary objective of determining the immunogenicity of vaccine dose three (100 μg) of mRNA-1273 among cancer patients and a secondary objective of evaluating safety at 14 and 28 days. METHODS The mRNA-1273 vaccine was administered ∼7 to 9 months after administering two vaccine doses (i.e., the primary series). Immune responses (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) were assessed 28 days post-dose three. Adverse events were collected at days 14 (± 5) and 28 (+5) post-dose three. Fisher exact or X2 tests were used to compare SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity rates, and paired t-tests were used to compare SARS-CoV-2 antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) across different time intervals. RESULTS Among 284 adults diagnosed with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies, dose three of mRNA-1273 increased the percentage of patients seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 antibody from 81.7% pre-dose three to 94.4% 28 days post-dose three. GMTs increased 19.0-fold (15.8-22.8). Patients with lymphoid cancers or solid tumors had the lowest and highest antibody titers post-dose three, respectively. Antibody responses after dose three were reduced among those who received anti-CD20 antibody treatment, had lower total lymphocyte counts and received anticancer therapy within 3 months. Among patients seronegative for SARS-CoV-2 antibody pre-dose three, 69.2% seroconverted after dose three. A majority (70.4%) experienced mostly mild, transient adverse reactions within 14 days of dose three, whereas severe treatment-emergent events within 28 days were very rare (<2%). CONCLUSION Dose three of the mRNA-1273 vaccine was well-tolerated and augmented SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in cancer patients, especially those who did not seroconvert post-dose two or whose GMTs significantly waned post-dose two. Lymphoid cancer patients experienced lower humoral responses to dose three of the mRNA-1273 vaccine, suggesting that timely access to boosters is important for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Giuliano
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | | | - Junmin Whiting
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Qianxing Mo
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | - Bradley Sirak
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | - Christopher Dukes
- Department of Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | - Kayoko Kennedy
- Non-Therapeutic Research Office (NTRO), Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Somedeb Ball
- Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Ning Dong
- Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Akriti Jain
- Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jeffrey Lancet
- Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Obermayer AN, Shaw TI, Lee SJ, Hodi FS, LaFramboise WA, Storkus W, Karunamurthy AD, Hwu P, Streicher H, Chen DT, Kirkwood JM, Tarhini AA. Abstract 5704: An integrated immune signature predictive of adjuvant immunotherapeutic benefits for high-risk melanoma. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-5704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction CTLA4 blockade with ipilimumab was more favorable than interferon-α2b (IFN) in high-risk melanoma in phase adjuvant III trial E1609. Characterization of the pretreatment tumor immune biomarkers and clinical covariates may inform the likelihood of response to ipilimumab and other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and guide future development of this and other modalities in this patient population.
Methods We utilized PATH-SURVEIOR, a bioinformatics framework developed in-house for associating genes and pathway signatures with clinical endpoints, to perform survival analysis of gene expression levels of 31 candidate immune-related biomarkers based on previous preliminary data. We analyzed microarray gene expression data from 471 melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab (ipi) and 248 melanoma patients treated with IFN as part of E1609. We then developed a LASSO Cox regression model and validated our model in 22 patients treated with neoadjuvant ipi in a separate clinical trial.
Results Using PATH-SURVEIOR, we evaluated 31 candidate immune biomarkers and their association with patient outcome by including treatment group (ipi and IFN) as a multiplicative covariate interaction in the Cox hazard model. Our analysis identified CXCL9, CD8A, CXCL10, and INPP5D as Tier 1 biomarkers (HR > 1 and P < 0.05) and IDO1, IGKC, and IL2RB as Tier 2 biomarkers (HR > 1 and P < 0.1). Next, we developed an ipilimumab immune-based risk score using LASSO Cox regression (L-IPI7) based on these 7 aggregate biomarkers. We then split our 471 ipi-treated cohort into training (310, 66%) and testing (161, 33%) cohorts and assessed our model for its ability to predict overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Our risk score was capable of stratifying ipi-treated patients into High-Risk and Low-Risk populations, which correlated with OS. As a negative control, we assessed our risk score in 248 IFN-treated patients and found no significant association with OS. As validation, we applied our L-IPI7 score to a cohort of 22 patients treated with neoadjuvant ipi and determined that the score was able to predict patients with a high risk of relapse. Interestingly, when we developed an interactive Cox-regression model with colitis status (grade 0-1 vs grade 2+), we found that neoadjuvant ipi patients with low-grade colitis were associated with a higher L-IPI7 risk score for disease relapse. In addition, we determined that: i) higher age and higher L-IPI7 risk score identified patients with the worst OS and RFS And ii) female patients with a low L-IPI7 risk scores had a better OS and RFS.
Conclusions We developed a broadly applicable model based on LASSO Cox Regression predictive of adjuvant ipi treatment outcomes in melanoma. Our L-IPI7 score based on expression of CXCL9, CD8A, CXCL10, INPP5D, IDO1, IGKC, IL2RB effectively predicts survival, with interactions with age, gender and on-treatment development of colitis.
Citation Format: Alyssa N. Obermayer, Timothy I. Shaw, Sandra J. Lee, F. Stephen Hodi, William A. LaFramboise, Walter Storkus, Arivarasan D. Karunamurthy, Patrick Hwu, Howard Streicher, Dung-Tsa Chen, John M. Kirkwood, Ahmad A. Tarhini. An integrated immune signature predictive of adjuvant immunotherapeutic benefits for high-risk melanoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5704.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Timothy I. Shaw
- 1H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Hwu
- 1H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Dung-Tsa Chen
- 1H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li T, Sukrithan V, Ratan A, McCarter M, Carpten J, Colman H, Ikeguchi AP, Wang X, Puzanov I, Dalton S, Churchman M, Hwu P, Rodriguez PC, Dalton WS, Weiner GJ, Tarhini A. Abstract 5703: The immune cell state atlas analysis predicts therapeutic benefits with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-5703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: In this study, we investigated the prognostic role of the immune cell state atlas in predicting therapeutic benefits of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) within the ORIEN network of 18 collaborating cancer centers under the Total Cancer Care protocol.
Methods: We utilized RNA-seq data of 926 samples generated from 875 individuals. Gene expression data were deconvoluted for immune cell states using the Carcinoma EcoTyper software. We then conducted a series of survival analyses to test the association between survival outcomes and predicted cell types and states in five malignant tumors: Genitourinary (GU), Gastrointestinal (GI), Thoracic (THO), Cutaneous (CUT), Head & Neck (H&N). The regularized Cox regression model in R package ‘glmnet’ was then applied to select the complementary pathway signatures (including gene ontology and KEGG pathways) to the immune cell states in predicting survival outcomes. We also explored the immune-related long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) as potential biomarkers for cell states and patient outcomes.
Results: EcoTyper analysis revealed that 692 (~80%) of patients were assigned to the 10 pre-identified Carcinoma Ecotypes (CE1 to CE10) or cell state atlas group. Overall, two immune deficiency ecotype patient groups (CE1 and CE2) pre-identified based on the independent training data were linked to worse survival, while two proinflammatory ecotype groups (CE9 and CE10) were associated with favorable surxvival. Those ecotype groups showed strong prognostic significance in predicting OS in melanoma and H&N. Meanwhile, CE6, a non-neoplastic tissue enriched cell subtype, was also found to be highly associated with longer OS in H&N and GU. CE7, an age-related mutation patient subgroup, contributed to shorter survival in both melanoma and GI. We also found that a subset of activated B cell state and the exhausted/effector CD4 T cell state were significantly associated with patient survival in melanoma and GU, respectively. The penalized Cox regression model revealed that β-catenin signaling pathway, P53 pathway and heme metabolism in the MSigDB Hallmark gene sets are the most complementary pathways to the ecotype scores in multiple cancer types. In additional, multiple pathways in KEGG such as endocytosis were found to jointly contribute to the ecotype-pathway composite prognostic model. In anazlying immune-related lncRNA biomarkers, we highlighted the prognostic role of NKILA in our dataset, which has been studied to promote tumor immune evasion.
Conclusion: Our analysis has successfully established the utility of immune cell state atlas in predicting therapeutic benefits with ICIs. We expect that the discovered complementary signatures in the cancer-cell compartment will also lead to a novel spectrum of tumor-based biomarkers to ICI.
Citation Format: Tingyi Li, Vineeth Sukrithan, Aakrosh Ratan, Martin McCarter, John Carpten, Howard Colman, Alexandra P. Ikeguchi, Xuefeng Wang, Igor Puzanov, Susanne Dalton, Michelle Churchman, Patrick Hwu, Paulo C. Rodriguez, William S. Dalton, George J. Weiner, Ahmad Tarhini. The immune cell state atlas analysis predicts therapeutic benefits with immune checkpoint inhibitors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5703.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingyi Li
- 1Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Inst, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | | | - John Carpten
- 5USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Xuefeng Wang
- 1Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Inst, Tampa, FL
| | - Igor Puzanov
- 8Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | | | - Patrick Hwu
- 1Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Inst, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | - George J. Weiner
- 11University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
William WN, Zhang J, Zhao X, Parra ER, Uraoka N, Lin HY, Peng SA, El-Naggar AK, Rodriguez-Canales J, Song J, Gillenwater AM, Wistuba II, Myers JN, Gold KA, Ferrarotto R, Hwu P, Davoli T, Lee JJ, Heymach JV, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Lippman SM. Spatial PD-L1, immune-cell microenvironment, and genomic copy-number alteration patterns and drivers of invasive-disease transition in prospective oral precancer cohort. Cancer 2023; 129:714-727. [PMID: 36597662 PMCID: PMC10508302 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies of the immune landscape led to breakthrough trials of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma therapy. This study investigated the timing, influence of somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs), and clinical implications of PD-L1 and immune-cell patterns in oral precancer (OPC). METHODS The authors evaluated spatial CD3, CD3/8, and CD68 density (cells/mm2 ) and PD-L1 (membranous expression in cytokeratin-positive intraepithelial neoplastic cells and CD68) patterns by multiplex immunofluorescence in a 188-patient prospective OPC cohort, characterized by clinical, histologic, and SCNA risk factors and protocol-specified primary end point of invasive cancer. The authors used Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher exact tests, linear mixed effect models, mediation, and Cox regression and recursive-partitioning analyses. RESULTS Epithelial, but not CD68 immune-cell, PD-L1 expression was detected in 28% of OPCs, correlated with immune-cell infiltration, 9p21.3 loss of heterozygosity (LOH), and inferior oral cancer-free survival (OCFS), notably in OPCs with low CD3/8 cell density, dysplasia, and/or 9p21.3 LOH. High CD3/8 cell density in dysplastic lesions predicted better OCFS and eliminated the excess risk associated with prior oral cancer and dysplasia. PD-L1 and CD3/8 patterns revealed inferior OCFS in PD-L1 high intrinsic induction and dysplastic immune-cold subgroups. CONCLUSION This report provides spatial insight into the immune landscape and drivers of OPCs, and a publicly available immunogenomic data set for future precancer interrogation. The data suggest that 9p21.3 LOH triggers an immune-hot inflammatory phenotype; whereas increased 9p deletion size encompassing CD274 at 9p24.1 may contribute to CD3/8 and PD-L1 depletion during invasive transition. The inferior OCFS in PD-L1-high, immune-cold OPCs support the development of T-cell recruitment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William N William
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Hospital BP, a Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jianjun Zhang
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Xin Zhao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Institute for Systems Genetics, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Edwin R Parra
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Naohiro Uraoka
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Heather Y Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - S Andrew Peng
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Adel K El-Naggar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jaime Rodriguez-Canales
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jaejoon Song
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ann M Gillenwater
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey N Myers
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kathryn A Gold
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Renata Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Teresa Davoli
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Institute for Systems Genetics, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - J Jack Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - John V Heymach
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, USA
| | - Scott M Lippman
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhou Y, Medik YB, Patel B, Zamler DB, Chen S, Chapman T, Schneider S, Park EM, Babcock RL, Chrisikos TT, Kahn LM, Dyevoich AM, Pineda JE, Wong MC, Mishra AK, Cass SH, Cogdill AP, Johnson DH, Johnson SB, Wani K, Ledesma DA, Hudgens CW, Wang J, Wadud Khan MA, Peterson CB, Joon AY, Peng W, Li HS, Arora R, Tang X, Raso MG, Zhang X, Foo WC, Tetzlaff MT, Diehl GE, Clise-Dwyer K, Whitley EM, Gubin MM, Allison JP, Hwu P, Ajami NJ, Diab A, Wargo JA, Watowich SS. Intestinal toxicity to CTLA-4 blockade driven by IL-6 and myeloid infiltration. J Exp Med 2023; 220:e20221333. [PMID: 36367776 PMCID: PMC9664499 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20221333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer treatment, yet quality of life and continuation of therapy can be constrained by immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Limited understanding of irAE mechanisms hampers development of approaches to mitigate their damage. To address this, we examined whether mice gained sensitivity to anti-CTLA-4 (αCTLA-4)-mediated toxicity upon disruption of gut homeostatic immunity. We found αCTLA-4 drove increased inflammation and colonic tissue damage in mice with genetic predisposition to intestinal inflammation, acute gastrointestinal infection, transplantation with a dysbiotic fecal microbiome, or dextran sodium sulfate administration. We identified an immune signature of αCTLA-4-mediated irAEs, including colonic neutrophil accumulation and systemic interleukin-6 (IL-6) release. IL-6 blockade combined with antibiotic treatment reduced intestinal damage and improved αCTLA-4 therapeutic efficacy in inflammation-prone mice. Intestinal immune signatures were validated in biopsies from patients with ICB colitis. Our work provides new preclinical models of αCTLA-4 intestinal irAEs, mechanistic insights into irAE development, and potential approaches to enhance ICB efficacy while mitigating irAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Zhou
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yusra B. Medik
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bhakti Patel
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Daniel B. Zamler
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX
| | - Sijie Chen
- Ministry of Education Key Lab of Bioinformatics and Bioinformatics Division, Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology; Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Thomas Chapman
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sarah Schneider
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX
- Department of Hematopoietic Biology and Malignancy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elizabeth M. Park
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rachel L. Babcock
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX
| | - Taylor T. Chrisikos
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX
| | - Laura M. Kahn
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX
| | - Allison M. Dyevoich
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Josue E. Pineda
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew C. Wong
- Platform for Innovative Microbiome and Translational Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Aditya K. Mishra
- Platform for Innovative Microbiome and Translational Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Samuel H. Cass
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Alexandria P. Cogdill
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX
| | - Daniel H. Johnson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sarah B. Johnson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Khalida Wani
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Debora A. Ledesma
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Courtney W. Hudgens
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jingjing Wang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Md Abdul Wadud Khan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christine B. Peterson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Aron Y. Joon
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Weiyi Peng
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Haiyan S. Li
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Reetakshi Arora
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ximing Tang
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Maria Gabriela Raso
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Xuegong Zhang
- Ministry of Education Key Lab of Bioinformatics and Bioinformatics Division, Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology; Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Wai Chin Foo
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael T. Tetzlaff
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gretchen E. Diehl
- Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Karen Clise-Dwyer
- Department of Hematopoietic Biology and Malignancy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elizabeth M. Whitley
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew M. Gubin
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - James P. Allison
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Patrick Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nadim J. Ajami
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Platform for Innovative Microbiome and Translational Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jennifer A. Wargo
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Platform for Innovative Microbiome and Translational Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephanie S. Watowich
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX
- Platform for Innovative Microbiome and Translational Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hahn AW, Menk AV, Rivadeneira DB, Augustin RC, Xu M, Li J, Wu X, Mishra AK, Gide TN, Quek C, Zang Y, Spencer CN, Menzies AM, Daniel CR, Hudgens CW, Nowicki T, Haydu LE, Khan MAW, Gopalakrishnan V, Burton EM, Malke J, Simon JM, Bernatchez C, Putluri N, Woodman SE, Vashisht Gopal YN, Guerrieri R, Fischer GM, Wang J, Wani KM, Thompson JF, Lee JE, Hwu P, Ajami N, Gershenwald JE, Long GV, Scolyer RA, Tetzlaff MT, Lazar AJ, Schadendorf D, Wargo JA, Kirkwood JM, DeBerardinis RJ, Liang H, Futreal A, Zhang J, Wilmott JS, Peng W, Davies MA, Delgoffe GM, Najjar YG, McQuade JL. Obesity Is Associated with Altered Tumor Metabolism in Metastatic Melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:154-164. [PMID: 36166093 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Overweight/obese (OW/OB) patients with metastatic melanoma unexpectedly have improved outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF-targeted therapies. The mechanism(s) underlying this association remain unclear, thus we assessed the integrated molecular, metabolic, and immune profile of tumors, as well as gut microbiome features, for associations with patient body mass index (BMI). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Associations between BMI [normal (NL < 25) or OW/OB (BMI ≥ 25)] and tumor or microbiome characteristics were examined in specimens from 782 patients with metastatic melanoma across 7 cohorts. DNA associations were evaluated in The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort. RNA sequencing from 4 cohorts (n = 357) was batch corrected and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) by BMI category was performed. Metabolic profiling was conducted in a subset of patients (x = 36) by LC/MS, and in flow-sorted melanoma tumor cells (x = 37) and patient-derived melanoma cell lines (x = 17) using the Seahorse XF assay. Gut microbiome features were examined in an independent cohort (n = 371). RESULTS DNA mutations and copy number variations were not associated with BMI. GSEA demonstrated that tumors from OW/OB patients were metabolically quiescent, with downregulation of oxidative phosphorylation and multiple other metabolic pathways. Direct metabolite analysis and functional metabolic profiling confirmed decreased central carbon metabolism in OW/OB metastatic melanoma tumors and patient-derived cell lines. The overall structure, diversity, and taxonomy of the fecal microbiome did not differ by BMI. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that the host metabolic phenotype influences melanoma metabolism and provide insight into the improved outcomes observed in OW/OB patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ICIs and targeted therapies. See related commentary by Smalley, p. 5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew W Hahn
- Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ashley V Menk
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Ryan C Augustin
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mingchu Xu
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jun Li
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Division of Basic Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiaogang Wu
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Aditya K Mishra
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tuba N Gide
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Camelia Quek
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yan Zang
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carrie R Daniel
- Department of Epidemiology, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Courtney W Hudgens
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Theodore Nowicki
- Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.,Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Lauren E Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - M A Wadud Khan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Vancheswaran Gopalakrishnan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth M Burton
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jared Malke
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Julie M Simon
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Biologics Development, Division of Therapeutics Discovery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nagireddy Putluri
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Scott E Woodman
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Y N Vashisht Gopal
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Renato Guerrieri
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Grant M Fischer
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, Division of Biosciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Khalida M Wani
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa Bay, Florida
| | - Nadim Ajami
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Division of Dermatopathology, Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Hospital Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Partner site Essen, Germany
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - John M Kirkwood
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ralph J DeBerardinis
- Children's Medical Research Institute and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Han Liang
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Division of Basic Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jianhua Zhang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - James S Wilmott
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Weiyi Peng
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Greg M Delgoffe
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Yana G Najjar
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer L McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tarhini A, Coleman S, El Naqa I, Sukrithan V, Aakrosh R, McCarter M, Carpten J, Colman H, Ikeguchi A, Puzanov I, Arnold S, Churchman M, Hwu P, Conejo-Garcia J, Dalton W, Weiner G, Tan A. 18P Systematic evaluation of published predictive gene expression signatures in pan-cancer patient cohorts treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in a real-world setting. Immuno-Oncology and Technology 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.iotech.2022.100123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
17
|
Somaiah N, Conley AP, Parra ER, Lin H, Amini B, Solis Soto L, Salazar R, Barreto C, Chen H, Gite S, Haymaker C, Nassif EF, Bernatchez C, Mitra A, Livingston JA, Ravi V, Araujo DM, Benjamin R, Patel S, Zarzour MA, Sabir S, Lazar AJ, Wang WL, Daw NC, Zhou X, Roland CL, Cooper ZA, Rodriguez-Canales J, Futreal A, Soria JC, Wistuba II, Hwu P. Durvalumab plus tremelimumab in advanced or metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcomas: a single-centre phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1156-1166. [PMID: 35934010 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00392-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few standard treatment options are available for patients with metastatic sarcomas. We did this trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and changes in the tumour microenvironment for durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 drug, and tremelimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 drug, across multiple sarcoma subtypes. METHODS In this single-centre phase 2 trial, done at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX USA), patients aged 18 years or older with advanced or metastatic sarcoma with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 who had received at least one previous line of systemic therapy were enrolled in disease subtype-specific groups (liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, angiosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, osteosarcoma, alveolar soft-part sarcoma, chordoma, and other sarcomas). Patients received 1500 mg intravenous durvalumab and 75 mg intravenous tremelimumab for four cycles, followed by durvalumab alone every 4 weeks for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 12 weeks in the intention-to-treat population (all patients who received at least one dose of treatment). Safety was also analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02815995, and is completed. FINDINGS Between Aug 17, 2016, and April 9, 2018, 62 patients were enrolled, of whom 57 (92%) received treatment and were included in the intention-to-treat population. With a median follow-up of 37·2 months (IQR 1·8-10·1), progression-free survival at 12 weeks was 49% (95% CI 36-61). 21 grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported, the most common of which were increased lipase (four [7%] of 57 patients), colitis (three [5%] patients), and pneumonitis (three [5%] patients). Nine (16%) patients had a treatment related serious adverse event. One patient had grade 5 pneumonitis and colitis. INTERPRETATION The combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab is an active treatment regimen for advanced or metastatic sarcoma and merits evaluation in specific subsets in future trials. FUNDING AstraZeneca.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Anthony P Conley
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Edwin Roger Parra
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heather Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Behrang Amini
- Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Luisa Solis Soto
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ruth Salazar
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carmelia Barreto
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Honglei Chen
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Swati Gite
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elise F Nassif
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Akash Mitra
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John Andrew Livingston
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vinod Ravi
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dejka M Araujo
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert Benjamin
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shreyaskumar Patel
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria A Zarzour
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sharjeel Sabir
- Department of General Interventional Radiology, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology-Lab Medicine Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, Division of Pathology-Lab Medicine Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Najat C Daw
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiao Zhou
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zachary A Cooper
- Oncology Research & Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | | | - Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Charles Soria
- General Director, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hinchcliff E, Patel A, Fellman B, Yuan Y, Chelvanambi M, Wargo J, LIU YAN, Liu J, Lee S, Roszik J, Hillman R, Westin S, Sood A, Soliman P, Frumovitz M, Shafer A, Meyer L, Fleming N, Gershenson D, Vining D, Ganeshan D, Hwu P, Lu K, Jazaeri A. Loss-of-function mutations in PPP2R1A Correlate with Exceptional Survival in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinomas Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (099). Gynecol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(22)01325-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
19
|
Andrews MC, Oba J, Wu CJ, Zhu H, Karpinets T, Creasy CA, Forget MA, Yu X, Song X, Mao X, Robertson AG, Romano G, Li P, Burton EM, Lu Y, Sloane RS, Wani KM, Rai K, Lazar AJ, Haydu LE, Bustos MA, Shen J, Chen Y, Morgan MB, Wargo JA, Kwong LN, Haymaker CL, Grimm EA, Hwu P, Hoon DSB, Zhang J, Gershenwald JE, Davies MA, Futreal PA, Bernatchez C, Woodman SE. Multi-modal molecular programs regulate melanoma cell state. Nat Commun 2022; 13:4000. [PMID: 35810190 PMCID: PMC9271073 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31510-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Melanoma cells display distinct intrinsic phenotypic states. Here, we seek to characterize the molecular regulation of these states using multi-omic analyses of whole exome, transcriptome, microRNA, long non-coding RNA and DNA methylation data together with reverse-phase protein array data on a panel of 68 highly annotated early passage melanoma cell lines. We demonstrate that clearly defined cancer cell intrinsic transcriptomic programs are maintained in melanoma cells ex vivo and remain highly conserved within melanoma tumors, are associated with distinct immune features within tumors, and differentially correlate with checkpoint inhibitor and adoptive T cell therapy efficacy. Through integrative analyses we demonstrate highly complex multi-omic regulation of melanoma cell intrinsic programs that provide key insights into the molecular maintenance of phenotypic states. These findings have implications for cancer biology and the identification of new therapeutic strategies. Further, these deeply characterized cell lines will serve as an invaluable resource for future research in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miles C. Andrews
- grid.1002.30000 0004 1936 7857Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Junna Oba
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA ,grid.26091.3c0000 0004 1936 9959Department of Extended Intelligence for Medicine, The Ishii-Ishibashi Laboratory, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chang-Jiun Wu
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Haifeng Zhu
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Tatiana Karpinets
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Caitlin A. Creasy
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Marie-Andrée Forget
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Xiaoxing Yu
- grid.26091.3c0000 0004 1936 9959Department of Extended Intelligence for Medicine, The Ishii-Ishibashi Laboratory, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Xingzhi Song
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Xizeng Mao
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - A. Gordon Robertson
- grid.434706.20000 0004 0410 5424Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Center, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC Canada ,Dxige Research Inc., Courtenay, BC Canada
| | - Gabriele Romano
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Peng Li
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Elizabeth M. Burton
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Yiling Lu
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Robert Szczepaniak Sloane
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Khalida M. Wani
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Kunal Rai
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Alexander J. Lazar
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA ,grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA ,grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Lauren E. Haydu
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Matias A. Bustos
- grid.416507.10000 0004 0450 0360Departments of Translational Molecular Medicine and Genomic Sequencing Center, St John’s Cancer Institute, Providence Saint John’s Health Center, Santa Monica, CA USA
| | - Jianjun Shen
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX USA
| | - Yueping Chen
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, TX USA
| | - Margaret B. Morgan
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Jennifer A. Wargo
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA ,grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Lawrence N. Kwong
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Cara L. Haymaker
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Elizabeth A. Grimm
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA ,grid.468198.a0000 0000 9891 5233H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL USA
| | - Dave S. B. Hoon
- grid.416507.10000 0004 0450 0360Departments of Translational Molecular Medicine and Genomic Sequencing Center, St John’s Cancer Institute, Providence Saint John’s Health Center, Santa Monica, CA USA
| | - Jianhua Zhang
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Michael A. Davies
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - P. Andrew Futreal
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA ,grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Biologics Development, Division of Therapeutics Discovery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Scott E. Woodman
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA ,grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jackson KR, Antunes DA, Talukder AH, Maleki AR, Amagai K, Salmon A, Katailiha AS, Chiu Y, Fasoulis R, Rigo MM, Abella JR, Melendez BD, Li F, Sun Y, Sonnemann HM, Belousov V, Frenkel F, Justesen S, Makaju A, Liu Y, Horn D, Lopez-Ferrer D, Huhmer AF, Hwu P, Roszik J, Hawke D, Kavraki LE, Lizée G. Charge-based interactions through peptide position 4 drive diversity of antigen presentation by human leukocyte antigen class I molecules. PNAS Nexus 2022; 1:pgac124. [PMID: 36003074 PMCID: PMC9391200 DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) molecules bind and present peptides at the cell surface to facilitate the induction of appropriate CD8+ T cell-mediated immune responses to pathogen- and self-derived proteins. The HLA-I peptide-binding cleft contains dominant anchor sites in the B and F pockets that interact primarily with amino acids at peptide position 2 and the C-terminus, respectively. Nonpocket peptide-HLA interactions also contribute to peptide binding and stability, but these secondary interactions are thought to be unique to individual HLA allotypes or to specific peptide antigens. Here, we show that two positively charged residues located near the top of peptide-binding cleft facilitate interactions with negatively charged residues at position 4 of presented peptides, which occur at elevated frequencies across most HLA-I allotypes. Loss of these interactions was shown to impair HLA-I/peptide binding and complex stability, as demonstrated by both in vitro and in silico experiments. Furthermore, mutation of these Arginine-65 (R65) and/or Lysine-66 (K66) residues in HLA-A*02:01 and A*24:02 significantly reduced HLA-I cell surface expression while also reducing the diversity of the presented peptide repertoire by up to 5-fold. The impact of the R65 mutation demonstrates that nonpocket HLA-I/peptide interactions can constitute anchor motifs that exert an unexpectedly broad influence on HLA-I-mediated antigen presentation. These findings provide fundamental insights into peptide antigen binding that could broadly inform epitope discovery in the context of viral vaccine development and cancer immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle R Jackson
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Melanoma, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dinler A Antunes
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amjad H Talukder
- Department of Melanoma, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ariana R Maleki
- Department of Melanoma, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kano Amagai
- Department of Melanoma, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Avery Salmon
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Immunology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Arjun S Katailiha
- Department of Melanoma, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yulun Chiu
- Department of Melanoma, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Romanos Fasoulis
- Department of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Jayvee R Abella
- Department of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brenda D Melendez
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Melanoma, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fenge Li
- Department of Melanoma, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yimo Sun
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Melanoma, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heather M Sonnemann
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Melanoma, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Yang Liu
- ThermoFisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA
| | - David Horn
- ThermoFisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason Roszik
- Department of Melanoma, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Hawke
- Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lydia E Kavraki
- Department of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory Lizée
- Department of Melanoma, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Immunology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fix SM, Forget MA, Sakellariou-Thompson D, Wang Y, Griffiths TM, Lee M, Haymaker CL, Dominguez AL, Basar R, Reyes C, Kumar S, Meyer LA, Hwu P, Bernatchez C, Jazaeri AA. CRISPR-mediated TGFBR2 knockout renders human ovarian cancer tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes resistant to TGF-β signaling. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2021-003750. [PMID: 35882447 PMCID: PMC9330322 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The correlation between elevated T-cell infiltration and improved survival of ovarian cancer (OvCa) patients suggests that endogenous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) possess some degree of antitumor activity that can be harnessed for OvCa immunotherapy. We previously optimized a protocol for ex vivo OvCa TIL expansion for adoptive cell therapy, which is now being tested in a clinical trial at our institution (NCT03610490). Building on this success, we embarked on genetic modification of OvCa TIL to overcome key immunosuppressive factors present in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we present the preclinical optimization of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of the TGF-β receptor 2 (TGFBR2) in patient-derived OvCa TIL. Methods OvCa TILs were generated from four patients’ tumor samples obtained at surgical resection and subjected to CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of TGFBR2 before undergoing a rapid expansion protocol. TGFBR2-directed gRNAs were comprehensively evaluated for their TGFBR2 knockout efficiency and off-target activity. Furthermore, the impact of TGFBR2 knockout on TIL expansion, function, and downstream signaling was assayed. Results TGFBR2 knockout efficiencies ranging from 59±6% to 100%±0% were achieved using 5 gRNAs tested in four independent OvCa TIL samples. TGFBR2 knockout TIL were resistant to immunosuppressive TGF-β signaling as evidenced by a lack of SMAD phosphorylation, a lack of global transcriptional changes in response to TGF-β stimulation, equally strong secretion of proinflammatory cytokines in the presence and absence of TGF-β, and improved cytotoxicity in the presence of TGF-β. CRISPR-modification itself did not alter the ex vivo expansion efficiency, immunophenotype, nor the TCR clonal diversity of OvCa TIL. Importantly for clinical translation, comprehensive analysis of CRISPR off-target effects revealed no evidence of off-target activity for our top two TGFBR2-targeting gRNAs. Conclusions CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout is feasible and efficient in patient-derived OvCa TIL using clinically-scalable methods. We achieved efficient and specific TGFBR2 knockout, yielding an expanded OvCa TIL product that was resistant to the immunosuppressive effects of TGF-β. This study lays the groundwork for clinical translation of CRISPR-modified TIL, providing opportunities for engineering more potent TIL therapies not only for OvCa treatment, but for the treatment of other solid cancers as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha M Fix
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marie-Andrée Forget
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Yunfei Wang
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tamara M Griffiths
- Biologics Development, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Minjung Lee
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Cara L Haymaker
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ana Lucía Dominguez
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rafet Basar
- Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christopher Reyes
- Cell Biology R&D, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, California, USA
| | - Sanjay Kumar
- Cell Biology R&D, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, California, USA
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amir A Jazaeri
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bekker RA, Zahid MU, Binning JM, Spring BQ, Hwu P, Pilon-Thomas S, Enderling H. Rethinking the immunotherapy numbers game. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2022-005107. [PMID: 35793871 PMCID: PMC9260835 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapies are a major breakthrough in oncology, yielding unprecedented response rates for some cancers. Especially in combination with conventional treatments or targeted agents, immunotherapeutics offer invaluable tools to improve outcomes for many patients. However, why not all patients have a favorable response remains unclear. There is an increasing appreciation of the contributions of the complex tumor microenvironment, and the tumor-immune ecosystem in particular, to treatment outcome. To date, however, there exists no immune biomarker to explain why two patients with similar clinical stage and molecular profile would have different treatment outcomes. We hypothesize that it is critical to understand both the immune and tumor states to understand how the complex system will respond to treatment. Here, we present how integrated mathematical oncology approaches can help conceptualize the effect of various immunotherapies on a patient’s tumor and local immune environment, and how combinations of immunotherapy and cytotoxic therapy may be used to improve tumor response and control and limit toxicity on a per patient basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Bekker
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.,Cancer Biology Ph.D. Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Mohammad U Zahid
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jennifer M Binning
- Department of Molecular Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Bryan Q Spring
- Translational Biophotonics Cluster, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Shari Pilon-Thomas
- Department of Immunology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Heiko Enderling
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA .,Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhou Y, Medik YB, Patel B, Zamler DB, Chen S, Chapman T, Schneider S, Babcock RL, Chrisikos TT, Kahn LM, Dyevoich AM, Park EM, Cogdill AP, Johnson DH, Johnson SB, Wani KM, Ledesma DA, Hudgens CW, Wang J, Khan MAW, Joon AY, Peng W, Li HS, Arora R, Tang X, Raso MG, Zhang X, Foo WC, Tetzlaff MT, Diehl GE, Clise-Dwyer K, Whitley EM, Gubin MM, Allison JP, Hwu P, Ajami NJ, Diab A, Wargo JA, Watowich SS. Abstract 5545: Intestinal toxicity to CTLA-4 blockade driven by IL-6 and myeloid infiltration. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-5545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Immunotherapies such as anti-CTLA-4 immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) have revolutionized cancer treatment, yet quality of life and continuation of therapy can be constrained by off-target tissue damage or immune-related adverse events (irAEs). At present, there is limited understanding of irAE mechanisms, hampering development of approaches to mitigate their damage. We addressed this problem by generating animal models of intestinal irAE. Our results show that disruption of homeostatic immunity by genetic predisposition to intestinal inflammation or acute gastrointestinal infection sensitizes mice to anti-CTLA-4-mediated intestinal toxicity. Inflammation-prone mice treated with anti-CTLA-4 showed neutrophil accumulation, systemic interleukin-6 (IL-6) release, and dysbiosis. Significantly, IL-6 blockade combined with antibiotic treatment improved anti-CTLA-4 therapeutic efficacy and reduced intestinal irAEs. Immune signatures were validated in biopsies from patients who developed colitis during ICB, supporting the utility of our models. This study provides new pre-clinical models, mechanistic insight into irAEs, and potential approaches to enhance ICB efficacy while mitigating irAEs.
Citation Format: Yifan Zhou, Yusra B. Medik, Bhakti Patel, Daniel B. Zamler, Sijie Chen, Thomas Chapman, Sarah Schneider, Rachel L. Babcock, Taylor T. Chrisikos, Laura M. Kahn, Allison M. Dyevoich, Elizabeth M. Park, Alexandria P. Cogdill, Daniel H. Johnson, Sarah B. Johnson, Khalida M. Wani, Debora A. Ledesma, Courtney W. Hudgens, Jingjing Wang, Md Abdul Wadud Khan, Aron Y. Joon, Weiyi Peng, Haiyan S. Li, Reetakshi Arora, Ximing Tang, Maria Gabriela Raso, Xuegong Zhang, Wai Chin Foo, Michael T. Tetzlaff, Gretchen E. Diehl, Karen Clise-Dwyer, Elizabeth M. Whitley, Matthew M. Gubin, James P. Allison, Patrick Hwu, Nadim J. Ajami, Adi Diab, Jennifer A. Wargo, Stephanie S. Watowich. Intestinal toxicity to CTLA-4 blockade driven by IL-6 and myeloid infiltration [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5545.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Zhou
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yusra B. Medik
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bhakti Patel
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Thomas Chapman
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sarah Schneider
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Laura M. Kahn
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Khalida M. Wani
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Jingjing Wang
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Aron Y. Joon
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Weiyi Peng
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Haiyan S. Li
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Reetakshi Arora
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ximing Tang
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Wai Chin Foo
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Hwu
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nadim J. Ajami
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Adi Diab
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bentebibel SE, Johnson D, Amariae R, McGrail D, Lecagoonporn S, Haymaker C, Duose D, Wani K, Safa H, Glitza IC, Patel SP, Wong MK, Tawbi H, Burks J, Yang X, Hwu P, Yee C, Davies MA, Murthy R, Bernatchez C, Ekmekcioglu S, Diab A, Lizée G. Abstract CT039: Intratumoral CD40 agonist sotigalimab with pembrolizumab induces broad innate and adaptive immune activation in local and distant tumors in metastatic melanoma. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-ct039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has become an important modality in the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM). However, most patients (pts) do not experience durable responses and new treatment options are needed to improve clinical outcomes. Our pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that intratumoral CD40 activation synergizes with anti-PD-1 based therapy and induces systemic and distant anti-tumor effects. In this ongoing phase I/II study, we assessed intratumoral sotigalimab (APX005M), a CD40 agonist antibody, in combination with systemic pembrolizumab in CPI treatment naïve, unresectable stage III or IV MM. A total of 40 participants will be enrolled. As of December 15, 2021, 30 pts were enrolled. Pts received sotigalimab every 3 weeks for a total of 4 doses. The dose escalation portion of the trial has been completed, with 14 pts enrolled in 5 dosing cohorts of sotigalimab at 0.1, 0.5, 1, 3 and 10 mg. The primary objectives include safety and tolerability, determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and assessment of the overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Biomarker analyses of blood and tumor samples were performed to measure immune activation using immunophenotyping including imaging mass cytometry, TCR sequencing, and a cross-cohort comparison of gene expression data (sotigalimab plus pembrolizumab versus anti-PD1 monotherapy). The combination therapy has been well-tolerated, and there were no study discontinuations or death due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Most common TRAEs were injection-site reactions; six pts experienced grade-3 immune-related adverse events. Efficacy analysis of 30 pts with post-baseline disease evaluations demonstrated an ORR of 50% (5 CR and 10 PR) in distant lesions and a disease control rate of 67%. The ORR at the RP2D of 10 mg is 55% (12/22). Responses were observed in PD-L1 negative pts and those with elevated LDH. Comprehensive transcriptome and immune cell profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor biopsies obtained from local lesions at baseline and 24 hours post sotigalimab injection demonstrate that sotigalimab effectively engaged CD40 pathway. In comparison to anti-PD1 monotherapy, the combination therapy significantly increased expression of genes associated with antigen presentation and effector T cells in local lesions accompanied by an increase in T cell activation genes at distant lesions. Additionally, T cell repertoire analysis demonstrated a significant increase in T cell clonality with expansion of new clones shared between local and distant tumors. Importantly, these immunologic changes were correlated with clinical response. Collectively, this combination therapy is well tolerated and has a notable clinical response rate, accompanied by broad innate and adaptive immune activation at both local and distant lesions.
Citation Format: Salah-Eddine Bentebibel, Daniel Johnson, Rodabe Amariae, Daniel McGrail, Srisuda Lecagoonporn, Cara Haymaker, Dzifa Duose, Khalida Wani, Houssein Safa, Isabella Claudia Glitza, Sapna Pradyuman Patel, Michael K. Wong, Hussein Tawbi, Jared Burks, Xiaodong Yang, Patrick Hwu, Cassian Yee, Michael A. Davies, Ravi Murthy, Chantale Bernatchez, Suhendan Ekmekcioglu, Adi Diab, Gregory Lizée. Intratumoral CD40 agonist sotigalimab with pembrolizumab induces broad innate and adaptive immune activation in local and distant tumors in metastatic melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT039.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel Johnson
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rodabe Amariae
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Daniel McGrail
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Cara Haymaker
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dzifa Duose
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Khalida Wani
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Houssein Safa
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Michael K. Wong
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jared Burks
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Patrick Hwu
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Cassian Yee
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Ravi Murthy
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Adi Diab
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gregory Lizée
- 1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ascierto PA, Avallone A, Bhardwaj N, Bifulco C, Bracarda S, Brody JD, Buonaguro L, Demaria S, Emens LA, Ferris RL, Galon J, Khleif SN, Klebanoff CA, Laskowski T, Melero I, Paulos CM, Pignata S, Ruella M, Svane IM, Taube JM, Fox BA, Hwu P, Puzanov I. Perspectives in Immunotherapy: meeting report from the Immunotherapy Bridge, December 1st-2nd, 2021. J Transl Med 2022; 20:257. [PMID: 35672823 PMCID: PMC9172186 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03471-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, immunotherapy has become an increasingly fundamental modality in the treatment of cancer. The positive impact of immune checkpoint inhibition, especially anti-programmed death (PD)-1/PD-ligand (L)1 blockade, in patients with different cancers has focused attention on the potential for other immunotherapeutic approaches. These include inhibitors of additional immune checkpoints, adoptive cell transfer (ACT), and therapeutic vaccines. Patients with advanced cancers who previously had limited treatment options available may now benefit from immunotherapies that can offer durable responses and improved survival outcomes. However, despite this, a significant proportion of patients fail to respond to immunotherapy, especially those with less immunoresponsive cancer types, and there remains a need for new treatment strategies.The virtual Immunotherapy Bridge (December 1st-2nd, 2021), organized by the Fondazione Melanoma Onlus, Naples, Italy in collaboration with the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer addressed several areas of current research in immunotherapy, including lessons learned from cell therapies, drivers of immune response, and trends in immunotherapy across different cancers, and these are summarised here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo A Ascierto
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Nina Bhardwaj
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carlo Bifulco
- Providence Genomics and Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sergio Bracarda
- Medical and Translational Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni, Italy
| | - Joshua D Brody
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luigi Buonaguro
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Innovative Immunological Models Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College; Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leisha A Emens
- Magee Women's Hospital/UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Jérôme Galon
- INSERM, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology/Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre Le Cancer/Centre de Recherche Des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, Marseille, France
| | - Samir N Khleif
- The Loop Immuno Oncology Laboratory, Georgetown University Medical School, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Christopher A Klebanoff
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Immuno-Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC)/Center for Cell Engineering, MSKCC/Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tamara Laskowski
- Head of New Therapeutic Products - Personalized Medicine, Lonza Global, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ignacio Melero
- Department of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Ruella
- Center for Cellular Immunotherapies and Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Inge Marie Svane
- National Center for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT-DK), Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Janis M Taube
- Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University SOM, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bernard A Fox
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Robert W. Franz Cancer Research Center, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Igor Puzanov
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Saad M, Lee SJ, Tan AC, El Naqa IM, Hodi FS, Butterfield LH, LaFramboise WA, Storkus W, Karunamurthy AD, Conejo-Garcia J, Hwu P, Streicher H, Sondak VK, Kirkwood JM, Tarhini AA. Enhanced immune activation within the tumor microenvironment and circulation of female high-risk melanoma patients and improved survival with adjuvant CTLA4 blockade compared to males. J Transl Med 2022; 20:253. [PMID: 35659704 PMCID: PMC9164320 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03450-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We hypothesized that a gender difference in clinical response may exist to adjuvant CTLA4 blockade with ipilimumab versus high-dose IFNα (HDI). We investigated differences in candidate immune biomarkers in the circulation and tumor microenvironment (TME). PATIENTS AND METHODS This gender-based analysis was nested within the E1609 trial that tested adjuvant therapy with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (ipi3) and 10 mg/kg (ipi10) versus HDI in high risk resected melanoma. We investigated gender differences in treatment efficacy with ipi3 and ipi10 versus HDI while adjusting for age, stage, ECOG performance (PS), ulceration, primary tumor status and lymph node number. Forest plots were created to compare overall survival (OS) and relapse free survival (RFS) between ipi and HDI. Gene expression profiling (GEP) was performed on tumors of 718 (454 male, 264 female) patients. Similarly, serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) samples were tested for soluble and cellular biomarkers (N = 321 patients; 109 female and 212 male). RESULTS The subgroups of female, stage IIIC, PS = 1, ulcerated primary, in-transit metastasis demonstrated significant improvement in RFS and/or OS with ipi3 versus HDI. Female gender was significant for both OS and RFS and was further explored. In the RFS comparison, a multivariate Cox regression model including significant variables indicated a significant interaction between gender and treatment (P = 0.024). In peripheral blood, percentages of CD3+ T cells (P = 0.024) and CD3+ CD4+ helper T cells (P = 0.0001) were higher in females compared to males. Trends toward higher circulating levels of IL1β (P = 0.07) and IL6 (P = 0.06) were also found in females. Males had higher percentages of monocytes (P = 0.03) with trends toward higher percentages of regulatory T cells (T-reg). Tumor GEP analysis supported enhanced infiltration with immune cells including gammadelta T cells (P = 0.005), NK cells (P = 0.01), dendritic cells (P = 0.01), CD4+ T cells (P = 0.03), CD8+ T cells (P = 0.03) and T-reg (P = 0.008) in the tumors of females compared to males and a higher T-effector and IFNγ gene signature score (P = 0.0244). CONCLUSION Female gender was associated with adjuvant CTLA4 blockade clinical benefits and female patients were more likely to have evidence of type1 immune activation within the TME and the circulation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01274338. Registered 11 January 2011, https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov/ct2/show/NCT01274338.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Saad
- grid.468198.a0000 0000 9891 5233Departments of Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612 USA 10920 McKinley Dr.,
| | - Sandra J. Lee
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Aik Choon Tan
- grid.468198.a0000 0000 9891 5233Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA Florida
| | - Issam M. El Naqa
- grid.468198.a0000 0000 9891 5233Department of Machine Learning, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, USA
| | - F. Stephen Hodi
- grid.65499.370000 0001 2106 9910Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Lisa H. Butterfield
- grid.489192.f0000 0004 7782 4884Univ. California San Francisco and The Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - William A. LaFramboise
- grid.417046.00000 0004 0454 5075Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pathology, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Walter Storkus
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (UPSOM), Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | | | - Jose Conejo-Garcia
- grid.468198.a0000 0000 9891 5233Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Florida Tampa, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- grid.468198.a0000 0000 9891 5233Administration, Cutaneous Oncology, Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Florida Tampa, USA
| | - Howard Streicher
- grid.48336.3a0000 0004 1936 8075National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD USA
| | - Vernon K. Sondak
- grid.468198.a0000 0000 9891 5233Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Florida Tampa, USA
| | - John M. Kirkwood
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (UPSOM), Pittsburgh, PA USA ,grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Ahmad A. Tarhini
- grid.468198.a0000 0000 9891 5233Departments of Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612 USA 10920 McKinley Dr.,
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dumbrava EE, Burton EM, Subudhi SK, Milton DR, Aparicio A, Yap TA, Naing A, Corn PG, Pilié PG, Zurita AJ, Wang J, Amaria RN, McQuade JL, Glitza IC, Lazar AJ, Meric-Bernstam F, Logothetis C, Davies MA, Hwu P, Tawbi HA. Phase I/II study of the selective PI3Kβ inhibitor GSK2636771 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and PTEN loss. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.5052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5052 Background: PTEN loss activates the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, contributes to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, resistance to androgen deprivation therapy and poor clinical outcome in pts with mCRPC. Treatment with anti-PD1 antibodies improves survival in many cancers, but efforts to harness its benefit in mCRPC have been unsuccessful. In preclinical PTEN loss models, selective PI3Kβ inhibitor enhanced survival and the frequency of intratumoral T cells. We hypothesized that the combination of PI3Kβ inhibitor and anti-PD-1 antibody is safe and promotes antitumor activity. To test this, we conducted a phase I/II study (NCT01458067) of PI3Kβ inh GSK2636771 and pembrolizumab in pts with solid tumors (including melanoma and mCRPC) with PTEN loss. We report the results from a cohort of pts with mCRPC and PTEN loss. Methods: The phase I primary objective was to determine the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of GSK2636771 + pembrolizumab using a 3+3 design. Pembrolizumab was given at 200 mg IV Q3W and dose escalation started at 300mg orally daily of GSK2636771 for 21 days cycle. The phase II primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination using RECIST 1.1. Secondary objectives were to evaluate PK and PD effects in tumor and blood. Tumoral PTEN loss was defined by loss of protein expression by IHC or by presence of an inactivating mutation identified by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Results: A total of 12 pts with mCRPC and PTEN loss were enrolled (2 pts in the dose escalation and 10 pts in the dose expansion cohorts). Median age was 67 years (range 55-80) and pts had a median of 4 lines of prior therapies with 83% of pts receiving prior taxane-based chemotherapy. The RP2D was identified at 200mg PO QD of GSK2636771 + pembrolizumab 200mg IV Q3W. Most treatment-related adverse events were grade (G) 1-2 with the most common being diarrhea (33%) and rash (42%). A total of 4 pts had G3 rash, including 2 pts with G3 immune-related bullous pemphigoid. Dose-limiting toxicities in pts with mCRPC included G3 hypophosphatemia and G3 rash. Treatment was discontinued because of G3 toxicity in 1 pt and 42% of pts required a dose reduction of GSK2636771. Among 11 evaluable pts at 200mg daily of GSK2636771, partial response (PR) was achieved in 2 pts (-56% and -59% as compared to baseline, per RECIST1.1), which was associated with ongoing progression free survival (PFS) > 12 months (24.1 and 13.6 months, respectively) and PSA > 50% reduction as compared to baseline. In addition, a pt with tumor reduction of 18% per RECIST1.1 has remained on treatment for 15.8 months. Conclusions: GSK2636771 plus pembrolizumab had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. The combination showed promising preliminary antitumor activity and durable responses in a heavily pretreated population of pts with mCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT01458067.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Denai R. Milton
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, Houston, TX
| | - Ana Aparicio
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Timothy A. Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Jennifer Wang
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Hwu
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vellano CP, White MG, Andrews MC, Chelvanambi M, Witt RG, Daniele JR, Titus M, McQuade JL, Conforti F, Burton EM, Lastrapes MJ, Ologun G, Cogdill AP, Morad G, Prieto P, Lazar AJ, Chu Y, Han G, Khan MAW, Helmink B, Davies MA, Amaria RN, Kovacs JJ, Woodman SE, Patel S, Hwu P, Peoples M, Lee JE, Cooper ZA, Zhu H, Gao G, Banerjee H, Lau M, Gershenwald JE, Lucci A, Keung EZ, Ross MI, Pala L, Pagan E, Segura RL, Liu Q, Borthwick MS, Lau E, Yates MS, Westin SN, Wani K, Tetzlaff MT, Haydu LE, Mahendra M, Ma X, Logothetis C, Kulstad Z, Johnson S, Hudgens CW, Feng N, Federico L, Long GV, Futreal PA, Arur S, Tawbi HA, Moran AE, Wang L, Heffernan TP, Marszalek JR, Wargo JA. Androgen receptor blockade promotes response to BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy. Nature 2022; 606:797-803. [PMID: 35705814 PMCID: PMC10071594 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04833-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Treatment with therapy targeting BRAF and MEK (BRAF/MEK) has revolutionized care in melanoma and other cancers; however, therapeutic resistance is common and innovative treatment strategies are needed1,2. Here we studied a group of patients with melanoma who were treated with neoadjuvant BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy ( NCT02231775 , n = 51) and observed significantly higher rates of major pathological response (MPR; ≤10% viable tumour at resection) and improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) in female versus male patients (MPR, 66% versus 14%, P = 0.001; RFS, 64% versus 32% at 2 years, P = 0.021). The findings were validated in several additional cohorts2-4 of patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma who were treated with BRAF- and/or MEK-targeted therapy (n = 664 patients in total), demonstrating improved progression-free survival and overall survival in female versus male patients in several of these studies. Studies in preclinical models demonstrated significantly impaired anti-tumour activity in male versus female mice after BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy (P = 0.006), with significantly higher expression of the androgen receptor in tumours of male and female BRAF/MEK-treated mice versus the control (P = 0.0006 and P = 0.0025). Pharmacological inhibition of androgen receptor signalling improved responses to BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy in male and female mice (P = 0.018 and P = 0.003), whereas induction of androgen receptor signalling (through testosterone administration) was associated with a significantly impaired response to BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy in male and female patients (P = 0.021 and P < 0.0001). Together, these results have important implications for therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Vellano
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael G White
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Miles C Andrews
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Manoj Chelvanambi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Russell G Witt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph R Daniele
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark Titus
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer L McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fabio Conforti
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas, and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elizabeth M Burton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew J Lastrapes
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gabriel Ologun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Surgery, Guthrie Courtland Medical Center, Courtland, NY, USA
| | - Alexandria P Cogdill
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Immunai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Golnaz Morad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter Prieto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yanshuo Chu
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guangchun Han
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - M A Wadud Khan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Beth Helmink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Kovacs
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Scott E Woodman
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sapna Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Michael Peoples
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zachary A Cooper
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Haifeng Zhu
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guang Gao
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hiya Banerjee
- Clinical Development and Analytics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Mike Lau
- Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura Pala
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas, and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Pagan
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Rossana Lazcano Segura
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Mikayla S Borthwick
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eric Lau
- Department of Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Melinda S Yates
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shannon N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Khalida Wani
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lauren E Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mikhila Mahendra
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - XiaoYan Ma
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zachary Kulstad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarah Johnson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Courtney W Hudgens
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ningping Feng
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lorenzo Federico
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - P Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Swathi Arur
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy E Moran
- Cell, Development & Cancer Biology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Linghua Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy P Heffernan
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Joseph R Marszalek
- TRACTION Platform, Therapeutics Discovery Division, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tarhini AA, Hobbs B, Khunger A, Yassine I, Kobeissi I, Hwu P, Sondak VK, LaFramboise W, Kirkwood JM. An 11-gene expression signature related to tumorigenesis and immunosuppression in primary cutaneous melanoma predicts sentinel lymph node metastatic status. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.e21579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e21579 Background: A biomarker derived from the primary melanoma tumor to predict regional sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastatic status can be valuable in guiding the decision making in planning the SLN surgical procedure for candidate patients. Methods: Gene expression profiling was performed on primary cutaneous melanoma tumor biopsies of 49 (24 known SLN+, 25 SLN-) patients (T3a/b, T4a/b) who underwent SLN for staging using transcriptome profiling analysis. U133A 2.0 Affymetrix gene chips were used. Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM) was used to test the association between gene expression level of the primary tumor and SLN status. Genes with fold change > 1.5 and q value < 0.05 were considered differentially expressed. Pathway analysis was performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Benjamini and Hochberg method was used to adjust for multiple testing in pathway analysis. All statistical analyses were implemented in R. Results: A total of 49 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma were studied, of which, 24 were diagnosed as SLN positive and 25 as SLN negative by routine H&E and immunohistochemistry. Using SLN metastatic status as the outcome, a univariate logistic regression model was fitted with individual probe sets. A total of 251 probe sets were filtered and 11 probe sets were considered as differentially expressed (DE) between SLN-ve and SLN+ve groups, with the selection criterion set at Benjamini- Hochberg method -adjusted p -value below 0.05 and the absolute log fold change above 0.5. As each of the 11 probe sets was matched to a unique known gene, an 11 gene signature was derived and among them, the expression level of 7 genes was significantly reduced in the SLN+ve group compared to the SLN-ve group, while 4 genes were overexpressed in the SLN+ve group. Integrative and interactive heatmaps were produced from hierarchical cluster analysis to show the 11 differentially expressed genes. Selected genes were found to be uniformly related to tumorigenesis, malignant progression, DNA repair, cell cycle regulation, chemoresistance, immunosuppression and/or involvement in multiple cancer-related pathways. Several of the selected genes were previously shown to be prognostic in various malignancies. Conclusions: We present a unique 11-gene expression signature derived from primary melanoma tumor biopsy samples and related to tumorigenesis and immunosuppression that may be useful for the prognostic stratification of melanoma patients. This may allow the optimal selection of patients for SLN biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad A. Tarhini
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Brian Hobbs
- The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Department of Population Health, Austin, TX
| | | | | | - Iyad Kobeissi
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Patrick Hwu
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Vernon K. Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tarhini AA, Tan AC, Xie M, El Naqa I, Ghasemi Saghand P, Dai D, Chen JL, Ratan A, McCarter M, Carpten JD, Colman H, Ikeguchi A, Tripathi A, Puzanov I, Arnold SM, Churchman ML, Hwu P, Conejo-Garcia J, Dalton WS, Weiner GJ. Predictors of immunotherapeutic benefits in patients with advanced melanoma and other malignancies treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors utilizing ORIEN “real-world” data. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.2618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2618 Background: Despite the significant improvements in treating cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), many patients (pts) do not achieve disease control. Using Oncology Research Information Exchange Network (ORIEN) Avatar real-world data conducted under the Total Cancer Care protocol we investigate predictive biomarkers of ICI benefits in pts with advanced malignancies. Methods: Clinical data were normalized as part of ORIEN Avatar. RNA-seq was performed on tumor samples following the RSEM pipeline and gene expressions were quantified as Transcript Per Million (TPM). Gene expressions (GE) were log2(TPM+1) transformed. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compute differences between groups, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Results: Pts (n=1214) with 27 cancer types treated with ICIs were retrieved from the database, where 1143 and 875 patients were profiled by WES and RNA-seq, respectively. 804 pts had both WES and RNA-seq data. The top six cancer types were renal cell carcinoma (n=206), non-small cell lung cancer (n=173), head and neck cancer (n=157), melanoma (n=154), sarcomas (n=99) and bladder cancer (n=87). The ICI regimens included therapy with atezolizumab (n=87), avelumab (n=12), cemiplimab (n=6), ipilimumab (n=47), nivolumab (n=424), pembrolizumab (n=525) and ipilimumab+nivolumab (n=113). Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 21.9 months. Patients had significant improvement in OS if ICI was given in the first line ( P<0.0001). Previously published GE signatures were tested in the melanoma cohort. Signatures related to IFNg, effector T cells, chemokines, MHC II and Tertiary Lymphoid Structures were significantly prognostic and predictive of ICI benefits in advanced melanoma (Table). Analyses in the other cancer types are ongoing. Conclusions: GE data analyses validate the predictive value of immune related gene signatures following ICI immunotherapy in melanoma. Ongoing analyses are investigating these signatures in other malignancies and integrating the GE data with data related to TMB, somatic mutations and germline genetic variations.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad A. Tarhini
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Aik Choon Tan
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Mengyu Xie
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Issam El Naqa
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Donghai Dai
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | | | | | - Martin McCarter
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Howard Colman
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Abhishek Tripathi
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | | | - Patrick Hwu
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | - George J. Weiner
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Amaria RN, Vining DJ, Kopetz S, Overman MJ, Javle MM, Antonoff M, Tzeng CWD, Wolff RA, Pant S, Lito K, Rangel KM, Wilson L, Fellman BM, Haymaker CL, Yuan Y, Forget MA, Hwu P, Bernatchez C, Jazaeri AA. Efficacy and safety of autologous expanded tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in multiple solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.2536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2536 Background: TIL therapy has been used extensively in metastatic melanoma patients for many years, now with ongoing efforts to commercialize treatment. The efficacy of TIL outside of melanoma is largely unknown thus we designed and implemented a trial using TIL manufactured at a single academic center for treatment refractory metastatic colorectal (CRC), pancreas (PDAC) and ovarian (OVA) cancers. Methods: Patients with CRC, PDAC and OVA refractory to standard therapies with ECOG PS 0-1 and normal organ function were eligible for TIL harvest. Ex vivo TIL expansion and manufacturing was conducted at the MD Anderson TIL lab under conditions that included IL2 and 41BB stimulation (using urelumab). All patients received a lymphodepletion regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide 60mg/kg days -7 and -6 and fludarabine 25mg/m2 days -5 through day -1, followed by infusion of pooled ex-vivo expanded TIL. Patients received up to 6 doses of high dose IL-2 (600,000 IU/kg) after TIL infusion. The primary endpoint was evaluation of the objective response rate (ORR) using RECIST 1.1 criteria with secondary endpoints including disease control rate, duration of response, PFS, OS and safety. Results: A total of 17 patients underwent TIL harvest and 16 were treated on protocol; including 8 CRC, 5 PDAC and 3 OVA. Median age was 57.5 (range 33-70) and 50% were females. Median number of lines of prior therapy was 2 (range 1-8). Median number of TIL infused was 76 X 109 (range 20.3 x 109-150 x 109). Median doses of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine administered were 2 (range, 2-2) and 3 (range, 1-5), respectively. Median doses of IL-2 administered was 6 (range, 1-6). There were no responders. Best response included prolonged SD in a patient with PDAC lasting until 18 months. Grade 3 or higher toxicities attributable to therapy was seen in 14 subjects (87.5%; 95% CI: 61.7 – 98.4) with the majority of toxicities representing expected pancytopenia from lymphodepletion. Infusion product analysis showed the presence of effector memory cells with high expression of CD39 irrespective of tumor type. Early on-treatment biopsy of PDAC patient with prolonged SD showed presence of proliferating (KI67+) CD4+ and CD8+ TIL. Conclusions: Generation of TIL at a single academic center for CRC, PDAC and OVA is feasible and treatment is associated with no new safety signals. For these tumor types, further research is required to identify host factors associated with resistance to TIL therapy and optimize manufacturing processes to create more effective TIL cell therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03610490.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David J. Vining
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Scott Kopetz
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Mara Antonoff
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Robert A. Wolff
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shubham Pant
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Bryan M. Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Patrick Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ghasemi Saghand P, El Naqa I, Tan AC, Xie M, Dai D, Chen JL, Ratan A, McCarter M, Carpten JD, Shah H, Ikeguchi A, Tripathi A, Puzanov I, Arnold SM, Churchman ML, Hwu P, Conejo-Garcia J, Dalton WS, Weiner GJ, Tarhini AA. A deep learning approach utilizing clinical and molecular data for identifying prognostic biomarkers in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: An ORIEN pan-cancer study. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.2619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2619 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have made significant improvements in the treatment of cancer patients (pts), but many continue to experience primary or secondary resistance. Here, we leveraged clinical and genomic data to identify prognostic biomarkers in pts treated with ICIs utilizing a pan-cancer approach. Methods: Pts were enrolled to the Total Cancer Care protocol across 18 cancer centers within the Oncology Research Information Exchange Network (ORIEN). RNA-seq was performed on tumors following the RSEM pipeline and gene expressions were quantified as Transcript Per Million (TPM) and were logarithmically normalized. An Auto-Encoder Survival Deep Network (AE-SDN) architecture was developed that combined the reconstruction loss of AE with Cox regression for modeling time to event. For comparison, immunoscore for each pt was calculated based on the estimated densities of tumor CD3+ and CD8+ T cells (Galon, 2020) utilizing CIBERSORTx. The quality of overall survival (OS) predictions was assessed using Harrell’s concordance index (C-index). Log-rank test was used to assess stratified group differences (by ICI or cancer histology) along with Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis of AE-SDN and immunoscore. Results: Pts (n=522) with 4 cancer types including melanoma (n=125), renal cell carcinoma (n=149), non-small cell lung cancer (n=128) and head and neck cancer (n=120) treated with 6 ICI regimens were included in this analysis. ICI regimens were nivolumab (n=219), pembrolizumab (n=202), ipilimumab+nivolumab (n=69), ipilimumab (n=30), avelumab (n=1) and cemiplimab (n=1). The Table summarizes the overall C-index and associated 95% CIs and log-rank P values for the entire cohort (regardless of histology) resulting from our proposed AE-SDN model and the separate estimated immunoscore categorization. AE-SDN top selected genes were mostly related to immunity, carcinogenesis and tumor suppression. The corresponding KM plots showed significantly wider separations of the survival curves in favor of our proposed AE-SDN model relative to the immunoscore with more than 20% improvement in prediction power. Conclusions: Deep network machine learning analysis is a promising approach to identifying relevant prognostic biomarkers in cancer pts treated with ICI. This may lead to novel therapeutic predictive signatures and identification of mechanisms of ICI resistance. Our AE-SDN gene expression signature was significantly prognostic and outperformed the estimated CD3+, CD8+ T Cell immunoscore. Further refinements to our prediction power are ongoing along with more advanced neural network architectures to elucidate related functional pathways. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Issam El Naqa
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Aik Choon Tan
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Mengyu Xie
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Donghai Dai
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | | | | | - Martin McCarter
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Harsh Shah
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Abhishek Tripathi
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | | | - Patrick Hwu
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | - George J. Weiner
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA
| | - Ahmad A. Tarhini
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hickman A, Koetsier J, Kurtanich T, Nielsen MC, Winn G, Wang Y, Bentebibel SE, Shi L, Punt S, Williams L, Haymaker C, Chesson CB, Fa'ak F, Dominguez A, Jones R, Kuiatse I, Caivano AR, Khounlo S, Warier ND, Marathi U, Market RV, Biediger RJ, Craft JW, Hwu P, Davies MA, Woodside DG, Vanderslice P, Diab A, Overwijk WW, Hailemichael Y. LFA-1 activation enriches tumor-specific T cells in a cold tumor model and synergizes with CTLA-4 blockade. J Clin Invest 2022; 132:154152. [PMID: 35552271 PMCID: PMC9246385 DOI: 10.1172/jci154152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The inability of CD8+ effector T cells (Teffs) to reach tumor cells is an important aspect of tumor resistance to cancer immunotherapy. The recruitment of these cells to the tumor microenvironment (TME) is regulated by integrins, a family of adhesion molecules that are expressed on T cells. Here, we show that 7HP349, a small-molecule activator of lymphocyte function–associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) and very late activation antigen-4 (VLA-4) integrin cell-adhesion receptors, facilitated the preferential localization of tumor-specific T cells to the tumor and improved antitumor response. 7HP349 monotherapy had modest effects on anti–programmed death 1–resistant (anti–PD-1–resistant) tumors, whereas combinatorial treatment with anti–cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (anti–CTLA-4) increased CD8+ Teff intratumoral sequestration and synergized in cooperation with neutrophils in inducing cancer regression. 7HP349 intratumoral CD8+ Teff enrichment activity depended on CXCL12. We analyzed gene expression profiles using RNA from baseline and on treatment tumor samples of 14 melanoma patients. We identified baseline CXCL12 gene expression as possibly improving the likelihood or response to anti–CTLA-4 therapies. Our results provide a proof-of-principle demonstration that LFA-1 activation could convert a T cell–exclusionary TME to a T cell–enriched TME through mechanisms involving cooperation with innate immune cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber Hickman
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Joost Koetsier
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Trevin Kurtanich
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Michael C Nielsen
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Glenn Winn
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Yunfei Wang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Salah-Eddine Bentebibel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Leilei Shi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Simone Punt
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Leila Williams
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Charles B Chesson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Faisal Fa'ak
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Ana Dominguez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Richard Jones
- Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Isere Kuiatse
- Department of Lymphoma & Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Amy R Caivano
- Molecular Cardiology Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, United States of America
| | - Sayadeth Khounlo
- Molecular Cardiology Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, United States of America
| | - Navin D Warier
- Molecular Cardiology Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, United States of America
| | | | - Robert V Market
- Molecular Cardiology Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, United States of America
| | - Ronald J Biediger
- Molecular Cardiology Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, United States of America
| | - John W Craft
- Department of Biology and Chemistry, University of Houston, Houston, United States of America
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Darren G Woodside
- Molecular Cardiology Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, United States of America
| | - Peter Vanderslice
- Molecular Cardiology Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, United States of America
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Willem W Overwijk
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| | - Yared Hailemichael
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hailemichael Y, Johnson DH, Abdel-Wahab N, Foo WC, Bentebibel SE, Daher M, Haymaker C, Wani K, Saberian C, Ogata D, Kim ST, Nurieva R, Lazar AJ, Abu-Sbeih H, Fa'ak F, Mathew A, Wang Y, Falohun A, Trinh V, Zobniw C, Spillson C, Burks JK, Awiwi M, Elsayes K, Soto LS, Melendez BD, Davies MA, Wargo J, Curry J, Yee C, Lizee G, Singh S, Sharma P, Allison JP, Hwu P, Ekmekcioglu S, Diab A. Interleukin-6 blockade abrogates immunotherapy toxicity and promotes tumor immunity. Cancer Cell 2022; 40:509-523.e6. [PMID: 35537412 PMCID: PMC9221568 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy frequently induces immune-related adverse events. To elucidate the underlying immunobiology, we performed a deep immune analysis of intestinal, colitis, and tumor tissue from ICB-treated patients with parallel studies in preclinical models. Expression of interleukin-6 (IL-6), neutrophil, and chemotactic markers was higher in colitis than in normal intestinal tissue; T helper 17 (Th17) cells were more prevalent in immune-related enterocolitis (irEC) than T helper 1 (Th1). Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) induced stronger Th17 memory in colitis than anti-program death 1 (anti-PD-1). In murine models, IL-6 blockade associated with improved tumor control and a higher density of CD4+/CD8+ effector T cells, with reduced Th17, macrophages, and myeloid cells. In an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model with tumors, combined IL-6 blockade and ICB enhanced tumor rejection while simultaneously mitigating EAE symptoms versus ICB alone. IL-6 blockade with ICB could de-couple autoimmunity from antitumor immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yared Hailemichael
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel H Johnson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Precision Cancer Therapies Program, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Noha Abdel-Wahab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Section of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Assiut University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Egypt
| | - Wai Chin Foo
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Salah-Eddine Bentebibel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - May Daher
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Khalida Wani
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chantal Saberian
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dai Ogata
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sang T Kim
- Section of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Roza Nurieva
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences (GSBS), Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hamzah Abu-Sbeih
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Faisal Fa'ak
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Antony Mathew
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yinghong Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adewunmi Falohun
- Section of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Van Trinh
- Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chrystia Zobniw
- Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christine Spillson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jared K Burks
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Muhammad Awiwi
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Khaled Elsayes
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Luisa Solis Soto
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brenda D Melendez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jonathan Curry
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cassian Yee
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory Lizee
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shalini Singh
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; The Immunotherapy Platform, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James P Allison
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; The Immunotherapy Platform, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Suhendan Ekmekcioglu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Creasy CA, Meng YJ, Forget MA, Karpinets T, Tomczak K, Stewart C, Torres-Cabala CA, Pilon-Thomas S, Sarnaik AA, Mulé JJ, Garraway L, Bustos M, Zhang J, Patel SP, Diab A, Glitza IC, Yee C, Tawbi H, Wong MK, McQuade J, Hoon DSB, Davies MA, Hwu P, Amaria RN, Haymaker C, Beroukhim R, Bernatchez C. Genomic Correlates of Outcome in Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:1911-1924. [PMID: 35190823 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) historically yields a 40%-50% response rate in metastatic melanoma. However, the determinants of outcome are largely unknown. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We investigated tumor-based genomic correlates of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response to therapy by interrogating tumor samples initially collected to generate TIL infusion products. RESULTS Whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from 64 samples indicated a positive correlation between neoantigen load and OS, but not PFS or response to therapy. RNA sequencing analysis of 34 samples showed that expression of PDE1C, RTKN2, and NGFR was enriched in responders who had improved PFS and OS. In contrast, the expression of ELFN1 was enriched in patients with unfavorable response, poor PFS and OS, whereas enhanced methylation of ELFN1 was observed in patients with favorable outcomes. Expression of ELFN1, NGFR, and PDE1C was mainly found in cancer-associated fibroblasts and endothelial cells in tumor tissues across different cancer types in publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing datasets, suggesting a role for elements of the tumor microenvironment in defining the outcome of TIL therapy. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that transcriptional features of melanomas correlate with outcomes after TIL therapy and may provide candidates to guide patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin A Creasy
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Yuzhong Jeff Meng
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marie-Andrée Forget
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Tatiana Karpinets
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Katarzyna Tomczak
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Chip Stewart
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Shari Pilon-Thomas
- Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.,Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Amod A Sarnaik
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - James J Mulé
- Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Levi Garraway
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matias Bustos
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, Saint John's Cancer Institute, Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California
| | - Jianhua Zhang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Isabella C Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Cassian Yee
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Michael K Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Dave S B Hoon
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, Saint John's Cancer Institute, Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Rameen Beroukhim
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas.,Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Romero PJ, Gulley JL, Hwu P, Dean M, Million-Weaver S. Celebrating a decade of the Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2022-005207. [PMID: 35618287 PMCID: PMC9125750 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-005207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro J Romero
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Epalinges, Switzerland
| | - James L Gulley
- NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Administration, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Mary Dean
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ascierto PA, Butterfield LH, Finn OJ, Futreal A, Hamid O, LaVallee T, Postow MA, Puzanov I, Sosman J, Fox BA, Hwu P. The "Great Debate" at Immunotherapy Bridge 2021, December 1st-2nd, 2021. J Transl Med 2022; 20:179. [PMID: 35449104 PMCID: PMC9022317 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03384-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
As part of the 2021 Immunotherapy Bridge virtual congress (December 1–2, Naples, Italy), the Great Debate sessions featured experts who were assigned counter opposing views on four important questions in immunotherapy today. The first topic was whether oncolytic viruses or other specific immunomodulators were the more promising approach for intralesional therapy. The second was whether early surrogate endpoints, such as response rate or progression-free survival, correlate with long-term overall survival was considered. Thirdly, whether vaccines can transform cold into hot tumors was discussed and, finally, broad versus deep analytic profiling approaches to gain insights into immune-oncology development were compared. As with previous Bridge congresses, presenters were invited by the meeting Chairs and positions taken during the debates may not have reflected their respective personal view. In addition, the views summarised in this article are based on available evidence but may reflect personal interpretation of these data, clinical experience and subjective opinion of the speaker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo A Ascierto
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
| | - Lisa H Butterfield
- Microbiology and Immunology, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Olivera J Finn
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Futreal
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Omid Hamid
- Medical Oncology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, A Cedar-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Theresa LaVallee
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael A Postow
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey Sosman
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bernard A Fox
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Robert W. Franz Cancer Research Center, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Fedoriw A, Shi L, O'Brien S, Smitheman KN, Wang Y, Hou J, Sherk C, Rajapurkar S, Laraio J, Williams LJ, Xu C, Han G, Feng Q, Bedford MT, Wang L, Barbash O, Kruger RG, Hwu P, Mohammad HP, Peng W. Inhibiting Type I Arginine Methyltransferase Activity Promotes T Cell-Mediated Antitumor Immune Responses. Cancer Immunol Res 2022; 10:420-436. [PMID: 35181787 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-21-0614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMT) are a widely expressed class of enzymes responsible for catalyzing arginine methylation on numerous protein substrates. Among them, type I PRMTs are responsible for generating asymmetric dimethylarginine. By controlling multiple basic cellular processes, such as DNA damage responses, transcriptional regulation, and mRNA splicing, type I PRMTs contribute to cancer initiation and progression. A type I PRMT inhibitor, GSK3368715, has been developed and has entered clinical trials for solid and hematologic malignancies. Although type I PRMTs have been reported to play roles in modulating immune cell function, the immunologic role of tumor-intrinsic pathways controlled by type I PRMTs remains uncharacterized. Here, our The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset analysis revealed that expression of type I PRMTs associated with poor clinical response and decreased immune infiltration in patients with melanoma. In cancer cell lines, inhibition of type I PRMTs induced an IFN gene signature, amplified responses to IFN and innate immune signaling, and decreased expression of the immunosuppressive cytokine VEGF. In immunocompetent mouse tumor models, including a model of T-cell exclusion that represents a common mechanism of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) resistance in humans, type I PRMT inhibition increased T-cell infiltration, produced durable responses dependent on CD8+ T cells, and enhanced efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy. These data indicate that type I PRMT inhibition exhibits immunomodulatory properties and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to induce durable antitumor responses in a T cell-dependent manner, suggesting that type I PRMT inhibition can potentiate an antitumor immunity in refractory settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Fedoriw
- Tumor Cell Targeting Research Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - Leilei Shi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shane O'Brien
- Tumor Cell Targeting Research Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Yunfei Wang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jiakai Hou
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Christian Sherk
- Tumor Cell Targeting Research Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - Satyajit Rajapurkar
- Tumor Cell Targeting Research Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - Jenny Laraio
- Tumor Cell Targeting Research Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - Leila J Williams
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chunyu Xu
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Guangchun Han
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qin Feng
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Mark T Bedford
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, Texas
| | - Linghua Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Olena Barbash
- Tumor Cell Targeting Research Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - Ryan G Kruger
- Tumor Cell Targeting Research Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Helai P Mohammad
- Tumor Cell Targeting Research Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - Weiyi Peng
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Giuliano AR, Lancet JE, Pilon-Thomas S, Dong N, Jain AG, Tan E, Ball S, Tworoger SS, Siegel EM, Whiting J, Mo Q, Cubitt CL, Dukes CW, Hensel JA, Keenan RJ, Hwu P. Evaluation of Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 Vaccination in Patients With Cancer in Florida. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:748-754. [PMID: 35266953 PMCID: PMC8914884 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Importance Patients with cancer experience high rates of morbidity and mortality after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Immune response to mRNA-1273 vaccination across multiple cancer types and treatments remains to be established. Objective To quantitate antibody responses after mRNA-1273 vaccination among patients with solid tumors and hematologic cancer and to assess clinical and treatment factors associated with vaccine response. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included patients with cancer who were aged 18 years or older, spoke English or Spanish, had received their first mRNA-1273 dose between January 12 and 25, 2021, and agreed to blood tests before and after vaccination. Exposures Receipt of 1 and 2 mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses. Main Outcomes and Measures Seroconversion after each vaccine dose and IgG levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein obtained immediately before the first and second vaccine doses and 57 days (plus or minus 14 days) after the first vaccine dose. Cancer diagnoses and treatments were ascertained by medical record review. Serostatus was assessed via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Paired t tests were applied to examine days 1, 29, and 57 SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels. Binding antibody IgG geometric mean titers were calculated based on log10-transformed values. Results The 515 participants were a mean (SD) age of 64.5 (11.4) years; 262 (50.9%) were women; and 32 (6.2%) were Hispanic individuals and 479 (93.0%) White individuals; race and ethnicity data on 4 (0.7%) participants were missing. Seropositivity after vaccine dose 2 was 90.3% (465; 95% CI, 87.4%-92.7%) among patients with cancer, was significantly lower among patients with hematologic cancer (84.7% [255]; 95% CI, 80.1%-88.6%) vs solid tumors (98.1% [210]; 95% CI, 95.3%-99.5%), and was lowest among patients with lymphoid cancer (70.0% [77]; 95% CI, 60.5%-78.4%). Patients receiving a vaccination within 6 months after anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment had a significantly lower seroconversion (6.3% [1]; 95% CI, 0.2%-30.2%) compared with those treated 6 to 24 months earlier (53.3% [8]; 95% CI, 26.6%-78.7%) or those who never received anti-CD20 treatment (94.2% [456]; 95% CI, 91.7%-96.1%). Low antibody levels after vaccination were observed among patients treated with anti-CD20 within 6 months before vaccination (GM, 15.5 AU/mL; 95% CI, 9.8-24.5 AU/mL), patients treated with small molecules (GM, 646.7 AU/mL; 95% CI, 441.9-946.5 AU/mL), and patients with low lymphocyte (GM, 547.4 AU/mL; 95% CI, 375.5-797.7 AU/mL) and IgG (GM, 494.7 AU/mL; 95% CI, 304.9-802.7 AU/mL) levels. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found that the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine induced variable antibody responses that differed by cancer diagnosis and treatment received. These findings suggest that patients with hematologic cancer and those who are receiving immunosuppressive treatments may need additional vaccination doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ning Dong
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tarhini AA, Lee SJ, Tan AC, El Naqa IM, Stephen Hodi F, Butterfield LH, LaFramboise WA, Storkus WJ, Karunamurthy AD, Conejo-Garcia JR, Hwu P, Streicher H, Sondak VK, Kirkwood JM. Improved prognosis and evidence of enhanced immunogenicity in tumor and circulation of high-risk melanoma patients with unknown primary. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2021-004310. [PMID: 35074904 PMCID: PMC8788316 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) represents a poorly understood group of patients both clinically and immunologically. We investigated differences in prognosis and candidate immune biomarkers in patients with unknown compared with those with known primary melanoma enrolled in the E1609 adjuvant trial that tested ipilimumab at 3 and 10 mg/kg vs high-dose interferon-alfa (HDI). PATIENTS AND METHODS MUP status was defined as initial presentation with cutaneous, nodal or distant metastasis without a known primary. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Stratified (by stage) log-rank test was used to compare RFS and OS by primary tumor status. Gene expression profiling (GEP) was performed on the tumor biopsies of a subset of patients. Similarly, peripheral blood samples were tested for candidate soluble and cellular immune biomarkers. RESULTS MUP cases represented 12.8% of the total population (N=1699) including 11.7% on the ipilimumab arms and 14.7% on the HDI arm. Stratifying by stage, RFS (p=0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.009) showed outcomes significantly better for patients with unknown primary. The primary tumor status remained prognostically significant after adjusting for treatment and stage in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Including only ipilimumab-treated patients, RFS (p=0.005) and OS (p=0.023) were significantly better in favor of those with unknown primary. Among patients with GEP data (n=718; 102 MUP, 616 known), GEP identified pathways and genes related to autoimmunity, inflammation, immune cell infiltration and immune activation that were significantly enriched in the MUP tumors compared with known primaries. Further investigation into infiltrating immune cell types estimated significant enrichment with CD8 +and CD4+T cells, B cells and NK cells as well as significantly higher major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-I and MHC-II scores in MUP compared with known primary. Among patients tested for circulating biomarkers (n=321; 66 unknown and 255 known), patients with MUP had significantly higher circulating levels of IL-2R (p=0.04). CONCLUSION Patients with MUP and high-risk melanoma had significantly better prognosis and evidence of significantly enhanced immune activation within the TME and the circulation, supporting the designation of MUP as a distinct prognostic marker in patients with high-risk melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad A Tarhini
- Cutaneous Oncology, Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sandra J Lee
- Biostatistics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA,Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Aik-Choon Tan
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Issam M El Naqa
- Machine Learning, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lisa H Butterfield
- The Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California, USA,Microbiology, Immunology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - William A LaFramboise
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Allegheny Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Walter J Storkus
- Immunology, Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Arivarasan D Karunamurthy
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA,Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jose R Conejo-Garcia
- Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Administration, Cutaneous Oncology, Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Howard Streicher
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Vernon K Sondak
- Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - John M Kirkwood
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA,Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Spencer CN, McQuade JL, Gopalakrishnan V, McCulloch JA, Vetizou M, Cogdill AP, Khan AW, Zhang X, White MG, Peterson CB, Wong MC, Morad G, Rodgers T, Badger JH, Helmink BA, Andrews MC, Rodrigues RR, Morgun A, Kim YS, Roszik J, Hoffman KL, Zheng J, Zhou Y, Medik YB, Kahn LM, Johnson S, Hudgens CW, Wani K, Gaudreau PO, Harris AL, Jamal MA, Baruch EN, Perez-Guijarro E, Day CP, Merlino G, Pazdrak B, Lochmann BS, Szczepaniak-Sloane RA, Arora R, Anderson J, Zobniw CM, Posada E, Sirmans E, Simon J, Haydu LE, Burton EM, Wang L, Dang M, Clise-Dwyer K, Schneider S, Chapman T, Anang NAAS, Duncan S, Toker J, Malke JC, Glitza IC, Amaria RN, Tawbi HA, Diab A, Wong MK, Patel SP, Woodman SE, Davies MA, Ross MI, Gershenwald JE, Lee JE, Hwu P, Jensen V, Samuels Y, Straussman R, Ajami NJ, Nelson KC, Nezi L, Petrosino JF, Futreal PA, Lazar AJ, Hu J, Jenq RR, Tetzlaff MT, Yan Y, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C, Sharma P, Watowich SS, Allison JP, Cohen L, Trinchieri G, Daniel CR, Wargo JA. Dietary fiber and probiotics influence the gut microbiome and melanoma immunotherapy response. Science 2021; 374:1632-1640. [PMID: 34941392 PMCID: PMC8970537 DOI: 10.1126/science.aaz7015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 318] [Impact Index Per Article: 106.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Gut bacteria modulate the response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) treatment in cancer, but the effect of diet and supplements on this interaction is not well studied. We assessed fecal microbiota profiles, dietary habits, and commercially available probiotic supplement use in melanoma patients and performed parallel preclinical studies. Higher dietary fiber was associated with significantly improved progression-free survival in 128 patients on ICB, with the most pronounced benefit observed in patients with sufficient dietary fiber intake and no probiotic use. Findings were recapitulated in preclinical models, which demonstrated impaired treatment response to anti–programmed cell death 1 (anti–PD-1)–based therapy in mice receiving a low-fiber diet or probiotics, with a lower frequency of interferon-γ–positive cytotoxic T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Together, these data have clinical implications for patients receiving ICB for cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine N. Spencer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jennifer L. McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - John A. McCulloch
- Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Marie Vetizou
- Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Alexandria P. Cogdill
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - A. Wadud Khan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Xiaotao Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael G. White
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Christine B. Peterson
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Matthew C. Wong
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Golnaz Morad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Theresa Rodgers
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jonathan H. Badger
- Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Beth A. Helmink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Miles C. Andrews
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Richard R. Rodrigues
- Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, and Microbiome and Genetics Core, Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA
| | - Andrey Morgun
- Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
| | - Young S. Kim
- Nutritional Science Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, NCI, NIH, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Jason Roszik
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kristi L. Hoffman
- Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jiali Zheng
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yifan Zhou
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yusra B. Medik
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Laura M. Kahn
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- MD Anderson University of Texas Health Graduate School, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sarah Johnson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Courtney W. Hudgens
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Khalida Wani
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Pierre-Olivier Gaudreau
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group and Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Angela L. Harris
- Center for Co-Clinical Trials, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Mohamed A. Jamal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Erez N. Baruch
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Eva Perez-Guijarro
- Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Chi-Ping Day
- Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Glenn Merlino
- Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, CCR, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Barbara Pazdrak
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Brooke S. Lochmann
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Reetakshi Arora
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jaime Anderson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chrystia M. Zobniw
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Eliza Posada
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Elizabeth Sirmans
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Julie Simon
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lauren E. Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Elizabeth M. Burton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Linghua Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Minghao Dang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Karen Clise-Dwyer
- Advanced Cytometry and Sorting Facility at South Campus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Hematopoietic Biology and Malignancy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sarah Schneider
- Advanced Cytometry and Sorting Facility at South Campus, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Thomas Chapman
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Nana-Ama A. S. Anang
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sheila Duncan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Joseph Toker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Jared C. Malke
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Isabella C. Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rodabe N. Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Hussein A. Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael K. Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sapna P. Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Scott E. Woodman
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael A. Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Merrick I. Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey E. Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Vanessa Jensen
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yardena Samuels
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
| | - Ravid Straussman
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
| | - Nadim J. Ajami
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kelly C. Nelson
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Luigi Nezi
- Dipartimento di Oncologia Sperimentale, Instituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, P.I. 08691440153, Italy
| | - Joseph F. Petrosino
- Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - P. Andrew Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Alexander J. Lazar
- MD Anderson University of Texas Health Graduate School, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jianhua Hu
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Robert R. Jenq
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Stem Cell Transplant, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael T. Tetzlaff
- Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, Dermatopathology and Oral Pathology Unit, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| | - Yan Yan
- Department of Biostatistics and the Harvard T.H. Chan Microbiome in Public Health Center, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Wendy S. Garrett
- Department of Molecular Metabolism, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Curtis Huttenhower
- Department of Biostatistics and the Harvard T.H. Chan Microbiome in Public Health Center, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
- Harvard Chan Microbiome in Public Health Center, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Stephanie S. Watowich
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - James P. Allison
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lorenzo Cohen
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Giorgio Trinchieri
- Laboratory of Integrative Cancer Immunology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Carrie R. Daniel
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jennifer A. Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
White MG, Szczepaniak Sloane R, Witt RG, Reuben A, Gaudreau PO, Andrews MC, Feng N, Johnson S, Class CA, Bristow C, Wani K, Hudgens C, Nezi L, Manzo T, De Macedo MP, Hu J, Davis R, Jiang H, Prieto P, Burton E, Hwu P, Tawbi H, Gershenwald J, Lazar AJ, Tetzlaff MT, Overwijk W, Woodman SE, Cooper ZA, Marszalek JR, Davies MA, Heffernan TP, Wargo JA. Short-term treatment with multi-drug regimens combining BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy and immunotherapy results in durable responses in Braf-mutated melanoma. Oncoimmunology 2021; 10:1992880. [PMID: 34777916 PMCID: PMC8583008 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2021.1992880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Targeted and immunotherapy regimens have revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma patients. Despite this, only a subset of patients respond durably. Recently, combination strategies of BRAF/MEK inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (α-CTLA-4 or α-PD-1) have increased the rate of durable responses. Based on evidence from our group and others, these therapies appear synergistic, but at the cost of significant toxicity. We know from other treatment paradigms (e.g. hematologic malignancies) that combination strategies with multi-drug regimens (>4 drugs) are associated with more durable disease control. To better understand the mechanism of these improved outcomes, and to identify and prioritize new strategies for testing, we studied several multi-drug regimens combining BRAF/MEK targeted therapy and immunotherapy combinations in a Braf-mutant murine melanoma model (BrafV600E/Pten−/−). Short-term treatment with α-PD-1 and α-CTLA-4 monotherapies were relatively ineffective, while treatment with α-OX40 demonstrated some efficacy [17% of mice with no evidence of disease, (NED), at 60-days]. Outcomes were improved in the combined α-OX40/α-PD-1 group (42% NED). Short-term treatment with quadruplet therapy of immunotherapy doublets in combination with targeted therapy [dabrafenib and trametinib (DT)] was associated with excellent tumor control, with 100% of mice having NED after combined DT/α-CTLA-4/α-PD-1 or DT/α-OX40/α-PD-1. Notably, tumors from mice in these groups demonstrated a high proportion of effector memory T cells, and immunologic memory was maintained with tumor re-challenge. Together, these data provide important evidence regarding the potential utility of multi-drug therapy in treating advanced melanoma and suggest these models can be used to guide and prioritize combinatorial treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G White
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Russell G Witt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexandre Reuben
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pierre Olivier Gaudreau
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Miles C Andrews
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ningping Feng
- Translational Research to AdvanCe Therapeutics and Innovation in ONcology (TRACTION), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarah Johnson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Caleb A Class
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher Bristow
- Translational Research to AdvanCe Therapeutics and Innovation in ONcology (TRACTION), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Khalida Wani
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Courtney Hudgens
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Luigi Nezi
- Department of Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Teresa Manzo
- Department of Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Jianhua Hu
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard Davis
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hong Jiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter Prieto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth Burton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Willem Overwijk
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Oncology Research, Nektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Scott E Woodman
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zachary A Cooper
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Translational Sciences Oncology, MedImmune, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Joseph R Marszalek
- Translational Research to AdvanCe Therapeutics and Innovation in ONcology (TRACTION), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy P Heffernan
- Translational Research to AdvanCe Therapeutics and Innovation in ONcology (TRACTION), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Genomic Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Saad M, Tan AC, Naqa IE, Lee S, Stephen Hodi F, Butterfield L, LaFramboise W, Storkus W, Conejo-Garcia J, Hwu P, Streicher H, Sondak V, Kirkwood J, Tarhini A. 88 Evidence of enhanced immune activation within the tumor microenvironment and the circulation of female patients with high-risk melanoma compared to males. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundSex differences in tumor immunity and response to immunotherapy were shown in murine models and descriptive analyses from recent clinical trials. We recently reported that female gender is a favorable prognostic marker for survival benefit following ipilimumab and high dose interferon-alfa (HDI) adjuvant therapy of high-risk melanoma in the ECOG-ACRIN E1609 trial (N=1670). Therefore, we investigated differences in candidate immune biomarkers in the circulation and tumor microenvironment (TME) of female and male patients.MethodsGene expression profiling (GEP) was performed on the tumor biopsies of 718 (454 male, 264 female) patients. The primary endpoint was mRNA expression profiling using U133A 2.0 Affymetrix gene chips. Raw microarray data sets were normalized by using the Robust Multi-array Average (RMA) method using Affymetrix Power Tools (APT) as previously published. Multiple probe sets representing the same genes were collapsed by using the probe with maximum gene expression. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed by comparing the female and male tumor samples, and gene sets with FDR q-value <0.1 were deemed as significant. Similarly, peripheral blood (serum and PBMC) samples were tested for soluble (Luminex) and cellular (multicolor flow cytometry) prognostic biomarkers in a subset of patients (N=321; 109 female and 212 male). All patients provided an IRB-approved written informed consent.ResultsAmong the subset of patients tested for circulating biomarkers, females were significantly younger than males (P=0.03). Testing PBMCs, the percentages of CD3+ T cells (P=0.04) and CD3+CD4+ helper T cells (P=0.0005) were significantly higher in female patients compared to males. Also, there were trends toward higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines IL1beta (P=0.07) and IL6 (P=0.06) in females. On the other hand, males had significantly higher percentages of monocytes (P=0.03). Further, there were trends toward higher percentages of CD3+/CD4+/CD25hi+/Foxp3+ (P=0.1) and CD3+/CD4+/CD25+/CD127low+ (P=0.1) T-reg in male patients compared to females. Among the cohort of patients (N=718) with tumor GEP data, females were significantly younger than males (P=0.0009). GEP identified pathways and genes related to immune cell infiltration and activation that were significantly enriched in the tumors of females compared to males (table 1).Abstract 88 Table 1Immune pathways significantly enriched in tumors of femalesConclusionsFemale gender was associated with adjuvant immunotherapeutic benefits and female patients were more likely to have evidence of immune activation within the TME and the circulation, supporting a potentially important role for female related factors in the immune response against melanoma, and these require further investigation.AcknowledgementsWe are grateful to the patients and family members who participated in the E1609 trial and the E1609 trial investigators. This study was conducted by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (Peter J. O’Dwyer, MD and Mitchell D. Schnall, MD, PhD, Group Co-Chairs) and supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under the following award numbers: U10CA180794, U10CA180820, U10CA180888, UG1CA233180, UG1CA233184. Biomarkers studies were supported under the following award number: P50CA12197310 (Tarhini and Kirkwood). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Trial RegistrationNCT01274338Ethics ApprovalThe E1609 study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of each participating institution and conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines as defined by the International Conference on Harmonization. All patients provided an IRB-approved written informed consent.ConsentNot applicable.
Collapse
|
44
|
Hou J, Wang Y, Shi L, Chen Y, Xu C, Saeedi A, Pan K, Bohat R, Egan N, McKenzie J, Mbofung R, Williams L, Yang Z, Sun M, Liang X, Ahnert JR, Varadarajan N, Yee C, Chen Y, Hwu P, Peng W. 554 The panorama of tumor intrinsic immune regulators exhibited by genome-wide CRPISR immune screen integrated with comprehensive clinical dataset analysis. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundDespite approval of immunotherapy for wide ranges of cancers, the majority of patients fail to respond to immunotherapy or relapse following initial response which is partially attributed to immunosuppression co-opted by tumor cells. However, it is challenging to utilize conventional methods to systematically evaluate the potential of tumor intrinsic factors to act as immune regulators in cancer patients.MethodsIn this study, an unbiased integrative strategy were designed to leverage the complementary strength of in vitro functional genomic screens and multi-omics clinical dataset to assess roles of individual tumor-intrinsic factors in regulating T cell tumor infiltration and T cell-mediated tumor killing, the two most important rate-limiting steps of cancer immunotherapy. Initially, a genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screening system using paired murine tumors and tumor-reactive T cells was employed to globally screen tumor intrinsic factors modulating the tumor sensitivity to T cell-mediated killing. Then, findings from the screening were integrated with the bioinformatics analysis of clinical datasets to further evaluate roles of each tumor intrinsic factor in governing antitumor immunity.ResultsThe integrative analysis successfully identified several novel tumor intrinsic factors as effectors of immune resistance, but also demonstrated distinct roles of these factors in controlling immune cell trafficking and tumor sensitivity to T cell-mediated killing. Among these factors, candidates controlling both rate-limiting steps of T cell tumor infiltration and T cell-mediated tumor killing were termed as ”Dual immune resistance regulators” and the remaining factors whose expression levels were not associated with tumor immune infiltration were termed as ”Cytotoxicity resistance regulators”. By selecting PRMT1 and RIPK1 as the representatives of these two groups respectively, we confirmed that genetically depletion of PRMT1 and RIPK1 sensitized tumors to T-cell mediated killing via two independent experimental approaches. Furthermore, inhibiting Prmt1 or Ripk1 sensitizes tumors to cancer immunotherapy, such as anti-PD-1 and anti-OX40 treatments (Tumor size (mm2) on day 21 after tumor inoculation: for anti-PD-1 treatment, Ctrl 84.05±23.10, PRMT1 KO 7.30±7.81, RIPK1 KO 2.03±4.96; for anti-OX40 treatment, Ctrl 81.04±7.72, PRMT1 KO 55.80±15.74, RIPK1 KO 38.78±14.06) and extended the survival of tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, by using a RIPK1-specific inhibitor, GSK2982772, we demonstrated that targeting cytotoxicity resistance regulators could enhance the antitumor activity of T cell-based cancer immunotherapy, despite limited impact on T cell tumor infiltration.ConclusionsCollectively, our data not only demonstrate distinct immunoregulatory roles and therapeutic potentials of PRMT1 and RIPK1 in T cell-mediated antitumor activity, but also provide a rich resource of novel targets for rational immuno-oncology combinations.
Collapse
|
45
|
Tarhini A, Tan AC, Naqa IE, Lee S, Stephen Hodi F, Butterfield L, LaFramboise W, Storkus W, Conejo-Garcia J, Hwu P, Streicher H, Sondak V, Kirkwood J. 87 Enhanced immunogenicity within the tumor microenvironment and the circulation of high-risk melanoma patients with unknown primary compared to those whose primary melanoma is known. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundWe recently reported data supporting the unknown primary status as a potentially distinct prognostic group among high-risk melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab and high dose interferon-alfa (HDI) in the ECOG-ACRIN E1609 trial (N=1670) with improved RFS and OS outcomes compared to known primary. Therefore, we investigated differences in candidate immune biomarkers in the circulation and tumor microenvironment (TME) of patients with unknown compared to those with known primary melanoma enrolled in this trial that tested adjuvant ipilimumab at 3 and 10 mg/kg versus HDI.MethodsGene expression profiling (GEP) was performed on the tumor biopsies of 718 (102 unknown, 616 known primary) melanoma patients. The primary endpoint was mRNA expression profiling using U133A 2.0 Affymetrix gene chips. Raw microarray data sets were normalized by using the Robust Multi-array Average (RMA) method using Affymetrix Power Tools (APT) as previously published. Multiple probe sets representing the same genes were collapsed by using the probe with maximum gene expression. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed by comparing the unknown and known primary tumor samples, and gene sets with FDR q-value <0.1 were deemed as significant. Similarly, peripheral blood (serum and PBMC) samples were tested for soluble (Luminex) and cellular (multicolor flow cytometry) immune biomarkers in a subset of patients (N=321; 66 unknown and 255 known primary). All patients provided an IRB-approved written informed consent.ResultsUnknown primary melanoma cases represented 12.8% of the total E1609 study population (N=1670) including 11.7% on the ipilimumab arms and 14.7% on the HDI arm. Stratifying by stage, relapse free survival (RFS) (P=0.001) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.009) were significantly better for patients with unknown primary tumor compared to known primary. Including only ipilimumab-treated patients, RFS (P=0.005) and OS (P=0.023) were significantly better in favor of the unknown primary status. Among the cohort of patients with tumor GEP data (N=718), GEP identified pathways and genes related to autoimmunity, inflammation, immune cell infiltration and immune activation that were significantly enriched in the unknown primary tumors compared to known primaries (table 1). Among the subset of patients tested for circulating biomarkers, patients with unknown primary melanoma had significantly higher circulating levels of IL-2R than those with known primary (P=0.04).Abstract 87 Table 1Immune pathways enriched in unknown primary melanomaConclusionsUnknown primary high-risk melanoma patients had significantly better prognosis and evidence of significantly enhanced immune activation within the TME and the circulation, supporting the designation of unknown primary melanoma as a distinct prognostic marker in patients with high-risk melanoma.AcknowledgementsWe are grateful to the patients and family members who participated in the E1609 trial and the E1609 trial investigators. This study was conducted by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (Peter J. O’Dwyer, MD and Mitchell D. Schnall, MD, PhD, Group Co-Chairs) and supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under the following award numbers: U10CA180794, U10CA180820, U10CA180888, UG1CA233180, UG1CA233184. Biomarkers studies were supported under the following award number: P50CA12197310 (Tarhini and Kirkwood). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Trial RegistrationNCT01274338Ethics ApprovalThe E1609 study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of each participating institution and conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines as defined by the International Conference on Harmonization. All patients provided an IRB-approved written informed consent.ConsentNot applicable.
Collapse
|
46
|
Paniagua MA, Haymaker C, Adolacion JR, An X, Creasy C, Fathi M, Rezvan A, Geiger T, Harel M, Robinson J, Amritkar A, Woodman S, Hwu P, Bernatchez C, Varadarajan N. 187 Multi-omic single-cell profiling demonstrates that competition for fatty acids and fatty acid oxidation enables tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte function and survival. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundAdoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) have shown durable responses in metastatic melanoma, yet these responses are unpredictable. Bioenergetics dictates the function and fate of adoptively transferred human T cells within the tumor microenvironment but the nature of metabolic competition leading to T-cell function and dysfunction are incompletely understood.MethodsWe integrated the profiling of TIL co-cultured with their autologous primary tumor cells with the aid of a suite of high-throughput single-cell functional assays, transcriptional, and proteomic assays. We validated the results of the model using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Association of functional features with clinical outcome was assessed.ResultsTimelapse Imaging Microscopy In Nanowell Grids (TIMING) demonstrated that while TIL frequencies in killing autologous tumor cells are equivalent across the donors, R-TIL had a significantly higher survival rate than NR-TILs. Tumor cells from NR patients had higher motility and showed increased elongation compared to R-tumors. RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) and proteomics showed that NR-tumors were enriched in pathways associated with utilization of fatty acids (FAs) and adipogenesis, as well as cancer cell metastasis, cellular motility, adhesion, and migration. Candidate genes associated with ameboidal migration (MYH9, MYH2; WNT5B and SERPINE1) and FA utilization (CD36 and PPARG) were enriched in the NR-tumors. Flow cytometry and confocal microscopy confirmed that NR-tumors showed increased CD36 expression and FA uptake compared to R-tumors. To simulate metabolic competition, we co-cultured the TIL with autologous tumors and sorted TIL for RNAseq. The R-TIL were enriched in pathways related to mitochondrial and carbohydrate metabolism; fatty acid oxidation (FAO), and long-chain FAs with a direct enrichment in fatty acyl CoA biosynthesis and both peroxisomal and mitochondrial FAO. Since patient-derived TILs were limiting for metabolomics type assays, we utilized genome-scale metabolic models to infer relevant metabolic pathways by comparison to the human metabolic Atlas (HMR2). At the level of individual metabolites, the significantly enriched metabolites within R TILs were dominated by peroxisome and mitochondria derived fatty acyl-CoA: e.g. palmitoyl-CoA, linoleoyl-CoA, and oleoyl-CoA. We utilized flow cytometry and confocal microscopy to perform pulse-chase assays with FAs for validation. R-TILs showed an increased accumulation of FA into the mitochondria confirming a direct role for TIL FAO.ConclusionsEfficient competition for FAs is a key attribute of T-cell efficacy in ACT. R-TILs are able to utilize FAs via FAO when in competition with autologous tumor cells whereas NR tumors effectively uptake and store FAs preventing T-cell function.AcknowledgementsThis abstract was supported by the NIH (R01CA174385); CPRIT (RP180466); MRA Established Investigator Award to NV (509800), Welch Foundation (E1774); NSF (1705464); CDMRP (CA160591); Owens Foundation (NV). We would like to acknowledge the MDACC Flow Cytometry and Cellular Imaging Core facility for the FACS sorting (NCI P30CA16672), UH Seq-n-edit core for RNA-seq, Intel for the loan of computing cluster, and the UH Center for Advanced Computing and Data Systems (CACDS) for high-performance computing facilities.Trial Registration protocol (2004–0069)Ethics ApprovalApproved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) and an FDA- approved Investigational New Drug (IND) application (NCT00338377)
Collapse
|
47
|
Fix S, Forget MA, Sakellariou-Thompson D, Wang Y, Dominguez AL, Basar R, Reyes C, Kumar S, Meyer L, Hwu P, Bernatchez C, Jazaeri A. 172 Overcoming immunosuppressive TGF-β signaling in human ovarian cancer-derived tumor infiltrating lymphocytes via non-viral CRISPR engineering. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundOur ongoing clinical trial for the treatment of melanoma with TGF-β-resistant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) [TGF-β dominant negative receptor 2 (TGFβDNR2) transduced-TIL] has yielded long-term responses in checkpoint refractory patients (NCT01955460). Building on this success, we sought to extend the impact of TGF-β–resistant TIL therapy to additional cancers while optimizing a non-viral alternative to transduction with a TGFβDNR2. Ovarian cancer (OvCa), which is characterized by an abundance of TGF-β, a dysfunctional immune infiltrate, and a paucity of novel treatment options, is an ideal candidate for TGF-β–resistant TIL therapy. Here, we present an optimized and clinically-scalable method for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of the TGF-β receptor (TGFBR2) in OvCa TIL.MethodsOvCa TIL were generated from tumor fragments1 and subjected to CRISPR-mediated knockout of TGFBR2 before going through a rapid expansion protocol. Resistance of TGFBR2-knockout TIL to TGF-β signaling was evaluated via quantification of downstream SMAD-2/-3 phosphorylation, global transcriptional changes upon TGF-β exposure, and cytokine release following TCR stimulation in the presence of TGF-β. The impact of CRISPR modification on TIL expansion and TCR clonal diversity was evaluated. Finally, the risk of off-target CRISPR activity throughout the genome was evaluated using Target Enriched GUIDE-seq (TEG-seq)2 followed by next generation sequencing (NGS) validation of putative off-target sites.ResultsUsing five TGFBR2-directed guide RNAs (gRNAs), we achieved gene disruption efficiencies ranging from 48%–90%, which correlated inversely with the degree of SMAD phosphorylation after TGF-β exposure (r=-0.9440, p=0.0158, n=4 donors) (figure 1A-C). TGF-β exposure induced a strong transcriptional response in wild-type TIL but had little to no effect on TGFBR2-knockout TIL (figure 2). TGFBR2-knockout TIL functioned well in the presence of exogenous TGF-β as evidenced by equally strong secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the presence and absence of TGF-β (figure 3). CRISPR-modification did not hamper the ex vivo expansion efficiency nor the TCR clonal diversity of expanded OvCa TIL (figure 4). Using TEG-seq, we identified ≤5 low-probability off-target sites for gRNA-#3 and gRNA-#4, each of which were attributed to background sequencing artifacts upon further validation by NGS of specific amplicons (figure 5).Abstract 172 Figure 1(A) Genomic-level TGFBR2 knockout efficiency using 5 different gRNAs as evidenced by NGS of specific amplicons (n=1 TIL donor). (B) SMAD-2 and SMAD-3 phosphorylation in TGFBR2 knockout TIL vs. control TIL after 30 min exposure to TGF-β1. The left panel shows representative histograms of phospho-SMAD staining, and the right panel shows quantification of cells positive for phospho-SMAD-2/-3 after TGF-β exposure (n=4 TIL donors). The statistical significance of each experimental condition compared to the non-transfected control is shown. (C) Inverse correlation of TGFBR2 knockout efficiency and TGF-β-mediated SMAD phosphorylation.Abstract 172 Figure 2Top 100 differentially expressed genes in non-transfected (WT) TIL exposed to TGF-β. TGFBR2 knockout (KO) TIL display minimal gene expression changes upon TGF-β exposure (n=3 technical replicates).Abstract 172 Figure 3TIL were collected after 14 days of expansion and re-stimulated with 300 ng/mL plate-bound anti-CD3 in the presence of 3000 IU/mL IL2 and 10 ng/mL human TGF-β1 or vehicle. Cell culture supernatant was collected after 72 hrs of stimulation and assayed for the presence of 10 proinflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-13, and TNF-α). For TIL with intact TGFBR2 (non-transfected and Cas9 mock transfected TIL), the production of many pro-inflammatory cytokines decreased significantly in the presence of TGF-β. Conversely, TGFBR2 knockout TIL (generated using gRNA #3 or gRNA #4) retain cytokine secretion in the presence of TGF-β. IL-12p70 was below the limit of detection in this assay and is therefore not presented.Abstract 172 Figure 4(A) Control and CRISPR-modified OvCa TIL expand with equal efficiency during a 14-day rapid expansion protocol. Fold expansions ranging from 1000× - 3000× were observed across 4 independent patient samples. (B) The TCR clonal diversity of TIL after 14-day expansion was assessed by TCRB sequencing. Productive Simpson Clonality was equivalent in CRISPR-modified TIL compared to control TIL samples.Abstract 172 Figure 5TEG-seq revealed 3 putative off-target sites for gRNA #3 and 5 putative off-target sites for gRNA #4. The aligned sequences show similarities and differences between the gRNA sequence and the reference genome site. Dots represent exact matches in the reference genome compared to the gRNA sequence. Dashes represent missing bases, lower-case letters represent extra bases, and upper-case letters represent a base mismatch. Validation by NGS of specific amplicons confirmed the presence of TEG-seq Tag integration and large indels at the on-target cleavage sites for gRNA #3 and #4, indicating successful Cas9 editing and Tag integration in our experiment. NGS validation revealed that all putative low probability off-target sites were background artifacts as evidenced by the lack of Tag identification and lack of large indels.ConclusionsCRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of TGFBR2 is feasible and efficient in patient-derived OvCa TIL using clinically-scalable methods that yield little to no evidence of off-target activity. This study lays the groundwork for clinical translation of CRISPR-modified, TGF-β-resistant TIL for OvCa treatment, which will not only provide a novel immunotherapy for OvCa patients but also a platform for engineering more potent TIL therapies in general.ReferencesSakellariou-Thompson D, Forget MA, Hinchcliff E, Celestino J, Hwu P, Jazaeri AA, et al. Potential clinical application of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy for ovarian epithelial cancer prior or post-resistance to chemotherapy. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy: CII 2019;68(11):1747–57.Tang PZ, Ding B, Peng L, Mozhayskiy V, Potter J, Chesnut JD. TEG-seq: an ion torrent-adapted NGS workflow for in cellulo mapping of CRISPR specificity. Bio Techniques 2018;65(5):259–67.Ethics ApprovalAll procedures performed were in accordance with the 1975 Helsinki declaration. Ethical approval and tissue from surgical resections used to expand TIL were both obtained under protocols (PA16-0912 and LAB02-188) approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study for their specimens and data to be used in research and for publication.
Collapse
|
48
|
Chaudhri A, Wang Y, Hung SH, Lizee G, Andrian UV, Hwu P, Freeman G. 229 CX3CR1 in exhausted CD8 T cell states. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundCancer has chronic antigen exposure that results in a suppressed CD8 T cell state termed exhaustion. An outcome of anti PD-1 blockade therapy is the expansion of early exhausted CD8+ T cells into a terminally differentiated exhausted state. The reversal of this transcriptionally plastic yet epigenetically fixed state of CD8 T cell exhaustion has the potential to increase responses to anti PD-1 therapy.MethodsCX3CR1 is a marker of CD8 T cell activation, effector function however less is known about the contribution of CX3CR1 in CD8 T cell exhaustion. We identified three distinct subsets of CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) based on high, mid, and negative CX3CR1 expression in a mouse model of colon carcinoma.ResultsThe CX3CR1 high CD8+ T cells are more exhausted with higher PD1+TIM3+ expression compared to CX3CR1 mid and CX3CR1 negative cells thereby representing the terminal state of CD8 T cell exhaustion. Moreover, CX3CR1 high CD8 T cells increase following anti PD-1 blockade, and their abundance is associated with a positive response to anti PD-1.ConclusionsWe identify a consequence of CX3CR1 in terminal T cell exhaustion, and our work can offer strategies to increase responses to anti PD-1.Ethics ApprovalAnimal experiments were performed as per the IACUC regulations at the Dana Farber cancer Institute, and the MD Anderson Cancer Center
Collapse
|
49
|
Shi L, Fedoriw A, O’Brien S, Smitheman K, Wang Y, Hou J, Sherk C, Rajapurkar S, Laraio J, Williams L, Xu C, Han G, Feng Q, Bedford M, Wang L, Barbash O, Kruger R, Hwu P, Mohammad H, Peng W. 624 Targeting Type I arginine methyltransferases promotes T cell mediated antitumor immune responses. J Immunother Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundAlthough immunotherapy produced dramatic clinical responses in a certain population of cancer patients, tumor cells can employ a variety of immunosuppressive measures to limit the immunotherapeutic efficacy. This highlights a great need to develop novel strategies to expand the clinical benefits of immunotherapy to a broader population of cancer patients. PRMTs have been described as vital regulators of immune responsive pathways in several cell types, but the immunoregulatory role of Type I PRMTs in the tumor microenvironment remains poorly understood.MethodsIn this study, we analyzed the correlation between Type I PRMT expression levels with the clinical outcome or immune signature. Gene expression changes were evaluated in a panel of immunogenic and non-immunogenic cancer cell lines with Type I PRMT inhibitor treatment. The antitumor and immunological effects of Type I PRMT inhibitor were evaluated in combination with checkpoint blockade in a panel of syngeneic tumor models.ResultsUsing TCGA dataset analysis, increased mRNA expression levels of several Type I PRMTs were associated with poor clinical response and decreased immune infiltration in melanoma patients. Particularly, tumors with high expression of PRMT1, the major Type I PRMTs, displayed significantly reduced relapse-free survival (HR=1.891, p=0.038), and were associated with lower cytolytic score (logFC=-0.875, p=1.49e-08) and lower lymphocyte infiltration score (logFC=-0.783, p=0.00077). RNA-seq results showed that interferon signaling was significantly altered after Type I PRMT inhibitor treatment in 10 of 15 cell lines analyzed, with most related genes showing increased expression. In addition, VEGFA was downregulated by 25% or more in 7/8 human and 3/5 mouse cancer cell lines, and a moderate decrease in chromatin accessibility at the Vegfa promoter was observed in ATAC-seq data. Furthermore, Type I PRMT inhibitor combined with anti-PD1 treatment significantly extended the survival of tumor-bearing mice and delayed tumor growth in a panel of immunocompetent mouse models. Mechanistically, Type I PRMT inhibitor significantly increased the apoptotic sensitivity of tumor cells to autologous tumor-reactive T cells in vitro and the infiltration of total T cells (CD3+) in 3 of 4 tested tumor models and cytotoxic T cells (CD8+) in two tested tumor models in vivo.ConclusionsTaken together, these data indicated that Type I PRMT inhibition exhibits immunomodulatory properties and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade to induce durable antitumor responses in a T cell dependent manner. This study provides a rationale to combine Type I PRMT inhibitor with immune checkpoint blockade to maximize clinical benefits in cancer patients.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank past and present members of the MDACC TIL lab for tumor/TIL processing and banking.
Collapse
|
50
|
Burton E, Ileana Dumbrava E, Peng W, Milton D, Amaria R, Mcquade J, Glitza I, Hong D, Patel S, Rodon J, Yap T, Naing A, Piha-Paul S, Balmes G, Lazar A, Meric-Bernstam F, Hwu P, Davies M, Tawbi H. 1085P Ph I/II study of PI3K-β inhibitor GSK2636771 (G771) in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in patients (pts) with PTEN loss and melanoma or other advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|