The value of platinum agents as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neoadjuvant Therapy: Current Landscape and Future Horizons for ER-Positive/HER2-Negative and Triple-Negative Early Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Navigating the complex landscape of breast cancer treatment involves distinct strategies for luminal and triple-negative subtypes. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy historically dominates the approach for aggressive triple-negative tumors, recent evidence highlights the transformative impact of immunotherapy, alongside chemotherapy, in reshaping treatment paradigms. In luminal cancers, endocrine therapy, notably aromatase inhibitors, demonstrates promising outcomes in postmenopausal patients with low-grade luminal A tumors. However, integrating targeted therapies like CDK4/6 inhibitors in neoadjuvant setting remains inconclusive. Identifying predictive factors for treatment response, especially in luminal tumors, poses a challenge, emphasizing the necessity for ongoing research. A multidisciplinary approach, tailored to individual patient profiles, is crucial for maximizing efficacy while minimizing toxicity. As we strive to optimize breast cancer management, a comprehensive understanding of the distinct characteristics and treatment implications of luminal and triple-negative subtypes, including the transformative role of immunotherapy, is essential for informed decision-making and personalized care.

High tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are significantly associated with pathological complete response in triple negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant KEYNOTE-522 chemoimmunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

For patients with locally advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the standard of care is to administer the KEYNOTE-522 (K522) regimen, including chemotherapy and immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) given in the neoadjuvant setting. Pathological complete response (pCR) is more likely in patients who receive the K522 regimen than in patients who receive standard chemotherapy. Studies have shown that pCR is a strong predictor of long-term disease-free survival. However, factors predicting pCR to K522 are not well understood and require further study in real-world populations.

METHODS

We evaluated 76 patients who were treated with the K522 regimen at our institution. Twenty-nine pre-treatment biopsy slides were available for pathology review. Nuclear grade, Nottingham histologic grade, Ki-67, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were evaluated in these 29 cases. For the cases that did not have available slides for review from pre-treatment biopsies, these variables were retrieved from available pathology reports. In addition, clinical staging, race, and BMI at the time of biopsy were retrieved from all 76 patients' charts. Binary logistic regression models were used to correlate these variables with pCR.

RESULTS

At the current time, 64 of 76 patients have undergone surgery at our institution following completion of K522 and 31 (48.4%) of these achieved pCR. In univariate analysis, only TIL was significantly associated with pCR (p = 0.014) and this finding was also confirmed in multivariate analysis, whereas other variables including age, race, nuclear grade, Nottingham grade, Ki-67, lymphovascular invasion, BMI, pre-treatment tumor size, and lymph node status were not associated with pCR (p > 0.1).

CONCLUSION

Our real-world data demonstrates high TIL is significantly associated with pCR rate in the K522 regimen and may potentially serve as a biomarker to select optimal treatment. The pCR rate of 48.4% in our study is lower than that reported in K522, potentially due to the smaller size of our study; however, this may also indicate differences between real-world data and clinical trial results. Larger studies are warranted to further investigate the role of immune cells in TNBC response to K522 and other treatment regimens.

Long-term survival after neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer under different treatment regimens: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a life-threatening subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options. Therefore, this network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of various neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) options on the long-term survival of patients with TNBC.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and major international conference databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of various NCT options in patients with TNBC. Searches were performed from January 2000 to June 2023. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were used to evaluate the pathologic complete response (pCR). The primary outcome was DFS.

RESULTS

We conducted an NMA of 21 RCTs involving 8873 patients with TNBC. Our study defined the combination of anthracyclines and taxanes as the preferred treatment option. On this basis, the addition of any of the following new drugs is considered a new treatment option: bevacizumab (B), platinum (P), poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values, the top three SUCRA area values of DFS were taxanes, anthracycline, and cyclophosphamide (TAC; 89.23%); CT (84.53%); and B (81.06%). The top three SUCRA area values of OS were CT (83.70%), TAC (62.02%), and B-containing regimens (60.06%). The top three SUCRA area values of pCR were B + P-containing regimens (82.7%), ICI + P-containing regimens (80.2%), and ICI-containing regimens (61.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This NMA showed that standard chemotherapy is a good choice with respect to long-term survival. Moreover, B associated with P-containing regimens is likely to be the optimal treatment option for neoadjuvant TNBC in terms of pCR.

Tata Memorial Centre Evidence Based Management of Breast cancer

ABSTRACT

The incidence of breast cancer is increasing rapidly in urban India due to the changing lifestyle and exposure to risk factors. Diagnosis at an advanced stage and in younger women are the most concerning issues of breast cancer in India. Lack of awareness and social taboos related to cancer diagnosis make women feel hesitant to seek timely medical advice. As almost half of women develop breast cancer at an age younger than 50 years, breast cancer diagnosis poses a huge financial burden on the household and impacts the entire family. Moreover, inaccessibility, unaffordability, and high out-of-pocket expenditure make this situation grimmer. Women find it difficult to get quality cancer care closer to their homes and end up traveling long distances for seeking treatment. Significant differences in the cancer epidemiology compared to the west make the adoption of western breast cancer management guidelines challenging for Indian women. In this article, we intend to provide a comprehensive review of the management of breast cancer from diagnosis to treatment for both early and advanced stages from the perspective of low-middle-income countries. Starting with a brief introduction to epidemiology and guidelines for diagnostic modalities (imaging and pathology), treatment has been discussed for early breast cancer (EBC), locally advanced, and MBC. In-depth information on loco-regional and systemic therapy has been provided focusing on standard treatment protocols as well as scenarios where treatment can be de-escalated or escalated.

Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer associated with shorter survival and a higher likelihood of the cancer returning. In early TNBC, platinum-based chemotherapy has been shown to improve pathological complete response (pCR); however, its effect on long-term survival outcomes has not been fully elucidated and recommendations to include platinum chemotherapy are not consistent in international guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of platinum-based chemotherapy as adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment in people with early triple-negative breast cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 4 April 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials examining neoadjuvant or adjuvant platinum chemotherapy for early TNBC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Our secondary outcomes were pCR, treatment adherence, grade III or IV toxicity related to chemotherapy, and quality of life. Prespecified subgroups included BRCA mutation status, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status, frequency of chemotherapy, type of platinum agent used, and the presence or absence of anthracycline chemotherapy. We assessed risk of bias using Cochrane's RoB 1 tool and certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

From 3972 records, we included 20 published studies involving 21 treatment comparisons, and 25 ongoing studies. For most domains, risk of bias was low across studies. There were 16 neoadjuvant chemotherapy studies (one of which combined neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy) and four adjuvant chemotherapy trials. Most studies used carboplatin (17 studies) followed by cisplatin (two), and lobaplatin (one). Eight studies had an anthracycline-free intervention arm, five of which had a carboplatin-taxane intervention compared to an anthracycline-taxane control. All studies reporting DFS and OS used carboplatin. Inclusion of platinum chemotherapy improved DFS in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings (neoadjuvant: hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.75; 7 studies, 8 treatment comparisons, 1966 participants; high-certainty evidence; adjuvant: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.88; 4 studies, 1256 participants; high-certainty evidence). Platinum chemotherapy in the regimen improved OS (neoadjuvant: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.86; 7 studies, 8 treatment comparisons, 1973 participants; high-certainty evidence; adjuvant: 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.96; 4 studies, 1256 participants; high-certainty evidence). Median follow-up for survival outcomes ranged from 36 to 97.6 months. Our analysis confirmed platinum chemotherapy increased pCR rates (risk ratio (RR) 1.44, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.59; 15 studies, 16 treatment comparisons, 3083 participants; high-certainty evidence). Subgroup analyses showed no evidence of differences in DFS according to BRCA mutation status, HRD status, lymph node status, or whether the intervention arm contained anthracycline chemotherapy or not. Platinum chemotherapy was associated with reduced dose intensity, with participants more likely to require chemotherapy delays (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.70 to 2.94; 4 studies, 5 treatment comparisons, 1053 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), dose reductions (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.02; 7 studies, 8 treatment comparisons, 2055 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and early cessation of treatment (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.38; 16 studies, 17 treatment comparisons, 4178 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Increased haematological toxicity occurred in the platinum group who were more likely to experience grade III/IV neutropenia (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.63; 19 studies, 20 treatment comparisons, 4849 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), anaemia (RR 8.20, 95% CI 5.66 to 11.89; 18 studies, 19 treatment comparisons, 4757 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and thrombocytopenia (RR 7.59, 95% CI 5.10 to 11.29; 18 studies, 19 treatment comparisons, 4731 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between chemotherapy groups in febrile neutropenia (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.49; 11 studies, 3771 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Renal impairment was very rare (0.4%, 2 events in 463 participants; note 3 studies reported 0 events in both arms; 4 studies; high-certainty evidence). Treatment-related death was very rare (0.2%, 7 events in 3176 participants and similar across treatment groups; RR 0.58, 95% 0.14 to 2.33; 10 studies, 11 treatment comparisons; note 8 studies reported treatment-related deaths but recorded 0 events in both groups. Thus, the RR and CIs were calculated from 3 studies rather than 11; 3176 participants; high-certainty evidence). Five studies collected quality of life data but did not report them.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Platinum-based chemotherapy using carboplatin in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting improves long-term outcomes of DFS and OS in early TNBC, with no evidence of differences by subgroup. This was at the cost of more frequent chemotherapy delays and dose reductions, and greater haematological toxicity, though serious adverse events including neuropathy, febrile neutropenia or treatment-related death were not increased. These findings support the use of platinum-based chemotherapy for people with early TNBC. The optimal dose and regimen are not defined by this analysis, but there is a suggestion that similar relative benefits result from the addition of carboplatin to either anthracycline-free regimens or those containing anthracycline agents.

Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line neoadjuvant treatments in triple-negative breast cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Neoadjuvant treatment options for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are abundant, but the efficacy of different combinations of treatment options remains unclear. Our network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of various neoadjuvant treatment options in patients with TNBC. Literature reports published before March 31, 2022, were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, main oncology conference of the European Society of Medical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium databases. Pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare direct and indirect evidence, respectively. The primary outcome was pathological complete response (pCR). Comparison of efficiency between different treatment regimens was made by HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall, 26 studies, including 9714 TNBC patients, were assessed in this network meta-analysis. Results indicated that the pCR of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-containing regimens is better than other joint regimens. PCR rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens containing bevacizumab, platinum, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors was higher than those of standard chemotherapy agents. By performing a conjoint analysis of the pCR rate and safety endpoints, we found that immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-containing regimens were well balanced in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Considering the efficacy and acceptable adverse events, neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum may be considered as an option for patients with TNBC.

Nucleolin aptamer conjugated MSNPs-PLR-PEG multifunctional nanoconstructs for targeted co-delivery of anticancer drug and siRNA to counter drug resistance in TNBC

The emergence of drug resistance in cancer cells is among the major challenges for treating cancer. In the last few years, the co-delivery of drug and siRNA has shown promising results against drug-resistant cancers. In the present study, we developed mesoporous silica-based multifunctional nanocarrier for co-delivery against drug-resistant triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. We synthesized the nanocarrier by modifying mesoporous silica nanoparticles with poly-L-arginine, polyethylene glycol and AS1411 aptamer to impart siRNA binding ability, biocompatibility, and cancer cell specificity, respectively. We optimized the loading of doxorubicin (DOX) within the developed nanocarrier to avoid interference with siRNA binding. We ascertained the target specificity by performing a receptor blockade assay during cellular uptake studies. The cytotoxic efficacy of DOX and siRNA co-delivered using the developed nanocarrier was assessed using DOX-resistant MDA-MB-231 TNBC cells. The nanocarrier exhibited >10-fold and 40-fold reduction in the IC₅₀ values of DOX due to co-delivery with BCl-xL and BCL-2 siRNA, respectively. The results were further validated using a 3-D in vitro cell culture system. This study demonstrates that the targeted co-delivery of drug and siRNA has a strong potential to overcome drug resistance in TNBC cells.

Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Literature Review

Numerous malignancies, including metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which has long been associated with a poor prognosis, have been transformed by the widespread use of immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that target and block programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in the treatment of patients with metastatic TNBC. The PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab is the first-line treatment of metastatic PD-L1+ TNBC in combination with chemotherapy, and the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab has also shown clinical activity. The median progression-free survival for pembrolizumab or atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy increased by 4.1 months and 2.5 months, respectively, with the addition of immunotherapy. Despite this progress, there is still more to be desired. The addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy improved the pathological complete response (PCR) rate compared to chemotherapy with placebo in landmark phase III trials in the early-stage neoadjuvant context, whereas others reported no meaningful improvement in PCR. There are various ongoing trials that show that more research and studies are needed for components in the TNBC microenvironment and to further explore its importance in the treatment of TNBC.

Sacituzumab govitecan: past, present and future of a new antibody-drug conjugate and future horizon

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a new antibody-drug conjugate directed against the cell-surface antigen Trop-2. Characteristics of the linker connecting the payload SN-38 to the antibody allows SG to kill tumor cells expressing Trop-2 and also the adjacent tumor cells (bystander effect). SG showed efficacy and safety in several epithelial tumors. The phase III ASCENT trial led to the approval of SG (10 mg/kg, d1,8 q3w) in patients with advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have received ≥2 prior systemic therapies, including ≥1 for metastatic disease. The phase III TROPiCS-02 trial in heavily pretreated advanced hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer has recently shown an improvement in progression-free survival for patients treated with SG compared to single-agent chemotherapy. The phase III post-neoadjuvant SASCIA study in early high-risk TNBC and HR-positive breast cancer is currently recruiting patients.

Targeted Treatment for High-Risk Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Spotlight on Pembrolizumab

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a biologically aggressive yet heterogeneous disease that disproportionately affects younger women and women of color compared to other breast cancer subtypes. The paucity of effective targeted therapies and the prevalence of chemotherapeutic resistance in high-risk, early-stage TNBC pose significant clinical challenges. Deeper insights into the genomic and immune landscape have revealed key features of TNBC, including intrinsic genomic instability, DNA repair deficiency, and potentially an immunogenic tumor microenvironment. These advances led to landmark trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the advanced-stage setting, which subsequently translated into immunotherapy-based clinical trials in the early-stage setting and recent promising results. Pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, was investigated in combination with platinum-, taxane- and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab monotherapy for patients with high-risk, early-stage TNBC in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 trial. In July 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted approval for pembrolizumab based on marked improvement in pathologic complete response rate and 3-year event-free survival compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. This advance immediately altered the longstanding treatment paradigm. Here, we review the impact of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with high-risk, early-stage TNBC, and discuss immunotherapy-related toxicity considerations, key immunomodulatory biomarkers under active investigation, and remaining clinical questions for future research directions.

Clinical analysis of pathologic complete responders in advanced-stage ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical characteristics of patients who attained pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and to identify specific predictive or prognostic factors associated with pCR.

METHODS

Two distinct populations of patients who underwent NACT followed by interval tumor reductive surgery (TRS) were used in this retrospective study. The first contained 472 patients from a single institution. The second contained only pCR patients (67); those identified from population one, plus 44 obtained through collaborative institutions. Cox analysis and log-rank tests were performed to assess associations between clinical characteristics and pCR outcome, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median RFS and OS in our pCR-only population was 24.2 and 80.8 months, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 32.4 months. In our single institution population, 23 patients attained pCR (4.9%) and had longer RFS compared to non-pCR patients with viable microscopic, optimal, or suboptimal residual disease (24.3 vs. 12.1 vs. 11.6 vs. 9.6 months, p = 0.025, 0.012, 0.008, respectively), and longer OS compared to those with optimal or suboptimal residual disease (54.5 vs. 29.4 vs. 25.7 months, p = 0.027, 0.007, respectively). Patients were more than three-fold likely to attain pCR if their CA125 value was normal at the time of surgery (OR 3.54, 95% CI: 1.14-11.05, p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with pCR after NACT have significantly longer RFS compared to those with residual viable tumor at the time of interval tumor-reductive surgery, and CA125 is plausible biomarker for identifying these extreme responders preoperatively.

Platinum-based systematic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer

Due to the lack of definitive hormone receptors, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients receive little clinical benefit from endocrine or molecular targeted therapies, leading to a highly aggressive disease with a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. In the past decades, chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for TNBC, with taxane/anthracyclines as the representative regimen. However, increasing irreversible cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines and drug-resistance had to be noticed. Gradually, platinum-based chemotherapy has become a topic of interest for researchers. Based on the accumulating studies on platinum-containing regimens for TNBC patients, we will summarize the progress of relevant clinical trials focusing on platinum monotherapy (e.g., cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin) or in combination with other therapeutic modalities (e.g., other chemotherapeutic agents, molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapy). To further evaluate patient response to platinum and screen for the optimal population to benefit from platinum, we will also analyze current potential biomarkers, such as breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1/2), homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD), tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), TP53 family and other emerging indicators (e.g., intrinsic subtype, cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) expression, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9)).

Biomarker dynamics and prognosis in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Breast cancer is a biologically diverse disease with treatment modalities selected based on tumor stage and tumor biology. Distinct intrinsic subtypes and surrogate biomarker profiles play a major role for therapeutic decisions. Response rates to systemic and local treatments as well as the interaction with epidemiological risk factors have been validated in clinical trials and translational studies. This retrospective study addresses the question how biomarker profiles and treatment modalities in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting have changed during the past 15 years and what prognostic impact these changes implicate. 342 female breast cancer stage I-IV patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2003 and 2017 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was correlated with preoperative clinical stage, postoperative pathological stage, treatment modalities and tumor biology before and after chemotherapy. Two subgroups were separated using an arbitrary cut-off year at 2009/2010, due to 2010 when platinum containing regimens were first administered. Median follow-up was 54 months. 57 (17%) patients died; recurrences occurred in 103 of 342 (30%) patients. Nodal stage and intrinsic subtypes (pre- and postoperative) significantly correlated with OS (p < 0.001). Preoperative histological grading lacked prognostic power. When comparing the patient characteristics of the subgroups, we found significant difference in the following characteristics: cT, ypT, ypN, pCR and chemotherapy regimens (p < 0.001). There was no difference in OS when comparing the two subgroups. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates had a significant impact on OS and disease-free survival (DFS) in HER2+ and triple negative subtypes (p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, high proliferation index (> 30%), clinical metastatic stage and pathological tumor stage had prognostic impact on OS (p < 0.001, p = 0.0001, p = 0.002). Clinico-pathological factors and distinct therapy regiments especially in triple negative and HER2+ subtypes have prognostic impact on pCR, OS and DFS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Pathological complete response following cisplatin or carboplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The addition of platinum compounds to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is highly controversial. Platinum agents, such as cisplatin and carboplatin, are DNA-damaging agents which exhibit activity in breast cancer, particularly in the TNBC subgroup. In order to assess the efficacy of each most representative platinum agent (cisplatin and carboplatin) in patients with TNBC treated with NACT, the present study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available published studies on TNBC. A search of PubMed was performed to identify studies that investigated platinum-based NACT in patients with TNBC. The primary endpoints were the pooled rate of the pathological complete response (pCR) between cisplatin vs. carboplatin-based NACT. A total of 24 studies were selected (17 studies for carboplatin and 6 studies for cisplatin and 1 study with both carboplatin and cisplatin, with 20 prospective studies) for the analysis of 1,711 patients with TNBC. Overall, the pooled rate of pCR in patients treated with platinum-based NACT was 48%. No significant differences were observed between the rates of pCR obtained under carboplatin vs cisplatin treatment. The carboplatin pCR rate was 0.470 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.401-0.539], while the cisplatin pCR rate was 0.473 (95% CI, 0.379-0.568). The comparison between these two categories revealed no significant differences (P=0.959). In the whole, the present study demonstrates that neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy improves the pCR rate in patients with TNBC, regardless of the platinum agent used. Carboplatin may thus represent a viable option due to its more favorable toxicity profile.

Immunotherapy Treatment for Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is considered one of the highest-risk subtypes of breast cancer and has dismal prognosis. Local recurrence rate after standard therapy in the early breast cancer setting can be upwards to 72% in 5 years, and in the metastatic setting, the 5-year overall survival is 12%. Due to the lack of receptor expression, there has been a paucity of targeted therapeutics available, with chemotherapy being the primary option for systemic treatment in both the neoadjuvant and metastatic setting. More recently, immunotherapy has revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, with FDA approval in over 20 types of cancer since 2011. Compared to other cancer types, breast cancer has been traditionally thought of as being immunologically cold; however, TNBC has demonstrated the most promise with immunotherapy use, a timely discovery due to its lack of targeted therapy options. In this review, we summarize the trials using checkpoint therapy in early and metastatic TNBC, as well as the development of biomarkers and the importance of immune related adverse events (IRAEs), in this disease process.

Prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using machine learning models in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning (ML) based model to accurately predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) using pretreatment clinical and pathological characteristics of electronic medical record (EMR) data in breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

The EMR data from patients diagnosed with early and locally advanced BC and who received NAC followed by curative surgery were reviewed. A total of 16 clinical and pathological characteristics was selected to develop ML model. We practiced six ML models using default settings for multivariate analysis with extracted variables.

RESULTS

In total, 2065 patients were included in this analysis. Overall, 30.6% (n = 632) of patients achieved pCR. Among six ML models, the LightGBM had the highest area under the curve (AUC) for pCR prediction. After hyper-parameter tuning with Bayesian optimization, AUC was 0.810. Performance of pCR prediction models in different histology-based subtypes was compared. The AUC was highest in HR+HER2- subgroup and lowest in HR-/HER2- subgroup (HR+/HER2- 0.841, HR+/HER2+ 0.716, HR-/HER2 0.753, HR-/HER2- 0.653).

CONCLUSIONS

A ML based pCR prediction model using pre-treatment clinical and pathological characteristics provided useful information to predict pCR during NAC. This prediction model would help to determine treatment strategy in patients with BC planned NAC.

Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 3 - Current Developments in the Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: Review and Assessment of Specialised Treatment Scenarios by an International Expert Panel

The continuous availability of findings from new studies repeatedly results in updated treatment recommendations and guidelines. In the case of breast carcinoma in particular, several studies have been published in the last few years that have transformed how early and advanced breast carcinoma is being treated. However, this by no means means implies that there is agreement among all experts on specific issues. It is precisely the diversity of interpretation of guidelines and study findings that reflects the constantly changing available data and its complexity, as well as the availability of new drugs. In recent years, new substances such as pertuzumab, T-DM1, neratinib and capecitabine have become available to treat patients with early stages of breast carcinoma. Furthermore, the first results on the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors for adjuvant treatment have now been published. Last but not least, the use of multigene tests to avoid the necessity of chemotherapy in certain patients is still under discussion. This review summarises the state of the data and publishes the results of the survey completed by experts at the 2021 St. Gallen Breast Cancer Conference on early-stage breast cancer.

Regulation of cancer stem cells in triple negative breast cancer

Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is the most lethal subtype of breast cancer. Despite the successes of emerging targeted therapies, relapse, recurrence, and therapy failure rates in TNBC significantly outpace other subtypes of breast cancer. Mounting evidence suggests accumulation of therapy resistant Cancer Stem Cell (CSC) populations within TNBCs contributes to poor clinical outcomes. These CSCs are enriched in TNBC compared to non-TNBC breast cancers. The mechanisms underlying CSC accumulation have been well-characterized and discussed in other reviews. In this review, we focus on TNBC-specific mechanisms that allow the expansion and activity of self-renewing CSCs. We highlight cellular signaling pathways and transcription factors, specifically enriched in TNBC over non-TNBC breast cancer, contributing to stemness. We also analyze publicly available single-cell RNA-seq data from basal breast cancer tumors to highlight the potential of emerging bioinformatic approaches in identifying novel drivers of stemness in TNBC and other cancers.

Molecular Classification and Future Therapeutic Challenges of Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an extremely diverse group of breast tumors, with aggressive clinical behavior, higher rates of distant recurrence and worse overall survival compared to other types of breast cancers. The genetic, transcriptional histological and clinical heterogeneity of this disease has been an obstacle in the progression of targeted therapeutic approaches, as a ubiquitous TNBC marker has not yet been discerned. In terms of that, current studies focus on the classification of TNBC tumors in subgroups with similar characteristics in order to develop a treatment specialized for each group of patients. To date, a series of gene expression profiles analysis in order to identify the different molecular subtypes have been used. Complementary DNA microarrays, PAM50 assays, DNA and RNA sequencing as well as immunohistochemical analysis are some of the methods utilized to classify TNBC tumors. In 2012, the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network conducted a major analysis of breast cancers using six different platforms, the genomic DNA copy number arrays, DNA methylation, exome sequencing, messenger RNA arrays, microRNA sequencing and reverse-phase protein arrays, in order to assort the tumors in homogenous subgroups. Since then, an increasing number of breast cancer data sets are being examined in an attempt to distinguish the classification with biological interpretation and clinical implementation. In this review, the progress in molecular subtyping of TNBC is discussed, providing a brief insight in novel TNBC biomarkers and therapeutic strategies.

Pathogenesis and Potential Therapeutic Targets for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous tumor characterized by early recurrence, high invasion, and poor prognosis. Currently, its treatment includes chemotherapy, which shows a suboptimal efficacy. However, with the increasing studies on TNBC subtypes and tumor molecular biology, great progress has been made in targeted therapy for TNBC. The new developments in the treatment of breast cancer include targeted therapy, which has the advantages of accurate positioning, high efficiency, and low toxicity, as compared to surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Given its importance as cancer treatment, we review the latest research on the subtypes of TNBC and relevant targeted therapies.

High BRCA2 Gene Expression is Associated with Aggressive and Highly Proliferative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Mutations of BRCA genes are the most studied in breast cancer, but the clinical relevance of BRCA2 gene expression has been less well studied. Given that BRCA2 is a DNA repair gene, we hypothesized that high BRCA2 expression is associated with highly proliferative and aggressive biology in breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 4342 breast cancer patients were analyzed from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, n = 1069) as the testing cohort and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset GSE96058 (n = 3273) as a validation cohort.

RESULTS

There was no relationship between BRCA2 mutation and BRCA2 gene expression. BRCA2 high expression breast cancer was associated with higher Nottingham grade (p < 0.001), with high proliferation (MKI-67, p < 0.001), and with higher intratumor heterogeneity, homologous recombination deficiency, mutation rate, fraction altered, and neoantigens (all p < 0.001). BRCA2 high expression was associated with E2F1, RB1, PALB2, and PARP, as well as cell proliferation-related gene sets, E2F targets, G2M checkpoints, and mitotic spindle, and with less ESR1 and ER response early and late gene sets. They were associated with significantly reduced number of stroma cells and with high infiltration of both favorable and unfavorable immune cells. BRCA2 high expression significantly correlated with response to olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, and inversely with cyclophosphamide in ER-positive/HER2-negative tumors, but not in TNBC.

CONCLUSIONS

BRCA2 high gene expression was associated with highly proliferative and aggressive breast cancer that was highly immunogenic with better response to PARP inhibitors in ER-positive patients. BRCA2 gene expression may become a candidate marker for aggressive biology and to tailor specific treatment strategies in the future.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Endocrine Therapy, and Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop guideline recommendations concerning optimal neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and provide recommended care options.

RESULTS

A total of 41 articles met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy should be managed by a multidisciplinary care team. Appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant therapy include patients with inflammatory breast cancer and those in whom residual disease may prompt a change in therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy can also be used to reduce the extent of local therapy or reduce delays in initiating therapy. Although tumor histology, grade, stage, and estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression should routinely be used to guide clinical decisions, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of other markers or genomic profiles. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have clinically node-positive and/or at least T1c disease should be offered an anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimen; those with cT1a or cT1bN0 TNBC should not routinely be offered neoadjuvant therapy. Carboplatin may be offered to patients with TNBC to increase pathologic complete response. There is currently insufficient evidence to support adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy. In patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be used when a treatment decision can be made without surgical information. Among postmenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, hormone therapy can be used to downstage disease. Patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative, HER2-positive disease should be offered neoadjuvant therapy in combination with anti-HER2-positive therapy. Patients with T1aN0 and T1bN0, HER2-positive disease should not be routinely offered neoadjuvant therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.

Activity of docetaxel, carboplatin, and doxorubicin in patient-derived triple-negative breast cancer xenografts

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is highly responsive to neoadjuvant polychemotherapy regimens including anthracyclines, taxanes, and, more recently, carboplatin. However, there is inadequate information on the individual contribution of each of these agents to the global activity of the combinations, and the use of combinations of up to four of these drugs is associated with relevant toxicity. Identifying single-drug activity in the clinical neoadjuvant setting is challenging. We developed patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) from several chemotherapy-naïve TNBC samples to assess the antitumor activity of single drugs and combinations of drugs. PDXs were established from chemotherapy-naïve TNBC samples. Nine TNBC PDX models (all of which corresponded to a basal-like phenotype according to the PAM50 classifier) were treated with carboplatin, docetaxel, and doxorubicin and the combination of docetaxel and carboplatin. Only one of nine PDX models showed sensitivity to doxorubicin, while eight of nine PDX models showed sensitivity to docetaxel and carboplatin as single agents. The 3 PDX models derived from patients with gBRCA-1 or gPALB2 mutations were very sensitive to carboplatin single agent. All 6 PDX models from patients without hereditary germ-line mutations showed increased sensitivity to the combination of docetaxel and carboplatin. In the present study, docetaxel and carboplatin single agents were active drugs against basal-like TNBC, while doxorubicin monotherapy showed low activity. The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin was more effective than the drugs used as single agents, except in the PDX from patients with gBRCA1/PALB2 mutations.

New Insight into Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Therapy: The Potential Roles of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Autophagy Mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is accounted as the fifth leading cause of mortality among the other cancers. Notwithstanding, Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is responsible for 15-20% of breast cancer mortality. Despite many investigations, it remains incurable in part due to insufficient understanding of its exact mechanisms.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases using the keywords autophagy, Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) stress, apoptosis, TNBC and the combinations of these keywords.

RESULTS

It was found that autophagy plays a dual role in cancer, so that it may decrease the viability of tumor cells or act as a cytoprotective mechanism. It then appears that using compounds having modulatory effects on autophagy is of importance in terms of induction of autophagic cell death and diminishing the proliferation and metastasis of tumor cells. Also, ER stress can be modulated in order to stimulate apoptotic and autophagic cell death in tumor cells.

CONCLUSION

Perturbation in the signaling pathways related to cell survival leads to the initiation and progression of cancer. Regarding the advancement in the cancer pathology, it seems that modulation of autophagy and ER stress are promising.

When the World Throws You a Curve Ball: Lessons Learned in Breast Cancer Management

In the care of patients with operable breast cancer, there has been a shift toward increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy. There are benefits to neoadjuvant therapy, such as monitoring for response, as well as an increased rate of breast conservation and reduction of potential morbidity associated with breast surgery, including axillary management. Among patients with highly proliferative tumors, such as HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer, those with residual disease are at higher risk of recurrence, which informs the recommended systemic therapy in the adjuvant setting. For instance, in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy, there is a role for adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine for those with residual disease at the time of surgery. The same holds true regarding the role of adjuvant capecitabine in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. With the added complexities of treating patients in the era of the COVID-19 outbreak, additional considerations are critical, including initiation of surgery within an appropriate time from completion of neoadjuvant therapy. National consensus guidelines on time to surgery must be developed to improve measurement and comparison across systems. In addition, there is emerging radiation treatment management research addressing a number of factors, including hypofractionation, role of proton beam therapy, safe omission of radiotherapy, and preoperative radiotherapy with or without drug combination. In this article, the multidisciplinary approach of treating patients with operable breast cancer is highlighted, with updates and future considerations described.

Chemotherapy Options beyond the First Line in HER-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Despite the recent advances in the biological understanding of breast cancer (BC), chemotherapy still represents a key component in the armamentarium for this disease. Different agents are available as mono-chemotherapy options in patients with locally advanced or metastatic BC (MBC) who progress after a first- and second-line treatment with anthracyclines and taxanes. However, no clear indication exists on what the best option is in some populations, such as heavily pretreated, elderly patients, triple-negative BC (TNBC), and those who do not respond to the first-line therapy. In this article, we summarize available literature evidence on different chemotherapy agents used beyond the first-line, in locally advanced or MBC patients, including rechallenge with anthracyclines and taxanes, antimetabolite and antimicrotubule agents, such as vinorelbine, capecitabine, eribulin, ixabepilone, and the newest developed agents, such as vinflunine, irinotecan, and etirinotecan.

Does dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy have clinically significant prognostic value in breast cancer?: A meta-analysis of 3,724 patients

Purpose

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is typically the initial treatment for non-early breast cancer patients. We thereby conducted a meta-analysis to explore whether dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ddNCT) improved the long-term prognosis of patients compared to the standard NCT regimen.

Methods

We compared the differences in efficacy and prognosis between patients receiving standard NCT and ddNCT. We also calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) of pathological complete response (pCR) and the pooled hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

Nine randomized controlled trials involving 3,724 patients from 10 published studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled OR for ddNCT was 1.18 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83–1.67, P = 0.356). A subgroup analysis in the cases with low hormone receptor expression levels showed the pCR in patients undergoing ddNCT was significantly higher than the pCR in patients undergoing standard NCT (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.09‒1.69, P = 0.007). There was no significant difference in DFS and OS between ddNCT and standard NCT (DFS: HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.79‒1.02, P = 0.095; OS; HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.81‒1.04, P = 0.160), regardless of hormone receptor expression levels. These data suggested the higher pCR rate in patients receiving ddNCT did not result in a survival benefit.

Conclusions

The meta-analysis demonstrated that ddNCT can significantly improve the pCR rate in patients with low hormone receptor expression levels, although patient survival was not significantly improved. The ddNCT can increase the breast-conserving rate and reduced pre-operative waiting time without increasing adverse reactions. This regimen can be considered when developing an NCT plan.

Capecitabine + Epirubicin + Cyclophosphamide Combination Therapy (CEX Therapy) as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER-2-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study

BACKGROUND

We modified and administered capecitabine + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide combination therapy (CEX) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for HER-2-negative breast cancer and retrospectively analyzed its effectiveness and tolerability at our center.

METHODS

The inclusion criteria were presence of breast cancer negative for HER-2 and positive lymph node metastasis, or negative lymph node metastasis when tumor diameter was 20 mm or greater without distant metastasis. Additional inclusion criteria were a performance status of 0 or 1, an EF >60%, and an age of 75 years or less. Clinical outcomes were evaluated after 4 courses of epirubicin 80 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 (administered every 3 weeks), and capecitabine 1,500 mg/m2 (administered for 2 weeks and withdrawn for 1 week).

RESULTS

A clinical benefit was noted in all 18 patients who received CEX as neoadjuvant chemotherapy during the period from 2009 through 2013. The clinical response rate was 83.3% (15/18), and the clinical complete response rate was 50%. Aesthetic outcomes of breast-conserving surgery were positive in all patients. Among patients with satisfactory outcomes, 33.3% had a pathologic complete response (triple-negative: 6, luminal: 0) and 68.8% were n0 (triple-negative: 8, luminal: 3). All patients with a pathologic complete response are presently alive, free of recurrence, and currently undergoing follow-up. Adverse events were classified as grade 2 or lower in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CEX therapy administered as neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be useful for individualized treatment. In particular, this regimen was effective for triple-negative breast cancer.

The Landscape of Targeted Therapies in TNBC

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) constitutes the most aggressive molecular subtype among breast tumors. Despite progress on the underlying tumor biology, clinical outcomes for TNBC unfortunately remain poor. The median overall survival for patients with metastatic TNBC is approximately eighteen months. Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment while there is a growing body of evidence that targeted therapies may be on the horizon with poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) and immune check-point inhibitors already established in the treatment paradigm of TNBC. A large number of novel therapeutic agents are being evaluated for their efficacy in TNBC. As novel therapeutics are now incorporated into clinical practice, it is clear that tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution can result to de novo or acquired treatment resistance. As precision medicine and next generation sequencing is part of cancer diagnostics, tailored treatment approaches based on the expression of molecular markers are currently being implemented in clinical practice and clinical trial design. The scope of this review is to highlight the most relevant current knowledge regarding underlying molecular profile of TNBC and its potential application in clinical practice.

FGF13 promotes metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents 10-20% of all human ductal adenocarcinomas and has a poor prognosis relative to other subtypes, due to the high propensity to develop distant metastases. Hence, new molecular targets for therapeutic intervention are needed for TNBC. We recently conducted a rigorous phenotypic and genomic characterization of four isogenic populations of MDA-MB-231 human triple-negative breast cancer cells that possess a range of intrinsic spontaneous metastatic capacities in vivo, ranging from nonmetastatic (MDA-MB-231_ATCC) to highly metastatic to lung, liver, spleen and spine (MDA-MB-231_HM). Gene expression profiling of primary tumours by RNA-Seq identified the fibroblast growth factor homologous factor, FGF13, as highly upregulated in aggressively metastatic MDA-MB-231_HM tumours. Clinically, higher FGF13 mRNA expression was associated with significantly worse relapse free survival in both luminal A and basal-like human breast cancers but was not associated with other clinical variables and was not upregulated in primary tumours relative to normal mammary gland. Stable FGF13 depletion restricted in vitro colony forming ability in MDA-MB-231_HM TNBC cells but not in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive MCF-7 or MDA-MB-361 cells. However, despite augmenting MDA-MB-231_HM cell migration and invasion in vitro, FGF13 suppression almost completely blocked the spontaneous metastasis of MDA-MB-231_HM orthotopic xenografts to both lung and liver while having negligible impact on primary tumour growth. Together, these data indicate that FGF13 may represent a therapeutic target for blocking metastatic outgrowth of certain TNBCs. Further evaluation of the roles of individual FGF13 protein isoforms in progression of the different subtypes of breast cancer is warranted.

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and BRCA-like status in stage III breast cancer patients randomised to adjuvant intensified platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) differs by breast cancer (BC) subtype. The aim of this study was to evaluate TILs in stage III BC in the context of BRCA1/2-like phenotypes and association with outcome and benefit of intensified platinum-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients participated in a randomised controlled trial of adjuvant intensified platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional anthracycline-based chemotherapy carried out between 1993 and 1999 in stage III BC. Stromal TILs were scored according to International guidelines in these human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumours. BRCA-profiles were determined using Comparative Genomic Hybridization.

RESULTS

TIL levels were evaluated in 248 BCs. High TILs were associated with Triple Negative BC (TNBC). BRCA-like tumours harboured higher TILs compared to non-BRCA-like tumours (median TILs of 20% versus 10%, p < 0.01). TIL levels in BRCA1-like tumours were higher compared to BRCA2-like tumours (median TILs of 20% versus 10%, p < 0.001). These correlations remained significant within the oestrogen (ER)-positive subgroup, however not within the TNBC subgroup. In this stage III BC cohort, high TIL level was associated with favourable outcome (TILs per 10% increment, recurrence-free survival (RFS): multivariate hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.94, p = 0.01; overall survival (OS): multivariate HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.94, p = 0.01). There was no significant interaction between TILs and benefit of intensified platinum-based chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

In this high-risk breast cancer cohort, high TILs were associated with TNBC and BRCA1-like status. Within the ER-positive subgroup, TIL levels were higher in BRCA1-like compared to BRCA2-like tumours. When adjusted for clinical characteristics, TILs were significantly associated with a more favourable outcome in stage III BC patients.

Bilateral Triple Negative Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma in a BRCA1 Mutation Carrier with Discrepant Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Herein, we report a case of synchronous bilateral triple negative invasive ductal breast carcinoma in a patient with discrepant pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Right and left breast cancer stages at the initial diagnosis were T1cN0M0 and T4dN3aM0, respectively. The patient was identified as a BRCA1 mutation carrier and treated with four cycles of adriamycin and cyclophosphamide, followed by four cycles of docetaxel. Bilateral breast cancer stages decreased with the first regimen. However, the bilateral breast cancers showed discrepant responses to chemotherapy with docetaxel. The right breast cancer showed a continuous tumor volume reduction while the left breast cancer showed marked progression. Finally, the tumor size was 0.3 cm and 12 cm in the right and left mastectomy specimens, respectively. As bilateral breast cancers of the same subtype may show discrepant responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, close monitoring and follow-up imaging are required to avoid delayed surgery.

Treatment of Early Breast Cancer Patients: Evidence, Controversies, Consensus: Focusing on Systemic Therapy - German Experts' Opinions for the 16th International St. Gallen Consensus Conference (Vienna 2019)

A German working group of leading breast cancer experts have discussed the votes at the International St. Gallen Consensus Conference in Vienna for the treatment of primary breast cancer with regard to the German AGO (Ar-beitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie) recommendations for clinical practice in Germany. Three of the German breast cancer experts were also members of this year's St. Gallen panel. Comparing the St. Gallen recommendations with the annually updated treatment recommendations of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO Mamma 2019) and the German S3 Guideline is useful, because the recommendations of the St. Gallen panel are based on expert opinions of different countries and disciplines. The focus of this article is on systemic therapy. The motto of this year's 16th St. Gallen Consensus Conference was "Estimating the magnitude of clinical benefit." The rationale behind this motto is that, for every treatment decision, a benefit-risk assessment must be taken into consideration for each patient.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for triple-negative breast cancer: a network meta-analysis

Different neoadjuvant chemotherapies are available for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Here, we performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the pathological complete response (pCR) benefit and safety of treatment regimens. Pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare direct and indirect evidence, respectively. Twenty-three studies involving 12 regimens namely standard chemotherapeutic agents, bevacizumab (B)-, platinum salts (P)-, B plus P (BP)-, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (Pi)-, P plus Pi (PPi)-, capecitabine (Ca)-, gemcitabine (Ge)-, zoledronic acid (Za)-, everolimus (E)-, P plus E (PE)-, and gefitinib (G)-containing regimens. The results showed that P-, B-, PPi-, and Za-containing regimens achieved higher pCR than standard chemotherapeutic agents. BP-containing regimens had a better pCR than B-containing regimens. In indirect comparisons, Za-, BP-, P-, and B-containing regimens were the top four strategies with the highest probability for pCR. Benefit-risk analysis showed that B-containing regimens had the highest acceptability of being the best treatment for better pCR achievement with fewer SAEs. The addition of P, B, BP, PPi, and Za to standard chemotherapeutic agents enhanced the pCR, but a balance between efficacy and safety should be carefully considered. B-containing regimens might be the best choice for neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to its better efficacy and tolerability.

A meta-analysis of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer

Aim: Platinum agents are DNA damaging agents with promising activity in breast cancers, especially in triple-negative subgroup. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the treatments of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and standard NAC for triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). Materials & methods: Diverse electronic databases were searched to identify the randomized clinical trials that directly compared the treatments of platinum-based NAC versus NAC in TNBC patients. Toxicity of platinum-based regimens was further evaluated. Results: Addition of platinum agents significantly improved the pathological complete response rates in TNBC patients compared with the standard NAC. Unfortunately, platinum-based regimens were more likely to develop higher incidence of hematologic toxicities. Conclusion: Platinum-based NAC regimens could achieve significant pathological complete response improvement with well-tolerated toxicity in TNBC patients.

Diagnosis and Therapy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) - Recommendations for Daily Routine Practice

The rapid increase in knowledge in tumour biology and tumour pathogenesis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has resulted in new therapeutic approaches and new therapeutic concepts for treatment. For years, TNBC has been considered to be a difficult-to-treat tumour due to its generally aggressive tumour biology and in view of limited therapeutic options. The risk of recurrence and metastasis is higher than in the case of other breast cancer subtypes of the same stage. In addition to surgery and radiation in the curative situation, systemic chemotherapy with anthracyclines and/or taxanes is still the therapy of choice. New therapeutic approaches are based on the knowledge that TNBC is a molecularly very heterogeneous disease. Research groups are working to classify TNBC better and better on a molecular level and use this molecular subtyping as the basis for new therapeutic strategies. The most promising new approaches and considerations regarding the therapy of TNBCs are shown below. In addition, the current therapeutic strategies are discussed using a fictitious case history, taking the current data and the resultant therapeutic consequence into account.

Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer: Evidence, Controversies, Consensus: Spectrum of Opinion of German Specialists on the 16th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference (Vienna 2019)

The results of the international St. Gallen Consensus Conference for the treatment of patients with primary breast cancer were discussed this year by a working group of leading breast cancer experts in view of the therapy recommendations for everyday clinical practice in Germany. Three of the breast cancer experts are also members of this year's St. Gallen panel. The comparison of the St. Gallen recommendations with the annually updated treatment recommendations of the AGO 2019 as well as the S3 guideline is useful, since the recommendations of the St. Gallen panel represent the opinions of experts from various countries and disciplines. The recommendations of the S3 guideline and AGO are based on evidence-based research of the literature. This year's 16th St. Gallen conference featured the motto "Magnitude of clinical benefit". In addition to the evidence-based data, each therapeutic decision must also undergo a benefit/risk assessment of the patient's individual situation and be discussed with the patient.

Distribution pattern of FDG uptake using ring-type dedicated breast PET in comparison to whole-body PET/CT scanning in invasive breast cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the incidence of rim uptake (RU) or multifocal uptake (MU) by invasive breast cancers on a ring-type dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) scanner compared with whole-body PET (wbPET) scanner imaging and to correlate uptake patterns with pathological features and prognosis.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2011, 76 lesions in 74 patients with primary invasive breast cancers were included. Each patient underwent dbPET and wbPET scanning on the same day after administration of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). The images were evaluated to identify specific uptake patterns (RU and MU). Their association with pathological characteristics and prognosis was analyzed.

RESULTS

On dbPET, RU and MU patterns were observed in 18 lesions (24%) and 28 lesions (37%), respectively. On wbPET, RU and MU patterns were observed in six lesions (8%) and 17 lesions (22%), respectively. Lesions with RU on dbPET were of higher grade than lesions without RU (P = 0.024) and a higher Ki-67 index (mean; 31% vs. 18%, P = 0.015). They tended to be triple-negative (33% vs. 12%, P = 0.046) and less likely to be luminal A subtype (17% vs. 47%, P = 0.020). On wbPET, however, no significant differences in these markers were seen between RU and non-RU. The MU pattern did not correlate with pathological characteristics in either scanner. Lesions with RU or MU were not significantly associated with disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

DbPET can identify detailed FDG distribution patterns of breast cancer better than wbPET. Breast cancer with RU on dbPET was associated with higher grade and triple-negative subtype.

Weekly carboplatin plus neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based regimen in early triple-negative breast cancer: a prospective phase II trial by the Breast Cancer Task Force of the Belgian Society of Medical Oncology (BSMO)

AIM

To evaluate the pCR rate and toxicity of the addition of weekly carboplatin (Cp) to paclitaxel (wP) and dose-dense (dd) epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) in an open-label phase II study in TNBC patients.

METHODS

Patients were included if they had stage II and III TNBC and received wP (80 mg/m²/week) concurrent with weekly Cp (AUC = 2) for 12 weeks, followed by bi-weekly epirubicin (90 mg/m²) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m²) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for four cycles, followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of pCR [(ypT0/isypN0)]. Secondary endpoints included safety and drug delivery.

RESULTS

Sixty-three eligible patients were included. Median age was 51 years (range 29-74); 88.9% had stage II disease, 46% were clinically node positive, and 77.8% had grade 3 tumors. Fifty-four percent achieved a pCR. Twelve percent missed two or more doses of wP, whereas at least two cycles of EC were missed in 9.5%. The rate of tolerance without delays or dose reductions is very low (16%). Sixty-two percent had G3/4 neutropenia. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 18 patients of which more than eighty percent occurred during EC despite primary prophylaxis with G-CSF. Thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 was noticed in 11 pts. Three patients developed grade 3 peripheral neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

The addition of weekly carboplatin to neoadjuvant paclitaxel and dd EC leads to a pCR rate comparable to prior studies (54%). However, hematological toxicity and febrile neutropenia rate was unexpectedly high. Future investigations could focus on reversing the sequence, which may lead to better hematological tolerability.

The effect of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in BRCA mutated triple negative breast cancers -systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) are associated with an aggressive clinical course, earlier recurrence and short survival. BRCA – mutated tumours represent up to 25% of all TNBC. BRCA status is being studied as a predictive biomarker of response to platinum agents. However, the predictive role of BRCA status is still uncertain in this setting. Since TNBC is a very heterogeneous group of diseases, it is important to identify subsets of TNBC patients that may benefit from platinum-based therapy. This study aims to establish if the presence of a germline BRCA mutation in women with TNBC improves the pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with platinum compounds.

Methods

An extensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS databases, WHO (WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register Database, for online trial registries and conference proceedings. The measurement of pCR was assessed by pathology review of breast specimen and lymph nodes.

Results

The overall OR was computed using random effects models.

Seven studies were included, comprising a total of 808 TNBC patients, among which 159 were BRCA mutated. Among mutated TNBC patients, 93 (93/159; 58.4%) achieved pCR, while 410 wildtype patients (410/808; 50.7%) showed pCR (OR 1.459 CI 95% [0.953–2.34] p = 0.082) although this result did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis shows that the addition of platinum to chemotherapy regimens in the neoadjuvant setting increases pCR rate in BRCA – mutated as compared to wild-type TNBC patients. However, this trend did not achieve statistical significance.

Trial registration

CRD42018092341

Pathological Response and Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Carboplatin plus Docetaxel

PURPOSE

Prognostic value of pathologic complete response (pCR) and extent of pathologic response attained with anthracycline-free platinum plus taxane neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unknown. We report recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) according to degree of pathologic response in patients treated with carboplatin plus docetaxel NAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One-hundred and ninety patients with stage I-III TNBC were treated with neoadjuvant carboplatin (AUC6) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2) every 21 days × 6 cycles. pCR (no evidence of invasive tumor in breast and axilla) and Residual cancer burden (RCB) were evaluated. Patients were followed for recurrence and survival. Extent of pathologic response was associated with RFS and OS using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Median age was 51 years, and 52% were node-positive. pCR and RCB I rates were 55% and 13%, respectively. Five percent of pCR patients, 0% of RCB I patients, and 58% of RCB II/III patients received adjuvant anthracyclines. Three-year RFS and OS were 79% and 87%, respectively. Three-year RFS was 90% in patients with pCR and 66% in those without pCR [HR = 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14-0.62; P = 0.0001]. Three-year OS was 94% in patients with pCR and 79% in those without pCR (HR = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.63; P = 0.001). Patients with RCB I demonstrated 3-year RFS (93%) and OS (100%) similar to those with pCR. On multivariable analysis, higher tumor stage, node positivity, and RCB II/III were associated with worse RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant carboplatin plus docetaxel yields encouraging efficacy in TNBC. Patients achieving pCR or RCB I with this regimen demonstrate excellent 3-year RFS and OS without adjuvant anthracycline.

Monitoring Serum VEGF in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A New Strategy for Early Prediction of Treatment Response and Patient Survival

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the clinical utility of serum biomarker changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

METHODS

A total of 303 patients with TNBC were included in this study. Serum samples were taken at three time points during NAC: baseline, prior to the third cycle, and prior to surgery. Luminex multibiomarker panel for 29 serum biomarkers was used to detect their correlation with NAC response. The predictive and prognostic value of each selected biomarker was then studied.

RESULTS

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was the only biomarker that correlated with treatment response, with a decreasing trend in pCR patients relative to non-pCR patients (p < .001). Univariable and multivariable analyses revealed that the relative change in VEGF prior to the third cycle of NAC had a remarkable predictive value for both pCR and pathological nonresponse with high sensitivity and specificity. VEGF was also independently correlated with disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that monitoring serum VEGF could help identify patients with different responses at an early time point of NAC and at varying risk of disease relapse. Serum VEGF may also serve as an alternative to traditional response-evaluating methodologies in tailoring and modifying the NAC strategy for both operable and advanced TNBCs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by definitive surgery is a standard of care for locally advanced breast cancer. The identification of sensitive responders to neoadjuvant therapy is highly significant for breast cancer, especially triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Results of this study indicate that the monitoring of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) could identify patients with favorable or poor responses at an early time point of NAC. Furthermore, the prediction power of VEGF was better than traditional response-evaluating methods. VEGF might serve as a complement or alternative to traditional imaging-based response-evaluating methodologies in tailoring systemic treatment strategies for both operable and advanced TNBCs.

Immunotherapeutic interventions of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer that lacks the expression of oestrogen receptors, progesterone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Although TNBC is sensitive to chemotherapy, the overall outcomes of TNBC are worse than for other breast cancers, and TNBC is still one of the most fatal diseases for women. With the discovery of antigens specifically expressed in TNBC cells and the developing technology of monoclonal antibodies, chimeric antigen receptors and cancer vaccines, immunotherapy is emerging as a novel promising option for TNBC. This review is mainly focused on the tumour microenvironment and host immunity, Triple Negative Breast Cancer and the clinical treatment of TNBC, novel therapies for cancer and immunotherapy for TNBC, and the future outlook for the treatment for TNBC and the interplay between the therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with targeted treatments in TNBC, adoptive cell therapy, cancer vaccines. The review also highlights recent reports on the synergistic effects of immunotherapy and chemotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, and exosomes, as potential multifunctional therapeutic agents in TNBC.

Pretreatment with taurine prevented brain injury and exploratory behaviour associated with administration of anticancer drug cisplatin in rats

The neurotoxicity associated with cisplatin treatment is one of the major side effects compromising the efficacy of the anti-cancer treatment. The present study investigated the possible protective effects of taurine, an intracellular amino acid, on cisplatin-induced brain injury and exploratory behaviour using five groups of ten female rats each. Group I received drinking water only. Group II orally received taurine alone at 200 mg/kg whereas Group III received cisplatin alone intraperitoneally at 10 mg/kg. Groups IV and V were treated with taurine at 100 and 200 mg/kg respectively for sixteen consecutive days and a single intraperitoneal injection of cisplatin on day 13 to induce neurotoxicity. Endpoint analyses using video-tracking software revealed that cisplatin administration alone caused neurobehavioral deficits evinced by marked decrease in the total distance travelled, average speed, total time mobile, total mobile episode, number of crossing and absolute turn angle. Furthermore, cisplatin alone significantly suppressed brain antioxidant defense mechanisms, elevated nitric oxide and lipid peroxidation levels whereas it increased acetylcholinesterase activity in the treated rats. However, rats pretreated with taurine exhibited significant improvement in behavioural performance and brain antioxidant status with concomitant decrease in acetylcholinesterase activity and oxidative stress indices when compared with cisplatin alone group. Histologically, taurine pretreatment prevented cisplatin-induced neuronal death in the cerebral and cerebellar cortices, caudo-putamen and hippocampus as well as abrogated cisplatin-mediated decrease in the dendritic arborization and mean diameter of the somata of pyramidal neurons in the treated rats. In conclusion, taurine may be a possible protective supplement to reduce cisplatin-induced side-effects including neurotoxicity in patients undergoing cisplatin treatment.

Salicylate •Phenanthroline copper (II) complex induces apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer cells

In this study, we investigated anti-tumor activity and associated molecular mechanism of action of Salicylate ●Phenanthroline Copper (II) Complex in triple-negative breast cancer. Salicylate ●Phenanthroline Copper (II) Complex inhibited the growth of four breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, T47D, MDA-MB-231 and BT-20) and induced apoptosis in a concentration-dependent manner. The effect was more profound in MDA-MB-231 and BT-20 triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. Western blot showed that the expression of the apoptosis-related protein Bcl-2, Bcl-xl and survivin was significantly reduced in MDA-MB-231 after treatment with Salicylate ●Phenanthroline Copper (II) Complex. In vivo, Salicylate ●Phenanthroline Copper (II) Complex administration significantly attenuated tumor growth of MDA-MB-231 xenografts, and the expression levels of Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and survivin were reduced as measured by immunohistochemical staining. These data suggest that Salicylate ●Phenanthroline Copper (II) Complex is a promising novel therapeutic drug for triple-negative breast cancer and warrants further study.

Pathological complete response after cisplatin neoadjuvant therapy is associated with the downregulation of DNA repair genes in BRCA1-associated triple-negative breast cancers

Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered a suitable surrogate marker of treatment efficacy in patients with triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying pCR as a result of such treatment remain obscure. Using real-time PCR arrays we compared the expression levels of 120 genes involved in the main mechanisms of DNA repair in 43 pretreatment biopsies of BRCA1-associated TNBCs exhibiting pCR and no pathological complete response (non-pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin. Altogether, 25 genes were significantly differentially expressed between tumors exhibiting pCR and non-pCR, and these genes were downregulated in the pCR group compared to the non-pCR group. A difference in expression level greater than 1.5-fold was detected for nine genes: MGMT, ERCC4, FANCB, UBA1, XRCC5, XPA, XPC, PARP3, and RPA1. The non-homologous end joining and nucleotide excision repair pathways of DNA repair showed the most significant relevance. Expression profile of DNA repair genes associated with pCR was different in the node-positive (20 genes with fold change >1.5) and node-negative (only 3 genes) subgroups. Although BRCA1 germline mutations are the principal defects in BRCA1-associated TNBC, our results indicate that the additional downregulation of other genes engaged in major pathways of DNA repair may play a decisive role in the pathological response of these tumors to cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The results suggest that patients with node-positive BRCA1-associated TNBCs that do not exhibit pCR after cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be candidates for subsequent therapy with PARP inhibitors, whereas UBA1 may be a potential therapeutic target in node-negative subgroup.