Skin cancer in transplant recipients, out of the woods. Scientific retreat of the ITSCC and SCOPE

The International Transplant Skin Cancer Collaborative (ITSCC) is an organization of more than 300 members dedicated to the study and care of skin changes that develop in solid-organ transplant recipients. This group of medical and surgical dermatologists, transplant surgeons and basic science researchers was formed to better understand the basic science of transplant dermatology, and to work collaboratively to address the clinical challenges in this patient population. Transplant patients have an ∼100-fold increased risk of developing cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma than the general population and are also at an increased risk of developing basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, Merkel cell carcinoma and Kaposi's sarcoma. In October 2010, ITSCC and its European counterpart Skin Care in Organ Transplant Patients Europe (SCOPE) held a joint biennial 4-day scientific retreat in the woods near Essex, Massachusetts. In this meeting report we provide an up-to-date distillation of the novel findings presented in the 21 oral abstracts, at the tumor board and within the working groups.

Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy in pediatric patients treated with sirolimus and tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) syndromes are reported to occur with increased frequency in transplant patients treated with siroliumus combined with a calcineurin inhibitor. We performed a retrospective study of all pediatric transplant patients at City of Hope who were administered combined tacrolimus/sirolimus (TAC/SIR) to determine the occurrence of TMA.

PROCEDURE

This analysis includes 41 consecutive patients between the ages of 2 and 20 (median age 9.1) who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant from any source and also received TAC/SIR for prevention or treatment of GVHD. Of those 41 patients, 20 received TAC/SIR as GVHD prohpylaxis and were designated the preventative group (PG), while 21 received TAC/SIR as treatment for GVHD and were designated the therapy group (TG). TMA occurrence in both groups was documented from day -1 of transplant to day 60 for the PG, and until 30 days after last dose for the TG. TMA was defined according to 2005 consensus criteria.

RESULTS

Five of twenty patients in the PG, and five of twenty one in the TG, experienced TMA, with an overall rate of 23.8% for the population. All ten patients with TMA showed elevated levels of TAC, SIR or both and nine of ten suffered from organ injury due to regimen-related toxicity or GVHD.

CONCLUSION

Physicians should exercise caution in the use of TAC/SIR in pediatric patients due to a high rate of TMA. It is not recommended for heavily pre-treated patients and peak levels of TAC/SIR must be very carefully controlled.

A phase I study of sirolimus and bevacizumab in patients with advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND

We performed a single institution, phase I study of sirolimus and bevacizumab, in order to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended phase II doses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had previously treated advanced malignancies and were enrolled in three cohorts. Sirolimus 90 mg PO weekly (45 mg on days 1 and 2) was combined with bevacizumab 7.5mg/kg (cohort #1) or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (cohort #2) IV q3weeks. Sirolimus 4 mg PO daily was combined with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV q3weeks (cohort #3).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients enrolled. The most common tumour types were colorectal (21%), head/neck (14%), and renal cell (11%). No DLTs were observed in cohorts #1 (4 patients) and #2 (12 patients), while two DLTs (grade 3 confusion and grade 3 fatigue) were observed in the first six patients in cohort #3 (12 patients). The most common grade 3 toxicities were fatigue (18%), hypertension (14%) and anorexia (11%). There were no responses, but one patient has had stable disease for 78 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sirolimus and bevacizumab at full doses is tolerable in the majority of patients. The availability and cost of sirolimus compared with other mTOR inhibitors make this an attractive agent to combine with bevacizumab.

New onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT): an overview

Although renal transplantation ameliorates cardiovascular risk factors by restoring renal function, it introduces new cardiovascular risks including impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia that are derived, in part, from immunosuppressive medications such as calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids, or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. New onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) is a serious and common complication following solid organ transplantation. NODAT has been reported to occur in 2% to 53% of all solid organ transplants. Kidney transplant recipients who develop NODAT have variably been reported to be at increased risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and other adverse outcomes including infection, reduced patient survival, graft rejection, and accelerated graft loss compared with those who do not develop diabetes. Identification of high-risk patients and implementation of measures to reduce the development of NODAT may improve long-term patient and graft outcome. The following article presents an overview of the literature on the current diagnostic criteria for NODAT, its incidence after solid organ transplantation, suggested risk factors and potential pathogenic mechanisms. The impact of NODAT on patient and allograft outcomes and suggested guidelines for early identification and management of NODAT will also be discussed.

Strategies to prevent EBV reactivation and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in high-risk patients

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated postallogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is often life threatening. The risk of EBV reactivation is highest in older patients, T cell-depleted SCT (in vivo or vitro), and in unrelated or mismatched SCT. Cumulative numbers of patients with EBV reactivation and PTLD are rising as more patients at high risk for EBV reactivation and PTLD are receiving allo-SCT. Novel but easily applicable strategies are needed to prevent EBV reactivation and PTLD to serve the needs of the increasingly enlarging population of high-risk SCT recipients across the globe.

Two drug interaction studies of sirolimus in combination with sorafenib or sunitinib in patients with advanced malignancies

PURPOSE

Sirolimus is the prototypical mTOR inhibitor. Sorafenib and sunitinib are small molecule inhibitors of multiple kinases including VEGF receptor (VEGFR) kinases. These agents have different mechanisms of action, providing a strong rationale for combination.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with advanced cancer were assigned to receive either sirolimus or the VEGFR inhibitor alone for a 2-week lead-in period, followed by combination therapy. The primary end point of each trial was to determine whether a drug interaction exists between sirolimus and either sorafenib or sunitinib, as defined by a difference in C(max) for each drug alone compared with its C(max) during combination therapy.

RESULTS

The sorafenib and sunitinib trials enrolled 34 and 23 patients, respectively. There were no clinically significant differences in C(max) for any of the drugs alone compared with the C(max) during combination therapy. Toxicity profiles were similar to those expected for each drug alone. One patient with adrenal cortical cancer had a partial response to sirolimus and sunitnib.

CONCLUSIONS

Sirolimus can be safely combined with sorafenib or sunitinib. Our trial design is feasible and informative in screening for potential drug-drug interactions, using a relatively small number of patients and limited pharmacokinetic sampling.

The effects of sirolimus on target organs during mesenteric ischemia and reperfusion damage in an experimental rat model

BACKGROUND

Mesenteric ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) syndrome (MIRS) has been considered a clinicopathologic entity associated with a variety of clinically severe conditions with decreased intestinal blood flow and has been known to induce I/R damage in various organs. Sirolimus (SRL), a macrolide antibiotic isolated from a strain of Streptomyces hygroscopicus, is a potent and nonnephrotoxic immunosuppressant.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate the potential impact of sirolimus on MIRS-induced I/R damage in renal, intestinal, pulmonary, and hepatic tissues in an experimental rat model.

METHODS

Twenty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats, aged 6 to 8 weeks and weighing 280 (±20 g), were studied. Using computer-generated random numbers, rats were assigned to 1 of the following 3 groups: group 1 (I/R group, n = 8), group 2 (I/R + sirolimus group, n = 8), and group 3 (control group, n = 8). Sirolimus, in a 1 mg/mL (60 mL) solution, was administered intraperitoneally in a dose of 1.5 mg/kg/d to the rats assigned to group 2 starting from 3 days before the surgical procedure. In surgery, a laparotomy was performed to clamp the superior mesenteric artery and, thus, induce bowel ischemia in groups 1 and 2. After 60 minutes of ischemia, the microvascular clamp on the superior mesenteric artery was removed for 3 hours of reperfusion. Soon after experimental induction of MIRS, bowel, lung, kidney, and liver specimens from each animal were harvested for both biochemical and histopathologic analysis.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences between groups 1 and 3 with regard to degrees of intestinal (P < 0.001), hepatic (P = 0.001), renal (P < 0.001), and pulmonary (P = 0.01) I/R damage. The lung specimens from group 2 had less inflammation and perivascular edema formation compared with specimens from group 1, but no statistical significance was observed between the groups (P < 0.33). There were statistically significant differences between groups 1 and 2 with regard to degrees of intestinal, hepatic, and renal I/R damage (P = 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSION

The findings of the present study demonstrate the attenuating effects of sirolimus on I/R damage in the intestine and remote organs, including the liver and kidney in the setting of MIRS in an experimental rat model. As a therapeutic implication, the utility of sirolimus may be of clinical value in procedures associated with a high likelihood of I/R damage, including major abdominal operations and renal transplantation. However, whether these results apply to humans is unclear. Additional experimental and clinical studies are warranted to confirm the clinical utility of sirolimus in conditions potentially associated with I/R damage.

Intestinal transplantation in children: a review of immunotherapy regimens

This review summarizes the outcomes and known adverse effects of current immunosuppression strategies in use in pediatric intestinal transplantation. Intestinal transplantation has evolved from an experimental therapy to a highly successful treatment for children with intestinal failure who have complications with total parenteral nutrition. Because of continued success with intestinal transplantation over the past decade, the focus of clinicians and researchers is shifting from short-term patient survival to optimizing long-term outcomes. Current 5-year patient and graft survival rates after intestinal transplantation are 58% and 40%, respectively, in the US; single centers have reported nearly 80% patient and 60% graft survival rates at 5 years. The immunosuppression strategy in intestinal transplantation includes a tacrolimus-based regimen, usually in conjunction with an antibody induction therapy such as rabbit-antithymocyte globulin, interleukin-2 receptor antagonists, or alemtuzumab. The use of these immunosuppressive regimens, along with improved medical and surgical care, has contributed significantly toward improved outcomes. Optimization of post-transplant immunosuppression strategies to reduce adverse effects while minimizing acute and chronic graft rejection is a strong clinical and research focus.

Therapeutic mTOR inhibition in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: What is the appropriate serum level?

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common inherited renal disease, and sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, has been shown to significantly retard cyst expansion in animal models. The optimal therapeutic dose of sirolimus is not yet defined. Here, we report the history of a previously unknown ADPKD deceased donor whose kidneys were engrafted in two different recipients. One of the two received an immunosuppressive regimen based on sirolimus for 5 years while the other did not. After transplantation, both patients developed severe transplant cystic disease. Donor DNA sequence identified a new hypomorphic mutation in PKD1. The rate of cyst growth was identical in the two patients regardless of the treatment. While sirolimus treatment reduced the activation of mTOR in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, it failed to prevent mTOR activation in kidney tubular cells, this could account for the inefficiency of treatment on cyst growth. Together, our results suggest that the dose of sirolimus required to inhibit mTOR varies according to the tissue.

Sirolimus and everolimus clearance in maintenance kidney and liver transplant recipients: diagnostic efficiency of the concentration/dose ratio for the prediction of trough steady-state concentrations

OBJECTIVES

Therapeutic monitoring of sirolimus and everolimus is necessary in order to minimize adverse side-effects and to ensure effective immunosuppression. A sirolimus-dosing model using the concentration/dose ratio has been previously proposed for kidney transplant patients, and the aim of our study was the evaluation of this single model for the prediction of trough sirolimus and everolimus concentrations.

METHODS

Trough steady-state sirolimus concentrations were determined in several blood samples from each of 7 kidney and 9 liver maintenance transplant recipients, and everolimus concentrations from 20 kidney, 17 liver, and 3 kidney/liver maintenance transplant recipients. Predicted sirolimus and everolimus concentrations (Css), corresponding to the doses (D), were calculated using the measured concentrations (Css(0)) and corresponding doses (D(0)) on starting the study: Css = (Css(0))(D)/D(0).

RESULTS

The diagnostic efficiency of the predicting model for the correct classification as subtherapeutic, therapeutic, and supratherapeutic values with respect to the experimentally obtained concentrations was 91.3% for sirolimus and 81.4% for everolimus in the kidney transplant patients. In the liver transplant patients the efficiency was 69.2% for sirolimus and 72.6% for everolimus, and in the kidney/liver transplant recipients the efficiency for everolimus was 67.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The model has an acceptable diagnostic efficiency (>80%) for the prediction of sirolimus and everolimus concentrations in kidney transplant recipients, but not in liver transplant recipients. However, considering the wide ranges found for the prediction error of sirolimus and everolimus concentrations, the clinical relevance of this dosing model is weak.

Inhibition of mTOR in kidney cancer

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mtor) has been shown to be an important target mechanism in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (rcc). In first-line treatment for patients with disease having poor prognostic features, temsirolimus, an mtor inhibitor approved for treatment of advanced rcc, has demonstrated benefit over interferon alfa in both overall and progression-free survival. Everolimus, a second mtor inhibitor that has showed activity in rcc, led to improved progression-free survival in a comparison with placebo in patients whose rcc progressed after treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sunitinib, sorafenib, or both). There is now compelling clinical evidence for the effectiveness of targeting mtor in the treatment of rcc.

BAFF is increased in renal transplant patients following treatment with alemtuzumab

Alemtuzumab is a monoclonal antibody that depletes T and B cells and is used as induction therapy for renal transplant recipients. Without long-term calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy, alemtuzumab-treated patients have a propensity to develop alloantibody and may undergo antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). In pursuit of a mechanistic explanation, we analyzed peripheral B cells and serum of these patients for BAFF (Blys) and BAFF-R, factors known to be integral for B-cell activation, survival, and homeostasis. Serum BAFF levels of 22/24 alemtuzumab-treated patients were above normal range, with average levels of 1967 pg/mL compared to 775 pg/mL in healthy controls (p = 0.006). BAFF remained elevated 2 years posttransplant in 78% of these patients. BAFF-R on CD19(+) B cells was significantly downregulated, suggesting ligand/receptor engagement. BAFF mRNA expression was increased 2-7-fold in CD14(+) cells of depleted patients, possibly linking monocytes to the BAFF dysregulation. Addition of recombinant BAFF to mixed lymphocyte cultures increased B-cell activation to alloantigen, as measured by CD25 and CD69 coexpression on CD19(+) cells. Of note, addition of sirolimus (SRL) augmented BAFF-enhanced B-cell activation whereas CNIs blocked it. These data suggest associations between BAFF/BAFF-R and AMR in alemtuzumab-treated patients.

Determination of blood sirolimus concentrations in liver and kidney transplant recipients using the Innofluor fluorescence polarization immunoassay: comparison with the microparticle enzyme immunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet method

BACKGROUND

Although high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the method of choice for blood sirolimus determination, the microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) run on the IMx analyser is widely used in therapeutic monitoring of this immunosuppressant agent. The aim of our study was to evaluate the possible determination of sirolimus using the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) commercialized for everolimus quantification.

METHODS

Sirolimus concentrations were determined in whole-blood samples from liver and kidney transplant recipients using the Innofluor Certican FPIA (Seradyn Inc.) run on a TDx analyser (Abbott Laboratories), Sirolimus MEIA run on an IMx analyser (Abbott Laboratories), and HPLC (UV detection) methods.

RESULTS

The Innofluor FPIA has a similar cross-reactivity with everolimus and sirolimus, and the within- and between-run coefficients of variation obtained for sirolimus determination were 2.7%-13.3%. In analysing different blood samples from liver and kidney transplant patients the linear regressions obtained were: FPIA = 1.12 HPLC + 0.43 (n=104, r=0.874), MEIA = 1.14 HPLC (n=146, r=0.892), and FPIA = 1.00 MEIA + 0.29 (n=106, r=0.941). Better correlation coefficients were obtained between the methods in the liver transplant samples (r>or=0.900) than in the kidney transplant samples (r>or=0.849). No significant effect was found for sirolimus clearance or the blood hematocrit on the relationship between the results produced by both immunoassays and HPLC.

CONCLUSION

The Innofluor FPIA is a valid alternative with an analogous performance to the MEIA for the therapeutic monitoring of sirolimus.

Urine metabolites reflect time-dependent effects of cyclosporine and sirolimus on rat kidney function

The clinical use of the immunosuppressant calcineurin inhibitor cyclosporine is limited by its nephrotoxicity. This is enhanced when combined with the immunosuppressive mTOR inhibitor sirolimus. Nephrotoxicity of both drugs is not yet fully understood. The goal was to gain more detailed mechanistic insights into the time-dependent effects of cyclosporine and sirolimus on the rat kidney by using a comprehensive approach including metabolic profiling in urine ((1)H NMR spectroscopy), kidney histology, kidney function parameters in plasma, measurement of glomerular filtration rates, the oxidative stress marker 15-F(2t)-isoprostane in urine, and immunosuppressant concentrations in blood and kidney. Male Wistar rats were treated with vehicle (controls), cyclosporine (10/25 mg/kg/day), and/or sirolimus (1 mg/kg/day) by oral gavage once daily for 6 and 28 days. Twenty-eight day treatment led to a decrease of glomerular filtration rates (cyclosporine, -59%; sirolimus, -25%). These were further decreased when both drugs were combined (-86%). Histology revealed tubular damage after treatment with cyclosporine, which was enhanced when sirolimus was added. No other part of the kidney was affected. (1)H NMR spectroscopy analysis of urine (day 6) revealed time-dependent changes of 2-oxoglutarate, citrate, and succinate concentrations. In combination with increased urine isoprostane concentrations, these changes indicated oxidative stress. After 28 days of cyclosporine treatment, urine metabonomics shifted to patterns typical for proximal tubular damage with reduction of Krebs cycle intermediates and trimethylamine-N-oxide concentrations, whereas acetate, lactate, trimethylamine, and glucose concentrations increased. Again, sirolimus enhanced these negative effects. Our results indicate that cyclosporine and/or sirolimus induce damage of the renal tubular system. This is reflected by urine metabolite patterns, which seem to be more sensitive than currently used clinical kidney function markers such as creatinine concentrations in serum. Metabolic profiling in urine may provide the basis for the development of toxicodynamic monitoring strategies for immunosuppressant nephrotoxicity.

The effect of sirolimus on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in male renal transplant recipients without prostate cancer

In kidney recipients, the immunosuppressant sirolimus has been associated with a decreased incidence of de novo posttransplant malignancies (including prostate cancer). But the effect of sirolimus on the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood level, an important prostate cancer screening tool, remains unknown. We studied male kidney recipients >50 years old (transplanted from January 1994 to December 2006) without clinical evidence for prostate cancer. Pre- and posttransplant PSA levels were analyzed for 97 recipients (n = 19 on sirolimus, n = 78 on tacrolimus [control group]). Pretransplant PSA was similar for sirolimus versus tacrolimus recipients (mean, 1.8 versus 1.7 ng/mL, p = 0.89), but posttransplant PSA was significantly lower for recipients on sirolimus (mean, 0.9 versus 1.9 ng/mL, respectively, p < 0.001). The mean difference between pretransplant and posttransplant PSA was -0.9 ng/mL (50.0%, p = 0.006) for the sirolimus group versus +0.2 ng/mL (+11.8%, p = 0.24) for the tacrolimus group. By multivariate analysis, only pretransplant PSA and immunosuppression with sirolimus independently impacted posttransplant PSA. Our data strongly suggest that sirolimus is associated with a significant PSA decrease in kidney recipients. Future studies must investigate the clinical implications of our findings for the use of PSA for prostate cancer screening in male kidney recipients on sirolimus.

Sirolimus-eluting stent treatment for unprotected versus protected left main coronary artery disease in widespread clinical routine: 6-month and 3-year clinical follow-up results from the prospective multicentre German Cypher Registry

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease in the bare stent era was limited by high restenosis rates which eventually resulted in sudden death in unprotected cases. Clinical and angiographic restenosis has been substantially reduced by drug-eluting stents, reviving therefore this indication for PCI despite the absence of direct comparative studies with coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the acute, mid- and long-term outcomes of patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents for unprotected LMCA stenoses and to compare them with those treated for protected LMCA disease in the same time period from the German Cypher Registry.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

The German Cypher Registry included 6755 patients. Eighty-two patients treated for unprotected LMCA disease were compared with 118 patients treated for protected LMCA stenoses. All patients were treated by sirolimus-eluting stents. The primary end point was death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target vessel revascularisation at 6 months' follow-up. Survival free of MI at the long term was considered as the safety end point.

RESULTS

One-third of the patients in both groups were treated for the distal left main bifurcation. Angiographic success was 98.5% for both groups. The cumulative combined incidence of all-cause death, non-fatal MI and target vessel revascularisation at 6 months was 14.1% in the unprotected LMCA group and 13.1% in the protected group (hazard ratio = 0.81 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.74), p = 0.8). At long-term, death/MI were reported among 20.2% (95% CI 13.5% to 29.6%) of the protected group versus 11.8% (95% CI 6.3% to 21.4%) of the unprotected group (p = 0.2).

CONCLUSION

Sirolimus-eluting stent treatment of unprotected and protected LMCA stenoses is technically feasible in widespread routine clinical use. Acceptable long-term clinical results can be achieved, with no particular safety concerns about treatment of unprotected LMCA disease.

Rapamycin retards growth and causes marked alterations in the growth plate of young rats

Rapamycin is a potent immunosuppressant with antitumoral properties widely used in the field of renal transplantation. To test the hypothesis that the antiproliferative and antiangiogenic activity of rapamycin interferes with the normal structure and function of growth plate and impairs longitudinal growth, 4-week-old male rats (n = 10/group) receiving 2 mg/kg per day of intraperitoneal rapamycin (RAPA) or vehicle (C) for 14 days were compared. Rapamycin markedly decreased bone longitudinal growth rate (94 +/- 3 vs. 182 +/- 3 microm/day), body weight gain (60.2 +/- 1.4 vs. 113.6 +/- 1.9 g), food intake (227.8 +/- 2.6 vs. 287.5 +/- 3.4 g), and food efficiency (0.26 +/- 0.00 vs. 0.40 +/- 0.01 g/g). Signs of altered cartilage formation such as reduced chondrocyte proliferation (bromodeoxiuridine-labeled cells 32.9 +/- 1.4 vs. 45.2 +/- 1.1%), disturbed maturation and hypertrophy (height of terminal chondrocytes 26 +/- 0 vs. 29 +/- 0 microm), and decreased cartilage resorption (18.7 +/- 0.5 vs. 31.0 +/- 0.8 tartrate-resistant phosphatase alkaline reactive cells per 100 terminal chondrocytes), together with morphological evidence of altered vascular invasion, were seen in the growth plate of RAPA animals. This study indicates that rapamycin can severely impair body growth in fast-growing rats and distort growth-plate structure and dynamics. These undesirable effects must be kept in mind when rapamycin is administered to children.

Sirolimus pharmacokinetics in pediatric renal transplant recipients receiving calcineurin inhibitor co-therapy

We have previously reported sirolimus (SRL) pharmacokinetics (PK) in pediatric renal transplant recipients on a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free protocol. We now report pediatric SRL PK in pediatric renal transplant patients receiving SRL + CNI. SRL was dosed to achieve target trough levels between 10 and 20 ng/mL. We performed 49 SRL PK profiles in pediatric renal transplant recipients receiving SRL in combination with either cyclosporine (CsA; 25 profiles), or tacrolimus (TCL; 24 profiles). Ten of the SRL + TCL profiles were obtained from children receiving SRL on a b.i.d. dosing regimen. All other SRL profiles were q.d. regimens. We calculated, the maximum concentration (C(max)), AUC, apparent clearance (aCL; dose/AUC) for dose in mg/m(2), and mean residence time (MRT). SRL levels were measured at 6 and 7 time points for b.i.d. and q.d. dosing, respectively. Regression analysis of SRL trough values vs. AUC showed good correlation in the SRL q.d. + CsA, SRL q.d. + TCL, and SRL b.i.d. + TCL groups (r(2) = 0.95, 0.68, and 0.44, respectively). SRL aCL corrected for body surface area was higher in children aged 0-5 yr receiving SRL with either CsA or TCL. SRL dosing schedule should be tailored to each patient. Higher SRL aCL may be present in younger children when administered with CNI.

Sirolimus therapy following early cyclosporine withdrawal in transplant patients: mechanisms of action and clinical results

Cyclosporine (CsA), a member of the family of calcineurin inhibitors, is a cornerstone of the immunosuppressive treatments used after organ transplantation. However, it exhibits significant toxicity, including nephrotoxicity and increased cardiovascular risk factors. CsA withdrawal has been used as a strategy to improve renal allograft function and other CsA-related toxicities. In order to maintain adequate immunosuppression levels, sirolimus may be used in association with CsA withdrawal. Sirolimus is a member of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) family. It presents a good immunosuppressive efficacy associated with antiproliferative actions. Early withdrawal of CsA with sirolimus is associated with a significant improvement of renal function. Despite numerically a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes, this maneuver seems also to be associated with a better allograft survival in the long-term, and improvement of renal histology and blood pressure. However, CsA withdrawal is only feasible in a selected population. Furthermore, the use of sirolimus is associated with other side-effects including lipid abnormalities, abnormal liver tests, and thrombocytopenia. Other studies are mandatory to define the population who can benefit from this maneuver. Finally, complete CsA avoidance has been already reported and is currently under clinical investigation.

Autophagy: A protective mechanism in response to stress and inflammation

Autophagy is one of the intracellular systems that is responsible for protein trafficking (degradation/recycling) in eukaryotic cells. This ubiquitous process contributes to cytosolic homeostasis, but its deregulation is often associated with various pathologies, including neurodegenerative diseases and cancer and pathologies with an altered inflammatory response. This review provides an overview of autophagy and discusses its regulation, function and future therapeutic possibilities, with a focus on the role of autophagy in inflammation.

The efficacy of sirolimus in the treatment of patients with refractory uveitis

AIMS

To determine the efficacy of sirolimus in the treatment of patients with severe non-infectious uveitis.

METHODS

Eight patients with severe non-infectious uveitis were recruited to an open study. Inclusion criteria were limited to patients whose disease was not controlled with at least two or more separate steroid sparing immunosuppressants (either because of unacceptable side effects or ineffectiveness of the drug) or who required regular doses of corticosteroids either as high dose systemic or orbital floor injections in order to control their disease. Intraocular inflammation, visual acuity, symptoms, corticosteroid burden, drug toxicity, and side effects were monitored.

RESULTS

Sirolimus therapy was effective in five of the eight patients, all of whom had their dose of corticosteroids reduced or discontinued. Treatment in three patients was considered a failure as it caused intolerable side effects and/or failed to control the uveitis. Side effects were common and were typically gastrointestinal or cutaneous in nature. The severity of symptoms was dose dependent in most cases and occurred at trough blood levels above 25 ng/ml.

CONCLUSION

Sirolimus is an effective and potent immunosuppressive treatment in the majority of patients with non-infectious uveitis and can reduce the need for long term supplementary corticosteroid therapy. Further studies are required to establish the long term efficacy and safety of sirolimus alone or in combination with other steroid sparing immunosuppressants.

Short sirolimus half-life in pediatric renal transplant recipients on a calcineurin inhibitor-free protocol

Immunosuppression with SRL may provide an opportunity to avoid long-term exposure to the nephrotoxicity of CNI. Thus, we have initiated an experimental protocol of IL-2r antibody induction, prednisone, MMF and SRL in pediatric renal transplant recipients (median age 15.5 yr, IQR 8.5, range 1.3-21.7). The recipients were treated with daclizumab every 2 wk for the first 2 months, prednisone on a tapering schedule, MMF at 1200 mg/m(2)/day and SRL given b.i.d. The SRL was dosed to achieve defined target whole blood 12-h trough levels. We performed 24 SRL PK profiles in 13 stable pediatric renal transplant recipients at 1 and 3 months post-transplant. Half-life (T(1/2)) and terminal T(1/2) were 9.7 (7.1-24.6) and 10.8 (4.4-95.2) hours (median, range) respectively at month 1, and were 9.6 (5-17.8) and 12.1 (4.7-71.0) hours respectively at month 3. SRL trough levels correlated with AUC (r(2) = 0.84, p < 0.001). There was no relationship between SRL and mycophenolic acid (MPA) AUC values (r(2) = 0.04). During the first 3 months post-transplant only one patient experienced severe neutropenia and another patient had subclinical (histologic) evidence of a mild acute rejection episode with no change in renal function. We conclude that the T(1/2) of SRL in pediatric renal transplant recipients not treated with CNI is much shorter than what has been reported for adults, due to rapid metabolism. We conclude that children require SRL dosing every 12 h, higher doses and frequent drug monitoring to achieve target SRL concentrations.

Drug eluting stents: maximising benefit and minimising cost

A policy of selective implantation of drug eluting stents, in a minority of lesions most likely to benefit, seems to be a rational way to employ this new and currently costly technology.

Tacrolimus and sirolimus decrease oxidative phosphorylation of isolated rat kidney mitochondria

1. Tacrolimus and sirolimus are potent immunosuppressors used in transplantation. Tacrolimus has been suspected to alter mitochondrial respiration of different tissues but sirolimus has not been evaluated. 2. We evaluated the in vitro effect of tacrolimus and sirolimus on oxidative phosphorylation of isolated rat kidney mitochondria. 3. Oxygen consumption was measured with a Clark-type electrode. Tacrolimus and sirolimus increased the resting rate (state 4) and had no significant effect on ADP-stimulated respiration (state 3). The decrease of respiratory control ratio was concentration-dependent with a biphasic curve for tacrolimus. The EC(50)s were 3.4 x 10(-11) M and 2.3 x 10(-8) M for tacrolimus and 4.4 x 10(-10) M for sirolimus. The maximal inhibition was 20 and 14% for tacrolimus and sirolimus, respectively. 4. Tacrolimus and sirolimus had an uncoupling effect on oxidative phosphorylation related to a decrease of the inner membrane fluidity. At the opposite of cyclosporin A, no effect on swelling or Ca(2+) fluxes was observed. 5. All events occurred at therapeutic concentrations and then could appear during long-term treatment. Cellular consequences such as chronic nephrotoxicity with tacrolimus are suggested. The risk of cyclosporin A nephrotoxicity potentiation by sirolimus is discussed.

Sirolimus steady-state trough concentrations are not affected by bolus methylprednisolone therapy in renal allograft recipients

AIMS

To determine whether bolus doses of methylprednisolone affect the steady-state trough concentrations of sirolimus.

METHODS

Fourteen renal transplant recipients received concentration-controlled sirolimus therapy in combination with azathioprine and steroids (n=8) or mycophenolate mofetil and steroids (n=6). Bolus doses of methylprednisolone (mean total dose over 1-5 days, 1694 mg; range, 500-3000 mg) were given for the treatment of acute rejection. For each patient, the sirolimus dose (mean, 24.1 mg; range, 3.3-52.5 mg) was the same before and during methylprednisolone therapy.

RESULTS

Mean sirolimus whole blood trough concentrations before and after treatment with methylprednisolone were 28.8 ng ml-1 (range, 13.9-45.3 ng ml-1), and 28.5 ng ml-1 (range, 13.0-47.9 ng ml-1), respectively (P=0.85; 95% confidence interval on the difference -3.3, 4.0 ng ml-1).

CONCLUSIONS

Bolus methylprednisolone treatment does not affect steady-state sirolimus trough concentrations.

Sirolimus/cyclosporine/tacrolimus interactions on bile flow and biliary excretion of immunosuppressants in a subchronic bile fistula rat model

The new immunosuppressive agent sirolimus generally is combined in transplant patients with cyclosporine and tacrolimus which both exhibit cholestatic effects. Nothing is known about possible cholestatic effects of these combinations which might be important for biliary excretion of endogenous compounds as well as of immunosuppressants. Rats were daily treated with sirolimus (1 mg kg(-1) p.o.), cyclosporine (10 mg kg(-1) i.p.), tacrolimus (1 mg kg(-1) i.p.), or a combination of sirolimus with cyclosporine or tacrolimus. After 14 days a bile fistula was installed to investigate the effects of the immunosuppressants and their combinations on bile flow and on biliary excretion of bile salts, cholesterol, and immunosuppressants. Cyclosporine as well as tacrolimus reduced bile flow (-22%; -18%), biliary excretion of bile salts (-15%;-36%) and cholesterol (-15%; -47%). Sirolimus decreased bile flow by 10%, but had no effect on cholesterol or bile salt excretion. Combination of sirolimus/cyclosporine decreased bile flow and biliary bile salt excretion to the same extent as cyclosporine alone, but led to a 2 fold increase of biliary cholesterol excretion. Combination of sirolimus/tacrolimus reduced bile flow only by 7.5% and did not change biliary bile salt and cholesterol excretion. Sirolimus enhanced blood concentrations of cyclosporine (+40%) and tacrolimus (+57%). Sirolimus blood concentration was increased by cyclosporine (+400%), but was not affected by tacrolimus. We conclude that a combination of sirolimus/tacrolimus could be the better alternative to the cotreatment of sirolimus/cyclosporine in cholestatic patients and in those facing difficulties in reaching therapeutic ranges of sirolimus blood concentration.

Sirolimus, but not the structurally related RAD (everolimus), enhances the negative effects of cyclosporine on mitochondrial metabolism in the rat brain

Clinical studies have shown enhancement of cyclosporine toxicity when co-administered with the immunosuppressant sirolimus. We evaluated the biochemical mechanisms underlying the sirolimus/cyclosporine interaction on rat brain metabolism using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and compared the effects of sirolimus with those of the structurally related RAD. Two-week-old rats (25 g) were allocated to the following treatment groups (all n=6): I. control, II. cyclosporine (10 mg kg(-1) d(-1)), III. sirolimus (3 mg kg(-1) d(-1)), IV. RAD (3 mg kg(-1) d(-1)), V. cyclosporine+sirolimus and VI. cyclosporine+RAD. Drugs were administered by oral gavage for 6 days. Twelve hours after the last dose, metabolic changes were assessed in brain tissue extracts using multinuclear MRS. Cyclosporine significantly inhibited mitochondrial glucose metabolism (glutamate: 78+/-6% of control; GABA: 67+/-12%; NAD(+): 76+/-3%; P<0.05), but increased lactate production. Sirolimus and RAD inhibited cytosolic glucose metabolism via lactate production (sirolimus: 81+/-3% of control, RAD: 69+/-2%; P<0.02). Sirolimus enhanced cyclosporine-induced inhibition of mitochondrial glucose metabolism (glutamate: 60+/-4%; GABA: 59+/-8%; NAD(+): 45+/-5%; P<0.02 versus cyclosporine alone). Lactate production was significantly reduced. In contrast, RAD antagonized the effects of cyclosporine (glutamate, GABA, and NAD(+), not significantly different from controls). The results can partially be explained by pharmacokinetic interactions: co-administration increased the distribution of cyclosporine and sirolimus into brain tissue, while co-administration with RAD decreased cyclosporine brain tissue concentrations. In addition RAD, but not sirolimus, distributed into brain mitochondria. The combination of cyclosporine/RAD compares favourably to cyclosporine/sirolimus in regards to their effects on brain high-energy metabolism and tissue distribution in the rat.

Synergistic mechanisms by which sirolimus and cyclosporin inhibit rat heart and kidney allograft rejection

The studies presented herein examined the mechanism(s) whereby sirolimus (SRL) and cyclosporin (CsA) act synergistically to block allograft rejection. Combination index (CI = 1 reflects additive, CI > 1 antagonistic, and CI < 1 synergistic, effects) analysis documented potent synergism between SRL and CsA to block allograft rejection. Combinations of the two drugs produced synergistic prolongation of heart (CI = 0.001-0.2) or kidney (CI = 0.03-0.5) allograft survival at SRL/CsA ratios ranging from 1:12.5 to 1:200. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the individual drugs showed that CsA does not affect the blood levels of SRL, and SRL mildly increases the levels of CsA in SRL/CsA-treated rats. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis was used to document that both subtherapeutic (1.0 mg/kg) and therapeutic (2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg) CsA doses inhibited the expression of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) (P < 0.03) and IL-2 (P < 0.003) mRNA produced by T helper (Th) 1 cells, as well as IL-10 (P < 0.001), but not IL-4 (NS) mRNA produced by Th2 cells. Contrariwise, all tested SRL doses (0.02, 0.04 or 0.08 mg/kg) did not affect cytokine mRNA expression. However, heart allografts from rat recipients treated with synergistic SRL/CsA doses displayed reduced levels of IFN-gamma (P < 0.01), IL-2 (P < 0.001) and IL-10 (P < 0.001) mRNA. Thus, because subtherapeutic doses of CsA reduce Th1/Th2 activity, thereby facilitating the inhibition of signal transduction by low does of SRL, the two agents act synergistically to inhibit allograft rejection.