Myeloid translocation genes differentially regulate colorectal cancer programs

Myeloid translocation genes (MTGs), originally identified as chromosomal translocations in acute myelogenous leukemia, are transcriptional corepressors that regulate hematopoietic stem cell programs. Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database revealed that MTGs were mutated in epithelial malignancy and suggested that loss of function might promote tumorigenesis. Genetic deletion of MTGR1 and MTG16 in the mouse has revealed unexpected and unique roles within the intestinal epithelium. Mtgr1^−/− mice have progressive depletion of all intestinal secretory cells, and Mtg16^−/− mice have a decrease in goblet cells. Furthermore, both Mtgr1^−/− and Mtg16^−/− mice have increased intestinal epithelial cell proliferation. We thus hypothesized that loss of MTGR1 or MTG16 would modify Apc^1638/+-dependent intestinal tumorigenesis. Mtgr1^−/− mice, but not Mtg16^−/− mice, had a 10-fold increase in tumor multiplicity. This was associated with more advanced dysplasia, including progression to invasive adenocarcinoma, and augmented intratumoral proliferation. Analysis of ChIP-seq datasets for MTGR1 and MTG16 targets indicated that MTGR1 can regulate Wnt and Notch signaling. In support of this, immunohistochemistry and gene expression analysis revealed that both Wnt and Notch signaling pathways were hyperactive in Mtgr1^−/− tumors. Furthermore, in human colorectal cancer (CRC) samples MTGR1 was downregulated at both the transcript and protein level. Overall our data indicates that MTGR1 has a context dependent effect on intestinal tumorigenesis.

Histone deacetylase inhibitors induce the degradation of the t(8;21) fusion oncoprotein

The t(8;21) chromosomal translocation that generates the fusion oncoprotein RUNX1-ETO predominates in leukemia patients of the French-American-British (FAB) class M2 subtype. The oncoprotein has the capacity to promote expansion of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells and induces leukemia in association with other genetic alterations. Here, we show that RUNX1-ETO undergoes degradation in response to treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitors, one of which, depsipeptide (DEP), is currently undergoing phase II clinical testing in a variety of malignancies. These compounds induce turnover of RUNX1-ETO without affecting the stability of RUNX1-ETO partner proteins. In addition, RUNX1-ETO physically interacts with heat shock protein 90 (HSP90). DEP treatment interrupts the association of RUNX1-ETO with HSP90 and induces proteasomal degradation of RUNX1-ETO. DEP and the HSP90 antagonist 17-allylamino-geldanamycin (17-AAG) both triggered RUNX1-ETO degradation, but without any additive or cooperative effects. These findings may stimulate the development of more rational and effective approaches for treating t(8;21) patients using histone deacetylase inhibitors or HSP90 inhibitors.

RUNX1 associates with histone deacetylases and SUV39H1 to repress transcription

RUNX1 (AML1) is a gene that is frequently disrupted by chromosomal translocations in acute leukemia. Like its Drosophila homolog Runt, RUNX1 both activates and represses transcription. Both Runt and RUNX1 are required for gene silencing during development and a central domain of RUNX1, termed repression domain 2 (RD2), was defined as being required for transcriptional repression and for the silencing of CD4 during T-cell maturation in thymic organ cultures. Although transcriptional co-repressors are known to contact other repression domains in RUNX1, the factors that bind to RD2 had not been defined. Therefore, we tested whether RD2 contacts histone-modifying enzymes that may mediate both repression and gene silencing. We found that RD2 contacts SUV39H1, a histone methyltransferase, via two motifs and that endogenous Suv39h1 associates with a Runx1-regulated repression element in murine erythroleukemia cells. In addition, one of these SUV39H1-binding motifs is also sufficient for binding to histone deacetylases 1 and 3, and both of these domains are required for full RUNX1-mediated transcriptional repression. The association between RUNX1, histone deacetylases and SUV39H1 provides a molecular mechanism for repression and possibly gene silencing mediated by RUNX1.

Bcl-2 is an apoptotic target suppressed by both c-Myc and E2F-1

Malignant transformation occurs in cells that overexpress c-Myc or that inappropriately activate E2F-1. Transformation occurs after the selection of cells that have acquired resistance to apoptosis that is triggered by these oncogenes, and a key mediator of this cell death process is the p53 tumor suppressor. In IL-3-dependent immortal 32D.3 myeloid cells the ARF/p53 apoptotic pathway is inactivated, as these cells fail to express ARF. Nonetheless, both c-Myc and E2F-1 overexpression accelerated apoptosis when these cells were deprived of IL-3. Here we report that c-Myc or E2F-1 overexpression suppresses Bcl-2 protein and RNA levels, and that restoration of Bcl-2 protein effectively blocks the accelerated apoptosis that occurs when c-Myc- or E2F-1-overexpressing cells are deprived of IL-3. Blocking p53 activity with mutant p53 did not abrogate E2F-1-induced suppression of Bcl-2. Analysis of immortal myeloid cells engineered to overexpress c-Myc and E2F-1 DNA binding mutants revealed that DNA binding activity of these oncoproteins is required to suppress Bcl-2 expression. These results suggest that the targeting of Bcl-2 family members is an important mechanism of oncogene-induced apoptosis, and that this occurs independent of the ARF/p53 pathway.

ETO, a target of t(8;21) in acute leukemia, makes distinct contacts with multiple histone deacetylases and binds mSin3A through its oligomerization domain

t(8;21) and t(16;21) create two fusion proteins, AML-1-ETO and AML-1-MTG16, respectively, which fuse the AML-1 DNA binding domain to putative transcriptional corepressors, ETO and MTG16. Here, we show that distinct domains of ETO contact the mSin3A and N-CoR corepressors and define two binding sites within ETO for each of these corepressors. In addition, of eight histone deacetylases (HDACs) tested, only the class I HDACs HDAC-1, HDAC-2, and HDAC-3 bind ETO. However, these HDACs bind ETO through different domains. We also show that the murine homologue of MTG16, ETO-2, is also a transcriptional corepressor that works through a similar but distinct mechanism. Like ETO, ETO-2 interacts with N-CoR, but ETO-2 fails to bind mSin3A. Furthermore, ETO-2 binds HDAC-1, HDAC-2, and HDAC-3 but also interacts with HDAC-6 and HDAC-8. In addition, we show that expression of AML-1-ETO causes disruption of the cell cycle in the G(1) phase. Disruption of the cell cycle required the ability of AML-1-ETO to repress transcription because a mutant of AML-1-ETO, Delta469, which removes the majority of the corepressor binding sites, had no phenotype. Moreover, treatment of AML-1-ETO-expressing cells with trichostatin A, an HDAC inhibitor, restored cell cycle control. Thus, AML-1-ETO makes distinct contacts with multiple HDACs and an HDAC inhibitor biologically inactivates this fusion protein.

Alterations in subnuclear trafficking of nuclear regulatory factors in acute leukemia

The nuclear matrix plays an important role in the functional organization of the nucleus in part by locally concentrating regulatory factors involved in nucleic acid metabolism. A number of nuclear regulatory proteins initially identified due to their involvement in human cancer are localized to discrete nuclear matrix-attached foci and correct nuclear partitioning likely plays a role in their function. Two such examples are promyelocytic leukemia (PML) and acute myelogenous leukemia-1 (AML-1; Runx1). PML, the target of the t(15;17) in acute PML, is localized to PML nuclear bodies (also termed Nuclear Domain 10 and PML oncogenic domains), a nuclear matrix-associated body whose function appears to be quite complex, with probable roles in cancer, apoptosis, and in acute viral infections. In t(15;17)-containing leukemic cells, the PML nuclear bodies are disrupted, but reform when the leukemic cells are induced to differentiate in the presence of all-trans retinoic acid. AML1 (RUNX1) is a key regulator of hematopoietic differentiation and AML1 proteins are found in nuclear compartments that reflect their roles in transcriptional activation and repression. The t(8;21), associated with AML, results in a chimeric transcription factor, AML-1/ETO (eight twenty one), that remains attached to the nuclear matrix through targeting signals contained in the ETO protein. When co-expressed, ETO and AML-1/ETO co-localize to a nuclear compartment distinct from that of AML1 or PML nuclear bodies. Interestingly, enforced expression of ETO or AML-1/ETO changes the average number of PML nuclear bodies per cell. Thus, chromosomal translocations involving AML1 result in altered nuclear trafficking of the transcription factor as well as other changes to the nuclear architecture. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 35:93-98, 2000.

Role of co-repressors in transcriptional repression mediated by the t(8;21), t(16;21), t(12;21), and inv(16) fusion proteins

The t(8;21), t(16;21), inv(16), and t(12;21) are some of the most frequent chromosomal translocations found in acute myeloid and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The fusion proteins created by these chromosomal translocations are transcriptional repressors. A full understanding of the types of proteins that these fusion proteins recruit to repress transcription will not only clarify understanding of the molecular mechanism of action of these fusion proteins but also provide further targets for therapeutic intervention.

TEL contacts multiple co-repressors and specifically associates with histone deacetylase-3

TEL (Translocation-ETS-Leukemia or ETV 6) is disrupted by multiple chromosomal translocations in acute leukemia. The loss of heterozygosity at the TEL locus in leukemias and the hemizygous deletion of TEL that is observed in various tumors, suggests that TEL is a tumor suppressor. Overexpression of TEL alters cellular morphology and represses the expression of the matrix metalloproteinase stromelysin-1. Based on these studies, deletion analysis was used to define the minimal repression domains of TEL. TEL-mediated repression required both the N-terminal pointed domain and a central region composed of amino acids 268-303. The mSin3A and N-CoR corepressors bind to the pointed domain and the central repression domain of TEL, respectively. Unexpectedly, histone deacetylase-3, but not other histone deacetylases, also associates with the central region of TEL. Histone deacetylase-3 interacts with a TEL mutant that cannot bind N-CoR, suggesting that this is a direct interaction with TEL. In addition, histone H3 was under-acetylated near the TEL-binding sites in the endogenous stromelysin-1 promoter when TEL was expressed. Furthermore, trichostatin A, a potent histone deacetylase inhibitor, impaired TEL-dependent repression of the stromelysin-1 promoter. Finally, while TEL-expression induced cellular aggregation of Ras-transformed cells, Trichostatin A reversed the TEL-induced cellular aggregation phenotype. Thus, the cumulative data suggests that histone deacetylase-3 activity is required for the transcriptional functions of TEL.

Topoisomerase IIalpha mediates E2F-1-induced chemosensitivity and is a target for p53-mediated transcriptional repression

Mutations of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor, pRb, or its cyclin-cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) regulatory kinases or CDK inhibitors, allows unrestrained E2F activity, leading to unregulated cell cycle progression. However, overexpression of E2F-1 also sensitizes cells to apoptosis, suggesting that targeting this pathway may be of therapeutic benefit. Enforced expression of E2F-1 in interleukin-3-dependent myeloid cells led to preferential sensitivity to the topoisomerase II inhibitor, etoposide, which was independent of p53 accumulation. Pretreatment of the E2F-1-expressing cells with ICRF-193, a second topoisomerase II inhibitor that does not cause DNA damage, protected these cells against etoposide-induced apoptosis. However, ICRF-193 cooperated with other DNA-damaging agents to induce apoptosis. Enforced expression of E2F-1 led to accumulation of p53 protein. An E2F-1 mutant that is defective in inducing cell cycle progression also induced p53, suggesting that p53 was responding directly to E2F, and not to secondary events caused by inappropriate cell cycle progression (i.e., DNA damage). Thus, topoisomerase II inhibition and DNA damage cooperate to selectively induce apoptosis in cells that have mutations in the pRb pathway.

E2F-1 induces the stabilization of p53 but blocks p53-mediated transactivation

E2F-1 induces p53 accumulation and E2F-1 and p53 form a physical complex, which affects the ability of E2F-1 to activate transcription. We mapped the domains on E2F-1 that interact with p53 and found two p53-binding domains. To understand the functional consequences of the E2F-1/p53 association on p53 activities we identified the domains of E2F-1 that were responsible for the accumulation of p53. Unexpectedly, we found that the E2F-1 transactivation domain was dispensable for p53 induction. By contrast, further deletion of the DP-1 interaction/'marked' box domain eliminated p53 accumulation. Radiolabeling pulse/chase analysis demonstrated that E2F-1 caused post-translational stabilization of p53. Although E2F-1 caused the stabilization of p53, E2F-1 expression impaired p53-dependent transactivation. Thus, the E2F-1 : p53 interaction may provide a checkpoint function to inactivate overactive E2F-1, but the association may also inactivate p53 transactivation to allow cell cycle progression.

AML-1/ETO fusion protein is a dominant negative inhibitor of transcriptional repression by the promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein

The AML-1/ETO fusion protein, created by the (8;21) translocation in M2-type acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), is a dominant repressive form of AML-1. This effect is due to the ability of the ETO portion of the protein to recruit co-repressors to promoters of AML-1 target genes. The t(11;17)(q21;q23)-associated acute promyelocytic leukemia creates the promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger PLZFt/RAR alpha fusion protein and, in a similar manner, inhibits RAR alpha target gene expression and myeloid differentiation. PLZF is expressed in hematopoietic progenitors and functions as a growth suppressor by repressing cyclin A2 and other targets. ETO is a corepressor for PLZF and potentiates transcriptional repression by linking PLZF to a histone deacetylase-containing complex. In transiently transfected cells and in a cell line derived from a patient with t(8;21) leukemia, PLZF and AML-1/ETO formed a tight complex. In transient assays, AML-1/ETO blocked transcriptional repression by PLZF, even at substoichiometric levels relative to PLZF. This effect was dependent on the presence of the ETO zinc finger domain, which recruits corepressors, and could not be rescued by overexpression of co-repressors that normally enhance PLZF repression. AML-1/ETO also excluded PLZF from the nuclear matrix and reduced its ability to bind to its cognate DNA-binding site. Finally, ETO interacted with PLZF/RAR alpha and enhanced its ability to repress through the RARE. These data show a link in the transcriptional pathways of M2 and M3 leukemia. (Blood. 2000;96:3939-3947)

TEL, a putative tumor suppressor, modulates cell growth and cell morphology of ras-transformed cells while repressing the transcription of stromelysin-1

TEL is a member of the ETS family of transcription factors that interacts with the mSin3 and SMRT corepressors to regulate transcription. TEL is biallelically disrupted in acute leukemia, and loss of heterozygosity at the TEL locus has been observed in various cancers. Here we show that expression of TEL in Ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells inhibits cell growth in soft agar and in normal cultures. Unexpectedly, cells expressing both Ras and TEL grew as aggregates. To begin to explain the morphology of Ras-plus TEL-expressing cells, we demonstrated that the endogenous matrix metalloproteinase stromelysin-1 was repressed by TEL. TEL bound sequences in the stromelysin-1 promoter and repressed the promoter in transient-expression assays, suggesting that it is a direct target for TEL-mediated regulation. Mutants of TEL that removed a binding site for the mSin3A corepressor but retained the ETS domain failed to repress stromelysin-1. When BB-94, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, was added to the culture medium of Ras-expressing cells, it caused a cell aggregation phenotype similar to that caused by TEL expression. In addition, TEL inhibited the invasiveness of Ras-transformed cells in vitro and in vivo. Our results suggest that TEL acts as a tumor suppressor, in part, by transcriptional repression of stromelysin-1.

Role of the transcription factor AML-1 in acute leukemia and hematopoietic differentiation

Chromosomal translocations affecting the AML-1 gene are among the most frequent aberrations found in acute leukemia. Because the AML-1 transcription factor is a critical regulator of hematopoeitic cell development, normal homeostasis is disrupted in cells containing these translocations. In this review we describe the mechanisms of transcriptional activation and repression by AML-1 and how this transcriptional control is disrupted by the chromosomal translocations that affect AML-1. Finally, we discuss how the mechanism of transcriptional repression by these chromosomal translocation fusion proteins is a possible target of therapeutic intervention in acute leukemia.

The ETO protein disrupted in t(8;21)-associated acute myeloid leukemia is a corepressor for the promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger protein

The ETO protein was originally identified by its fusion to the AML-1 transcription factor in translocation (8;21) associated with the M2 form of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The resulting AML-1-ETO fusion is an aberrant transcriptional regulator due to the ability of ETO, which does not bind DNA itself, to recruit the transcriptional corepressors N-CoR, SMRT, and Sin3A and histone deacetylases. The promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF) protein is a sequence-specific DNA-binding transcriptional factor fused to retinoic acid receptor alpha in acute promyelocytic leukemia associated with the (11;17)(q23;q21) translocation. PLZF also mediates transcriptional repression through the actions of corepressors and histone deacetylases. We found that ETO is one of the corepressors recruited by PLZF. The PLZF and ETO proteins associate in vivo and in vitro, and ETO can potentiate transcriptional repression by PLZF. The N-terminal portion of ETO forms complexes with PLZF, while the C-terminal region, which was shown to bind to N-CoR and SMRT, is required for the ability of ETO to augment transcriptional repression by PLZF. The second repression domain (RD2) of PLZF, not the POZ/BTB domain, is necessary to bind to ETO. Corepression by ETO was completely abrogated by histone deacetylase inhibitors. This identifies ETO as a cofactor for a sequence-specific transcription factor and indicates that, like other corepressors, it functions through the action of histone deactylase.

Expression of the AML-1 oncogene shortens the G(1) phase of the cell cycle

The AML-1-encoded transcription factor, AML-1B, regulates numerous hematopoietic-specific genes. Inappropriate expression of AML-1-family proteins is oncogenic in cell culture systems and in mice. To understand the oncogenic functions of AML-1, we established cell lines expressing AML-1B to examine the role of AML-1 in the cell cycle. DNA content analysis and bromodeoxyuridine pulse-chase studies indicated that entry into the S phase of the cell cycle was accelerated by up to 4 h in AML-1B-expressing 32D.3 myeloid progenitor cells as compared with control cells or cells expressing E2F-1. However, AML-1B was not able to induce continued cell cycle progression in the absence of growth factors. The DNA binding and transactivation domains of AML-1B were required for altering the cell cycle. Thus, AML-1B is the first transcription factor that affects the timing of the mammalian cell cycle.

Mammalian runt-domain proteins and their roles in hematopoiesis, osteogenesis, and leukemia

Mammalian Runt-domain-containing factors are structurally and functionally similar and have essential roles in hematopoiesis and osteogenesis. These factors can act as either positive or negative transcriptional regulators of tissue-specific genes whose promoters or enhancers contain the consensus Runt-domain binding element, TGT/CGGT. This sequence is necessary but not sufficient to regulate the transcription of a wide variety of genes. Runt-domain factors are promoter organizers that cooperate with neighboring factors and recruit transcriptional co-activators or co-repressors to regulate expression of tissue-specific genes. AML1 is required for hematopoiesis and is a frequent target of chromosomal translocations in acute leukemias. Fusion proteins generated by these translocations are dominant repressors of genes regulated by the Runt-domain factors. AML3 may also be involved in leukemogenesis. In addition, AML3 has an essential role in bone development, as it is required for osteoblast differentiation and is mutated in patients with cleidocranial dysplasia. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppls. 32/33:51-58, 1999.

A mechanism of repression by acute myeloid leukemia-1, the target of multiple chromosomal translocations in acute leukemia

AML1 is one of the most frequently translocated genes in human leukemia. Here we demonstrate that acute myeloid leukemia-1 (AML-1) (Runx-1) represses transcription from a native promoter, p21(Waf1/Cip1). Unexpectedly, this repression did not require interactions with the Groucho co-repressor. To define the mechanism of repression, we asked whether other co-repressors could interact with AML-1. We demonstrate that AML-1 interacts with the mSin3 co-repressors. Moreover, endogenous AML-1 associated with endogenous mSin3A in mammalian cells. A deletion mutant of AML-1 that did not interact with mSin3A failed to repress transcription. The AML-1/mSin3 association suggests a mechanism of repression for the chromosomal translocation fusion proteins that disrupt AML-1.

The inv(16) encodes an acute myeloid leukemia 1 transcriptional corepressor

The inv(16) is one of the most frequent chromosomal translocations associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The inv(16) fusion protein acts by dominantly interfering with AML-1/core binding factor beta-dependent transcriptional regulation. Here we demonstrate that the inv(16) fusion protein cooperates with AML-1B to repress transcription. This cooperativity requires the ability of the translocation fusion protein to bind to AML-1B. Mutational analysis and cell fractionation experiments indicated that the inv(16) fusion protein acts in the nucleus and that repression occurs when the complex is bound to DNA. We also found that the inv(16) fusion protein binds to AML-1B when it is associated with the mSin3A corepressor. An AML-1B mutant that fails to bind mSin3A was impaired in cooperative repression, suggesting that the inv(16) fusion protein acts through mSin3 and possibly other corepressors. Finally, we demonstrate that the C-terminal portion of the inv(16) fusion protein contains a repression domain, suggesting a molecular mechanism for AML-1-mediated repression.

Both TEL and AML-1 contribute repression domains to the t(12;21) fusion protein

t(12;21) is the most frequent translocation found in pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias. This translocation fuses a putative repressor domain from the TEL DNA-binding protein to nearly all of the AML-1B transcription factor. Here, we demonstrate that fusion of the TEL pointed domain to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain resulted in sequence-specific transcriptional repression, indicating that the pointed domain is a portable repression motif. The TEL pointed domain functioned equally well when the GAL4 DNA-binding sites were moved 600 bp from the promoter, suggesting an active mechanism of repression. This lead us to demonstrate that wild-type TEL and the t(12;21) fusion protein bind the mSin3A corepressor. In the fusion protein, both TEL and AML-1B contribute mSin3 interaction domains. Deletion mutagenesis indicated that both the TEL and AML-1B mSin3-binding domains contribute to repression by the fusion protein. While both TEL and AML-1B associate with mSin3A, TEL/AML-1B appears to bind this corepressor much more stably than either wild-type protein, suggesting a mode of action for the t(12;21) fusion protein.

Identification and characterization of a protein containing formin homology (FH1/FH2) domains

A novel member of the Formin/Diaphanous family of proteins was cloned and characterized. A 4kB mRNA is ubiquitously expressed but is found in abundance in the spleen. FHOS (Formin Homologue Overexpressed in Spleen) contains a 3414bp open reading frame and encodes for an approximately 128kDa protein. FHOS has sequence homology to Diaphanous and Formin proteins within the Formin Homology (FH)1 and FH2 domains. FHOS also contains a coiled-coil, a collagen-like domain, two nuclear localization signals, and several potential PKC and PKA phosphorylation sites. FHOS-specific antiserum was generated and used to determine that FHOS is a predominantly cytoplasmic protein and is expressed in a variety of human cell lines. FHOS was mapped to chromosome 16q22 between framework markers WI-5594 and WI-9392.

Role of histone deacetylases in acute leukemia

Accumulating evidence points to a connection between cancer and transcriptional control by histone acetylation and deacetylation. This is particularly true with regard to the acute leukemias, many of which are caused by fusion proteins that have been created by chromosomal translocations. Genetic rearrangements that disrupt the retinoic acid receptor-alpha and acute myeloid leukemia-1 genes create fusion proteins that block terminal differentiation of hematopoietic cells by repressing transcription. These fusion proteins interact with nuclear hormone co-repressors, which recruit histone deacetylases to promoters to repress transcription. This finding suggests that proteins within the histone deacetylase complexes may be potential targets for pharmaceutical intervention in many leukemia patients.

ETO, a target of t(8;21) in acute leukemia, interacts with the N-CoR and mSin3 corepressors

t(8;21) is one of the most frequent translocations associated with acute myeloid leukemia. It produces a chimeric protein, acute myeloid leukemia-1 (AML-1)-eight-twenty-one (ETO), that contains the amino-terminal DNA binding domain of the AML-1 transcriptional regulator fused to nearly all of ETO. Here we demonstrate that ETO interacts with the nuclear receptor corepressor N-CoR, the mSin3 corepressors, and histone deacetylases. Endogenous ETO also cosediments on sucrose gradients with mSin3A, N-CoR, and histone deacetylases, suggesting that it is a component of one or more corepressor complexes. Deletion mutagenesis indicates that ETO interacts with mSin3A independently of its association with N-CoR. Single amino acid mutations that impair the ability of ETO to interact with the central portion of N-CoR affect the ability of the t(8;21) fusion protein to repress transcription. Finally, AML-1/ETO associates with histone deacetylase activity and a histone deacetylase inhibitor impairs the ability of the fusion protein to repress transcription. Thus, t(8;21) fuses a component of a corepressor complex to AML-1 to repress transcription.

Multiple functional domains of AML1: PU.1 and C/EBPalpha synergize with different regions of AML1

Control elements of many genes are regulated by multiple activators working in concert to confer the maximal level of expression, but the mechanism of such synergy is not completely understood. The promoter of the human macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) receptor presents an excellent model with which we can study synergistic, tissue-specific activation for two reasons. First, myeloid-specific expression of the M-CSF receptor is regulated transcriptionally by three factors which are crucial for normal hematopoiesis: PU.1, AML1, and C/EBPalpha. Second, these proteins interact in such a way as to demonstrate at least two examples of synergistic activation. We have shown that AML1 and C/EBPalpha activate the M-CSF receptor promoter in a synergistic manner. As we report here, AML1 also synergizes, and interacts physically, with PU. 1. Detailed analysis of the physical and functional interaction of AML1 with PU.1 and C/EBPalpha has revealed that the proteins contact one another through their DNA-binding domains and that AML1 exhibits cooperative DNA binding with C/EBPalpha but not with PU.1. This difference in DNA-binding abilities may explain, in part, the differences observed in synergistic activation. Furthermore, the activation domains of all three factors are required for synergistic activation, and the region of AML1 required for synergy with PU.1 is distinct from that required for synergy with C/EBPalpha. These observations present the possibility that synergistic activation is mediated by secondary proteins contacted through the activation domains of AML1, C/EBPalpha, and PU.1.

CBFa(AML/PEBP2)-related elements in the TGF-beta type I receptor promoter and expression with osteoblast differentiation

Organization of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) type I receptor (TRI) promoter predicts constitutive transcription, although its activity increases with differentiation status in cultured osteoblasts. Several sequences in the rat TRI promoter comprise cis-acting elements for CBFa (AML/PEBP2alpha) transcription factors. By gel mobility shift and immunological analyses, a principal osteoblast-derived nuclear factor that binds to these sites is CBFa1 (AML-3/PEBP2alphaA). Rat CBFa1 levels parallel expression of the osteoblast phenotype and increase under conditions that promote mineralized bone nodule formation in vitro. Fusion of CBFa binding sequence from the TRI promoter to enhancer-free transfection vector increases reporter gene expression in cells that possess abundant CBFa1, and overexpression of CBFa increase the activity of transfected native TRI promoter/reporter plasmid. Consequently, phenotype-restricted use of cis-acting elements for CBFa transcription factors can contribute to the high levels of TRI that parallel osteoblast differentiation and to the potent effects of TGF-beta on osteoblast function.

The MYND motif is required for repression of basal transcription from the multidrug resistance 1 promoter by the t(8;21) fusion protein

Chromosomal translocations in acute leukemia that affect the AML-1/CBFbeta transcription factor complex create dominant inhibitory proteins. However, the mechanisms by which these proteins act remain obscure. Here we demonstrate that the multidrug resistance 1 (MDR-1) promoter is a target for AML/ETO transcriptional repression. This repression is of basal, not activated, expression from the MDR-1 promoter and thus represents a new mechanism for AML/ETO function. We have defined two domains in AML/ETO that are required for repression of basal transcription from the MDR-1 promoter: a hydrophobic heptad repeat (HHR) motif and a conserved zinc finger (ZnF) domain termed the MYND domain. The HHR mediates formation of AML/ETO homodimers and AML/ETO-ETO heterodimers. Single serine substitutions at conserved cysteine residues within the predicted ZnFs also abrogate transcriptional repression. Finally, we observe that AML/ETO can also inhibit Ets-1 activation of the MDR-1 promoter, indicating that AML/ETO can disrupt both basal and Ets-1-dependent transcription. The fortuitous inhibition of MDR-1 expression in t(8;21)-containing leukemias may contribute to the favorable response of these patients to chemotherapeutic drugs.

The t(8;21) fusion product, AML-1-ETO, associates with C/EBP-alpha, inhibits C/EBP-alpha-dependent transcription, and blocks granulocytic differentiation

AML-1B is a hematopoietic transcription factor that is functionally inactivated by multiple chromosomal translocations in human acute myeloblastic and B-cell lymphocytic leukemias. The t(8;21)(q22;q22) translocation replaces the C terminus, including the transactivation domain of AML-1B, with ETO, a nuclear protein of unknown function. We previously showed that AML-1-ETO is a dominant inhibitor of AML-1B-dependent transcriptional activation. Here we demonstrate that AML-1-ETO also inhibits C/EBP-alpha-dependent activation of the myeloid cell-specific, rat defensin NP-3 promoter. AML-1B bound the core enhancer motifs present in the NP-3 promoter and activated transcription approximately sixfold. Similarly, C/EBP-alpha bound NP-3 promoter sequences and activated transcription approximately sixfold. Coexpression of C/EBP-alpha with AML-1B or its family members, AML-2 and murine AML-3, synergistically activated the NP-3 promoter up to 60-fold. The t(8;21) product, AML-1-ETO, repressed AML-1B-dependent activation of NP-3 and completely inhibited C/EBP-alpha-dependent activity as well as the synergistic activation. In contrast, the inv(16) product, which indirectly targets AML family members by fusing their heterodimeric DNA binding partner, CBF-beta, to the myosin heavy chain, inhibited AML-1B but not C/EBP-alpha activation or the synergistic activation. AML-1-ETO and C/EBP-alpha were coimmunoprecipitated and thus physically interact in vivo. Deletion mutants demonstrated that the C terminus of ETO was required for AML-1-ETO-mediated repression of the synergistic activation but not for association with C/EBP-alpha. Finally, overexpression of AML-1-ETO in myeloid progenitor cells prevented granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced differentiation. Thus, AML-1-ETO may contribute to leukemogenesis by specifically inhibiting C/EBP-alpha- and AML-1B-dependent activation of myeloid promoters and blocking differentiation.

E2F-1 and E2F-3 are functionally distinct in their ability to promote myeloid cell cycle progression and block granulocyte differentiation

Interleukin 3 (IL-3)-dependent 32D.3 myeloid cells are an attractive model system for the analysis of hematopoietic cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis. In these cells, E2F-3, E2F-4, and DP-1 are regulated by both IL-3 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), whereas E2F-1 was expressed at low levels and was not regulated by either cytokine. E2F-2 and E2F-5 were not detectable. To examine phenotypes associated with the loss of normal cell cycle regulation by pRb, we established E2F-1- and E2F-3-overexpressing cell lines. In contrast to E2F-1, E2F-3 overexpression did not accelerate apoptosis or promote S-phase entry in the absence of IL-3, demonstrating that they are not functionally redundant. In addition, when cells were cultured in G-CSF to stimulate granulocytic differentiation, E2F-1 overexpression overrode survival functions provided by G-CSF and serum and induced apoptosis. In contrast, cells overexpressing E2F-3 exhibited normal granulocytic differentiation. Bcl-2 coexpression blocked E2F-1-induced apoptosis in the presence of G-CSF. However, these cells were blocked in the granulocytic differentiation program at the metamyelocyte stage and remained dependent on G-CSF for continuous culture. Cells overexpressing both E2F-1 and Bcl-2 exhibited slowed but continuous cell cycling in the absence of IL-3 until they eventually succumbed to apoptosis. Therefore, E2F-1, but not E2F-3, can temporally replace the requirement for growth factors to promote cell cycle progression, and in terminally differentiating cells, this leads to a block in differentiation and induction of apoptosis.

Transcriptional regulation during myelopoiesis

The coordinated production of all blood cells from a common stem cell is a highly regulated process involving successive stages of commitment and differentiation. From analyses of mice deficient in transcription factor genes and from the characterizations of chromosome breakpoints in human leukemias, it has become evident that transcription factors are important regulators of hematopoiesis. During myelopoiesis, which includes the development of granulocytic and monocytic lineages, transcription factors from several families are active, including AML1/CBF beta, C/EBP, Ets, c-Myb, HOX, and MZF-1. Few of these factors are expressed exclusively in myeloid cells; instead it appears that they cooperatively regulate transcription of myeloid-specific genes. Here we discuss recent advances in transcriptional regulation during myelopoiesis.

Runt homology domain proteins in osteoblast differentiation: AML3/CBFA1 is a major component of a bone-specific complex

The AML/CBFA family of runt homology domain (rhd) transcription factors regulates expression of mammalian genes of the hematopoietic lineage. AML1, AML2 and AML3 are the three AML genes identified to date which influence myeloid cell growth and differentiation. Recently AML-related proteins were identified in an osteoblast-specific promoter binding complex that functionally modulates bone-restricted transcription of the osteocalcin gene. In the present study we demonstrate that in primary rat osteoblasts AML-3 is the AML family member present in the osteoblast-specific complex. Antibody specific for AML-3 completely supershifts this complex, in contrast to antibodies with specificity for AML-1 or AML-2, AML-3 is present as a single 5.4 kb transcript in bone tissues. To establish the functional involvement of AML factors in osteoblast differentiation, we pursued antisense strategies to alter expression of rhd genes. Treatment of osteoblast cultures with rhd antisense oligonucleotides significantly decreased three parameters which are linked to differentiation of normal diploid osteoblasts: the representation of alkaline phosphatase-positive cells, osteocalcin production, and the formation of mineralized nodules. Our findings indicate that AML-3 is a key transcription factor in bone cells and that the activity of rhd proteins is required for completion of osteoblast differentiation.

Identification of a nuclear matrix targeting signal in the leukemia and bone-related AML/CBF-alpha transcription factors

Transcription factors of the AML (core binding factor-alpha/polyoma enhancer binding protein 2) class are key transactivators of tissue-specific genes of the hematopoietic and bone lineages. Alternative splicing of the AML-1 gene results in two major AML variants, AML-1 and AML-1B. We show here that the transcriptionally active AML-1B binds to the nuclear matrix, and the inactive AML-1 does not. The association of AML-1B with the nuclear matrix is independent of DNA binding and requires a nuclear matrix targeting signal (NMTS), a 31 amino acid segment near the C terminus that is distinct from nuclear localization signals. A similar NMTS is present in AML-2 and the bone-related AML-3 transcription factors. Fusion of the AML-1B NMTS to the heterologous GAL4-(1-147) protein directs GAL4 to the nuclear matrix. Thus, the NMTS is necessary and sufficient to target the transcriptionally active AML-1B to the nuclear matrix. The loss of the C-terminal domain of AML-1B is a frequent consequence of the leukemia-related t(8;21) and t(3;21) translocations. Our results suggest this loss may be functionally linked to the modified interrelationships between nuclear structure and gene expression characteristic of cancer cells.

E2F-1 cooperates with topoisomerase II inhibition and DNA damage to selectively augment p53-independent apoptosis

Mutations in the retinoblastoma (pRb) tumor suppressor pathway including its cyclin-cdk regulatory kinases, or cdk inhibitors, are a hallmark of most cancers and allow unrestrained E2F-1 transcription factor activity, which leads to unregulated G1-to-S-phase cell cycle progression. Moderate levels of E2F-1 overexpression are tolerated in interleukin 3 (IL-3)-dependent 32D.3 myeloid progenitor cells, yet this induces apoptosis when these cells are deprived of IL-3. However, when E2F activity is augmented by coexpression of its heterodimeric partner, DP-1, the effects of survival factors are abrogated. To determine whether enforced E2F-1 expression selectively sensitizes cells to cytotoxic agents, we examined the effects of chemotherapeutic agents and radiation used in cancer therapy. E2F-1 overexpression in the myeloid cells preferentially sensitized cells to apoptosis when they were treated with the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide. Although E2F-1 alone induces moderate levels of p53 and treatment with drugs markedly increased p53, the deleterious effects of etoposide in E2F-1-overexpressing cells were independent of p53 accumulation. Coexpression of Bcl-2 and E2F-1 in 32D.3 cells protected them from etoposide-mediated apoptosis. However, Bcl-2 also prevented apoptosis of these cells upon exposure to 5-fluorouracil and doxorubicin, which were also cytotoxic for control cells. Pretreating E2F-1-expressing cells with ICRF-193, a second topoisomerase II inhibitor that does not damage DNA, protected the cells from etoposide-induced apoptosis. However, ICRF-193 cooperated with DNA-damaging agents to induce apoptosis. Therefore, topoisomerase II inhibition and DNA damage can cooperate to selectively induce p53-independent apoptosis in cells that have unregulated E2F-1 activity resulting from mutations in the pRb pathway.

Synergistic up-regulation of the myeloid-specific promoter for the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor by AML1 and the t(8;21) fusion protein may contribute to leukemogenesis

AML1 is involved in the (8;21) translocation, associated with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)-type M2, which results in the production of the AML1-ETO fusion protein: the amino-terminal 177 amino acids of AML1 and the carboxyl-terminal 575 amino acids of ETO. The mechanism by which AML1-ETO accomplishes leukemic transformation is unknown; however, AML1-ETO interferes with AML1 transactivation of such AML1 targets as the T-cell receptor beta enhancer and the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promoter. Herein, we explored the effect of AML1-ETO on regulation of a myeloid-specific AML1 target, the macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) receptor promoter. We found that AML1-ETO and AML1 work synergistically to transactivate the M-CSF receptor promoter, thus exhibiting a different activity than previously described. Truncation mutants within the ETO portion of AML1-ETO revealed the region of ETO necessary for the cooperativity between AML1 and AML1-ETO lies between amino acids 347 and 540. Endogenous M-CSF receptor expression was examined in Kasumi-1 cells, derived from a patient with AML-M2 t(8;21) and the promonocytic cell line U937. Kasumi-1 cells exhibited a significantly higher level of M-CSF receptor expression than U937 cells. Bone marrow from patients with AML-M2 t(8;21) also exhibited a higher level of expression of M-CSF receptor compared with normal controls. The upregulation of M-CSF receptor expression by AML1-ETO may contribute to the development of a leukemic state in these patients.

AML-2 is a potential target for transcriptional regulation by the t(8;21) and t(12;21) fusion proteins in acute leukemia

AML-1B is targeted directly and indirectly in multiple chromosomal translocations in myeloid and B-cells. The AML-1/ETO and TEL/AML-1 fusion proteins, created by the t(8;21) and t(12;21) respectively, disrupt AML-1B-dependent transcription. Recently, two human members of the runt homology domain family of transcription factors have been identified, AML-2 and AML-3, which also regulate transcription through enhancer core motifs. If multiple factors regulate transcription through the same site, a dominant interfering protein may be required to promote leukemogenesis, rather than the inactivation of both AML1 alleles. To determine which AML family proteins are active in hematopoietic cells, we developed antisera specific to each family member for use in gel mobility shift assays. We have found that AML-1B is the major DNA binding activity in T-cell lines, while both AML-1B and AML-2 are expressed in myeloid and B-cell lines. AML-1B represents most of the active protein in the mouse thymus, whereas AML-1 and AML-2 are equally expressed in the mouse spleen. AML-3 is expressed at very low levels in a single myeloid cell line, 32D.3, and is the only core binding activity present in Buffalo rat liver cells. We demonstrate that AML-2-dependent transactivation mediated by enhancer core motifs is inhibited by the AML-1/ETO and TEL/AML-1 fusion proteins. This indicates that the t(8;21) and t(12;21) fusion proteins inhibit transcriptional activation by the AML-1 transcription factor family, and in so doing contributes to leukemogenesis.

An AML-1 consensus sequence binds an osteoblast-specific complex and transcriptionally activates the osteocalcin gene

Tissue and cell-type specific expression of the rat osteocalcin (rOC) gene involves the interplay of multiple transcriptional regulatory factors. In this report we demonstrate that AML-1 (acute myeloid leukemia-1), a DNA-binding protein whose genes are disrupted by chromosomal translocations in several human leukemias, interacts with a sequence essential for enhancing tissue-restricted expression of the rOC gene. Deletion analysis of rOC promoter-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase constructs demonstrates that an AML-1-binding sequence within the proximal promoter (-138 to -130 nt) contributes to 75% of the level of osteocalcin gene expression. The activation potential of the AML-1-binding sequence has been established by overexpressing AML-1 in osteoblastic as well as in nonosseous cell lines. Overexpression not only enhances rOC promoter activity in osteoblasts but also mediates OC promoter activity in a nonosseous human fibroblastic cell line. A probe containing this site forms a sequence specific protein-DNA complex with nuclear extracts from osteoblastic cells but not from nonosseous cells. Antisera supershift experiments indicate the presence of AML-1 and its partner protein core-binding factor beta in this osteoblast-restricted complex. Mutations of the critical AML-1-binding nucleotides abrogate formation of the complex and strongly diminish promoter activity. These results indicate that an AML-1 related protein is functional in cells of the osteoblastic lineage and that the AML-1-binding site is a regulatory element important for osteoblast-specific transcriptional activation of the rOC gene.

Prostaglandin A2 blocks the activation of G1 phase cyclin-dependent kinase without altering mitogen-activated protein kinase stimulation

Prostaglandin A2 (PGA2) reversibly blocked the cell cycle progression of NIH 3T3 cells at G1 and G2/M phase. When it was applied to cells synchronized in G0 or S phase, cells were blocked at G1 and G2/M, respectively. The G2/M blockage was transient. Microinjected oncogenic leucine 61 Ras protein could not override the PGA2 induced G1 blockage, nor could previous transformation with the v-raf oncogene. The serum-induced activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase was not inhibited by PGA2 treatment. These data suggest that PGA2 blocks cell cycle progression without interfering with the cytosolic proliferative signaling pathway. Combined microinjection of E2F-1 and DP-1 proteins or microinjected adenovirus E1A protein, however, could induce S phase in cells arrested in G1 by PGA2, indicating that PGA2 does not directly inhibit the process of DNA synthesis. In quiescent cells, PGA2 blocked the normal hyperphosphorylation of the retinoblastoma susceptible gene product and the activation of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 2 and CDK4, in response to serum stimulation. PGA2 treatment elevated the p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1 protein expression level. These data indicate that PGA2 may arrest the cell cycle in G1 by interfering with the activation of G1 phase CDKs.

The t(12;21) translocation converts AML-1B from an activator to a repressor of transcription

The t(12;21) translocation is present in up to 30% of childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic and fuses a potential dimerization motif from the ets-related factor TEL to the N terminus of AML1. The t(12;21) translocation encodes a 93-kDa fusion protein that localizes to a high-salt- and detergent-resistant nuclear compartment. This protein binds the enhancer core motif, TGTGGT, and interacts with the AML-1-binding protein, core-binding factor beta. Although TEL/AML-1B retains the C-terminal domain of AML-1B that is required for transactivation of the T-cell receptor beta enhancer, it fails to activate transcription but rather inhibits the basal activity of this enhancer. TEL/AML-1B efficiently interferes with AML-1B dependent transactivation of the T-cell receptor beta enhancer, and coexpression of wild-type TEL does not reverse this inhibition. The N-terminal TEL helix-loop-helix domain is essential for TEL/AML-1B-mediated repression. Thus, the t(12;21) fusion protein dominantly interferes with AML-1B-dependent transcription, suggesting that the inhibition of expression of AML-1 genes is critical for B-cell leukemogenesis.

CCAAT enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) and AML1 (CBF alpha2) synergistically activate the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor promoter

Transcription factors play a key role in the development and differentiation of specific lineages from multipotential progenitors. Identification of these regulators and determining the mechanism of how they activate their target genes are important for understanding normal development of monocytes and macrophages and the pathogenesis of a common form of adult acute leukemia, in which the differentiation of monocytic cells is blocked. Our previous work has shown that the monocyte-specific expression of the macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) receptor is regulated by three transcription factors interacting with critical regions of the M-CSF receptor promoter, including PU.1 and AML1.PU.1 is essential for myeloid cell development, while the AML1 gene is involved in several common leukemia-related chromosome translocations, although its role in hematopoiesis has not been fully identified. Along with AML1, a third factor, Mono A, interacts with a small region of the promoter which can function as a monocyte-specific enhancer when multimerized and linked to a heterologous basal promoter. Here, we demonstrate by electrophoretic mobility shift assays with monocytic nuclear extracts, COS-7 cell-transfected factors, and specific antibodies that the monocyte-enriched factor Mono A is CCAAT enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP). C/EBP has been shown previously to be an important transcription factor involved in hepatocyte and adipocyte differentiation; in hematopoietic cells, C/EBP is specifically expressed in myeloid cells. In vitro binding analysis reveals a physical interaction between C/EBP and AML1. Further transfection studies show that C/EBP and AML1 in concert with the AML1 heterodimer partner CBF beta synergistically activate M-CSF receptor by more then 60 fold. These results demonstrate that C/EBP and AML1 are important factors for regulating a critical hematopoietic growth factor receptor, the M-CSF receptor, suggesting a mechanism of how the AML1 fusion protein could contribute to acute myeloid leukemia. Furthermore, they demonstrate physical and functional interactions between AML1 and C/EBP transcription factor family members.

AML1, the target of multiple chromosomal translocations in human leukemia, is essential for normal fetal liver hematopoiesis

The AML1-CBF beta transcription factor is the most frequent target of chromosomal rearrangements in human leukemia. To investigate its normal function, we generated mice lacking AML1. Embryos with homozygous mutations in AML1 showed normal morphogenesis and yolk sac-derived erythropoiesis, but lacked fetal liver hematopoiesis and died around E12.5. Sequentially targeted AML1-/-es cell retained their capacity to differentiate into primitive erythroid cells in vitro; however, no myeloid or erythroid progenitors of definitive hematopoietic origin were detected in either the yolk sac or fetal livers of mutant embryos. Moreover, this hematopoietic defect was intrinsic to the stem cells in that AML1-/-ES cells failed to contribute to hematopoiesis in chimeric animals. These results suggest that AML1-regulated target genes are essential for definitive hematopoiesis of all lineages.

The AML1/ETO fusion protein blocks transactivation of the GM-CSF promoter by AML1B

The t(8;21) translocation, commonly found in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), generates a fusion protein containing N-terminal AML1 and C-terminal ETO amino acids. The human AML1 gene encodes several related proteins that specifically bind to the sequence TGT/cGGT, located in the promoter regions of a variety of hematopoietic growth factor genes. To examine the abilities of the AML1B protein (which contains 479 amino acids), a shorter AML1A isoform (which contains amino acids 1-250), and the AML1/ETO fusion protein (which contains AML1A amino acids 1-177) to stimulate transcription from the GM-CSF promoter, we performed co-transfection experiments in T cells using a human GM-CSF promoter-CAT reporter gene plasmid and expression vectors that contain the cDNAs for one of the above proteins. Our data demonstrate that AML1B, but not AML1A or AML1/ETO transactivates the GM-CSF promoter, requiring the TGTGGT sequence contained between base pairs -68 and -53. Furthermore, we show that AML1/ETO, but not AML1A, inhibits the ability of AML1B to stimulate CAT expression. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated the specific binding of AML1 proteins to the GM-CSF promoter TGTGGT sequence, which does not require GM-CSF sequences immediately upstream of this binding site. Our data support a role for AML1B as a transcriptional activator and establish that the AML1/ETO fusion protein can act as a dominant negative protein on the human GM-CSF promoter. Although AML1/ETO does not stimulate the transcription of GM-CSF, it may function by inhibiting the normal activity of AML1B in AML cells with the t(8;21) translocation.

E2F-1:DP-1 induces p53 and overrides survival factors to trigger apoptosis

The E2F DNA binding activity consists of a heterodimer between E2F and DP family proteins, and these interactions are required for association of E2F proteins with pRb and the pRb-related proteins p107 and p130, which modulate E2F transcriptional activities. E2F-1 expression is sufficient to release fibroblasts from G0 and induce entry into S phase, yet it also initiates apoptosis. To investigate the mechanisms of E2F-induced apoptosis, we utilized interleukin-3 (IL-3)-dependent 32D.3 myeloid cells, a model of hematopoietic progenitor programmed cell death. In the absence of IL-3, E2F-1 alone was sufficient to induce apoptosis, and p53 levels were diminished. DP-1 alone was not sufficient to induce cell cycle progression or alter rates of death following IL-3 withdrawal. However, overexpression of both E2F-1 and DP-1 led to the rapid death of cells even in the presence of survival factors. In the presence of IL-3, levels of endogenous wild-type p53 increased in response to E2F-1, and coexpression of DP-1 further augmented p53 levels. These results provide evidence that E2F is a functional link between the tumor suppressors p53 and pRb. However, induction of p53 alone was not sufficient to trigger apoptosis, suggesting that the ability of E2F to override survival factors involves additional effectors.

Functional domains of the t(8;21) fusion protein, AML-1/ETO

The AML-1/ETO fusion protein is created by the (8;21) translocation, the second most frequent chromosomal abnormality associated with acute myeloid leukemia. In the fusion protein the AML-1 runt homology domain, which is responsible for DNA binding and CBF beta interaction, is linked to ETO, a gene of unknown function. The primary sequences of the runt homology domain indicates no known DNA binding motifs, but is predicted to contain six beta-strands, two alpha-helices and a nucleotide binding motif. Mutagenesis of AML-1/ETO was performed to delimit the functional domains of the chimeric protein. Most mutations in the runt homology domain that resulted in reduced CBF beta binding also inhibited DNA binding, indicating that the DNA and CBF beta binding sequences are tightly linked. However, these activities were separated by a point mutation of residue 144, within the putative ATP binding motif, which nearly eliminated DNA binding, but did not affect CBF beta binding. Random mutagenesis identified the hydrophobic face of the amphipathic fifth beta-strand, adjacent to the putative ATP binding motif, as critical for both DNA and CBF beta binding. C-terminal deletion mutants of AML-1/ETO indicated that ETO sequences are essential for interference with AML-1B-mediated transcriptional activation, and that residue 540 defines the C-terminal boundary of a potential repression domain. Thus, these mutational analyses define the regions of AML-1/ETO which regulate its function and that may be important in promoting leukemia.

Heterogeneity in CBF beta/MYH11 fusion messages encoded by the inv(16)(p13q22) and the t(16;16)(p13;q22) in acute myelogenous leukemia

Inv(16)(p13q22) is one of the most frequent chromosomal rearrangements found in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), representing approximately 16% of documented karyotypic abnormalities. The inv(16) breakpoints have been cloned and shown to involve the non-DNA binding component of the AML-1 transcription factor complex termed core binding factor beta gene (CBF beta) on 16q and the smooth muscle myosin heavy chain gene (MYH11) on 16p. In this study, we analyzed 37 cases of inv(16)-containing AML and 4 cases with t(16;16)(p13;q22) for expression of the CBF beta/MYH11 chimeric message by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. CBF beta/MYH11 chimeric messages were detected in 33 of 37 cases with the inv(16) and in the 4 t(16;16)-containing cases. Sequence analysis of PCR products showed extensive breakpoint heterogeneity in both CBF beta and MYH11. In addition to the previously described breakpoint in CBF beta at nucleotide (nt) 495 (amino acid 165), we have identified a second novel fusion point at nt 399 (amino acid 133) in 7% of the cases. Similarly, a unique breakpoint site was identified in MYH11 at nt 1098, as well as at three previously characterized sites at nts 994, 1201, and 1921. Of the 4 PCR-negative cases, 2 of 3 tested lacked CBF beta rearrangements by Southern blot analysis, suggesting the possible involvement of a different genomic locus in some cases with cytogenetic evidence of inv(16). To assess whether the portions of CBF-beta contained within the CBF beta/MYH11 chimeric products retain the ability to interact with their heterodimeric DNA-binding partner AML-1, we performed in vitro DNA-binding analysis. Recombinant CBF-beta polypeptides consisting of the N-terminal 165 amino acids retained their ability to interact with AML-1, whereas mutants containing only the N-terminal 133 amino acids interacted with AML-1 less efficiently. These data suggest that different CBF beta/MYH11 products may vary subtly in their biologic activities.

Fusion of the TEL gene on 12p13 to the AML1 gene on 21q22 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Chromosomal rearrangements involving band 12p13 are found in a wide variety of human leukemias but are particularly common in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The genes involved in these rearrangements, however, have not been identified. We now report the cloning of a t(12;21) translocation breakpoint involving 12p13 and 21q22 in two cases of childhood pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia, in which t(12;21) rearrangements were not initially apparent. The consequence of the translocation is fusion of the helix-loop-helix domain of TEL, an ETS-like putative transcription factor, to the DNA-binding and transactivation domains of the transcription factor AML1. These data show that TEL, previously shown to be fused to the platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, can be implicated in the pathogenesis of leukemia through its fusion to either a receptor tyrosine kinase or a transcription factor. The TEL-AML1 fusion also indicates that translocations affecting the AML1 gene can be associated with lymphoid, as well as myeloid, malignancy.

The t(8;21) fusion protein interferes with AML-1B-dependent transcriptional activation

The AML-1/CBF beta transcription factor complex is targeted by both the t(8;21) and the inv(16) chromosomal alterations, which are frequently observed in acute myelogenous leukemia. AML-1 is a site-specific DNA-binding protein that recognizes the enhancer core motif TGTGGT. The t(8;21) translocation fuses the first 177 amino acids of AML-1 to MTG8 (also known as ETO), generating a chimeric protein that retains the DNA-binding domain of AML-1. Analysis of endogenous AML-1 DNA-binding complexes suggested the presence of at least two AML-1 isoforms. Accordingly, we screened a human B-cell cDNA library and isolated a larger, potentially alternatively spliced, form of AML1, termed AML1B. AML-1B is a protein of 53 kDa that binds to a consensus AML-1-binding site and complexes with CBF beta. Subcellular fractionation experiments demonstrated that both AML-1 and AML-1/ETO are efficiently extracted from the nucleus under ionic conditions but that AML-1B is localized to a salt-resistant nuclear compartment. Analysis of the transcriptional activities of AML-1, AML-1B, and AML-1/ETO demonstrated that only AML-1B activates transcription from the T-cell receptor beta enhancer. Mixing experiments indicated that AML-1/ETO can efficiently block AML-1B-dependent transcriptional activation, suggesting that the t(8;21) translocation creates a dominant interfering protein.

Indirect and direct disruption of transcriptional regulation in cancer: E2F and AML-1

The disruption of transcriptional regulatory circuits through the elimination of negative regulatory factors (tumor suppressors), the activation of positive acting factors (oncogenes), or when chimeric proteins result from chromosomal translocations, is likely a key event in multistep tumorigenesis. Here, using the transcription factors E2F and AML-1 as model systems, we discuss the disruption of coordinate transcriptional regulation in oncogenesis. E2F oncogenic signals are released when the pRb tumor suppressor is inactivated, and E2F activation may necessitate the coordinate inactivation of a second tumor suppressor, p53. AML-1 is the target of the (8;21) translocation, found in approximately 15% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases, and the t(12;21), found in up to 30% of childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias. The t(8;21) creates a fusion protein between AML-1 and a gene of unknown function, mtg8 (ETO), whereas the t(12;21) fuses the TEL (translocation-ets-leukemia) transcription factor to the N-terminus of AML-1. The inv(16), which is the most frequent anomaly found in AML, also targets AML-1, by fusing the gene that encodes AML-1's heterodimeric partner CBF beta to the smooth muscle myosin heavy chain gene MYHll. Thus, E2F and AML-1 provide excellent models for the disruption of transcriptional regulation in cancer.

An E2F dominant negative mutant blocks E1A induced cell cycle progression

E2F is a cellular transcription factor that is regulated during the cell cycle through interactions with the product of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene (RB1) and the pRb-like p107 and p130 proteins. Analysis of mutations within both adenovirus E1A and pRb, which affected their ability to regulate cellular proliferation and alter E2F activity, suggested that E2F may play a role in cell cycle progression. Microinjection of a GST-E2F-1 fusion protein into quiescent Balb/c 3T3 cells induced DNA synthesis whereas co-injection of GST-E2F-1 and GST-E2F(95-191) protein, encoding only the DNA binding domain of E2F-1, blocked the induction of S-phase. While E1A likely targets multiple cellular pathways, co-injection of the GST-E2F(95-191) dominant inhibitory protein with 12S E1A protein blocked E1A-mediated induction of DNA synthesis, suggesting that the E2F-dependent pathway is dominant. Analysis of the interval required for microinjected quiescent cells to enter S-phase indicated that E2F-1 acted faster than either E1A or serum.

Dual control of myc expression through a single DNA binding site targeted by ets family proteins and E2F-1

NIH3T3 cells expressing a mutant colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor (CSF-1R) containing a phenylalanine for tyrosine substitution in the tyrosine kinase domain at codon 809 exhibit defective myc regulation and do not enter S phase when stimulated by CSF-1. Enforced expression of either ets-1 or ets-2 in these cells restores their mitogenic response, albeit less efficiently than myc itself, suggesting that ets proteins may regulate c-myc expression. Ets-1 transactivates reporter genes driven by the human and mouse c-myc promoters through the binding site for the transcription factor E2F, the latter being required for E1A- and serum-induced c-myc expression. Analysis of E2F-1 sequences identified a minimal DNA binding domain that is related to those of ets proteins. Although E2F and ets proteins interact with similar consensus DNA binding sites, in vitro binding assays revealed that E2F can bind DNA as a homodimer, whereas ets proteins bind these sites as monomers. E2F and ets proteins do not form heterodimers in vitro and do not transactivate c-myc synergistically. Thus, E2F-1 and ets family members may independently regulate c-myc transcription through the same binding site at different times following growth factor stimulation.