Evaluating Confounding Control in Estimations of Influenza Antiviral Effectiveness in Electronic Health Plan Data

Observational studies of oseltamivir use and influenza complications could suffer from residual confounding. Using negative control risk periods and a negative control outcome, we examined confounding control in a health-insurance-claims-based study of oseltamivir and influenza complications (pneumonia, all-cause hospitalization, and dispensing of an antibiotic). Within the Food and Drug Administration's Sentinel System, we identified individuals aged ≥18 years who initiated oseltamivir use on the influenza diagnosis date versus those who did not, during 3 influenza seasons (2014-2017). We evaluated primary outcomes within the following 1-30 days (the primary risk period) and 61-90 days (the negative control period) and nonvertebral fractures (the negative control outcome) within days 1-30. We estimated propensity-score-matched risk ratios (RRs) per season. During the 2014-2015 influenza season, oseltamivir use was associated with a reduction in the risk of pneumonia (RR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70, 0.75) and all-cause hospitalization (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.55) in days 1-30. During days 61-90, estimates were near-null for pneumonia (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.15) and hospitalization (RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91, 0.98) but slightly increased for antibiotic dispensing (RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.21). The RR for fractures was near-null (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.20). Estimates for the 2016-2017 influenza season were comparable, while the 2015-2016 season had conflicting results. Our study suggests minimal residual confounding for specific outcomes, but results differed by season.

Baloxavir vs oseltamivir: reduced utilization and costs in influenza

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether baloxavir use is associated with lower health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for secondary influenza complications post treatment compared with oseltamivir.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Patients filling a prescription for baloxavir or oseltamivir within 48 hours following an influenza-related outpatient visit were identified in the 2018-2019 influenza season from the US Truven MarketScan Research Databases and propensity matched 1:2 (baloxavir:oseltamivir). Outcomes were assessed 15 and 30 days after antiviral treatment and included all-cause, all respiratory-related, and select respiratory-related (influenza, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or infection) HCRU and costs.

RESULTS

The study included 5080 baloxavir-treated and 10,160 matched oseltamivir-treated patients. All-cause emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient hospitalizations were lower in baloxavir-treated patients, with a statistically significant difference in the percentage hospitalized at 30 days (0.3% vs 0.5%; P = .04). ED visits for all or select respiratory-related conditions were significantly reduced with baloxavir (P < .01 for all comparisons). Mean per-patient cost savings at day 30 for all-cause, all respiratory-related, and select respiratory-related conditions were $79, $50, and $51, respectively, despite slightly higher prescription costs for baloxavir. In high-risk patients (baloxavir: n = 1958; oseltamivir: n = 3949), the incidence of ED visits was significantly lower for all respiratory-related and select respiratory-related conditions (P < .01); cost savings with baloxavir in the high-risk cohort were substantially greater than in the overall cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of patients with influenza with single-dose baloxavir was generally associated with lower HCRU and costs post treatment compared with oseltamivir, particularly in high-risk patients.

Global update on the susceptibilities of human influenza viruses to neuraminidase inhibitors and the cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor baloxavir, 2018–2020

Global analysis of the susceptibility of influenza viruses to neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors (NAIs) and the polymerase acidic (PA) inhibitor (PAI) baloxavir was conducted by five World Health Organization Collaborating Centres for Reference and Research on Influenza during two periods (May 2018–May 2019 and May 2019–May 2020). Combined phenotypic and NA sequence-based analysis revealed that the global frequency of viruses displaying reduced or highly reduced inhibition (RI or HRI) or potential to show RI/HRI by NAIs remained low, 0.5% (165/35045) and 0.6% (159/26010) for the 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 periods, respectively. The most common amino acid substitution was NA-H275Y (N1 numbering) conferring HRI by oseltamivir and peramivir in A(H1N1)pdm09 viruses. Combined phenotypic and PA sequence-based analysis showed that the global frequency of viruses showing reduced susceptibility to baloxavir or carrying substitutions associated with reduced susceptibility was low, 0.5% (72/15906) and 0.1% (18/15692) for the 2018–2019 and 2019–2020 periods, respectively. Most (n = 61) of these viruses had I38→T/F/M/S/L/V PA amino acid substitutions. In Japan, where baloxavir use was highest, the rate was 4.5% (41/919) in the 2018–2019 period and most of the viruses (n = 32) had PA-I38T. Zoonotic viruses isolated from humans (n = 32) in different countries did not contain substitutions in NA associated with NAI RI/HRI phenotypes. One A(H5N6) virus had a dual substitution PA-I38V + PA-E199G, which may reduce susceptibility to baloxavir. Therefore, NAIs and baloxavir remain appropriate choices for the treatment of influenza virus infections, but close monitoring of antiviral susceptibility is warranted.

Is it possible to hospitalize patients in multiple-bed room without increasing the risk of hospital-acquired influenza? Description of a pragmatic preventive strategy in a French university hospital

BACKGROUND

Large inrush of patients through Emergency Department during influenza season can be dramatic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of an emergency preventive strategy, namely admission of patients with influenza in multiple-bed room with patients free from influenza, on the occurrence of hospital-acquired influenza (HAI).

METHODS

When a patient with an influenza RT-PCR diagnosis was hospitalized in a multiple-bed room, the emergency preventive strategy was applied: selection of non-immunocompromised neighbor, implementation of physical barriers (rigid screen pulled between beds, surgical mask for healthcare workers and visitors), preemptive Oseltamivir therapy for the neighbor.

RESULTS

From 29/11/2017 to 10/05/2018 a total of 464 hospitalized influenza patients were included; 318 were placed in multiple-bed room and 141 in single room. Emergency preventive strategy was correctly applied for 75.1% of patients in multiple-bed room. A total of 8 exposed neighbors matched HAI definition despite strategy. 7 were already exposed to the case before the set-up of the strategy. Only one case of documented transmission of influenza occurred after application of an incorrect emergency preventive strategy: preventive posology of Oseltamivir was not correct.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results suggest that the occurrence of HAI in multiple-bed rooms can be limited by the implementation of maximum precautions and urge us to promote further evaluation of the strategy. A detection bias should be considered without a systematic neighbors monitoring.

Impact of Adding Oseltamivir to Usual Care on Quality-Adjusted Life-Years During Influenza-Like Illness

OBJECTIVES

The ALIC⁴E trial has shown that oseltamivir reduces recovery time while increasing the risk of nausea. This secondary analysis of the ALIC⁴E trial aimed to determine the gain in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with adding oseltamivir to usual primary care in patients presenting with influenza-like illness (ILI).

METHODS

Patients with ILI were recruited during the influenza season (2015-2018) in 15 European countries. Patients were assigned to usual care with or without oseltamivir through stratified randomization (age, severity, comorbidities, and symptom onset). Patients' health status was valued with the EQ-5D and visual analog scale (VAS) for up to 28 days. Average EQ-5D and VAS scores over time were estimated for both treatment groups using one-inflated beta regression in children (<13 years old) and adults (≥13 years old). QALY gain was calculated as the difference between the groups. Sensitivity analysis considered the value set to convert EQ-5D answers to summary scores and the follow-up period.

RESULTS

In adults, oseltamivir gained 0.0006 (95% confidence interval 0.0002-0.0010) QALYs, whereas no statistically significant gain was found in children (14-day follow-up, EQ-5D). QALY gains were statistically significant in patients aged ≥65 years, patients without relevant comorbidities, or patients experiencing symptoms for ≤48 hours. Using VAS and accounting for 28-day follow-up resulted in higher QALY gain.

CONCLUSIONS

QALY gain owing to oseltamivir is limited compared with other diseases, and its clinical meaningfulness remains to be determined. Further analysis is needed to evaluate whether QALY gain and its impact on ILI treatment cost render oseltamivir cost-effective.

Antivirals Targeting the Neuraminidase

The neuraminidase (NA) of influenza A and B viruses plays a distinct role in viral replication and has a highly conserved catalytic site. Numerous sialic (neuraminic) acid analogs that competitively bind to the NA active site and potently inhibit enzyme activity have been synthesized and tested. Four NA inhibitors are now licensed in various parts of the world (zanamivir, oseltamivir, peramivir, and laninamivir) to treat influenza A and B infections. NA changes, naturally occurring or acquired under selective pressure, have been shown to reduce drug binding, thereby affecting the effectiveness of NA inhibitors. Drug resistance and other drawbacks have prompted the search for the next-generation NA-targeting therapeutics. One of the promising approaches is the identification of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the conserved NA epitopes. Anti-NA mAbs demonstrate Fab-based antiviral activity supplemented with Fc-mediated immune effector functions. Antiviral Fc-conjugates offer another cutting-edge strategy that is based on a multimodal mechanism of action. These novel antiviral agents are composed of a small-molecule NA inhibitor and an Fc-region that simultaneously engages the immune system. The significant advancements made in recent years further support the value of NA as an attractive target for the antiviral development.

Retrospective evaluation of seven different treatment protocols in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Background/aim

As the experience has increased regarding SARS-CoV-2 in time, treatment trends have changed since the beginning of the pandemic. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of different treatment modalities for inpatients in a tertiary pandemic hospital in Antalya, Turkey.

Materials and methods

Individuals aged 18 years and above who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in PCR with presenting COVID-related radiological findings, hospitalized for at least 3 days, and completed follow-up between March 15, 2020 and November 30, 2020 were included in the study. Patients’ data were reviewed retrospectively. Seven treatment groups based on the single or combined use of hydroxychloroquine, oseltamivir, favipiravir, and remdesivir were formed and compared in terms of mortality, survival, length of hospital stay, need for intensive care, and mechanical ventilation.

Results

A total of 321 patients were included in the study. The length of hospital stay, the need for intensive care, and mechanical ventilation were lower in Group 1 (hydroxychloroquine) and Group 2 (hydroxychloroquine + oseltamivir) compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference was determined in survival between treatment groups. Analysis of prognostic factors affecting overall survival revealed that the need for intensive care and mechanical ventilation increased mortality [11.1 times (p < 0.001) and 6.48 times (p < 0.001), respectively].

Conclusion

No significant difference was determined between different treatment protocols in terms of their impact on survival. To end the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an urgent need to develop highly efficient, rapid-acting, and orally available antiviral drugs.

Does C-reactive protein predict time to recovery and benefit from oseltamivir treatment in primary care patients with influenza-like illness? A randomized controlled trial secondary analysis

OBJECTIVE

Recovery time and treatment effect of oseltamivir in influenza-like illness (ILI) differs between patient groups. A point-of-care test to better predict ILI duration and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from oseltamivir treatment would aid prescribing decisions in primary care. This study aimed to investigate whether a C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration of ≥30 mg/L can predict (1) ILI disease duration, and (2) which patients are most likely to benefit from oseltamivir treatment.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial data.

SETTING

Primary care in Lithuania, Sweden and Norway during three consecutive influenza seasons 2016-2018.

SUBJECTS

A total of 277 ILI patients aged one year or older and symptom duration of ≤72 h.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Capillary blood CRP concentration at baseline, and ILI recovery time defined as having 'returned to usual daily activity' with residual symptoms minimally interfering.

RESULTS

At baseline, 20% (55/277) had CRP concentrations ≥30mg/L (range 0-210). CRP concentration ≥30 mg/L was not associated with recovery time (adjusted hazards ratio (HR) 0.80: 95% CI 0.50-1.3; p = 0.33). Interaction analysis of CRP concentration ≥30 mg/L and oseltamivir treatment did not identify which patients benefit more from oseltamivir treatment (adjusted HR 0.69: 95% CI 0.37-1.3; p = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

There was no association between CRP concentration of ≥30 mg/L and recovery time from ILI. Furthermore, CRP could not predict which ILI patients benefit more from oseltamivir treatment. Hence, we do not recommend CRP testing for predicting ILI recovery time or identifying patients who will receive particular benefit from oseltamivir treatment.Key PointsPredicting disease course of influenza-like illness (ILI), and identifying which patients benefit from oseltamivir treatment is a challenge for physicians.• There was no association between CRP concentration at baseline and recovery time in patients consulting with ILI in primary care.• There was no association between CRP concentration at baseline and benefit from oseltamivir treatment.• We, therefore, do not recommend CRP testing for predicting recovery time or in decision-making concerning oseltamivir prescribing in ILI patients.

Combination of Baloxavir and Oseltamivir for Treatment of Severe Influenza Infection in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Novel Treatment Strategy for a High-risk Population

Baloxavir, a cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor, was recently approved for treatment of severe influenza infections. Combining baloxavir with oseltamivir has been proposed to increase the response rate. We report 2 hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with severe influenza infections who were treated with this combination and discuss possible reasons for their different responses.

Impact of empirical oseltamivir discontinuation in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia after confirmed negative for influenza

Objectives:

To study the effect of appropriate oseltamivir discontinuation in patients hospitalized with pneumonia, after they tested negative for influenza.

Methods:

A retrospective study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients admitted with a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia and started on empirical oseltamivir were included. The duration of stay at the hospital and readmission rates were identified. Additionally, we studied factors that led healthcare providers to continue patients on oseltamivir therapy despite testing negative for influenza.

Results:

A total of 210 patients were studied. The rate of empirical oseltamivir appropriate discontinuation was 31% (66 patients). No significant difference was noted between the 2 groups in the length of hospital stay (p=0.46). There was no significant difference in terms of 30-day (OR=0.67, 95% CI [0.28-1.59]), 60-day (OR=1.14, 95% CI [0.47, 2.78]), and 90-day readmission rates (OR=1.35, 95% CI [0.35-5.27]). After adjusting for other variables, admission to the intensive care unit was independently associated with appropriate discontinuation compared with patients admitted to general wards.

Conclusions:

This study showed that appropriate discontinuation of empirical antiviral therapy is safe, effective, and has no impact on the length of stay and readmission rates.

A nanotechnological approach in the current therapy of COVID-19: model drug oseltamivir-phosphate loaded PLGA nanoparticles targeted with spike protein binder peptide of SARS-CoV-2

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is today's most serious epidemic disease threatening the human race. The initial therapeutic approach of SARS-CoV-2 disease is based upon the binding the receptor-binding site of the spike protein to the host cell's ACE-2 receptor on the plasma membrane. In this study, it is aimed to develop a biocompatible and biodegradable polymeric drug delivery system that is targeted to the relevant receptor binding site and provides controlled drug release. Oseltamivir phosphate (OP) is an orally administered antiviral prodrug for primary therapy of the disease in biochemically activated carboxylate form (oseltamivir carboxylate OC). In the presented study, model drug OP loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) targeted with spike-binding peptide 1 (SBP1) of SARS-CoV-2 were designed to be used as an efficient and prolonged released antiviral drug delivery system. RY, EE, and DL values of the OP-loaded NPs produced by the solvent evaporation method were calculated to be 59.3%, 61.4%, and 26.9%, respectively. The particle size of OP-loaded NPs and OP-loaded NPs targeted with SBP1 peptide were 162.0 ± 11.0 and 226.9 ± 21.4 nm, respectively. While the zeta potential of the produced OP-loaded NPs was achieved negatively -23.9 ± 1.21 mV), the result of the modification with SBP1 peptide this value approached zero as -4.59 ± 0.728 mV. Morphological features of the OP-loaded NPs were evaluated using FEG-SEM. The further characterization and surface modification of the NPs were analyzed by FT-IR.In-vitrorelease studies of NPs showed that sustained release of OP occurred for two months that fitting the Higuchi kinetic model. By evaluating these outputs, it was reported that surface modification of OP-loaded NPs was significantly effective on characteristics such as size, zeta potential values, surface functionality, and release behavior. The therapeutic model drug-loaded polymeric formulation targeted with a specific peptide may serve as an alternative to more effective and controlled release pharmaceuticals in the treatment of COVID-19 upon an extensive investigation.

Cluster of Oseltamivir-Resistant and Hemagglutinin Antigenically Drifted Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 Viruses, Texas, USA, January 2020

Four cases of oseltamivir-resistant influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection were detected among inhabitants of a border detention center in Texas, USA. Hemagglutinin of these viruses belongs to 6B.1A5A-156K subclade, which may enable viral escape from preexisting immunity. Our finding highlights the necessity to monitor both drug resistance and antigenic drift of circulating viruses.

Use of point-of-care molecular tests reduces hospitalization and oseltamivir administration in children presenting with influenza-like illness

Influenza is associated with increased morbidity, healthcare costs, hospitalization rates, and mortality in children. Rapid immunochromatography assay (ICA), a test with low sensitivity, is often used as point-of-care (POC) test. Recently, the rapid syndromic molecular test FilmArray has become available. This observational study aims to evaluate whether the use of FilmArray would decrease the use of antivirals and hospitalization rates among children presenting to the emergency room (ER) with influenza-like illness (ILI) symptoms. Nasopharyngeal swabs were prospectively collected from children, aged 0-16 years, presenting with ILI at the ER of a tertiary hospital during the peak endemic period. Patients were allocated to be tested by either FilmArray or ICA. The use of antivirals and hospitalization rates were noted. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the impact of testing methods on decision-making. Overall, 80 children were included (mean age: 5 years). Admissions were more likely to occur if an ICA test was performed (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.01-9.82; p = .046). Oseltamivir administration was more likely among children who had undergone the ICA test (OR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.06-20.43; p = .041). The implementation of rapid molecular test had no impact on complementary diagnostic testing or antibacterial prescription. The use of FilmArray significantly reduced both hospitalization and oseltamivir administration in children. Further knowledge on the use of POC tests is required to improve current management of children presenting with ILI and decrease associated healthcare costs.

Baloxavir treatment of oseltamivir-resistant influenza A/H1pdm09 in two immunocompromised patients

Few treatment options are available for oseltamivir-resistant influenza. It has been proposed that baloxavir can be effective in this setting due to its distinct mechanism of action but clinical experience is lacking for immunocompromised patients. We report two such cases treated with baloxavir after failure of oseltamivir and detection of oseltamivir resistance mutations. Baloxavir/zanamivir combination therapy was effective in one patient, but persistent viral shedding was noted with baloxavir monotherapy in the other patient.

Deciphering molecular mechanics in the taste masking ability of Maltodextrin: Developing pediatric formulation of Oseltamivir for viral pandemia

Present research work was aimed at masking the bitter taste of anti- viral drug Oseltamivir phosphate (Ost) by complexing it with pea starch maltodextrin- Kleptose Linecaps® (Mld). The Ost groups involved in triggering the bitter sensation were identified by computationally assessing its interaction with human bitter taste receptor hTAS2R 38. A series of exhaustive molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was run using Schrodinger® suite to understand the type of interaction of Ost with Mld. Experimentally, complexes of Ost with Mld were realized by solution method. The complexes were characterized using differential scanning colorimetry (DSC), fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), hot stage microscopy (HSM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), proton NMR (¹H-NMR) and Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (¹³C-NMR). Ost-oral dispersible mini tablets (ODMT) were prepared by direct compression and optimised using mixture designs. Finally, bitter taste perception of Ost-ODMT was evaluated in healthy human volunteers of either sex. Computational assessment, involving interaction of Ost with bitter receptor, predicted the involvement of free amino group of Ost in triggering the bitter response whereas, MD simulation predicted the formation of stable complex between Ost and double helical confirmation of Mld. Different characterization techniques confirmed the findings of MD simulation. Results from the taste assessment in human volunteers revealed a significant reduction in bitter taste of prepared Ost-ODMT.

Neuraminidase inhibitors are effective and safe in reducing influenza complications: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

There is scarce evidence verifying the impact of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) in reducing influenza complications. The aim was to evaluate the available evidence from randomized-controlled trials (RCT) regarding the efficacy and safety of NAIs in reducing influenza complications.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed in the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science databases (2006-2019). Eligibility criteria were RCT that enrolled patients of any age or clinical severity with seasonal influenza (H₁N₁, H₃N_2, or B) or influenza-like syndrome and receiving NAIs comparing to placebo therapy.

RESULTS

Eighteen RCTs (9004 patients) were included: nine focused on oral oseltamivir, six on inhaled zanamivir, and three on intravenous peramivir. Administration of NAIs therapy significantly decreased the time to clinical resolution (median difference: -17.7 hours; and total influenza-related complications (OR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.51-0.82). In addition, NAIs significantly decreased acute otitis media complication (OR: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.31-0.82) and need for antibiotic treatment (OR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.46-0.90); and showed a trend towards a reduced occurrence of pneumonia (OR: 0.44, 95%CI: 0.10-2.00), bronchitis (OR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.43-1.48), sinusitis (OR: 0.73, 95%CI: 0.40-1.32), asthma exacerbations (OR: 0.57, 95%CI: 0.28-1.16), and hospitalizations (OR: 0.57, 95%CI: 0.24-1.38). The overall proportion of AEs tend to increase with NAIs treatment (OR: 1.16, 95%CI: 0.92-1.47). Use of NAIs was associated with a significant increase of nausea and vomiting (OR: 1.61, 95%CI: 1.04-2.50) and a decrease on diarrhea (OR: 0.81, 95%CI: 0.65-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

NAIs are effective in reducing time to clinical resolution, total influenza-related complications, otitis media, and need of antibiotic administration. Reductions on mortality, pneumonia, asthma exacerbations or hospitalization rates only did demonstrate a trend benefit in favor of NAIs. The only significant AE is the increased occurrence of nausea and vomiting.

Safety and efficacy of favipiravir versus hydroxychloroquine in management of COVID-19: A randomised controlled trial

Favipiravir is considered a potential treatment for COVID-19 due its efficacy against different viral infections. We aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of favipiravir in treatment of COVID-19 mild and moderate cases. It was randomized-controlled open-label interventional phase 3 clinical trial [NCT04349241]. 100 patients were recruited from 18th April till 18th May. 50 patients received favipiravir 3200 mg at day 1 followed by 600 mg twice (day 2-day 10). 50 patients received hydroxychloroquine 800 mg at day 1 followed by 200 mg twice (day 2-10) and oral oseltamivir 75 mg/12 h/day for 10 days. Patients were enrolled from Ain Shams University Hospital and Assiut University Hospital. Both arms were comparable as regards demographic characteristics and comorbidities. The average onset of SARS-CoV-2 PCR negativity was 8.1 and 8.3 days in HCQ-arm and favipiravir-arm respectively. 55.1% of those on HCQ-arm turned PCR negative at/or before 7th day from diagnosis compared to 48% in favipiravir-arm (p = 0.7). 4 patients in FVP arm developed transient transaminitis on the other hand heartburn and nausea were reported in about 20 patients in HCQ-arm. Only one patient in HCQ-arm died after developing acute myocarditis resulted in acute heart failure. Favipiravir is a safe effective alternative for hydroxychloroquine in mild or moderate COVID-19 infected patients.

Oseltamivir-Current Dosing Recommendations Reduce the Therapeutic Benefit in Patients With Mild to Moderate Renal Function and/or Large Body Mass: A Review of the Literature With Recommendations to Optimize Dosing, Including the Use of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

PURPOSE

Oseltamivir is indicated for the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza infections. Achieving therapeutic concentrations EARLY in the course of the infection impacts greatly on the magnitude of benefit. Oseltamivir is renally cleared and dose reductions are advised for patients with renal impairment. The purpose of this review was to determine whether these dose reductions facilitate the early attainment of therapeutic concentrations. The review also examined the effect of body mass on the same outcome.

METHOD

Oseltamivir is administered as a prodrug and converted to the active carboxylate moiety in the liver. Published articles that included oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) pharmacokinetics in patients with renal impairment and those with large body mass were reviewed. Concentrations of OC achieved in the first 24 hours were compared with those from patients with normal renal function and body mass.

RESULTS

Studies that informed dosage regimens for patients with mild to moderately impaired renal function focused on attaining steady-state concentrations similar to those observed in patients with normal renal function. They overlooked the importance of achieving therapeutic concentrations EARLY in the course of the infection. As a result, many patients will not attain therapeutic concentrations until too late in the infection. This is also true for patients with a large body mass.

CONCLUSIONS

Current dosing advice for oseltamivir in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment and those with a larger body mass are likely to reduce (or even negate) its efficacy. The first dose should be 75 mg for patients with normal body mass and proportionately larger when body mass is larger. Subsequent doses should be reduced in proportion to the degree of renal impairment. Timely therapeutic drug monitoring can provide invaluable dosing (and other) information to the clinician treating patients with influenza and could improve patient outcomes.

Association between Maoto Use and Hospitalization for Seasonal Influenza in a Nonelderly Cohort in Japan

Objective Maoto is a traditional Japanese Kampo formula used to treat influenza. However, clinical evidence for maoto has been limited to small-scale studies of its effect in alleviating symptoms. The present study evaluated whether or not the addition of maoto to a neuraminidase inhibitor was associated with a reduction in hospitalization following influenza. Methods Using the JMDC Claims Database, we identified outpatients <60 years old who were diagnosed with influenza by an antigen test from September 2013 to August 2018. One-to-five propensity score matching was conducted between patients who received maoto in addition to a neuraminidase inhibitor and those who received a neuraminidase inhibitor alone. Hospitalization within seven days of the influenza diagnosis was compared in the matched groups using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Results We identified 1.79 million cases of influenza from the database in the 5-year study period. Maoto was prescribed for 3.9% of the 1.67 million cases receiving a neuraminidase inhibitor. In the 64,613 propensity score-matched groups of patients, the 7-day hospitalization rate was 0.116% (n=75) for patients with maoto and 0.122% (n=394) for patients without maoto. The difference between these treatment groups was nonsignificant (common odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 1.22; p=0.695). Conclusion The addition of maoto to a neuraminidase inhibitor was not associated with a decrease in hospitalization among nonelderly patients with influenza. Further research is necessary to clarify the indication and efficacy of maoto.

Monitoring influenza virus oseltamivir resistance - our experience to date

OBJECTIVE

The monitoring of influenza virus resistance is a routine part of influenza virus surveillance conducted by the National Reference Laboratory for Influenza and Non-Influenza Respiratory Viral Diseases (NRL/INI) at the National Institute of Public Health (NIPH). The aim is to detect neuraminidase inhibitor (oseltamivir) resistance in patients diagnosed with influenza.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 326 influenza virus isolates from tissue culture were included in the study. They were obtained from inpatient and outpatient nasopharyngeal swabs which were referred to the NRL/INI during the seasons 2013/2014 to 2019/2020 and turned out to be RTPCR (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) positive for RNA (ribonucleic acid) of influenza virus A or B. The MDCK (Madin-Darby canine kidney) tissue culture cells were used for virus isolation from nasopharyngeal swabs. Oseltamivir resistance was tested using the NA-Star Influenza Neuraminidase Inhibitor Resistance Detection Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

RESULTS

Nine of 326 positive specimens were oseltamivir resistant. Resistant strains showed IC50 values 100 times as high on average as those in oseltamivir sensitive strains.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring influenza virus resistance is helpful in controlling reasonable prescription of antivirals and thus becomes an integral part of influenza virus surveillance. Antiviral resistance monitoring is necessary not only in hospitalized patients on antivirals but also in symptomatically treated outpatients as the detection of antiviral drug resistant strains in the latter group can suggest the emergence and/or spread of antiviral drug resistance in the population.

Why we should be more careful using hydroxychloroquine in influenza season during COVID-19 pandemic?

The aim of this study was to describe the QTc prolongation and related adverse cardiac events during the administration of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and its combinations for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Hospitalized patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) who received HCQ and had initial and follow-up electrocardiograms performed between March 10 and May 30, 2020 were included. Critical QTc prolongation was detected in 12% of the patients. On multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus (odds ratio 5.8, 95% confidence interval 1.11-30.32, p = 0.037) and the use of oseltamivir (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval 1.02-28, p = 0.047) were found to be associated with critical QTc prolongation.

Is oseltamivir suitable for fighting against COVID-19: In silico assessment, in vitro and retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Oseltamivir is a first-line antiviral drug, especially in primary hospitals. During the ongoing outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), most patients with COVID-19 who are symptomatic have used oseltamivir. Considering its popular and important role as an antiviral drug, it is necessary to evaluate oseltamivir in the treatment of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of oseltamivir against COVID-19.

METHODS

Swiss-model was used to construct the structure of the N-terminal RNA-binding domain (NRBD) of the nucleoprotein (NC), papain-like protease (PLpro), and RNA-directed RNA polymerase (RdRp) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). TM-align program was performed to compare the structure of the viral proteins with the structure of the neuraminidase of influenza A. Molecular docking was used to analyze the theoretical possibility of effective binding of oseltamivir with the active centers of the viral proteins. In vitro study was used to evaluate the antiviral efficiency of oseltamivir against SARS-CoV-2. By clinical case analysis, we statistically evaluated whether the history of oseltamivir use influenced the progression of the disease.

RESULTS

The structures of NRBD, PLpro, and RdRp were built successfully. The results from TM-align suggested that the S protein, NRBD, 3C-like protease (3CLpro), PLPrO, and RdRp were structurally similar to the influenza A neuraminidase, with TM-scores of 0.30077, 0.19254, 0.28766, 0.30666, and 0.34047, respectively. Interestingly, the active center of 3CL pro was found to be similar to the active center from the neuraminidase of influenza A. Through an analysis of molecular docking, we discovered that oseltamivir carboxylic acid was more favorable to bind to the active site of 3CLpro effectively, but its inhibitory effect was not strong compared with the positive group. Finally, we used in vitro study and retrospective case analysis to verify our speculations. We found that oseltamivir is ineffective against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro study and the clinical use of oseltamivir did not improve the patients' symptoms and signs and did not slow the disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

We consider that oseltamivir isn't suitable for the treatment of COVID-19. During the outbreak of novel coronavirus, when oseltamivir is not effective for the patients after they take it, health workers should be highly vigilant about the possibility of COVID-19.

Diagnostic difficulties of AH1N1 influenza infection in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Two case reports

INTRODUCTION

Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at a risk of developing influenza-related complications. Approximately 10% of influenza-infected children with ALL or other types of cancer need intensive care, and 5% of them eventually die.

PATIENTS' CONCERNS

We report 2 children with ALL and the swine-origin influenza A virus infection. Diagnosing influenza in them was a challenge. Medical records of these children were reviewed for demographic, clinical, and laboratory data. Patients were hospitalized in the Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantology of the Medical University of Lublin, Poland. Case 1 involved a 2-year-old girl who, according to acute lymphoblastic leukemia intercontinental Berlin-Frankfürt-Münster protocol 2009, started chemotherapy in July 2015. She was categorized in the intermediate risk group and received the induction and consolidation phase of the therapy without severe complications. The reinduction therapy was administered in the outpatient department till the 15 day. On the 20 day of this phase, she was admitted to our department with fever, mucositis, tachypnea, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. In September 2009, a 14-year-old boy (case 2) who, according to acute lymphoblastic leukemia intercontinental Berlin-Frankfürt-Münster protocol 2002, was categorized in the high-risk (HR) group, received the induction (Protocol I) phase of therapy without severe complications. On the 7 day of the HR-1 course, he manifested fever and strong, tiring cough, followed by strong mucositis. Chemotherapy had to be interrupted in both children.

DIAGNOSIS

Respiratory viral infections, causing pneumonia, occurred in both patients during anticancer treatment. Initially, the real-time polymerase chain reaction test for the swine-origin influenza A was negative in both patients, which delayed the diagnosis. Additionally, bacterial, and fungal complications were also observed.

INTERVENTIONS

Both patients received oseltamivir twice a day, a broad-spectrum antibiotic, antifungal drug, and granulocyte colony growth factor.

OUTCOMES

The disease progressed quickly, and our patients subsequently died.

CONCLUSION

We speculated that early antiviral treatment can help in the better management of patients in the HR group. It is also important to minimize influenza morbidity and mortality by vaccinating family members, using empiric therapy, providing immediate antiviral therapy, and educating parents about hygiene measures.