Factor VIII trafficking to CD4+ T cells shapes its immunogenicity and requires several types of antigen-presenting cells

Despite >80 years of clinical experience with coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors, surprisingly little is known about the in vivo mechanism of this most serious complication of replacement therapy for hemophilia A. These neutralizing antidrug alloantibodies arise in ∼30% of patients. Inhibitor formation is T-cell dependent, but events leading up to helper T-cell activation have been elusive because of, in part, the complex anatomy and cellular makeup of the spleen. Here, we show that FVIII antigen presentation to CD4+ T cells critically depends on a select set of several anatomically distinct antigen-presenting cells, whereby marginal zone B cells and marginal zone and marginal metallophilic macrophages but not red pulp macrophages (RPMFs) participate in shuttling FVIII to the white pulp in which conventional dendritic cells (DCs) prime helper T cells, which then differentiate into follicular helper T (Tfh) cells. Toll-like receptor 9 stimulation accelerated Tfh cell responses and germinal center and inhibitor formation, whereas systemic administration of FVIII alone in hemophilia A mice increased frequencies of monocyte-derived and plasmacytoid DCs. Moreover, FVIII enhanced T-cell proliferation to another protein antigen (ovalbumin), and inflammatory signaling-deficient mice were less likely to develop inhibitors, indicating that FVIII may have intrinsic immunostimulatory properties. Ovalbumin, which, unlike FVIII, is absorbed into the RPMF compartment, fails to elicit T-cell proliferative and antibody responses when administered at the same dose as FVIII. Altogether, we propose that an antigen trafficking pattern that results in efficient in vivo delivery to DCs and inflammatory signaling, shape the immunogenicity of FVIII.

Bispecific antibody mimicking factor VIII

There are some issues in the current factor (F)VIII replacement therapy for severe hemophilia A. One is mental and physical burden for the multiple intravenous infusions, and the other is difficulty in the hemostatic treatment for the patients with FVIII inhibitor. The development of novel drug with fully hemostatic effect, simply procedure, and long-acting reaction has been expected. Recently, FVIIIa-mimicking humanized recombinant bispecific antibody (ACE910) against FIXa and FX was developed. In the non-human clinical study, primate model of acquired hemophilia A demonstrated that the ACE910 was effective on both on-going and spontaneous bleedings. A phase I clinical study was conducted in healthy adults by single subcutaneous infusion of ACE910, followed by the patients' part study, Japanese patients with severe hemophilia A without or with inhibitor were treated with once-weekly subcutaneous injection of ACE910 at three dose levels for 12 successive weeks. There was no significant adverse event related to ACE910 in the clinical and laboratorial findings, and t1/2 of ACE910 was ∼30 days. The median annual bleeding rates were reduced very markedly dose-dependently, independently of inhibitor. Furthermore, among the patients with dose escalation, bleeding rate was decreased as ACE910 dose was increased. In conclusion, ACE910 would have a number of promising features: its high subcutaneous bioavailability and long half-life make the patients possible to be injected subcutaneously with a once-a-week or less frequency. In addition, ACE910 would provide the bleeding prophylactic efficacy, independently of inhibitor.

Characterization of a genetically engineered mouse model of hemophilia A with complete deletion of the F8 gene

ESSENTIALS: Anti-factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitory antibody formation is a severe complication in hemophilia A therapy. We genetically engineered and characterized a mouse model with complete deletion of the F8 coding region. F8(TKO) mice exhibit severe hemophilia, express no detectable F8 mRNA, and produce FVIII inhibitors. The defined background and lack of FVIII in F8(TKO) mice will aid in studying FVIII inhibitor formation.

BACKGROUND

The most important complication in hemophilia A treatment is the development of inhibitory anti-Factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies in patients after FVIII therapy. Patients with severe hemophilia who express no endogenous FVIII (i.e. cross-reacting material, CRM) have the greatest incidence of inhibitor formation. However, current mouse models of severe hemophilia A produce low levels of truncated FVIII. The lack of a corresponding mouse model hampers the study of inhibitor formation in the complete absence of FVIII protein.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to generate and characterize a novel mouse model of severe hemophilia A (designated the F8(TKO) strain) lacking the complete coding sequence of F8 and any FVIII CRM.

METHODS

Mice were created on a C57BL/6 background using Cre-Lox recombination and characterized using in vivo bleeding assays, measurement of FVIII activity by coagulation and chromogenic assays, and anti-FVIII antibody production using ELISA.

RESULTS

All F8 exonic coding regions were deleted from the genome and no F8 mRNA was detected in F8(TKO) mice. The bleeding phenotype of F8(TKO) mice was comparable to E16 mice by measurements of factor activity and tail snip assay. Similar levels of anti-FVIII antibody titers after recombinant FVIII injections were observed between F8(TKO) and E16 mice.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a new C57BL/6 mouse model for severe hemophilia A patients lacking CRM. These mice can be directly bred to the many C57BL/6 strains of genetically engineered mice, which is valuable for studying the impact of a wide variety of genes on FVIII inhibitor formation on a defined genetic background.

Recombinant human thrombin: safety and immunogenicity in pediatric burn wound excision

BACKGROUND

Previous studies of recombinant human thrombin (rThrombin) enrolled adult and adolescent patients. This phase 4, open-label, single-group study was conducted in pediatric patients undergoing synchronous burn wound excision and skin grafting to provide information regarding the safety and immunogenicity of rThrombin (primary and secondary endpoints) in this population.

METHODS

Topical rThrombin was applied as a hemostatic aid during a surgical procedure (day 1). Adverse events and clinical laboratory abnormalities were recorded during the study. Immunogenicity samples were collected on days 1 and 29 (study end). Study results were summarized with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Thirty patients enrolled and 28 completed the study. Mean age was 6.9 years (range, 0.9-17.8 years); 40.0% of patients were girls. Flame and scald were the most common burn types (33.3% each, n = 10/30). Mean graft size was 3.6% total body surface area. Procedural pain (50.0% patients), pruritus (43.3%), and anemia (30.0%) were the most commonly reported adverse events. All adverse events and clinical laboratory abnormalities were considered unrelated to treatment. No patients developed anti-rThrombin product antibodies at day 29.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients undergoing burn wound excision and skin grafting, rThrombin was well tolerated and did not lead to the formation of anti-rThrombin product antibodies.

Topical bovine thrombin and adverse events: a review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To review published evidence suggesting a link between topical bovine thrombin (TBT) and important adverse events (AEs).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

English language articles and abstracts were obtained from MEDLINE using combinations of text and MeSH terms for thrombin, bovine thrombin and their trade names. References from summary articles were also retrieved. Published case reports, review articles, and retrospective, prospective or observational studies involving either immunogenicity or AEs were selected for further assessment. Retrieved articles were evaluated separately as AE case reports, quantitative studies of antibodies, or quantitative studies of AEs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Presence of case causal information, temporal pattern of case report publication, reproducibility of aggregate data findings, and study design features.

RESULTS

The major limitations of reviewed publications were insufficient information regarding TBT and other exposures, and designs in which linkage between laboratory immune phenomena and AEs could not be evaluated. While immunogenicity studies did support an increased risk for post-TBT antibodies, there was no consistent evidence that this led to an increased AE risk or severity. Common evidentiary deficiencies included case reports from high incidence environments, studies of combination or mixture products, biased study designs, lack of patient-level exposure data, inadequate control groups and insufficient sample sizes. The best designed study (a randomized, controlled comparison of TBT to a recombinant bovine product) documented post-TBT antibody production, but no important efficacy or AE differences. An examination of publication dates for case reports showed a peak between 1992 and 1994 followed by a substantial drop. Since 1997 the number of published AE case reports has continued to decline.

CONCLUSIONS

TBT increases the risk for antibody elevations in patients. A careful review of published evidence does not show that either TBT itself or any associated elevations in anti-bovine antibodies are risk factors for clinically important AEs.

Bovine thrombin: history, use, and risk in the surgical patient

Thrombin is a common hemostatic drug used in surgical practice for over 100 years because of its simplicity and efficacy. Thrombin converts fibrinogen to fibrin, activates platelets, and induces vascular contraction. It is available in multiple forms, including human thrombin, bovine thrombin, and, most recently, human recombinant thrombin. Over 100 case reports of adverse reactions to bovine thrombin include hemorrhage, thrombosis, and substantial immune reaction when used on cardiovascular surgery patients. Approximately 30% of patients exposed to bovine thrombin develop cross-reacting antibodies. Thirty percent of patients with anticlotting factor antibodies develop abnormal coagulation that can be detected by prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, or thrombin time, which makes anticoagulation monitoring difficult. Patients with multiple elevated antibodies prior to surgery are also more likely to sustain adverse events. Animal studies confirm these immunological responses seen in humans. With the available clinical and laboratory data, a less immunogenic yet biologically effective thrombin should be available for use in our surgical patients.

Preclinical safety of recombinant human thrombin

Recombinant human thrombin (rhThrombin) is being developed as an alternative to thrombin products purified from pooled human or bovine plasma, which are currently marketed for topical hemostasis. Preclinical studies of rhThrombin were conducted prior to its evaluation as a topical adjunct to surgical hemostasis in clinical trials. No overt clinical pathology or signs were observed in cynomolgus monkeys following implantation of a gelatin sponge containing either rhThrombin or bovine thrombin to a surgical liver wound, and similar gross and microscopic wound healing characteristics were observed over an eight-week recovery period with either compound. Repeated subcutaneous injections of rhThrombin or bovine thrombin to cynomolgus monkeys produced no treatment-related effects. Whereas no monkeys demonstrated anti-rhThrombin antibody seroconversion, specific anti-bovine antibodies were detected in all tested monkeys exposed to bovine thrombin. Addition of rhThrombin or bovine thrombin to mouse fibroblast cells resulted in expected detachment and shape change. Topical application of rhThrombin to rabbits did not cause irritation to the eye, normal skin, or abraded skin. These studies showed that topical, subcutaneous, or implanted rhThrombin was minimally immunogenic, safe, and well tolerated in nonclinical models, and supported the clinical evaluation of rhThrombin in a variety of surgical settings.

Thrombin Inhibits IFN-γProduction in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells by Promoting a Th2 Profile

Thrombin, the key enzyme of the coagulation cascade, is involved in inflammation. It was proposed recently that thrombin activity may play an important role in allergic inflammation. Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) is a potent Th1-related cytokine secreted by activated T cells and is usually downregulated in allergic inflammation. We recently demonstrated that thrombin enhances interleukin-10 (IL-10) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Thus, we hypothesized that thrombin may promote a Th2 profile. We here report that human alpha- thrombin downregulates IFN-gamma expression at both protein and mRNA levels in activated PBMCs. The use of proteolytically inactive thrombin and of the specific thrombin receptor agonist peptide, SFLLRN, shows that this downregulation is thrombin specific and requires thrombin proteolytic activity. The addition of an anti- IL-10 monoclonal antibody (mAb) to thrombin-treated PBMCs abolishes IFN-gamma downregulation, suggesting that thrombin exerts its effect through IL-10, a Th2-related cytokine. Furthermore, IFN-gamma reduction was accompanied by increased IL-4 release, as well as by an increase in the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1. In conclusion, the observation that thrombin affects the production of IFN-gamma (Th1 profile) and IL-4 (Th2 profile) provides further evidence for the role played by thrombin in modulating Th1/Th2 cytokine balance, which could be particularly relevant in allergic inflammation.

Aprotinin and hemostasis monitoring concerns during cardiac surgery

Aprotinin (Trasylol) is a serine protease inhibitor, isolated from bovine lung that initially was marketed for the treatment of pancreatitis. In the mid 1980s, reports of its ability to decrease hemorrhaging after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery introduced the drug to the realm of cardiac surgery. Unfortunately, its introduction into this arena was followed by the publication of multiple studies and case reports that blamed aprotinin for poor outcomes in the form of early graft closure. More than 17 years have passed since the initial article describing the use of aprotinin during cardiopulmonary bypass, and with time there has been a significant increase in scientific knowledge and clinical experience. Interestingly, modern literature does not support the dogma that aprotinin is a procoagulant. Aprotinin increases the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), as well as the kaolin- and celite-activated clotting time (ACT), regardless of heparin. Aprotinin, because of its ability to inhibit kallikrein, has been found to decrease thrombin antithrombin III complexes, fibrin-split products, fibrinopeptide 1+2, prothrombin fragments, and all markers of thrombin formation. Some authors have suggested that it may have a synergistic effect with heparin to ensure graft patency. Anticoagulation monitoring during the use of aprotinin also has been developed based on early studies. Aprotinin administration does influence the results of various ACT tests, and consequently different methods of testing anticoagulation have been developed. Researchers have demonstrated that the celite ACT is not "artificially" prolonged in the presence of heparin and aprotinin, rather the kaolin ACT is "artificially" shortened. This article will review the scientific literature with regard to aprotinin's anticoagulatory effects and review the current recommendations for hemostasis monitoring during the use of aprotinin.

Perioperative topical bovine thrombin exposure is not associated with hemodialysis graft thrombosis

Arteriovenous (AV) graft use as hemodialysis access remains highly prevalent, with a consequent high thrombosis rate. The magnitude of this problem requires that all potentially modifiable risk factors for graft thrombosis be thoroughly investigated. During graft surgery, topical bovine thrombin is often administered, which can lead to the development of antibovine thrombin antibodies and subsequent hemostatic changes. A recent study correlated the presence of plasma antibovine thrombin antibodies with graft thrombosis in hemodialysis patients. We therefore hypothesized that perioperative topical bovine thrombin exposure would lead to the development of antibovine thrombin antibodies and graft thrombosis. We screened 314 hemodialysis patients and identified 73 patients who had 74 grafts placed for whom complete data on perioperative topical bovine thrombin exposure and subsequent graft outcomes was available. Sixty-one of these patients were available for retrospective measurement of antibovine thrombin antibodies, antihuman thrombin antibodies, and the thrombin activation markers thrombin activatible fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) and thrombin precursor protein (TpP). In these grafts, there was no significant association between topical bovine thrombin exposure and primary assisted patency (P = 0.37). The presence of antibovine thrombin antibodies (P = 0.13), antihuman thrombin antibodies (P = 0.10), and increased TAFI (P = 0.18) were associated with trends toward reduced primary assisted patency which did not reach significance. There was a correlation between antibovine thrombin antibodies and antihuman thrombin antibodies (r = 0.30, P < 0.0001) and between TAFI and TpP trade mark (r = 0.30, P < 0.0001), but no significant correlation between topical bovine thrombin exposure and elevated levels of antibovine thrombin antibodies, antihuman thrombin antibodies, TAFI or TpP trade mark. We conclude that perioperative topical bovine thrombin exposure is not associated with subsequent graft thrombosis.

Safety of aprotinin use and re-use in pediatric cardiothoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity reactions to aprotinin have been reported in adult cardiac surgical patients undergoing initial and re-exposure to the medication. This study describes the incidence and impact of aprotinin hypersensitivity reactions in children undergoing cardiothoracic surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective review of our entire experience with aprotinin (n=865), 681 first exposures, 150 second exposures, and 34 third or higher exposures were examined. Reactions were classified as mild (generalized cutaneous erythema, Type A) or severe (unexplained cardiopulmonary instability after aprotinin exposure, Type B). Records of patients sustaining a reaction were reviewed to assess the impact of the reaction on outcome and to survey reaction management strategies. Reactions occurred in 7 of 681 first exposures (1.0%), of which 2 were Type A and 5 were Type B. In second exposures, there were reactions in 2 of 150 (1.3%), of which both were Type B. In 34 third or higher exposures, there was only 1 reaction (2.9%), which was Type B. Reactions were no more likely on second, third, or higher exposure than on initial exposure. Skin testing had a negative predictive value of 98.9% and a positive predictive value of 20%. Anti-aprotinin IgE was undetectable in 7 of 8 reactor cases tested. No adverse sequelae were attributed to aprotinin reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of hypersensitivity reactions to aprotinin is low in children undergoing cardiothoracic surgery, even with multiple exposures to the medication. Reactions are more likely with re-exposure, and risk increases with multiple exposures. Neither skin testing nor assays for IgE identified reactors.

Antiphospholipid antibodies after surgical exposure to topical bovine thrombin

Exposure to topical bovine thrombin during surgery frequently results in the development of antibodies to multiple protein and carbohydrate antigens. We investigated the frequency of increased levels of antibodies to cardiolipin and beta(2)-glycoprotein I (beta(2)-GPI) in two groups of patients, one exposed to bovine thrombin during cardiovascular surgery (n = 151) and a "control" group undergoing cardiovascular surgery but without exposure to bovine thrombin (n = 11). Anticardiolipin antibody levels were increased before surgery in 10 of the 151 patients exposed to topical thrombin (6.6%). Four to 8 weeks after surgery, 84 patients (55.6%) had increased anticardiolipin antibody levels (P <.0001). In the control group, an increased anticardiolipin antibody level was present in a single patient before and after surgery (9%). Increased levels of antibodies to bovine and human beta(2)-GPI were also observed after surgery in the patients exposed to topical thrombin (37.7% and 38.2%, respectively). Increased anticardiolipin levels correlated with higher levels of antibody to bovine, but not human, beta(2)-GPI. In addition, increased levels of anticardiolipin antibody were associated with higher levels of antibodies to bovine factor V and prothrombin, as well as human factor V. Antibody binding on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay conducted to detect anticardiolipin antibody was dependent on the presence of anionic phospholipid, indicating that binding was not linked to the fetal bovine serum in the blocking buffer alone. Seven of 8 patients with delayed thromboembolic complications had increased anticardiolipin IgG antibody levels after surgery, but this association was not statistically significant. Nevertheless, our findings support the recommendation that the clinical safety of these commonly used hemostatic agents should be reassessed.

Serological analysis of patients treated with a new surgical hemostat containing bovine proteins and autologous plasma

A randomized, controlled clinical study of the management of diffuse bleeding with CoStasis surgical hemostat, a new hemostat containing bovine thrombin and collagen with the patient's own plasma, included patients undergoing cardiac, hepatic, iliac, and general surgery. Sera from 92 patients treated with CoStasis and 84 control patients were collected preoperatively and at a post surgical follow-up of 8 weeks. Among the control group, 57 patients were treated with Instat collagen sponge in noncardiac indications. Results showed that antibody responses in the CoStasis clinical study were similar to the reported literature for all antigens screened and were not associated with any adverse reactions. The bovine thrombin preparations in CoStasis and other commercially available thrombins were compared with the use of SDS-PAGE and Western blot analyses. Within this clinical study, CoStasis was shown to be a safe and effective hemostatic product containing bovine thrombin and bovine collagen and no pooled human blood products.

Development of antibodies to topical bovine thrombin after abdominal hysterectomy. A case report

BACKGROUND

Topical thrombin spray is frequently used as a hemostatic agent in surgery, particularly following cardiovascular, orthopedic and neurologic surgery. Acquired coagulation factor inhibitors to thrombin and factor V may develop following gynecologic surgery with repeat topical thrombin use.

CASE

A 45-year-old woman underwent total abdominal hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Her past medical history included idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and Marfan's syndrome and past surgery included splenectomy and aortic valve replacement with a three-vessel coronary artery bypass graft. She was converted from Coumadin (DuPont Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, Delaware) to heparin preoperatively, and heparin was stopped six hours before surgery, with normalization of her prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT). Topical bovine thrombin spray was applied to the surgical field in anticipation of early resumption of heparin anticoagulation. Seven days after surgery, after recovering from some acute bleeding problems, the patient began to have elevation of her PT in spite of being off Coumadin for 10 days. Her PT and international normalized ratio (INR) continued to rise, reaching peak values of 31.4 and 6.99, respectively. A mixing study did not correct the problem, confirming the presence of coagulation inhibitors. The patient was given intravenous immunoglobulins and corticosteroids, and her PT/PTT and INR values slowly normalized.

CONCLUSION

Acquired coagulation factor may develop following gynecologic surgery with topical thrombin use. This potential complication should be strongly considered in any patient prior to using topical bovine thrombin, especially those with a prior exposure or history of surgical procedures in which bovine thrombin is commonly used.

Anaphylactic reactions to aprotinin reexposure in cardiac surgery: relation to antiaprotinin immunoglobulin G and E antibodies

BACKGROUND

Aprotinin, a serine proteinase inhibitor, reduces bleeding during cardiac surgery. As aprotinin is derived from bovine lung, it has antigenic properties. This investigation examined the incidence of anaphylactic reactions in patients reexposed to aprotinin and the relation to preformed antiaprotinin immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgE antibodies.

METHODS

This prospective observational study conducted at five centers in Germany evaluated patients undergoing repeat cardiac surgery reexposed to aprotinin between 1995 and 1996. Antiaprotinin IgG and IgE antibody measurements, using a noncommercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and an immunofluorescence assay, respectively, were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. An anaphylactic reaction was defined as major changes from baseline within 10 min of aprotinin administration of systolic pressure 20% or greater, heart rate 20% or greater, inspiratory pressure greater than 5 cm H2O, or a skin reaction.

RESULTS

In 121 cases (71 adults, 46 children), a mean aprotinin reexposure interval of 1,654 days (range, 16-7,136 days) was observed. Preoperative antiaprotinin IgG (optical density ratio > 3) and IgE antibodies (radioallergosorbent test [RAST] score < 3) were detected in 18 and 9 patients, respectively. High concentrations of each (IgG, optical density ratio > 10; IgE, RAST score > or = 3) were detected in five patients. Three patients (2.5%; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-7.1%) experienced an anaphylactic reaction after aprotinin exposure, followed by full recovery; these patients had reexposure intervals less than 6 months (22, 25, and 25 days) and the highest preoperative IgG concentrations of all patients (P < 0.05). Assay sensitivity was 100%, as no anaphylactic reactions occurred in IgG-negative patients (95% confidence interval, 0.0-3.1%); assay specificity was 98%. Preoperative IgE measurements were quantifiable in two of three reactive patients and in three nonreacting patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative detection of antiaprotinin IgE and IgG lacks specificity for predictive purposes; however, quantitation of antiaprotinin IgG may identify patients at risk for developing an anaphylactic reaction to aprotinin reexposure.

Anaphylaxis after thrombin injection of a femoral pseudoaneurysm: recommendations for prevention

After the injection treatment of a femoral pseudoaneurysm, an anaphylactic reaction occurred in a patient undergoing hemodialysis who previously had repeated exposure to thrombin. Before injecting bovine thrombin in patients with a history of prior exposure, we recommend that they undergo skin prick testing to detect possible allergy.

The significance of preformed aprotinin-specific antibodies in cardiosurgical patients

Acute hypersensitivity reactions are serious complications of reexposure to aprotinin. Previous contact via infusions or fibrin tissue adhesives can induce specific antibodies. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the preoperative prevalence of aprotinin-specific antibodies in patients scheduled for cardiac operations. Sera of 520 consecutive cardiosurgical patients were collected preoperatively and screened retrospectively for aprotinin-specific IgG using a standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Positive sera were analyzed also for aprotinin-specific IgA (ELISA) and IgE (fluorescence enzyme immunoassay). The histories of all patients were reviewed with focus on aprotinin preexposure. Of 520 patients, 22 (4%) had specific IgG. Only three of these had a documented aprotinin preexposure. Of 448 patients exposed to aprotinin intraoperatively, 15 had preformed specific antibodies. The only patient presenting with severe anaphylaxis was positive for both IgG and IgE, and had a recent IV preexposure in cardiovascular surgery. The presence of aprotinin-specific IgG alone seems not to induce adverse reactions on exposure. Exposure history alone is not sensitive enough to identify patients with aprotinin-specific antibodies.

IMPLICATIONS

Anaphylaxis on IV reexposure to aprotinin is a medical emergency. The clinical significance of preformed aprotinin-specific IgG remains questionable, whereas preformed IgE was present in the only patient who suffered from severe anaphylaxis on reexposure to aprotinin. Preformed antibodies are not reliably predicted by exposure history.

Fibrin sealant, aprotinin, and immune response in children undergoing operations for congenital heart disease

OBJECTIVE

Most commercially available fibrin sealants contain aprotinin in doses of 1500 kallikrein inactivator units per milliliter. They are used in many operative disciplines. An elevated risk of hypersensitivity reactions exists at reexposure to aprotinin. Our aim was to examine the immunogenic potency of aprotinin as a fibrin sealant content.

METHODS

We investigated 49 children with operatively treated congenital heart disease. All patients received aprotinin only topically as contained in fibrin sealant. Serum samples were drawn preoperatively, 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and approximately 1 year after operation. They were analyzed for aprotinin-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies with a standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay for aprotinin-specific immunoglobulin E antibodies.

RESULTS

At 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 1 year, we found prevalences of 8% (2 of 26), 8% (2 of 24), 6% (3 of 49), and 0% for aprotinin-specific Immunoglobulin E, and for aprotinin-specific immunoglobulin G 8% (2 of 26), 17% (4 of 24), 39% (19 of 49), and 12% (5 of 41). The doses of aprotinin given did not differ significantly in antibody-negative and antibody-positive patients; no significant factors could predict the immune response.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show the existence of a subgroup of patients who had aprotinin-specific antibodies develop after topical aprotinin application. Any use of aprotinin must be carefully documented. If aprotinin use is planned in patients who previously underwent a surgical procedure, preexposure to aprotinin in any form must be sought to avoid unexpected anaphylactic reactions. The necessity itself and alternatives for aprotinin as a stabilizing agent in fibrin sealants merit consideration.

Anaphylactic shock after aprotinin reexposure: time course of aprotinin-specific antibodies

We report a case of severe anaphylactic shock during a cardiac operation that occurred as a consequence of aprotinin readministration in the presence of preformed aprotinin-specific antibodies. Both immunoglobulin G (3 hours) and immunoglobulin E (5 minutes) antibody levels dropped early after the clinical event. Despite their possibly limited clinical significance, we still recommend the conductance of specific antibody screening tests before readministration of aprotinin.

Routine intraoperative application of high-dose aprotinin in open heart surgery in adults: antibody formation after first exposure

High-dose aprotinin is now routinely used in cardiac surgery to reduce postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements, although several cases of anaphylactic reactions to the proteinase inhibitor have been reported. As part of a multi-centre study to evaluate the immunological response to aprotinin after first exposure 61 cardiac surgical patients were treated with the Hammersmith regimen. Patients with previous aprotinin exposure were excluded from the study. To determine specific IgG and IgE antibodies blood samples were taken pre-operatively, within 3 to 4 weeks and 6 to 7 months after operation. Determinations were made by using Western Blot and ELISA methods. Fifty-six patients were followed up for a 6-month period, 26 (46.4%) of them developed IgG antibodies to aprotinin determined by Western Blot, whereas only 14 (26.8%) patients with IgG antibodies were found by the ELISA. IgE antibodies were not found in any of the patients. On hospital admission and 6 months post-operatively additional intradermal prick tests were performed. No clear-cut positive reaction to the skin test was found in any patient.

Reaction to injectable collagen: results in animal models and clinical use

Since its commercial release, Zyderm collagen implant has been used to treat more than 200,000 subjects in the United States for soft-tissue contour defects and more than 250,000 patients internationally (including the United States). Approximately 3 percent of subjects' skin tested with Zyderm collagen experience localized hypersensitivity reactions to collagen, whereas approximately 1 percent of treated patients demonstrate symptoms of hypersensitivity at treatment sites. Of the latter treatment responses reported since the conclusion of clinical trials with Zyderm, 56 percent occurred following the first treatment, 28 percent following the second, 10 percent following the third, and 6 percent following subsequent exposures. The data indicate that most patients receive a median of three treatments (mean = 4.4) with Zyderm collagen, but most patients who are likely to develop sensitivity to Zyderm collagen appear to respond immunologically to the test implant or first treatment exposure. Examining these treatment responses, 45 percent of the patients reported an onset of symptoms within 10 days and 22 percent at more than 30 days following the last treatment with Zyderm collagen. Erythema was the sole symptom in 24 percent of cases, whereas erythema plus induration comprised an additional 42 percent. Antibodies against Zyderm collagen were detected in the sera of 88 percent of these subjects using an ELISA, but no reactivity was observed against human collagen. Sera from patients reporting only systemic symptoms were not found to have anticollagen antibodies. These data suggest that the relative risk of a hypersensitivity reaction to Zyderm collagen does not increase with multiple exposures, since patients who are going to develop an immune response to bovine collagen react with greatest frequency to initial injections of collagen. In animal models, Zyderm collagen was shown to be less immunogenic than other medical devices which are composed of bovine collagen. Specifically, comparative studies were conducted in which Zyderm collagen and hemostatic agents were implanted in the guinea pig subcutaneum: sera from animals treated with collagen-derived hemostatic devices possessed significant levels of anti-implant antibodies (titers greater than 640), whereas animals treated with Zyderm collagen mounted minimal responses (titers less than 40). Additional studies were conducted in which implant materials were compared in a guinea pig parietal (bony defect) model and in a rabbit hemostasis model: in both, Zyderm collagen demonstrated lower immunogenicity than commercial bovine collagen hemostatic agents. Histologic results from these studies showed Zyderm