Steroid Refractory Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Pediatric Transplant and Cellular Therapy Consortium RESILIENT Conference on Pediatric Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Survivorship After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part IV. Patient Important Outcomes

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) occurs in approximately 1 in 5 pediatric allogeneic HCT patients and is a leading cause of late morbidity and mortality. Late effects of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may lead to long-term chronic health conditions and shortened life expectancy. In addition to direct physiologic challenges from cGVHD and other late effects, numerous patient-important outcomes impact the quality of life (QOL) of patients and their families. The Research and Education towards Solutions for Late Effects to Innovate, Excel, and Nurture (RESILIENT) after GVHD Consensus Conference was convened to better understand the overlap of cGVHD and late effects in pediatric HCT survivors. Working Committee IV: Patient Important Outcomes identified 4 key areas for focus: (1) What are the key mental health and QOL concerns of survivors of pediatric cGVHD? (2) What is the impact of cGVHD on cognitive performance and social development? (3) What multilevel social determinants of health impact cGVHD survivors, families, and communities? (4) What is the role of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic factors on the development of cGVHD and the risk for adverse outcomes related to survivorship? For each focus area, the Working Committee reviewed the current state of the field, developed recommendations for clinical practice, and highlighted areas to prioritize for future research. Eleven recommendations were adapted and approved. Substantial overlap exists between the role of cGVHD and late effects on the QOL and mental health of childhood HCT survivors. Recommendations based on available data and consensus opinion may be helpful to improve outcomes for these patients. However, several gaps remain that need further study.

Efficacy and safety of belumosudil for treatment of cGVHD: multicenter retrospective analysis of the French cohort of the compassionate use program, on behalf of the French Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Chronic graft versus host disease is a major cause of morbidity after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation. Belumosudil has recently been approved for the treatment of cGVHD refractory after two lines of treatment. However, few data are available to evaluate its efficacy and safety in real life. 68 patients with cGVHD received belumosudil through a compassionate access program in France. The median follow-up was 337 days from belumosudil initiation. Eighty-two percent of patients had severe cGVHD with a median of three organs involved. Patients had received a median of three prior treatment lines. Median treatment duration was 251 days. The best overall response rate (ORR) was 57.3%, including 14.7% complete remission (CR) and 42.6% partial response (PR). The ORR at three and six months was 47% and 45.6%, respectively. Liver and mouth involvement showed the highest response rates (72.7% and 70.4%), while lung involvement had the lowest (17.2%). Median failure-free survival (FFS) was not reached, with 6- and 12-month FFS rates of 89.1% and 80.4%, respectively. Nine patients died, mainly from GVHD (n = 5). Ten adverse events were reported, leading to treatment discontinuation in three cases. These results support the efficacy and safety of belumosudil in refractory cGVHD.

Development of the Lee Symptom Scale-Skin Sclerosis for chronic GVHD-associated sclerosis

ABSTRACT

Sclerosis is a highly morbid manifestation of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), associated with distressing symptoms and significant long-term disability. A patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for cGVHD-associated sclerosis is essential to advance therapeutic trials. We aimed to develop a PRO for adults with cGVHD-associated sclerosis and evaluate and refine its content validity. Adults aged ≥18 years with cGVHD-associated sclerosis participated in semistructured interviews to identify salient symptoms and functions. Sclerosis-relevant symptoms and functions from existing PROs were also used to prompt discussion of topics not spontaneously mentioned. Symptoms and functions (subcodes) of importance were clustered and mapped to overarching domains (codes) using inductive analysis, and candidate items were developed. Cognitive interviews were used to evaluate content validity of the items, response options, recall period, and respondent instructions. Thirty-six open-ended interviews, conducted to saturation, revealed the breadth of the patient experience with cGVHD-associated sclerosis including 5 overarching domains: (1) skin changes, (2) symptoms, (3) emotional and social functioning, (4) mobility restrictions, and (5) activity limitations. A pool of 54 items was tested and iteratively refined through cognitive debriefing interviews (n = 25). Phrasing changes were made to improve relevance and comprehension. One item was removed, and 2 items were added to address respondent feedback, resulting in 55 items. Results support the relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness of the provisional Lee Symptom Scale-Skin Sclerosis. Concept elicitation and cognitive interviewing have informed the development of the Lee Symptom Scale-Skin Sclerosis. Psychometric testing and determination of minimal clinically important differences are underway in an external cohort to validate the PROs.

Clonal GZMK+CD8+ T cells are identified as a hallmark of the pathogenesis of cGVHD-induced bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is one of the most devastating outcomes of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This remains an area of unmet clinical need for optimal therapy for BOS patients partly due to the limited understanding of pathogenic mechanisms.

METHODS

We collected blood samples from 22 patients with cGVHD and 11 patients without cGVHD following allo-HSCT. By applying a combination of mass cytometry (CyTOF), RNA-sequencing and the quantitative cytokine array, we discovered a new cellular hallmarker of patients with cGVHD-BOS. This finding was further validated in cGVHD-BOS murine models by using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and paired single-cell V(D)J sequencing analyses.

FINDINGS

We revealed that circulating Granzyme K (GZMK)-expressing CD8+ T cells with increased expression of CCR5 were accumulated in cGVHD-BOS patients, and GZMK can induce the expression of fibrosis-essential proteins, collagen type I alpha 1 chain (COL1A1) and fibronectin (FN1), in human fibroblasts. As compared to those of control mice, GZMK+CD8+ T cells in the lungs of cGVHD-BOS mice were undergoing significant infiltration and clonal hyperexpansion, with more cytotoxic, pro-inflammatory, migratory and exhausted phenotypes. Moreover, we screened small-molecule drugs and revealed that Bosutinib, the second-generation BCR-ABL1-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), could inhibit GZMK expression in CD8+ T cells and reduce lung stiffness and pulmonary fibrosis in cGVHD-BOS mice.

INTERPRETATION

This study provides proof-of-principle evidence for clonal GZMK+CD8+ T cells as an unexplored contributor to the pathogenesis of cGVHD-BOS, which can be an underlying biomarker for treatment.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82170141, 82100123, 81870136), and "Pioneer" and "Leading Goose" R&D Program of Zhejiang (grant No. 2022C03012).

Chart review study of real-world clinical outcomes in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma treated with extracorporeal photopheresis in the US in 2017-2019

BACKGROUND

Response rates of approved systemic therapies for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) hover near 30%, suggesting unmet need. This study describes real-world treatment patterns and response rates of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in CTCL patients.

METHODS

A chart review was conducted in the United States of adults with CTCL who initiated ECP between January 1, 2017, and February 28, 2019, and received at least three months of ECP treatment as monotherapy or concomitant therapy. Clinical outcomes were collected quarterly for up to 18 months.

RESULTS

The 52 patients were predominantly Caucasian. Half were male; median age was 69 years. Most patients had Sézary syndrome (50%) or mycosis fungoides (36.5%). Nearly 40% of patients had stage IV disease; 33% had lymph node involvement. Nineteen patients (36.5%) achieved response (>50% reduction in BSA affected); median time to response was 6.5 months. The percentage of patients rated as at least minimally improved was 59.5% at 6 months (N = 22), 75.0% at 9 months (N = 24), and 60.0% at 12 months (N = 15) after ECP initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the ECP treated population in this study being older and having more advanced-stage disease than recent trials, response rates were comparable. These real-world findings support ECP as an effective treatment option for CTCL patients.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease: unresolved complication or ancient history?

ABSTRACT

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is associated with morbidity, mortality, impaired quality of life, prolonged immunosuppressive therapy, and infection risk after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Major strides have occurred in the understanding of cGVHD biology; National Institutes of Health Consensus meetings have refined rigorous approaches to diagnosis, staging, and response criteria; major interventional trials have established standard benchmarks for treatment outcome; and 3 agents to date have been US Food and Drug Administration approved for treating corticosteroid-refractory cGVHD. Promising results from several recent trials have led some, but not others, to conclude that the risk of developing cGVHD is sufficiently low to be considered a major post-HCT complication of the past. We propose that it is time to critically examine the results of contemporary graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimens and discuss the state of the science and associated controversies in the spectrum of conclusions reached as to the risk of cGVHD. With these data, the current cGVHD incidence can be most precisely determined, and the present and future burden of cGVHD-affected patients can be accurately modeled. Through review of existing evidence, we highlight unresolved needs and opportunities to refine best GVHD prophylaxis or preemptive therapy approaches and optimize established cGVHD therapy, and make the argument that support of preclinical and clinical research is critical in improving patient outcomes.

Role of extracorporeal photopheresis in the management of acute and chronic graft versus disease: current status

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a therapy that combines the collection of mononuclear cells by apheresis, the addition of a photosensitizer (8-methoxisoralen), the illumination of the product with ultraviolet A light, and the immediate infusion of the product to the patient. Initially developed and approved to treat T-cell cutaneous lymphomas, soon started to be used to treat graft versus host disease (GvHD) developed after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. The high response rate of ECP in skin, ocular, oral, pulmonary, and liver forms of chronic GvHD, the steroid-sparing effect, and the improved overall survival of treated patients, made ECP one of the second-line treatments used to treat steroid-resistant acute and chronic GVHD. Recently, the development of new drugs for treating GVHD has changed the position of ECP in the therapy of GVHD and has started to be used in combination with drugs for increasing the response rate to the treatment in severe or resistant forms of acute and chronic GVHD. ECP remains an essential therapeutic resource in the management of patients with refractory acute and chronic GVHD.

Recent insights into extracorporeal photopheresis for graft-versus-host disease

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) may be considered the unique large-scale cell therapy currently available. It is currently employed mainly as second-line treatment, especially in steroid-resistant or steroid-dependent Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD) with good results and very few limitations.

AREAS COVERED

Many points need to be clarified regarding the ECP mechanism of action, that conditions the lack of uniqueness among the different centers, essentially cycle frequency, treatment duration, and the number of cells to be treated to obtain a response, according to the organs involved. Moreover, reliable biomarkers for prediction of response are lacking, as well as the best pharmacological combination. We will focus on the recent advances concerning ECP for GvHD treatment. We performed a systematic literature research in Pubmed and Embase as of September 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

The recent studies on ECP mechanism of action along with the promising biomarkers of response, and the synergistic benefit of ECP in association with the new drugs render this therapy an important weapon for GvHD resistant to conventional treatment and can be proposed as a valid first-line therapy option with promising results. We believe that it should be used early in all categories of patients, considering its high safety profile.

A review of low dose interleukin-2 therapy in management of chronic graft-versus-host-disease

INTRODUCTION

Patients with chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) have low circulating regulatory T cells (Tregs). Interleukin-2(IL-2) is a growth factor for Tregs, and clinical trials have explored its use in cGVHD patients.

AREAS COVERED

Here we will discuss the biology of IL-2, its rationale for use and results of clinical trials in cGVHD. We also describe its mechanisms of action and alteration in gene expression in T-cell subsets after treatment with low dose IL-2 and photopheresis.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical trials using Low dose IL-2 have been done at single centers in small patient series. The majority of the clinical responses seen with IL-2 in cGVHD are classified as partial responses and efficacy as a single agent is limited. Compared to currently approved oral therapies, it has to be administered subcutaneously and requires specialized processing for compounding and storage limiting its widespread use. Its use is associated with constitutional symptoms and local injection site reactions. Local reactions can be easily managed by supportive care practices like rotation of injection sites and premeditations, constitutional symptoms resolve with, dose reduction (25-50%) allowing for continued therapy. Additional studies are needed to define optimal combination strategies with approved agents. Longer acting formulations of IL-2 that require less frequent dosing may also improve patient compliance.

A personalized, organ-based approach to the treatment of chronic steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease

Chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGvHD) remains the leading cause of morbidity among transplant recipients. The efficacy of second-line treatments varies widely based on many factors, including wide differences in the organ overall response-rate response and in the current era where multiple agents are approved, and optimal sequencing of drugs based on organ ORR is unknown. We aimed to evaluate outcomes based on ORRs to the most common agents for the treatment of steroid-refractory/steroid-dependent cGvHD by conducting a systematic literature review. A total of 387 studies were evaluated for the ORRs of 12 cGvHD treatments. The highest skin ORR was observed to be 77% though some agents had an acceptable ORR. Most agents had an ocular response ranging from 17 to 50% Some agents resulted in a GI ORR of ≥88%. Rituximab showed the best response for musculoskeletal-GvHD. In the case of lung-GvHD (bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome [BOS]), negligible response was observed in patients treated with various agents. No clinically meaningful responses to treatments were reported for genital-GvHD. Most GvHD trials are focused on the ORR and partial response rates (PRR). The evidence for optimal agents for each organ is limited, and therefore, our study results are striking for differences in organ-ORR yields for a clinically meaningful difference. Thus, a personalized organ-based approach to the selection of therapeutic agents in cGvHD could result in favorable outcomes.

Low-dose rituximab in steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is a major complication that puts patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) at risk of death or infection. Currently, there is no gold standard for the first-line treatment of patients who do not respond to steroids, and there are several therapeutic options being evaluated in clinical trials for this disease to be used even in the first-line treatment for GvHD. There is evidence of the benefit of rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, at a standard dose of 375 mg/m2 weekly in the treatment of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus disease (SR-cGvHD).

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of low-dose rituximab in a middle-income center in northeastern Mexico STUDY DESIGN: We report the experience of 26 patients with chronic graft-versus-graft disease who received low-dose rituximab (100 mg weekly for 4 weeks). We utilized the advances in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria for diagnosis, scoring, trial design, and assessment of treatment response.

RESULTS

We obtained a 5-year overall survival of 23.6%, including four patients with complete response. The 1-year event-free survival was 70% for patients with rituximab. During the treatment, there were 3 hospitalizations, and the causes were: immune thrombocytopenia, a parapneumonic effusion, and a cerebral vascular event. The median length of hospital stay was twelve days.

CONCLUSION

A low dose of rituximab is an available and cost-effective option for patients with steroid-refractory cGvHD.

Second-Line Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

First-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) achieves durable remission in approximately 60% of patients. In relapsed or refractory disease, only about 20% achieve durable remission with salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The ZUMA-7 (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel]) and TRANSFORM (lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel]) trials demonstrated superior event-free survival (and, in ZUMA-7, overall survival) in primary-refractory or early-relapsed (high-risk) DLBCL with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) compared with salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative ASCT; however, list prices for CAR-T exceed $400 000 per infusion.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of second-line CAR-T versus salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative ASCT.

DESIGN

State-transition microsimulation model.

DATA SOURCES

ZUMA-7, TRANSFORM, other trials, and observational data.

TARGET POPULATION

"High-risk" patients with DLBCL.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Health care sector.

INTERVENTION

Axi-cel or liso-cel versus ASCT.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net monetary benefit (iNMB) in 2022 U.S. dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $200 000 per QALY.

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS

The increase in median overall survival was 4 months for axi-cel and 1 month for liso-cel. For axi-cel, the ICER was $684 225 per QALY and the iNMB was -$107 642. For liso-cel, the ICER was $1 171 909 per QALY and the iNMB was -$102 477.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

To be cost-effective with a WTP of $200 000, the cost of CAR-T would have to be reduced to $321 123 for axi-cel and $313 730 for liso-cel. Implementation in high-risk patients would increase U.S. health care spending by approximately $6.8 billion over a 5-year period.

LIMITATION

Differences in preinfusion bridging therapies precluded cross-trial comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Neither second-line axi-cel nor liso-cel was cost-effective at a WTP of $200 000 per QALY. Clinical outcomes improved incrementally, but costs of CAR-T must be lowered substantially to enable cost-effectiveness.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

No research-specific funding.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease is characterized by high levels and distinctive tissue-of-origin patterns of cell-free DNA

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is a devastating complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Effective early detection may improve the outcome of cGvHD. The potential utility of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA), a sensitive marker for tissue injury, in HSCT and cGvHD remains to be established. Here, cfDNA of prospectively collected plasma samples from HSCT recipients (including both cGvHD and non-cGvHD) and healthy control (HC) subjects were evaluated. Deconvolution methods utilizing tissue-specific DNA methylation signatures were used to determine cfDNA tissue-of-origin. cfDNA levels were significantly higher in HSCT recipients than HC and significantly higher in cGvHD than non-cGvHD. cGvHD was characterized by a high level of cfDNA from innate immune cells, heart, and liver. Non-hematologic tissue-derived cfDNA was significantly higher in cGvHD than non-cGvHD. cfDNA temporal dynamics and tissue-of-origin composition have distinctive features in patients with cGvHD, supporting further exploration of the utility of cfDNA in the study of cGvHD.

Novel therapies for graft versus host disease with a focus on cell therapies

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) can occur at any period post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a common clinical complication contributing to significant morbidity and mortality. Acute GVHD develops in approximately 30-50% of patients receiving transplants from matched related donors. High doses of steroids are used as first-line treatment, but are unsuccessful in around 40% of patients, resulting in the diagnosis of steroid-refractory acute GVHD. Consensus has yet to develop for the management of steroid-refractory acute GVHD, and prognosis at six months has been estimated at around 50%. Thus, it is critical to find effective treatments that increase survival of steroid-refractory acute GVHD. This article describes the currently known characteristics, pathophysiology, and treatments for GVHD, with a special focus on recent advances in cell therapies. In particular, a novel cell therapy using decidua stromal cells (DSCs) was recently shown to have promising results for acute GVHD, with improved effectiveness over previous treatments including mesenchymal stromal cells. At the Karolinska Institute, severe acute GVHD patients treated with placenta-derived DSCs supplemented with either 5% albumin or 10% AB plasma displayed a one-year survival rate of 76% and 47% respectively. Furthermore, patients with steroid-refractory acute GVHD, displayed survival rates of 73% with albumin and 31% with AB plasma-supplemented DSCs, compared to the 20% survival rate in the mesenchymal stromal cell control group. Adverse events and deaths were found to be attributed only to complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplant and GVHD, not to the study intervention. ASC Therapeutics, Inc, in collaboration with the Karolinska Institute, will soon initiate a phase 2 multicenter, open-label study to further assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous DSC treatment in sixty patients with Grade II-IV steroid-refractory acute GVHD. This novel cell therapy represents a promising treatment to combat the poor prognosis that steroid-refractory acute GVHD patients currently face.

Estimating the Lifetime Medical Cost Burden of an Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Patient

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has the potential for curative outcomes for a variety of hematologic malignancies. Current allo-HCT studies often describe the outcomes and costs in the near term; however, research on the lifetime economic burden post-allo-HCT remains limited. This study was conducted to estimate the average total lifetime direct medical costs of an allo-HCT patient and the potential net monetary savings from an alternative treatment associated with improved graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). A disease-state model was constructed using a short-term decision tree and a long-term semi-Markov partitioned survival model to estimate the average per-patient lifetime cost and expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for an allo-HCT patient from a US healthcare system perspective. Key clinical inputs included overall survival, GRFS, incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD, relapse of the primary disease, and infections. Cost results were reported as ranges based on varying the percentage of chronic GVHD patients that remained on treatment after 2 years (15% or 39%). Over a lifetime, the average per-patient medical cost of allo-HCT was estimated to range from $942,373 to $1,247,917. The majority of the costs were for chronic GVHD treatment (37% to 53%), followed by the allo-HCT procedure (15% to 19%). The expected lifetime QALYs of an allo-HCT patient were estimated as 4.7. Lifetime per-patient treatment costs often exceed $1,000,000 for allo-HCT patients. Innovative research efforts focused on the reduction or elimination of late complications, particularly chronic GVHD, may provide the greatest value to improved patient outcomes.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of ruxolitinib versus best alternative therapy for patients with steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease aged > 12 years in Singapore

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30-70% of patients who have undergone allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) eventually experience chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Patients who develop steroid-refractory (SR)-cGVHD are the most severely impacted due to significant disease and financial burden. There remains an unmet need for safe, efficacious, and accessible treatments for these patients. The objective of this study was to determine the cost effectiveness of ruxolitinib for treatment of SR-cGvHD from the Singapore healthcare system perspective.

METHODS

Based on data from the REACH3 randomized open-label trial, a semi-Markov model was developed to evaluate cost-effectiveness of ruxolitinib compared with investigators' choice of best alternative therapy (BAT) for treatment of patients > 12 years of age with SR-cGVHD in Singapore over a 40-year time horizon. The model only considered direct medical-care costs related to the treatment of SR-cGVHD and reported them in Singapore Dollars (SGD). Half-cycle correction was applied to all costs and outcomes, which were discounted at 3%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA), and scenario analysis were conducted to explore the drivers of uncertainty in the model.

RESULTS

In the deterministic base case, more life years (LY; 10.28 vs. 9.42) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs; 7.31 vs. 6.51) were gained with ruxolitinib than BAT at higher costs (SGD 303,214 vs. SGD 302,673) leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SGD 677/QALY. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of SGD 75,000/QALY gained, PSA found that ruxolitinib had a 78.52% probability of being cost-effective. Findings were sensitive to variations in non-responder utilities in the BAT arm and duration of BAT treatment in the OWSA, or comparison to either methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolic acid as a single comparator in the scenario analysis. ICERs remained lower than SGD 75,000/QALY in all other tested variations and scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Ruxolitinib is likely to be cost-effective from Singapore healthcare system's perspective for patients with SR-cGVHD, which is promising in the management of patients with unmet clinical needs.

Challenges and concepts in the diagnosis and management of ocular graft-versus-host disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is characterized by tissue inflammation in the host following an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The pathophysiology is complex and only incompletely understood yet. Donor lymphocyte interaction with the histocompatibility antigens of the host plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Inflammation may affect multiple organs and tissues, e.g., the gastrointestinal tract, liver, lung, fasciae, vaginal mucosa, and the eye. Subsequently, alloreactive donor-derived T and B lymphocytes may lead to severe inflammation of the ocular surface (i.e., cornea and conjunctiva) and the eyelids. Furthermore, fibrosis of the lacrimal gland may lead to severe dry eye. This review focuses on ocular GVHD (oGVHD) and provides an overview of current challenges and concepts in the diagnosis and management of oGVHD. Ophthalmic manifestations, diagnostic procedures, grading of severity and recommendations for ophthalmic examination intervals are provided. Management of ocular surface disease with lubricants, autologous serum eye drops, topical anti-inflammatory agents and systemic treatment options are described based on the current evidence. Ocular surface scarring and corneal perforation are severe complications of oGVHD. Therefore, ophthalmic screening and interdisciplinary treatment approaches are highly relevant to improve the quality of life of patients and to prevent potentially irreversible visual loss.

Immunopathological insights into villitis of unknown etiology on the basis of transplant immunology

Villitis of unknown etiology (VUE) is an inflammatory disease characterized by the infiltration of maternal CD8 +T cells into the placental villi. Although the pathogenesis of VUE is still debated, dysregulation of the immune system appears to be an important factor in the development of the disease. Interaction of maternal T cells with the fetal antigens seems to be the trigger for the VUE onset. In this context, graft vs host disease (GVHD) and allographic rejection seem to share similarities in the VUE immunopathological mechanism, especially those related to immunoregulation. In this review, we compared the immunological characteristics of VUE with allograft rejection, and GVHD favoring a better knowledge of VUE pathogenesis that may contribute to VUE therapeutics strategies in the future.

A Review of Cutaneous Diseases Observed in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk for numerous cutaneous conditions that fall within four categories: pre-neoplastic, neoplastic, infectious, or idiopathic. Many of these diseases can be attributed to immunosuppressive medications, including mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, azathioprine, tacrolimus, or glucocorticoids. Iatrogenic lessening of the immune system places the patient at risk of malignancies, opportunistic infections, immune-mediated dermatoses, and adverse effects of medications. As the life expectancy of patients with solid organ transplants continues to increase, dermatologists and transplant physicians must stay abreast of this spectrum of dermatologic conditions, their respective prognoses, prevention, mitigation, and treatment.

Novel and Promising Strategies for Therapy of Post-Transplant Chronic GVHD

Despite the achievements that have increased viability after the transplantation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells (aHSCT), chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains the main cause of late complications and post-transplant deaths. At the moment, therapy alternatives demonstrate limited effectiveness in steroid-refractory illness; in addition, we have no reliable data on the mechanism of this condition. The lack of drugs of choice for the treatment of GVHD underscores the significance of the design of new therapies. Improved understanding of the mechanism of chronic GVHD has secured new therapy goals, and organized diagnostic recommendations and the development of medical tests have ensured a general language and routes for studies in this field. These factors, combined with the rapid development of pharmacology, have helped speed up the search of medicines and medical studies regarding chronic GVHD. At present, we can hope for success in curing this formidable complication. This review summarizes the latest clinical developments in new treatments for chronic GVHD.

Extracorporeal photopheresis versus alternative treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, occurring in 6% to 65% of the paediatric recipients. Currently, the therapeutic mainstay for cGvHD is treatment with corticosteroids, frequently combined with other immunosuppressive agents in people with steroid-refractory manifestations. There is no established standard treatment for steroid-refractory cGvHD. The therapeutic options for these patients include extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), an immunomodulatory treatment that involves ex vivo collection of mononuclear cells from peripheral blood, exposure to the photoactive agent 8-methoxypsoralen, ultraviolet radiation and re-infusion of the processed cell product. The mechanisms of action of ECP are not completely understood. This is the second update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2014 and first updated in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ECP for the management of cGvHD in children and adolescents after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2021), MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase databases from their inception to 25 January 2021. We searched the reference lists of potentially relevant studies without any language restrictions. We searched five conference proceedings and nine clinical trial registries on 9 November 2020 and 12 November 2020, respectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We aimed to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ECP with or without alternative treatment versus alternative treatment alone in children and adolescents with cGvHD after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed the study selection. We resolved disagreements in the selection of trials by consultation with a third review author.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no studies meeting the criteria for inclusion in this 2021 review update.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We could not evaluate the efficacy of ECP in the treatment of cGvHD in children and adolescents after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation since the second review update again found no RCTs. Current recommendations are based on retrospective or observational studies only. Thus, ideally, ECP should be applied in the context of controlled trials only. However, performing RCTs in this population will be challenging due to the limited number of eligible participants, variable disease presentation and the lack of well-defined response criteria. International collaboration, multicentre trials and appropriate funding for such trials will be needed. If treatment decisions based on clinical data are made in favour of ECP, recipients should be carefully monitored for beneficial and harmful effects. In addition, efforts should be made to share this information with other clinicians, for example by setting up registries for children and adolescents treated with ECP.

Comparison of procedure times and collection efficiencies using integrated and multistep nonintegrated procedures for extracorporeal photopheresis

Background

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a blood‐based therapeutic procedure increasingly used for modulation of immune dysregulation in various underlying disease settings. The aim of this study was to compare the procedure times and blood collection efficiencies between the two approaches currently utilized in European centers: the integrated versus the multistep nonintegrated procedures.

Methods

A retrospective data analysis was conducted, comparing treatment data from patients who received ECP therapy at the Central Institute for Blood Transfusion & Department of Immunology (ZIB) of the Tirol Kliniken GmbH, where the integrated and multistep nonintegrated procedures are routinely used in an approximated setup.

Results

During the observation period, a total of 15 patients who were treated with alternating systems on 2 consecutive days were identified. This allowed treatment pair comparisons with minimal interpatient variabilities, similar to a cross‐over design even though analyzed retrospectively. Total average procedure times with the integrated system were 99.3 vs 122.0 minutes with the multistep nonintegrated procedures, respectively. Significant differences were observed for all steps of the ECP procedure: (a) time for buffy coat collection, 66.5 vs 74.7; (b) handling/transfer, 2.8 vs 18.7; (c) irradiation, 20.3 vs 11.7; and (d) reinfusion/handling time, 9.6 vs 16.3 minutes. The calculated collection throughput was 7.79 mL/min for the integrated and 7.84 mL/min for the multistep nonintegrated procedures, and with a white blood cell (WBC) collection efficiency of 34.2% and 21.0%, respectively.

Conclusion

The data presented in this study show a significant shorter overall procedure time and higher WBC collection efficiency for the integrated ECP system.

Cost Utility of Lifelong Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy vs Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant to Treat Agammaglobulinemia

IMPORTANCE

Lifelong immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) is standard-of-care treatment for congenital agammaglobulinemia but accrues high annual costs ($30 000-$90 000 per year) and decrements to quality of life over patients' life spans. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) offers an alternative 1-time therapy, but has high morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost utility of IRT vs matched sibling donor (MSD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) HSCT to treat patients with agammaglobulinemia in the US.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This economic evaluation used Markov analysis to model the base-case scenario of a patient aged 12 months with congenital agammaglobulinemia receiving lifelong IRT vs MSD or MUD HSCT. Costs, probabilities, and quality-of-life measures were derived from the literature. Microsimulations estimated premature deaths for each strategy in a virtual cohort. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluated uncertainty around parameter estimates performed from a societal perspective over a 100-year time horizon. The threshold for cost-effective care was set at $100 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). This study was conducted from 2020 across a 100-year time horizon.

EXPOSURES

Immunoglobulin replacement therapy vs MSD or MUD HSCT for treatment of congenital agammaglobulinemia.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed in 2020 US dollars per QALY gained and premature deaths associated with each strategy.

RESULTS

In this economic evaluation of patients with congenital agammaglobulinemia, lifelong IRT cost more than HSCT ($1 512 946 compared with $563 776 [MSD] and $637 036 [MUD]) and generated similar QALYs (20.61 vs 17.25 [MSD] and 17.18 [MUD]). Choosing IRT over MSD or MUD HSCT yielded ICERs of $282 166 per QALY gained over MSD and $255 633 per QALY gained over MUD HSCT, exceeding the US willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. However, IRT prevented at least 2488 premature deaths per 10 000 microsimulations compared with HSCT. When annual IRT price was reduced from $60 145 to below $29 469, IRT became the cost-effective strategy. Findings remained robust in sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In the US, IRT is more expensive than HSCT for agammaglobulinemia treatment. The findings of this study suggest that IRT prevents more premature deaths but does not substantially increase quality of life relative to HSCT. Reducing US IRT cost by 51% to a value similar to IRT prices in countries implementing value-based pricing may render it the more cost-effective strategy.

Management of Chronic Graft-vs.-Host Disease in Children and Adolescents With ALL: Present Status and Model for a Personalised Management Plan

Herein we review current practice regarding the management of chronic graft-vs.-host disease (cGvHD) in paediatric patients after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Topics covered include: (i) the epidemiology of cGvHD; (ii) an overview of advances in our understanding cGvHD pathogenesis; (iii) current knowledge regarding risk factors for cGvHD and prevention strategies complemented by biomarkers; (iii) the paediatric aspects of the 2014 National Institutes for Health-defined diagnosis and grading of cGvHD; and (iv) current options for cGvHD treatment. We cover topical therapy and newly approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors, emphasising the use of immunomodulatory approaches in the context of the delicate counterbalance between immunosuppression and immune reconstitution as well as risks of relapse and infectious complications. We examine real-world approaches of response assessment and tapering schedules of treatment. Furthermore, we report on the optimal timepoints for therapeutic interventions and changes in relation to immune reconstitution and risk of relapse/infection. Additionally, we review the different options for anti-infectious prophylaxis. Finally, we put forth a theory of a holistic view of paediatric cGvHD and its associated manifestations and propose a checklist for individualised risk evaluation with aggregated considerations including site-specific cGvHD evaluation with attention to each individual's GvHD history, previous medical history, comorbidities, and personal tolerance and psychosocial circumstances. To complement this checklist, we present a treatment algorithm using representative patients to inform the personalised management plans for patients with cGvHD after HSCT for ALL who are at high risk of relapse.

The clinical landscape of chronic graft-versus-host disease management in 2021

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is an important systemic complication of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with heterogeneous, multi-organ involvement that can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Despite significant advances in understanding the complex pathophysiology driving the disease, curative treatment options remain suboptimal. The past decade, however, has seen much growth in collaborative research efforts and standardization of criteria for clinical trials that have led to discovery of several new second-line therapies in cGVHD. The key to successful cGVHD control and management includes a comprehensive and sustained multidisciplinary effort with emphasis on ancillary and supportive care for these patients. The focus of this review is to summarize the new developments in systemic, organ-specific, and topical treatments in the management of cGVHD that emerged since the 2014 NIH consensus conference.

Belumosudil for Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) After 2 or More Prior Lines of Therapy: The ROCKstar Study

Belumosudil, a selective ROCK2 inhibitor, was well tolerated in heavily pretreated subjects, with 44% continuing treatment beyond 1 year.

Belumosudil demonstrated efficacy in patients with SR cGVHD, with responses in all organs and after failure of ibrutinib/ruxolitinib.

Belumosudil, an investigational oral selective inhibitor of Rho-associated coiled-coil–containing protein kinase 2 (ROCK2), reduces type 17 and follicular T helper cells via downregulation of STAT3 and enhances regulatory T cells via upregulation of STAT5. Belumosudil may effectively treat patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), a major cause of morbidity and late nonrelapse mortality after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. This phase 2 randomized multicenter registration study evaluated belumosudil 200 mg daily (n = 66) and 200 mg twice daily (n = 66) in subjects with cGVHD who had received 2 to 5 prior lines of therapy. The primary end point was best overall response rate (ORR). Duration of response (DOR), changes in Lee Symptom Scale score, failure-free survival, corticosteroid dose reductions, and overall survival were also evaluated. Overall median follow-up was 14 months. The best ORR for belumosudil 200 mg daily and 200 mg twice daily was 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62-84) and 77% (95% CI, 65-87), respectively, with high response rates observed in all subgroups. All affected organs demonstrated complete responses. The median DOR was 54 weeks; 44% of subjects have remained on therapy for ≥1 year. Symptom reduction with belumosudil 200 mg daily and 200 mg twice daily was reported in 59% and 62% of subjects, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with those expected in patients with cGVHD receiving corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants. Sixteen subjects (12%) discontinued belumosudil because of possible drug-related AEs. Belumosudil, a promising therapy for cGVHD, was well tolerated with clinically meaningful responses. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03640481.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with steroid-resistant chronic graft-versus-host disease in the United States: a retrospective claims database analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is the most serious non-relapse complication affecting long-term allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) survivors. We describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with steroid-resistant (SR) cGVHD versus no GVHD up to 360 and 720 days post-HCT.

METHODS

Claims from the Optum Research Database were used to identify patients aged ≥12 years who underwent allogeneic HCT (index date) in the United States from 01 January 2010 to 31 August 2016 with diagnosis of cGVHD (within the study period or unspecified GVHD beyond 120 days post-HCT [SR defined as additional therapy ≥7 days after initiation of systemic steroids]) or no GVHD at any time. All-cause HCRU and costs were compared in patients with SR cGVHD (1-year analysis, n = 296; 2-year analysis, n = 178) versus no GVHD (1-year analysis, n = 227; 2-year analysis, n = 158).

RESULTS

Most patients with SR cGVHD (75%) received ≥4 lines of therapy during follow-up. Patients with SR cGVHD had significantly more median office visits (49 vs. 27), outpatient visits (69 vs. 24), emergency department visits (1 vs. 0), and inpatient admissions (2 vs. 1) within 1 year post-HCT versus patients with no GVHD (all p<.001); HCRU was also higher in the 2-year period. Median total all-cause costs were significantly higher (p<.001) for patients with SR cGVHD versus no GVHD in the 1-year ($372,254 vs. $219,593) and 2-year ($532,673 vs. $252,909) follow-up periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SR cGVHD required multiple lines of therapy and used significantly more outpatient and inpatient resources resulting in higher costs versus patients with no GVHD.

Treatment of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease with imatinib: Real-life experience of the Spanish group of hematopoietic transplantation (GETH)

Treatment of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a challenge. Here, we describe a retrospective analysis of 66 patients with steroid-refractory cGVHD treated with imatinib (starting dose of 100 mg in 70% of patients; maximum dose of 100-200 mg in 74%). Most patients had multi-organ involvement (≥2 organs, 83%), with the most affected being skin (85%), oral mucosa (55%), eyes (42%), and lungs (33%). The overall response rate was 41% (21 partial and three complete responses). The organ with the best response rate was the skin (46%), followed by gastrointestinal tract (43%), liver (41%), the oral mucosa (36%), eyes (29%), and lungs (18%). Imatinib led to steroid tapering in 17/38 patients. Twenty-five (38%) patients experienced imatinib-related adverse events, comprising extra-hematologic toxicity (n = 24, 36%) and hematologic toxicity (n = 6, 9%). No cases of grade 4-5 toxicity were reported. The main causes of imatinib discontinuation were treatment failure (52%) and toxicity (9%). After a median follow-up of 41 months, the 3-year overall survival was 81%, with no difference between imatinib responders and non-responders. These real-life results show that imatinib is safe and has moderate efficacy in patients with heavily pre-treated cutaneous sclerotic cGVHD; however, activity against lung cGVHD is very limited.

Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) Recommendations Regarding Essential Medications Required To Establish An Early Stage Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Program

Establishing a hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) program is complex. Planning is essential while establishing such a program to overcome the expected challenges. Authorities involved in HCT program establishment will need to coordinate the efforts between the different departments required to start up the program. One essential department is pharmacy and the medications required. To help facilitate this, the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation organized a structured survey to address the essential medications required to start up an HCT program. A group of senior physicians and pharmacists prepared a list of the medications used at the different phases of transplantation. These drugs were then rated by a questionnaire using a scale of necessity based on the stage of development of the transplant program. The questionnaire was sent to 30 physicians, in different parts of the world, who have between 5 and 40 years of experience in autologous and/or allogeneic transplantation. This group of experts scored each medication on a 7-point scale, ranging from an absolute requirement (score of 1) to not required (score of 7). The results are presented here to help guide the prioritization of required medications.

The CoV-2 outbreak: how hematologists could help to fight Covid-19

COVID-19 is a medical emergency, with 20 % of patients presenting with severe clinical manifestations. From the pathogenetic point of view, COVID-19 mimics two other well-known diseases characterized by cytokine storm and hyper-activation of the immune response, with consequent organ damage: acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Hematologists are confident with these situations requiring a prompt therapeutic approach for switching off the uncontrolled cytokine release; here, we discuss pros and cons of drugs that are already employed in hematology in the light of their possible application in COVID-19. The most promising drugs might be: Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, with a rapid and powerful anti-cytokine effect, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with their good anti-inflammatory properties, and perhaps the anti-Cd26 antibody Begelomab. We also present immunological data from gene expression experiments where TKIs resulted effective anti-inflammatory and pro-immune drugs. A possible combined treatment algorithm for COVID-19 is here proposed.

Chronic Graft Versus Host Myopathies: Noninflammatory, Multi-Tissue Pathology With Glycosylation Disorders

Myopathies during chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) are syndromes for which tissue targets and mechanisms of muscle damage remain incompletely defined. This study reviewed, and pathologically analyzed, 14 cGvHD myopathies, comparing myopathology to other immune myopathies. Clinical features in cGvHD myopathy included symmetric, proximal weakness, associated skin, gastrointestinal and lung disorders, a high serum aldolase (77%), and a 38% 2-year survival. Muscle showed noninflammatory pathology involving all 3 tissue components. Perimysial connective tissue had damaged structure and histiocytic cells. Vessel pathology included capillary loss, and reduced α-l-fucosyl and chondroitin sulfate moieties on endothelial cells. Muscle fibers often had surface pathology. Posttranslational glycosylation moieties on α-dystroglycan had reduced staining and abnormal distribution in 86%. Chondroitin-SO4 was reduced in 50%, a subgroup with 3-fold longer times from transplant to myopathy, and more distal weakness. cGvHD myopathies have noninflammatory pathology involving all 3 tissue components in muscle, connective tissue, small vessels, and myofibers. Abnormal cell surface glycosylation moieties are common in cGvHD myopathies, distinguishing them from other immune myopathies. This is the first report of molecular classes that may be immune targets in cGvHD. Disordered cell surface glycosylation moieties could produce disease-related tissue and cell damage, and be biomarkers for cGvHD features and activity.

[Artesunate attenuate chronic graft-versus-host disease by regulating Th17/Treg balance]

目的

探讨青蒿琥酯抗慢性移植物抗宿主病（cGVHD）的作用及可能机制。

方法

将B10D2小鼠的骨髓细胞和脾脏细胞混合悬液通过尾静脉输入近交系雌性BALB/c小鼠体内建立cGVHD模型，分别予青蒿琥酯（实验组）和丙酮腹腔（对照组）注射治疗。观察两组小鼠的cGVHD临床表现、生存时间和组织病理学改变；应用流式细胞术分析小鼠外周血和脾脏Th17和Treg细胞比例；免疫磁珠分选BALB/c小鼠脾脏CD4⁺T细胞，分别予丙酮和青蒿琥酯进行干预72 h，流式细胞术分析两组Th17/Treg细胞比例。

结果

①实验组小鼠cGVHD临床症状较对照组明显减轻，生存时间延长[（55.71±6.99）d对（46.57±7.83）d，χ²=5.457，P=0.020]。②实验组小鼠皮肤及肺脏cGVHD病理损伤较轻。③与对照组比较，实验组小鼠外周血、脾脏Th17细胞比例均降低[（0.58±0.19）%对（1.51±0.18）%，t=7.233，P<0.001；（0.71±0.18）%对（1.48±0.38）%，t=3.653，P=0.011]，Treg细胞比例增高[（8.40±0.23）%对（4.45±0.04）%，t=15.680，P<0.001；（10.48±0.48）%对（6.62±0.24）%，t=6.590，P=0.003]，Th17/Treg细胞比值均下降（0.09±0.03对0.34±0.05，t=7.621，P=0.002；0.06±0.02对0.19±0.03，t=6.993，P=0.002）。④体外培养小鼠脾脏CD4⁺T细胞，青蒿琥酯干预组较对照组Th17细胞比例减低[（0.82±0.37）%对（3.39±1.22）%，t=4.044，P=0.007]，Treg细胞比例明显增高[（34.63±1.29）%对（14.28±1.69）%，t=19.119，P<0.001]，Th17/Treg细胞比值下降（0.24±0.09对0.02±0.01，t=4.780，P=0.003）。

结论

青蒿琥酯可通过减少Th17细胞及增加Treg细胞，恢复Th17/Treg平衡，减轻cGVHD的临床与病理学损伤，从而发挥抗cGVHD作用。

Changes in Immunosuppressive Treatment of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: Comparison of 2 Surveys within Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) remains the leading cause of late morbidity and mortality. Despite the growing number of treatment options in cGVHD, evidence remains sparse. The German-Austrian-Swiss GVHD Consortium performed a survey on clinical practice in treatment of cGVHD among transplant centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland in 2009 and 2018 and compared the results. The survey performed in 2009 contained 20 questions on first-line treatment and related issues and 4 questions on second-line scenarios followed by a survey on all systemic and topic treatment options known and applied, with 31 of 36 transplant centers (86%) responding. The survey in 2018 repeated 7 questions on first-line treatment and 3 questions on second-line scenarios followed by an updated survey on all current systemic treatment options known and applied, with 29 of 66 centers (43%) responding. In summary, the results show a large overlap of first-line treatment practice between centers and the 2 surveys because of a lack of new data that changes practice, except significant heterogeneity of treatment of cGVHD progressive onset type, which can be explained by the lack of trials focusing on this high-risk entity. In contrast, treatment options applied to second-line therapy vary considerably, with new agents like ibrutinib and ruxolitinib entering clinical practice. Moreover, treatment of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome demonstrates heterogeneity in applied therapeutic options and sequence because of a lack of controlled data and different conclusions from already existing evidence. In summary, the survey results demonstrate an increasing number of treatment options applied to cGVHD accompanied by a significant heterogeneity in second-line treatment and underline the urgent need for clinical trials and registry analyses on rare entities with high mortality like progressive onset type and lung involvement of cGVHD.

How I treat refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease

Approximately 35% to 50% of patients otherwise cured of hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation will develop the pleomorphic autoimmune-like syndrome known as chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Since in 2005, National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus panels have proposed definitions and classifications of disease to standardize treatment trials. Recently, the first agent was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for steroid-refractory cGVHD. Despite these advances, most individuals do not achieve durable resolution of disease activity with initial treatment. Moreover, standardized recommendations on how to best implement existing and novel immunomodulatory agents and taper salvage agents are often lacking. Given the potential life-threatening nature of cGVHD, we employ in our practice patient assessment templates at each clinic visit to elucidate known prognostic indicators and red flags. We find NIH scoring templates practical for ongoing assessments of these complex patient cases and determination of when changes in immunosuppressive therapy are warranted. Patients not eligible or suitable for clinical trials have systemic and organ-directed adjunctive treatments crafted in a multidisciplinary clinic. Herein, we review these treatment options and offer a management and monitoring scaffold for representative patients with cGVHD not responding to initial therapy.