ESCMID COVID-19 living guidelines: drug treatment and clinical management

Effectiveness of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies in real-life: RNAemia and clinical outcomes in high-risk COVID-19 patients

BACKGROUND

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been shown to have clinical benefits in treating high-risk patients with mild-moderate COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 RNA in serum (RNAemia), is usually associated with severe disease and deaths. This study evaluates real-life data on the effectiveness of mAbs therapies against SARS-CoV-2 infections by different viral variants, particularly in the presence of RNAemia, focusing on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

From March 2021 to May 2022, high-risk patients with PCR-confirmed mild-moderate COVID-19 were enrolled at the Clinic of Infectious Diseases, San Paolo Hospital in Milan. Patients received Bamlanivimab/Bamlanivimab + Etesevimab/Casirivimab + Imdevimab/Sotrovimab based on Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) guidelines and prevalent SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and plasma samples were collected at infusion (t0) and after 7 days (t1). NPS viral loads and RNAemia were quantified using RT-qPCR, and variant typing was conducted. Clinical outcomes were evaluated, including time to symptom resolution and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Among 176 enrolled patients, treatment efficacy was observed in 96.6% with a median time to symptom resolution of 12 days (IQR 10-19). Viral load significantly decreased in both NPS and plasma by day 7 post-treatment (p<0.001). At t0, RNAemia was present in 61.9% of patients and NPS viral loads were higher in patients with RNAemia (p=0.002). However, after treatment, no significant differences in viral loads and times to symptom resolution were noted between patients with and without RNAemia. Omicron-infected patients exhibited higher plasma viral loads compared to Alpha and Delta variants (p<0.001) and the presence of RNAemia was significantly associated with Omicron (p<0.001). Vaccinated patients achieved faster recovery regardless of variant type (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Early administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs in high-risk patients significantly reduced viral loads in NPS and plasma and improved clinical outcomes. Despite the presence of RNAemia, these tailored mAb therapies led to favorable recovery times and minimal adverse effects.

Efficacy of tocilizumab for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and high IL-6 levels: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IL-6 driven personalized treatment strategy with tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

TRIAL DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, open-label, single-center trial of a tocilizumab treatment strategy in adult patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and IL-6 serum levels > 40 pg/mL.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive standard of care (SOC) or SOC plus one dose of tocilizumab. The primary outcome was death or need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) within 28 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included ICU admission, days on IMV and hospital stay. A meta-analysis of clinical trials to evaluate the effect of tocilizumab on mortality and need of IMV in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were included: 30 in the SOC arm and 32 in the standard-treatment plus tocilizumab arm. The primary outcome occurred in 12.9% in the tocilizumab arm and 32.3% in the SOC arm(p = 0.068). There was a trend towards fewer days on IMV (7.5 vs 19.5 days, p = 0.073) and a shorter hospital stay (4 vs 8 days, p = 0.134) in the tocilizumab group. No serious adverse events were reported. The meta-analysis revealed a RR for death or IMV of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89) in patients receiving tocilizumab, compared to patients receiving SOC.

CONCLUSION

Tocilizumab could be effective to prevent death or IMV in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and high IL-6 serum levels. Safety profile of tocilizumab does not arise major concern in patients with severe COVID19.

Safety of ceftobiprole in patients with impaired renal, hepatic or immune function: A multinational retrospective hospital chart review (RETRACE study)

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Ceftobiprole, an advanced-generation cephalosporin with broad bactericidal activity, is approved for community-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonia (excluding ventilator-associated pneumonia). We aimed to evaluate, in a real-world setting, the safety profile of ceftobiprole in patients with risk conditions (severe renal impairment, hepatic impairment, and immunocompromised status), groups excluded from clinical trials.

METHODS

In this retrospective study (NCT04170309), 396 consecutive charts of patients treated with ceftobiprole during 2016-2022 in 15 centres in France, Italy, and Spain were analysed: 62 had severe renal impairment, 51 had a hepatic impairment, 120 were immunocompromised, and 203 had no predefined risk condition (controls).

RESULTS

Ceftobiprole was used for off-label indications in 110/396 (27.8%) patients; 46/396 (11.6%) patients received a higher-than-recommended dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) considered as ceftobiprole-related occurred in 44 patients, more frequently in the risk groups compared to controls (severe renal impairment: 8/62 [12.9%]; hepatic impairment: 7/51 [13.7%]; immunocompromised: 19/120 [15.8%]; controls: 15/203, [7.4%]); in 7/44 patients, these events were serious. Compared to controls, liver-related AEs occurred more frequently in the impaired hepatic function (17/51 [33.3%] vs. 22/203 [10.8%], odds ratio [OR:]: 4.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.98-8.55) and immunocompromised (30/120 [25.0%] vs. 22/203 [10.8%], OR: 2.74; 95% CI: 1.50-5.02) groups. Hyponatremia was also more frequent in immunocompromised patients than controls (14/120 [11.7%] vs. 9/203 [4.4%], OR: 2.85; 95% CI: 1.19-6.80). Underlying disease, concomitant medications and the poor health status of the patients likely affected these imbalances.

CONCLUSION

Overall, no new safety concerns related to ceftobiprole use in real-world patients with severe renal impairment, hepatic impairment or immunocompromised status were identified.

Persistent mortality in critical COVID-19 ICU cases from wild-type to delta variant: A descriptive cohort study

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic led to significant advancements in treatment and vaccination, contributing to a decline in overall COVID-19-related mortality. However, it remains unclear whether the mortality rate for critical cases treated on intensive care units has also decreased. This multicentric, multinational retrospective observational study analyzed 447 critically ill COVID-19 patients treated on ICUs across ten study centers in Germany and Austria. Patients were categorized into two periods: period 1 (March 2020 to May 2021, n = 316) and period 2 (June 2021 to January 2022, n = 131). Despite evolving treatment strategies and widespread vaccine availability in period 2, 30-day mortality remained unchanged (30% in period 1 vs. 37% in period 2; HR 1.26, 95% CI: 0.90-1.79, p = 0.181). Further outcomes, including ICU-free days (p = 0.735), ventilatory support-free days (p = 0.699), vasopressor-free days (p = 0.379), and dialysis-free days (p = 0.396), also showed no significant differences. Notably, 81% (106 of 131) of ICU patients in period 2 were unvaccinated, underscoring the persistent vulnerability of this group. These findings suggest that while public health measures reduced overall COVID-19 severity, critical illness remained highly lethal. Further research is needed to explore targeted interventions for high-risk ICU patients and to better understand the factors contributing to persistent mortality despite medical advancements.

Therapeutic Versus Non-Therapeutic Dose Anticoagulation in COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Background

Abnormal coagulation and thrombotic complications prompted many guidelines to recommend thromboprophylaxis for patients hospitalised with COVID-19, but the dose required for prophylaxis remains unclear. This systematic review (SR) analyses the safety and efficacy of therapeutic dose anticoagulation (TDA) versus non-therapeutic dose anticoagulation (NDA) in COVID-19 patients.

Methods

According to the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Review of Interventions, we performed an SR. The protocol is registered in Prospero (CRD42021269197, date 12 August 2021).

Results

In this SR of 18 studies, TDA was shown to reduce all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.83; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.70, 0.99) in COVID-19 infection. TDA also reduced thrombosis (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.48, 0.72) but increased major bleeding (RR 1.87; 95% CI 1.29, 2.69). A stratified analysis according to severity revealed that, in non-critical patients, TDA resulted in mortality benefit (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.67, 0.94). In critical patients, TDA did not affect all-cause mortality (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.89, 1.18) but reduced thrombosis (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48, 0.86) and increased major bleeding (RR 1.85; 95% CI 1.06, 3.23).

Conclusion

TDA significantly reduced all-cause mortality and thrombosis in non-critical COVID-19 patients at the expense of increased major bleeding. In critical COVID-19, this mortality benefit was not observed.

The effect of baricitinib and corticosteroid compared to that of corticosteroid monotherapy in severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19: A Japanese multicenter inpatient database study

BACKGROUND

Systemic baricitinib and corticosteroids play important roles in treating severely and critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the efficacy of the combination of baricitinib and corticosteroids compared to that of corticosteroid monotherapy in severely and critically ill hospitalized patients with COVID-19 remains unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed severely and critically ill hospitalized patients with COVID-19 aged >18 years between January 1, 2020 and May 31, 2023, using a Japanese multicenter inpatient database. We performed propensity score matching to analyze the effect of the combination of baricitinib and corticosteroids within 2 days of hospital admission (combination group) on the 28-day and in-hospital mortality rates compared with those of corticosteroid monotherapy within 2 days of hospital admission (control group). Sensitivity analysis was performed using inverse probability weighting analysis and the generalized estimating equation method.

RESULTS

The eligible patients (n = 7433) were divided into a combination (n = 679) and a control group (n = 6754). One-to-four propensity score matching analyses included 566 combination and 2264 control group patients. There was no significant difference in 28-day (8.5 % vs. 8.8 %; risk difference, -0.3 % [95 % confidence interval, -2.9 to 2.3]) or in-hospital (11 % vs. 10 %; risk difference, 1.0 [-1.9 to 3.9]) mortality rates between 2 groups. The sensitivity analysis showed similar outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This observational study, using a Japanese multicenter inpatient database, found that the combination of baricitinib and corticosteroid therapy did not improve the 28-day or in-hospital mortality rates in severely and critically ill patients with COVID-19 compared to corticosteroid monotherapy.

Trajectories and predictive significance of inflammatory parameters for clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients treated with tocilizumab

PURPOSE

The IL-6 receptor inhibitor tocilizumab reduces mortality and morbidity in severe cases of COVID-19 through its effects on hyperinflammation and was approved as adjuvant therapy. Since tocilizumab changes the levels of inflammatory markers, we aimed to describe these changes in patients treated with tocilizumab, analyse their value in predicting death and bacterial superinfection and determine their influence on mortality rates.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 76 patients who were treated with tocilizumab for severe COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021 was conducted. Inflammatory markers (IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin) were documented before and up to seven days after tocilizumab administration.

RESULTS

The overall mortality was 25% and 53.8% in patients who required invasive respiratory support. Deceased patients had higher baseline IL-6 (p = 0.026) and peak IL-6 levels after tocilizumab vs those who survived (p < 0.0001). A peak IL-6 value > 1000 pg/dl after tocilizumab administration was a good predictor of mortality (AUC = 0.812). Of the deceased patients 41.1% had a renewed CRP increase after an initial decrease following tocilizumab administration, compared to 7.1% of the surviving patients (p = 0.0011). Documented bacterial superinfections were observed in 35.5% (27/76) of patients, of whom 48.1% (13/27) died.

CONCLUSION

CRP-decline and IL-6 increase after tocilizumab treatment occurs regularly. An increase of IL-6 levels exceeding tenfold of baseline IL-6 levels, an absolute peak of 1000 pg/ml or a renewed increase of CRP are associated with higher mortality. Suppressed CRP synthesis can impede the diagnosis of bacterial superinfections, thus increasing the risk for complications.

Corticosteroid dose escalation in non-ICU COVID-19 patients with worsening lung lesions reduces lesion severity without improving clinical outcomes

The effect of increasing corticosteroid doses on clinical outcomes and chest findings in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pneumonia and lung disease remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the effects of increasing steroid dosage on chest lesion area and clinical outcomes in patients with moderate or severe COVID-19 and progressive lung involvement on chest computed tomography (CT). A total of 105 patients with radiological progression during methylprednisolone (MP) therapy either received an increased MP dose (n = 79) or were maintained on the same MP dose (n = 26). These patients were divided into dose-increment and no-change groups according to the MP dose adjustment strategy. Clinical features, changes in CT severity scores within 7 days after steroid adjustment, and outcomes were compared between the groups. Six (7.6%) and one (3.8%) patients in the dose-increment and no-change groups, respectively, had increasing World Health Organization outcome scores 96 h after MP adjustment (P = 0.678). Length of stay [15 days (IQR: 10-24) vs. 14 days (IQR: 10-25); P = 0.994] and in-hospital death rate (7.6% vs. 3.8%; P = 0.678) showed no significant differences between the groups. Logistic regression analyses revealed that an increased MP dose was significantly associated with improvement in CT lesion area compared with no change in MP dose, but the CT lesions deteriorated subsequently (79.7% vs. 53.8%, P = 0.044). In conclusion, increasing the MP dose in patients with worsening CT findings ameliorates CT lesions but fails to prevent serious adverse outcomes.

Public Health Benefits of Applying Evidence-Based Best Practices in Managing Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19

BACKGROUND

As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related mortality remains a concern, optimal management of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 continues to evolve. We developed a population model based on real-world evidence to quantify the clinical impact of increased utilization of remdesivir, the effectiveness of which has been well established in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

The PINC AI healthcare database records for patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from January to December 2023 were stratified by those treated with or without remdesivir ("RDV" and "no RDV") and by supplemental oxygen requirements: no supplemental oxygen charges (NSOc), low-flow oxygen (LFO), and high-flow oxygen/non-invasive ventilation. Key vulnerable subgroups such as elderly and immunocompromised patients were also evaluated. The model applied previously published hazard ratios (HRs) to 28-day in-hospital mortality incidence to determine the number of potential lives saved if additional no RDV patients had been treated with remdesivir upon hospital admission.

RESULTS

Of 84 810 hospitalizations for COVID-19 in 2023, 13,233 no RDV patients were similar in terms of characteristics and clinical presentation to the RDV patients. The model predicted that initiation of remdesivir in these patients could have saved 231 lives. Projected nationally, this translates to >800 potential lives saved (95% confidence interval, 469-1126). Eighty-nine percent of potential lives saved were elderly and 19% were immunocompromised individuals. Seventy-six percent were among NSOc or LFO patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This public health model underscores the value of initiating remdesivir upon admission in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, in accordance with evidence-based best practices, to minimize lives lost because of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.

Remdesivir Effectiveness in Reducing the Risk of 30-Day Readmission in Vulnerable Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: A Retrospective US Cohort Study Using Propensity Scores

BACKGROUND

Reducing hospital readmission offer potential benefits for patients, providers, payers, and policymakers to improve quality of healthcare, reduce cost, and improve patient experience. We investigated effectiveness of remdesivir in reducing 30-day coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related readmission during the Omicron era, including older adults and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions.

METHODS

This retrospective study utilized the US PINC AI Healthcare Database to identify adult patients discharged alive from an index COVID-19 hospitalization between December 2021 and February 2024. Odds of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission to the same hospital were compared between patients who received remdesivir vs those who did not, after balancing characteristics of the two groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Analyses were stratified by maximum supplemental oxygen requirement during index hospitalization.

RESULTS

Of 326 033 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 during study period, 210 586 patients met the eligibility criteria. Of these, 109 551 (52%) patients were treated with remdesivir. After IPTW, lower odds of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission were observed in patients who received remdesivir vs those who did not, in the overall population (3.3% vs 4.2%, respectively; odds ratio [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 0.78 [.75-.80]), elderly population (3.7% vs 4.7%, respectively; 0.78 [.75-.81]), and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions (5.3% vs 6.2%, respectively; 0.86 [.80-.92]). These results were consistent irrespective of supplemental oxygen requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of 30-day COVID-19-related readmission across all patients discharged alive from the initial COVID-19 hospitalization, including older adults and those with underlying immunocompromising conditions.

Remdesivir-Associated Survival Outcomes Among Immunocompromised Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19: Real-world Evidence From the Omicron-Dominant Era

BACKGROUND

Patients with immunocompromising conditions are at increased risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalizations and deaths. Randomized clinical trials provide limited enrollment, if any, to provide information on the outcomes in such patients treated with remdesivir.

METHODS

Using the US PINC AI Healthcare Database, we identified adult patients with immunocompromising conditions, hospitalized for COVID-19 between December 2021 and February 2024. The primary outcome was all-cause inpatient mortality examined in propensity score-matched patients in remdesivir vs nonremdesivir groups. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with cancer, hematological malignancies, and solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

RESULTS

Of 28 966 patients included in the study, 16 730 (58%) received remdesivir during the first 2 days of hospitalization. After propensity score matching, 8822 patients in the remdesivir and 8822 patients in the nonremdesivir group were analyzed. Remdesivir was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate among patients with no supplemental oxygen (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.73 [.62-.86] at 14 days and 0.79 [.68-.91] at 28 days) and among those with supplemental oxygen (0.75 [.67-.85] and 0.78 [.70-.86], respectively). Remdesivir was also associated with lower mortality rates in subgroups of patients with cancer, hematological malignancies (leukemia, lymphoma, or multiple myeloma), and solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplants.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of patients with immunocompromising conditions hospitalized for COVID-19, remdesivir was associated with significant improvement in survival, including patients with varied underlying immunocompromising conditions. The integration of current real-world evidence into clinical guideline recommendations can inform clinical communities to optimize treatment decisions in the evolving COVID-19 era, extending beyond the conclusion of the public health emergency declaration.

Impact of antibiotic therapy in patients with respiratory viral infections: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The impact of antibiotics in patients with positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for respiratory viruses without evidence of a respiratory bacterial co-infection is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the association of antibiotics on 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay in patients with an acute respiratory infection and PCR documented presence of respiratory viruses.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to hospital between 2012 and 2021 with positive PCR for influenza virus (H3N2, H1N1, influenza B), respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus or severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. We used logistic regression, the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Poisson's regression to assess the impact of antibiotic therapy on outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 3979 patients, 67.7% received antibiotics. In adjusted analyses, antibiotics initiated in the emergency department (adjusted OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.77-1.96) and days of antibiotic therapy (adjusted OR per day of therapy 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.00) had no significant impact on mortality, whereas antibiotics initiated later during admission (adjusted OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.26-4.02) was associated with increased mortality. Patients prescribed antibiotics had longer duration of hospital admission.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed no protective association between in-hospital antibiotic therapy and outcomes, suggesting overuse of antibiotics in respiratory infections with proven respiratory viruses. A restrictive antibiotic strategy may be warranted.

Epidemiology, clinical and biological characteristics, and prognosis of critically ill COVID 19 patients: a single-center experience through 4 successive waves

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with severe pneumonia due to SARS-CoV-2, comparing them according to successive waves, and to identify prognostic factors for morbidity and mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective observational descriptive study was conducted from March 10, 2020, to October 17, 2021. All adult patients admitted with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia presenting acute respiratory failure were included. COVID 19 diagnosis was confirmed by RT-PCR testing of respiratory specimens. The primary endpoint was ICU mortality. Secondary endpoints were the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) or bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 437 patients were included of whom 282 (65%) patients were ventilated for 9 [5;20] days. Among the studied population, 38% were treated for one or more episodes of VAP, and 22 (5%) for bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. ICU mortality was 26% in the first wave, then fell and stabilized at around 10% in subsequent waves (p = 0.02). Increased age, Charlson index, SOFA score and lactatemia on admission were predictive of mortality. Survival at 90 days was 85% (95% CI 82-88) and was unaffected by the presence of VAP. However, the occurrence of bronchopulmonary aspergillosis increased mortality to 36%.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we observed mortality in the lower range of those previously reported. Risk factors for mortality mainly included age and previous comorbidities. The prognosis of these critically ill Covid 19 patients improved over the four waves, underlining the likely beneficial effect of vaccination and dexamethasone.

Real-world effectiveness and factors associated with increased mortality in non-critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia receiving remdesivir

OBJECTIVES

Evidence on the effectiveness of remdesivir when used in real-life clinical practice is controversial. This study aims to analyse its effectiveness and the factors associated with increased mortality in non-critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who require supplemental low-flow oxygen and received remdesivir.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Ramón y Cajal University Hospital (Madrid, Spain) which included all patients treated with remdesivir in our institution during the second pandemic breakout in Spain, from August to November 2020. Treatment with remdesivir was limited to non-critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring low-flow supplemental oxygen, with a treatment duration of 5 days.

RESULTS

A total of 1757 patients were admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia during the study period, of which 281 non-critically ill patients were treated with remdesivir and included in the analysis. Mortality at 28 days after initiation of treatment was 17.1%. The median (IQR) time to recovery was 9 days (6-15). 104 (37.0%) patients had complications during hospitalisation, with renal failure being the most frequent (31 patients; 36.5%). After adjustment for confounding factors, high-flow oxygen therapy was associated with increased 28-day mortality (HR 2.77; 95% CI 1.39 to 5.53; p=0.004) and decreased 28-day clinical improvement (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.85; p=0.008). A significant difference in survival and clinical improvement was identified between patients treated with high and low-flow oxygen.

CONCLUSION

The 28-day mortality rate in patients treated with remdesivir needing low-flow oxygen therapy was higher than that published in clinical trials. Age and increased oxygen therapy needed after the beginning of treatment were the main risk factors associated with mortality.

Effect of methylprednisolone in reducing severe COVID-19 and mortality in high-risk patients: A retrospective study

Introduction

The treatment of COVID-19 patients, especially high-risk patients, remains a large challenge. Glucocorticoids have been accepted as effective medicines for severe COVID-19. However, the glucocorticoid usage guidelines do not cover all the indications for high-risk patients.

Objective

To identify more effective treatments for high-risk patients with COVID-19, this retrospective study analyzed routine epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory data from 33 high-risk patients with COVID-19 in Beijing Gobroad Boren Hospital, Beijing, China, most of whom responded well to treatment.

Methods

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection was confirmed via real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays. Outcome measures such as duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay, and 28-day mortality were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: mild to moderate COVID-19 (n = 26) and severe COVID-19 (n = 7). Chest computed tomography images were used to guide methylprednisolone administration or withdrawal.

Results

Upon intensive care unit admission, 12.1% of patients were mechanically ventilated with an average partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen(PaO2/FiO2) ratio of 279 ± 146. No coinfections with other endemic viruses were observed. The duration of mechanical ventilation was 16 days (interquartile range: 8-28); the intensive care unit length of stay was 11 (interquartile range: 2-33) days; and the 28-day total mortality was 3.0%.

Conclusion

Multivariate regression analysis revealed that low-dose, timely methylprednisolone administration was associated with a lower severe COVID-19 rate and mortality in high-risk patients. For high-risk patients, once there are ground-glass opacities (GGO) in the computed tomography image, continuous and low-dose methylprednisolone administration promotes inflammation remission and protects them from severe COVID-19 or mortality.

Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab as SARS-CoV-2 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients during the Omicron Wave: A Real-World Monocentric Experience

Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) respond poorly to vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TIX/CIL) reduces the incidence of infection and the evolution to severe COVID-19. In vitro data show decreased activity against Omicron variants. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of TIX/CIL in LTRs during the Omicron wave. A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at ISMETT in Palermo (Italy). In June 2022, SARS-CoV-2 PrEP with TIX/CIL 150/150 mg was offered to LTRs. LTRs who received TIX/CIL were compared to LTRs who did not. Logistic regression analysis (adjusted for prior COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, age, years from transplant, and rejection) was performed. The objective of this study was to compare the following among the two populations: prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, length of SARS-CoV-2 positivity, and COVID-19 disease severity. Among 110 eligible LTRs, 79 (72%) received TIX/CIL and 31 (28%) did not. SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in 6% (n = 5) of patients who received TIX/CIL and 29% (n = 9) of patients who did not (p < 0.001). In both groups, infections were mild/asymptomatic, and no one was hospitalized or died. At multivariate analysis, TIX/CIL was associated with a lower risk of infection (aOR 0.22; 95%CI 0.06-0.78; p = 0.02). TIX/CIL was safe and effective in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 in LTRs during the Omicron wave.

Do rheumatic diseases, long-term glucocorticoids, and immunosuppressant treatment, and vaccination impact the COVID-19 severity? Insight from a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The impact of rheumatic diseases, long-term medication, and vaccination on COVID-19 severity remain insufficiently understood, hindering effective patient management. This study aims to investigate factors influencing COVID-19 severity in Chinese rheumatic patients and to provide real-world evidence for patient care.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study consisting of two cohorts, followed by a nested case-control analysis. The outpatient cohort included non-severe COVID-19 patients, while the inpatient cohort included consecutive severe COVID-19 inpatients. Additionally, rheumatic patients from both cohorts were included for the nested case-control study. Clinical information was obtained from electronic medical records and surveys.

RESULTS

A total of 749 outpatients and 167 inpatients were enrolled. In the outpatient cohort, rheumatic diseases were identified as a risk factor for the severity of dyspnea (No rheumatic disease: OR = 0.577, 95% CI = 0.396-0.841, p = .004), but not for mortality, length of hospitalization, or hospitalization costs in the inpatient cohort. Long-term glucocorticoids use was identified as an independent risk factor for severity of dyspnea in rheumatic patients (OR = 1.814, 95% CI = 1.235-2.663, p = .002), while vaccination and immunosuppressant treatment showed no association. Vaccination was identified as a protective factor against hospitalization due to COVID-19 in patients with rheumatic diseases (OR = 0.031, 95% CI = 0.007-0.136, p < .001), whereas long-term glucocorticoids and immunosuppressant treatment showed no association.

CONCLUSIONS

Rheumatic diseases and long-term glucocorticoids use are significant risk factors for COVID-19 severity in the Chinese population, whereas emphasizing the protective effects of vaccines against COVID-19 severity is crucial. Additionally, the investigation provides preliminary support for the concept that long-term immunosuppressant therapy does not necessarily require additional prescription adjustments.

Patient Experiences Navigating Care Coordination For Long COVID: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about how to best evaluate, diagnose, and treat long COVID, which presents challenges for patients as they seek care.

OBJECTIVE

Understand experiences of patients as they navigate care for long COVID.

DESIGN

Qualitative study involving interviews with patients about topics related to seeking and receiving care for long COVID.

PARTICIPANTS

Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age, spoke English, self-identified as functioning well prior to COVID infection, and reported long COVID symptoms continued to impact their lives at 3 months or more after a COVID infection.

APPROACH

Patients were recruited from a post-COVID recovery clinic at an academic medical center from August to September 2022. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

KEY RESULTS

Participants (n=21) reported experiences related to elements of care coordination: access to care, evaluation, treatment, and ongoing care concerns. Some patients noted access to care was facilitated by having providers that listened to and validated their symptoms; other patients reported feeling their access to care was hindered by providers who did not believe or understand their symptoms. Patients reported confusion around how to communicate their symptoms when being evaluated for long COVID, and they expressed frustration with receiving test results that were normal or diagnoses that were not directly attributed to long COVID. Patients acknowledged that clinicians are still learning how to treat long COVID, and they voiced appreciation for providers who are willing to try new treatment approaches. Patients expressed ongoing care concerns, including feeling there is nothing more that can be done, and questioned long-term impacts on their aging and life expectancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings shed light on challenges faced by patients with long COVID as they seek care. Healthcare systems and providers should consider these challenges when developing strategies to improve care coordination for patients with long COVID.

Characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital with and without respiratory symptoms

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 is primarily known as a respiratory illness; however, many patients present to hospital without respiratory symptoms. The association between non-respiratory presentations of COVID-19 and outcomes remains unclear. We investigated risk factors and clinical outcomes in patients with no respiratory symptoms (NRS) and respiratory symptoms (RS) at hospital admission.

METHODS

This study describes clinical features, physiological parameters, and outcomes of hospitalised COVID-19 patients, stratified by the presence or absence of respiratory symptoms at hospital admission. RS patients had one or more of: cough, shortness of breath, sore throat, runny nose or wheezing; while NRS patients did not.

RESULTS

Of 178,640 patients in the study, 86.4 % presented with RS, while 13.6 % had NRS. NRS patients were older (median age: NRS: 74 vs RS: 65) and less likely to be admitted to the ICU (NRS: 36.7 % vs RS: 37.5 %). NRS patients had a higher crude in-hospital case-fatality ratio (NRS 41.1 % vs. RS 32.0 %), but a lower risk of death after adjusting for confounders (HR 0.88 [0.83-0.93]).

CONCLUSION

Approximately one in seven COVID-19 patients presented at hospital admission without respiratory symptoms. These patients were older, had lower ICU admission rates, and had a lower risk of in-hospital mortality after adjusting for confounders.

What do clinicians mean by epidemics' preparedness

BACKGROUND

Infectious disease pandemics and epidemics pose significant global threats, and the risk of emerging infectious diseases has increased because of factors such as international connections, travel, and population density. Despite investments in global health surveillance, much of the world remains unprepared to manage infectious disease threats.

OBJECTIVES

This review article discusses the general considerations and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of epidemic preparedness.

SOURCES

Non-systematic search on PubMed, scientific society websites, and scientific newspapers (performed in April 2023).

CONTENT

Key factors for preparedness include robust public health infrastructure, adequate allocation of resources, and effective communication between stakeholders. This narrative review emphasizes the need for timely and accurate dissemination of medical knowledge, as well as addressing the challenges of misinformation and infodemics. It also highlights the importance of quick availability of diagnostic tests and vaccines, ensuring equitable access to these technologies. The role of scientific coordination in developing treatment strategies and the safety and mental well-being of healthcare workers are discussed. Lastly, it should be emphasized the need for medical training, multidisciplinary teams, new technologies and artificial intelligence, and the active role of infectious disease physicians in epidemic preparedness efforts.

IMPLICATIONS

From clinicians' perspective, healthcare authorities play a crucial role in epidemic preparedness even by providing resource management plans, ensuring availability of essential supplies and training, facilitating communication, and improving safe infection management.

Community antibiotic prescribing in patients with COVID-19 across three pandemic waves: a population-based study in Scotland, UK

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to examine community antibiotic prescribing across a complete geographical area for people with a positive COVID-19 test across three pandemic waves, and to examine health and demographic factors associated with antibiotic prescribing.

DESIGN

A population-based study using administrative data.

SETTING

A complete geographical region within Scotland, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Residents of two National Health Service Scotland health boards with SARS-CoV-2 virus test results from 1 February 2020 to 31 March 2022 (n=184 954). Individuals with a positive test result (n=16 025) had data linked to prescription and hospital admission data ±28 days of the test, general practice data for high-risk comorbidities and demographic data.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The associations between patient factors and the odds of antibiotic prescription in COVID-19 episodes across three pandemic waves from multivariate binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Data included 768 206 tests for 184 954 individuals, identifying 16 240 COVID-19 episodes involving 16 025 individuals. There were 3263 antibiotic prescriptions ±28 days for 2395 episodes. 35.6% of episodes had a prescription only before the test date, 52.3% of episodes after and 12.1% before and after. Antibiotic prescribing reduced over time: 20.4% of episodes in wave 1, 17.7% in wave 2 and 12.0% in wave 3. In multivariate logistic regression, being female (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.45), older (OR 3.02, 95% CI 2.50 to 3.68 75+ vs <25 years), having a high-risk comorbidity (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.61), a hospital admission ±28 days of an episode (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.77) and health board region (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.25, board B vs A) increased the odds of receiving an antibiotic.

CONCLUSION

Community antibiotic prescriptions in COVID-19 episodes were uncommon in this population and likelihood was associated with patient factors. The reduction over pandemic waves may represent increased knowledge regarding COVID-19 treatment and/or evolving symptomatology.

Current management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid organ transplant recipients: Experience derived from an ESGICH-ESOT survey

OBJECTIVE

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients have a poorer SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response and higher risk for COVID-19-associated complications. However, there is no consensus on the current management of COVID-19 and data on persistent COVID-19 rates in SOT recipients are lacking.

METHODS

An electronic survey concerning the management of COVID-19 in SOT recipients was distributed among all members of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH) and of the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT). Four major sections were covered: prevention, early COVID-19, late COVID-19, and persistent COVID-19. We developed a structured questionnaire including eight multiple-choice questions with branching logic in case of positive answers and three open-ended questions related to clinical practice. Questions were asked separately for lung and non-lung transplantation.

RESULTS

Thirty-two physicians from 24 different centers participated. Most answers (n = 30) were provided by European physicians. Thirty of 32 (93.75%) physicians managed non-lung transplant recipients and 12 of 32 (33.3%) lung transplant recipients. There was a huge variability in practice regarding the treatment of COVID-19, and particularly noticeable when considering lung and non-lung transplant recipients. Main discordances included the use of nirmatrelvir alone or in combination therapy for early COVID-19, the use of immunomodulatory drugs other than steroids for late COVID-19, and the need for treating asymptomatic viral shedding in persistent COVID-19. There was more similarity in terms of prophylaxis recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Despite a low number of respondents, this survey shows that there are many differences on how experts manage SARS-CoV-2 infections in SOT recipients.

Adverse events related to drug-drug interactions in COVID-19 patients. A persistent concern in the post-pandemic era: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Since COVID-19 patients are often polytreated, monitoring drug-drug interaction (DDIs) is necessary. We evaluated whether drugs used after the second COVID-19 pandemic wave were associated with DDI-related adverse events and the role of drug interaction checkers in identifying them.

METHODS

The study (PROSPERO-ID: CRD42024507634) included: 1) consulting the drug interaction checkers Drugs.com, Liverpool COVID-19 Interactions, LexiComp, Medscape, and Micromedex; 2) systematic review; 3) reviewed studies analysis; 4) evaluating drug interaction checkers potential to anticipate DDI-related adverse events.The systematic review was performed searching PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane databases from 1 March 2022 to 11 November 2023. Observational studies, and clinical trials were included. Article without reporting direct association between DDIs and adverse events were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

The most frequent DDIs involved nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (N/R) and fluvoxamine. Fifteen studies, including 150 patients and 35 DDI-related outcomes, were analyzed. The most frequent DDIs involved tacrolimus with N/R, resulting in creatinine increase.Eighty percent of reported DDI-related adverse events would have been identified by all drug-interaction checkers, while the remaining 20% by at least 2 of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug interaction checkers are useful but show inconsistencies. Multiple sources are needed to tailor treatment in the context of COVID-19.

Efficacy of different doses of corticosteroids in treating severe COVID-19 pneumonia

BACKGROUND

To investigate the efficacy of different doses of corticosteroids in treating severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia.

METHODS

Between May 01, 2023, and June 20, 2023, 48 patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia were treated at the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of Jinan Fourth People's Hospital. The observation group (21 patients) received standard care and high-dose corticosteroids, (high-dose group). The control group (27 patients) received standard care and low-dose corticosteroids (low-dose group). We collected baseline data and recorded inflammatory marker levels after 3 days of treatment, body temperature recovery time, length of stay, and 28-day all-cause mortality. The results of outpatient follow-up were recorded after 1 month.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in 28-day mortality and length of stay. The number of days it took for body temperature to return to normal in the high-dose group was less than in the low-dose group. The high-dose group had significantly more reduced inflammatory factors (C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6). A total of 20 discharged patients were given 8-16 mg of methylprednisolone, depending on chest computed tomography (CT) and clinical symptoms after 1 month; in all discharged patients using oral corticosteroids, CT features improved.

CONCLUSION

High-dose corticosteroids had a significantly positive effect on the reduction of inflammatory factors and shortening body temperature recovery time. In the treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia, early administration of high-dose, short-course corticosteroids should be implemented.

Increased antibody titers but induced T cell AICD and apoptosis response in COVID-19 convalescents by inactivated vaccine booster

It is urgently needed to evaluate the necessity and benefits of booster vaccination against the coronavirus 2 of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron to facilitate clinical decision-making for 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) convalescents. We conducted a multicenter, prospective clinical trial (registration number: ChiCTR2100045810) in the first patients with COVID-19 from 28 January 2020 to 20 February 2020 to assess the long-term durability of neutralizing antibodies against live Omicron BA.5 and further assess the efficiency and safety of CoronaVac in the convalescent group. A total of 96 COVID-19 convalescents were enrolled in this study. Neutralizing antibody titers in convalescents were significantly reduced in 9-10 months. A dose-refreshing vaccination in 28 convalescents with an antibody titer below 96 significantly induced neutralizing antibodies against live Omicron by 4.84-fold. Meanwhile, the abundance of naive T cells increased dramatically, and TEMRA and TEM cells gradually decreased after vaccination. Activation-induced cell death and apoptosis-related genes were significantly elevated after vaccination in all T-cell subtypes. One-dose booster vaccination was effective in inducing a robust antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron in COVID-19 convalescents with low antibody titers. However, vaccine-mediated T-cell consumption and regeneration patterns may be detrimental to the antiviral response.IMPORTANCEThe globally dominant coronavirus 2 of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant raises the possibility of repeat infections among 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) convalescents with low neutralizing antibody titers. The importance of this multicenter study lies in its evaluation of the long-term durability of neutralizing antibodies in COVID-19 convalescents and the efficacy of a booster vaccination against the live Omicron. The findings suggest that a one-dose booster vaccination is effective in inducing a robust antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron in convalescents with low antibody titers. However, the study also highlights the potential detrimental effects on the antiviral response due to vaccine-mediated T-cell consumption and regeneration patterns. These results are crucial for facilitating clinical decision-making for COVID-19 convalescents and informing public health policies regarding booster vaccinations.

The clinical features, treatment and prognosis of neutropenic fever and Coronavirus disease 2019 results of the multicentre teos study

This multicentre (22 centres in Turkey) retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with neutropenic fever and SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Study period was 15 March 2020-15 August 2021. A total of 170 cases (58 female, aged 59 ± 15.5 years) that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the study. One-month mortality rate (OMM) was 44.8%. The logistic regression analysis showed the following significant variables for the mentioned dependent variables: (i) achieving PCR negativity: receiving a maximum of 5 days of favipiravir (p = 0.005, OR 5.166, 95% CI 1.639-16.280); (ii) need for ICU: receiving glycopeptide therapy at any time during the COVID-19/FEN episode (p = 0.001, OR 6.566, 95% CI 2.137-20.172), the need for mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001, OR 62.042, 95% CI 9.528-404.011); (iii) need for mechanical ventilation: failure to recover from neutropenia (p < 0.001, OR 17.869, 95% CI 3.592-88.907), receiving tocilizumab therapy (p = 0.028, OR 32.227, 95% CI 1.469-707.053), septic shock (p = 0.001, OR 15.4 96% CI 3.164-75.897), and the need for ICU (p < 0.001, OR 91.818, 95% CI 15.360-548.873), (iv) OMM: [mechanical ventilation (p = 0.001, OR 19.041, 95% CI 3.229-112.286) and septic shock (p = 0.010, OR 5.589,95% CI 1.509-20.700)]. Although it includes a relatively limited number of patients, our findings suggest that COVID-19 and FEN are associated with significant mortality and morbidity.

Barriers to and facilitators of living guidelines use in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Living guidelines provide reliable, ongoing evidence surveillance and regularly updated recommendations for healthcare decision-making. As a relatively new concept, most of the initial application of living approaches has been undertaken in high-income countries. However, in this scoping review, we looked at what is currently known about how living guidelines were developed, used and applied in low-income and middle-income countries.

METHODS

Searches for published literature were conducted in Medline, Global Health, Cochrane Library and Embase. Grey literature was identified using Google Scholar and the WHO website. In addition, the reference lists of included studies were checked for missing studies. Studies were included if they described or reflected on the development, application or utility of living guideline approaches for low-income and middle-income countries.

RESULTS

After a full-text review, 21 studies were included in the review, reporting on the development and application of living recommendations in low-income and middle-income countries. Most studies reported living guideline activities conducted by the WHO (15, 71.4%), followed by China (4, 19%), Chile (1, 4.8%) and Lebanon (1, 4.8%). All studies based on WHO reports relate to living COVID-19 management guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the studies in this review were WHO-reported studies focusing solely on COVID-19 disease treatment living guidelines. However, there was no clear explanation of how living guidelines were used nor information on the prospects for and obstacles to the implementation of living guidelines in low-income and middle-income countries.

Case report: Enhancing prognosis in severe COVID-19 through human herpes virus coinfection treatment strategies

Background

In the context of increasing reports of co-infection with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), particularly with human herpes viruses (HHVs), it is important to consider the appropriate treatment options for HHVs that have been reactivated by COVID-19.

Case presentation

This study presents two cases of severe COVID-19 with HHV co-infection. The first case involved a critically ill patient with COVID-19 co-infected with herpes simplex virus type 1, confirmed using metagenomic next-generation sequencing, and another patient with severe COVID-19 experiencing Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, as evidenced by elevated EBV-DNA levels in the serum. Treatment included high-dose glucocorticoids and sivelestat sodium, with notable improvements observed after initiating ganciclovir anti-herpesvirus therapy.

Conclusion

This study underscores the significance of recognizing HHV co-infections in severe COVID-19 cases and highlights the potential of combining anti-HHV treatment, increased glucocorticoid dosages, and anti-cytokine storm therapy to enhance prognosis.

Adherence to application technique of inhaled corticosteroid in patients with asthma and COVID-19 improves outcomes

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids have been widely reported as a preventive measure against the development of severe forms of COVID-19 not only in patients with asthma.

METHODS

In 654 Czech and Slovak patients with asthma who developed COVID-19, we investigated whether the correct use of inhaler containing corticosteroids was associated with a less severe course of COVID-19 and whether this had an impact on the need for hospitalisation, measurable lung functions and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

Of the studied cohort 51.4% had moderate persistent, 29.9% mild persistent and 7.2% severe persistent asthma. We found a significant adverse effect of poor inhaler adherence on COVID-19 severity (p=0.049). We also observed a lower hospitalisation rate in patients adequately taking the inhaler with OR of 0.83. Vital capacity and forced expiratory lung volume deterioration caused by COVID-19 were significantly reversed, by approximately twofold to threefold, in individuals who inhaled correctly.

CONCLUSION

Higher quality of inhalation technique of corticosteroids measured by adherence to an inhaled medication application technique (A-AppIT) score had a significant positive effect on reversal of the vital capacity and forced expiratory lung volume in 1 s worsening (p=0.027 and p<0.0001, respectively) due to COVID-19. Scoring higher in the A-AppIT was also associated with significantly improved QoL. All measured variables concordantly and without exception showed a positive improvement in response to better adherence. We suggest that corticosteroids provide protection against the worsening of lungs in patients with COVID-19 and that correct and easily assessable adherence to corticosteroids with appropriate inhalation technique play an important role in preventing severe form of COVID-19.

Clostridioides Difficile: A Concise Review of Best Practices and Updates

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common and severe nosocomial infections worldwide. It can also affect healthy individuals in the community. The incidence of CDI has been on the rise globally for the past decade, necessitating a proactive approach to combat its spread; new strategies are being developed to enhance diagnostic accuracy and optimize treatment outcomes. Implementing the 2-step testing has increased diagnostic specificity, reducing the usage of CD-specific antibiotics with no concomitant increase in surgical complication rates. In 2021, the Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (IDSA/SHEA) shifted its preference for initial treatment to fidaxomicin over vancomycin and metronidazole due to its lower recurrence rate. It also prioritized fidaxomicin for the treatment of recurrent CDI. There are new developments on the frontiers of fecal microbiota therapies, with RBX2660 and SER-109 approved recently by the FDA for prevention, with other microbiome-based therapies in various development and clinical trials. This review offers providers an updated and practical guide for CDI management.

Potential Drugs in COVID-19 Management

The SARS-CoV-2 virus first emerged in China in December 2019 and quickly spread worldwide. Despite the absence of a vaccination or authorized drug specifically developed to combat this infection, certain medications recommended for other diseases have shown potential effectiveness in treating COVID-19, although without definitive confirmation. This review aims to evaluate the existing literature on the efficacy of these medications against COVID-19. The review encompasses various potential treatments, including antiviral medications, anti-malaria and anti-rheumatic drugs, vaccines, corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), antipyretic and analgesic medicines, antiparasitic drugs, and statins. The analysis also addresses the potential benefits and drawbacks of these medications, as well as their effects on hypertension and diabetes. Although these therapies hold promise against COVID-19, further research, including suitable product production or clinical testing, is needed to establish their therapeutic efficacy.

[Early post-exposure and curative therapeutic strategies against COVID-19]

INTRODUCTION

There now exist preventive and curative treatments available for both early and advanced stages of COVID-19 management.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE

Antibiotics have no place in the initial therapeutic management of Sars-Cov-2 pneumonia. On the other hand, corticosteroids are recommended for patients requiring oxygen therapy≥2L/min. According to the latest recommendations, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is indicated as an early treatment for adults not requiring oxygen therapy but at high risk of developing a severe form of COVID-19. In case of contraindication, remdesivir is an alternative therapy.

PERSPECTIVES

Although there is no indication for convalescent plasma outside of clinical trials, it seems promising for immunocompromised patients, particularly those with B lymphopenia. It is noteworthy that currently, with the predominance of the Omicron XBB.1.5 variant, monoclonal antibodies are no longer recommended as therapy except for sotrovimab, which still has partial efficacy and could be considered after expert opinion as salvage therapy in a previously well-established program.

CONCLUSION

Despite the evolution of variants, antivirals still appear to have activity and remain the first-line treatment for patients, in addition to vaccination.

Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroid Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized, Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In the present study, we aimed to assess the effect of corticosteroids on all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with CAP.

METHODS

For this meta-analysis and meta-regression, we conducted a systematic search of trials that evaluated the effect of corticosteroid therapy in patients hospitalized with CAP through March 2023. We included randomized, controlled trials, comparing adjunctive corticosteroid therapy with the standard of care alone for treatment of patients hospitalized with CAP and reporting all-cause mortality. We excluded retrospective analyses, observational data, and trial protocols. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days after hospital admission. The safety analysis included the frequency of adverse events and steroid-associated adverse events.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 35 713 citations, of which 15 studies and 3367 patients were eligible for the final analysis. The all-cause mortality at 30 days was significantly lower in the corticosteroid group (104 of 1690, 6.15%) than in the control group (152 of 1677, 9.06%; risk ratio [RR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], .53 to .85; P = .001; I2 = 0%). In 9 studies (2549 patients) that reported the occurrence of adverse events, corticosteroid therapy was not associated with an increased risk of developing any adverse event compared with standard care (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, .65 to 1.24; P = .5; I2 = 88%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive systemic corticosteroid therapy in patients hospitalized with CAP was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality by day 30. The benefits were more pronounced in patients with severe pneumonia.

Serum C-reactive protein greater than 75 mg/dL as an early available laboratory predictor of severe COVID-19: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Severe COVID-19 management is still challenging. Having a laboratory factor to predict the severity of a patient's condition can be very useful in how to approach each patient. There have been studies concentrating on the correlation between serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level and COVID-19 severity but we aim to reach a threshold for CRP in disease severity determination.

METHODS

We conducted a thorough search on PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases from early 2019 to October 2021, and 323 studies were assessed for eligibility in three phases. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to examine the validity of the studies. The t-test was applied for the CRP level cutoffs.

RESULTS

Eventually, 11 articles and 1615 patients were included in this systematic review. Our analysis evaluated combined mean, median, and standard deviation of severe patients' CRP to be respectively 73.37, 53.80, and 47.936. Based on the combined mean, 75 mg/dL was suggested as an initial threshold for baseline CRP in hospitalized patients for developing severe conditions.

CONCLUSION

This study recommends that COVID-19 patients with on-admission serum CRP levels of 75 mg/dL and more are likely associated with severe conditions. Thus, anti-inflammatory agents and further following may be helpful in these patients.

Cytokine storm and translating IL-6 biology into effective treatments for COVID-19

As of May 3, 2023, the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in more than 760 million confirmed cases and over 6.9 million deaths. Several patients have developed pneumonia, which can deteriorate into acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary etiology may be attributed to cytokine storm, which is triggered by the excessive release of proinflammatory cytokines and subsequently leads to immune dysregulation. Considering that high levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) have been detected in several highly pathogenic coronavirus-infected diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2002, the Middle East respiratory syndrome in 2012, and COVID-19, the IL-6 pathway has emerged as a key in the pathogenesis of this hyperinflammatory state. Thus, we review the history of cytokine storm and the process of targeting IL-6 signaling to elucidate the pivotal role played by tocilizumab in combating COVID-19.

IGF2BP2‑dependent STIM1 inhibition protects against LPS‑induced pneumonia in vitro by alleviating endoplasmic reticulum stress and the inflammatory response

Pneumonia is a disease caused by inflammation and has high morbidity and mortality rates. Stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) is involved in the regulation of inflammatory processes. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the role of STIM1 in pneumonia has not yet been reported. In the present study, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was administered to A549 cells to construct a cell damage model. The expression of STIM1 in the model cells was detected by western blotting and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. Then, STIM1 expression was inhibited and cell survival was detected by Cell Counting Kit-8 and flow cytometry. The expression of inflammatory factors was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS)-related proteins were detected by immunofluorescence and western blotting. Subsequently, the relationship between insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 2 (IGF2BP2) and STIM1 was verified by RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation assay and actinomycin D treatment. Finally, the regulatory mechanism of IGF2BP2 and STIM1 in LPS-induced A549 cells was further investigated. The results of the present study demonstrated that STIM1 expression was increased in LPS-induced A549 cells and that STIM1 knockdown inhibited LPS-induced A549 cell apoptosis and alleviated LPS-induced A549 cell inflammation and ERS. In addition, IGF2BP2 enhanced the stability of STIM1 mRNA and knockdown of IGF2BP2-regulated STIM1 expression alleviated LPS-induced ERS and inflammatory responses in A549 cells. In conclusion, knockdown of IGF2BP2-regulated STIM1 improved cell damage in the LPS-induced pneumonia cell model by alleviating ERS and the inflammatory response.

Relationship between Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism and the Risk of COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Research shows the correlation between angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) deletion and insertion (D/I) polymorphism and COVID-19 risk; yet, conclusive evidence is still lacking. Thus, a meta-analysis of relevant articles was performed to more accurately estimate the relationship of ACE I/D polymorphism with the risk of COVID-19. Material and Methods. Relevant literature from the PubMed database was systematically reviewed, and odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were measured. Additionally, the metapackage from Stata version 15.0 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis eventually contained 8 studies, including 1362 COVID-19 cases and 4312 controls. Based on the data, the ACE I/D polymorphism did not show an association with COVID-19 risk (D vs. I: OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.96-1.64; DD vs. II: OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 0.95-3.74; DI vs. II: OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 0.92-3.31; dominant model: OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 0.99-3.53; and recessive model: OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.81-1.90). Further, subgroup analyses stratified based on case proved that the ACE D allele demonstrated an association with increasing risk of COVID-19 severity (D vs. I: OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.01-2.66; DD vs. II: OR = 4.62, 95% CI = 2.57-8.30; DI vs. II: OR = 3.07, 95% CI = 1.75-5.38; dominant model: OR = 3.74, 95% CI = 2.15-6.50; and recessive model: OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 0.46-3.51).

CONCLUSIONS

The ACE D allele was clearly related to an enhanced risk of COVID-19 severity. Hence, it is imperative to take into account the influence of genetic factors during the development of future vaccines.

The Outcome of Antibiotic Overuse before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Oman

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), a serious global public health challenge, may have accelerated development during the COVID-19 pandemic because antibiotics were prescribed for COVID-19. This study aimed to assess antibiotics use before and during the pandemic and correlate the results with the rate of resistant microorganisms detected in hospitalized patients during the study period. This single-center study looked retrospectively at four years of data (2018-2021) from Royal Hospital, Muscat, which is the biggest hospital in Oman with approximately 60,000 hospital admissions yearly. The consumption rate of ceftriaxone, piperacillin tazobactam, meropenem, and vancomycin was presented as the antibiotic consumption index, the ratio of defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 bed days. Analyses were performed using the nonparametric test for trend across the study period. Correlation between antibiotic consumption indexes and the isolated microorganisms in the four-year study period was performed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. We compared data from the pre-COVID-19 to the COVID-19 period. Though more patients were admitted pre-COVID-19 (132,828 versus 119,191 during COVID-19), more antibiotics were consumed during the pandemic (7350 versus 7915); vancomycin and ceftriaxone had higher consumption during than before the pandemic (p-values 0.001 and 0.036, respectively). Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) and Candida auris were detected more during the COVID-19 period with p-values of 0.026 and 0.004, respectively. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp., and C. auris were detected more often during the pandemic with p-values of 0.011, 0.002, and 0.03, respectively. Significant positive correlations between antibiotic consumption and drug-resistant isolates were noted. This study confirms that the overuse of antibiotics triggers the development of bacterial resistance; our results emphasize the importance of antibiotic control.

Antibiotic prescribing guideline recommendations in COVID-19: a systematic survey

Background

COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are two intersecting public health crises. Antimicrobial overuse in patients with COVID-19 threatens to worsen AMR. Guidelines are fundamental in encouraging antimicrobial stewardship. We sought to assess the quality of antibiotic prescribing guidelines and recommendations in the context of COVID-19, and whether they incorporate principles of antimicrobial stewardship.

Methods

We performed a systematic survey which included a search using the concepts "antibiotic/antimicrobial" up to November 15, 2022 of the eCOVID-19 living map of recommendations (RecMap) which aggregates guidelines across a range of international sources and all languages. Guidelines providing explicit recommendations regarding antibacterial use in COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion. Guideline and recommendation quality were assessed using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX instruments, respectively. We extracted guideline characteristics including panel representation and the presence or absence of explicit statements related to antimicrobial stewardship (i.e., judicious antibiotic use, antimicrobial resistance or adverse effects as a consequence of antibiotic use). We used logistic regression to evaluate the relationship between guideline characteristics including quality and incorporation of antimicrobial stewardship principles. Protocol registration (OSF): https://osf.io/4pgtc.

Findings

Twenty-eight guidelines with 63 antibiotic prescribing recommendations were included. Recommendations focused on antibiotic initiation (n = 52, 83%) and less commonly antibiotic selection (n = 13, 21%), and duration of therapy (n = 15, 24%). Guideline and recommendation quality varied widely. Twenty (71%) guidelines incorporated at least one concept relating to antimicrobial stewardship. Including infectious diseases expertise on the guideline panel (OR 9.44, 97.5% CI: 1.09-81.59) and AGREE-REX score (OR 3.26, 97.5% CI: 1.14-9.31 per 10% increase in overall score) were associated with a higher odds of guidelines addressing antimicrobial stewardship.

Interpretation

There is an opportunity to improve antibiotic prescribing guidelines in terms of both quality and incorporation of antimicrobial stewardship principles. These findings can help guideline developers better address antibiotic stewardship in future recommendations beyond COVID-19.

Funding

This project was funded by Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE centres.

Respiratory virus infections after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Current understanding, knowledge gaps, and recent advances

Before the COVID-19 pandemic, common community-acquired seasonal respiratory viruses (CARVs) were a significant threat to the health and well-being of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients, often resulting in severe illness and even death. The pandemic has further highlighted the significant risk that immunosuppressed patients, including allo-HCT recipients, face when infected with SARS-CoV-2. As preventive transmission measures are relaxed and CARVs circulate again among the community, including in allo-HSCT recipients, it is crucial to understand the current state of knowledge, gaps, and recent advances regarding CARV infection in allo-HCT recipients. Urgent research is needed to identify seasonal respiratory viruses as potential drivers for future pandemics.

Changes in Lymphocyte Subpopulations after Remdesivir Therapy for COVID-19: A Brief Report

Remdesivir (RDV) has demonstrated clinical benefit in hospitalized COronaVIrus Disease (COVID)-19 patients. The objective of this brief report was to assess a possible correlation between RDV therapy and the variation in lymphocyte subpopulations. We retrospectively studied 43 hospitalized COVID-19 patients: 30 men and 13 women (mean age 69.3 ± 15 years); 9/43 had received RDV therapy. Six patients had no need for oxygen (severity group 0); 22 were on oxygen treatment with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≤ 50% (group 1); 7 on not-invasive ventilation (group 2); 3 on invasive mechanical ventilation (group 3); and 5 had died (group 4). Cytofluorimetric assessment of lymphocyte subpopulations showed substantial changes after RDV therapy: B lymphocytes and plasmablasts were significantly increased (p = 0.002 and p = 0.08, respectively). Cytotoxic T lymphocytes showed a robust reduction (p = 0.008). No changes were observed in CD4+-T cells and natural killers (NKs). There was a significant reduction in regulatory T cells (Tregs) (p = 0.02) and a significant increase in circulating monocytes (p = 0.03). Stratifying by disease severity, after RDV therapy, patients with severity 0-2 had significantly higher B lymphocyte and monocyte counts and lower memory and effector cytotoxic T cell counts. Instead, patients with severity 3-4 had significantly higher plasmablast and lower memory T cell counts. No significant differences for CD4+-T cells, Tregs, and NKs were observed. Our brief report showed substantial changes in the lymphocyte subpopulations analyzed between patients who did not receive RDV therapy and those after RDV treatment. Despite the small sample size, due to the retrospective nature of this brief report, the substantial changes in lymphocyte subpopulations reported could lead to speculation on the role of RDV treatment both on immune responses against the virus and on the possible downregulation of the cytokine storm observed in patients with more severe disease.

The Impact of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on a Retrospective Cohort of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 Treated with a Combination of Steroids and Tocilizumab

OBJECTIVES

In the context of COVID-19, patients with a severe or critical illness may be more susceptible to developing secondary bacterial infections. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the use of prophylactic antibiotic therapy and the occurrence of bacterial or fungal isolates following the administration of tocilizumab in hospitalized COVID-19 patients who had previously received steroids during the first and second waves of the pandemic in Spain.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 70 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who received tocilizumab and steroids between January and December 2020. Data on demographics, comorbidities, laboratory tests, microbiologic results, treatment, and outcomes were collected from electronic health records. The patients were divided into two groups based on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis, and the incidence of bacterial and fungal colonizations/infections was analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the included patients, 45 patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. No significant clinical differences were observed between the patients based on prophylaxis use regarding the number of clinically diagnosed infections, ICU admissions, or mortality rates. However, the patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis showed a higher incidence of colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria compared to that of the subgroup that did not receive prophylaxis. The most commonly isolated microorganisms were Candida albicans, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Conclusions: In this cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with tocilizumab and steroids, the use of antibiotic prophylaxis did not reduce the incidence of secondary bacterial infections. However, it was associated with an increased incidence of colonization by multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Comparison between available early antiviral treatments in outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: a real-life study

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical impact of three available antivirals for early COVID-19 treatment in a large real-life cohort.

METHODS

Between January and October 2022 all outpatients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 referring to IRCCS S. Orsola hospital treated with an early antiviral therapy were enrolled. A comparison between patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NTV/r), molnupiravir (MPV) and remdesivir (RDV) was conducted in term of indications and outcome. To account for differences between treatment groups a propensity score analysis was performed. After estimating the weights, we fitted a survey-weighted Cox regression model with inverse-probability weighting with hospital admission/death versus clinical recovery as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Overall 1342 patients were enrolled, 775 (57.8%), 360 (26.8%) and 207 (15.4%) in MPV, NTV/r and RDV group, respectively. Median age was 73 (59-82) years, male sex was 53.4%. Primary indication was immunosuppression (438, 32.6%), the median time from symptom onset to drug administration was 3 [2-4] days. Overall, clinical recovery was reached in 96.9% of patients, with hospital admission rate of 2.6%. No significant differences were found in clinical recovery nor hospitalization. Cox regression showed a decreased probability of hospital admission/ death among prior vaccinated patients compared with unvaccinated (HR 0.31 [95%CI 0.14-0.70], p = 0.005]). No difference in hospitalization rates in early treatment compared to late treatment were found.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences among MPV, NTV/r and RDV in terms of clinical recovery or hospitalization were found. Patients not vaccinated had a significant increased risk of hospitalization.

Rapid Response to Remdesivir in Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients: A Propensity Score Weighted Multicentre Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Remdesivir is a registered treatment for hospitalised patients with COVID-19 that has moderate clinical effectiveness. Anecdotally, some patients' respiratory insufficiency seemed to recover particularly rapidly after initiation of remdesivir. In this study, we investigated if this rapid improvement was caused by remdesivir, and which patient characteristics might predict a rapid clinical improvement in response to remdesivir.

METHODS

This was a multicentre observational cohort study of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who required supplemental oxygen and were treated with dexamethasone. Rapid clinical improvement in response to treatment was defined by a reduction of at least 1 L of supplemental oxygen per minute or discharge from the hospital within 72 h after admission. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted logistic regression modelling was used to assess the association between remdesivir and rapid clinical improvement. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, ICU admission rate and hospitalisation duration.

RESULTS

Of 871 patients included, 445 were treated with remdesivir. There was no influence of remdesivir on the occurrence of rapid clinical improvement (62% vs 61% OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.79-1.40; p = 0.76). The in-hospital mortality was lower (14.7% vs 19.8% OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48-1.02; p = 0.06) for the remdesivir-treated patients. Rapid clinical improvement occurred more often in patients with low C-reactive protein (≤ 75 mg/L) and short duration of symptoms prior to hospitalisation (< 7 days) (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.07-7.56).

CONCLUSION

Remdesivir generally does not increase the incidence of rapid clinical improvement in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, but it might have an effect in patients with short duration of symptoms and limited signs of systemic inflammation.

Outcome of COVID-19 patients with haematological malignancies after the introduction of vaccination and monoclonal antibodies: results from the HM-COV 2.0 study

Patients with haematological malignancies (HM) and SARS-CoV-2 infection present a higher risk of severe COVID-19 and mortality. The aim of the study was to investigate whether vaccination and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have modified the outcomes of HM patients with COVID-19. This is a single-centre retrospective study in HM patients hospitalized due to SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 2020 to April 2022. Patients were divided into PRE-V-mAb group (patients hospitalized before the introduction of vaccination and mAbs) and POST-V-mAb group (patients hospitalized after the use of vaccine and mAbs). A total of 126 patients were included (65 PRE-V-mAb and 61 POST-V-mAb). POST-V-mAb patients showed a significantly lower risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission (8.2% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.005), shorter viral shedding [17 (IQR 10-28) vs. 24 days (IQR 15-50), p = 0.011] and shorter hospitalization length [13 (IQR 7-23) vs. 20 (IQR 14-41) days, p = 0.0003] compared to the PRE-V-mAb group. Nevertheless, both in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (29.5% POST-V-mAb vs. 36.9% PRE-V-mAb and 21.3% POST-V-mAb vs. 29.2% PRE-V-mAb, respectively). At the multivariable analysis, an active malignancy (p = 0.042), a critical COVID-19 at admission (p = 0.025) and the need for high-level of oxygen support at respiratory worsening [either HFNC/CPAP (p = 0.022) or mechanical ventilation (p = 0.011)] were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. In the subgroup of POST-V-mAb patients, receiving therapy with mAbs was a protective factor (p = 0.033). Despite the new therapeutic and preventive strategies available, HM patients with COVID-19 disease represent an extremely vulnerable group with still high mortality rates.

COVID-19: An Update on Epidemiology, Prevention and Treatment, September-2023

After a downward trend for more than 12 months, the incidence of COVID-19 has increased in the last months. Although COVID-19 is not as frequent as in the first years of the pandemic, case numbers are still very high, and it causes a significant number of deaths. COVID-19 is not seen with a predictable frequency, at least two times more deadly than the flu, continues as an epidemic, and has not reached the endemic level yet. Currently, the Omicron strains EG.5 and XBB.1.16 are dominant worldwide. Although BA.2.86 and FLip variants, including FL.1.5.1 are not widespread at the moment, both were shown to be highly immune-evasive and require close monitoring. Prevention of COVID-19 relies on vaccinations, surveillance, proper ventilation of enclosed spaces, isolation of patients, and mask usage. Currently, monovalent COVID-19 vaccines, including XBB.1.5 Omicron SARS-CoV-2, are recommended for both primary and booster vaccinations against COVID-19. Monovalent vaccines, including only original SARS-CoV-2 strain, and bivalent vaccines, including original virus plus BA4/5 variant, are no longer recommended against COVID-19. Booster vaccination with XBB.1.5 containing vaccine should be prioritized for patients at high risk for severe COVID-19. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination does not seem to be effective in preventing COVID-19. At the current phase of the pandemic, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir, molnupiravir, sotrovimab (for patients from XBB.1.5 variant dominant settings), and convalescent plasma can be considered for the treatment of high-risk early-stage outpatients with COVID-19, while hospitalized patients with more severe disease can be treated with dexamethasone, anti cytokines including tocilizumab, sarilumab, baricitinib, and tofacitinib and antithrombotic agents including enoxaparin. Remdesivir oral analogues and ensitrelvir fumarate are promising agents for treating acute COVID-19, which are in phase trials now; however, ivermectin, fluvoxamine, and metformin were shown to be ineffective.

Sinonasal mucormycosis during 2 years of COVID-19 pandemic in central Iran: incidence rate and clinical features

INTRODUCTION

As a novel infectious disease, COVID-19 is caused by SARS-COV-2, spreading rapidly worldwide. ENT specialists have faced this challenging disease in various ways since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. We are currently facing an increase in cases referred due to sinonasal mucormycosis which is a rare but invasive, rapidly progressive, and life-threatening infection. We provide an overview of this disease's incidence rate and clinical features.

METHODS

This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 46 sinonasal mucormycosis patients who were histopathologically confirmed after sinonasal endoscopic surgery in our educational therapeutic hospital during 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic from March 20, 2020, to March 20, 2022.

RESULTS

There was an increase in the incidence of mucormycosis more than twice as much as before. All patients had a history of COVID-19 and 69.6% were diabetic. The median time to symptom onset from COVID-19 detection was 3.3 weeks. A total of 60.9% received steroids while 85.7% were prescribed during COVID-19 treatment. The most common manifestation was orbital involvement (80.4%). Of the 46 study cases, unfortunately, 17 (37%) died. An exciting point in our study was the incidence of peripheral facial palsy which is associated involvement of multiple other cranial nerves (II, III, IV, V, VI) considered to be the likely occurrence of a rare phenomenon called Garcin's syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, during 2 years of the COVID -19 pandemic, there was an increase in the incidence of sinonasal mucormycosis more than twice as much as before.

Remdesivir: A Review in COVID-19

Remdesivir (Veklury®), a nucleotide analogue prodrug with broad-spectrum antiviral activity, is approved for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Unlike some antivirals, remdesivir has a low potential for drug-drug interactions. In the pivotal ACTT-1 trial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, daily intravenous infusions of remdesivir significantly reduced time to recovery relative to placebo. Subsequent trials provided additional support for the efficacy of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with moderate or severe COVID-19, with a greater benefit seen in patients with minimal oxygen requirements at baseline. Clinical trials also demonstrated the efficacy of remdesivir in other patient populations, including outpatients at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, as well as hospitalized paediatric patients. In terms of mortality, results were equivocal. However, remdesivir appeared to have a small mortality benefit in hospitalized patients who were not already being ventilated at baseline. Remdesivir was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, but pharmacovigilance data found an increased risk of hepatic, renal and cardiovascular adverse drug reactions in the real-world setting. In conclusion, remdesivir represents a useful treatment option for patients with COVID-19, particularly those who require supplemental oxygen.