1
|
Davis SL, Messersmith WA, Purcell WT, Lam ET, Corr BR, Leal AD, Lieu CH, O’Bryant CL, Smoots SG, Dus ED, Jordan KR, Serkova NJ, Pitts TM, Diamond JR. A Phase Ib Expansion Cohort Evaluating Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib and Dual TORC1/2 Inhibitor Sapanisertib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1456. [PMID: 38672538 PMCID: PMC11048245 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study further evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of alisertib and sapanisertib in an expansion cohort of patients, including a subset of patients with refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with further evaluation of the pharmacodynamic characteristics of combination therapy. METHODS Twenty patients with refractory solid tumors and 11 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated at the recommended phase 2 dose of alisertib and sapanisertib. Adverse events and disease response were assessed. Patients in the expansion cohort were treated with a 7-day lead-in of either alisertib or sapanisertib prior to combination therapy, with tumor tissue biopsy and serial functional imaging performed for correlative analysis. RESULTS Toxicity across treatment groups was overall similar to prior studies. One partial response to treatment was observed in a patient with ER positive breast cancer, and a patient with pancreatic cancer experienced prolonged stable disease. In an additional cohort of pancreatic cancer patients, treatment response was modest. Correlative analysis revealed variability in markers of apoptosis and immune cell infiltrate according to lead-in therapy and response. CONCLUSIONS Dual targeting of Aurora A kinase and mTOR resulted in marginal clinical benefit in a population of patients with refractory solid tumors, including pancreatic adenocarcinoma, though individual patients experienced significant response to therapy. Correlatives indicate apoptotic response and tumor immune cell infiltrate may affect clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Lindsey Davis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Wells A. Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - W. Thomas Purcell
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Elaine T. Lam
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Bradley R. Corr
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Alexis D. Leal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Christopher H. Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Cindy L. O’Bryant
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Stephen G. Smoots
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Evan D. Dus
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Kimberly R. Jordan
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Natalie J. Serkova
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Todd M. Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Jennifer R. Diamond
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hawkins HJ, Yacob BW, Brown ME, Goldstein BR, Arcaroli JJ, Bagby SM, Hartman SJ, Macbeth M, Goodspeed A, Danhorn T, Lentz RW, Lieu CH, Leal AD, Messersmith WA, Dempsey PJ, Pitts TM. Examination of Wnt signaling as a therapeutic target for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) using a pancreatic tumor organoid library (PTOL). PLoS One 2024; 19:e0298808. [PMID: 38598488 PMCID: PMC11006186 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents at advanced stages and is refractory to most treatment modalities. Wnt signaling activation plays a critical role in proliferation and chemotherapeutic resistance. Minimal media conditions, growth factor dependency, and Wnt dependency were determined via Wnt inhibition for seven patient derived organoids (PDOs) derived from pancreatic tumor organoid libraries (PTOL). Organoids demonstrating response in vitro were assessed in vivo using patient-derived xenografts. Wnt (in)dependent gene signatures were identified for each organoid. Panc269 demonstrated a trend of reduced organoid growth when treated with ETC-159 in combination with paclitaxel or gemcitabine as compared with chemotherapy or ETC-159 alone. Panc320 demonstrated a more pronounced anti-proliferative effect in the combination of ETC-159 and paclitaxel but not with gemcitabine. Panc269 and Panc320 were implanted into nude mice and treated with ETC-159, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine as single agents and in combination. The combination of ETC-159 and paclitaxel demonstrated an anti-tumor effect greater than ETC-159 alone. Extent of combinatory treatment effect were observed to a lesser extent in the Panc320 xenograft. Wnt (in)dependent gene signatures of Panc269 and 320 were consistent with the phenotypes displayed. Gene expression of several key Wnt genes assessed via RT-PCR demonstrated notable fold change following treatment in vivo. Each pancreatic organoid demonstrated varied niche factor dependencies, providing an avenue for targeted therapy, supported through growth analysis following combinatory treatment of Wnt inhibitor and standard chemotherapy in vitro. The clinical utilization of this combinatory treatment modality in pancreatic cancer PDOs has thus far been supported in our patient-derived xenograft models treated with Wnt inhibitor plus paclitaxel or gemcitabine. Gene expression analysis suggests there are key Wnt genes that contribute to the Wnt (in)dependent phenotypes of pancreatic tumors, providing plausible mechanistic explanation for Wnt (in)dependency and susceptibility or resistance to treatment on the genotypic level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley J. Hawkins
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Betelehem W. Yacob
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Monica E. Brown
- Section of Developmental Biology, Dept. of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Brandon R. Goldstein
- Section of Developmental Biology, Dept. of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - John J. Arcaroli
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Stacey M. Bagby
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Sarah J. Hartman
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Morgan Macbeth
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Andrew Goodspeed
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Thomas Danhorn
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Robert W. Lentz
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Christopher H. Lieu
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Alexis D. Leal
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Wells A. Messersmith
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Peter J. Dempsey
- Section of Developmental Biology, Dept. of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| | - Todd M. Pitts
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Osorio D, Capasso A, Eckhardt SG, Giri U, Somma A, Pitts TM, Lieu CH, Messersmith WA, Bagby SM, Singh H, Das J, Sahni N, Yi SS, Kuijjer ML. Population-level comparisons of gene regulatory networks modeled on high-throughput single-cell transcriptomics data. Nat Comput Sci 2024; 4:237-250. [PMID: 38438786 DOI: 10.1038/s43588-024-00597-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
Single-cell technologies enable high-resolution studies of phenotype-defining molecular mechanisms. However, data sparsity and cellular heterogeneity make modeling biological variability across single-cell samples difficult. Here we present SCORPION, a tool that uses a message-passing algorithm to reconstruct comparable gene regulatory networks from single-cell/nuclei RNA-sequencing data that are suitable for population-level comparisons by leveraging the same baseline priors. Using synthetic data, we found that SCORPION outperformed 12 existing gene regulatory network reconstruction techniques. Using supervised experiments, we show that SCORPION can accurately identify differences in regulatory networks between wild-type and transcription factor-perturbed cells. We demonstrate SCORPION's scalability to population-level analyses using a single-cell RNA-sequencing atlas containing 200,436 cells from colorectal cancer and adjacent healthy tissues. The differences between tumor regions detected by SCORPION are consistent across multiple cohorts as well as with our understanding of disease progression, and elucidate phenotypic regulators that may impact patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Osorio
- Department of Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
| | - Anna Capasso
- Department of Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - S Gail Eckhardt
- Department of Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Uma Giri
- Department of Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Alexander Somma
- Department of Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Todd M Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Christopher H Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Stacey M Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Harinder Singh
- Department of Immunology, Center for Systems Immunology, University of Pittsburg, Pittsburg, PA, USA
| | - Jishnu Das
- Department of Immunology, Center for Systems Immunology, University of Pittsburg, Pittsburg, PA, USA
| | - Nidhi Sahni
- Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S Stephen Yi
- Department of Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
- Interdisciplinary Life Sciences Graduate Programs (ILSGP), College of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences (ICES), The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
| | - Marieke L Kuijjer
- Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway (NCMM), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Leiden Center for Computational Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smoots SG, Schreiber AR, Jackson MM, Bagby SM, Dominguez ATA, Dus ED, Binns CA, MacBeth M, Whitty PA, Diamond JR, Pitts TM. Overcoming doxorubicin resistance in triple-negative breast cancer using the class I-targeting HDAC inhibitor bocodepsin/OKI-179 to promote apoptosis. Breast Cancer Res 2024; 26:35. [PMID: 38429789 PMCID: PMC10908182 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01799-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype with a poor prognosis. Doxorubicin is part of standard curative therapy for TNBC, but chemotherapy resistance remains an important clinical challenge. Bocodepsin (OKI-179) is a small molecule class I histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that promotes apoptosis in TNBC preclinical models. The purpose of this study was to investigate the combination of bocodepsin and doxorubicin in preclinical TNBC models and evaluate the impact on terminal cell fate, including apoptosis and senescence. METHODS TNBC cell lines were treated with doxorubicin and CellTiter-Glo was used to assess proliferation and determine doxorubicin sensitivity. Select cell lines were treated with OKI-005 (in vitro version of bocodepsin) and doxorubicin and assessed for proliferation, apoptosis as measured by Annexin V/PI, and cell cycle by flow cytometry. Immunoblotting was used to assess changes in mediators of apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and senescence. Senescence was measured by the senescence-associated β-galactosidase assay. An MDA-MB-231 xenograft in vivo model was treated with bocodepsin, doxorubicin, or the combination and assessed for inhibition of tumor growth. shRNA knockdown of p53 was performed in the CAL-51 cell line and proliferation, apoptosis and senescence were assessed in response to combination treatment. RESULTS OKI-005 and doxorubicin resulted in synergistic antiproliferative activity in TNBC cells lines regardless of p53 mutation status. The combination led to increased apoptosis and decreased senescence. In vivo, the combination resulted in increased tumor growth inhibition compared to either single agent. shRNA knock-down of p53 led to increased doxorubicin-induced senescence that was decreased with the addition of OKI-005 in vitro. CONCLUSION The addition of bocodepsin to doxorubicin resulted in synergistic antiproliferative activity in vitro, improved tumor growth inhibition in vivo, and promotion of apoptosis which makes this a promising combination to overcome doxorubicin resistance in TNBC. Bocodepsin is currently in clinical development and has a favorable toxicity profile compared to other HDAC inhibitors supporting the feasibility of evaluating this combination in patients with TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen G Smoots
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Avenue MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Anna R Schreiber
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Avenue MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Marilyn M Jackson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Avenue MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Stacey M Bagby
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Avenue MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Adrian T A Dominguez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Avenue MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Evan D Dus
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Avenue MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Cameron A Binns
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Avenue MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Morgan MacBeth
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Avenue MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Phaedra A Whitty
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Avenue MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Jennifer R Diamond
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Avenue MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Todd M Pitts
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 East 17th Avenue MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amo-Aparicio J, Dominguez A, Atif SM, Dinarello A, Azam T, Alula KM, Piper M, Lieu CH, Lentz RW, Leal AD, Bagby SM, Messersmith WA, Karam SD, Dinarello CA, Pitts TM, Marchetti C. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells Regulate NLRP3 Activation to Generate a Tolerogenic Microenvironment. Cancer Res Commun 2023; 3:1899-1911. [PMID: 37772994 PMCID: PMC10510589 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
Defining feature of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that participates in the high mortality rate and drug resistance is the immune-tolerant microenvironment which enables tumors to progress unabated by adaptive immunity. In this study, we report that PDAC cells release CSF-1 to induce nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich containing family, pyrin domain-containing-3 (NLRP3) activation in myeloid cells. Increased NLRP3 expression was found in the pancreas of patients with PDAC when compared with normal pancreas which correlated with the formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Using human primary cells and an orthotopic PDAC mouse model, we show that NLRP3 activation is responsible for the maturation and release of the inflammatory cytokine IL1β which selectively drives Th2-type inflammation via COX2/PGE2 induction. As a result of this inflammation, primary tumors were characterized by reduced cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell activation and increased tumor expansion. Genetic deletion and pharmacologic inhibition of NLRP3 enabled the development of Th1 immunity, increased intratumoral levels of IL2, CD8+ T cell–mediated tumor suppression, and ultimately limited tumor growth. In addition, we observed that NLRP3 inhibition in combination with gemcitabine significantly increased the efficacy of the chemotherapy. In conclusion, this study provides a mechanism by which tumor-mediated NLRP3 activation exploits a distinct adaptive immunity response that facilitates tumor escape and progression. Considering the ability to block NLRP3 activity with safe and small orally active molecules, this protein represents a new promising target to improve the limited therapeutic options in PDAC. SIGNIFICANT This study provides novel molecular insights on how PDAC cells exploit NLRP3 activation to suppress CD8 T-cell activation. From a translational perspective, we demonstrate that the combination of gemcitabine with the orally active NLRP3 inhibitor OLT1177 increases the efficacy of monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesus Amo-Aparicio
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Adrian Dominguez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Shaikh M. Atif
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Alberto Dinarello
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Tania Azam
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Kibrom M. Alula
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Miles Piper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Christopher H. Lieu
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Robert W. Lentz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Alexis D. Leal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Stacey M. Bagby
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Wells A. Messersmith
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sana D. Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Charles A. Dinarello
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Todd M. Pitts
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Carlo Marchetti
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lanis JM, Lewis MS, Strassburger H, Larsen K, Bagby SM, Dominguez ATA, Marín-Jiménez JA, Pelanda R, Pitts TM, Lang J. Testing Cancer Immunotherapeutics in a Humanized Mouse Model Bearing Human Tumors. J Vis Exp 2022. [PMID: 36591990 DOI: 10.3791/64606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Reversing the immunosuppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment is critical for the successful treatment of cancers with immunotherapy drugs. Murine cancer models are extremely limited in their diversity and suffer from poor translation to the clinic. To serve as a more physiological preclinical model for immunotherapy studies, this protocol has been developed to evaluate the treatment of human tumors in a mouse reconstituted with a human immune system. This unique protocol demonstrates the development of human immune system (HIS, "humanized") mice, followed by implantation of a human tumor, either a cell-line derived xenograft (CDX) or a patient derived xenograft (PDX). HIS mice are generated by injecting CD34+ human hematopoietic stem cells isolated from umbilical cord blood into neonatal BRGS (BALB/c Rag2-/- IL2RγC-/- NODSIRPα) highly immunodeficient mice that are also capable of accepting a xenogeneic tumor. The importance of the kinetics and characteristics of the human immune system development and tumor implantation is emphasized. Finally, an in-depth evaluation of the tumor microenvironment using flow cytometry is described. In numerous studies using this protocol, it was found that the tumor microenvironment of individual tumors is recapitulated in HIS-PDX mice; "hot" tumors exhibit large immune infiltration while "cold" tumors do not. This model serves as a testing ground for combination immunotherapies for a wide range of human tumors and represents an important tool in the quest for personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi M Lanis
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Matthew S Lewis
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Hannah Strassburger
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Kristina Larsen
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Stacey M Bagby
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Adrian T A Dominguez
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Juan A Marín-Jiménez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-L'Hospitalet)
| | - Roberta Pelanda
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Todd M Pitts
- Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Julie Lang
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lang J, Leal AD, Marín-Jiménez JA, Hartman SJ, Shulman J, Navarro NM, Lewis MS, Capasso A, Bagby SM, Yacob BW, MacBeth M, Freed BM, Eckhardt SG, Jordan K, Blatchford PJ, Pelanda R, Lieu CH, Messersmith WA, Pitts TM. Cabozantinib sensitizes microsatellite stable colorectal cancer to immune checkpoint blockade by immune modulation in human immune system mouse models. Front Oncol 2022; 12:877635. [PMID: 36419897 PMCID: PMC9676436 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.877635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been found to be effective in metastatic MSI-high colorectal cancers (CRC), however, have no efficacy in microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers, which comprise the majority of mCRC cases. Cabozantinib is a small molecule multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is FDA approved in advanced renal cell, medullary thyroid, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Using Human Immune System (HIS) mice, we tested the ability of cabozantinib to prime MSS-CRC tumors to enhance the potency of immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab. In four independent experiments, we implanted distinct MSS-CRC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) into the flanks of humanized BALB/c-Rag2nullIl2rγnullSirpαNOD (BRGS) mice that had been engrafted with human hematopoietic stem cells at birth. For each PDX, HIS-mice cohorts were treated with vehicle, nivolumab, cabozantinib, or the combination. In three out of the four models, the combination had a lower tumor growth rate compared to vehicle or nivolumab-treated groups. Furthermore, interrogation of the HIS in immune organs and tumors by flow cytometry revealed increased Granzyme B+, TNFα+ and IFNγ+ CD4+ T cells among the human tumor infiltrating leukocytes (TIL) that correlated with reduced tumor growth in the combination-treated HIS-mice. Notably, slower growth correlated with increased expression of the CD4+ T cell ligand, HLA-DR, on the tumor cells themselves. Finally, the cabozantinib/nivolumab combination was tested in comparison to cobimetinib/atezolizumab. Although both combinations showed tumor growth inhibition, cabozantinib/nivolumab had enhanced cytotoxic IFNγ and TNFα+ T cells. This pre-clinical in vivo data warrants testing the combination in clinical trials for patients with MSS-CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Lang
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Alexis D. Leal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Juan A. Marín-Jiménez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-L´Hospitalet), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sarah J. Hartman
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Jeremy Shulman
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Natalie M. Navarro
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Matthew S. Lewis
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Anna Capasso
- Department of Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Stacey M. Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Bethlehem W. Yacob
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Morgan MacBeth
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Brian M. Freed
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - S. Gail Eckhardt
- Department of Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Kimberly Jordan
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Patrick J. Blatchford
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Roberta Pelanda
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Christopher H. Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Wells A. Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Todd M. Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Davis SL, Hartman SJ, Bagby SM, Schlaepfer M, Yacob BW, Tse T, Simmons DM, Diamond JR, Lieu CH, Leal AD, Cadogan EB, Hughes GD, Durant ST, Messersmith WA, Pitts TM. ATM kinase inhibitor AZD0156 in combination with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil in preclinical models of colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1107. [PMID: 36309653 PMCID: PMC9617348 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10084-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
AZD0156 is an oral inhibitor of ATM, a serine threonine kinase that plays a key role in DNA damage response (DDR) associated with double-strand breaks. Topoisomerase-I inhibitor irinotecan is used clinically to treat colorectal cancer (CRC), often in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5FU). AZD0156 in combination with irinotecan and 5FU was evaluated in preclinical models of CRC to determine whether low doses of AZD0156 enhance the cytotoxicity of irinotecan in chemotherapy regimens used in the clinic.
Methods
Anti-proliferative effects of single-agent AZD0156, the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN38), and combination therapy were evaluated in 12 CRC cell lines. Additional assessment with clonogenic assay, cell cycle analysis, and immunoblotting were performed in 4 selected cell lines. Four colorectal cancer patient derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with AZD0156, irinotecan, or 5FU alone and in combination for assessment of tumor growth inhibition (TGI). Immunofluorescence was performed on tumor tissues. The DDR mutation profile was compared across in vitro and in vivo models.
Results
Enhanced effects on cellular proliferation and regrowth were observed with the combination of AZD0156 and SN38 in select models. In cell cycle analysis of these models, increased G2/M arrest was observed with combination treatment over either single agent. Immunoblotting results suggest an increase in DDR associated with irinotecan therapy, with a reduced effect noted when combined with AZD0156, which is more pronounced in some models. Increased TGI was observed with the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan as compared to single-agent therapy in some PDX models. The DDR mutation profile was variable across models.
Conclusions
AZD0156 and irinotecan provide a rational and active combination in preclinical colorectal cancer models. Variability across in vivo and in vitro results may be related to the variable DDR mutation profiles of the models evaluated. Further understanding of the implications of individual DDR mutation profiles may help better identify patients more likely to benefit from treatment with the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan in the clinical setting.
Collapse
|
9
|
Schreiber AR, Smoots S, Yacob BW, Dominguez ATA, Levandowski C, Diamond JR, Pitts TM. Abstract 1063: Combination strategies to overcome doxorubicin induced senescence in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-1063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer that lacks the expression of the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor-2 over-expression. Compared to other subtypes of breast cancer, TNBC is associated with a higher risk for metastatic recurrence. While immunotherapy, PARP inhibitors, and sacituzumab govitecan have shown benefit in a subset of TNBC patients, chemotherapy with doxorubicin remains a mainstay of treatment. Senescence is a cellular phenomenon where cells are committed to an arrested state, however, senescent cells are able to secrete pro-tumorigenic factors which can help to promote tumor progression and invasion. It has been suggested that senescence is a potential mechanism of resistance in doxorubicin (dox) treated cells. Transitioning senescence mediated resistance to apoptosis is crucial to the treatment of TNBC. The objective of this study was to evaluate the combination BCL-2 and HDAC inhibitors with dox to overcome resistance and induce apoptosis.
Experimental Procedures: TNBC cell lines resistant and sensitive to doxorubicin were identified using a CellTiter-Glo Viability Assay and resistant cell lines were selected for further analysis. To assess proliferation, dox resistant TNBC cell lines were plated in 96-well plates. Cells were exposed to vehicle control, dox, BCL-2 inhibitor, HDAC inhibitor or the combination of dox and BCL-2 inhibitor or HDAC inhibitor for 72 hours. Cellular proliferation was assessed using the BioSpa live cell analysis system. Apoptosis at 24 hours was analyzed by flow cytometry using Annexin V on cells treated in combination and as single agents. Immunoblotting was performed to evaluate the downstream effects of apoptosis and senescence of drugs as single agents and in combination.
Results: The addition of a BCL-2 inhibitor and HDAC inhibitor to doxorubicin resulted in decreased proliferation in resistant TNBC cell lines compared to single agents and vehicle control by live cell microscopy. Furthermore, the combination of dox and a BCL-2 inhibitor resulted in increased apoptosis when compared to single agents and control using Annexin V staining. The cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors p21 and p16 were over-expressed in cells exposed to combination treatment. Apoptotic proteins BAD, PUMA, cleaved PARP and the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2 were upregulated in cells treated with a BCL-2 inhibitor with or without dox. The pro-mitotic protein cyclin-B1 was downregulated in resistant cells treated with single agent BCL-2 inhibitor and in combination with dox. Additional mechanistic studies are ongoing.
Conclusion: The combination of doxorubicin with BCL-2 and HDAC inhibitors resulted in decreased cellular proliferation and increased apoptosis. Potential senolytic drugs used with dox represent an exciting potential to overcome dox resistance and warrant further investigation.
Citation Format: Anna R. Schreiber, Stephen Smoots, Betelehem W. Yacob, Adrian TA Dominguez, Cecilia Levandowski, Jennifer R. Diamond, Todd M. Pitts. Combination strategies to overcome doxorubicin induced senescence in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1063.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephen Smoots
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | | | | | - Todd M. Pitts
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smoots SG, Schreiber AR, Yacob B, Dominguez A, Levandowski C, Pitts TM, Diamond JR. Abstract 136: Doxorubicin-induced senescence as a mechanism of resistance in TNBC cell lines. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer which lacks HER2 overexpression, as well estrogen and progesterone receptor expression. TNBC constitutes 10-15% of all breast cancers but has a worse prognosis due to limited treatment options and high rates of metastatic recurrence. Doxorubicin (dox) remains one of the most active chemotherapy agents for the treatment of TNBC, although de novo and acquired resistance to chemotherapy remains a major challenge. The purpose of this work was to characterize dox resistant cell phenotypes and investigate treatment-induced senescence in p53-mutated (Mut) and wildtype (WT) TNBC cell lines.
Methods: A panel of 12 TNBC cell lines (p53 WT and p53 Mut) were exposed to dox (0-5 uM) for 72 hours and cellular proliferation was determined using the Cell Titer Glo assay. A subset of sensitive and resistant cell lines were treated with dox (0.1, 0.25 uM) or vehicle control and apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry (Annexin-V) at 24 and 48 hrs. Cells were treated with dox or control for 24 hrs and western blotting was performed for mediators of apoptosis. Senescence was analyzed by ß-galactosidase staining following treatment with dox for 3-14 days. shRNA knockdown (KD) of p53 was performed in the CAL-51 (p53 WT cell line) and cells were subject to investigations above.
Results: Doxorubicin treatment resulted in decreased cellular proliferation and increased apoptosis as assessed by Annexin-V expression in a subset of p53 WT and p53 Mut cell lines. Treatment with dox resulted in an increase in the pro-apoptotic proteins BID and p21, as well as a decrease in VAMP in sensitive cell lines. In a subset of cell lines resistant to dox treatment, we observed an increase in cells demonstrating phenotypic features of senescence and ß -galactosidase staining. We observed a decrease in p16 with dox treatment in the CAL-51 (p53 WT cell line) compared to an increase following treatment in p53 Mut cell lines. KD of p53 resulted in an increase in senescent cells following treatment with low dose dox.
Conclusions: Treatment with doxorubicin resulted in different terminal cell phenotypes in TNBC cell lines with apoptosis observed in p53 WT and Mut cell lines. Senescence was observed in resistant cells and KD of p53 increased dox-induced senescence, confirming a role for p53 in mediating terminal cell fate. Efforts are ongoing to understand the role of mutant p53 in mediating terminal cell fate in response to dox and rational combinations to overcome dox-induced senescence may be clinically active in metastatic TNBC.
Citation Format: Stephen G. Smoots, Anna R. Schreiber, Betelehem Yacob, Adrian Dominguez, Cecilia Levandowski, Todd M. Pitts, Jennifer R. Diamond. Doxorubicin-induced senescence as a mechanism of resistance in TNBC cell lines [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 136.
Collapse
|
11
|
Diamond JR, Pitts TM, Ungermannova D, Nasveschuk CG, Zhang G, Phillips AJ, Bagby SM, Pafford J, Yacob BW, Newton TP, Tentler JJ, Gittleman B, Hartman SJ, DeMattei JA, Winkler JD, Wendt MK, Schiemann WP, Eckhardt SG, Liu X, Piscopio AD. Preclinical development of the class I selective histone deacetylase inhibitor OKI-179 for the treatment of solid tumors. Mol Cancer Ther 2021; 21:397-406. [PMID: 34965958 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-21-0455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Histone deacetylases (HDACs) play critical roles in epigenomic regulation and histone acetylation is dysregulated in many human cancers. While HDAC inhibitors are active in T-cell lymphomas, poor isoform selectivity, narrow therapeutic indices and a deficiency of reliable biomarkers may contribute to the lack of efficacy in solid tumors. In this article, we report the discovery and preclinical development of the novel, orally bioavailable, class I-selective HDAC inhibitor, OKI-179. OKI-179 and its cell active predecessor OKI-005 are thioester prodrugs of the active metabolite OKI-006, a unique congener of the natural product HDAC inhibitor largazole. OKI-006, OKI-005 and subsequently OKI-179, were developed through a lead candidate optimization program designed to enhance physiochemical properties without eroding potency and selectivity relative to largazole. OKI-005 displays anti-proliferative activity in vitro with induction of apoptosis and increased histone acetylation, consistent with target engagement. OKI-179 demonstrated anti-tumor activity in preclinical cancer models with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and on-target pharmacodynamic effects. Based on its potency, desirable class I HDAC inhibition profile, oral bioavailability, and efficacy against a broad range of solid tumors, OKI-179 is currently being evaluated in a first-in-human phase I clinical trial with plans for continued clinical development in solid tumor and hematologic malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Gan Zhang
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder
| | | | | | - Jessica Pafford
- Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Betelehem W Yacob
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
| | | | | | - Brian Gittleman
- Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
| | - Sarah J Hartman
- Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
| | | | | | - Michael K Wendt
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University West Lafayette
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Marín-Jiménez JA, Capasso A, Lewis MS, Bagby SM, Hartman SJ, Shulman J, Navarro NM, Yu H, Rivard CJ, Wang X, Barkow JC, Geng D, Kar A, Yingst A, Tufa DM, Dolan JT, Blatchford PJ, Freed BM, Torres RM, Davila E, Slansky JE, Pelanda R, Eckhardt SG, Messersmith WA, Diamond JR, Lieu CH, Verneris MR, Wang JH, Kiseljak-Vassiliades K, Pitts TM, Lang J. Testing Cancer Immunotherapy in a Human Immune System Mouse Model: Correlating Treatment Responses to Human Chimerism, Therapeutic Variables and Immune Cell Phenotypes. Front Immunol 2021; 12:607282. [PMID: 33854497 PMCID: PMC8040953 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.607282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, immunotherapies have revolutionized the treatment of cancer. Although the success of immunotherapy is remarkable, it is still limited to a subset of patients. More than 1500 clinical trials are currently ongoing with a goal of improving the efficacy of immunotherapy through co-administration of other agents. Preclinical, small-animal models are strongly desired to increase the pace of scientific discovery, while reducing the cost of combination drug testing in humans. Human immune system (HIS) mice are highly immune-deficient mouse recipients rtpeconstituted with human hematopoietic stem cells. These HIS-mice are capable of growing human tumor cell lines and patient-derived tumor xenografts. This model allows rapid testing of multiple, immune-related therapeutics for tumors originating from unique clinical samples. Using a cord blood-derived HIS-BALB/c-Rag2nullIl2rγnullSIRPαNOD (BRGS) mouse model, we summarize our experiments testing immune checkpoint blockade combinations in these mice bearing a variety of human tumors, including breast, colorectal, pancreatic, lung, adrenocortical, melanoma and hematological malignancies. We present in-depth characterization of the kinetics and subsets of the HIS in lymph and non-lymph organs and relate these to protocol development and immune-related treatment responses. Furthermore, we compare the phenotype of the HIS in lymph tissues and tumors. We show that the immunotype and amount of tumor infiltrating leukocytes are widely-variable and that this phenotype is tumor-dependent in the HIS-BRGS model. We further present flow cytometric analyses of immune cell subsets, activation state, cytokine production and inhibitory receptor expression in peripheral lymph organs and tumors. We show that responding tumors bear human infiltrating T cells with a more inflammatory signature compared to non-responding tumors, similar to reports of "responding" patients in human immunotherapy clinical trials. Collectively these data support the use of HIS mice as a preclinical model to test combination immunotherapies for human cancers, if careful attention is taken to both protocol details and data analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan A. Marín-Jiménez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO-L’Hospitalet), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Capasso
- Department of Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Matthew S. Lewis
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Stacey M. Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Sarah J. Hartman
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Jeremy Shulman
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Natalie M. Navarro
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Hui Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Chris J. Rivard
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Xiaoguang Wang
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Jessica C. Barkow
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Degui Geng
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Adwitiya Kar
- Division of Endocrinology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Ashley Yingst
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Dejene M. Tufa
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - James T. Dolan
- Rocky Vista College of Osteopathic Medicine – OMS3, Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO, United States
| | - Patrick J. Blatchford
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Brian M. Freed
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Raul M. Torres
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Eduardo Davila
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Jill E. Slansky
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Roberta Pelanda
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - S. Gail Eckhardt
- Department of Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Wells A. Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Jennifer R. Diamond
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Christopher H. Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Michael R. Verneris
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Jing H. Wang
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
- Division of Endocrinology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Todd M. Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Julie Lang
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hartman SJ, Bagby SM, Yacob BW, Simmons DM, MacBeth M, Lieu CH, Davis SL, Leal AD, Tentler JJ, Diamond JR, Eckhardt SG, Messersmith WA, Pitts TM. WEE1 Inhibition in Combination With Targeted Agents and Standard Chemotherapy in Preclinical Models of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:642328. [PMID: 33869031 PMCID: PMC8044903 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.642328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal cancer with high incidences of p53 mutations. AZD1775 (adavosertib, previously MK-1775) is a small molecule WEE1 inhibitor that abrogates the G2M checkpoint and can potentially synergize with DNA damaging therapies commonly used in PDAC treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify combination partners for AZD1775, including standard chemotherapy or targeted agents, in PDAC preclinical models. Low powered preliminary screens demonstrated that two of the four PDX models responded better to the combinations of AZD1775 with irinotecan or capecitabine than to either single agent. Following the screens, two full powered PDAC PDX models of differing p53 status were tested with the combinations of AZD1775 and irinotecan or capecitabine. The combinations of AZD1775 and SN38 or 5-FU were also tested on PDAC cell lines. Cellular proliferation was measured using an IncuCyte Live Cell Imager and apoptosis was measured using a Caspase-Glo 3/7 assay. Flow cytometry was conducted to measure alterations in cell cycle distribution. Western blot analysis was used to determine the effects of the drug combinations on downstream effectors. In PDX models with mutated p53 status, there was significant tumor growth inhibition from the combination of AZD1775 with irinotecan or capecitabine (P ≤ 0.03), while PDX models with wild type p53 did not show anti-tumor synergy from the same combinations (P ≥ 0.08). The combination of AZD1775 with SN38 or 5-FU significantly decreased proliferation in all PDAC cell lines, and enhanced apoptosis in multiple cell lines. Cell cycle distribution was disrupted from the combination of AZD1775 with SN38 or 5-FU which was recorded as G2M arrest and decreased G1 phase. AZD1775 inhibited phospho-CDC2 and increased the expression of γH2AX that was either maintained or enhanced after combination with SN38 or 5-FU. The combination of AZD1775 with irinotecan/SN38 or capecitabine/5-FU showed anti-tumor effects in vivo and in vitro in PDAC models. These results support further investigation for these combination strategies to enhance outcomes for PDAC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Hartman
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Stacey M Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Betelehem W Yacob
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Dennis M Simmons
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Morgan MacBeth
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Christopher H Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - S Lindsey Davis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Alexis D Leal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - John J Tentler
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Jennifer R Diamond
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - S Gail Eckhardt
- Department of Oncology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Todd M Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Duff MR, Redzic JS, Ryan LP, Paukovich N, Zhao R, Nix JC, Pitts TM, Agarwal P, Eisenmesser EZ. Structure, dynamics and function of the evolutionarily changing biliverdin reductase B family. J Biochem 2021; 168:191-202. [PMID: 32246827 DOI: 10.1093/jb/mvaa039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliverdin reductase B (BLVRB) family members are general flavin reductases critical in maintaining cellular redox with recent findings revealing that BLVRB alone can dictate cellular fate. However, as opposed to most enzymes, the BLVRB family remains enigmatic with an evolutionarily changing active site and unknown structural and functional consequences. Here, we applied a multi-faceted approach that combines X-ray crystallography, NMR and kinetics methods to elucidate the structural and functional basis of the evolutionarily changing BLVRB active site. Using a panel of three BLVRB isoforms (human, lemur and hyrax) and multiple human BLVRB mutants, our studies reveal a novel evolutionary mechanism where coenzyme 'clamps' formed by arginine side chains at two co-evolving positions within the active site serve to slow coenzyme release (Positions 14 and 78). We find that coenzyme release is further slowed by the weaker binding substrate, resulting in relatively slow turnover numbers. However, different BLVRB active sites imposed by either evolution or mutagenesis exhibit a surprising inverse relationship between coenzyme release and substrate turnover that is independent of the faster chemical step of hydride transfer also measured here. Collectively, our studies have elucidated the role of the evolutionarily changing BLVRB active site that serves to modulate coenzyme release and has revealed that coenzyme release is coupled to substrate turnover.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Duff
- Biochemistry & Cellular and Molecular Biology Department, University of Tennessee, 1311 Cumberland Ave., Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
| | - Jasmina S Redzic
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, 12801 E 17th Ave., Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Lucas P Ryan
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, 12801 E 17th Ave., Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Natasia Paukovich
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, 12801 E 17th Ave., Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Rui Zhao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, 12801 E 17th Ave., Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Jay C Nix
- Molecular Biology Consortium, Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Rd., Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Todd M Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, 12801 E 17th Ave., Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Pratul Agarwal
- Biochemistry & Cellular and Molecular Biology Department, University of Tennessee, 1311 Cumberland Ave., Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
| | - Elan Zohar Eisenmesser
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, 12801 E 17th Ave., Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Redzic JS, Duff MR, Blue A, Pitts TM, Agarwal P, Eisenmesser EZ. Modulating Enzyme Function via Dynamic Allostery within Biliverdin Reductase B. Front Mol Biosci 2021; 8:691208. [PMID: 34095235 PMCID: PMC8173106 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.691208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The biliverdin reductase B (BLVRB) class of enzymes catalyze the NADPH-dependent reduction of multiple flavin substrates and are emerging as critical players in cellular redox regulation. However, the role of dynamics and allostery have not been addressed, prompting studies here that have revealed a position 15 Å away from the active site within human BLVRB (T164) that is inherently dynamic and can be mutated to control global micro-millisecond motions and function. By comparing the inherent dynamics through nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation approaches of evolutionarily distinct BLVRB homologues and by applying our previously developed Relaxation And Single Site Multiple Mutations (RASSMM) approach that monitors both the functional and dynamic effects of multiple mutations to the single T164 site, we have discovered that the most dramatic mutagenic effects coincide with evolutionary changes and these modulate coenzyme binding. Thus, evolutionarily changing sites distal to the active site serve as dynamic "dials" to globally modulate motions and function. Despite the distal dynamic and functional coupling modulated by this site, micro-millisecond motions span an order of magnitude in their apparent kinetic rates of motions. Thus, global dynamics within BLVRB are a collection of partially coupled motions tied to catalytic function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmina S Redzic
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Michael R Duff
- Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States
| | - Ashley Blue
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL, United States
| | - Todd M Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Pratul Agarwal
- Department of Physiological Sciences and High Performance Computing Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States
| | - Elan Zohar Eisenmesser
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tentler JJ, Lang J, Capasso A, Kim DJ, Benaim E, Lee YB, Eisen A, Bagby SM, Hartman SJ, Yacob BW, Gittleman B, Pitts TM, Pelanda R, Eckhardt SG, Diamond JR. RX-5902, a novel β-catenin modulator, potentiates the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in preclinical models of triple-negative breast Cancer. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:1063. [PMID: 33148223 PMCID: PMC7641792 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07500-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype with limited systemic treatment options. RX-5902 is a novel anti-cancer agent that inhibits phosphorylated-p68 and thus attenuates nuclear β-catenin signaling. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of β-catenin signaling blockade to enhance the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade in immunocompetent, preclinical models of TNBC. METHODS Treatment with RX-5902, anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4 or the combination was investigated in BALB/c mice injected with the 4 T1 TNBC cell line. Humanized BALB/c-Rag2nullIl2rγnullSIRPαNOD (hu-CB-BRGS) mice transplanted with a human immune system were implanted with MDA-MB-231 cells. Mice were randomized into treatment groups according to human hematopoietic chimerism and treated with RX-5902, anti-PD-1 or the combination. At sacrifice, bone marrow, lymph nodes, spleen and tumors were harvested for flow cytometry analysis of human immune cells. RESULTS The addition of RX-5902 to CTLA-4 or PD-1 inhibitors resulted in decreased tumor growth in the 4 T1 and human immune system and MDA-MB-231 xenograft models. Immunologic analyses demonstrated a significant increase in the number of activated T cells in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) with RX-5902 treatment compared to vehicle (p < 0.05). In the RX-5902/nivolumab combination group, there was a significant increase in the percentage of CD4+ T cells in TILs and increased systemic granzyme B production (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Conclusions: RX-5902 enhanced the efficacy of nivolumab in a humanized, preclinical model of TNBC. Several changes in immunologic profiles were noted in mice treated with RX-5902 and the combination, including an increase in activated TILs and a decrease in human myeloid populations, that are often associated with immunosuppression in a tumor microenvironment. RX-5902 also was shown to potentiate the effects of checkpoint inhibitors of CTLA4 and the PD-1 inhibitor in the 4 T-1 murine TNBC model. These findings indicate that RX-5902 may have important immunomodulatory, as well as anti-tumor activity, in TNBC when combined with a checkpoint inhibitor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Tentler
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - Julie Lang
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA
| | - Anna Capasso
- Dell Medical School, Department of Oncology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | | | - Ely Benaim
- Rexahn Pharmaceuticals Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Young B Lee
- Rexahn Pharmaceuticals Inc., Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | - Stacey M Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Sarah J Hartman
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Betelehem W Yacob
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Brian Gittleman
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Todd M Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Roberta Pelanda
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA
| | - S Gail Eckhardt
- Dell Medical School, Department of Oncology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer R Diamond
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, MS8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Davis SL, Ionkina AA, Bagby SM, Orth JD, Gittleman B, Marcus JM, Lam ET, Corr BR, O'Bryant CL, Glode AE, Tan AC, Kim J, Tentler JJ, Capasso A, Lopez KL, Gustafson DL, Messersmith WA, Leong S, Eckhardt SG, Pitts TM, Diamond JR. Preclinical and Dose-Finding Phase I Trial Results of Combined Treatment with a TORC1/2 Inhibitor (TAK-228) and Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor (Alisertib) in Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:4633-4642. [PMID: 32414750 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Revised: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rational combination of TORC1/2 inhibitor TAK-228 and Aurora A kinase inhibitor alisertib in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and to conduct a phase I dose escalation trial in patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN TNBC cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with alisertib, TAK-228, or the combination and evaluated for changes in proliferation, cell cycle, mTOR pathway modulation, and terminal cellular fate, including apoptosis and senescence. A phase I clinical trial was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with escalating doses of alisertib and TAK-228 using a 3+3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). RESULTS The combination of TAK-228 and alisertib resulted in decreased proliferation and cell-cycle arrest in TNBC cell lines. Treatment of TNBC PDX models resulted in significant tumor growth inhibition and increased apoptosis with the combination. In the phase I dose escalation study, 18 patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled. The MTD was alisertib 30 mg b.i.d. days 1 to 7 of a 21-day cycle and TAK-228 2 mg daily, continuous dosing. The most common treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, nausea, rash, mucositis, and alopecia. CONCLUSIONS The addition of TAK-228 to alisertib potentiates the antitumor activity of alisertib in vivo, resulting in increased cell death and apoptosis. The combination is tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors and should be evaluated further in expansion cohorts with additional pharmacodynamic assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - James D Orth
- University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado
| | | | | | - Elaine T Lam
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | | | | | | - Jihye Kim
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | - Anna Capasso
- Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas
| | - Kyrie L Lopez
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | | - Stephen Leong
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - S Gail Eckhardt
- Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas
| | - Todd M Pitts
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dhar D, Raina K, Kumar D, Wempe MF, Bagby SM, Pitts TM, Orlicky DJ, Agarwal C, Messersmith WA, Agarwal R. Bitter melon juice intake with gemcitabine intervention circumvents resistance to gemcitabine in pancreatic patient-derived xenograft tumors. Mol Carcinog 2020; 59:1227-1240. [PMID: 32816368 DOI: 10.1002/mc.23251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Chemoresistance to gemcitabine (GEM)-a frontline chemotherapeutic, resulting from its dysfunctional uptake and metabolism in cancer cells, is a major contributing factor for failed therapy in pancreatic cancer (PanC) patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need for agents that could reverse GEM resistance and allow continued chemosensitivity to the drug. We employed natural nontoxic agent (with anti-PanC potential) bitter melon juice (BMJ) and GEM to examine their combinatorial benefits against tumorigenesis of PanC patient-derived xenograft (PDX)-pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas explants PDX272 (wild-type KRAS), PDX271 (mutant KRAS and SMAD4), and PDX266 (mutant KRAS). Anti-PanC efficacy of single agents vs combination in the three tumor explants, both at the end of active dosing regimen and following a drug-washout phase were compared. In animal studies, GEM alone treatment significantly inhibited PDX tumor growth, but effects were not sustained, as GEM-treated tumors exhibited regrowth posttreatment termination. However, combination-regimen displayed enhanced and sustained efficacy. Mechanistic assessments revealed that overcoming GEM resistance by coadministration with BMJ was possibly due to modulation of GEM transport/metabolism pathway molecules (ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunit M1, human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1, and deoxycytidine kinase). Study outcomes, highlighting significantly higher and sustained efficacy of GEM in combination with BMJ, make a compelling case for a clinical trial in PanC patients, wherein BMJ could be combined with GEM to target and overcome GEM resistance. In addition, given their specific effectiveness against KRAS-mutant tumors, this combination could be potentially beneficial to a broader PanC patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepanshi Dhar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Komal Raina
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.,Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota
| | - Dileep Kumar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Michael F Wempe
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Stacey M Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Todd M Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - David J Orlicky
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Chapla Agarwal
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Rajesh Agarwal
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Denver-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hartman SJ, Nadales N, Bagby SM, Yacob BW, Gittleman BL, Estrada-Bernal A, Le AT, Lieu CH, Davis SL, Leal AD, Diamond JR, Messersmith WA, Schlaepfer IR, Pitts TM. Abstract 6387: Therapeutic targeting of lipid oxidation and apoptosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-6387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths with more than 56,000 new cases estimated to be diagnosed in 2019. Current treatment options for PDAC include radiation and chemotherapeutic regimens, however these targeted therapies are ineffective for patients with advanced disease progression. Additionally, the dense stromal nature of PDAC tumors create challenges to target the cancer cells resulting in incomplete cell killing and eventual drug resistance. Recent evidence has shown that CPT1A, an enzyme that regulates the entry of lipids into mitochondria for β-oxidation, is strongly expressed in several cancers. CPT1A is located on the mitochondrial membrane and potentially interacts with BCL-2, an anti-apoptotic protein that promotes tumor maintenance and metastasis. Metabolic stress can activate the anti-apoptotic effects of BCL-2, reprograming metabolism to use fat oxidation for cancer survival. Therefore, a co-inhibition using the selective BCL-2 inhibitor, venetoclax, with agents that inhibit CPT1A and β-oxidation, could be a novel strategy for PDAC. There are few studies considering CPT1A as a therapeutic target for PDAC. Current available drugs to target these pathways include the anti-anginal ranolazine, and CPT1A inhibitors etomoxir and perhexiline. Previous studies have shown that expression of BCL-2 by tumor cells is necessary for BCL-2 inhibitors to be effective. We initially wanted to determine the expression of BCL-2 and CPT1A in PDAC cells utilizing western blot and rtPCR, and to confirm their proximity using a proximity ligation assay (PLA). PDAC cells were then plated in 96 well plates and Cell Titer-Glo assays were performed to determine effective concentrations of single agent venetoclax, etomoxir, and perhexiline. The effects of these drugs in combination were then evaluated using a clonogenic assay, which was analyzed using the ImageJ colony area plugin. PDAC cells were then exposed to the combinations and western blots were performed to evaluate changes downstream effectors. We have confirmed the expression of BCL-2 and CPT1A on the mitochondrial membrane using Westerns, rtPCR, and a PLA on several PDAC lines. Though single agent drugs had little effect on cell viability, the combination of venetoclax with CPT1A and β-oxidation inhibitors decreased colony formation in some PDAC cell lines. Western blot analysis revealed the drug combinations affected the phosphorylation of AKT and 4E-BP1 and expression of the pro-apoptotic protein BID. These data suggest that co-targeting BCL-2 and CPT1A have potential for anti-tumor effects in PDAC. Additional research into the role of CPT1A in PDAC biology will elucidate the optimal dosing concentrations and mechanisms for further studies.
Citation Format: Sarah J. Hartman, Nathalie Nadales, Stacey M. Bagby, Betelehem W. Yacob, Brian L. Gittleman, Adriana Estrada-Bernal, Anh T. Le, Christopher H. Lieu, S. Lindsey Davis, Alexis D. Leal, Jennifer R. Diamond, Wells A. Messersmith, Isabel R. Schlaepfer, Todd M. Pitts. Therapeutic targeting of lipid oxidation and apoptosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 6387.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anh T. Le
- University of Colorado Denver AMC, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bagby SM, Hartman SJ, Navarro NM, Yacob BW, Shulman J, Barkow J, Lieu CH, Davis SL, Leal AD, Messersmith WA, Minic A, Jordan KR, Lang J, Pitts TM. Abstract 6647: Sensitizing microsatellite stable colorectal cancer to immune checkpoint therapy utilizing Wnt pathway inhibition. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-6647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Immunotherapies that target immune regulatory checkpoints such as CTLA-4 and PD-1 are widely used among many cancer types and have shown positive results in CRC with high microsatellite instability. However, in microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC there is a dismal response rate of 0%. The limited efficacy has shown to be partially due to the lack of T-cells in the tumor microenvironment and/or no activation/regulation of paramount cells in the immune system. The Wnt pathway is the most commonly altered pathway in CRC and is highly involved in driving tumor initiation and progression. Recent evidence also demonstrates the Wnt pathway is involved in T-lymphocyte development, maturation/activation of CD8+ effector T cells and recruitment of dendritic cells. Therefore, targeting the Wnt pathway utilizing a Porcupine (PORCN) inhibitor (ETC-159) in MSS CRC may be a promising strategy to sensitize tumors to immune checkpoint inhibition.
Human Immune System BRGS (BALB/c, Rag2−/−, IL2RγC−/−, NODSIRPα) mice were engrafted with MSS CRC PDX (hPDX). The hPDX were randomized according to human chimerism into the following drug treatments groups: Vehicle, ETC-159, nivolumab, and the combination. Treatments began when tumors reached 100-300mm3 and tumors were measured twice weekly. At the end of study, sera, lymph nodes, spleen, and tumor tissue were collected for immunohistochemistry, single cell suspensions, and flow cytometry analysis.
Combination therapy resulted in a significant decrease in tumor volume compared to both single agents and vehicle. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated an increase in human immune cells, in particular human CD4 and CD8 cells in the combination compared to the vehicle and nivolumab treated groups. Additionally, these T-cells showed increased signs of activation and effector function, as indicated by increased CD69+ expression, effector memory subsets, and granzyme B+ cells in the TILs, with a further reduction in Treg populations, suggesting an overall increase in inflammation. An increase in MHC II expression on tumor cells was observed in the ETC-159 single agent with a statistically significant increase in the combination treated tumors demonstrating enhanced antigen presentation. Furthermore, PD-1 expression was upregulated on CD4+ T-cells in the ETC-159 single agent. Lastly, VECTRA analysis corroborates the flow cytometry data showing a changing tumor immune landscape through an increase in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the tumor and surrounding stroma.
Our data demonstrates the combination treatment of ETC-159 + nivolumab in MSS CRC hPDX show increased tumor infiltration of human immune cells. Further preclinical data is compulsory but these results support further development of this combination in clinical trials.
Citation Format: Stacey M. Bagby, Sarah J. Hartman, Natalie M. Navarro, Betelehem W. Yacob, Jeremy Shulman, Jessica Barkow, Christopher H. Lieu, S. Lindsey Davis, Alexis D. Leal, Wells A. Messersmith, Angela Minic, Kimberly R. Jordan, Julie Lang, Todd M. Pitts. Sensitizing microsatellite stable colorectal cancer to immune checkpoint therapy utilizing Wnt pathway inhibition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 6647.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abbott JM, Zhou Q, Esquer H, Pike L, Broneske TP, Rinaldetti S, Abraham AD, Ramirez DA, Lunghofer PJ, Pitts TM, Regan DP, Tan AC, Gustafson DL, Messersmith WA, LaBarbera DV. First-in-Class Inhibitors of Oncogenic CHD1L with Preclinical Activity against Colorectal Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2020; 19:1598-1612. [PMID: 32499299 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-20-0106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Since the discovery of CHD1L in 2008, it has emerged as an oncogene implicated in the pathology and poor prognosis of a variety of cancers, including gastrointestinal cancers. However, a mechanistic understanding of CHD1L as a driver of colorectal cancer has been limited. Until now, there have been no reported inhibitors of CHD1L, also limiting its development as a molecular target. We sought to characterize the clinicopathologic link between CHD1L and colorectal cancer, determine the mechanism(s) by which CHD1L drives malignant colorectal cancer, and discover the first inhibitors with potential for novel treatments for colorectal cancer. The clinicopathologic characteristics associated with CHD1L expression were evaluated using microarray data from 585 patients with colorectal cancer. Further analysis of microarray data indicated that CHD1L may function through the Wnt/TCF pathway. Thus, we conducted knockdown and overexpression studies with CHD1L to determine its role in Wnt/TCF-driven epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). We performed high-throughput screening (HTS) to identify the first CHD1L inhibitors. The mechanism of action, antitumor efficacy, and drug-like properties of lead CHD1L inhibitors were determined using biochemical assays, cell models, tumor organoids, patient-derived tumor organoids, and in vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Lead CHD1L inhibitors display potent in vitro antitumor activity by reversing TCF-driven EMT. The best lead CHD1L inhibitor possesses drug-like properties in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic mouse models. This work validates CHD1L as a druggable target and establishes a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua M Abbott
- The Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Qiong Zhou
- The Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Hector Esquer
- The Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Laura Pike
- The Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Travis P Broneske
- The Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sébastien Rinaldetti
- The Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Adedoyin D Abraham
- The Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Dominique A Ramirez
- Flint Animal Cancer Center and Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Paul J Lunghofer
- Flint Animal Cancer Center and Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Todd M Pitts
- The School of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.,The University of Colorado Cancer Center, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Daniel P Regan
- Flint Animal Cancer Center and Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Aik Choon Tan
- The School of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.,The University of Colorado Cancer Center, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Daniel L Gustafson
- Flint Animal Cancer Center and Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.,The University of Colorado Cancer Center, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- The School of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.,The University of Colorado Cancer Center, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Daniel V LaBarbera
- The Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. .,The University of Colorado Cancer Center, The University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pitts TM, Simmons DM, Bagby SM, Hartman SJ, Yacob BW, Gittleman B, Tentler JJ, Cittelly D, Ormond DR, Messersmith WA, Eckhardt SG, Diamond JR. Wee1 Inhibition Enhances the Anti-Tumor Effects of Capecitabine in Preclinical Models of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12030719. [PMID: 32204315 PMCID: PMC7140086 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12030719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype defined by lack of hormone receptor expression and non-amplified HER2. Adavosertib (AZD1775) is a potent, small-molecule, ATP-competitive inhibitor of the Wee1 kinase that potentiates the activity of many DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics and is currently in clinical development for multiple indications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the combination of AZD1775 and capecitabine/5FU in preclinical TNBC models. TNBC cell lines were treated with AZD1775 and 5FU and cellular proliferation was assessed in real-time using IncuCyte® Live Cell Analysis. Apoptosis was assessed via the Caspase-Glo 3/7 assay system. Western blotting was used to assess changes in expression of downstream effectors. TNBC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with AZD1775, capecitabine, or the combination and assessed for tumor growth inhibition. From the initial PDX screen, two of the four TNBC PDX models demonstrated a better response in the combination treatment than either of the single agents. As confirmation, two PDX models were expanded for statistical comparison. Both PDX models demonstrated a significant growth inhibition in the combination versus either of the single agents. (TNBC012, p < 0.05 combo vs. adavosertib or capecitabine, TNBC013, p < 0.01 combo vs. adavosertib or capecitabine.) An enhanced anti-proliferative effect was observed in the adavosertib/5FU combination treatment as measured by live cell analysis. An increase in apoptosis was observed in two of the four cell lines in the combination when compared to single-agent treatment. Treatment with adavosertib as a single agent resulted in a decrease in p-CDC2 in a dose-dependent manner that was also observed in the combination treatment. An increase in γH2AX in two of the four cell lines tested was also observed. No significant changes were observed in Bcl-xL following treatment in any of the cell lines. The combination of adavosertib and capecitabine/5FU demonstrated enhanced combination effects both in vitro and in vivo in preclinical models of TNBC. These results support the clinical investigation of this combination in patients with TNBC, including those with brain metastasis given the CNS penetration of both agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd M. Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (D.M.S.); (S.M.B.); (S.J.H.); (B.W.Y.); (B.G.); (J.J.T.); (W.A.M.); (J.R.D.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Dennis M. Simmons
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (D.M.S.); (S.M.B.); (S.J.H.); (B.W.Y.); (B.G.); (J.J.T.); (W.A.M.); (J.R.D.)
| | - Stacey M. Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (D.M.S.); (S.M.B.); (S.J.H.); (B.W.Y.); (B.G.); (J.J.T.); (W.A.M.); (J.R.D.)
| | - Sarah J. Hartman
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (D.M.S.); (S.M.B.); (S.J.H.); (B.W.Y.); (B.G.); (J.J.T.); (W.A.M.); (J.R.D.)
| | - Betelehem W. Yacob
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (D.M.S.); (S.M.B.); (S.J.H.); (B.W.Y.); (B.G.); (J.J.T.); (W.A.M.); (J.R.D.)
| | - Brian Gittleman
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (D.M.S.); (S.M.B.); (S.J.H.); (B.W.Y.); (B.G.); (J.J.T.); (W.A.M.); (J.R.D.)
| | - John J. Tentler
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (D.M.S.); (S.M.B.); (S.J.H.); (B.W.Y.); (B.G.); (J.J.T.); (W.A.M.); (J.R.D.)
| | - Diana Cittelly
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA;
| | - D. Ryan Ormond
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA;
| | - Wells A. Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (D.M.S.); (S.M.B.); (S.J.H.); (B.W.Y.); (B.G.); (J.J.T.); (W.A.M.); (J.R.D.)
| | - S. Gail Eckhardt
- Dell Medical School, Department of Oncology, The University of Texas Austin, 1701 Trinity Street, Austin, TX 78712, USA;
| | - Jennifer R. Diamond
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12801 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (D.M.S.); (S.M.B.); (S.J.H.); (B.W.Y.); (B.G.); (J.J.T.); (W.A.M.); (J.R.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pitts TM, Simmons DM, Dailey K, Bagby SM, Hartman SJ, Yacob BW, Gittleman B, Tentler JJ, Cittely D, Ormond DR, Messersmith WA, Eckhardt SG, Diamond JR. Abstract P1-19-25: Wee1 inhibition enhances the anti-tumor effects of capecitabine in preclinical models of triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p1-19-25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype defined by lack of hormone receptor expression and non-amplified HER2. TNBC accounts for approximately 15% of breast cancer cases, however, is associated with an increased risk of cancer recurrence, brain metastasis, and death due to metastatic breast cancer. Mutations in p53 are common in TNBC, occurring in approximately 85% of tumors. While a number of promising targeted therapies are on the horizon in TNBC including immunotherapy, there remains an unmet need for active targeted therapies where chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for metastatic disease and results in a median survival of 12-18 months. Adavosertib (AZD1775) is a potent, small molecule, ATP-competitive inhibitor of the Wee1 kinase that potentiates the activity of many DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics and is currently in clinical development for multiple indications. AZD1775 potentiates the activity of DNA-damaging and antimetabolite chemotherapeutics in preclinical models without TP53-deficiency, possibly due to baseline replicative stress or compromised DNA repair proficiency. A previous unbiased screen of CTEP compounds in TNBC PDX models demonstrated that the combination of adavosertib and capecitabine/5FU had greater anti-proliferative effects than either of the single agents. The purpose of this study was to further investigate the combination of adavosertib and capecitabine/5FU in preclinical TNBC models. Methods: HCC1937, CAL51, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells were plated in 96-well plates and exposed to increasing concentrations of adavosertib, 5FU, or the combination. Cellular proliferation was assessed in real-time using IncuCyte® Live Cell Analysis. Apoptosis was assessed via the Caspase-Glo 3/7 assay system. Western blotting was used to assess changes in expression of CDC2, phospho-CDC2, H2AX, and Bcl-xL. TNBC PDX models CU_TNBC_012 and CU_TNBC_013 were treated with vehicle, adavosertib, capecitabine, or the combination and assessed for tumor growth inhibition. Results: From the initial PDX screen, two of the four TNBC PDX models demonstrated a better response in the combination treatment than either of the single agents. As confirmation, two PDX models were expanded for statistical comparison. Both PDX models demonstrated a significant growth inhibition in the combination versus either of the single agents. (TNBC012, p<0.05 combo vs adavosertib or capecitabine, TNBC013, p<0.01 combo vs adavosertib or capecitabine ). An enhanced antiproliferative effect was observed in the adavosertib/5FU combination treatment as measured by live cell analysis. An increase in apoptosis was observed in two of the four cell lines in the combination when compared to single agent treatment. Treatment with single agent adavosertib resulted in an increase in p-cdc2 in a dose dependent manner that was also observed in the combination treatment. Similar results were observed with γH2AX in two of the four cell lines tested. No significant changes were observed in Bcl-xL following treatment in any of the cell lines. Conclusions: The combination of adavosertib and capecitabine/5-FU demonstrated enhanced combination effects both in vitro and in vivo in preclinical models of TNBC. These results support the clinical investigation of this combination in patients with TNBC, including those with brain metastasis given the CNS penetration of both agents.
Citation Format: Todd M Pitts, Dennis M Simmons, Kyrie Dailey, Stacey M Bagby, Sarah J Hartman, Betelehem W Yacob, Brian Gittleman, John J Tentler, Diana Cittely, D. Ryan Ormond, Wells A Messersmith, S Gail Eckhardt, Jennifer R Diamond. Wee1 inhibition enhances the anti-tumor effects of capecitabine in preclinical models of triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-25.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd M Pitts
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, AURORA, CO
| | | | - Kyrie Dailey
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, AURORA, CO
| | - Stacey M Bagby
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, AURORA, CO
| | | | | | | | - John J Tentler
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, AURORA, CO
| | - Diana Cittely
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, AURORA, CO
| | - D. Ryan Ormond
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, AURORA, CO
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lang J, Capasso A, Jordan KR, French JD, Kar A, Bagby SM, Barbee J, Yacob BW, Head LS, Tompkins KD, Freed BM, Somerset H, Clark TJ, Pitts TM, Messersmith WA, Eckhardt SG, Wierman ME, Leong S, Kiseljak-Vassiliades K. Development of an Adrenocortical Cancer Humanized Mouse Model to Characterize Anti-PD1 Effects on Tumor Microenvironment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; 105:5568436. [PMID: 31513709 PMCID: PMC7947837 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgz014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Revised: 04/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Although the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has transformed treatment strategies of several human malignancies, research models to study immunotherapy in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) are lacking. OBJECTIVE To explore the effect of anti-PD1 immunotherapy on the alteration of the immune milieu in ACC in a newly generated preclinical model and correlate with the response of the matched patient. DESIGN, SETTING, AND INTERVENTION To characterize the CU-ACC2-M2B patient-derived xenograft in a humanized mouse model, evaluate the effect of a PD-1 inhibitor therapy, and compare it with the CU-ACC2 patient with metastatic disease. RESULTS Characterization of the CU-ACC2-humanized cord blood-BALB/c-Rag2nullIl2rγnullSirpaNOD model confirmed ACC origin and match with the original human tumor. Treatment of the mice with pembrolizumab demonstrated significant tumor growth inhibition (60%) compared with controls, which correlated with increased tumor infiltrating lymphocyte activity, with an increase of human CD8+ T cells (P < 0.05), HLA-DR+ T cells (P < 0.05) as well as Granzyme B+ CD8+ T cells (<0.001). In parallel, treatment of the CU-ACC2 patient, who had progressive disease, demonstrated a partial response with 79% to 100% reduction in the size of target lesions, and no new sites of metastasis. Pretreatment analysis of the patient's metastatic liver lesion demonstrated abundant intratumoral CD8+ T cells by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS Our study reports the first humanized ACC patient-derived xenograft mouse model, which may be useful to define mechanisms and biomarkers of response and resistance to immune-based therapies, to ultimately provide more personalized care for patients with ACC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Lang
- Department of Immunology & Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Anna Capasso
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Kimberly R Jordan
- Department of Immunology & Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jena D French
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Adwitiya Kar
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Stacey M Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jacob Barbee
- Department of Immunology & Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Betelehem W Yacob
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Lia S Head
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Kenneth D Tompkins
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Brian M Freed
- Department of Immunology & Microbiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Hilary Somerset
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Toshimasa J Clark
- Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Todd M Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - S Gail Eckhardt
- Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Margaret E Wierman
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
- Research Service Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Stephen Leong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine at Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
- Research Service Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
- Correspondence and Reprint Requests: Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades, DO, Endocrinology MS8106, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12801 East 17th Ave, RC1 South, Aurora, CO 80045. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Klauck PJ, Hawkins HJ, Weber M, Bagby SM, Lieu CH, Hartman SJ, Yacob BW, Sullivan KD, Brown M, Reisz JA, D’Alessandro A, Messersmith WA, Eckhardt SG, Pitts TM. Abstract B107: Metabolic reprogramming enhances the efficacy of mTOR inhibition in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-19-b107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: PI3K/mTOR pathway is mutated in 10-20% of colorectal cancer (CRC) specimens and has been associated with poor survival. Phosphatidic acid (PA) is a central lipid membrane metabolite and lipid second messenger which has been shown to target mTOR. It is thought that PA lipid signaling to mTOR in part promotes mTOR mediated cancer cell growth, proliferation and survival. Diacylglycerol kinases (DGKs) are one of several mechanisms of PA generation. In this study, we found diacylglycerol kinases to be synthetically lethal in mTOR inhibitor resistant CRC. We evaluated the anti-proliferative, pharmacodynamic and metabolic effects of dual inhibition with mTOR (TAK-228) and DGK (ritanserin and R59022) inhibitors. Methods: A synthetic lethal screen was performed with two TAK-228 resistant colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT116 and SW620). Subsequent experiments were performed with one TAK-228 sensitive (DLD1) and one resistant (HCT116) CRC cell lines. Efficacy of TAK-228/ritanserin and TAK-228/R59022 combination therapy was evaluated with CellTiter-Glo cell viability and clonogenic colony formation assays. Global metabolomics profiling of DLD1 and HCT116 cells upon treatment with TAK-228, R59022, and in combination was performed using ultra high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Pharmacologic DGK inhibition was phenocopied using lentiviral shRNA knockdown of DGKα. Immunoblotting was performed to evaluate mechanism of action of TAK-228 combination therapy. Results: TAK-228 combined with ritanserin and R59022 demonstrated decreased cell viability and colony formation as compared to either single agent. Immunoblotting confirmed TAK-228 abrogates PI3K/mTOR pathway activity. DGK inhibition alone resulted in a compensatory activation of mTOR signaling. DGK inhibition disrupted the phosphatidic acid pathway in DLD1 and HCT116 as evidenced by a decrease in PA synthesis and elevation of glycerol 3-phosphate levels, respectively: altering energy metabolism. Specifically, in HCT116, glucose utilization, glutaminolysis, and Krebs cycle anaplerosis were elevated; while one carbon metabolism was decreased. Lentiviral shRNA transduction resulted in DGKα knockdown as evaluated by RT-PCR and immunoblot. Phenocopy combination therapy with TAK-228 and DGKα knockdown resulted in an increased sensitivity to mTOR inhibition compared to mock transduced control. Conclusions: Pharmacologic and shRNA knockdown inhibition of DGK in combination with mTOR inhibition resulted in decreased cancer cell viability and decreased colony formation. Pharmacologic inhibition of mTOR and DGK, alone or in combination, alter metabolic wiring in crucial pathways such as energy metabolism, nucleotide biosynthesis, and the generation of lipid precursors. Impaired phosphatidic acid production may sensitize cells to mTOR inhibition. These results suggest a therapeutic anti-cancer advantage of simultaneously targeting lipid signaling/metabolism via diacylglycerol kinases and mTOR.
Citation Format: Peter J Klauck, Hayley J Hawkins, Madison Weber, Stacey M Bagby, Christopher H Lieu, Sarah J Hartman, Betelehem W Yacob, Kelly D Sullivan, Monica Brown, Julie A Reisz, Angelo D’Alessandro, Wells A Messersmith, S Gail Eckhardt, Todd M Pitts. Metabolic reprogramming enhances the efficacy of mTOR inhibition in colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr B107. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-B107
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Klauck
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Madison Weber
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Stacey M Bagby
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | | | | | - Monica Brown
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Julie A Reisz
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | - S Gail Eckhardt
- 2University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX
| | - Todd M Pitts
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kar A, Zhang Y, Yacob BW, Saeed J, Tompkins KD, Bagby SM, Pitts TM, Somerset H, Leong S, Wierman ME, Kiseljak-Vassiliades K. Targeting PDZ-binding kinase is anti-tumorigenic in novel preclinical models of ACC. Endocr Relat Cancer 2019; 26:765-778. [PMID: 31325906 PMCID: PMC6938568 DOI: 10.1530/erc-19-0262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is an aggressive orphan malignancy with less than 35% 5-year survival and 75% recurrence. Surgery remains the primary therapy and mitotane, an adrenolytic, is the only FDA-approved drug with wide-range toxicities and poor tolerability. There are no targeted agents available to date. For the last three decades, H295R cell line and its xenograft were the only available preclinical models. We recently developed two new ACC patient-derived xenograft mouse models and corresponding cell lines (CU-ACC1 and CU-ACC2) to advance research in the field. Here, we have utilized these novel models along with H295R cells to establish the mitotic PDZ-binding kinase (PBK) as a promising therapeutic target. PBK is overexpressed in ACC samples and correlates with poor survival. We show that PBK is regulated by FOXM1 and targeting PBK via shRNA decreased cell proliferation, clonogenicity and anchorage-independent growth in ACC cell lines. PBK silencing inhibited pAkt, pp38MAPK and pHistone H3 altering the cell cycle. Therapeutically, targeting PBK with the small-molecule inhibitor HITOPK032 phenocopied PBK-specific modulation of pAkt and pHistone H3, but also induced apoptosis via activation of JNK. Consistent with in vitro findings, treatment of CU-ACC1 PDXs with HITOPK032 significantly reduced tumor growth by 5-fold (P < 0.01). Treated tumor tissues demonstrated increased rates of apoptosis and JNK activation, with decreased pAkt and Histone H3 phosphorylation, consistent with effects observed in ACC cell lines. Together these studies elucidate the mechanism of PBK in ACC tumorigenesis and establish the potential therapeutic potential of HITOPK032 in ACC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adwitiya Kar
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Yu Zhang
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Betelehem W. Yacob
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Jordan Saeed
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Kenneth D. Tompkins
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Stacey M. Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Todd M. Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Hilary Somerset
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Stephen Leong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Margaret E. Wierman
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO 80045
- Research Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora, CO 80045
- Research Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Aurora, CO 80045
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Capasso A, Bagby SM, Dailey KL, Currimjee N, Yacob BW, Ionkina A, Frank JG, Kim DJ, George C, Lee YB, Benaim E, Gittleman B, Hartman SJ, Tan AC, Kim J, Pitts TM, Eckhardt SG, Tentler JJ, Diamond JR. First-in-Class Phosphorylated-p68 Inhibitor RX-5902 Inhibits β-Catenin Signaling and Demonstrates Antitumor Activity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2019; 18:1916-1925. [PMID: 31488700 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-18-1334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2018] [Revised: 06/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
RX-5902 is a first-in-class anticancer agent targeting phosphorylated-p68 and attenuating nuclear shuttling of β-catenin. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of RX-5902 in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and to explore effects on β-catenin expression. A panel of 18 TNBC cell lines was exposed to RX-5902, and changes in proliferation, apoptosis, cellular ploidy, and effector protein expression were assessed. Gene expression profiling was used in sensitive and resistant cell lines with pathway analysis to explore pathways associated with sensitivity to RX-5902. The activity of RX-5902 was confirmed in vivo in cell line and patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models. RX-5902 demonstrated potent antiproliferative activity in vitro against TNBC cell lines with an average IC50 of 56 nmol/L in sensitive cell lines. RX-5902 treatment resulted in the induction of apoptosis, G2-M cell-cycle arrest, and aneuploidy in a subset of cell lines. RX-5902 was active in vivo against TNBC PDX models, and treatment resulted in a decrease in nuclear β-catenin. RX-5902 exhibited dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and plasma and tumor tissue in nude mice. Pathway analysis demonstrated an increase in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation (EMT), TGFβ, and Wnt/β-catenin pathways associated with sensitivity to RX-5902. RX-5902 is active against in vitro and in vivo preclinical models of TNBC. Target engagement was confirmed with decreases in nuclear β-catenin and MCL-1 observed, confirming the proposed mechanism of action. This study supports the continued investigation of RX-5902 in TNBC and combinations with immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Capasso
- Department of Oncology, Dell Medical School, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
| | - Stacey M Bagby
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Kyrie L Dailey
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Naomi Currimjee
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Betelehem W Yacob
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Anastasia Ionkina
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | | | | - Young B Lee
- Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, Maryland
| | - Ely Benaim
- Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, Maryland
| | - Brian Gittleman
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sarah J Hartman
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Aik Choon Tan
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jihye Kim
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Todd M Pitts
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - S Gail Eckhardt
- Department of Oncology, Dell Medical School, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - John J Tentler
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jennifer R Diamond
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yacob BW, Arcaroli JJ, Taddese M, Pitts TM, Bagby SM, Hartman SJ, Davis S, Lieu CH, Leal AD, Messersmith WA. Abstract 3855: Preclinical investigation of novel ALDH1A1 inhibitors in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-3855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains a devastating disease, with a predicted 5-year survival at the time of diagnosis of less than 10%, and likely the number 2 cause of U.S. cancer deaths in the next decade. The lack of effective therapies and resistance to cytotoxic agents contribute to the poor outcomes in this patient population. Aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) are a family of enzymes that play important biological and metabolic roles in the human body. ALDH activity has been identified in many human malignancies as a marker of tumor initiating cells. In pancreatic cancer, ALDH1A1 has been shown to be upregulated in cancer stem cells (CSCs) and has been attributed to tumorigenesis and chemotherapeutic resistance.
Methods: Six novel ALDH1A1 inhibitor drugs from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) were screened on human pancreatic cancer cell lines using the Cell Titer-Glo Assay. Proliferation assays were also performed with the three best performing inhibitors on a total of eight human pancreatic cancer cell lines. The best performing ALDH1A1 inhibitor drug were chosen and tested in combination with gemcitabine and paclitaxel on patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs). The combination effects were assessed over a 7-day period using the IncuCyte ZOOM live cell imager and CellTiter-Glo 3D Assay.
Results: We assessed the anti-proliferative effects of 6 novel ALDH1A1 inhibitors on 4 pancreatic cancer cell lines. Two out of 4 pancreatic cell lines showed moderate treatment effects to 3 ALDH1A1 inhibitors. Further evaluation of one of the ALDH1A1 inhibitor on 8 additional pancreatic cancer cell lines revealed similar results. While several pancreatic cell lines showed some moderate activity at higher levels of drug exposure, most of the pancreatic cancer cell lines treated were more resistant. We next investigated the treatment effects of ALDH1A1 inhibitor in combination with gemcitabine or paclitaxel on PDTO 269 and 272. A combination effect with the ALDH1A1 inhibitor and paclitaxel was observed after 72 hours of drug exposure in both PDTO 269 and 272. In contrast, treatment with the ALDH1A1 inhibitor with gemcitabine did not further decrease growth when compared to single agent ALDH1A1 and gemcitabine.
Conclusions: Although single agent activity of novel ALDH1A1 inhibitors is limited at significantly reducing cellular proliferation, inhibition of ALDH1A1 in combination with paclitaxel appears to have potent anti-tumor activity in PDTOs. These findings support further investigation of this combinational therapy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Additional studies are currently underway to evaluate this combinational activity in more preclinical pancreatic cancer models and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms whereby the inhibition of ALDH1A1 enhances the anti-tumor potential of paclitaxel.
Citation Format: Betelehem W. Yacob, John J. Arcaroli, Maraake Taddese, Todd M. Pitts, Stacey M. Bagby, Sarah J. Hartman, S.Lindsey Davis, Christopher H. Lieu, Alexis D. Leal, Wells A. Messersmith. Preclinical investigation of novel ALDH1A1 inhibitors in pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3855.
Collapse
|
29
|
Davis SL, Schlaepfer MI, Bagby SM, Hartman SJ, Yacob BW, Tse T, Simmons DM, Diamond JR, Lieu CH, Leal AD, Cadogan EB, Hughes GD, Durant ST, Messersmith WA, Pitts TM. Abstract 4720: Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase inhibitor AZD0156 in combination with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan in preclinical models of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-4720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: AZD0156 is an oral inhibitor of ATM, a serine threonine kinase that plays a key role in DNA damage response associated with DNA double strand breaks. Topoisomerase-I inhibitors like irinotecan induce single-strand DNA breaks, which are converted to double-strand breaks during DNA replication. Thus the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan is a rational combination for clinical use. Irinotecan is used clinically to treat a variety of malignancies, including colorectal cancer (CRC), usually in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) as FOLFIRI. An ongoing phase 1 clinical trial is evaluating AZD0156 in combination with single-agent irinotecan and FOLFIRI in patients with refractory cancers (NCT02588105). The purpose of this study is to evaluate AZD0156 in combination with irinotecan and 5FU in preclinical models of CRC to help inform clinical use.
Methods: Anti-proliferative effects of single-agent AZD0156 and combination therapy with SN38 (active metabolite of irinotecan) and 5FU were evaluated in CRC cell lines using the Cell-Titer Glo assay. Immunoblotting and cell cycle analysis were performed to determine the mechanism of enhanced combination effects. Four CRC patient derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with AZD0156, irinotecan, and 5FU alone and in combination for assessment of tumor growth inhibition (TGI).
Results: An enhanced antiproliferative effect was observed with the combination treatment over either single agent. A more significant synergistic effect was demonstrated with the combination of AZD0156 and SN38 as compared with the combination of AZD0156 and 5FU. Cell cycle data demonstrated enhanced cell cycle arrest with combination therapy as compared to single agents. Immunoblotting results suggest a decrease in phosphorylated gamma-H2AX in cell lines treated with combination therapies. Increased TGI was observed in CRC PDX models treated with the combination of AZD0156 and irinotecan as compared to single-agent therapy in 3 of 4 models. There was not a significant change in TGI with the addition of 5FU for triplet therapy in the majority of models.
Conclusions: The combination of AZD0156 with irinotecan is synergistic in in vitro models and is associated with increased TGI in CRC PDX in vivo models. The addition of 5FU to AZD0156 and irinotecan did not result in increased TGI as compared to doublet therapy in CRC PDX models, though did not decrease the AZD0156/irinotecan combination effect. An ongoing clinical trial is evaluating this combination in patients with cancers refractory to standard treatments (NCT02588105).
Citation Format: S. Lindsey Davis, Marina I. Schlaepfer, Stacey M. Bagby, Sarah J. Hartman, Betelehem W. Yacob, Tonia Tse, Dennis M. Simmons, Jennifer R. Diamond, Christopher H. Lieu, Alexis D. Leal, Elaine B. Cadogan, Gareth D. Hughes, Stephen T. Durant, Wells A. Messersmith, Todd M. Pitts. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase inhibitor AZD0156 in combination with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan in preclinical models of colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4720.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Tonia Tse
- 1University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hartman SJ, Bagby SM, Yacob BW, Simmons DM, Tse TE, Lieu CH, Davis SL, Leal AD, Diamond JR, Messersmith WA, Pitts TM. Abstract 1315: Combination of Wee1 inhibition with targeted and standard chemotherapy in preclinical models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-1315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is the fourth leading cause of cancer death and has a 5-year survival rate of less than 7%. The poor prognosis associated with PDA is related in part to a lack of screening tests to promote early detection and ineffective systemic targeted therapies. Adavosertib (AZD1775, MK1775) is a selective Wee1 inhibitor with promising preclinical activity in PDA and synergy with cytotoxic chemotherapy in other cancer types. Wee1 is a tyrosine kinase that activates in the G2M cell cycle checkpoint in response to DNA damage. Inhibition of Wee1 with adavosertib prevents the phosphorylation of CDC2, thus allowing unrepaired DNA to enter mitosis and ultimately succumb to mitotic catastrophe. The purpose of this study was to investigate adavosertib in combination with standard chemotherapy and other targeted agents in preclinical models of PDA.
Methods: Athymic nude mice were implanted with PDA PDX models on the right and left flanks. When the average tumor volume reached 100-300 mm3, mice were randomized into one of the following treatments: vehicle, adavosertib, irinotecan, navitoclax, capecitabine, adavosertib + irinotecan, or adavosertib + navitoclax, adavosertib + capecitabine. Tumor volume was calculated using the following equation: volume = (length × width) × 0.52. Four pancreatic cancer cell lines were plated in 96-well plates and Cell Titer-Glo proliferation assays were performed to determine the most effective combination doses of irinotecan, 5FU, or navitoclax with adavosertib in vitro. Combination effects were analyzed using CalcuSyn software. The most effective doses within each cell line were selected and used for Caspase 3/7 apoptosis assays and cell cycle analyses by flow cytometry. Western blots were performed to evaluate changes in downstream effectors.
Results: In vivo, the combination of adavosertib with either irinotecan or navitoclax resulted in decreased tumor growth compared to the respective single agents. The combination of adavosertib with irinotecan, 5FU, or navitoclax in vitro resulted in greater antiproliferative effects in all cell lines, and the several combinations were synergistic in all cell lines as determined by CI values less than 1. Navitoclax increased apoptosis in several cell lines both as a single agent and was enhanced in combination with adavosertib. Irinotecan proved to be more cell cycle dependent and significantly altered the cell cycle in all cell lines. Irinotecan increased phospho-CDC2 and decreased PHH3, while adavosertib increased gamma-H2AX as a single agent and in combination.
Conclusions: The combination of adavosertib with either irinotecan, 5FU, or navitoclax in vivo decreased tumor growth and had enhanced antiproliferative effects in vitro. These data support future studies with adavosertib in combination with standard therapies or navitoclax to treat PDA.
Citation Format: Sarah J. Hartman, Stacey M. Bagby, Betelehem W. Yacob, Dennis M. Simmons, Tonia E. Tse, Christopher H. Lieu, S. Lindsey Davis, Alexis D. Leal, Jennifer R. Diamond, Wells A. Messersmith, Todd M. Pitts. Combination of Wee1 inhibition with targeted and standard chemotherapy in preclinical models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1315.
Collapse
|
31
|
Lennon S, Oweida A, Milner D, Phan AV, Bhatia S, Van Court B, Darragh L, Mueller AC, Raben D, Martínez-Torrecuadrada JL, Pitts TM, Somerset H, Jordan KR, Hansen KC, Williams J, Messersmith WA, Schulick RD, Owens P, Goodman KA, Karam SD. Pancreatic Tumor Microenvironment Modulation by EphB4-ephrinB2 Inhibition and Radiation Combination. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:3352-3365. [PMID: 30944125 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-2811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Revised: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A driving factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment resistance is the tumor microenvironment, which is highly immunosuppressive. One potent immunologic adjuvant is radiotherapy. Radiation, however, has also been shown to induce immunosuppressive factors, which can contribute to tumor progression and formation of fibrotic tumor stroma. To capitalize on the immunogenic effects of radiation and obtain a durable tumor response, radiation must be rationally combined with targeted therapies to mitigate the influx of immunosuppressive cells and fibrosis. One such target is ephrinB2, which is overexpressed in PDAC and correlates negatively with prognosis.Experimental Design: On the basis of previous studies of ephrinB2 ligand-EphB4 receptor signaling, we hypothesized that inhibition of ephrinB2-EphB4 combined with radiation can regulate the microenvironment response postradiation, leading to increased tumor control in PDAC. This hypothesis was explored using both cell lines and in vivo human and mouse tumor models. RESULTS Our data show this treatment regimen significantly reduces regulatory T-cell, macrophage, and neutrophil infiltration and stromal fibrosis, enhances effector T-cell activation, and decreases tumor growth. Furthermore, our data show that depletion of regulatory T cells in combination with radiation reduces tumor growth and fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS These are the first findings to suggest that in PDAC, ephrinB2-EphB4 interaction has a profibrotic, protumorigenic role, presenting a novel and promising therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelby Lennon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Ayman Oweida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Dallin Milner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Andy V Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Shilpa Bhatia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Benjamin Van Court
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Laurel Darragh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Adam C Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - David Raben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jorge L Martínez-Torrecuadrada
- Crystallography and Protein Engineering Unit, Structural Biology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Todd M Pitts
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Hilary Somerset
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Kimberly R Jordan
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Kirk C Hansen
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jason Williams
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Richard D Schulick
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.,Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Philip Owens
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.,Research Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Denver, Colorado
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Sana D Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Simmons DM, Tse TE, Dailey K, Hartman SJ, Bagsby S, Pitts TM, Tentler JJ, Diamond JR. Abstract P2-06-15: Rational combination of Wee1 and BCL-2 inhibition in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p2-06-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype distinguished by its lack of expression of receptors for estrogen, progesterone, and normal human epidermal growth factor 2 expression. TNBC is difficult to treat and is associated with a high risk of recurrence and mortality. In order to effectively treat TNBC, alternative therapeutic targets need to be identified. Wee1 is a tyrosine kinase that phosphorylates CDC2 to pause the cell cycle at the G2 checkpoint as a means to delay mitosis while DNA damage undergoes repair. Inactivation of Wee1 via adavosertib (AZD1775, MK1775), a highly selective inhibitor of Wee1, allows CDC25 to dephosphorylate the CDC2/cyclin B complex resulting in premature initiation of mitosis and, ultimately, mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis. An unbiased screen of adovosertib in combination with other targeted compounds in TNBC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models demonstrated that the combination of adavosertib and navitoclax, an inhibitor of anti-apoptotic BCL-2 and BCL-XL proteins, had greater efficacy than the single agents alone. The purpose of this study was to investigate the combination of adavosertib and navitoclax in preclinical TNBC models, both in vitro and in vivo.
Methods:
HCC1937, CAL51, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells were plated in 96-well plates and exposed to increasing concentrations of adavosertib (125nM – 1000nM), navitoclax (2500nM – 10000nM), or the combination. Cellular proliferation was assessed in real-time using IncuCyte Live Cell Analysis, followed by endpoint sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. Combination effects were analyzed using Calcusyn to determine combination indexes (CI). Apoptosis was assessed via the Caspase 3/7 assay. Western blotting was used to assess changes in expression of CDC2, phospho-CDC2, and BCL2. TNBC PDX models CU_TNBC_013 and CU_TNBC_014 were treated with vehicle, adavosertib (50mg/kg), navitoclax (100mg/kg), or the combination and assessed for tumor growth inhibition.
Results:
The combination of adavosertib and navitoclax resulted in greater antiproliferative effects in vitro compared to either single agent (p< 0.05). This effect was classified as synergistic with CI values <1. We observed a significant increase in apoptosis with the combination treatment as measured by Caspase 3/7 (p <0.005). The combination of adavosertib and navitoclax treatment resulted in a decrease in phospo-CDC2, and BCL2 in cell lines. In vivo, the combination treatment resulted in greater tumor growth inhibition as compared to adavosertib or navitoclax alone in the CU_TNBC_013 and CU_TNBC_014 PDX models.
Conclusions:
The combination of adavosertib and navitoclax is active in preclinical TNBC models and induces apoptosis and tumor growth inhibition. This data supports the continued development of this combination in TNBC with investigation of potential selective markers.
Citation Format: Simmons DM, Tse TE, Dailey K, Hartman SJ, Bagsby S, Pitts TM, Tentler JJ, Diamond JR. Rational combination of Wee1 and BCL-2 inhibition in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-06-15.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- DM Simmons
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - TE Tse
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - K Dailey
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - SJ Hartman
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - S Bagsby
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - TM Pitts
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - JJ Tentler
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - JR Diamond
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Capasso A, Lang J, Pitts TM, Jordan KR, Lieu CH, Davis SL, Diamond JR, Kopetz S, Barbee J, Peterson J, Freed BM, Yacob BW, Bagby SM, Messersmith WA, Slansky JE, Pelanda R, Eckhardt SG. Characterization of immune responses to anti-PD-1 mono and combination immunotherapy in hematopoietic humanized mice implanted with tumor xenografts. J Immunother Cancer 2019; 7:37. [PMID: 30736857 PMCID: PMC6368764 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-019-0518-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The success of agents that reverse T-cell inhibitory signals, such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies, has reinvigorated cancer immunotherapy research. However, since only a minority of patients respond to single-agent therapies, methods to test the potential anti-tumor activity of rational combination therapies are still needed. Conventional murine xenograft models have been hampered by their immune-compromised status; thus, we developed a hematopoietic humanized mouse model, hu-CB-BRGS, and used it to study anti-tumor human immune responses to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line and patient-derived colorectal cancer (CRC) xenografts (PDX). Methods BALB/c-Rag2nullIl2rγnullSIRPαNOD (BRGS) pups were humanized through transplantation of cord blood (CB)-derived CD34+ cells. Mice were evaluated for human chimerism in the blood and assigned into experimental untreated or nivolumab groups based on chimerism. TNBC cell lines or tumor tissue from established CRC PDX models were implanted into both flanks of humanized mice and treatments ensued once tumors reached a volume of ~150mm3. Tumors were measured twice weekly. At end of study, immune organs and tumors were collected for immunological assessment. Results Humanized PDX models were successfully established with a high frequency of tumor engraftment. Humanized mice treated with anti-PD-1 exhibited increased anti-tumor human T-cell responses coupled with decreased Treg and myeloid populations that correlated with tumor growth inhibition. Combination therapies with anti-PD-1 treatment in TNBC-bearing mice reduced tumor growth in multi-drug cohorts. Finally, as observed in human colorectal patients, anti-PD-1 therapy had a strong response to a microsatellite-high CRC PDX that correlated with a higher number of human CD8+ IFNγ+ T cells in the tumor. Conclusion Hu-CB-BRGS mice represent an in vivo model to study immune checkpoint blockade to human tumors. The human immune system in the mice is inherently suppressed, similar to a tumor microenvironment, and thus allows growth of human tumors. However, the suppression can be released by anti-PD-1 therapies and inhibit tumor growth of some tumors. The model offers ample access to lymph and tumor cells for in-depth immunological analysis. The tumor growth inhibition correlates with increased CD8 IFNγ+ tumor infiltrating T cells. These hu-CB-BRGS mice provide a relevant preclinical animal model to facilitate prioritization of hypothesis-driven combination immunotherapies. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-019-0518-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Capasso
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - J Lang
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12800 E. 19th Ave P18-8401G, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - T M Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Ct, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - K R Jordan
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12800 E. 19th Ave P18-8401G, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - C H Lieu
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Ct, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - S L Davis
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Ct, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - J R Diamond
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Ct, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - S Kopetz
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd10, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - J Barbee
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12800 E. 19th Ave P18-8401G, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - J Peterson
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12800 E. 19th Ave P18-8401G, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - B M Freed
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - B W Yacob
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - S M Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - W A Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Ct, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - J E Slansky
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 1665 Aurora Ct, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.,Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12800 E. 19th Ave P18-8401G, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - R Pelanda
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12800 E. 19th Ave P18-8401G, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - S G Eckhardt
- Department of Oncology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1701 Trinity Street, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Krishnamurthy A, Dasari A, Noonan AM, Mehnert JM, Lockhart AC, Leong S, Capasso A, Stein MN, Sanoff HK, Lee JJ, Hansen A, Malhotra U, Rippke S, Gustafson DL, Pitts TM, Ellison K, Davis SL, Messersmith WA, Eckhardt SG, Lieu CH. Phase Ib Results of the Rational Combination of Selumetinib and Cyclosporin A in Advanced Solid Tumors with an Expansion Cohort in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Res 2018; 78:5398-5407. [PMID: 30042150 PMCID: PMC6139073 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-0316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Revised: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
MEK inhibition is of interest in cancer drug development, but clinical activity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been limited. Preclinical studies demonstrated Wnt pathway overexpression in KRAS-mutant cell lines resistant to the MEK inhibitor, selumetinib. The combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A, a noncanonical Wnt pathway modulator, demonstrated antitumor activity in mCRC patient-derived xenografts. To translate these results, we conducted a NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-approved multicenter phase I/IB trial (NCT02188264) of the combination of selumetinib and cyclosporin A. Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with the combination of oral selumetinib and cyclosporin A in the dose escalation phase, followed by an expansion cohort of irinotecan and oxaliplatin-refractory mCRC. The expansion cohort utilized a single-agent selumetinib "run-in" to evaluate FZD2 biomarker upregulation and KRAS-WT and KRAS-MT stratification to identify any potential predictors of efficacy. Twenty and 19 patients were enrolled in dose escalation and expansion phases, respectively. The most common adverse events and grade 3/4 toxicities were rash, hypertension, and edema. Three dose-limiting toxicities (grade 3 hypertension, rash, and increased creatinine) were reported. The MTD was selumetinib 75 mg twice daily and cyclosporin A 2 mg/kg twice daily on a 28-day cycle. KRAS stratification did not identify any differences in response between KRAS-WT and KRAS-MT cancers. Two partial responses, 18 stable disease, and 10 progressive disease responses were observed. Combination selumetinib and cyclosporin A is well tolerated, with evidence of activity in mCRC. Future strategies for concept development include identifying better predictors of efficacy and improved Wnt pathway modulation.Significance: These findings translate preclinical studies combining selumetinib and cyclosporin into a phase I first-in-human clinical trial of such a combination in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Cancer Res; 78(18); 5398-407. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Janice M Mehnert
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | - Mark N Stein
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Hanna K Sanoff
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - James J Lee
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Usha Malhotra
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - S Gail Eckhardt
- University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
- University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, LIVESTRONG Cancer Institutes, Austin, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Davis SL, Eckhardt SG, Diamond JR, Messersmith WA, Dasari A, Weekes CD, Lieu CH, Kane M, Choon Tan A, Pitts TM, Leong S. A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Linsitinib (OSI-906), a Small-Molecule Dual Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor/Insulin Receptor Kinase Inhibitor, in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Cancer. Oncologist 2018; 23:1409-e140. [PMID: 30139840 PMCID: PMC6292546 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Lessons Learned. The maximum tolerated dose of the combination of linsitinib and irinotecan is linsitinib 450 mg daily on days 1–3 every 7 days and irinotecan 125 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 of a 21‐day cycle. The adverse effects associated with the combination are not significantly increased beyond what is expected of each drug as a single agent. Multiple negative trials of insulin‐like growth factor‐1 receptor inhibitors performed in unselected patient populations led to the early discontinuation of linistinib development and this trial. Earlier integration of assessment of potential predictive biomarkers into clinical trials, as was planned in this study, is vital to the development of targeted therapies in oncology.
Background. This phase I dose‐escalation study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combination of irinotecan and insulin‐like growth factor‐1 receptor (IGF‐1R) inhibitor linsitinib in patients with advanced cancer refractory to standard therapy. Methods. Dose escalation in three specified dose levels was performed according to a standard 3 + 3 design. Dose levels were as follows: (a) linsitinib 400 mg and irinotecan 100 mg/m2, (b) linsitinib 450 mg and irinotecan 100 mg/m2, and (c) linsitinib 450 mg and irinotecan 125 mg/m2. Linisitinib was administered once daily on days 1–3, 8–10, and 15–17, and irinotecan on days 1 and 8. Assessment of a candidate predictive biomarker was planned in all patients, with further evaluation in an expansion cohort of advanced colorectal cancer. Results. A total of 17 patients were treated, with 1 patient in both cohort 2 and 3 experiencing dose‐limiting toxicity. Linsitinib 450 mg and irinotecan 125 mg/m2 was the maximum tolerated dose. Sixteen (94%) patients experienced at least one treatment‐related adverse event. Neutropenia was the only grade >3 toxicity (4%). No significant hyperglycemia or QT interval prolongation was noted. No objective responses were observed; 47% (n = 8) had stable disease with median duration of 5.25 months. Conclusion. Although the combination was determined safe, the study was halted due to termination of linsitinib development, and biomarker testing was not performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Gail Eckhardt
- The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | - Colin D Weekes
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Madeline Kane
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Aik Choon Tan
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Todd M Pitts
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Stephen Leong
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Diamond JR, Eckhardt SG, Pitts TM, van Bokhoven A, Aisner D, Gustafson DL, Capasso A, Sams S, Kabos P, Zolman K, Colvin T, Elias AD, Storniolo AM, Schneider BP, Gao D, Tentler JJ, Borges VF, Miller KD. A phase II clinical trial of the Aurora and angiogenic kinase inhibitor ENMD-2076 for previously treated, advanced, or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2018; 20:82. [PMID: 30071865 PMCID: PMC6090978 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-018-1014-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains an aggressive breast cancer subtype with limited treatment options. ENMD-2076 is a small-molecule inhibitor of Aurora and angiogenic kinases with proapoptotic and antiproliferative activity in preclinical models of TNBC. Methods This dual-institution, single-arm, two-stage, phase II clinical trial enrolled patients with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC previously treated with one to three prior lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting. Patients were treated with ENMD-2076 250 mg orally once daily with continuous dosing in 4-week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was 6-month clinical benefit rate (CBR), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and biologic correlates in archival and fresh serial tumor biopsies in a subset of patients. Results Forty-one patients were enrolled. The 6-month CBR was 16.7% (95% CI, 6–32.8%) and included two partial responses. The 4-month CBR was 27.8% (95% CI, 14–45.2%), and the average duration of benefit was 6.5 cycles. Common adverse events included hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea. Treatment with ENMD-2076 resulted in a decrease in cellular proliferation and microvessel density and an increase in p53 and p73 expression, consistent with preclinical observations. Conclusions Single-agent ENMD-2076 treatment resulted in partial response or clinical benefit lasting more than 6 months in 16.7% of patients with pretreated, advanced, or metastatic TNBC. These results support the development of predictive biomarkers using archival and fresh tumor tissue, as well as consideration of mechanism-based combination strategies. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01639248. Registered on July 12, 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R Diamond
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA. .,Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, 12801 East 17th Avenue, Mailstop 8117, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - S G Eckhardt
- Department of Oncology, University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Todd M Pitts
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Dara Aisner
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Anna Capasso
- Department of Oncology, University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Sharon Sams
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Peter Kabos
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | | | | - Anna M Storniolo
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Bryan P Schneider
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Dexiang Gao
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | | | - Kathy D Miller
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Scott AJ, Arcaroli JJ, Bagby SM, Yahn R, Huber KM, Serkova NJ, Nguyen A, Kim J, Thorburn A, Vogel J, Quackenbush KS, Capasso A, Schreiber A, Blatchford P, Klauck PJ, Pitts TM, Eckhardt SG, Messersmith WA. Cabozantinib Exhibits Potent Antitumor Activity in Colorectal Cancer Patient-Derived Tumor Xenograft Models via Autophagy and Signaling Mechanisms. Mol Cancer Ther 2018; 17:2112-2122. [PMID: 30026382 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-0131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2017] [Revised: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Antiangiogenic therapy used in treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) inevitably succumbs to treatment resistance. Upregulation of MET may play an essential role to acquired anti-VEGF resistance. We previously reported that cabozantinib (XL184), an inhibitor of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) including MET, AXL, and VEGFR2, had potent antitumor effects in mCRC patient-derived tumor explant models. In this study, we examined the mechanisms of cabozantinib sensitivity, using regorafenib as a control. The tumor growth inhibition index (TGII) was used to compare treatment effects of cabozantinib 30 mg/kg daily versus regorafenib 10 mg/kg daily for a maximum of 28 days in 10 PDX mouse models. In vivo angiogenesis and glucose uptake were assessed using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI and [18F]-FDG-PET imaging, respectively. RNA-Seq, RTK assay, and immunoblotting analysis were used to evaluate gene pathway regulation in vivo and in vitro Analysis of TGII demonstrated significant antitumor effects with cabozantinib compared with regorafenib (average TGII 3.202 vs. 48.48, respectively; P = 0.007). Cabozantinib significantly reduced vascularity and glucose uptake compared with baseline. Gene pathway analysis showed that cabozantinib significantly decreased protein activity involved in glycolysis and upregulated proteins involved in autophagy compared with control, whereas regorafenib did not. The combination of two separate antiautophagy agents, SBI-0206965 and chloroquine, plus cabozantinib increased apoptosis in vitro Cabozantinib demonstrated significant antitumor activity, reduction in tumor vascularity, increased autophagy, and altered cell metabolism compared with regorafenib. Our findings support further evaluation of cabozantinib and combinational approaches targeting autophagy in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(10); 2112-22. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Scott
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Banner University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona.
| | - John J Arcaroli
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Stacey M Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Rachel Yahn
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Kendra M Huber
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Natalie J Serkova
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Anna Nguyen
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jihye Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Andrew Thorburn
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jon Vogel
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Kevin S Quackenbush
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Anna Capasso
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Anna Schreiber
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Patrick Blatchford
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Peter J Klauck
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Todd M Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - S Gail Eckhardt
- Division of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dhar D, Kumar D, Bagby S, Pitts TM, Messersmith WA, Raina K, Agarwal R. Abstract 277: Gaining insights into pancreatic cancer intervention with bitter melon, a natural agent, in combination with gemcitabine using patient derived xenografts. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PanC) remains the 4th leading cause of cancer related-deaths in U.S. resulting in a dismal survival rate of <5%. This generates a critical need for identifying novel non-toxic agents aimed at effective PanC management with minimal patient distress. Bitter melon (Momordica charantia), a dietary agent, is actively being examined for its anti-cancer efficacy against a panel of malignancies. Recent data from our group highlights the anti-PanC potential of bitter melon juice (BMJ); its role in PanC-cancer stem cell (CSC) self-renewal/ kinetics and gemcitabine (GEM) resistance in PanC cells. GEM is the standard of care drug used in PanC therapeutics but there has been a continual increase in GEM resistant PanC patients lately. In our current study, we determined the nature of combinations for BMJ (0.5- 2% v/v) and GEM (2- 25 μM) in vitro using 3 human PanC cell lines. Combination indices (CI) determined using Chou-Talalay method for BMJ and GEM were: PANC1 (no observed interaction), AsPC1 (CI=0.5-1, leaning towards synergism) and BxPC3 (CI=0.1-0.8, synergistic). Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) are gaining importance as representatives of the genomic complexities and interactions with tumor microenvironment like primary patient tumors, thereby contributing to accelerated therapeutic approaches. Subsequently, we focused on assessing the efficacy of BMJ alone, or in addition to GEM using the PanC-PDX mouse model. Treatment regimen had 4 cohorts: Controls (untreated); BMJ alone- 200mg/Kg; GEM alone- 50mg/Kg; and Combo (BMJ+GEM). BMJ efficacy was examined in 3 human PanC-PDX explants in nude mice, denoted by PanC-PDX 272, 266 and 271, alongside GEM, and Combo. Tumor volumes recorded post first part of study (~day 35; first sacrifice time-point) showed significant tumor growth inhibition in all treated groups. GEM and Combo displayed comparable efficacies by decrease in tumor volume (~70-80% decrease), followed by BMJ (~50-60% decrease). Interestingly, tumor regrowth determination with subsequent treatment washout period (~30 days), showed maximum tumor regrowth in GEM-treated mice, nearing the untreated controls. BMJ consistently showed a prolonged effect by containment of tumors until the study end (~day 64; second sacrifice time-point). Combo tumors remained close to BMJ, suggesting no apparent antagonistic interference. Notably, at study completion (day 64), BMJ or Combo displayed the most significant and sustained effect on tumor volumes (~60-80% decrease for BMJ, 80-90% decrease for Combo) compared to GEM (~40-50% decrease), after treatments were stopped. Together, these results point to the chemopreventive efficacy of BMJ as a monotherapeutic as well a perfect combinatorial candidate in studies with chemotherapeutic agents like GEM aimed at PanC management utilizing the resourceful PanC-PDX mouse model.
Citation Format: Deepanshi Dhar, Dileep Kumar, Stacey Bagby, Todd M. Pitts, Wells A. Messersmith, Komal Raina, Rajesh Agarwal. Gaining insights into pancreatic cancer intervention with bitter melon, a natural agent, in combination with gemcitabine using patient derived xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 277.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepanshi Dhar
- 1Univ. of Colorado Denver, Skaggs School of Pharmacy, Aurora, CO
| | - Dileep Kumar
- 1Univ. of Colorado Denver, Skaggs School of Pharmacy, Aurora, CO
| | - Stacey Bagby
- 2Univ. of Colorado Denver, Division of Medical Oncology, Aurora, CO
| | - Todd M. Pitts
- 2Univ. of Colorado Denver, Division of Medical Oncology, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Komal Raina
- 1Univ. of Colorado Denver, Skaggs School of Pharmacy, Aurora, CO
| | - Rajesh Agarwal
- 1Univ. of Colorado Denver, Skaggs School of Pharmacy, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Paukovich N, Xue M, Elder JR, Redzic JS, Blue A, Pike H, Miller BG, Pitts TM, Pollock DD, Hansen K, D'Alessandro A, Eisenmesser EZ. Biliverdin Reductase B Dynamics Are Coupled to Coenzyme Binding. J Mol Biol 2018; 430:3234-3250. [PMID: 29932944 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Revised: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Biliverdin reductase B (BLVRB) is a newly identified cellular redox regulator that catalyzes the NADPH-dependent reduction of multiple substrates. Through mass spectrometry analysis, we identified high levels of BLVRB in mature red blood cells, highlighting the importance of BLVRB in redox regulation. The BLVRB conformational changes that occur during conezyme/substrate binding and the role of dynamics in BLVRB function, however, remain unknown. Through a combination of NMR, kinetics, and isothermal titration calorimetry studies, we determined that BLVRB binds its coenzyme 500-fold more tightly than its substrate. While the active site of apo BLVRB is highly dynamic on multiple timescales, active site dynamics are largely quenched within holo BLVRB, in which dynamics are redistributed to other regions of the enzyme. We show that a single point mutation of Arg78➔Ala leads to both an increase in active site micro-millisecond motions and an increase in the microscopic rate constants of coenzyme binding. This demonstrates that altering BLVRB active site dynamics can directly cause a change in functional characteristics. Our studies thus address the solution behavior of apo and holo BLVRB and identify a role of enzyme dynamics in coenzyme binding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasia Paukovich
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Mengjun Xue
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - James R Elder
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Jasmina S Redzic
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Ashley Blue
- National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA
| | - Hamish Pike
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Brian G Miller
- Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA
| | - Todd M Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - David D Pollock
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Kirk Hansen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Angelo D'Alessandro
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Elan Zohar Eisenmesser
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kiseljak-Vassiliades K, Zhang Y, Bagby SM, Kar A, Pozdeyev N, Xu M, Gowan K, Sharma V, Raeburn CD, Albuja-Cruz M, Jones KL, Fishbein L, Schweppe RE, Somerset H, Pitts TM, Leong S, Wierman ME. Development of new preclinical models to advance adrenocortical carcinoma research. Endocr Relat Cancer 2018; 25:437-451. [PMID: 29371329 PMCID: PMC5831504 DOI: 10.1530/erc-17-0447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Adrenocortical cancer (ACC) is an orphan malignancy that results in heterogeneous clinical phenotypes and molecular genotypes. There are no curative treatments for this deadly cancer with 35% survival at five years. Our understanding of the underlying pathobiology and our ability to test novel therapeutic targets has been limited due to the lack of preclinical models. Here, we report the establishment of two new ACC cell lines and corresponding patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. CU-ACC1 cell line and PDX were derived from a perinephric metastasis in a patient whose primary tumor secreted aldosterone. CU-ACC2 cell line and PDX were derived from a liver metastasis in a patient with Lynch syndrome. Short tandem repeat profiling confirmed consistent matches between human samples and models. Both exomic and RNA sequencing profiling were performed on the patient samples and the models, and hormonal secretion was evaluated in the new cell lines. RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry confirmed the expression of adrenal cortex markers in the PDXs and human tumors. The new cell lines replicate two of the known genetic models of ACC. CU-ACC1 cells had a mutation in CTNNB1 and secreted cortisol but not aldosterone. CU-ACC2 cells had a TP53 mutation and loss of MSH2 consistent with the patient's known germline mutation causing Lynch syndrome. Both cell lines can be transfected and transduced with similar growth rates. These new preclinical models of ACC significantly advance the field by allowing investigation of underlying molecular mechanisms of ACC and the ability to test patient-specific therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
- Research Service Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver CO 80220
| | - Yu Zhang
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Stacey M. Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Adwitiya Kar
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Nikita Pozdeyev
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Mei Xu
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Katherine Gowan
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Vibha Sharma
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
| | | | - Maria Albuja-Cruz
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Kenneth L. Jones
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Lauren Fishbein
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
- Research Service Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver CO 80220
| | - Rebecca E. Schweppe
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Hilary Somerset
- Department of Pathology; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Todd M. Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Stephen Leong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Margaret E. Wierman
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045
- Research Service Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver CO 80220
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Pitts TM, Bradshaw-Pierce EL, Bagby SM, Hyatt SL, Selby HM, Spreafico A, Tentler JJ, McPhillips K, Klauck PJ, Capasso A, Diamond JR, Davis SL, Tan AC, Arcaroli JJ, Purkey A, Messersmith WA, Ecsedy JA, Eckhardt SG. Antitumor activity of the aurora a selective kinase inhibitor, alisertib, against preclinical models of colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2018; 7:50290-50301. [PMID: 27385211 PMCID: PMC5226583 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.10366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2016] [Accepted: 06/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Aurora kinases are a family of serine/threonine kinases comprised of Aurora A, B, and C which execute critical steps in mitotic and meiotic progression. Alisertib (MLN8237) is an investigational Aurora A selective inhibitor that has demonstrated activity against a wide variety of tumor types in vitro and in vivo, including CRC. Results CRC cell lines demonstrated varying sensitivity to alisertib with IC50 values ranging from 0.06 to > 5 umol/L. Following exposure to alisertib we observed a decrease in pAurora A, B and C in four CRC cell lines. We also observed an increase in p53 and p21 in a sensitive p53 wildtype cell line in contrast to the p53 mutant cell line or the resistant cell lines. The addition of alisertib to standard CRC treatments demonstrated improvement over single agent arms; however, the benefit was largely less than additive, but not antagonistic. Methods Forty-seven CRC cell lines were exposed to alisertib and IC50s were calculated. Twenty-one PDX models were treated with alisertib and the Tumor Growth Inhibition Index was assessed. Additionally, 5 KRAS wildtype and mutant PDX models were treated with alisertib as single agent or in combination with cetuximab or irinotecan, respectively. Conclusion Alisertib demonstrated anti-proliferative effects against CRC cell lines and PDX models. Our data suggest that the addition of alisertib to standard therapies in colorectal cancer if pursued clinically, will require further investigation of patient selection strategies and these combinations may facilitate future clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd M Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Erica L Bradshaw-Pierce
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,Takeda California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Stacey M Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Stephanie L Hyatt
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Heather M Selby
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - John J Tentler
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kelly McPhillips
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Peter J Klauck
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anna Capasso
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jennifer R Diamond
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - S Lindsey Davis
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Aik Choon Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - John J Arcaroli
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alicia Purkey
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jeffery A Ecsedy
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - S Gail Eckhardt
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tentler JJ, Frank JG, Kim DJ, George C, Lee YB, Ely B, Tan AC, Kim J, Pitts TM, Capasso A, Dailey KL, Eckhardt G, Diamond JR. Abstract P5-21-16: Preclinical studies of RX-5902, a beta-catenin modulator in triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p5-21-16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: RX-5902 (Supinoxin) is a novel anti-cancer compound that targets phosphorylated p68 RNA helicase, a member of the DEAD box family of helicases, affecting upstream and downstream molecules in the Wnt canonical pathway. As a single agent, RX-5902 exhibits strong growth inhibition in both in vitro and in vivo settings. Specifically, RX-5902 enhances survival and tumor growth inhibition in numerous xenograft models, including ovarian, renal and breast. We have previously shown RX-5902 inhibits cell growth in a dose-dependent fashion in the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) xenograft MDA-MB231. In the current study, we have expanded our investigation of the therapeutic potential of RX-5902 against TNBC using both in vitro and in vivo preclinical models.
Methods: RX-5902 was provided by Rexahn, Inc. (Rockville, MD). Cell proliferation was measured using the Cell-Titer Glo luminescent cell viability assay (Promega). Apoptosis was assessed using Incucyte Caspase 3/7 Green apoptosis assay (Essenbioscience). Immunoblots of MDA-MB-231 cell line were probed for ß-catenin (Cell Signaling). Syngeneic 4T1 murine TNBC mice were obtained from Sippr-BK Laboratory Animal Co (Shanghai, China) and tumor volumes were measured twice a week. When the mean tumor volumes reached ˜90 mm3, mice were randomized and treated with vehicle or RX-5902 PO daily alone or in combination with anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD-1 BIW for 3 weeks. Tumor growth inhibition (TGI) was calculated at Day 25.
Results: A panel of 18 TNBC cell lines were treated with RX-5902 and effects on cell proliferation were measured by the Cell Titer-Glo assay. Using 100nM as a cutoff, 14 sensitive lines and 4 resistant lines were identified, with an average IC50 of 56 nM in the sensitive lines. Of these, we chose 2 sensitive lines (MDA-MB-231, HCC1806) and 2 resistant lines (MDA-MB-436 and CAL-120) and assessed induction of apoptosis by the Incucyte caspase activity assay. Robust induction of apoptosis was observed in both sensitive lines (N=3). These lines were then subjected to cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry, which revealed a pronounced G2/M cell cycle arrest and aneuploidy following exposure to RX-5902. Western blot analysis of the MDA-MB-231 cell line showed decreases in the Wnt pathway-related protein nuclear ß-catenin in doses ranging from 20 nM to 200 nM. Finally, the therapeutic efficacy of RX-5902 was assessed as a single agent and in combination with two immune-oncology agents in the treatment of the TNBC 4T1 animal model. RX-5902 as a single agent showed dose dependency in the 4T1 model, and when given in combination with either anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 showed an additive effect (p<0.001). All the treatments were well-tolerated and no severe body weight loss was observed in this study.
Conclusions: RX-5902 showed efficacy against several in vitro and in vivo preclinical models of TNBC. RX-5902 resulted in G2/M arrest and induced apoptosis in sensitive TNBC cell lines and decreases in nuclear beta-catenin. In vivo, RX-5902 demonstrated additive anti-tumor effects when combined with either anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD1 immunotherapies. Together, these finding indicate that RX-5902 may have important clinical implications for the treatment of TNBC. A phase 2a clinical study in metastatic TNBC is ongoing..training_cert
Citation Format: Tentler JJ, Frank JG, Kim DJ, George C, Lee YB, Ely B, Tan AC, Kim J, Pitts TM, Capasso A, Dailey KL, Eckhardt G, Diamond JR. Preclinical studies of RX-5902, a beta-catenin modulator in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-16.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JJ Tentler
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - JG Frank
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - DJ Kim
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - C George
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - YB Lee
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - B Ely
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - AC Tan
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - J Kim
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - TM Pitts
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - A Capasso
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - KL Dailey
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - G Eckhardt
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD
| | - JR Diamond
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Diamond JR, Eckhardt SG, Pitts TM, van Bokhoven A, Aisner D, Gustafson DL, Capasso A, Elias AD, Storniolo AM, Schneider BP, Gao D, Tentler JJ, Borges VF, Miller KD. Abstract PD3-16: Clinical safety and efficacy of the aurora and angiogenic kinase inhibitor ENMD-2076 in previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-pd3-16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype defined by the lack of expression of the estrogen and progesterone receptors and lack of HER2 over-expression. ENMD-2076 is an orally bioavailable small molecule inhibitor of Aurora and angiogenic kinases with pro-apoptotic and antiproliferative activity in preclinical models of TNBC.
Methods: This two institution, single-arm, two-stage, phase II clinical trial enrolled patients with locally advanced or metastatic TNBC refractory to 1-3 prior lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting. Patients had ECOG PS ≤ 1, measureable disease by RECIST 1.1 and no evidence of brain metastasis. Patients were treated with ENMD-2076 250 mg PO daily with continuous dosing in 4-week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary end point was 6-month clinical benefit rate (6-CBR) and secondary endpoints included time to progression (TTP), PK profile, safety and biologic correlatives in archival and fresh serial tumor biopsies in a subset of patients.
Results: Between July 2012 and October 2016, 41 patients were enrolled (median age 54; range 30-73; female 40; male 1). Patients received a mean 1.7 prior lines of chemotherapy for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic disease and 80.5% received prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy (N=33). Thirty-six patients were evaluable per protocol for the primary efficacy analysis. Five patients (12.2%) were not included in the efficacy analysis due to: adverse events (AE) leading to discontinuation prior to objective efficacy assessment (N=3), not meeting eligibility criteria on day 1 (N=1) and withdraw of consent in cycle 1 (N=1). The study proceeded to the second stage of enrollment based on observing three 6-CBR events in Stage 1 (N=18 patients). The 6-CBR in the overall trial was 16.7% (95% exact CI: 6%-32.8%; 2 patients with PR and 4 patients with SD > 6 mos). The median duration of response or clinical benefit in these patients was 32 weeks (8 cycles). 4-CBR was 27.8% (95% exact CI: 14%-45.2%). Dose reduction occurred in 8 patients (20%) for fatigue, hypertension and proteinuria. The most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (37.5%) and fatigue (10%). One patient experienced grade 4 hypertension. Analysis of serial tumor biopsies prior to and following 2 weeks of ENMD-2076 (N=8 patients), demonstrated a treatment-induced decrease in cellular proliferation (Ki-67) and microvessel density (CD34) as assessed by IHC. Immunofluorescence performed on a subset of samples demonstrated an increase in p53-family member expression following treatment, consistent with changes observed in preclinical TNBC patient-derived tumor xenograft models.
Conclusions: ENMD-2076 has durable clinical activity in a subset of patients with pretreated, advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Predictive biomarker development using archival and fresh tumor tissue is underway. Exploration of lower doses of ENMD-2076 in future clinical trials may improve tolerability.
Citation Format: Diamond JR, Eckhardt SG, Pitts TM, van Bokhoven A, Aisner D, Gustafson DL, Capasso A, Elias AD, Storniolo AM, Schneider BP, Gao D, Tentler JJ, Borges VF, Miller KD. Clinical safety and efficacy of the aurora and angiogenic kinase inhibitor ENMD-2076 in previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-16.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JR Diamond
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - SG Eckhardt
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - TM Pitts
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - A van Bokhoven
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - D Aisner
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - DL Gustafson
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - A Capasso
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - AD Elias
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - AM Storniolo
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - BP Schneider
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - D Gao
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - JJ Tentler
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - VF Borges
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - KD Miller
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO; The University of Texas at Austin, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Austin, TX; Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Klauck PJ, Bagby SM, Capasso A, Bradshaw-Pierce EL, Selby HM, Spreafico A, Tentler JJ, Tan AC, Kim J, Arcaroli JJ, Purkey A, Messersmith WA, Kuida K, Gail Eckhardt S, Pitts TM. Antitumor activity of the polo-like kinase inhibitor, TAK-960, against preclinical models of colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:136. [PMID: 29402316 PMCID: PMC5800287 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4036-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is a serine/threonine kinase that is a key regulator of multiple stages of mitotic progression. Plk1 is upregulated in many tumor types including colorectal cancer (CRC) and portends a poor prognosis. TAK-960 is an ATP-competitive Plk1 inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy across a broad range of cancer cell lines, including CRC. In this study, we investigated the activity of TAK-960 against a large collection of CRC models including 55 cell lines and 18 patient-derived xenografts. METHODS Fifty-five CRC cell lines and 18 PDX models were exposed to TAK-960 and evaluated for proliferation (IC50) and Tumor Growth Inhibition Index, respectively. Additionally, 2 KRAS wild type and 2 KRAS mutant PDX models were treated with TAK-960 as single agent or in combination with cetuximab or irinotecan. TAK-960 mechanism of action was elucidated through immunoblotting and cell cycle analysis. RESULTS CRC cell lines demonstrated a variable anti-proliferative response to TAK-960 with IC50 values ranging from 0.001 to > 0.75 μmol/L. Anti-proliferative effects were sustained after removal of drug. Following TAK-960 treatment a highly variable accumulation of mitotic (indicating cell cycle arrest) and apoptotic markers was observed. Cell cycle analysis demonstrated that TAK-960 treatment induced G2/M arrest and polyploidy. Six out of the eighteen PDX models responded to single agent TAK-960 therapy (TGII< 20). The addition of TAK-960 to standard of care chemotherapy resulted in largely additive antitumor effects. CONCLUSION TAK-960 is an active anti-proliferative agent against CRC cell lines and PDX models. Collectively, these data suggest that TAK-960 may be of therapeutic benefit alone or in combination with other agents, although future work should focus on the development of predictive biomarkers and hypothesis-driven rational combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J. Klauck
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Stacey M. Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Anna Capasso
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Erica L. Bradshaw-Pierce
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
- Takeda California, San Diego, CA USA
| | - Heather M. Selby
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - John J. Tentler
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Aik Choon Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Jihye Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - John J. Arcaroli
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Alicia Purkey
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Wells A. Messersmith
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Keisuke Kuida
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - S. Gail Eckhardt
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Todd M. Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Diamond JR, Orth JD, Ionkina A, Dailey K, Pitts TM, Capasso A, Marcus JM, Burke RT, Davis SL, Kim J, Tan AC, Eckhardt SG, Tentler JJ. Abstract B175: Rational combination of mTOR and Aurora kinase A inhibition in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-17-b175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Alisertib is a highly selective inhibitor of Aurora kinase A and has antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity in a subset of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines and patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models. Cellular senescence and increased expression of genes in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway has been observed in TNBC models following treatment with alisertib that demonstrate de novo or acquired resistance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the combination of alisertib and the TORC1/2 inhibitor TAK-228 in preclinical TNBC models. Methods: MDA-MB-468, HCC1187, HCC1937, CAL51, and BT20 cells were plated in 96 well plates and exposed to increasing concentrations of alisertib (25nM-125nM), TAK-228 (25nM-125nM), or the combination and proliferation was assessed using the Cell Titer-Glo (CTG) assay. Apoptosis was assessed using long-term live cell microscopy and caspase 3/7 staining. Western blotting was used to assess changes in pS6, p4EBP1, and survivin expression. TNBC p53 wildtype CAL51 cells were transfected with the fluorescent ubiquitin cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) reporters and exposed to increasing concentrations of alisertib, TAK-228, or the combination to evaluate the effect on cell cycle progression, growth, and apoptosis. TNBC PDX models CU_TNBC_004 and CU_TNBC_007 were treated with vehicle, alisertib (30mg/kg), TAK-228 (0.5mg/kg), or the combination and assessed for tumor growth inhibition and translational markers by immunofluorescence (IF) and senescence-associated- ß-galactosidase (SA-ß-gal) staining. Results: A combination effect was observed for alisertib and TAK-228 in vitro with a decrease in cellular proliferation with the combination as measured by CTG. We observed an increase in cell death with the combination, as opposed to cell cycle arrest with single-agent treatment. Alisertib treatment was associated with an increase in survivin not observed with combination treatment. TAK-228 treatment was associated with a decrease in pS6 and p4EBP1 as a single agent or in combination. The combination of TAK-228 and alisertib resulted in greater tumor growth inhibition in vivo as compared to either single agent alone, accompanied by an increase in apoptosis as measured by BAX and DR5 expression and a decrease in senescence as evaluated by SA-ß-gal and phenotypic changes. Single agents in the CAL51 FUCCI system resulted in a dose-dependent effect on cell cycle progression and apoptosis by live cell microscopy. The combination, however, led to a complete block of cell growth and simultaneous apoptosis, leading to no expansion of cells after treatment and a gradual loss of the cell population. Conclusions: The combination of alisertib and TAK-228 in vitro and in vivo in TNBC models resulted in greater antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity. This combination is currently being investigated in a phase I dose escalation trial in patients with advanced solid tumors with a planned expansion cohort in metastatic TNBC to further evaluate the mechanism of the combination (NCT02719691).
Citation Format: Jennifer R. Diamond, James D. Orth, Anastasia Ionkina, Kyrie Dailey, Todd M. Pitts, Anna Capasso, Joshua M. Marcus, Russell T. Burke, Sarah L. Davis, Jiyhe Kim, Aik-Choon Tan, Sue G. Eckhardt, John J. Tentler. Rational combination of mTOR and Aurora kinase A inhibition in preclinical models of triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B175.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kyrie Dailey
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Todd M. Pitts
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Anna Capasso
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | - Sarah L. Davis
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Jiyhe Kim
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Aik-Choon Tan
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Sue G. Eckhardt
- 4Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Davis SL, Lam ET, Corr BR, O'Bryant CL, Glode A, Adler N, Pitts TM, Tentler JJ, Capasso A, Dailey K, Serkova NJ, Weekes CD, Gustafson DL, Lieu CH, Messersmith WA, Leong S, Eckhardt SG, Diamond JR. Abstract A083: A phase Ib study of the combination of MLN0128 (dual TORC1/2 inhibitor) and MLN8237 (Aurora A inhibitor, alisertib) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Mol Cancer Ther 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-17-a083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: MLN0128 is an oral inhibitor of mTOR kinase and mTORC1/2 signaling. Alisertib is an oral inhibitor of Aurora A kinase. Senescence and upregulation of genes in the PI3K/AKT/mTor pathway have been observed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient-derived xenograft models treated with alisertib, with greater tumor growth inhibition demonstrated in combination with MLN0128 as compared to each agent alone. An investigator-initiated trial was developed to evaluate the combination of MLN0128 and alisertib in patients with advanced solid tumors, followed by an expansion cohort in metastatic TNBC and other selected cancers. The goals of this ongoing study are to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of the combination. Results of dose escalation are presented here. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy were treated orally at escalating doses with the combination of MLN0128 daily on a continuous schedule and alisertib twice daily (BID) on days 1-7 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalation was conducted according to a standard 3+3 design. Key eligibility criteria included HgbA1c <7%, fasting serum glucose <130mg/dL and fasting triglycerides <300mg/dL, normal cardiac function, no condition with potential to cause excessive daytime sleepiness (including chronic hypoxia) and no risk of malabsorption of oral medications. PK assessments were performed at various time points after single-agent and combination dosing. Results: A total of 16 patients with refractory cancers were enrolled in dose escalation. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in dose level 1 (MLN0128 1mg/alisertib 30mg) or dose level 2 (2mg/30mg). At the third dose level (2mg/40mg) 2 of 7 patients experienced a DLT (grade 3 fatigue/confusion and grade 2 GERD/nausea leading to study discontinuation). In an alternate dose level cohort evaluating MLN0128 3mg and alisertib 30mg, 2 of 2 patients experienced a DLT of grade 3 fatigue. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination was determined to be MLN0128 2mg daily and alisertib 30mg BID. Most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included alopecia, diarrhea, fatigue and rash in 19% each and nausea in 31% of patients. Most common Grade 3 AEs included fatigue (19%) and decreased neutrophil count (31%). Dose modification was required in 56% of patients, most often due to neutropenia. Median time on study was 3 cycles (range 1-15) at data cutoff. Best response of stable disease was observed in 5 patients (31%), with prolonged stable disease noted in a patient with ER+/HER2- breast cancer (15 cycles) and a patient with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (10 cycles). PK assessments indicate no significant drug interaction between agents. Cmax was 24.7 (± 13.6) ng/mL for MLN0128 and 1049 (±363) ng/mL for alisertib at combination MTD doses. MLN0128 AUC was 128.2 (±72.7) ng/mLxhr and alisertib AUC0-8 was 6119 (±2331) ng/mlxhr at these doses. Conclusions: MLN0128 2mg daily on a continuous schedule and alisertib 30mg BID days 1-7 of a 21-day cycle is the MTD of the drug combination. An expansion cohort in patients with TNBC and other selected cancers is currently enrolling at this dose. Functional imaging and serial tumor biopsies are being integrated into this cohort to assess the pharmacodynamic interactions of the combination.
Citation Format: S. Lindsey Davis, Elaine T. Lam, Bradley R. Corr, Cindy L. O'Bryant, Ashley Glode, Nichole Adler, Todd M. Pitts, John J. Tentler, Anna Capasso, Kyrie Dailey, Natalie J. Serkova, Colin D. Weekes, Daniel L. Gustafson, Christopher H. Lieu, Wells A. Messersmith, Stephen Leong, S. Gail Eckhardt, Jennifer R. Diamond. A phase Ib study of the combination of MLN0128 (dual TORC1/2 inhibitor) and MLN8237 (Aurora A inhibitor, alisertib) in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A083.
Collapse
|
47
|
Capasso A, Lang J, Pitts TM, Lieu CH, Kopetz S, Davis SL, Jordan K, Bagby SM, Messersmith WA, Pelanda R, Eckhardt SG. Abstract A012: Humanized patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) recapitulate clinical responses in microsatellite stable (MSS) and unstable (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC). Mol Cancer Ther 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-17-a012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Recent data have demonstrated that patients with MSI-H metastatic CRC are more likely to respond to a PD-1 inhibitor as a single agent compared to patients with MSS CRC. Effective immunotherapy approaches for MSS CRC remain a critical unmet need. There is great interest in investigating immune checkpoint inhibition in combination with novel agents, but preclinical studies have been hampered by current models. To gain a better understanding of immune responses and facilitate preclinical evaluation of combination strategies with immunotherapy, we developed a “hematopoietic” humanized mouse model with the intent of leveraging this model for the development of rational combinations in MSS CRC patients. Methods: BRGS (in house breeding) newborn pups were transplanted with CD34+ cells purified from (HLA unmatched) umbilical cord blood at 48 hours. In order to better understand the immune context of these novel animal models, we selected an MSI-high CRC (MDA-C0999-203) and a MSS (CRC172) humanized PDX model. At 16 weeks, MDA-C0999-203 (MSI-H) and CRC172 (MSS) were implanted on both flanks of humanized mice and nonhumanized controls. When the average tumor size reached ~150-300 mm3, both groups of mice were randomized into vehicle and nivolumab (30mg/kg IP twice weekly) stratified by % chimerism (human CD45+ >45%). At the end of the treatment, a portion of the tumor was immediately fixed in formalin for immunohistochemistry and pharmacodynamic analyses with seven-color multispectral imaging using the Perkin Elmer Vectra- 3 instrument, and compared to a surgical specimen from an untreated patient with an MSI-H tumor. Results: In the MSI-H model we observed tumor growth inhibition in the nivolumab-treated, humanized mice with respect to the humanized vehicle-treated control and the nonhumanized nivolumab-treated group (TGII 3.5% vs 76%). In a separate experiment, an MSS CRC humanized PDX model (CRC172) was treated with nivolumab as described above. Although initial control of tumor growth was observed, this was followed by rapid tumor progression (TGII 138.4%). In addition to flow cytometry, an MSI-H CRC tumor directly from a patient was stained for a variety of immunologic markers and analyzed by Vectra. The tumors contained both CD4- and CD8-positive cells, indicating T-cell infiltration. These data are consistent with what was observed by flow cytometry. Similar results were observed in an MSI-H CRC tumor grown as a xenograft in humanized mice both with and without nivolumab. However, in the MSS CRC PDX model, very few CD4 and CD8 cells were observed in the tumor or in the surrounding stroma. Conclusions: We have successfully established in vivo MSI-H and MSS humanized CRC PDXs. All mice were highly chimeric and the MSI-H model demonstrated high TILs, and responding tumors exhibited IFNγ production, high CD8%, higher effector memory % (HLADR+, CD45RO+), and decreased PD-L1 expression by flow cytometry. Interestingly, we also observed greater numbers of T cells in the lymph nodes of the MSI-H PDX. Moreover, immune infiltrates were observed in the MSI-H PDX compared to the MSS by immunohistochemistry. These data suggest that humanized PDX models may be useful in the development of rational combinations of immunotherapy.
Citation Format: Anna Capasso, Julie Lang, Todd M. Pitts, Christopher H. Lieu, Scott Kopetz, Sarah L. Davis, Kimberly Jordan, Stacey M. Bagby, Wells A. Messersmith, Roberta Pelanda, S. Gail Eckhardt. Humanized patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) recapitulate clinical responses in microsatellite stable (MSS) and unstable (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A012.
Collapse
|
48
|
Schreiber AR, Nguyen A, Bagby SM, Arcaroli JJ, Yacob BW, Quackenbush K, Guy JL, Crowell T, Stringer B, Danaee H, Kalebic T, Messersmith WA, Pitts TM. Evaluation of TAK-264, an Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines and Patient-Derived Xenograft Models. Clin Cancer Drugs 2018; 5:42-49. [PMID: 30631747 PMCID: PMC6324574 DOI: 10.2174/2212697x05666180516120907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging technology consisting of an antibody, linker, and toxic agent, which have the potential to offer a targeted therapeutic approach. A novel target recently explored for the treatment of pancreatic cancer is guanylyl cyclase C (GCC). The objective of this study was to determine the anti-tumorigenic activity of TAK-264, an investigational ADC consisting of an antibody targeting GCC linked to a monomethyl auristatin E payload via a peptide linker. METHODS The antiproliferative effects of TAK-264 assessed in a panel of eleven pancreatic cancer cell lines. Additionally, ten unique pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cancer patient-derived xenograft models were treated with TAK-264 and the efficacy was determined. Baseline levels of GCC were analyzed on PDX models and cell lines. Immunoblotting was performed to evaluate the effects of TAK-264 on downstream effectors. RESULTS GCC protein expression was analyzed by immunoblotting in both normal and tumor tissue; marked increase in GCC expression was observed in tumor tissue. The in vitro experiments demonstrated a range of responses to TAK-264. Eight of the ten PDAC PDX models treated with TAK-264 demonstrated a statistically significant tumor growth inhibition. Immunoblotting demonstrated an increase in phosphorylated-HistoneH3 in both responsive and less responsive cell lines and PDAC PDX models treated with TAK-264. There was no correlation between baseline levels of GCC and response in either PDX or cell line models. CONCLUSION TAK-264 has shown suppression activity in pancreatic cancer cell lines and in pancreatic PDX models. These findings support further investigation of ADC targeting GCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna R. Schreiber
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, CO, USA
| | - Anna Nguyen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, CO, USA
| | - Stacey M. Bagby
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, CO, USA
| | - John J. Arcaroli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, CO, USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Betelehem W. Yacob
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, CO, USA
| | - Kevin Quackenbush
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, CO, USA
| | - Joe L. Guy
- Univeristy of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Wells A. Messersmith
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, CO, USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Todd M. Pitts
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, CO, USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Schreiber AR, Nguyen A, Bagby SM, Yacob B, Quackenbush K, Guy JL, Crowell T, Stringer B, Danaee H, Kalebic T, Messersmith WA, Arcaroli JJ, Pitts TM. Abstract B050: Evaluation of TAK-264, a novel antibody-drug conjugate in pancreatic cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenograft models. Mol Cancer Ther 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.targ-17-b050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging technology consisting of antibody, linker, and toxic agent, which have the potential to offer a more targeted therapeutic approach than standard chemotherapy regimens. ADCs selectively bind to antigens expressed in tumor environments. An emerging target for the treatment of pancreatic cancer is guanylyl cyclase C (GCC). GCC is a transmembrane G protein receptor found on the apical surface of intestinal enterocytes. It plays an important role in GI homeostasis. GCC is highly expressed in various colorectal carcinomas as well as adenocarcinomas of the upper GI tract. The objective of this study was to determine the antitumorigenic activity of TAK-264, an investigational ADC that targets GCC. Experimental Procedures: The antiproliferative effects of TAK-264 were assessed in a panel of eleven pancreatic cancer cell lines with various molecular backgrounds. Additionally, ten unique pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were treated with TAK-264 and the efficacy was determined. Tumor size was evaluated twice per week by caliper measurements. Sensitivity to TAK-264 was defined based on tumor growth inhibition that was statistically significant when compared to the vehicle control. Baseline levels of GCC were analyzed by IHC/immunoblotting and RT-PCR on PDX models and cell lines. Immunoblotting was performed to evaluate the effects of TAK-264 on downstream effectors. Results: GCC protein expression was analyzed by immunoblotting in normal versus tumor tissue; a marked increase in GCC expression was observed in tumor tissue when compared to matching normal tissue. The in vitro experiments demonstrated a range of responses to TAK-264 in an SRB assay. Eight of the ten PDAC PDX models demonstrated a statistically significant tumor growth inhibition when compared to the vehicle control. Immunoblotting demonstrated an increase in phosphorylated-Histone-H3 in two cell lines and in the PDAC PDX models treated with TAK-264, indicating a DNA damage response. The analysis of GCC protein expression in normal versus tumor tissue has shown a marked increase in GCC expression in tumor tissue when compared to matching normal tissue. There was no correlation between baseline levels of GCC and response to TAK-264 in either PDX or cell line models. Conclusions: TAK-264, an ADC targeting GCC, has good growth suppression activity in pancreatic cancer cell lines and in pancreatic PDX models. These findings support a hypothesis that further investigation of ADC targeting GCC may lead to novel therapeutic modalities for pancreatic cancer.
Citation Format: Anna R. Schreiber, Anna Nguyen, Stacey M. Bagby, Betelehem Yacob, Kevin Quackenbush, Joe L. Guy, Thomas Crowell, Bradley Stringer, Hadi Danaee, Thea Kalebic, Wells A. Messersmith, John J. Arcaroli, Todd M. Pitts. Evaluation of TAK-264, a novel antibody-drug conjugate in pancreatic cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenograft models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B050.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Nguyen
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | | | - Joe L. Guy
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Todd M. Pitts
- 1University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Couts KL, Bemis J, Turner JA, Bagby SM, Murphy D, Christiansen J, Hintzsche JD, Le A, Pitts TM, Wells K, Applegate A, Amato C, Multani P, Chow-Maneval E, Tentler JJ, Shellman YG, Rioth MJ, Tan AC, Gonzalez R, Medina T, Doebele RC, Robinson WA. ALK Inhibitor Response in Melanomas Expressing EML4-ALK Fusions and Alternate ALK Isoforms. Mol Cancer Ther 2018; 17:222-231. [PMID: 29054983 PMCID: PMC5752582 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-17-0472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Revised: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 09/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Oncogenic ALK fusions occur in several types of cancer and can be effectively treated with ALK inhibitors; however, ALK fusions and treatment response have not been characterized in malignant melanomas. Recently, a novel isoform of ALK (ALKATI ) was reported in 11% of melanomas but the response of melanomas expressing ALKATI to ALK inhibition has not been well characterized. We analyzed 45 melanoma patient-derived xenograft models for ALK mRNA and protein expression. ALK expression was identified in 11 of 45 (24.4%) melanomas. Ten melanomas express wild-type (wt) ALK and/or ALKATI and one mucosal melanoma expresses multiple novel EML4-ALK fusion variants. Melanoma cells expressing different ALK variants were tested for response to ALK inhibitors. Whereas the melanoma expressing EML4-ALK were sensitive to ALK inhibitors in vitro and in vivo, the melanomas expressing wt ALK or ALKATI were not sensitive to ALK inhibitors. In addition, a patient with mucosal melanoma expressing ALKATI was treated with an ALK/ROS1/TRK inhibitor (entrectinib) on a phase I trial but did not respond. Our results demonstrate ALK fusions occur in malignant melanomas and respond to targeted therapy, whereas melanomas expressing ALKATI do not respond to ALK inhibitors. Targeting ALK fusions is an effective therapeutic option for a subset of melanoma patients, but additional clinical studies are needed to determine the efficacy of targeted therapies in melanomas expressing wt ALK or ALKATIMol Cancer Ther; 17(1); 222-31. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasey L Couts
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| | - Judson Bemis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jacqueline A Turner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Stacey M Bagby
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | | - Jennifer D Hintzsche
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Anh Le
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Todd M Pitts
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Keith Wells
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Allison Applegate
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Carol Amato
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | | - John J Tentler
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Yiqun G Shellman
- Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Matthew J Rioth
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
- Division of Biomedical Informatics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Aik-Choon Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Rene Gonzalez
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Theresa Medina
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Robert C Doebele
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - William A Robinson
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|