Characterization of the homeobox-containing gene GH6 identifies novel regions of homeobox gene expression in the developing chick embryo

Live imaging of retinotectal mapping reveals topographic map dynamics and a previously undescribed role for Contactin 2 in map sharpening

Organization of neuronal connections into topographic maps is essential for processing information. Yet, our understanding of topographic mapping has remained limited by our inability to observe maps forming and refining directly in vivo. Here, we used Cre-mediated recombination of a new colorswitch reporter in zebrafish to generate the first transgenic model allowing the dynamic analysis of retinotectal mapping in vivo. We found that the antero-posterior retinotopic map forms early but remains dynamic, with nasal and temporal retinal axons expanding their projection domains over time. Nasal projections initially arborize in the anterior tectum but progressively refine their projection domain to the posterior tectum, leading to the sharpening of the retinotopic map along the antero-posterior axis. Finally, using a CRISPR-mediated mutagenesis approach, we demonstrate that the refinement of nasal retinal projections requires the adhesion molecule Contactin 2. Altogether, our study provides the first analysis of a topographic map maturing in real time in a live animal and opens new strategies for dissecting the molecular mechanisms underlying precise topographic mapping in vertebrates.

Autoregulation of retinal homeobox (rax) gene promoter activity through a highly conserved genomic element

The Retinal homeobox (rax) gene is expressed in vertebrate retinal progenitor and stem cells and is essential for retinal development. In frogs, rax is expressed in the ciliary marginal zone (CMZ), a region containing retinal progenitor and stem cells at the anterior of the eye. Little is known regarding regulation of rax transcription and regulation of transcription of rax targets. We found that three ultra-conserved genomic elements (UCEs) flanking the rax coding region regulate expression of a rax promoter-GFP transgene in Xenopus tadpoles. One of these elements, UCE1, regulates expression of the transgene in the dorsal CMZ. UCE1 contains a Rax binding site, PCE-1. We demonstrate that rax regulates expression of the transgene through the PCE-1 site found in UCE1. Therefore, rax transcription in the CMZ is controlled, in part, by autoregulatory mechanisms.

Xenopus laevis Nkx5.3 and sensory organ homeobox (SOHo) are expressed in developing sensory organs and ganglia of the head and anterior trunk

Nkx5 family members are homeobox transcription factors important for sensory organ development. Several members of the Nkx5 family are expressed in the eye, brain, developing ear, and lateral line. Members of this family have been previously identified in medaka, chick, and mouse. Here, we characterize two members of the Nkx5 family, Nkx5.3 and SOHo, in Xenopus laevis. We verify the identity of X. laevis Nkx5.3 and SOHo by phylogenetic comparison to chicken, medaka, and zebrafish orthologs. Both Nkx5.3 and SOHo are expressed in the developing eye, ear, lateral line system, and cranial neurons as determined by in situ hybridization.

A dimerized HMX1 inhibits EPHA6/epha4b in mouse and zebrafish retinas

HMX1 is a homeobox-containing transcription factor implicated in eye development and responsible for the oculo-auricular syndrome of Schorderet-Munier-Franceschetti. HMX1 is composed of two exons with three conserved domains in exon 2, a homeobox and two domains called SD1 and SD2. The function of the latter two domains remains unknown. During retinal development, HMX1 is expressed in a polarized manner and thus seems to play a role in the establishment of retinal polarity although its exact role and mode of action in eye development are unknown. Here, we demonstrated that HMX1 dimerized and that the SD1 and homeodomains are required for this function. In addition, we showed that proper nuclear localization requires the presence of the homeodomain. We also identified that EPHA6, a gene implicated in retinal axon guidance, is one of its targets in eye development and showed that a dimerized HMX1 is needed to inhibit EPHA6 expression.

Hmx1 is required for the normal development of somatosensory neurons in the geniculate ganglion

Hmx1 is a variant homeodomain transcription factor expressed in the developing sensory nervous system, retina, and craniofacial mesenchyme. Recently, mutations at the Hmx1 locus have been linked to craniofacial defects in humans, rats, and mice, but its role in nervous system development is largely unknown. Here we show that Hmx1 is expressed in a subset of sensory neurons in the cranial and dorsal root ganglia which does not correspond to any specific sensory modality. Sensory neurons in the dorsal root and trigeminal ganglia of Hmx1dm/dm mouse embryos have no detectable Hmx1 protein, yet they undergo neurogenesis and express sensory subtype markers normally, demonstrating that Hmx1 is not globally required for the specification of sensory neurons from neural crest precursors. Loss of Hmx1 expression has no obvious effect on the early development of the trigeminal (V), superior (IX/X), or dorsal root ganglia neurons in which it is expressed, but results in marked defects in the geniculate (VII) ganglion. Hmx1dm/dm mouse embryos possess only a vestigial posterior auricular nerve, and general somatosensory neurons in the geniculate ganglion are greatly reduced by mid-gestation. Although Hmx1 is expressed in geniculate neurons prior to cell cycle exit, it does not appear to be required for neurogenesis, and the loss of geniculate neurons is likely to be the result of increased cell death. Fate mapping of neural crest-derived tissues indicates that Hmx1-expressing somatosensory neurons at different axial levels may be derived from either the neural crest or the neurogenic placodes.

Zebrafish hmx1 promotes retinogenesis

Ocular development is controlled by a complex network of transcription factors, cell cycle regulators, and diffusible signaling molecules. Together, these molecules regulate cell proliferation, apoptosis and specify retinal fate. In the zebrafish (Danio rerio), hmx1 is a homeobox transcription factor implicated in eye and brain development. Hmx1 transcripts were detected in the nasal retina and lens as well as otic vesicles and pharyngeal arches by 24-32 hpf. Before this stage, transcripts were more uniformly expressed in the optic vesicle. Knockdown of hmx1 led to microphthalmia. Delayed withdrawal of retinal progenitors from the cell cycle resulting in retarded retinal differentiation was observed in morphant. The retina and brain also showed an increased cell death at 24 hpf. The polarized expression of hmx1 to the nasal part in the zebrafish retina strongly suggested an involvement in the nasal-temporal patterning. However, the key patterning genes tested so far were not regulated by hmx1. Altogether, these results suggest an important role for hmx1 in retinogenesis.

Deletion of a conserved regulatory element required for Hmx1 expression in craniofacial mesenchyme in the dumbo rat: a newly identified cause of congenital ear malformation

Hmx1 is a homeodomain transcription factor expressed in the developing eye, peripheral ganglia, and branchial arches of avian and mammalian embryos. Recent studies have identified a loss-of-function allele at the HMX1 locus as the causative mutation in the oculo-auricular syndrome (OAS) in humans, characterized by ear and eye malformations. The mouse dumbo (dmbo) mutation, with similar effects on ear and eye development, also results from a loss-of-function mutation in the Hmx1 gene. A recessive dmbo mutation causing ear malformation in rats has been mapped to the chromosomal region containing the Hmx1 gene, but the nature of the causative allele is unknown. Here we show that dumbo rats and mice exhibit similar neonatal ear and eye phenotypes. In midgestation embryos, dumbo rats show a specific loss of Hmx1 expression in neural-crest-derived craniofacial mesenchyme (CM), whereas Hmx1 is expressed normally in retinal progenitors, sensory ganglia and in CM, which is derived from mesoderm. High-throughput resequencing of 1 Mb of rat chromosome 14 from dmbo/dmbo rats, encompassing the Hmx1 locus, reveals numerous divergences from the rat genomic reference sequence, but no coding changes in Hmx1. Fine genetic mapping narrows the dmbo critical region to an interval of ∼410 kb immediately downstream of the Hmx1 transcription unit. Further sequence analysis of this region reveals a 5777-bp deletion located ∼80 kb downstream in dmbo/dmbo rats that is not apparent in 137 other rat strains. The dmbo deletion region contains a highly conserved domain of ∼500 bp, which is a candidate distal enhancer and which exhibits a similar relationship to Hmx genes in all vertebrate species for which data are available. We conclude that the rat dumbo phenotype is likely to result from loss of function of an ultraconserved enhancer specifically regulating Hmx1 expression in neural-crest-derived CM. Dysregulation of Hmx1 expression is thus a candidate mechanism for congenital ear malformation, most cases of which remain unexplained.

A symphony of inner ear developmental control genes

The inner ear is one of the most complex and detailed organs in the vertebrate body and provides us with the priceless ability to hear and perceive linear and angular acceleration (hence maintain balance). The development and morphogenesis of the inner ear from an ectodermal thickening into distinct auditory and vestibular components depends upon precise temporally and spatially coordinated gene expression patterns and well orchestrated signaling cascades within the otic vesicle and upon cellular movements and interactions with surrounding tissues. Gene loss of function analysis in mice has identified homeobox genes along with other transcription and secreted factors as crucial regulators of inner ear morphogenesis and development. While otic induction seems dependent upon fibroblast growth factors, morphogenesis of the otic vesicle into the distinct vestibular and auditory components appears to be clearly dependent upon the activities of a number of homeobox transcription factors. The Pax2 paired-homeobox gene is crucial for the specification of the ventral otic vesicle derived auditory structures and the Dlx5 and Dlx6 homeobox genes play a major role in specification of the dorsally derived vestibular structures. Some Micro RNAs have also been recently identified which play a crucial role in the inner ear formation.

Identification of the minimal promoter region of the mouse NKX5-3, a transcription factor implicated in eye development

Early ocular development is controlled by a complex network of transcription factors, cell cycle regulators, and diffusible signalling molecules. Together, these molecules regulate cell proliferation and apoptosis, and specify retinal fate. NKX5-3 is a homeobox transcription factor implicated in eye development. The analysis of the 5'-flanking region of the mouse Nkx5-3 gene revealed a predicted TATA-less promoter sequence between -416 and -166 of the translation start site. To functionally characterise Nkx5-3 promoter activity, serial deletions of the promoter sequence were introduced in pGL-3 basic vector and promoter activity of these 5'- and 3'-deleted constructions was tested in HeLa and CHO cells. Transactivation assays identified a region between -350 and -296 exhibiting promoter-like activity. Combined analysis by deletions and point mutations showed that this sequence, containing multiple Sp1 binding sites was necessary to promote transcriptional activity. Binding of Sp1 to this region was confirmed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and chromatin immunoprecipitation, using an antibody specific for Sp1. Altogether, these results demonstrated that the immediate upstream region of Nkx5-3 gene possessed a strong intrinsic promoter activity in vitro, suggesting a potential role in Nkx5-3 transcription in vivo.

Molecular mechanisms of vertebrate retina development: Implications for ganglion cell and photoreceptor patterning

Although the neural retina appears as a relatively uniform tissue when viewed from its surface, it is in fact highly patterned along its anterior-posterior and dorso-ventral axes. The question of how and when such patterns arise has been the subject of intensive investigations over several decades. Most studies aimed at understanding retinal pattern formation have used the retinotectal map, the ordered projections of retinal ganglion cells to the brain, as a functional readout of the pattern. However, other cell types are also topographically organized in the retina. The most commonly recognized example of such a topographic cellular organization is the differential distribution of photoreceptor types across the retina. Photoreceptor patterns are highly species-specific and may represent an important adaptation to the visual niche a given species occupies. Nevertheless, few studies have addressed this functional readout of pattern to date and our understanding of its development has remained superficial. Here, we review recent advances in understanding the molecular cascades that control regionalization of the eye anlage, relate these findings to the development of photoreceptor patterns and discuss common and unique strategies involved in both aspects of retinal pattern formation.

HOXA13 directly regulates EphA6 and EphA7 expression in the genital tubercle vascular endothelia

Hypospadias, a common defect affecting the growth and closure of the external genitalia, is often accompanied by gross enlargements of the genital tubercle (GT) vasculature. Because Hoxa13 homozygous mutant mice also exhibit hypospadias and GT vessel expansion, we examined whether genes playing a role in angiogenesis exhibit reduced expression in the GT. From this analysis, reductions in EphA6 and EphA7 were detected. Characterization of EphA6 and EphA7 expression in the GT confirmed colocalization with HOXA13 in the GT vascular endothelia. Analysis of the EphA6 and EphA7 promoter regions revealed a series of highly conserved cis-regulatory elements bound by HOXA13 with high affinity. GT chromatin immunoprecipitation confirmed that HOXA13 binds these gene-regulatory elements in vivo. In vitro, HOXA13 activates gene expression through the EphA6 and EphA7 gene-regulatory elements. Together these findings indicate that HOXA13 directly regulates EphA6 and EphA7 in the developing GT and identifies the GT vascular endothelia as a novel site for HOXA13-dependent expression of EphA6 and EphA7.

[Known gene interactions as implicated in craniofacial development]

Many genes intervening in development, morphogenesis and craniofacial growth have been identified, primarily by the use of mice mutants. We can distinguish two families: the signalling factors and the transcription factors. The latter interact with DNA to activate or to inhibit the expression of other genes. Some of the transcription factors are called homeogenes because they interact with DNA by a sequence of amino acids known as homeobox that has been carefully conserved throughout the course of evolution. Those factors interact, and signalling cascades have been described. Current research projects seek to discern the exact role of each of these genes in craniofacial growth and to develop a better understanding of the interactions between them.

Retroviral misexpression of cVax disturbs retinal ganglion cell axon fasciculation and intraretinal pathfinding in vivo and guidance of nasal ganglion cell axons in vivo

The transcription factor cVax (Vax2) is expressed in the ventral neural retina and restricted expression is a prerequisite for at least three prominent aspects of retinal dorsal-ventral patterning: polarized expression of EphB/B-ephrin molecules, the retinotectal projection and the distribution of rod photoreceptors across the retina. In the chick retina, the fasciculation pattern of ganglion cell axons also differs between the dorsal and ventral eye. To investigate the molecular mechanisms involved, the nerve fiber layer was analyzed after retroviral misexpression of several factors known to regulate the positional specification of retinal ganglion cells. Forced cVax expression ventralized the fasciculation pattern and caused axon pathfinding errors near the optic disc. Ectopic expression of different ephrin molecules indicated that axon fasciculation is, at least in part, mediated by the EphB system. Finally, we report that retroviral misexpression of cVax increased the pool of EphA4 receptors phosphorylated on tyrosine residues and altered the guidance preference of nasal axons in vitro. These results identify novel functions for cVax in intraretinal axon fasciculation and pathfinding as well as suggest a mechanism to explain how restricted cVax expression may influence map formation along the dorso-ventral and antero-posterior axes of the optic tectum.

The rod photoreceptor pattern is set at the optic vesicle stage and requires spatially restricted cVax expression

How and when positional identities in the neural retina are established have been addressed primarily with respect to the topographic projections of retinal ganglion cells onto their targets in the brain. Although retinotectal map formation is a prominent manifestation of retinal patterning, it is not the only one. Photoreceptor subtypes are arranged in distinct, species-specific patterns. The mechanisms used to establish photoreceptor patterns have been relatively unexplored at the mechanistic level. We performed ablations of the eye anlage in chickens and found that removal of the anterior or dorsal optic vesicle caused loss of the area centralis, which is a rod-free central area of the retina, and severely disorganized other aspects of the rod pattern. These observations indicate that the anteroposterior and dorsoventral distribution of rods is determined by the optic vesicle stage. To investigate the molecular mechanisms involved, the rod distribution was analyzed after viral misexpression of several patterning genes that were previously shown to be important in positional specification of retinal ganglion cells. Ectopic expression of FoxG1, SOHo1,or GH6 transcription factors expressed in the anterior optic vesicle and/or optic cup, respectively, did not affect the rod pattern. This pattern therefore appears to be specified by an activity acting before, or in parallel with, these factors. In contrast, misexpression of the ventrally restricted transcription factor, cVax, severely disturbed the rod pattern.

Fgf signals from a novel signaling center determine axial patterning of the prospective neural retina

Axial eye patterning determines the positional code of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), which is crucial for their topographic projection to the midbrain. Several asymmetrically expressed determinants of retinal patterning are known, but it is unclear how axial polarity is first established. We find that Fgf signals, including Fgf8, determine retinal patterning along the nasotemporal (NT) axis during early zebrafish embryogenesis: Fgf8 induces nasal and/or suppresses temporal retinal cell fates; and inhibition of all Fgf-receptor signaling leads to complete retinal temporalization and concomitant loss of all nasal fates. Misprojections of RGCs with Fgf-dependent alterations in retinal patterning to the midbrain demonstrate the importance of this early patterning process for late topographic map formation. The crucial period of Fgf-dependent patterning is at the onset of eye morphogenesis. Fgf8 expression, the restricted temporal requirement for Fgf-receptor signaling and target gene expression at this stage suggests that the telencephalic primordium is the source of Fgf8 and acts as novel signaling center for non-autonomous axial patterning of the prospective neural retina.

The HMX homeodomain protein MLS-2 regulates cleavage orientation, cell proliferation and cell fate specification in the C. elegans postembryonic mesoderm

The proper formation of a complex multicellular organism requires the precise coordination of many cellular events, including cell proliferation, cell fate specification and differentiation. The C. elegans postembryonic mesodermal lineage, the M lineage, allows us to study mechanisms coordinating these events at single cell resolution. We have identified an HMX homeodomain protein MLS-2 in a screen for factors required for M lineage patterning. The MLS-2 protein is present in nuclei of undifferentiated cells in the early M lineage and in a subset of head neurons. In the M lineage, MLS-2 activity appears to be tightly regulated at the fourth round of cell division, coincident with the transition from proliferation to differentiation. A predicted null allele of mls-2, cc615, causes reduced cell proliferation in the M lineage, whereas a semi-dominant, gain-of-function allele, tm252, results in increased cell proliferation. Loss or overexpression of mls-2 also affects cleavage orientation and cell fate specification in the M lineage. We show that the increased cell proliferation in mls-2(tm252) mutants requires CYE-1, a G1 cell cycle regulator. Furthermore, the C. elegans Myod homolog HLH-1 acts downstream of mls-2 to specify M-derived coelomocyte cell fates. Thus MLS-2 functions in a cell type-specific manner to regulate both cell proliferation and cell fate specification.

Hmx2 and Hmx3 Homeobox Genes Direct Development of the Murine Inner Ear and Hypothalamus and Can Be Functionally Replaced by Drosophila Hmx

The Hmx homeobox gene family appears to play a conserved role in CNS development in all animal species examined, and in higher vertebrates has an additional role in sensory organ development. Here, we show that murine Hmx2 and Hmx3 have both overlapping and distinct functions in the development of the inner ear's vestibular system, whereas their functions in the hypothalamic/pituitary axis of the CNS appear to be interchangeable. As in analogous knockin studies of Otx and En function, Drosophila Hmx can rescue conserved functions in the murine CNS. However, in contrast to Otx and En, Drosophila Hmx also rescues significant vertebrate-specific functions outside the CNS. Our work suggests that the evolution of the vertebrate inner ear may have involved (1) the redeployment of ancient Hmx activities to regulate the cell proliferation of structural components and (2) the acquisition of additional, vertebrate-specific Hmx activities to regulate the sensory epithelia.

Transgenic analysis of the atrialnatriuretic factor (ANF) promoter: Nkx2-5 and GATA-4 binding sites are required for atrial specific expression of ANF

The atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) gene is initially expressed throughout the myocardial layer of the heart, but during subsequent development, expression becomes limited to the atrial chambers. Mouse knockout and mammalian cell culture studies have shown that the ANF gene is regulated by combinatorial interactions between Nkx2-5, GATA-4, Tbx5, and SRF; however, the molecular mechanisms leading to chamber-specific expression are currently unknown. We have isolated the Xenopus ANF promoter in order to examine the temporal and spatial regulation of the ANF gene in vivo using transgenic embryos. The mammalian and Xenopus ANF promoters show remarkable sequence similarity, including an Nkx2-5 binding site (NKE), two GATA sites, a T-box binding site (TBE), and two SRF binding sites (SREs). Our transgenic studies show that mutation of either SRE, the TBE or the distal GATA element, strongly reduces expression from the ANF promoter. However, mutations of the NKE, the proximal GATA, or both elements together, result in relatively minor reductions in transgene expression within the myocardium. Surprisingly, mutation of these elements results in ectopic ANF promoter activity in the kidneys, facial muscles, and aortic arch artery-associated muscles, and causes persistent expression in the ventricle and outflow tract of the heart. We propose that the NKE and proximal GATA elements serve as crucial binding sites for assembly of a repressor complex that is required for atrial-specific expression of the ANF gene.

PITX2 isoform-specific regulation of atrial natriuretic factor expression: synergism and repression with Nkx2.5

PITX2 and Nkx2.5 are two of the earliest known transcriptional markers of vertebrate heart development. Pitx2-/- mice present with severe cardiac malformations and embryonic lethality, demonstrating a role for PITX2 in heart development. However, little is known about the downstream targets of PITX2 in cardiogenesis. We report here that the atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) promoter is a target of PITX2. PITX2A, PITX2B, and PITX2C isoforms differentially activate the ANF promoter. However, only PITX2C can synergistically activate the ANF promoter in the presence of Nkx2.5. We further demonstrate that the procollagen lysyl hydroxylase (PLOD1) promoter is regulated by Nkx2.5. Mechanistically, PITX2C and Nkx2.5 synergistically regulate ANF and PLOD1 expression through binding to their respective DNA elements. Surprisingly, PITX2A activation of the ANF and PLOD1 promoters is repressed by co-transfection of Nkx2.5 in the C3H10T1/2 embryonic fibroblast cell line. Pitx2a and Pitx2c are endogenously expressed in C3H10T1/2 cells, and these cells express factors that differentially regulate PITX2 isoform activities. We provide a new mechanism for the regulation of heart development by PITX2 isoforms through the regulation of ANF and PLOD1 gene expression and Nkx2.5 transcriptional activity.

The dorsal-ventral axis of the neural retina is divided into multiple domains of restricted gene expression which exhibit features of lineage compartments

The neural retina is a complex sensory structure designed to receive, integrate, and transmit visual information. An important aspect of retinal development is the establishment of pattern along the dorsal-ventral (D-V) and anterior-posterior (A-P) axes. The recent identification and functional characterization of a dorsal-specific and a ventral-specific transcription factor suggested that the D-V axis is divided into two domains. This study characterizes the expression patterns of these and other D-V markers, and establishes that the retina is subdivided into at least four domains of gene expression along this axis. The composition and spatial relation of these expression domains alters our model of D-V patterning, suggesting more complexity in the way that the retina is patterned than was previously recognized. As domains of gene expression within developing tissues sometimes comprise compartments whose borders are not crossed by clonally related cells, we performed a retroviral lineage study. A strong preference for cells to remain in their original domain of gene expression was observed, suggesting that these borders comprise developmental compartments.

Patterning the neural retina

The early patterning events that shape the neural retina guide the genesis and distribution of postmitotic cell types, as well as their connectivity. The recent discovery of key signaling pathways and transcription factors involved in establishing central, anterior-posterior, and dorsal-ventral retinal patterning has given us insights into the molecular mechanisms controlling these events.

Early eye development in vertebrates

This review provides a synthesis that combines data from classical experimentation and recent advances in our understanding of early eye development. Emphasis is placed on the events that underlie and direct neural retina formation and lens induction. Understanding these events represents a longstanding problem in developmental biology. Early interest can be attributed to the curiosity generated by the relatively frequent occurrence of disorders such as cyclopia and anophthalmia, in which dramatic changes in eye development are readily observed. However, it was the advent of experimental embryology at the turn of the century that transformed curiosity into active investigation. Pioneered by investigators such as Spemann and Adelmann, these embryological manipulations have left a profound legacy. Questions about early eye development first addressed using tissue manipulations remain topical as we try to understand the molecular basis of this process.

Hmx2 homeobox gene control of murine vestibular morphogenesis

Development of the vertebrate inner ear is characterized by a series of genetically programmed events involving induction of surface ectoderm, preliminary morphogenesis, specification and commitment of sensory, nonsensory and neuronal cells, as well as outgrowth and restructuring of the otocyst to form a complex labyrinth. Hmx2, a member of the Hmx homeobox gene family, is coexpressed with Hmx3 in the dorsolateral otic epithelium. Targeted disruption of Hmx2 in mice demonstrates the temporal and spatial involvement of Hmx2 in the embryonic transition of the dorsal portion (pars superior) of the otocyst to a fully developed vestibular system. In Hmx2 null embryos, a perturbation in cell fate determination in the lateral aspect of the otic epithelium results in reduced cell proliferation in epithelial cells, which includes the vestibular sensory patches and semicircular duct fusion plates, as well as in the adjacent mesenchyme. Consequently, enlargement and morphogenesis of the pars superior of the otocyst to form a complex labyrinth of cavities and ducts is blocked, as indicated by the lack of any distinguishable semicircular ducts, persistence of the primordial vestibular diverticula, significant loss in the three cristae and the macula utriculus, and a fused utriculosaccular chamber. The developmental regulators Bmp4, Dlx5 and Pax2 all play a critical role in inner ear ontogeny, and the expression of each of these genes is affected in the Hmx2 null otocyst suggesting a complex regulatory role for Hmx2 in this genetic cascade. Both Hmx2 and Hmx3 transcripts are coexpressed in the developing central nervous system including the neural tube and hypothalamus. A lack of defects in the CNS, coupled with the fact that not all of the Hmx2-positive regions in developing inner ear are impaired in the Hmx2 null mice, suggest that Hmx2 and Hmx3 have both unique and overlapping functions during embryogenesis.

Two-step regulation of left-right asymmetric expression of Pitx2: initiation by nodal signaling and maintenance by Nkx2

Pitx2 is left--right (L--R) asymmetrically expressed initially in the lateral plate and later in primordial visceral organs. The transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that underlie L--R asymmetric expression of Pitx2 were investigated. Mouse Pitx2 has a left side-specific enhancer (ASE) that mediates both the initiation and maintenance of L--R asymmetric expression. This element contains three binding sites for the transcription factor FAST. The FAST binding sites function as Nodal-responsive elements and are sufficient for the initiation but not for the maintenance of asymmetric expression. The maintenance requires an Nkx2-5 binding site also present within the ASE. These results suggest that the left-sided expression of Pitx2 is directly initiated by Nodal signaling and is subsequently maintained by Nkx2. Such two-step control may represent a general mechanism for gene regulation during development.

Two homeobox genes define the domain of EphA3 expression in the developing chick retina

Graded expression of the Eph receptor EphA3 in the retina and its two ligands, ephrin A2 and ephrin A5 in the optic tectum, the primary target of retinal axons, have been implicated in the formation of the retinotectal projection map. Two homeobox containing genes, SOHo1 and GH6, are expressed in a nasal-high, temporal-low pattern during early retinal development, and thus in opposing gradients to EphA3. Retroviral misexpression of SOHo1 or GH6 completely and specifically repressed EphA3 expression in the neural retina, but not in other parts of the central nervous system, such as the optic tectum. Under these conditions, some temporal ganglion cell axons overshot their expected termination zones in the rostral optic tectum, terminating aberrantly at more posterior locations. However, the majority of ganglion cell axons mapped to the appropriate rostrocaudal locations, although they formed somewhat more diffuse termination zones. These findings indicate that other mechanisms, in addition to differential EphA3 expression in the neural retina, are required for retinal ganglion axons to map to the appropriate rostrocaudal locations in the optic tectum. They further suggest that the control of topographic specificity along the retinal nasal-temporal axis is split into several independent pathways already at a very early time in development.

Hmx: an evolutionary conserved homeobox gene family expressed in the developing nervous system in mice and Drosophila

Three homeobox genes, one from Drosophila melanogaster (Drosophila Hmx gene) and two from mouse (murine Hmx2 and Hmx3) were isolated and the full-length cDNAs and corresponding genomic structures were characterized. The striking homeodomain similarity encoded by these three genes to previously identified genes in sea urchin, chick and human, as well as the recently cloned murine Hmx1 gene, and the low homology to other homeobox genes indicate that the Hmx genes comprise a novel gene family. The widespread existence of Hmx genes in the animal kingdom suggests that this gene family is of ancient origin. Drosophila Hmx was mapped to the 90B5 region of Chromosome 3 and at early embryonic stages is primarily expressed in distinct areas of the neuroectoderm and subsets of neuroblasts in the developing fly brain. Later its expression continues in rostral areas of the brain in a segmented pattern, suggesting a putative role in the development of the Drosophila central nervous system. During evolution, mouse Hmx2 and Hmx3 may have retained a primary function in central nervous system development as suggested by their expression in the postmitotic cells of the neural tube, as well as in the hypothalamus, the mesencephalon, metencephalon and discrete regions in the myelencephalon during embryogenesis. Hmx1 has diverged from other Hmx members by its expression in the dorsal root, sympathetic and vagal nerve (X) ganglia. Aside from their expression in the developing nervous system, all three Hmx genes display expression in sensory organ development, and in the adult uterus. Hmx2 and Hmx3 show identical expression in the otic vesicle, whereas Hmx1 is strongly expressed in the developing eye. Transgenic mouse lines were generated to examine the DNA regulatory elements controlling Hmx2 and Hmx3. Transgenic constructs spanning more than 31 kb of genomic DNA gave reproducible expression patterns in the developing central and peripheral nervous systems, eye, ear and other tissues, yet failed to fully recapitulate the endogenous expression pattern of either Hmx2 or Hmx3, suggesting both the presence and absence of certain critical enhancers in the transgenes, or the requirement of proximal enhancers to work synergistically.

Molecular genetics of pattern formation in the inner ear: do compartment boundaries play a role?

The membranous labyrinth of the inner ear establishes a precise geometrical topology so that it may subserve the functions of hearing and balance. How this geometry arises from a simple ectodermal placode is under active investigation. The placode invaginates to form the otic cup, which deepens before pinching off to form the otic vesicle. By the vesicle stage many genes expressed in the developing ear have assumed broad, asymmetrical expression domains. We have been exploring the possibility that these domains may reflect developmental compartments that are instrumental in specifying the location and identity of different parts of the ear. The boundaries between compartments are proposed to be the site of inductive interactions required for this specification. Our work has shown that sensory organs and the endolymphatic duct each arise near the boundaries of broader gene expression domains, lending support to this idea. A further prediction of the model, that the compartment boundaries will also represent lineage-restriction compartments, is supported in part by fate mapping the otic cup. Our data suggest that two lineage-restriction boundaries intersect at the dorsal pole of the otocyst, a convergence that may be critical for the specification of endolymphatic duct outgrowth. We speculate that the patterning information necessary to establish these two orthogonal boundaries may emanate, in part, from the hindbrain. The compartment boundary model of ear development now needs to be tested through a variety of experimental perturbations, such as the removal of boundaries, the generation of ectopic boundaries, and/or changes in compartment identity.

A model of retinal cell differentiation in the chick embryo

This article presents an overview of retinal cell differentiation in the chick embryo, in the context of a hypothetical model based on information generated during the last several years. The model proposes that: (1) most (if not all) proliferating neuroepithelial cells have the potential to give rise to a progeny comprising two or more different cell types; (2) the time at which cells undergo their terminal mitosis does not determine their differentiated fate; (3) many postmitotic precursor cells remain plastic (i.e., uncommitted) for some time after terminal mitosis, during which they encounter position-dependent signals as they migrate toward their definitive laminar position within the retina; (4) as a consequence of these inductive stimuli, precursor cells that migrate to different retinal layers express different transcriptional regulators; (5) morphologically undifferentiated precursor cells are committed to cell type-specific, complex patterns of differentiation, which they can express even when isolated from their normal microenvironment, and (6) even after precursor cells become committed to a specific identity, additional inductive signals are necessary for the cells to complete the development of a fully mature phenotype. The article presents a summary of the supportive evidence, as well as a critical evaluation of the model, and concludes with an overview of unanswered questions regarding retinal cell differentiation and a brief evaluation of the prospects for further progress in this field.

Two highly related homeodomain proteins, Nkx5-1 and Nkx5-2, display different DNA binding specificities

The mouse Nkx5-1 and Nkx5-2 genes are related to NK genes in Drosophila and encode proteins with very similar homeodomains. In higher vertebrates Nkx5 genes are specifically expressed in the inner ear. Inactivation of the mouse Nkx5-1 gene by homologous recombination revealed a critical role for the formation of vestibular inner ear structures. Here, we investigated biochemical properties of the proteins encoded by the Nkx5 genes. A similar consensus binding sequence was isolated for both Nkx5 proteins using binding site selection. This sequence is related to target sequences previously identified for other Nkx proteins and contains the conserved homeodomain binding core TAAT. An additional, novel and unrelated high affinity binding sequence could be identified for the Nkx5-2 protein.

Lens development

This review gives a brief account of the main processes of lens development, including induction, morphogenesis, differentiation and growth. It describes what is known about the molecules and mechanisms that control and regulate these processes. Some of the recent progress made in understanding the molecular basis of lens development is highlighted along with some of the challenging areas for future research.

Expression of the Vax family homeobox genes suggests multiple roles in eye development

BACKGROUND

Homeobox gene products are thought to regulate target genes involved in the regional specification of tissues and organs. Several genes play roles in eye development.

RESULTS

We isolated two new mouse homeobox genes, Vax1 and Vax2, expressed in retina primordium. The two genes share the same gene organization, consisting of three exons with predicted amino acid sequences identical in the homeodomain but diversified in other regions. At 9. 5 days post coitum, both Vax genes were expressed in optic vesicles. At 11.5-14.5 dpc, Vax1 became restricted to the optic stalk, while Vax2 was expressed in the ventral half of the neural retina. Mapping of Vax2 between D6Mit3 and D6Mit8 on chromosome 6 indicated a possible linkage with Emx1.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression patterns of Vax genes suggest separate and specific involvement in eye development. Vax1 may contribute to differentiation of the neuroretina, pigmented epithelium and optic stalk, while Vax2 could function in the establishment of the dorso-ventral axis of the retina and the visual system. The chromosomal location of Vax2 suggests that Vax2-Emx1 and Vax1-Emx2 arose by chromosome duplication of the same ancestral gene.

Transcriptional antagonism between Hmx1 and Nkx2.5 for a shared DNA-binding site

The recently described Hmx family of homeodomain proteins is predominately expressed in discrete regions of developing sensory tissues. In this report, we have identified the preferred DNA-binding site of the murine Hmx3 homeodomain protein by the selection and amplification binding (SAAB) technique. The consensus Hmx-binding site contained the sequence 5'-CAAGTG-3', which differs from the 5'-TAAT-3' motif commonly associated with homeodomain proteins. Instead, the Hmx consensus is similar to the 5'-CAAGTG-3'-binding sites of Nkx2.1 and Nkx2.5 homeodomain proteins. Based on mutation studies, both the 5'-CAAG-3' core and the 3'-TG dinucleotide are required for high affinity binding by Hmx3 and the homologous Hmx1 protein. A critical determinant of this specificity is the glutamine at position 50 in the third helix of the Hmx homeodomain. Hmx1 binds to the 5'-CAAGTG-3' element with an apparent dissociation constant of 20 nM. Unexpectedly, the human Hmx1 protein specifically repressed transcription from a luciferase reporter gene containing 3 copies of the 5'-CAAGTG-3' sequence. In contrast, the Nkx2.5 protein transactivated this luciferase reporter. Interestingly, co-expression of Hmx1 and Nkx2.5 attenuated each others activity, suggesting that genes containing the CAAGTG element can integrate signals from these proteins. Therefore, Hmx1 and Nkx2. 5 proteins bind a unique DNA sequence and act as transcriptional antagonists.

Molecular regulators involved in vertebrate eye development

Development of the eye can be subdivided into three phases. The first phase is the formation of the major structures of the eye by the processes of induction and regional specification. The second is the maturation of these structures to form the functional eye, and the third phase is the formation of neuronal connections between retina and the optic tectum. These processes are tightly regulated by signalling cascades that direct axonal outgrowth, cellular proliferation and differentiation. Some members of these signalling cascades have been identified in recent studies. These include secreted factors which transmit signals extracellularly, and receptors and transcription factors which are members of intracellular signalling pathways that respond to extracellular signals. This review summarizes the recent research that has implicated these factors in playing a role in eye development on the basis of functional or expression criteria.

Signalling interactions during facial development

The development of the vertebrate face is a dynamic multi-step process which starts with the formation of neural crest cells in the developing brain and their subsequent migration to form, together with mesodermal cells, the facial primordia. Signalling interactions co-ordinate the outgrowth of the facial primordia from buds of undifferentiated mesenchyme into the intricate series of bones and cartilage structures that, together with muscle and other tissues, form the adult face. Some of the molecules that are thought to be involved have been identified through the use of mouse mutants, data from human craniofacial syndromes and by expression studies of signalling molecules during facial development. However, the way that these molecules control the epithelial-mesenchymal interactions which mediate facial outgrowth and morphogenesis is unclear. The role of neural crest cells in these processes has also not yet been well defined. In this review we discuss the complex interaction of all these processes during face development and describe the candidate signalling molecules and their possible target genes.

Cloning, characterization, and mapping of the mouse homeobox gene Hmx1

Homeobox-containing genes play an important role in development, including positional specification of the body plan and organogenesis. We previously isolated the human HMX1 (H6) gene, a novel homeobox-containing gene of the HMX family, from a human embryonic craniofacial cDNA library. The closely related mouse genes Hmx3 (Nkx5.1) and Hmx2 (Nkx5.2) are in the same class as the HMX1 gene and are expressed in the craniofacial region of the developing embryo. To provide a resource for further characterization of the human HMX1 gene, we isolated the mouse Hmx1 genomic clone. We show here the mouse Hmx1 genomic sequence, its gene mapping, and its expression pattern in the developing mouse embryo. Evidence is presented showing that the three known Hmx genes in the mouse likely play complementary roles in the development of the second arch, retina, sympathetic nerve ganglia, and cranial neural ganglia. Hmx1 may play an important role in the development of craniofacial structures and may interact with Hoxa-2 and Dlx-2 in the second branchial arch.

Inner ear and maternal reproductive defects in mice lacking the Hmx3 homeobox gene

The Hmx homeobox gene family is of ancient origin, being present in species as diverse as Drosophila, sea urchin and mammals. The three members of the murine Hmx family, designated Hmx1, Hmx2 and Hmx3, are expressed in tissues that suggest a common functional role in sensory organ development and pregnancy. Hmx3 is one of the earliest markers for vestibular inner ear development during embryogenesis, and is also upregulated in the myometrium of the uterus during pregnancy. Targeted disruption of the Hmx3 gene results in mice with abnormal circling behavior and severe vestibular defects owing to a depletion of sensory cells in the saccule and utricle, and a complete loss of the horizontal semicircular canal crista, as well as a fusion of the utricle and saccule endolymphatic spaces into a common utriculosaccular cavity. Both the sensory and secretory epithelium of the cochlear duct appear normal in the Hmx3 null animals. The majority of Hmx3 null females have a reproductive defect. Hmx3 null females can be fertilized and their embryos undergo normal preimplantation development, but the embryos fail to implant successfully in the Hmx3 null uterus and subsequently die. Transfer of preimplantation embryos from mutant Hmx3 uterine horns to wild-type pseudopregnant females results in successful pregnancy, indicating a failure of the Hmx3 null uterus to support normal post-implantation pregnancy. Molecular analysis revealed the perturbation of Hmx, Wnt and LIF gene expression in the Hmx3 null uterus. Interestingly, expression of both Hmx1 and Hmx2 is downregulated in the Hmx3 null uterus, suggesting a hierarchical relationship among the three Hmx genes during pregnancy.

The development of the vertebrate inner ear

The inner ear is a complex sensory organ responsible for balance and sound detection in vertebrates. It originates from a transient embryonic structure, the otic vesicle, that contains all of the information to develop autonomously into the mature inner ear. We review here the development of the otic vesicle, bringing together classical embryological experiments and recent genetic and molecular data. The specification of the prospective ectoderm and its commitment to the otic fate are very early events and can be related to the expression of genes with restricted expression domains. A combinatorial gene expression model for placode specification and diversification, based on classical embryological evidence and gene expression patterns, is discussed. The formation of the otic vesicle is dependent on inducing signals from endoderm, mesoderm and neuroectoderm. Ear induction consists of a sequence of discrete instructions from those tissues that confer its final identity on the otic field, rather than a single all-or-none process. The important role of the neural tube in otic development is highlighted by the abnormalities observed in mouse mutants for the Hoxa1, kreisler and fgf3 genes and those reported in retinoic acid-deficient quails. Still, the nature of the relation between the neural tube and otic development remains unclear. Gene targeting experiments in the mouse have provided evidence for genes potentially involved in regional and cell-fate specification in the inner ear. The disruption of the mouse Brn3.1 gene identifies the first mutation affecting sensory hair-cell specification, and mutants for Pax2 and Nkx5.1 genes show their requirement for the development of specific regions of the otic vesicle. Several growth-factors contribute to the patterned cell proliferation of the otic vesicle. Among these, IGF-I and FGF-2 are expressed in the otic vesicle and may act in an autocrine manner. Finally, little is known about early mechanisms involved in guiding ear innervation. However, targeted disruption of genes coding for neurotrophins and Trk receptors have shown that once synaptic contacts are established, they depend on specific trophic interactions that involve these two gene families. The accessibility of new cellular and molecular approaches are opening new perspectives in vertebrate development and are also starting to be applied to ear development. This will allow this classical and attractive model system to see a rapid progress in the near future.

The expression domain of two related homeobox genes defines a compartment in the chicken inner ear that may be involved in semicircular canal formation

Homeobox-containing genes encode a class of proteins that control patterning in developing systems, in some cases by acting as selector genes that define compartment identity. In an effort to demonstrate a similar role for such genes during ear development in the chicken, we present a detailed expression study of two related homeobox-containing genes, SOHo-1 and GH6, using in situ hybridization. At otocyst stages the two genes define a broad lateral domain of expression, which may represent a developmental compartment. Three-dimensional computer reconstructions of SOHo-1 expression at these and later stages revealed that the lateral domain becomes progressively restricted to the three semicircular canals. Thus, SOHo-1 and GH6 are among a small group of markers for a specific structural component of the inner ear. The gene expression domain initially includes the sensory regions of the semicircular canals, known as the cristae ampullaris, but none of the other four sensory organs which were recognizable by BMP4 expression during early morphogenesis (stages 19-24). Significantly, two of the sensory organs (the superior and posterior cristae) were found at the limits, or boundaries, of the SOHo-1/GH6 expression domain, suggesting that compartment boundaries may be involved in specifying sensory organ location as well as identity. Maintained expression at the boundaries may aid in specifying the location of canal outgrowth. These concepts are presented as a formal model which emphasizes that patterning information could be provided at the boundaries of gene expression domains in the inner ear.

Isolation of a new homeobox gene belonging to the Pitx/Rieg family: expression during lens development and mapping to the aphakia region on mouse chromosome 19

We recently reported the positional cloning of a homeobox gene involved in the pathogenesis of Rieger syndrome, RIEG1 , and its mouse homolog, Rieg1 . Rieg1 (also independently described as Pitx2) is highly homologous to the Ptx1/Potx gene product, suggesting that there may be additional members of this novel Pitx family. The Pitx genes play an important role in eye, tooth, pituitary and umbilical region development as evidenced by Rieger syndrome and iris hypoplasia phenotypes, resulting from mutations in the RIEG1 gene and by expression studies. In order to characterize further the Pitx gene family we searched mouse cDNA libraries to identify additional members. A new gene was isolated which encodes a homeoprotein with strong homology to the other Pitx proteins and 97-100% identity in the homeodomain itself, suggesting that this is a third member of the family, Pitx3 . In whole mount in situ hybridization on mouse embryos ranging from 8.5 to 11.5 days post-coitum (d.p.c.), Pitx3 mRNA was seen only in the developing lens starting at day 11. Hybridization on cross-sections revealed strong signals in the lens vesicle in 11 d.p.c. embryos and throughout the lens, particularly in the anterior epithelium and equator region in 15 d.p.c. embryos. Pitx3 was mapped close to aphakia on mouse chromosome 19. The aphakia homozygous mouse is characterized by small eyes lacking a lens, which fail to develop beyond 11 d.p.c. These data make Pitx3 a strong candidate gene for the aphakia phenotype in the mouse and suggest a role for the human homolog in congenital lens malformations.

Novel genes expressed in the chick otocyst during development: identification using differential display of RNA

Differential display of mRNA is a technique that enables the researcher to compare genes expressed in two or more different tissues or in the same tissue or cell under different conditions. The method is based on polymerase chain reaction amplification and comparison of specific subsets of mRNA. We have used this method to clone partial complementary DNAs (cDNAs; amplicons) for genes expressed in the otocyst in order to identify genes that may be involved in development of the inner ear. A full length cDNA was isolated from an embryonic quail head library with an amplicon (KH121) obtained from the otocyst. This avian cDNA encoded a novel, 172-amino acid acidic protein and detected a major transcript of ca 0.8 kb in RNA from chick embryos and several neonatal chick tissues. The full length avian cDNA had high sequence identity to several human cDNAs (expressed sequence tags) from human fetal tissues, including cochlea, brain, liver/spleen and lung, and from placenta. The human homologue of the avian gene encoded a protein that was 183 amino acids long and had 75.6% amino acid sequence identity to the avian protein. These results identified both the avian and human homologues of an evolutionarily conserved gene encoding a small acidic protein of unknown function; however, expression of this gene was not restricted to otocysts.

Gene homologs on human chromosome 15q21-q26 and a chicken microchromosome identify a new conserved segment

The genes for insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R), aggrecan (AGC1), beta2-microglobulin (B2M), and an H6-related gene have been mapped to a single chicken microchromosome by genetic linkage analysis. In addition, a second H6-related gene was mapped to chicken macrochromosome 3. The Igf1r and Agc1 loci are syntenic on mouse Chr 7, together with Hmx3, an H6-like locus. This suggests that the H6-related locus, which maps to the chicken microchromosome in this study, is the homolog of mouse Hmx3. The IGF1R, AGC1, and B2M loci are located on human Chr 15, probably in the same order as found for this chicken microchromosome. This conserved segment, however, is not entirely conserved in the mouse and is split between Chr 7 (Igf1r-Agc) and 2 (B2m). This comparison also predicts that the HMX3 locus may map to the short arm of human Chr 15. The conserved segment defined by the IGF1R-AGC1-HMX3-B2M loci is approximately 21-35 Mb in length and probably covers the entire chicken microchromosome. These results suggest that a segment of human Chr 15 has been conserved as a chicken microchromosome. The significance of this result is discussed with reference to the evolution of the avian and mammalian genomes.

Cellular and molecular features of lens differentiation: a review of recent advances

In this paper, the more recent literature pertaining to differentiation in the developing vertebrate lens is reviewed in relation to previous work. The literature reviewed reveals that the developing lens has been, and will continue to be, a useful model system for the examination of many fundamental processes occurring during embryonic development. Areas of lens development reviewed here include: the induction and early embryology of the lens; lens cell culture techniques; the role of growth factors and cytokines; the involvement of gap junctions in lens cell-cell communication; the role of cell adhesion molecules, integrins, and the extracellular matrix; the role of the cytoskeleton; the processes of programmed cell death (apoptosis) and lens fibre cell denucleation; the involvement of Pax and Homeobox genes; and crystallin gene regulation. Finally, some speculation is provided as to possible directions for further research in lens development.

Cell fate specification in the inner ear

From its origin as a single ectodermal patch, the inner ear becomes a labyrinth of chambers housing six to eight sensory organs. Along the way, specific cell fates are realized. The secrets underlying these cell fate specifications are beginning to be revealed through the application of several molecular-genetic approaches. Recent papers describing such approaches have included gene expression studies in the early otic epithelium and inner ear sensory epithelia. large-scale screens of zebrafish mutants to identify ear defects, and targeted gene perturbations of neurotrophins. of their receptors or of the Brn-3.1 transcription factor in mice.

Checklist: vertebrate homeobox genes

Up to now around 170 different homeobox genes have been cloned from vertebrate genomes. A compilation of the various isolates from mouse, chick, frog, fish and man is presented in the form of a concise checklist, including the designations from the original publications. Putative homologs from different species are aligned, and key characteristics of embryonic or adult expression domains, as well as mutant phenotypes are briefly indicated.

Genetic aspects of embryonic eye development in vertebrates

The vertebrate eye comprises tissues from different embryonic origins, e.g., iris and ciliary body are derived from the wall of the diencephalon via optic vesicle and optic cup. Lens and cornea, on the other hand, come from the overlying surface ectoderm. The timely action of transcription factors and inductive signals ensure the correct development of the different eye components. Establishing the genetic basis of eye defects has been an important tool for the detailed analysis of this complex process. One of the main control genes for eye development was discovered by the analysis of the allelic series of the Small eye mouse mutants and characterized as Pax6. It is involved in the interaction between the optic cup and the overlaying ectoderm. The central role for Pax6 in eye development is conserved throughout the animal kingdom as the murine Pax6 gene induces ectopic eyes in transgenic Drosophila despite the obvious diverse organization of the eye in the fruit fly compared to vertebrates. In human, mutations in the PAX6 gene are responsible for aniridia and Peter's anomaly. In addition to Pax6, other mutations affecting the interaction of the optic cup and the lens placode have been documented in the mouse. For the differentiation of the retina from the optic cup several genes are responsible: Mi leads to microphthalmia, if mutated, and encodes for a transcription factor, which is expressed in the melanocytes of the pigmented layer of the retina. In addition, further genes are implicated in the correct development of the retina, e.g., Chx10, Dlx1, GH6, Msx1 and -2, Otx1 and -2, or Wnt7b. Mutations within the retinoblastoma gene (RB1) are responsible for retinal tumors. Knock-out mutants of RB1 exhibit a block of lens differentiation prior to the retinal defect. Besides the influence of Rb1, the lens differentiates under the influence of growth factors (e.g., FGF, IGF, PDGF, TGF), and specific genes become activated encoding cytoskeletal proteins (e.g., filensin, phakinin, vimentin), structural proteins (e.g., crystallins) or membrane proteins (e.g., Mip). The optic nerve originates from the neural retina; ganglion cells grow to the optic stalk, forming the optic nerve. Its retrograde walk to the brain through the rudiment of the optic stalk depends on the correct Pax2 expression.