51
|
Kaló Z, Zemplényi A, Rutten-van Mölken M, Looman W, Huić M, Tandara Haček R, Petrova G, Piniazhko O, Tesar T, Csanádi M, Pitter JG. Development of transferability guidance for integrated care models with special focus on Central and Eastern European countries. Croat Med J 2020; 61:252-259. [PMID: 32643342 PMCID: PMC7358690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 03/30/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM To develop pragmatic recommendations for Central and Eastern European (CEE) policymakers about transferability assessment of integrated care models established in higher income European Union (EU) countries. METHODS Draft recommendations were developed based on Horizon 2020-funded SELFIE project deliverables related to 17 promising integrated care models for multimorbid patients throughout Europe, as well as on an online survey among CEE stakeholders on the relevance of implementation barriers. Draft recommendations were discussed at the SELFIE transferability workshop and finalized together with 22 experts from 12 CEE countries. RESULTS Thirteen transferability recommendations are provided in three areas. Feasibility of local implementation covers the identification and prioritization of implementation barriers and proposals for potential solutions. Performance measurement of potentially transferable models focuses on the selection of models with proven benefits and assurance of performance monitoring. Transferability of financing methods for integrated care explores the relevance of financing methodologies and planning of adequate initial and long-term financing. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of international integrated care models cannot be recommended without evidence on its local feasibility or scientifically sound and locally relevant performance assessment in the country of origin. However, if the original financing method is not transferable to the target region, development of a locally relevant alternative financing method can be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marcell Csanádi
- Marcell Csanádi, Syreon Research Institute, Mexikói Str. 65/a., Budapest, Hungary,
| | | |
Collapse
|
52
|
Economic evaluations of public health interventions for physical activity and healthy diet: A systematic review. Prev Med 2020; 136:106100. [PMID: 32353572 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Physical inactivity and unhealthy dietary habits are associated with an increased disease and economic burden. The aim of this systematic review was to identify economic evaluations of public health interventions targeting physical activity and healthy diet, and assess the quality and transferability of the findings to the Swedish context. A search of published economic evaluations was conducted through electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Databases (NHS EED) and the Health Technology Assessment Database (HTA). An additional search was done using references of relevant systematic reviews and websites of relevant organizations were checked to find grey literature. Quality and transferability of the economic evaluations were appraised using a quality assessment tool developed by the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment. Thirty-two economic evaluations, rated as moderate or high quality, of 178 interventions were included; thirteen studies targeting physical activity, thirteen targeting healthy diet and six targeting both. The interventions varied in terms of their content, setting, mode of delivery and target populations. A majority of the economic evaluations reported that the interventions were likely to be cost-effective; however, considerable variations in the methodological and reporting qualities were observed. Only half of the economic evaluations were rated to have a high probability of transferring to the Swedish context. Public health interventions targeting physical activity and dietary habits have a high potential to be cost-effective. However, decision makers should consider the variation in quality and transferability of the available evidence.
Collapse
|
53
|
Németh B, Goettsch W, Kristensen FB, Piniazhko O, Huić M, Tesař T, Atanasijevic D, Lipska I, Kaló Z. The transferability of health technology assessment: the European perspective with focus on central and Eastern European countries. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2020; 20:321-330. [PMID: 32500749 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1779061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lower-income European countries have a worse health status and less funds for health care compared to Western Europe. Despite their limited human and financial capacities for conducting Health Technology Assessment (HTA), the need for evidence-based decision-making is growing. Two main approaches emerged as potential solutions: joint clinical assessments on the European level, and simplified procedures relying on the judgments of well-established HTA agencies of Western countries. AREAS COVERED Based on considerations of transferability, the European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) was built up to harmonize HTA methodologies across the European Union, and to develop an HTA Core Model by focusing on joint production of relative effectiveness assessment, which can be used as a basis for national value assessments. The second approach has been suggested in various forms without considering transferability issues. EXPERT OPINION Joint clinical assessments reduce duplication of efforts based on appropriate scientific rationale. On the other hand, recent examples show that relying on judgments of HTA agencies from wealthier countries with potentially different health-care priorities can lead to suboptimal allocation decisions. In the short term, some stakeholders may benefit from ignoring transferability, but it will ultimately lead to limited access in other disease areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wim Goettsch
- WHO CollaboratingUtrecht Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University , Utrecht, The Netherlands.,National Health Care Institute , Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Finn Børlum Kristensen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Public Health, Research Unit of User Perspectives, University of Southern Denmark , Odense, Denmark.,Department of Strategy and Innovation, Copenhagen Business School , Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Oresta Piniazhko
- Health Technology Assessment Department, State Expert Centre of Ministry of Health of Ukraine , Kyiv, Ukraine
| | | | - Tomáš Tesař
- Department of Organisation and Management in Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University , Bratislava, Slovakia
| | | | - Iga Lipska
- Departament of Health Care Services, National Health Fund HQ , Warsaw, Poland
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Syreon Research Institute , Budapest, Hungary.,Centre for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University , Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Wijnen BFM, Oberjé EJM, Evers SMAA, Prins JM, Nobel HE, van Nieuwkoop C, Veenstra J, Pijnappel FJ, Kroon FP, van Zonneveld L, van Hulzen AGW, van Broekhuizen M, de Bruin M. Cost-effectiveness and Cost-utility of the Adherence Improving Self-management Strategy in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Care: A Trial-based Economic Evaluation. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 68:658-667. [PMID: 30239629 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Several promising human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment adherence interventions have been identified, but data about their cost-effectiveness are lacking. This study examines the trial-based cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the proven-effective Adherence Improving Self-Management Strategy (AIMS), from a societal perspective, with a 15-month time horizon. Methods Treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients at risk for viral rebound were randomized to treatment as usual (TAU) or AIMS in a multicenter randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands. AIMS is a nurse-led, 1-on-1 self-management intervention incorporating feedback from electronic medication monitors, delivered during routine clinical visits. Main outcomes were costs per reduction in log10 viral load, treatment failure (2 consecutive detectable viral loads), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Results Two hundred twenty-three patients were randomized. From a societal perspective, AIMS was slightly more expensive than TAU but also more effective, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €549 per reduction in log10 viral load and €1659 per percentage decrease in treatment failure. In terms of QALYs, AIMS resulted in higher costs but more QALYs compared to TAU, which resulted in an ICER of €27759 per QALY gained. From a healthcare perspective, AIMS dominated TAU. Additional sensitivity analyses addressing key limitations of the base case analyses also suggested that AIMS dominates TAU. Conclusions Base case analyses suggests that over a period of 15 months, AIMS may be costlier, but also more effective than TAU. All additional analyses suggest that AIMS is cheaper and more effective than TAU. This trial-based economic evaluation confirms and complements a model-based economic evaluation with a lifetime horizon showing that AIMS is cost-effective. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01429142.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben F M Wijnen
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University.,Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Center of Economic Evaluations, Utrecht
| | - Edwin J M Oberjé
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam.,Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Healthcare, Heerlen
| | - Silvia M A A Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University.,Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Center of Economic Evaluations, Utrecht
| | - Jan M Prins
- Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam
| | - Hans-Erik Nobel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam
| | | | - Jan Veenstra
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam
| | | | - Frank P Kroon
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center
| | | | | | | | - Marijn de Bruin
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Rautenberg TA, George G, Bwana MB, Moosa MS, Pillay S, McCluskey SM, Aturinda I, Ard K, Muyindike W, Moodley P, Brijkumar J, Johnson BA, Gandhi RT, Sunpath H, Marconi VC, Siedner MJ. Comparative analyses of published cost effectiveness models highlight critical considerations which are useful to inform development of new models. J Med Econ 2020; 23:221-227. [PMID: 31835974 PMCID: PMC7105898 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1705314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background: Comparative analyses of published cost effectiveness models provide useful insights into critical issues to inform the development of new cost effectiveness models in the same disease area.Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe a comparative analysis of cost-effectiveness models and highlight the importance of such work in informing development of new models. This research uses genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing after first line treatment failure for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) as an example.Method: A literature search was performed, and published cost effectiveness models were selected according to predetermined eligibility criteria. A comprehensive comparative analysis was undertaken for all aspects of the models.Results: Five published models were compared, and several critical issues were identified for consideration when developing a new model. These include the comparator, time horizon and scope of the model. In addition, the composite effect of drug resistance prevalence, antiretroviral therapy efficacy, test performance and the proportion of patients switching to second-line ART potentially have a measurable effect on model results. When considering CD4 count and viral load, dichotomizing patients according to higher cost and lower quality of life (AIDS) versus lower cost and higher quality of life (non-AIDS) status will potentially capture differences between resistance testing and other strategies, which could be confirmed by cross-validation/convergent validation. A quality adjusted life year is an essential outcome which should be explicitly explored in probabilistic sensitivity analysis, where possible.Conclusions: Using an example of GART for HIV, this study demonstrates comparative analysis of previously published cost effectiveness models yields critical information which can be used to inform the structure and specifications of new models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. A. Rautenberg
- Division of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- Centre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia
| | - G. George
- Division of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - M. B. Bwana
- Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
| | - M. S. Moosa
- Division of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - S. Pillay
- Division of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - S. M. McCluskey
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - I. Aturinda
- Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
| | - K. Ard
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - W. Muyindike
- Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
| | - P. Moodley
- Division of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - J. Brijkumar
- Division of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - B. A. Johnson
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - R. T. Gandhi
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - H. Sunpath
- Division of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - V. C. Marconi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - M. J. Siedner
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Jacobsen E, Boyers D, Avenell A. Challenges of Systematic Reviews of Economic Evaluations: A Review of Recent Reviews and an Obesity Case Study. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2020; 38:259-267. [PMID: 31930461 PMCID: PMC7045785 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00878-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Decision makers increasingly require cost-effectiveness evidence to inform resource allocation and the need for systematic reviews of economic evaluations (SREEs) has grown accordingly. The objective of this article is to describe current practice and identify unique challenges in conducting and reporting SREEs. Current guideline documents for SREEs were consulted and summarised. A rapid review of English-language SREEs, using MEDLINE and EMBASE, published in 2017/2018, containing at least 20 studies was undertaken to describe current practice. Information on data extraction methods, quality assessment (QA) tools and reporting methods were narratively summarised. Lessons learned from a recently conducted SREE of weight loss interventions for severely obese adults were discussed. Sixty-three publications were included in the rapid review. Substantial heterogeneity in review methods, reporting standards and QA approaches was evident. Our recently conducted SREE on weight loss interventions identified scope to improve process efficiency, opportunity for more transparent and succinct reporting, and potential to improve consistency of QA. Practical solutions may include (1) using pre-piloted data extraction forms linked explicitly to results tables; (2) consistently reporting on key assumptions and sensitivity analyses that drive results; and (3) using checklists that include topic-specific items where relevant and allow reviewers to distinguish between reporting, justification and QA. The lack of a mutually agreed, standardised set of best practice guidelines has led to substantial heterogeneity in the conduct and reporting of SREEs. Future work is required to standardise the approach to conducting SREEs so that they can generate efficient, timely and relevant evidence to support decision-making. We suggest only data extracting information that will be reported, focusing discussion around the key drivers of cost-effectiveness, and improving consistency in QA by distinguishing between what is reported, justified by authors and deemed appropriate by the reviewer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabet Jacobsen
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Dwayne Boyers
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Alison Avenell
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Lee P, Chin K, Liew D, Stub D, Brennan AL, Lefkovits J, Zomer E. Economic evaluation of clinical quality registries: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e030984. [PMID: 31843824 PMCID: PMC6924778 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this systematic review was to examine the existing evidence base for the cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit of clinical quality registries (CQRs). DESIGN Systematic review and narrative synthesis. DATA SOURCES Nine electronic bibliographic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL, in the period from January 2000 to August 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Any peer-reviewed published study or grey literature in English which had reported on an economic evaluation of one or more CQRs. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were screened, extracted and appraised by two independent reviewers. A narrative synthesis was performed around key attributes of each CQR and on key patient outcomes or changes to healthcare processes or utilisation. A narrative synthesis of the cost-effectiveness associated with CQRs was also conducted. The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness, in terms of the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), cost savings or return-on-investment (ROI) attributed to CQR implementation. RESULTS Three studies and one government report met the inclusion criteria for the review. A study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Programme (NSQIP) in the USA found that the cost-effectiveness of this registry improved over time, based on an ICER of US$8312 per postoperative event avoided. A separate study in Canada estimated the ROI to be US$3.43 per US$1.00 invested in the NSQIP. An evaluation of a post-splenectomy CQR in Australia estimated that registry cost-effectiveness improved from US$234 329 to US$18 358 per life year gained when considering the benefits accrued over the lifetime of the population. The government report evaluating five Australian CQRs estimated an overall return of 1.6-5.5 times the cost of investment. CONCLUSIONS Available data indicate that CQRs can be cost-effective and can lead to significant returns on investment. It is clear that further studies that evaluate the economic and clinical impacts of CQRs are necessary. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018116807.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Lee
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ken Chin
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danny Liew
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dion Stub
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Departrment of Cardiology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angela L Brennan
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Lefkovits
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ella Zomer
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Most guideline organizations lack explicit guidance in how to incorporate cost considerations. J Clin Epidemiol 2019; 116:72-83. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Revised: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
59
|
Lindenberg MA, Retèl VP, van den Berg JH, Geukes Foppen MH, Haanen JB, van Harten WH. Treatment With Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Advanced Melanoma: Evaluation of Early Clinical Implementation of an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product. J Immunother 2019; 41:413-425. [PMID: 30300260 PMCID: PMC6200372 DOI: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL)-therapy in advanced melanoma is an advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) which, despite promising results, has not been implemented widely. In a European setting, TIL-therapy has been in use since 2011 and is currently being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. As clinical implementation of ATMPs is challenging, this study aims to evaluate early application of TIL-therapy, through the application of a constructive technology assessment (CTA). First the literature on ATMP barriers and facilitators in clinical translation was summarized. Subsequently, application of TIL-therapy was evaluated through semistructured interviews with 26 stakeholders according to 6 CTA domains: clinical, economic, patient-related, organizational, technical, and future. In addition, treatment costs were estimated. A number of barriers to clinical translation were identified in the literature, including: inadequate financial support, lack of regulatory knowledge, risks in using live tissues, and the complex path to market approval. Innovative reimbursement procedures could particularly facilitate translation. The CTA survey of TIL-therapy acknowledged these barriers, and revealed the following facilitators: the expected effectiveness resulting in institutional support for an internal pilot, the results of which led to the inclusion of TIL-therapy in a national coverage with evidence development program, the availability of an in-house pharmacist, quality assurance expertise and a TIL-skilled technician. Institutional and national implementation of TIL-therapy remains complex. The promising clinical effectiveness is expected to facilitate the adoption of TIL-therapy, especially when validated through a randomized controlled trial. Innovative and conditional reimbursement procedures, together with the organization of knowledge transfer, could support and improve clinical translation of TIL and ATMPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie A. Lindenberg
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology
- Department of Health Technology and Services research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca P. Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology
- Department of Health Technology and Services research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marnix H. Geukes Foppen
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam
| | - John B. Haanen
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam
| | - Wim H. van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology
- Department of Health Technology and Services research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Alshreef A, MacQuilkan K, Dawkins B, Riddin J, Ward S, Meads D, Taylor M, Dixon S, Culyer AJ, Ruiz F, Chalkidou K, Edoka I. Cost-Effectiveness of Docetaxel and Paclitaxel for Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: Adaptation of a Model-Based Economic Evaluation From the United Kingdom to South Africa. Value Health Reg Issues 2019; 19:65-74. [PMID: 31096179 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Revised: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Transferability of economic evaluations to low- and middle-income countries through adaptation of models is important; however, several methodological and practical challenges remain. Given its significant costs and the quality-of-life burden to patients, adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer was identified as a priority intervention by the South African National Department of Health. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of docetaxel and paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy regimens (taxanes) compared with standard (non-taxane) treatments. METHODS A cost-utility analysis was undertaken based on a UK 6-health-state Markov model adapted for South Africa using the Mullins checklist. The analysis assumed a 35-year time horizon. The model was populated with clinical effectiveness data (hazard ratios, recurrence rates, and adverse events) using direct comparisons from clinical trials. Resource use patterns and unit costs for estimating cost parameters (drugs, diagnostics, consumables, personnel) were obtained from South Africa. Uncertainty was assessed using probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS The incremental cost per patient for the docetaxel regimen compared with standard treatment was R6774. The incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were 0.24, generating an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of R28430 per QALY. The cost of the paclitaxel regimen compared with standard treatment was estimated as -R578 and -R1512, producing an additional 0.03 and 0.025 QALYs, based on 2 trials. Paclitaxel, therefore, appears to be a dominant intervention. The base case results were robust to all sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS Based on the adapted model, docetaxel and paclitaxel are predicted to be cost-effective as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer in South Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abualbishr Alshreef
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Kim MacQuilkan
- SAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Priority Setting, PRICELESS SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciencess, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Bryony Dawkins
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Jane Riddin
- Essential Drugs Programme, National Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Sue Ward
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - David Meads
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Matthew Taylor
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, England, UK
| | - Simon Dixon
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Anthony J Culyer
- Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, England, UK
| | - Francis Ruiz
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, England, UK
| | - Kalipso Chalkidou
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, England, UK; Centre for Global Development Europe, London, England, UK
| | - Ijeoma Edoka
- SAMRC/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Priority Setting, PRICELESS SA, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciencess, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Luhnen M, Prediger B, Neugebauer EAM, Mathes T. Systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: A structured analysis of characteristics and methods applied. Res Synth Methods 2019; 10:195-206. [PMID: 30761762 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Revised: 12/22/2018] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The number of systematic reviews of health economic evaluations (SR-HEs) is increasing. We aimed at providing a detailed overview of the characteristics and applied methods in recently published SR-HEs. METHODS We searched MEDLINE (03/2017) for SR-HEs published since 2015 using validated search filters. We included studies that performed a systematic review of full economic evaluations and searched at least one electronic database. We extracted data in a standardized, beforehand piloted form that was deduced from the items of the PRISMA and CHEERS checklists. Data were extracted by one reviewer, and a 10% random sample was verified by a second. We prepared descriptive statistical measures to describe the SR-HEs. RESULTS We included 202 SR-HEs. We identified similarities especially in the methods for information retrieval. Study selection, data extraction, and assessment of quality and transferability were frequently not reported or performed without taking measures to reduce errors (eg, independent study selection). A wide range of different tools was applied for critical appraisal. Moreover, the reporting of included economic evaluations and the synthesis of their results showed strong variations. CONCLUSIONS Overall, we identified few common features in the applied methods for SR-HEs. The information retrieval processes are largely standardized, but many studies did not use validated search filters. For the other systematic review steps, the methodological approaches varied. In particular, important challenges seem to be the methodological quality and transferability assessment as well as presentation and (quantitative) synthesis of results. Efforts are needed for increasing standardization, quality of applied methods, and reporting of SR-HEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Luhnen
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.,International Affairs Unit, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Barbara Prediger
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Edmund A M Neugebauer
- Brandenburg Medical School - Theodor Fontane, Faculty of Health, Neuruppin, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Services Research, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Tim Mathes
- International Affairs Unit, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Munthe-Kaas H, Nøkleby H, Nguyen L. Systematic mapping of checklists for assessing transferability. Syst Rev 2019; 8:22. [PMID: 30642403 PMCID: PMC6330740 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0893-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews of research evidence have become an expected basis for decisions about practice guidelines and policy decisions in the health and welfare sectors. Review authors define inclusion criteria to help them determine which studies to search for and include in their reviews. However, these studies may still vary in the extent to which they reflect the context of interest in the review question. While most review authors would agree that systematic reviews should be relevant and useful for decision makers, there appears to be few well known, if any, established methods for supporting review authors to assess the transferability of review findings to the context of interest in the review. With this systematic mapping and content analysis, we aim to identify whether there exists checklists to support review authors in considering transferability early in the systematic review process. The secondary aim was to develop a comprehensive list of factors that influence transferability as discussed in existing checklists. METHODS We conducted a systematic mapping of checklists and performed a content analysis of the checklist criteria included in the identified checklists. In June 2016, we conducted a systematic search of eight databases to identify checklists to assess transferability of findings from primary or secondary research, without limitations related to publication type, status, language, or date. We also conducted a gray literature search and searched the EQUATOR repository of checklists for any relevant document. We used search terms such as modified versions of the terms "transferability," "applicability," "generalizability," etc. and "checklist," "guideline," "tool," "criteria," etc. We did not include papers that discussed transferability at a theoretical level or checklists to assess the transferability of guidelines to local contexts. RESULTS Our search resulted in 11,752 titles which were screened independently by two review authors. The 101 articles which were considered potentially relevant were subsequently read by two authors, independently in full text and assessed for inclusion. We identified 31 relevant checklists. Six of these examined transferability of economic evaluations, and 25 examined transferability of primary or secondary research findings in health (n = 23) or social welfare (n = 2). The content analysis is based on the 25 health and social welfare checklists. We identified seven themes under which we grouped categories of checklist criteria: population, intervention, implementation context (immediate), comparison intervention, outcomes, environmental context, and researcher conduct. CONCLUSIONS We identified a variety of checklists intended to support end users (researchers, review authors, practitioners, etc.) to assess transferability or related concepts. While four of these checklists are intended for use in systematic reviews of effectiveness, we found no checklists for qualitative evidence syntheses or for the field of social welfare practice or policy. Furthermore, none of the identified checklists for review authors included guidance to on how to assess transferability, or present assessments in a systematic review. The results of the content analysis can serve as the basis for developing a comprehensive list of factors to be used in an approach to support review authors in systematically and transparently considering transferability from the beginning of the review process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heid Nøkleby
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lien Nguyen
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Afzali T, Fangel MV, Vestergaard AS, Rathleff MS, Ehlers LH, Jensen MB. Cost-effectiveness of treatments for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions: A systematic review. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0209240. [PMID: 30566527 PMCID: PMC6300294 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Knee pain is common in adolescents and adults and is associated with an increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this systematic review was to gather and appraise the cost-effectiveness of treatment approaches for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions. METHOD A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42016050683). The literature search was done in MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database. Study selection was carried out by two independent reviewers and data were extracted using a customized extraction form. Study quality was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list. RESULTS Fifteen studies were included. The majority regarded the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, but we also identified studies evaluating other knee pain conditions such as meniscus injuries, cartilage defects, and patellofemoral pain syndrome. Study interventions were categorized as surgical or non-surgical interventions. The surgical interventions included ACL reconstruction, chondrocyte implantation, meniscus scaffold procedure, meniscal allograft transplantation, partial meniscectomy, microfracture, and different types of autografts and allografts. The non-surgical management consisted of physical therapy, rehabilitation, exercise, counselling, bracing, and advice. In general, for ACL injuries surgical management alone or in combination with rehabilitation appeared to be cost-effective. The quality of the economic evaluations was of moderate to high quality. CONCLUSION There was insufficient evidence to give a firm overview of cost-effective interventions for non-osteoarthritic knee pain, but surgical treatment of acute ACL injury appeared cost-effective. There is very little data regarding the cost-effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for non-traumatic knee conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamana Afzali
- Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Mia Vicki Fangel
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Anne Sig Vestergaard
- Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Department of Business and Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Holger Ehlers
- Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Department of Business and Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
64
|
García-Pérez L, Linertová R, Álvarez-de-la-Rosa M, Bayón JC, Imaz-Iglesia I, Ferrer-Rodríguez J, Serrano-Aguilar P. Cost-effectiveness of cell-free DNA in maternal blood testing for prenatal detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13: a systematic review. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2018; 19:979-991. [PMID: 29249015 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-017-0946-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this paper was to conduct a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of the analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood, often called the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT), in the prenatal screening of trisomy in chromosomes 21, 18 and 13. MEDLINE, MEDLINE in process, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched in April 2017. We selected: (1) economic evaluations that estimated the costs and detected cases of trisomy 21, 18 or 13; (2) comparisons of prenatal screening with NIPT (universal or contingent strategies) and the usual screening without NIPT, (3) in pregnant women with any risk of foetal anomalies. Studies were reviewed by two researchers. Data were extracted, the methodological quality was assessed and a narrative synthesis was prepared. In total, 12 studies were included, four of them performed in Europe. Three studies evaluated NIPT as a contingent test, three studies evaluated a universal NIPT, and six studies evaluated both. The results are heterogeneous, especially for the contingent NIPT where the results range from NIPT being dominant to a dominated strategy. Universal NIPT was found to be more effective but also costlier than the usual screening, with very high incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. One advantage of screening with NIPT is lower invasive procedure-related foetal losses than with usual screening. In conclusion, the cost-effectiveness of contingent NIPT is uncertain according to several studies, while the universal NIPT is not cost-effective currently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia García-Pérez
- Servicio de Evaluación, Servicio Canario de la Salud, Camino Candelaria Nº 44, 1ª planta, El Rosario, 38109, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.
- Fundación Canaria de Investigación Sanitaria (FUNCANIS), Camino Candelaria Nº 44, 1ª planta, El Rosario, 38109, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.
- Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Spain.
- Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de La Laguna, Campus de Guajara, Camino de la Hornera s/n, La Laguna, 38071, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain.
| | - Renata Linertová
- Servicio de Evaluación, Servicio Canario de la Salud, Camino Candelaria Nº 44, 1ª planta, El Rosario, 38109, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
- Fundación Canaria de Investigación Sanitaria (FUNCANIS), Camino Candelaria Nº 44, 1ª planta, El Rosario, 38109, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Spain
| | - Margarita Álvarez-de-la-Rosa
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias (HUC), Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), Carretera de Ofra s/n, La Cuesta, La Laguna, 38320, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Bayón
- Department of Health, Basque Government, Basque Office for Health Technology Assessment (OSTEBA), Alameda Rekalde Nº 39, 48008, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Iñaki Imaz-Iglesia
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Monforte de Lemos Nº 5, 28029, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jorge Ferrer-Rodríguez
- Fundación Canaria de Investigación Sanitaria (FUNCANIS), Camino Candelaria Nº 44, 1ª planta, El Rosario, 38109, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
- Servicio de Evaluación, Servicio Canario de la Salud, Camino Candelaria Nº 44, 1ª planta, El Rosario, 38109, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Németh B, Kulchaitanaroaj P, Lester‐George A, Huic M, Coyle K, Coyle D, Pokhrel S, Kaló Z. A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control-related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study. Addiction 2018; 113 Suppl 1:42-51. [PMID: 29377316 PMCID: PMC6033140 DOI: 10.1111/add.14092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Revised: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To inform the transferability of tobacco control-related economic evidence to resource-poor countries. METHODS We ran a univariate sensitivity analysis on a return on investment (ROI) model, the European study on Quantifying Utility of Investment in Protection from Tobacco model (EQUIPTMOD), to identify key input values to which the ROI estimates were sensitive. The EQUIPTMOD used a Markov-based state transition model to estimate the ROI of several tobacco control interventions in five European countries (England, Germany, Spain, Hungary and the Netherlands). Base case ROI estimates were obtained through average values of model inputs (throughout the five countries), which were then replaced one at a time with country-specific values. Tornado diagrams were used to evaluate the significance of sensitivity, defined as a ≥ 10% difference in ROI estimates from the base case estimates. RESULTS The ROI estimates were sensitive to 18 (of 46) input values. Examples of model inputs to which ROI estimates were sensitive included: smoking rate, costs of smoking-related diseases (e.g. lung cancer) and general population attributes. CONCLUSION Countries that have limited research time and other resources can adapt EQUIPTMOD to their own settings by choosing to collect data on a small number of model inputs. EQUIPTMOD can therefore facilitate transfer of tobacco control related economic evidence to new jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Puttarin Kulchaitanaroaj
- Health Economics Research Group, Institute of Environment, Health and SocietyBrunel University LondonUK,Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of PharmacyUniversity of IowaIowa CityIAUSA
| | | | - Mirjana Huic
- Agency for Quality and Accreditation in Health Care and Social WelfareZagrebCroatia
| | - Kathryn Coyle
- Health Economics Research Group, Institute of Environment, Health and SocietyBrunel University LondonUK
| | - Doug Coyle
- Health Economics Research Group, Institute of Environment, Health and SocietyBrunel University LondonUK,School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive MedicineUniversity of OttawaCanada
| | - Subhash Pokhrel
- Health Economics Research Group, Institute of Environment, Health and SocietyBrunel University LondonUK
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Syreon Research InstituteBudapestHungary,Department of Health Policy and Health EconomicsEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Präger M, Kiechle M, Stollenwerk B, Hinzen C, Glatz J, Vogl M, Leidl R. Costs and effects of intra-operative fluorescence molecular imaging - A model-based, early assessment. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0198137. [PMID: 29856875 PMCID: PMC5983425 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Successful breast conserving cancer surgeries come along with tumor free resection margins and account for cosmetic outcome. Positive margins increase the likelihood of tumor recurrence. Intra-operative fluorescence molecular imaging (IFMI) aims to focus surgery on malignant tissue thus substantially lowering the presence of positive margins as compared with standard techniques of breast conservation (ST). A goal of this paper is to assess the incremental number of surgeries and costs of IFMI vs. ST. Methods We developed a decision analytical model and applied it for an early evaluation approach. Given uncertainty we considered that IFMI might reduce the proportion of positive margins found by ST from all to none and this proportion is assumed to be reduced to 10% for the base case. Inputs included data from the literature and a range of effect estimates. For the costs of IFMI, respective cost components were added to those of ST. Results The base case reduction lowered number of surgeries (mean [95% confidence interval]) by 0.22 [0.15; 0.30] and changed costs (mean [95% confidence interval]) by €-663 [€-1,584; €50]. A tornado diagram identified the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) costs, the proportion of positive margins of ST, the staff time saving factor and the duration of frozen section analysis (FSA) as important determinants of this cost. Conclusions These early results indicate that IFMI may be more effective than ST and through the reduction of positive margins it is possible to save follow-up surgeries–indicating further health risk–and to save costs through this margin reduction and the avoidance of FSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Präger
- Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH)—German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Department of Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (CCCM), Munich, Germany
| | - Björn Stollenwerk
- Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH)—German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Hinzen
- Institute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH)—German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
- Chair for Biological Imaging, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Glatz
- Institute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH)—German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
- Chair for Biological Imaging, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Vogl
- Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH)—German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Reiner Leidl
- Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH)—German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
- Munich Center of Health Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Rijkers GT, Yousif LI, Spoorenberg SM, van Overveld FJ. Triptych of the Hermit Saints: pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines for the elderly. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2018; 11:55-65. [PMID: 29636634 PMCID: PMC5881283 DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s130405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Pneumococcal pneumonia is a serious disease with considerable morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Despite adequate antibiotic treatment, the long-term mortality of pneumococcal pneumonia remains high. Preventive measures in the form of vaccination, therefore, are warranted. Twenty-three-valent polysaccharide vaccines have a broad coverage but limited efficacy. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines have been shown in children to be able to prevent invasive and mucosal pneumococcal diseases. It should be realized that the serotype composition of current pneumococcal conjugate vaccines is not tailored for the elderly, and that replacement disease can occur. Yet, the current 13-valent conjugate vaccine has been shown to protect against infections with vaccine serotypes. Long-term mortality of pneumococcal pneumonia should be included in policy making about the introduction of these vaccines for the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ger T Rijkers
- Department of Science, University College Roosevelt, Middelburg, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Laura Ie Yousif
- Department of Science, University College Roosevelt, Middelburg, the Netherlands
| | | | - Frans J van Overveld
- Department of Science, University College Roosevelt, Middelburg, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Guglielmo A, Staropoli N, Giancotti M, Mauro M. Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2018; 16:2. [PMID: 29386984 PMCID: PMC5778687 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-018-0085-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Due to its epidemiological relevance, several studies have been performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests and treatments in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Objective We reviewed economic evaluations on diagnosis of inherited CRC-syndromes and genetic tests for the detection of mutations associated with response to therapeutics. Methods A systematic literature review was performed by searching the main literature databases for relevant papers on the field, published in the last 5 years. Results 20 studies were included in the final analysis: 14 investigating the cost-effectiveness of hereditary-CRC screening; 5 evaluating the cost-effectiveness of KRAS mutation assessment before treatment; and 1 study analysing the cost-effectiveness of genetic tests for early-stage CRC patients prognosis. Overall, we found that: (a) screening strategies among CRC patients were more effective than no screening; (b) all the evaluated interventions were cost-saving for certain willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold; and (c) all new CRC patients diagnosed at age 70 or below should be screened. Regarding patients treatment, we found that KRAS testing is economically sustainable only if anticipated in patients with non-metastatic CRC (mCRC), while becoming unsustainable, due to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) beyond the levels of WTP-threshold, in all others evaluated scenarios. Conclusions The poor evidence in the field, combined to the number of assumptions done to perform the models, lead us to a high level of uncertainty on the cost-effectiveness of genetic evaluations in CRC, suggesting that major research is required in order to assess the best combination among detection tests, type of genetic test screening and targeted-therapy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0085-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annamaria Guglielmo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University, Viale Europa 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Staropoli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University, Viale Europa 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Monica Giancotti
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University, Viale Europa 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Marianna Mauro
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, "Magna Græcia" University, Viale Europa 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Lessa F, Caccavo F, Curtis S, Ouimet-Rathé S, Lemgruber A. Strengthening and implementing health technology assessment and the decision-making process in the Region of the Americas. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2017; 41:e165. [PMID: 31384277 PMCID: PMC6650625 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2017.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2016] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective. Health technology assessment (HTA) has been adopted by countries in order to
improve allocative efficiency in their health systems. This study aimed to
describe and analyze the HTA decision-making process in the Region of the
Americas. Methods. A literature review was done to better understand the HTA situation in the
Region. Also, in 2014 and 2015, individuals responsible for conducting HTA
in countries of the Americas were identified and received a questionnaire on
HTA and the decision-making process. Results. A total of 46 questionnaire responses were obtained, from 30 countries. The
respondents were similar in terms of their institutions, main funding
sources, and technology types assessed. Of the 46 respondents, 23 (50%) work
for their respective ministry of health. Also, 36 (78%) undertake and/or
coordinate HTA through coverage and reimbursement/pricing decisions and
other HTA-related activities, while 24 (52%) use HTA for emerging
technologies. While some countries in the Region have created formal HTA
units, there is a weak link between the HTA process and decision-making.
Most of the countries with recognized HTA institutions are members of the
Health Technology Assessment Network of the Americas (RedETSA). Despite the
advances in the Region overall, most countries in Central America and the
Caribbean are still at the early stages of implementing HTA to support
decision-making. Conclusions. Many countries in the Americas have benefited from the exchange and
capacity-building opportunities within RedETSA. However, there are still
many challenges to overcome in the Region in terms of the discussion and
creation of HTA-related policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda Lessa
- Medicines and Health Technologies Unit Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization Washington, D.C. United States of America Medicines and Health Technologies Unit, Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Francisco Caccavo
- Medicines and Health Technologies Unit Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization Washington, D.C. United States of America Medicines and Health Technologies Unit, Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Stephanie Curtis
- Medicines and Health Technologies Unit Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization Washington, D.C. United States of America Medicines and Health Technologies Unit, Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Stéphanie Ouimet-Rathé
- Medicines and Health Technologies Unit Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization Washington, D.C. United States of America Medicines and Health Technologies Unit, Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Alexandre Lemgruber
- Medicines and Health Technologies Unit Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization Washington, D.C. United States of America Medicines and Health Technologies Unit, Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Psaltikidis EM, Silva END, Bustorff-Silva JM, Moretti ML, Resende MR. Economic evaluation of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2017; 17:355-375. [PMID: 28776441 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1360767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) consists of providing antimicrobial therapy by parenteral infusion without hospitalization. A systematic review was performed to compare OPAT and hospitalization as health care modalities from an economic perspective. Areas covered: We identified 1455 articles using 13 electronic databases and manual searches. Two independent reviewers identified 35 studies conducted between 1978 and 2016. We observed high heterogeneity in the following: countries, infection site, OPAT strategies and outcomes analyzed. Of these, 88% had a retrospective observational design and one was a randomized trial. With respect to economic analyses, 71% of the studies considered the cost-consequences, 11% cost minimization, 6% cost-benefit, 6% cost-utility analyses and 6% cost effectiveness. Considering all 35 studies, the general OPAT cost saving was 57.19% (from -13.03% to 95.47%). Taking into consideration only high-quality studies (6 comparative studies), the cost saving declined by 16.54% (from -13.03% to 46.86%). Expert commentary: Although most studies demonstrate that OPAT is cost-effective, the magnitude of this effect is compromised by poor methodological quality and heterogeneity. Economic assessments of the issue are needed using more rigorous methodologies that include a broad range of perspectives to identify the real magnitude of economic savings in different settings and OPAT modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliane Molina Psaltikidis
- a Health Technology Assessment Department , Clinical Hospital of State University of Campinas , Campinas , Brazil.,b School of Medical Sciences , State University of Campinas , Campinas , Brazil
| | | | - Joaquim Murray Bustorff-Silva
- a Health Technology Assessment Department , Clinical Hospital of State University of Campinas , Campinas , Brazil.,d Surgery Department, School of Medical Sciences , State University of Campinas , Campinas , Brazil
| | - Maria Luiza Moretti
- e Division of Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine Department, School of Medical Sciences , State University of Campinas , Campinas , Brazil
| | - Mariângela Ribeiro Resende
- a Health Technology Assessment Department , Clinical Hospital of State University of Campinas , Campinas , Brazil.,e Division of Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine Department, School of Medical Sciences , State University of Campinas , Campinas , Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Burgers LT, Redekop WK, Al MJ, Lhachimi SK, Armstrong N, Walker S, Rothery C, Westwood M, Severens JL. Cost-effectiveness analysis of new generation coronary CT scanners for difficult-to-image patients. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2017; 18:731-742. [PMID: 27650359 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-016-0824-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2015] [Accepted: 08/04/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
AIMS New generation dual-source coronary CT (NGCCT) scanners with more than 64 slices were evaluated for patients with (known) or suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD) who are difficult to image: obese, coronary calcium score > 400, arrhythmias, previous revascularization, heart rate > 65 beats per minute, and intolerance of betablocker. A cost-effectiveness analysis of NGCCT compared with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was performed for these difficult-to-image patients for England and Wales. METHODS AND RESULTS Five models (diagnostic decision model, four Markov models for CAD progression, stroke, radiation and general population) were integrated to estimate the cost-effectiveness of NGCCT for both suspected and known CAD populations. The lifetime costs and effects from the National Health Service perspective were estimated for three strategies: (1) patients diagnosed using ICA, (2) using NGCCT, and (3) patients diagnosed using a combination of NGCCT and, if positive, followed by ICA. In the suspected population, the strategy where patients only undergo a NGCCT is a cost-effective option at accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds. The strategy of using NGCCT in combination with ICA is the most favourable strategy for patients with known CAD. The most influential factors behind these results are the percentage of patients being misclassified (a function of both diagnostic accuracy and the prior likelihood), the complication rates of the procedures, and the cost price of a NGCCT scan. CONCLUSION The use of NGCCT might be considered cost-effective in both populations since it is cost-saving compared to ICA and generates similar effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L T Burgers
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - W K Redekop
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M J Al
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S K Lhachimi
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Research Group for Evidence-Based Public Health, BIPS -Leibniz-Institute für Prevention Research und Epidemiology, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - S Walker
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - C Rothery
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - M Westwood
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
| | - J L Severens
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Berg ML, Cheung KL, Hiligsmann M, Evers S, de Kinderen RJA, Kulchaitanaroaj P, Pokhrel S. Model-based economic evaluations in smoking cessation and their transferability to new contexts: a systematic review. Addiction 2017; 112:946-967. [PMID: 28060453 PMCID: PMC5434798 DOI: 10.1111/add.13748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Revised: 06/06/2016] [Accepted: 12/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To identify different types of models used in economic evaluations of smoking cessation, analyse the quality of the included models examining their attributes and ascertain their transferability to a new context. METHODS A systematic review of the literature on the economic evaluation of smoking cessation interventions published between 1996 and April 2015, identified via Medline, EMBASE, National Health Service (NHS) Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), Health Technology Assessment (HTA). The checklist-based quality of the included studies and transferability scores was based on the European Network of Health Economic Evaluation Databases (EURONHEED) criteria. Studies that were not in smoking cessation, not original research, not a model-based economic evaluation, that did not consider adult population and not from a high-income country were excluded. FINDINGS Among the 64 economic evaluations included in the review, the state-transition Markov model was the most frequently used method (n = 30/64), with quality adjusted life years (QALY) being the most frequently used outcome measure in a life-time horizon. A small number of the included studies (13 of 64) were eligible for EURONHEED transferability checklist. The overall transferability scores ranged from 0.50 to 0.97, with an average score of 0.75. The average score per section was 0.69 (range = 0.35-0.92). The relative transferability of the studies could not be established due to a limitation present in the EURONHEED method. CONCLUSION All existing economic evaluations in smoking cessation lack in one or more key study attributes necessary to be fully transferable to a new context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marrit L. Berg
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research InstituteMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Kei Long Cheung
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research InstituteMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Mickaël Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research InstituteMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Silvia Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research InstituteMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands,Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and AddictionUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Reina J. A. de Kinderen
- Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research InstituteMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands,Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and AddictionUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | | | - Subhash Pokhrel
- Health Economics Research GroupBrunel University LondonUxbridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Sørensen SS, Pedersen KM, Weinreich UM, Ehlers L. Economic Evaluation of Community-Based Case Management of Patients Suffering From Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2017; 15:413-424. [PMID: 27928660 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-016-0298-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyse the cost effectiveness of community-based case management for patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS The study took place in the third largest municipality in Denmark and was conducted as a randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up. A total of 150 patients with COPD were randomised into two groups receiving usual care and case management in addition to usual care. Case management included among other things self care proficiency, medicine compliance, and care coordination. Outcome measure for the analysis was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) from the perspective of the healthcare sector. Costs were valued in British Pounds (£) at price level 2016. Scenario analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted in order to assess uncertainty of the ICER estimate. RESULTS The intervention resulted in a QALY improvement of 0.0146 (95% CI -0.0216; 0.0585), and a cost increase of £494 (95% CI -1778; 2766) per patient. No statistically significant difference was observed either in costs or effects. The ICER was £33,865 per QALY gained. Scenario analyses confirmed the robustness of the result and revealed slightly lower ICERs of £28,100-£31,340 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS Analysis revealed that case management led to a positive incremental QALY, but were more costly than usual care. The highly uncertain ICER somewhat exceeds for instance the threshold value used by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE). No formally established Danish threshold value exists. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01512836.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Storgaard Sørensen
- Department of Business and Management, Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Aalborg University, Fibigerstræde 11, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark.
| | - Kjeld Møller Pedersen
- Department of Business and Management, Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Aalborg University, Fibigerstræde 11, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark
- University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Ulla Møller Weinreich
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
- The Clinical Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lars Ehlers
- Department of Business and Management, Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Aalborg University, Fibigerstræde 11, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Harries L, Schrem H, Stahmeyer JT, Krauth C, Amelung VE. High resource utilization in liver transplantation-how strongly differ costs between the care sectors and what are the main cost drivers?: a retrospective study. Transpl Int 2017; 30:621-637. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.12950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Revised: 09/05/2016] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Harries
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research; Hannover Medical School; Hannover Germany
- Core Facility Quality Management & Health Technology Assessment in Transplantation; Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation; Hannover Medical School; Hannover Germany
| | - Harald Schrem
- Core Facility Quality Management & Health Technology Assessment in Transplantation; Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation; Hannover Medical School; Hannover Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery; Hannover Medical School; Hannover Germany
| | - Jona T. Stahmeyer
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research; Hannover Medical School; Hannover Germany
| | - Christian Krauth
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research; Hannover Medical School; Hannover Germany
- Core Facility Quality Management & Health Technology Assessment in Transplantation; Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation; Hannover Medical School; Hannover Germany
| | - Volker E. Amelung
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research; Hannover Medical School; Hannover Germany
- Core Facility Quality Management & Health Technology Assessment in Transplantation; Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation; Hannover Medical School; Hannover Germany
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Nherera LM, Trueman P, Karlakki SL. Cost-effectiveness analysis of single-use negative pressure wound therapy dressings (sNPWT) to reduce surgical site complications (SSC) in routine primary hip and knee replacements. Wound Repair Regen 2017; 25:474-482. [DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Leo M. Nherera
- Smith & Nephew Advanced Wound Management; Hull United Kingdom
| | - Paul Trueman
- Smith & Nephew Advanced Wound Management; Hull United Kingdom
| | - Sudheer L. Karlakki
- Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon; Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic NHS Hospital Foundation Trust; Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Baudouin A, Armoiry X, Dussart C. L’évaluation médico-économique des stratégies thérapeutiques en milieu hospitalier : une revue systématique des travaux français. ANNALES PHARMACEUTIQUES FRANÇAISES 2017; 75:227-235. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pharma.2016.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2016] [Revised: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
77
|
Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Imaging-Guided Prostate Biopsy Techniques: Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound, Direct In-Bore MRI, and Image Fusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 208:1058-1063. [PMID: 28225639 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.16.17322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Three commonly used prostate biopsy approaches are systematic transrectal ultrasound guided, direct in-bore MRI guided, and image fusion guided. The aim of this study was to calculate which strategy is most cost-effective. MATERIALS AND METHODS A decision tree and Markov model were developed to compare cost-effectiveness. Literature review and expert opinion were used as input. A strategy was deemed cost-effective if the costs of gaining one quality-adjusted life year (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) did not exceed the willingness-to-pay threshold of €80,000 (≈$85,000 in January 2017). A base case analysis was performed to compare systematic transrectal ultrasound- and image fusion-guided biopsies. Because of a lack of appropriate literature regarding the accuracy of direct in-bore MRI-guided biopsy, a threshold analysis was performed. RESULTS The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for fusion-guided biopsy compared with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy was €1386 ($1470) per quality-adjusted life year gained, which was below the willingness-to-pay threshold and thus assumed cost-effective. If MRI findings are normal in a patient with clinically significant prostate cancer, the sensitivity of direct in-bore MRI-guided biopsy has to be at least 88.8%. If that is the case, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is €80,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained and thus cost-effective. CONCLUSION Fusion-guided biopsy seems to be cost-effective compared with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. Future research is needed to determine whether direct in-bore MRI-guided biopsy is the best pathway; in this study a threshold was calculated at which it would be cost-effective.
Collapse
|
78
|
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study is to analyze the quality and transferability issues reported in published peer-reviewed English-language economic evaluations based in healthcare settings of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) and former Soviet countries. Methods: A systematic search of economic evaluations of healthcare interventions was performed for Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Estonia, Georgia, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Republic of Moldova, Romania, the Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovenia, and Ukraine. The included studies were assessed according to their characteristics, quality (using Drummond's checklist), use of local data, and the transferability of inputs and results, if addressed. Results: Most of the thirty-four economic evaluations identified were conducted from a healthcare or payer perspective (74 percent), with 47 percent of studies focusing on infectious diseases. The least frequently and transparently addressed parameters were the items’ stated perspectives, relevant costs included, accurately measured costs in appropriate units, outcomes and costs credibly valued, and uncertainties addressed. Local data were often used to assess unit costs, baseline risk, and resource usage, while jurisdiction-specific utilities were included in only one study. Only 32 percent of relevant studies discussed the limitations of using foreign data, and 36 percent of studies discussed the transferability of their own study results to other jurisdictions. Conclusions: Transferability of the results is not sufficiently discussed in published economic evaluations. To simplify the transferability of studies to other jurisdictions, the following should be comprehensively addressed: uncertainty, impact of influential parameters, and data transferability. The transparency of reporting should be improved.
Collapse
|
79
|
Tomini F, Prinzen F, van Asselt ADI. A review of economic evaluation models for cardiac resynchronization therapy with implantable cardioverter defibrillators in patients with heart failure. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2016; 17:1159-1172. [PMID: 26728985 PMCID: PMC5080299 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-015-0752-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2015] [Accepted: 11/25/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cardiac resynchronization therapy with a biventricular pacemaker (CRT-P) is an effective treatment for dyssynchronous heart failure (DHF). Adding an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-D) may further reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, if the majority of patients do not require shock therapy, the cost-effectiveness ratio of CRT-D compared to CRT-P may be high. The objective of this study was to systematically review decision models evaluating the cost-effectiveness of CRT-D for patients with DHF, compare the structure and inputs of these models and identify the main factors influencing the ICERs for CRT-D. METHODS A comprehensive search strategy of Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid) and EconLit identified eight cost-effectiveness models evaluating CRT-D against optimal pharmacological therapy (OPT) and/or CRT-P. RESULTS The selected economic studies differed in terms of model structure, treatment path, time horizons, and sources of efficacy data. CRT-D was found cost-effective when compared to OPT but its cost-effectiveness became questionable when compared to CRT-P. CONCLUSIONS Cost-effectiveness of CRT-D may increase depending on improvement of all-cause mortality rates and HF mortality rates in patients who receive CRT-D, costs of the device, and battery life. In particular, future studies need to investigate longer-term mortality rates and identify CRT-P patients that will gain the most, in terms of life expectancy, from being treated with a CRT-D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Tomini
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - F Prinzen
- Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A D I van Asselt
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Kirsch F. Economic Evaluations of Multicomponent Disease Management Programs with Markov Models: A Systematic Review. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2016; 19:1039-1054. [PMID: 27987631 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2015] [Revised: 07/04/2016] [Accepted: 07/27/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disease management programs (DMPs) for chronic diseases are being increasingly implemented worldwide. OBJECTIVES To present a systematic overview of the economic effects of DMPs with Markov models. The quality of the models is assessed, the method by which the DMP intervention is incorporated into the model is examined, and the differences in the structure and data used in the models are considered. METHODS A literature search was conducted; the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was followed to ensure systematic selection of the articles. Study characteristics e.g. results, the intensity of the DMP and usual care, model design, time horizon, discount rates, utility measures, and cost-of-illness were extracted from the reviewed studies. Model quality was assessed by two researchers with two different appraisals: one proposed by Philips et al. (Good practice guidelines for decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment: a review and consolidation of quality asessment. Pharmacoeconomics 2006;24:355-71) and the other proposed by Caro et al. (Questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility of modeling studies for informing health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report. Value Health 2014;17:174-82). RESULTS A total of 16 studies (9 on chronic heart disease, 2 on asthma, and 5 on diabetes) met the inclusion criteria. Five studies reported cost savings and 11 studies reported additional costs. In the quality, the overall score of the models ranged from 39% to 65%, it ranged from 34% to 52%. Eleven models integrated effectiveness derived from a clinical trial or a meta-analysis of complete DMPs and only five models combined intervention effects from different sources into a DMP. The main limitations of the models are bad reporting practice and the variation in the selection of input parameters. CONCLUSIONS Eleven of the 14 studies reported cost-effectiveness results of less than $30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year and the remaining two studies less than $30,000 per life-year gained. Nevertheless, if the reporting and selection of data problems are addressed, then Markov models should provide more reliable information for decision makers, because understanding under what circumstances a DMP is cost-effective is an important determinant of efficient resource allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Kirsch
- Munich School of Management and Munich Center of Health Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Institute for Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Member of the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
van Mastrigt GAPG, Hiligsmann M, Arts JJC, Broos PH, Kleijnen J, Evers SMAA, Majoie MHJM. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2016; 16:689-704. [PMID: 27805469 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1246960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Systematic reviews of economic evaluations are useful for synthesizing economic evidence about health interventions and for informing evidence-based decisions. Areas covered: As there is no detailed description of the methods for performing a systematic review of economic evidence, this paper aims to provide an overview of state-of-the-art methodology. This is laid out in a 5-step approach, as follows: step 1) initiating a systematic review; step 2) identifying (full) economic evaluations; step 3) data extraction, risk of bias and transferability assessment; step 4) reporting results; step 5) discussion and interpretation of findings. Expert commentary: The paper aims to help inexperienced reviewers and clinical practice guideline developers, but also to be a resource for experts in the field who want to check on current methodological developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghislaine A P G van Mastrigt
- a CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - Mickaël Hiligsmann
- a CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus J C Arts
- b Department of Orthopedics , Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - Pieter H Broos
- c Knowledge Institute of Medical Specialists , Utrecht , The Netherlands
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- d CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - Silvia M A A Evers
- a CAPHRI, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.,e Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction , Utrecht , The Netherlands
| | - Marian H J M Majoie
- f Department of Research and Development , Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe , Heeze , The Netherlands.,g Department of Neurology, Academic Centre for Epileptology , Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.,h School of Mental Health and Neuroscience , Maastricht University Medical Center , Maastricht , The Netherlands.,i School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Wijnen B, Van Mastrigt G, Redekop WK, Majoie H, De Kinderen R, Evers S. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2016; 16:723-732. [PMID: 27762640 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This article is part of the series "How to Prepare a Systematic Review (SR) of Economic Evaluations (EE) for Informing Evidence-based Healthcare Decisions" in which a five-step-approach for conducting a SR of EE is proposed. Areas covered: This paper explains the data extraction process, the risk of bias assessment and the transferability of EEs by means of a narrative review and expert opinion. SRs play a critical role in determining the comparative cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions. It is important to determine the risk of bias and the transferability of an EE. Expert commentary: Over the past decade, several criteria lists have been developed. This article aims to provide recommendations on these criteria lists based on the thoroughness of development, feasibility, overall quality, recommendations of leading organizations, and widespread use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bfm Wijnen
- a Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School of Public Health and Primary Care , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.,b Department of Research and Development , Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe , Heeze , The Netherlands
| | - Gapg Van Mastrigt
- a Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School of Public Health and Primary Care , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - W K Redekop
- c Department of Health Policy and Management, Institute for Medical Technology Assessment , Erasmus University Rotterdam , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Hjm Majoie
- b Department of Research and Development , Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe , Heeze , The Netherlands.,d Department of Neurology, Academic Centre for Epileptology , Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe and Maastricht University Medical Centre , Maastricht , The Netherlands.,f School of Mental Health and Neuroscience , Maastricht University Medical Center , Maastricht , The Netherlands.,g School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - Rja De Kinderen
- a Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School of Public Health and Primary Care , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands
| | - Smaa Evers
- a Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School of Public Health and Primary Care , Maastricht University , Maastricht , The Netherlands.,e Department for Economic Evaluations , Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction , Utrecht , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Vissink CE, Huijts SM, de Wit GA, Bonten MJM, Mangen MJJ. Hospitalization costs for community-acquired pneumonia in Dutch elderly: an observational study. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16:466. [PMID: 27589847 PMCID: PMC5010739 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1783-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2015] [Accepted: 08/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most common infections, especially in the elderly (≥65 years). The aim of this study was to quantify hospitalization costs for CAP in different age groups and in patients with different CAP risk profiles. Secondary objectives were to assess disease severity differences between placebo and vaccine receiving participants and identify cost driving factors of CAP in hospitalized elderly in the Netherlands. METHODS This prospective cohort study of hospitalized CAP patients was executed in parallel to the Community Acquired Pneumonia Immunization Trial in Adults (CAPiTA). Within the CAPiTA, a cohort of 84,496 subjects aged ≥65, all suspected CAP-episodes presenting in one of the 58 participating hospitals between September 2008 and August 2013 were included. CAP was diagnosed on clinical and radiographical criteria. Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and non-IPD-CAP episodes, regardless of the causing pathogen, were evaluated separately. Costs were calculated by multiplying recorded healthcare resources with Dutch unit cost prices for the year 2012. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify cost drivers. RESULTS In the sentinel hospitals 3225 suspected CAP and IPD episodes were included, of which 1933 were radiographically confirmed by chest X-ray. Analyses were conducted on confirmed CAP episodes only. Overall mean length of hospital stay was 12.1 days, the in-hospital mortality rate was 11.26 %, and mean costs were €8301 (95 % CI: €7760-€8999). When stratified in age-categories 65-74, 75-84 and ≥85, mean hospitalization costs were €8674, €8770 and €6197, respectively (p = 0.649). IPD-CAP and non-IPD-CAP mean hospitalization costs were €13,611 and €8081, respectively. Higher CURB-65 score and individuals at medium risk for developing pneumococcal disease were significantly associated with higher costs. Being male, lower age, previous admissions, lower risk, lower urbanity and higher socio-economic status were associated with lower costs. CONCLUSIONS Mean hospitalization costs of a CAP subject were €8301 and higher for IPD-CAP compared to non-IPD-CAP cases. Medium risk patients and higher CURB-65 scores were identified as cost driving factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conrad E Vissink
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Present address: Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, A01.126, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508, GA, The Netherlands.
| | - Susanne M Huijts
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - G Ardine de Wit
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc J M Bonten
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Josée J Mangen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Jensen CE, Jensen MB, Riis A, Petersen KD. Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of implementing guidelines on low back pain management in primary care: is transferability to other countries possible? BMJ Open 2016; 6:e011042. [PMID: 27267108 PMCID: PMC4908862 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary aim is to identify, summarise and quality assess the available literature on the cost-effectiveness of implementing low back pain guidelines in primary care. The secondary aim is to assess the transferability of the results to determine whether the identified studies can be included in a comparison with a Danish implementation study to establish which strategy procures most value for money. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES The search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Scopus, CINAHL and EconLit. No restrictions were made concerning language, year of publication or publication type. The bibliographies of the included studies were searched for any studies not captured in the literature search. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES To be included, a study must be: (1) based on a randomised controlled trial comparing implementation strategies, (2) the guideline must concern treatment of low back pain in primary care and (3) the economic evaluation should contain primary data on cost and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS The title and abstract were assessed for 308 studies; of these, three studies were found eligible for inclusion. The Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) list showed that the 3 studies were of moderate methodological quality while application of Welte's model showed that cost results from two studies could, with adjustments, be transferred to a Danish setting. It was questionable whether the associated effects could be transferred. CONCLUSIONS Despite the resemblance of the implementation strategies, the 3 studies report conflicting results on cost-effectiveness. This review showed that transferring the results from the identified studies is not straightforward and underlines the importance of transparent reporting. Future research should focus on transferability of effects, for example, development of a supplement to Welte's model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathrine Elgaard Jensen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Martin Bach Jensen
- Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Allan Riis
- Research Unit for General Practice in Aalborg, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Karin Dam Petersen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
85
|
Vestergaard AS, Skjøth F, Lip GYH, Larsen TB. Effect of Anticoagulation on Hospitalization Costs After Intracranial Hemorrhage in Atrial Fibrillation: A Registry Study. Stroke 2016; 47:979-85. [PMID: 26883499 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.115.012338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2015] [Accepted: 01/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the most feared adverse event with oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. The health economic aspects of resuming oral anticoagulant therapy after ICH are unknown. The aim was to estimate hospitalization costs of thromboembolism and hemorrhage subsequent to ICH in 2 patient groups with atrial fibrillation surviving the first 90 days post ICH: (1) patients resuming warfarin therapy within 90 days post ICH and (2) patients discontinuing therapy. METHODS Retrospective data from Danish national registries were linked to identify patients with atrial fibrillation who suffered an ICH between January 1, 1997, and April 1, 2011. Study start was 90 days after incident ICH. Mortality was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate. Occurrence of hospitalization-requiring thromboembolism and hemorrhage was used to estimate hospitalization costs by linkage of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes to Danish Diagnosis-Related Group tariffs. The effect of resuming warfarin therapy on average 3-year hospitalization costs was estimated by regression analysis adjusted for between-group differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS In the inclusion period, 2162 patients had an ICH; 1098 survived the first 90 days and were included for analysis, and of those, 267 resumed warfarin therapy. Therapy resumption reduced the mean 3-year hospitalization cost of hospitalized patients significantly by US$ 1588 (95% confidence interval, -2925 to -251) and was significantly correlated with fewer hospitalization days per hospitalized patient (-4.6 [95% confidence interval, -7.6 to -1.6]). The marginal effect of therapy resumption on hospitalization costs per patient was US$ -407 (95% confidence interval, -815 to 2). CONCLUSIONS Resuming warfarin therapy within 90 days after ICH in patients with atrial fibrillation is associated with a decrease in average hospitalization costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Sig Vestergaard
- From the Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Department of Business and Management, Faculty of Social Sciences (A.S.V.) and Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health (F.S., G.Y.H.L., T.B.L.), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Unit of Clinical Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (F.S.) and Department of Cardiology (T.B.L.), Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom (G.Y.H.L.).
| | - Flemming Skjøth
- From the Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Department of Business and Management, Faculty of Social Sciences (A.S.V.) and Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health (F.S., G.Y.H.L., T.B.L.), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Unit of Clinical Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (F.S.) and Department of Cardiology (T.B.L.), Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom (G.Y.H.L.)
| | - Gregory Y H Lip
- From the Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Department of Business and Management, Faculty of Social Sciences (A.S.V.) and Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health (F.S., G.Y.H.L., T.B.L.), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Unit of Clinical Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (F.S.) and Department of Cardiology (T.B.L.), Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom (G.Y.H.L.)
| | - Torben Bjerregaard Larsen
- From the Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Department of Business and Management, Faculty of Social Sciences (A.S.V.) and Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health (F.S., G.Y.H.L., T.B.L.), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Unit of Clinical Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (F.S.) and Department of Cardiology (T.B.L.), Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; and Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom (G.Y.H.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
86
|
Kaló Z, Gheorghe A, Huic M, Csanádi M, Kristensen FB. HTA Implementation Roadmap in Central and Eastern European Countries. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2016; 25 Suppl 1:179-92. [PMID: 26763688 PMCID: PMC5066682 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2015] [Revised: 08/20/2015] [Accepted: 09/24/2015] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
The opportunity cost of inappropriate health policy decisions is greater in Central and Eastern European (CEE) compared with Western European (WE) countries because of poorer population health and more limited healthcare resources. Application of health technology assessment (HTA) prior to healthcare financing decisions can improve the allocative efficiency of scarce resources. However, few CEE countries have a clear roadmap for HTA implementation. Examples from high-income countries may not be directly relevant, as CEE countries cannot allocate so much financial and human resources for substantiating policy decisions with evidence. Our objective was to describe the main HTA implementation scenarios in CEE countries and summarize the most important questions related to capacity building, financing HTA research, process and organizational structure for HTA, standardization of HTA methodology, use of local data, scope of mandatory HTA, decision criteria, and international collaboration in HTA. Although HTA implementation strategies from the region can be relevant examples for other CEE countries with similar cultural environment and economic status, HTA roadmaps are not still fully transferable without taking into account country-specific aspects, such as country size, gross domestic product per capita, major social values, public health priorities, and fragmentation of healthcare financing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltán Kaló
- Department of Health Policy and Health Economics, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Adrian Gheorghe
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Mirjana Huic
- Department for Development, Research and HTA, Agency for Quality and Accreditation in Health Care and Social Welfare, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Finn Boerlum Kristensen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Danish Health and Medicines Authority, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Gao L, Hu H, Zhao FL, Li SC. Can the Direct Medical Cost of Chronic Disease Be Transferred across Different Countries? Using Cost-of-Illness Studies on Type 2 Diabetes, Epilepsy and Schizophrenia as Examples. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0147169. [PMID: 26814959 PMCID: PMC4731392 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2015] [Accepted: 12/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To systematically review cost of illness studies for schizophrenia (SC), epilepsy (EP) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and explore the transferability of direct medical cost across countries. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed to yield studies that estimated direct medical costs. A generalized linear model (GLM) with gamma distribution and log link was utilized to explore the variation in costs that accounted by the included factors. Both parametric (Random-effects model) and non-parametric (Boot-strapping) meta-analyses were performed to pool the converted raw cost data (expressed as percentage of GDP/capita of the country where the study was conducted). Results In total, 93 articles were included (40 studies were for T2DM, 34 studies for EP and 19 studies for SC). Significant variances were detected inter- and intra-disease classes for the direct medical costs. Multivariate analysis identified that GDP/capita (p<0.05) was a significant factor contributing to the large variance in the cost results. Bootstrapping meta-analysis generated more conservative estimations with slightly wider 95% confidence intervals (CI) than the parametric meta-analysis, yielding a mean (95%CI) of 16.43% (11.32, 21.54) for T2DM, 36.17% (22.34, 50.00) for SC and 10.49% (7.86, 13.41) for EP. Conclusions Converting the raw cost data into percentage of GDP/capita of individual country was demonstrated to be a feasible approach to transfer the direct medical cost across countries. The approach from our study to obtain an estimated direct cost value along with the size of specific disease population from each jurisdiction could be used for a quick check on the economic burden of particular disease for countries without such data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Gao
- School of Biomedical Sciences & Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Hao Hu
- School of Biomedical Sciences & Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Fei-Li Zhao
- Access and Public Affair, Pfizer Australia, West Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Shu-Chuen Li
- School of Biomedical Sciences & Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Cheung KL, Evers SMAA, Hiligsmann M, Vokó Z, Pokhrel S, Jones T, Muñoz C, Wolfenstetter SB, Józwiak-Hagymásy J, de Vries H. Understanding the stakeholders' intention to use economic decision-support tools: A cross-sectional study with the tobacco return on investment tool. Health Policy 2016; 120:46-54. [PMID: 26718686 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2015] [Revised: 10/21/2015] [Accepted: 11/17/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite an increased number of economic evaluations of tobacco control interventions, the uptake by stakeholders continues to be limited. Understanding the underlying mechanism in adopting such economic decision-support tools by stakeholders is therefore important. By applying the I-Change Model, this study aims to identify which factors determine potential uptake of an economic decision-support tool, i.e., the Return on Investment tool. METHODS Stakeholders (decision-makers, purchasers of services/pharma products, professionals/service providers, evidence generators and advocates of health promotion) were interviewed in five countries, using an I-Change based questionnaire. MANOVA's were conducted to assess differences between intenders and non-intenders regarding beliefs. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify the main explanatory variables of intention to use an economic decision-support tool. FINDINGS Ninety-three stakeholders participated. Significant differences in beliefs were found between non-intenders and intenders: risk perception, attitude, social support, and self-efficacy towards using the tool. Regression showed that demographics, pre-motivational, and motivational factors explained 69% of the variation in intention. DISCUSSION This study is the first to provide a theoretical framework to understand differences in beliefs between stakeholders who do or do not intend to use economic decision-support tools, and empirically corroborating the framework. This contributes to our understanding of the facilitators and barriers to the uptake of these studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Long Cheung
- Caphri school of Public Health and Primary Care, Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, GT Maastricht, 6229, The Netherlands.
| | - Silvia M A A Evers
- Caphri school of Public Health and Primary Care, Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Duboisdomein 30, GT Maastricht, 6229, The Netherlands
| | - Mickaël Hiligsmann
- Caphri school of Public Health and Primary Care, Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, GT Maastricht, 6229, The Netherlands
| | - Zoltán Vokó
- Department of Health Policy & Health Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/a, Budapest, 1117, Hungary; Syreon Research Institute, Thököly út 119, Budapest, 1146, Hungary
| | - Subhash Pokhrel
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University London, UB8 3PH, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
| | - Teresa Jones
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University London, UB8 3PH, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
| | - Celia Muñoz
- Centre for Research in Health and Economics (CRES), University Pompeu Fabra, Ramon Trias Fargas 25-27, Barcelona, 08005, Spain
| | - Silke B Wolfenstetter
- Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, Neuherberg, 85764, Germany
| | | | - Hein de Vries
- Caphri school of Public Health and Primary Care Health Promotion, Maastricht University, POB 616 6200, MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Oddershede L, Petersen KD. Adjustment of foreign EQ-5D-3L utilities can increase their transferability. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2015; 7:629-36. [PMID: 26719715 PMCID: PMC4687628 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s93280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Foreign utilities of the EQ-5D-3L (3-level version of the EuroQol-5 Dimension of health questionnaire) are not readily transferrable to economic evaluations conducted from a national perspective. It has been advised to avoid transferring mean utilities from one country to another without adjusting them; yet no such method exists. Purpose The present study aimed to develop a method for adjusting mean utilities to increase their transferability from one country to another. Methods Seven datasets containing EQ-5D-3L answers were valued using value sets from four countries: the UK, the Netherlands, Germany, and Spain. Hereby, seven mean utility values were obtained for each country. This allowed for three pairwise comparisons: 1) UK mean values vs Dutch mean values; 2) UK mean values vs German mean values; and 3) UK mean values vs Spanish mean values. For each of these three comparisons, a regression model was fitted using the mean UK utilities as the dependent variable and the other country’s mean utilities as the independent variable. The coefficients from the three regression models were validated using results from a published article containing mean utilities obtained by valuing the EQ-5D-3L data using all four value sets. Results The findings suggested that adjustment of foreign utilities may increase transferability between countries where value sets are not comparable. It was possible to adjust the mean utilities valued by the Dutch and German value sets to make them reflect mean UK utilities as there were substantial differences between these value sets. Transferability of the Spanish mean utility values was not improved as the Spanish and UK value sets are sufficiently similar. Conclusion It is feasible to adjust foreign mean utilities of the EQ-5D-3L to make them reflect national preferences for health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Oddershede
- Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Faculty of Social Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark ; HEOR Consult ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karin Dam Petersen
- Danish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Faculty of Social Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aalborg University, Aalborg East, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Kirsch F. A systematic review of Markov models evaluating multicomponent disease management programs in diabetes. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2015; 15:961-84. [DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2015.1108191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
91
|
García-Pérez L, Pinilla-Domínguez P, García-Quintana A, Caballero-Dorta E, García-García FJ, Linertová R, Imaz-Iglesia I. Economic evaluations of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a systematic review. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2015; 16:879-893. [PMID: 25323413 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-014-0637-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2013] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this paper was to review the cost-effectiveness studies of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). A systematic review of the literature published in English or Spanish was performed by electronically searching MEDLINE and MEDLINE in process, EMBASE, NHS-EED, and EconLit. Some keywords were implantable cardioverter defibrillator, heart failure, heart arrest, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, syncope, sudden death. Selection criteria were the following: (1) full economic evaluations published after 1995, model-based studies or alongside clinical trials (2) that explored the cost-effectiveness of ICD with or without associated treatment compared with placebo or best medical treatment, (3) in adult patients for primary or secondary prevention of SCD because of ventricular arrhythmias. Studies that fulfilled these criteria were reviewed and data were extracted by two reviewers. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed and a narrative synthesis was prepared. In total, 24 studies were included: seven studies on secondary prevention and 18 studies on primary prevention. Seven studies were performed in Europe. For secondary prevention, the results showed that the ICD is considered cost-effective in patients with more risk. For primary prevention, the cost-effectiveness of ICD has been widely studied, but uncertainty about its cost-effectiveness remains. The cost-effectiveness ratios vary between studies depending on the patient characteristics, methodology, perspective, and national settings. Among the European studies, the conclusions are varied, where the ICD is considered cost-effective or not dependent on the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia García-Pérez
- Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), Camino Candelaria Nº 44, 1ª planta, El Rosario, 38109, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.
- Fundación Canaria de Investigación y Salud (FUNCIS), Canary Islands, Spain.
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.
- Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Spain.
| | - Pilar Pinilla-Domínguez
- Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), Camino Candelaria Nº 44, 1ª planta, El Rosario, 38109, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio García-Quintana
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrín, Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Eduardo Caballero-Dorta
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrín, Canary Islands, Spain
| | - F Javier García-García
- Unidad de Calidad y Seguridad del Paciente, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Canary Islands, Spain
| | - Renata Linertová
- Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), Camino Candelaria Nº 44, 1ª planta, El Rosario, 38109, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
- Fundación Canaria de Investigación y Salud (FUNCIS), Canary Islands, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Spain
| | - Iñaki Imaz-Iglesia
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
- Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (AETS), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Tandogdu Z, Vale L, Fraser C, Ramsay C. A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of the Use of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopy in Surgery Compared with Open or Laparoscopic Surgery. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2015; 13:457-67. [PMID: 26239361 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-015-0185-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot assisted laparoscopic (RAL) surgery developed to overcome the limitations of laparoscopy to assist in surgical procedures, has high capital and operating costs. Systematically assembled evidence demonstrating its clinical and cost effectiveness would be helpful for its adoption by decision makers. OBJECTIVE To summarise the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic (RAL) surgery compared with relevant alternatives. Methods and results of identified studies were assessed to identify the deficiencies in evidence and areas for further research. METHODS Studies reporting both costs and outcomes for comparisons of RAL with laparoscopy and/or open surgery were systematically identified. Searches were conducted in February 2015 on MEDLINE, EMBASE and NHS EED. Quality of the included studies was assessed against a standard checklist for economic analyses. Length of hospital stay and operating time (determinants of cost), cost of intervention, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were extracted. To aid comparison, costs were converted into a common currency and price year (2014 US dollars). RESULTS Forty-seven eligible studies were identified (full economic evaluation n = 6 and cost analysis n = 41). Economic models were used in 11 (23%) studies. Only three studies used a model considered representative of the disease and clinical pathway with a time-horizon allowing capture of relevant differences in outcomes across strategies. The cost of RAL varied substantially between uses, ranging from US$7011 for hysterectomy to over US$30,000 for radical cystectomy. The majority of estimates were between US$15,000 and US$25,000 per person. In part this difference is explained by the difference between studies in which costs were included. It was also identified to have higher costs than the alternatives it was compared against. Incremental cost per QALY for RAL radical prostatectomy was US$28,801-$31,763 over a 10-year period assuming 200 cases per annum. CONCLUSION The clinical evidence available for RAL overall and used within included studies is limited. RAL surgery costs were consistently higher than open and laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, in adopting the robotic technology decision makers need to take into account the cost effectiveness within their own systems. Economic models generated and published for radical prostatectomy and hysterectomy may be adapted to other health systems if the care pathway is similar to provide locally relevant data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zafer Tandogdu
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Cynthia Fraser
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, 3rd Floor, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Craig Ramsay
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, 3rd Floor, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Harvey MJ, Gaies MG, Prosser LA. U.S. and International In-Hospital Costs of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: a Systematic Review. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2015; 13:341-57. [PMID: 25894740 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-015-0170-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The in-hospital costs of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) have not been well established. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the in-hospital costs of ECMO technology in both US and non-US settings for all patient types. DATA SOURCES Systematic review of English-language articles, using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and EconLit databases. Searches consisted of the terms 'ECMO' AND 'health expenditures' or 'resource use' or 'costs' or 'cost analysis' or 'cost(-)effectiveness' or 'cost(-)benefit' or 'cost(-)utility' or 'economic(-)evaluation' or 'economic' or 'QALY' or 'cost per quality-adjusted life year'. STUDY SELECTION Only full scientific research articles were included. The exclusion criteria included papers that focused on pumpless ECMO, simulation training or decision support systems; papers that did not include human subjects or were not written in English; papers that did not mention ECMO, costs, economics or resource utilization; and papers that included only outside-hospital, infrastructure capital or device capital costs. DATA EXTRACTION Data extraction was completed by one author, using predefined criteria. RESULTS From the database searches, 1371 results were returned, 226 records underwent a full review and 18 studies were included in the final review. Three papers studied adult populations, two studied adult and paediatric populations, five studied only paediatric populations, one studied a paediatric and neonatal population, and the remaining seven exclusively examined ECMO in neonatal populations. The sample sizes ranged from 8 to 8753 patients. ECMO for respiratory conditions was the most common diagnosis category, followed by congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and then cardiac conditions. Most papers (n = 14) used retrospective cost collection. Only eight papers stated the perspective of the cost analysis. The results show a large variation in the cost of ECMO over multiple cost categories (e.g., range of total in-hospital costs of treatment: USD 42,554-537,554 [in 2013 values]). In the U.S.A., the reported costs of ECMO were highest for CDH repair, followed by cardiac conditions, and lowest for respiratory conditions. The US charges were highest for cardiac conditions. Outside the U.S.A., the ECMO cost was highest for cardiac conditions, followed by respiratory conditions, and lowest for CDH repair. No non-US studies reported charges. CONCLUSION The current literature shows that a large variation exists in the in-hospital cost estimates for ECMO. Further research is needed to understand how the diagnosis, setting and other factors relate to this variation in the cost of this technology. Reliable costing methodologies and cost information will be critical to inform policymakers and stakeholders wishing to maximize the value of advanced medical technologies such as ECMO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Harvey
- Department of Health Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2029, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
94
|
Economic Evaluation alongside Multinational Studies: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0131949. [PMID: 26121465 PMCID: PMC4488296 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2014] [Accepted: 06/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose of the study This study seeks to explore methods for conducting economic evaluations alongside multinational trials by conducting a systematic review of the methods used in practice and the challenges that are typically faced by the researchers who conducted the economic evaluations. Methods A review was conducted for the period 2002 to 2012, with potentially relevant articles identified by searching the Medline, Embase and NHS EED databases. Studies were included if they were full economic evaluations conducted alongside a multinational trial. Results A total of 44 studies out of a possible 2667 met the inclusion criteria. Methods used for the analyses varied between studies, indicating a lack of consensus on how economic evaluation alongside multinational studies should be carried out. The most common challenge appeared to be related to addressing differences between countries, which potentially hinders the generalisability and transferability of results. Other challenges reported included inadequate sample sizes and choosing cost-effectiveness thresholds. Conclusions It is recommended that additional guidelines be developed to aid researchers in this area and that these be based on an understanding of the challenges associated with multinational trials and the strengths and limitations of alternative approaches. Guidelines should focus on ensuring that results will aid decision makers in their individual countries.
Collapse
|
95
|
Butzke B, Oduncu FS, Severin F, Pfeufer A, Heinemann V, Giessen-Jung C, Stollenwerk B, Rogowski WH. The cost-effectiveness of UGT1A1 genotyping before colorectal cancer treatment with irinotecan from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. Acta Oncol 2015; 55:318-28. [PMID: 26098842 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2015.1053983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence concerning the cost-effectiveness of UGT1A1*28 genotyping is ambiguous and does not allow drawing valid conclusions for Germany. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of UGT1A1 genotyping in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing irinotecan-based chemotherapy compared to no testing from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance. MATERIAL AND METHODS A decision-analytic Markov model with a life time horizon was developed. No testing was compared to two genotype-dependent therapy strategies: 1) dose reduction by 25%; and 2) administration of a prophylactic G-CSF growth factor analog for homozygous and heterozygous patients. Probability, quality of life and cost parameters used in this study were based on published literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to account for parameter uncertainties. RESULTS Strategy 1 dominated all remaining strategies. Compared to no testing, it resulted in only marginal QALY increases (0.0002) but a cost reduction of €580 per patient. Strategy 2 resulted in the same health gains but increased costs by €10 773. In the probabilistic analysis, genotyping and dose reduction was the optimal strategy in approximately 100% of simulations at a threshold of €50 000 per QALY. Deterministic sensitivity analysis shows that uncertainty for this strategy originated primarily from costs for irinotecan-based chemotherapy, from the prevalence of neutropenia among heterozygous patients, and from whether dose reduction is applied to both homozygotes and heterozygotes or only to the former. CONCLUSION This model-based synthesis of the most recent evidence suggests that pharmacogenetic UGT1A1 testing prior to irinotecan-based chemotherapy dominates non-personalized colon cancer care in Germany. However, as structural uncertainty remains high, these results require validation in clinical practice, e.g. based on a managed-entry agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Butzke
- Institute for Health Economics and Healthcare Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Fuat S. Oduncu
- Division Hematology and Oncology, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Severin
- Institute for Health Economics and Healthcare Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Arne Pfeufer
- Institute for Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Klinikum Grosshadern and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens Giessen-Jung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Klinikum Grosshadern and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Björn Stollenwerk
- Institute for Health Economics and Healthcare Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Wolf H. Rogowski
- Institute for Health Economics and Healthcare Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Mandrik O, Knies S, Severens JL. Economic value of in vitro fertilization in Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2015; 7:347-56. [PMID: 26109873 PMCID: PMC4472064 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s79513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An economic value calculation was performed to estimate the lifetime net present value of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan. METHODS Net lifetime tax revenues were used to represent governmental benefits accruing from a hypothetical cohort of an IVF population born in 2009 using the methodology of generational accounting. Governmental expenses related to this population included social benefits, education and health care, unemployment support, and pensions. Where available, country-specific data referencing official sources were applied. RESULTS The average health care cost needed to achieve one additional birth from the governmental perspective varied from $2,599 in Ukraine to $5,509 in Belarus. The net present value from the population born using IVF was positive in all countries: for Ukraine ($9,839), Belarus ($21,702), and Kazakhstan ($2,295). The break-even costs of drugs and supplies per IVF procedure is expected to be $3,870, $8,530, and $1,780, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses based on 5,000 simulations show that the average net present value per person remains positive: $1,894±$7,619, $27,925±$12,407, and $17,229±$24,637 in Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, respectively. CONCLUSION Financing IVF may represent a good investment in terms of governmental financial returns, even in lower-income countries with state-financed health care systems such as Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olena Mandrik
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Saskia Knies
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- National Health Care Institute, Diemen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan L Severens
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- iMTA Institute of Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Sailer AM, van Zwam WH, Wildberger JE, Grutters JPC. Cost-effectiveness modelling in diagnostic imaging: a stepwise approach. Eur Radiol 2015; 25:3629-37. [PMID: 26003789 PMCID: PMC4636534 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3770-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2015] [Accepted: 04/03/2015] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Abstract Diagnostic imaging (DI) is the fastest growing sector in medical expenditures and takes a central role in medical decision-making. The increasing number of various and new imaging technologies induces a growing demand for cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) in imaging technology assessment. In this article we provide a comprehensive framework of direct and indirect effects that should be considered for CEA in DI, suitable for all imaging modalities. We describe and explain the methodology of decision analytic modelling in six steps aiming to transfer theory of CEA to clinical research by demonstrating key principles of CEA in a practical approach. We thereby provide radiologists with an introduction to the tools necessary to perform and interpret CEA as part of their research and clinical practice. Key Points • DI influences medical decision making, affecting both costs and health outcome. • This article provides a comprehensive framework for CEA in DI. • A six-step methodology for conducting and interpreting cost-effectiveness modelling is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M Sailer
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, P.Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands. .,Department of Radiology, Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Wim H van Zwam
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, P.Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim E Wildberger
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, P.Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke P C Grutters
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Grochtdreis T, Brettschneider C, Wegener A, Watzke B, Riedel-Heller S, Härter M, König HH. Cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for the treatment of depressive disorders in primary care: a systematic review. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0123078. [PMID: 25993034 PMCID: PMC4437997 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2014] [Accepted: 02/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For the treatment of depressive disorders, the framework of collaborative care has been recommended, which showed improved outcomes in the primary care sector. Yet, an earlier literature review did not find sufficient evidence to draw robust conclusions on the cost-effectiveness of collaborative care. PURPOSE To systematically review studies on the cost-effectiveness of collaborative care, compared with usual care for the treatment of patients with depressive disorders in primary care. METHODS A systematic literature search in major databases was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Methodological quality of the articles was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) list. To ensure comparability across studies, cost data were inflated to the year 2012 using country-specific gross domestic product inflation rates, and were adjusted to international dollars using purchasing power parities (PPP). RESULTS In total, 19 cost-effectiveness analyses were reviewed. The included studies had sample sizes between n = 65 to n = 1,801, and time horizons between six to 24 months. Between 42% and 89% of the CHEC quality criteria were fulfilled, and in only one study no risk of bias was identified. A societal perspective was used by five studies. Incremental costs per depression-free day ranged from dominance to US$PPP 64.89, and incremental costs per QALY from dominance to US$PPP 874,562. CONCLUSION Despite our review improved the comparability of study results, cost-effectiveness of collaborative care compared with usual care for the treatment of patients with depressive disorders in primary care is ambiguous depending on willingness to pay. A still considerable uncertainty, due to inconsistent methodological quality and results among included studies, suggests further cost-effectiveness analyses using QALYs as effect measures and a time horizon of at least 1 year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Grochtdreis
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Brettschneider
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Annemarie Wegener
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Birgit Watzke
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Research, Institute of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Steffi Riedel-Heller
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Martin Härter
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Helmut König
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Lorenzoni V, Trieste L, Turchetti G. The cost-effectiveness of drug therapies to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism in renal failure: a focus on evidence regarding paricalcitol and cinacalcet. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2015; 15:611-24. [PMID: 25988877 DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2015.1047348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The present review aims to assess the state-of-the-art regarding cost-effectiveness of therapy for secondary hyperparathyroidism in order to identify the best treatment and review methodological issues. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify papers performing comparative analysis of costs and effects of treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism in adult patients. Among the 66 papers identified, only 10 were included in the analysis. Treatment strategies evaluated in the selected papers were: cinacalcet in addition to vitamin D and phosphate binders versus vitamin D and phosphate binders only (seven papers), paricalcitol versus non-selective vitamin D (two papers), early and late introduction of cinacalcet in addition to vitamin D and phosphate binders (one paper) and paricalcitol versus cinacalcet (one paper). The high degree of heterogeneity among alternative treatments and methodological limits related to cost items considered, resource valuation methods and so on, make it unfeasible to reach a definite conclusion regarding cost-effectiveness but allow for future research opportunities.
Collapse
|
100
|
Boehler CEH, Lord J. Mind the Gap! A Multilevel Analysis of Factors Related to Variation in Published Cost-Effectiveness Estimates within and between Countries. Med Decis Making 2015; 36:31-47. [PMID: 25878194 PMCID: PMC4708620 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x15579173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2014] [Accepted: 02/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background. Published cost-effectiveness estimates can vary considerably, both within and between countries. Despite extensive discussion, little is known empirically about factors relating to these variations. Objectives. To use multilevel statistical modeling to integrate cost-effectiveness estimates from published economic evaluations to investigate potential causes of variation. Methods. Cost-effectiveness studies of statins for cardiovascular disease prevention were identified by systematic review. Estimates of incremental costs and effects were extracted from reported base case, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses, with estimates grouped in studies and in countries. Three bivariate models were developed: a cross-classified model to accommodate data from multinational studies, a hierarchical model with multinational data allocated to a single category at country level, and a hierarchical model excluding multinational data. Covariates at different levels were drawn from a long list of factors suggested in the literature. Results. We found 67 studies reporting 2094 cost-effectiveness estimates relating to 23 countries (6 studies reporting for more than 1 country). Data and study-level covariates included patient characteristics, intervention and comparator cost, and some study methods (e.g., discount rates and time horizon). After adjusting for these factors, the proportion of variation attributable to countries was negligible in the cross-classified model but moderate in the hierarchical models (14%−19% of total variance). Country-level variables that improved the fit of the hierarchical models included measures of income and health care finance, health care resources, and population risks. Conclusions. Our analysis suggested that variability in published cost-effectiveness estimates is related more to differences in study methods than to differences in national context. Multinational studies were associated with much lower country-level variation than single-country studies. These findings are for a single clinical question and may be atypical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian E H Boehler
- Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre-European Commission, Seville, Spain (CEHB)
| | - Joanne Lord
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK (JL)
| |
Collapse
|