101
|
Faron M, Blanchard P, Ribassin-Majed L, Pignon JP, Michiels S, Le Teuff G. A frequentist one-step model for a simple network meta-analysis of time-to-event data in presence of an effect modifier. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0259121. [PMID: 34723994 PMCID: PMC8559936 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Individual patient data (IPD) present particular advantages in network meta-analysis (NMA) because interactions may lead an aggregated data (AD)-based model to wrong a treatment effect (TE) estimation. However, fewer works have been conducted for IPD with time-to-event contrary to binary outcomes. We aimed to develop a general frequentist one-step model for evaluating TE in the presence of interaction in a three-node NMA for time-to-event data. METHODS One-step, frequentist, IPD-based Cox and Poisson generalized linear mixed models were proposed. We simulated a three-node network with or without a closed loop with (1) no interaction, (2) covariate-treatment interaction, and (3) covariate distribution heterogeneity and covariate-treatment interaction. These models were applied to the NMA (Meta-analyses of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer [MACH-NC] and Radiotherapy in Carcinomas of Head and Neck [MARCH]), which compared the addition of chemotherapy or modified radiotherapy (mRT) to loco-regional treatment with two direct comparisons. AD-based (contrast and meta-regression) models were used as reference. RESULTS In the simulated study, no IPD models failed to converge. IPD-based models performed well in all scenarios and configurations with small bias. There were few variations across different scenarios. In contrast, AD-based models performed well when there were no interactions, but demonstrated some bias when interaction existed and a larger one when the modifier was not distributed evenly. While meta-regression performed better than contrast-based only, it demonstrated a large variability in estimated TE. In the real data example, Cox and Poisson IPD-based models gave similar estimations of the model parameters. Interaction decomposition permitted by IPD explained the ecological bias observed in the meta-regression. CONCLUSION The proposed general one-step frequentist Cox and Poisson models had small bias in the evaluation of a three-node network with interactions. They performed as well or better than AD-based models and should also be undertaken whenever possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Faron
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
- Service de chirurgie viscérale oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
- Service de radiothérapie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Laureen Ribassin-Majed
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
- Service de Biostatistique et d’Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Pignon
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
- Service de Biostatistique et d’Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
- Service de Biostatistique et d’Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Gwénaël Le Teuff
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
- Service de Biostatistique et d’Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Li S, An W, Wang B, Li J, Qu Y, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Wang S, Qin L. Inorganic nitrate alleviates irradiation-induced salivary gland damage by inhibiting pyroptosis. Free Radic Biol Med 2021; 175:130-140. [PMID: 34454049 DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.08.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Over 80% of patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) suffer reduced saliva secretion and dry mouth symptoms due to salivary gland damage. Although therapeutic interventions to alleviate such RT-induced damage are available, long-term hypofunction remains a significant issue. Therefore, novel therapeutic solutions to prevent irradiation (IR)-induced salivary gland damage are required. This study explored the protective effect of inorganic nitrate in preventing IR-induced salivary gland injury via pyroptosis suppression, both in vivo and in vitro. In the treatment group, C57BL/6 mice were pretreated with 2 mmol/L NaNO3 supplied in drinking water one week before a single-dose of 15 Gy IR in the submandibular gland (SMG) region. Human vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and mice SMG cells were treated with 10 μmol/L or 100 μmol/L NaNO3 2 h before a single-dose of 8 Gy IR. In vivo, IR-induced decreased saliva flow rate and body weight loss could be alleviated by nitrate supplementation. Nitrate prevented acinar and microvascular endothelial cell loss. Moreover, nitrate improved mitochondrial function and significantly decreased pyroptosis-related indexes. In vitro, nitrate supplementation reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation by preserving mitochondrial homeostasis to inhibit NLPR3 inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis both in HUVECs and SMG cells. Nitrate showed potential as an oral protective agent to prevent IR-induced salivary gland damage; prospective insight into the underlying molecular mechanisms is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaoqing Li
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial & Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China; Beijing Laboratory of Oral Helath, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; Department of Stomatology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100091, China
| | - Wei An
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial & Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China; Beijing Laboratory of Oral Helath, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030012, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial & Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial & Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Yi Qu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial & Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Haoyang Zhang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial & Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Yingrui Zhang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial & Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Songlin Wang
- Beijing Laboratory of Oral Helath, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Capital Medical University School of Basic Medicine, Beijing 100069, China.
| | - Lizheng Qin
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial & Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China; Beijing Laboratory of Oral Helath, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China.
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Prospective Evaluation of Migration and Anatomical Changes of the Major Salivary Glands. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13215404. [PMID: 34771567 PMCID: PMC8582485 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to quantify anatomical changes of parotids and submandibular glands and evaluate potential dosimetric advantages during weekly adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) for the definitive treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC). The data and plans of 12 patients treated with bilateral intensity-modulated radiotherapy for HNC using MR-linac, with weekly offline adaptations, were prospectively evaluated. The positional and volumetric changes of the salivary glands were analyzed by manual segmentation in weekly MRI images and the dosimetric impact of these anatomical changes on the adapted treatment plans was assessed. The mean volume change in parotid and submandibular gland volume was -31.9% (p < 0.0001) and -29.7% (p < 0.0001) after five weeks, respectively. The volume change was significantly correlated with the cumulative dose for the respective gland at the time of volume measurement. Inter-parotid distance changed by -5.4% (6.5 mm) on average after five weeks (p = 0.0005). The distance became significantly smaller only in the left-right direction. The inter-submandibular gland distance changed by 0.7 mm (p = 0.38). This study demonstrated significant changes in salivary gland volumes and position following daily MR guidance and weekly plan adaptation. Ongoing clinical trials will provide data on the clinical impact of these changes and novel MR-based adaptation strategies.
Collapse
|
104
|
Chen L, Riaz N, Lee N, McBride S. Current considerations for radiotherapy in HPV-associated head and neck cancer. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124:945-951. [PMID: 34617275 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV)-mediated oncogenesis confers increased sensitivity to radiotherapy and HPV head and neck cancer is associated with improved patient outcomes. As such, management of HPV-related head and neck cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach that balances maximizing locoregional control with minimizing treatment-related toxicity. We highlight considerations in radiation dose and target delineation, as well as considerations for chemoradiation, postoperative radiotherapy, and single modality, definitive radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nancy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sean McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Saddawi-Konefka R, Simon AB, Sumner W, Sharabi A, Mell LK, Cohen EEW. Defining the Role of Immunotherapy in the Curative Treatment of Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Promises, Challenges, and Opportunities. Front Oncol 2021; 11:738626. [PMID: 34621678 PMCID: PMC8490924 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.738626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advancements in the development of immunotherapies have raised the hope for patients with locally-advanced HNSCC (LA-HNSCC) to achieve improved oncologic outcomes without the heavy burden of treatment-related morbidity. While there are several ongoing late phase clinical trials that seek to determine whether immunotherapy can be effectively employed in the definitive setting, initial results from concurrent immuno-radiotherapy therapy trials have not shown strong evidence of benefit. Encouragingly, evidence from preclinical studies and early-phase neoadjuvant studies have begun to show potential pathways forward, with therapeutic combinations and sequences that intentionally spare tumor draining lymphatics in order to maximize the synergy between definitive local therapy and immunotherapy. The intent of this review is to summarize the scientific rationale and current clinical evidence for employing immunotherapy for LA-HNSCC as well as the ongoing efforts and challenges to determine how to optimally deliver and sequence immunotherapy alongside traditional therapeutics. In both the preclinical and clinical settings, we will discuss the application of immunotherapies to both surgical and radiotherapeutic management of HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Saddawi-Konefka
- Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, United States
- Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Aaron B. Simon
- Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Whitney Sumner
- Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Andrew Sharabi
- Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Loren K. Mell
- Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Ezra E. W. Cohen
- Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Studer G, Glanzmann C. [Radiation Oncology - Recent Status]. PRAXIS 2021; 110:733-742. [PMID: 34583545 DOI: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Radiation Oncology - Recent Status Abstract. We summarize the most important developments and innovations in the field over the past years and illustrate resulting external radiation treatment schedules and related treatment tolerance, focusing on hypofractionation.
Collapse
|
107
|
Winter IW, Smile TD, Videtic GMM. Approach to Oligometastatic Cancer in the Elderly Patient. Curr Oncol Rep 2021; 23:122. [PMID: 34448967 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01123-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with advanced cancer who have "oligometastatic" disease (OMD) have a limited burden of metastatic sites such that they may benefit from definitive therapies with limited toxicities. The incidence of cancers diagnosed in the elderly is increasing and treatment choices for them are often made because of their vulnerability to side effects. The present review discusses treatment of the elderly with OMD considering cancer outcomes and treatment toxicity. RECENT FINDINGS Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is emerging as a standard in the management of OMD because of its excellent local control and minimal toxicity. Phase II trials suggest that SBRT added to palliative therapy may improve overall survival and may delay the initiation of systemic therapy in OMD patients. Elderly patients are well represented in OMD studies SBRT will contribute significantly to the management of OMD in the elderly patient population by optimizing cancer control and limiting side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian W Winter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, CA-5, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Timothy D Smile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, CA-5, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Gregory M M Videtic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, CA-5, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Falco A, de Oliveira TB, Cacicedo J, Ospina AV, Ticona MÁ, Galindo H, Pereira MD, Aguilar-Ponce JL, Rueda-Domínguez A, Soria T, Taberna M, Iglesias L, Sowley T, Mesía R, On behalf of TTCC group (Spanish Group for the Treatment of the Head and Neck Cancer). Ibero-American Expert Consensus on Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Treatment in Patients Unable to Receive Cisplatin: Recommendations for Clinical Practice. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:6689-6703. [PMID: 34471383 PMCID: PMC8405157 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s322411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Cisplatin is the standard of treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) that has demonstrated efficacy, either in locally advanced disease when combined with radiotherapy at high doses, or in metastatic/recurrent disease when combined with other agents. However, the usual toxicities related to cisplatin, such as neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and hematologic toxicities, especially when high doses have been administered, have important implications in the patients' quality of life. The decision to administer cisplatin depends on several patient factors, such as age, performance status, weight loss, comorbidities, previous toxicities, chronic viral infection, or even the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In order to establish recommendations for the management of patients with SCCHN, a group of experts in medical and radiation oncology from Spain and Latin-American discussed how to identify patients who are not candidates for cisplatin to offer them the most suitable therapeutic alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agustín Falco
- Instituto Alexander Fleming, Asociación Argentina de Oncología Clínica (AAOC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Jon Cacicedo
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Aylen Vanessa Ospina
- ICCAL, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Asociación Colombiana de Hematología y Oncología (ACHO), Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Miguel Ángel Ticona
- Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins de Lima, Sociedad Peruana de Oncología Médica (SPOM), Lima, Perú
| | - Héctor Galindo
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Sociedad Chilena de Oncología Médica (SCOM), Santiago, Chile
| | - Marcos David Pereira
- Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Asociación Argentina de Oncología Clínica (AAOC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - José Luis Aguilar-Ponce
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Sociedad Mexicana de Oncología (SMeO), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Antonio Rueda-Domínguez
- UGC Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Tannia Soria
- Hospital SOLCA de Quito, Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Oncología (SEO), Quito, Ecuador
| | - Miren Taberna
- Institut Català d’Oncologia, ICO L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Taysser Sowley
- Instituto Oncológico Nacional (ION) de Panamá, Sociedad Panameña de Oncología (SPO), Panama City, Panama
| | - Ricard Mesía
- Institut Català d’Oncologia, ICO Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - On behalf of TTCC group (Spanish Group for the Treatment of the Head and Neck Cancer)
- Instituto Alexander Fleming, Asociación Argentina de Oncología Clínica (AAOC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Clínica (SBOC), São Paulo, Brazil
- Hospital Universitario Cruces/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
- ICCAL, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Asociación Colombiana de Hematología y Oncología (ACHO), Bogotá, Colombia
- Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins de Lima, Sociedad Peruana de Oncología Médica (SPOM), Lima, Perú
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Sociedad Chilena de Oncología Médica (SCOM), Santiago, Chile
- Instituto de Oncología Ángel H. Roffo, Asociación Argentina de Oncología Clínica (AAOC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Sociedad Mexicana de Oncología (SMeO), Mexico City, Mexico
- UGC Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
- Hospital SOLCA de Quito, Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Oncología (SEO), Quito, Ecuador
- Institut Català d’Oncologia, ICO L’Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Oncológico Nacional (ION) de Panamá, Sociedad Panameña de Oncología (SPO), Panama City, Panama
- Institut Català d’Oncologia, ICO Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Bloodstream infections in head and neck cancer patients after curative-intent radiotherapy: a population-based study from the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group database. Br J Cancer 2021; 125:458-464. [PMID: 34017084 PMCID: PMC8329195 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01430-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiation (CRT) may become immunocompromised. In this population-based study, we aimed to investigate the risk factors, microbiological aetiologies, prognosis and impact on early non-cancer mortality of bloodstream infections (BSIs) after RT/CRT. METHODS Patients with HNSCC of the pharynx, larynx and oral cavity treated with curative-intent RT/CRT in Denmark between 2010 and 2017 and subsequent BSI episodes occurring within 18 months of RT/CRT initiation were identified in national registries. RESULTS We included 5674 patients and observed 238 BSIs. Increasing age, stage and performance status were significantly associated with an elevated BSI risk, while sex, smoking and high-grade mucositis were not. Human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients had a decreased risk. Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 34% of episodes occurring during the first 3 months. The 30-day post-BSI mortality rate was 26% (95% confidence interval: 19-32) and BSIs were involved in 10% of early non-cancer deaths. CONCLUSION The risk of BSI development is associated with several patient- and disease-related factors and BSIs contribute considerably to early non-cancer mortality. Empiric antibiotic treatment regimens should prioritise coverage for S. aureus when treating suspected systemic infection in this population.
Collapse
|
110
|
Nutting CM, Griffin CL, Sanghera P, Foran B, Beasley M, Bernstein D, Cosgrove V, Fisher S, West CM, Sibtain A, Palaniappan N, Urbano TG, Sen M, Soe W, Rizwanullah M, Wood K, Ramkumar S, Junor E, Cook A, Roques T, Scrase C, Bhide SA, Gujral D, Harrington KJ, Mehanna H, Miah A, Emson M, Gardiner D, Morden JP, Hall E. Dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers: ART DECO, a phase III randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 2021; 153:242-256. [PMID: 34256319 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical (chemo)radiotherapy offers potentially curative treatment for patients with locally advanced laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer. We aimed to show that dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (DE-IMRT) improved locoregional control. METHODS We performed a phase III open-label randomised controlled trial in patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer (AJCC III-IVa/b, TNM 7). Patients were randomised (1:1) to DE-IMRT or standard dose IMRT (ST-IMRT) using a minimisation algorithm, balancing for centre, tumour site, nodal status and chemotherapy use. DE-IMRT was 67.2 gray (Gy) in 28 fractions (f) to the primary tumour and 56Gy/28f to at-risk nodes; ST-IMRT was 65Gy/30f to primary tumour and 54Gy/30f to at-risk nodes. Suitable patients received 2 cycles of concomitant cisplatin and up to 3 cycles of platinum-based induction chemotherapy. The primary end-point was time to locoregional failure analysed by intention-to-treat analysis using competing risk methodology. FINDINGS Between February 2011 and October 2015, 276 patients (138 ST-IMRT; 138 DE-IMRT) were randomised. A preplanned interim futility analysis met the criterion for early closure. After a median follow-up of 47.9 months (interquartile range 37.5-60.5), there were locoregional failures in 38 of 138 (27.5%) ST-IMRT patients and 42 of 138 (30.4%) DE-IMRT patients; an adjusted subhazard ratio of 1.16 (95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.83, p = 0.519) indicated no evidence of benefit with DE-IMRT. Acute grade 2 pharyngeal mucositis was reported more frequently with DE-IMRT than with ST-IMRT (42% vs. 32%). No differences in grade ≥3 acute or late toxicity rates were seen. CONCLUSION DE-IMRT did not improve locoregional control in patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer. The trial is registered: ISRCTN01483375.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - David Bernstein
- Department of Physics, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Katie Wood
- Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | | | | | | | - Tom Roques
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Hisham Mehanna
- The Institute for Head and Neck Studies and Education, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Marie Emson
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | | | - Emma Hall
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
[Moderate dose de-escalation of cisplatin-based chemoradiation for HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma : Results of the NRG-HN002 trial]. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:950-952. [PMID: 34312699 PMCID: PMC8458172 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01823-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
112
|
Dionisi F, Widesott L, Van Vulpen M, Fuller CD, Frondizi R, Meneguzzo M, Blanchard P, Amichetti M, Sanguineti G. Methodologies to Increase the Level of Evidence of Real-life Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Tumors. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:328-338. [PMID: 34285959 PMCID: PMC8270108 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00051.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This review aims to present and assess available and new methodologies to increase the clinical evidence of proton therapy data for patients with head and neck cancer. Despite the increasing number of scientific reports showing the feasibility and effectiveness of proton therapy in head and neck cancer, clinical evidence on the potential benefits of its use remains low for several reasons. In this article, the pros and cons of consolidated and new methodologies in this setting such as randomized clinical trials, the model-based approach, and the use of prospective multicentric registries will be detailed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Dionisi
- Proton Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Lamberto Widesott
- Proton Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | | | - Clifton David Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rocco Frondizi
- Department of Management and Law, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Meneguzzo
- Department of Management and Law, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,Centre for Organisational Research, Health and Public Management, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Maurizio Amichetti
- Proton Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Wang W, Peng S, Wu H, Luo Y, Yuan F, Lin Z, Cheng G, Chen S. Association of tumor downstaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with survival in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021; 147:2913-2922. [PMID: 34160678 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03690-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Assessing the downstaging effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) and predicting response to treatment remain challenging. The present study aimed to evaluate the long-term prognosis of downstaging after NACT in patients with LANPC and to investigate the prognostic value of post-NACT tumor downstaging on treatment outcomes in the era of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS This retrospective study included 226 patients with stage III (n = 188) and IVA (n = 38) NPC admitted to Haikou People's Hospital between 1 October 2009 and 1 October 2012. The patients were grouped as downstaging or no after NACT. Overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS), and distant failure-free survival (DFFS) were analyzed. RESULTS Among 226 patients, 196 (86.7%) were in the downstaging group and 30 (13.3%) were in the non-downstaging group. The longest follow-up was 76 months, and the median was 45 months. The 3-year OS rates of the downstaging group and non-downstaging group were 91.0% (95% CI 0.89-0.93) and 69.5% (95% CI 0.66-0.72) (P = 0.005). The 5-year OS rates were 81.6% (95% CI 0.78-0.86) and 53.3% (95% CI 0.49-0.61) (P = 0.001). N downstaging (3-year OS, HR 0.491, 95% CI 0.221-0.881, P = 0.022; 5-year OS, HR = 0.597, 95% CI 0.378-0.878, P = 0.021) was independently associated with OS. CONCLUSION In the treatment of LANPC, the patients with downstaging after NACT have a better prognosis than those without downstaging. This study suggests that NACT can improve the prognosis for patients with LANPC if there is downstaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weifeng Wang
- Department of Oncology Radiotherapy, Hainan Cancer Hospital, 4 th west Street of ChangBin Road, Haikou, 570311, China.
| | - Shaohua Peng
- Department of Oncology Radiotherapy, Hainan Cancer Hospital, 4 th west Street of ChangBin Road, Haikou, 570311, China
| | - Huanliang Wu
- Department of Oncology Radiotherapy, Hainan Cancer Hospital, 4 th west Street of ChangBin Road, Haikou, 570311, China
| | - Yunxiu Luo
- Department of Oncology Radiotherapy, Hainan Cancer Hospital, 4 th west Street of ChangBin Road, Haikou, 570311, China
| | - Feng Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haikou Municipal Hospital, Haikou, China
| | - Zhiren Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haikou Municipal Hospital, Haikou, China
| | - Gang Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haikou Municipal Hospital, Haikou, China
| | - Shengmin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haikou Municipal Hospital, Haikou, China
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Chen D, Menon H, Verma V, Seyedin SN, Ajani JA, Hofstetter WL, Nguyen QN, Chang JY, Gomez DR, Amini A, Swisher SG, Blum MA, Younes AI, Barsoumian HB, Erasmus JJ, Lee JH, Bhutani MS, Hess KR, Minsky BD, Welsh JW. Results of a Phase 1/2 Trial of Chemoradiotherapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Radiotherapy Dose in Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2021; 5:1597-1604. [PMID: 31529018 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Importance Effective treatment options for locally advanced esophageal cancer are limited, and rates of local recurrence after standard chemoradiotherapy remain high. Objective To evaluate toxic effects, local control, and overall survival rates after chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose to the gross tumor and nodal disease for patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants A phase 1/2, single-arm trial was conducted in 46 patients from April 28, 2010, to April 9, 2015 (median follow-up, 52 months [range, 2-86 months]), at a tertiary academic cancer center. Outcomes of the study patients were compared with those of 97 similar patients treated at the same institution from January 10, 2010, to December 5, 2014, as part of the interim analysis. Statistical analysis was performed from December 15, 2018, to February 12, 2019. Interventions Chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose (50.4 Gy to subclinical areas at risk and 63.0 Gy to the gross tumor and involved nodes, all given in 28 fractions) with concurrent docetaxel and capecitabine or fluorouracil. Main Outcomes and Measures Toxic effects, local (in-field) control, and overall survival rates. Results All 46 patients (11 women and 35 men; median age, 65.5 years [range, 37.3-84.4 years]) received per-protocol therapy, as intensity-modulated photon therapy (39 [85%]) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (7 [15%]); 11 patients (24%) ultimately underwent resection. No patients experienced grade 4 or 5 toxic effects; the 10 acute grade 3 toxic events were esophagitis (4), dysphagia (3), and anorexia (3) and the 3 late grade 3 toxic events were all esophageal strictures. The actuarial local recurrence rates were 22% (95% CI, 11%-35%) at 6 months, 30% (95% CI, 18%-44%) at 1 year, and 33% (95% CI, 20%-46%) at 2 years. Overall, 15 patients (33%) experienced local failure, at a median interval of 5 months (range, 1-24 months). The median overall survival time was 21.5 months (range, 2.3-86.4 months). Exploratory comparison with a 97-patient contemporaneous institutional cohort receiving standard-dose (non-simultaneous integrated boost) chemoradiotherapy showed superior local control (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.26-0.92; P = .03) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.94; P = .02) in the group that received chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose for locally advanced esophageal cancer is well tolerated, with encouraging local control, and thus warrants further study. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01102088.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawei Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Hari Menon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven N Seyedin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Iowa City
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Stephen G Swisher
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Mariela A Blum
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ahmed I Younes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Jeremy J Erasmus
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology-Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jeffrey H Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Kenneth R Hess
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - James W Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
De Felice F, Lei M, Oakley R, Lyons A, Fry A, Jeannon JP, Simo R, Guerrero Urbano T. Risk stratified follow up for head and neck cancer patients - An evidence based proposal. Oral Oncol 2021; 119:105365. [PMID: 34058702 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has a significant impact on patients' quality of life and treatment can be associated with severe morbidity. Following completion of treatment, patients are followed up in order to detect potentially salvageable recurrences and to manage long-term toxicities. In recent years, a growing interest has been given to risk stratified follow-up interventions to prevent and detect recurrences and manage treatment toxicities in other tumour sites as well as to transfer some of that care to community services. We review the literature for HNSCC and propose a risk stratified follow up protocol to address these issues and assist clinicians in decision making. A shift in patterns of care is suggested in order to provide a basis to improve care for HNSCC patients after complete response to primary treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca De Felice
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK; Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mary Lei
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Richard Oakley
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery Guys and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Lyons
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery Guys and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alastair Fry
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery Guys and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jean-Pierre Jeannon
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery Guys and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK; King's College London, UK
| | - Ricard Simo
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery Guys and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
116
|
Van den Bosch L, van der Laan HP, van der Schaaf A, Oosting SF, Halmos GB, Witjes MJH, Oldehinkel E, Meijer TWH, van den Hoek JGM, Steenbakkers RJHM, Langendijk JA. Patient-Reported Toxicity and Quality-of-Life Profiles in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Definitive Radiation Therapy or Chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:456-467. [PMID: 34048816 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation therapy is an effective but burdensome treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). We aimed to characterize the severity and time pattern of patient-reported symptoms and quality of life in a large cohort of patients with HNC treated with definitive radiation therapy, with or without systemic treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 859 patients with HNC treated between 2007 and 2017 prospectively completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Cancer module (QLQ-HN35) and Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) at regular intervals during and after treatment for up to 5 years. Patients were classified into 3 subgroups: early larynx cancer, infrahyoideal cancer, and suprahyoideal cancer. Outcome scales of both questionnaires were quantified per subgroup and time point by means of average scores and the frequency distribution of categorized severity (none, mild, moderate, and severe). Time patterns and symptom severity were characterized. Toxicity profiles were compared using linear mixed model analysis. Additional toxicity profiles based on age, human papillomavirus status, treatment modality, smoking status, tumor site, and treatment period were characterized as well. RESULTS The study population consisted of 157 patients with early larynx cancer, 304 with infrahyoideal cancer, and 398 with suprahyoideal cancer. The overall questionnaire response rate was 83%. Generally, the EORTC QLQ-HN35 symptoms reported showed a clear time pattern, with increasing scores during treatment followed by a gradual recovery in the first 2 years. Distinct toxicity profiles were seen across subgroups (P < .001), with generally less severe symptom scores in the early larynx subgroup. The EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning, quality-of-life, and general symptoms reported showed a less evident time pattern and less pronounced differences in mean scores between subgroups, although differences were still significant (P < .001). Differences in mean scores were most pronounced for role functioning, appetite loss, fatigue, and pain. CONCLUSIONS We established patient-reported toxicity and quality-of-life profiles that showed different patterns for 3 subgroups of patients with HNC. These profiles provide detailed information on the severity and persistence of various symptoms as experienced by patients during and after definitive radiation therapy. These profiles can be used to inform treatment of future patients and may serve as a benchmark for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Van den Bosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Hans Paul van der Laan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen van der Schaaf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoukje F Oosting
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gyorgy B Halmos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Max J H Witjes
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin Oldehinkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tineke W H Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna G M van den Hoek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Roel J H M Steenbakkers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Poh SS, Soong YL, Sommat K, Lim CM, Fong KW, Tan TW, Chua ML, Wang FQ, Hu J, Wee JT. Retreatment in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Current status and perspectives. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2021; 41:361-370. [PMID: 33955719 PMCID: PMC8118589 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Shuxian Poh
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Yoke Lim Soong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Kiattisa Sommat
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Chwee Ming Lim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169608.,Surgery Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Kam Weng Fong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Terence Wk Tan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Melvin Lk Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Fu Qiang Wang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Jing Hu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| | - Joseph Ts Wee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, 169610.,Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169857
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Radzhapova MU, Gulidov IA, Sevryukov FE, Mardynsky YS, Panaseykin JA, Semenov AV, Ivanov SA, Kaprin AD. CHEMORADIOTHERAPY FOR ORAL CANCER USING HYPERFRACTIONATED RADIATION SCHEDULE. SIBERIAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2021; 20:29-36. [DOI: 10.21294/1814-4861-2021-20-2-29-36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- M. U. Radzhapova
- A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the Federal State Budget Institution «National Medical Research Center of Radiology» of the Health Ministry of the Russian Federation
| | - I. A. Gulidov
- A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the Federal State Budget Institution «National Medical Research Center of Radiology» of the Health Ministry of the Russian Federation
| | - F. E. Sevryukov
- A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the Federal State Budget Institution «National Medical Research Center of Radiology» of the Health Ministry of the Russian Federation
| | - Yu. S. Mardynsky
- A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the Federal State Budget Institution «National Medical Research Center of Radiology» of the Health Ministry of the Russian Federation
| | - J. A. Panaseykin
- A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the Federal State Budget Institution «National Medical Research Center of Radiology» of the Health Ministry of the Russian Federation
| | - A. V. Semenov
- A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the Federal State Budget Institution «National Medical Research Center of Radiology» of the Health Ministry of the Russian Federation
| | - S. A. Ivanov
- A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the Federal State Budget Institution «National Medical Research Center of Radiology» of the Health Ministry of the Russian Federation
| | - A. D. Kaprin
- A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the Federal State Budget Institution «National Medical Research Center of Radiology» of the Health Ministry of the Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
The prognostic impact of daytime and seasonality of radiotherapy on head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 158:293-299. [PMID: 33848563 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The potential impact of daytime and season of radiotherapy application on prognosis is unclear. This was analyzed in a retrospective cohort of patients who were diagnosed with non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and treated with definitive radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment parameters and outcome until last follow-up or death were obtained. Median radiotherapy delivery daytime of each patient was categorized as morning (AM) and afternoon (PM). Treatment season was defined by median date of treatment course. Each year was divided into DARK and LIGHT according to equinoxes. Time-to-event endpoints were defined by first biopsy confirming the HNSCC. RESULTS Six hundred fifty-five cases were identified who were treated with (chemo)radiotherapy between 2002 and 2015. Median follow-up was 47 months. No significant heterogeneity in patient, tumor and treatment characteristics were observed between DARK and LIGHT or regarding median daily fraction time (X2 p > 0.05). Five-year loco-regional control (73% vs. 61%; p = 0.0108) and progression-free survival (51% vs. 43%; p = 0.0374) were superior when radiotherapy was administered in DARK. Neither the daytime nor any other treatment time-related parameter affected prognosis. CONCLUSION This is the first study investigating and presenting the prognostic impact of seasonality regarding the treatment course on loco-regional control and progression-free survival (DARK > LIGHT). The biological mechanism of action is unclear. These results should be interpreted with caution and our findings have to be validated externally.
Collapse
|
120
|
Nuyts S, Bollen H, Eisbruch A, Corry J, Strojan P, Mäkitie AA, Langendijk JA, Mendenhall WM, Smee R, DeBree R, Lee AWM, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Unilateral versus bilateral nodal irradiation: Current evidence in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 2021; 43:2807-2821. [PMID: 33871090 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancers of the head and neck region often present with nodal involvement. There is a long-standing convention within the community of head and neck radiation oncology to irradiate both sides of the neck electively in almost all cases to include both macroscopic and microscopic disease extension (so called elective nodal volume). International guidelines for the selection and delineation of the elective lymph nodes were published in the early 2000s and were updated recently. However, diagnostic imaging techniques have improved the accuracy and reliability of nodal staging and as a result, small metastases that used to remain undetected and were thus in the past included in the elective nodal volume, will now be included in high-dose volumes. Furthermore, the elective nodal areas are situated close to the parotid glands, the submandibular glands and the swallowing muscles. Therefore, irradiation of a smaller, more selected volume of the elective nodes could reduce treatment-related toxicity. Several researchers consider the current bilateral elective neck irradiation strategies an overtreatment and show growing interest in a unilateral nodal irradiation in selected patients. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the current evidence about the indications and benefits of unilateral nodal irradiation and the use of SPECT/CT-guided nodal irradiation in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Nuyts
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Heleen Bollen
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Avrahram Eisbruch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - June Corry
- Division of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Primoz Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Antti A Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, HUS Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Robert Smee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Remco DeBree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne W M Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Alessandra Rinaldo
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Udine School of Medicine, Udine, Italy
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Sequential chemotherapy regimen of induction with panitumumab and paclitaxel followed by radiotherapy and panitumumab in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer unfit for platinum derivatives. The phase II, PANTERA/TTCC-2010-06 study. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 23:1666-1677. [PMID: 33876416 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02567-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sequential treatment of Panitumumab (Pb) plus Paclitaxel (Px) as induction treatment (IT) followed by concurrent bioradiotherapy (Bio-RT) with Pb may be an alternative for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN) in patients ineligible for high-dose cisplatin therapy. METHODS Phase II, single-arm, multicentre study, with two-stage design, in patients ≥ 18 years with stage III-IVa-b LA-SCCHN unfit for platinum. Patients received Px + Pb (9 weeks) as IT followed by Bio-RT + Pb. Primary endpoint: overall response rate (ORR) after IT, defined as: more than 70% of patients achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to IT. Secondary end-points: progression-free survival, organ preservation rate, safety profile. RESULTS Study ended prematurely (51 patients) due to slow recruitment. ORR: 66.7% (95% CI: 53.7-79.6), 8 (15.7%) CR and 26 (51.0%) PR. 39 patients (76%) completed radiotherapy (RT). Pb and/or Px-related adverse events (AEs) grade 3-4: 56.9% during IT and 63.4% during the concomitant phase, of which most common were skin toxicity (33.3%). Five deaths occurred during treatment, two of them (3.9%) were Pb and/or Px-related. CONCLUSIONS Although underpowered, ORR was higher than the pre-specified boundary for considering the treatment active. Although Px + Pb as IT provides some benefit, the safety profile is worse than expected. To consider Pb + Px as IT as an alternative for platinum-unsuitable LA-SCCHN, further research/investigation would be needed.
Collapse
|
122
|
Petit C, Lacas B, Pignon JP, Le QT, Grégoire V, Grau C, Hackshaw A, Zackrisson B, Parmar MKB, Lee JW, Ghi MG, Sanguineti G, Temam S, Cheugoua-Zanetsie M, O'Sullivan B, Posner MR, Vokes EE, Cruz Hernandez JJ, Szutkowski Z, Lartigau E, Budach V, Suwiński R, Poulsen M, Kumar S, Ghosh Laskar S, Mazeron JJ, Jeremic B, Simes J, Zhong LP, Overgaard J, Fortpied C, Torres-Saavedra P, Bourhis J, Aupérin A, Blanchard P. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: an individual patient data network meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:727-736. [PMID: 33862002 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00076-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised, controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown the survival benefit of concomitant chemoradiotherapy or hyperfractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. However, the relative efficacy of these treatments is unknown. We aimed to determine whether one treatment was superior to the other. METHODS We did a frequentist network meta-analysis based on individual patient data of meta-analyses evaluating the role of chemotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer [MACH-NC]) and of altered fractionation radiotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Carcinomas of Head and Neck [MARCH]). Randomised, controlled trials that enrolled patients with non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer between Jan 1, 1980, and Dec 31, 2016, were included. We used a two-step random-effects approach, and the log-rank test, stratified by trial to compare treatments, with locoregional therapy as the reference. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. The global Cochran Q statistic was used to assess homogeneity and consistency and P score to rank treatments (higher scores indicate more effective therapies). FINDINGS 115 randomised, controlled trials, which enrolled patients between Jan 1, 1980, and April 30, 2012, yielded 154 comparisons (28 978 patients with 19 253 deaths and 20 579 progression events). Treatments were grouped into 16 modalities, for which 35 types of direct comparisons were available. Median follow-up based on all trials was 6·6 years (IQR 5·0-9·4). Hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (HFCRT) was ranked as the best treatment for overall survival (P score 97%; hazard ratio 0·63 [95% CI 0·51-0·77] compared with locoregional therapy). The hazard ratio of HFCRT compared with locoregional therapy with concomitant chemoradiotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy (CLRTP) was 0·82 (95% CI 0·66-1·01) for overall survival. The superiority of HFCRT was robust to sensitivity analyses. Three other modalities of treatment had a better P score, but not a significantly better HR, for overall survival than CLRTP (P score 78%): induction chemotherapy with taxane, cisplatin, and fluorouracil followed by locoregional therapy (ICTaxPF-LRT; 89%), accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (82%), and ICTaxPF followed by CLRT (80%). INTERPRETATION The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that further intensifying chemoradiotherapy, using HFCRT or ICTaxPF-CLRT, could improve outcomes over chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. FUNDINGS French Institut National du Cancer, French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and Fondation ARC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Petit
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France
| | - Benjamin Lacas
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Pignon
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France
| | - Quynh Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Cai Grau
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, Cancer Institute, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Björn Zackrisson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Mahesh K B Parmar
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ju-Whei Lee
- ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maria Grazia Ghi
- Oncology Unit 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Stéphane Temam
- Service de Cancérologie Cervico-faciale, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Maurice Cheugoua-Zanetsie
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marshall R Posner
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Everett E Vokes
- Section of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Zbigniew Szutkowski
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Center, Marie Curie-Sklodowska Memorial Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Eric Lartigau
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rafal Suwiński
- Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Clinic and Teaching Hospital, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Michael Poulsen
- Radiation Oncology Services, Mater Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Shaleen Kumar
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Sarbani Ghosh Laskar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | | | | | - John Simes
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Center, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Lai-Ping Zhong
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Pedro Torres-Saavedra
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France; Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Anne Aupérin
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Ligue Contre le Cancer, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France; Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-94805 Villejuif, France; Groupe d'Oncologie Radiothérapie Tête Et Cou, Tours, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
123
|
Van den Bosch L, van der Schaaf A, van der Laan HP, Hoebers FJ, Wijers OB, van den Hoek JG, Moons KG, Reitsma JB, Steenbakkers RJ, Schuit E, Langendijk JA. Comprehensive toxicity risk profiling in radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: A new concept for individually optimised treatment. Radiother Oncol 2021; 157:147-154. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
124
|
The impact of delivery daytime and seasonality of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer on toxicity burden. Radiother Oncol 2021; 158:162-166. [PMID: 33667582 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.02.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM The potential impact of the daytime and season of radiotherapy application on acute and late toxicity burden was analyzed on a cohort of curatively treated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. METHODS Through a retrospective chart review, patient and tumor characteristics, treatment parameters and outcome were obtained. Patients treated with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy with and without chemotherapy receiving ≥60 Gy between 2002 and 2015 were included (n = 617). Daily fraction times and dates were extracted. Median radiotherapy delivery time of each patient was categorized as morning (AM) and afternoon (PM). Treatment season was defined by the median day of the treatment course. Each year was divided into DARK and LIGHT by the March and September equinoxes. Acute (T) and late (A) toxicity were defined by TAME methodology. RESULTS Median follow-up was 51 months. Mean T and A scores during and after radiotherapy in DARK vs. LIGHT were 1.98 vs. 1.61 (p = 0.0127) and 0.41 vs. 0.30 (p = 0.1699), respectively. Mean T and A scores during and after AM vs. PM radiotherapy were 1.71 vs. 1.88 (p = 0.0387) and 0.31 vs. 0.41 (p = 0.2638), respectively. Multivariate analyses indicated DARK vs. LIGHT as the only independent treatment time-related factor among other factors such as tumor subsite, UICC stage, radiotherapy technique, and chemotherapy for T. CONCLUSION This is the first study investigating the impact of seasonality on toxicity burden, showing higher acute toxicity with radiotherapy in DARK. The daytime did not predict the toxicity. The hypothesis-generating findings of this retrospective study should be further investigated.
Collapse
|
125
|
Zhang X, Yang J. Role of Non-coding RNAs on the Radiotherapy Sensitivity and Resistance of Head and Neck Cancer: From Basic Research to Clinical Application. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 8:637435. [PMID: 33644038 PMCID: PMC7905100 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.637435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Head and neck cancers (HNCs) rank as the sixth common and the seventh leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with an estimated incidence of 600,000 cases and 40-50% mortality rate every year. Radiotherapy is a common local therapeutic modality for HNC mainly through the function of ionizing radiation, with approximately 60% of patients treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Although radiotherapy is more advanced and widely used in clinical practice, the 5-year overall survival rates of locally advanced HNCs are still less than 40%. HNC cell resistance to radiotherapy remains one of the major challenges to improve the overall survival in HNC patients. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are newly discovered functional small RNA molecules that are different from messenger RNAs, which can be translated into a protein. Many previous studies have reported the dysregulation and function of ncRNAs in HNC. Importantly, researchers reported that several ncRNAs were also dysregulated in radiotherapy-sensitive or radiotherapy-resistant HNC tissues compared with the normal cancer tissues. They found that ectopically elevating or knocking down expression of some ncRNAs could significantly influence the response of HNC cancer cells to radiotherapy, indicating that ncRNAs could regulate the sensitivity of cancer cells to radiotherapy. The implying mechanism for ncRNAs in regulating radiotherapy sensitivity may be due to its roles on affecting DNA damage sensation, inducing cell cycle arrest, regulating DNA damage repair, modulating cell apoptosis, etc. Additionally, clinical studies reported that in situ ncRNA expression in HNC tissues may predict the response of radiotherapy, and circulating ncRNA from body liquid serves as minimally invasive therapy-responsive and prognostic biomarkers in HNC. In this review, we aimed to summarize the current function and mechanism of ncRNAs in regulating the sensitivity of HNC cancer cells to radiotherapy and comprehensively described the state of the art on the role of ncRNAs in the prognosis prediction, therapy monitoring, and prediction of response to radiotherapy in HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xixia Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Iorio GC, Arcadipane F, Martini S, Ricardi U, Franco P. Decreasing treatment burden in HPV-related OPSCC: A systematic review of clinical trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 160:103243. [PMID: 33516806 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Favorable outcomes are observed after treatment with standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients. The consistent growing interest on treatment-related toxicity burden, potentially jeopardizing survivors' quality of life, led clinicians to investigate possible de-escalation strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive systematic literature search of clinical trials was performed through the EMBASE database to provide an overview of the de-escalation strategies spectrum. Additionally, hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used. RESULTS Herein, we report and discuss different approaches to de-escalation of therapy, with respect to both local and systemic strategies. CONCLUSIONS Several promising de-escalation experiences have been published. However, while further evidence is awaited, no changes in the management nor deviation from the standard of care should be made outside of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefania Martini
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
127
|
Langer C, Wittekindt C, Jensen AD. [The role of chemoradiotherapy in curative treatment of head and neck cancer]. Laryngorhinootologie 2021; 101:22-34. [PMID: 33506441 DOI: 10.1055/a-1351-0417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are integral parts of definitive and adjuvant therapy in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The outcome of therapy is essentially dependent on selection and dosage of chemotherapeutical substances and on the other hand on the radiotherapeutical setting concerning fractionation, time of therapy and technical aspects. Immunotherapeutical substances have an increasing role in the therapy of HNSCC as well as particle therapy is investigated as part of radiotherapy in actual studies. Further challenges relate to treatment of HPV-induced tumors with regard to their differences in tumor biology and consecutively better prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Langer
- HNO, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg Standort Gießen, Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf-Halschirurgie und plastische Operationen, Gießen, Germany
| | | | - Alexandra Désirée Jensen
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH Standort Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Lacas B, Carmel A, Landais C, Wong SJ, Licitra L, Tobias JS, Burtness B, Ghi MG, Cohen EEW, Grau C, Wolf G, Hitt R, Corvò R, Budach V, Kumar S, Laskar SG, Mazeron JJ, Zhong LP, Dobrowsky W, Ghadjar P, Fallai C, Zakotnik B, Sharma A, Bensadoun RJ, Ruo Redda MG, Racadot S, Fountzilas G, Brizel D, Rovea P, Argiris A, Nagy ZT, Lee JW, Fortpied C, Harris J, Bourhis J, Aupérin A, Blanchard P, Pignon JP. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 107 randomized trials and 19,805 patients, on behalf of MACH-NC Group. Radiother Oncol 2021; 156:281-293. [PMID: 33515668 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in squamous cell Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC) demonstrated that concomitant chemotherapy (CT) improved overall survival (OS) in patients without distant metastasis. We report the updated results. MATERIALS AND METHODS Published or unpublished randomized trials including patients with non-metastatic carcinoma randomized between 1965 and 2016 and comparing curative loco-regional treatment (LRT) to LRT + CT or adding another timing of CT to LRT + CT (main question), or comparing induction CT + radiotherapy to radiotherapy + concomitant (or alternating) CT (secondary question) were eligible. Individual patient data were collected and combined using a fixed-effect model. OS was the main endpoint. RESULTS For the main question, 101 trials (18951 patients, median follow-up of 6.5 years) were analyzed. For both questions, there were 16 new (2767 patients) and 11 updated trials. Around 90% of the patients had stage III or IV disease. Interaction between treatment effect on OS and the timing of CT was significant (p < 0.0001), the benefit being limited to concomitant CT (HR: 0.83, 95%CI [0.79; 0.86]; 5(10)-year absolute benefit of 6.5% (3.6%)). Efficacy decreased as patients age increased (p_trend = 0.03). OS was not increased by the addition of induction (HR = 0.96 [0.90; 1.01]) or adjuvant CT (1.02 [0.92; 1.13]). Efficacy of induction CT decreased with poorer performance status (p_trend = 0.03). For the secondary question, eight trials (1214 patients) confirmed the superiority of concomitant CT on OS (HR = 0.84 [0.74; 0.95], p = 0.005). CONCLUSION The update of MACH-NC confirms the benefit and superiority of the addition of concomitant CT for non-metastatic head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Lacas
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH, USA; Institut Saint Catherine, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cai Grau
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, USA
| | | | | | - Renzo Corvò
- Tata Memorial Centre Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, India
| | - Volker Budach
- State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Johns Hopkins Univ/Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, MD, USA
| | - Carlo Fallai
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, France
| | | | - Atul Sharma
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UK
| | | | | | - Séverine Racadot
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Paolo Rovea
- Kragulevac University Hospital, Yugoslavia, Serbia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jean Bourhis
- Institut Saint Catherine, France; Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA
| | - Anne Aupérin
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH, USA; Institut Saint Catherine, France
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH, USA; Institut Saint Catherine, France; University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
129
|
Patel Y, Srivastava S, Rana D, Goel A, Suryanarayana K, Saini SK. PET-CT scan-based maximum standardized uptake value as a prognostic predictor in oropharynx squamous cell cancer. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021; 26:100305. [PMID: 33461080 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Positron emission tomography with 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose integrated with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT) is clinically useful and extensively used in initial staging and follow-up of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We studied the potential prognostic significance of primary tumor maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) by 18F-FDG PET-CT in oropharyngeal cancer. METHODS Sixty patients with early and locally advanced histopathologically proven oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer were staged using FDG PET-CT at diagnosis. All patient received radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy (in stage III and IVA disease) and were assessed prospectively for treatment outcome. Groups were created based on stage and cut off for SUVmax. The association of SUVmax of primary tumour and stage with disease-free survival and overall survival was analyzed by univariate and multivariate statistics. RESULTS In univariate analysis, a primary tumour SUVmax of greater than 13.0 and advanced stage (IVA) predicted inferior disease-free survival (P=0.0241 and 0.0005, respectively) and overall survival (P=0.0510, toward significance and 0.0003, respectively). In proportional hazards analysis, stage was significant only when adjusted for primary SUVmax. CONCLUSION SUVmax failed to demonstrate predictive significance in oropharyngeal cancer, and an increase in primary tumor uptake is possibly a direct effect of advanced disease and consequently increased metabolic activity and aggressiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yamini Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | | | - Divyesh Rana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baroda Medical College, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
| | - Anil Goel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baroda Medical College, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
| | - K Suryanarayana
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GCRI, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - Surendra Kumar Saini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, India.
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Margalit DN, Sacco AG, Cooper JS, Ridge JA, Bakst RL, Beadle BM, Beitler JJ, Chang SS, Chen AM, Galloway TJ, Koyfman SA, Mita C, Robbins JR, Tsai CJ, Truong MT, Yom SS, Siddiqui F. Systematic review of postoperative therapy for resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Executive summary of the American Radium Society appropriate use criteria. Head Neck 2021; 43:367-391. [PMID: 33098180 PMCID: PMC7756212 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aims of this systematic review are to (a) evaluate the current literature on the impact of postoperative therapy for resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) on oncologic and non-oncologic outcomes and (b) identify the optimal evidence-based postoperative therapy recommendations for commonly encountered clinical scenarios. METHODS An analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Prospective studies and methodology-based systematic reviews and meta-analyses of postoperative therapy for SCCHN were identified by searching Medline (OVID) and EMBASE (Elsevier) using controlled vocabulary terms (ie, National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings [MeSH], EMTREE). Study screening and selection was performed with Covidence software and full-text review. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used by the expert panel to rate the appropriate use of postoperative therapy, and the modified Delphi method was used to come to consensus. RESULTS A total of 5660 studies were identified and screened using the title and abstract, leading to 201 studies assessed for relevance using full-text review. After limitation to the eligibility criteria, 101 studies from 1977 to 2020 were identified, including 77 with oncologic endpoints and 24 with function and quality of life endpoints. All studies reported staging prior to the implementation of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC-8). CONCLUSIONS Prospective clinical studies and systematic reviews identified through the PRISMA systematic review provided good evidence for consensus statements regarding the appropriate use of postoperative therapy for resected SCCHN. Further research is needed in domains where consensus by the expert panel could not be achieved for the appropriateness of specific postoperative therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle N. Margalit
- Dana‐Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Beth M. Beadle
- Stanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carol Mita
- Countway Library, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | | | | | - Minh T. Truong
- Boston University School of MedicineBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Sue S. Yom
- University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
131
|
Jhawar SR, Bonomi M, Harari PM. Treating Advanced Head and Neck Cancer When Cisplatin Is Not an Option. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:7-12. [PMID: 33275489 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.02720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin R Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Marcelo Bonomi
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Paul M Harari
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Narvaez C, Schild SE, Rades D. Comparison of Conventional Fractionation and Accelerated Fractionation With Concomitant Boost for Radiotherapy of Non-metastatic Stage IV Head-and-Neck Cancer. In Vivo 2021; 35:411-415. [PMID: 33402490 PMCID: PMC7880725 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Some patients with unresectable or incompletely resected head-and-neck cancer (SCCHN) cannot tolerate radiochemotherapy. Alternatives are needed that are more effective than conventional radiotherapy alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective study investigated patients irradiated for non-metastatic stage IV SCCHN who could not receive concurrent chemotherapy. Eight patients received accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost (group A) and 31 patients conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (group B). Groups were matched for tumor site, gender, age, performance score and histologic grade. RESULTS Two-year PFS-rates were 63% in group A vs. 41% in group B, and median PFS-times were 36 vs. 10 months (p=0.48). Two-year OS-rates were 88% vs. 37%, and median OS-times were 44 vs. 14 months (p=0.19). Grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis was significantly (p=0.040) more common in group B; other toxicities were similar. CONCLUSION Accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost appeared superior to conventional fractionation and can be considered for patients with stage IV SCCHN not suitable for radiochemotherapy. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Narvaez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, U.S.A
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Radiation-Induced Salivary Gland Dysfunction: Mechanisms, Therapeutics and Future Directions. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9124095. [PMID: 33353023 PMCID: PMC7767137 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9124095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Salivary glands sustain collateral damage following radiotherapy (RT) to treat cancers of the head and neck, leading to complications, including mucositis, xerostomia and hyposalivation. Despite salivary gland-sparing techniques and modified dosing strategies, long-term hypofunction remains a significant problem. Current therapeutic interventions provide temporary symptom relief, but do not address irreversible glandular damage. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of mechanisms involved in RT-induced hyposalivation and provide a framework for future mechanistic studies. One glaring gap in published studies investigating RT-induced mechanisms of salivary gland dysfunction concerns the effect of irradiation on adjacent non-irradiated tissue via paracrine, autocrine and direct cell-cell interactions, coined the bystander effect in other models of RT-induced damage. We hypothesize that purinergic receptor signaling involving P2 nucleotide receptors may play a key role in mediating the bystander effect. We also discuss promising new therapeutic approaches to prevent salivary gland damage due to RT.
Collapse
|
134
|
Zakeri K, Rotolo F, Lacas B, Vitzthum LK, Le QT, Gregoire V, Overgaard J, Hackshaw A, Zackrisson B, Parmar MKB, Burtness BA, Ghi MG, Sanguineti G, O'Sullivan B, Fortpied C, Bourhis J, Shen H, Harris J, Michiels S, Pignon JP, Mell LK. Predictive classifier for intensive treatment of head and neck cancer. Cancer 2020; 126:5263-5273. [PMID: 33017867 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 05/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the effectiveness of intensive treatment for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) depends on the proportion of patients' overall event risk attributable to cancer. METHODS This study analyzed 22,339 patients with LAHNC treated in 81 randomized trials testing altered fractionation (AFX; Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of Head and Neck [MARCH] data set) or chemotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer [MACH-NC] data set). Generalized competing event regression was applied to the control arms in MARCH, and patients were stratified by tertile according to the ω score, which quantified the relative hazard for cancer versus competing events. The classifier was externally validated on the MACH-NC data set. The study tested for interactions between the ω score and treatment effects on overall survival (OS). RESULTS Factors associated with a higher ω score were a younger age, a better performance status, an oral cavity site, higher T and N categories, and a p16-negative/unknown status. The effect of AFX on OS was greater in patients with high ω scores (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.99) and medium ω scores (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98) versus low ω scores (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.05; P for interaction = .086). The effect of chemotherapy on OS was significantly greater in patients with high ω scores (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88) and medium ω scores (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93) versus low ω scores (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86-1.08; P for interaction = .011). CONCLUSIONS LAHNC patients with a higher risk of cancer progression relative to competing mortality, as reflected by a higher ω score, selectively benefit from more intensive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Federico Rotolo
- Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer Meta-Analysis Plateform, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Centre d'Etude des Supports de Publicite, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1018, Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Benjamin Lacas
- Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer Meta-Analysis Plateform, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Centre d'Etude des Supports de Publicite, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1018, Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research United Kingdom and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, Cancer Institute, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Björn Zackrisson
- Department of Radiation Sciences-Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Mahesh K B Parmar
- Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Catherine Fortpied
- Headquarters, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Hanjie Shen
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Jonathan Harris
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer Meta-Analysis Plateform, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Centre d'Etude des Supports de Publicite, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1018, Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Pignon
- Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer Meta-Analysis Plateform, Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Centre d'Etude des Supports de Publicite, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1018, Université Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Gupta T, Ghosh-Laskar S, Agarwal JP. Resource-sparing curative-intent hypofractionated-accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: More relevant than ever before in the COVID era. Oral Oncol 2020; 111:105045. [PMID: 33091846 PMCID: PMC7572312 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing worldwide, with over three quarters of cases now diagnosed in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) with resource-constraints. Loco-regional recurrence remains the predominant pattern of failure mandating adequate local therapy for acceptable loco-regional control and survival. There is high-quality evidence that intensification of treatment by either by adding concurrent chemotherapy or by altering radiotherapy (RT) fractionation improves outcomes in the curative-intent management of loco-regionally advanced HNSCC. Even conservative estimates indicate that >50% of patients in LMIC are unlikely to get access to timely RT, which will only get compounded with the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic. The radiation oncology community has been systematically testing altered fractionation schedules in several solid cancers (breast, lung, and head-neck), given the cost-effectiveness, convenience, and compliance to short-course RT regimens. Radiobiological modelling suggests that standard fractionation of 6-7 weeks in HNSCC can be compressed safely into a 4-week schedule to counter accelerated repopulation by increasing the dose per fraction and delivering 5 fractions per week which is currently being tested in the ongoing multicentric trial of hypo- vs normo-fractionated accelerated RT (HYPNO study). Herein, we discuss the radiobiological basis of curative-intent hypofractionated-accelerated RT schedule delivering 55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks in HNSCC followed by critical appraisal of the published literature on such regimens with concurrent systemic therapy and its inherent resource-sparing potential applicable across large parts of the world particularly in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejpal Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, HBNI, Mumbai, India.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
136
|
Digitalized healthcare for head and neck cancer patients. JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY, ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY 2020; 122:434-440. [PMID: 33242658 DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The ongoing shortage in healthcare services and the increasing cancer incidence, highlight the need for new strategies to ensure optimal treatments, cares and follow-up for all patients. Digitalized healthcare, which includes various concepts (digital health, telemedicine, telemonitoring and digital therapeutics), are a promising option to meet these needs. In this scoping review, we provide an overview of the recent available research evidence on digitalized healthcare for HNC patients and caregivers. Through the interrogation of PubMed and Cochrane Library databases, a total of 32 relevant articles reporting the use of digitalized healthcare in different settings of HNC patients' care management, were analyzed. Overall, HNC patients as well as caregivers were highly satisfied, especially because digitalized healthcare allows the early detection of health disorders, improve patient's management, quality of life, self-confidence and communication. Furthermore, digitalized healthcare were significantly time- and cost-effective. While the benefits digitalized healthcare has been reported to be feasible and clinically relevant, our future efforts should focus on the demonstration of their clinical utility in well-designed clinical trials. It is tempting to anticipate that this approach will improve patients' management and quality of life and change the way patients interact with family and professional health care givers.
Collapse
|
137
|
Ghate A. Imputing radiobiological parameters of the linear-quadratic dose-response model from a radiotherapy fractionation plan. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:225009. [PMID: 32937610 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abb935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The objective in cancer radiotherapy is to maximize tumor-kill while limiting toxic effects of radiation dose on nearby organs-at-risk (OAR). Given a fixed number of treatment sessions, planners thus face the problem of finding a dosing sequence that achieves this goal. This is called the fractionation problem, and has received steady attention over a long history in the clinical literature. Mathematical formulations of the resulting optimization problem utilize the linear-quadratic (LQ) framework to characterize radiation dose-response of tumors and OAR. This yields a nonconvex quadratically constrained quadratic program. The optimal dosing plan in this forward problem crucially depends on the parameters of the LQ model. Unfortunately, these parameters are difficult to estimate via in vitro or in vivo studies, and as such, their values are unknown to treatment planners. The clinical literature is thus replete with debates about what parameter values will make specific dosing plans effective. This paper formulates this as an inverse optimization problem. The LQ dose-response parameters appear in the objective function, the left hand side, and the right hand side of the forward problem, and none of the existing generic methods can provide an exact solution of the inverse problem. This paper exploits the structure of the problem and identifies all possible parameter values that render the given dosing plan optimal, in closed-form. This closed-form formula is applied to dosing-plans from three clinical studies published within the last two years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archis Ghate
- Industrial & Systems Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Michaelidou A, Adjogatse D, Suh Y, Pike L, Thomas C, Woodley O, Rackely T, Palaniappan N, Jayaprakasam V, Sanchez-Nieto B, Evans M, Barrington S, Lei M, Guerrero Urbano T. 18F-FDG-PET in guided dose-painting with intensity modulated radiotherapy in oropharyngeal tumours: A phase I study (FiGaRO). Radiother Oncol 2020; 155:261-268. [PMID: 33161013 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The FiGaRO trial assessed the feasibility and safety of using an FDG-PET-based dose-painting technique to deliver a radiotherapy (RT) boostto the FDG-avid primary tumour in patients with locally advanced high and intermediate risk oropharyngeal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHOD Patients underwent a planning 18FDG-PET-CT scan, immobilised in the treatment position, after one cycle of induction chemotherapy. The volume of persistent FDG-avidity in the primary tumour was escalated to 71.5 Gy in30 fractions delivered using a simultaneous integrated boost Intensity Modulated RT (SIB-IMRT) technique. RT was delivered with concomitant Cisplatin following 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy. The primary outcome was the incidence of grade ≥ 3 late mucosal toxicity 12 months post-treatment, with an excess rate of >10% regarded as unacceptable. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients were included and twenty-four were treated between 2014 and 2018, in two UK centres. Median follow-up was 36 months (range 4-56 months). Pre-defined planning target volume objectives and organ at risk dose constraints were met in all cases. There were no incidents of acute grade 4 toxicity. There were 4 cases of grade ≥ 3 mucosal toxicity at 12 months post-treatment (19.1%). There were no cases of persistent mucosal ulceration at 12 months. Overall survival at 3-years was 87.5%, 92.9% for intermediate and 70.0% for high risk patients. CONCLUSION Late toxicity rates, although higher than anticipated, are comparable to contemporary published data for standard dose chemo-IMRT. Results suggest improved 3y survival rates for high risk patients. This approach merits further investigation. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02953197.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Michaelidou
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK; Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent, UK
| | - D Adjogatse
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Y Suh
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - L Pike
- King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - C Thomas
- Department of Medical Physics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - O Woodley
- Medical Physics Department, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - T Rackely
- Department of Oncology, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - N Palaniappan
- Department of Oncology, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - V Jayaprakasam
- Wales Research and Diagnostic PET Imaging Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - B Sanchez-Nieto
- Institute of Physics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - M Evans
- Department of Oncology, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - S Barrington
- King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - M Lei
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - T Guerrero Urbano
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
139
|
Benhmida S, Sun R, Gherga E, Hammoud Y, Rouvier J, Mauvais O, Bockel S, Louvrier A, Lebbad A, Bontemps P, Ortholan C, Bourhis J, Lestrade L, Sun XS. Split-course hypofractionated radiotherapy for aged and frail patients with head and neck cancers. A retrospective study of 75 cases. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:812-819. [PMID: 33144061 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the efficacy and the tolerance of a split course hypofractionated (SCH) radiotherapy (RT) protocol in head and neck cancer (HNC) for eldery and/or unfit patients (pts). PATIENTS AND METHODS Pts with HNC treated by SCH-RT in two institutions were included retrospectively. The main SCH RT regimen was two courses of 30 grays (Gy)/10 fractions separated by 2-4 weeks, without any systemic therapy. RESULTS Between February 2012 and January 2019, 75 consecutive patients were analyzed. The median age was 80 years (range: 45.7-98.2) and 53 (70.7%) were men. Sixty-one (81.3%) pts had stage III/IV disease and 54 (72%) had at least two comorbidities. All of them were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 10.6 months (range: 3.1-58.3). Local control at 12 and 24 months was 72.8% IC95%[62-85.5] and 51.7% IC95%[38.1-70.1] respectively. Progression free survival (PFS) at 12 and 24 months were 47.7% IC95%[37.4-60.8] and 41% IC95%[15-36.4] respectively, with a median of 11.5 months IC95%[8.9-17]. OS at 12 and 24 months were 60.4% IC95%[50-73.1] and 41% IC95%[30.6-54.9] respectively, with a median of 19.3 months IC95%[11.9-25.8]. Acute and late grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred for 6 (8%) and 3 (4%) pts. CONCLUSION The present SCH-RT regimen seems effective, well-tolerated and could represent an alternative to palliative strategies for pts deemed unfit for standard exclusive RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Benhmida
- Department of radiotherapy, CHU de Besancon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France; Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France.
| | - R Sun
- Department of radiotherapy, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - E Gherga
- Department of radiotherapy, CHU de Besancon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France; Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France
| | - Y Hammoud
- Department of radiotherapy, CHU de Besancon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France; Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France
| | - J Rouvier
- Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France
| | - O Mauvais
- Department of head and neck surgery, CHU de Besançon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - S Bockel
- Department of radiotherapy, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - A Louvrier
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology, CHU de Besançon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France
| | - A Lebbad
- Department of head and neck surgery, Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté, 100, route de Moval, Trevenans, France
| | - P Bontemps
- Department of radiotherapy, CHU de Besancon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France; Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France
| | - C Ortholan
- Department of radiotherapy, Centre hospitalier Princesse-Grace, 98000 Monaco, Monaco
| | - J Bourhis
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Service de Radio-oncologie, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - L Lestrade
- Department of radiotherapy, CHU de Besancon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France; Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France
| | - X S Sun
- Department of radiotherapy, CHU de Besancon, 2, boulevard Fleming, 25030 Besançon, France; Department of radiotherapy, Hopital Nord Franche-Comté de Montbéliard, site du Mittan, 1 rue Henri Becquerel, 25220 Montbéliard, France
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Machiels JP, René Leemans C, Golusinski W, Grau C, Licitra L, Gregoire V. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx: EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1462-1475. [PMID: 33239190 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 460] [Impact Index Per Article: 92.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J-P Machiels
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium; Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - C René Leemans
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W Golusinski
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences and The Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - C Grau
- Department of Oncology and Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - L Licitra
- Head and Neck Cancer Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - V Gregoire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Machiels JP, René Leemans C, Golusinski W, Grau C, Licitra L, Gregoire V. Reprint of "Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx: EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up". Oral Oncol 2020; 113:105042. [PMID: 33583513 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- J-P Machiels
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium; Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - C René Leemans
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W Golusinski
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences and The Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - C Grau
- Department of Oncology and Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - L Licitra
- Head and Neck Cancer Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - V Gregoire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
142
|
Chang CF, Islam A, Liu PF, Zhan JH, Chueh PJ. Capsaicin acts through tNOX (ENOX2) to induce autophagic apoptosis in p53-mutated HSC-3 cells but autophagy in p53-functional SAS oral cancer cells. Am J Cancer Res 2020; 10:3230-3247. [PMID: 33163267 PMCID: PMC7642647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the progress that has been made in diagnosing and treating oral cancers, they continue to have a poor prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival rate of approximately 50%. We have intensively studied the anticancer properties of capsaicin (a burning constituent of chili pepper), mainly focusing on its apoptotic properties. Here, we investigated the interplay between apoptosis and autophagy in capsaicin-treated oral cancer cells with either functional or mutant p53. Cytotoxicity was determined by cell impedance measurements and WST-1 assays, and cell death was analyzed by flow cytometry. The interaction between capsaicin and tumor-associated NADH oxidase (tNOX, ENOX2) was studied by cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA) and isothermal dose-response fingerprint curves (ITDRFCETSA). Our CETSA data suggested that capsaicin directly engaged with tNOX, resulting in its degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome and the autophagy-lysosome systems. In p53-functional SAS cells, capsaicin induced significant cytotoxicity via autophagy but not apoptosis. Given that tNOX catalyzes the oxidation of NADH, the direct binding of capsaicin to tNOX also inhibited the NAD+-dependent activity of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) deacetylase, we found that capsaicin-induced autophagy involved enhanced acetylation of ULK1, which is a key player in autophagy activation, possibly through SIRT1 inhibition. In p53-mutated HSC-3 cells, capsaicin triggered both autophagy and apoptosis. In this case, autophagy occurred before apoptosis: during this early stage, autophagy seemed to inhibit apoptosis; at a later stage, in contrast, autophagy appeared to be essential for the induction of apoptosis. Western blot analysis revealed that the reduction in tNOX and SIRT1 associated with enhanced ULK1 acetylation and c-Myc acetylation, which in turn, reactivated the TRAIL pathway, ultimately leading to apoptosis. Taken together, our data highlight the potential value of leveraging capsaicin and tNOX in therapeutic strategies against oral cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chin-Fang Chang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Jen-Ai HospitalTaichung 41265, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Education and Research, Jen-Ai HospitalTaichung 41265, Taiwan
- Cancer Medicine Center, Jen-Ai HospitalTaichung 41265, Taiwan
- Basic Medical Education Center, Central Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaichung 40601, Taiwan
| | - Atikul Islam
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University145 Xingda Road, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Fen Liu
- Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University145 Xingda Road, South District, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
| | - Jun-Han Zhan
- Bachelor Program of Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University145 Xingda Road, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
| | - Pin Ju Chueh
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University145 Xingda Road, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, China Medical University HospitalTaichung 40402, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Basic Medicine, China Medical UniversityTaichung 40402, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
Hosni A, Chiu K, Huang SH, Xu W, Huang J, Bayley A, Bratman SV, Cho J, Giuliani M, Kim J, O'Sullivan B, Ringash J, Waldron J, Spreafico A, de Almeida JR, Monteiro E, Witterick I, Chepeha DB, Gilbert RW, Irish JC, Goldstein DP, Hope A. Non-operative management for oral cavity carcinoma: Definitive radiation therapy as a potential alternative treatment approach. Radiother Oncol 2020; 154:70-75. [PMID: 32861702 PMCID: PMC7453211 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the outcomes of oral cavity squamous cell cancer (OSCC) patients treated with non-surgical approach i.e. definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS All OSCC patients treated radically with IMRT (without primary surgery) between 2005-2014 were reviewed in a prospectively collected database. OSCC patients treated with definitive RT received concurrent chemotherapy except for early stage patients or those who declined or were unfit for chemotherapy. The 5-year local, and regional, distant control rates, disease-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival, and late toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS Among 1316 OSCC patients treated with curative-intent; 108 patients (8%) received non-operative management due to: medical inoperability (n = 14, 13%), surgical unresectability (n = 8, 7%), patient declined surgery (n = 15, 14%), attempted preservation of oral structure/function in view of required extensive surgery (n = 53, 49%) or extensive oropharyngeal involvement (n = 18, 17%). Sixty-eight (63%) were cT3-4, 38 (35%) were cN2-3, and 38 (35%) received concurrent chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 52 months, the 5-year local, regional, distant control rate, disease-free, overall, and cancer-specific survival were 78%, 92%, 90%, 42%, 50%, and 76% respectively. Patients with cN2-3 had higher rate of 5-year distant metastasis (24% vs 3%, p = 0.001), with detrimental impact on DFS (p = 0.03) and OS (p < 0.02) on multivariable analysis. Grade ≥ 3 late toxicity was reported in 9% of patients (most common: grade 3 osteoradionecrosis in 6%). CONCLUSIONS Non-operative management of OSCC resulted in a meaningful rate of locoregional control, and could be an alternative curative approach when primary surgery would be declined, unsuitable or unacceptably delayed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Hosni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.
| | - Kevin Chiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Shao Hui Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Jingyue Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Bayley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Scott V Bratman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - John Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Meredith Giuliani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - John Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Jolie Ringash
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - John Waldron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - John R de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric Monteiro
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Ian Witterick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Douglas B Chepeha
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - R W Gilbert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Jonathan C Irish
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - David P Goldstein
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Hope
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Noël G, Thariat J, Antoni D. [Uncertainties in the current concept of radiotherapy planning target volume]. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:667-675. [PMID: 32828670 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The planning target volume is an essential notion in radiotherapy, that requires a new conceptualization. Indeed, the variability and diversity of the uncertainties involved or improved with the development of the new modern technologies and devices in radiotherapy suggest that random and systematic errors cannot be currently generalized. This article attempts to discuss these various uncertainties and tries to demonstrate that a redefinition of the concept of planning target volume toward its personalization for each patient and the robustness notion are likely an improvement basis to take into account the radiotherapy uncertainties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Noël
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (Icans), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67033 Strasbourg, France.
| | - J Thariat
- Département de radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, 3, avenue General-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Association Advance Resource Centre for Hadrontherapy in Europe (Archade), 3, avenue General-Harris, 14000 Caen, France; Laboratoire de physique corpusculaire, Institut national de physique nucléaire et de physique des particules (IN2P3), 6, boulevard Maréchal-Juin, 14000 Caen, France; École nationale supérieure d'ingénieurs de Caen (ENSICaen), 6, boulevard Maréchal-Juin, CS 45053 14050 Caen cedex 4, France; Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), UMR 6534, 6, boulevard Maréchal-Juin, 14000 Caen, France; Université de Caen Normandie (Unicaen), esplanade de la Paix, CS 14032, 14032 Caen, France
| | - D Antoni
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (Icans), 17, rue Albert-Calmette, 67033 Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
De Felice F, Bonomo P, Sanguineti G, Orlandi E. Moderately accelerated intensity-modulated radiation therapy using simultaneous integrated boost: Practical reasons or evidence-based choice? A critical appraisal of literature. Head Neck 2020; 42:3405-3414. [PMID: 32767530 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is the non-surgical mainstay of treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The following aspects have emerged as fundamental components of the combined approach: first, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the minimum standard technical requirement, with level 1 evidence in support of its reduction of late treatment-induced morbidity in comparison with 3D conformal radiotherapy. Second, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the preferred systemic agent to be associated with radiation, with 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks deemed as the reference schedule. Because of significant progress in irradiation techniques achieved in last 15 years, the optimal fractionation schedule in modern radiation era remains controversial, especially for locally advanced disease. The purpose of this work was to perform a critical review on the value of moderately accelerated IMRT using simultaneous-integrated boost (SIB) in HNSCC, aiming to provide insights on current clinical practice and directions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiotherapy 2 Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Znati S, Carter R, Vasquez M, Westhorpe A, Shahbakhti H, Prince J, Vlckova P, De Vellis C, Bascal Z, Loizidou M, Sharma RA. Radiosensitisation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells by Vandetanib. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12071878. [PMID: 32668592 PMCID: PMC7408860 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12071878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in incidence worldwide and requires new approaches to therapy. The combination of anti-angiogenic drug therapy and radiotherapy is one promising new approach. The anti-angiogenic drug vandetanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and RET proto-oncogene with radio-enhancement potential. To explore the benefit of combined vandetanib and radiotherapy treatment for HCC, we studied outcomes following combined treatment in pre-clinical models. Methods: Vandetanib and radiation treatment were combined in HCC cell lines grown in vitro and in vivo. In addition to 2D migration and clonogenic assays, the combination was studied in 3D spheroids and a syngeneic mouse model of HCC. Results: Vandetanib IC50s were measured in 20 cell lines and the drug was found to significantly enhance radiation cell kill and to inhibit both cell migration and invasion in vitro. In vivo, combination therapy significantly reduced cancer growth and improved overall survival, an effect that persisted for the duration of vandetanib treatment. Conclusion: In 2D and 3D studies in vitro and in a syngeneic model in vivo, the combination of vandetanib plus radiotherapy was more efficacious than either treatment alone. This new combination therapy for HCC merits evaluation in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sami Znati
- University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (R.C.); (M.V.); (A.W.); (H.S.); (P.V.); (C.D.V.)
- Correspondence: (S.Z.); (R.A.S.)
| | - Rebecca Carter
- University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (R.C.); (M.V.); (A.W.); (H.S.); (P.V.); (C.D.V.)
| | - Marcos Vasquez
- University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (R.C.); (M.V.); (A.W.); (H.S.); (P.V.); (C.D.V.)
| | - Adam Westhorpe
- University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (R.C.); (M.V.); (A.W.); (H.S.); (P.V.); (C.D.V.)
| | - Hassan Shahbakhti
- University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (R.C.); (M.V.); (A.W.); (H.S.); (P.V.); (C.D.V.)
| | - Jessica Prince
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK;
| | - Petra Vlckova
- University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (R.C.); (M.V.); (A.W.); (H.S.); (P.V.); (C.D.V.)
| | - Chiara De Vellis
- University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (R.C.); (M.V.); (A.W.); (H.S.); (P.V.); (C.D.V.)
- Scuola di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Naturali, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50121 Florence, Italy
| | - Zainab Bascal
- Biocompatibles UK Ltd. (A BTG International Group Company), Lakeview, Riverside Way, Watchmoor Park, Camberley, Surrey GU15 3YH, UK;
| | - Marilena Loizidou
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London NW3 2QG, UK;
| | - Ricky A. Sharma
- University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (R.C.); (M.V.); (A.W.); (H.S.); (P.V.); (C.D.V.)
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, UK
- Correspondence: (S.Z.); (R.A.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Guberina M, Sak A, Pöttgen C, Tinhofer-Keilholz I, Budach V, Balermpas P, Von der Grün J, Rödel CM, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Belka C, Pigorsch S, Combs SE, Mönnich D, Zips D, De-Colle C, Welz S, Linge A, Lohaus F, Baretton G, Gauler T, Baumann M, Krause M, Schuler M, Bankfalvi A, Höing B, Lang S, Stuschke M. ERCC2 gene single-nucleotide polymorphism as a prognostic factor for locally advanced head and neck carcinomas after definitive cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy. THE PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL 2020; 21:37-46. [PMID: 32546699 PMCID: PMC7840506 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-020-0174-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Revised: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Identifying patients with locally advanced head and neck carcinoma on high risk of recurrence after definitive concurrent radiochemotherapy is of key importance for the selection for consolidation therapy and for individualized treatment intensification. In this multicenter study we analyzed recurrence-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DNA repair genes in tumor DNA from 132 patients with locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (LadHnSCC). Patients were treated with definitive radiotherapy and simultaneous cisplatin-based chemotherapy at six partner sites of the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Radiation Oncology Group from 2005 to 2011. For validation, a group of 20 patients was available. Score selection method using proportional hazard analysis and leave-one-out cross-validation were performed to identify markers associated with outcome. The SNPs rs1799793 and rs13181 were associated with survival and the same SNPs and in addition rs17655 with freedom from loco-regional relapse (ffLRR) in the trainings datasets from all patients. The homozygote major rs1799793 genotype at the ERCC2 gene was associated with better (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.418 (0.234-0.744), p = 0.003) and the homozygote minor rs13181 genotype at ERCC2 with worse survival (HR: 2.074, 95% CI (1.177-3.658), p = 0.017) in comparison to the other genotypes. At the ffLRR endpoint, rs1799793 and rs13181 had comparable prognostic value. The rs1799793 and rs13181 genotypes passed the leave-one-out cross-validation procedure and associated with survival and ffLRR in patients with LadHnSCC treated with definitive radiochemotherapy. While findings were confirmed in a small validation dataset, further validation is underway within a prospective biomarker study of the DKTK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Guberina
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Ali Sak
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Tinhofer-Keilholz
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jens Von der Grün
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claus Michael Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Medicine and University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Partner Site Dresden, Germany and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University of Heidelberg Medical School, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT), University of Heidelberg Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany.,Translational Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg Medical School and German Cancer Research Center (DKF), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Group Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Steffi Pigorsch
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephani E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institut für Innovative Radiotherapie (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - David Mönnich
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Chiara De-Colle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Welz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Annett Linge
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Lohaus
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gustavo Baretton
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Tumor and Normal Tissue Bank, University Cancer Centre (UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Gauler
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Medicine and University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Partner Site Dresden, Germany and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Schuler
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Essen, Germany.,Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen, Germany.,Division of Thoracic Oncology, University Medicine Essen-Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Agnes Bankfalvi
- Institute for Pathology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Benedikt Höing
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Essen, University Hospital Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stephan Lang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Essen, University Hospital Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Green M, Van Nest SJ, Soisson E, Huber K, Liao Y, McBride W, Dominello MM, Burmeister J, Joiner MC. Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: We should treat all cancer patients with hypofractionation. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:7-14. [PMID: 32602186 PMCID: PMC7324689 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Green
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMIUSA
| | | | - Emilie Soisson
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of VermontBurlingtonVTUSA
| | - Kathryn Huber
- Department of Radiation OncologyTufts Medical CenterBostonMAUSA
| | - Yixiang Liao
- Department of Radiation OncologyRush University Medical CenterChicagoILUSA
| | - William McBride
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of California at Los Angeles (UCLA)Los AngelesCAUSA
| | | | - Jay Burmeister
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
- Gershenson Radiation Oncology CenterBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMIUSA
| | - Michael C. Joiner
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMIUSA
| |
Collapse
|
149
|
Mazul AL, Stepan KO, Barrett TF, Thorstad WL, Massa S, Adkins DR, Daly MD, Rich JT, Paniello RC, Pipkorn P, Zevallos JP, Jackson RS, Kang SY, Puram SV. Duration of radiation therapy is associated with worse survival in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 2020; 108:104819. [PMID: 32485609 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Delays in radiation are multifactorial, frequent, and associated with poor outcomes. This study investigates the effect of both primary and adjuvant radiation therapy duration and their interaction with other measures of treatment delay on survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS We built a retrospective cohort using the National Cancer Database, consisting of primary oral cavity, hypopharynx, larynx and oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma without distant metastasis and with at least six weeks of radiation. The primary exposure was the duration of radiation therapy (DRT), and the primary outcome was death. We estimated the association between DRT and 5-year overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios (HRs) with Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS In both primary (definitive) and adjuvant (post-surgical) radiation settings, increased DRT results in decreased survival. In the primary radiation cohort, 5-year OS was 59.7% [59.1%-60.3%] among those with 47-53 days DRT, which decreased significantly with each subsequent week to completion (81+ days: 38.4% [36.2%-40.7%]). In the surgical cohort, survival decreased 16.5% when DRT extended beyond 75 days (40-46 days: 68.2% [67.3%-69.1%] vs. 75+ days: 53.3% [50.1%-56.7%]). Multivariate analyses showed increased hazard of death with increased DRT (primary radiation: 81+ days HR: 1.69 [1.58-1.81]); surgical: 75+ days HR: 1.61 [1.37-1.88]), with effects intensifying when restricting to those receiving full-dose radiation. CONCLUSION A prolonged DRT was associated with worse OS in head and neck cancer. Radiation treatment delays of even a week lead to a significant survival disadvantage. DRT had a stronger association with survival than time to initiation of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela L Mazul
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States; Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Katelyn O Stepan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Thomas F Barrett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Wade L Thorstad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Sean Massa
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Douglas R Adkins
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Mackenzie D Daly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Jason T Rich
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Randal C Paniello
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Jose P Zevallos
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Ryan S Jackson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States
| | - Stephen Y Kang
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States; Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Holländer-Mieritz C, Johansen J, Taarnhøj GA, Johansen C, Vogelius IR, Kristensen CA, Pappot H. Systematic use of patient reported outcome during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: study protocol for the national DAHANCA 38 trial. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:603-607. [PMID: 32056473 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1725244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jørgen Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospitalet, Odense, Denmark
| | - Gry A. Taarnhøj
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ivan R. Vogelius
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus A. Kristensen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|