1
|
Fernández-García S, Del Campo-Albendea L, Sambamoorthi D, Sheikh J, Lau K, Osei-Lah N, Ramkumar A, Naidu H, Stoney N, Sundaram P, Sengupta P, Mehta S, Attarde S, Maddock S, Manning M, Meherally Z, Ansari K, Lawson H, Yap M, Kew T, Punnoose A, Knight C, Sadeqa E, Cherian J, Ravi S, Chen W, Walker K, O'Donoghue K, van Wely M, van Leeuwen E, Kostova E, Kunst H, Khalil A, Brizuela V, Kara E, Kim CR, Thorson A, Oladapo OT, Mofenson L, Gottlieb SL, Bonet M, Moss N, Zamora J, Allotey J, Thangaratinam S. Effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health 2024; 9:e014247. [PMID: 38580375 PMCID: PMC11002410 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effects of COVID-19 vaccines in women before or during pregnancy on SARS-CoV-2 infection-related, pregnancy, offspring and reactogenicity outcomes. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Major databases between December 2019 and January 2023. STUDY SELECTION Nine pairs of reviewers contributed to study selection. We included test-negative designs, comparative cohorts and randomised trials on effects of COVID-19 vaccines on infection-related and pregnancy outcomes. Non-comparative cohort studies reporting reactogenicity outcomes were also included. QUALITY ASSESSMENT, DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and extracted data. We undertook random-effects meta-analysis and reported findings as HRs, risk ratios (RRs), ORs or rates with 95% CIs. RESULTS Sixty-seven studies (1 813 947 women) were included. Overall, in test-negative design studies, pregnant women fully vaccinated with any COVID-19 vaccine had 61% reduced odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.75; 4 studies, 23 927 women; I2=87.2%) and 94% reduced odds of hospital admission (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.71; 2 studies, 868 women; I2=92%). In adjusted cohort studies, the risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy was reduced by 12% (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.92; 2 studies; 115 085 women), while caesarean section was reduced by 9% (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98; 6 studies; 30 192 women). We observed an 8% reduction in the risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97; 2 studies; 54 569 women) in babies born to vaccinated versus not vaccinated women. In general, vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy or perinatal outcomes. Pain at the injection site was the most common side effect reported (77%, 95% CI 52% to 94%; 11 studies; 27 195 women). CONCLUSION COVID-19 vaccines are effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and related complications in pregnant women. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020178076.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Fernández-García
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Laura Del Campo-Albendea
- Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Jameela Sheikh
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Karen Lau
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nana Osei-Lah
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anoushka Ramkumar
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Harshitha Naidu
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicole Stoney
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paul Sundaram
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Samay Mehta
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shruti Attarde
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sophie Maddock
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Millie Manning
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Kehkashan Ansari
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Heidi Lawson
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Magnus Yap
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tania Kew
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Andriya Punnoose
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Chloe Knight
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Eyna Sadeqa
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jiya Cherian
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sangamithra Ravi
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Wentin Chen
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Madelon van Wely
- Amsterdam UMC Location AMC Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elizabeth van Leeuwen
- Amsterdam UMC Location AMC Department of Obstetrics Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elena Kostova
- Amsterdam UMC Location AMC Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heinke Kunst
- Queen Mary University of London Blizard Institute, London, UK
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Asma Khalil
- St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Vanessa Brizuela
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Edna Kara
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Caron Rahn Kim
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Anna Thorson
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Olufemi T Oladapo
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Lynne Mofenson
- Research, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Sami L Gottlieb
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Mercedes Bonet
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | | | - Javier Zamora
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Centre (BRC), University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - John Allotey
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Centre (BRC), University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Centre (BRC), University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Santimano AJ, Al-Zoubi RM, Al-Qudimat AR, Al Darwish MB, Ojha LK, Rejeb MA, Hamad Y, Elrashid MA, Ruxshan NM, El Omri A, Bawadi H, Al-Asmakh MA, Yassin A, Aboumarzouk OM, Zarour A, Al-Ansari AA. Efficacy and Clinical Outcomes of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Intervirology 2024; 67:40-54. [PMID: 38432215 PMCID: PMC11006275 DOI: 10.1159/000538135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The world has witnessed one of the largest pandemics, dubbed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). As of December 2020, the USA alone reported 98,948 cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection during pregnancy, with 109 related maternal deaths. Current evidence suggests that unvaccinated pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 are at a higher risk of experiencing complications related to COVID-19 compared to nonpregnant women. This review aimed to provide healthcare workers and non-healthcare workers with a comprehensive overview of the available information regarding the efficacy of vaccines in pregnant women. SUMMARY We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. The search through the database for articles published between December 2019 and October 2021 was performed. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases for research publications published between December 2019 and October 2021. We focused on original research, case reports, case series, and vaccination side effect by authoritative health institutions. Phrases used for the Medical Subject Heading [MeSH] search included ("COVID-19" [MeSH]) or ("Vaccine" [MeSH]) and ("mRNA" [MeSH]) and ("Pregnant" [MeSH]). Eleven studies were selected and included, with a total of 46,264 pregnancies that were vaccinated with mRNA-containing lipid nanoparticle vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna during pregnancy. There were no randomized trials, and all studies were observational (prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional). The mean maternal age was 32.2 years, and 98.7% of pregnant women received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination. The local and systemic adverse effects of the vaccination in pregnant women were analyzed and reported. The local adverse effects of the vaccination (at least 1 dose) such as local pain, swelling, and redness were reported in 32%, 5%, and 1%, respectively. The systemic adverse effects such as fatigue, headaches, new onset or worsening of muscle pain, chills, fever, and joint pains were also reported in 25%, 19%, 18%, 12%, 11%, and 8%, respectively. The average birthweight was 3,452 g. Among these pregnancies, 0.03% were stillbirth and 3.68% preterm (<37 weeks) births. KEY MESSAGES The systemic side effect profile after administering the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine to pregnant women was similar to that in nonpregnant women. Maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality were lowered with the administration of either one or both the doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio J. Santimano
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Raed M. Al-Zoubi
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- Department of Chemistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Ahmad R. Al-Qudimat
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Mohamed B. Al Darwish
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Laxmi Kumari Ojha
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Mohamed Amine Rejeb
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Yasser Hamad
- Department of Quality and Patients Safety, Rehabilitation Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Malaz A. Elrashid
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Noorah M. Ruxshan
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Abdelfatteh El Omri
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Hiba Bawadi
- Department of Nutrition, College of Health Sciences, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - Maha A. Al-Asmakh
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- Biomedical Research Centre, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - Aksam Yassin
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
- Center of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dresden International University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Omar M. Aboumarzouk
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
- College of Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ahmad Zarour
- Acute Care Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Abdulla A. Al-Ansari
- Surgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rafati A, Jameie M, Amanollahi M, Jameie M, Pasebani Y, Sakhaei D, Ilkhani S, Rashedi S, Pasebani MY, Azadi M, Rahimlou M, Kwon CS. Association of seizure with COVID-19 vaccines in persons with epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2023; 95:e29118. [PMID: 37732629 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.29118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Seizure aggravation following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines is a major cause behind vaccine hesitancy among persons with epilepsy (PwE), resulting in lower immunization rates. We systematically reviewed seizure-activity-related events in PwE following COVID-19 vaccination. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, until January 31, 2023, and included articles reporting seizure activity-related events in PwE receiving COVID-19 vaccination. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were followed. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022312475). Outcomes included pooled incidence proportions of (a) increased seizure frequency, (b) status epilepticus (SE), and (c) change in seizure type. Of the 2207 studies, 16 entered the meta-analysis. The pooled incidence proportion of increased seizure frequency (16 studies-3245 PwE) was 5% (95% CI: 3%-7%, I2 = 52%). Regarding increased seizure frequency, no significant difference was observed between mRNA and viral vector (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.49-2.52, I2 = 0%), and between mRNA and inactivated virus (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.27-9.37; I2 = 0%). The pooled incidence proportion of SE (15 studies-2387 PwE) was 0.08% (95% CI: 0.02%-0.33%, I2 = 0%). Ultimately, the pooled incidence proportion of change in seizure type (7 studies-1172 PwE) was 1% (95% CI: 1%-2%, I2 = 0%). The meta-analysis revealed post-COVID-19-vaccination increased seizure frequency in 5% of PwE, with no difference between mRNA and viral vector or inactivated virus vaccines. Furthermore, we found 0.08% and 1% incidence proportions for postvaccination SE and change in seizure type, respectively. While noteworthy, these values are far less than reports for COVID-19 infection, emphasizing vaccination importance in preventing COVID-19 consequences in PwE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Rafati
- School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Melika Jameie
- Neuroscience Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mobina Amanollahi
- Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mana Jameie
- Tehran Heart Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Yeganeh Pasebani
- School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Delaram Sakhaei
- School of Medicine, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran
| | - Saba Ilkhani
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sina Rashedi
- Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | | | - Mehran Rahimlou
- Department of Nutrition, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
| | - Churl-Su Kwon
- Departments of Neurology, Epidemiology, Neurosurgery, The Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moll MEC, Martínez AMS, Cisneros BT, Onofre JIG, Floriano GN, de León MB. Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnant and Lactating Mexican Women and Breastfed Infants: A Survey-Based Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1280. [PMID: 37631848 PMCID: PMC10459654 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11081280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccines' safety has been extensively studied; however, further analysis is required in pregnant women, nursing mothers, and breastfed infants. Our aim was to compare the extension and severity of self-reported COVID-19 vaccine side effects in pregnant and breastfeeding women, and breastfed infants. In this cross-sectional study, COVID-19-vaccinated subjects were enrolled using an online survey in Mexico. Women were classified by pregnancy and breastfeeding status at the time of vaccination (n = 3167). After the first or only dose, there was a trend toward fewer systemic effects in pregnant women (p = 0.06). BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) had a higher frequency of local symptoms in pregnancy. Lactating women experienced fewer local symptoms after the first or single dose (p = 0.04) and the opposite occurred after the second dose (p = 0.001). ChAdOx1 (AstraZeneca) increased the chances of developing both local and systemic symptoms after the first dose but decreased them after the second dose. The severity was similar across groups, although the result of lack of association in pregnancy requires studies with a larger sample size. Irritability was the most reported symptom in breastfed infants. This study contributes to the knowledge about the side effects in pregnant and lactating women, and breastfed babies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Elena Camacho Moll
- Department of Molecular Biology, Northeast Biomedical Research Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Monterrey 64720, N.L., Mexico;
- Center for Molecular Diagnosis and Personalized Medicine, Health Sciences Division, Universidad de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza García 66238, N.L., Mexico
| | - Ana María Salinas Martínez
- Epidemiologic and Health Services Research Unit, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Monterrey 64360, N.L., Mexico
- School of Public Health and Nutrition, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey 64460, N.L., Mexico
| | - Benjamín Tovar Cisneros
- School of Biological Sciences, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, Monterrey 66455, N.L., Mexico;
| | - Juan Ignacio García Onofre
- Family Medicine Unit No. 64, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Santa Catarina 66358, N.L., Mexico; (J.I.G.O.); (G.N.F.)
| | - Gloria Navarrete Floriano
- Family Medicine Unit No. 64, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Santa Catarina 66358, N.L., Mexico; (J.I.G.O.); (G.N.F.)
| | - Mario Bermúdez de León
- Department of Molecular Biology, Northeast Biomedical Research Center, Mexican Institute of Social Security, Monterrey 64720, N.L., Mexico;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sotoodeh Ghorbani S, Taherpour N, Rahimi E, Farhadi Babadi K, Feyzi R, Hashemi Nazari SS. Effectiveness, Immunogenicity and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnant Women: A Rapid Review Study. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2023; 37:72. [PMID: 37600627 PMCID: PMC10436674 DOI: 10.47176/mjiri.37.72] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Pregnant women infected with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, and the only real preventive strategy against COVID-19 is mass vaccination. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness, immunogenicity, and safety of Covid-19 vaccination in pregnant women. Methods A combination of search terms was performed by 2 researchers independently in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases, the World Health Organization website, and the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website up to February 2022. After the selection of eligible studies, the review process, description, and summarization of the selected studies were performed by the research team. Results Finally, 22 articles were included in this study. Evidence supports the safety of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. There is no risk of transmitting COVID-19 to infants during lactation. In addition, antibodies made by vaccination can protect infants through breast milk. Conclusion The scientific community believes that being vaccinated as soon as possible is the best course of action because there is no evidence to suggest that the COVID-19 vaccine poses a risk to expectant or nursing women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahar Sotoodeh Ghorbani
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Niloufar Taherpour
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Research Center, Shahid Beheshti
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Elham Rahimi
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kosar Farhadi Babadi
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Rezvan Feyzi
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Saeed Hashemi Nazari
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Research Center, Shahid Beheshti
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Avorgbedor F, Gondwe KW, Aljarrah A, Bankole AO. COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making Among Black Pregnant and Postpartum Women. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023:10.1007/s40615-023-01675-6. [PMID: 37335424 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-023-01675-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The history of biomedical research is marred by racially discriminatory and abusive practices that impacted Black/African Americans. Medical racism impacts the trust and utilization of new medical interventions, such as the COVID-19 vaccine. This study aimed to understand Black pregnant and postpartum women's perspectives and decision-making about the COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS We used a qualitative descriptive design and recruited 23 pregnant and postpartum Black women aged 18 years and above. Data was collected using a semi-structured interview guide. Data were analyzed using content analysis. FINDINGS The participants described factors influencing their decision to receive or not receive the COVID-19 vaccines. These factors included individual, cultural, ethnicity, religious, and family-related factors (individual-personal beliefs influenced decisions about the vaccine; ethnicity, culture, and religion influenced vaccine decision-making; group-family and friends played a role in decision-making), vaccine or vaccination-related issues (concerns about vaccination and pregnancy outcomes and mistrust in the vaccine information), and contextual influence (sources of vaccine information influenced decision-making and healthcare providers influenced decision-making). CONCLUSION Understanding the vaccine decision-making process of underserved populations likely to decline vaccination due to pregnancy, postpartum, and breastfeeding status will help design tailored interventions to improve vaccine acceptance in minority communities, especially for pregnant and postpartum women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Forgive Avorgbedor
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.
| | | | - Ahmad Aljarrah
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hantoushzadeh S, Eshraghi N, Younesi S, Salehi M, Rezaei N, Hasheminejad MM, Rashidian P, Shirdel S, Asadi F, Ghaemi M. Cord blood antibodies following BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) vaccination during pregnancy. Immun Inflamm Dis 2023; 11:e874. [PMID: 37382259 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the maternal and umbilical cord blood antibody levels, after COVID vaccination during pregnancy. METHOD The women who received the COVID-19 vaccine (Sinopharm) during pregnancy were included. Maternal and cord blood samples were tested to detect the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 receptor binding domain (RBD) specific antibodies. In addition, obstetric information and side effects after vaccination were gathered. RESULT A total of 23 women were included. Eleven pregnant women took two doses and 12 cases received a single dose of the vaccine. No IgM antibody was detected in any maternal blood or cord blood samples. The RBD-specific Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody was positive in mothers receiving 2 doses of the vaccine and their infants. But the antibody titers were under the positive cut-off threshold for the other 12 women who were vaccinated with a single dose. Women who received both doses of vaccine had significantly higher IgG levels than a single dose of Sinopharm (p = .025). The same result was demonstrated in infants born to these mothers (p = .019). CONCLUSION There was a significant correlation between maternal and neonatal IgG concentrations. Although, receiving both doses of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine (not 1 dose) during pregnancy is highly beneficial for increasing humoral immunity for the mother and fetus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sedigheh Hantoushzadeh
- Vali-E-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nasim Eshraghi
- Vali-E-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sarang Younesi
- Nilou Laboratory, Prenatal Screening Department, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Salehi
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nima Rezaei
- Department of Immunology, Research Center for Immunodeficiencies, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Mehdi Hasheminejad
- Vali-E-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Pegah Rashidian
- Vali-E-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Saeedeh Shirdel
- Vali-E-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Asadi
- Vali-E-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Marjan Ghaemi
- Vali-E-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Family Health Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ciapponi A, Berrueta M, P K Parker E, Bardach A, Mazzoni A, Anderson SA, Argento FJ, Ballivian J, Bok K, Comandé D, Goucher E, Kampmann B, Munoz FM, Rodriguez Cairoli F, Santa María V, Stergachis AS, Voss G, Xiong X, Zamora N, Zaraa S, Buekens PM. Safety of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine 2023:S0264-410X(23)00332-8. [PMID: 37012114 PMCID: PMC10040368 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Background Assessment of COVID-19 vaccines safety during pregnancy is urgently needed. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, including their components and technological platforms used in other vaccines during pregnancy and animal studies to complement direct evidence. We searched literature databases from its inception to September 2021 without language restriction, COVID-19 vaccine websites, and reference lists of other systematic reviews and the included studies. Pairs of reviewers independently selected, data extracted, and assessed the risk of bias of the studies. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. (PROSPERO CRD42021234185). Results We retrieved 8,837 records from the literature search; 71 studies were included, involving 17,719,495 pregnant persons and 389 pregnant animals. Most studies (94%) were conducted in high-income countries, were cohort studies (51%), and 15% were classified as high risk of bias. We identified nine COVID-19 vaccine studies, seven involving 309,164 pregnant persons, mostly exposed to mRNA vaccines. Among non-COVID-19 vaccines, the most frequent exposures were AS03 and aluminum-based adjuvants. A meta-analysis of studies that adjusted for potential confounders showed no association with adverse outcomes, regardless of the vaccine or the trimester of vaccination. Neither the reported rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes nor reactogenicity exceeded expected background rates, which was the case for ASO3- or aluminum-adjuvanted non-COVID-19 vaccines in the proportion meta-analyses of uncontrolled studies/arms. The only exception was postpartum hemorrhage after COVID-19 vaccination (10.40%; 95% CI: 6.49-15.10%), reported by two studies; however, the comparison with non-exposed pregnant persons, available for one study, found non-statistically significant differences (adjusted OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.56-2.12). Animal studies showed consistent results with studies in pregnant persons. Conclusion We found no safety concerns for currently administered COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. Additional experimental and real-world evidence could enhance vaccination coverage. Robust safety data for non-mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agustín Ciapponi
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Mabel Berrueta
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Edward P K Parker
- The Vaccine Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
| | - Ariel Bardach
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Agustina Mazzoni
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Steven A Anderson
- US Food & Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
| | - Fernando J Argento
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Jamile Ballivian
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina
| | - Karin Bok
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Dr # 7A03, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| | - Daniel Comandé
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Erin Goucher
- School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA.
| | - Beate Kampmann
- The Vaccine Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK; Vaccines & Immunity Theme, MRC Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul, the Gambia; Charité Centre for Global Health, Universitätsmedizin Charité Berlin, Germany.
| | - Flor M Munoz
- The Vaccine Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
| | - Federico Rodriguez Cairoli
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina.
| | - Victoria Santa María
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina
| | - Andy S Stergachis
- School of Pharmacy and School of Public Health, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, BOX 357631, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Gerald Voss
- Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), Oslo, Norway.
| | - Xu Xiong
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Dr # 7A03, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| | - Natalia Zamora
- Centro de Investigación de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIESP) - Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Argentina
| | - Sabra Zaraa
- Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, 6621 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Pierre M Buekens
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Dr # 7A03, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ahmed AK, Sijercic VC, Sayad R, Ruthig GR, Abdelwahab SF, El-Mokhtar MA, Sayed IM. Risks and Preventions for Pregnant Women and Their Preterm Infants in a World with COVID-19: A Narrative Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11030640. [PMID: 36992224 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11030640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background and Aim: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is linked to increasing cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) around the world. COVID-19 infections have an important impact on pregnancy, preterm birth (PTB) and delivery. Although several complications have been reported in infected pregnant women, the effect of infection on PTB is controversial. The purpose of this study was to summarize the existing literature on the effects and complications of COVID-19 on the health of pregnant women and preterm babies and its impact on the incidence of PTB. We also discuss the effect of current COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. (2) Methods: We carried out a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed for studies on preterm births associated with COVID-19. (3) Results and Conclusions: We discovered contradictory results regarding the prevalence of PTB during the pandemic compared to earlier years. While most studies indicated an increase in PTBs with COVID-19, some indicated a decline in the preterm delivery rate during this time. During pregnancy, COVID-19 infection can increase the incidence of cesarean section, stillbirth, ICU admission, preeclampsia/eclampsia, and mortality rates. In the treatment of pregnant women with severe COVID-19, methylprednisolone was favored over prednisolone, and a brief course of dexamethasone is advised for pregnant women with anticipated PTB to accelerate the development of the fetal lung. Generally, vaccination for COVID-19 in pregnant and lactating women stimulates anti-SARS-CoV2 immune responses, and it does not result in any noteworthy negative reactions or outcomes for the mother or baby.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Reem Sayad
- Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
| | - Gregory R Ruthig
- Department of Biology, North Central College, Naperville, IL 60540, USA
| | - Sayed F Abdelwahab
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed A El-Mokhtar
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
- Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sphinx University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
| | - Ibrahim M Sayed
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
- Department of Biomedical and Nutritional Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
He J, Wei Z, Leng T, Bao J, Gao X, Chen F. Vaccination options for pregnant women during the Omicron period. J Reprod Immunol 2023; 156:103798. [PMID: 36640675 PMCID: PMC9817340 DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2023.103798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Omicron exhibits reduced pathogenicity in general population than the previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants. However, the severity of disease and pregnancy outcomes of Omicron infection among pregnant women have not yet been definitively established. Meanwhile, substantial proportions of this population have doubts about the necessity of vaccination given the reports of declining efficacy of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. Herein, we comprehensively discuss the clinical outcomes of infected pregnant women during the Omicron period and summarize the available data on the safety and efficacy profile of COVID-19 vaccination. The results found that the incidence of moderate and severe disease, maternal mortality, pregnancy loss, preterm delivery, stillbirth, preeclampsia/eclampsia, and gestational hypertension during the Omicron period are similar to those during the Pre-Delta period. In view of the effects of mass vaccination and previous natural infection on disease severity, the virulence of Omicron in pregnant women may be comparable to or even higher than that of the Pre-Delta variant. Moreover, the currently approved COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective for pregnant women. Particularly, those who received a second or third dose had significantly less severe disease with little progression to critical illness or death compared with those who were unvaccinated or received only one dose. Therefore, in the case of the rapid spread of Omicron, pregnant women should still strictly follow preventive measures to avoid infection and receive the COVID-19 vaccine in a timely manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiarui He
- Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Rd, Jining 272067, China
| | - Zichun Wei
- Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Rd, Jining 272067, China
| | - Taiyang Leng
- Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Rd, Jining 272067, China
| | - Jiaqi Bao
- Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Rd, Jining 272067, China
| | - Xinyao Gao
- Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Rd, Jining 272067, China
| | - Fei Chen
- Jining Medical University, 133 Hehua Rd, Jining 272067, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pregnancy Outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-Positive Patients: A 20-Month Retrospective Analysis of Delivery Cases. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:medicina59020341. [PMID: 36837541 PMCID: PMC9968024 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The SARS-CoV-2 infection brings supplemental risks for pregnant women. Due to controversial hesitancy, their vaccination rate was lower in 2021 compared to the general population. In addition, access to maternal care was reduced during the pandemic. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of the health records data over 20 months (1 April 2020 to 20 November 2021) aiming to explore the outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-positive cases referred for delivery to a tertiary public hospital in Western Romania. Materials and Methods: Women with SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosed for the first time at the moment of birth who delivered singletons after 24 weeks of gestation, and had a clear immunization status were included in the analysis. Results: Out of the 97 patients included in the study, 35 (36%) had undergone ARN-based vaccination. Five cases of maternal death were recorded (all unvaccinated). Our retrospective exploratory analysis showed that the presence of COVID-19 symptoms in the SARS-CoV-2-positive patients made a significant impact on the delivery hospitalization, with a median hospital stay increase from 5 to 9 days (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.014): longer hospitalization was recorded in the symptomatic cases irrespective of their vaccination status. No other adverse outcomes, such as gestational age at delivery, C-section rate, 5 min Apgar index, or birth weight were associated with the presence of symptoms. Conclusions: Our clinic maintained safe maternal care for the COVID-19 patients during the analyzed period. Vaccination of the expectant women was beneficial in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients by lowering the risk of COVID-19 symptoms, with subsequent implications on the newborns' health and maternal attachment.
Collapse
|
12
|
A Retrospective Evaluation of Self-Reported Adverse Events Following Immunization with Different COVID-19 Vaccines in Türkiye. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11020316. [PMID: 36851193 PMCID: PMC9964774 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Sinovac and BioNTech vaccines were the first to be introduced in Türkiye to fight the ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic. As these vaccines had shown some side-effects in its clinical trial, we aimed to conduct a survey study to assess the short-term adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) in Türkiye. METHOD A cross-sectional study was conducted using social and electronic media platforms by delivering a pre-formed and validated online questionnaire among people who had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. This survey study focused on mass populations from different regions in Türkiye. A total of 603 responses were collected. Among these, 602 were selected based on complete answers and used for the assessment. The collected data were then analyzed to evaluate the various parameters related to the AEFIs of the respondents. RESULTS Among the total 602 participants, 20.8% were male, and 78.7% were female, actively answering all of the constructive questions. Most of the respondents were between 18-30 years of age. We found that a total of 23.3% of the total respondents had been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Our survey revealed that out of 602 volunteers, the rate of experiencing physical discomfort was higher in participants who had received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine at all three doses than in those who had received the Sinovac vaccine. When all vaccine types were examined, the most common side effect was pain at the injection site, reported by 75.19% participants. When the side effects were compared according to vaccine types, there was a significant difference only in terms of fever. Fever rates in those who had received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (20.96%) were found to be significantly higher than those who had received the Sinovac vaccine (8%). CONCLUSIONS The studied vaccines showed minor side effects and there was no significant difference between the vaccines in terms of other side effects. Moreover, further research is needed to determine the efficacy of the existing vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections or after-infection hospitalization.
Collapse
|
13
|
Novillo B, Martínez-Varea A. COVID-19 Vaccines during Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review. J Pers Med 2022; 13:jpm13010040. [PMID: 36675701 PMCID: PMC9864310 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13010040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Pregnant and breastfeeding women received unclear recommendations regarding COVID-19 vaccination at the beginning of the pandemic, as they were not included in the initial clinical trials. This systematic review aims to provide an update regarding COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Methods: The systematic review was carried out through a literature search in Medline/Pubmed. Studies were selected if they included information regarding COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding. The PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed. Results: A total of 33 studies were included. The main adverse effect is pain at the injection site, as in the general population. Adverse effects are more frequent after the second dose, being slightly more frequent after the Moderna vaccine. COVID-19 vaccination reduces the risk of severe COVID-19 in pregnant women. Additionally, COVID-19 vaccination induces artificial active immunogenicity in the mother and natural passive immunogenicity in the child. Breastmilk straddles both immediate antibody-mediated and long-lived cellular-mediated immune protection. Regarding neonatal benefits, vaccination is associated with a larger and more stable Immunoglobulin G response, while COVID-19 Infection is associated with a rapid and long-lasting Immunoglobulin A response. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccines are not only suggested but strongly recommended for pregnant and breastfeeding populations to protect mothers and newborns.
Collapse
|
14
|
Chong SH, Burn LA, Cheng TKM, Warr IS, Kenyon JC. A review of COVID vaccines: success against a moving target. Br Med Bull 2022; 144:12-44. [PMID: 36335919 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldac025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple vaccine platforms against COVID-19 have been developed and found safe and efficacious at a record speed. Although most are effective, they vary in their ease of production and distribution, their potential speed of modification against new variants, and their durability of protection and safety in certain target groups. SOURCES OF DATA Our discussion is based on published reports of clinical trials and analyses from national and global health agencies. AREAS OF AGREEMENT The production of neutralizing antibodies against the viral spike protein is protective, and all vaccines for which published data exist have been found to be effective against severe disease caused by the viral strain they target. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY The degree to which vaccines protect against emerging variants, moderate disease and asymptomatic infection remains somewhat unclear. GROWING POINTS Knowledge of the duration of protection and its decay is increasing, and discussions of booster frequency and target strains are ongoing. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH The global effort to combat transmission and disease continues to rely upon intense epidemiological surveillance, whilst real-world data and clinical trials shape vaccination schedules and formulae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S H Chong
- Homerton College, University of Cambridge, Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 8PH, UK
| | - L A Burn
- Homerton College, University of Cambridge, Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 8PH, UK
| | - T K M Cheng
- Homerton College, University of Cambridge, Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 8PH, UK.,Department of Medicine, Level 5 Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.,Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK
| | - I S Warr
- Homerton College, University of Cambridge, Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 8PH, UK
| | - J C Kenyon
- Homerton College, University of Cambridge, Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 8PH, UK.,Department of Medicine, Level 5 Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.,Division of Virology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tormen M, Taliento C, Salvioli S, Piccolotti I, Scutiero G, Cappadona R, Greco P. Effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women: A systematic review with meta-analysis. BJOG 2022; 130:348-357. [PMID: 36444098 PMCID: PMC9878107 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data regarding COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of COVID-19 vaccination received during pregnancy on SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19-related hospitalisation, COVID-19-related intensive care unit (ICU) admission and maternal-fetal complications. SEARCH STRATEGY MEDLINE, CINHAL, Embase, Scopus and CENTRAL databases, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov, reference lists, related articles and grey literature sources. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies of interventions, pregnant women, COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Study selection, risk-of-bias assessment, data extraction and assessment of the certainty of evidence using the GRADE method were performed independently by two authors. Meta-analyses were performed using Cochrane RevMan 5.4. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022308849. MAIN RESULTS We included 14 observational studies (362 353 women). The administration of a COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy resulted in a statistically significant reduction in SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28-0.76) and COVID-19-related hospitalisation (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.33-0.51). The effect appeared to be greater in fully vaccinated women, for both infection (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.16-0.59) and hospitalisation (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.10-0.21). However, the certainty of evidence was very low. The difference in COVID-19-related ICU admission between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.13-2.58). Finally, there were no statistically significant differences in any of the maternal-fetal complications considered in the included studies. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 vaccination administered during pregnancy seems to reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalisation, with no significant effects on maternal-fetal complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Tormen
- Maternal and Child Department, Unit of Obstetrics and GynecologyS. Anna University HospitalConaFerraraItaly,Department of Medical SciencesUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly
| | | | - Stefano Salvioli
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal and Child Sciences (DINOGMI)University of Genoa – Campus of SavonaSavonaItaly,Department of Neuroscience and RehabilitationUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly
| | | | - Gennaro Scutiero
- Maternal and Child Department, Unit of Obstetrics and GynecologyS. Anna University HospitalConaFerraraItaly,Department of Medical SciencesUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly
| | | | - Pantaleo Greco
- Maternal and Child Department, Unit of Obstetrics and GynecologyS. Anna University HospitalConaFerraraItaly,Department of Medical SciencesUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
KRISHNA H, MOTWANI R, KUMARI C, SAHNI C, ANANT M, KULANDHASAMY M, RANA K, KUMAR A. Evaluation of Safety Concerns for COVID-19 Immunization of Pregnant Women: a Systematic Review of Emerging Evidence. MAEDICA 2022; 17:963-984. [PMID: 36818252 PMCID: PMC9923056 DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.4.963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: There is an urgent need to review the status of COVID-19 vaccine immunization in pregnant women globally, so that adverse outcomes may be prevented. In this study, we performed a systematic review to evaluate the probable outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women. Materials and methods:An electronic search over three months (June 15-August 15, 2021) was conducted. Original studies evaluating safety concerns in pregnant women for COVID-19 vaccination were included. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2009 guidelines were used for data collection and reporting of findings. Results:COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women was not associated with increased adverse effects or complications to the mother as well as the developing fetus or new-born compared to non-vaccinated pregnant women. Vaccinated pregnant women showed a robust immune response against COVID-19 infection. Conclusion:COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy causes no significant health risks for the mother or the developing fetus or new-born.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hare KRISHNA
- Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Rohini MOTWANI
- Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bibinagar, Telangana, India
| | - Chiman KUMARI
- Department of Anatomy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Chetan SAHNI
- Department of Anatomy, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Monika ANANT
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)-Patna, Bihar, India
| | | | - Kavita RANA
- Dhiti Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India
| | - Ashutosh KUMAR
- Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)-Patna, Bihar, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mascolo A, di Mauro G, Fraenza F, Gaio M, Zinzi A, Pentella C, Rossi F, Capuano A, Sportiello L. Maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant women receiving COVID-19 vaccination: The preg-co-vax study. Front Immunol 2022; 13:965171. [PMID: 36263025 PMCID: PMC9574088 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.965171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionAlthough the European Medicines Agency (EMA) encourage coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in pregnant women, the scientific evidence supporting the use of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy is still limited.AimWe aimed to investigate adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy.MethodsWe retrieved Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) related to the use of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy from the EudraVigilance database for the year 2021. We analyzed AEFI related to the mother and fetus/newborn. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was computed to compare the reporting probability of spontaneous abortion between COVID-19 vaccines.ResultsDuring the study period, among 1,315,315 ICSRs related to COVID-19 vaccines, we retrieved 3,252 (0.25%) reports related to the use in pregnancy. More than half (58.24%) of ICSRs were submitted by non-healthcare professionals. Although the majority (87.82%) of ICSRs concerned serious AEFI, their outcomes were mostly favorable. In this study, 85.0% of total ICSRs referred to pregnant women (n = 2,764), while 7.9% referred to fetuses/newborns (n = 258). We identified 16,569 AEFI. Moreover, 55.16% were AEFI not related to pregnancy (mostly headache, pyrexia, and fatigue), while 17.92% were pregnancy-, newborn-, or fetus-related AEFI. Among pregnancy-related AEFI, the most reported was spontaneous abortion. Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines had a lower reporting probability of spontaneous abortion than viral vector-based vaccines (ROR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.93). Moderna and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines had a higher reporting probability of spontaneous abortion (ROR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05–1.38 and ROR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08–1.47, respectively), while a lower reporting probability was found for Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine compared with all other COVID-19 vaccines (ROR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64–0.84). In addition, 5.8% of ICSRs reported a fatal outcome.ConclusionsNo strong insight of unknown AEFI associated with COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women was observed. Considering the high risk associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, our analysis suggests that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy outweigh the possible risks. However, it is important to continue monitoring the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in this subpopulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annamaria Mascolo
- Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Gabriella di Mauro
- Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- UOC Pharmacy, AORN Santobono-Pausilipon Children’s Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Federica Fraenza
- Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- *Correspondence: Federica Fraenza,
| | - Mario Gaio
- Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessia Zinzi
- Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Ciro Pentella
- Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Rossi
- Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Annalisa Capuano
- Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| | - Liberata Sportiello
- Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
SeyedAlinaghi S, MohsseniPour M, Saeidi S, Habibi P, Dashti M, Nazarian N, Noori T, Pashaei Z, Bagheri A, Ghasemzadeh A, Afsahi AM, Aghaie N, Mojdeganlou P, Arjmand G, Zargari G, Modiri R, Mojdeganlou H, Razi A, Mehraeen E, Dadras O. Complications of COVID-19 Vaccines during Pregnancy; a Systematic Review. ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2022; 10:e76. [PMID: 36426163 PMCID: PMC9676695 DOI: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rare serious complications have been documented after COVID-19 vaccination as clinical research proceeded and new target populations, such as children and pregnant women, were included. In this study, we attempted to review the literature relevant to pregnancy complications and maternal outcomes of COVID-19 immunization in pregnant women. . METHODS We searched the databases of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science on 31 August 2022. The records were downloaded and underwent a two-step screening; 1) title/abstract and then 2) full-text screening to identify the eligible studies. We included English original studies that evaluated the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. Information such as the type of study, geographical location, type of vaccine injected, gestational age, maternal underlying diseases, and complications following the vaccination were extracted into pre-designed tables. RESULTS According to the findings of included studies, in most of them vaccination had a positive impact and no negative effects were observed. Also, no medical history was reported in 11 articles, and pregnant women had no underlying diseases. Some serious adverse events were reported after vaccination, including miscarriage, paresthesia, uterine contraction, vaginal bleeding, preterm birth, major congenital anomalies, intrauterine growth restriction, and seizure. . CONCLUSION Because of limited data availability and the cross-sectional design of most studies, we could neither infer causation between vaccines and incidence of adverse effects nor comment with certainty about any possible adverse outcome of COVID-19 vaccines in vaccinated pregnant women. Consequently, more longitudinal and experimental studies are needed to define the exact adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi
- Iranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mehrzad MohsseniPour
- Iranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Solmaz Saeidi
- Department of Nursing, Khalkhal University of Medical Sciences; Khalkhal, Iran
| | - Pedram Habibi
- Iranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Dashti
- Department of Radiology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | | | - Tayebeh Noori
- Department of Health Information Technology, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran
| | - Zahra Pashaei
- Iranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - AmirBehzad Bagheri
- Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Afsaneh Ghasemzadeh
- Department of Radiology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Amir Masoud Afsahi
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego (UCSD), California, USA
| | - Narjes Aghaie
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Ghazal Arjmand
- Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ghazal Zargari
- School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences. Tehran, Iran
| | - Roshanak Modiri
- Iranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Armin Razi
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Esmaeil Mehraeen
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ,Corresponding Author: Esmaeil Mehraeen, Department of Health Information Technology, Khalkhal University of Medical Sciences, Khalkhal, Iran. Postal Code: 5681761351, Tel: +98-45-32426801, Fax: +98-45-32422305, E-mail:
| | - Omid Dadras
- Iranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ,Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Pregnancy is an independent risk factor for severe covid-19. Vaccination is the best way to reduce the risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection and limit its morbidity and mortality. The current recommendations from the World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and professional organizations are for pregnant, postpartum, and lactating women to receive covid-19 vaccination. Pregnancy specific considerations involve potential effects of vaccination on fetal development, placental transfer of antibodies, and safety of maternal vaccination. Although pregnancy was an exclusion criterion in initial clinical trials of covid-19 vaccines, observational data have been rapidly accumulating and thus far confirm that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the potential risks. This review examines the evidence supporting the effectiveness, immunogenicity, placental transfer, side effects, and perinatal outcomes of maternal covid-19 vaccination. Additionally, it describes factors associated with vaccine hesitancy in pregnancy. Overall, studies monitoring people who have received covid-19 vaccines during pregnancy have not identified any pregnancy specific safety concerns. Additional information on non-mRNA vaccines, vaccination early in pregnancy, and longer term outcomes in infants are needed. To collect this information, vaccination during pregnancy must be prioritized in vaccine research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina L Badell
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. USA
| | - Carolynn M Dude
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. USA
| | - Sonja A Rasmussen
- Departments of Pediatrics and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Denise J Jamieson
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA. USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lin K, Liu M, Bao L, Lv Q, Zhu H, Li D, Xu Y, Xiang Z, Liu J, Liang X, Han Y, Cong Z, Liu R, Deng R, Wang S, Guo Z, Sun L, Wei Q, Qiao H, Wang S, Pan S, Gao H, Qin C. Safety and protective capability of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine on pregnancy, lactation and the growth of offspring in hACE2 mice. Vaccine 2022; 40:4609-4616. [PMID: 35738970 PMCID: PMC9174435 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Revised: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The mass inoculation of a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine to induce herd immunity is one of the most effective measures to fight COVID-19. The vaccination of pregnant women cannot only avoid or reduce the probability of infectious diseases, but also offers the most effective and direct protection for neonates by means of passive immunization. However, there is no randomized clinical data to ascertain whether the inactivated vaccination of pregnant women or women of childbearing age can affect conception and the fetus. We found that human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) mice that were vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac (an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine) before and during pregnancy exhibited normal weight changes and reproductive performance indices; the physical development of their offspring was also normal. Following intranasal inoculation with SARS-CoV-2, pregnant mice in the immunization group all survived; reproductive performance indices and the physical development of offspring were all normal. In contrast, mice in the non-immunization group all died before delivery. Analyses showed that inoculation of CoronaVac was safe and did not exert any significant effects on pregnancy, lactation, or the growth of offspring in hACE2 mice. Vaccination effectively protected the pregnant mice against SARS-CoV-2 infection and had no adverse effects on the growth and development of the offspring, thus suggesting that inoculation with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine may be an effective strategy to prevent infection in pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaili Lin
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Meixuan Liu
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Linlin Bao
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Qi Lv
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Hua Zhu
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Dan Li
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yanfeng Xu
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhiguang Xiang
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jiangning Liu
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Xujian Liang
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yunlin Han
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhe Cong
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Ruixue Liu
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Ran Deng
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Siyuan Wang
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhi Guo
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Lu Sun
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Hongwei Qiao
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Shunyi Wang
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Sidan Pan
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Hong Gao
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
| | - Chuan Qin
- Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Comparative Medicine Center, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, and Reproduction: Effects on Fertility, Pregnancy, and Neonatal Life. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10081775. [PMID: 35892675 PMCID: PMC9331824 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10081775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Since its discovery in Wuhan, China, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread over the world, having a huge impact on people’s lives and health. The respiratory system is often targeted in people with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The virus can also infect many organs and tissues in the body, including the reproductive system. The consequences of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on fertility and pregnancy in hosts are poorly documented. Available data on other coronaviruses, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV) and Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV) coronaviruses, identified pregnant women as a vulnerable group with increased pregnancy-related complications. COVID-19 was also shown to impact pregnancy, which can be seen in either the mother or the fetus. Pregnant women more likely require COVID-19 intensive care treatment than non-pregnant women, and they are susceptible to giving birth prematurely and having their newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a key player of the ubiquitous renin-angiotensin system (RAS), is the principal host cellular receptor for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. ACE2 is involved in the regulation of both male and female reproductive systems, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated RAS dysfunction could affect reproduction. Herein, we review the current knowledge about COVID-19 consequences on male and female fertility, pregnant women, and their fetuses. Furthermore, we describe the effects of COVID-19 vaccination on reproduction.
Collapse
|
22
|
Chekol Abebe E, Ayalew Tiruneh G, Asmare Adela G, Mengie Ayele T, Tilahun Muche Z, Behaile T/Mariam A, Tilahun Mulu A, Abebe Zewde E, Dagnaw Baye N, Asmamaw Dejenie T. COVID-19 vaccine uptake and associated factors among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Debre Tabor public health institutions: A cross-sectional study. Front Public Health 2022; 10:919494. [PMID: 35928488 PMCID: PMC9343782 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.919494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundVaccination is the best means of reducing the increased risk of severe COVID-19 during pregnancy. Data on COVID-19 vaccine uptake among pregnant women in Ethiopia is scarce. Thus, this study aimed to assess COVID-19 vaccine uptake and associated factors among pregnant women.MethodAn institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 634 pregnant women attending antenatal care in Debre Tabor public health institutions from March 14 to 30, 2022. Participants were recruited using a multistage sampling technique and data were collected via face-to-face interviews using a pre-tested structured questionnaire. Stata version 16.0 software was used for data analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake, with a p-value< 0.05 considered statistically significant.ResultOnly 14.4% (95% CI: 11.7%-17.3%) of participants had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccines. The main reasons for declining vaccination were fear that the COVID-19 vaccine may have harmful side effects on the fetus or the mother. Being 45 or older (AOR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.01–2.95), being married (AOR: 1.26, 95%CI: 1.12, 2.96), having good knowledge (AOR:3.52, 95%CI:1.83–3.87), and a positive attitude (AOR:4.81, 95% CI: 1.42–7.33) were positive predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake. But attaining a college or university education (AOR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.12–0.69) was found to be a barrier to vaccine uptake by pregnant women.ConclusionCOVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women was substantially low. Old age, being married, low education, good knowledge, and a positive attitude were significant predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake. To enhance the COVID-19 vaccine uptake, the government should improve the knowledge and attitude of pregnant women toward the COVID-19 vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Endeshaw Chekol Abebe
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | | | - Getachew Asmare Adela
- Department of Reproductive Health and Nutrition, School of Public Health, Woliata Sodo University, Woliata Sodo, Ethiopia
| | - Teklie Mengie Ayele
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Zelalem Tilahun Muche
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Awgichew Behaile T/Mariam
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Anemut Tilahun Mulu
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Edgeit Abebe Zewde
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Nega Dagnaw Baye
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
| | - Tadesse Asmamaw Dejenie
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rawal S, Tackett RL, Stone RH, Young HN. COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people in the United States: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2022; 4:100616. [PMID: 35283351 PMCID: PMC8908633 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pregnant people are at increased risk of COVID-19–related morbidity and mortality, and vaccination presents an important strategy for preventing negative outcomes. However, pregnant people were not included in vaccine trials, and there are limited data on COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. The objectives of this systematic review were to identify the safety, immunogenicity, effectiveness, and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people in the United States. DATA SOURCES Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar) were used to identify eligible studies published from January 1, 2020 through February 6, 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed empirical research conducted in the United States, publications in English, and research addressing 1 of the following topics: safety, immunogenicity, effectiveness, and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people. METHODS A narrative synthesis approach was used to synthesize findings. Critical appraisal was done using the JBI (formerly Joanna Briggs Institute) tool. RESULTS Thirty-two studies were identified. Most studies (n=24) reported the use of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant people; only 6 reported the Janssen vaccine. Of the 32 studies, 11 examined COVID-19 vaccine safety, 10 investigated immunogenicity and effectiveness, and 11 assessed vaccine acceptance among pregnant people. Injection-site pain and fatigue were the most common adverse events. One case study reported immune thrombocytopenia. COVID-19 vaccination did not increase the risk of adverse pregnancy or neonatal outcomes compared with unvaccinated pregnant people. After COVID-19 vaccination, pregnant people had a robust immune response, and vaccinations conferred protective immunity to newborns through breast milk and placental transfer. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was low among pregnant people in the United States. African American race, Hispanic ethnicity, younger age, low education, previous refusal of the influenza vaccine, and lack of provider counseling were associated with low vaccine acceptance. CONCLUSION Peer-reviewed studies support COVID-19 vaccine safety and protective effects on pregnant people and their newborns. Future studies that use rigorous methodologies and include diverse populations are needed to confirm current findings. In addition, targeted and tailored strategies are needed to improve vaccine acceptance, especially among minorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita Rawal
- Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
| | - Randall L Tackett
- Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
| | - Rebecca H Stone
- Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
| | - Henry N Young
- Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nunes MC, Madhi SA. COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. Trends Mol Med 2022; 28:662-680. [PMID: 35610123 PMCID: PMC9061132 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2022.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
25
|
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 infection poses increased risks of poor outcomes during pregnancy, including preterm birth and stillbirth. There is also developing concern over the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the placenta, and these effects seem to vary between different viral variants. Despite these risks, many pregnant individuals have been reluctant to be vaccinated against the virus owing to safety concerns. We now have extensive data confirming the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, although it will also be necessary to determine the effectiveness of these vaccines specifically against newly emerging viral variants, including Omicron. In this Progress article, I cover recent developments in our understanding of the risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy, and how vaccination can reduce these.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Male
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines during Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes. Viruses 2022; 14:v14030539. [PMID: 35336947 PMCID: PMC8951373 DOI: 10.3390/v14030539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Objective: This systematic review summarizes current knowledges about maternal and neonatal outcomes following COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding. (2) Study design: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) were searched up to 27 October 2021. The primary outcome was to estimate how many pregnant and lactating women were reported to be vaccinated and had available maternal and neonatal outcomes. (3) Results: Forty-five studies sourcing data of 74,908 pregnant women and 5098 lactating women who received COVID-19 vaccination were considered as eligible. No major side-effects were reported, especially during the second and third trimester of pregnancy and during breastfeeding. Conversely, available studies revealed that infants received specific SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after maternal vaccination. (4) Conclusions: Vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 virus should be recommended for pregnant women, after the pros and cons have been adequately explained. In particular, given the still limited evidence and considering that fever during the first months of gestation increases the possibility of congenital anomalies, they should be carefully counseled. The same considerations apply to breastfeeding women, also considering the immune responses that mRNA vaccines can generate in their human milk.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ocular Complications Following Vaccination for COVID-19: A One-Year Retrospective. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10020342. [PMID: 35214800 PMCID: PMC8875181 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Vaccination efforts as a mitigation strategy in the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are fully underway. A vital component of understanding the optimal clinical use of these vaccines is a thorough investigation of adverse events following vaccination. To date, some limited reports and reviews have discussed ocular adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination, but a systematic review detailing these reports with manifestations and clinical courses as well as proposed mechanisms has yet to be published. This comprehensive review one-year into vaccination efforts against COVID-19 is meant to furnish sound understanding for ophthalmologists and primary care physicians based on the existing body of clinical data. We discuss manifestations categorized into one of the following: eyelid, orbit, uveitis, retina, vascular, neuro-ophthalmology, ocular motility disorders, and other.
Collapse
|
28
|
Sznajder KK, Kjerulff KH, Wang M, Hwang W, Ramirez SI, Gandhi CK. Covid-19 vaccine acceptance and associated factors among pregnant women in Pennsylvania 2020. Prev Med Rep 2022; 26:101713. [PMID: 35127367 PMCID: PMC8800167 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Data on factors associated with vaccine acceptance among pregnant women are critical to the rapid scale up of interventions to improve vaccine uptake. When COVID-19 vaccines were still in the testing phases of research, we surveyed pregnant women accessing prenatal care at an academic medical institution in Central Pennsylvania, United States to examine factors associated with vaccine acceptance. Willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine once a vaccine became available was asked as part of an ongoing study on the COVID-19 pandemic and pregnancy (n = 196). Overall, 65% of women reported they would be willing or somewhat willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Women who had received an influenza vaccine within the past year were more likely to be willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine than women who had never received an influenza vaccine or those who received it over one year ago (aOR 4.82; 95% CI 2.17, 10.72). Similarly, women who were employed full-time were more willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine than women who were not employed full time (aOR 2.22; 95% CI 1.02, 4.81), and women who reported feeling overloaded were more willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine than women who did not feel overloaded (aOR 2.18; 95% CI 1.02, 4.68). Our findings support the need to increase vaccination education among pregnant women before vaccines are rolled out, especially those who have not received an influenza vaccine within the past year. Improved understanding of willingness to vaccinate among pregnant women will improve future pandemic responses and current vaccination efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin K. Sznajder
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
- Corresponding author at: Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 90 Hope Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
| | - Kristen H. Kjerulff
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Ming Wang
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Wenke Hwang
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Sarah I. Ramirez
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Chintan K. Gandhi
- Department of Pediatrics, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pratama NR, Wafa IA, Budi DS, Putra M, Wardhana MP, Wungu CDK. mRNA Covid-19 vaccines in pregnancy: A systematic review. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0261350. [PMID: 35108277 PMCID: PMC8809595 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pregnancy is a known risk factor for severe Coronavirus disease 2019. It is important to develop safe vaccines that elicit strong maternal and fetal antibody responses. METHODS Registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO Clinical Trial Registry, and the European Union Clinical Trial Registry) and databases (MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Proquest, Springer, medRxiv, and bioRxiv) were systematically searched in June 20-22, 2021, for research articles pertaining to Covid-19 and pregnancy. Manual searches of bioRxiv and medRxiv were also conducted. Inclusion criteria were studies that focused on Covid-19 vaccination among pregnant women, while review articles and non-human studies were excluded. Infection rate, maternal antibody response, transplacental antibody transfer, and adverse events were described. RESULTS There were 13 observational studies with a total of 48,039 pregnant women who received mRNA vaccines. Of those, three studies investigated infection rate, six studies investigated maternal antibody response, seven studies investigated antibody transfer, three studies reported local adverse events, and five studies reported systemic adverse events. The available data suggested that the mRNA-based vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) can prevent future SARS-CoV-2 infection. These vaccines did not show clear harm in pregnancy. The most commonly encountered adverse reactions were pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache, but these were transient. Antibody responses were rapid after the first vaccine dose. After the booster, antibody responses were stronger and associated with better transplacental antibody transfer. Longer intervals between first vaccination dose and delivery were also associated with higher antibody fetal IgG and a better antibody transfer ratio. CONCLUSIONS The SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines are encouraged for pregnancy. These vaccines can be a safe option for pregnant women and their fetuses. Two vaccine doses are recommended for more robust maternal and fetal antibody responses. Longer latency is associated with higher fetal antibody responses. Further research about its long-term effect on pregnancy is needed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42021261684).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ifan Ali Wafa
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | | | - Manesha Putra
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Manggala Pasca Wardhana
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Citrawati Dyah Kencono Wungu
- Department of Physiology and Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
- Institute of Tropical Disease, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kadali RAK, Janagama R, Yedlapati SH, Kanike N, Gajula V, Madathala RR, Poddar S, Sukka N, Jogu HR, Racherla S, Shah I. Side effects of messenger RNA vaccines and prior history of COVID-19, a cross-sectional study. Am J Infect Control 2022; 50:8-14. [PMID: 34718069 PMCID: PMC8552581 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are concerns regarding immunogenicity with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines among persons with prior history of COVID-19 (PHC). This study was to analyze the short-term side effects of mRNA vaccines among health care workers (HCWs) with and without PHC. METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed using an independent online survey questionnaire that gathered responses from HCWs. RESULTS Among 1,475 HCWs, 1268 (85.97%) completed the survey, 102/1268 (44/447 in Moderna group and 58/821 in Pfizer-BioNTech group) reported PHC during pre-vaccination period. Symptoms of flushing/P = .05, brain fogging/P= .005, vertigo/P= .041, numbness/P= .023, diarrhea/P= .047, hives/P= .028, itching/P= .028, swelling of lips/mouth/P= .001, shortness of breath/P= .022, and anxiety/P= .048 have greater occurrence among Pfizer-BioNtech group with PHC when compared to Pfizer-BioNtech group with no PHC. Symptoms of chills/P= .027, flushing/P= .045, tremor/P= .05, muscle spasm/P= .039, vomiting/P= .031, diarrhea/P= .015, and cough/P= .011 have higher occurrence among Moderna group with PHC when compared to Moderna group with no PHC. CONCLUSIONS Few short-term side effects among mRNA vaccine recipients with PHC may have necessitated transient time-off from work. The PHC can be considered as a predictor for severity of side effects. While the vaccination program continues in the United States, a future COVID legislation that mandates vaccination among employees along with paid time off provision may help with higher compliance and acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renuka Ananth Kalyan Kadali
- Department of Internal Medicine, Harnett Hospitalist Group, Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC.
| | | | - Siva H Yedlapati
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Neelakanta Kanike
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Newburgh, IN
| | - Viswanath Gajula
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS
| | | | - Swati Poddar
- Psychiatry Program, California Health Care Facility, Stockton, CA
| | - Neelakanta Sukka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Vidant medical group, Lenoir Memorial hospital, Kinston, NC
| | - Hanumantha R Jogu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Vidant medical group, Greenville, NC
| | - Shailaja Racherla
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA
| | - Isha Shah
- Rheumatology Program, Kent Hospital, Warwick, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gandhi AP, Thakur JS, Gupta M, Kathirvel S, Goel K, Singh T. COVID-19 vaccination uptake and adverse events following COVID-19 immunization in pregnant women in Northern India: a prospective, comparative, cohort study. J Rural Med 2022; 17:228-235. [DOI: 10.2185/jrm.2022-025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aravind P. Gandhi
- Department of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - JS Thakur
- Department of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Madhu Gupta
- Department of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Soundappan Kathirvel
- Department of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Kapil Goel
- Department of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Tarundeep Singh
- Department of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abu-Raya B, Madhi SA, Omer SB, Amirthalingam G, Giles ML, Flanagan KL, Zimmermann P, O’Ryan M, Safadi MA, Papaevangelou V, Maertens K, Wanlapakorn N, Diaz-Brito V, Tommelein E, Esposito S. Global Perspectives on Immunization Against SARS-CoV-2 During Pregnancy and Priorities for Future Research: An International Consensus Paper From the World Association of Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders. Front Immunol 2021; 12:808064. [PMID: 35003137 PMCID: PMC8733958 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.808064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in pregnancy is associated with a higher risk for severe morbidity and mortality when compared with infection in non-pregnant women of childbearing age. An increasing number of countries recommend immunization against SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant women. Recent studies provide preliminary and supportive evidence on safety, immunogenicity and effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in pregnant women; however, important knowledge gaps remain which warrant further studies. This collaborative consensus paper provides a review of the current literature on COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women, identifies knowledge gaps and outlines priorities for future research to optimize protection against SARS-CoV-2 in the pregnant women and their infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Shabir A. Madhi
- South African Medical Research Council, Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Saad B. Omer
- Department of Internal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Gayatri Amirthalingam
- Immunisation and Countermeasures Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle L. Giles
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Katie L. Flanagan
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
- School of Health and Biomedical Science, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Immunology and Pathology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Tasmanian Vaccine Trial Centre, Clifford Craig Foundation, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, TAS, Australia
| | - Petra Zimmermann
- Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
- Department of Paediatrics, Fribourg Hospital HFR, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | - Miguel O’Ryan
- Microbiology and Mycology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences and Millennium Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Marco A. Safadi
- Department of Pediatrics, Santa Casa de Sao Paulo School of Medical Sciences, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vassiliki Papaevangelou
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Third Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece
| | - Kirsten Maertens
- Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nasamon Wanlapakorn
- Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Vicens Diaz-Brito
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu,, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eline Tommelein
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Susanna Esposito
- Pediatric Clinic, Pietro Barilla Children’s Hospital, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Riad A, Jouzová A, Üstün B, Lagová E, Hruban L, Janků P, Pokorná A, Klugarová J, Koščík M, Klugar M. COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance of Pregnant and Lactating Women (PLW) in Czechia: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:13373. [PMID: 34948987 PMCID: PMC8708407 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182413373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Pregnant and lactating women (PLW) represent a particular population subset with increased susceptibility for COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, even though the evidence about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines was delayed due to their initial exclusion from development trials. This unclear situation could have led to increased COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy levels among PLW; therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the attitudes of Czech PLW towards COVID-19 vaccines and the determinants of their attitudes. An analytical cross-sectional survey-based study was carried out in the University Hospital Brno (South Moravia, Czechia) between August and October 2021. The study utilised a self-administered questionnaire (SAQ) adapted from previous instruments used for the same purpose. The SAQ included closed-ended items covering demographic characteristics, clinical and obstetric characteristics, attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, and potential psychosocial predictors of vaccine acceptance. Out of the 362 included participants, 278 were pregnant (PW) and 84 were lactating women (LW). The overall COVID-19 vaccine acceptance (immediate and delayed) level was substantially high (70.2%), with a significant difference between PW (76.6%) and LW (48.8%). Out of the 70.2% who agreed to receive the vaccine, 3.6% indicated immediate acceptance, and 66.6% indicated delayed acceptance. Only 13.3% of the participants indicated their acceptance of their physician's vaccination recommendation during pregnancy or while lactating, and 62.2% were against it. Our results agreed with the recent studies that revealed that PW tended to have a high level of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, and they were also inclined to resist professional recommendations because they predominantly preferred to delay their vaccination. The pregnancy trimester, education level, employment status, and previous live births were significant determinants for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. The most commonly preferred vaccine type was mRNA-based vaccines, followed by viral vector-based and inactivated virus vaccines. The first top priority of PLW was vaccine safety for their children, followed by vaccine safety for the PLW and vaccine effectiveness. Regarding psychosocial predictors, media/social media, trust in the government, the pharmaceutical industry, and healthcare professionals, partners, and a positive risk-benefit ratio were significant promoters for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. Findings from this study suggest that promotional interventions targeting PLW should use web platforms and focus on vaccine safety evidence, the expected benefits of vaccines and potential harms of the infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abanoub Riad
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; (E.L.); (M.K.)
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; (A.P.); (J.K.)
| | - Anna Jouzová
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brno and Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Obilní Trh 11, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic; (A.J.); (L.H.); (P.J.)
| | - Batuhan Üstün
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Namık Kemal University, Namık Kemal Kampüs Caddesi No. 1, Merkez, Tekirdağ 59030, Turkey;
| | - Eliška Lagová
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; (E.L.); (M.K.)
| | - Lukáš Hruban
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brno and Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Obilní Trh 11, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic; (A.J.); (L.H.); (P.J.)
| | - Petr Janků
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brno and Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Obilní Trh 11, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic; (A.J.); (L.H.); (P.J.)
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Andrea Pokorná
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; (A.P.); (J.K.)
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jitka Klugarová
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; (A.P.); (J.K.)
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Koščík
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; (E.L.); (M.K.)
| | - Miloslav Klugar
- Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; (A.P.); (J.K.)
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Leik NKO, Ahmedy F, Guad RM, Baharuddin DMP. Covid-19 vaccine and its consequences in pregnancy: Brief review. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021; 72:103103. [PMID: 34845421 PMCID: PMC8609745 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy is linked to a higher incidence of severe Covid-19. It's critical to find safe vaccinations that elicit protective pregnant and fetal immune responses. This review summarises the rate of COVID-19 infection, maternal antibodies responsiveness, placenta antibody transmission, and adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy studied in epidemiological studies evaluating mRNA vaccines. Potential COVID-19 infection in pregnant women can be prevented using mRNA-based vaccinations. Gestation, childbirth, and perinatal mortality were proven unaffected by COVID-19 vaccination. Injection-site discomfort, tiredness, and migraine are the most prevalent side effects, but these are temporary. After the first dosage of vaccinations, fast antibody responses were demonstrated. The adaptive immunity is found to be more significant after booster vaccination, and is linked to improved placental antigen transmission. Two vaccination doses are associated with more robust maternal and fetal antibody levels. Longer delays between the first immunization dosage and birth are linked to greater fetal IgG antibody levels with reduction in antigen transmission proportion. The mRNA vacciness are effective in reducing the severity of COVID-19 infection and these vaccinations are regarded to be safe options for pregnant women and their unborn fetus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nang Kham Oo Leik
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia
| | - Fatimah Ahmedy
- Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia
| | - Rhanye Mac Guad
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia
| | - Dg Marshitah Pg Baharuddin
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kharbanda EO, Haapala J, DeSilva M, Vazquez-Benitez G, Vesco KK, Naleway AL, Lipkind HS. Spontaneous Abortion Following COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy. JAMA 2021; 326:1629-1631. [PMID: 34495304 PMCID: PMC8427483 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.15494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
This study presents findings from case-control surveillance of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and spontaneous abortion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Kimberly K. Vesco
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Allison L. Naleway
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | | |
Collapse
|