Hyperlipoproteinemia (a) and Phytoestrogen Therapy in Dialysis Patients: A Review

PURPOSE

Hyperlipoproteinemia (a) is a prevalent complication in dialysis patients, with no valid treatment strategy. The aim of this narrative review was to investigate the clinical significance of hyperlipoproteinemia (a) and phytoestrogen therapy in dialysis patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the published data was performed regarding the effects of phytoestrogen therapy on hyperlipoproteinemia (a) in dialysis patients.

FINDINGS

Hyperlipoproteinemia (a) occurs in dialysis patients due to decreased catabolism and increased synthesis of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)]. A few clinical trials have studied the effects of phytoestrogens on serum Lp(a). All studies of dialysis patients or nonuremic individuals with hyperlipoproteinemia (a), except one, showed that phytoestrogens could significantly reduce serum Lp(a) levels. However, all investigations of phytoestrogen therapy in individuals with normal serum Lp(a) levels showed that it had no effect on serum Lp(a). Phytoestrogens seem to have effects similar to those of estrogen in lowering Lp(a) concentrations.

IMPLICATIONS

Considering the high prevalence of hyperlipoproteinemia (a) in dialysis patients, phytoestrogen therapy is a reasonable approach for reducing serum Lp(a) levels and its complications in these patients.

Treat-to-Target or High-Intensity Statin in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

In patients with coronary artery disease, some guidelines recommend initial statin treatment with high-intensity statins to achieve at least a 50% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). An alternative approach is to begin with moderate-intensity statins and titrate to a specific LDL-C goal. These alternatives have not been compared head-to-head in a clinical trial involving patients with known coronary artery disease.

Objective

To assess whether a treat-to-target strategy is noninferior to a strategy of high-intensity statins for long-term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A randomized, multicenter, noninferiority trial in patients with a coronary disease diagnosis treated at 12 centers in South Korea (enrollment: September 9, 2016, through November 27, 2019; final follow-up: October 26, 2022).

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either the LDL-C target strategy, with an LDL-C level between 50 and 70 mg/dL as the target, or high-intensity statin treatment, which consisted of rosuvastatin, 20 mg, or atorvastatin, 40 mg.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end point was a 3-year composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary revascularization with a noninferiority margin of 3.0 percentage points.

Results

Among 4400 patients, 4341 patients (98.7%) completed the trial (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [9.9] years; 1228 females [27.9%]). In the treat-to-target group (n = 2200), which had 6449 person-years of follow-up, moderate-intensity and high-intensity dosing were used in 43% and 54%, respectively. The mean (SD) LDL-C level for 3 years was 69.1 (17.8) mg/dL in the treat-to-target group and 68.4 (20.1) mg/dL in the high-intensity statin group (n = 2200) (P = .21, compared with the treat-to-target group). The primary end point occurred in 177 patients (8.1%) in the treat-to-target group and 190 patients (8.7%) in the high-intensity statin group (absolute difference, -0.6 percentage points [upper boundary of the 1-sided 97.5% CI, 1.1 percentage points]; P < .001 for noninferiority).

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients with coronary artery disease, a treat-to-target LDL-C strategy of 50 to 70 mg/dL as the goal was noninferior to a high-intensity statin therapy for the 3-year composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary revascularization. These findings provide additional evidence supporting the suitability of a treat-to-target strategy that may allow a tailored approach with consideration for individual variability in drug response to statin therapy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02579499.

The Levels of Soluble Adhesion Molecules in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients with Combined Hyperlipoproteinemia and the Effect of Ciprofibrate Therapy

Cell adhesion molecules are thought to play a role in atherosclerosis. Several clinical trials have shown that fibrate treatment leads to a reduction in coronary events, although the mechanisms are not fully understood. Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) and soluble E-selectin plasma concentrations were measured in 10 obese dyslipidemic men (group A), in 10 obese dyslipidemic type 2 diabetic men without coronary artery disease (CAD) (group B), and in 10 dyslipidemic type 2 diabetic men with angiographically documented CAD (group C) before and after 12 weeks of treatment with ciprofibrate. Compared with nondiabetic dyslipidemic men, diabetic patients with CAD or without documented CAD had significantly increased levels of sVCAM-1 (512 ±39 versus 750 ±139 ng/mL; p<0.0001 and 566 ±78 ng/mL; p<0.01, respectively) and sE-selectin (54.8 ±6.9 versus 65.9 ±8.8 ng/mL; p<0.001 and 62.6 ±9.4 ng/mL; p=0.056, respectively). The levels of sICAM-1 were similar in all 3 groups. Multivariate analyses showed that the higher sCAM levels in patients occurred independently of lipoprotein levels. Waist circumference as a marker of abdominal adiposity was the only independent predictor of elevated concentrations of all 3 cell adhesion molecules in multivariate analyses. sE-selectin was associated with HbA1C levels (p<0.01) in diabetic men at baseline. After 12 weeks of ciprofibrate therapy, sVCAM-1 levels were reduced by 13.5 ±2.1%, sICAM-1 levels by 11.8 ±2.2%, and sE-selectin levels by 17.1 ±3.5% (p<0.01 for all) with the greatest sE-selectin reduction in the diabetic subgroups (p<0.001). There was no correlation between the lowering of soluble adhesion molecules and the magnitude of lipid-lowering effect. An increased level of circulating adhesion molecules may be a mechanism by which dyslipidemia and/or diabetes mellitus promotes atherogenesis, and treatment with ciprofibrate may alter vascular cell activation.

Dyslipoproteinemia and Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) is common in older age. PAOD is associated with an increased risk of vascular events (eg, myocardial infarction or stroke). Therefore, the prevention and treatment of PAOD is important, especially at a time when the elderly population is increasing. There is an association between lipid abnormalities and the risk of developing PAOD. However, it is not yet definitively established that early intervention with lipid-lowering drugs prevents the development of PAOD. There is evidence that vascular events in patients with PAOD can be significantly reduced by statins and that the symptoms associated with PAOD are improved by this treatment. There is an urgent need for appropriately designed lipid-lowering trials in patients with PAOD.

Postprandial lipemia as a cardiometabolic risk factor

High levels of fasting circulating triglycerides (TG) represent an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In western countries, however, people spend most time in postprandial conditions, with continuous fluctuation of lipemia due to increased levels of TG-rich lipoproteins (TRLs), including chylomicrons (CM), very low density lipoproteins (VLDL), and their remnants. Several factors contribute to postprandial lipid metabolism, including dietary, physiological, pathological and genetic factors. The presence of coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance and obesity is associated with higher postprandial TG levels compared with healthy conditions; this association is present also in subjects with normal fasting TG levels. Increasing evidence indicates that impaired metabolism of postprandial lipoproteins contributes to the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease, suggesting that lifestyle modifications as well as pharmacological approaches aimed at reducing postprandial TG levels might help to decrease the cardiovascular risk.

[Dyslipidemia and obesity 2011. Similarities and differences]

We shall open our overview of issues related to obesity and hyperlipoproteinemia (HLP) or dyslipidemia with a notoriously known truth (that some are still reluctant to accept): HLP/DLP is not obesity. It is certainly not possible to put an equal sign between subcutaneous fat and the level of plasma lipids and lipoproteins. On the other hand, it is obvious that there is a number of connecting links between HLP/DLP and obesity. These associations on one side and differences on the other are the focus of this review paper. (1) HLP/DLP as well as obesity represent a group of high incidence metabolic diseases (gradually evolving from epidemic to pandemic) that affect several tens of percent of inhabitants. (2) Both HLP/DLP and obesity often occur concurrently, often as a result of unhealthy lifestyle. However, genetic factors are also been studies and it is possible that mutual predispositions for the development of both diseases will be identified. At present, it is only possible to conclude that obesity worsens lipid metabolism in genetically-determined HLP. (3) Both these metabolic diseases represent a risk factor for other pathologies, cardiovascular diseases are the most important common complication of both conditions (central type of obesity only). Concurrent presence of HDL/DLP and obesity is often linked to other diagnoses, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2T), hypertension, pro-coagulation or pro-inflammatory states; all as part of so called metabolic syndrome. (4) Patients with metabolic syndrome and, mainly, central obesity usually have typical dyslipidemia with reduced HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and sometimes hypertriglyceridaemia. Current treatment of HDL/DLP aims to first impact on the primary aim, i.e. LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), and than influence HDL-C. (5) It seems that the therapeutic efforts in HLP/DLP and obesity will go in the same direction. I will skip the trivial (and difficult to accept by patients) dietary changes. Pharmacotherapy, however, (very scarce with respect to obesity) may bring positive effects on lipids and BMI. Metformin used to be considered as a drug that could improve lipid profile and lead to body weight reduction. Even though larger studies did not provide an unambiguous evidence for this, metformin keeps its position as a first line oral antidiabetic (not only) in patients with T2DM, HLP and obesity. Positive effect on lipids, mainly HDL-C is reported with pioglitazone. This drug, unlike other glitazones, does not bring body weight reduction but at least does not have a negative effect. Other antidiabetics with a positive effect on lipids and body weight include incretins, liraglutid in particular. Liraglutid importantly decreases triglyceride levels and has anorectic effect. Furthermore, metabolic effects of bariatric surgery should not be overlooked. Bariatric surgery brings weight reduction as well as it improves lipid profile and compensation of diabetes mellitus (DM). It should be mentioned here that bariatric surgery has been used for the treatment of HLP as early as 1980s. The results of the 25-year follow up within the POSCH study (ideal bypass indicated for HLP), presented in 2010, confirm a decrease in overall as well as cardiovascular mortality in an operated group, even though patients who did not undergo surgery were significantly more frequently treated with statins.

[Pleiotropic effects of nicotinic acid therapy in men with coronary heart disease and elevated lipoprotein(a) levels]

PURPOSE

To assess effects of niacin on risk factors of atherosclerosis in men with coronary heart disease (CHD) and high lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty men (mean age 54+/-6 years) with angiographic evidence of CHD were randomized into two groups. Active group (n=30) received extended release nicotinic acid 1500 mg, control group consisted of remaining 30 patients. All patients received basic therapy with atorvastatin 10-40 mg qd. Blood samples were collected for total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), Lp(a), lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PL-2), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), complex of tissue-type plasminogen activator with plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (tPA/PAI-1). Carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) was measured at baseline and after 6-months therapy.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the clinical and biochemical characteristics. During the study lipid profile data were within the target levels. In the active group median percent decrease of Lp(a) level was 23% (from 84+/-40 to 67+/-25 mg/dl after 6 weeks and up to 65+/-37 mg/dl after 6 months of treatment, p<0.01); LDL-C, TG, tPA/PAI-1, and Lp-PL-2 mass levels decreased by 25, 20, 25, and 32%, respectively; HDL-C increased by 16% (p<0.05 vs baseline, respectively). Nicotinic acid treatment produced statistically significant reduction nicotinic acid of the mean CIMT (right: 0.83+/-0.16 vs 0.77+/-0.17 mm, p<0.05; left: 0.88+/-0.21 vs 0.82+/-0.17, p<0.05). In control group no changes of CIMT or blood tests were observed.

CONCLUSION

In men with CHD and Lp(a) excess of addition to atorvastatin results in regression of CIMT on an average of 0.06 mm in 6 months. Such rapid and significant effect on the arterial wall structure can be attributed to the complex influence of nicotinic acid on Lp(a), lipids, Lp-PL-2 and thrombogenic factors. This is the first study providing the evidence of using Lp(a) as one of therapeutic targets in patients with high Lp(a) levels for achieving beneficial effect on a surrogate marker of atherosclerosis.

[Hyperlipoproteinaemia and dyslipoproteinaemia II. Therapy: non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches]

At present, literally no one disputes hyperlipoproteinaemia and dyslipidemia (HLP and DLP) treatment as a rational therapeutic approach in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). This approach is in line with the current principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and is sufficiently evidenced particularly by the results of large intervention studies. Nevertheless! When the results of the recent studies are critically appraised, these by no means are (mostly, there, obviously, are exceptions) as conclusive as the studies conducted in 1980s and 1990s. Consequently, positive results are being sought in subanalyses, subgroup evaluations and multiple-study metaanalyses. This paper is not intended as a critique of new drugs. These certainly are developed to be safe, effective and well-tolerated. However, the newer studies suffer from a range of issues: the populations studied are already very well managed, it is not possible to compare against placebo and sometimes, let us be honest, the trial design itself is problematic (often it is an uncritical effort to treat as wide as possible range of patients as well as new groups of patients who might not be suitable for the given treatment). Certainly, we should not start disputing the well-evidenced hypotheses and seek alternatives to the long-established arguments and approaches as a consequence to some less convincing studies. We must not overlook the most robust results of statin studies as well as 'positive' studies with other hypolipidemics. There is no doubt that the effect ofstatins on LDL-cholesterol represents a significant move towards cardiovascular disease prevention. Despite this, we currently recognise with increased intensity that this very effective and well-evidenced treatment has its limits and that a high proportion of patients dies or are faced with cardiovascular diseases even though they are treated with a correct dose ofa statin and a target LDL-C level is achieved. This remaining risk (represents more than 50% ofevents) has been termed 'RESIDUAL RISK'. The issue of residual risk is crucial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2T) or in all patients with HDL-C-low DLP. As was repeatedly emphasised, a statin will be a cornerstone of pharmacological treatment of a DLP. However, a question arises what to combine it with. The most convincing data exist for niacin (combination of niacin with laropiprant minimising the incidence of unwanted flushes). We surely should not marginalize other hypolipidemics used mainly in combinations: resin and ezetimibe to treat LDL-C, niacin, fibrates and possibly omega-3-fatty acids to manage the residual risk (HDL and TG). Last but not least we should not forget non-pharmacological treatment as the pivotal treatment approach in all patients.

Gemfibrozil in the treatment of dyslipidaemias in middle-aged male survivors of myocardial infarction

The effects of gemfibrozil on serum lipids and apolipoproteins were investigated in 60 male survivors of myocardial infarction (MI) (age range 29-48 years, mean 44). Fifteen had normal serum cholesterol (less than or equal to 7.0 mmol/l) and triglyceride (less than or equal to 1.7 mmol/l) levels, but most had low levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (less than 1.00 mmol/l). Ten had type II A, 27 type II B and 8 type IV hyperlipidaemia. A double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over design was used with 3-month treatment periods. Gemfibrozil was given in daily doses of 1200 mg. The drug was well tolerated and there were no drop-outs attributable to its use. In all subjects, gemfibrozil reduced the mean serum total cholesterol by 17% and triglycerides by 54% and increased HDL cholesterol by 16%. The percentage HDL cholesterol of total cholesterol increased from 14 to 19%. The changes were similar in patients with normal serum cholesterol and triglyceride values and in those with classical hyperlipidaemias. In contrast, the changes during placebo treatment corresponded to those in healthy male untreated controls who were followed simultaneously. Apoprotein A-I remained unchanged, but A-II increased by 20% during gemfibrozil treatment. It is concluded that gemfibrozil corrects effectively dyslipidaemias in male MI patients but further long-term studies are warranted.

[Correlation between acute coronary syndrome, hyperlipoproteinemia and statins]

Atherosclerosis is defined as a chronic, progressive, proliferative and inflammatory process developed as a response of blood vessel endothelium to the numerous noxious factors. The definition, which is only an approximate one, shows that one of the terms to carry definition is progression. In other words, it is a well-known fact today that atherosclerosis is a progressive process. The question about the possibilities of its stagnation and regression arises. The appearance of statins and their introduction into the therapy and the process of prevention give a positive answer to the previous question. The results of many studies have also shown that statins can be used to decrease and even stop the process of atherosclerosis. Using the modern diagnostic procedures, primarily the intravascular and Doppler ultrasound, andfocusing on regression, these studies fillowed the process of atherosclerosis in patients with statin therapy. The conclusions of these studies have indicated a clear degree of regression of atherosclerosis which is not a spectacular one, but implies the significant clinical improvement.

Influence of xantinole nicotinic acid on cutaneous microcirculation in patients with coronary artery disease and hyperlipoproteinemia

Xantinole nicotinic acid (NA) dose dependently lowers plasma levels of atherogenic lipoproteins and increases blood flow through vasodilation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of NA on cutaneous microcirculation in patients with coronary artery disease and hyperlipidemia. In this open pilot study, five men and three women (74.2+/-9.1 yrs; 81.4+/-7.9 kg; 171.6+/-7.0 cm) with angiographically proven coronary artery disease and hyperlipidemia were included. Nailfold capillary microscopy was used for measurements of erythrocyte velocities at rest and after three minutes of ischemia, before and one hour after intake of 1000 mg of NA. The blood pressure (120+/-12/73+/-8 mmHg vs. 113+/-10/72+/-5 mmHg; p=0.19/0.83) and the heart rate (72+/-8/min vs. 70+/-7/min; p=0.38) remained unchanged. The mean capillary red blood cell velocity at rest (v(RBC); 0.27+/-0.23 mm/s vs. 0.32+/-0.18 mm/s; p=0.089) and the time to maximal post ischemia erythrocyte velocity (t(peak); 21.0+/-7.9 s vs. 24.3+/-15.5 s; p=0.49) did not change. The maximal post ischemic erythrocyte velocity (v(maxRBC); 0.93+/-0.33 mm/s vs. 1.19+/-0.19 mm/s; p=0.0096) raised slightly but significantly, the duration of post-ischemia hyperemia (DpH; 101+/-16 s vs. 127+/-15 s; p=0.0005) increased markedly. One patient reported about flush in the whole body. The administration of 1000 mg of NA resulted in a significant improvement of the cutaneous microcirculation in patients with coronary artery disease and hyperlipidemia.

Short-term therapy with atorvastatin or fenofibrate does not affect plasma ghrelin, resistin or adiponectin levels in type 2 diabetic patients with mixed hyperlipoproteinaemia

Lipid-lowering therapy is associated with reduced cardiovascular risk. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether lipid-lowering therapy might be associated with changes in the concentrations of metabolically important hormone concentrations. We performed a randomised cross-over open-label trial with atorvastatin (10 mg/day) and fenofibrate (200 mg/day), each for 6 weeks separated by a 6-week washout period in 13 patients (5 men, 8 women, age 60.0+/-6.8 years, body mass index 30.0+/-3.0 kg/m2) with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mixed hyperlipoproteinaemia. Plasma ghrelin (RIA, Phoenix Pharmaceuticals, Mountain View, CA, USA), adiponectin (ELISA, Biovendor, Heidelberg, Germany) as well as resistin (ELISA, Linco Research, St. Charles, MO, USA) concentrations were measured before and after atorvastatin as well as before and after fenofibrate. Ghrelin (462+/-84 pg/ml before vs. 464+/-102 pg/ml after atorvastatin, n.s.; 454+/-85 pg/ml before vs. 529+/-266 pg/ml after fenofibrate, n.s.), resistin (24.4+/-7.4 pg/ml before vs. 23.7+/-9.1 pg/ml after atorvastatin, n.s.; 23.4+/-8.2 pg/ml before vs. 19.9+/-5.5 pg/ml after fenofibrate, n.s.), adiponectin (10.89+/-5.33 pg/ml before vs. 12.41+/-5.75 pg/ml after atorvastatin, n.s.; 12.58+/-9.87 pg/ml before vs. 10.27+/-5.23 pg/ml after fenofibrate, n.s.) and insulin levels did not change significantly during lipid-lowering therapy. In patients with type 2 diabetes and mixed hyperlipoproteinaemia, short-term atorvastatin as well as fenofibrate therapy had no significant effects on adiponectin, ghrelin or resistin levels.

Drug therapy of high-risk lipid abnormalities in children and adolescents: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth Committee, Council of Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, with the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing

Despite compliance with lifestyle recommendations, some children and adolescents with high-risk hyperlipidemia will require lipid-lowering drug therapy, particularly those with familial hypercholesterolemia. The purpose of this statement is to examine new evidence on the association of lipid abnormalities with early atherosclerosis, discuss challenges with previous guidelines, and highlight results of clinical trials with statin therapy in children and adolescents with familial hypercholesterolemia or severe hypercholesterolemia. Recommendations are provided to guide decision-making with regard to patient selection, initiation, monitoring, and maintenance of drug therapy.

Beta-Thalassemia, Hyperlipoproteinemia(a), And Metabolic Syndrome: Its Low-Cost Holistic Therapy

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is an emerging global health problem. Although studies highlighting its genetic, lipid, and cardiometabolic associations have been described in detail, the exact cause for these associations is not clear. The authors describe, in this study, the case of a patient who, along with his family members, had clinical evidence of MS. In addition, this patient also exhibited beta-thalassemia minor and hyperlipoproteinemia(a). Lipoprotein [Lp(a)] levels diminished significantly following therapy with bark-stem powder of Terminalia arjuna, an ancient remedy recommended for angina pectoris. The co-existence of these conditions, reflecting both a genetic link and a significant reduction in Lp(a) levels amounting to 24.71% following the administration of T. arjuna, prompted the authors to report on this case.

Impact of thiazolidenediones on serum lipoprotein levels

The thiazolidinediones, acting through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor chi (PPARchi), affect multiple areas of metabolism. Of increasing importance is the recognition that these agents affect lipoprotein metabolism and cause changes in serum lipid and lipoprotein levels. All three thiazolidinediones, including troglitazone (which was withdrawn in the year 2000), rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone, tend to increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, increase the size/decrease the density of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, and raise the level of lipoprotein(a). In addition, troglitazone and pioglitazone, but not rosiglitazone, lower triglyceride levels modestly, thereby further contributing to increases in LDL and HDL size. The mechanism for these effects is still being clarified, but may involve enhancement of triglyceride clearance (in the case of pioglitazone), alteration of apolipoprotein C-III levels, reduction of hepatic lipase, and increase in ATP binding cassette A1 (ABCA1) activity. The clinical implications of these effects need further exploration.

Apolipoprotein A1 and B

This article reviews the evidence showing that apolipoprotein (apo) B and A-1 are superior to the conventional cholesterol indices as analytes in laboratory practice, indices of the lipoprotein-related risk for vascular disease, and measures of the adequacy of low-density lipoprotein-lowering therapy.

Efficacy and tolerability of combined treatment with L-carnitine and simvastatin in lowering lipoprotein(a) serum levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration is generally related to coronary artery disease (CAD) and cerebrovascular disease. However, at present, few interventions are available to lower Lp(a) concentrations. We investigated the effects of l-carnitine, co-administered with simvastatin, on hyper-Lp(a) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We conducted an open, randomised, parallel-group study, in one investigational center (University hospital). Fifty-two patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, a triglyceride serum levels <400mg/dL (<4.5 mmol/L), and Lp(a) serum levels >20mg/dL (0.71 mmol/L) were randomised to receive simvastatin alone (n=26) or simvastatin plus l-carnitine (n=26) for 60 days. Simvastatin was administered, in both groups, at a dosage of 20 mg/day, while l-carnitine was administered at a dosage of 2g/day once daily. Both treatments were given orally. Serum levels of triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol (total cholesterol minus HDL cholesterol), apolipoprotein B, and Lp(a) were measured at baseline and 60 days after starting treatment. No difference in time by groups (simvastatin and simvastatin plus l-carnitine) were observed in the reduction of LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apoB serum levels. On the other hand, Lp(a) serum levels increase from baseline to 60 days in the simvastatin group alone versus a significant decrease in the combination group. Our findings provide support for a possible role of combined treatment with l-carnitine and simvastatin in lowering Lp(a) serum levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus than with simvastatin alone. Our results strongly suggest that l-carnitine may have a role among lipid-lowering strategies.

Effects of bezafibrate on HDL2/HDL3 ratio in postmenopausal hypertriglyceridemic women

The short-term effects of bezafibrate on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol quality and triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism in 186 postmenopausal hypertriglyceridemic women were investigated. Patients were randomized to an untreated group and to bezafibrate (400 mg/d) for 6 months. Fasting lipid concentrations, high-density lipoprotein 2, and high-density lipoprotein 3 levels were measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. At 3 months, bezafibrate had significantly decreased mean serum triglycerides and remnant-like particle cholesterol levels (105.7 +/- 43.4 mg/dL and 5.33 +/- 2.1 mg/dL, P < .001, respectively) from baseline values (232.5 +/- 63.9 mg/dL and 9.69 +/- 3.8 mg/dL, respectively). It also maintained lower total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and remnant-like particle cholesterol concentrations to 6 months. After 3 months, it significantly increased mean serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (55.1 +/- 14.7 vs 64.8 +/- 12.1 mg/dL; P < .0001) and maintained higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 6 months. The high-density lipoprotein 2-high-density lipoprotein 3 ratio was decreased after 3 months of therapy with bezafibrate (2.13 +/- 0.68) from the baseline (2.42 +/- 0.71) (P < .01).

Lipoprotein(a) and atherosclerosis: new perspectives on the mechanism of action of an enigmatic lipoprotein

Although elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) have been identified as a risk factor for coronary heart disease, the pathophysiologic and physiologic roles of Lp(a) continue to elude basic researchers and clinicians alike. Lp(a) is a challenging lipoprotein to study because it has a complex structure consisting of a low-density lipoprotein-like moiety to which is covalently attached the unique glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)). Apo(a) contains multiply repeated kringle domains that are similar to a sequence found in the fibrinolytic proenzyme plasminogen; differing numbers of kringle sequences in apo(a) give rise to Lp(a) isoform size heterogeneity. In addition to elevated plasma concentrations of Lp(a), apo(a) isoform size has been identified as a risk factor for coronary heart disease, although studies addressing this relationship have been limited. The similarity of Lp(a) to low-density lipoprotein and plasminogen provides an enticing link between the processes of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, although a clear demonstration of this association in vivo has not been provided. Clearly, Lp(a) is a risk factor for both atherothrombotic and purely thrombotic events; a plethora of mechanisms to explain these clinical findings has been provided by both in vitro studies as well as animal models for Lp(a).

Gemfibrozil reduces small low-density lipoprotein more in normolipemic subjects classified as low-density lipoprotein pattern B compared with pattern A

We tested the hypothesis that gemfibrozil has a differential effect on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subclass distributions and postprandial lipemia that is different in subjects classified as having LDL subclass pattern A or LDL pattern B who do not have a classic lipid disorder. Forty-three normolipemic subjects were randomized to gemfibrozil (1,200 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. Lipids and lipoproteins were determined by enzymatic methods. The mass concentrations of lipoproteins in plasma were determined by analytic ultracentrifugation and included the S(f) intervals: 20 to 400 (very LDL), 12 to 20 (intermediate-density lipoprotein), 0 to 12 (LDL), and HDL(2) mass (F(1.20) 3.5 to 9.0) and HDL(3) mass (F(1.20) 0 to 3.5). Postprandial measurements of triglycerides and lipoprotein(a) were taken after the patients consumed a 500 kcal/M(2) test meal. Treatment with gemfibrozil, compared with placebo, significantly reduced fasting plasma triglycerides (difference from placebo +/- SE; -50.2 +/- 20.6 mg/dl, p = 0.02), total cholesterol (-16.4 +/- 7.5 mg/dl, p = 0.04), apolipoprotein B (-16.1 +/- 5.5 mg/dl, p = 0.006), very LDL mass of S(f) 20 to 400 (-50.8 +/- 24.1 mg/dl, p = 0.02), S(f) 20 to 60 (-17.5 +/- 8.5 mg/dl, p = 0.05), S(f) 60 to 100 (-16.2 +/- 8.1 mg/dl, p = 0.05), and increased peak S(F) (0.48 +/- 0.27 Svedberg, p = 0.08). Gemfibrozil reduced the postprandial triglyceride level significantly at 3 (p = 0.04) and 4 (p = 0.05) hours after the test meal. A significantly different subclass response to gemfibrozil was observed in those with LDL pattern A versus B. Those with LDL pattern B had a significantly greater reduction in the small LDL mass S(f) 0 to 7 (p = 0.04), specifically regions S(f) 0 to 3 (p = 0.009) and S(f) 3 to 5 (p = 0.009). In conclusion, normolipemic subjects with either predominantly dense or buoyant LDL respond differently to gemfibrozil as determined by the changes in LDL subclass distribution. Thus, treatment with gemfibrozil may have additional antiatherogenic effects in those with LDL pattern B by decreasing small dense LDL that is not apparent in those with pattern A.

[The effect of hypolipemic therapy with diet and simvastatin on the course of angina pectoris and the results of exercise stress test in patients with coronary artery disease]

Statins are the multi-directorial acting drugs in atherosclerosis prevention, which decrease the overall and cardiovascular mortality. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of six-month long hypolipemic therapy with diet and 20 mg of simvastatin on clinical intensity of angina pectoris and the course of exercise stress test.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 44 patients with typical anginal chest pain. In all blood sampling and treadmill stress test were made, and next in all hypolipemic diet and simvastatin 20 mg were recommended. After four weeks and six months of treatment clinical assessment and exercise test were made.

RESULTS

After four weeks and six month long observation period the decrease of total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and fibrinogen were found. Moreover, we have observed the improvement in frequency of anginal symptoms, their intensity in CCS classification and number of nitroglycerin tablets taken per week. The course of exercise test was also ameliorated: the percentage of patients, in whom stress test was finished because of chest pain was decreased, time of chest pain duration after exercise cessation was shorter, the percentage of patients with significant ST interval depression diminished, maximal ST interval depression as well as the time of significant ST interval depression duration also decreased. Although improvement in values of mentioned parameters, after six months long therapy with simvastatin the percentage of patients with Duke's treadmill score value showing intermediate cardiovascular risk (between -10 and +4) increased. In conclusion, therapy with hypolipemic diet and simvastatin already after four weeks decreased plasma lipids and fibrinogen levels and improved the course of angina pectoris and exercise stress test, what suggested its effectiveness not only as the treatment improving atherosclerosis risk factors, but also with prompt and clinical important effect ameliorating the handicapped coronary reserve.

Remnant lipoproteinemia is a risk factor for endothelial vasomotor dysfunction and coronary artery disease in metabolic syndrome

This study aimed to determine whether elevated levels of remnant lipoprotein, an atherogenic triglyceride-rich lipoprotein, might be associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) and endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in metabolic syndrome. The fasting serum levels of remnant lipoproteins (remnant-like lipoprotein particles cholesterol; RLP-C) were measured by an immunoseparation method in 210 patients with metabolic syndrome meeting ATP III criteria. Flow-mediated endothelium-dependent dilatation (FMD) in the brachial artery during reactive hyperemia was examined by high-resolution ultrasound technique. This study found that elevated RLP-C levels were a significant and independent risk factor for impaired FMD and angiographically proven coronary artery disease (CAD). Treatment with bezafibrate (n = 20) or atorvastatin (n = 20) for 4 weeks significantly reduced RLP-C levels, with a concomitant improvement in FMD. The % reduction in RLP-C levels from baseline after the treatment was independently correlated with the magnitude of improvement in FMD after adjustment for the % changes in levels of triglyceride, hsCRP, and IL-6, and HOMA index. Thus, elevated levels of RLP-C are a risk factor for CAD and endothelial vasomotor dysfunction, a predictor of coronary events, in metabolic syndrome. Measurement of RLP-C is useful for assessment of CAD risk and therapeutic effects in metabolic syndrome.

[Hypolipidemic activity of a water extract from roots carline thistle]

In the researches which have been lead on white not purebred rats--mans on model nutritional hyperlipoproteinemia it fixed hypolipidemic activity of a water extract from roots carline thistle with the content of dry solvends of 7% which.

[The study of influence of chitosan on clinical, metabolic and immune parameters in patients with cardiovascular diseases]

The investigation of influent of antiatherosclerotic diets with chitosan on clinical and metabolic parameters in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Results of the study show that enrichment of a diet with chitosan in patients with ishemic heart disease and hypertension improved clinic, immune status, antropometric levels and lipid spectrum of blood. The research has shown, that the use in the treat-preventive purposes chitosan is rather perspective.

[Risk adapted therapy of vascular diseases--basic therapy of dys- and hyperlipoproteinemia]

The target values in the treatment of patients with dys- and hyperlipoproteinemia are dependent on the underlying risk factors and the already existing vascular complications, respectively. The target value for patients with manifest vascular complications and for diabetics is <2.6 mmol/l (100 mg/dl) for LDL cholesterol. Results of recent studies show that in these high risk patients the target value for LDL Cholesterol should be </=1.8 mmol/l (70 mg/dl). Triglycerides should generally be lowered to <1.7 mmol/l (150 mg/dl) and HDL cholesterol should be >1.0 mmol/l (40 mg/dl). In high risk patients even higher HDL levels should be reached (men: >1,2 mmol/l (45 mg/dl), women: >1,4 mmol/l (55 mg/dl)). Basic therapy measurements of hyperlipoproteinemia are changes in diet, reduction of body weight and physical training after exclusion of contraindications. If the goals of therapy cannot be reached with these measures, drug therapy is indicated. In hypercholesterolemia the first choice are statins, which show the best data concerning endpoint studies. Other therapeutic options are ezetimibe, nicotinic acid derivates with retarded release marketed in Germany as Niaspan, fibrates and in single cases anion exchanger. In patients with hypertriglyceridemia fibrates are effective, but there exist very few endpoint studies for this substance group. Fish oils can also be used in this case. Mixed forms of hyperlipoproteinemia are the most difficult disorders to treat, in these cases the therapeutic decision should depend on whether the hypercholesterolemia or the hypertriglyceridemia is dominating.

Elevated soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor levels in non-obese adults with the atherogenic dyslipoproteinemia

Adipose tissue expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of obesity-linked insulin resistance and the dyslipoproteinemia of insulin resistance. This study has two aims: (1) to compare select inflammatory mediators in non-smoking, normoglycemic male subjects with and without the atherogenic dyslipoproteinemia (ADL), and (2) to determine the effects of statin therapy on select inflammatory mediators. ADL subjects had higher levels of insulin (16.7 +/- 7.5 versus 11.6 +/- 5.9 microIU/mL, P=0.008), soluble TNF receptor superfamily 1B (sTNFRSF1B) (3.3 +/- 0.7 versus 2.7 +/- 0.5 ng/mL, P=0.005), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (2.6 +/- 2.2 versus 1.3 +/- 1.8 pg/mL, P=0.006) as compared to those of the non-ADL subjects. After adjustment for age, sTNFRSF1B (P=0.003) was more predictive of ADL than high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (P=0.047). Statin therapy did not change sTNFRSF1B, TNF-alpha, IL-6, hs-CRP, whereas soluble TNF receptor superfamily 1A (sTNFRSF1A) increased slightly (P=0.048). A high level of sTNFRSF1B is a strong marker of the pro-inflammatory state in this sample of male ADL subjects.

Long-term effects of statins on arterial pressure and stiffness of hypertensives

Although lowering blood pressure (BP) reduces aortic stiffness, achieving the recommended BP goal can be difficult. Recent studies have shown that short-term use of statins can reduce BP significantly. To determine the long-term effects of statins on BP and aortic stiffness, a single-blind randomized prospective study was performed on 85 hyperlipidaemic hypertensive patients whose BP was insufficiently controlled by antihypertensive therapy. Every 3 months, aortic stiffness was assessed by measuring pulse wave velocity (PWV). Patients were randomly allocated to groups treated with pravastatin, simvastatin, fluvastatin, or a nonstatin antihyperlipidaemic drug. No significant differences in patient characteristics, kinds of antihypertensive drugs, BP, ankle brachial index, PWV, or serum lipid, creatinine, or C-reactive protein levels were found between the four groups at the start of the study. During the 12-month treatment period, PWV did not change in the pravastatin group or nonstatin group, but it was transiently reduced in the simvastatin group and significantly decreased in the fluvastatin group, even though the doses of the statins used in this study were lower than the usually prescribed dose. All four antihyperlipidaemic drugs significantly decreased serum cholesterol levels without affecting BP, ankle brachial index, or serum triglyceride levels. The C-reactive protein serum levels decreased significantly in the three statin groups but not in the nonstatin group. These results suggest that long-term use of fluvastatin by hyperlipidaemic hypertensive patients is associated with a significant reduction in aortic stiffness without any effect on BP.

Pilot study to reduce dioxins in the human body

OBJECTIVE

The accumulation of dioxins, characterized by its lipophilicity and persistency in human tissue, is a great concern since many of these compounds elicit adverse health effects and developmental toxicity. Although the half-life of dioxins in the human body have been described to be as long as 3-25 years, there are very few drugs or methods that can exclude them from the human body. Thus, it is necessary to establish a new method to reduce them and prevent adverse health effects. Here, a pilot study to reduce the dioxins accumulated in the human body using the cholesterol-lowering drug, colestimide, is reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight male and two female subjects were investigated. All of them were treated with colestimide for six months, and the dioxin level of the blood samples was assessed before and after the treatment. The dioxins in the blood samples were measured by gas-chromatography/mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Nine out of the ten subjects completed the treatment, and their blood samples were analyzed. The mean dioxin level in the blood samples before the treatment was 44.0 +/- 8.22 pg-TEQ/g-fat. Six months later, the mean dioxin level was lowered about 20% on average to 34.7 +/- 5.49 pg-TEQ/g-fat.

CONCLUSION

Previous studies have reported that the blood dioxin level increases with age. In this study, the results suggest that colestimide can decrease the blood dioxin level of humans. A randomized placebo-controlled clinical study including large numbers of subjects are needed to confirm the present result.

Effect of short term treatment with simvastatin and atorvastatin on lipids and paraoxonase activity in patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia

OBJECTIVE

High-density lipoprotein (HDL)-associated paraoxonase (PON) activity may play an important role in the inhibition of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation. Previous studies have demonstrated that serum PON activity is decreased in patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia and coronary heart disease. The study presented here examined the effect of short-term treatment with simvastatin and atorvastatin on lipids and PON activity in patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A prospective, non-blinded, single-group, cross-over, comparative trial was performed. Following an 8-week dietary run-in period, 49 patients (23 men and 26 women, mean age: 59.8 +/- 7.9 years) with Fredrickson type IIa. and IIb. hyperlipoproteinaemias were randomized to receive either simvastatin 20 mg/day or atorvastatin 10 mg/day for 3 months. Following an 8-week washout period, patients were crossed-over to receive the other drug for a further 3 months. Serum lipids were measured and serum PON activity was determined spectrophotometrically using paraoxon as a substrate.

RESULTS

Simvastatin treatment significantly reduced serum cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and apolipoprotein (apo) B levels (p < 0.001). Atorvastatin had a more pronounced cholesterol, LDL-C- and apo B-lowering effect (p < 0.001) compared with simvastatin. Both statins also significantly reduced serum triglyceride levels (p < 0.01). Simvastatin and atorvastatin caused no significant change in the levels of HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and apo A1. HDL-associated PON activity did not change significantly after simvastatin therapy, but significantly increased after atorvastatin treatment (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term administration of simvastatin did not increase PON activity. Atorvastatin treatment had a favourable effect on lipid profile and increased the activity of HDL-associated PON.

Effect of liver fatty acid binding protein (FABP) T94A missense mutation on plasma lipoprotein responsiveness to treatment with fenofibrate

Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferated activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) agonist, has been shown to decrease plasma triglyceride (TG) and increase plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels despite a large interindividual variation in the response. Fenofibrate-activated PPARalpha binds to a DNA sequence element termed PPAR response element (PPRE) present in regulatory regions of target genes. A PPRE has been identified in the proximal 5' flanking region of the gene encoding the liver fatty acid binding protein (LFABP). LFABP is a small cytosolic protein of 14 kDa present in the liver and the intestine and is a member of the superfamily of the fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs). FABPs play a role in the solubilization of long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) and their CoA-ester to various intracellular organelles. FABPs serves as intracellular acceptors of LCFAs, and they may also have an impact in ligand-dependent transactivation of PPARs in trafficking LCFAs to the nucleus. Since PPARs are known to regulate the transcription of many genes involved in lipid metabolism, the importance of LFABP in fatty acid uptake has to be considered. The aim of this study was to verify whether genetic variations in the LFABP gene may impact on plasma lipoprotein/lipid levels in the fasting state as well as on the response to a lipid-lowering therapy with fenofibrate on plasma lipids and obesity variables. We also wanted to verify whether the presence of the PPARalpha L162V mutation interacts with genetic variants in LFABP gene. To achieve this goal, we first determined the genomic structure of the human LFABP gene and then designed intronic primers to sequence the coding regions, all exon-intron splicing boundaries, and the promoter region of the gene in 24 patients showing divergent plasma lipoprotein/lipid response to fenofibrate. Sequence analysis revealed the presence of a T94A missense mutation in exon 3. Interspecies comparison revealed that threonine 94 is conserved among species. We subsequently screened another sample of 130 French Canadian subjects treated with fenofibrate for the presence of the LFABP T94A mutation. Carriers of the A94 allele were at increased risk to exhibit plasma TG levels above 2.00 mmol/l after treatment with fenofibrate [2.75 (1.03-7.34); OR 95% confidence interval (CI)]. In addition, carriers of the A94 allele were characterized by higher baseline plasma-free fatty acid levels (FFA) ( p=0.01) and by a lower body mass index (BMI) ( p=0.05) and waist circumference ( p=0.005) than T94 homozygotes. Moreover, PPARalpha L162V and LFABP T94A showed to have a synergistic effect on BMI ( p interaction = 0.03). These results suggest that the LFABP T94A missense mutation could influence obesity indices as well as the risk to exhibit residual hypertriglyceridmia following a lipid-lowering therapy with fenofibrate.

Statin and fibrate associated myopathy: study of eight patients

Lipid-lowering drugs have been occasionally associated with neuromuscular symptoms and muscle biopsy changes. We reported the clinical course and the muscle biopsy in eight patients with hyperlipoproteinemia, treated with lipid -lowering drugs (statins/fibrates). Five patients had myalgias while; in two cases there was proximal muscle weakness. All patients became asymptomatic after the withdrawal of the drug, although creatine kinase remained elevated. We performed muscle biopsy in six cases from three months to two years after suspension of the drug. We found variation in fibers diameters in all cases, with necrosis of fibers in five cases, inflammatory infiltration in one case, the presence of vacuolated fiber in one patient and ragged-red fibers in three subjects. We concluded that although the muscle biopsy findings were not specific, the prolonged use of statins and or fibrates might induce a chronic myopathy even in the absence of symptoms.

Genetically defined hyperlipidemia

The unraveling of genetic defects associated with disorders in lipid metabolism has contributed to the understanding of lipoprotein metabolism and the pathophysiological consequences of a particular mutation. The translation, however, of a single genetic defect into the individual's risk of cardiovascular disease and subsequent treatment strategies is an extremely complex issue that involves the identification of multiple additional determinants, including genetic, metabolic and environmental factors. The discovery of these factors, including genetic determinants of drug efficacy, provides insight into the interaction between regulatory systems traditionally thought to be unrelated and may, in the future, lead to a more complete diagnostic and therapeutic appreciation of the individual patient.

Chronic treatment with fluvastatin improves smooth muscle dilatory function in genetically determined hyperlipoproteinemia

We hypothesized that the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor fluvastatin, does not only improve endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation, but that it also increases vascular smooth muscle reactivity in hyperlipoproteinemia. New Zealand White (NZW) rabbits aged 37 weeks (control), Watanabe Heritable Hyperlipidemic rabbits (WHHL) aged 37 weeks, and WHHL aged 35 weeks with fluvastatin treatment of 17 weeks (10 mg/kg/d) were examined. Aortas were isolated for isometric tension recording. Both endothelium-dependent and independent relaxation were impaired in WHHL. Fluvastatin significantly restored impaired endothelium-independent relaxation (WHHL: 57 +/- 12 versus WHHL+ fluvastatin: 150 +/- 22%; P < 0.05) and in tendency endothelium-dependent relaxation (WHHL: 26 +/- 5 versus WHHL+ fluvastatin: 83 +/- 29%; (P = 0.07)). In parallel, fluvastatin restored nitrite plasma level in hyperlipoproteinemic animals (WHHL: 480 (13-3821) versus WHHL+ fluvastatin: 808 (467-1595) nmol; P < 0.05). Thus, chronic treatment with fluvastatin not only improves endothelial but also vascular smooth muscle function in hyperlipoproteinemia, which may contribute to the beneficial clinical effects of statins.

Effects of simvastatin on the lipid profile and attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals when added to thiazolidinedione therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Coronary heart disease is the major cause of mortality in individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM). Given the increasingly aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals for patients with DM set by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III and the American Diabetes Association, many patients remain above target. Treatment with thiazolidinediones (TZDs) improves glycemic control but does not lower (and may raise) LDL-C concentrations.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the lipid-modifying efficacy and tolerability of adding the hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A-reductase inhibitor simvastatin to existing TZD therapy in patients with type 2 DM.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Patients with type 2 DM who were taking a stable dose of pioglitazone or rosiglitazone and had a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value < or =9.0% and an LDL-C concentration > 100 mg/dL were randomized to receive simvastatin 40 mg (the recommended initial dose for patients with DM) or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary end point was the effect of treatment on LDL-C concentrations. Other lipid, lipoprotein, and safety measures were also assessed.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-three patients (127 [50.2%] men, 126 [49.8%] women; mean age, 56 years) were randomized to treatment (123 simvastatin, 130 placebo). At the end of the study, mean LDL-C concentrations were reduced 34.)% from baseline (from 134.3 to 89.5 mg/dL) in the simvastatin group and were unchanged in the placebo group (P<0.001). Simvastatin produced significant reductions in concentrations of total cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein (apo) B compared with placebo (all, P<0.001 ) and significant increases in concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ( P=0.002 ) and apo A-I ( P=0.006 ). In patients who had not attained target concentrations of LDL-C (<100 mg/dL), TG (<150 mg/dL), or HDL-C (>45 mg/dL) at baseline, significantly more simvastatin recipients had achieved these goals at the end of the study compared with placebo recipients (LDL-C: 67.3% vs 5.2%, respectively, P<0.001; HDL-C: 95.3% vs 83.6%, P<0.05; TG: 40.8% vs 11.0%, P<0.001 ). Simvastatin was well tolerated, and no clinically meaningful differences in the incidence of serious adverse events, treatment-related adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events were observed between groups. There were no significant between-group differences in glycemic control (HbA1c) or concentrations of fasting insulin, creatine phosphokinase, or hepatic transaminases.

CONCLUSION

Simvastatin was an effective and generally well tolerated treatment for hyperlipidemia when used in combination with TZD therapy in this population of patients with type 2 DM.

[Therapy of hyperlipoproteinemia in the elderly]

Atherosclerosis associated diseases are the major cause of mortality in men and women over 65 years. Although the epidemiological relationship between hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular disease is less prominent in elderly than in younger patients, the results of numerous intervention trials show that risk reduction can also be achieved in elderly and old patients. The numbers needed to treat to prevent one cardiovascular event is usually lower in this age group because of the high absolute rate of events. Therefore, in secondary prevention settings these patients should be treated similar to younger patients, i.e. a LDL-cholesterol below 100 mg/dl should be achieved. In hyper- or dyslipoproteinemic patients without evidence of clinical or subclinical atherosclerosis cholesterol lowering drugs should be used restrictively.

Lipoprotein lipase activator NO-1886

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is a rate-limiting enzyme that hydrolyzes circulating triglyceride-rich lipoproteins such as very low-density lipoproteins and chylomicrons. A decrease in LPL activity is associated with an increase in plasma triglycerides (TG) and a decrease in plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The increase in plasma TG and decrease in plasma HDL-C are risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Tsutsumi et al. hypothesized that elevating LPL activity would cause a reduction of plasma TG and an increase in plasma HDL-C, resulting in protection against the development of atherosclerosis. To test this hypothesis, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc. synthesized the LPL activator NO-1886. NO-1886 increased LPL mRNA and LPL activity in adipose tissue, myocardium and skeletal muscle, resulting in an elevation of postheparin plasma LPL activity and LPL mass in rats. NO-1886 also decreased plasma TG concentration and caused a concomitant rise in plasma HDL-C. Long-term administration of NO-1886 to rats and rabbits with experimental atherosclerosis inhibited the development of atherosclerotic lesions in coronary arteries and aortas. Multiple regression analysis suggested that the increase in plasma HDL-C and the decrease in plasma TG protect from atherosclerosis. The atherogenic lipid profile is changed to an antiatherogenic profile by increasing LPL activity, resulting in protection from atherosclerosis. Therefore, the LPL activator NO-1886 or other possible LPL activating agents are potentially beneficial for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia, hypo-HDL cholesterolemia, and protection from atherosclerosis.

The concept of apolipoprotein-defined lipoprotein families and its clinical significance

Classification of plasma lipoproteins on the basis of apolipoprotein (apo) composition recognizes two lipoprotein (Lp) classes, one of which is characterized by apoA-I and the other by apoB as major protein constituents. The former lipoprotein class consists of three major subclasses referred to (according to their apolipoprotein constituents) as Lp-A-I, Lp-A-I:A-II, and Lp-A-II, and the latter one of five subclasses called Lp-B, Lp-B:E, Lp-B:C, Lp-B:C:E, and Lp-A-II:B:C:D:E. As polydisperse systems of particles, the apoA-I-containing lipoproteins overlap in high-density segments and apoB- containing lipoproteins in low-density segments of the density gradient. Each subclass is characterized by a specific chemical composition and metabolic property. Normolipidemia and dyslipoproteinemias are characterized by quantitative rather than qualitative differences in the levels of apoA- and apoB-containing subclasses. Furthermore, apoA-containing subclasses seem to differ with respect to their relative antiatherogenic capacities, and apoB-containing subclasses regarding their relative atherogenic potentials. Whereas Lp-A-I may have a greater antiatherogenic capacity than other apoA-containing subclasses, the cholesterol-enriched Lp-B:C appears to be the most atherogenic subclass among apoB-containing lipoprotein families. The use of pharmacologic and/or dietary interventions to treat dyslipoproteinemias has already shown that these therapeutic modalities may affect selectively individual apolipoprotein-defined lipoproteins, and thus allow the selection of individualized treatments targeted at decreasing harmful and/or increasing beneficial lipoprotein subclasses.