51
|
Ceyhan-Birsoy O. Germline Testing for the Evaluation of Hereditary Cancer Predisposition. Clin Lab Med 2022; 42:497-506. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2022.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
52
|
Tewattanarat N, Junhasavasdikul T, Panwar S, Joshi SD, Abadeh A, Greer MLC, Goldenberg A, Zheng G, Villani A, Malkin D, Doria AS. Diagnostic accuracy of imaging approaches for early tumor detection in children with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 2022; 52:1283-1295. [PMID: 35391548 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-022-05296-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Toronto protocol for cancer surveillance in children with Li-Fraumeni syndrome has been adopted worldwide. OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the imaging used in this protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a blinded retrospective review of imaging modalities in 31 pediatric patients. We compared imaging findings with the reference standards, which consisted of (1) histopathological diagnosis, (2) corresponding dedicated imaging or subsequent surveillance imaging or (3) clinical outcomes. We individually analyzed each modality's diagnostic performance for cancer detection and assessed it on a per-study basis for chest and abdominal regional whole-body MRI (n=115 each), brain MRI (n=101) and abdominal/pelvic US (n=292), and on a per-lesion basis for skeleton/soft tissues on whole-body MRI (n=140). RESULTS Of 763 studies/lesions, approximately 80% had reference standards that identified 4 (0.7%) true-positive, 523 (85.3%) true-negative, 5 (0.8%) false-positive, 3 (0.5%) false-negative and 78 (12.7%) indeterminate results. There were 3 true-positives on whole-body MRI and 1 true-positive on brain MRI as well as 3 false-negatives on whole-body MRI. Sensitivities and specificities of tumor diagnosis using a worst-case scenario analysis were, respectively, 40.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.3%, 83.0%) and 38.2% (95% CI: 29.2%, 48.0%) for skeleton/soft tissues on whole-body MRI; sensitivity non-available and 97.8% (95% CI: 91.4%, 99.6%) for chest regional whole-body MRI; 100.0% (95% CI: 5.5%, 100.0%) and 96.8% (95% CI: 90.2%, 99.2%) for abdominal regional whole-body MRI; sensitivity non-available and 98.3% (95% CI: 95.3, 99.4) for abdominal/pelvic US; and 50.0% (95% CI: 2.7%, 97.3%) and 93.8% (95% CI: 85.6%, 97.7%) for brain MRI. CONCLUSION Considerations for optimizing imaging protocol, defining criteria for abnormalities, developing a structured reporting system, and practicing consensus double-reading may enhance the diagnostic accuracy for tumor surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nipaporn Tewattanarat
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children University of Toronto, 555 University Ave., 2nd floor, Toronto, ON, M5G1X8, Canada.,Department of Radiology, Khon Kaen University, Mueang, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Thitiporn Junhasavasdikul
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children University of Toronto, 555 University Ave., 2nd floor, Toronto, ON, M5G1X8, Canada.,Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rajthevi, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sanuj Panwar
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children University of Toronto, 555 University Ave., 2nd floor, Toronto, ON, M5G1X8, Canada.,Research Institute, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sayali D Joshi
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children University of Toronto, 555 University Ave., 2nd floor, Toronto, ON, M5G1X8, Canada
| | - Armin Abadeh
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children University of Toronto, 555 University Ave., 2nd floor, Toronto, ON, M5G1X8, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mary Louise C Greer
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children University of Toronto, 555 University Ave., 2nd floor, Toronto, ON, M5G1X8, Canada
| | - Anna Goldenberg
- Research Institute, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gang Zheng
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anita Villani
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Malkin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea S Doria
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children University of Toronto, 555 University Ave., 2nd floor, Toronto, ON, M5G1X8, Canada. .,Research Institute, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Assessing Use of Gender Diverse Language in Patient Education Materials on Breast Reconstruction. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2022; 10:e4400. [PMID: 35747258 PMCID: PMC9208894 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Utilizing inclusive terminology in patient education materials is an increasing area of focus in plastic surgery. Over 300,000 cases of breast cancer were diagnosed in 2020, affecting cisgender and gender diverse patients alike. Both cisgender and gender diverse patients may choose to undergo breast reconstruction. This study aims to assess the use of inclusive language in online patient education materials on reconstruction after breast cancer.
Collapse
|
54
|
Mogos R, Popovici R, Tanase A, Calistru T, Popovici P, Grigore M, Carauleanu A. New approaches in ovarian cancer based on genetics and carcinogenesis hypotheses (Review). Exp Ther Med 2022; 23:423. [DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Raluca Mogos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ‘Cuza Voda’ Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clinical Hospital, 700038 Iasi, Romania
| | - Razvan Popovici
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ‘Cuza Voda’ Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clinical Hospital, 700038 Iasi, Romania
| | - Adina Tanase
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ‘Grigore T. Popa’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700015 Iasi, Romania
| | | | - Paula Popovici
- Pediatrics, ‘Grigore T. Popa’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700015 Iasi, Romania
| | - Mihaela Grigore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ‘Cuza Voda’ Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clinical Hospital, 700038 Iasi, Romania
| | - Alexandru Carauleanu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ‘Cuza Voda’ Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clinical Hospital, 700038 Iasi, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Giordano G, Ferioli E, Tafuni A. The Role of Mesothelin Expression in Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: Impacts on Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapeutic Targets. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092283. [PMID: 35565412 PMCID: PMC9103848 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Mesothelin (MSLN) is a protein expressed in the mesothelial cell lining of the pleura, peritoneum, and pericardium; its biological functions in normal cells are still unknown. Experimental studies using knockout mice have suggested that this molecule does not play an important role in development and reproduction. In contrast, it has been observed that this molecule is produced in abnormal amounts in several malignant neoplasms, such as mesotheliomas and pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Many molecular studies have also demonstrated that mesothelin is overexpressed in HSOCs. Here, we discuss the current knowledge of mesothelin and focus on its role in clinical and pathological diagnoses, as well as its impact on the prognosis of HSOC. Moreover, regarding the binding of MSLN to the ovarian cancer antigen CA125, which has been demonstrated in many studies, we also report on signal transduction pathways that may play an important role in the spread and neoplastic progression of this lethal neoplasm. Given that mesothelin is overexpressed in many solid tumours and has antigenic properties, this molecule could be considered an antigenic target for the treatment of many malignancies. Consequently, we also review the literature to report on mesothelin-targeting therapies for HSOC that have been recently investigated in many clinical studies.
Collapse
|
56
|
Pallonen TAS, Lempiäinen SMM, Joutsiniemi TK, Aaltonen RI, Pohjola PE, Kankuri-Tammilehto MK. Genetic, clinic and histopathologic characterization of BRCA-associated hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in southwestern Finland. Sci Rep 2022; 12:6704. [PMID: 35469032 PMCID: PMC9038668 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10519-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractWe have analyzed the histopathological, clinical, and genetic characteristics in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients of counselled families from 1996 up to today in the southwestern Finland population. In this study we analyzed the incidence of different BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PV). 1211 families were evaluated, and the families were classified as 38 BRCA1 families, 48 BRCA2 families, 689 non-BRCA families and 436 other counselled families (criteria for genetic testing was not met). In those families, the study consisted of 44 BRCA1 breast and/or ovarian cancer patients, 58 BRCA2 cancer patients, 602 non-BRCA patients and 328 other counselled patients. Breast cancer mean onset was 4.6 years earlier in BRCA1 carriers compared to BRCA2 (p = 0.07, a trend) and ovarian cancer onset almost 11 years earlier in BRCA1 families (p < 0.05). In BRCA families the onset of ovarian cancer was later than 40 years, and BRCA2-origin breast cancer was seen as late as 78 years. The BRCA PV (9%) increases the risk for same patient having both ovarian and breast cancer with a twofold risk when compared to non-BRCA group (4%) (95% CI p < 0.05). Triple-negativity in BRCA1 (42%) carriers is approximately 2.6 times vs more common than in BRCA2 carriers (16%) (p < 0.05). The risk ratio for bilateral breast cancer is approximately four times when compared BRCA2 (17%) and other counselled patients’ group (4%) (p < 0.05). 27% southwestern BRCA2-families have a unique PV, and correspondingly 39% of BRCA1-families. The results of this analysis allow improved prediction of cancer risk in high-risk hereditary breast and ovarian families in southwestern Finland and improve long term follow-up programs. According to the result it could be justified to have the discussion about prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy by the age of 40 years. The possibility of late breast cancer onset in BRCA2 carriers supports the lifelong follow-up in BRCA carriers. Cancer onset is similar between BRCA2 carries and non-BRCA high-risk families. This study evaluated mutation profile of BRCA in southwestern Finland. In this study genotype–phenotype correlation was not found
Collapse
|
57
|
Disciglio V, Sanese P, Fasano C, Lotesoriere C, Valentini AM, Forte G, Lepore Signorile M, De Marco K, Grossi V, Lolli I, Cariola F, Simone C. Identification and Somatic Characterization of the Germline PTEN Promoter Variant rs34149102 in a Family with Gastrointestinal and Breast Tumors. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:644. [PMID: 35456450 PMCID: PMC9025445 DOI: 10.3390/genes13040644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic variants located in non-coding regions can affect processes that regulate protein expression, functionally contributing to human disease. Germline heterozygous mutations in the non-coding region of the PTEN gene have been previously identified in patients with PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS) diagnosed with breast, thyroid, and/or endometrial cancer. In this study, we report a PTEN promoter variant (rs34149102 A allele) that was identified by direct sequencing in an Italian family with a history of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma and breast cancer. In order to investigate the putative functional role of the rs34149102 A allele variant, we evaluated the status of PTEN alterations at the somatic level. We found that PTEN protein expression was absent in the GEJ adenocarcinoma tissue of the index case. Moreover, we detected the occurrence of copy number loss involving the PTEN rs34149102 major C allele in tumor tissue, revealing that the second allele was somatically inactivated. This variant is located within an active regulatory region of the PTEN core promoter, and in silico analysis suggests that it may affect the binding of the nuclear transcription factor MAZ and hence PTEN expression. Overall, these results reveal the functional role of the PTEN promoter rs34149102 A allele variant in the modulation of PTEN protein expression and highlight its contribution to hereditary cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittoria Disciglio
- Medical Genetics, National Institute of Gastroenterology—IRCCS “S. de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, 70013 Bari, Italy; (V.D.); (P.S.); (C.F.); (G.F.); (M.L.S.); (K.D.M.); (V.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Paola Sanese
- Medical Genetics, National Institute of Gastroenterology—IRCCS “S. de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, 70013 Bari, Italy; (V.D.); (P.S.); (C.F.); (G.F.); (M.L.S.); (K.D.M.); (V.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Candida Fasano
- Medical Genetics, National Institute of Gastroenterology—IRCCS “S. de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, 70013 Bari, Italy; (V.D.); (P.S.); (C.F.); (G.F.); (M.L.S.); (K.D.M.); (V.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Claudio Lotesoriere
- Oncology Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology—IRCCS “S. de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, 70013 Bari, Italy; (C.L.); (I.L.)
| | - Anna Maria Valentini
- Department of Pathology, National Institute of Gastroenterology—IRCCS “S. de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, 70013 Bari, Italy;
| | - Giovanna Forte
- Medical Genetics, National Institute of Gastroenterology—IRCCS “S. de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, 70013 Bari, Italy; (V.D.); (P.S.); (C.F.); (G.F.); (M.L.S.); (K.D.M.); (V.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Martina Lepore Signorile
- Medical Genetics, National Institute of Gastroenterology—IRCCS “S. de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, 70013 Bari, Italy; (V.D.); (P.S.); (C.F.); (G.F.); (M.L.S.); (K.D.M.); (V.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Katia De Marco
- Medical Genetics, National Institute of Gastroenterology—IRCCS “S. de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, 70013 Bari, Italy; (V.D.); (P.S.); (C.F.); (G.F.); (M.L.S.); (K.D.M.); (V.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Valentina Grossi
- Medical Genetics, National Institute of Gastroenterology—IRCCS “S. de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, 70013 Bari, Italy; (V.D.); (P.S.); (C.F.); (G.F.); (M.L.S.); (K.D.M.); (V.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Ivan Lolli
- Oncology Unit, National Institute of Gastroenterology—IRCCS “S. de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, 70013 Bari, Italy; (C.L.); (I.L.)
| | - Filomena Cariola
- Medical Genetics, National Institute of Gastroenterology—IRCCS “S. de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, 70013 Bari, Italy; (V.D.); (P.S.); (C.F.); (G.F.); (M.L.S.); (K.D.M.); (V.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Cristiano Simone
- Medical Genetics, National Institute of Gastroenterology—IRCCS “S. de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, 70013 Bari, Italy; (V.D.); (P.S.); (C.F.); (G.F.); (M.L.S.); (K.D.M.); (V.G.); (F.C.)
- Medical Genetics, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology (DIMO), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Lesueur F, Easton DF, Renault AL, Tavtigian SV, Bernstein JL, Kote-Jarai Z, Eeles RA, Plaseska-Karanfia D, Feliubadaló L, Arun B, Herold N, Versmold B, Schmutzler RK, Nguyen-Dumont T, Southey MC, Dorling L, Dunning AM, Ghiorzo P, Dalmasso BS, Cavaciuti E, Le Gal D, Roberts NJ, Dominguez-Valentin M, Rookus M, Taylor AMR, Goldstein AM, Goldgar DE, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Andrieu N. First international workshop of the ATM and cancer risk group (4-5 December 2019). Fam Cancer 2022; 21:211-227. [PMID: 34125377 PMCID: PMC9969796 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00248-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The first International Workshop of the ATM and Cancer Risk group focusing on the role of Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) gene in cancer was held on December 4 and 5, 2019 at Institut Curie in Paris, France. It was motivated by the fact that germline ATM pathogenic variants have been found to be associated with different cancer types. However, due to the lack of precise age-, sex-, and site-specific risk estimates, no consensus on management guidelines for variant carriers exists, and the clinical utility of ATM variant testing is uncertain. The meeting brought together epidemiologists, geneticists, biologists and clinicians to review current knowledge and on-going challenges related to ATM and cancer risk. This report summarizes the meeting sessions content that covered the latest results in family-based and population-based studies, the importance of accurate variant classification, the effect of radiation exposures for ATM variant carriers, and the characteristics of ATM-deficient tumors. The report concludes that ATM variant carriers outside of the context of Ataxia-Telangiectasia may benefit from effective cancer risk management and therapeutic strategies and that efforts to set up large-scale studies in the international framework to achieve this goal are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabienne Lesueur
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer Team, INSERM U900, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne-Laure Renault
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Dijana Plaseska-Karanfia
- Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology « Georgi D. Efremov », MASA, Skopje, UK
| | - Lidia Feliubadaló
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Oncobell Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Banu Arun
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Natalie Herold
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Beatrix Versmold
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Katharina Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tú Nguyen-Dumont
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Leila Dorling
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paola Ghiorzo
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Bruna Samia Dalmasso
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Genetics of Rare Cancers, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Eve Cavaciuti
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer Team, INSERM U900, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Dorothée Le Gal
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer Team, INSERM U900, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Nicholas J Roberts
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Mev Dominguez-Valentin
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Matti Rookus
- Netherlands Cancer Institute NKI, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander M R Taylor
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alisa M Goldstein
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | | | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
- Service de Génétique, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- INSERM U830, Paris, France
| | - Nadine Andrieu
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer Team, INSERM U900, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
- Institut Curie, Paris, France.
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France.
- PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Carrera P, Sheppard VB, Caballero A, Gómez-Trillos S, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A. A culturally targeted video to promote genetic counseling in a community sample of at-risk US Latina women: The role of the concrete mindset. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY 2022; 50:1331-1342. [PMID: 34606624 DOI: 10.1002/jcop.22718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Latina women, who are at increased risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), have lower use of genetic counseling and testing (GCT) than non-Hispanic White women. In a recent study, culturally targeted video improved psychosocial outcomes related to GCT. Additional analyses examine whether the culturally targeted video improved positive reactions in women who focus on difficulties (concrete mindset) versus women who focus on the final goals (abstract mindset). Participants (N = 32) completed surveys before and immediately after watching the video. The surveys measured attitudes, emotions, and women's mindset. Before watching the video, women with a concrete mindset reported more negative attitudes and negative emotions about GCT than women with an abstract mindset. After watching the video, women with a concrete mindset reported negative attitudes and feelings at levels comparable to those of women with an abstract mindset, reflecting a reduction in their negative attitudes and emotions. The sample size limits the power to find statistically significant differences. Results support the relevance of considering the audience's mindset in the development and testing of public health messages to promote the use of GCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pilar Carrera
- Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Amparo Caballero
- Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara Gómez-Trillos
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Cancer Genomics, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Cancer Genomics, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Simões Corrêa Galendi J, Kautz-Freimuth S, Stock S, Müller D. Uptake Rates of Risk-Reducing Surgeries for Women at Increased Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Applied to Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Scoping Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1786. [PMID: 35406563 PMCID: PMC8997187 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The cost-effectiveness of genetic screen-and-treat strategies for women at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer often depends on the women's willingness to make use of risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) or salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). To explore the uptake rates of RRM and RRSO applied in health economic modeling studies and the impact of uptake rates on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), we conducted a scoping literature review. In addition, using our own model, we conducted a value of information (VOI) analysis. Among the 19 models included in the review, the uptake rates of RRM ranged from 6% to 47% (RRSO: 10% to 88%). Fifty-seven percent of the models applied retrospective data obtained from registries, hospital records, or questionnaires. According to the models' deterministic sensitivity analyses, there is a clear trend that a lower uptake rate increased the ICER and vice versa. Our VOI analysis showed high decision uncertainty associated with the uptake rates. In the future, uptake rates should be given more attention in the conceptualization of health economic modeling studies. Prospective studies are recommended to reflect regional and national variations in women's preferences for preventive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Simões Corrêa Galendi
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany; (S.K.-F.); (S.S.)
| | | | | | - Dirk Müller
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany; (S.K.-F.); (S.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Alpinumisoflavone Disrupts Endoplasmic Reticulum and Mitochondria Leading to Apoptosis in Human Ovarian Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14030564. [PMID: 35335940 PMCID: PMC8954479 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Alpinumisoflavone is a prenylated isoflavonoid derived from the Cudrania tricuspidate fruit and Genista pichisermolliana. Alpinumisoflavone has anticancer properties in a variety of cancer cells, including colorectal, esophageal, renal and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, its mechanisms and effects in ovarian cancer remain unexplored. Our findings indicate that alpinumisoflavone triggers anti-proliferation in 2D- and 3D-cultured human ovarian cancer (ES2 and OV90) cells, including a reduction in the proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression and sub-G1 phase arrest of the cell cycle. Both alpinumisoflavone-treated ES2 and OV90 cells exhibited an augmentation in late apoptotic cells and the depolarization of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP). We also observed a decrease in respiratory chain activity in ovarian cancer cells, owing to lower energy output by the alpinumisoflavone. In addition, combining cisplatin (a chemotherapeutic drug used in several malignancies) with alpinumisoflavone boosted apoptosis in ES2 and OV90 cells via a reduction in cell proliferation, induction of late apoptotic cells, and depolarization of MMP. Furthermore, alpinumisoflavone also regulated the PI3K/AKT, MAPK and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress regulatory signaling pathways, leading to cell death in both ES2 and OV90 cells. In general, our findings verified that alpinumisoflavone inhibited ovarian cancer cell growth via mitochondrial malfunction.
Collapse
|
62
|
Ramamurthy C, Nassar AH, Abou Alaiwi S, Adib E, Akl EW, Yang S, Esplin ED, Liss MA, Tomlinson GE, Sonpavde GP. Prevalence of pathogenic germline cancer risk variants in testicular cancer patients: Identifying high risk groups. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:113.e9-113.e15. [PMID: 35022142 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline studies in testicular cancer have focused on unselected populations but so far have not led to recommendations for testicular cancer screening. OBJECTIVE Herein, we hypothesized that men with testicular cancer and an additional risk factor for hereditary cancer predisposition carry a higher rate of pathogenic variants than men with testicular cancer without another risk factor. METHODS AND RESULTS 187 patients with a personal history of testicular cancer underwent germline testing via Invitae. Patients were divided into low-risk and high-risk patients. Low-risk patients (n=83) had testicular cancer as their only primary malignancy without a family history of testicular cancer. High-risk patients (n=104) had additional primary malignancies and/or a family history of testicular cancer. 23.1% of patients harbored pathogenic germline variants with 19.6% carrying actionable variants. Among low-risk patients, 13.5% carried pathogenic variants versus 29.9% in the high-risk cohort. Of patients with a family history of non-testicular cancers and a personal history of additional primary malignancies, 32% harbored pathogenic variants. CONCLUSION High-risk patients are twice as likely to harbor pathogenic variants compared to low-risk patients. Importantly, patients with a family history of cancer and other primary malignancies represent a subset of patients that may benefit from genetic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amin H Nassar
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sarah Abou Alaiwi
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Elio Adib
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Elie W Akl
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shan Yang
- Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CL
| | | | - Michael A Liss
- Department of Medical Oncology, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | - Gail E Tomlinson
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology and Oncology and Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | - Guru P Sonpavde
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Pena-Couso L, Ercibengoa M, Mercadillo F, Gómez-Sánchez D, Inglada-Pérez L, Santos M, Lanillos J, Gutiérrez-Abad D, Hernández A, Carbonell P, Letón R, Robledo M, Rodríguez-Antona C, Perea J, Urioste M. Considerations on diagnosis and surveillance measures of PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome: clinical and genetic study in a series of Spanish patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022; 17:85. [PMID: 35227301 PMCID: PMC8886852 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-02079-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The limited knowledge about the PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS) makes its diagnosis a challenging task. We aimed to define the clinical and genetic characteristics of this syndrome in the Spanish population and to identify new genes potentially associated with the disease. RESULTS We reviewed the clinical data collected through a specific questionnaire in a series of 145 Spanish patients with a phenotypic features compatible with PHTS and performed molecular characterization through several approaches including next generation sequencing and whole exome sequencing (WES). Macrocephaly, mucocutaneous lesions, gastrointestinal polyposis and obesity are prevalent phenotypic features in PHTS and help predict the presence of a PTEN germline variant in our population. We also find that PHTS patients are at risk to develop cancer in childhood or adolescence. Furthermore, we observe a high frequency of variants in exon 1 of PTEN, which are associated with renal cancer and overexpression of KLLN and PTEN. Moreover, WES revealed variants in genes like NEDD4 that merit further research. CONCLUSIONS This study expands previously reported findings in other PHTS population studies and makes new contributions regarding clinical and molecular aspects of PHTS, which are useful for translation to the clinic and for new research lines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Pena-Couso
- Familial Cancer Clinical Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - María Ercibengoa
- Respiratory Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance Group, Infectious Diseases Area, BioDonostia; Microbiology Department, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Donostialdea Integrated Health Organization, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Fátima Mercadillo
- Familial Cancer Clinical Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - David Gómez-Sánchez
- Hereditary Cancer Laboratory, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, i+12 Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
- Clinical and Translational Lung Cancer Research Unit, i+12 Research Institute and Biomedical Research Networking Center in Oncology (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Lucía Inglada-Pérez
- Biostatistics Unit, Statistics and Operational Research Department, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Santos
- Hereditary Endocrine Cancer Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Lanillos
- Hereditary Endocrine Cancer Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - David Gutiérrez-Abad
- Medical Oncology Service, University Hospital of Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain
| | - Almudena Hernández
- Dermatology Service, University Hospital of Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain
| | - Pablo Carbonell
- Biochemistry and Clinical Genetics Centre, Virgen Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain
| | - Rocío Letón
- Hereditary Endocrine Cancer Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes Robledo
- Hereditary Endocrine Cancer Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
- Rare Diseases Networking Biomedical Research Centre (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Rodríguez-Antona
- Hereditary Endocrine Cancer Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
- Rare Diseases Networking Biomedical Research Centre (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - José Perea
- Surgery Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Health Research Institute-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Urioste
- Familial Cancer Clinical Unit, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Hibler EA, Fought AJ, Kershaw KN, Molsberry R, Nowakowski V, Lindner D. Novel Interactive Tool for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Assessment (Bright Pink Assess Your Risk): Development and Usability Study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e29124. [PMID: 35200148 PMCID: PMC8914739 DOI: 10.2196/29124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer is significantly higher among women with genetic susceptibility or a strong family history. However, current risk assessment tools and clinical practices may identify only 10% of asymptomatic carriers of susceptibility genes. Bright Pink developed the Assess Your Risk (AYR) tool to estimate breast and ovarian cancer risk through a user-friendly, informative web-based quiz for risk assessment at the population level. Objective This study aims to present the AYR tool, describe AYR users, and present evidence that AYR works as expected by comparing classification using the AYR tool with gold standard genetic testing guidelines. Methods The AYR is a recently developed population-level risk assessment tool that includes 26 questions based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and factors from other commonly used risk assessment tools. We included all women who completed the AYR between November 2018 and January 2019, with the exception of self-reported cancer or no knowledge of family history. We compared AYR classifications with those that were independently created using NCCN criteria using measures of validity and the McNemar test. Results There were 143,657 AYR completions, and most participants were either at increased or average risk for breast cancer or ovarian cancer (137,315/143,657, 95.59%). Using our estimates of increased and average risk as the gold standard, based on the NCCN guidelines, we estimated the sensitivity and specificity for the AYR algorithm–generated risk categories as 100% and 89.9%, respectively (P<.001). The specificity improved when we considered the additional questions asked by the AYR to define increased risk, which were not examined by the NCCN criteria. By race, ethnicity, and age group; we found that the lowest observed specificity was for the Asian race (85.9%) and the 30 to 39 years age group (87.6%) for the AYR-generated categories compared with the NCCN criteria. Conclusions These results demonstrate that Bright Pink’s AYR is an accurate tool for use by the general population to identify women at increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. We plan to validate the tool longitudinally in future studies, including the impact of race, ethnicity, and age on breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Hibler
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Angela J Fought
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Kiarri N Kershaw
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Rebecca Molsberry
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Virginia Nowakowski
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
65
|
Toward More Comprehensive Homologous Recombination Deficiency Assays in Ovarian Cancer, Part 1: Technical Considerations. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051132. [PMID: 35267439 PMCID: PMC8909526 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most frequent and lethal form of ovarian cancer and is associated with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in 50% of cases. This specific alteration is associated with sensitivity to PARP inhibitors (PARPis). Despite vast prognostic improvements due to PARPis, current molecular assays assessing HRD status suffer from several limitations, and there is an urgent need for a more accurate evaluation. In these companion reviews (Part 1: Technical considerations; Part 2: Medical perspectives), we develop an integrative review to provide physicians and researchers involved in HGSOC management with a holistic perspective, from translational research to clinical applications. Abstract High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), the most frequent and lethal form of ovarian cancer, exhibits homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in 50% of cases. In addition to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, which are the best known thus far, defects can also be caused by diverse alterations to homologous recombination-related genes or epigenetic patterns. HRD leads to genomic instability (genomic scars) and is associated with PARP inhibitor (PARPi) sensitivity. HRD is currently assessed through BRCA1/2 analysis, which produces a genomic instability score (GIS). However, despite substantial clinical achievements, FDA-approved companion diagnostics (CDx) based on GISs have important limitations. Indeed, despite the use of GIS in clinical practice, the relevance of such assays remains controversial. Although international guidelines include companion diagnostics as part of HGSOC frontline management, they also underscore the need for more powerful and alternative approaches for assessing patient eligibility to PARP inhibitors. In these companion reviews, we review and present evidence to date regarding HRD definitions, achievements and limitations in HGSOC. Part 1 is dedicated to technical considerations and proposed perspectives that could lead to a more comprehensive and dynamic assessment of HR, while Part 2 provides a more integrated approach for clinicians.
Collapse
|
66
|
Gomes P, Pietrabissa G, Silva ER, Silva J, Matos PM, Costa ME, Bertuzzi V, Silva E, Neves MC, Sales CMD. Family Adjustment to Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:1603. [PMID: 35162625 PMCID: PMC8834948 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Hereditary cancer syndromes are inherited pathogenic genetic variants that significantly increase the risk of developing cancer. When individuals become aware of their increased probability of having cancer, the whole family is affected by this new reality and needs to adjust. However, adjustment to hereditary cancer syndromes has been mainly studied at an individual level, and research about familial adjustment remains dispersed and disorganized. To overcome this gap, this review aims to understand how families adjust to genetic testing and risk management, and to what extent the family's adjustment influences the psychological response and risk management behaviors of mutation carriers. We conducted searches on the PubMed/Med Line, PsycInfo, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases and used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT-v2018) to assess the methodological quality of each selected study. Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. Most results highlighted the interdependent nature of adjustment of pathogenic variant carriers and their families. The way carriers adjust to the syndrome is highly dependent on family functioning and related to how family members react to the new genetic information, particularly partners and siblings. Couples who share their worries and communicate openly about cancer risk present a better long-term adjustment than couples who use protective buffering (not talking about it to avoid disturbing the partner) or emotional distancing. Parents need help dealing with disclosing genetic information to their children. These findings reinforce the importance of adopting a family-centered approach in the context of genetic counseling and the necessity of involving family members in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Gomes
- Cancer Genetics Group, Research Centre of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Centre (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (E.R.S.); (J.S.); (M.C.N.)
- Centre for Psychology at University of Porto (CPUP), Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences at University of Porto (FPCEUP), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (P.M.M.); (M.E.C.); (E.S.); (C.M.D.S.)
| | - Giada Pietrabissa
- Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 20123 Milan, Italy; (G.P.); (V.B.)
- Psychology Research Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Eunice R. Silva
- Cancer Genetics Group, Research Centre of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Centre (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (E.R.S.); (J.S.); (M.C.N.)
- Psychology Service, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
| | - João Silva
- Cancer Genetics Group, Research Centre of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Centre (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (E.R.S.); (J.S.); (M.C.N.)
- Medical Genetics Service, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
| | - Paula Mena Matos
- Centre for Psychology at University of Porto (CPUP), Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences at University of Porto (FPCEUP), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (P.M.M.); (M.E.C.); (E.S.); (C.M.D.S.)
| | - Maria Emília Costa
- Centre for Psychology at University of Porto (CPUP), Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences at University of Porto (FPCEUP), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (P.M.M.); (M.E.C.); (E.S.); (C.M.D.S.)
| | - Vanessa Bertuzzi
- Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 20123 Milan, Italy; (G.P.); (V.B.)
| | - Eliana Silva
- Centre for Psychology at University of Porto (CPUP), Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences at University of Porto (FPCEUP), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (P.M.M.); (M.E.C.); (E.S.); (C.M.D.S.)
| | - Maria Carolina Neves
- Cancer Genetics Group, Research Centre of IPO Porto (CI-IPOP)/RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Centre (Porto.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal; (E.R.S.); (J.S.); (M.C.N.)
- Centre for Psychology at University of Porto (CPUP), Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences at University of Porto (FPCEUP), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (P.M.M.); (M.E.C.); (E.S.); (C.M.D.S.)
| | - Célia M. D. Sales
- Centre for Psychology at University of Porto (CPUP), Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences at University of Porto (FPCEUP), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; (P.M.M.); (M.E.C.); (E.S.); (C.M.D.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Wu N, Wei L, Li L, Li F, Yu J, Liu J. Perspectives on the role of breast cancer susceptibility gene in breast cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2022; 27:495-511. [PMID: 35064849 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-02098-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 can repair damaged DNA through homologous recombination. Besides, the local immune microenvironment of breast cancer is closely linked to the prognosis of patients. But the relationship of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 expression and local immunosuppressive microenvironment in breast cancer is not clear. The aim of this study was to discuss the correlation between them. METHODS The fresh primary breast tumors and paired normal tissues of 156 cases of breast cancer patients as well as peripheral blood of 156 cases among them in Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital from January 2014 to October 2018 were collected. The association between breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 germline mutation and immune status of microenvironment in situ was analyzed. RESULTS The results indicated that the germline mutation of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 was inconsistent with the breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 protein expression, and the proportion of immune cells in patients with negative expression of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 protein was higher than patients with positive expression of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 protein (p < 0.05). And the expression of programmed cell death protein 1, cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4, programmed death ligand-1 of CD3+ T cells in patients with negative expression of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 protein was higher than patients with positive expression of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 protein (p < 0.05). The breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 protein expression was significantly correlated with family history of breast cancer patients (p = 0.006), local lymph node metastases (p = 0.001), and TNM staging (p ≤ 0.001). The breast cancer susceptibility gene 2 protein expression was significantly related to local lymph node metastases (p ≤ 0.001), III stage rate(p = 0.003) and molecular subtyping (p ≤ 0.001). Besides, the 5 years disease free survival was worse for G1 group and pathological III stage patients than other groups and other TNM stage patients. CONCLUSION In short, the immune therapy may be a potential therapy method for breast cancer patients with negative expression of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 protein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Wu
- Cancer Prevention Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tiyuanbei, Huanhuxi Rode, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Lijuan Wei
- Cancer Prevention Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tiyuanbei, Huanhuxi Rode, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Lijuan Li
- Cancer Prevention Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tiyuanbei, Huanhuxi Rode, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Fangxuan Li
- Cancer Prevention Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tiyuanbei, Huanhuxi Rode, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China
| | - Jinpu Yu
- The Molecular Diagnostics, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tiyuanbei, Huanhuxi Rode, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
| | - Juntian Liu
- Cancer Prevention Center, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tiyuanbei, Huanhuxi Rode, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
- The Second Department of Breast Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, 300060, China.
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Lee MV, Aharon S, Kim K, Sunn Konstantinoff K, Appleton CM, Stwalley D, Olsen MA. Recent Trends in Screening Breast MRI. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2022; 4:39-47. [PMID: 35103253 PMCID: PMC8794012 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbab088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess trends in screening breast MRI utilization among privately insured women in the U.S. from 2007 to 2017. METHODS The utilization of screening breast MRI among women aged 25-64 years from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017, was obtained using the MarketScan Commercial Database. We used Current Procedural Terminology codes to exclude breast MRI exams performed in women with a new breast cancer diagnosis and in women imaged to assess response to neoadjuvant therapy in the preceding 90 days. During the 11-year study, 351 763 study-eligible women underwent 488 852 MRI scans. RESULTS An overall 55.0% increase in screening breast MRI utilization was observed over the study period, with a steadily increasing trend. The greatest annual increase in percent utilization was from 2007 to 2008 at 16.6%. The highest utilization rate was in 2017, in which 0.4% of women aged 25-64 years underwent screening breast MRI. Of the women who underwent screening MRI with sufficient follow-up, 76.5% underwent only one examination during the study period. CONCLUSION Utilization of screening breast MRI has increased steadily in the past decade to a peak of 0.4% of adult women. However, an estimated 9% of U.S. women are eligible for high-risk breast MRI screening; thus, utilization falls short of optimal compliance. Further studies to evaluate the barriers to screening compliance may help optimize utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle V Lee
- Medical College of Georgia, Department of Radiology, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Shani Aharon
- Medical School at the University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Kevin Kim
- Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | - Dustin Stwalley
- Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Margaret A Olsen
- Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Harada M, Kimura F, Takai Y, Nakajima T, Ushijima K, Kobayashi H, Satoh T, Tozawa A, Sugimoto K, Saji S, Shimizu C, Akiyama K, Bando H, Kuwahara A, Furui T, Okada H, Kawai K, Shinohara N, Nagao K, Kitajima M, Suenobu S, Soejima T, Miyachi M, Miyoshi Y, Yoneda A, Horie A, Ishida Y, Usui N, Kanda Y, Fujii N, Endo M, Nakayama R, Hoshi M, Yonemoto T, Kiyotani C, Okita N, Baba E, Muto M, Kikuchi I, Morishige KI, Tsugawa K, Nishiyama H, Hosoi H, Tanimoto M, Kawai A, Sugiyama K, Boku N, Yonemura M, Hayashi N, Aoki D, Osuga Y, Suzuki N. Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines 2017 for fertility preservation in childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer patients: part 1. Int J Clin Oncol 2022; 27:265-280. [PMID: 34973107 PMCID: PMC8816532 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-02081-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
In 2017, the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) published the JSCO Clinical Practice Guidelines 2017 for Fertility Preservation in Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Patients. These were the first Japanese guidelines to address issues of oncofertility. In this field of medicine, sustained close cooperation between oncologists and reproductive specialists is essential from the diagnosis of cancer until many years after completion of cancer treatment. These JSCO guidelines were intended to guide multidisciplinary medical staff in considering the availability of fertility preservation options and to help them decide whether to provide fertility preservation to childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer patients before treatment starts, with the ultimate goal of improving patient survivorship. The guidelines are presented as Parts 1 and 2. This article (Part 1) summarizes the goals of the guidelines and the methods used to develop them and provides an overview of fertility preservation across all oncology areas. It includes general remarks on the basic concepts surrounding fertility preservation and explanations of the impacts of cancer treatment on gonadal function by sex and treatment modality and of the options for protecting/preserving gonadal function and makes recommendations based on 4 clinical questions. Part 2 of these guidelines provides specific recommendations on fertility preservation in 8 types of cancer (gynecologic, breast, urologic, pediatric, hematologic, bone and soft tissue, brain, and digestive).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miyuki Harada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Fuminori Kimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Seta Tsukinowa-Cho Otsu, Shiga, 520-2192, Japan
| | - Yasushi Takai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, 1981 Kamoda, Kawagoe City, Saitama, 350-3550, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nakajima
- Department of Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Kimio Ushijima
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-0011, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kobayashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan
| | - Toyomi Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Akiko Tozawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Kohei Sugimoto
- International Center for Reproductive Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 2-1-50 Minamikoshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan
| | - Shigehira Saji
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikarigaoka, Fukushima-city, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan
| | - Chikako Shimizu
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan
| | - Kyoko Akiyama
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Hiroko Bando
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Akira Kuwahara
- Ladies Clinic Cosmos Kochi, 6-27, Sugiiru, Kochi, Kochi, 780-0082, Japan
| | - Tatsuro Furui
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Okada
- International Center for Reproductive Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 2-1-50 Minamikoshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan
| | - Koji Kawai
- Department of Urology, International University of Health and Welfare, 852, Hatakeda Narita, Chiba, 286-0124, Japan
| | - Nobuo Shinohara
- Department of Renal and Genitourinary Surgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita 15Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Koichi Nagao
- Department of Urology, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, 6-11-1, Omori-Nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan
| | - Michio Kitajima
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan
| | - Souichi Suenobu
- Division of General Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasama, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan
| | - Toshinori Soejima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kobe Proton Center, 1-6-8, Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Miyachi
- Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| | - Yoko Miyoshi
- Department of Health and Nutrition, Faculty of Health and Nutrition, Osaka Shoin Women's University, 4-2-26 Hishiya-nishi, Higashi-Osaka, Osaka, 577-8550, Japan
| | - Akihiro Yoneda
- Division of Pediatric Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Akihito Horie
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyoku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Yasushi Ishida
- Pediatric Medical Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, 83 Kasuga-machi, Matsuyama-city, Ehime, 790-0024, Japan
| | - Noriko Usui
- Division of Clinical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-19-18 Nishi-Shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Kanda
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya-ku, Saitama-city, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan
| | - Nobuharu Fujii
- Division of Transfusion, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Makoto Endo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Robert Nakayama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Manabu Hoshi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-Machi, Abeno-Ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Yonemoto
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan
| | - Chikako Kiyotani
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8535, Japan
| | - Natsuko Okita
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Eishi Baba
- Department of Oncology and Social Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Manabu Muto
- Department of Therapeutic Oncology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyoku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Iwaho Kikuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Park Yokohama, 1-1-8, Sakuragi-cho, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 231-0062, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichirou Morishige
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1, Yanagido, Gifu City, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Koichiro Tsugawa
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Hajime Hosoi
- Department of Nursing, Doshisha Women's College of Liberal Arts, Kodo, Kyotanabe City, Kyoto, 610-0395, Japan
| | - Mitsune Tanimoto
- Chugoku Central Hospital, 148-13, Kamiiwanari, Miyuki-cho, Fukuyama-city, Hiroshima, 720-0001, Japan
| | - Akira Kawai
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology and Rehabilitation Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Sugiyama
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Neuro-Oncology Program, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan
| | - Narikazu Boku
- Department of Medical Oncology and General Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, IMSUT Hospital, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan
| | - Masato Yonemura
- Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, 277-0882, Japan
| | - Naoko Hayashi
- Graduate School of Nursing Science, St Luke's International University, 10-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0044, Japan
| | - Daisuke Aoki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yutaka Osuga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| | - Nao Suzuki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Temkin SM, Smeltzer MP, Dawkins MD, Boehmer LM, Senter L, Black DR, Blank SV, Yemelyanova A, Magliocco AM, Finkel MA, Moore TE, Thaker PH. Improving the quality of care for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: Program components, implementation barriers, and recommendations. Cancer 2021; 128:654-664. [PMID: 34787913 PMCID: PMC9298928 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The high lethality of ovarian cancer in the United States and associated complexities of the patient journey across the cancer care continuum warrant an assessment of current practices and barriers to quality care in the United States. The objectives of this study were to identify and assess key components in the provision of high‐quality care delivery for patients with ovarian cancer, identify challenges in the implementation of best practices, and develop corresponding quality‐related recommendations to guide multidisciplinary ovarian cancer programs and practices. This multiphase ovarian cancer quality‐care initiative was guided by a multidisciplinary expert steering committee, including gynecologic oncologists, pathologists, a genetic counselor, a nurse navigator, social workers, and cancer center administrators. Key partnerships were also established. A collaborative approach was adopted to develop comprehensive recommendations by identifying ideal quality‐of‐care program components in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer management. The core program components included: care coordination and patient education, prevention and screening, diagnosis and initial management, treatment planning, disease surveillance, equity in care, and quality of life. Quality‐directed recommendations were developed across 7 core program components, with a focus on ensuring high‐quality ovarian cancer care delivery for patients through improved patient education and engagement by addressing unmet medical and supportive care needs. Implementation challenges were described, and key recommendations to overcome barriers were provided. The recommendations emerging from this initiative can serve as a comprehensive resource guide for multidisciplinary cancer practices, providers, and other stakeholders working to provide quality‐directed cancer care for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer and their families. Quality‐directed recommendations for ovarian cancer care delivery are developed across 7 core program components, with a focus on ensuring high‐quality care delivery by addressing unmet medical and supportive care needs. These recommendations can serve as a comprehensive resource guide for multidisciplinary cancer practices, providers, and other stakeholders working to provide quality‐directed cancer care for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Temkin
- Office of Research for Women's Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Matthew P Smeltzer
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - Leigh M Boehmer
- Association of Community Cancer Centers, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University and Ohio State Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Destin R Black
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Willis-Knighton Medical Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | | | - Anna Yemelyanova
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | - Mollie A Finkel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mount Sinai Medical Center-Chelsea, New York, New York
| | - Tracy E Moore
- Ovarian Cancer Research Alliance, New York, New York
| | - Premal H Thaker
- Washington University Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Boddicker NJ, Hu C, Weitzel JN, Kraft P, Nathanson KL, Goldgar DE, Na J, Huang H, Gnanaolivu RD, Larson N, Yussuf A, Yao S, Vachon CM, Trentham-Dietz A, Teras L, Taylor JA, Scott CE, Sandler DP, Pesaran T, Patel AV, Palmer JR, Ong IM, Olson JE, O'Brien K, Neuhausen S, Martinez E, Ma H, Lindstrom S, Le Marchand L, Kooperberg C, Karam R, Hunter DJ, Hodge JM, Haiman C, Gaudet MM, Gao C, LaDuca H, Lacey JV, Dolinsky JS, Chao E, Carter BD, Burnside ES, Bertrand KA, Bernstein L, Auer PW, Ambrosone C, Yadav S, Hart SN, Polley EC, Domchek SM, Couch FJ. Risk of Late-Onset Breast Cancer in Genetically Predisposed Women. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3430-3440. [PMID: 34292776 PMCID: PMC8547938 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in established breast cancer predisposition genes in women in the general population over age 65 years is not well-defined. However, testing guidelines suggest that women diagnosed with breast cancer over age 65 years might have < 2.5% likelihood of a PV in a high-penetrance gene. This study aimed to establish the frequency of PVs and remaining risks of breast cancer for each gene in women over age 65 years. METHODS A total of 26,707 women over age 65 years from population-based studies (51.5% with breast cancer and 48.5% unaffected) were tested for PVs in germline predisposition gene. Frequencies of PVs and associations between PVs in each gene and breast cancer were assessed, and remaining lifetime breast cancer risks were estimated for non-Hispanic White women with PVs. RESULTS The frequency of PVs in predisposition genes was 3.18% for women with breast cancer and 1.48% for unaffected women over age 65 years. PVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 were found in 3.42% of women diagnosed with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, 1.0% with ER-positive, and 3.01% with triple-negative breast cancer. Frequencies of PVs were lower among women with no first-degree relatives with breast cancer. PVs in CHEK2, PALB2, BRCA2, and BRCA1 were associated with increased risks (odds ratio = 2.9-4.0) of breast cancer. Remaining lifetime risks of breast cancer were ≥ 15% for those with PVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2. CONCLUSION This study suggests that all women diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer or ER-negative breast cancer should receive genetic testing and that women over age 65 years with BRCA1 and BRCA2 PVs and perhaps with PALB2 and CHEK2 PVs should be considered for magnetic resonance imaging screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Peter Kraft
- Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Katherine L. Nathanson
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Jie Na
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Hongyan Huang
- Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Song Yao
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | | | - Lauren Teras
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | | | - Alpa V. Patel
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Huiyan Ma
- Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Sara Lindstrom
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Loic Le Marchand
- Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI
| | | | | | | | - James M. Hodge
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Christopher Haiman
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mia M. Gaudet
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Chi Gao
- Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | - Brian D. Carter
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | - Paul W. Auer
- UWM Joseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | | | | | | | - Susan M. Domchek
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
72
|
Bancroft EK, Page EC, Brook MN, Thomas S, Taylor N, Pope J, McHugh J, Jones AB, Karlsson Q, Merson S, Ong KR, Hoffman J, Huber C, Maehle L, Grindedal EM, Stormorken A, Evans DG, Rothwell J, Lalloo F, Brady AF, Bartlett M, Snape K, Hanson H, James P, McKinley J, Mascarenhas L, Syngal S, Ukaegbu C, Side L, Thomas T, Barwell J, Teixeira MR, Izatt L, Suri M, Macrae FA, Poplawski N, Chen-Shtoyerman R, Ahmed M, Musgrave H, Nicolai N, Greenhalgh L, Brewer C, Pachter N, Spigelman AD, Azzabi A, Helfand BT, Halliday D, Buys S, Ramon Y Cajal T, Donaldson A, Cooney KA, Harris M, McGrath J, Davidson R, Taylor A, Cooke P, Myhill K, Hogben M, Aaronson NK, Ardern-Jones A, Bangma CH, Castro E, Dearnaley D, Dias A, Dudderidge T, Eccles DM, Green K, Eyfjord J, Falconer A, Foster CS, Gronberg H, Hamdy FC, Johannsson O, Khoo V, Lilja H, Lindeman GJ, Lubinski J, Axcrona K, Mikropoulos C, Mitra AV, Moynihan C, Ni Raghallaigh H, Rennert G, Collier R, Offman J, Kote-Jarai Z, Eeles RA. A prospective prostate cancer screening programme for men with pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes (IMPACT): initial results from an international prospective study. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:1618-1631. [PMID: 34678156 PMCID: PMC8576477 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00522-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome is a rare familial cancer syndrome caused by pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2, that cause predisposition to various cancers, predominantly colorectal and endometrial cancer. Data are emerging that pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes increase the risk of early-onset aggressive prostate cancer. The IMPACT study is prospectively assessing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in men with germline mismatch repair pathogenic variants. Here, we report the usefulness of PSA screening, prostate cancer incidence, and tumour characteristics after the first screening round in men with and without these germline pathogenic variants. METHODS The IMPACT study is an international, prospective study. Men aged 40-69 years without a previous prostate cancer diagnosis and with a known germline pathogenic variant in the MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 gene, and age-matched male controls who tested negative for a familial pathogenic variant in these genes were recruited from 34 genetic and urology clinics in eight countries, and underwent a baseline PSA screening. Men who had a PSA level higher than 3·0 ng/mL were offered a transrectal, ultrasound-guided, prostate biopsy and a histopathological analysis was done. All participants are undergoing a minimum of 5 years' annual screening. The primary endpoint was to determine the incidence, stage, and pathology of screening-detected prostate cancer in carriers of pathogenic variants compared with non-carrier controls. We used Fisher's exact test to compare the number of cases, cancer incidence, and positive predictive values of the PSA cutoff and biopsy between carriers and non-carriers and the differences between disease types (ie, cancer vs no cancer, clinically significant cancer vs no cancer). We assessed screening outcomes and tumour characteristics by pathogenic variant status. Here we present results from the first round of PSA screening in the IMPACT study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00261456, and is now closed to accrual. FINDINGS Between Sept 28, 2012, and March 1, 2020, 828 men were recruited (644 carriers of mismatch repair pathogenic variants [204 carriers of MLH1, 305 carriers of MSH2, and 135 carriers of MSH6] and 184 non-carrier controls [65 non-carriers of MLH1, 76 non-carriers of MSH2, and 43 non-carriers of MSH6]), and in order to boost the sample size for the non-carrier control groups, we randomly selected 134 non-carriers from the BRCA1 and BRCA2 cohort of the IMPACT study, who were included in all three non-carrier cohorts. Men were predominantly of European ancestry (899 [93%] of 953 with available data), with a mean age of 52·8 years (SD 8·3). Within the first screening round, 56 (6%) men had a PSA concentration of more than 3·0 ng/mL and 35 (4%) biopsies were done. The overall incidence of prostate cancer was 1·9% (18 of 962; 95% CI 1·1-2·9). The incidence among MSH2 carriers was 4·3% (13 of 305; 95% CI 2·3-7·2), MSH2 non-carrier controls was 0·5% (one of 210; 0·0-2·6), MSH6 carriers was 3·0% (four of 135; 0·8-7·4), and none were detected among the MLH1 carriers, MLH1 non-carrier controls, and MSH6 non-carrier controls. Prostate cancer incidence, using a PSA threshold of higher than 3·0 ng/mL, was higher in MSH2 carriers than in MSH2 non-carrier controls (4·3% vs 0·5%; p=0·011) and MSH6 carriers than MSH6 non-carrier controls (3·0% vs 0%; p=0·034). The overall positive predictive value of biopsy using a PSA threshold of 3·0 ng/mL was 51·4% (95% CI 34·0-68·6), and the overall positive predictive value of a PSA threshold of 3·0 ng/mL was 32·1% (20·3-46·0). INTERPRETATION After the first screening round, carriers of MSH2 and MSH6 pathogenic variants had a higher incidence of prostate cancer compared with age-matched non-carrier controls. These findings support the use of targeted PSA screening in these men to identify those with clinically significant prostate cancer. Further annual screening rounds will need to confirm these findings. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, The Ronald and Rita McAulay Foundation, the National Institute for Health Research support to Biomedical Research Centres (The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust; Oxford; Manchester and the Cambridge Clinical Research Centre), Mr and Mrs Jack Baker, the Cancer Council of Tasmania, Cancer Australia, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Cancer Council of Victoria, Cancer Council of South Australia, the Victorian Cancer Agency, Cancer Australia, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), the Institut Català de la Salut, Autonomous Government of Catalonia, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute, Swedish Cancer Society, General Hospital in Malmö Foundation for Combating Cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth K Bancroft
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Mark N Brook
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Sarah Thomas
- Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Pope
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jana McHugh
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | | | - Susan Merson
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Kai Ren Ong
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jonathan Hoffman
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Camilla Huber
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lovise Maehle
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Astrid Stormorken
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jeanette Rothwell
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Angela F Brady
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
| | - Marion Bartlett
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
| | | | | | - Paul James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Joanne McKinley
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lyon Mascarenhas
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chinedu Ukaegbu
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lucy Side
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK; Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Tessy Thomas
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK; Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Julian Barwell
- Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Genetics Department and Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute (IPO Porto), Porto, Portugal; Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mohnish Suri
- Clinical Genetics Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Finlay A Macrae
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicola Poplawski
- Adult Genetics Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Rakefet Chen-Shtoyerman
- The Genetic Institute, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel; Biology Department, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| | - Munaza Ahmed
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Hannah Musgrave
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Lynn Greenhalgh
- Clinical Genetics Service, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Carole Brewer
- Peninsular Genetics, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK; Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Nicholas Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Allan D Spigelman
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, Waratah, NSW, Australia; University of New South Wales, St Vincent's Clinical School, NSW, Australia; Cancer Genetics Clinic, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ashraf Azzabi
- Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Brian T Helfand
- John and Carol Walter Center for Urological Health, Division of Urology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Dorothy Halliday
- Oxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Saundra Buys
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | - Kathleen A Cooney
- Duke Cancer Institute and Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Marion Harris
- Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - John McGrath
- Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK; University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Rosemarie Davidson
- West of Scotland Genetic Service, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Amy Taylor
- East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Kathryn Myhill
- Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew Hogben
- Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Audrey Ardern-Jones
- Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris H Bangma
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Elena Castro
- Spanish National Cancer Research Center, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Dearnaley
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - Alexander Dias
- Instituto Nacional de Cancer Jose de Alencar Gomes da Silva INCA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Diana M Eccles
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK; Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kate Green
- Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jorunn Eyfjord
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | | | | | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Oskar Johannsson
- Landspitali - the National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; St George's Hospital, Tooting, London, UK; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - Hans Lilja
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Surgery, and Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geoffrey J Lindeman
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jan Lubinski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Karol Axcrona
- Department of Urology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | | | - Anita V Mitra
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare Moynihan
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Gad Rennert
- CHS National Cancer Control Center, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Rebecca Collier
- Clinical Genetics Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Judith Offman
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Rosalind A Eeles
- Oncogenetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cancer Genetics Unit & Academic Urology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Abstract
Objective We aimed to describe the differences in clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival (OS) between male and female breast cancer patients, and to develop a prognostic nomogram to predict survival in patients with male breast cancer (MBC). Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we compared age, race, histological type, histological grade, tumor size, lymph node status, metastases, estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) and HER-2 status between male and female patients, and analyzed their relationships with OS. We established a nomogram and produced a calibration curve to observe its predictive effect. Results Age, race, T stage, N stage, bone and lung metastases, and histological type and grade differed between male and female patients. OS in male patients was related to age, tumor size, metastatic site, ER/PR status, and histological grade, but not to race or lymph node status. A nomogram was established, which showed good predictive performance for survival in MBC patients (area under the curve = 0.7). Conclusion MBC has a worse prognosis than female breast cancer, mainly characterized by late onset age, late staging, high proportion of invasive non-specific histological types, high histological grade, and luminal breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinli Wang
- Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi province, China
| | - Shusong Liu
- Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi province, China
| | - Yan Xue
- Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi province, China
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Matzenbacher Bittar C, de Araújo Rocha YM, Vieira IA, Rosset C, Andreis TF, Sartor ITS, Artigalás O, Netto CBO, Alemar B, Macedo GS, Ashton-Prolla P. Clinical and molecular characterization of patients fulfilling Chompret criteria for Li-Fraumeni syndrome in Southern Brazil. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251639. [PMID: 34529667 PMCID: PMC8445435 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome caused by pathogenic germline variants in the TP53 gene, characterized by a predisposition to the development of a broad spectrum of tumors at an early age. The core tumors related to LFS are bone and soft tissue sarcomas, premenopausal breast cancer, brain tumors, adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC), and leukemias. The revised Chompret criteria has been widely used to establish clinical suspicion and support TP53 germline variant testing and LFS diagnosis. Information on TP53 germline pathogenic variant (PV) prevalence when using Chompret criteria in South America and especially in Brazil is scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize patients that fulfilled these specific criteria in southern Brazil, a region known for its high population frequency of a founder TP53 variant c.1010G>A (p.Arg337His), as known as R337H. TP53 germline testing of 191 cancer-affected and independent probands with LFS phenotype identified a heterozygous pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in 26 (13.6%) probands, both in the DNA binding domain (group A) and in the oligomerization domain (group B) of the gene. Of the 26 carriers, 18 (69.23%) were R337H heterozygotes. Median age at diagnosis of the first tumor in groups A and B differed significantly in this cohort: 22 and 2 years, respectively (P = 0.009). The present study shows the clinical heterogeneity of LFS, highlights particularities of the R337H variant and underscores the need for larger collaborative studies to better define LFS prevalence, clinical spectrum and penetrance of different germline TP53 pathogenic variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camila Matzenbacher Bittar
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular (PPGBM), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
- Laboratório de Medicina Genômica, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Yasminne Marinho de Araújo Rocha
- Laboratório de Medicina Genômica, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Igor Araujo Vieira
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular (PPGBM), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
- Laboratório de Medicina Genômica, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Clévia Rosset
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular (PPGBM), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
- Laboratório de Medicina Genômica, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Tiago Finger Andreis
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular (PPGBM), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
- Laboratório de Medicina Genômica, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | | | - Osvaldo Artigalás
- Hospital Moinhos de Vento (HMV), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Cristina B. O. Netto
- Serviço de Genética Médica, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Barbara Alemar
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular (PPGBM), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
- Laboratório de Medicina Genômica, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Gabriel S. Macedo
- Laboratório de Medicina Genômica, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Patricia Ashton-Prolla
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular (PPGBM), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
- Laboratório de Medicina Genômica, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
- Serviço de Genética Médica, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Abstract
Radical cystectomy is the standard of care for patients with nonmetastatic high-risk bladder cancer. Robotic approach to radical cystectomy has been developed to reduce perioperative morbidities and enhance postoperative recovery while maintaining oncologic control. Classically, radical cystectomy in female patient entails anterior pelvic exenteration with removal of the bladder, uterus, fallopian tubes, ovaries, anterior vaginal wall, and urethra. Pelvic organ-sparing radical cystectomy has been adopted in carefully selected patients to optimize postoperative sexual and urinary function, especially in those undergoing orthotopic urinary diversion. In this article, we describe our techniques of both classical and organ-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy in female patients. We also review patient selection criteria, perioperative management, and alternative approaches to improve operative outcomes in female patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Truong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Victoria Maxon
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alvin C Goh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Kim SJ, Lubinski J, Huzarski T, Møller P, Armel S, Karlan BY, Senter L, Eisen A, Foulkes WD, Singer CF, Tung N, Bordeleau L, Neuhausen SL, Olopade OI, Eng C, Weitzel JN, Fruscio R, Narod SA, Kotsopoulos J. Weight Gain and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:2038-2043. [PMID: 34426412 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weight gain and other anthropometric measures on the risk of ovarian cancer for women with BRCA mutations are not known. We conducted a prospective analysis of weight change since age 18, height, body mass index (BMI) at age 18, and current BMI and the risk of developing ovarian cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. METHODS In this prospective cohort study, height, weight, and weight at age 18 were collected at study enrollment. Weight was updated biennially. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ovarian cancer. RESULTS This study followed 4,340 women prospectively. There were 121 incident cases of ovarian cancer. Weight gain of more than 20 kg since age 18 was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of ovarian cancer, compared with women who maintained a stable weight (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.13-3.54; P = 0.02). Current BMI of 26.5 kg/m2 or greater was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers, compared with those with a BMI less than 20.8 kg/m2 (Q4 vs. Q1 HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.04-4.36; P = 0.04). There were no significant associations between height or BMI at age 18 and risk of ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS Adult weight gain is a risk factor for ovarian cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. IMPACT These findings emphasize the importance of maintaining a healthy body weight throughout adulthood in women at high risk for ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shana J Kim
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Pål Møller
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Susan Armel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, the Ohio State University Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nadine Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Louise Bordeleau
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Division of Biomarkers of Early Detection and Prevention, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | | | - Charis Eng
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Center for Personalized Genetic Healthcare, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
77
|
Gong Y, Nagarathinam R, Arisi MF, Gerratana L, Winn JS, Slifker M, Pei J, Cai KQ, Hasse Z, Obeid E, Noriega J, Sebastiano C, Ross E, Alpaugh K, Cristofanilli M, Fernandez SV. Genetic Variants and Tumor Immune Microenvironment: Clues for Targeted Therapies in Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC). Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22168924. [PMID: 34445631 PMCID: PMC8396191 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22168924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
To better understand the etiology of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and identify potential therapies, we studied genomic alterations in IBC patients. Targeted, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) (n = 33) and paired DNA from tumor tissues (n = 29) from 32 IBC patients. We confirmed complementarity between cfDNA and tumor tissue genetic profiles. We found a high incidence of germline variants in IBC patients that could be associated with an increased risk of developing the disease. Furthermore, 31% of IBC patients showed deficiencies in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, ATM, BARD1) making them sensitive to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. We also characterized the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in tumor tissue biopsies by studying several markers (CD4, CD8, FoxP3, CD20, PD-1, and PD-L1) through immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. In 7 of 24 (29%) patients, tumor biopsies were positive for PD-L1 and PD-1 expression on TILs, making them sensitive to PD-1/PD-L1 blocking therapies. Our results provide a rationale for considering PARP inhibitors and PD-1/PDL1 blocking immunotherapy in qualifying IBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulan Gong
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (J.S.W.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (K.Q.C.); (Z.H.); (E.O.); (J.N.); (E.R.); (K.A.)
- Correspondence: (Y.G.); (R.N.); (S.V.F.); Tel.: +1-215-728-4767 (S.V.F.)
| | - Rajeswari Nagarathinam
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (J.S.W.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (K.Q.C.); (Z.H.); (E.O.); (J.N.); (E.R.); (K.A.)
- Correspondence: (Y.G.); (R.N.); (S.V.F.); Tel.: +1-215-728-4767 (S.V.F.)
| | - Maria F. Arisi
- Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; (M.F.A.); (C.S.)
| | - Lorenzo Gerratana
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; (L.G.); (M.C.)
| | - Jennifer S. Winn
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (J.S.W.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (K.Q.C.); (Z.H.); (E.O.); (J.N.); (E.R.); (K.A.)
| | - Michael Slifker
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (J.S.W.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (K.Q.C.); (Z.H.); (E.O.); (J.N.); (E.R.); (K.A.)
| | - Jianming Pei
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (J.S.W.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (K.Q.C.); (Z.H.); (E.O.); (J.N.); (E.R.); (K.A.)
| | - Kathy Q. Cai
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (J.S.W.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (K.Q.C.); (Z.H.); (E.O.); (J.N.); (E.R.); (K.A.)
| | - Zachary Hasse
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (J.S.W.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (K.Q.C.); (Z.H.); (E.O.); (J.N.); (E.R.); (K.A.)
| | - Elias Obeid
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (J.S.W.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (K.Q.C.); (Z.H.); (E.O.); (J.N.); (E.R.); (K.A.)
| | - Julio Noriega
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (J.S.W.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (K.Q.C.); (Z.H.); (E.O.); (J.N.); (E.R.); (K.A.)
| | - Christopher Sebastiano
- Department of Pathology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; (M.F.A.); (C.S.)
| | - Eric Ross
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (J.S.W.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (K.Q.C.); (Z.H.); (E.O.); (J.N.); (E.R.); (K.A.)
| | - Katherine Alpaugh
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (J.S.W.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (K.Q.C.); (Z.H.); (E.O.); (J.N.); (E.R.); (K.A.)
| | - Massimo Cristofanilli
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA; (L.G.); (M.C.)
| | - Sandra V. Fernandez
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA; (J.S.W.); (M.S.); (J.P.); (K.Q.C.); (Z.H.); (E.O.); (J.N.); (E.R.); (K.A.)
- Correspondence: (Y.G.); (R.N.); (S.V.F.); Tel.: +1-215-728-4767 (S.V.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Huilgol YS, Keane H, Shieh Y, Hiatt RA, Tice JA, Madlensky L, Sabacan L, Fiscalini AS, Ziv E, Acerbi I, Che M, Anton-Culver H, Borowsky AD, Hunt S, Naeim A, Parker BA, van 't Veer LJ, Esserman LJ. Elevated risk thresholds predict endocrine risk-reducing medication use in the Athena screening registry. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:102. [PMID: 34344894 PMCID: PMC8333106 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00306-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Risk-reducing endocrine therapy use, though the benefit is validated, is extremely low. The FDA has approved tamoxifen and raloxifene for a 5-year Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT) risk ≥ 1.67%. We examined the threshold at which high-risk women are likely to be using endocrine risk-reducing therapies among Athena Breast Health Network participants from 2011-2018. We identified high-risk women by a 5-year BCRAT risk ≥ 1.67% and those in the top 10% and 2.5% risk thresholds by age. We estimated the odds ratio (OR) of current medication use based on these thresholds using logistic regression. One thousand two hundred and one (1.2%) of 104,223 total participants used medication. Of the 33,082 participants with 5-year BCRAT risk ≥ 1.67%, 772 (2.3%) used medication. Of 2445 in the top 2.5% threshold, 209 (8.6%) used medication. Participants whose 5-year risk exceeded 1.67% were more likely to use medication than those whose risk was below this threshold, OR 3.94 (95% CI = 3.50-4.43). The top 2.5% was most strongly associated with medication usage, OR 9.50 (8.13-11.09) compared to the bottom 97.5%. Women exceeding a 5-year BCRAT ≥ 1.67% had modest medication use. We demonstrate that women in the top 2.5% have higher odds of medication use than those in the bottom 97.5% and compared to a risk of 1.67%. The top 2.5% threshold would more effectively target medication use and is being tested prospectively in a randomized control clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yash S Huilgol
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Holly Keane
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Yiwey Shieh
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert A Hiatt
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Tice
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Leah Sabacan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Elad Ziv
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Irene Acerbi
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mandy Che
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Arash Naeim
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Laura J Esserman
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
George S, Ragin C, Ashing KT. Black Is Diverse: The Untapped Beauty and Benefit of Cancer Genomics and Precision Medicine. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 17:279-283. [PMID: 33974833 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia George
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA.,African Caribbean Cancer Consortium
| | - Camille Ragin
- African Caribbean Cancer Consortium.,Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
80
|
Kim S, Aceti M, Baroutsou V, Bürki N, Caiata-Zufferey M, Cattaneo M, Chappuis PO, Ciorba FM, Graffeo-Galbiati R, Heinzelmann-Schwarz V, Jeong J, Jung MM, Kim SW, Kim J, Lim MC, Ming C, Monnerat C, Park HS, Park SH, Pedrazzani CA, Rabaglio M, Ryu JM, Saccilotto R, Wieser S, Zürrer-Härdi U, Katapodi MC. Using a Tailored Digital Health Intervention for Family Communication and Cascade Genetic Testing in Swiss and Korean Families With Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Protocol for the DIALOGUE Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e26264. [PMID: 34114954 PMCID: PMC8235289 DOI: 10.2196/26264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), family communication of genetic test results is essential for cascade genetic screening, that is, identifying and testing blood relatives of known mutation carriers to determine whether they also carry the pathogenic variant, and to propose preventive and clinical management options. However, up to 50% of blood relatives are unaware of relevant genetic information, suggesting that potential benefits of genetic testing are not communicated effectively within family networks. Technology can facilitate communication and genetic education within HBOC families. Objective The aims of this study are to develop the K-CASCADE (Korean–Cancer Predisposition Cascade Genetic Testing) cohort in Korea by expanding an infrastructure developed by the CASCADE (Cancer Predisposition Cascade Genetic Testing) Consortium in Switzerland; develop a digital health intervention to support the communication of cancer predisposition for Swiss and Korean HBOC families, based on linguistic and cultural adaptation of the Family Gene Toolkit; evaluate its efficacy on primary (family communication of genetic results and cascade testing) and secondary (psychological distress, genetic literacy, active coping, and decision making) outcomes; and explore its translatability using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework. Methods The digital health intervention will be available in French, German, Italian, Korean, and English and can be accessed via the web, mobile phone, or tablet (ie, device-agnostic). K-CASCADE cohort of Korean HBOC mutation carriers and relatives will be based on the CASCADE infrastructure. Narrative data collected through individual interviews or mini focus groups from 20 to 24 HBOC family members per linguistic region and 6-10 health care providers involved in genetic services will identify the local cultures and context, and inform the content of the tailored messages. The efficacy of the digital health intervention against a comparison website will be assessed in a randomized trial with 104 HBOC mutation carriers (52 in each study arm). The translatability of the digital health intervention will be assessed using survey data collected from HBOC families and health care providers. Results Funding was received in October 2019. It is projected that data collection will be completed by January 2023 and results will be published in fall 2023. Conclusions This study addresses the continuum of translational research, from developing an international research infrastructure and adapting an existing digital health intervention to testing its efficacy in a randomized controlled trial and exploring its translatability using an established framework. Adapting existing interventions, rather than developing new ones, takes advantage of previous valid experiences without duplicating efforts. Culturally sensitive web-based interventions that enhance family communication and understanding of genetic cancer risk are timely. This collaboration creates a research infrastructure between Switzerland and Korea that can be scaled up to cover other hereditary cancer syndromes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04214210; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04214210 and CRiS KCT0005643; https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/ International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/26264
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Kim
- Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Monica Aceti
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Vasiliki Baroutsou
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nicole Bürki
- Women's Clinic and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Maria Caiata-Zufferey
- La Scuola Universitaria Professionale della Svizzera Italiana (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland
| | - Marco Cattaneo
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Pierre O Chappuis
- Unit of Oncogenetics, Division of Oncology, Division of Genetic Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Florina M Ciorba
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Viola Heinzelmann-Schwarz
- Women's Clinic and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Joon Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - MiSook M Jung
- College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Deajeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Won Kim
- Dairim St Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jisun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Division of Tumor Immunology, Center for Gynecologic Cancer Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Ming
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Hyung Seok Park
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Hyung Park
- Department of Computer Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Carla A Pedrazzani
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Manuela Rabaglio
- University Clinic for Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jai Min Ryu
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ramon Saccilotto
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Simon Wieser
- School of Management and Law, Winterthur Institute of Health Economics, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Ursina Zürrer-Härdi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Maria C Katapodi
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
A clinical case of diagnosis of breast cancer in patients with family history of BRCA mutations 1. REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY : JOURNAL OF GREATPOLAND CANCER CENTER IN POZNAN AND POLISH SOCIETY OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2021; 26:463-469. [PMID: 34277102 PMCID: PMC8281913 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background The incidence of breast cancer is growing rapidly worldwide (1.7 million new cases and 600,000 deaths per year). Moreover, about 10% of breast cancer cases occur in young women under the age of 45. The aim of the study was to report a rare case of BRCA 1-mutated breast cancer in a young patient with multiple affected relatives. Breast cancer is due to a genetic predisposition with BRCA1 and BRCA2 representing a significant proportion of families with a very high risk of developing the disease over a lifetime of up to 50–80%. Case presentation In this paper we report a case of a 29-year-old woman with a confirmed diagnosis of left breast carcinoma. Conclusions Mutations of the BRCA1 gene were revealed in the patient, in two of her sisters, brother and brother’s daughter.
Collapse
|
82
|
Modell SM, Allen CG, Ponte A, Marcus G. Cancer genetic testing in marginalized groups during an era of evolving healthcare reform. J Cancer Policy 2021; 28:100275. [PMID: 35559905 PMCID: PMC8224823 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Affordable Care Act and subsequent reforms pose tradeoffs for racial-ethnic, rural, and sex-related groups in the United States experiencing disparities in BRCA1/2 genetic counseling and testing and colorectal cancer screening, calling for policy changes. METHODS A working group of the American Public Health Association Genomics Forum Policy Committee engaged in monthly meetings to examine ongoing literature and identify policy alternatives in the coverage of cancer genetic services for marginalized groups. 589 items were collected; 408 examined. Efforts continued from February 2015 through September 2020. RESULTS African Americans and Latinos have shown 7-8 % drops in uninsured rates since the Exchanges opened. The ACA has increased BRCA1/2 test availability while several disparities remain, including by sex. Rural testing and screening utilization rates have improved. Medicaid expansion and the inclusion of Medicare in the ACA have resulted in mixed improvements in colorectal cancer screening rates in marginalized groups. CONCLUSION Cancer genetic testing and screening to date have only partially benefited from healthcare reforms. Sensitivity to cost concerns and further monitoring of emerging data are needed. A reduction in disparities depends on the availability of private insurance, Medicaid and Medicare to the marginalized. Attention to value-based design and the way cancer benefits are translated into actual testing and screening are crucial. POLICY SUMMARY The findings suggest the need for further benefits-related health agency interpretation of and amendments to the ACA, continued Medicaid and innovative Medicare expansion, and incorporation of cancer services values-based considerations at several levels, aimed at reducing group disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen M Modell
- Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, M5409 SPH II, 1415 Washington Hts., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, United States.
| | - Caitlin G Allen
- Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA, 30322, United States
| | - Amy Ponte
- Genedu Health Solutions, 47 Petigru Dr., Beaufort, SC, 29902, United States
| | - Gail Marcus
- Genetics and Newborn Screening Unit, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, C/O CDSA of the Cape Fear, 3311 Burnt Mill Dr., Wilmington, NC, 28403, United States
| |
Collapse
|
83
|
Heald B, Hampel H, Church J, Dudley B, Hall MJ, Mork ME, Singh A, Stoffel E, Stoll J, You YN, Yurgelun MB, Kupfer SS. Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer Position statement on multigene panel testing for patients with colorectal cancer and/or polyposis. Fam Cancer 2021; 19:223-239. [PMID: 32172433 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00170-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Multigene panel tests for hereditary cancer syndromes are increasingly utilized in the care of colorectal cancer (CRC) and polyposis patients. However, widespread availability of panels raises a number of questions including which patients should undergo testing, which genes should be included on panels, and the settings in which panels should be ordered and interpreted. To address this knowledge gap, key questions regarding the major issues encountered in clinical evaluation of hereditary CRC and polyposis were designed by the Collaborative Group of the Americas on Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer Position Statement Committee and leadership. A literature search was conducted to address these questions. Recommendations were based on the best available evidence and expert opinion. This position statement addresses which genes should be included on a multigene panel for a patient with a suspected hereditary CRC or polyposis syndrome, proposes updated genetic testing criteria, discusses testing approaches for patients with mismatch repair proficient or deficient CRC, and outlines the essential elements for ordering and disclosing multigene panel test results. We acknowledge that critical gaps in access, insurance coverage, resources, and education remain barriers to high-quality, equitable care for individuals and their families at increased risk of hereditary CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandie Heald
- Sanford R Weiss, MD, Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Heather Hampel
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - James Church
- Sanford R Weiss, MD, Center for Hereditary Colorectal Neoplasia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Beth Dudley
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael J Hall
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maureen E Mork
- Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aparajita Singh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elena Stoffel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jessica Stoll
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk and Prevention Clinic, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Y Nancy You
- Department of Clinical Cancer Genetics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew B Yurgelun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sonia S Kupfer
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk and Prevention Clinic, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
84
|
Multigene Panel Testing for Hereditary Cancer and Genetic Counseling. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2021. [PMID: 33983594 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-32-9620-6_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
As sequencing technology and information of the genomic causes for cancer development expand, multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer is increasing in clinical practice. In this chapter, we reviewed the application of multi-gene panel with pre-/post- testing considerations and summarized genetic counseling based on panel testing results in clinical field. In addition, we introduce multi-gene panel for hereditary cancer developed in Seoul National University Hospital.
Collapse
|
85
|
Distribution of Estimated Lifetime Breast Cancer Risk Among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217:48-55. [PMID: 33978450 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.23333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Supplemental screening breast MRI is recommended for women with an estimated lifetime risk of breast cancer of greater than 20-25%. The performance of risk prediction models varies for each individual and across groups of women. The present study investigates the concordance of three breast cancer risk prediction models among women presenting for screening mammography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In this prospective study, we calculated the estimated lifetime risk of breast cancer using the modified Gail, Tyrer-Cuzick version 7, and BRCAPRO models for each woman who presented for screening mammography. Per American Cancer Society guidelines, for each woman the risk was categorized as less than 20% or 20% or greater as well as less than 25% or 25% or greater with use of each model. Venn diagrams were constructed to evaluate concordance across models. The McNemar test was used to test differences in risk group allocations between models, with p ≤ .05 considered to denote statistical significance. RESULTS. Of 3503 screening mammography patients who underwent risk stratification, 3219 (91.9%) were eligible for risk estimation using all three models. Using at least one model, 440 (13.7%) women had a lifetime risk of 20% or greater, including 390 women (12.1%) according to the Tyrer-Cuzick version 7 model, 18 (0.6%) according to the BRCAPRO model, and 141 (4.4%) according to the modified Gail model. Six women (0.2%) had a risk of 20% or greater according to all three models. Women were significantly more likely to be classified as having a high lifetime breast cancer risk by the Tyrer-Cuzick version 7 model compared with the modified Gail model, with thresholds of 20% or greater (odds ratio, 6.4; 95% CI, 4.7-8.7) or 25% or greater (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% CI, 4.7-11.9) used for both models. CONCLUSION. To identify women with a high lifetime breast cancer risk, practices should use estimates of lifetime breast cancer risk derived from multiple risk prediction models.
Collapse
|
86
|
Ahn HS, Ho JY, Yu J, Yeom J, Lee S, Hur SY, Jung Y, Kim K, Choi YJ. Plasma Protein Biomarkers Associated with Higher Ovarian Cancer Risk in BRCA1/2 Carriers. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13102300. [PMID: 34064977 PMCID: PMC8150736 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Most hereditary ovarian cancer is associated with BRCA1/2 variants, and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy during the follow-up monitoring of ovarian cancer development in heathy women with the BRCA1/2 variant reduces ovarian cancer incidence. The aim of this study was to identify plasma protein biomarkers that can indicate an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer using a proteomic approach based on a population of genetic variants. Two identified biomarkers among differentially expressed proteins, SPARC and THBS1, had lower plasma concentrations in healthy BRCA1/2 variant carriers than in ovarian cancer patients with the BRCA1/2 variant; concentration of two proteins increased at the onset of ovarian cancer. These protein markers from non-invasive liquid biopsy sampling could be used to help women with the BRCA1/2 variant determine whether to undergo an oophorectomy that could potentially affect the quality of life. Abstract Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and in-time diagnosis is limited because of the absence of effective biomarkers. Germline BRCA1/2 genetic alterations are risk factors for hereditary OC; risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is pursued for disease prevention. However, not all healthy carriers develop the disease. Therefore, identifying predictive markers in the BRCA1/2 carrier population could help improve the identification of candidates for preventive RRSO. In this study, plasma samples from 20 OC patients (10 patients with BRCA1/2 wild type (wt) and 10 with the BRCA1/2 variant (var)) and 20 normal subjects (10 subjects with BRCA1/2wt and 10 with BRCA1/2var) were analyzed for potential biomarkers of hereditary OC. We applied a bottom-up proteomics approach, using nano-flow LC-MS to analyze depleted plasma proteome quantitatively, and potential plasma protein markers specific to the BRCA1/2 variant were identified from a comparative statistical analysis of the four groups. We obtained 1505 protein candidates from the 40 subjects, and SPARC and THBS1 were verified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Plasma SPARC and THBS1 concentrations in healthy BRCA1/2 carriers were found to be lower than in OC patients with BRCA1/2var. If plasma SPARC concentrations increase over 337.35 ng/mL or plasma THBS1 concentrations increase over 65.28 μg/mL in a healthy BRCA1/2 carrier, oophorectomy may be suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee-Sung Ahn
- Asan Medical Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Seoul 05505, Korea; (H.-S.A.); (J.Y.)
| | - Jung Yoon Ho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea; (J.Y.H.); (S.L.); (S.Y.H.); (Y.J.)
- Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
| | - Jiyoung Yu
- Asan Medical Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Seoul 05505, Korea; (H.-S.A.); (J.Y.)
| | - Jeonghun Yeom
- Convergence Medicine Research Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul 05505, Korea;
| | - Sanha Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea; (J.Y.H.); (S.L.); (S.Y.H.); (Y.J.)
| | - Soo Young Hur
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea; (J.Y.H.); (S.L.); (S.Y.H.); (Y.J.)
- Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
| | - Yuyeon Jung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea; (J.Y.H.); (S.L.); (S.Y.H.); (Y.J.)
- Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
| | - Kyunggon Kim
- Asan Medical Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Seoul 05505, Korea; (H.-S.A.); (J.Y.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Convergence Medicine Research Center, Asan Medical Center, Clinical Proteomics Core Laboratory, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Asan Medical Center, Bio-Medical Institute of Technology, Seoul 05505, Korea
- Correspondence: (K.K.); (Y.J.C.); Tel.: +82-2-1688-7575 (K.K.); +82-2-2258-2810 (Y.J.C.)
| | - Youn Jin Choi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea; (J.Y.H.); (S.L.); (S.Y.H.); (Y.J.)
- Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
- Correspondence: (K.K.); (Y.J.C.); Tel.: +82-2-1688-7575 (K.K.); +82-2-2258-2810 (Y.J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Crook A, Kwa R, Ephraums S, Wilding M, Thiyagarajan L, Fleming J, Moore K, Berman Y. The psychological impact and experience of breast cancer screening in young women with an increased risk of breast cancer due to neurofibromatosis type 1. Fam Cancer 2021; 21:241-253. [PMID: 33963463 PMCID: PMC8105152 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00259-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Women with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have an increased risk of developing early breast cancer with a poorer prognosis compared to the general population. Therefore, international management guidelines recommend regular screening in women with NF1 starting from 30 to 35 years. As the psychological impacts of breast cancer screening in other high-risk populations cannot be extended to women with NF1, due to increased incidence of cognitive and mental health issues, the psychological harms of breast screening in women with NF1 are unknown. Consequently, the aim of this study was to assess the psychological impact of breast cancer screening in women with NF1 attending an established risk management clinic. Twenty-eight women with NF1 (30–50 years) completed psychological well-being and patient experience questionnaires, administered across five time points, before and after their initial and second round annual breast screening visits. Preliminary findings demonstrated the screening regimen was well-tolerated, with most participants reporting high satisfaction with the screening process. Overall, no significant increase in psychological distress related to the breast screening process was identified, with mean cancer worry and anxiety scores decreasing over time. However, some women did experience negative aspects of screening and barriers to re-attendance at annual breast screening appointments. As some women with NF1 exhibited clinical levels of psychological distress prior to screening, efforts to identify those at risk and additional support to address concerns and expectations throughout the breast screening process may be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Crook
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- NSLHD Familial Cancer Service, Department of Cancer Services, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Rebekah Kwa
- Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah Ephraums
- Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mathilda Wilding
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- NSLHD Familial Cancer Service, Department of Cancer Services, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lavvina Thiyagarajan
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane Fleming
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Katrina Moore
- Department of Breast Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yemima Berman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Hickey M, Moss KM, Mishra GD, Krejany EO, Domchek SM, Wark JD, Trainer A, Wild RA. What Happens After Menopause? (WHAM): A prospective controlled study of cardiovascular and metabolic risk 12 months after premenopausal risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:88-96. [PMID: 33972087 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To prospectively measure cardiometabolic risk 12 months after premenopausal risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRBSO) compared to a similar age comparison group, and the effects of Hormone Therapy (HT) on cardiometabolic risk. METHODS Prospective observational study of 95 premenopausal women planning RRBSO and 99 comparisons who retained their ovaries. At baseline and 12 months, blood pressure (BP), Body Mass Index (BMI), waist and hip circumference, fasting total, HDL and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, glucose and insulin were measured and HOMA-IR was calculated. Chi-square tests, t-tests and adjusted logistic regression models were used to compare groups. RESULTS Baseline cardiometabolic phenotypes were similar between groups but more RRBSO participants were overweight/obese with higher waist/hip ratios. By 12 months, BP and cardiometabolic phenotypes were largely unchanged. Paired t-tests showed statistically significant increases in BMI (p = 0.037) and weight (p = 0.042) and larger increases in waist circumference (p < 0.001) and waist-hip ratio (p = 0.009) after RRBSO vs comparisons. However, these were not significant when adjusted for baseline values. After RRBSO 60% initiated Hormone Therapy (HT). Paired t-tests demonstrated that non-HT users had a significantly greater mean increase in waist circumference of 4.3 cm (95% CI 2.0-6.5) compared to 1.3 cm in HT users (95% CI -0.2-2.7, p < 0.001), which remained significant when adjusted for baseline values (p = 0.02). At 12 months, mean waist circumference was 2.94 cm greater in non-HT users compared to HT users. CONCLUSIONS Cardiometabolic risk markers are largely unchanged 12 months after RRBSO. Hormone Therapy after RRBSO may prevent against an increase in waist circumference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Hickey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Royal Women's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Katrina M Moss
- Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gita D Mishra
- Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Research, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Efrosinia O Krejany
- Gynaecology Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - John D Wark
- Bone and Mineral Medicine, Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Trainer
- Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robert A Wild
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Abramov IS, Korneva YS, Shisterova OA, Ikonnikova AY, Emelyanova MA, Lisitsa TS, Krasnov GS, Nasedkina TV. Germline and Somatic Mutations in Archived Breast Cancer Specimens of Different Subtypes. Mol Biol 2021; 55:354-362. [DOI: 10.1134/s0026893321020163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
|
90
|
Baran JA, Tsai SD, Isaza A, Brodeur GM, MacFarland SP, Zelley K, Adams DM, Franco AT, Bauer AJ. The Clinical Spectrum of PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome: Exploring the Value of Thyroid Surveillance. Horm Res Paediatr 2021; 93:634-642. [PMID: 33887726 PMCID: PMC8159851 DOI: 10.1159/000515731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS) comprises a collection of clinical features characterized by constitutional variants in PTEN. Several guidelines recommend thyroid screening, beginning at the pediatric age at the time of PHTS diagnosis; however, the benefits of early surveillance has not been well defined. METHODS We conducted a retrospective investigation of patients followed up at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia with a diagnosis of PHTS between January 2003 and June 2019. In total, 81 patients younger than 19 years were identified. RESULTS The most common clinical feature at presentation was macrocephaly (85.1%), followed by impaired development (42.0%), skin/oral lesions (30.9%), and autism spectrum disorder (27.2%). A total of 58 of 81 patients underwent thyroid surveillance, with 30 patients (51.7%) found to have a nodule(s). Ultimately, 16 patients underwent thyroidectomy, with 7.4% (6/81) diagnosed with thyroid cancer. All thyroid cancer patients were older than 10 years at diagnosis, and all displayed low-invasive behavior. Of the patients younger than 10 years at the time of thyroid ultrasound (US) surveillance, 71.4% (15/21) had a normal US. The remaining 6 patients had thyroid nodules, including 4 undergoing thyroid surgery with benign histology. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION Patients with macrocephaly, impaired cognitive development and thyroid nodules, and/or early-onset gastrointestinal polyps should undergo constitutional testing for PHTS. There does not appear to be a clinical advantage to initiating thyroid US surveillance before 10 years of age. In PHTS patients with a normal physical examination, thyroid US surveillance can be delayed until 10 years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia A Baran
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Thyroid Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Steven D Tsai
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amber Isaza
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Thyroid Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Garrett M Brodeur
- Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Cancer Predisposition Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Suzanne P MacFarland
- Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Cancer Predisposition Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kristin Zelley
- Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Cancer Predisposition Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Denise M Adams
- Comprehensive Vascular Anomalies Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Aime T Franco
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Thyroid Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andrew J Bauer
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Thyroid Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Cancer Predisposition Program, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Targeted gene panels identify a high frequency of pathogenic germline variants in patients diagnosed with a hematological malignancy and at least one other independent cancer. Leukemia 2021; 35:3245-3256. [PMID: 33850299 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01246-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The majority of studies assessing the contribution of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) to cancer predisposition have focused on patients with single cancers. We analyzed 45 known cancer predisposition genes (CPGs) in germline samples of 202 patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) plus one or more other independent cancer managed at major tertiary medical centers on two different continents. This included 120 patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MNs), where the HM occurred after cytotoxic treatment for a first malignancy, and 82 patients with multiple cancers in which the HM was not preceded by cytotoxic therapy (MC-HM). Using American College of Medical Genetics/Association for Molecular Pathology variant classification guidelines, 13% of patients had PGVs, most frequently identified in CHEK2 (17% of PGVs), BRCA1 (13%), DDX41 (13%), and TP53 (7%). The frequency of PGVs in MC-HM was higher than in t-MN, although not statistically significant (18 vs. 9%; p = 0.085). The frequency of PGVs in lymphoid and myeloid HM patients was similar (19 vs. 17.5%; p > 0.9). Critically, patients with PGVs in BRCA1, BRCA2 or TP53 did not satisfy current clinical phenotypic criteria for germline testing. Our data suggest that a personal history of multiple cancers, one being a HM, should trigger screening for PGVs.
Collapse
|
92
|
Meiser B, Kaur R, Morrow A, Peate M, Wong WKT, McPike E, Cops E, Nichols C, Austin R, Fine M, Thrupp L, Ward R, Macrae F, Hiller JE, Trainer AH, Mitchell G. Impact of national guidelines on use of BRCA1/2 germline testing, risk management advice given to women with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants and uptake of advice. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2021; 19:24. [PMID: 33836815 PMCID: PMC8035714 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-021-00180-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This nationwide study assessed the impact of nationally agreed cancer genetics guidelines on use of BRCA1/2 germline testing, risk management advice given by health professionals to women with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants and uptake of such advice by patients. Methods Clinic files of 883 women who had initial proband screens for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants at 12 familial cancer clinics between July 2008–July 2009 (i.e. before guideline release), July 2010–July 2011 and July 2012–July 2013 (both after guideline release) were audited to determine reason given for genetic testing. Separately, the clinic files of 599 female carriers without a personal history of breast/ovarian cancer who underwent BRCA1/2 predictive genetic testing and received their results pre- and post-guideline were audited to ascertain the risk management advice given by health professionals. Carriers included in this audit were invited to participate in a telephone interview to assess uptake of advice, and 329 agreed to participate. Results There were no significant changes in the percentages of tested patients meeting at least one published indication for genetic testing - 79, 77 and 78% of files met criteria before guideline, and two-, and four-years post-guideline, respectively (χ = 0.25, p = 0.88). Rates of documentation of post-test risk management advice as per guidelines increased significantly from pre- to post-guideline for 6/9 risk management strategies. The strategies with the highest compliance amongst carriers or awareness post-release of guidelines were annual magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography in women 30–50 years (97%) and annual mammography in women > 50 years (92%). Of women aged over 40 years, 41% had a risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy. Amongst women aged > 40 years, 75% had a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Amongst women who had not had a risk-reducing bilateral mastectomy, only 6% took risk-reducing medication. Fear of side-effects was cited as the main reasons for not taking these medicines by 73% of women. Conclusions Guidelines did not change the percentages of tested patients meeting genetic testing criteria but improved documentation of risk management advice by health professionals. Effective approaches to enhance compliance with guidelines are needed to improve risk management and quality of care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13053-021-00180-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| | - Rajneesh Kaur
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - April Morrow
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Oncology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - W K Tim Wong
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.,School of Social Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emily McPike
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Elisa Cops
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cassandra Nichols
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Rachel Austin
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Miriam Fine
- Adult Genetics Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide and School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Letitia Thrupp
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robyn Ward
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Finlay Macrae
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Janet E Hiller
- Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.,School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Alison H Trainer
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gillian Mitchell
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
93
|
Conley CC, Castro-Figueroa EM, Moreno L, Dutil J, García JD, Burgos C, Ricker C, Kim J, Graves KD, Ashing KT, Quinn GP, Soliman H, Vadaparampil ST. A pilot randomized trial of an educational intervention to increase genetic counseling and genetic testing among Latina breast cancer survivors. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:394-405. [PMID: 32936981 PMCID: PMC7960565 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Latinas are less likely to participate in genetic counseling (GC) and genetic testing (GT) than non-Hispanic Whites. A multisite, randomized pilot study tested a culturally targeted educational intervention to increase uptake of GC/GT among Latina breast cancer (BC) survivors (N = 52). Participants were recruited in Tampa, FL and Ponce, PR and randomized to: (a) fact sheet about BC survivorship (control) or (b) a culturally targeted educational booklet about GC/GT (intervention). Participants in the intervention condition were also offered no-cost telephone GC followed by free GT with mail-based saliva sample collection. Participants self-reported hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) knowledge and emotional distress at baseline and 1- and 3-month follow-ups. We used logistic regression to examine differences in GC/GT uptake by study arm (primary outcome) and repeated measures ANOVA to examine the effects of study arm and time on HBOC knowledge and emotional distress (secondary outcomes). Compared to the control arm, intervention participants were more likely to complete GC (ORIntervention = 13.92, 95% CI = 3.06-63.25, p < .01) and GT (ORIntervention = 12.93, 95% CI = 2.82-59.20, p < .01). Study site did not predict uptake of GC (p = .08) but Ponce participants were more likely to complete GT (ORPonce = 4.53, 95% CI = 1.04-19.72, p = .04). ANOVAs demonstrated an increase in HBOC knowledge over time across both groups (F(2,88) = 12.24, p < .01, ηp2 = 0.22). We also found a significant interaction of study arm and time, such that intervention participants demonstrated a greater and sustained (to the 3-month follow-up) increase in knowledge than control participants (F(2,88) = 3.66, p = .03, ηp2 = 0.08). No other main or interaction effects were significant (all p's> .15). Study findings demonstrate the potential of our culturally targeted print intervention. Lessons learned from this multisite pilot study for enhancing GC/GT in Latinas include the need to attend to both access to GC/GT and individual factors such as attitudes and knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire C. Conley
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- Georgetown Lombardi Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Charité Ricker
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
94
|
Decision-making for Risk-reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in Southeast Asian BRCA Mutation Carriers With Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study. Int J Behav Med 2021; 29:1-13. [PMID: 33791992 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-021-09984-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in Asian countries is variable despite being the most effective option for ovarian cancer risk reduction in BRCA mutation carriers. Exploration of factors which may impact the RRSO decision-making of BRCA mutation carriers from Malaysia, a developing country in Southeast Asia, was undertaken. METHODS In-depth interviews with 28 Malaysian BRCA mutation carriers with a history of breast cancer were conducted in addition to observing their RRSO decision-making consultations in the clinic. RESULTS The decision-making considerations among the carriers were centered around the overarching theme of "Negotiating cancer risk and womanhood priorities," with the following themes: (1) risk perception, (2) self-preservation, (3) motherhood obligation, and (4) the preciousness of marriage. Cognitive knowledge of BRCA risk was often conceptualized based on personal and family history of cancer, personal beliefs, and faith. Many women reported fears that RRSO would affect them physically and emotionally, worrying about the post-surgical impact on their motherhood responsibilities. Nevertheless, some reported feeling obliged to choose RRSO for the sake of their children. For some, their husband's support and approval were critical, with emotional well-being and sexuality reportedly perceived as important to sustaining married life. Despite reporting hesitancy toward RRSO, women's decisions about choosing this option evolved as their priorities changed at different stages of life. CONCLUSIONS Recognizing during clinic encounters with Malaysian women that RRSO decision-making involves negotiating the likelihood of developing cancer with the societal priorities of being a woman, mother, and wife may serve to support their decision-making.
Collapse
|
95
|
Abou Alaiwi S, Nassar AH, Adib E, Groha SM, Akl EW, McGregor BA, Esplin ED, Yang S, Hatchell K, Fusaro V, Nielsen S, Kwiatkowski DJ, Sonpavde GP, Pomerantz M, Garber JE, Freedman ML, Rana HQ, Gusev A, Choueiri TK. Trans-ethnic variation in germline variants of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cell Rep 2021; 34:108926. [PMID: 33789101 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Prior studies of the renal cell carcinoma (RCC) germline landscape investigated predominantly patients of European ancestry. We examine the frequency of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in 1,829 patients with RCC from various ancestries. Overall, P/LP variants are found in 17% of patients, among whom 10.3% harbor one or more clinically actionable variants with potential preventive or therapeutic utility. Patients of African ancestry with RCC harbor significantly more P/LP variants in FH compared to patients of non-African ancestry with RCC and African controls from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Patients of non-African ancestry have significantly more P/LP variants in CHEK2 compared to patients of African ancestry with RCC and non-Finnish Europeans controls. Non-Africans with RCC have more actionable variants compared to Africans with RCC. This work helps understand the underlying biological differences in RCC between Africans and non-Africans and paves the way to more comprehensive genomic characterization of underrepresented populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Abou Alaiwi
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amin H Nassar
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elio Adib
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stefan M Groha
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elie W Akl
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bradley A McGregor
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Shan Yang
- Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - David J Kwiatkowski
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Guru P Sonpavde
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark Pomerantz
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Judy E Garber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Population Sciences, Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew L Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Huma Q Rana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Population Sciences, Division of Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander Gusev
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Landry JP, Schertz KL, Chiang YJ, Bhalla AD, Yi M, Keung EZ, Scally CP, Feig BW, Hunt KK, Roland CL, Guadagnolo A, Bishop AJ, Lazar AJ, Slopis JM, McCutcheon IE, Torres KE. Comparison of Cancer Prevalence in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1 at an Academic Cancer Center vs in the General Population From 1985 to 2020. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e210945. [PMID: 33734413 PMCID: PMC7974640 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a complex genetic disorder that is associated with not only neurofibromas, but also an increased susceptibility to other neoplasms. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prevalence of neoplasia and outcomes among patients with NF1. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study was conducted among patients with NF1 at a single academic cancer center from 1985 to 2020 with median (range) follow-up of 2.9 years (36 days to 30.5 years). Of 2427 patients evaluated for NF1, 1607 patients who met the National Institutes of Health consensus criteria for NF1 were included. This group was compared with estimates from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Cancer Statistics Review 1975 to 2015 and SEER participants database unless otherwise specified. Data were analyzed from August 2018 to March 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Disease-specific survival (DSS) was measured from diagnosis date to date of neoplasm-specific death or censorship and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Deaths from disease were considered a DSS end point; other deaths were considered censored observations. Secondary outcome measures were comparisons of (1) overall survival of patients with NF1 with neurofibroma neoplasms vs those without nonneurofibroma neoplasms, (2) neoplasm prevalence in the NF1 group vs general population estimates, and (3) age at diagnosis in the NF1 group vs general population estimates for the most common neoplasms in the NF1 group. RESULTS Among 1607 patients with NF1, the median (range) age at initial visit was 19 years (1 month to 83 years) and 840 (52.3%) were female patients. Among 666 patients who developed other neoplasms in addition to neurofibromas (41.4%), 295 patients (18.4%) developed glioma and 243 patients (15.1%) developed malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), the most common neoplasms. Patients with NF1, compared with the general population, developed several neoplasms at a younger mean (SD) age (low-grade glioma: 12.98 [11.09] years vs 37.76 [24.53] years; P < .0001; high-grade glioma [HGG]: 27.31 [15.59] years vs 58.42 [19.09] years; P < .0001; MPNST: 33.88 [14.80] years vs 47.06 [20.76] years; P < .0001; breast cancer: 46.61 [9.94] years vs 61.71 [13.85] years; P < .0001). Patients with NF1 developed neoplasms more frequently compared with the general population (odds ratio, 9.5; 95% CI, 8.5-10.5; P < .0001). Among patients with NF1, significantly lower 5-year DSS rates were found among those with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (1 of 5 patients [20.0%]), HGG (8 of 34 patients [23.1%]), MPNST (72 of 228 patients [31.6%]), ovarian carcinoma (4 of 7 patients [57.1%]), and melanoma (8 of 12 patients [66.7%]) compared with those who had neoplasms classified as other (110 of 119 patients [92.4%]) (all P < .001) . CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study found that among patients with NF1, those who developed undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, HGG, MPNST, ovarian carcinoma, or melanoma had significantly lower DSS rates compared with those who developed other neoplasms. This study also found that patients with NF1 developed some neoplasms more frequently and at a younger age compared with individuals without NF1. HGGs and MPNST were noteworthy causes of death among patients NF1. This information may be useful for NF1 patient counseling and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jace P. Landry
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Kelsey L. Schertz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Angela D. Bhalla
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Min Yi
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Emily Z. Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Christopher P. Scally
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Barry W. Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Kelly K. Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Christina L. Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Andrew J. Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Alexander J. Lazar
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - John M. Slopis
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ian E. McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Keila E. Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Shin W, Jeong G, Son Y, Seo SS, Kang S, Park SY, Lim MC. The Knowledge and Attitude of Patients Diagnosed with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer towards Genetic Testing. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18052312. [PMID: 33652933 PMCID: PMC7956717 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This study assessed the knowledge and attitude of patients with ovarian cancer (OC) toward OC and next generation sequencing (NGS). The data, including characteristics of patients, their knowledge about OC and their knowledge and attitude of NGS, were collected from June to October 2018. Of the 103 participants, 70.9% (n = 73) had cancer within the second-degree relatives, and 18.4% (n = 19) had BRCA pathogenic mutations. The percentage of right answer for the knowledge about OC and NGS was 64.7% (11/17) and 50% (6/12), respectively. The median number of patients who had positive expectations for the genetic test was 34 (range, 22-44). Based on a first-degree familial history, patients had a different degree of knowledge about OC (11 vs. 8.5, p = 0.026) and NGS (6.5 vs. 5, p = 0.011), but patients with a BRCA pathogenic mutation did not have a different degree of knowledge about OC and NGS panel testing. High-income families had a more positive attitude towards the genetic test than low-income families (p = 0.005). Women with OC do not have enough knowledge about OC (11/17, 64.7%) and NGS (6/12, 50%) but they showed a positive attitude toward the NGS test. These women need OC and NGS educational intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wonkyo Shin
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Goyang 10408, Korea; (W.S.); (G.J.); (S.-S.S.); (S.K.); (S.-Y.P.)
| | - Gowoon Jeong
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Goyang 10408, Korea; (W.S.); (G.J.); (S.-S.S.); (S.K.); (S.-Y.P.)
| | - Yedong Son
- College of Nursing, Woosuk University, Wanju 55338, Korea;
| | - Sang-Soo Seo
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Goyang 10408, Korea; (W.S.); (G.J.); (S.-S.S.); (S.K.); (S.-Y.P.)
| | - Sokbom Kang
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Goyang 10408, Korea; (W.S.); (G.J.); (S.-S.S.); (S.K.); (S.-Y.P.)
- Division of Precision Medicine, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Goyang 10408, Korea
- Department of Cancer Control & Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
| | - Sang-Yoon Park
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Goyang 10408, Korea; (W.S.); (G.J.); (S.-S.S.); (S.K.); (S.-Y.P.)
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Goyang 10408, Korea; (W.S.); (G.J.); (S.-S.S.); (S.K.); (S.-Y.P.)
- Department of Cancer Control & Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
- Center for Clinical Trials, Hospital, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Goyang 10408, Korea
- Division of Tumor Immunology, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Goyang 10408, Korea
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-31-920-1763
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Local Laboratory Testing of Germline BRCA Mutations vs. Myriad: A Single-Institution Experience in Korea. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11020370. [PMID: 33671539 PMCID: PMC7926822 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic diagnosis for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients with the germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation has been emphasized since the development of polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors. Myriad Genetics, Inc.’s (Salt Lake City, UT, USA) companion diagnostics service is almost exclusively used for genetic testing. The aim of this study was to compare the results of germline BRCA mutation tests returned by a local laboratory and those performed by Myriad. Between April 2014 and February 2018, 31 patients with gBRCA 1/2 mutation test results from both Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) and Myriad were enrolled. “Discordant: Opposite classification” was observed for only one among 27 (3.7%). This discrepancy was due to the detection of a deleterious large genomic rearrangement of BRCA 1 by Myriad. Samsung Medical Center performed multiple ligation-dependent probe amplifications (MLPA) to detect large genomic rearrangements only in high-risk patients. This one case was not suspected as high risk and MLPA was not performed. The concordant rate was 74.1% for all 27 patients. “Discordant: Laboratory’s uncertain classification” was found in 22.2% of the sample (six patients). All discrepancies were generated during interpretation of BRCA 2 gene sequencing. Further studies and standardization of genetic testing for BRCA 1/2 genes are required.
Collapse
|
99
|
Ahern TP, Sprague BL, Farina NH, Tsai E, Cuke M, Kontos D, Wood ME. Lifestyle, Behavioral, and Dietary Risk Factors in Relation to Mammographic Breast Density in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:936-944. [PMID: 33619019 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women at high risk for breast cancer due to genetics or risk factor profiles are counseled to adopt lifestyle, behavioral, and dietary changes to help reduce their risk. These recommendations are based on studies of women at average risk, so their effectiveness in high-risk women is unclear. METHODS We evaluated the impact of physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and intake of folate and carotenoids on mammographic breast density-a proxy for breast cancer risk-among 387 high-risk women. Exposures were self-reported on questionnaires. Breast dense area, nondense area, and percent dense area were measured from screening mammograms with Library for Breast Radiodensity Assessment software. Cross-sectional associations were estimated with multivariable quantile regression models. RESULTS After adjusting for age, adiposity, reproductive history, and use of postmenopausal hormones, no breast density measure was associated with physical activity level, smoking status, alcohol consumption, or estimated intake of folate, alpha-carotene, beta-carotene, lutein/zeaxanthin, and beta-cryptoxanthin. Lycopene intake was associated with lower dense area when comparing the highest and lowest intake categories (adjusted difference in median = -14 cm2, 95% confidence interval: -29 to 1.3 cm2). This association may be explained by incomplete adjustment for adiposity. CONCLUSIONS Recommended lifestyle, behavioral, and dietary changes to mitigate personal risk of breast cancer do not substantially impact mammographic breast density measures. IMPACT Alternative strategies, such as increased uptake of chemoprevention, may better serve risk reduction efforts in women at high risk for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P Ahern
- Department of Surgery, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont. .,Department of Biochemistry, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Brian L Sprague
- Department of Surgery, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.,Department of Biochemistry, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.,Department of Radiology, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Nicholas H Farina
- Department of Biochemistry, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Erin Tsai
- Department of Radiology, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Melissa Cuke
- Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Despina Kontos
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Marie E Wood
- Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Sa'at H, Lee YK, Yoon SY, Wong SW, Woo YL, Barlow-Stewart K, Mohd Taib NA. The needs of Southeast Asian BRCA mutation carriers considering risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a qualitative study. Fam Cancer 2021; 21:21-33. [PMID: 33604745 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00232-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The decision to have risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) by BRCA mutation carriers to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer is difficult. The choice involves trade-offs in terms of its risks and benefits. To date, understanding the decision-making needs of RRSO among Southeast Asian BRCA mutation carriers is limited. This study aimed to explore the decision-making needs of Malaysian BRCA mutation carriers as an exemplar for the Southeast Asian community. In-depth interviews and clinic observations were conducted with 31 BRCA mutation carriers and analysed thematically. The core theme identified was 'Coping with complex information and alleviating uncertainties' with the following subthemes: (1) the need for an adjustment period, (2) information support, (3) social support and, (4) religious support. We found that women required time to accept their BRCA mutation status before they were ready to make a risk-reducing choice; that understanding complex genetic information and multiple risk management options can be an overwhelming experience; and obtaining further information and a second opinion were challenging. Many described the need for experiential information from other peer-carriers who had undergone RRSO. Support from their spouse and family members was thought to be essential for them to feel reassured with their decision. Many relied on religion to positively cope with cancer risk and cancer worry; Muslim BRCA carriers sought religious guidance through prayers and Islamic fatwas to feel more certain about their RRSO decision. These findings underscore the importance of the provision of resources and support that includes input from peers, husband, family members and religion to underpin the decision-making needs of Malaysian BRCA mutation carriers considering RRSO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamizah Sa'at
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Yew-Kong Lee
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Sook-Yee Yoon
- Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Siu Wan Wong
- Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Yin Ling Woo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Kristine Barlow-Stewart
- Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nur Aishah Mohd Taib
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
- University of Malaya Cancer Institute, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|