Simplified processing and rapid quantification of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, and their conjugated metabolites in human plasma using UPLC-MS/MS: Assessment of buprenorphine exposure during opioid use disorder treatment

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a chronic neurobehavioral ailment and is prevalent in pregnancy. OUD is commonly treated with methadone or buprenorphine (BUP). Pregnancy is known to alter the pharmacokinetics of drugs and may lead to changes in drug exposure and response. A simple, specific, and sensitive analytical method for measuring the parent drug and its metabolites is valuable for assessing the impact of pregnancy on drug exposure. A new liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method that utilized a simple protein precipitation procedure for sample preparation and four deuterated internal standards for quantification was developed and validated for BUP and its major metabolites (norbuprenorphine [NBUP], buprenorphine-glucuronide [BUP-G], and norbuprenorphine-glucuronide [NBUP-G]) in human plasma. The standard curve was linear over the concentration range of 0.05-100 ng/mL for BUP and NBUP, and 0.1-200 ng/mL for BUP-G and NBUP-G. Intra- and inter-day bias and precision were within ±15% of nominal values for all the analytes. Quality controls assessed at four levels showed high recovery consistently for all the analytes with minimal matrix effect. Adequate analyte stability was observed at various laboratory conditions tested. Overall, the developed method is simple, sensitive, accurate and reproducible, and was successfully applied for the quantification of BUP and its metabolites in plasma samples collected from pregnant women in a clinical study assessing BUP exposure during OUD treatment.

Characteristics and circumstances of death related to buprenorphine toxicity in Australia

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine is a semi-synthetic opioid used in the treatment of opioid dependence and chronic pain. The current study aimed to determine the characteristics and circumstances of all recorded cases of buprenorphine-related toxicity death in Australia; determine toxicology and organ pathology; and compare these profiles to cases of death due to buprenorphine-related traumatic injury.

METHODS

All cases of buprenorphine-related drug toxicity death were retrieved from the National Coronial Information System (2000-2019), as were all cases of buprenorphine-related traumatic injury. Information was collected on cause of death, case characteristics, toxicology and major organ pathology.

RESULTS

A total of 314 cases of drug toxicity and 55 of traumatic injury were identified. Toxicity cases were significantly older (40.5 v 36.1 years), more likely to have a history of chronic pain (OR 2.95), less likely to have a history of injecting drug use (OR 0.09), but more likely to have injected buprenorphine proximal to death (OR 4.90). There were no group differences in buprenorphine or norbuprenorphine toxicology. Toxicity cases were more likely to have hypnosedatives (OR 2.08) and other opioids (OR 4.69) present, but less likely to have psychostimulants (OR 0.26) and THC (OR 0.45). Toxicity cases were more likely to be obese (OR 4.05), have pre-existing cardiovascular disease (OR 4.02) and heavier hearts (412.1 v 355.2 g).

CONCLUSIONS

Buprenorphine-related toxicity death cases differed from trauma deaths in their characteristics, toxicology and disease. Fatal buprenorphine toxicity is associated with older age, concurrent use of depressants and cardiovascular disease.

Mechanisms of QT prolongation by buprenorphine cannot be explained by direct hERG channel block

Buprenorphine is a μ-opioid receptor (MOR) partial agonist used to manage pain and addiction. QT_C prolongation that crosses the 10 msec threshold of regulatory concern was observed at a supratherapeutic dose in two thorough QT studies for the transdermal buprenorphine product BUTRANS^®. Because QT_C prolongation can be associated with Torsades de Pointes (TdP), a rare but potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmia, these results have led to further investigation of the electrophysiological effects of buprenorphine. Drug-induced QT_C prolongation and TdP are most commonly caused by acute inhibition of hERG current (I_hERG) that contribute to the repolarizing phase of the ventricular action potentials (APs). Concomitant inhibition of inward late Na⁺ (I_NaL) and/or L-type Ca²⁺ (I_CaL) current can offer some protection against proarrhythmia. Therefore, we characterized the effects of buprenorphine and its major metabolite norbuprenorphine on cardiac hERG, Ca²⁺, and Na⁺ ion channels, as well as cardiac APs. For comparison, methadone, a MOR agonist associated with QT_C prolongation and high TdP risk, and naltrexone and naloxone, two opioid receptor antagonists, were also studied. Whole cell recordings were performed at 37°C on cells stably expressing hERG, Ca_V1.2, and Na_V1.5 proteins. Microelectrode array (MEA) recordings were made on human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs). The results showed that buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, naltrexone, and naloxone had no effect on I_hERG, I_CaL, I_NaL, and peak Na⁺ current (I_NaP) at clinically relevant concentrations. In contrast, methadone inhibited I_hERG, I_CaL, and I_NaL. Experiments on iPSC-CMs showed a lack of effect for buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, naltrexone, and naloxone, and delayed repolarization for methadone at clinically relevant concentrations. The mechanism of QT_C prolongation is opioid moiety-specific. This remains undefined for buprenorphine, while for methadone it involves direct hERG channel block. There is no evidence that buprenorphine use is associated with TdP. Whether this lack of TdP risk can be generalized to other drugs with QT_C prolongation not mediated by acute hERG channel block warrants further study.

Use of urinary naloxone levels in a single provider practice: a case study

BACKGROUND

Urine drug monitoring for medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) such as buprenorphine can help to support treatment adherence. The practice of introducing unconsumed medication directly into urine (known as "spiking" samples) has been increasingly recognized as a potential means to simulate treatment adherence. In the laboratory, examination of the ratios of buprenorphine and its metabolite, norbuprenorphine, has been identified as a mechanism to identify "spiked" samples. Urine levels of naloxone may also be a novel marker in cases where the combination buprenorphine-naloxone product has been administered. This case study, which encompasses one provider's practice spanning two sites, represents a preliminary report on the utility of using urinary naloxone as an indicator of "spiked" urine toxicology samples. Though only a case study, this represents the largest published evaluation of patients' naloxone levels to date.

CASE PRESENTATION

Over a 3-month period across two practice sites, we identified 1,223 patient samples with recorded naloxone levels, spanning a range of 0 to 12,161 ng/ml. The average naloxone level was 633.65 ng/ml with the majority (54%) of samples < 300 ng/ml. 8.0% of samples demonstrated extreme values of naloxone (> 2000 ng/ml). One practice site, which had increased evidence of specimen tampering at collections, had a greater percent of extreme naloxone levels (>  2000 ng/ml) at 9.3% and higher average naloxone level (686.8 ng/ml), in contrast to a second site (570.9 ng/ml; 6.4% at > 2000 ng/ml) that did not have known reports of specimen tampering.

CONCLUSIONS

We postulate that naloxone may serve as an additional flag to identify patient "spiking" of urine samples with use of the combination product of buprenorphine-naloxone.

Determination of buprenorphine, naloxone and phase I and phase II metabolites in rat whole blood by LC-MS/MS

Buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone combination are maintenance treatments used worldwide. However, since their marketing, despite ceiling respiratory effects, poisonings and fatalities have been attributed to buprenorphine misuse and overdose. Therefore, to better understand the mechanisms of buprenorphine-related toxicity in vivo, experimental investigations have been conducted, mainly in the rat. We developed a liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) method with electrospray ionization for the simultaneous quantification of buprenorphine, naloxone and their metabolites (norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine glucuronide, norbuprenorphine glucuronide and naloxone glucuronide) in rat whole blood. Compounds were extracted from whole blood by protein precipitation and chromatographically separated using gradient elution of aqueous ammonium formate and methanol in a Raptor Biphenyl core-shell column (100 mm x 3,0 mm x 2,7 μm). Following electrospray ionization, quantification was carried out in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode by the tandem mass spectrometer API 3200 system. The LC-MS/MS method was validated according to the currently accepted criteria for bioanalytical method validation. The method required small sample volumes (50 μL) and was sensitive with limits of quantification of 6.9, 6.2, 3.6, 3.3, 1.3 and 57.7 ng/mL for buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine glucuronide, norbuprenorphine glucuronide, naloxone and naloxone glucuronide respectively. The upper limit of quantification was 4000 ng/ml for all the studied compounds. Trueness (88-115 %), repeatability and intermediate precision (both <15%) were in accordance with the international recommendations. The procedure was successfully used to quantify these compounds in the whole blood sample from one rat 24 h after the intravenous administration of buprenorphine/naloxone (30.0/7.5 mg/kg).

Interpreting quantitative urine buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine levels in office-based clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Quantitative urine buprenorphine testing is used to monitor patients receiving buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), however the interpretation of urine buprenorphine testing is complex. Currently, interpretation of quantitative buprenorphine testing is guided by data from drug assay development studies and forensic labs rather than clinical treatment cohorts.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we describe the patterns of urine buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine levels in patients prescribed sublingual buprenorphine for OUD in an office-based addiction treatment clinic. Urine buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine levels were analyzed in patients who reported having adulterated their urine, patients clinically suspected of adulterating their urine, and patients without concern for urine adulteration. Finally, we tested the accuracy of urine buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, and norbuprenorphine: buprenorphine ratio (Norbup:Bup) to identify adulterated urine samples.

RESULTS

Patients without suspicion for urine adulteration rarely provided specimens with buprenorphine >=1000ng/ml (4.4%), while the proportion provided by those who endorsed or were suspected of urine adulteration was higher (42.9%, 40.6%, respectively). Compared to patients without reported urine adulteration, specimens from patients who reported or were suspected of urine adulteration had significantly higher buprenorphine (p=0.0001) and lower norbuprenorphine (<0.0001) levels, and significantly lower Norbup:Bup ratios (p=0.04). Buprenorphine >=700ng/ml offered the best accuracy for discriminating between adulterated and non-adulterated specimens.

CONCLUSION

This study describes the patterns of urine buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine levels from patients with OUD receiving buprenorphine treatment in an office-based addiction treatment clinic. Parameters for identifying urine adulterated by submerging buprenorphine medication in the urine specimen are discussed.

Drug Binding Poses Relate Structure with Efficacy in the μ Opioid Receptor

The μ-opioid receptor (MOPr) is a clinically important G protein-coupled receptor that couples to Gi/o proteins and arrestins. At present, the receptor conformational changes that occur following agonist binding and activation are poorly understood. This study has employed molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the binding mode and receptor conformational changes induced by structurally similar opioid ligands of widely differing intrinsic agonist efficacy, norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine, and diprenorphine. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assays for Gi activation and arrestin-3 recruitment in human embryonic kidney 293 cells confirmed that norbuprenorphine is a high efficacy agonist, buprenorphine a low efficacy agonist, and diprenorphine an antagonist at the MOPr. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed that these ligands adopt distinct binding poses and engage different subsets of residues, despite sharing a common morphinan scaffold. Notably, norbuprenorphine interacted with sodium ion-coordinating residues W2936.48 and N1503.35, whilst buprenorphine and diprenorphine did not. Principal component analysis of the movements of the receptor transmembrane domains showed that the buprenorphine-bound receptor occupied a distinct set of conformations to the norbuprenorphine-bound receptor. Addition of an allosteric sodium ion caused the receptor and ligand to adopt an inactive conformation. The differences in ligand-residue interactions and receptor conformations observed here may underlie the differing efficacies for cellular signalling outputs for these ligands.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling after subcutaneous, intravenous and buccal administration of a high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine in conscious cats

Background

The aim of this study was to describe the joint pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model and evaluate thermal antinociception of a high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine (Simbadol^™) in cats.

Methods

Six healthy cats (4.9 ± 0.7 kg) were included in a prospective, randomized, blinded, crossover study. Simbadol^™ (1.8 mg mL^-1) was administered by the subcutaneous (SC; 0.24 mg kg^-1), intravenous (IV; 0.12 mg kg^-1) or buccal (OTM; 0.12 mg kg^-1) route of administration and thermal thresholds (TT) were compared with a saline group (SAL). Thermal threshold testing and blood sampling were performed at predetermined time points up to 72 hours including a placebo group. Plasma buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. A bespoke bicompartmental pharmacokinetic model simultaneously fitted data from two analytes/three routes of administration. Temporal changes in TT were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test and treatment comparisons using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction (P < 0.05).

Results

Thermal thresholds were significantly increased after SC, IV and OTM from 1–24 hours (except 2 hours), 0.5–8 hours (except 6 hours), and 1–8 hours (except 6 hours), respectively, when compared with baseline. Thermal thresholds were significantly increased after SC (1–30 hours), IV (1–8 hours) and OTM (1–12 hours) when compared with SAL, but not different among buprenorphine-treated cats. The absolute buprenorphine clearance was 0.98 L kg^-1 hour^-1, volume of distribution at steady state was 7.9 L kg^-1 and the elimination-half-life was 12.3 hours. Bioavailability for SC and OTM was 94% and 24%, respectively. Subcutaneous absorption was biphasic. An initial peak (0.08 hours) was followed by a slow (half-life 11.2 hours) and progressive (peak acceleration at 2.8 hours) uptake.

Conclusion

The SC administration of Simbadol^™ was characterized by prolonged absorption half-life and sustained plasma concentrations yielding long-lasting antinociception (≥ 24 hours) when compared with the IV and OTM routes.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Once-Weekly and Once-Monthly Buprenorphine Subcutaneous Injection Depots (CAM2038) Versus Intravenous and Sublingual Buprenorphine in Healthy Volunteers Under Naltrexone Blockade: An Open-Label Phase 1 Study

INTRODUCTION

CAM2038 q1w (once weekly) and q4w (once monthly) are investigational buprenorphine subcutaneous (SC) formulations based on FluidCrystal^® injection depot technology. These two drug products are being developed for opioid dependence treatment, with a target for once-weekly and once-monthly SC dosing. The rationale for developing two products with different dosing frequencies is that treatment strategies/routines, and hence different treatment preferences, can vary between patients, different stages of opioid maintenance treatment, and countries. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine following administration of CAM2038 q1w or q4w versus active controls.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers were randomized to five treatment groups. All received a single intravenous dose of buprenorphine 600 µg, followed post-washout by a single dose of CAM2038 q4w 96 mg, a single dose of CAM2038 q4w 192 mg, or sublingual buprenorphine 8, 16, or 24 mg daily for 7 days, followed post-washout by a single dose of CAM2038 q4w 64 or 128 mg or four repeated weekly doses of CAM2038 q1w 16 mg. All subjects received daily naltrexone.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven subjects were randomized. Median buprenorphine t _max after CAM2038 q4w was 4-10 h (24 h for CAM2038 q1w); mean terminal half-life was 19-25 days (5 days for CAM2038 q1w). CAM2038 q4w showed dose-proportional buprenorphine release, with similar exposure to repeat-dose CAM2038 q1w at comparable monthly dose level. Both CAM2038 formulations showed complete absolute bioavailability of buprenorphine and 5.7- to 7.7-fold greater buprenorphine bioavailability versus sublingual buprenorphine. CAM2038 q1w and q4w were well tolerated; subjects' acceptance was higher for CAM2038 than for sublingual buprenorphine 1 h post-dose.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic profiles of CAM2038 q1w and q4w versus sublingual buprenorphine support expected treatment efficacy with once-weekly and once-monthly dosing, respectively. CAM2038 formulations were safe and showed good local tolerability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN24987553.

FUNDING

Camurus AB.

Quantitation of Buprenorphine, Norbuprenorphine, Buprenorphine Glucuronide, Norbuprenorphine Glucuronide, and Naloxone in Urine by LC-MS/MS

Buprenorphine is an opioid drug that has been used to treat opioid dependence on an outpatient basis, and is also prescribed for managing moderate to severe pain. Some formulations of buprenorphine also contain naloxone to discourage misuse. The major metabolite of buprenorphine is norbuprenorphine. Both compounds are pharmacologically active and both are extensively metabolized to their glucuronide conjugates, which are also active metabolites. Direct quantitation of the glucuronide conjugates in conjunction with free buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, and naloxone in urine can distinguish compliance with prescribed therapy from specimen adulteration intended to mimic compliance with prescribed buprenorphine. This chapter quantitates buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, their glucuronide conjugates and naloxone directly in urine by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Urine is pretreated with formic acid and undergoes solid phase extraction (SPE) prior to analysis by LC-MS/MS.

Buprenorphine infrequently found in fatal overdose in New York City

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine is an opioid agonist medication that is both safe and effective in the treatment of opioid use disorders and the prevention of opioid overdoses. Despite this, media coverage has highlighted public concerns about the potential safety consequences of buprenorphine misuse and diversion. To address the possible contribution of buprenorphine to overdose mortality, we systematically tested post mortem blood specimens from decedents who had died of an unintentional drug overdoses in 2013.

METHODS

We retrospectively tested consecutive drug overdose cases that occurred from June through October 2013. Cases with available blood specimens were tested for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Toxicology results were linked to death certificates and case files from New York City Vital Statistics and New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner.

RESULTS

Of the 98 unintentional drug overdose fatalities tested, only 2 (2.0%) tested positive for buprenorphine metabolites. All 98 unintentional fatalities involved multiple substances.

CONCLUSIONS

Buprenorphine was infrequently found in drug overdose deaths in New York City. Since the safety and efficacy of buprenorphine are well documented, and overdoses resulting from buprenorphine treatment or diversion are very rare, facilitating access to buprenorphine treatment is strongly recommended.

A population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling approach to support the clinical development of RBP-6000, a new, subcutaneously injectable, long-acting, sustained-release formulation of buprenorphine, for the treatment of opioid dependence

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study implemented pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling to support the clinical development of RBP-6000, a new, long-acting, sustained-release formulation of buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid dependence. Such a formulation could offer advantages over existing buprenorphine pharmacotherapy by improving patient compliance and reducing the diversion of the product.

METHODS

A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using 36 opioid-dependent subjects who received single subcutaneous doses of RBP-6000. Another pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was developed using μ-opioid receptor occupancy (µORO) data to predict efficacy of RBP-6000 after repeated doses. It was also assessed how buprenorphine plasma concentrations were correlated with opioid withdrawal symptoms and hydromorphone agonist blockade data from 15 heroin-dependent subjects.

RESULTS

The resulting pharmacokinetic model accurately described buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine plasma concentrations. A saturable maximum effect (E max) model with 0.67 ng/mL effective concentration at 50 % of maximum (EC50) and 91 % E max best described µORO versus buprenorphine plasma concentrations. Linear relationships were found among µORO, withdrawal symptoms and blockade of agonist effects.

CONCLUSION

Previously published findings have demonstrated µORO ≥70 % is needed to achieve withdrawal suppression and blockade of opioid agonist subjective effects. Model simulations indicated that a 200 mg RBP-6000 dose should achieve 2–3 ng/mL buprenorphine average concentrations and desired efficacy.

Effect of thienorphine on intestinal transit and isolated guinea-pig ileum contraction

AIM: To evaluate the effect of thienorphine on small intestinal transit in vivo and on guinea-pig ileum (GPI) contraction in vitro.

METHODS: The effects of thienorphine on intestinal transit were examined in mice and in isolated GPI. Buprenorphine and morphine served as controls. The distance traveled by the head of the charchol and the total length of the intestine were measured in vivo. Gastrointestinal transit was expressed as a percentage of the distance traveled by the head of the marker relative to the total length of the small intestine. The isolated GPI preparations were connected to an isotonic force transducer and equilibrated for at least 1 h before exposure to drugs. Acetylcholine was used for muscle stimulation.

RESULTS: Thienorphine (0.005-1.0 mg/kg, ig) or buprenorphine (0.005-1.0 mg/kg, sc) dose-dependently significantly inhibited gut transit compared with saline. Thienorphine inhibited gut transit less than buprenorphine. The maximum inhibition by thienorphine on the intestinal transit was 50%-60%, whereas the maximum inhibition by morphine on gut transit was about 100%. Thienorphine also exhibited less inhibition on acetylcholine-induced contraction of GPI, with a maximum inhibition of 65%, compared with 93% inhibition by buprenorphine and 100% inhibition by morphine. Thienorphine induced a concentration-dependent decrease in the basal tonus of spontaneous movement of the GPI, the effect of which was weaker than that with buprenorphine. The duration of the effect of thienorphine on the GPI was longer than that with buprenorphine.

CONCLUSION: Thienorphine had less influence, but a longer duration of action on GPI contraction and moderately inhibited intestinal transit.

Effects of intermittent hemodialysis on buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine plasma concentrations in chronic pain patients treated with transdermal buprenorphine

The present study was designed to study the impact of intermittent hemodialysis on the disposition of the partial agonist buprenorphine and its metabolite norbuprenorphine during therapy with transdermal buprenorphine in chronic pain patients with end-stage kidney disease. Ten patients (mean age 63 years) who had received transdermal buprenorphine for at least 1 week, were asked to provide blood samples immediately before and after hemodialysis. Blood samples were analysed for buprenorphine and its metabolite norbuprenorphine. The median buprenorphine plasma concentrations were found to be 0.16 ng/ml before and 0.23 ng/ml after hemodialysis. A significant correlation between plasma levels and administered doses was observed (Spearman R=0.74; P<0.05). In three patients norbuprenorphine plasma levels were detected. No differences in pain relief before and after hemodialysis were observed. This investigation shows no elevated buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine plasma levels in patients with renal insufficiency receiving transdermal buprenorphine up to 70 microg/h. Furthermore, hemodialysis did not affect buprenorphine plasma levels, leading to stable analgesic effects during the therapy.

Interactions between buprenorphine and the protease inhibitors darunavir-ritonavir and fosamprenavir-ritonavir

BACKGROUND

This study examined drug interactions between buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist used for opioid dependence treatment and pain management, and the protease inhibitors (PIs) darunavir-ritonavir and fosamprenavir-ritonavir.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine and its metabolites and symptoms of opioid withdrawal or excess were compared in opioid-dependent, buprenorphine-naloxone-maintained, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative volunteers (11 for darunavir-ritonavir and 10 for fosamprenavir-ritonavir) before and after 15 days of PI administration. PI pharmacokinetics and adverse effects were compared between the buprenorphine-maintained participants and an equal number of sex-, age-, race-, and weight-matched, healthy, non-opioid-dependent volunteers who received darunavir-ritonavir or fosamprenavir-ritonavir but not buprenorphine.

RESULTS

There were no significant changes in buprenorphine or PI plasma levels and no significant changes in medication adverse effects or opioid withdrawal. Increased concentrations of the inactive metabolite buprenorphine-3-glucuronide suggested that darunavir-ritonavir and fosamprenavir-ritonavir induced glucuronidation of buprenorphine.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose adjustments are not likely to be necessary when buprenorphine and darunavir-ritonavir or fosamprenavir-ritonavir are coadministered for the treatment of opioid dependence and HIV disease.

Pharmacological mechanisms underlying the antinociceptive and tolerance effects of the 6,14-bridged oripavine compound 030418

AIM

To investigate possible pharmacological mechanisms underlying the antinociceptive effect of and tolerance to N-methyl-7α-[(R)-1-hydroxy-1-methyl-3-(thien-3-yl)-propyl]-6,14-endo-ethanotetrahydronororipavine (030418), a derivative of thienorphine.

METHODS

The binding affinity and efficacy of 030418 were determined using receptor binding and guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPγS) assays in CHO-μ, CHO-κ, CHO-δ, and CHO-ORL1 cell membranes. The analgesic activity of and tolerance to 030418 were evaluated in thermal nociceptive tests in mice. The effects of 030418 on opioid receptors were further investigated using in vivo pharmacological antagonist blockade and in vitro tissue preparations.

RESULTS

The compound 030418 displayed high binding affinity to all subtypes of opioid receptors with K(i) values in the nanomolar range. In [(35)S]GTPγS binding assay, the maximal stimulation of 030418 to μ-, κ-, δ-receptors and the ORL1 receptor was 89%, 86%, 67% and 91%, respectively. In hot-plate test, the antinociceptive effect of 030418 was more potent and longer than morphine. The nonselective opioid receptor antagonist naloxone could completely block 030418-induced antinociception, while both the μ-opioid receptor antagonist β-FNA and the κ-opioid receptor antagonist nor-BNI attenuated 030418-induced antinociception. In contrast, the ORL1 receptor antagonist J-113397 enhanced the antinociceptive effect of 030418. Additionally, chronic treatment with 030418 resulted in a dramatic development of tolerance that could not be effectively prevented by J-113397. In guinea pig ileum preparation, the existing action of 030418 could be removed with difficulty after prolonged washing.

CONCLUSION

The compound 030418 is a novel agonist of opioid receptors with high efficiency, long-lasting effect and liability to tolerance, which may be closely correlated with the methyl group at the N(17) position and the high hydrophobicity of the C(7)-thiophene group in its chemical structure.

Preliminary buprenorphine sublingual tablet pharmacokinetic data in plasma, oral fluid, and sweat during treatment of opioid-dependent pregnant women

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine is currently under investigation as a pharmacotherapy to treat pregnant women for opioid dependence. This research evaluates buprenorphine (BUP), norbuprenophine (NBUP), buprenorphine-glucuronide (BUP-Gluc), and norbuprenorphine-glucuronide (NBUP-Gluc) pharmacokinetics after high-dose (14-20 mg) BUP sublingual tablet administration in three opioid-dependent pregnant women.

METHODS

Oral fluid and sweat specimens were collected in addition to plasma specimens for 24 hours during gestation weeks 28 or 29 and 34, and 2 months after delivery. Time to maximum concentration was not affected by pregnancy; however, BUP and NBUP maximum concentration and area under the curve at 0 to 24 hours tended to be lower during pregnancy compared with postpartum levels.

RESULTS

Statistically significant but weak positive correlations were found for BUP plasma and OF concentrations and BUP/NBUP ratios in plasma and oral fluid. Statistically significant negative correlations were observed for times of specimen collection and BUP and NBUP oral fluid/plasma ratios. BUP-Gluc and NBUP-Gluc were detected in only 5% of oral fluid specimens. In sweat, BUP and NBUP were detected in only four of 25 (12 or 24 hours) specimens in low concentrations (less than 2.4 ng/patch).

CONCLUSION

These preliminary data describe BUP and metabolite pharmacokinetics in pregnant women and suggest that, like methadone, upward dose adjustments may be needed with advancing gestation.

Effects of gamma-irradiation on PLGA microspheres loaded with thienorphine

Ionizing radiation can be used as a drug sterilization technique, provided that the drug itself is not modified and that no toxic products are produced; moreover, if the irradiated product is a drug delivery system, its drug release characteristics must not be significantly altered by radiation. The aim of this work was to study the effects of sterilization by ionizing radiation on PLGA microspheres, containing thienorphine. Thienorphine PLGA microspheres were prepared by the O/W solvent evaporation method and characterized by HPLC, SEM and laser particle size analysis. Our experimental results showed that gamma-rays did not alter the drug content, and did not modify the kinetics of drug release from microspheres. Moreover, no significant changes in the shape and in the size distribution of microspheres were found after irradiation. In conclusion, the sterilization method is adequate because microspheres not underwent any change after exposition to gamma-irradiation.

Preparation and in vivo evaluation of thienorphine-loaded PLGA microspheres

Thienorphine-loaded microspheres composed of poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) were prepared by an O/W emulsion solvent evaporation method. HPLC was used to determine the drug loading and drug release, while a LC-MS-MS system was employed to analyze the plasma drug concentration. Results indicated that the PLGA particles obtained were spherical and of appropriate size. The formulation was stable during the test period. In vitro drug release from the microspheres was sustained for about 28 days mostly by the diffusion mechanism. The plasma drug concentration-time profiles were relatively smooth for about 28 days after subcutaneous injection of the drug-loaded microspheres to rats, compared with that for drug suspension. In vitro and in vivo correlation was established.

Effect of the selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist JDTic on nicotine antinociception, reward, and withdrawal in the mouse

RATIONALE

Several lines of evidence support a role for the endogenous opioid system in mediating behaviors associated with drug dependence. Specifically, recent findings suggest that the kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) may play a role in aspects of nicotine dependence, which contribute to relapse and continued tobacco smoking.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to determine the involvement of the KOR in the initial behavioral responses of nicotine, nicotine reward, and nicotine withdrawal using the highly selective KOR antagonist JDTic. JDTic doses of 1, 4, 8, or 16 mg/kg were administered subcutaneously (s.c.) 18 h prior to nicotine treatment.

RESULTS

JDTic dose-dependently blocked acute nicotine-induced antinociception in the tail-flick but not the hot-plate test and did not significantly attenuate morphine's antinociceptive effect in either the tail-flick or hot-plate test. Furthermore, JDTic (8 and 16 mg/kg, s.c.) failed to block the expression of nicotine reward as measured by the conditioned place preference model. In contrast, JDTic and the KOR antagonist norBNI attenuated the expression of both the physical (somatic signs and hyperalgesia) and affective (anxiety-related behavior and conditioned place aversion) nicotine withdrawal signs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings clearly show that the KOR is involved in mediating the withdrawal aspects of nicotine dependence. The results from this study suggest that blockade of the KOR by selective KOR antagonists may be useful smoking cessation pharmacotherapies.

[In vitro comparison of thienorphine metabolism in liver microsomes of human, Beagle dog and rat]

The inter-species differences of thienorphine metabolism were investigated in human, Beagle dog and rat liver microsomes, by comparing enzyme kinetics of the parent drug and the formation of its major metabolites. The incubation systems of thienorphine with liver microsomes of the three species were optimized in terms of thienorphine concentration, microsomal protein content and incubation time. The concentrations of thienorphine and its metabolites in incubates were measured by a LC-MS/MS method. The biotransformation of thienorphine by human liver microsomes was the lowest among the three species. The K(m), V(max), CL(int) and T1/2 of thienorphine obtained from human liver microsomes were (4.00 +/- 0.59) micromol x L(-1), (0.21 +/- 0.06) micromol x L(-1) x min(-1), (117 +/- 3.19) mL x min(-1) x kg(-1) and (223 +/- 6.10) min, respectively. The corresponding kinetic parameters for dog and rat liver microsomes were (3.57 +/- 0.69) and (3.28 +/- 0.50) micromol x L(-1), (0.18 +/- 0.04) and (0.14 +/- 0.04) micromol x L(-1) x min(-1), (213 +/- 1.06) and (527 +/- 7.79) mL x min(-1) x kg(-1), (244 +/- 1.21) and (70.7 +/- 1.05) min, respectively. A total of six phase I metabolites were observed in liver microsomes, including one N-dealkylated metabolite, three oxidative metabolites and two N-dealkylated oxidation metabolites. All these six metabolites were detected in the liver microsomes of the three species. However, the relative amounts of the metabolites generated were different in three species. The results indicated that the major phase I metabolic pathway of thienorphine was similar in the liver microsomes from all three species. However, the inter-species differences observed were relative amounts of the metabolites as well as the metabolic characteristics of thienorphine in liver microsomal incubates.

Buprenorphine and major metabolites in blood specimens collected for drug analysis in law enforcement purposes

A liquid chromatographic/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric method for the quantification of buprenorphine (BUP), norbuprenorphine (NBUP), buprenorphine-3-beta-D-glucuronide (BUPG) and norbuprenorphine-3-beta-D-glucuronide (NBUPG) in serum samples was developed and validated. Pre-treatment of BUP and NBUP was by liquid-liquid extraction, while glucuronides were favourably isolated by solid phase extraction. Separation in 2 separate runs (2 x 5 min) was achieved using isocratic elution. The method was applied to 20 authentic serum specimens collected for law enforcement purposes where BUP intake had been indicated. The parent drug was not detectable in half of the specimens at a lower limit of detection of 0.2 ng/mL, whereas NBUP could be determined from any sample but one. NBUPG is the major metabolite present, which could be identified along with BUPG in all samples under investigation. In authentic specimens it could be advisable to monitor BUP metabolites along with the parent drug.

Effect of rifampin and nelfinavir on the metabolism of methadone and buprenorphine in primary cultures of human hepatocytes

We tested the hypothesis that primary cultures of human hepatocytes could predict potential drug interactions with methadone and buprenorphine. Hepatocytes (five donors) were preincubated with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (vehicle), rifampin, or nelfinavir before incubation with methadone or buprenorphine. Culture media (0-60 min) was analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for R- and S-methadone and R- and S-2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) or for buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, and their glucuronides [buprenorphine-3-glucuronide (B-3-G) and norbuprenorphine-3-glucuronide (N-3-G)]. R- and S-EDDP were detected in three of five, four of five, and five of five media from cells pretreated with DMSO, nelfinavir, and rifampin. R-EDDP increased 3.1- and 26.5-fold, and S-EDDP increased 2.5- and 21.3-fold after nelfinavir and rifampin. The rifampin effect was significant. B-3-G production was detected in media of all cells incubated with buprenorphine and accounted for most of the buprenorphine loss from culture media; it was not significantly affected by either pretreatment. Norbuprenorphine and N-3-G together were detected in three of five, four of five, and five of five donors pretreated with DMSO, nelfinavir and rifampin, and norbuprenorphine in one of five, one of five, and two of five donors. Although there was a trend for norbuprenorphine (2.8- and 4.9-fold) and N-3-G (1.7- and 1.9-fold) to increase after nelfinavir and rifampin, none of the changes were significant. To investigate low norbuprenorphine production, buprenorphine was incubated with human liver and small intestine microsomes fortified to support both N-dealkylation and glucuronidation; N-dealkylation predominated in small intestine and glucuronidation in liver microsomes. These studies support the hypothesis that methadone metabolism and its potential for drug interactions can be predicted with cultured human hepatocytes, but for buprenorphine the combined effects of hepatic and small intestinal metabolism are probably involved.

[Structure-activity relationships analysis of thienorphine and its derivatives]

Thienorphine is a chemically-new opioid developed in Beijing Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology. To elucidate the chemical basis for the unique pharmacological effects of thienorphine, 15 derivatives were synthesized according to combinatorial chemistry and the structure-activity relationships of these compounds were studied. It is demonstrated that thienorphine is a potent long-acting partial agonist. N-Cyclopropylmethyl is responsible for the antagonist effect of thienorphine. More importantly, thiophene at the end of side chain is most likely the pharmacophore accounts for the long-lasting effect of thienorphine. Change of the connection of thiophene and the side chain does not result in changes in the antinociceptive activity.

Simultaneous quantification of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine-glucuronide and norbuprenorphine-glucuronide in human umbilical cord by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

A LCMS method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of buprenorphine (BUP), norbuprenorphine (NBUP), buprenorphine-glucuronide (BUP-Gluc) and norbuprenorphine-glucuronide (NBUP-Gluc) in human umbilical cord. Quantification was achieved by selected ion monitoring of precursor ions m/z 468.4 for BUP; 414.3 for NBUP; 644.4 for BUP-Gluc and 590 for NBUP-Gluc. BUP and NBUP were identified by MS(2), with m/z 396, 414 and 426 for BUP, and m/z 340, 364 and 382 for NBUP. Glucuronide conjugates were identified by MS(3) with m/z 396 and 414 for BUP-Gluc and m/z 340 and 382 for NBUP-Gluc. The assay was linear 1-50 ng/g. Intra-day, inter-day and total assay imprecision (%RSD) were <14.5%, and analytical recovery ranged from 94.1% to 112.3% for all analytes. Extraction efficiencies were >66.3%, and process efficiency >73.4%. Matrix effect ranged, in absolute value, from 3.7% to 7.4% (CV<21.8%, n=8). The method was selective with no endogenous or exogenous interferences from 41 compounds evaluated. Sensitivity was high with limits of detection of 0.8 ng/g. In order to prove method applicability, an authentic umbilical cord obtained from an opioid-dependent pregnant woman receiving BUP pharmacotherapy was analyzed. Interestingly, BUP was not detected but concentrations of the other metabolites were NBUP-Gluc 13.4 ng/g, BUP-Gluc 3.5 ng/g and NBUP 1.2 ng/g.

Comparison of cerebral pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in anin vivosheep model

The pharmacokinetics and time course of blood-brain equilibration of buprenorphine (BUP) and norbuprenorphine (norBUP) in sheep were characterized. Sheep were administered 0.04 mg kg(-1) BUP or 0.6 mg kg(-1) norBUP as 4-min i.v. infusions. The cerebral kinetics were inferred from arterio-sagittal sinus concentration gradients and changes in cerebral blood flow. These data were fitted to physiologically based pharmacokinetic models. BUP cerebral kinetics were best described by a membrane-limited model with a large equilibration delay (half-life of 20 min) between brain and blood due to intermediate permeability (47 ml min(-1)) and a large cerebral distribution volume (595 ml). Significant limitation in permeability (6 ml min(-1)) characterized the cerebral kinetics of norBUP with a cerebral distribution volume (157 ml) giving a blood-brain equilibration half-life (21 min) similar to that for BUP. The logD of BUP and norBUP were 3.93 +/- 0.08 and 1.18 +/- 0.04 (mean +/- SD), respectively. Both compounds revealed slow cerebral equilibration with variations in degree of permeability and distribution volume reflecting the difference in lipophilicity. It is possible that norBUP contributes to the central effects seen after chronic BUP administration as this study demonstrated its entry into the brain.

[Determination of buprenorphine in urine]

Buprenorphine is one of the drugs used for treatment of opioid-dependent patients enrolled in rehabilitation programs in Norway. Buprenorphine is metabolized in the liver by cytochrome P450 to the active metabolite norbuprenorphine, and further to buprenorphine-glucuronide and norbuprenorphine-glucuronide. The Division of Forensic Toxicology and Drug Abuse at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health has during the past 5 years received an increasing number of urine samples for buprenorphine analysis. All urine samples with question of buprenorphine have since August 2005 been analysed with a new method, which analyses the glucuronides of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in urine. This method is fast and simple and saves time and resources in our routine laboratory.

Development and GC-MS Validation of a Highly Sensitive Recombinant G6PDH-Based Homogeneous Immunoassay for the Detection of Buprenorphine and Norbuprenorphine in Urine

Buprenorphine is now increasingly prescribed as an alternative to methadone for the treatment of heroin addiction. Because of its potency (dosage usages from 0.2 mg to 8 mg), the drug concentrations in body fluids are normally very low. Here, we report the first recombinant glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH)-based homogeneous immunoassay (EMIT-type assay) for free buprenorphine and free norbuprenorphine in urine. The antibody used in this assay cross-reacts nearly identically with buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine and, at the same time, has less than 1% cross-reactivity with a wide range of commonly prescribed opiates, particularly those structurally related compounds such as morphine, codeine, and dihydrocodeine. More importantly, this assay has a low detection limit of 1 ng/mL for buprenorphine or norbuprenorphine. Further evaluation of this technique using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) of authentic urine samples demonstrated that the accuracy of the assay is greater than 95%. Because this assay is designed to measure the free drugs in urine, it resulted in simplification for GC-MS or liquid chromatography-MS confirmation methods that did not require urine hydrolysis before solid-phase or liquid-liquid extraction.

Rapid Quantification of Buprenorphine-Glucuronide and Norbuprenorphine-Glucuronide in Human Urine by LC-MS-MS

A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) method was developed and validated for the determination of buprenorphine-glucuronide (BUP-G) and norbuprenorphine-glucuronide (NBUP-G) in human urine. The method included a dilution step followed by filtration through a Mini-Uniprep Filter and direct injection onto the LC column. The analytes were quantified in multiple reactions monitoring mode using one transition ion. Norbuprenorpine-d(3) (NBUP-d(3)) was used as the internal standard. The concentration ranges were 6-161 ng/mL for BUP-G and 12-295 ng/mL for NBUP-G. Recoveries determined after filtration for the analytes were 75%. The between-day precision of the method was in the range of 4.8-11%. The limits of quantification were found to be 4.6 ng/mL for BUP-G and 11.8 ng/mL for NBUP-G. Approximately 1000 samples from law enforcement, prison inmates, probation services, and hospitals were analyzed by the presented method. The ratios of drug glucuronides versus creatinine were calculated for a selection of samples (n = 151), where there was information on treatment with buprenorphine between 16 and 20 mg/day. The majority (86%) of the samples had a ratio of BUP-G/creatinine below 570 microg/g, and 76% of the samples had NBUP-G/creatinine lower than 1060 microg/g. The LC-MS-MS method proved to be robust and specific for the determination of BUP-G and NBUP-G in urine.

Simultaneous determination of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine and the enantiomers of methadone and its metabolite (EDDP) in human plasma by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry

A previously reported enantioselective LC-MS assay for the determination of (R)- and (S)-methadone [Met] and (R)- and (S)-2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenyl-pyrrolidine [EDDP] (the primary metabolite of Met) has been adapted for use in the simultaneous determination of the plasma concentrations of Met, EDDP, buprenorphine (Bu) and norbuprenorphine (norBu). All of the target compounds were separated within 15 min using an alpha1-acid glycoprotein chiral stationary phase, a mobile phase composed of acetonitrile: ammonium acetate buffer [10 mM, pH 7.0] in a ratio of 18:82 (v/v), a flow rate of 0.9 ml/min at 25 degrees C. Deuterium labeled compounds were used as internal standards [d4-Bu, d3-norBu, (R,S)-d3-Met and (R,S)-d3-EDDP] and linear relationships between peak height ratios and drug concentrations were obtained for Bu and norBu in the range 0.2-12 ng/ml with correlation coefficients greater than 0.999. The relative standard deviations (%R.S.D.) for the intra- and inter-day precision of the method were <4.5% and for accuracy was <4.0%. The method was validated and used to analyze plasma samples obtained from opioid dependent methadone-maintained adults enrolled in a research study.

Simultaneous determination of methadone, buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in biological fluids for therapeutic drug monitoring purposes

Methadone and buprenorphine are two of the drugs most frequently used for abstinence from illicit opioids and in the treatment of pain. A sensitive and selective high-performance liquid chromatographic method with diode array detection for the simultaneous determination of methadone, buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine has been developed. Separation of the three analytes was obtained by using a reversed-phase column (C8, 250mmx4.6mm i.d., 5microm) and a mobile phase composed of 40% phosphate buffer containing triethylamine, 50% methanol and 10% acetonitrile (final apparent pH 6.0). Loxapine was used as the internal standard. An accurate pre-treatment procedure of biological samples was developed, using solid-phase extraction with C8 cartridges (100mg, 1mL) and needing small amounts of plasma or urine (300microL). The calibration curves were linear over a working range of 10.0-1500.0ng/mL for methadone and of 5.0-500.0ng/mL for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in both matrices. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) and the limit of detection (LOD) were 1.0 and 0.4ng/mL for methadone and 0.5 and 0.2ng/mL for both buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine, respectively. The method was successfully applied to the analysis of plasma and urine samples from patients undergoing treatment with these drugs. Precision and accuracy results were satisfactory and no interference from endogenous or exogenous compounds was found. The method is suitable for the simultaneous determination of methadone and buprenorphine in human plasma and urine for therapeutic drug monitoring purposes.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the respiratory depressant effect of norbuprenorphine in rats

The objective of this investigation was to characterize the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) correlation of buprenorphine's active metabolite norbuprenorphine for the effect on respiration in rats. Following i.v. administration in rats (dose range 0.32-1.848 mg), the time course of the concentration in plasma was determined in conjunction with the effect in ventilation as determined with a novel whole-body plethysmography technique. The PK of norbuprenorphine was best described by a three-compartment PK model with nonlinear elimination. A saturable biophase distribution model with a power PD model described the PK-PD relationship best. No saturation of the effect at high concentrations was observed, indicating that norbuprenorphine acts as a full agonist with regard to respiratory depression. Moreover, analysis of the hysteresis based on the combined receptor association-dissociation biophase distribution model yielded high values of the rate constants for receptor association and dissociation, indicating that these processes are not rate-limiting. In a separate analysis, the time course of the plasma concentrations of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine following administration of both the parent drug and the metabolite were simultaneously analyzed based on a six-compartment PK model with nonlinear elimination of norbuprenorphine. This analysis showed that following i.v. administration, 10% of the administered dose of buprenorphine is converted into norbuprenorphine. By simulation it is shown that following i.v. administration of buprenorphine, the concentrations of norbuprenorphine reach values that are well below the values causing an effect on respiration.

Thienorphine: receptor binding and behavioral effects in rhesus monkeys

Thienorphine is an oripavine with long-lasting antinociceptive effects in mice that are thought to be mediated by mu-opioid receptors. This study examined the receptor binding of thienorphine in cell membrane homogenates and its behavioral effects in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Affinity and potency were determined using radioligand displacement and stimulation of guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding in C6 (mu, delta) and Chinese hamster ovary (kappa) cell membranes. Thienorphine displayed high affinity for kappa-, mu-, and delta-opioid receptors with K(i) values of 0.14, 0.22, and 0.69 nM, respectively. Thienorphine partially stimulated kappa-opioid (75%) and mu-opioid (19%) receptors and not delta-opioid receptors. Thienorphine dose-dependently increased tail-withdrawal latency for 50 degrees C water and not 55 degrees C water with effects lasting for more than 7 days. The kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) (3.2 mg/kg) and a large dose (1.0 mg/kg) of naltrexone prevented thienorphine-induced antinociception. Thienorphine enhanced the antinociceptive effects of morphine and U50,488 [trans-3, 4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl]-benzeneacetamide] with 50 degrees C water; with 55 degrees C water, thienorphine enhanced the effects of morphine and attenuated the effects of U50,488. In other monkeys, thienorphine decreased responding in both components of a multiple schedule of food presentation and stimulus shock termination for up to 8 days; naltrexone and nor-BNI partially prevented these rate-decreasing effects. In morphine-treated monkeys discriminating naltrexone, thienorphine, and U50,488 neither substituted for nor modified the naltrexone discriminative stimulus. Thienorphine and U50,488 produced the same directly observable signs. These results show that thienorphine has long-lasting effects that seem to be mediated by low-efficacy agonism at kappa-opioid receptors, both in vitro and in vivo.

Dexamethasone hepatic induction in rats subsequently treated with high dose buprenorphine does not lead to respiratory depression

In humans, asphyxic deaths and severe poisonings have been attributed to high-dosage buprenorphine, a maintenance therapy for heroin addiction. However, in rats, intravenous buprenorphine at doses up to 90 mg kg(-1) was not associated with significant effects on arterial blood gases. In contrast, norbuprenorphine, the buprenorphine major cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A-derived metabolite, is a potent respiratory depressant. Thus, our aim was to study the consequences of CYP3A induction on buprenorphine-associated effects on resting ventilation in rats. We investigated the effects on ventilation of 30 mg kg(-1) buprenorphine alone or following cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A induction with dexamethasone, using whole body plethysmography (N=24) and arterial blood gases (N=12). Randomized animals in 4 groups received sequential intraperitoneal dosing with: (dexamethasone [days 1-3]+buprenorphine [day 4]), (dexamethasone solvent [days 1-3]+buprenorphine [day 4]), (dexamethasone [days 1-3]+buprenorphine solvent [day 4]), or (dexamethasone solvent [days 1-3]+buprenorphine solvent [day 4]). Buprenorphine alone caused a significant rapid and sustained increase in the inspiratory time (P<0.001), without significant effects on the respiratory frequency, the tidal volume, the minute volume, or arterial blood gases. In dexamethasone-pretreated rats, there was no significant alteration in the respiratory parameters, despite CYP3A induction and significant increase of the ratio of plasma norbuprenorphine-to-buprenorphine concentrations. In conclusion, dexamethasone did not modify the effects of 30 mg kg(-1) buprenorphine on rat ventilation. Our results suggest a limited role of drug-mediated CYP3A induction in the occurrence of buprenorphine-attributed respiratory depression in addicts.

A highly selective kappa-opioid receptor agonist with low addictive potential and dependence liability

Buprenorphine analogs have been synthesized. In the studies of analgesic and addictive effects in mice and [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assay in human brain tissue, an analog of buprenorphine where the tert-butyl is replaced by a cyclobutyl moiety (16) has been identified as a selective kappa-partial agonist which gives antinociceptive effects, but has low abuse potential. The results may lead to lower degrees of dysphoria than full kappa-agonists.

Quantitative Analysis of Buprenorphine and Norbuprenorphine in Urine using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Buprenorphine is an opioid analgesic drug that is used as an alternative to methadone to treat heroin addiction. Established methods for the analysis of buprenorphine and its metabolites in urine such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) involve complicated sample extraction procedures. The aim of the present study was to develop a sensitive yet straightforward method for the simultaneous analysis of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in urine using liquid chromatography-MS-MS. The method comprised an enzymatic hydrolysis using Patella vulgata b-glucuronidase, followed by centrifugation and direct analysis of the supernatant. The limits of detection and quantitation were < 1 microg/L for buprenorphine and < 1 and 4 microg/L, respectively, for norbuprenorphine. Assay coefficients of variation (CVs) were < 15%, with the exception of concentrations close to the limit of quantitation, where CVs were below 20%. In direct comparison with an established GC-MS protocol, the method showed minimal negative bias (8.7% for buprenorphine and 1.8% for norbuprenorphine) and was less susceptible to sample carryover. The extent of conjugation in unhydrolyzed urine was investigated and found to be highly variable, with proportions of unconjugated buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine of 6.4% [range 0% to 67%; standard deviation (SD) 9.7%] and 34% (range 0% to 100%; SD 23.8%), respectively.

The In Vivo Glucuronidation of Buprenorphine and Norbuprenorphine Determined by Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

The opioid partial agonist medication, buprenorphine (BUP), and its primary metabolite, norbuprenorphine (NBUP), are extensively glucuronidated. Sensitive analytical methods that include determination of buprenorphine-3-glucuronide (BUPG) and norbuprenorphine-3-glucuronide (NBUPG) are needed to more fully understand the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine. A method has now been developed that uses solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. BUP-d4, NBUP-d3, and morphine-3-glucuronide-d3 were used as internal standards. The lower limit of quantitation was 0.1 and 0.5 ng/mL for each of the analytes in 1-mL of human plasma and urine, respectively, except for NBUP in urine in which it was 2.5 ng/mL. The analytes were stable under the following conditions: plasma and urine at room temperature, up to 20 hours; plasma and urine at -20 degrees C for 119 and 85 days, respectively; plasma freeze-thaw, up to 3 cycles; processed sample, up to 96 hours at -20 degrees C and up to 48 hours on the autosampler; stock solutions at room temperature and at -20 degrees C, up to 6 hours and 128 days, respectively. In plasma collected from 5 subjects on maintenance daily sublingual doses of 16 mg BUP and 4 mg naloxone, respective 0- to 24-hour areas under the curve were 32, 88, 26, and 316 ng/mL x h for BUP, NBUP, BUPG, and NBUPG. In urine samples respective percent of daily dose excreted in the 24-hour urine were 0.014%, 1.89%, 1.01%, and 7.76%. This method allowed us to determine that NBUPG is a major metabolite present in plasma and urine of BUP. Because urinary elimination is limited ( approximately 11% of daily dose), the role of NBUPG in total clearance of buprenorphine is not yet known.

Thienorphine is a potent long-acting partial opioid agonist: a comparative study with buprenorphine

A strategy in the development of new treatment for opioid addiction is to find partial opioid agonists with properties of long duration of action and high oral bioavailability. In a search for such compounds, thienorphine, a novel analog of buprenorphine, was synthesized. Here, we reported that, like buprenorphine, thienorphine bound potently and nonselectively to mu-, delta-, and kappa-opioid receptors stably expressed in CHO (Chinese hamster ovary) cells and behaved as a partial agonist at mu-opioid receptor. However, some differences were observed between the pharmacological profiles of thienorphine and buprenorphine. In vitro, thienorphine was more potent than buprenorphine in inhibiting [3H]diprenorphine and stimulating guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding to rat mu-opioid receptor stably expressed in CHO cells. In vivo, thienorphine exhibited a less potent but more efficacious antinociceptive effect with an ED50 value of 0.25 mg/kg s.c. and more potent antimorphine effect with an ED50 value of 0.64 mg/kg intragastric, compared with buprenorphine. Additionally, the bioavailability of thienorphine was greatly higher than that of buprenorphine after oral administration. Moreover, compared with buprenorphine, thienorphine showed a similar long-lasting antinociceptive effect but a much longer antagonism of morphine-induced lethality (more than 15 days). These results indicate that thienorphine is a potent, long-acting partial opioid agonist with high oral bioavailability and may have possible application in treating addiction.

Liquid chromatographic-electrospray ionization mass spectrometric quantitative analysis of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, nordiazepam and oxazepam in rat plasma

A liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric method with electrospray ionization is presented for the simultaneous determination of buprenorphine, nordiazepam and their pharmacologically active metabolites, norbuprenorphine and oxazepam, in rat plasma. The drugs were extracted from plasma by liquid-liquid extraction and chromatographically separated using a gradient elution of aqueous ammonium formate and acetonitrile. Following electrospray ionization, the analytes were quantified in the single ion storage mode. The assay was validated according to current acceptance criteria for bioanalytical method validation. It was proved to be linear from 0.7 to 200 ng/ml plasma for buprenorphine, 1.0 to 200 ng/ml for norbuprenorphine, 2.0 to 200 ng/ml for nordiazepam, and from 5.0 to 200 ng/ml for oxazepam. The average recoveries of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, nordiazepam and oxazepam were 89, 39, 88 and 82%, respectively, with average coefficients of variation ranging from 1.8 to 14.3%. The limits of quantitation for these drugs were 0.7, 1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 ng/ml, respectively, with associated precisions within 17% and accuracies within +/-18% of the nominal values. Both the intra- and inter-assay precision values did not exceed 11.3% for the four analytes. Intra- and inter-assay accuracies lay within +/-15% of the nominal values. The validated method was applied to the determination of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, nordiazepam and oxazepam in plasma samples collected from rats at various times after intravenous administration of buprenorphine and nordiazepam.

Validation of the Immunalysis(R) Microplate ELISA for the Detection of Buprenorphine and Its Metabolite Norbuprenorphine in Urine

The purpose of this study was to validate the Immunalysis Buprenorphine Microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of buprenorphine in urine samples. Sixty-nine urine samples were obtained from volunteers on the Subutex treatment program and from routine samples submitted to the laboratory for buprenorphine testing. For ELISA analysis, samples were diluted 1:10 with K(2)HPO(4) (0.1M, pH 7.0). The limit of detection was calculated as 0.5 ng/mL buprenorphine. The intra-assay and interday precision was 3.8% (n = 10) and 8.6% (n = 50) respectively at 1 ng/mL buprenorphine. At a low concentration of norbuprenorphine (1 ng/mL), the immunoassay demonstrated a cross-reactivity of 78%. A higher cross-reactivity of 116% was observed at a higher concentration of norbuprenorphine (10 ng/mL). Dihydrocodeine, codeine, tramadol, morphine, propoxyphene, methadone, and EDDP were tested at concentrations of 10 ng/mL and 10,000 ng/mL and demonstrated no cross-reactivity with the assay. For liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS), deuterated internal standard mixture, 1M acetate buffer (pH 5.0), and b-glucuronidase were added to the standards and samples, which were then incubated for 3 h at 60 degrees C. After incubation, 3 mL K(2)HPO(4) (0.1M, pH 6.0) was added and the pH altered to pH 6.0 using 1M KOH. Buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine were subsequently extracted by solid-phase. Twenty-one samples were confirmed positive and 48 samples were confirmed negative by LC-MS-MS. Using a cut-off value of 0.5 ng/mL buprenorphine, the immunoassay demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.

Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometric analysis of buprenorphine and its N-dealkylated metabolite norbuprenorphine in rat brain tissue and plasma

INTRODUCTION

A specific, accurate, and reproducible liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric (LC/MS) method was developed and validated that allows simultaneous measurement of the centrally acting analgesic buprenorphine and its major metabolite, norbuprenorphine, in rat brain and plasma samples.

METHODS

A 96-well plate solid phase extraction (SPE) procedure was developed for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine using mixed-mode cation-exchange reversed-phase sorbent. An LC method using a C8 column with isocratic mobile phase (80:20 water/acetonitrile with 20 mM ammonium acetate and 0.1% acetic acid) was developed for reproducible and selective separation. A quadrupole mass spectrometer with atmospheric electrospray ionization source under positive ion mode was used for detection. d4-Buprenorphine and d3-norbuprenorphine were used as internal standards.

RESULTS

The calibration curves for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in plasma and brain tissue were linear within the range of 7 to 8333 ng/ml (plasma) and 5 to 5000 ng/g (brain). The lower limit of quantification for both buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine from brain tissue was 5 ng/g, and from plasma was 7 ng/ml. Assay accuracy and precision of back-calculated standards were within +/-15%.

DISCUSSION

This method will be useful for investigation of buprenorphine's mechanism of action and clinical profile.

Buprenorphine is protective against the depressive effects of norbuprenorphine on ventilation

High dose buprenorphine is used as substitution treatment in heroin addiction. However, deaths have been reported in addicts using buprenorphine. The role of norbuprenorphine, an N-dealkyl metabolite of buprenorphine, was hypothesized to explain these fatal cases. We determined the median intravenous lethal dose (LD(50)) of norbuprenorphine in male Sprague-Dawley rats. The effects of a single intravenous dose of 3 or 9 mg/kg norbuprenorphine alone on arterial blood gases were studied. Finally, the effect of pre- and post-administrations of buprenorphine on norbuprenorphine-induced changes on arterial blood gases were analyzed. Norbuprenorphine's LD(50) was 10 mg kg(-1). Norbuprenorphine 3 mg kg(-1) produces the rapid onset of sustained respiratory depression, as demonstrated at 20 min by a maximal significant increase in PaCO(2) (8.4+/-0.9 versus 5.7+/-0.1 kPa), decrease in arterial pH (7.25+/-0.06 versus 7.44+/-0.01), and hypoxia (8.3+/-0.6 versus 11.1+/-0.2 kPa). Buprenorphine not only protected against the effects of 3 mg kg(-1) norbuprenorphine in a dose-dependent manner but also reversed the effects when given afterward. Binding experiments suggest a role for micro- and to a lesser extent for delta-opioid receptors in buprenorphine protective effect against norbuprenorphine-induced respiratory depression. In conclusion, our data clearly show that norbuprenorphine alone causes important deleterious effects on ventilation in rats. However, buprenorphine protective effect calls into question the role for norbuprenorphine in respiratory toxicity associated with buprenorphine use.

Hydrolysis of Conjugated Metabolites of Buprenorphine II. The Quantitative Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Norbuprenorphine-3- -D-Glucuronide in Human Urine

In gas chromatographic-mass spectroscopic analysis of buprenorphine metabolites, the urine specimen must be first hydrolyzed to release buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine from their glucuronide conjugates. For evaluation of existing hydrolysis methods and to find out the optimal hydrolysis conditions, buprenorphine-3-beta-D-glucuronide (B3G) and norbuprenorphine-3-beta-D-glucuronide (NB3G) were synthesized. In a previous communication we reported on the optimum conditions for hydrolysis of B3G. Because we have previously shown that no hydrolysis was achieved under basic conditions and that acid hydrolysis resulted in extensive degradation, only enzymatic hydrolysis was examined for NB3G. This study therefore reports on the optimum enzymatic conditions for the hydrolysis of NB3G. Urine fortified with synthetic NB3G was hydrolyzed with beta-glucuronidases from different source species, including Helix pomatia, Escherichia coli, and Patella vulgata. Glusulase, a preparation containing both the beta-glucuronidase (H. pomatia) and sulfatase, was also tested. It was found that marked differences exist in the reactivity of these enzymes. Incubation with glucuronidases from H. pomatia or E. coli at 37 degrees C for 16 h resulted in quantitative hydrolysis of NB3G. At 60 degrees C, complete hydrolysis was achieved with 1000 units of H. pomatia in 4 h and after only 1 h with glusulase. On the other hand, incubation at 60 degrees C for 4 h with Patella vulgata resulted in only 14.7% hydrolysis.

Simultaneous determination of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in serum by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry

Buprenorphine is a strong narcotic analgesic. It is also used in the substitution therapy for opium alkaloid addicts. The aim of this paper was to develop and validate a highly sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry method for simultaneous determination of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in human serum. The developed methodology was then applied to real clinical cases in a clinical toxicology setting. Extraction of analytes has been done using solid-phase extraction. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a LiChroCART column with a Purospher RP-18e cartridge, and for detection an LCQ mass spectrometer with an ion trap analyzer was used. Quantitation of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine was performed in a single ion monitoring mode (m/z 468 buprenorphine, m/z 414 for norbuprenorphine) in order to increase the sensitivity of the method. The standard curves for both compounds were linear over the range of 0.2-10 ng/mL (r2 > 0.995). The quantitation limit was 0.2 ng/mL for both analytes. The method was used for quantitation of both buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in the serum of 15 patients undergoing the buprenorphine substitution therapy. Serum concentrations ranged between 0.36 and 4.60 ng/mL for buprenorphine and 0.21 and 2.50 ng/mL for norbuprenorphine, with buprenorphine single dosages from 0.8 to 6.0 mg.

Buprenorphine and Norbuprenorphine Concentrations in Human Breast Milk Samples Determined by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Buprenorphine (BUP) is considered to be safe during pregnancy. However, the extent of BUP transfer into breast milk has not been investigated thoroughly. Because the drug concentration in the milk is 1 of the determinants in the assessment of the exposure risk, a rapid and sensitive LC-MS/MS method has been developed and evaluated to measure BUP and norbuprenorphine (norBUP) concentrations in milk. A solid-phase and 2 liquid-liquid extraction procedures have been compared. The lower limits of detection and quantification were 0.05 ng/mL and 0.18 ng/mL for BUP and 0.05 ng/mL and 0.20 ng/mL for norBUP, respectively, using a sample volume of 0.5 mL milk. BUP and norBUP concentrations determined from 10 random breast milk samples collected over 4 successive days from a lactating woman during buprenorphine maintenance therapy ranged from 1.0 to 14.7 and 0.6 to 6.3 ng/mL, respectively. Drug exposure of the infant may be considered to be low. Further investigations may seek to extend these preliminary findings to evaluate an infant's level of BUP exposure through breast milk.

IN VITRO METABOLISM STUDY OF BUPRENORPHINE: EVIDENCE FOR NEW METABOLIC PATHWAYS

Buprenorphine (BUP) is a synthetic derivative of the morphine alkaloid thebaine. BUP is metabolized by N-dealkylation to form the active metabolite nor-buprenorphine (Nor-BUP), and both undergo subsequent glucuronidation. Although BUP has been used clinically for years, its metabolism has still not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to clarify the identity of the human hepatic cytochromes P450 (P450s) involved in BUP metabolism and to investigate other potential metabolites. The metabolism of BUP was examined using human liver microsomes (HLM) and Ad293 P450-transfected cell lines, as well as CYP 3A4 and 2C8 recombinant isoforms. The kinetic parameters of metabolite formation were calculated for HLM and competent isoforms. Individual contribution of P450 isoforms in BUP metabolism as well as Nor-BUP production was evaluated using chemical inhibition experiments, as well as the relative activity factor approach. The analytical method used was based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Among the 13 P450 isoforms tested, CYP 3A4, 2C8, 3A5, and 3A7 produced Nor-BUP. Based on the results of chemical inhibition, CYP 3A4 accounts for about 65% of Nor-BUP production and CYP 2C8 for about 30%. BUP utilization by either HLM or P450-transfected cells revealed that another oxidative metabolic pathway exists, which was found to involve CYP 2C9, 2C18, 2C19, and mainly CYP 3A. Incubation of BUP or Nor-BUP with HLM led to the formation of new metabolites, identified by tandem mass spectrometry as being hydroxy-BUP and hydroxy-Nor-BUP. Hydroxy-BUP was produced by the CYP 3A, but not the 2C isoforms.

Effect of benzodiazepines on the metabolism of buprenorphine in human liver microsomes

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether enzyme inhibition explains the clinical adverse interaction of benzodiazepines and buprenorphine.

METHODS

Buprenorphine was incubated in the presence of benzodiazepines (or metabolites) with human liver microsomes (HLMs). A number of benzodiazepines were screened at therapeutic concentrations after 0-min and 15-min preincubation times. For tentative metabolically activated inhibitors, the kinetics of inhibition was studied in a secondary incubation system. Buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine were quantified by means of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Buprenorphine elimination and norbuprenorphine formation were at most reduced by 26% (i.e., weak or negligible inhibition). Evidence of metabolically activated inhibition suggested the need for further studies on the inhibitory kinetics. Midazolam caused time- and concentration-dependent inhibition of norbuprenorphine formation with pseudo-first-order kinetics, and K(I) and k(inact) values of 10.5 microM and 0.045 min(-1), respectively. Mixed-type inhibition of buprenorphine elimination (K(i) = 30-35 microM) and a noncompetitive inhibition of norbuprenorphine formation were also observed. For clonazepam (up to 10 microM), 3-hydroxy-7-acetamidoclonazepam (up to 10 microM), and alpha-hydroxy-triazolam (up to 1.0 microM), no time- or concentration-dependent inhibition of buprenorphine metabolism was found.

CONCLUSION

A single benzodiazepine, midazolam, is a moderate mechanism-based inactivator of buprenorphine N-dealkylation. It is anticipated that repeated exposures to midazolam might alter the in vivo metabolism of buprenorphine.

Comparison of the antinociceptive effect of morphine, methadone, buprenorphine and codeine in two substrains of Sprague-Dawley rats

Sprague-Dawley rats from two different vendors, Möllegård, Denmark and B&K Universal, Sweden, have been tested for the antinociceptive effect of morphine, methadone, buprenorphine and codeine on the hot plate. Morphine and methadone had significantly weaker effect in Möllegård rats compare to B&K rats. In contrast, the effect of buprenorphine was stronger in Möllegård rats than in B&K rats and the effect of codeine was similar in the two substrains. Plasma levels of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide, morphine-3-glucuronide, buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine were determined at two time points after drug injection. Möllegård rats had significantly lower mean plasma level of morphine and significantly higher ratio of morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine at 30 min, compared to B&K rats. No difference was seen for the metabolism of buprenorphine in the two substrains. The results suggest that Möllegård rats metabolize morphine to morphine-3-glucuronide to a greater extent than B&K rats, and this may at least partly underlie the substrain difference in the effect of morphine. It is also suggested that the antinociceptive mechanisms of buprenorphne may be different from those of morphine and methadone.

Liquid chromatographic/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric analysis for the quantification of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine-3-beta-D-glucuronide and norbuprenorphine-3-beta-D-glucuronide in human plasma

A liquid chromatographic/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric method for the quantification of the synthetic opiate buprenorphine (BUP), norbuprenorphine (NBUP), buprenorphine-3-beta-D-glucuronide (BUP-3-G) and norbuprenorphine-3-beta-D-glucuronide (NBUP-3-G) in human plasma was developed and validated. Identification and quantification were based on the following transitions: m/z 468 to 396 and 414 for BUP, m/z 414 to 326 and 340 for NBUP, m/z 644 to 468 for BUP-3-G and m/z 590 to 414 for NBUP-3-G. Calibration by linear regression analysis utilized deuteratated internal standards and a weighting factor of 1/x. The method was accurate and precise across a linear dynamic range of 0.6-50.0 ng ml(-1). Pretreatment of plasma samples using solid-phase extraction was sufficient to limit matrix suppression to <30% for all four analytes. The method proved to be suitable for the quantification of BUP and the related metabolites in plasma samples collected from BUP-maintained study participants.