1
|
Thomson JP, Hollis RL, van Baal J, Ilenkovan N, Churchman M, van de Vijver K, Dijk F, Meynert AM, Bartos C, Rye T, Croy I, Diana P, van Gent M, Creedon H, Nirsimloo R, Nussey F, Lok C, Herrington CS, Gourley C. Whole exome sequencing of low grade serous ovarian carcinoma identifies genomic events associated with clinical outcome. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:157-166. [PMID: 37207500 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a distinct, rare, ovarian cancer type characterised by younger patient age and intrinsic chemoresistance. Understanding the molecular landscape is crucial for optimising targeted therapy. METHODS Genomic data from whole exome sequencing of tumour tissue was analysed in a LGSOC cohort with detailed clinical annotation. RESULTS 63 cases were analysed and three subgroups identified based on single nucleotide variants: canonical MAPK mutant (cMAPKm: 52%, KRAS/BRAF/NRAS), MAPK-associated gene mutation (MAPK-assoc: 27%) and MAPK wild-type (MAPKwt: 21%). NOTCH pathway disruption occurred across all subgroups. Tumour mutational burden (TMB), mutational signatures and recurrent copy number (CN) changes varied across the cohort with co-occurrence of chromosome 1p loss and 1q gain (CN Chr1pq) a recurrent feature. Low TMB and CN Chr1pq were associated with inferior disease-specific survival (HR 6.43; p < 0.001 and HR 3.29, p = 0.011 respectively). Stepwise genomic classification in relation to outcome resulted in four groups (TMB low; CN Chr1pq; MAPKwt/MAPKassoc; cMAPKm). 5 year disease-specific survival was 46%, 55%, 79% and 100% respectively for these groups. The two most favourable genomic subgroups were enriched for the SBS10b mutational signature, particularly the cMAPKm subgroup. CONCLUSIONS LGSOC comprises multiple genomic subgroups with distinct clinical and molecular features. Chr1pq CN arm disruption and TMB represent promising methods to identify individuals with poorer prognosis. Further investigation of the molecular basis for these observations is required. MAPKwt cases represent around a fifth of patients. NOTCH inhibitors represent a candidate therapeutic strategy worthy of exploration across these cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Thomson
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert L Hollis
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Juliette van Baal
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology and Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Narthana Ilenkovan
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Churchman
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Koen van de Vijver
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology and Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederike Dijk
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology and Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alison M Meynert
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Clare Bartos
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tzyvia Rye
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ian Croy
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Patricia Diana
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mignon van Gent
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology and Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Helen Creedon
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rachel Nirsimloo
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Fiona Nussey
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christianne Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology and Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Simon Herrington
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hollis RL, Thomson JP, van Baal J, Ilenkovan N, Churchman M, van de Vijver K, Dijk F, Meynert AM, Bartos C, Rye T, Croy I, Diana P, van Gent M, Creedon H, Nirsimloo R, Lok C, Gourley C, Herrington CS. Distinct histopathological features are associated with molecular subtypes and outcome in low grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Sci Rep 2023; 13:7681. [PMID: 37169775 PMCID: PMC10175560 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34627-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Low grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) demonstrates unique clinical and molecular features compared to other ovarian cancer types. The relationship between common histological features of LGSOC and molecular events, such as hormone receptor expression patterns and MAPK gene mutation status, remains poorly understood. Recent data suggest some of these molecular features may be biomarkers of response to recently introduced biologically-targeted therapies, namely endocrine therapy and MEK inhibitors. We utilize a cohort of 63 pathologically-confirmed LGSOC cases with whole exome sequencing and hormone receptor expression data to investigate these relationships. LGSOC cases demonstrated uniformly high oestrogen receptor (ER) expression, but variable progesterone receptor (PR) expression intensity. 60% and 37% of cases demonstrated micropapillary and macropapillary patterns of stromal invasion, respectively. 63% of cases demonstrated desmoplasia, which was significantly associated with advanced disease stage and visible residual disease after cytoreductive surgery. MAPK-mutant cases (KRAS, BRAF, NRAS) more frequently demonstrated macropapillary stromal invasion, while Chr1p loss was associated with desmoplasia and low PR expression. Presence of micropapillary stromal invasion and low PR expression were associated with significantly poorer survival after accounting for stage and residual disease status. Together, these data identify novel relationships between histopathological features and molecularly-defined subgroups in LGSOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Hollis
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
| | - John P Thomson
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Juliette van Baal
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Narthana Ilenkovan
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
- Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Glasgow, UK
| | - Michael Churchman
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Koen van de Vijver
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike Dijk
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alison M Meynert
- MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Clare Bartos
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Tzyvia Rye
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Ian Croy
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Patricia Diana
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Mignon van Gent
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Helen Creedon
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rachel Nirsimloo
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christianne Lok
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlie Gourley
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK
| | - C Simon Herrington
- Nicola Murray Centre for Ovarian Cancer Research, Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Geurts V, Voorwerk L, Sikorska K, Salgado R, van de Vijver K, van Dongen M, Kemper I, Mandjes IA, Heuver-mes M, Haanen J, Sonke GS, Horlings H, Kok M. Abstract P3-06-01: Unleashing NK- and CD8 T cells by combining monalizumab (anti-NKG2A) and trastuzumab for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer: first results MIMOSA trial. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p3-06-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Although treatment options and survival of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients have greatly improved, the majority of MBC-patients still die of this disease. The relatively high levels of TILs observed in this BC subtype provide a rationale for immunomodulatory strategies, however, PD1-blockade has only shown modest response rates in this setting. While PD-1 blockade mainly acts on T cells, monalizumab targets the inhibitory immune checkpoint NKG2A which interacts with HLA-E on tumor cells, thereby unleashing NK- as well as CD8 T cells. We hypothesize that monalizumab can promote antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) which is critical for trastuzumab efficacy. Clinical activity was shown in patients with head and neck cancer when monalizumab was combined with cetuximab (anti-EGFR). Here, we present the first results of the MIMOSA-trial investigating the efficacy of the novel combination monalizumab and trastuzumab in patients with HER2+ MBC. Methods In the phase II MIMOSA-trial (NTC04307329), HER2+ MBC patients were treated biweekly with 4mg/kg trastuzumab and 750mg monalizumab. Key eligibility criteria were progressive disease despite anti-HER2 therapy, had received a minimum of one and a maximum of three lines of palliative chemotherapy, had measurable disease according to RECIST1.1, and a serum LDH-level below 500U/L. Primary endpoint was objective response rate according to RECIST1.1. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate (complete response CR, partial response PR or stable disease SD for at least 6 months) according to RECIST1.1, progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. Dose-limiting toxicities were continuously monitored throughout the trial and evaluated using a pre-defined Pocock-type boundary rule. Following a Simon’s two-stage design, 11 patients were included in stage I of the trial. If two or more responders were observed, further exploration is warranted in stage II. Results Between January 2021 and April 2022, eleven women of which ten are currently evaluable were enrolled in the trial. Patients received a median of two lines of prior treatment for MBC, of which 6 out of 11 patients were treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). The majority of patients had hormone receptor positive BC (72% of the patients) and had low levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) with a median of 1% (ranging from 1% to 20%). Patients received a median of four cycles of trastuzumab and monalizumab. Treatment was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities. No objective responses were observed in the first ten out of eleven evaluable patients. Therefore, MIMOSA stage I did not meet its primary endpoint, leading to discontinuation of the trial. Conclusions The novel combination of trastuzumab and monalizumab did not induce objective responses in heavily pre-treated HER2+ MBC patients.
Citation Format: Veerle Geurts, Leonie Voorwerk, Karolina Sikorska, Roberto Salgado, Koen van de Vijver, Marloes van Dongen, Inge Kemper, Ingrid A. Mandjes, Martine Heuver-mes, John Haanen, Gabe S. Sonke, Hugo Horlings, Marleen Kok. Unleashing NK- and CD8 T cells by combining monalizumab (anti-NKG2A) and trastuzumab for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer: first results MIMOSA trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle Geurts
- 1Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Roberto Salgado
- 4GZA-ZNA-Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium; Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - John Haanen
- 10Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hugo Horlings
- 12Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marleen Kok
- 13Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baez-Navarro X, van Bockstal MR, Nawawi D, Broeckx G, Colpaert C, Doebar SC, Hogenes MCH, Koop E, Lambein K, Peeters DJE, Sinke RHJA, Bastiaan van Brakel J, van der Starre-Gaal J, van der Vegt B, van de Vijver K, Vreuls CPH, Vreuls W, Westenend PJ, van Deurzen CHM. Interobserver Variation in the Assessment of Immunohistochemistry Expression Levels in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Can We Improve the Identification of Low Levels of HER2 Expression by Adjusting the Criteria? An International Interobserver Study. Mod Pathol 2023; 36:100009. [PMID: 36788064 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2022.100009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The classification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is optimized to detect HER2-amplified breast cancer (BC). However, novel HER2-targeting agents are also effective for BCs with low levels of HER2. This raises the question whether the current guidelines for HER2 testing are sufficiently reproducible to identify HER2-low BC. The aim of this multicenter international study was to assess the interobserver agreement of specific HER2 immunohistochemistry scores in cases with negative HER2 results (0, 1+, or 2+/in situ hybridization negative) according to the current American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines. Furthermore, we evaluated whether the agreement improved by redefining immunohistochemistry (IHC) scoring criteria or by adding fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). We conducted a 2-round study of 105 nonamplified BCs. During the first assessment, 16 pathologists used the latest version of the ASCO/CAP guidelines. After a consensus meeting, the same pathologists scored the same digital slides using modified IHC scoring criteria based on the 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines, and an extra "ultralow" category was added. Overall, the interobserver agreement was limited (4.7% of cases with 100% agreement) in the first round, but this was improved by clustering IHC categories. In the second round, the highest reproducibility was observed when comparing IHC 0 with the ultralow/1+/2+ grouped cluster (74.3% of cases with 100% agreement). The FISH results were not statistically different between HER2-0 and HER2-low cases, regardless of the IHC criteria used. In conclusion, our study suggests that the modified 2007 ASCO/CAP criteria were more reproducible in distinguishing HER2-0 from HER2-low cases than the 2018 ASCO/CAP criteria. However, the reproducibility was still moderate, which was not improved by adding FISH. This could lead to a suboptimal selection of patients eligible for novel HER2-targeting agents. If the threshold between HER2 IHC 0 and 1+ is to be clinically actionable, there is a need for clearer, more reproducible IHC definitions, training, and/or development of more accurate methods to detect this subtle difference in protein expression levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ximena Baez-Navarro
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Diënna Nawawi
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Cecile Colpaert
- Department of Pathology, General Hospital Turnhout, Turnhout, Belgium; Department of Pathology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Shusma C Doebar
- Department of Pathology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem Zuid, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke C H Hogenes
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory Pathology East Netherlands, Hengelo, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Koop
- Department of Pathology, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Kathleen Lambein
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dieter J E Peeters
- Department of Pathology, Sint-Maarten General Hospital, Mechelen, Belgium; Department of Pathology, CellCarta NV, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Bert van der Vegt
- Department of Pathology & Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Koen van de Vijver
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium; Division of Diagnostic Sciences, Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Celien P H Vreuls
- Department of Pathology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Vreuls
- Department of Pathology, CWZ Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Westenend
- Department of Pathology, PAL Laboratory of Pathology, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Göker M, Denys H, van de Vijver K, Braems G. Genomic assays for lobular breast carcinoma. J Clin Transl Res 2022; 8:523-531. [PMID: 36451999 PMCID: PMC9706320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the current challenges in breast cancer is the appropriate treatment of invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) and defining the high-risk group within ILC. The biological character of ILC typically translates to a good prognosis, however, several studies have indicated that the long-term prognosis is worse than for patients diagnosed with the more commonly invasive ductal carcinoma. Many genomic tests are now available to determine whether those patients are at high risk (HR) and enable tailored treatment. Unfortunately, most of the studies in which these genomic tests have been evaluated entail retrospective analysis of a prospective trial. AIM This review focuses on the validation of the available genomic assays based on trials performed in ILC patients, where in some instances, the various subtypes of ILC (classical, pleomorphic, and non-classic type) were taken into account. RESULTS Using Oncotype DX in retrospective studies, only 1.3%-8% of ILC tumors were categorized as HR tumors. For MammaPrint, 24% of patients were classified as HR, which was associated with poor outcome. In a recent sub-analysis of the MINDACT study comprising 487 ILC patients, 16.2% were high genomic risk. EndoPredict, Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay, and the Breast Cancer Index have been validated in patients receiving only endocrine treatment. CONCLUSION Although ILC accounts for the second most common breast cancer subtype in women, none of these tests encompass tumor morphology in their algorithms. Prospective studies on ILC with genomic assays are warranted given the various subtypes of and treatment options for this underestimated, but frequently occurring cancer. RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS Genomic assays can be employed in ILC patients to predict the risk of recurrence and identify those patients who might benefit from chemotherapy in addition to their standard treatment regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Menekse Göker
- Department of Gynecology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Geert Braems
- Department of Gynecology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mercan C, Balkenhol M, Salgado R, Sherman M, Vielh P, Vreuls W, Polónia A, Horlings HM, Weichert W, Carter JM, Bult P, Christgen M, Denkert C, van de Vijver K, Bokhorst JM, van der Laak J, Ciompi F. Deep learning for fully-automated nuclear pleomorphism scoring in breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:120. [DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00488-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractTo guide the choice of treatment, every new breast cancer is assessed for aggressiveness (i.e., graded) by an experienced histopathologist. Typically, this tumor grade consists of three components, one of which is the nuclear pleomorphism score (the extent of abnormalities in the overall appearance of tumor nuclei). The degree of nuclear pleomorphism is subjectively classified from 1 to 3, where a score of 1 most closely resembles epithelial cells of normal breast epithelium and 3 shows the greatest abnormalities. Establishing numerical criteria for grading nuclear pleomorphism is challenging, and inter-observer agreement is poor. Therefore, we studied the use of deep learning to develop fully automated nuclear pleomorphism scoring in breast cancer. The reference standard used for training the algorithm consisted of the collective knowledge of an international panel of 10 pathologists on a curated set of regions of interest covering the entire spectrum of tumor morphology in breast cancer. To fully exploit the information provided by the pathologists, a first-of-its-kind deep regression model was trained to yield a continuous scoring rather than limiting the pleomorphism scoring to the standard three-tiered system. Our approach preserves the continuum of nuclear pleomorphism without necessitating a large data set with explicit annotations of tumor nuclei. Once translated to the traditional system, our approach achieves top pathologist-level performance in multiple experiments on regions of interest and whole-slide images, compared to a panel of 10 and 4 pathologists, respectively.
Collapse
|
7
|
de Boo L, Cimino-Mathews A, Lubeck Y, Daletzakis A, Opdam M, Sanders J, Hooijberg E, van Rossum A, Loncova Z, Rieder D, Trajanoski Z, Vollebergh M, Sobral-Leite M, van de Vijver K, Broeks A, van der Wiel R, van Tinteren H, Linn S, Horlings HM, Kok M. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and BRCA-like status in stage III breast cancer patients randomised to adjuvant intensified platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 2020; 127:240-250. [PMID: 31956037 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic value of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) differs by breast cancer (BC) subtype. The aim of this study was to evaluate TILs in stage III BC in the context of BRCA1/2-like phenotypes and association with outcome and benefit of intensified platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients participated in a randomised controlled trial of adjuvant intensified platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional anthracycline-based chemotherapy carried out between 1993 and 1999 in stage III BC. Stromal TILs were scored according to International guidelines in these human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumours. BRCA-profiles were determined using Comparative Genomic Hybridization. RESULTS TIL levels were evaluated in 248 BCs. High TILs were associated with Triple Negative BC (TNBC). BRCA-like tumours harboured higher TILs compared to non-BRCA-like tumours (median TILs of 20% versus 10%, p < 0.01). TIL levels in BRCA1-like tumours were higher compared to BRCA2-like tumours (median TILs of 20% versus 10%, p < 0.001). These correlations remained significant within the oestrogen (ER)-positive subgroup, however not within the TNBC subgroup. In this stage III BC cohort, high TIL level was associated with favourable outcome (TILs per 10% increment, recurrence-free survival (RFS): multivariate hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.94, p = 0.01; overall survival (OS): multivariate HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.94, p = 0.01). There was no significant interaction between TILs and benefit of intensified platinum-based chemotherapy. CONCLUSION In this high-risk breast cancer cohort, high TILs were associated with TNBC and BRCA1-like status. Within the ER-positive subgroup, TIL levels were higher in BRCA1-like compared to BRCA2-like tumours. When adjusted for clinical characteristics, TILs were significantly associated with a more favourable outcome in stage III BC patients.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- BRCA1 Protein/genetics
- BRCA2 Protein/genetics
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism
- Carboplatin/administration & dosage
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/immunology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/genetics
- Carcinoma, Lobular/immunology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
- Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage
- Epirubicin/administration & dosage
- Female
- Fluorouracil/administration & dosage
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/immunology
- Mutation
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/immunology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Neoplasm Staging
- Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
- Retrospective Studies
- Survival Rate
- Thiotepa/administration & dosage
- Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/immunology
- Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonora de Boo
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Yoni Lubeck
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Antonios Daletzakis
- Biometrics Department, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark Opdam
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erik Hooijberg
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annelot van Rossum
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Zuzana Loncova
- Division of Bioinformatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Dietmar Rieder
- Division of Bioinformatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Zlatko Trajanoski
- Division of Bioinformatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Marieke Vollebergh
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marcelo Sobral-Leite
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Coordenação de Pesquisa, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Koen van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology and Biobanking, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rianne van der Wiel
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology and Biobanking, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Harm van Tinteren
- Biometrics Department, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine Linn
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hugo Mark Horlings
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marleen Kok
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Visser L, Hoogstraat M, Bismeijer T, Elshof L, Vijver KVD, Groen E, Almekinders M, Sanders J, Bierman C, Peters D, Hofland I, Nieboer F, Maaker MD, Kristel P, Mulder L, Broeks A, Schaapveld M, Schmidt M, Wessels L, Lips E, Wesseling J. Abstract 751: Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Cancer precursor or not. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a potential precursor of invasive breast cancer (IBC). However, the natural course of a particular DCIS lesion is unknown, because almost all women with DCIS are treated. Furthermore, most studies are biased because these comprise DCIS adjacent to IBC, also known as synchronous DCIS and IBC, indicating that such DCIS lesions already have the capacity to progress to IBC. It is still unknown which proportion and type of subsequent ipsilateral IBCs (iIBC) are related to the initial primary “pure” DCIS lesion. Therefore, we performed an extensive molecular characterization of DCIS and matched subsequent iIBC, to better understand the natural course of DCIS.
Patients and methods. We used a unique series of 78 women diagnosed with DCIS and treated by breast conserving surgery (BCS) alone, which subsequently developed iIBC. Mean time to iIBC event was 6.3 years (range 0.5-17.0). These 78 women are a representative sample of a case-control series, nested in a nation-wide, population-based cohort including all patients diagnosed with DCIS between 1989 and 2005 in the Netherlands (Visser, et al Clin Can Res 2018). Data on tumor location (ICD-10) was available for all lesions. DNA and RNA was simultaneously extracted for 78 DCIS lesions and 78 matched subsequent iIBC (DNA >20ng; RNA >100ng), and RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and low coverage whole genome sequencing (CNVseq) was performed. Panel sequencing (PanelSeq), using a custom panel of 53 breast cancer driver genes, was performed with the remaining DNA of 42 DCIS and iIBC matched pairs. We determined if the iIBC lesion and DCIS lesion were related, by comparing tumor location and genomic features.
Results. Based on tumor location and histological grade, >95% of the subsequent iIBC reflected outgrowth of residual disease. Based on RNAseq data, 77% of all DCIS and IBC lesions classified into the same PAM50 subtypes. The CNVseq data showed that the DCIS lesions contained copy number aberrations on typical breast cancer-associated loci, such as 1q gain, 8q gain, 16q loss, 20q gain. However, when we compared DCIS with their matched iIBC, we observed in 41% of the cases very distinct copy number profiles, indicating either outgrow of a different tumor (minority) subclone or a second primary tumor. Analysis of PanelSeq mutation data supported this clonal or independent origin of the subsequent iIBC.
Conclusion. To our knowledge, our study is the first to investigate if subsequent iIBC is likely to originate from the initial primary “pure” DCIS in a large series with long-term follow-up.
Surprisingly, our CNVseq and PanelSeq results indicate that more than one third of the subsequent iIBCs after BCS alone treated primary DCIS are likely to be second primary tumors or represent selective outgrowth of a minority DCIS subclone.
Citation Format: Lindy Visser, Marlous Hoogstraat, Tycho Bismeijer, Lotte Elshof, Koen van de Vijver, Emilie Groen, Mathilde Almekinders, Joyce Sanders, Carolien Bierman, Dennis Peters, Ingrid Hofland, Frank Nieboer, Michiel de Maaker, Petra Kristel, Lennart Mulder, Annegien Broeks, Michael Schaapveld, Marjanka Schmidt, Lodewyk Wessels, Esther Lips, Jelle Wesseling, On behalf of the PRECISION team. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Cancer precursor or not [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 751.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindy Visser
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Lotte Elshof
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Emilie Groen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Joyce Sanders
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Dennis Peters
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Nieboer
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Petra Kristel
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Esther Lips
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reijnen C, Weelden WJV, Arts MSJP, Peters JP, Rijken PF, Vijver KVD, Santacana M, Bronsert P, Bulten J, Hirschfeld M, Colas E, Gil-Moreno A, Reques A, Mancebo G, Alameda F, Krakstad C, Trovik J, Haldorsen IS, Huvila J, Schrouwen S, Koskas M, Walker F, Weinberger V, Minar L, Jandakova E, Snijders MPLM, Erp SVDBV, Küsters-Vandevelde HVN, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F, Massuger LFAG, Bussink J, Pijnenborg JMA. Abstract 4879: Poor outcome in hypoxic endometrial carcinoma is related to vascular density. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-4879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Optimal identification of endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients at high risk of recurrence is currently lacking. Hypoxia is an important feature of aggressive EC leading to activation of hypoxic and angiogenetic target genes. The present study investigates the prognostic role of hypoxia and angiogenesis in EC. Data and tissues were used from 11 collaborating European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ENITEC) centers. Tumor slides were stained for CAIX as a hypoxic marker and CD-34 for assessment of microvessel density (MVD) as a marker for angiogenesis. Complete slides were digitalized and analyzed using ImageJ software after exclusion of areas without tumor. A cutoff of 1% for the fraction of CAIX positive tumor cells was used. The MVD was assessed according to the Weidner method with the median as cutoff. Correlations with disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) were calculated using Cox regression analysis. Sixty-three (16.4%) of 385 ECs showed positive CAIX-expression with high vascular density. Multivariable analysis showed that ECs with combined positive CAIX-expression and high vascular density had a reduced DSS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.71, p = 0.002) and DDFS (HR 2.68, p = 0.009) and a trend for reduced DFS (HR 1.87, p = 0.054). Multivariable analyses with CAIX-expression and vascular density as separate markers, showed that both were independent prognostic markers as well. This study found an impaired DSS and DDFS in ECs with positive CAIX-expression and high vascular density. Differential adjuvant treatment might be indicated for these ECs.
Citation Format: Casper Reijnen, Willem Jan van Weelden, Martijn SJP Arts, Johan P. Peters, Paul F. Rijken, Koen van de Vijver, Maria Santacana, Peter Bronsert, Johan Bulten, Marc Hirschfeld, Eva Colas, Antonio Gil-Moreno, Amando Reques, Gemma Mancebo, Fransesc Alameda, Camilla Krakstad, Jone Trovik, Ingfrid S. Haldorsen, Jutta Huvila, Stefanie Schrouwen, Martin Koskas, Francine Walker, Vit Weinberger, Lubos Minar, Eva Jandakova, Marc PLM Snijders, Saskia van den Berg-van Erp, Heidi VN Küsters-Vandevelde, Xavier Matias-Guiu, Frederic Amant, ENITEC-consortium, Leon FAG Massuger, Johan Bussink, Johanna MA Pijnenborg. Poor outcome in hypoxic endometrial carcinoma is related to vascular density [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4879.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Maria Santacana
- 3Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Eva Colas
- 5Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- 5Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Jone Trovik
- 9Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- 3Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Frederic Amant
- 15Center for Gynaecologic Oncology, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Visser LL, Elshof LE, Schaapveld M, van de Vijver K, Groen EJ, Almekinders MM, Bierman C, van Leeuwen FE, Rutgers EJ, Schmidt MK, Lips EH, Wesseling J. Clinicopathological Risk Factors for an Invasive Breast Cancer Recurrence after Ductal Carcinoma In Situ-A Nested Case-Control Study. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:3593-3601. [PMID: 29685879 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Revised: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is treated to prevent progression to invasive breast cancer. Yet, most lesions will never progress, implying that overtreatment exists. Therefore, we aimed to identify factors distinguishing harmless from potentially hazardous DCIS using a nested case-control study.Experimental Design: We conducted a case-control study nested in a population-based cohort of patients with DCIS treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) alone (N = 2,658) between 1989 and 2005. We compared clinical, pathologic, and IHC DCIS characteristics of 200 women who subsequently developed ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC; cases) and 474 women who did not (controls), in a matched setting. Median follow-up time was 12.0 years (interquartile range, 9.0-15.3). Conditional logistic regression models were used to assess associations of various factors with subsequent iIBC risk after primary DCIS.Results: High COX-2 protein expression showed the strongest association with subsequent iIBC [OR = 2.97; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.72-5.10]. In addition, HER2 overexpression (OR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.05-2.31) and presence of periductal fibrosis (OR = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.01-2.06) were associated with subsequent iIBC risk. Patients with HER2+/COX-2high DCIS had a 4-fold higher risk of subsequent iIBC (vs. HER2-/COX-2low DCIS), and an estimated 22.8% cumulative risk of developing subsequent iIBC at 15 years.Conclusions: With this unbiased study design and representative group of patients with DCIS treated by BCS alone, COX-2, HER2, and periductal fibrosis were revealed as promising markers predicting progression of DCIS into iIBC. Validation will be done in independent datasets. Ultimately, this will aid individual risk stratification of women with primary DCIS. Clin Cancer Res; 24(15); 3593-601. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindy L Visser
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lotte E Elshof
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koen van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emma J Groen
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mathilde M Almekinders
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carolien Bierman
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emiel J Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther H Lips
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. .,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hendry S, Salgado R, Gevaert T, Russell PA, John T, Thapa B, Christie M, van de Vijver K, Estrada MV, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Sanders M, Solomon B, Solinas C, Van den Eynden GGGM, Allory Y, Preusser M, Hainfellner J, Pruneri G, Vingiani A, Demaria S, Symmans F, Nuciforo P, Comerma L, Thompson EA, Lakhani S, Kim SR, Schnitt S, Colpaert C, Sotiriou C, Scherer SJ, Ignatiadis M, Badve S, Pierce RH, Viale G, Sirtaine N, Penault-Llorca F, Sugie T, Fineberg S, Paik S, Srinivasan A, Richardson A, Wang Y, Chmielik E, Brock J, Johnson DB, Balko J, Wienert S, Bossuyt V, Michiels S, Ternes N, Burchardi N, Luen SJ, Savas P, Klauschen F, Watson PH, Nelson BH, Criscitiello C, O’Toole S, Larsimont D, de Wind R, Curigliano G, André F, Lacroix-Triki M, van de Vijver M, Rojo F, Floris G, Bedri S, Sparano J, Rimm D, Nielsen T, Kos Z, Hewitt S, Singh B, Farshid G, Loibl S, Allison KH, Tung N, Adams S, Willard-Gallo K, Horlings HM, Gandhi L, Moreira A, Hirsch F, Dieci MV, Urbanowicz M, Brcic I, Korski K, Gaire F, Koeppen H, Lo A, Giltnane J, Ziai J, Rebelatto MC, Steele KE, Zha J, Emancipator K, Juco JW, Denkert C, Reis-Filho J, Loi S, Fox SB. Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group: Part 2: TILs in Melanoma, Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinomas, Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Mesothelioma, Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck, Genitourinary Carcinomas, and Primary Brain Tumors. Adv Anat Pathol 2017; 24:311-335. [PMID: 28777143 PMCID: PMC5638696 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 438] [Impact Index Per Article: 62.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Assessment of the immune response to tumors is growing in importance as the prognostic implications of this response are increasingly recognized, and as immunotherapies are evaluated and implemented in different tumor types. However, many different approaches can be used to assess and describe the immune response, which limits efforts at implementation as a routine clinical biomarker. In part 1 of this review, we have proposed a standardized methodology to assess tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in solid tumors, based on the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group guidelines for invasive breast carcinoma. In part 2 of this review, we discuss the available evidence for the prognostic and predictive value of TILs in common solid tumors, including carcinomas of the lung, gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary system, gynecologic system, and head and neck, as well as primary brain tumors, mesothelioma and melanoma. The particularities and different emphases in TIL assessment in different tumor types are discussed. The standardized methodology we propose can be adapted to different tumor types and may be used as a standard against which other approaches can be compared. Standardization of TIL assessment will help clinicians, researchers and pathologists to conclusively evaluate the utility of this simple biomarker in the current era of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shona Hendry
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory/Breast International Group, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Pathology and TCRU, GZA, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Thomas Gevaert
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Experimental Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium
| | - Prudence A. Russell
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia
- Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Tom John
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Bibhusal Thapa
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Michael Christie
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Koen van de Vijver
- Divisions of Diagnostic Oncology & Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. Valeria Estrada
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | | | - Melinda Sanders
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - Benjamin Solomon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cinzia Solinas
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gert GGM Van den Eynden
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Yves Allory
- Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France
- INSERM, UMR 955, Créteil, France
- Département de pathologie, APHP, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine, Clinical Division of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Hainfellner
- Institute of Neurology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Vingiani
- European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Sandra Demaria
- New York University Medical School, New York, USA
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Paolo Nuciforo
- Molecular Oncology Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Comerma
- Molecular Oncology Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Sunil Lakhani
- Centre for Clinical Research and School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Seong-Rim Kim
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Stuart Schnitt
- Cancer Research Institute and Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Boston, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Cecile Colpaert
- Department of Pathology, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Sint-Augustinus, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stefan J. Scherer
- Academic Medical Innovation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, USA
| | - Michail Ignatiadis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Robert H. Pierce
- Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network, Central Laboratory and Program in Immunology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicolas Sirtaine
- Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Department of Surgical Pathology and Biopathology, Jean Perrin Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- University of Auvergne UMR1240, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Tomohagu Sugie
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical School, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
- The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Soonmyung Paik
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Severance Biomedical Science Institute and Department of Medical Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ashok Srinivasan
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrea Richardson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, USA
- Department of Cancer Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - Yihong Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital and Lifespan Medical Center, Providence, USA
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA
| | - Ewa Chmielik
- Tumor Pathology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Gliwice, Poland
- Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Jane Brock
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Douglas B. Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, USA
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, USA
| | - Justin Balko
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, USA
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, USA
| | - Stephan Wienert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- VMscope GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Veerle Bossuyt
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Service de Biostatistique et d’Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Inserm U1018, Université-Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Nils Ternes
- Service de Biostatistique et d’Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Inserm U1018, Université-Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Stephen J. Luen
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter Savas
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Peter H. Watson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Trev & Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Brad H. Nelson
- Trev & Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
- Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Sandra O’Toole
- The Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia
- Australian Clinical Labs, Bella Vista, Australia
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Roland de Wind
- Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Fabrice André
- INSERM Unit U981, and Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Sud, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Magali Lacroix-Triki
- INSERM Unit U981, and Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Mark van de Vijver
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Federico Rojo
- Pathology Department, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, UAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Shahinaz Bedri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar
| | - Joseph Sparano
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Centre, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
| | - David Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Torsten Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Baljit Singh
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Medical Centre, New York, USA
| | - Gelareh Farshid
- Directorate of Surgical Pathology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
- Discipline of Medicine, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | - Nadine Tung
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - Sylvia Adams
- New York University Medical School, New York, USA
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Karen Willard-Gallo
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugo M. Horlings
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leena Gandhi
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, USA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - Andre Moreira
- Pulmonary Pathology, New York University Center for Biospecimen Research and Development, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Fred Hirsch
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
- Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Maria Urbanowicz
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Iva Brcic
- Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Austria
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Pathology and Tissue Analytics, Roche Innovation Centre Munich, Penzberg, Germany
| | - Fabien Gaire
- Pathology and Tissue Analytics, Roche Innovation Centre Munich, Penzberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Koeppen
- Research Pathology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA
| | - Amy Lo
- Research Pathology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA
| | | | - James Ziai
- Research Pathology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA
| | | | | | - Jiping Zha
- Translational Sciences, MedImmune, Gaithersberg, USA
| | | | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jorge Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Sherene Loi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephen B. Fox
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hendry S, Salgado R, Gevaert T, Russell PA, John T, Thapa B, Christie M, van de Vijver K, Estrada MV, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Sanders M, Solomon B, Solinas C, Van den Eynden GGGM, Allory Y, Preusser M, Hainfellner J, Pruneri G, Vingiani A, Demaria S, Symmans F, Nuciforo P, Comerma L, Thompson EA, Lakhani S, Kim SR, Schnitt S, Colpaert C, Sotiriou C, Scherer SJ, Ignatiadis M, Badve S, Pierce RH, Viale G, Sirtaine N, Penault-Llorca F, Sugie T, Fineberg S, Paik S, Srinivasan A, Richardson A, Wang Y, Chmielik E, Brock J, Johnson DB, Balko J, Wienert S, Bossuyt V, Michiels S, Ternes N, Burchardi N, Luen SJ, Savas P, Klauschen F, Watson PH, Nelson BH, Criscitiello C, O’Toole S, Larsimont D, de Wind R, Curigliano G, André F, Lacroix-Triki M, van de Vijver M, Rojo F, Floris G, Bedri S, Sparano J, Rimm D, Nielsen T, Kos Z, Hewitt S, Singh B, Farshid G, Loibl S, Allison KH, Tung N, Adams S, Willard-Gallo K, Horlings HM, Gandhi L, Moreira A, Hirsch F, Dieci MV, Urbanowicz M, Brcic I, Korski K, Gaire F, Koeppen H, Lo A, Giltnane J, Ziai J, Rebelatto MC, Steele KE, Zha J, Emancipator K, Juco JW, Denkert C, Reis-Filho J, Loi S, Fox SB. Assessing Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors: A Practical Review for Pathologists and Proposal for a Standardized Method From the International Immunooncology Biomarkers Working Group: Part 1: Assessing the Host Immune Response, TILs in Invasive Breast Carcinoma and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Metastatic Tumor Deposits and Areas for Further Research. Adv Anat Pathol 2017; 24:235-251. [PMID: 28777142 PMCID: PMC5564448 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 423] [Impact Index Per Article: 60.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in histopathologic specimens can provide important prognostic information in diverse solid tumor types, and may also be of value in predicting response to treatments. However, implementation as a routine clinical biomarker has not yet been achieved. As successful use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and other forms of immunotherapy become a clinical reality, the need for widely applicable, accessible, and reliable immunooncology biomarkers is clear. In part 1 of this review we briefly discuss the host immune response to tumors and different approaches to TIL assessment. We propose a standardized methodology to assess TILs in solid tumors on hematoxylin and eosin sections, in both primary and metastatic settings, based on the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines for TIL assessment in invasive breast carcinoma. A review of the literature regarding the value of TIL assessment in different solid tumor types follows in part 2. The method we propose is reproducible, affordable, easily applied, and has demonstrated prognostic and predictive significance in invasive breast carcinoma. This standardized methodology may be used as a reference against which other methods are compared, and should be evaluated for clinical validity and utility. Standardization of TIL assessment will help to improve consistency and reproducibility in this field, enrich both the quality and quantity of comparable evidence, and help to thoroughly evaluate the utility of TILs assessment in this era of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shona Hendry
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia,The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory/Breast International Group, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium,Department of Pathology and TCRU, GZA, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Thomas Gevaert
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Experimental Urology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,Department of Pathology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium
| | - Prudence A. Russell
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia,Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Tom John
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia,Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Australia,School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Bibhusal Thapa
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Australia,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Michael Christie
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Koen van de Vijver
- Divisions of Diagnostic Oncology & Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. Valeria Estrada
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | | | - Melinda Sanders
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - Benjamin Solomon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cinzia Solinas
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gert GGM Van den Eynden
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium,Department of Pathology, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Yves Allory
- Université Paris-Est, Créteil, France,INSERM, UMR 955, Créteil, France,Département de pathologie, APHP, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine, Clinical Division of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Hainfellner
- Institute of Neurology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy,University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Vingiani
- European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy,University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Sandra Demaria
- New York University Medical School, New York, USA,Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Paolo Nuciforo
- Molecular Oncology Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Comerma
- Molecular Oncology Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Sunil Lakhani
- Centre for Clinical Research and School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia,Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Seong-Rim Kim
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Stuart Schnitt
- Cancer Research Institute and Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Cancer Center, Boston, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Cecile Colpaert
- Department of Pathology, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Sint-Augustinus, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stefan J. Scherer
- Academic Medical Innovation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, USA
| | - Michail Ignatiadis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Robert H. Pierce
- Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network, Central Laboratory and Program in Immunology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicolas Sirtaine
- Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Department of Surgical Pathology and Biopathology, Jean Perrin Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Clermont-Ferrand, France,University of Auvergne UMR1240, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Tomohagu Sugie
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical School, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA,The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Soonmyung Paik
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,Severance Biomedical Science Institute and Department of Medical Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ashok Srinivasan
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Operations Center/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrea Richardson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, USA,Department of Cancer Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - Yihong Wang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital and Lifespan Medical Center, Providence, USA,Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, USA
| | - Ewa Chmielik
- Tumor Pathology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Gliwice, Poland,Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Jane Brock
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Douglas B. Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, USA,Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, USA
| | - Justin Balko
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, USA,Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, USA
| | - Stephan Wienert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,VMscope GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Veerle Bossuyt
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Service de Biostatistique et d’Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Inserm U1018, Université-Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Nils Ternes
- Service de Biostatistique et d’Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Inserm U1018, Université-Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Stephen J. Luen
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter Savas
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Peter H. Watson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada,Trev & Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Brad H. Nelson
- Trev & Joyce Deeley Research Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada,Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada,Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Sandra O’Toole
- The Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia,Australian Clinical Labs, Bella Vista, Australia
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Roland de Wind
- Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Fabrice André
- INSERM Unit U981, and Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France,Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Sud, Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Magali Lacroix-Triki
- INSERM Unit U981, and Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Mark van de Vijver
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Federico Rojo
- Pathology Department, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, UAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Shahinaz Bedri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar
| | - Joseph Sparano
- Department of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Centre, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
| | - David Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Torsten Nielsen
- Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Baljit Singh
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Medical Centre, New York, USA
| | - Gelareh Farshid
- Directorate of Surgical Pathology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia,Discipline of Medicine, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | - Nadine Tung
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - Sylvia Adams
- New York University Medical School, New York, USA,Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Karen Willard-Gallo
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugo M. Horlings
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leena Gandhi
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, USA,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - Andre Moreira
- Pulmonary Pathology, New York University Center for Biospecimen Research and Development, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Fred Hirsch
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, USA
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy,Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Maria Urbanowicz
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Iva Brcic
- Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Austria
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Pathology and Tissue Analytics, Roche Innovation Centre Munich, Penzberg, Germany
| | - Fabien Gaire
- Pathology and Tissue Analytics, Roche Innovation Centre Munich, Penzberg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Koeppen
- Research Pathology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA
| | - Amy Lo
- Research Pathology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA,Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA
| | | | - James Ziai
- Research Pathology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, USA
| | | | | | - Jiping Zha
- Translational Sciences, MedImmune, Gaithersberg, USA
| | | | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jorge Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Sherene Loi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephen B. Fox
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia,The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Visser LL, Elshof LL, Vijver KVD, Groen EJ, Almekinders M, Schmidt MK, Leeuwen FV, Rutgers EJ, Schaapveld M, Lips EH, Wesseling J. Abstract 4738: Risk of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer after DCIS: a comparison of primary DCIS and subsequent invasive disease by morphological and immunohistochemical analysis. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-4738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. The wide spread adoption of population-based breast cancer screening has led to a substantial increase in diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). When detected, almost all DCIS is treated to prevent progression to invasive disease, even though the majority of DCIS will never progress. Yet, we are unable to discriminate harmless from potentially hazardous DCIS. Hence, there is an urgent need to find characteristics of DCIS and biomarkers that predict subsequent invasive tumor development. In this study, we compared primary DCIS lesions with their subsequent ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC), to explore how the initial DCIS lesion and its subsequent iIBC are related.
PATIENTS AND METHODS. We used a population-based, nation-wide cohort consisting of 2,654 women who were treated for primary DCIS by breast conserving surgery (BCS) only. Within a median follow-up time of 10.7 years, 316 women developed a subsequent iIBC (12%). FFPE tissue blocks of both DCIS and subsequent iIBC could be collected for 158 of these 316 women. We assessed histology characteristics, tumor location, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, p16 expression, and HER2 and p53 overexpression. Additionally, DNA and RNA were simultaneously isolated from 100 DCIS and 100 matched subsequent iIBC specimens for extensive molecular profiling.
RESULTS. More than 95% of the invasive recurrences were located at or near the site of the primary DCIS. Concordant histological grade was found in 94% of the matched pairs and identical immunohistochemical (IHC) marker expression in 58%. Of the 44 patients with HER2 positive DCIS, 36% developed HER2 negative iIBC. Furthermore, this change in HER2 status was also a main cause of a change in surrogate intrinsic subtype (based on ER, PR, HER2) between DCIS and iIBC, which was observed in 16% of the patients. These dissimilarities were not found when we compared invasive disease with synchronous DCIS (present in 83 of 158 patients). Molecular analyses is still ongoing.
CONCLUSION. This is the first time that an unbiased comparison could be made between primary DCIS and its subsequent iIBC within such a large patient group, integrating clinical, histological and IHC data. Our results suggest that the majority of invasive breast cancers in our cohort reflect outgrowth of residual disease based on tumor location and histological grade. DCIS and iIBC are very similar when comparing histological grade, but frequently show differences on the IHC level. Remarkably, the dissimilarities in HER2 status and surrogate intrinsic subtype as seen in primary DCIS vs. iIBC are missing when comparing IBC with synchronous DCIS. As a next step, we will analyse the lesions on the molecular level, to verify these findings and to look for molecular characteristics of DCIS that could be associated with progression to invasive disease.
Citation Format: Lindy L. Visser, Lotte L. Elshof, Koen van de Vijver, Emma J. Groen, Mathilde Almekinders, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Flora van Leeuwen, Emiel J. Rutgers, Michael Schaapveld, Esther H. Lips, Jelle Wesseling. Risk of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer after DCIS: a comparison of primary DCIS and subsequent invasive disease by morphological and immunohistochemical analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4738. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4738
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Emma J. Groen
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
van der Putten LJM, van de Vijver K, Bartosch C, Davidson B, Gatius S, Matias-Guiu X, McCluggage WG, Toledo G, van der Wurff AAM, Pijnenborg JMA, Massuger LFAG, Bulten J. Reproducibility of measurement of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma. Virchows Arch 2016; 470:63-68. [PMID: 27787595 PMCID: PMC5243868 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-016-2035-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Myometrial invasion (MI) as a percentage (%MI), categorized into <50 or ≥50 %, is an important predictor of prognosis in endometrial carcinoma. Recent studies suggest that tumor-free distance (TFD) to serosa and the absolute depth of invasion (DOI) might be stronger predictors of prognosis. Although reproducibility is important in clinical practice for patient prognostication and treatment, reproducibility of these methods for the measurement of MI is largely unknown. One or two slides from 50 patients with FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma were viewed by seven gynecological pathologists, who were requested to measure %MI, TFD, and DOI. We categorized %MI as <50 % (including no MI) or ≥50 %, TFD as ≤1.75 or >1.75 mm (including no MI), ≤7 or >7 mm (including no MI), and ≤10 or >10 mm (including no MI) and DOI as <4 mm (including no MI) or ≥4 mm. Light’s kappa for multi-rater agreement was calculated. The %MI, TFD, and DOI could be measured in 88, 83, and 79 % of cases, respectively. Kappa was 0.75 for %MI, 0.77, 0.73, and 0.69 respectively for TFD with cutoffs of 1.75, 7, and 10 mm, and 0.59 for DOI. Pathologists reach substantial agreement when measuring %MI and TFD and moderate agreement when measuring DOI. The %MI can be measured in more cases than TFD and DOI. This supports the use of %MI in daily clinical practice, but future studies should compare %MI and TFD more extensively, including inter-observer variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis J M van der Putten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Geert Grooteplein 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Koen van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Anthoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066CX, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carla Bartosch
- Department of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute-Porto, R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ben Davidson
- Department of Pathology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Ullernchausseen 70, 0379, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sonia Gatius
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Av. Alcalde Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Av. Alcalde Rovira Roure, 80, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Knockbracken Healthcare, Saintfield Rd, Belfast, County Antrim, BT8 8BH, UK
| | - Gemma Toledo
- Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Calle de Arturo Soria, 270, 28033, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anneke A M van der Wurff
- Department of Pathology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Hilvarenbeekse Weg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, TweeSteden Hospital, Doctor Deelenlaan 5, 5042 AD, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Geert Grooteplein 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
van der Putten LJ, Visser NC, van de Vijver K, Santacana M, Bronsert P, Bulten J, Hirschfeld M, Colas E, Gil-Moreno A, Garcia A, Mancebo G, Alameda F, Trovik J, Kopperud RK, Huvila J, Schrauwen S, Koskas M, Walker F, Weinberger V, Minar L, Jandakova E, Snijders MP, van den Berg-van Erp S, Matias-Guiu X, Salvesen HB, Amant F, Massuger LF, Pijnenborg JM. L1CAM expression in endometrial carcinomas: an ENITEC collaboration study. Br J Cancer 2016; 115:716-24. [PMID: 27505134 PMCID: PMC5023774 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2016] [Revised: 07/08/2016] [Accepted: 07/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Identification of aggressive endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs) and non-endometrioid carcinomas (NEECs) is essential to improve outcome. L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) expression is a strong prognostic marker in stage I EECs, but less is known about L1CAM expression in advanced-stage EECs and NEECs. This study analyses L1CAM expression in a clinically representative cohort of endometrial carcinomas. Methods: The expression of L1CAM was immunohistochemically determined in 1199 endometrial carcinomas, treated at one of the European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ENITEC) centres. Staining was considered positive when >10% of the tumour cells expressed L1CAM. The association between L1CAM expression and several clincopathological characteristics and disease outcome was calculated. Results: In all, L1CAM was expressed in 10% of the 935 stage I EECs, 18% of the 160 advanced stage EECs, and 75% of the 104 NEECs. The expression of L1CAM was associated with advanced stage, nodal involvement, high tumour grade, non-endometrioid histology, lymphovascular space invasion, and distant recurrences in all cases, and with reduced survival in the EECs, but not in the NEECs. Conclusions: The expression of L1CAM is a strong predictor of poor outcome in EECs, but not NEECs. It is strongly associated with non-endometrioid histology and distant spread, and could improve the postoperative selection of high-risk endometrial carcinomas. The value of L1CAM expression in the preoperative selection of high-risk endometrial carcinomas should be studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Jm van der Putten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen 6525GA, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Cm Visser
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen 6525GA, The Netherlands
| | - Koen van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Anthoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066CX, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Santacana
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Avenida Alcalde Rovira Roure, 80, Lleida 25198, Spain
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, Freiburg 79106, Germany
| | - Johan Bulten
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen 6525GA, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Hirschfeld
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, Freiburg 79106, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
| | - Eva Colas
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Biomedical Research Group in Gynecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain.,Gynecological Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain
| | - Angel Garcia
- Department of Pathology, Vall Hebron University Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain
| | - Gemma Mancebo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim, 25-29, Barcelona 08003, Spain
| | - Fransesc Alameda
- Department of Pathology, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Marítim, 25-29, Barcelona 08003, Spain
| | - Jone Trovik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, Bergen 5021, Norway
| | - Reidun K Kopperud
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, PO Box 7800, Bergen 5020, Norway.,Center for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), University of Bergen, PO Box 7800, Bergen 5020, Norway
| | - Jutta Huvila
- Department of Pathology, University of Turku, PO Box 7245, Laskut, Turku 01051, Finland
| | - Stefanie Schrauwen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Martin Koskas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, Paris 75018, France
| | - Francine Walker
- Department of Pathology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, Paris 75018, France
| | - Vit Weinberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic
| | - Lubos Minar
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic
| | - Eva Jandakova
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic
| | - Marc Plm Snijders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, Nijmegen 6532SZ, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia van den Berg-van Erp
- Department of Pathology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, Nijmegen 6532SZ, The Netherlands
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Avenida Alcalde Rovira Roure, 80, Lleida 25198, Spain
| | - Helga B Salvesen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, Bergen 5021, Norway
| | - Frederic Amant
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Leon Fag Massuger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen 6525GA, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna Ma Pijnenborg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, TweeSteden Hospital, Doctor Deelenlaan 5, Tilburg 5042AD, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Setiawan VW, Yang HP, Pike MC, McCann SE, Yu H, Xiang YB, Wolk A, Wentzensen N, Weiss NS, Webb PM, van den Brandt PA, van de Vijver K, Thompson PJ, Strom BL, Spurdle AB, Soslow RA, Shu XO, Schairer C, Sacerdote C, Rohan TE, Robien K, Risch HA, Ricceri F, Rebbeck TR, Rastogi R, Prescott J, Polidoro S, Park Y, Olson SH, Moysich KB, Miller AB, McCullough ML, Matsuno RK, Magliocco AM, Lurie G, Lu L, Lissowska J, Liang X, Lacey JV, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankinson SE, Håkansson N, Goodman MT, Gaudet MM, Garcia-Closas M, Friedenreich CM, Freudenheim JL, Doherty J, De Vivo I, Courneya KS, Cook LS, Chen C, Cerhan JR, Cai H, Brinton LA, Bernstein L, Anderson KE, Anton-Culver H, Schouten LJ, Horn-Ross PL. Type I and II endometrial cancers: have they different risk factors? J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:2607-18. [PMID: 23733771 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.48.2596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 515] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Endometrial cancers have long been divided into estrogen-dependent type I and the less common clinically aggressive estrogen-independent type II. Little is known about risk factors for type II tumors because most studies lack sufficient cases to study these much less common tumors separately. We examined whether so-called classical endometrial cancer risk factors also influence the risk of type II tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Individual-level data from 10 cohort and 14 case-control studies from the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium were pooled. A total of 14,069 endometrial cancer cases and 35,312 controls were included. We classified endometrioid (n = 7,246), adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (n = 4,830), and adenocarcinoma with squamous differentiation (n = 777) as type I tumors and serous (n = 508) and mixed cell (n = 346) as type II tumors. RESULTS Parity, oral contraceptive use, cigarette smoking, age at menarche, and diabetes were associated with type I and type II tumors to similar extents. Body mass index, however, had a greater effect on type I tumors than on type II tumors: odds ratio (OR) per 2 kg/m(2) increase was 1.20 (95% CI, 1.19 to 1.21) for type I and 1.12 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.14) for type II tumors (P heterogeneity < .0001). Risk factor patterns for high-grade endometrioid tumors and type II tumors were similar. CONCLUSION The results of this pooled analysis suggest that the two endometrial cancer types share many common etiologic factors. The etiology of type II tumors may, therefore, not be completely estrogen independent, as previously believed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Wendy Setiawan
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1450 Biggy St, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Setiawan VW, Yang HP, Pike MC, McCann S, Yu H, Xiang YB, Wolk A, Wentzensen N, Weiss NS, Webb PM, van den Brandt PA, van de Vijver K, Thompson PJ, Strom BL, Spurdle AB, Shu XO, Schairer C, Sacerdote C, Rohan TE, Robien K, Risch H, Ricceri F, Rebbeck TR, Rastogi R, Prescott J, Polidoro S, Park Y, Olson SH, Moysich KB, Miller AB, McCullough ML, Matsuno RK, Magliocco AM, Lurie G, Lu L, Lissowska J, Liang X, Lacey JV, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Hankinson SE, Håkansson N, Goodman MT, Gaudet MM, Garcia-Closas M, Friedenreich C, Freudenheim JL, Doherty J. Abstract 1029: The association of body mass index with risk of endometrial cancer subtypes: Pooled analysis in E2C2. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-1029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Excess body weight is a known risk factor for endometrial cancer but whether it differentially affects histological subtypes of endometrial cancer is unclear. The two proposed main subtypes are the “estrogen-dependent Type I” and “non estrogen-dependent and clinically aggressive Type II”. Little is known about risk factors for Type II tumors mainly because most epidemiologic studies lack sufficient cases to study these rare tumors separately. Here we examined the association between recent adult body mass index (BMI) and endometrial tumor subtypes in a pooled analysis of 25 studies in the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium (E2C2). Individual-level data from 10 cohort studies and 15 case-control studies provided a total of 14,409 endometrial cancer cases and 35,950 controls for this analysis. Cohort studies were analyzed using a nested case-control design. The majority of women were white (86%) and postmenopausal (83%). Endometrial cancer cases were classified into two subtypes: Type I (endometrioid adenocarcinomas, adenocarcinoma tubular, papillary adenocarcinomas, mucinous adenocarcinomas, adenocarcinomas with squamous metaplasia, n=13,286) and Type II (serous, squamous cell, small cell, mixed cell, n=1,123). The associations of BMI with the risk of tumor subtypes were evaluated by calculating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using polytomous logistic regression models. Potential confounders included in the analysis were age, race, parity, age at menarche, oral contraceptive (OC) use, menopausal hormone (PMH) use, and smoking status. BMI was positively associated with both Type I and Type II tumors, but the association was stronger for Type I than for Type II tumors (P value for the difference in OR between Type I and Type II was <0.0001). The OR associated with each five kg/m2 increase in BMI (OR5) was 1.58 (95% CI: 1.55, 1.62) for Type I and 1.35 (95% CI: 1.28, 1.42) for Type II. In the analysis of individual histologic types, the OR5 was lowest for serous tumors (1.28), moderate for mixed cell and clear cell (1.33-1.37), and highest for endometrioid tumors (1.60) and various adenocarcinoma groups (1.54-1.58). The associations of BMI with both Type I and II tumors were greater among postmenopausal women who never used PMH [OR5 = 1.84 (95% CI: 1.78, 1.89) for Type I and 1.48 (95% CI: 1.38, 1.58) for Type II] than among estrogen-only users [OR5 = 1.20 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.28) for Type I and 1.05 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.26) for Type II] or among estrogen-progestin users [OR5 = 1.33 (95% CI: 1.25, 1.41) for Type I and 1.12 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.33) for Type II]. Other known endometrial cancer risk factors such as OC use, parity, and smoking did not appear to modify the association between BMI and tumor subtype. In this large pooled analysis, we observed that BMI is a risk factor for all types of endometrial cancer, although, the association is consistently stronger for Type I than for Type II tumors.
Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1029. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-1029
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Brian L. Strom
- 11University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Xiao-ou Shu
- 12Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | | | - Kim Robien
- 15University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | | | | | | | - Jennifer Prescott
- 18Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Sara H. Olson
- 17Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Anthony B. Miller
- 19Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Galina Lurie
- 10University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI
| | | | - Jolanta Lissowska
- 22M. Sklowdowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Xiaolin Liang
- 17Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hanbeukers B, Borger J, van den Ende P, van der Ent F, Houben R, Jager J, Keymeulen K, Murrer L, Sastrowijoto S, van de Vijver K, Boersma L. Customized Computed Tomography-Based Boost Volumes in Breast-Conserving Therapy: Use of Three-Dimensional Histologic Information for Clinical Target Volume Margins. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 75:757-63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2008] [Revised: 10/17/2008] [Accepted: 11/11/2008] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|