A phase II study evaluating the efficacy of enzalutamide and the role of liquid biopsy for evaluation of ARv7 in mCRPC patients with measurable metastases including visceral disease (Excalibur study)

Background

Up to 30% of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) develop visceral metastases, which are associated with a poor prognosis.

Objectives

Efficacy of enzalutamide in mCRPC patients with measurable metastases, including visceral and/or extra-regional lymph nodes.

Methods

In this phase II multicenter study, patients with mCRPC and measurable metastases received enzalutamide as the first line. Primary endpoint: 3-month (mo) disease control rate (DCR) defined as the proportion of patients with complete (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Secondary endpoint: safety. Exploratory endpoint: the association between ARv7 splicing variants in basal circulating tumor cell (CTC)-enriched blood samples and treatment response/resistance using the AdnaTest ProstateCancerSelect kit and the AdnaTest ProstateCancer Panel AR-V7.

Results

From March 2017 to January 2021, 68 patients were enrolled. One patient never started treatment. Median age: 72 years. A total of 52 patients (78%) received enzalutamide as a first line for mCRPC. The median follow-up was 32 months. At the 3-month assessment, 24 patients presented an SD, 1 patient achieved a CR, and 23 patients had a PR (3-mo-DCR of 72%). Discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), disease-related death, or disease progression occurred in 9%, 6%, and 48% of patients. All patients reported at least one grade (G) 1-2 AE: the most common were fatigue (49%) and hypertension (33%). Six G3 AEs were reported: two hypertension, one seizure, one fatigue, one diarrhea, and one headache. Basal detection of ARv7 was significantly associated with poor treatment response (p = 0.034) and a nonsignificant association (p = 0.15) was observed between ARv7 detection and response assessments. At month 3, ARv7 was detected in 57%, 25%, and 15% of patients undergoing progressive disease, SD, and PR, respectively.

Conclusion

The study met its primary endpoint, showing the efficacy of enzalutamide in men with mCRPC and measurable metastatic lesions in visceral and/or lymph node sites.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03103724. First Posted: 6 April 2017. First patient enrollment: 19 April 2017.

Erdafitinib in BCG-treated high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Treatment options are limited for patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with disease recurrence after bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment and who are ineligible for/refuse radical cystectomy. FGFR alterations are commonly detected in NMIBC. We evaluated the activity of oral erdafitinib, a selective pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, versus intravesical chemotherapy in patients with high-risk NMIBC and select FGFR3/2 alterations following recurrence after BCG treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years with recurrent, BCG-treated, papillary-only high-risk NMIBC (high-grade Ta/T1) and select FGFR alterations refusing or ineligible for radical cystectomy were randomized to 6 mg daily oral erdafitinib or investigator's choice of intravesical chemotherapy (mitomycin C or gemcitabine). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The key secondary endpoint was safety.

RESULTS

Study enrollment was discontinued due to slow accrual. Seventy-three patients were randomized 2 : 1 to erdafitinib (n = 49) and chemotherapy (n = 24). Median follow-up for RFS was 13.4 months for both groups. Median RFS was not reached for erdafitinib [95% confidence interval (CI) 16.9 months-not estimable] and was 11.6 months (95% CI 6.4-20.1 months) for chemotherapy, with an estimated hazard ratio of 0.28 (95% CI 0.1-0.6; nominal P value = 0.0008). In this population, safety results were generally consistent with known profiles for erdafitinib and chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Erdafitinib prolonged RFS compared with intravesical chemotherapy in patients with papillary-only, high-risk NMIBC harboring FGFR alterations who had disease recurrence after BCG therapy and refused or were ineligible for radical cystectomy.

Erdafitinib or Chemotherapy in Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Erdafitinib is a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in adults with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who have progression after platinum-containing chemotherapy. The effects of erdafitinib in patients with FGFR-altered metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progression during or after treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1] or anti-programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] agents) are unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a global phase 3 trial of erdafitinib as compared with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who had progression after one or two previous treatments that included an anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive erdafitinib or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (docetaxel or vinflunine). The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 266 patients underwent randomization: 136 to the erdafitinib group and 130 to the chemotherapy group. The median follow-up was 15.9 months. The median overall survival was significantly longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (12.1 months vs. 7.8 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.88; P = 0.005). The median progression-free survival was also longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (5.6 months vs. 2.7 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.78; P<0.001). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was similar in the two groups (45.9% in the erdafitinib group and 46.4% in the chemotherapy group). Treatment-related adverse events that led to death were less common with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (in 0.7% vs. 5.4% of patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Erdafitinib therapy resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and FGFR alterations after previous anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 treatment. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; THOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03390504.).

Impact of influenza vaccination on survival of patients with advanced cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (INVIDIa-2): final results of the multicentre, prospective, observational study

Background

The prospective multicentre observational INVIDIa-2 study investigated the clinical effectiveness of influenza vaccination in patients with advanced cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In this secondary analysis of the original trial, we aimed to assess the outcomes of patients to immunotherapy based on vaccine administration.

Methods

The original study enrolled patients with advanced solid tumours receiving ICI at 82 Italian Oncology Units from Oct 1, 2019, to Jan 31, 2020. The trial's primary endpoint was the time-adjusted incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI) until April 30, 2020, the results of which were reported previously. Secondary endpoints (data cut-off Jan 31, 2022) included the outcomes of patients to immunotherapy based on vaccine administration, for which the final results are reported herein. A propensity score matching by age, sex, performance status, primary tumour site, comorbidities, and smoking habits was planned for the present analysis. Only patients with available data for these variables were included. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease-control rate (DCR).

Findings

The original study population consisted of 1188 evaluable patients. After a propensity score matching, 1004 patients were considered (502 vaccinated and 502 unvaccinated), and 986 of them were evaluable for overall survival (OS). At the median follow-up of 20 months, the influenza vaccination demonstrated a favourable impact on the outcome receiving ICI in terms of median OS [27.0 months (CI 19.5-34.6) in vaccinated vs. 20.9 months (16.6-25.2) in unvaccinated, p = 0.003], median progression-free survival [12.5 months (CI 10.4-14.6) vs. 9.6 months (CI 7.9-11.4), p = 0.049], and disease-control rate (74.7% vs. 66.5%, p = 0.005). The multivariable analyses confirmed the favourable impact of influenza vaccination in terms of OS (HR 0.75, 95% C.I. 0.62-0.92; p = 0.005) and DCR (OR 1.47, 95% C.I. 1.11-1.96; p = 0.007).

Interpretation

The INVIDIa-2 study results suggest a favourable immunological impact of influenza vaccination on the outcome of cancer patients receiving ICI immunotherapy, further encouraging the vaccine recommendation in this population and supporting translational investigations about the possible synergy between antiviral and antitumour immunity.

Funding

The Federation of Italian Cooperative Oncology Groups (FICOG), Roche S.p.A., and Seqirus.

Current Status of Predictive Biomarker Development in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we analyze the current state of research in development of new biomarkers that may be useful in managing metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Combining tumor-based biomarkers (gene expression profile) and blood-based biomarkers (ctDNA, cytokines) would be helpful in acquiring information regarding RCC and might be significant in the decision-making process. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the sixth most frequently diagnosed neoplasm in men and tithe in women, making it responsible for 5% and 3% of all diagnosed cancers respectively. Metastatic stage represents a non-negligible percentage at diagnosis and is characterized by poor prognosis. Despite clinical features and prognostic score could guide clinicians in therapeutic approach of this disease, biomarkers predictive of response to treatment remain an unmet need.

Collecting ducts carcinoma: In depth exploration and biologically driven therapy (CICERONE)

TPS754

Background: Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) is a rare type of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma with an aggressive course and poor prognosis. The treatment of metastatic disease remains unsatisfactory as no standard-of-care has been established yet. The gap in the clinical management is certainly linked to the poor molecular characterization. To date, a comprehensive biological characterization of CDC and the identification of predictive biomarker is still lacking. Our previous studies proved that CDC is a molecularly heterogeneous disease composed of at least two subtypes distinguished by cell signalling, metabolic and immune-related alterations and featured by a prognostic signature associating T cell immunity and angiogenesis with good clinical outcome and sensitivity to cabozantinib (Gargiuli et al, Cancers 2021 Jun 10;13(12):2903; Todoerti et al, J Clin Oncol 40, no. 16_suppl (June 01, 2022) e16507-e16507; Verzoni et al, Ann Oncol 33:S1218-S121). The aim of CICERONE trial is to change the paradigm of CDC management providing therapies in a biologically informed manner starting from our previous findings. Methods: First, we will define a molecular taxonomy of CDC through comprehensive transcriptomic profiling of 100 CDC samples retrospectively collected within 12 months from the Italian Group of Uropathology Network and the European Union Hub Center. Pathologic review by genitourinary pathologist was required. RNA-Seq will be performed. Results will be merged to that already obtained by the same methodology from the BONSAI dataset (NCT03354884) and evaluated by unsupervised clustering analysis. We will identify differentially expressed genes and pathways. The immune and angiogenic signatures will be searched validating our preliminary results to identify predictive signatures for the subsequent prospective phase II trial. RNA-seq data will be also explored to detect fusion transcripts, as potential source of novel CDC oncogenic drivers, and study immune tumor content through Cybersort deconvolution. RT-qPCR on RNA derived from tumor and normal tissue will be performed to determine tumor specific origin of the fusion transcripts. Immune infiltrate will be also characterized by IHC, together with PDL-1 scoring. Subsequently we will conduct a prospective phase II trial in order to optimize treatment choice and validate prospectively the biological data. In this phase, previously untreated patients with metastatic CDC will be treated according to baseline tumor signature. Moreover, we will assess whether a new concept of immune liquid biopsy that includes the assessment of immunosuppressive vs antitumor immune cells may represent an accessible and compliant tool to test systemic immunity and its implications in response to treatment. This study was supported by the Italian Ministry of health (RF-2019-12369602). Clinical trial information: NCT05372302 .

A multicenter phase 2 single arm study of cabozantinib in patients with advanced or unresectable renal cell carcinoma pre-treated with one immune-checkpoint inhibitor: The BREAKPOINT trial (Meet-Uro trial 03)

BACKGROUND

First-line therapies based on immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improved survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. Cabozantinib was shown to target kinases involved in immune-escape and to prolong survival in patients pre-treated with tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (TKIs). The impact of ICIs combinations in first line on subsequent therapies is still unclear.

METHODS

This is an open label, multicenter, single arm, phase II study designed to assess activity, safety and efficacy of cabozantinib in mRCC patients progressed after an adjuvant or first line anti-Programmed Death (PD)-1/PD-Ligand (PD-L) 1-based therapy. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety.

RESULTS

31 patients were included in the analysis. After a median (m) follow-up of 11.9 months, mPFS was 8.3 months (90%CI 3.9-17.4) and mOS was 13.8 months (95%CI 7.7-29.0). ORR was 37.9% with an additional 13 patients achieving disease stability. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 47% of patients, including more frequently creatine phosphokinase (CPK) serum level elevation, neutropenia, hyponatremia, diarrhea, hand-food syndrome, oral mucositis and hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

The BREAKPOINT trial met its primary endpoint showing that cabozantinib as second line therapy after ICIs was active in mRCC. Safety profile was manageable.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03463681 - A Study of CaBozantinib in Patients With Advanced or Unresectable Renal cEll cArcinoma (BREAKPOINT) - https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03463681.

Optimal Choice of Adjuvant Treatment for Renal Cell Carcinoma Following Nephrectomy

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the fourteenth most common cancer worldwide. In about 55% of cases, it is diagnosed at a localised and/or locally advanced stage and therefore amenable to a curative approach. Although nephrectomy still represents the cornerstone of non-metastatic RCC (nmRCC) treatment, a relapse is observed in about 25–30% of patients undergoing curative surgery. Prognosis is drastically influenced by lymph nodal involvement. After the first disappointing results with a cytokine-based strategy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were tested as adjuvant agents. Despite their efficacy in the metastatic setting, results in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) are not unequivocal and the overall survival (OS) benefit has not been demonstrated. Moreover, their toxicity profile induced a remarkable percentage of patients to discontinue the treatment. On the contrary, the KEYNOTE-564 trial showed the benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with placebo in terms of DFS with promising results in term of OS. Patients included were at intermediate or high risk of relapse, or patients with no evidence of disease after metastasectomy (M1 NED). The updated analysis presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Genito-Urinary (ASCO GU) 2022 confirmed the benefit of pembrolizumab versus placebo over time, although OS data are still immature. A longer follow-up and the several ongoing trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) will provide further data about adjuvant immuno-oncology (IO). Furthermore, the patients’ selection based on clinical or biological features will be crucial in order to identify who benefits most from treatments.

Molecular analyses of metastatic collecting ducts renal cell carcinoma from the phase 2 prospective trial of cabozantinib as first-line treatment (BONSAI trial Meeturo 2)

e16507

Background: The phase II BONSAI trial ( n = 25 ; NCT 03354884) met the primary endpoint demonstrating activity of cabozantinib in untreated metastatic collecting ducts carcinoma (mCDC), a rare and biologically poorly characterized disease. Here we report on molecular analyses of baseline tissue samples. Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from 18 mCDC patients enrolled in BONSAI were sequenced by TruSeq RNA Exome kit (Illumina). The data were mapped and quantified using STAR and htseq, respectively. Globaltest and edgeR packages in R were used to assess the correlation between transcriptional profiles and survival data. Nineteen samples underwent DNA Sequencing with the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus (ThermoFisher Scientific). The reads were aligned to the human genome reference (hg19) and analyzed with Opencravat and IonReporter software. Germline variants were excluded based on 1000 Genomes, GnomAd and Exac databases, and Clinical annotation of somatic variants was performed using ClinVar. Results: The global expression levels of thirty-one genes have been found significantly associated with overall survival (OS). The natural grouping of the 18 tumor samples based on the 31-gene signature identified a main group of 11 cases, showing global higher expression levels in 22 out of the 31 genes. This group displayed overall a significant higher OS rate in comparison to the remaining 7 patients, carrying opposite expression trend and mostly undergoing to disease progression. The identified signature was enriched in biological processes like cell junction, cytoskeleton organization and methylation. FOS oncogene was among the 9 genes negatively associated to OS, showing common higher expression in the poorer survival rate group. Furthermore, a 22-gene signature was found significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS), involving mainly genes associated to cell cycle regulation or recognized as components of Golgi apparatus. Only three genes were globally up-regulated in the group of 9 patients characterized by shorter PFS. Finally, heterogeneous pattern of somatic mutations was identified in 19 tumor samples, with at least 8 genes recurrently affected in more than three patients. Notably, mutated genes were mostly involved in DNA repair and chromatin modification processes. Conclusions: Our findings for the first time define specific molecular signatures that differentiate therapy-specific outcomes in first-line mCDC, warranting further investigation of their involvement in the tumor biology. Clinical trial information: NCT 03354884.

Cabozantinib as First-line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Collecting Duct Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of the BONSAI Trial for the Italian Network for Research in Urologic-Oncology (Meet-URO 2 Study)

Importance

Metastatic collecting duct carcinoma (mCDC) is a rare type of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ncRCC) with poor prognosis and no standard treatments. Despite retrospective series that have documented the benefit of cabozantinib in ncRCC, no prospective trials have evaluated this treatment in mCDC.

Objective

To determine whether cabozantinib is an active treatment in patients with mCDC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The caBozantinib in cOllectiNg ductS Renal Cell cArcInoma (BONSAI) trial was an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial carried out between January 2018 and November 2020 at a single academic center with data cut off in September 2021 on behalf of the the Italian Network for Research in Urologic-Oncology (Meet-URO 2). Eligible patients had histologic diagnosis of centrally confirmed mCDC with measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1). In total, 25 patients were screened.

Interventions

Patients received cabozantinib, 60 mg orally once daily, until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST, version 1.1.

Results

At data cut off, of 25 patients enrolled, 23 started treatment because 2 were excluded after failing the screening process at pathologic review. The median follow-up cannot be estimated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier estimator. The median time to censoring was 11 months (95% CI, 0-22 months). Median (range) age was 66 (53-74) years. As best overall response, 3 patients presented stable disease, 1 patient achieved a complete response, and 7 a partial response. The ORR was 35% (95% CI, 16%-57%). The median progression-free survival was 4 months (95% CI, 3-13 months). The median OS was 7 months (95% CI, 3-31 months). All patients reported at least 1 grade (G) 1 to 2 adverse event (AE). The most common G1 to G2 AEs were fatigue (14 [60%]), anorexia (9 [39%]), hand-foot syndrome (7 [30%]), hypothyroidism (7 [30%]), mucositis (7 [30%]), diarrhea (5 [22%]), and hypertension (3 [13%]). Six G3 AEs were reported: 2 arterial hyperthension, 1 pulmonary thromboembolism, 1 bleeding, and 2 fatigue. There were no permanent discontinuations from the study owing to AEs. Four patients (17%) required dose reduction to 40 mg, and 4 (17%) required a transitory interruption to manage toxic effects.

Conclusions and Relevance

The study met the ORR primary end point, showing encouraging efficacy of cabozantinib in untreated patients with mCDC. Further investigations to advance the molecular understanding of this tumor are ongoing.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03354884.

Biomarker-driven immunotherapy for precision medicine in prostate cancer

Although immunotherapy has recently revolutionized standard of care in different cancer types, prostate cancer has generally failed to show dramatic responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. As in other tumors, the goal in prostate cancer is now to target treatments more precisely on patient's individual characteristics through precision medicine. Defects in mismatch repair, mutations in the exonuclease domain of the DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE), high tumor mutational burden and the presence of biallelic loss of CDK12 among others, are predictive biomarkers of response to immunotherapy. In the present review, we summarize the evolving landscape of immunotherapy in prostate cancer, including precision approaches and strategies to define classes of responsive patients and scale up resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors With or Without Bone-Targeted Therapy in NSCLC Patients With Bone Metastases and Prognostic Significance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio

Introduction

Bone metastases (BMs) are a negative prognostic factor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape of NSCLC, little information is available on BMs from NSCLC treated with ICIs alone or in association with bone-targeted therapy (BTT) such as zoledronate or denosumab.

Methods

From 2014 to 2020, 111 of the 142 patients with BMs secondary to NSCLC extrapolated from the prospective multicenter Italian BM Database were eligible for analysis. Information on blood count, comorbidities, and toxicity was retrospectively collected. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) pre- and post-treatment was calculated. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, with statistical significance of survival differences assessed using the log-rank test.

Results

Median age was 66 (range, 42-84) years. Performance status (PS) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) was 0-1 in 79/111 patients. The majority of patients (89.2%) had adenocarcinoma histology. At a median follow-up of 47.4 months, median progression-free (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) was 4.9 (95%CI, 2.8-10.0) and 11.9 (95%CI, 8.2-14.4) months, respectively. Forty-six (43.4%) patients with BM NSCLC underwent first- or further-line therapy with ICIs: 28 (60.8%) received nivolumab, 9 (19.6%) pembrolizumab, and 9 (19.6%) atezolizumab. Of the 46 patients treated with ICIs, 30 (65.2%) underwent BTT: 24 (80.0%) with zoledronate and 6 (20.0%) with denosumab. The ICI-alone group had an mOS of 15.8 months [95%CI, 8.2-not evaluable (NE)] vs. 21.8 months (95%CI, 14.5-not evaluable) for the ICI plus BTT group and 7.5 (95%CI, 6.1-10.9) months for the group receiving other treatments (p < 0.001). NLR ≤5 had a positive impact on OS.

Conclusion

BTT appears to have a synergistic effect when used in combination with ICIs, improving patient survival.

Cabozantinib beyond progression improves survival in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients: the CABEYOND study (Meet-URO 21)

BACKGROUND

Cabozantinib improves survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after prior antiangiogenics. The best treatment at disease progression (PD) is unknown. Being also a AXL/MET inhibitor, involved in acquired resistance, we hypothesized a prolonged tumor growth control in patients continuing cabozantinib despite PD.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study enrolled patients receiving cabozantinib after the first line between 2014 and 2020. We compared patients maintaining cabozantinib after first PD due to clinical benefit and good tolerability with those who changed therapy. The postprogression survival (PPS) of both was our primary endpoint.

RESULTS

We analyzed 89 patients: 45 received cabozantinib beyond PD and 44 switched therapy. 40.4%, 31.5%, and 28.1% of patients received 1, 2, or >2 prior treatment, respectively. 84.3% were intermediate-poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database risk. Patients continuing cabozantinib showed a higher response rate to cabozantinib before PD (46.7% vs 25%, p = 0.03) and were more heavily pretreated. Continuing cabozantinib showed a significantly longer PPS compared with switching therapy (median PPS 16.9 vs 13.2 months, HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.48-0.92, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed longer PPS in patients continuing cabozantinib beyond PD, suggesting that this could be an effective option.

Update on radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: clinical aspects and survival effects

OBJECTIVE

To give an updated overview on clinical aspects and survival effects of lutetium-177-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT), a novel treatment option for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched for relevant articles published up to March 2021. The search was restricted to English-language articles.

RESULTS

Current evidence from the literature consistently demonstrated the efficacy, safety, and survival benefit of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA RLT in mCRPC. However, current data rely predominantly on retrospective analyses, showing heterogeneity of patient population and treatment protocols. More recently, results from the first randomized phase II study (TheraP) demonstrated that ¹⁷⁷Lu-PMSA therapy significantly improved prostate-specific antigen response rate (66% vs 37%) and had fewer grade 3/4 adverse events when compared to cabazitaxel in patients with docetaxel-pretreated, progressive mCRPC. This review is intended to provide an updated overview of treatment protocols and responses, toxicity profile, and survival effects of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA RLT.

CONCLUSIONS

¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA RLT has emerged as a promising targeted treatment in mCRPC. It is currently applied in compassionate use programs and following exhaustion of approved therapies. Crucial for establishing this treatment in routine clinical management will be the results of the phase III VISION trial, which may confirm the encouraging patient outcomes reported to date.

Characteristics and Treatment Challenges of Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCC) comprise several rare and poorly described diseases, often characterized by bad prognosis and with no standard treatments available. The gap in their clinical management is linked to the poor molecular characterization in handling the treatment of non clear-cell RCC with untailored therapies. Due to their rarity, non-clear RCC are in fact under-represented in prospective randomized trials. Thus, treatment choices are based on extrapolating results from clear cell RCC trials, retrospective data, or case reports. Over the last two decades, various options have been considered as the mainstay for the treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC), including angiogenesis inhibitors, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors, other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), as well as MET inhibitors and mammalian targeting of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. More recently, the therapeutic armamentarium has been enriched with immunotherapy, alone or in combination with targeted agents that have been shown to significantly improve outcomes of mRCC patients, if compared to TKI single-agent. It has been widely proven that non-clear cell RCC is a morphologically and clinically distinct entity from its clear cell counterpart but more knowledge about its biology is certainly needed. Histology-specific collaborative trials are in fact now emerging to investigate different treatments for non-clear cell RCC. This review summarizes pathogenetic mechanisms of non-clear cell RCC, the evolution of treatment paradigms over the last few decades, with a focus on immunotherapy-based trials, and future potential treatment options.

Second-line treatment in renal cell carcinoma: clinical experience and decision making

Currently, conventional treatments for metastatic RCC (mRCC) include immune-based combination regimens and/or targeted therapies, the latter mainly acting on angiogenesis, a key element of the process of tumor growth and spread. Although these agents proved able to improve patients’ outcomes, drug resistance and disease progression are still experienced by a substantial number of VEGFR-TKIs-treated mRCC patients. Following the inhibition of the VEGF/VEGFRs axis, two strategies have emerged: either specifically targeting resistance pathways, at the same time continuing to inhibit angiogenesis, or using a completely different approach aimed at re-activating the immune system through the use of inhibitors of specific negative immune checkpoints. These two approaches, practically represented by the use of either cabozantinib or nivolumab, seem to remain a rational therapeutic approach also when first-line immune-based combinations are used. The objective of this study is to design a preferential therapeutic pathway for the second-line treatment of mRCC. The procedure applied in this project was a group discussion, based on the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) method in a meeting session, aimed at defining the therapeutic choice for the second-line treatment of mRCC. The NGT process defined the most relevant parameters that, according to the interviewed panelists, clinicians should consider for the selection of the second-line therapy in the context of advanced renal cell carcinoma of mRCC. The algorithm developed for the treatment selection as a result of this process should thus be considered by clinicians as reference for therapy selection.

Clinical safety and activity of cabozantinib (CABO) plus durvalumab (DURVA) in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) after platinum chemotherapy (ARCADIA): Preliminary results from a nonrandomized, open-label, phase 2 trial

e16529

Background: Combining anti-VEGFR drugs with checkpoint inhibitors have shown synergistic effect in pts with UC. ARCADIA is a phase 2 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of combination of CABO, a multikinase inhibitor, with the anti-PDL1 DURVA in pts with platinum-refractory advanced UC or variant histology (NCT03824691). Herein we report the preliminary results. Methods: Pts received CABO 40 mg daily, orally, in combination with DURVA 1500 mg, intravenously, every 28 days, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Key inclusion criteria were: ECOG-PS 0-1, UC or variant histology, failure of 1 or 2 platinum-based regimen for metastatic disease, non-measurable disease was permitted. Response was evaluated by RECIST criteria v.1.1 every 2 cycles by CT and 18FDG PET/CT scans. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS). Other endpoints included safety, objective response-rate (ORR), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS). PD-L1 expression was assessed by Ventana SP142 assay. Next-generation sequencing tests (FoundationOne) on pre-therapy tumor samples were performed. Results: From September 2019 to February 2021, 26 pts were enrolled with a median follow-up of 5 mo. Median age was 64 yrs (range 44-74), 69% were male, and 23% had ECOG PS 1. 8 pts presented variant histology. Five pts (19%) had received 2 prior systemic anticancer therapies. In pts evaluable for efficacy analyses, 3 (11.5%) complete responses (CR) and 6 (23.1%) partial responses (PR) were observed. The ORR and DCR were 34.6% and 57.7% respectively. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 17 pts (65%), including 2 (8%) grade 3 TRAEs, within the first 2 cycles. 7 pts (27%) discontinued CABO due to toxicity, no interruption of DURVA was observed. The most common AEs by any grade were transaminase increase (35.7%), asthenia (27%), diarrhea (27%), and hypertension (15%). Conclusions: Combination of CABO and DURVA demonstrated promising preliminary activity and a manageable safety profile in pts with advanced UC and variant histology. More mature results according to biomarkers and histology will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03824691.

A phase II study evaluating the efficacy of enzalutamide and the role of ARv7 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) with visceral disease

5052

Background: Enzalutamide is a second-generation androgen receptor inhibitor that showed to prolong survival in different setting of prostate cancer. Visceral metastases, occurring in 10–30% of mCRPC pts, have been associated with poor outcomes. Given the poor prognosis, trial investigating hormone therapies often excluded men with visceral disease, especially in the pre-docetaxel setting. To date, there are no prospective studies designed ad hoc to test hormone therapies in this subgroup of pts. Methods: In this open label phase II multicentre study mCRPC pts with visceral metastases were treated with enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily as first or second line after docetaxel until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Pts were eligible if they had documented measurable metastatic visceral disease (according to RECIST 1.1 criteria), including lesions in lung or liver or extraregional lymphnodes. Pts must have PSA progression or radiographic progression (according to PCWG2). Primary endpoint was to determine the clinical benefit, as measured by 3-months (mo) disease control rate (DCR) defined as the proportion of pts with best overall response of confirmed complete (CR) or partial responses (PR) or stable disease as per RECIST 1.1 at mo 3. Secondary endpoints were safety, quality of life (assessed by EQ-5D-5L e FACT-P questionnaire), pain assessment (by BPI-SF questionnaire). Exploratory objectives were to assess the association between ARv7 splicing variants (in CTCs samples) and treatment response/resistance. For CTC and ARv7 detection, we used the Adna test Prostate Cancer Panel. Results: From March 2017 through January 2021, 68 pts were enrolled at 6 Italian centres. One pt never started treatment because of withdrawal of consent. Median age was 70 years (IQR 65- 78). All pts presented with visceral disease at baseline: 27, 6, 55 pts presented with lung, liver and lymphnodes lesions, respectively. 26 pts presented with only one metastatic site, 22 pts with two, while the remaining part with multiple sites. 15 pts received a previous treatment with docetaxel in the mCRPC phase. The median follow-up was 10 mo. The median time on treatment was 8 mo. At mo 3, 24 pts presented a stable disease, 1 pt achieved a confirmed CR and 20 pts a PR for a 3 mo-DCR of 67% (45/67). Discontinuations due to adverse-events, disease-related death, or disease progression occurred in 6%, 7%, and 40% of pts, respectively. So far, only 26 patients were evaluated for baseline CTC and ARv7. Interestingly, 75% of patients experiencing a progression at month 3 were classified as ARv7 positive at baseline. Conclusions: The study met its primary endpoint showing enzalutamide is an active treatment option for men with mCRPC and visceral disease in both pre or post-docetaxel setting. CTCs status combined with ARv7 detection could be useful to personalize treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT03103724.

INfluenza Vaccine Indication During therapy with Immune checkpoint inhibitors: a multicenter prospective observational study (INVIDIa-2)

Background

Until now, no robust data supported the efficacy, safety and recommendation for influenza vaccination in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods

The prospective multicenter observational INfluenza Vaccine Indication During therapy with Immune checkpoint inhibitors (INVIDIa-2) study investigated the clinical effectiveness of influenza vaccination in patients with advanced cancer receiving ICIs, enrolled in 82 Italian centers from October 2019 to January 2020. The primary endpoint was the time-adjusted incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI) until April 30, 2020. Secondary endpoints regarded ILI severity and vaccine safety.

Results

The study enrolled 1279 patients; 1188 patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint analysis. Of them, 48.9% (581) received influenza vaccination. The overall ILI incidence was 8.2% (98 patients). Vaccinated patients were significantly more frequently elderly (p<0.0001), males (p=0.004), with poor European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (p=0.009), affected by lung cancer (p=0.01), and by other non-cancer comorbidities (p<0.0001) when compared with unvaccinated. ILI incidence was not different basing on influenza vaccination: the time-to-ILI was similar in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients (p=0.62). ILI complications were significantly less frequent for patients receiving the vaccination (11.8% vs 38.3% in unvaccinated, p=0.002). ILI-related intravenous therapies were significantly less frequent in vaccinated patients than in unvaccinated (11.8% vs 29.8%, p=0.027). ILI lethality was, respectively, 0% in vaccinated and 4.3% in unvaccinated patients. Vaccine-related adverse events were rare and mild (1.5%, grades 1–2).

Conclusion

The INVIDIa-2 study results support a positive recommendation for influenza vaccination in patients with advanced cancer receiving immunotherapy.

A phase 2 prospective trial of cabozantinib as first-line treatment for metastatic collecting ducts renal cell carcinoma: The BONSAI trial (Meeturo 2) clinical trial information—NCT03354884

4571

Background: Metastatic collecting ducts carcinoma (mCDC) is a rare disease with bad prognosis and no standard treatments. Due to its rarity, mCDC is biologically poorly characterized and under-represented in prospective randomized trials. We recently identified two different molecular subtypes of mCDC based on relative expression levels of angiogenesis, metabolic and immune-related genes. Methods: : This prospective, monocentric, phase II trial evaluated cabozantinib (cabo) 60 mg orally once daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity in untreated mCDC patients (pts). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as the proportion of pts with best overall response of confirmed complete (CR) or partial responses (PR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival and safety profile. Exploratory objectives were: to identify somatic mutations by targeted NGS-based sequencing; to define molecular subtypes, signatures and transcript fusions genes by RNA sequencing; to monitor circulating immune cells and study the immunological context of tumor cells. A central pathological review was mandatory. The study was based on a Simon’s two stage optimal design: at least 2 responses in 9 pts in the first stage were needed to proceed to the second stage where at least 6 responses in 14 additional pts were needed to prove activity of cabo. Results: From January 2018 to November 2020, 25 pts were enrolled, of whom 23 started treatment. Median age was 66 years, 19 pts were male. 19 (83%) pts received a previous nephrectomy. 9 pts presented with only one metastatic site, 8 pts with two, while the remaining part with multiple sites. The most common metastatic sites were lymphnodes and bone (15 and 13 pts respectively), followed by lung and liver (10 and 4 pts respectively). Median follow up was 8 months. As best overall response, 6 pts presented a stable disease (26%),1 pt achieved a confimed CR and 7 a PR for an ORR of 35%. Median PFS was 6 months. Treatment was feasible and well tolerated. All pts reported at least one grade (G) 1-2 adverse event (AE): the most common were fatigue (43%), hypotiroidism (28%), stomatitis (28%), anorexia (26%), Hand-Foot Syndrome (13%), hypertension (17%), and diarrhea (13%). 5 pts reported G3 AEs (2 thromboembolic events, 2 arterial hypertension, 1 fatigue), while no G4-5 AEs were reported. 17% of pts required dose reduction. DNA sequencing on CDC showed to be feasible, finding 256 mutations in 119 genes (missens mutations the majority). Altered genes, molecular subtypes and signatures will be associated to different outcomes and responses to cabo. Conclusions: The study met its primary endpoint showing promising efficacy and acceptable tolerability of cabo in mCDC pts. Mature results according to mutational profiles and gene signatures will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03354884.

A phase 2 single-arm study of cabozantinib in patients with advanced or unresectable renal cell carcinoma pretreated with one immune checkpoint inhibitor: The BREAKPOINT trial (MeetUro trial 03-NCT03463681)

4569

Background: For many years, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy (tp) has been a milestone for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Recently, first line tp based on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (IO-TKI) and anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 combos (IO-IO) significantly improved survival of mRCC patients (pts). Prospective data are lacking to determine the efficacy of anti-VEGF tp after IO-IO or IO-TKI. Cabozantinib (Cabo) showed to prolong survival in mRCC pts pre-treated with TKIs and to target kinases involved in immune-escape. So, it may represent an ideal agent to be used sequentially after ICIs. Methods: This is an open label, single arm, multicenter, phase II study evaluating efficacy and safety of Cabo in mRCC pts who received an anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based adjuvant (adj) or first line tp. Cabo 60 mg/daily was administered until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) by Brookmeyer-Crowley test, secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Exploratory endopoints were to investigate tissue PD-L1 expression, to assess the modulating activity of Cabo on local and systemic tumor immunity and to explore bone formation and reabsorption markers. Results: From July 2018, 49 pts were enrolled and 48 were included in the analysis. Median age was 62.5 years (range: 30-78), 63% of pts were male. At baseline, 26% of pts had a good Heng risk score, 47% intermediate and 28% a poor risk, while in 2% of pts the class of risk was undetermined. 74% of pts received an IO-IO combo as first line tp, 17% IO-TKI, 9% pts an adj IO monotherapy. Pts received a median of 10 cycles of Cabo (range 5-17 cycles). 25 pts (53%) are still on tp, 1 patient discontinued Cabo for AEs, 13 pts for radiological PD, 6 pts discontinued for clinical PD or death, while 2 pts for reasons other than AEs or PD. Among evaluable cases, 17 pts (43%) achieved a partial response and 15 pts (37%) stable disease. Complete responses were not observed. At a median (m) follow-up of 8.0 months (mo) (4.4-13.5 mo), 71% of pts were alive and mPFS was 9.3 mo (95% CI 7.1-29.0 mo). Grade (G) 3-4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 34% of pts, including more frequently serum bilirubin increase, hypertension, calcium and sodium serum levels alterations and oral mucositis. G1-2 were observed in 61% of pts, including in most of cases diarrhoea, nausea, oral mucositis, disgeusia, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue and hypothyroidism. Due to AEs, transitory withholding of Cabo was observed in 53.5% of pts and for 23 pts (48%) dose reductions were needed. Conclusions: So far, Cabo tp after IO-IO or IO-TKI showed promising results and was well tolerated. Longer follow-up is needed for final OS and exploratory endpoints results. Clinical trial information: NCT03463681.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with zolendronic acid and denosumab: An observational retrospective multicenter trial

299

Background: Bone is one of the most common site of metastasis occurring in 30% of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients (pts)3,4. Skeletal metastases from mRCC are usually osteolytic and associated to high rate of morbidity and complication through skeletal related events (SRE). Bone-targeted therapies (BTT) such as zolendronic acid (ZOL AC) and denosumab (Dmab), shown to decrease the time-to-first and subsequent SREs12. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a rare but potentially serious adverse event associated with BTT. It occurs in 1-2% of pts treated with BTT and in 10-17% of mRCC pts treated with ZOL AC or Dmab. Vascular endothelial growth factor-Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGF-TKI) represent the backbone treatment for mRCC. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether the association of DMAB and ZOL AC to VEGF-TKITTagents could be associated to higher incidence of ONJ. Methods: We retrospectively collected data, from 2 Italian referring centers for mRCC, about 74 pts with bone metastases from mRCC who received, concurrently or sequentially to VEGF-TKI or immune-oncology (IO), AC ZOL and DMAB from January 2013 to January 2020. All pts provided informed consent for inclusion in the study. Results: All pts received VEGF-TKI as first line treatment. 17 pts received AC ZOL whereas 57 received DMAB. All pts received odontological consultation and orthopantomography before start BTT. The median time of Dmab and AC ZOL exposure was 11.6 months. ONJ occurred in 10/74 pts (7.4%): 6/10 pts were on first line treatment and 4/10 on second line. Treatments administered at the time of ONJ diagnosis were nivolumab (1/10), cabozantinib (2/10), sorafenib (1/10), sorafenib (1/10), sunitinib (4/10) and one pts was off therapy. Conclusions: In this real-life Italian population, treatment with BTT in mRCC pts treated with VEGF-TKI inhibitors and IO is associated to higher incidence of ONJ compared to previous report of pts treated with BTT for bone metastasis and lower compared to previous reports in mRCC. Despite the retrospective collection, we provided one of the largest sample of pts treated concurrently with VEGF-TKI or IO and BTT. Physicians should be careful in the use of BTT combined with other treatments in mRCC pts.

A phase II open-label study of cabozantinib after first-line treatment including an immune-checkpoint combination in patients with advanced or unresectable renal cell carcinoma: The BREAKPOINT trial (MeetUro trial 03 - EudraCT number 2018-000582-36)

326

Background: Antiangiogenic therapy has been a milestone in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) for years. The positive results with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are changing the frontline standard of care of mRCC patients (pts). To date, prospective data are lacking to determine the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy in pts progressed to ICI. The multikinase inhibitor Cabozantinib (cabo) has shown prolonged survival in pre-treated mRCC pts. Moreover, by targeting multiple pathways and crucial kinases involved in microenvironment-driven immune-escape, it may represent an ideal agent to be used sequentially after ICI. Methods: This is the first prospective open label, single arm, multicenter, phase II study to evaluate efficacy and safety of Cabo in pts with mRCC pre-treated with adjuvant or first line PD-1/PD-L1-based therapy (as monotherapy or in combination with an TKI or anti CTLA-4). Cabo 60 mg once daily was administered until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: Among 23 patients enrolled, 22 were included in the analysis (one was excluded for screening failure). Median age was 59.5 years (range: 29-74), 69.5% were male. At baseline, Karnofsky performance status was 100 in 59% of pts, 80-90 in 31.8% and 70-80 in 9%. 22.7% of pts had a good Heng score, 50% intermediate and 27.2% poor. Median duration of the previous therapy with anti PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 compounds was 4.3 months. Pts received an average of 4.7 months of Cabo. Among evaluable cases, 6 pts (27.2%) achieved a partial response and 5 pts (22.7%) stable disease. The median follow-up was 7.2 months and the median PFS was 7.2 months. 2 pts discontinued treatment for toxicity, 8 pts for PD, 1 patient discontinued treatment for different reason than PD, 11 pts are still on treatment. Grade (G) 3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 22.7% of pts; the most common AEs were hand and foot syndrome (HFS) (G1 in 36.3% of pts, G2 18.1%, G3 4.5%), diarrhea (G1 31.8%, G2 18.1%), hypothyroidism (G1 9.09 %, G2 22.7 %), mucositis (G1 36.3%, G2 4,5%), and fatigue (G1 18.1%, G2 18.1%). Transitory withholding of cabo was observed in 63.6% of pts (14/22) and it was due to AEs in the 90% of the cases. For 5/22 pts (22.7 %), dose reduction was needed to manage AEs. The most common AEs leading to temporary drug interruption were HFS G1-3 (13.9%), liver disfunction G1-G2 (13.9%), diarrhea G1-G2 (11.6%), nausea and vomiting G2 (11.6 %) and fatigue G2 (9.3%). Conclusions: So far, the treatment with cabo after a I line anti-PD-1 based immunotherapy resulted active and well tolerated. Clinical trial information: NCT03463681 .

Radical metastasectomy followed by sorafenib versus observation in patients withclear cell renal cell carcinoma: extended follow -up of efficacy results from the randomized phase II RESORT trial

Background: The RESORT trial showed no longer relapse free survival (RFS) with sorafenib following radical metastasectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We present the updated 42-month follow-up data.Methods: The phase II RESORT trial randomized patients to sorafenib or observation within 12 weeks from surgery. RFS was the primary endpoint.Results: We analyzed 68 patients (32 in sorafenib and 36 in the observation arm), randomized between November 2012 and November 2017. Eighty-one percent in the sorafenib arm and 80% in the observation arm had one metastasis . At a median follow-up of 42 months (interquartile range 31-58), in the observation arm the median RFS was 35 months, RFS probability was 57% (95% CI 42-76%) at 24 and 44% (95% CI 30-65%) at 48 months. In the sorafenib arm, median RFS was 21 months, RFS probability was 50% (95% CI 34-71%) at 24 and 32% (95% CI 18-57%) at 48 months (p = 0.342;HR 1.35;95% CI 0.72-2.54). Forty-seven percent and 37.5% of the patients in the two arms, respectively, are disease free. The site of relapses was independent of the previous metastasectomy site.Expert commentary: Sorafenib after metastasectomy did not improve RFS, but surgery in selected patients should be considered in order to potentially improve survival.Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT0144480.

Symptomatic COVID-19 in advanced-cancer patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors: prospective analysis from a multicentre observational trial by FICOG

Background

This prospective, multicentre, observational INVIDIa-2 study is investigating the clinical efficacy of influenza vaccination in advanced-cancer patients receiving immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), enrolled in 82 Italian centres, from October 2019 to January 2020. The primary endpoint was the incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI) until 30 April 2020. All the ILI episodes, laboratory tests, complications, hospitalizations and pneumonitis were recorded. Therefore, the study prospectively recorded all the COVID-19 ILI events.

Patients and methods

Patients were included in this non-prespecified COVID-19 analysis, if alive on 31 January 2020, when the Italian government declared the national emergency. The prevalence of confirmed COVID-19 cases was detected as ILI episode with laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2. Cases with clinical-radiological diagnosis of COVID-19 (COVID-like ILIs), were also reported.

Results

Out of 1257 enrolled patients, 955 matched the inclusion criteria for this unplanned analysis. From 31 January to 30 April 2020, 66 patients had ILI: 9 of 955 cases were confirmed COVID-19 ILIs, with prevalence of 0.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3-2.4], a hospitalization rate of 100% and a mortality rate of 77.8%. Including 5 COVID-like ILIs, the overall COVID-19 prevalence was 1.5% (95% CI: 0.5-3.1), with 100% hospitalization and 64% mortality. The presence of elderly, males and comorbidities was significantly higher among patients vaccinated against influenza versus unvaccinated (p = 0.009, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). Overall COVID-19 prevalence was 1.2% for vaccinated (six of 482 cases, all confirmed) and 1.7% for unvaccinated (8 of 473, 3 confirmed COVID-19 and 5 COVID-like), p = 0.52. The difference remained non-significant, considering confirmed COVID-19 only (p = 0.33).

Conclusion

COVID-19 has a meaningful clinical impact on the cancer-patient population receiving ICIs, with high prevalence, hospitalization and an alarming mortality rate among symptomatic cases. Influenza vaccination does not protect from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Prospective Translational Study Investigating Molecular PrEdictors of Resistance to First-Line PazopanIb in Metastatic reNal CEll Carcinoma (PIPELINE Study)

OBJECTIVES

Despite the initial clinical benefit, resistance to antiangiogenic therapies develops through the activation of alternative pathways. We measured plasma levels of circulating angiogenic factors to explore their predictive role in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with pazopanib.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

mRCC patients receiving first-line pazopanib were prospectively enrolled. The levels of circulating interleuchine (IL)-6, IL-8, stromal derived factor-1, vascular endothelial growth factor-A, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), osteopontin, and E-selectin were quantified at baseline and every 4 weeks until disease progression (PD). Patients were dichotomized into "low" and "high" subgroups by a cutoff point defined by the respective median circulating angiogenic factor (CAF) value at baseline. Then, association with the objective response was determined. Changes in CAF levels between baseline and PD were also compared.

RESULTS

Among 25 patients included in the final data set, 6 patients were still on treatment. As best response, 12 patients presented a partial response (48%), 9 showed stable disease, and 4 showed PD. The median follow-up was 31.9 months. The median progression-free survival was 14.8 months. Low baseline levels of IL-6, IL-8, HGF, and osteopontin were found to be significantly associated with objective response. In addition, patients with low baseline levels of HGF showed longer progression-free survival and overall survival, whereas patients with low baseline levels of IL-8 showed longer overall survival. Among patients experiencing PD, the median plasma levels of stromal derived factor-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A were significantly higher compared with the baseline (P=0.01; P=0.011). Conversely, the median levels of E-selectin were significantly lower compared with the baseline (P=0.017).

CONCLUSION

Changes in levels of selected CAFs were associated with response/resistance to pazopanib in mRCC patients.

Predictive Biomarkers of Response to Immunotherapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer

Introduction

In the last decades, the therapeutic decision-making approach to metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) has dramatically changed thanks to the introduction in the treatment scenario of, first, anti-angiogenic agents and, afterward, immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Immunotherapy is now the standard of care in pretreated mRCC patients and has recently entered even the first line setting. Nevertheless, in mRCC as well as in other tumor settings, a durable and clinically meaningful benefit from treatment with ICIs is not obtained for all patients treated. Therefore, the necessity to identify and validate predictive biomarkers of response to immunotherapy has emerged, in order to design the optimal treatment strategy for mRCC patients.

Discussion

In this review, we present and discuss the most promising predictive biomarkers of response to ICIs in mRCC with the recent data available. In details, the first marker that was investigated is the immunohistochemical expression of programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1), showing a negative prognostic role in mRCC, but the debate about its potential predictive value is still open. Additionally, the high heterogeneity in PD-L1 determination methods adds complexity to this issue. Second, the tumor mutational or neoantigen burden is an emerging biomarker of increased response to immunotherapy, hypothesizing that the higher the TMB, the higher is the production of neoantigens, and thus the stimulation of anti-tumor immune response, even though controversial results have been obtained. Third, the tumor microenvironment, namely the different populations of the immune infiltrate, plays a key role in tumor progression and in the response to immunotherapy. Finally, several studies have collected evidence on the potential association of the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with the benefit from ICIs, first in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma, and recently even in mRCC.

Conclusion

Several promising biomarkers of response to immunotherapy with ICIs have been identified, though without conclusive results upon their potential predictive value in mRCC. Therefore, the results of the exploratory analyses of the recently presented first-line trials and hopefully of future prospective, biomarker-driven studies could provide useful tools to be applied in the everyday clinical practice.

The emerging role of PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

In prostate cancer , there has recently been an emerging interest in mutations in genes belonging to the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway and in the inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins.

AREAS COVERED

Mutations in the HRR genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, and Ataxia-Telangiesctasia mutated (ATM), have been reported in prostate cancer, with different incidence in the localized and advanced settings. The PARP enzyme complex is involved in repair of DNA damage and its inhibition causes the accumulation of DNA mutations in HRR deficient cells. Several PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are under development, such as olaparib, talazoparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and veliparib. In metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), olaparib has been the most studied and its clinical efficacy has been validated in a phase III clinical trial. Rucaparib and niraparib have also shown promising results in the preliminary analyzes of two phase II trials, while talazoparib is currently under development.

EXPERT OPINION

PARPi have become part of the treatment of mCRPC. Early results of combination therapy with PARPi and new hormonal therapy are promising and are supported by a strong biological rationale. Current results need to be validated in randomized phase III-controlled trials in order to translate the use of PARPi into real world practice.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors and metastatic prostate cancer therapy: Learning by making mistakes

Despite advances in metastatic prostate cancer therapy, expected survival for patients in the castration-resistant phase of disease is poor. Immune-checkpoints inhibitors significantly prolonged life expectancy in some solid tumors and have been evaluated also in advanced stage prostate cancer. The majority of data available derive from preliminary phase I and II trials evaluating CTLA-4 and PD-1 as monotherapy or in combination with each other, vaccines, radiotherapy or targeted/hormonal therapy, achieving only limited benefits in terms of biochemical and radiologic responses. There are many reasons that may explain why prostate cancer responds poorly to modern immunotherapies, such as its characteristic low tumor mutational burden or immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment. The present review summarizes the results obtained treating advanced prostate cancer patients with immune-checkpoints inhibitors and analyzes potential mechanisms of both resistance and sensitivity, in order to hypothesize possible avenues of special interest for future research.

Angiogenesis and Immunity in Renal Carcinoma: Can We Turn an Unhappy Relationship into a Happy Marriage?

The frontline treatment options for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are evolving rapidly since the approval of combination immunotherapies by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). In particular, in combination with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved the outcome of patients with mRCC compared to TKI monotherapy. Here, we review the preclinical data supporting the combination of ICIs with VEGFR TKIs. The VEGF-signaling inhibition could ideally sustain immunotherapy through a positive modulation of the tumor microenvironment (TME). Antiangiogenetics, in fact, with their inhibitory activity on myelopoiesis that indirectly reduces myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory T cells' (Tregs) frequency and function, could have a role in determining an effective anti-tumor immune response. These findings are relevant for the challenges posed to clinicians concerning the clinical impact on treatment strategies for mRCC.

Transcriptomic profiling as proof of concept for investigation of collecting duct carcinoma (CDC)

714

Background: Collecting duct carcinoma is a rare, highly aggressive and molecularly uncharacterized kidney disease with poor outcome. To date, no standard therapies are available and treatment choice is based on retrospective data. Identifying molecular features of this tumor could provide a biologic rationale for novel targeted systemic therapies. Methods: Total RNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues of 6 CDCs, 5 clear cell renal carcinomas (ccRCCs) and 4 adjacent normal tissues. Samples were profiled by GeneChip Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 (Affymetrix) and constituted the Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT) dataset. Data were pre-processed using the robust multi-array average method and differentially expressed genes were identified according to the limma pipeline. Genes with a false discovery rate < 0.25 were selected. Pathway analysis was performed by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), single sample (ss) GSEA, DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 and Pathfinder Bioconductor package. Moreover, a list of genes representing angiogenesis and immune biology, previously used in the IMmotion150 study, was chosen to explore further functional subcategories of CDC. Available RNA-Seq data of 7 CDCs and 5 matched normal tissue from GSE89122 dataset were used for validation. Results: Comparison of transcriptome profiles of CDCs and ccRCCs versus normal tissue led to the identification of a core of 14 genes specifically up-regulated in CDC, 5 of which (SFN, S100A11, CKAP5, CDH1 and CD44) were significantly involved in extracellular matrix organization. Other deregulated genes were related to immune system, cell cycle progression, glucose and pentose phosphate metabolism and EGFR-signaling. In addition, ssGSEA permitted to identify two major distinct biological subgroups in CDC of both INT and GSE89122 datasets, based on relative expression levels of angiogenesis and immune genes. Conclusions: Our study reveals novel insights into the biology and heterogeneity of CDCs. Although further validation using larger samples is needed, the current findings suggest that this heterogeneity could have clinical implications for the treatment of patients with this rare kidney cancer.

From biology to clinical experience: evolution in the knowledge of neuroendocrine tumours

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) represent a group of neoplasias characterized by significant histopathological and biological heterogeneity. Diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumours relies upon histological examination augmented by newer techniques, such as pet-dotatoc scan. Surgery represents the only curative therapeutic approach. In advanced unresectable disease, medical treatment is the best choice. Somatostatin analogues allow adequate control of the carcinoid syndrome with a low effect on tumour cell growth. Chemotherapy has a good activity only in poor prognosis patients. According to the clinical course of the disease, a multimodal approach could be evaluated in selected cases. New target therapy including multikinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibody and m-tor inhibitors is now under clinical investigation for the treatment of advanced NETs. Preliminary results demonstrated a good activity in terms of disease control rate and tumour shrinkage.

Is there a role for targeted therapies in the collecting ducts of Bellini carcinoma?

396

Background: Carcinoma of Bellini collecting ducts (CDC) is very uncommon but it is one of the most aggressive urological entities. For this tumor, originating from the epithelium of Bellini ducts in the distal tubule and preferentially occurring in young populations, no standard effective therapy has been so far established. Results of previous clinical experiences with chemo- or immunotherapy have been disappointing. We report our experience in 7 cases of CDC treated with targeted therapies.

Methods: From December 2004 to May 2010, 333 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma have been treated with targeted therapies at Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan. From the global database analysis, seven cases with histological subtype of CDC have been identified. All patients had advanced disease and received a targeted therapy as first-line treatment. Six of them underwent previous nephrectomy, all had nodal involvement, and three had two or more sites of disease including lung, liver, and adrenal glands. Four patients received sorafenib as first-line treatment, two sunitinib, and one temsirolimus. After sorafenib failure, two patients received a second-line treatment consisting of both sunitinib and temsirolimus.

Results: Five patients developed early progression of disease with a very short 4-month survival. One patient had a long term partial response of 33 months with sorafenib, he underwent second-line sunitinib and had no progression for further 10 months. The last patient reached a progression-free survival of 6 months with temsirolimus; when progressed, he achieved a disease control for further 9 months during sunitinib therapy. Both patients are alive after 50 and 15 months of treatment, respectively. The most common adverse events, low or moderate in severity, consisted of fatigue, hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, hypertension, and anemia.

Conclusions: Prognosis of advanced CDC remains unfavorable. New target agents may be active in this disease and need further prospective phase II studies.

[Table: see text]

Low dose of ketoconazole in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma resistant to pharmacological castration

OBJECTIVE

• To assess the efficacy of ketoconazole in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• From April 2008 to November 2009, 37 patients with CRPC have been treated with ketoconazole. The primary endpoint was the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response; the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and safety profile. • Ketoconazole was administered by oral route at a dose of 200 mg every 8 h continuous dosing until the onset of serious adverse events or disease progression. • The study was based on a two-step design with an interim efficacy analysis carried out on the first 12 patients accrued.

RESULTS

• Main characteristics of population were: median age 75 years (range 60-88); baseline mean PSA 28.8 ng/mL (4.3-1000); 30 patients previously challenged with at least two lines of hormone therapy; 15 patients previously treated with chemotherapy. • Biochemical responses accounted for: two complete responses (5%), six partial responses (16%), 13 patients with stable disease (35%), and 14 with progressive disease (38%). Of 15 patients resistant to chemotherapy, overall disease control (complete plus partial responses plus stable disease) was recorded in seven of them. • Treatment was feasible without inducing grade 3-4 adverse events. The most common grade 1-2 adverse events were asthenia (27%), vomiting (8%) and abdominal pain (8%).

CONCLUSION

• Treatment with low-dose ketoconazole is feasible and well tolerated. The efficacy was satisfactory in patients previously treated with chemotherapy.

Prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: the role of palonosetron

Prevention of nausea and vomiting is the main goal of antiemetic treatment in cancer patients scheduled to receive chemotherapy. To prevent acute emesis, antiemetics should be administered just before chemotherapy and patients should be protected for up to 24 hours after chemotherapy initiation. The emetogenic potential of chemotherapeutic agents guides clinicians towards the most appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis. Current guidelines recommend the use of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist (RA) either alone or in combination with dexamethasone and/or a neurokinin-1 RA both in the acute and delayed phases. The second-generation 5-HT(3)RA palonosetron exhibits a longer half-life and a higher binding affinity than older antagonists. Palonosetron has been approved by the FDA for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients scheduled to receive either moderately (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and for the prevention of delayed CINV in patients receiving MEC. The present review will discuss the role of palonosetron in the prevention of acute CINV.